186.
A A Hanmante, Subject Matter Specialist, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Killa-Roha, District, Raigarh
(Maharashtra)
187.
188.
Asim Kr Maiti, Programme Coordinator, Seva Bharati Krishi Vigyan Kendra,P O -Kapgari,
District -Paschim Medinipur 721505 ( West Bengal)
189.
Avneet Kaur , Assistant Professor ( Fruit Science), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mukatsar (Punjab)
190.
Biplab Das, Programme Coordinator, Jalpaiguri Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Bengal University
of Animal and Fishery Sciences,PO -Ramshai,District Jalpaiguri 735219 (West Bengal)
191.
Devinder Kaur, Professor, Department of Apparel and Textile Science, Punjab Agricultural
University, Ludhiana 141 004 (Punjab)
192.
Hansa Patel, Subject Matter Specialist ( Home Science) Krishi Vigyan Kendra , Ambuja Cement
Foundation ,Kodinar- 362720 ( Gujarat)
193.
H K Verma, Director of Extension Education, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences
University, Ludhiana 141 004 (Punjab)
194.
Jatinder Manan, Assistant Professor ( Agronomy), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kapurthala- 144620
(Punjab)
195.
196.
Kanchan Sandhu, Assistant Professor ( Home Science), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jalandhar
(Punjab)
197.
Kulvir Kaur, Assistant Professor (Home Science), Directorate of Extension Education, Punjab
Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004 (Punjab)
198.
Mayank Kr Rai, Programme Coordinator, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pilibhit ( Uttar Pradesh).
199.
200.
201.
Rajdeep Kaur, Assistant Professor ( Home Science), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ferozepur (Punjab)
Kendra,
CONTENTS
Sr. No. Title
Page No.
1.
1-4
2.
5-9
3.
10-17
4.
18-22
5.
23-29
6.
30-36
7.
37-40
8.
41-43
9.
10.
51-55
11.
56-59
12.
60-62
13.
63-66
44-50
Page No.
14.
Package of Practices Followed by Farmers and its Effect on Wheat Yield in District
Kapurthala.
Jatinder Manan, Manoj Sharma, Gurmeet Singh and Gobinder Singh
67-71
15.
72-75
16.
76-79
17.
Performance and Adoption of Direct Seeded Basmati in Sri Muktsar Sahib District of
Punjab.
Balkaran Singh Sandhu and Nirmaljit Singh Dhaliwal
80-83
18.
Performance of Early Cauliflower Variety Sabour Agrim vis a vis Different Dates of
Transplanting in Arwal District of Bihar.
K P Singh, Rakesh Kumar, R K Sohane and A K Das.
84-87
19.
88-90
20.
Quality Evaluation of Honey from Stingless Bee (Trigona sp) Reared by Garo Tribes
in West Garo Hills of Meghalaya.
Tarun Kumar Das, Tanmay Samajdar and Greatush Marak
91-94
Short Communication
Water Hyacinth: A Potential Raw Material for Developing Handicraft Sector in
Assam.
Rupjyoti Bhattacharjee, Rizwanul Helim, Rinku Moni Phukon, Sanjukta
Saikia and Pabitra Kr.Bordoloi
95-97
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00050.1
Prerna Kapila
the benefits generated by the knitwear industry
can be sustained in the long-run depends on
clusters ability to address a number of challenges
and constraints. (Shanmugasundaran and
Panchnatham, 2011). The present study tries to
identify the current status of various support
services available in the cluster so that the weaker
links can be identified and steps can be taken to
strengthen the same.
The main objective of the investigation is to
assess the level of quality of support services in
the knitwear cluster of Ludhiana.The scope of the
study was limited to the knitwear industry of
Ludhiana involved in manufacturing knitted
apparels from circular knit fabrics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The knitwear units were selected after mapping
of the Ludhiana knitwear industry and identifying
the areas of knitwear manufacturing in Ludhiana.
With the help of the data available with District
Industries Centre and local industry association,
twelve circular knitwear manufacturing firms were
selected using simple random sampling technique
.A questionnaire was prepared to assess status of
various support services available in the cluster.
These firms were asked to rate various attributes
of the supply chain process like availability of
finance, technology status, nature of competition
among firms, quality of available man power,
quality management procedures followed with in
firms, pricing structure and market status as well
as understanding of the market on a ten point scale.
Scores were then calculated as simple average and
data were analyzed to identify the status of
different attributes in the circular knitwear
manufacturing supply chain.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results were analyzed to identify the level and
quality of support services available in the
knitwear cluster of Ludhiana.
Status of availability of Finance for knitwear
industries
Data in Table 1 depicts that availability of
funds from the financial institutions was not
considered a major issue by the manufacturers
though the rate of interest on credit has been rated
as the problem area with an average score of 5.7
2
Sr. No Attribute
1
Finance
Technology adoption
Nature of competition
Manpower quality
Quality management
Pricing policies
7.
Score
Cost of Capital
Availability of credit
Access to start up funds
Ease and quality of funding
Technology appropriateness with respect to global markets
Production Processes
Innovation management and new product development
Quality of existing plant and machinery
Information technology usage for business application
Dependence on large units for raw material
Level of trust and information sharing
Cooperation among competitors for marketing
Competency of trade associations
Pooling of R and D resources
Availability of skilled workmen
Availability of competent managers
Labour productivity
Employee skill up gradation and training
Product standards followed
Process standards followed
Final product/quality consciousness
International certification on quality and management
Import duty on raw material
Labour cost
Cost of power from utility
Transportation cost
Input cost in comparison to competitors
Threat due to shift in consumer preference
Cost of developing brand
Growth in domestic market
Growth in export market
5.7
4.7
4.0
3.4
4.4
3.9
3.9
3.7
2.9
4.5
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.4
8.0
7.3
7.3
6.3
3.3
3.1
3.1
2.1
9.2
7.3
6.9
6.6
6.2
5.4
4.5
4.4
3.9
Prerna Kapila
increased the cost of manufacturing due to high
usage of generators and other power sources. This
problem was a major hindrance in the smooth
working of the manufacturing units with an overall
score of 6.9. Transportation cost had also been
rated high with a score of 6.6, which was directly
affecting the pricing structure. The availability of
raw material was not an issue but the price
fluctuations within the industry and dependence
on large units for raw material was a major
challenge faced by the industry with an overall
score of 6.2. Due to fluctuations in the prices of
raw material the manufacturers were not able make
big and long term deals which was again affecting
the profitability of their manufacturing process
(Bakht and Salimullah, 2008).
Market Status and its Understanding in knitwear
industries
The demand situation in exports as well as
domestic market had been showing an increase
generally, so the market was quite developing.
Data in table 1 depicts that frequent changes in
the consumer preferences and tastes created a fear
in the minds of the manufacturers and had been
considered an area of concern with a score of 5.4.
Knitwear industry had a booming market but again
dearth of marketing professionals and consultants
in the field was giving a setback to the industry.
CONCLUSION
The competitiveness of any industry is very
important to improve cost efficiencies in a highly
competitive world trade environment and
Knitwear industry of Ludhiana is no exception.
In order to be globally competitive, the industry
is being forced to improve its cost efficiencies by
working on all the factors affecting the
productivity of the industry. It is important to
identify the areas of supply chain where serious
intervention is required by the stock holders. It
becomes imperative that the factors affecting
pricing policies are handled with utmost priority
and manpower quality is improved in the knitwear
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00051.3
3.9
2.7
84.6
8.6
7.9
Unsprayed check
Marksulfo 75 WG
@ 0.024 kg a.i./ha
Leader 75 WG
2.9 (8)
4.1 (16)
1.0 (0)
1.0 (0)
2.2 (4)
1.9 (3)
@ 0.024 kg a.i./ha
LSD (p=0.05)
0.6
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
Figure within parenthesis are original means. Weed data is subjected to square root transformation.
Rumex
dentatus
6.6 (43)
3.9 (14)
69.8
85.8
70.2
55.8
7.9
26.2
7.8
Phalaris
minor
4.8 (23)
2.9 (7)
Effect on weeds
The prominent grass weed in the field was
Phalaris minor. Among the broadleaf weeds
Chenopodium album, Anagallis arvensis,
Medicago denticulata, Rumex dentatus,
Coronopus didymus, Malva parviflora were
present.
Treatment
Table 1. Bio-efficacy of new brand formulation Marksulfo 75 WG (sulfosulfuron) for control of weeds at 60 DAS in wheat.
WCE (%)
Grasses
BLW
Kaur et al
0.5
0.3
0.3
Figure within parenthesis are original means. Weed data is subjected to square root transformation.
2.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.0 (0)
2.3 (4)
0.1
99.5
89.7
1.1 (0)
2.7
1.1 (0)
1.0 (0)
1.0 (0)
Rumex
dentatus
6.7 (45)
1.0 (0)
Phalaris
minor
4.8 (23)
2.4 (5)
1.0 (0)
88.9
7.5 (56)
1.1 (0)
26.2
2.9
Unsprayed check
Markpower 75 WG
@ 0.03 kg a.i./ha
Total 75 WG ]
@ 0.03 kg a.i./ha
LSD (p=0.05)
Treatment
Table 2. Bio-efficacy of new brand formulation Markpower 75 WG for control of weeds at 60 DAS in wheat.
WCE (%)
Grasses
BLW
99.3
Kaur et al
Table 3. Bio-efficacy of new brand formulations Marksulfo 75 WG on yield attributes and grain yield of wheat.
Treatment
Unsprayed check
Marksulfo 75 WG @ 0.024 kg a.i./ha
Leader 75 WG @ 0.024 kg a.i./ha
LSD (p=0.05)
9.9
12.4
12.8
1.2
Effective
tillers/ m2
Grain yield
(q/ha)
Biological
yield (q/ha)
220.6
329.4
325.6
15
36.5
54.0
54.6
8.6
137.2
149.7
151.8
19.7
Table 4. Bio-efficacy of new brand formulation Markpower 75 WG on yield attributes and grain yield of wheat.
Treatment
Unsprayed check
Markpower 75 WG @ 0.03kg a.i./ha
Total 75 WG@ 0.03kg a.i./ha
C.D. (p=0.05)
9.9
12.8
13.0
1.3
Effective
tillers/ m2
Grain yield
(q/ha)
Biological
yield (q/ha)
220.6
325.7
327.8
10.7
36.5
54.1
54.4
5.7
137.2
149.5
148.5
10.3
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00052.5
10
11
Category
Sex
Age
Discipline
Education
Marital status
Education of spouse
Occupation of spouse
Male
Female
28-38
38-48
Above 48
Agronomy
Vegetables
Agricultural Engineering
Entomology
Home Science
Soil Science
Extension Education
Pomology
Animal/Vet. Science
Plant Pathology
Forestry
Nematology
Agri Economics
On campus
1-53
53-105
105-157
No membership
Annual
Life
M.Sc/Post graduation
Ph. D
Married
Unmarried
Matric
10+2
Graduation
Post-Graduation
Ph. D.
Service
Housewives
Business
Farming
Rural
Urban
Joint
Nuclear
Agriculture
Business
Service
Agriculture + Service
1-11
11-21
Above 21
13 Service Experience
12
Frequency
Percentage
62
35
29
48
20
13
9
4
9
18
11
11
6
3
6
4
1
2
7
72
11
7
5
35*
79*
35
62
93
4
2
1
21
54
15
71
17
4
1
56
41
47
50
18
3
67
9
55
26
16
63.9
36.1
29.9
49.5
20.6
13.4
9.3
4.1
9.3
18.6
11.3
11.3
6.2
3.1
6.2
4.1
1.0
2.1
7.2
74.2
11.3
7.2
5.2
36.1
81.4
36.1
63.9
95.9
4.1
2.2
1.1
22.6
58.1
16.1
76.3
18.3
4.3
1.1
57.7
42.3
48.5
51.6
18.6
3.1
69.1
9.3
56.7
26.8
16.5
among them.
Delay in recruitment of vacant posts was also
a constraint reported by substantial (72.2%)
number of respondents. Particularly in Haryana
this is really a big constraint. Then similar number
of respondents said that there was no incentive
for working under hard conditions. Usually most
of the KVKs were located in the far interiors where
SMSs were not getting the facilities like other
University teachers e.g. good housing, good
schools for children, internet connectivity,
electricity supply, transportation etc. So working
under that hard conditions didnt fetch any
incentive, rather they are getting lesser pay in
comparison to them because of less house rent
allowance and city compensatory allowance.
Similarly lack of incentives for excellent work
(69.1%) and frequent transfers of staff (53.6%)
were major constraints which demoralize the
excellent workers and effecting the functioning
of the KVKs. Lack of opportunities for updating
knowledge was also a major problem as reported
by around half of the respondents. This may be
resulted due to lack of full-fledged library, limited
access to internet, less or no subscription of
research journals and due to work load less
opportunities to attend refresher training courses.
Shortage of transport is also a problem reported
by 38.14 per cent respondents. Although KVKs
are provided with jeep and motorcycle but during
sowing seasons when all SMSs had to go to the
fields, these vehicles were not sufficient.
Particularly with female SMSs when jeep is
engaged in other works they become helpless
because of their social shyness to drive
motorcycles.
Rather keeping in view the substantial female
staff, scooters should be provided. Finding of the
study is in consonance with that of Pandita (1991),
who reported that vacant posts, frequent transfers,
lack of watchman and gardener were the main
problems of KVKs. In similar lines Kumar et al
(2002) reported lack of transport facility, delay in
Sr. No
1
2
3
Technological constraint
Difficulty in disseminating complex technology
Non recommendation of farmers own used technologies
Lack of location specific technologies
n=97
Frequency
64
61
67
Percentage
65.9
62.9
69.1
13
Sr. No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Administrative constraint
Lack of support from other line departments
Posts of supporting staff are less
Delay in recruitment of vacant posts
Frequent transfers of staff
Lack of incentives for excellent work
Lack of incentive for working under hard conditions
Lack of opportunities for updating knowledge
Shortage of transport facility
Lack of motivation/encouragement from superiors
Lack of cooperation from subordinates, office staff and colleagues
Drawbacks in state and national agricultural policies
Too much reporting work
Frequency
24
72
70
52
67
70
50
37
30
15
64
83
n=97
Percentage
24.7
74.2
72.2
53.6
69.1
72.2
51.6
38.1
30.9
15.5
65.9
85.6
n=97
Percentage
60.8
67.0
70.1
59.8
87.6
95.9
Sr. No.
1
2
3
4
5
n=97
Frequency
78
42
65
41
41
Sr. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Personal constraint
Lack of freedom of expression
Lack of dedication among subordinates
Lack of dedication among colleagues
Lack of interest in field work
Lack of freedom to disagree with decisions taken by superiors
Work overload affecting family and social life
Percentage
80.4
43.3
67.0
42.3
42.3
n=97
Frequency
25
25
19
12
51
44
Percentage
25.8
25.8
19.6
12.4
52.6
45.4
15
Sr. No
1
2
3
4
5
n=97
Percentage
2.1
3.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
17
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00053.7
18
19
K B Singh
Figure 1. Effect of irrigation on cumulative evapotranspiration (ETa) of spring maize during two years
Figure 2. Crop coefficient under different irrigation regimes during two years
20
Figure 3. Crop coefficient as a function of leaf area index under different irrigation treatments during two years
21
K B Singh
irrigation during 2007 under I0.9 and I0.6 irrigation
treatments Kc was < 1 and more variable due to
closer of stomata for greater time period which
resulted into less growth of crop leading to low
LAI compared to frequent irrigation treatment
(I1.2). Crop coefficient was increased exponentially
with leaf area index in all the treatments (Fig. 3).
However, the coefficient of determination varies
with different treatments. Coefficient of
determination between Kc and LAI decreases
significantly from 0.78 (under I1.2 irrigation) to 0.49
(under I 0.6 irrigation regime) with decrease in
irrigation amount during 2007 irrespective of leaf
area index. However, during 2008 the coefficient
of determination between Kc and LAI was not
varied significantly from frequent irrigations.
Variability in Kc was greater during 2007 (lower
value of R2) compared to 2008 (higher value of
R2) because of more variability in temperature and
evaporation and less rain fall during 2007.
Crop water use
During 2007, water use efficiency (WUE) of
spring maize in I1.2 irrigation regime increased by
13.9 and 33.8 percent over I0.9 and I0.6 irrigation
regimes respectively (Table 1). However, during
2008 increase in WUE with I1.2 over I0.6 irrigation
regimes was 17.2 percent and no any difference
in WUE was observed between I 1.2 and I 0.9 .
Overall irrigation increased WUE of spring maize
due to significant increase in grain yield. Therefore
significant increase in WUE with irrigation was
because of soil water being used for crop growth
and yield rather than in soil evaporation (Todd et
al, 1991).
Table 1. Grain yield, evapotranspiration and water use
efficiency in spring maize.
Years
Treatments
2007
I1.2
I0.9
I0.6
I1.2
I0.9
I0.6
2008
22
Grain
yield
(Mg/ha)
4.743
3.882
2.989
5.008
4.803
3.893
ETa
(cm)
78.4
73.0
66.1
70.2
67.7
64.0
CONCLUSION
Spring season is very hot and dry in northern
India because of which evapotranspiration losses
of water are high. Frequent irrigations lead to
unproductive water losses through soil
evaporation. Therefore actual evapotranspiration
exceeds potential evapotranspiration. Medium
irrigation regime is helpful in saving irrigation
compared to very frequent and delayed irrigation.
However, increased frequency of irrigation
increased water use efficiency of spring maize by
increasing grain yield.
REFERENCES
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M (1998). Crop
evapotranspiration. In:Guidelines for Computing Crop Water
Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56,
FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 331.
Norwood C A (2000). Water use and yield of limited irrigated and
dry land corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 365-370.
Prihar S S and Sandhu B S (1987). Irrigation of Field CropsPrinciples and Practices. ICAR, New Delhi, India.
Rong Y (2013). Estimation of maize evapotranspiration and yield
under different deficit irrigation on a sandy farmland in
Northwest China. African J Agril Res. 7: 4698-4707.
Smith D S and Ritchie J T (1992). Short and long term responses
of corn to a pre-anthesis soil water deficit. Agron J 84:107113.
Tariq J A and Usman K (2009) Regulated deficit irrigation
scheduling of maize crop. Sarhad J.Agri. 25: 441-450.
Todd R W, Klocke N L, Hergert G W and Parkhurst A M (1991).
Evaporation from soil influenced by crop shading, crop residue
and wetting regime. Trans ASAE 34: 461-466.
Trooijen T P, Buschman L L, Sloderbeck P, Dhuyvetter K C and
Spurgeon W E (1999). Water use efficiency of different maturity
corn hybrids and grain sorghum in the Central Great Plains.
J Prod Agri 12: 377-382.
Water use
efficiency
(kg/m3)
0.605
0.531
0.452
0.713
0.709
0.608
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00054.9
23
Kaur et al
characters studied and method of recording
observations were days to emergence, number of
shoots / plant, number of tubers/plant, tuber weight
(g), foliage weight/plant (g),tuber length (cm),
tuber yield/plant (g), total tuber yield (q/ha). For
analysis of variance over environments, the
genotypes were assessed for their stability of
performance over environments as suggested by
Eberhart and Russell (1966).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The mean squares for different sources of
variation for different traits viz., days to
emergence, number of shoots/plant, foliage
weight/plant (g), number of tubers/plant, tuber
weight (g), tuber length (cm), tuber yield/plant (g),
total tuber yield (q/ha) among the cultivars under
investigation indicated that sufficient variability
was present among the genotypes for these
characters. The significance of environment
component for all the traits indicated the presence
of wide variation among environments. The
environment component was highly significant for
all the traits except days to emergence, number
of shoots/plant and tuber weight (g). Genotypes
x environments interaction was significant for
number of shoots/plant, foliage weight/plant (g),
tuber weight (g), tuber yield/plant (g), total tuber
yield (q/ha).
