Tucks Discount Vitamins

Tuck's Discount Vitamins
1 of 8
http://tucksdiscountvitamins.com/shared/article.php?idx=13682&tID=...
C.A.D.
Home
Healthy News
About Us
Cancer
Diabetes
Anti Aging
About Us
Terms & Conditions
Product Science
Contact Us
Heart Disease
Weight Loss
Other Health Needs
FAQ
Check out with

confidence
using our digital
secure shop!
Visit Our Wholesale Site

Tuck's Quality Brands
Category : About Deadly, Dangerous & Ineffective Vaccines

Topic : Vaccines - Help Us Stop Mandatory Vaccinations
Return to article table of contents
The British government was desperately trying to prevent the

public release under the UKs Freedom Of Information laws of
secret files on a proven dangerous MMR [measles, mumps and
rubella] vaccine.
Quality Brand Level C
Quality Brand Level D
This is the story the UK media have steadfastly not been publishing and of the contrasting and
extraordinary new developments in the US and US Federal Court. Starting in Canada from 1986,
followed by Japan and the UK in 1988, it is a definitive carefully researched and accessible previously
unpublished account over 20 years to the present over MMR, vaccines, autism and life-threatening
childhood food allergies.
The UKs Daily Mail newspaper reported [13/Jan/09] the British government was desperately trying to
prevent the public release under the UKs Freedom Of Information laws of secret files on a proven
dangerous MMR [measles, mumps and rubella] vaccine. In a recent case they have been forced to open
the files up to scrutiny: [Confidential MMR vaccine files should be opened in the public interest,
watchdog rules - The Daily Mail - Jenny Hope - 13th January 2009]
After over 20 years children continue to be injured. What else are we not being told? The problem is
international, not just autism and not just the MMR vaccine [see USA developments and Federal Court
decisions below]. See how politics and money have overtaken the health and safety of your children.
[Copy to others: Secret British MMR Vaccine FilesForced Open By Legal Action]
British Governments Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety

The UKs Department of Health and others appear to have been reckless as to the safety of British
children over the manner in which Glaxo company, Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltds Pluserix
MMR vaccine was introduced and used on British Children in 1988
the problems with Pluserix MMR were known to the supplier, Glaxo company Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd from the
experience of its introduction to Canada, in 1986, where Pluserix was marketed under the name Trivirix
Trivirix (Pluserix) was withdrawn from use in Canada in 1988 because it was dangerous, causing high levels of adverse reactions in
children
the high levels of British adverse reactions to the vaccine were apparent and known about at British Ministerial level in 1990, as
shown by ministerial correspondence
Pluserix/Trivirx are the identical vaccine manufactured in the identical Smith Kline factory in Belgium and with the exact same
component parts and constituents
despite the Canadian position and contemporaneously with the final withdrawal of Pluserix/Trivirix in Canada the UK signed the
contract to purchase Pluserix MMR from Glaxo company, Smith Kline & French Laboratories Limited in July 1988, even though it was
known by then to be too dangerous for use on our children
SK&F was provided with a blanket indemnity in that contract by the NHS Procurement Directorate
the contract was signed up by the backdoor through the North East Thames Regional Health Authority as agent for the NHS
Procurement Directorate rather than being a contract directly entered into with the NHS Procurement Directorate which negotiated
the contract or the NHS Executive of the time
there was no Parliamentary scrutiny of this and it seems to have been effected in a manner Ministerially deniable
similar problems were experienced in Japan with the Japanese MMR vaccine which, in common with Pluserxi/Trivirix, contained the
Urabe strain of mumps virus
the Japanese MMR was also withdrawn by 1992 on safety grounds having caused high levels of adverse reactions
the British government continued the licence for Pluserix MMR after 1992, which enabled it to be supplied overseas
even today, because it is cheaper than safer alternatives, organisations like UNICEF continue supplying urabe strain containing MMR
vaccine to the more adverse reaction vulnerable and less well nourished third world children
since 1998, statistical papers claiming no evidence of an association between the MMR vaccine and autism have been published in a
blaze of publicity, but when all the noise has died down, on subsequent careful examination, each one has been found to be flawed.
These are the same kinds of statistical studies [epidemiology] used by the tobacco industry in the 1940s and 50s to claim smoking
did not cause lung cancer
other than the Royal Frees paper, no clinical studies of the MMR child litigants were undertaken or published
after being put under financial pressure by the British Government, in 2005 the Oxford based Cochrane Collaboration published a
systematic review of all prior papers and its authors claimed to conclude the MMR vaccine was safe:it was shown the authors had violated the standards of evidence-based medicine and
Keyword Search
The Tuck's team believes that most chronic
diseases can be prevented, treated and in
some cases even cured using natural
medicines. Please use our keyword search
to help you in making the right decisions
for your good health and well being.
Please note the keyword search will display
recommended products, supporting science,
reference articles and related health
professional modalities.
Advanced Search
Specials
Tranquil Sleep
60 tb
Tuck's Stock #: 036702
Reg. $16.50/ea CAD$
Now $16.50/ea CAD$
more...
Whey Factors - French Vanilla

