02/12 2014 3:47PM FAX 250 979 6768 Kelowna Court Services \g0002/0003 500512300, Futtonco 05:17:53 p.m. 12-02-2018 Blasphemy of The Self Butdent Td - The Hoy Sent! FORM 109 (RULE 22-2(2) AND (7)) + This is the 1st affidavit of Angela Phillips in this case and ERO was made on December 2, 2014 4 DEC 0 2 2014 ) “ ‘Action No. 105238 ; Kelowna Registry ReaistB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA In the Matter of the Estate of Ru jeinz Krass, deceased AFFIDAVIT 1, Angela Phillips, of c/o 300-350 Lansdowne Street, Kamloops, British Columbia, Administrative Assistant, SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT: 1L 1 am the Disputant in this proceeding and as such I have personal knowledge of cts. hereinafter deposed to, save and except where stated to be on information lief, , where so stated I believe them to be true. OPINION Crepud iad ebyective Sous!) PI fag 2 T understand that my uncle, Emst John Krass (“Ernst Krash'), hae ‘Sled into question cpinioN — whether my father George Walter Krass (“George Krass”) was in fact my biological father. Always in if 3. George Krass died in December, 2010, -what day? Deatt Cortficwte o available NE! 4, It is ye that George Krass was not married to my mother when I was born. However, it was Always my understanding from what I have been told by my mother, by George Krass, and by others, that George Krass and my mother had been in a romantic relationship prior to my birth, and that George Krass was my biological father, NoT TRUE - LIE PERMURY! 5. Growing up. my mother had custody of me, but I generally spent all school holidays with myfather. oT TRUE-PERTURY! ‘Some 6. T understand, again from what my mother and George Krass told me, that there was a legal dispute between my parents over child support payments and visitation rights when Twas quite young. For G yaors 7, Lunderstand that George Krass paid child support payments to my mother in respect of IRRELEVANT! 10194558, jpmentcTemplaes\BLANne unsugeot hed w OPIN" During his lifetime, George Krass consistently referred to me as his daughter, and consistently referred to himself as my father. VER, LIE! 9, Mymother also dSasiotently referred to George Krass as my biological father. PERTURY! NoT 10. _ Inever heard either my mother or George Krass ever say anything that gave me reason to TRUE | suspect that I was not the biological daughter of Geroge Krass. PERJURY! 11. Lalways knew Rudi Heinz Krass, the deceased (the “Deceased”) as my grandfather, and called him “Opa”, which I understand to be the traditional German equivalent of “grandpa. NoT TRUE 12. The Deceased always referred to me and treated me as his granddaughter. I never heard him say anything that gave me any reason to suspect that I was not the biological daughter of George Krass. 13. Prior to the litigation that arose between us over the Deceased’s estate (the “Estate”), ovwteN —_Emst Krass consistently referred to himself as my uncle, and to me as his niece. 14. Prior to the litigation over the Estate, I do not recall any instance where Ernst Krass said KEPT anything that gave me any reason to suspect that I was not the biological daughter of SECRET: George Krass. 15. In various correspondence both before and during the litigation over the Estate, Emst Krass referred to me as his “niece”, as “family”, or as “blood”. True copies of such correspondence are attached to this Affidavit as Exhibit “A”, OPINION! 16. Ibis my understanding that George Krass was not the biological son of the Deceased but TRUE rather was adopted by the Deceased. As a result, Emnst Krass and I would not share FACT familial DNA such as would permit this question to be resolved by way of DNA test. SHORT NUT Lone 17. A true copy of my, birth certificate is attached to this Affidavit as Exhibit “B". I have never seen my long-form birth certificate but I have heard that my mother, on one form or another, put “God” in a field asking for “father”. My mother finds this yand 1 FACT understand from her that she did this as a joke t towards George Krass, as theY' were not egeSUINCE getting along very well at the time. As I have described above, my mother has Em consistently referred to George Krass as my biological father. Bop FAcED LIE! oe FF cy SWORN (OR AFFIRMED) BEFORE ME Tying is “Funny” 2? at Kamloops, British Columbia, on December 2, 2014. ) ) ) Any d ) ) ) ) Ge X Commissioner for taking Affidavits in the Province af British Columbia. Gf Baitish Columbitss tay D4 SUBORNATION oF PERTURY | Petar *- INLD cE Comedion Caminal Code 200r 