Genotypes and environments exhibited
significant variation which indicated the presence
Table 1. Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for days to emergence in potato during
autumn season.
Kufri Badshah
Kufri Anand
Kufri Chandramukhi
Kufri Bahar
Kufri Lauvkar
Kufri Chipsona-1
Kufri Chipsona-2
Kufri Ashoka
Kufri Jawahar
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
Mean
CD (5%)
CV
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at
24
E1
E2
E3
29.33
30.00
26.67
27.67
30.33
30.33
27.00
30.00
32.67
22.67
28.67
2.14
4.37
1%
29.33
31.33
28.33
28.67
30.67
31.33
27.33
27.00
35.33
25.33
29.46
1.84
3.74
24.67
30.33
29.33
27.00
26.67
30.67
25.33
24.67
36.33
22.67
27.77
1.71
3.48
Overall mean
( Xi )
27.78
30.56
28.11
27.78
29.22
30.78
26.56
27.22
34.78
23.56
28.63
2.48
bi
S2di
2.80
0.57
-0.64
0.98
2.39
0.38
1.19
1.47
-0.66
1.54
3.21**
0.50
3.04**
0.03
1.60
0.31
0.25
11.18**
6.55**
1.33
SE of bi = 1.39
Table 2.Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for number of shoots/plant in potato
during autumn season.
Kufri Badshah
Kufri Anand
Kufri Chandramukhi
Kufri Bahar
Kufri Lauvkar
Kufri Chipsona-1
Kufri Chipsona-2
Kufri Ashoka
Kufri Jawahar
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
Mean
CD (5%)
CV
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at
E1
E2
E3
3.87
5.47
4.80
3.33
4.80
4.93
3.67
4.80
4.13
5.07
4.49
0.43
5.66
4.67
4.07
3.53
3.27
4.20
3.87
5.53
4.40
3.47
4.13
4.11
0.46
6.12
4.00
5.47
3.73
5.27
4.27
4.33
5.93
5.63
4.13
4.80
4.76
0.39
5.21
Overall mean
( Xi )
4.18
5.00
4.02
3.96
4.42
4.38
5.04
4.94
3.91
4.67
4.45
1.13
bi
S2di
-1.10
2.27
0.50
2.93
0.20
0.86
0.28
1.86
1.08
1.13
0.11*
0.23**
0.88**
0.79**
0.21**
0.42**
2.91**
0.07
0.05
0.20**
SE of bi = 1.67
25
Kaur et al
Table 3. Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for foliage weight/plant (g) in potato
during autumn season.
E1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Kufri Badshah
163.93
Kufri Anand
125.33
Kufri Chandramukhi
50.73
Kufri Bahar
107.07
Kufri Lauvkar
72.27
Kufri Chipsona-1
155.47
Kufri Chipsona-2
101.53
Kufri Ashoka
85.80
Kufri Jawahar
140.80
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
81.27
Mean
108.42
CD (5%)
14.24
CV
6.60
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at 1%
E2
E3
310.20
183.33
64.60
153.87
70.47
158.47
173.80
193.20
183.73
143.47
163.51
11.37
5.27
254.27
151.07
47.73
151.33
71.13
104.53
60.40
72.47
81.53
60.33
105.47
8.15
3.78
Overall mean
( Xi )
242.80
153.24
54.36
137.42
71.29
139.49
111.91
117.16
135.36
95.02
125.80
45.96
bi
S2di
1.72
0.78
0.27
0.40
-0.02
0.54
1.67
2.02
1.32
1.30
4559.39**
393.42**
2.42
1035.25**
0.72
1220.37**
657.81**
27.36
1536.74**
146.88**
SE of bi = 0.67
Table 4.Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for number of tubers/plants in potato
during autumn season.
Kufri Badshah
Kufri Anand
Kufri Chandramukhi
Kufri Bahar
Kufri Lauvkar
Kufri Chipsona-1
Kufri Chipsona-2
Kufri Ashoka
Kufri Jawahar
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
Mean
CD (5%)
CV
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at
26
E1
E2
E3
9.20
10.50
6.20
7.20
7.40
11.40
7.60
7.00
9.93
7.70
8.51
4.72
3.53
1%
12.10
11.67
6.60
8.50
7.50
12.90
9.50
10.20
8.80
9.00
9.68
3.95
5.66
12.50
12.20
8.40
8.30
7.60
11.13
11.90
7.10
11.30
11.50
10.19
4.16
6.64
Overall mean
bi
S2di
( Xi )
11.27
11.46
7.07
8.00
7.50
11.81
10.00
8.10
10.01
9.40
9.46
1.78
2.05
1.01
1.15
0.73
0.11
0.09
1.76
0.52
0.51
2.07
0.24
0.00
0.80
0.18
0.00
1.80**
1.22*
6.23**
2.75**
1.13*
SE of bi = 0.98
Table 5. Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for tuber weight (g) in potato during
autumn season.
E1
Kufri Badshah
19.82
Kufri Anand
21.03
Kufri Chandramukhi
36.07
Kufri Bahar
25.37
Kufri Lauvkar
24.55
Kufri Chipsona-1
21.11
Kufri Chipsona-2
26.69
Kufri Ashoka
25.94
Kufri Jawahar
18.92
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
16.04
Mean
23.55
CD (5%)
4.72
CV
9.79
*Significant at 5%, **Significant at 1%
E2
E3
33.04
26.91
20.37
43.53
44.90
36.19
41.46
33.22
28.77
24.26
32.67
3.95
8.19
41.53
30.25
17.96
28.44
23.11
28.58
25.60
43.60
26.65
18.23
25.39
4.16
8.59
Overall mean
( Xi )
31.46
26.06
24.80
32.45
30.85
26.63
31.25
34.25
24.78
19.51
28.20
11.03
bi
S2di
1.52
0.67
-1.77
1.96
2.18
1.01
1.58
0.86
1.09
0.89
143.55**
24.79**
63.47**
28.80**
100.02**
4.65
53.21**
126.58**
4.15
3.15
SE of bi = 1.15
27
Kaur et al
Table 6. Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for tuber length (cm) in potato during
autumn season.
Kufri Badshah
Kufri Anand
Kufri Chandramukhi
Kufri Bahar
Kufri Lauvkar
Kufri Chipsona-1
Kufri Chipsona-2
Kufri Ashoka
Kufri Jawahar
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
Mean
CD (5%)
CV
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at
E1
E2
E3
5.17
5.03
4.17
5.16
4.35
5.36
5.19
5.55
4.59
4.10
4.87
0.31
3.50
1%
6.35
5.82
4.69
5.63
5.05
5.57
5.30
6.01
5.54
4.88
5.48
0.41
4.61
5.43
5.32
4.43
4.89
4.57
5.25
5.22
5.65
5.05
4.63
5.04
0.47
5.34
Overall mean
( Xi )
5.65
5.39
4.43
5.23
4.65
5.39
5.24
5.74
5.06
4.54
5.13
0.49
bi
S2di
2.41
1.47
-0.54
1.41
1.35
0.63
-0.44
0.93
1.63
1.16
0.04
0.05
0.52**
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.16**
0.01
0.11*
0.15**
SE of bi = 0.93
Kufri Bahar, Kufri Chipsona-1, Kufri Chipsona2 and Kufri Ashoka produced significantly higher
total yield than mean value (Table 8). Yield in
case of environment E1, was comparatively less
due to unfavourable agroclimatic conditions
during vegetative growth, tuber formation and
tuber development stages. the cvs to perform
better than the mean. In case of pooled analysis,
cvs Kufri Badshah, Kufri Chipsona-1 and Kufri
Chipsona-2 were found to produce significantly
more total yield than pooled mean. The cv. Kufri
Badshah had higher tuber yield than mean value,
regression coefficient more than one (2.47) and
Table 7.Mean ( Xi ), regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2di) for tuber yield/plant (g) in potato during
autumn season.
E1
Kufri Badshah
177.80
Kufri Anand
214.73
Kufri Chandramukhi
222.80
Kufri Bahar
182.00
Kufri Lauvkar
180.40
Kufri Chipsona-1
239.27
Kufri Chipsona-2
229.13
Kufri Ashoka
181.40
Kufri Jawahar
188.00
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
123.27
Mean
193.88
CD (5%)
9.79
CV
2.15
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at 1%
28
E2
396.87
313.67
134.40
368.87
336.47
384.93
390.33
338.47
251.00
217.47
313.25
18.86
4.15
E3
517.67
368.67
150.60
237.20
175.33
318.27
304.20
307.47
298.47
209.13
288.70
12.31
2.71
Overall mean
( Xi )
364.11
299.02
169.92
262.69
230.73
314.16
307.89
275.78
245.82
183.29
265.28
93.58
bi
S2di
2.32
1.05
-0.75
1.29
0.93
1.11
1.19
1.32
0.71
0.82
16438.23**
3392.63**
2.33
5195.47**
9951.19**
805.49**
1677.75**
1.02
2181.83**
72.82
SE of bi = 0.71
E1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Kufri Badshah
195.67
Kufri Anand
185.43
Kufri Chandramukhi
162.13
Kufri Bahar
191.53
Kufri Lauvkar
169.30
Kufri Chipsona-1
272.97
Kufri Chipsona-2
260.83
Kufri Ashoka
232.33
Kufri Jawahar
177.63
Russet Nor x 97-ES-33
199.17
Mean
204.72
CD (5%)
14.41
CV
3.22
*Significant at 5%,**Significant at 1%
E2
E3
363.43
292.77
103.13
327.67
285.80
333.03
334.07
329.03
294.47
179.33
284.29
22.45
5.02
435.00
321.27
151.03
306.47
225.73
322.17
334.27
312.63
318.67
203.13
293.09
13.12
2.94
Overall mean
( Xi )
331.47
266.67
138.77
275.22
226.94
309.39
309.72
291.63
263.59
193.88
260.70
37.91
bi
S2di
2.47
1.46
-0.37
1.46
0.97
0.64
0.87
1.03
1.54
-0.07
1267.52**
126.16*
1316.41**
578.90**
2361.23**
135.17*
26.96
347.90**
58.83
300.64**
SE of bi = 0.37
29
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00055.0
30
Season
Early Kharif (Vaikasi pattam)
Rabi(Karthigai pattam)
Month of sowing
May August
Nov Dec
Month of harvest
July
February
Duration (Days)
75
90
Purpose
Seed
Vegetable (Samba)
Sr.No
Observation recorded
1.