1 kg
Reg. $31.35/ea CAD$
Now $31.35/ea CAD$
more...
01/07/2014 10:24
2 of 8
their conclusions were not supported by the body of the review

and it later was discovered that the British Department of Health had increased the funding for Cochranes Oxford
administration by 1 million per annum and extended the contracts of its British groups
Top Sellers
Vaccine Risks Outweigh Risk of Disease

Autism - A serious problem being ignored
Vitamin K2
60 caps
Reg. $13.95/ea CAD$
more...
19 Children A Day - 4 in 5 is a Boy

Autism in Britian outstrips all other major disorders affecting British children combined and is
substantially more serious than measles. Every day 19 British children develop autism spectrum
disorders:
Vitamin D3 5000IU
120 sgels
Reg. $11.60/ea CAD$
more...
this will be 600,000 British children and adults in the future (birth rate approx 600,000 p.a.)
and horrific prospects for expectant parents
1 in every 54 boys will be on the Autistic Spectrum
autism affects 4 times as many boys
so 1 in 215 girls are affected as well
[* 19 a day and 1 in 54 come from: Baird et Al Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a
population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP); Lancet
2006;368:210 15. This research revealed 1 in 86 British children are being diagnosed with autistic
spectrum disorders (116.1 in 10,000).
New Products
4/5 x 116.1/5000 = 1 in 54 (4/5ths of the 116.1 are boys and approx 5000 of the 10,000 children
affected will be boys)]
Inno-Osteo
180 sgels
Reg. $23.95/ea CAD$
more...
Measles Comparison
See here how the risk to children in Western economies from measles is now insignificant for the vast
majority Measles - The Official UK Statistics.
Vivimind
60 tablets
Reg. $28.00/ea CAD$
more...
For the USA seeUS Measles Data and generally see Risk to Children & Government Scaremongering.
Mercury in British Vaccines, Autism and Your Childs Allergies

[New Exclusive Worldwide Revelations 22/Jan/2009]
In addition to the new MMR vaccine, in 1990 infants were also hit with the accelerated DTP vaccine
schedule - receiving three DTP shots - one each at 2, 3 and 4 months instead of at the previous 3, 5
and 9 to 12 months of age intervals.
Web sites of Interest

Tucks Professional Services
Tucks Paralegal Services
The DTP vaccine contained a highly neurotoxic ingredient. The ingredieint was an organo-mercury
excipient called Thiomersal ["Thimerosal" in the USA]. Thiomersal is toxic in parts per billion - in
extremely small dilutions.
People First Republic Party of

Ontario
The vaccine concerned was The Wellcome Foundations Trivax AD DTP vaccine. The Wellcome
Foundation is now GlaxoSmithKline. Thiomersal was first introduced by pharmaceutical company Merck
in the 1930s and was not clinically trialled for safety in use in vaccines.
HFNN.ca
Video: University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine - How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Degeneration
Matrix Vrit Publishing
Health Canada Abuse

Friends of Freedom International
Freedom of Choice in Health Care
CuresNaturally.com
Canadian Coalition for Health
Freedom
Revealed here exclusively worldwide for the first time, information obtained under the UKs
Freedom of Information law confirms the British MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency] has no data on how much Thiomersal was in Trivax AD DTP vaccine, although the British DoH
[Department of Health] claimed publicly to have known that latter claim therefore appears incorrect.
Your Childs Allergies and Vaccines

