Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • Paper Review

    Diunggah oleh

    Dian Wijayanti
    16 tayangan9 halaman
    This document outlines the main steps for evaluating the validity of an analytical study: 1) Check the research question and evaluate the study design, which could be a clinical trial, cohort, or case control study. 2) Evaluate the study sample for potential selection bias, missing data, enrollment patterns, and participation rates. A good participation rate is over 90%. 3) Assess the study measurements for potential measurement bias, misclassification that could bias results toward or away from null, and confounding effects that could make associations stronger or weaker.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    Paper Review

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    PPTX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    This document outlines the main steps for evaluating the validity of an analytical study: 1) Check the research question and evaluate the study design, which could be a clinical trial, cohort, or case control study. 2) Evaluate the study sample for potential selection bias, missing data, enrollment patterns, and participation rates. A good participation rate is over 90%. 3) Assess the study measurements for potential measurement bias, misclassification that could bias results toward or away from null, and confounding effects that could make associations stronger or weaker.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai PPTX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    16 tayangan9 halaman

    Paper Review

    Diunggah oleh

    Dian Wijayanti
    This document outlines the main steps for evaluating the validity of an analytical study: 1) Check the research question and evaluate the study design, which could be a clinical trial, cohort, or case control study. 2) Evaluate the study sample for potential selection bias, missing data, enrollment patterns, and participation rates. A good participation rate is over 90%. 3) Assess the study measurements for potential measurement bias, misclassification that could bias results toward or away from null, and confounding effects that could make associations stronger or weaker.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai PPTX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 9

    Critical Appraisal of Article

    1/12/2015

    Main Steps for Evaluating the


    Validity of a Study (Analytical type)

    Check research question(s)


    Evaluate the study design
    Evaluate the study sample
    Asses the study measurement
    Asses the chance (analysis &
    statistics)

    Research Question
    What is the best study design can be
    implemented in that situation?
    Clinical Trial
    Cohort
    Case Control

    Study Sample
    Selection Bias
    Missing data ~ loss to follow up
    Enrollment pattern / Self selection
    Participation rate / response rate
    Good if > 90%

    Study Measurement
    Measurement Bias
    Outcome
    Exposure
    Confounder

    Misclassification
    Non differential: tend to bias toward the
    null (weaker association)
    Differential: bias to either direction

    Confounder
    Confounding effect
    Adjustment make Stronger association
    Adjustment make Weaker association
    Judgment on the residual confounding

    Chance
    Purpose of confidence interval:
    Wide interval ~ less certain
    Narrow interval ~ more certain

    Statistical vs clinical/social

    Review Framework, p.211

    Tugas
    Menjawab seluruh pertanyaan pada
    kerangka review disertai dengan
    bukti/alasan
    Berupa file word dan power point
    (outline jawaban untuk 10 menit
    presentasi)
    Dikirim paling lambat tgl 7 Desember
    2015:
    dwi.agustian@unpad.ac.id
    Dipresentasikan pada tgl 8 Desember

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai