StructureofPresentation
What is ALARP ?
Why are we doing an ALARP demonstration ?
How is the project achieving ALARP ?
How are you contributing ?
Decision making & ALARP
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
WhatdoesALARPmean?
As Low As Reasonably Practicable.
WhatdowemeanbytheALARPPrinciple?
Risks are ALARP when it can be shown that there
would be a gross disproportion between the cost of
additional reduction measures and the reduction in
risk achieved.
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
WhyisanALARPDemonstrationrequired?
Requirement of the Sakhalin II Basis of Design , that
the risks to personnel on, and associated with the LUNA and PA-B facilities are demonstrated to be ALARP.
SEIC required to produce HSE Case demonstrating all
risks have been identified & managed to ALARP
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
Responsibilities
Management sets the framework for the
engineers to follow.
Not solely the responsibility of the HSE
Engineering Discipline.
Overall process is a continuous one which starts
with concept selection and follows through to
operation.
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
HowisanALARPdesignachieved bytheProject?
Project
Decisionmakingframework
-communication
-Reviews&audits
-Monitorperformance
-Decideprocedurestobeused
HEMP
Engineers
appropriatecodesandstandards,
goodengineeringpractice,
engineeringjudgmentbasedontechnical
experience
HSEMANAGEMENT
Managementstructure
HSE
CASE
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
ApplicationofALARPStrategy
CONCEPT & FEED
STUDIES
DETAIL
DESIGN
ENGINEERING
JUDGEMENT
GOOD PRACTICE
CODES & STANDARDS
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
HowisALARPbuiltintootherdisciplineswork?
Piping E.g. Piping & Equipment layouts
Structural risk based design
Process - E.g. Minimizing leak sources
Mechanical E.g. Material selection, specification of
pump seals
Electrical E.g. Equipment selection in accordance
with hazardous areas
Instrument E.g. IPF Review , ESD system
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
DecisionMaking&ALARP
What happens when there is a difficult decision to be
made / when codes & standards are not enough?
The decision is elevated to higher level
Safety involvement to ensure safety risk
management achieved, compare with set criteria
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
ProjectRiskAcceptanceCriteria
INTOLERABLE
TOLERABLE
BROADLY ACCEPTABLE
ALARP
Region
Unacceptable
Risk
(all workers)
CONSIDER
FURTHER
RISK
REDUCTION
MEASURES
5 x 10-4
Average Individual Risk (per annum)
1 x 10- -5
Negligible Risk
Broadly Acceptable
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
CostBenefitAnalysisCBA
StrategyforALARPDemonstration
ALARP
Amecsintentionistoprovidea
topsidesdesignwhich
demonstratestherisksassociated
withitareAsLowAsReasonably
Practicable.