Thiomersal is also known to induce allergy. Many children in particular those with regressive autism
have serious problems with allergies. Some have exceptionally high levels of IgE, [the allergic antibody
immunoglobulin E].
Since the introduction of the accelerated DTP vaccination schedule in 1990 the prevalence of
life-threatening food allergies in British children has also increased exponentially Time trends in
allergic disorders in the UK R Gupta, A Sheikh, D P Strachan, H R Anderson, Thorax 2006;000:16.
Big rise in patients with deadly allergies - Jamie Doward, The Observer 16 Apr 2006. Number of
children treated for nut allergies soars Daniel Foggo, The Sunday Times April 2, 2006.
The date of the rise can be tracked back to 1990 using publicly available data. This increase has
occurred in parallel with significant increases in other disorders like autism, asthma and childhood
diabetes.
01/07/2014 10:24
3 of 8
Thiomersal is a well recognised cause of allergies: [The European Agency for the Evaluation of
Medicinal Products - Medicines Evaluation Unit - Safety Working Party Assessment of the Toxicity of
Thiomersal in Relation to Its Use in Medicinal Product SCPMP/SWP/I898/1998 - 8 September 1998].
And again revealed here exclusively worldwide for the first time is the recent British 2006-7
Parliamentary session House of Lords Science and Technology Committee Report Allergy [6th Report
01/07/2014 10:24
4 of 8
of Sesssion] makes no mention whatsoever of Thiomersal in vaccines being a potential and possibly
most likely cause of the exponential rise in childhood allergies which has occurred since 1990 in the
UK.
The use of Thiomersal in other pharmaceuticals [eg. contact len cleaning fluid] has been strictly
controlled in Europe: CPMP Position Paper on Thiomersal - Implementation of the Warning Statement
Relating to Sensitisation. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products London, 21
October 1999 CPMP/2612/99]
Thiomersal contains 50% by weight of mercury. There is no safe limit - only a permitted daily/weekly
tolerable limit. This is measured in parts per million per kilogramme of body weight. Those limits apply
when ingested in food]. This neurotoxic organo-mercury compound was injected directly into infants
bodies at a time their bodies and nervous systems were developing the most rapidly at any time in
their lives. The amount of thiomersal claimed to be in Trivax AD DTP vaccine was 50 millionths of a
gramme injected directly into the body.
A 4 kilo weight 2 month old baby would have received in one injection 63 times higher than the
permitted tolerable daily intake in food set by the US Environmental protection Agency and the UKs
Committee on Toxicity. [To protect infants the PTWI set by the UK Committee on Toxicity for intake of
mercury compounds in food for women who are pregnant, or who may become pregnant within the
following year, or for breast-feeding mothers is one tenth of a millionth of gramme per kilogramme of
body weight per day - for a 9 stone woman [57 kg] that is 5.7 millionths of a gram per day].
Calculation of an infants overall body burden of toxic mercury must also include the burden from
environmental pollution. Sources include mercury from power station emissions, in fish as a result of
oceanic pollution by anti-fouling applied to ships hulls]. Research shows that children with autism
appear to have deficient mechanisms for expelling toxins like mercury and it accumulates in the body.
Also revealed here worldwide for the first time under Freedom of Information is that the
British Government also had no data on Thiomersal content of many other vaccines around that time
and some had more than claimed by the British government was in DTP. Examples are Duncan
Flockharts DTP vaccine - 130 millionths of a gramme thiomersal per millilitre and Lister Institute
Pertussis vaccine - 120 mcg/ml Thiomersal. Accordingly, this brings into question how much was in
Trivax AD DTP vaccine.
The British Government also hid this lack of knowledge from Parliament. A further revelation made
here exclusively worldwide for the first time is that British Health Minister Hazel Blears MP misled
the English Parliament in 2001 when she said in a Parliamentary answer that All childhood vaccines
licensed since 1986 which have ever contained thiomersal as an excipient are listed in the table [to
the answer]. [House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 3 Jul 2001 (pt 19)]. The table contained
no such details and listed only those vaccines granted a licence in the UK since 1993.
Julie Kirkbride MP had asked for the vaccines . licensed since 1986 which contain thiomersal.
If you are asked have you been licensed to drive your car since 2006, you will answer yes even if you
have held a licence since 1980. Blears answer was in fact the answer to the question of the vaccines
granted a licence since 1986 which contain Thiomersal.
But, it seems mercury is not the only problem [See more below - US Court Decisions and Other
Recent Developments - Its Not Just MMR].
In Whom Can You Trust - [Added 24/Jan/09]
The British Government
The British Government claims Thiomersal was phased out of its childhood vaccines in October 2004
[but vaccine stocks may have taken longer to run down and how safe is what has replaced it?].
A previously confidential 1991 internal Merck memorandum published by the USAs Los Angeles Times
shows the UK authorities had then known about the problem and were privately expressing concern to
the vaccine manufacturer about the presence of mercury in vaccines. This was along with Sweden,
Japan and Switzerland: [91 Memo Warned of Mercury in Shots - By Myron Levin - LA Times - February
08, 2005].
So why did they take 13 years to do something about it and why did they and do they continue to tell
the British public there is and was no problem when they knew there was and is? And as vaccines also
alter the functioning of the immune system, the removal of Thiomersal may well not be the only factor
affecting the increases in autism, asthma, allergies and childhood diabetes. [see more below - US Court
Decisions and Other Recent Developments].
The US Centers For Disease Control and Drug Companies
On 7-8 June 2000, a confidential private meeting without public scrutiny took place between vaccine
manufacturers representatives, 51 US scientists, and a representative of the World Health
Organization. This was to discuss a study by US Centers for Disease Control expert Dr Thomas
Verstraeten of increasing doses of Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders in children.
Verstraeten used US Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, an official US governmental data bank on the
children from US health maintenance organizations (HMOs).
Verstraetens study showed a dose-response relationship between Thimerosal in vaccines and
neurodevelopmental disorders in children that held up to rigorous statistical analyses. This means
Verstraetens study showed a causal association between the amount of Thimerosal in vaccines a child
received and the extent to which the child developed the symptoms of impaired brain development .
These ranged from tics, speech impairment to symptoms of and full autism. The discussions can be read
in the transcript of the Simpsonwood Conference obtained by US organisaton SafeMinds under Freedom
of Information.
Three years later Dr Thomas Verstraeten, MD, MSc [now working for GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals,
01/07/2014 10:24
5 of 8
Belgium] published a different paper in the journal Pediatrics: ["Safety of thimerosal-containing

