1.
2015-2016: #11
Call to Order
1.1
Opening Prayer
1.2
Roll Call
1.3
Comments from the Public
1.4
Consent Agenda
A.
Edmonton Catholic Schools Foundation Report
B.
Homeward Trust Youth Systems Committee Involvement
1.5
Presentation
1.6
Agenda
2.
Minutes
2.1
Minutes of the Previous Meeting
A.
January 19, 2016
2.2
Matters Arising from the Minutes
A.
3.
C. Olsen, M. Barylo
J. Carr
J. Carr
Barry Litun Executive Director
Council of Alberta School
Superintendents
Board Business
A.
Reports for Information
(i)
L. Kowalczyk
J. Acheson
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Patricia Grell, Ward 71
SUPERINTENDENT
Joan Carr
3.2
B.
J. Acheson
J. Acheson
Media Break
4.0
3.3
New Business
A.
Notices of Motion
Not for debate
B.
Trustee Inquiries
Not for debate, for vote only
C.
Schedule Special Public Meeting of the Board March 24, 2016 9:15 a.m.
J. Acheson
3.4
In-Camera
A.
Adjournment
4.1
Closing Prayer
4.2
Motion to Adjourn
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Patricia Grell, Ward 71
SUPERINTENDENT
Joan Carr
In 2015, the Foundation affirmed that its raison detre are the children and youth who attend
Edmonton Catholic Schools (ECS). The fundamental platform supporting all that the Edmonton
Catholic Schools Foundation wishes to accomplish is based upon Catholic social justice
principles and practises. As such, the Foundation refocused its mandate and fundraising efforts to
reflect this reality with a more tangible and meaningful brand: Dreams for Kids. Inspired by faith,
embraced by love, and empowered by hope, Dreams for Kids raises funds in support of the Edmonton
Catholic Schools Foundation.
The Edmonton Catholic Schools Foundation wants every childespecially those in need--to have an
equal opportunity to succeed in school and in life. Our primary role is to provide additional financial
assistance which can help address the challenges our children and youth face today that often prevent
them from attaining the best Catholic educational experience possible. Donations to an annual Dreams
for Kids fundraising campaign are to be directed to the following six Funds, which were created by the
Foundation after consultation with ECS administration, principals and staff:
Guardian Angel Fund providing support for students with mental health needs
Conquer Hunger Fund supporting healthy school lunch and snack programs
Helping Hands Fund providing resources to assist schools in addressing student emergency
needs including clothing, shelter, transportation, food, and poverty relief
Dream Maker Fund providing financial support/subsidies to students so they may equitably
participate in school-based retreats, as well as recreational, educational, and social
events/activities
100 Voices Fund - funding socially and educationally disadvantaged young children who
would significantly benefit from early childhood education, but who do not qualify for
government support
The Foundations fundraising and marketing strategies are based upon the building and nurturing of
long-term relationships with individuals and community stakeholders. Our fundraising efforts are not
focusing on special events such as dinners, auctions, or golf tournaments but rather, in meeting face-toface with individuals, businesses, community organizations and institutional donors to ask for their
investment in the children and youth being served at Edmonton Catholic Schools--especially those
affected by the barrier of poverty.
During the past year, and with the support of staff from the Edmonton Catholic School District,
communication and fundraising materials were developed for the Foundation. As well, a fundraising
software system was purchased and implemented. The web-site for the Foundation was also completely
redesigned and rebranded (www.ecsfoundation.ca). On average, each day we have 100 page views and
30 new or unique visitors, which is a two-thirds increase over 2014.
Through a limited direct mail Dreams for Kids campaign combined with personal meetings with
prospective supporters over the last few months, the Foundation has been successful in securing
approximately $300,000, of which $135,000 has been designated to the 100 Voices program.
In 2016, we hope to roll-out a comprehensive annual Dreams for Kids public fundraising campaign.
The Foundation has also been successful in establishing more than $85,000 in endowed gifts.
