OUTPUT RATHER THAN EFFORT.

It is necessary that the office be output oriented, meaning, a good focus be put
to the production of outputs and it being on time. This, that the head should set a
definable(?) timeframe for the task. This makes that office productive, when tasks are
completed on time. On of the reasons why tasks take too long to be completed is due to
the workers intentional tarrying of it. Why will a worker willingly slow down the pace of
his work?
He wants to fill his office-time with working. Often, employees get insecure
when they do not work as they ought to, especially when their bosses are
effort orientedthese are bosses who require their subordinates to always
work. But this attitude has no good productive management grounds. Often
it only is the cause of a sadistic boss (he always wants the workers to sweat
for their pay) or because of a bad moodthis attitude towards workers isnt
really that healthy.
He wants overtimes. When an office provides overtimes to employees when
the boss sees a task should be done, a worker instinctually could tarry a
particular task and save the rest of his efforts in working it during an
overtime, precisely, to earn more.
SUPPORT, NOT CONTROL.
The boss must then be supporting, not controlling, the employee; this, from the
theory* that good* workers are innately creative and decisive, should they be put under
the proper environment. Controlling, at times, becomes intimidating for the worker.
When a head requires from a worker a particular task, it should be that the worker knows
what to do and how to do it. The boss should give tasks to competent people, and if it is
assumed they are confident, they should be treated with a proper amount of confidence.
During the time between the order and its accomplishment, all necessary support
should be provided to the employee, such as overtimes when needed, and financial
funding whenever required. Instead c