101945583. pmentcTempRBSBLESO LANSDOWNE ST REET KAMLOOPS, BC v2C 1Y12nsia Wie Act Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada IMPORTANT INFORMATION wt [Exhibit °C’ LLS ACT [RSBC 1996] eiaerinaas Contents 1. Definitions Parti Property disposable by will Writing required Signatures required on formal will Military forces and mariners Place of signature Wills of persons under 19 years of age Will exercising power of appointment Publication 10 Incompetence of witness 11. Gift to attesting witness 12 Creditor as witness 13 Executor as witness 14 Revocation in general 15 Revocation by marriage 16 Revocation of gift on dissolution of marriage 17 Atering a will 18 Revival of will 19 Subsequent conveyance 20 Effective time of will 21 Lapsed and void devises and bequests 22 Indlusion of leaseholds in general devise 23 Exercise of general power of appointment by general git 24 Devise without words of imitation 25 Gifts to heirs 26 Meaning of “die without issue” 27 Devise to trustees otherwise than for term 28 Unlimited devise to trustees 29. Gifts to issue predeceasing testator 30 Primary liability of mortgaged land 31. Executor as trustee of residue wu awa caePLibraefoctaws_ nenlocumendbfresiet0, 9648801 waVvanaun maasia Ws Act Part2 32 Filing of notice of will with chief executive officer 33 Filing of notice of revocation 34 Filing notice of change of place of will 35. Chief executive officer's records 36 Search of records 37. Validity of will or revocation not affected 38 Power to make regulations Part3 39 Definitions and interpretation 40. Wills of interest in movables 41 Change of domicile 42 Construction of will 43 Movables used in relation to land Part 4 44 Application of Act Definitions 1 In this Act: “chief executive officer" means the chief executive officer under the Vital Statistics Act; disposition, er - Part 1 Property disposable by will 2 A person may by will devise, bequeath or dispose of all property, whether acquired before or after making the wil, to which at the time of the person's death he or she is entitled either at law or in equity, including one or more of the following: (a) estates pur autre vie, whether there is or is not a special occupant, and whether they are corporeal or incorporeal hereditaments; (b) contingent, executory or other future interest in property, whether the testator is or is not ascertained as the person or one of the persons in whom those interests may become vested and whether the person is entitled to them under the instrument by which they were created or under a disposition of them by deed or wi blaws.ca/EPLibaresfodlaws_newidocumenviDireesie/00_96489_01 anaans2 Wits set will; (c) rights of entry. Writing required 3 A willis valid only iit is in writing, Be iene ovr wey weartwrgyee ss Ut ; Signatures required on formal will fo Ute Rudi Krass’ usill apis: 4. Subject to section 5, 2 will is not valid unless (a) at its end it is signed by the testator or signed in the testator’s Contradicts the name by some other person in the testator's presence and by the \definition of wills at testator's direction, Ithe start of this Act [Patently unreasonable, lof no effect, invalid and lunenforceable! Military forces and mariners 5 (1) A member of the Canadian Forces while placed on active service under the National Defence Act, or member of the naval, land or air force of any member of the British Commonwealth of Nations or any ally of Canada while on active service, or a mariner or seaman at sea or in the course of a voyage may, regardless of his or her age, dispose of his or her real and personal estate by will in writing, signed by the testator at its end or by some other person in the presence of and by the direction of the testator, (3) If the willis signed by another person, the signature of that other person must be attested by the signature of at least one person, who must attest in the presence of the testator and of that other person. Place of signature (2) AWillis) nob rendered invalid) in any of the following circumstances: (a) the signature does not follow immediately the end of the will; wow blows. ca/EPLibraviesiblaws newidocumentIDireesiel00_ 96489 01asia wits Act (b) a blank space intervenes between the concluding words of the will and the signature; jaffirm that the lpatently lwas only put in all simple wills, Is. 4 is patently lunreasonable Imaking it lunenforceable! [These sections Iplace to dismiss |without justification (©) the signature is placed among the words of a testimonium clause outline of’section4 or of an attestation