Going forward, the Foundation is cognizant that its long-term financial sustainability must be
addressed. Leadership at the Foundation is reviewing various models being successfully used by other
public and separate educational Foundations in the country. Within the current calendar year an
appropriate model of sustainability will be presented to the Foundation Board--one which will likely
support greater collaboration and resource sharing with the Edmonton Catholic School District.
In conclusion, we as Catholics, have much to be proud of, and certainly the Edmonton Catholic School
system is one of them. The Foundation is proud to be a partner in offering its support to ECS and its
countless hard working and dedicated staff.
On behalf of Dr. Mona-Lee Feehan, our Chair, the Board, and the staff of the Edmonton Catholic
Schools Foundation, I express our debt of gratitude to the Board of Trustees for their continued support,
to Joan Carr and her senior leadership team for their wisdom and generosity, and finally, to the
principals and staff of ECS for their selfless and exemplary leadership.
Marc Barylo
Executive Director
Board of Trustees
1.
2.
2015-2016: #9
Call to Order
1.1
Board Chair Bergstra called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
Father Julian began the meeting with the Opening Prayer.
Father Jullian
1.2
Present:
Marilyn Bergstra, Board Chair
John Acheson, Vice-Chair
Debbie Engel
Patricia Grell
Larry Kowalczyk
Laura Thibert
Absent
Cindy Olsen
1.3
1.4
Consent Agenda
Trustee Grell moved that the Consent Agenda that includes the following item be approved as
circulated.
A. Update February 6, 2016 Community Conversation on Inclusive Education
Carried
1.5
Presentations
There were no presentations scheduled.
1.6
Agenda
Trustee Grell moved that the agenda of the January 19, 2016 Public Meeting of the Board be
approved as circulated and as follows:
a recess be called at 5:30 p.m.
the Board go in-camera following the meeting.
Carried
Minutes
2.1
Minutes of the Previous Meeting
A.
December 8, 2015
Trustee Thibert moved that the Board approves the minutes of the December 8, 2015 Public
Meeting of the Board as circulated.
Trustee Grell moved to reword the motion by her in 2.2A.
The Board Chair ruled that the minutes would remain as circulated.
Page 1 of 3
On the question by the Chair, the Board supported the ruling by the Chair.
Opposed: P. Grell
In Favour: J. Acheson
D. Engel
L. Kowalczyk
L. Thibert
M. Bergstra
The motion to approve the minutes as circulated was.
Opposed: P. Grell
Carried
In Favour: J. Acheson
D. Engel
L. Kowalczyk
L. Thibert
M. Bergstra
B.
2.2
3.
Page 2 of 3
(ii)
3.2
Board Business
A.
Reports for Information
There were no reports scheduled.
3.2
B.
3.3
New Business
A.
Notices of Motion
Trustee Bergstra placed the following Notice of Motion on the table:
That a collaborative initiative between municipal and provincial governments, not-for-profit
stakeholders, and our school district to address youth homelessness. The vision is the
development of a comprehensive wrap-around model of supports
Trustee Inquiries
There were no inquiries.
C.
D.
4.0
Adjournment
4.1
Father Julian said the Closing Prayer.
4.2
Trustee Engel moved that the meeting adjourn at 6:15 p.m.
Carried
Page 3 of 3
Submitted by:
Date:
69
23
15
14
7
11
around the following question: What did you hear from all six presentations that you believe are
important considerations for creating an inclusive education model for Edmonton Catholic
Schools? After the lunch break, participants engaged in discussion around a second question:
What do you believe are the 5 - 6 key elements of an effective and functional Inclusive Education
Model for the Edmonton Catholic School District? The day ended with closing remarks by Trustee
Kowalczyk and a closing prayer by Fr. Julian Bilyj.
The entire day was facilitated by Corrie Ziegler, from the Edmonton Regional Learning
Consortium. A brief discussion about the purpose for the day, norms for collaboration, and
process for working together created a positive approach for the discussion that followed.
