ABSTRACT
The Gear Materials and Heat Treatment Manual provides information pertaining to engineering materials
and material treatments used in gear manufacture. Topics included are definitions, selection guidelines, heat
treatment, quality control, life considerations and a bibliography. The material selection includes ferrous, nonferrous and nonmetallic materials. Wrought, cast, and fabricated gear blanks are considered. The heat treatment section includes data on through hardened, flame hardened, induction hardened, carburized, carbonitrided, and nitrided gears. Quenching, distortion, and shot peening are discussed. Quality control is discussed as
related to gear blanks, process control, and metallurgical testing on the final products.
Copyright E, 1989
Reaffirmed October 1995
February 1989
ISBN: 1---55589---524---7
ANSI/AGMA
ii
2004---B89
FOREWORD
[The foreword, footnotes, and appendices, if any, are provided for informational purposes only and should
not be construed as part of AGMA Standard 2004---B89 (Formerly 240.01), Gear Materials and Heat Treatment
Manual.]
The Standard provides a broad range of information on gear materials and their heat treatment. It is intended to assist the designer, process engineer, manufacturer and heat treater in the selection and processing of
materials for gearing. Data contained herein represents a consensus from metallurgical representatives of member companies of AGMA.
This Standard replaces AGMA 240.01, October 1972. The first draft of AGMA 240.01, Gear Materials
Manual, was prepared in October 1966. It was approved by the AGMA membership in March 1972. Reprinting
of AGMA 240.01 for distribution was discontinued in 1982 because it had been decided in 1979 by the Metallurgy and Materials Committee to revise its format. The initial draft of AGMA 2004---B89 (formerly 240.01) was
completed in April, 1983. Work continued on the Standard with numerous additional revised drafts within the
Metallurgy and Materials Committee until it was balloted in 1988. It was completed and approved by the
AGMA Technical Division Executive Committee in September 1988 and on January 23, 1989 it was approved as
an American National Standard.
Suggestions for the improvement of this standard will be welcome. They should be sent to the American
Gear Manufacturers Association, 1500 King Street, Suite 201, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
ANSI/AGMA
iii
2004---B89
ACTIVE MEMBERS
N. P. Milano (Regal Beloit Corporation)
A. G. Milburn (The Gear Works --- Seattle)
P. Rivart (CLECIM)
R. H. Shapiro (Arrow Gear)
W. L. Shoulders (Reliance Electric) (Deceased)
M. Starozhitsky (Outboard Marine)
A. A. Swiglo (IPSEN)
S. Tipton (Caterpillar)
D. Vukovich (Eaton)
L. L. Witte (General Motors)
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
R. L. Leslie (SPECO Corporation)
B. L. Mumford (Alten Foundry)
G. E. Olson (Cleveland)
J. R. Partridge (Lufkin)
E. M. Rickt (Auburn Gear)
H. I. Sanderow (Supermet)
R. L. Schwettman (Xtek, Inc.)
L. J. Smith (Invincible Gear)
Y. Sueyoshi (Tsubakimoto Chain)
M. Tanaka (Nippon Gear)
R. E. Vaglia (Farrel Connecticut)
T. L. Winterrowd (Cummins Engine)
ANSI/AGMA
iv
2004---B89
Table of Contents
Section
Title
Page
1.
Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Information Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4.
5.
5
6
7
7
7
8
9
9
19
19
25
25
Heat Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
6.
Mechanical Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Grade and Heat Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cleanliness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dimensional Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost and Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hardenability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ferrous Gearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selection Criteria for Wrought, Cast, or Fabricated Steel Gearing . . . . . . . . . . . .