2.
3.
4.
Seedling height
Leaf sheath diameter
Number of leaf sheath
Onion bulb length in
the seedling
Number of roots
Root length
5.
6.
40 days old
seedling
15.2 -18.3 cm
0.7-1.1
2-3
1.0-1.3 cm
13-21
1.7-2.1 cm
31
Bharathi C et al
Table 3. Variety and Duration of Onion in Vadavathur village of Namakkal District.
Variety
Co4 & Valayapatti
local
Bulb
CO (On) 5 Onion
Purpose
Seed
Vegetable
Bulb
Seed rate(Kg/ha)
Seed Bulb
1,250- 1,750 kg
Month of sowing
June
December end
Nursery October
3rd week and planting
December 1st week
2.5kg
Harvest
2nd week
of August
March
March
Duration (days)
75
90
90 days
(Excluding
Nursery)
Month/Year
Oct. 2014
Nov. 2014
Dec.2014
Jan. 2015
Feb.2015
March.2015
Average
32
Temp (oC)
Max
Min
34.7
23.7
35.9
23.7
36.3
24.0
35.5
24
35.8
23.8
36.1
24.2
35.7
23.9
Wind speed
(Km/h)
3.4
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.2
Rainfall
(mm)
136
69
61
266
Rainy days
12
5
2
19
Sr.No
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Observation recorded
Plant height at 30 DAP (cm)
Plant height at 45 DAP (cm)
Diameter of leaf sheath (cm) at 45 DAP
No. of leaf sheath/ Plant
Foliage
Intensity of green colour in foliage
Number of roots/plant
Root length (cm)
CO (On) 5
26.2
38.5
1.71
23
Erect
Dark
23
4.6 6.1
CO 4
17.1
33.2
1.02
17
Semi erect
Light
19
3.1
Valayapatti local
11.5
22.4
0.87
13
Semi erect
Light
17
2.8
CO (On) 5
4.7
4.47
3.6
4.01
3- 4
14.3 - 27
23 -25
82
43 - 82
20.5
CO 4
4.5
4.02
3.4
3.23
2 -3
6 - 8.02
40-46
89-96
19-24
16.8
Valayapatti local
3.9
4.00
2.7
3.18
2-3
5.8
69 -71
152
16 - 19
12.0
33
Bharathi C et al
Co(On) 5 Nursery
CONCLUSION
The Aggregatum onion cultivation with low
seed rate (2.5kg/ha) variety Co(On) 5 proved
economically viable intervention for the farmers.
Any seed - setting onion variety, is preferred by
the farmers over the bulb-propagated ones, as it
Sr. No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Parameter
Thickness of neck (cm)
Basic colour of dry skin
Adherence of skin after harvest
Colour of epidermis of fleshy scale
Position of root disc
1.2 -1.5
Dark red
Medium
Whitish pink
Exerted
Characteristic
0.9- 1
Pink
Medium
Whitish pink
Inserted
0.8-1.0
Dark pink
Strong
Whitish pink
Exerted
Particulars
1.
Ploughing
3000.00
3000.00
2.
2500.00
6000.00
2500.00
6000.00
37500.00
6250.00
2438.00
110.00
110.00
500.00
3.
4.
5.
Nursery raising
6.
7.
7.
8.
Weedicide
( 3- 5 days after planting)
Manuring
Irrigation
9000.00
9000.00
425.00
2525.00
9000.00
4750.00
2000.00
750.00
-
1600.00
2790.00
2000.00
750.00
288.00
1500.00
5000.00
5300.00
35
Bharathi C et al
S.No Cultural operations
9.
Particulars
10.
Harvest
Separation of onion bulbs
from onion (Curing) plant.
11.
Yield
Net profit
36
1000.00
1000.00
1200.00
-
58.00
4500.00
24,813.00
2000.00
4500.00
29625.00
107976.00
2,51,505.00
1,43,529.00
87,306.00
4,05,000.00
3,17,694.00
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00056.2
37
Manjarekar et al
production technologies for further wide scale
diffusion. Keeping in view of an effective
extension approach of FLDs for dissemination of
okra technology, it was thought that impact of
FLDs conducted by KVK, Rohais to be assessed.
Therefore, the present study was conducted with
the specific objectives to evaluate the FLD in terms
of adoption of recommended okra production
technology and to know the impact of FLD on
okra growing farmers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was conducted in Raigad
district of Maharashtra state where during 200809 to 2011-12, total 150 farmers demonstrated
the okra production technologies through FLDs.
For this study, the four tehsils viz. Alibaug, Pen,
Roha and Mangaon selected purposively in which
okra FLDs had been given by KVK, Roha during
rabi season of the year 2011-2012. For selection
of respondents, a list of farmers to whom FLD
okra had been allotted and also who had actually
undertaken demonstration with control trial were
selected for the study. Randomly, ten farmers from
Table 1.Demonstrated package of practices and farmers practice for Okra cultivation.
articular
Okra
Demonstrated package
Farmers practice
Hybrid variety resistant to
Yellow Mosaic Virus (YMV)
Sowing time for okra
Seed treatment
Seed rate and spacing
Line sowing on ridges and furrows
Recommended Fertilizer dose
Irrigation
Weed management
Harvesting at proper stage
38
Mahyco No.10
Local variety
October-November
Not followed
20 to 22 kg/ha sown at 30 x 20 cm
Not always followed
Used mixed chemical fertilizers
(Approx. 20 to 30 g/ plant) 3 to 4 times
during crop period
Not followed
Once/twice in a week
Hand weeding 3 to 4times
Used local knife and stages were
improper
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Package of practice
Adoption
(Before FLD)
No.
Per cent
21
52.5
Adoption
(After FLD)
No.
Per cent
35
87.5
Increase in
Adoption
No.
Per cent
14
35.0
18
14
19
22
10
18
45.0
35.0
47.5
55.0
25.0
45.0
25
20
30
28
30
27
62.5
50.0
75.0
70.0
75.0
67.5
7
6
11
6
20
9
17.5
15.0
27.5
15.0
50.0
22.5
10
7
14
25.0
17.5
35.0
28
14
20
70.0
35.0
50.0
18
7
6
45.0
17.5
15.0
Sr. No.
(n= 40)
70.6
t= 9.36( Calculated t)
(n=40)
Percent increase
in Yield
104.4
47.8
**(H.S.)
Sr. No.
1
2
3
4
5
Item
Cost of cultivation (Rs/ha)
Yield of okra (q/ha)
Gross Return (Rs/ha)
Net Return (Rs/ha)
B:C ratio
Before FLD
1,38,927
70.6
2,82,480
1,43,553
2.03
After FLD
1,46,315
104.4
4,17,400
2,71,085
2.85
39
Manjarekar et al
profitability was calculated which showed that net
returns from okra crop before FLD was Rs.
1,43,553/-ha while the net returns from okra crop
after FLD was Rs. 2,71,085/-/ha. The B:C ratio
for before FLD was 2.03 increased from after FLD
to 2.85.
It was evident from the results that, B:C ratio
of okra crop in FLD was higher than before FLD.
The factors responsible for low B:C ratio before
FLD was less adoption of all the package of
practices recommended for okra crop in the
region. However, increase in B:C ratio after FLD
plot was due to the adoption of 50 per cent to
87.5 per cent adoption of different package of
practices even one year after FLD programme.
Similar results were reported by Sharma and
Sharma (2004) and Patel and Patel (2014).The
other reasons may be good extension contact by
FLD farmers with the scientist and extension
workers.
CONCLUSION
On the set of technologies of okra crop before
FLD, the adoption was very less but after
40
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00057.4
41
Characteristics
Age (yr)
15-25
25-35
35-45
45-55
Caste
General
Scheduled Caste
Education
Illiterate
Up to metric
Up to +2
Graduate
Marital status
Married
Unmarried
Land holding
Landless
42
n=110
26.4
30.0
23.6
20.0
64
46
58.2
41.8
22
41
28
19
20.0
37.3
25.5
17.3
73
37
66.4
33.6
79
71.8
19
12
17.3
10.9
64
46
58.2
41.8
63
47
57.3
42.7
74
36
67.3
32.7
Characteristics
Kind of container for storing cleaning agents
Preparation of cleaning agents at home
Benefits of preparing cleaning agents at home
Cost effectiveness
Kind of utensil used for mixing caustic soda
Stirrer to be used for mixing ingredients
Kind of utensil used for mixing raw ingredients
Avoidance of mixing ingredients barehanded
Precautions for longer shelf life
Multipurpose use of cleaning agents
Rank
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Characteristics
Preparation of cleaning agents at home
Kind of utensil used for mixing caustic soda
Kind of utensil used for mixing raw ingredients
Stirrer to be used for mixing ingredients
Avoidance of mixing ingredients barehanded
Kind of container for storing cleaning agents
Benefits of preparing cleaning agents at home
Cost effectiveness
Precautions for longer shelf life
Multipurpose use of cleaning agents
n=110
Pre evaluation
frequency
31
14
3
11
66
23
17
-
Post evaluation
frequency
110
110
110
99
108
110
110
103
108
108
Gain in knowledge
(%)
71.8
87.3
97.3
80.0
98.2
40.0
79.1
78.2
98.2
98.2
43
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00058.6
44
Degree of
freedom
2
153
155
M.S.