Participants were asked to identify table facilitators, timers, recorders, and use a talking stick to
ensure all voices were heard.
The agenda for the event is included in Appendix II along with a link to the power point used
throughout the day.
Summary of Participant Responses:
Total number of participants that provided responses to the two worksheets outlined below = 113
One parent left very early in the morning, feeling frustrated and commented: why are we doing
this again?
Total number of people per group that provided responses:
Parents = 31 (one provided an email response)
Teachers = 22
Administration (Principals and Assistant Principals) = 18
Educational Assistants = 7
Community Members/Societies = 4
Mixed Group (Combination to teachers, principals, society members, presenters) = 31
Seven Trustees and three Consultants were in attendance, and submitted responses to worksheet
A and B. These responses are not included in the total number of responses and are provided for
information and comparison purposes only.
Presenters were in attendance but did not submit responses.
Summary of Responses to Worksheet A
Worksheet A: What did you hear from all six presentations that you believe are important
considerations for creating an inclusive education model for Edmonton Catholic Schools?
Considerations are listed in order from the highest total number of comments to the lowest total
number of comments related to each consideration.
Bulleted phrases under each consideration are examples of responses related to the consideration,
and are included to provide deeper understanding of the consideration.
Considerations
1. Provide
8
Teachers and EAs
adequate funding
and time during
the instructional
day to:
develop
expertise and
instructional
materials
collaborate and
conference the
parents
engage in
effective,
research based
PD
learn about and
apply best
practices
coding and
documentation
learn to use
technology
effectively
support new
teachers
increase pay to
attract qualified
staff
2. Provide
8
adequate, effective
resources/funds
for teachers,
students, parents
for:
psychoeducational
assessments
smaller class
sizes
Teachers
Administrators
Educational
Assistants
Community
Members/
Societies
Mixed
Groups
Total
Trustees
Consultants
19
12
11
53
12
27
specialized
supports
EAs in every
classroom
ramps and
facility
upgrades
creating
deeper/broade
r awareness of
existing
excellent
resources
3. Work
8
collaboratively
with all
stakeholders:
Recognize
parental
expertise/bias
takes a village
to raise a child
approach
Decisions made
locally
Advocacy
support
4. Choice of
4
programs:
Inside/outside
school
Congregated
and segregated
Equal access
Revive some
programs
5. Leverage use of 7
Multi Disciplinary
Teams:
Support for
teachers is not
equal/consisten
t (eg. Not all
MDT members
offer the same
19
19
18
quality of
services, not all
programs offer
the same levels
of supports
Should work to
build capacity
of EAs
Should work
directly with
special needs
children
6. Support
students social
development:
students with
behavior
challenges pose
the greatest
challenge
provide mental
health supports
teach life skills
provide
behavior
support teams
7. Support EAs
through:
Training
increase FTE
allowing the
right person for
the job
allowing EA to
move up the
grades with the
student
8. Need for
common district
vision and values:
High academic
standards
See differences
as ordinary
Build
16
15
13
on/celebrate
strengths
Remove stigma
9. Need for
Transparency
Build trust
Spiritual
inclusion
(katholos)
School are
truly
welcoming
Not always
about dollars
10. Advocacy and
Clear
Communication
about Funding
Lobbying AE
Provide
clear/consisten
t explanations
to parents
about funding
for children
with special
needs
11. Leadership
Hold teachers
accountable
Create plans for
evaluating the
effectiveness of
initiatives, best
practices, etc.
Create families
of schools that
explore creative
solutions
Advocate for
changes in
UNIFOR
collective
agreements
12. Policy vs
13
12
12
0
6
Practice
ECSD and AE
alignment
bridge the gap
Should practice
affect policy or
the other way
around?