Copper Base Gearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Non---Ferrous Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non---Metallic Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Through Hardening Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flame and Induction Hardening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Carburizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Carbonitriding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nitriding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Heat Treatments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quenching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distortion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shot Peening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residual Stress Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26
28
34
38
39
41
42
42
47
51
52
52
53
53
55
56
61
63
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
ANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
Table of Contents
Section
Title
Page
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
65
Table 4---6
Table 4---7
Table 4---8
Table 4---9
Table 4---10
Table 4---11
Table 4---12
Table 4---13
11
14
14
16
17
22
22
23
24
Table 5---1
Table 5---2
Table 5---3
Table 5---4
Table 5---5
Table 5---6
35
38
39
41
43
50
Appendix C
Appendix D
67
69
70
Tables
Table 4---1
Table 4---2
Table 4---3
Table 4---4
Table 4---5
ANSI/AGMA
vi
7
8
10
2004---B89
Table of Contents
Section
Title
Page
Figures
Fig 4---1
Fig 4---2
Fig 5---1
Fig 5---4
Fig 5---5
Fig 5---6
Fig 5---7
Fig 5---8
33
45
46
48
49
50
Fig 6---1
Fig 6---2
Fig 6---3
Fig 6---4
58
59
61
62
Fig 5---2
Fig 5---3
ANSI/AGMA
vii
29
30
2004---B89
ANSI/AGMA
viii
2004---B89
1. Scope
ASTM A290---82, Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for Rings for Reduction Gears
ASTM A310---77, Methods and Definitions for
Mechanical Testing of Steel Products
This Manual was developed to provide basic information and recommend sources of additional information pertaining to gear materials, their treatments, and other considerations related to the
manufacture and use of gearing.
Metallurgical aspects of gearing as related to rating (allowable sac and sat values) are not included,
but, are covered in AGMA rating standards.
ASTM 388---80, Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Heavy Steel Forgings
2.1 References.
Abbreviations are used in the references to specific documents in this Standard. The abbreviations
include: AGMA, American Gear Manufacturers
Association; ASNT, American Society of Nondestructive Testing; ASTM, American Society for Testing Materials; SAE, Society of Automotive Engineers.
AGMA 141.01---1984, Plastics Gearing --Molded, Machined, And Other Methods, A Report on
the State of the Art
AGMA 6033---A88, Standard for Marine Propulsion Gear Units, Part 1 Materials
ASTM E18---79, Test Methods for Rockwell Hardness and Rockwell Superficial Hardness of Metallic
Materials
ASNT---TC---1A (June 80), Recommended Practice by American Society for Nondestructive Testing
2004---B89
3. Definitions
ASTM E446---81, Standard Reference Radiographs for Steel Castings Up to 2 inch (51 mm) in
Thickness
ANSI/SAE AMS 2300 F, Magnetic Particle Inspection, Premium Aircraft ---Quality Steel Cleanliness
ANSI/SAE AMS 3201 G, Magnetic Particle Inspection, Aircraft ---Quality Steel Cleanliness
2.2 Information Sources.
Design of gears is concerned with the selection
of materials and metallurgical processing. This
Manual cannot substitute for metallurgical expertise, but is intended to be a basic tool to assist in the
selection and metallurgical processing of gear materials. The material information and metallurgical
processes contained herein are based on established
data and practices which can be found in the appropriate publications. It is necessary that the designer use a source of metallurgical knowledge of materials and processing.
Material specifications are issued by agencies,
including the government, large industrial users, and
technical societies, some of whom are:
ASM International
ASM Metals Handbooks
ASM Heat Treaters Guide
ASM Metals Reference Book
ASM Standard
ANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
Bainite. Bainite is a microstructural phase resulting from the transformation of austenite, and
consists of an aggregate of ferrite and iron carbide.
Its appearance is feathery if formed in the upper portion of the bainite transformation range, and acicular
if formed in the lower portion.
Carbon. Carbon is the principal hardening element in steel, and its amount determines the maximum hardness obtainable. Generally as carbon is increased, tensile strength and wear resistance increase; however, ductility and weldability decrease.
Carbonitriding. A modified form of gas carburizing, in which steel (typically plain carbon and very
low alloy) is heated between 1450---1650_F
(788---899_C) in an ammonia enriched carburizing
atmosphere. This results in simultaneous absorption
of carbon and nitrogen, which results in the formation of complex nitrides in a high carbon case.
Case Depth of Flame or Induction Harden Components. This is defined as the depth at which the
hardness is 10 HRC points below the minimum specified surface hardness.