clause or follows or is after or under an | 2 witnesses - is attestation clause either with or without a blank space intervening, or follows or is after or under or beside the name of a subscribing lunreasonable and witness; [> (d) the signature is on a side or page or other portion of the paper or papers containing the will on which no disposing part of the will is ie. written above the signature; (e) there appears to be sufficient space to contain the signature on or at the bottom of the side or page or other portion of the same paper on which the will is written and preceding that on which the signature appears. (3) The generality of subsection (1) is not restricted by the enumeration of circumstances set out in subsection (2), but a signature in conformity with section 4 or 5 or this section does not give effect to a disposition or direction that is underneath the signature or that follows the signature or to a disposition or direction inserted after the signature was made. Wills of persons under 19 years of age 7 (1) A will made by a person who is under 19 years of age is not valid unless at the time of making the will the person (2) is or has been married, or (b) is a person described in section 5. (2) For the purposes of section 5 and of this section, a certificate that purports to be signed by or on behalf of an officer who has custody of the records of the force in which a person was serving at the time the will was made and that sets out that the person was at that time a member of a naval, military or air force of a named country is sufficient proof of that fact. (3) A person who has made a will to which subsection (1) applies may, while under 19 years of age, revoke the will. Publication wun claws ca/EPLbraries/oclaws_newidocumeruiOfraeside00_96489_01 anaesex “oe Last Will and Testimony 1, Rudi Heinz Krass, being of sound mind leave all my worldly possessions to the sole remaining survivor of our family, Emst John Krass, to do with as he wills. 7 OWN this surname relatve to me! ‘There are no previous wills and there is no need for any other wills. Date: the \3"™ day of Segh, 2011 5 in M Mearclaon Qe vereeny D Davt 2son!KELOWNA JUN 29 2012 Reis TRY Form 109 (Rule 22-2 (2) and (7)) ‘This is the Ist affidavit of QUINTIN DONALD Davidson in this case and was made on June 21,2012 nor F545] KELOWNA Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA RE: THE INHERITANCE OF ERNST JOHN KRASS AFFIDAVIT OF WITNESSING WILL SIGNING OF RUDI HEINZ KRASS [Rule 22-3 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules applies to all forms.] BAA HY We |, Quintin! m, of 301 955 Leon Avenue, Kelowna, British Columbia, V14 6K1, retired, SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT: 1 on September 13, 2011, I witnessed Rudi Heinz Krass sign his informal will/“testamentary document” in GOOD FAITH and the witness signature is that of me, Quintin D. Davidson. In fact, it was Rudi Krass who asked me to witness his signature on September 13, 2011. 2 I knew Rudi and his family from the 1960's when he worked for my company, Davidson Brothers Construction, in the Peace River Country.3 if you have any further questions concerning the matter of the informal ‘will/testamentary document” of Rudi Heinz Krass, designated Exhibit “A”, I can be contacted as follows: home: 301 955 Leon Avenue KELOWNA BC V146K1 telephone no.: 250 861-9344Quintin D. Davidson 301 955 Leon Avenue KELOWNA BC V14 6K1 March 19, 2012 RE: Affirming having witnessed the signing of Rudi Krass’ will“testamentary document” To Whom It May Concern: On September 13,2011, I witnessed Rudi Heinz Krass sign his “testamentary document” and the witness signature is that of me, Quintin D. Davidson. J knew Rudi and his family from the 1960's when he worked for my company, Davidson Brothers Construction, in the Peace River Country. Ifyou have any further questions conceming the matter of the informal will/“testamentary document” of Rudi Krass, I can be contacted as follows: home: 301 955 Leon Avenue KELOWNA BC V146K1 telephone no.: 250 861-9344 Qin f Toon Wines: Diene Sograr Date: 2 printname: Diane Bognar a Oe * itil wad printmame: Halwa Luctun gytWitness: lh eees printname: AwoeRnson) Twinn E00 7 ee printname: Egasr Kesss Witness: print name: Witness: print name: Witness: print name: Witness: print name: Date: (9 “rane Zor Date: Merck 19, 2012 Date: Date: Date: Date: page 2Mr. E, J. Krass, SoH Just Call Me - Galileo Il/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm March 19, 2012 Judge Advocate General and The Defender of The Faith RE: How the attestation of Quintin D. Davidson took place Dear Sirs: 1. ‘This document explains exactly how the attached attestation from Quintin D. Davidson took place this morning between 8:35 AM and 8:51 AM at the main McDonald’s Restaurant in WESTBANK, British Columbia. 