vaccines: a two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization databases".
Verstraeten T, Davis RL, DeStefano F, et al. Pediatrics.2003; 112 :1039 1048]. The new paper
included another set of data from a third HMO, reorganised the criteria for inclusion of children and
restructured the patient groupings, and a less than statistically significant link was demonstrated. It
was heavily criticised by campaigners and concerned experts. Verstraeten published a vigorous letter in
his defence in which he rejected any suggestion of impropriety: ["Thimerosal, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, and GlaxoSmithKline"]: PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 4 April 2004, pp. 932.
What can be said about this? When Verstraeten was a public official working for the US CDC there was
a serious problem. When Verstraeten was working for GlaxoSmithKline there was no problem.
Independent Medical Professional Organisations
The US Institutes of Medicine published a report in 2001 on whether MMR caused autism
[Immunization Safety Review - Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism].
The IOM committee held closed meetings to discuss the reports content and before considering the
evidence. A transcript of a meeting on 12th January 2001 was disclosed in Court proceedings [US
District Court of Texas, Eastern District; Case #5:03-CV-141].
Here are some quotes from the transcript:[the Centers for Disease Control] wants us to declare, well, these things are pretty safe on a population basis. [p33]
We said this before you got here, and I think we said this yesterday, the point of no return, the line we will not cross in public policy
is to pull the vaccine, change the schedule. We could say it is time to revisit this, but we would never recommend that level. Even
recommending research is recommendations for policy. We wouldnt say compensate, we wouldnt say pull the vaccine, we wouldnt
say stop the program. [p74]
we are not ever going to come down that it is a true side effect, [p97]
Chances are, when all is said and done, we are still going to be in this category. It is just a general feeling that we probably still are
not going to be able to make a statement, [p123]
British Government & Establishments Efforts to Deny Compensation to MMR

