SUPERVISORS OBSERVATION
OF LTM/SPE 612 Field Student
Candidate: Karla Usinger
Date: 10/14/2014
Cooperating Teacher:
Number of Students:
School:
Grade
Subject(s):
Evidence (Candidate)
2nd Observation _ __
The lesson had a clearly defined structure around which activities were
organized.
The standards matched the objectives. While this was a second grade
class, the math CCSS should have been used. Your CT told you to use the
1st grade standards because they were behind. This was a rich opportunity
for us to discuss after your teaching about the necessity of using the grade
level standards and then modifying according to student needs.
The identified academic language was used appropriately and modified
when necessary. If the group working with the special education teacher
was included with the large group, you might have found more challenges
in assuring the content met their needs.
All of the materials and resources were suitable to the students and,
supported the instructional outcomes, and engaged students in meaningful
learning.
You utilized school-grade level curriculum materials and used other
teacher-made materials that supported the content focus.
The lesson was designed with a range of engaging activities.
You tried to connect with the learners personal interests at one point of the
lesson.
The outcome was clear.
You displayed an awareness of resources to enhance content and
pedagogical knowledge available through the school and some familiarity
with resources on the Internet (Pinterest).
Copyright 2010. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
Evidence (Candidate)
____Inadequate
____Emerging
__X_ Proficient
____Distinctive
Copyright 2010. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
Evidence (Candidate)
Copyright 2010. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
Evidence (Candidate)
____Inadequate
____Emerging
____Proficient
____Distinctive
Evidence (Candidate)
____Inadequate
____Emerging
__X__Proficient
____Distinctive
Summary Statement: Karla, you articulated an appropriate application of the WTS, the AEA and an educational framework through the
design and implementation of your lesson.
____Emerging
__X__Proficient
____Distinctive
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
DESCRIBE AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING in a short narrative:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
background information about the lesson, (e.g. urban, 3rd grade, social studies lesson on )
how in the design or implementation of the lesson you demonstrated two of the Wisconsin Teacher Standards for Licensure and
Development; (name the standards and provide evidence of your actions)
(SPE only) how in the design or implementation of the lesson you demonstrated two of the Council for Exceptional Children Initial
Content Standards and Knowledge and Skill Sets;
how in the design or implementation of the lesson you demonstrated two of the Alverno Graduate Advanced Education Abilities;
how the lesson demonstrates the Common Core Standards and/or academic standards;
(SPE only) how did you accommodate students IEP goals?
at least one educational framework that is reflected in the design and/or implementation of the lesson plan (e.g. Bloom, Vygotsky,
Gardner)
Copyright 2010. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED