Dr. Frederiksen
EDUC 450
15 November 2015
Data Analysis
A. Students were expected to write an argument essay after having read two
articles providing conflicting views on an issue. The prompt was: Can
Congress ban people from threatening to burn the Quran? After reading,
No Rights Are Absolute, Especially Amid Legitimate Safety Issues by
Jessica Gabel and Dont Let Government Determine What Is Offensive
Speech by Ronald D. Rotunda, write an essay that addresses the question
and supports your position with evidence from the text. Be sure to
acknowledge competing views.
a. Students were assessed on the following categories Focus,
Controlling Idea, Reading/Research, Development, Organization,
Conventions (including citations), and Content Understanding. All of
these align with the CCSS for 12th grade. Students were assessed on
a 1-4 scale. 1 being Not Yet, 2 as Approaches Expectations, 3
being Meets expectations, and 4 is Advanced. Students were
required to get at least a 3 for all categories in order to be
considered proficient.
b. I agree that students need to score 3s on all categories in order to be
considered proficient. More specifically, a well-written argument
essay will have a controlling thesis that is present throughout the
essay, evidence from both texts that is cited and explained
(developed), an acknowledgement and refutation of the
counterargument, it will be organized in a way that makes sense to
the reader and includes clear transitions, and has a strong
introduction and conclusion. The essay will also have few to no errors
that are distracting to the reader.
c. The assessment did give students a good opportunity to show what
they know. The assessment was normed among several language arts
teachers in the schools and district. It is also based on the curriculum
that the students would have been very familiar with throughout
their years in high school.
B. Diagnosing Students Strengths and Needs
a. High (Objectives met): Cayden Alban, 232, and Lucas Wood.
b. Expected (Obj. Partially met): Mark Romero, Kaitlyn Kable, Noah R.,
Brittany Burns, Natalie Cole, 206, Kelly Owens, Jordynn Greggs,
Kevin Lutz, Adrian Chavez, Breena D., Marcus Silvertooth, Gunner
Mengel, Natalie S., and Ashli Ochs.
c. Low (obj. not met): Kenzie Herrington, Codey Lesperance, Preston
Moore, Colbey Rose, Taylor Bittner, Parker S. Tyler Brian, Theyra
Shern, Luna Parsons, Brett W., Rave Herbert, Wyatt Orr, Ryan Hart,
Cody Walker, 209, and Dalton B.
C. Examples and how they met expectations:
a. Objectives met:
i. Lucas Wood: He accurately addressed the prompt and had a
strong thesis maintained throughout the piece. He also