Case Depth of Nitrided Components. Nitrided
case depth is defined as the depth at which the hardness is equivalent to 105 percent of the measured
core hardness. The case depth is determined by a microhardness tester and measured normal to the tooth
surface at 0.5 tooth height and mid face width.
Case Hardness. Case Hardness is the micro--hardness measured perpendicular to the tooth surface at a depth of 0.002 to 0.004 inches (0.05 to 0.10
mm) at 0.5 tooth height and mid face width.
Cementite. Cementite is a hard microstructure
phase otherwise known as iron carbide (Fe3C) and
characterized by an orthorhombic crystal structure.
D.I. (Ideal Critical Diameter). Ideal critical diameter is the diameter which, when quenched in an
infinite quench severity (such as ice brine), will result
in a microstructure consisting of 50 percent martensite of the center of the bar.
(2) Etched case depth. Etched case depth is determined by etching a sample cross---section with nitric acid, and measuring the depth of the darkened
area. The etched case approximates the effective
ANSI/AGMA
Decarburization. Decarburization is the reduction in surface carbon content of a gear or test piece
during thermal processing.
2004---B89
sorbed into the surface of a ferrous material at a temperature below the austenitizing temperature
[1000---1150_F (538---621_C)], while submerged in a
gas stirred and activated molten chemical salt bath.
These processes are used mainly for improved wear
resistance and fatigue strength.
Nitriding (Gas). Surface hardening process in
which alloy steel, after machining following quench
and tempering, is subjected to a cracked ammonia
furnace atmosphere at 950---1060_F (510---571_C)
causing nitrogen to be absorbed into the surface,
forming hard iron nitrides.
Nitriding (Aerated Salt Bath). This term includes a number of heat treat processes in which nitrogen and carbon in varying concentrations are abANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
Mechanical Properties
Grade and Heat Treatment
Cleanliness
Dimensional Stablility
Availability and Cost
Hardenability and Size Effects
Machinability and Other Manufacturing
Characteristics
4.1.2 Fatigue Strength. Contact and bending fatigue strengths are used to predict, at a given stress
level, the number of cycles that gearing can be expected to endure before pitting or fracture occurs.
Contact and bending fatigue strengths are influenced by a variety of factors such as hardness, miANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
Table 4---1
Typical Gear Materials --- Wrought Steel
Common Alloy
Steel Grades
Common Heat 1
Treat Practice
General Remarks/Application
1045
4130
4140
4145
8640
4340
Low Hardenability
Marginal Hardenability
Fair Hardenability
Medium Hardenability
Medium Hardenability
Good Hardenability in Heavy Sections
T---H&N
T---H&N
I---H, F---H, T---H, TH&N
4142
4350 @
1020
C---H
4118
4620
8620
C---H
C---H
C---H
4320
8822
C---H
C---H
3310 @
4820
9310
C---H
C---H
C---H
ANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
Table 4---2
Typical Brinell Hardness Ranges and Strengths for
Annealed, Normalized and Tempered Steel Gearing
Normalized & Tempered #
1045
4130
8630
4140
4142
8640
4145
4150
4340
4350 Type
Brinell
Hardness
Range
HB
Tensile
Strength
min
ksi (MPa)
Yield
Strength
min
ksi (MPa)
Brinell
Hardness
Range
HB
Tensile
Strength
min
ksi (MPa)
Yield
Strength
min
ksi (MPa)
159---201
80
(550)
50
(345)
159---201
80
(550)
50
(345)
156---197
80
(550)
50
(345)
167---212
90
(620)
60
(415)
187---229
95
(655)
60
(415)
262---302
130
(895)
85
(585)
197---241
100
(690)
60
(415)
285---331
140
(965)
90
(620)
212---255
110
(760)
65
(450)
302---341
150
(1035)
95
(655)
4.3 Cleanliness. Alloy steel manufactured with electric furnace practice for barstock and forged steel
gear applications is commonly vacuum degassed, inert atmosphere (argon) shielded and bottom poured
to improve cleanliness and reduce objectionable gas
content (hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen). Improved
cleanliness (reduced nonmetallic inclusion content)
results in improved transverse ductility and impact
strength, but machinability may be reduced; for example, with sulfur content less than 0.015 percent.