2: ‘This morning I arranged to have Quin Davidson come to the McDonald’s Restaurant in Westbank and at 8:23 AM he showed up. At the McDonald’s in Westbank, my dad used to have coffee with several buddies that he had gotten to know since 1999. a Around 8:35 AM, I read the attached document to Quintin D. Davidson and then I asked everyone for several tables by the front door to watch as Quintin signed the document. At this point, the document was passed to several of the witnesses who willingly and in good faith attested to having watched Quintin D, Davidson sign the document that is attached. 4. The document makes it quite clear that Quintin D. Davidson did indeed watch Rudi Krass on September 13,2011 sign in good faith the simple will based upon the fact that Iam the sole survivor of the Krass Family delineated from Rudi Heinz Krass. cs Rudi Krass asked me to prepare a simple will based upon the circumstances of what had happened to George Walter Krass’ estate which resulted from a sudden heart attack incident on December 6, 2010. 6. Rudi Krass, in full control of his faculties on September 13, 2011, knew just how close he had come to dying from an allergic reaction to Cipro and Rudi Krass wanted to insure that any and all parts of his life’s estate was to go to his only surviving direct heir. 4%. At the time, little did we know of the duplicity of the current since 1996 Wills Act of British Columbia but | did know of the overriding Exhibit “AA”, the Supreme Court's dissertation on s. 52 (1) of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms which included the following: 28 First, and most importantly, the Constitution is, under s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, "the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect”. The invalidity of a legislative provision inconsistent with the Charter does not arise from the fact of its being declared unconstitutional by a court, but from the operation of s. 52(1). Thus, in principle, such a provision is invalid from the moment it is enacted, and a judicial declaration to this effect is but one remedy amongst others to protect those whom itadversely affects. In that sense, by virtue of . 52(1), the question of constitutional validity inheres in every legislative enactment, Courts may not apply invalid laws, and the same 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T IE1 1Mr. E. J. Krass, Sol Just Call Me - Galileo Il/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and lis Realm obligation applies to every level and branch of government, including the administrative organs of the state. 8 Clearly, The Court of Fundamental Justice, headed by the Judge Advocate General, who advises the Lt-Governors, the Governor General and The Monarchy are bound to The Principles of Fundamental Justice and this s. 28 dissertation without question. 9. The problem, as fully put forth in Form 34, Order for reversing wording of the Wills Act (of British Columbia), is the reliance, in the known 7 provinces with the 2 witness standard, upon a provision of the Wills Acts and Probate Acts where all single witness wills are being negated and those knowing of the lie of s. 2 of Form 92 (21-5 (4)) cannot allow the provided “testamentary document” to be set aside by a provision that is of no effect and unenforceable according tos. 52 (1) of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 10. ‘The consequences of this corruption of the Wills Acts and Probate Acts, though, is that those with valid and undisputable “informal”/“old standard wills” are being convinced by the lawyers at their most vulnerable time of their lives that the wills of their deceased “don’t constitute” the standard for a “testamentary document” that is binding on both courts forthwith which means that countless heirs with simple and supported wills are being coerced to proceed with the probate of the estate according the enacted Estate Administration Act of British Columbia or whatever name the other provinces have for their equivalent laws. WL Basically, this functioning of the law according to “reverse onus”/“devil’s advocacy” constitutes extortion according to Canada’s Criminal Code: as you need the estate probated to do anything with the assets within the estate, you “must” accept the lie that your loved one died without an informal will in DENIAL of the pure fact Truth to the contrary as the informal will is still a “testamentary document” regardless of the wishes of the new false kings of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskaichewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, PEland Newfoundland and Labrador and their colluding against the definition of a will. ey The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was established to insure “formalities of the law” or “technicalities” were NOT to be used nor created in order to dismiss the definition of a will and a person’s authority to bequeath their assets as they see fit. But, the elected bodies have circumvented the demands of Fundamental Justice and have dismissed ILLEGALLY all INALIENABLE RIGHTS as defined by s. 33 (1) of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms minus s. 15, which was a concoction to distract everyone from universality of being 3 years after the fact according to s. 32 (2) of The Charter, which reads as follows: Exception (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force. 13. Tam very, very disgusted with the process of getting a simple Fundamental 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T IE1 2Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH Just Call Me - Galileo Il/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm Justice will recognised in a system where “reverse onus”/“devil’s advocacy” is taking place ahead of the standard of Fundamental Justice and the barristers and solicitors are working on behalf of the provincially enacted and corrupt rule of law rather than the rights of the paying customers especially since these actions constitute extortion under Canada’s Criminal Code. 14, The attached attestation document affirms that Quintin D. Davidson is indeed a person beyond contention, otherwise, and that he did witness the good will signing of the September 13, 2011 will/“testamentary document” by Rudi Heinz Krass and affirms Quintin D. Davidson's ‘good will witnessing of the will. 15. Please use this attestation to complete the quickly the summary reversal of the 2 witness standard for all wills across Canada and back through whenever it first came into existence in whatever province that w: 16. This whole process was completely unnecessary as s. 28 of the neutral citation 2003 SCC 54 - Exhibit “AA” - makes it quite clear that none of the Will Acts and Probate Acts enacted since the corruption started EVER had any validity according to s. 52 (1) of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 17. Again, I passed the test with flying colours of that there is no doubt! In the name of Jesus Christ, 4k Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH ‘Author of The Treatise on The Petition to the Court Due Legal Process Galileo Il/Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE SOCIETY Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Petitioner on File No. PO-001 with The Defender of The Faith Attached: Exhibit “AA”; Quintin D. Davidson's letter of attestation witnessed by many people who also attested to the signing of the document 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC VAT IE1 3Proof of 3" Charter Remedy submitted to The Queen in Council of Canada in February 2015 — 2 months before former Finance Minister of Canada Jim Flaherty was executed and sent to hell on my account by God Almighty. Jim Flaherty REFUSED to comply with The Principles of Fundamental Justice, s. 7 and s. 24(1) of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which automatically set up a kill or be killed scenario where The Almighty would have to dispense Fundamental Justice for Jim Flaherty’s refusal to accept my Rank as The Comforter/Helper as put forth by my level of Honesty against the fullest extent of oppression and persecution in Canada under ruling through the letter of the law without redress according to s. 24 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. To win, | had to lie about Angela Dawn Dutkywich being a branch of the offspring of Rudi Heinz Krass. | cannot blasphemy the Self Evident Truth - The Holy Spirit! 