F-ratio
x1
x2
x1/x 2
Gross returns
Average per family
Percentage
Gross returns
Average per family
Percentage
Gross returns
Average per family
Percentage
45
Kaur et al
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Technology adoption is a double edged
sword. On one hand, it entails a cost to the farmer
producer, while on the other hand it leads to higher
production, productivity and in turn, to higher
returns. Income of the selected farm holdings in
three categories has been presented in table 1.
The net income in bullock operated farms was
Rs.8,23,710 in the year 2007-08 (Table 1). The
maximum proportion of net income in this
category was found to be contributed by
miscellaneous items like remittances received from
family members serving outside (67 % ),extra farm
income (16 %),sale of fuel produced on the farm
(5 %),sale of manure (2.5 %) as well as other
income sources like running shops etc. Income
from farm cultivation was the second major source
(35 %) of net income with average of Rs.72,018
annum/household. Imputed income from interest
on capital other than land has emerged at the third
position (11 %).Out of this interest income 57 per
cent is on imputed value of buildings for
residence, bullocks and milch cattle and 21 per
cent on amount invested on wells and tube wells,
respectively. The income arising from milk
production was merely Rs. 840 household/annum.
On the whole, average income from different
sources comes to be Rs.2,05,927 household/
annum in this category of holdings.
In second category of semi-mechanized farm
holdings the net income from various sources
comes to be Rs.2,02,58,98 per annum and the
average income per family was Rs.2,66,56 per
annum in 2007-08. The maximum proportion of
net income was contributed by farm cultivation
(58 %). The second major source of income was
the interest imputed on capital assets other than
land i.e. 26 per cent. Amongst this source,
proportion of imputed interest was on buildings
(76.8%), milch cattle (9.2%), value of wells and
tube wells (11.2%) and implements used on the
farm (2.7%). In this category also milk production
has not emerged as a major source of income i.e.
Rs 4,104 per household per annum.
In the third category of mechanized farm
holdings, farm cultivation was found to be
contributing maximum proportion of net income
i.e. 64 per cent of total in 2007-08. Interest on
capital assets was the second major source of
46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total
Bullock operated
Av. expenditure Percentage
/family
Food
63,711
40.5
Fuel
7,008
4.5
Clothing
8,396
5.3
Housing
16,350
10.4
Lighting
2,333
1.5
Medicine
21,605
13.7
Traveling
3,642
2.3
Education
3,245
2.1
Religion
1,353
0.9
Social
15,500
9.9
Amusement &
8,468
5.4
luxuries
Misc.
5,486
3.5
Total
1,57,097
100.0
8,505
1,56,085
5.5
100.0
9,699
2,18,234
4.4
100.0
Table 3. Area operated and net income of cultivators in three categories of technology adoption.
Particulars
Bullock operated
Area held
Gross income
Expenditure
Net returns
(ha)
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
Gross returns
7.68
823710
308511
515199
Average per family
1.92
205927
77128
128799
Semi mechanized holdings
Gross returns
189.59
20258986
4972441
15286545
Average per family
2.49
266566
65427
201139
Mechanized holdings
Gross returns
405.56
32229982
16633402
15596580
Average per family
5.34
424079
218860
205219
47
Kaur et al
Table 4.Recommended dietary allowances and consumption of major food items in selected farm holdings in
punjab (g/head/d).
Particulars
Average intake 2007-08
Recommended
Bullock
SemiMechanized
Dietary
operated
mechanized
Allowance
Cereals
Pulses
Milk and milk products
Oil and ghee
Sugar
Meat
Salt
402
39
690
38
101
02
10
416
33
810
26
97
02
8
424
40
894
37
101
02
8
350
50
150
20
30
30
6
Table 5. Analysis of variance of different parameters among the categories of farmers based on technology
adoption.
(Rs.)
Parameters
Bullock
SemiMechanized
F Ratio
operated
mechanized
Income from farm cultivation (1)
Income from milk production (2)
Total farm income (1+2)
Interest on capital (3)
Miscellaneous (4)
Non farm Income (3+4)
Area held
Farm Exp
Family Size
Food Exp
Non food Exp
Total Exp
%age Food Exp
%age non food Exp
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
72,018.5
65,368.39
840.25
1,680.5
72,858.75
65,705.12
21,926.75
9,421.22
11,1142
1,40,130.6
1,33,068.8
1,44,348.5
1.92
0.84857
77127.75
26497.13
6.75
2.363
63,711.5
11,810.99
9,33,855
52,135.08
15,097
48,822.61
44
16.19
56
16.19
1,53,296.1
91,660.73
4,103.82
7,126.58
1,56,300.2
91,723.87
67,990.68
39,401.03
41,175.03
78,059.67
1,09,165.7
91,358.32
2.49
1.22226
65,426.86
82,934.09
5.95
2.274
55,210.57
15,137.51
1,11,567.6
98,970.94
1,66,778.1
10,0183
36.67
9.78
63.33
9.78
2,69,061.58 19.187**
1,50,040.143
4,946.61
0.949 NS
5,914.57
2,74,008.18 19.564**
1,50,000.14
1,05,853.99 21.983**
41,662.39
44,216.42
1.316 NS
86,869.34
1,50,070.41
3.367*
1,00,463.23
5.34
46.455**
2.35706
2,18,866.55 122.374**
97,735.88
6.76
1.879 NS
2.943
72,573.75
10.480**
29,670.24
1,42,107.17
2.763 NS
69,201.17
2,14,680.92
5.650**
80,044.49
35.5
1.161 NS
12.43
64.5
1.161 NS
12.43
49
Kaur et al
Devadarshini Chitropala, Mundiamni S M and Kastriba B (2009).
Nutritional Adequacy of Diets: A case study of UAS Ladies
Hostel, Proceedings, National Seminars on Food Security
and Sustainability in India, GAD Institute of Development
Studies, Amritsar: 351-353
Received on 1/8/2014
50
Accepted on 22/3/2015
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00059.8
51
Table 1. Knowledge level of the dairy farmers about improved dairy farming.
Sr. No Parameter
11
22
33
34
35
6
Figures
52
Low
9(15.0)
7(11.7)
9(15.0)
11(18.3)
13(21.7)
10(16.6)
Knowledge level
Medium
48(80.0)
48(80.0)
47(78.3)
44(73.3)
43(71.7)
46(76.7)
High
3(5.0)
5(8.3)
4(6.7)
5(8.3)
4(6.6)
4(6.7)
Subash et al
cent, 51.7 per cent and 50.0 per cent farmers,
respectively. Pregnancy diagnosis at right time
and identification of heat symptoms helps to
reduce inter calving period and also reduce the
mortality rates in young ones. These findings were
in the line with the findings of Fulzele et al (1995),
Sah et al (2003). Information regarding high
yielding breeds of cattle, gestation period, breeding
heifer and castration of scrub bulls were some
what needed by 43.3, 46.7, 38.3, 45.0 per cent of
the respondents, respectively.
Information needs on nutrition and feeding
The results clearly showed that the majority
of the respondents (60.0%) expressed mostly
needed information on feeding schedule followed
by, formulation of balanced ration (51.7%). It is
may be due to the reason that farmers would like
to know more about efficient feeding and
preparation of feeds at their disposal. Most of the
respondents expressed they mostly need
information on; by pass nutrient technology
(53.3%), complete feed block (48.3%), complete
feed (41.7%), Information regarding calf starter
(48.3%) and Information regarding mineral
mixture (46.7%). About 36.7 percent of the
respondents expressed their needs as some what
needed regarding Colostrum feeding to new born
calf. It could be due to the reason that there is
shortage of good quality and balanced nutrient
enriched feed; therefore to improve the production
of milk they require information on all the areas
of nutrition and feeding.
Information needs on fodder production
management
It was observed that majority of the
respondents (53.3%) expressed most needed
information on round the year fodder production
plan followed by 38.3 per cent of the respondents
mostly needed information on conservation of
green fodder like silage and hay making, while
45.0 per cent of the respondents some what
needed information on fodder crops cultivation
practices. It is because of the reason that, unlike
food crops, farmers were not well informed and
advised on fodder cultivation practices by the
field extension functionaries. This lack of
information on fodder production leads green
fodder scarcity in many areas and thus results in
53
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
67
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
Subash et al
the importance of carrying out such information
need assessment and prioritization studies
especially well before developing any ICT based
module for the benefit of farmers. The study also
proves that the involvement of farmers at the
development stage of ICT module preparation
would be extremely useful for its development as
well as its implementation amongst the intended
end users.
REFERENCES
55
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00060.4
56
57
Sr.
No.
1.
2.
3.
Item
Difficulty Discrimination
Index
Index
80.76*
0.11*
65.38*
0.69*
23.07*
0.34*
Bio control agent used for the control of paddy blast is ____( Trichoderma)
How do we apply Trichoderma ____?(Seed treatment )
What is the quantity of Trichoderma used for seed treatment is ______?
(10g/kg seed)
4.
The quantity of Trichoderma used as seedling root dip is____ g/l of
water (20g/l)
5.
Pseudomonas is used against for the control of ___? (Bacterial Leaf Blight)
6.
How can we apply Pseudomonas_________? (Seed treatment)
7.
The quantity of Pseudomonas used for seed treatment is _______g/kg seed
(10 g/kg )
8.
What is the quantity of Pseudomonas used as root dip of seedlings is
______ g/l of water (250g/750ml)
9.