Vaccine Child Victims
Legal Aid funded claims by children started as early as 1991 and well before Dr Andrew Wakefield
warned the British public about the vaccine. His efforts were met with the full force of the British
establishment to discredit him and proceedings before the General Medical Council resumed only
yesterday, which have been going on for three years.
The main false accusation levied in February 2004 was that Wakefield made his disclosures in a
medical paper published in The Lancet medical journal because he wanted to make money being an
expert witness in Court. But few people know the following [and there is naturally full documentation
on this].
The Chief Executive of the owners of The Lancet, Crispin Davis, had a few months earlier been
brought onto the Board of Directors of MMR litigation Defendants parent company GlaxoSmithKline in
the prior July [2003].
Brian Deer, a freelance journalist was commissioned by The Sunday Times two months later in
September 2003 to write the stories attacking Wakefield.
This was about two weeks before the Legal Services Commission final decision was due on withdrawal
of Legal Aid from the MMR childrens UK litigation and which did withdraw legal aid.
The person who commissioned Deer was Paul Nuki, Sunday Times sometime Head of Newsroom
investigations and Focus editor. Paul Nuki is son of Professor George Nuki. Professor George Nuki in
1987 sat on the Committee on Safety of Medicines when the CSM was considering Glaxo company
Smith Kline & French Laboratories Pluserix MMR vaccine for safety approval. The CSM approved
Pluserix MMR but it caused very high levels of adverse reactions and was withdrawn by the
manufacturers on very little notice in late 1992 leaving the Department of Health in an embarrassing
position.
Large numbers of British children were injured and legal aid claims had already started from as early as
1990, six years before Wakefield became involved and contrary to The Sunday Times false claims that
this was all a scam set up by Wakefield and solicitor Richard Barr.
Sitting on the CSM with Professor George Nuki was Professor Sir Roy Meadow and Professor Sir David
Hull. Professor Sir Roy Meadow is now notorious for his evidence falsely condemning mothers around
the world for killing their children. This includes the Sally Clark case where vaccines are directly
implicated in the cause of death, as revealed by Neville Hodgkinson in The Spectator, (What killed Sally
Clarks child? | The Spectator 16 May 2007 ) but which were specifically discounted by Professor
Meadow in his evidence, despite sitting on the joint CSM/JCVI vaccine safety sub-committee with
Professor David Salisbury and others to approve the MMR vaccine.
It was Professor Sir David Hull in 1998 who, as chairman of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and
Immunisation, started the attacks on Wakefields work. The Joint Committee on Vaccination and
Immunisation advises the Department of Health on vaccination issues and the childhood vaccination
programme. As Chairman of the JCVI, Professor Sir David Hull could have taken action to deal with the
issues over the MMR and protect British children. Despite his attacks on Wakefields work, alleging
unethical research on children for no clinical benefit, two years later in 2000, it was Professor Sir David
Hull who rewrote the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health ethical guidelines to permit research
on children where there was no clinical benefit (albeit in The Royal Frees case all the investigations
were clinically justified).
The Sunday Times freelancer was assisted in his efforts with free advice and assistance from the
Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry funded and controlled company Medico Legal
Investigations Limited. Medico Legal Investigations Limited speciality was in getting medical doctors on
charges before the General Medical Council. So we know that before a single word was published by
The Sunday Times, it was already being planned with the involvement of interested parties that
Wakefield and colleagues were to be taken before the GMC.
01/07/2014 10:24
6 of 8
Another free of charge helper to Sunday Times journalist Deer was Glaxo Wellcome funded Fellow and
active British Medical Association member, Dr Evan Harris MP. Harris has advised and assisted Deer up
to the present, including attending the Wakefield GMC hearings with Deer.
The Sunday Times journalist, Deer, was also assisted by The Royal Frees Strategic Health Authority
which passed Deer confidential documents in the spirit of openness and including documents relating
to the confidential medical treatment of the MMR child litigants. The SHA at first denied providing
documents until it was pointed out the fact was disclosed by Dr Evan Harris MP, in Parliament on 15th
March 2004.
On Saturday 21 February 2004, Lancet Editor Richard Horton pre-empted the Sunday Times stories.
Horton was reported in The Times claiming he would not have published the MMR part of The Royal
Frees Lancet paper had Wakefields paid involvement in the MMR litigation been disclosed. The Sunday