1am NOT A NAZI unlike former Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his finance ministers Jim Flaherty and Angela Dawn Dutkywich and the Crumb family members attached to Elena Crumb! However, | have been oppressed and persecuted for my honesty over the past 4 years and there ‘was no way that, under the Conservative Federal Government of Canada, | was every going to receive my CERTIFIED BY THE PRINCIPLES OF FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE Constitutional Remedy which is why this amount has been repeatedly removed by FIAT from the consolidated revenue fund as “interest” for this crime against humanity against me — The Comforter/Helper. A King’s Ransom was established according to Revelations 17:14! Luke 18:6-8: © Then the Lord said, “Hear what the unjust judge said. ’And shall God not avenge His own elect who cry out day and night to Him, though He bears long with them? *I tell you that He will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He really find faith on the earth?”Striking down further fraudulent actions by the Ministry of Justice of British Columbia Actions. EJ Krass (OMS? — 2 wmowtty later Me. Flaherty i DEAD! Documents Cupienom dimeased To: Ministry of Justice Canada, Ministry of Justice BC, Cathy Clow, Ministry of Justice of Ontario, Hon, Felix Collins, Hon. Stephen Horsman, Hon. Lena Metlege Diab, otp.informationdesk@ice-cpi.int Bee: Dan Chupa Outlook.com Active View 3 attachments (total 592.4 KB) uy 150205102154_0001 4th Affidavit demanding the Long Form Birth Certificate be produced. pdf 150205155140 _0001 February 5, 2015 Form 34.pdf 150130125604_0001 Form 35 Order made after Application Petition file no 105646.pdf Download all as zip ave all to OneDrive Dear Sirs: | know now that my Petition no. 105646 with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, and my January 23, 2015 Notice of Application of Charter Question cannot be opposed because of the words of s. 17 of Angela Phillips' December 2, 2014 Affidavit on her Notice of Dispute file no. 105238 with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, which reads as follows: I have never seen my long form birth certificate (irrelevant as it exists upon request) but | have heard that my mother, on one form or another, put "God" in the field for "father". My motherfinds this funny and | understand from her that she did this as a joke t towards George, as they were not getting along very well at the time... (Contrary evidence after this that is repudiated by these facts.) According to law, this determines that George Walter Krass was never registered as the "father" which DISQUALIFIES the contention by Angela Phillips that she is the daughter of George Walter Krass and, therefore, is an intestate successor to Rudi Heinz Krass, my beloved dad. ‘Also, according to law - Supreme Court Civil Rule 3-7(3), now that it proven factually the George Walter Krass is NOT the registered father and there is no possibility of a DNA test to place George Walter Krass on Angela Phillips’ Birth Record, Angela Phillips has no Right to oppose or be heard at the February 16, 2015 hearing. Ihave tried to dismiss the hearing by providing a "Consent Order" to Fulton Law, LLP - see the attachment. | hope that this matter can be resolved before the end of next week because the hearing on February 16, 2015 will just be the Judge signing off on the attached Form 35, Order Made After Application, which it nothing more than a formality. Actions Krass Documents To: Tyson MeNeil-Hay, Robert Sloman, Ministry of Justice Canada, Ministry of Justice BC, Cathy Clow Outlook.com Active View 3 attachments (total 608.0 KB) 150205102154_0001 4th Affidavit demandin; 150205155140_0001 February 5, 2015 Form 34.pdf150130125604_0001 Form 35 Order made after Application Petition file no 105646.pdf Download all as zip Save all to OneDrive Dear Sirs: It is a legally established fact that Angela Phillips is NOT the daughter of George Walter Krass just as it is a legally established fact, therefore, that ALL actions based on the lies being, presented by Farris Law and The Ministry of Justice of British Columbia are DISQUALIFIED AND STRUCK DOWN due to the main point being deficient. Thave already DISQUALIFIED the pleadings from February 3, 2014, served upon me, based upon the law which established outright that the only evidence that can now be considered is something that cannot be produced which is a DNA test to put George Walter Krass upon the birth record where he does not exist today and never existed there. Thave brought in the International Criminal Court and I am filling out the paperwork to be Private Prosecutor for The International Criminal Court in British Columbia. To me, this is a matter not just of Right versus wrong but really life or death. To imy under the false contention that Angela Phillips is the daughter of George Walter Krass