Missin
g
Total
male
femal
e
Total
Syste
m
Frequen
cy
Percent
47
47.0
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
47.5
47.5
52
52.0
52.5
99
99.0
100.0
1.0
100
100.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:Out of 100 samples , 52% of people are female respondent and 48% are
male respondent.
[Type text]
Valid
yes
Frequency
100
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
[Type text]
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
36.1
36.1
41.2
77.3
18.6
95.9
4.1
100.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples 41% of the customers have said that Girias is preferable
company based on the price and, 36% of the customers have said that
Harsha is preferable company based on the price and 4% of the
customers have said that JTK is preferable company based on the price
[Type text]
have
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
17.2
17.2
53.5
70.7
24.2
94.9
5.1
100.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples 54% of the customers have said that Girias is preferable
company based on the quality and, 17% of the customers have said that
Harsha is preferable company based on the quality and 24% of the
customers have said that JTK is preferable company based on the quality
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:[Type text]
24
4
99
24.0
4.0
99.0
1.0
10
0
100.0
Valid
Cumulativ
Percent
e Percent
19.2
19.2
52.5
71.7
24.2
4.0
100.0
96.0
100.0
In 100 samples 53% of the customers have said that Girias is preferable
company based on the service and, 19% of the customers have said that
Harsha is preferable company based on the service and 4% of the
customers have said that JTK is preferable company based on the service
and 19% of the customers have said that Reliance is preferable
company based on the service.
[Type text]
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
25.8
25.8
32.0
57.7
36.1
93.8
6.2
100.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples 32% of the customers have said that Girias is preferable
company based on the variety and, 26% of the customers have said that
Harsha is preferable company based on the variety and 6% of the
customers have said that JTK is preferable company based on the variety
and 36% of the customers have said that Reliance is preferable
company based on the variety.
very
bad
bad
average
good
very
good
Total
Missin System
g
Total
[Type text]
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
3.0
3.1
3.1
4
46
39
4.0
46.0
39.0
4.1
46.9
39.8
7.1
54.1
93.9
6.0
6.1
100.0
98
98.0
100.0
2.0
100
100.0
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples, apart from girias most of people prefer to buy from
reliance ie, 47% ,
37% prefer buying from harsha, 14% prefer
buying from jtk and 9% from other stores.
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:Among 100 samples, 85% of them like to recommend their friends and
relatives to buy from girias and 15% of them do not like to recommend
their friends and relatives to buy from girias.
[Type text]
Total
100
100.0
100.0
Interpretation
Among 100 samples 23% of people are encouraged by the gifts provided
by the girias and 77% of people are not encouraged by the gifts provided
by the girias.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:Among 100 samples, as per the opinion the acceptable number of days to
repair the electronic good give by the customers is 26% for same day,
32% for next day, 29% for within 3 days and 12% for within a week.
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples , 80% of the people are satisfied with the service provided
by the girias and 20% of the people are not satisfied with the service
provided by the girias.
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples , 50% of the customers are ready to buy again from the
girias, 10% of them are not willing to buy again from girias, and 40% of
the people may buy from the girias.
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples 34% of them have returned or replaced the products from
girias and 65% of have not returned or replaced the products from girias .
[Type text]
once in a
year
twice in a
year
thrice in a
year
Total
Missing System
Total
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
44
44.0
44.4
44.4
41
41.0
41.4
85.9
14
14.0
14.1
100.0
99
1
100
99.0
1.0
100.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:Among 100 samples, 44% of people visit girias once in a year, 41%
people visit girias twice in a year, 14% people visit girias thrice in a year.
[Type text]
[Type text]
Valid
Frequency
variety
31
service
23
quality
20
price
11
convenience
15
Total
100
Cumulative
Percent
31.0
54.0
74.0
85.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:In 100 samples 31% of people are encouraged to visit girias by variety, 23
% of people are encouraged to visit girias by services, 20% of people are
encouraged to visit girias by quality, 11% of people are encouraged to
visit girias by price, 15% of people are encouraged to visit girias by
convenience.
[Type text]
OBSE
RVATION:In 100 samples 3% of people feel the repair and service charges
reasonable is excellent, 37% of people feel the repair and service charges
reasonable is good, 47% of people feel the repair and service charges
reasonable is average, 11% of people feel the repair and service charges
reasonable is fair, 1 % of people feel the repair and service charges
reasonable is poor.
[Type text]
Valid
Frequency
excellent
2
good
42
average
32
fair
22
poor
2
Total
100
Cumulative
Percent
2.0
44.0
76.0
98.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:Among 100 samples, 42% of the staff was co-operative and polite, were
good, 32% were average,22% were fair, 2% were poor,2% were excellent .
[Type text]
OBSERVATION:Among 100 samples the overall service experience at girias is 42% good,
40% of the overall service experience at girias is average, 11% of the
overall service experience at girias is fair, 5% the overall service
experience at girias is excellent, 2% of the overall service experience at
girias is poor.
[Type text]
Valid
Frequency
excellent
5
Good
46
average
37
Fair
9
Poor
3
Total
100
Cumulative
Percent
5.0
51.0
88.0
97.0
100.0
OBSERVATION:out of 100 samples , the service provider was able to understand the
product issues and answered the queries was 46% good, 37% of service
provider was able to understand the product issues and answered the
queries was average, 9% of service provider were fair , 3% of service
provider were poor and 5% of them were excellent service provider.
[Type text]
[Type text]