Times had waited until Sunday 22 February 2004, 5 days before judgment in the MMR child litigants
High Court challenge to the withdrawal of legal aid, to publish its stories attacking Wakefield. Prime
Minister Blair was reported in the press on the issue as was Health Secretary Reid.
As Dr Horton records in his book ["MMR Science and Fiction: Exploring the Vaccine Crisis,"], he was the
next day exchanging notes over dinner and liqueurs with a member of the UKs medical regulatory
body, The General Medical Council on possible bases for GMC proceedings against Andrew Wakefield:
["The confusion": Richard Horton - a remarkably frank passage' John Stone BMJ 2 November 2004]
That MMR is solely a political and money issue was given away by journalist Jeremy Laurances The
Independents story of 24th February 2004. Laurance reported there was delight in Whitehall as
Ministers temper their triumphalism and that joy was unconfined at the discrediting of Andrew
Wakefield. ["Ministers temper their triumphalism but delight spreads at Whitehall" The Independent Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor Tuesday, 24 February 2004 ].
This was bizarre if the issue was just which measles vaccine might be given to children. There was an
acceptable, cheaper and more effective measles vaccine. This was hardly stuff for Prime Minister Blair
to involve himself in but even he jumped in with both feet.
However, in the light of the British governments financial indemnity to Glaxo, the potential damage to
billion pound sterling Glaxos financial interests from a scandal over the vaccine and the British
governments liability in negligence to large numbers of children, it starts to make sense. This also puts
into clearer perspective why the choice of which measles vaccine children received became a major
political issue. It had and has nothing to do with protecting your children from disease or child health
safety. [blue text 15/Jan/09]
Legal aid was withdrawn on 27th February 2004 in a secret judgment by High Court Judge Nigel Davis.
The reasons remain unpublished today. Evidence given in open court at a different hearing included the
allegation from a parent that an official admitted to her that legal aid was withdrawn after government
pressure.
It was discovered in 2007 that Judge Sir Nigel Davis is the brother of Lancet owners CEO and main
Glaxo board member Sir Crispin Davis. When challenged a statement was issued on Judge Davis behalf
to The Telegraph newspapers legal correspondent Joshua Rosenberg and stated The possibility of any
conflict of interest arising from his brothers position did not occur to him.
On 15th March 2004 Dr Evan Harris launched an unprecedented and defamatory Parliamentary attack
on Wakefield and his Royal Free colleagues and to which not one of Harris Liberal Democrat colleagues
contributed. This was based on material in documents Sunday Times freelancer Deer had obtained and
passed to Harris. Harris used the opportunity to raise allegations The Sunday Times chose not to
publish.
Crispin Davis was awarded a knighthood June 2004.
Sunday Times freelance journalist Brian Deer confirmed it was he who had made the submissions to
the GMC which led to the present GMC proceedings against Wakefield. Wakefields lawyers had
reported in November 2004 that Deer had made a statutory complaint to the GMC and freelancer Deer
reported in the Sunday Times in December 2004 that the General Medical Council was investigating
the complaints against Wakefield.
Professor Denis McDevitt was due in July 2007 to chair the unprecedented British General Medical
Council hearing of the case of Doctors Wakefield, Murch and Professor Walker-Smith. McDevitt and the
GMC failed to declare McDevitts personal involvement in approving the dangerous Pluserix MMR
vaccine in 1988. He only stood down after Jamie Doward of the Observer, Martyn Halle, freelance
journalist for the Sunday Express, Andy Wilks of the Mail on Sunday, Jenny Hope of the Daily Mail and
Heather Mills of Private Eye challenged the GMC over the matter. ["MMR Conflict of Interest Zone"
Private Eye - June 2007]
A British Medical Journal post suggests more troubling conflicts of interest of the current panel
Chairman Dr Surendra Kumar. Kumar sits on two committees of the authority which licences the MMR
vaccine (MHRA), the Independent Review Panel for Advertising and the Independent Review Panel for
Borderline Products. Dr Kumar is also a shareholder in MMR defendants GlaxoSmithKline. Re:
Financial conflicts - shock horror John Stone - British Medical Journal - 2 October 2008 [Blue text
15/Jan/09]
Contrary to Lancet Editor Dr Richard Hortons evidence to the GMC that he did not know of Wakefields
paid involvement in the MMR litigation, Horton had detailed correspondence in 1997 disclosing that
involvement The correspondence was with Richard Barr, the solicitor who was working on the MMR
litigation with Wakefield to help all those seriously injured British children. This correspondence was
considerably in advance of Hortons February 1998 publication in The Lancet of the Royal Frees paper
containing the interpretation that MMR vaccine is associated with autism cases involving inflammatory