Need for
flexibility
local decision
making
13. Work with
0
Universities to
provide much more
training around
inclusion
Key Elements
Parents
1. Choice and
4
equal access to
programs for all
students:
flexibility to
move in and out
of segregated
classes as
needed
one size does
not fit all
consistency in
program
delivery for
each program
offered
all programs
focused on
learner needs
that fully
engage the
students
consistent
funding and
support for all
students
(including
regular or noncoded from
pre-school to
grade 12)
Teachers
Administrators
(Principals and
Assistant
Principals)
Educational
Assistants
Community
Members/
Societies
Mixed
Groups
Total
Trustees
Consultants
12
31
24
18
13
Use districts
$18 million to
support
inclusion
Continuation of
funding (no
breaks in
funding when
student needs
to be
reassessed)
5. Inclusion should 2
include:
social goals
(recess,
working with
others,
behavior, etc.)
physical activity
inquiry
universal
design for
learning
approach
reconsider the
impact of IPPs
6. Professional
0
Development for
administrators,
teachers and EAs
ongoing
proactive
mandatory for
some teachers
during the
school day
use of effective
PD models
7. Enhanced
1
support for
Educational
Assistants:
training and PD
increased pay
ability to move
12
12
11
10
11
value teacher
judgment
ongoing
13. Support for
advocacy for
parents and
students separate
from the school
board
14. Work with
Universities to
better prepare
teachers to support
inclusion
15. Learning
Coaches
both student
learning
coaches and
teacher
learning
coaches
reduce paper
work so
learning
coaches can
work with
students
16. Divide ECSD
schools into
regions:
provide
support based
on the student
needs in the
region
share
resources, best
practices, PD
12
13
Would have been beneficial to have Inclusion Alberta speak generally as opposed to only
speaking to 3 specific groups
As an alternative to focusing on 3 individual populations perhaps present a more global
perspective of inclusions. (e.g. Have representation from Inclusion Alberta inform members
about the future for our inclusive students in our society.)
I was disappointed that mental health wasnt included in the conversation. This poses a
significant challenge to inclusive education and it was excluded from the conversation.
This information session was very informative especially for us newer parents
Presentations were good but a bit repetitive
Would love to find out more of how this helped to make any changes that might need to be
put in place to make differences to all
Would have enjoyed hearing what is working/positive as well as negative
Facilitation/Logistics:
Really appreciated the attention to process, including reminders: equity, active listening,
and the talking sticks
Greatly organized by the ERLC
Corrie did a wonderful job moderating
Good as quite fast moving
Amazing format
More time to talk fewer speakers, more time
Time for table talk was adequate
We need more time in between to discuss
More interaction needed
The groups being split was awesome so that everyone had a chance to really share what we
feel
Would have benefited from interacting with teachers, administration and board, not just
like parents
Should have had a larger venue multiple community conversations are needed. Very
small representation of all groups/stakeholders
Need to be more specific on who is invited. At our table the invitation was given to one
parent, by a teacher. Another parent was invited by a principal, and another parent
received the invitation on an old email list.
We registered and have the email to confirm our registration but somehow we did not get
registered. No reminders were sent. This happened to more than one school team
Hosting on Saturday morning is good
Saturday morning was a good time for all involved
Thanks for it not being a full day
Thanks for respecting everyones time but we would have preferred a longer time
The session was extremely beneficial and could perhaps be held at each school
Awesome lunch, snacks and the warm welcome
14
As ECSD moves forward with inclusion, ERLC would be pleased to offer tailored and targeted
professional learning sessions to various stakeholders groups:
Parents: information sessions, etc.
Teacher Assistants and Teachers: professional learning sessions, communities of practice
that could address the range of topics listed in the responses
Leaders: Build a common vision around inclusion, create a culture of trust, etc.
Work with entire school staffs or groups of school staffs to create a culture of inclusion, a
clear communication plan, and a collaborative approach to supporting all students.
ERLC could also coordinate professional learning sessions with various societies and
agencies, showcasing the supports and resources already available but not used.
15
16
Appendix II - Agenda
17