The quantity of Pseudomonas used as foliar is_______? g/l of water (20g/l)
10. Foliar spray of Pseudomonas is applied at the age of_______? (30-45 DAT)
11. Beauveria is used for the control of ______? (Leaf roller )
12. The quantity of Beauveria used ________? (20g/l)
13. Trichogramma cards are used for the control of ______? (Stem borer)
14. How many Tricho cards or pieces are to be placed in an acre of rice
fields _____? (5cc/ha)
15. Pheromone traps are used effectively for the control of _______?
(Yellow stem borer)
16. How many Pheromone traps are to be placed in an acre of rice fields_____ ?
( 8/acre)
17. Mention one organic manure used in rice fields ________ (FYM)
18. What is the quantity of organic manure that has to be applied in rice
fields___? (5 t/ha)
19. What do we apply to the soil when it is acidic_____? (Lime)
20. What is the quantity of lime that has to be applied to a hectare/acre/cent
___? (600 kg/ha)
21. Name one green-leaf manure used in rice cultivation _____? (Daincha)
22. Mention any one natural enemy of insects commonly seen in rice
fields____?(Spider)
23. What is the use of summer ploughing in rice fields ______? ( To kill insects)
24. Why do we plaster and trim the bunds in the rice fields _____?
( To kill grasshopper)
25. When should be the Trichogramma released in rice fields ____? (30DAT)
26. What should be the frequency of the release of Trichogramma ____?
(7 days interval)
27. Name a botanical pesticide effectively used in rice___? (Neem)
28. Name a natural enemy commonly seen ___?(Damson fly)
29. What is the insect-pest against which passing of rope is effective in the control
of _____? (Leaf folder)
30. How do we apply Bauveria ______? (Foliar spray)
31. Which of the following enhances the fertilizer use efficiency in rice___?
(PGPR)
32. Light traps are used for monitoring ___? (Stem borer and leaf folder )
33. The distance to be maintained for placing each Pheromone traps is_______?
(60mt)
34. Which is the major natural enemy of rodent population in rice fields___? (Snake)
35. Name a microbial formulation effective against many diseases in rice__? (Bacillus)
*Mark indicates the items that are retained for the final study
58
57.69*
0.11*
34.61*
15.38
19.23
0.23*
0.11
0
26.92
61.53
7.69
34.61
61.53*
69.23*
61.53*
-0.11
0.11
-0.11
0.46*
0.34*
0.34*
61.53*
0.46*
19.23
-0.11
96.15
53.84*
0.11
0.11*
92.30
38.46*
0.23
0.34*
96.15
76.92*
0.11
0.34*
80.76*
57.69*
0.34*
0.11*
11.53
34.61
-0.23
-0.11
80.76*
61.53*
57.69*
0.34*
0.11*
0.57*
76.92*
73.07*
0.23*
0.237*
46.15*
19.23
0.34*
0.23
96.15
30.76*
0.11
0.23*
CONCLUSION
The test developed was scientifically tested
for its validity and hence, it can be very well used
to measure the knowledge level of farmers on ecofriendly farm technologies related to rice farming
in similar micro level conditions with necessary
59
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00061.6
60
Prajapati et al
Table 1. Effect of using Ovsynch technique on conception rate in cross bred cows.
Type of Animals
Repeat breeding Cross bred cows
By using Ovsynch technique
No. of
Animals
20
20
First Service
30 % (n=6)
30.0
Overall
55% (11/20)
60.0
61
62
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00062.8
63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
64
Cluster bean
Dolichos bean
Bitter guard
Ridge guard
Ladies finger
Radish
Chillies
Brinjal
Tomato
Amaranthus
Palak
Mesta
Quantity of
seed
distributed
(g/each)
150
150
50
50
50
35
16
16
10
50
100
100
20
25
23
15
12
20 bunches
15 bunches
20 bunches
20 bunches
10 bunches
20 bunches
10 bunches
20 bunches
20 bunches
Sudha Rani et al
20 per cent of the women were illiterate, 37 per
cent were having elementary education.
Maximum of 43 per cent women having higher
school education. As the sample consisted of all
categories of women, a nonformal approach of
nutrition education and intervention may be more
suitable.
Occupation
Of the selected sample, all were engaged in
agriculture and allied occupation, which fell under
the category of moderate work.
Monthly Family Income
The selected participants were from low
income group. Variations were observed among
subjects in their monthly earnings, 33 per cent of
the respondents were earning monthly income
between Rs.4,001-5,000/-. Twenty five per cent
of families were earning monthly income between
Rs.5,001 to 7,000/- Majority of the families i.e.,
42 per cent of the families were earning below
Rs. 4,000/-. Another observation on family type
was that the joint families tend to be better off
socio-economically due to more number of
economic supporters compared to nuclear families.
Nutrition knowledge of the women
Nutrition education is the pre-requisition for
improving the nutritional status among all age
groups. The nutrition education component helps
to develop skills for proper utilization of available
food resources. Although nutrition education is a
slow process, it can bring long term benefits.
Nutrition education through intervention
programmes were given to women, programmes
consisted of regular contacts with the beneficiaries,
lectures,
group
discussions,
method
demonstrations etc., to encourage categories.
Pre and post test measures of Knowledge,
Attitude and Practice (KAP) on nutrition aspects
from women were collected. The results revealed
Sr. No.
1.
2.
3.
S.
No.
1.
2.
Gender
Male
Female
Children
Total
Total Number
34
42
Boys
23
Girls
19
121
Percentage
30.5
34.7
19.0
15.7
3.
Educational level
Illiterates
Elementary school
education
High school education
No.of
subjects
6
11
Percentage
(%)
20
37
13
43
65
66
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00063.X
Block
Nadala
Dhilwan
Sultanpur
Kapurthala
Total
No. of farmers
surveyed
30
60
50
60
200
Area covered
(ha)
73
98
130
151
452
67
Manan et al
Table 2. Diversity in wheat cultivation.
Block
Nadala
Dhilwan
Sultanpur
Kapurthala
Overall
33.3
37.5
34.2
25.0
37.8
40.0
40.0
34.3
35.0
38.8
Block
Nadala
Dhilwan
Sultanpur
Kapurthala
Overall
68
Seed
drill
31.5
35.0
30.0
37.2
34.2
40.5
39.4
36.0
37.9
Zero till
drill
20.0
33.0
34.1
36.9
32.3
Block
Nadala
Dhilwan
Sultanpur
Kapurthala
Overall
< 95
37.5
37.5
> 105
35.0
29.4
39.0
36.6
Recommendation
Tilt application @ 500g/ha
Seed treatment with Vitavax
power @ 3.0 g/kg seed
Application
Not applied
Applied
Followed
Not followed
Yield (q/ha)
33.8
34.6
34.4
33.3
69
Manan et al
Table 6. Effect of fertilizer application on wheat grain yield.
Recommendation
Fertilizer applied after soil testing
Basal application of urea
Quantity of DAP applied
Adoption
Not applied
Applied
Not applied
Applied
< 137.5 kg/ha
>137.5 kg/ha
Block
Nadala
Dhilwan
Sultanpur
Kapurthala
Overall
Economics
53.7
50.8
58.6
53.2
53.8
Per cent
decrease in
2014-15
44.1
33.9
42.3
28.3
36.0
Block
Nadala
Dhilwan
Sultanpur
Kapurthala
Distt. overall
70
% Farmers
95.8
4.2
83.3
16.7
67.7
32.3
% Area covered
97.4
2.6
81.0
19.0
61.6
38.4
Yield (q/ha)
34.1
35.4
34.9
35.0
33.8
35.0
B:C ratio
0.59
0.63
0.65
0.74
0.59
71
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00064.1
72
S.
Characteristics
No.
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Age
Young (18-30 years)
Lower middle (31-45 years)
Upper middle (46-60 years)
Education
Illiterate
Primary
Secondary
Higher secondary
College
Family type
Joint
Nuclear
Marital status
Married
Unmarried
Widow
Divorced
Occupation
Agriculture
Labour
Service
Home makers
Income
Low
Medium
High
Land
Landless
Marginal
Small
Large
Herd Size ( Number)
Small (2-3)
Medium (4-10)
Big (Above 11)
N=150
No.
Percentage
28
99
23
18.6
66.0
15.3
25
39
42
34
10
16.6
26.0
28.0
22.6
6.6
77
73
51.3
48.6
119
14
11
6
79.3
9.3
7.3
4.0
91
17
6
36
60.6
11.3
4.0
24.0
77
58
15
51.3
38.6
10.0
17
53
48
22
11.3
35.3
32.0
14.6
77
40
33
51.3
26.6
22.0
73
Kulvir Kaur
Table 2. Distribution of respondents on the basis of their participation in dairy farming. N=150
Frequency
Percentage
10
52
56
127
135
137
57
140
146
57
18
6.6
34.6
37.3
84.6
90.0
91.3
38.0
93.3
97.3
38.0
12.0
133
107
143
140
87
88.6
71.3
95.3
93.3
58.0
126
46
98
148
83
78
25
84.0
30.6
65.3
98.6
55.3
52.0
16.6
97
111
64.6
74.0
122
40
18
81.3
26.6
12.0
75
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00065.3
76
Table 1. Nutrient composition of mountain crops and other cereals. (Per 100 g edible portion)
Crop
Wheat
Rice
Maize
Amaranths
Buck wheat
Finger millet
Protein (g)
11.3
6.8
11.1
17.9
15.3
7.7
Fat(g)
1.6
3.6
1.9
4.2
1.5
CHO (g)
69.7
78.2
66.2
58.9
58.7
72.6
Nutritional value
Fibre (g)
Iron(mg.)
1.5
2.0
0.2
2.7
9.6
10.4
18.0
15.3
3.6
7.4
Ca (mg.)
