Anda di halaman 1dari 67

> * USE FILE OPEN OR TEXT EDITOR TO INITIATE SESSION

> deck
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 85.14(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.540E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 170.61 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 10.94(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.078E-01
LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

5.82 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0864E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.25(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.795E-02


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.60 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.01(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.08 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0185E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+01


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0184E+02

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 71.04(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.460E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 101.78 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 15.54(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.433E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 16.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

3.2722E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.43(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.219E-02


LARGEST CHANGE (

1.15 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 34.73(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.152E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.74 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0196E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0196E+02

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 71.04(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.460E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 101.78 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 15.54(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.433E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 16.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

3.2722E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.43(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.219E-02


LARGEST CHANGE (

1.15 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 34.73(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.152E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.74 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES

2.0196E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0196E+02

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.087E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :
> iter

0.050 SECS

* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION


YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.019E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.016E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?

* DECK BEING PROCESSED


PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.010 SECS

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 59.32(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.919E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 44.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 22.92(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.178E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 16.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

4.4256E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES

IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 40.96(%)


FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.957E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.77 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 22.72(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.126E+00
LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

8.99 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0190E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES

2.0190E+02

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 64.16(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.268E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 85.92 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 37.59(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 6.532E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 15.07 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES

COMP SUM OF SQUARES


1

2.9540E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 31.64(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.247E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.02 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.06(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.174E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.42 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+02


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 64.16(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.268E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 85.92 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES

IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 37.59(%)


FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 6.532E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 15.07 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.9540E+02

> iter
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 31.64(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.247E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.02 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.06(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.174E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.42 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1
> iter

2.0183E+02

* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+02


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES

IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 64.16(%)


FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.268E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 85.92 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 37.59(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 6.532E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 15.07 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.9540E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 31.64(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.247E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.02 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.06(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.174E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.42 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+02


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :
> SOLVE

0.000 SECS

*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION


SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 64.16(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.268E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 85.92 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 37.59(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 6.532E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 15.07 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.9540E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 31.64(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.247E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.02 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.06(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.174E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.42 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+02


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0183E+02

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION

YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 71.04(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.460E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 101.78 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 15.54(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.433E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 16.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

3.2722E+02

> ITER

* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.43(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.219E-02


LARGEST CHANGE (

1.15 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 34.73(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.152E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.74 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0196E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0196E+02

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 76.86(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.000E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 121.04 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 11.57(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.419E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 12.24 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.8656E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 13.32(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 8.397E-02
LARGEST CHANGE (

3.15 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 18.72(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.117E+00
LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

8.04 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0189E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0189E+02

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 76.86(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.000E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 121.04 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 11.57(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.419E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 12.24 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.8656E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 13.32(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 8.397E-02
LARGEST CHANGE (

3.15 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 18.72(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.117E+00
LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

8.04 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0189E+02

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0189E+02

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

* KOMN GENERATED BY DECK DIFFERS FROM PREVIOUS CORE KOMN


> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*

***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.747E+02**29*


SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.071E+03**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.495E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.

> PLOT Q(1)


> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.356E+03**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 4.810E+03**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.629E+04**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 9.359E+05**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.356E+03**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 4.288E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 2.359E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck

UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 5.299E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 4.763E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> solve
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION

***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*


***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 2.913E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> iter
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.283E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.859E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION

YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
***ITERATIONS SET TO ZERO*29*
***RATIO OF CALC.SIG TO ESTIMATED SIG= 1.264E+02**29*
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 96.57(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.082E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 65.47 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.35(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.725E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

7.08 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.7330E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.95(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

4.08 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.74(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.927E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

7.12 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES

COMP SUM OF SQUARES


1

2.5532E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.81(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.34 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.14(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.843E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

8.29 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.3790E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.62(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.59 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.81(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.191E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

2.67 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.2285E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.24 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.09(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

1.95 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.1164E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

6.02(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.337E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

6.23 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.99(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.302E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

1.52 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.9694E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 7.500E-01

6.22(%)

LARGEST CHANGE (

9.71 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.64(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.390E+00


LARGEST CHANGE ( 10.96 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7797E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.11(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.331E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7066E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7066E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 92.77(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.275E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 34.43 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.8695E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

6.14(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.267E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

4.52 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.37(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.457E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