bowel disease.
Notwithstanding this, the alleged non disclosure of the legal aid funding to Lancet Editor, Dr Richard
Horton and the publication of the 1998 Royal Free paper was the nub of Deers The Sunday Times
February 2004 attacks on Wakefield where it was claimed:The investigation has found that when [Wakefield] warned parents to avoid MMR, and published
research claiming a link with autism, he did not disclose he was being funded through solicitors seeking
evidence to use against vaccine manufacturers.
01/07/2014 10:24
7 of 8
Now we know from this that Hortons claims do not stand up and with them, those of The Sunday Times
fall as well. But of course, not a word in the UK media.
Horton has not returned to the GMC Wakefield hearing this week [13/Jan/09] to clarify his evidence
and face cross-examination. It seems only his statement will be read out.
As for the Legal Aid money, for months in 1996 the Royal Free Medical School prevaricated accepting it
because Clearly, this could lead to a case against the Government for damages. wrote Dean
Zuckerman privately to the British Medical Association Secretary on 11th October 1996.
What no one knows and disclosed here publicly exclusively worldwide for the first time is that
when The Sunday Times published its allegations against Wakefield in 2004 their journalist already had
the documents showing Wakefield - a man accused of doing what he did for the money - was fed up
with this and had arranged in May 1997 for all the legal aid monies to be sent back and that he had
intended to raise the money himself for the injured children [see copy Freedom of Information
memo below - added 17/Jan/09].
It was the Royal Free which instead then reversed its position, decided to accept the money and
arranged in July 1997 for it to be paid to special trustees. Wakefield was never going to and never did
receive a cent.
AUTISM - US Court Decisions and Other Recent Developments - Its Not Just
MMR
[Blue added 15/Jan/09]
In February 2008, award winning best selling author David Kirby broke the story of the case of Hannah
Poling and how the US Department of Health and Human Services secretly conceded [ie. there was no
need for a hearing] in a US Federal Court case that Hannahs symptoms of autism were caused by the
nine vaccines [ie. not just MMR] which she received in one day [The Vaccine-Autism Court Document
Every American Should Read - David Kirby - Huffington Post - February 26, 2008].
The official HHS position is that they conceded [whether frankly or spin] that vaccines caused Hannahs
autistic symptoms by exacerbating an underlying mitochondrial disorder. The case put the issue high
up the US political agenda and continues to receive coast-to-coast media coverage in the USA [but
almost total silence in the UK]. CNN lists the autism issue in its top ten US health stories of 2008:#2 - Autism - Debate over the causes of autism continued to rage after a court decided to compensate
a family whose daughter developed the disorder after receiving childhood vaccinations - Autism in
CNNs 2008 top ten US health stories
But Hannahs case is not isolated and her underlying mitochondrial dysfunction appears not to be as
rare as the US HHS would like us to think [Explaining Vaccines Autism & Mitochondrial Disorder]. And
other cases have been made public [see below for details of another three involving MMR - but we do
not know how many cases have been settled quietly, as Hannah's case was before it became coastto-coast news in the USA throughout 2008].
US Autism prevalence was put on the US presidential political agenda by all US presidential candidates
in 2008:-
01/07/2014 10:24
8 of 8
Obama Climbs On The Vaccine Bandwagon - April 22, 2008 David Kirby, Huffington Post]
You do not want to bring your children into the world where we go on with the number of children who
are born with autism tripling every 20 years, and nobody knows why, Bill Clinton said.
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama returning to Oregon - Amy Easley and Tony Fuller,
KTVZ.COM,
McCain steps into debate over cause of autism - International Herald Tribune Benedict Carey - March 4, 2008
In addition to the Hannah Poling case, the US Court also

ruled last year in favour of a little boy Benjamin Zeller,
deciding that as a result of the MMR vaccination received on
17 November 2004, Benjamin, suffered
Copyright 1995 - 2014 Tuck's Discount Vitamins, All Rights Reserved
Home Healthy News Questions ? About Us Product Science Contact Us

Anti Aging Cancer Diabetes Heart Disease Weight Loss Other Health Needs
Check out with confidence

using our digital secure shop!
01/07/2014 10:24

Tucks Discount Vitamins

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Tucks Discount Vitamins

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Tuck's Discount Vitamins

Terms & Conditions

Other Health Needs

Check out with

Visit Our Wholesale Site

Category : About Deadly, Dangerous & Ineffective Vaccines

The British government was desperately trying to prevent the

British Governments Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety

Whey Factors - French Vanilla