38.1
10.0
9.3
430.1
64.0
340.0
Minerals (g)
1.5
0.7
1.5
3.1
4.1
2.7
77
Chanderkanta Vats
Table 2. Nutritional composition of Mountain crops supplemented to wheat (40:60) for different culinary products (Per 100
g edible Portion)
Supplementation
100% Wheat
40:60 (Amaraths:Wheat)
40:60(Buck-wheat:wheat)
40 :60(Fingermillet: Wheat
CHO(g)
69.70
65.37
65.18
70.74
Nutritional value
Protein (g) Fat(g) Dietary Fiber Iron(mg.) Ca (mg.) Minerals (g)
11.34
1.57
1.50
2.01
38.07
1.50
13.97
1.71
4.74
5.37
194.95
2.14
12.93
2.60
8.10
7.33
48.44
2.54
9.88
1.54
2.34
4.17
158.84
1.98
Supplementation
Nutritional value
Wheat(100%)
Wheat: Amarathus(80:20)
Wheat:Buck wheat(80:20)
Wheat:Finger millet(80:20)
Protein (g)
9.07
10.25
9.70
8.48
Fat(g)
9.27
9.27
9.57
12.56
CHO(g)
65.60
62.54
57.51
64.21
Iron (mg)
1.60
3.52
4.17
2.47
Minerals(g)
1.20
1.45
1.61
1.39
Taste
4.10
3.80
4.40
3.80
4.02
0.26
NS
Overall Acceptance
4.30
3.90
4.40
3.80
4.10
0.21
NS
Ratio
Wheat(100%)
Wheat: Amarathus(80:20)
Wheat:Buck wheat(80:20)
Wheat: Finger millet (80:20)
Mean
SE+
CD
Color
4.20
4.30
4.40
3.90
4.20
0.25
NS
Flavor
4.00
3.80
4.40
3.70
3.97
0.23
NS
79
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00066.5
80
Villages
Bhullar
Buttar Sharinh
Kothe Dashmesh
Lalbai 1
Lalbai 2
pH (1:2)
8.6
8.7
9.1
8.5
8.7
EC (dS m-1 )
0.40
0.35
1.17
0.27
0.36
OC (%)
0.48
0.58
0.44
0.53
0.43
P (kg/ha)
24.6
23.2
20.5
24.3
22.3
K (kg/ha)
235.2
532.0
148.3
199.0
130.6
Soil Texture
Loam
Sandy loam
Loamy sand
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
81
Sandhu et al
Table 2. Grain yield, economics and benefit-cost ratio of different demonstrations.
Village Name
B:C
Ratio
5.91:1
4.83:1
5.04:1
5.84:1
6.81:1
5.64:1
Cost
(Rs/ha)
19,600
24,300
23,850
19,750
20,300
21,560
B:C
Ratio
7.14:1
5.29:1
4.99:1
6.44:1
7.41:1
6.17:1
83
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00067.7
84
Month
June
July
August
September
October
Temperature-2013
Temperature-2014
Min.
Max.
Minimum Maximum
Temp.(c) Temp.(c) Temp.(c) Temp.(c)
29.2
44.3
25.5
43.2
29.9
42.5
26.5
44.6
29.1
40.6
25.7
41.5
29.1
39.3
24.8
38.5
30.0
38.8
22.3
37.2
Humidity (%)
2013
2014
(Max)
(Max)
85.3
84.4
86.0
88.1
87.6
89.4
87.8
89.9
89.2
88.6
Rainfall(mm)
2013
2014
20.2
73.6
144.3
98.2
3.1
19.9
83.3
155.1
104.4
2.9
85
Singh et al
Table 2. Soil status of the experimental plots.
Replication
pH
ECe(d Sm-1)
OC(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
5.72
5.97
5.81
5.80
5.97
5.90
5.73
5.88
5.76
6.03
0.17
0.16
0.19
0.26
0.24
0.31
0.21
0.29
0.31
0.25
0.59
0.61
0.67
0.32
0.12
0.74
0.68
0.58
0.53
0.50
272.0
291.0
300.0
211.0
159.0
318.0
301.0
251.0
239.0
226.0
P
(kg/ha)
421.2
22.9
22.85
13.71
27.42
13.71
9.14
13.71
22.85
31.99
K
116.48
176.5
64.96
72.8
99.6
96.3
94.0
90.7
87.3
181.4
Table-3. Vegetative and reproductive characters of early Cauliflower var. Sabour Agrim (pooled 2013 and 2014)
Treatments
T1 -Farmers Practice
T2 Transplanting on 1st July
T3 - Transplanting on 15th July
T4- Transplanting on 30th July
C.D.
CV
S E Diff.
86
Marketable
Curd
Plant
Curd
curd weight
length
height
diameter
(g)
(cm)
(cm)
(cm)
Farmers do not cultivate Early Cauliflower in this period.
308.0
10.8
56.9
11.0
430.9
13.4
67.3
15.6
372.2
11.9
62.3
12.6
18.3
1.3
3.2
1.2
5.3
11.7
5.5
9.4
8.7
0.6
1.5
0.6
Yield of
marketable
curd(q/ha)
123.4
223.5
155.5
9.0
5.7
4.3
Treatment
T1-Farmers practice
T2 Transplanting on 1st July
T3 - Transplanting on 15th July
T4- Transplanting on 30th July
Gross income
Net return
B:C ratio
(Rs./ha)
(Rs./ha)
Farmer do not cultivate early cauliflower in this period.
145200.00
76645.00
2.11
268800.00
187820.00
3.31
187200.00
111525.00
2.50
agronomic practices.
REFERENCES
Ajith kumar B and Savani M B (2007). Phasic development model
for Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) using thermal
indices. J Agromet 9 (2): 231-235.
Ara N, Kaisar M O, Khalequzzman K M, Kohinoor H and
Ahamed K U( 2009). Effect of different dates of planting and
lines on the growth, yield and yield contributing characteristics
of Cauliflower. J Soil Nat 3(1): 16-19.
BingLiang W, Min X and JiaShu C ( 2005). Effect of seeding
date and cultivars on plant growth and abnormal curd in early
Cauliflower. Chin Veg 5: 13-15.
Gill H S and Sharma S R (1996). Cole crops. In: Paroda, R. S.
and Chadha, K. L. (eds.), 50 Years of Crop Science Research
in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi,
pp. 635-645.
Jana J C and Mukhopadhyay T P (2006). Effect of sowing dates
and varieties on growth and curd yield of Cauliflower in terai
zone of West Bengal. Orissa J Hort 34(1): 45-48.
Muhammad Din, Muhammad Qasim, Noor Elahi Jan and
Faridullah(2007).Response of Different Sowing Dates on the
growth and Yield of Cauliflower Sarhad J Agric 23 (2):289292.
Srivastava P, Srivastava B K and Singh M P ( 2002). Effect of
date of planting and growing environment on the plant survival,
growth and yield of early Cauliflower in rainy season. Veg Sci
29 (2): 157-160.
87
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00068.9
88
Year
Parameter
2012-13
Average milk yield per animal
2013-14
Average milk yield per animal
2014-15
Average milk yield per animal
Pooled of three years
Average milk yield per animal
Values in rows are significance at P < 0.01
Control
10.50 0.96
12.30 0.59
12.10 0.48
11.63 0.59
Treatment group
10.90 1.02
12.91 0.63
12.80 0.40
12.20 0.62
Significance
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
control
3.91 0.43
4.01 0.24
3.81 0.34
3.91 0.25
Treatment group
4.31 0.36
4.33 0.26
4.10 0.30
4.23 0.21
Significance
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Year
Parameter
2012-13
Average fat percentage per animal
2013-14
Average fat percentage per animal
2014-15
Average fat percentage per animal
Pooled of three years
Average fat percentage per animal
Values in rows are significance at P < 0.01
Table 3. Effect of supplementation of bypass fat on milk yield (kg).
Particulars
Milk
Milk
Milk
Milk
Milk
Milk
Milk
yield
yield
yield
yield
yield
yield
yield
Bypass fat
Control
Treatment
15.51
18.88
17.57
18.65
9.49
10.68
11.40
13.18
17.80
19.00
11.17
12.04
20.42
21.55
Increase in MY
Kg
(%)
3.37
21.7
1.08
6.2
1.19
12.5
1.78
15.6
1.20
6.8
0.87
7.8
1.13
5.5
References
Naik et al. (2009)
Tyagi et al. (2009)
Thakur and Shelke (2010)
Sirohi et al. (2010)
Gowda et al. (2011)
Parnerkar et al. (2011)
Wadhwa et al. (2012)
89
90
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00069.0
91
Das et al
content, diastase activity, apparent sugar content,
and water insoluble solids content. These criteria
help the food analyst to determine the chemical
quality of the honeys analyzed (Cantarelli et al,
2008).
Stingless bees are small just few mm in length.
The resident species nest among boulders, old
walls, dead trees and tree cavities and are widely
distributed in tropical and sub temperate region
of the world (Kumar et al, 2012). In rural West
Garo Hills, the tribal (Garos) people have learnt
about the occurrence and behaviour of the local
bee species over the years from their ancestors.
The beekeepers of this region collect the bees
(colonies) from undisturbed branches of trees or
crevices found naturally in forests and hive the
colonies in the wooden boxes or earthen pots.
Therefore, the study was initiated to analyse the
nutrient contents in the honey produced by
stingless bees in West Garo Hills of Meghalaya,
India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
The study was conducted from January to
December, 2013 in the West Garo Hills district
located in Meghalaya which is situated at Northeastern part of India. The area experience a warm
climatic which encourages great bio-diversity
giving great potential for human manipulation and
management. The rainy season extends from April
to September with highest rainfall usually
recorded in August. The mean annual rainfall is
4851.48 mm. with average maximum and
minimum temperatures of 24.53 0C and 19.570 C
, respectively. The area is between 90 to 1418 m
above sea level.
Sample Collection and Preparation
Twenty samples of locally produced raw
honey (200g each) were collected from local
honey producer (HS-1 to HS-20). The collected
samples were analyzed at the Food Processing and
Preservation Department, Polytechnique Institute,
Tura, Meghalaya.