4.30 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.6026E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.65(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.321E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.88 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.81(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.727E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

4.16 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES

2.3621E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.73(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.40 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.61(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

2.09 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.2147E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

7.07(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.041E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

6.07 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

1.09(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

1.31 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0358E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

7.53(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 7.500E-01


LARGEST CHANGE ( 10.67 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.01(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.989E+00


LARGEST CHANGE ( 17.30 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES

COMP SUM OF SQUARES


1

1.7881E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.94(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.077E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.10 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.368E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.03 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.6997E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **
ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.6997E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 80.89(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 27.92 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES

IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 12.03(%)


FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 9.569E-01
LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

9.39 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

4.1010E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 27.64(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.625E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 14.89 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 17.32(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 10.35 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.4535E+01

> ITER

* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 29.37(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.711E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 18.45 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

1.38(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.527E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

1.37 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7090E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

** 2ND ITERATION ABORTED BECAUSE YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR


TOO FAR FROM A FIT **

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7090E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 84.86(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.216E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 30.46 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

3.9059E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 17.86(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.447E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 11.28 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

3.2082E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

6.17(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 9.598E-01


LARGEST CHANGE ( 25.31 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 41.58(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.395E+00
LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

6.04 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7588E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.80(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 6.064E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.42 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01

0.01(%)

LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.27 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7446E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.000 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 90.41(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.146E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 35.26 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.9062E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.01(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.056E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

4.18 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.74(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.149E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

3.87 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.6850E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.50(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.317E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

4.40 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.91(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.539E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

4.22 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.4635E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.60(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.209E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.34 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES

IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.42(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.630E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

3.75 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.2700E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.23(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.29 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.43(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.659E-01


LARGEST CHANGE ( 10.93 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0994E+01

> ITER

* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 12.03(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 9.945E-01
LARGEST CHANGE ( 12.40 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

6.38(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.489E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

4.56 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7289E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.14(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 3.092E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.68 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.18 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7265E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 90.12(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.132E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 35.06 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.8797E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.70(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.95 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.82(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.331E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

8.19 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES

2.6671E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

7.09(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.786E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

5.45 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.82(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.304E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

5.40 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.4080E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.01(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.38 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.82(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

2.07 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.2463E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

9.18(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.685E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

9.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

1.63(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 9.559E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

8.77 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES

COMP SUM OF SQUARES


1

2.0069E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 14.88(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.212E+00
LARGEST CHANGE ( 16.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.29(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 7.721E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.64 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7033E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.08(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.185E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.18 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7020E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
> deck
UPDATE?
* DECK BEING PROCESSED
PRE-PROCESSING TIME :

0.010 SECS

> SOLVE
*** MODEL CODE 2 SOLUTION
SOLUTION TIME :

0.000 SECS

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES = 89.25(%)
FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.092E+00

LARGEST CHANGE ( 34.47 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 0.000E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.00 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.8037E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.40(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.93 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.86(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.125E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

7.42 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.6039E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

5.67(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.444E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

4.50 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

2.95(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.767E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

4.43 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.3839E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.70(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

2.54 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.08(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.278E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

2.81 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.2250E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

4.27(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.512E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

3.25 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

1.78(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

1.76 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

2.0921E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

7.15(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.855E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

9.82 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

3.01(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 9.990E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

6.18 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

0.010 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.8842E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES

IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

9.15(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 2.573E+00


LARGEST CHANGE ( 15.55 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 0)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.66(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 4.308E+00


LARGEST CHANGE (

ITERATION TIME :

0.83 %) WAS IN PAR( 2, 1)

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7004E+01

> ITER
* PARTIALS ESTIMATED
* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 5.239E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.03 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

* CORRECTION VECTOR ESTIMATED

CONVERGENCE MEASURES
IMPROVEMENT IN SUM OF SQUARES =

0.00(%)

FINAL VALUE OF CONAB = 1.000E-01


LARGEST CHANGE (

0.01 %) WAS IN PAR( 0, 2)

ITERATION TIME :

0.000 SECS

DISTRIBUTION OF SQUARES
COMP SUM OF SQUARES
1

1.7003E+01

> ITER
* NO ITERATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS SOLUTION
YOU ARE EITHER TOO CLOSE OR TOO FAR AWAY FROM A FIT.
> PLOT Q(1)
>

Anda mungkin juga menyukai