would be a crime against humanity and would result in my Right to Life, Security of Person and Liberty being dismissed: I naturally inherited the residue of my family. Lam obligated to send you these form to consider your next step. a To: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int, Ministry of Justice Canada, Ministry of Justice BC, Cathy Clow, Ministry of Justice of Ontario, Hon. Stephen Horsman, Hon. Lena Metlege Diab, Hon. Felix Collins Outlook.com Active Lattachment (350.4 KB) 150205102154 0001 4th Affidavit demanding the Long Form Birth Certificate be produced.pdfDownload as zip Save to OneDrive Dear Sirs: On December 22, 2014, | initiated a Petition file no, 105646 with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, because, for 2 years now, the Province has interfered in distribution of my April 2012 Charter Remedy. Thave moved to strike down the fraudulent Ministry of Justice of British Columbia orders that ‘were never signed personally and this deficiency makes the file no. 49709 with the SCBC, Kamloops Registry, struck down and unenforceable, as itis legal fact. OF No FORCE AND of NO EFFECT! Today, I filed my 4th affidavit following making my Petition file no. 105646 into a proper Charter Question given the fact that The Ministry of Justice of British Columbia dismissed the rule of law on December 4, 2013 IN MY CASE and intentionally gave the title "granddaughter of Rudi Heinz Krass" even though The Ministry of Justice of British Columbia knew full well that that particular title had to be placed there by the legal standard of a Long Form Birth Certificate showing that the named was registered within 1 year after birth to the alleged father ora DNA test result proving or dismissing the initial position. However, the starting point for all questions of paternity depend on what is on the initial WHO Birth Record and its resulting Long Form Birth Certificate. ‘The natural legal position then, from the WHO Birth Record, is that God is the father of Angela Phillips as registered by the mother in 1987 and NOT So Walter Krass and, thus, Angela” Fulton Law, Angela's Legal Counsel, has made it clear to me that, in theirlopinion and the opinion’ of The Ministry of Justice, the court does NOT have to abide by this strict interpretation of the law even ‘hough SBF SRD Courrop aveew Corumeta GrvReis 3°7(y TURES ph ‘counsel to be fraud because Angela Phillips must prove, according to law, her birth relationship with a Long Form Birth Certificate or DNA test who she is relative to George Walter Krass and Rudi Heinz Krass - everything else is trivial and moot as they are not legal facts. The World is FLAT Angela Phillips is wrongly claiming that her Birth Record is trivial and overridden by circumstantial evidence: The lie. The World is ROUNDAfter decades of deliberations, the world has agreed upon the reality that Birth Records and their corresponding Long Form Birth Certificates are binding on human thought just as changing these recorded paternity can only be done after I year by a DNA test - it is now 27 years since Angela Phillips was born: The Truth. By bringing in the mother of Angela Phillips, though, Angela Phillips has brought in the only person in possession of a Long Form Birth Certificate to my knowledge. have right demanded that this document now be produced on February 16, 2015 in Kelowna at its Law Courts. My affidavit sets out the natural events given production of the document or ‘NOT (SUMMARY DISQUALIFICATION AND STRIKING DOWN) of all of Angela Phillips civil actions because they were vexatious and malicious and wholly without merit. Please read the attached 4th Affidavit on Petition file no. 105646. proved WRONG! have no reason for suspect that the Ministry of Justice will finally cede to the rule of law for all IN MY CASE and strike down according the files as listed as well as distribute to me my April 2012 Charter Remedy which is sorely overdue given s. 52(1) of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Consequently, I have no other choice but to bring in The International Criminal Court as the Truth, the law and The Charter of Rights and Freedoms were completely talked around for over 2 years in my case and for no other reason than that is what The Ministry of Justice of British Columbia wanted it - a truly scary thought because that is how the Nazi's dealt with matters! Praise be to the Almighty in the Name of His Son, Jesus Christ, and the Blessed Holy Spirit, Ernst John Krass Personal Representative of Rudi Heinz Krass, deceased