Moisture Content, pH, TSS and Acidity
The moisture content of the honey samples
was estimated by the oven drying method and the
92
Sr.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Parameter
Unit
Moisture content
%
Ash
%
Water Insoluble Solid
%
pH
TSS
%
Conductivity
S/cm
Acidity
%
Hydroxymethyl furfural mg/kg
Indian Standards
Not > 25 % by mass
Not > 0.5 % by mass
Not < 65 % by mass
Not > 0.2% by mass
Not > 80 mg/kg
World Honey
Standards*
18-23
0.25-1.0
0.1
3.2-4.5
60-70
50
-
Source: 1. Indian Standards- Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, 2010. Ministry of Health & Family
Welfare, Govt. of India
2. World Honey Standards- Kinati et al (2011)
93
Das et al
as world standards for all of the tested parameters
except for ash content materials which was below
the standard limit. These samples were marked to
be safe for human consumption. Usually the
honey of stingless bees is used for home
consumption by the Garo tribe. The results shows
the potential of the honey of this area is very high
for export. The range of ash content material could
easily be brought within the standard range by
changing month and season of harvesting. Hence,
it can be concluded that with some small
intervention from the technical experts as well as
the Government , the honey of the region has a
tremendous potential to catch the export market
leading to better earning of the local tribes as well
as improving their livelihood.
REFERENCES
Acquarone C, Buera P and Elizalde B (2007). Pattern of pH and
electrical conductivity upon honey dilution as a complementary
tool for discriminating geographical origin of honeys. In Food
Chemistry 101, Pp. 695703.
Aloisi P A (2010). Determination of quality Chemicals of Honey
from Chubut (Argentinean patagonia). Chilean J Agril
Res70(4) :640-645
Cantarelli M A, Pellerano R G, Marchevsky E J and Camina, J M
(2008). Quality of honey from Argentna: study of chemical
composition and trace elements. In The Journal of the
Argentine Chemical Society 96 (1-2),Pp. 33-41.
Codex Alimentarius Commission Standards (2001). Codex
Standards for Sugars. FOA/ WHO official food standards,
rvision 2.
Duthil A (1983). Behaviour of quality indices of Cuban honey
after extraction. Apiculture Abstract, 98 (10): 366-372.
Elif Sari and Nusret Ayyildiz (2012). Biological Activities and
Some Physicochemical Properties of Sunflower Honeys
Collected from the Thrace Region of Turkey. Pakistan J
Biological Sci. 15(23): Pp 1102-1110.
Emarah M L, Missoten and Khalaf M A (1997) .The use of bee
honey in the treatment of external eye diseases. International
Symposium on Apitheropy, National Research Centre, Cairo,
Egypt.
Finola M S, Lasagno M C and Marioli J M (2007). Microbiological
and chemical characterization of honeys from central
Argentina. In Food Chemistry vol. 100, Pp. 1649-1653.
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (2010). Ministry
of Health & Family Welfare,Govt. of India,FDA
Bhawan,Kotla Road, New Delhi- 110002
Gairola A, Tiwari P and Tiwari J K (2013). Physico-Chemical
Properties of Apis cerana- indica F. honey from Uttarkashi
district of Uttarkhand,India. J Global Bioscience 11(2): Pp.2025.
94
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00070.7
Short Communication
95
Bhattacharjee et al
Table1. Performance of one self help group unit.
Average
production per
SHG unit
100-130
Product / Month
Average
production
cost /SHG unit
(in Rs.)
Rs-1200/Month
Average price
of the Product
in the market
where sold (Rs.)
Rs 150/product
Average
income
/ SHG unit)
C:B ratio
Rs-17,500/month
1:1.46
Rs-66,000/-
Decorative material
Sofa Set
97
2.
(Surname)
(First Name)
Membership Category (Please tick one)
For 1 year Rs.1000/- 3 years Rs.2500/-
3.
Designation
4.
Date of Birth
6.
DD
MM
Organization currently attached to
7.
5 years Rs.3500/-
City
State
Phone Off.
Res.
E-mail
8.
9.
Academic Qualifications
Degree
(Middle Name)
5.
Year
Sex
Pin Code
Country
Fax
Institution
Year
10.
Mode of Payment
Demand Draft/ Cash______________ dated_________ for Rs.________ favoring Treasurer,
Society of Krishi Vigyan, Payable at Ludhiana and/or
Funds Can Be Transferred Electronically In Societys Saving Account No.29380100008424 In
Bank Of Baroda, Ludhiana and The IFSC Code of the Branch is BARBOPAULUD.
Please complete this form, and mail to:
Dr Tanmay Samajdar, Secretary, Society of Krishi Vigyan,
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Garo Hills, District Tura, Meghalaya (India)
E-mail: secretarykvk2011@gmail.com
Call 09872745890
please
contact
the
editorial
office
at
Manuscript preparation
Language: Papers must be written in English. The text and all supporting materials must use UK
spelling conventions. It is up to the authors to make sure there are no typographical errors in the
manuscript.
Typescript: Manuscripts must be typed in Microsoft Word, using Times New Roman font at 12 points,
double spaced on one side of A4 size bond paper with 2.5 cm margin on all sides. All pages should be
numbered consecutively in the right corner on the top. Indent new paragraphs.
Words: Papers should not normally exceed up to 8000 words for review articles; 4000 words for
original full length papers and 1500 words for short communications.
Headings: Main Headings - Major headings are centered, all capitals, boldface in Times New Roman
font at 12 points, and consist of ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND MATHODS,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (optional) and
REFERENCES.
First subheadings are placed in a separate line, begin at the left margin, and are in italics. Text that
follows should be in a new paragraph.
Second Subheadings should begin with the first line of a paragraph, indented and in italic. The text
follows immediately after the second subheading.
Contents: The contents must be arranged in an orderly way with suitable headings for each subsection.
The recommended subdivision of contents is as follows:Running head: The running head or short title of not more than 50 characters, in title case and
centered should be placed above the main title of the study.
Title: The title must be informative and brief. The initials and name of the author(s), the address of the
host institution where the work was done must follow the title.
Superscripts (1,2,3) should be used in cases where authors are from different institutions. The
superscript # should be appended to the author to whom correspondence should be addressed, and
indicated as such together with an e-mail address in the line immediately following the keywords. The
present postal address of authors, if currently different from that of the host institution should also be
superscripted appropriately and inserted in the lines following the key words.
Abstracts: It must summarize the major objectives, methods, results, conclusions, and practical
applications of the study conducted. The Abstract must consist of complete sentences and use of
abbreviations should be limited.
Keywords: The Abstract is followed by three to five keywords from the title to be used for subject
indexing. These should be singular (e.g. paper, not papers). The abstract, including key words should
be separated by horizontal lines places before and after the text.
Introduction: This should include a statement of why the subject under investigation is considered to
be of importance, a concise indication of the status quo of published work in this field and a declaration
of the aims of the experiment or study i.e. the hypothesis.
Materials and Methods: These should be concise but of sufficient detail to enable the experiment to
be replicated by an outside party. Particular care should be taken to ensure that the appropriate
statistical analyses have been carried out. Specify the design used, factors tested or the statistical
model employed. Non significant differences (P> 0.05) should not be discussed.
Results and Discussion: Results and discussion should be combined to avoid repetition. It should be
presented in a logical sequence in the text, tables and figures. The repetitive presentation of the same
data in different forms should be avoided. The discussion should consider the results in relation to any
hypotheses advanced in the Introduction and place the study in the context of other work.
Conclusion: The conclusion should consist of a short integration of results that refer directly to the
stated aims of the experiment and a statement on the practical implications of the results.
Acknowledgements (optional): A brief and formal acknowledgment section, if desired, should follow
the conclusion statement. Do not include titles of persons; such as Dr., Mr., or Ms., use only initials
and surnames.
References: The existing relevant literature restricted to those with a direct bearing upon the findings
must be appropriately cited.
References appearing in the text References in the text should be given as : Sharma and Rao
(1983). Use nd and not &. A reference by three or more authors should be identified in the text
only by the first author followed by et al (in italic) and the year.
Where several references are quoted consecutively in the text, the order should be chronological or,
within a year, alphabetical (by first author or, if necessary, by first and second author(s).
Where references are made to several papers by the same author(s) in the same year, the year should
be followed by a, b, c, etc.
Personal communications and unpublished work should be cited in the text only and not in the reference
list, giving the initials, name: for example (M. S. Gill, unpublished), (M.S. Gill, personal
communication).
References to internet sites should be quoted in the normal way in the text e.g. FDA (2008). In the
reference list, the full URL must be given, followed by the date that the website was assessed.
References appearing in reference section : All publications cited in the text should be presented in
the list under Reference section, in alphabetical order. The title of the article should be given in the
reference and journals name should be cited in italic as abbreviated by the journal. It is the full
responsibility of the authors to cross check reference in the text of the article with those in the list of
references. In all cases, a reference must provide sufficient information to enables the reader to locate
it.
Examples of references (Hanging indent 1 cm)
For journals/periodicals
Mufeed S (1998). Evaluating employee performance: A successful instrument for human resource
development. Indian J Trg and Dev 28 (2): 72-93.
For books
AOAC (1980). Official Methods of Analysis. 13th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Washington, DC.
For Chapters in book
Barnabas A P and Lakshmiswaramma M (1980). Assessment of Evaluation system for Rural
development. In: Monitoring and Evaluation of Rural Development: Some Asian Experiences.
(eds Kuldeep Mathu and Inayatulloah) Kuala Lumpur U.N. Asian and Pacific Development Centre.
Pp: 121-22.
Bray R A (1994). The leucaena psylid. In: Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture
Gutteridge and H M Shelton). CAB International, Oxford. Pp. 283-91.
(eds. R C
Designation