Vacuum degassed steel may be further refined by
vacuum arc remelting (VAR) or electroslag remelting (ESR) of the steel. These refining processes further reduce gas and inclusion size and content for improved fatigue strength to produce the highest quality steel for critical gearing applications. Significant
ANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
Table 4---3
Typical Brinell Hardness Ranges and Strengths for Quenched and Tempered Alloy Steel
Gearing
Alloy
Steel *
Grade
4130
8630
4140
8640
4142
4145
4150
4340
4350
Tensile
Strength
minimum
ksi (MPa)
Yield
Strength
minimum
ksi (MPa)
Heat Treatment
Hardness
Range
HB [
Water
Quench &
Temper
212---248
up to
302---341
100
(690)
75
(515)
145
(1000)
125
(860)
Oil
Quench &
Temper
241---285]
up to
341---388
120
(830)
95
(655)
341---388
170
(1170)
277---321
up to
363---415w
135
(930)
180
(1240)
Oil
Quench &
Temper
150 (1035)
110
(760)
145 (1000)
* Steels shown in order of increased hardenability, 4350 being the highest. These steels can be ordered
to H Band hardenability ranges.
[ Hardness range is dependent upon controlling section size (refer to appendix B) and quench severity.
] It is difficult to cut teeth in 4100 Series steels above 341 HB and 4300 Series steels above 375 HB.
(4340 and 4350 provide advantage due to higher tempering temperatures and microstructure
considerations)
w High specified hardness is used for special gearing, but costs should be evaluated due to reduced
machinability.
4.6 Hardenability. Hardenability of steel is the property that determines the hardness gradient produced
ANSI/AGMA
2004---B89
4.7 Machinability. Several factors influence the machinability of materials and in turn affect the economy and feasibility of manufacturing. These factors
must be considered at the design stage, particularly
when high strength levels are being specified. Factors influencing machinability are:
(1) Material being cut, including composition,
microstructure, hardness, shape, and size.
(2) Cutting speeds, feeds and cutting tools.
(3) Condition of machine tools, including
rigidity, precision, power, etc.
ANSI/AGMA
4.8.1 Wrought Steel. Wrought steel is the generic term applied to carbon and alloy steels which are
mechanically worked into form for specific applications. The standard wrought steel forms are round
stock, flat stock and forgings. Forgings reduce machining time, and are available in a wide range of
sizes and grades.
2004---B89
Table 4---4
Machinability of Common Gear Materials
Material Grades
1020
4118
4620
8620
8822
3310
4320
4820
9310
Material Grades
1045
1141
1541
4130
4140
4142
4145
4150
4340
4345
4350
Remarks for medium carbon alloy steel (above) apply. However, the
higher carbon results in lower machinability. Sulfur additions aid the
machinability of these grades. 4340 machinability is good up to 363
HB. The higher carbon level in 4145, 4150, 4345, and 4350 makes
them more difficult to machine and should be specified only for
heavy sections. Inadequate (slack) quench can seriously affect
machinability in these steels.
NOTE: Coarse grain steels are more machinable than fine grain. However, gear steels are generally
used in the fine grain condition since mechanical properties are improved, and distortion during heat
treatment is reduced. Increasingly cleaner steels are now also being specified for gearing. However, if
sulfur content is low, less than 0.015 percent, machinability may decrease appreciably.
Material Grades
Gray Irons
Ductile Irons
Gear Bronzes
and Brasses
All gear bronzes and brass have good machinability. The very high
strength heat treated bronzes [above 110 ksi (760 MPa) tensile strength]
have fair machinability.
Austenitic
Stainless Steel
All austenitic stainless steel grades only have fair machinability. Because
of work hardening tendencies, feeds and speeds must be selected to
minimize work hardening.
ANSI/AGMA
10
2004---B89
4.8.1.1 Round Stock. Round bars can be purchased in various diameters for standard carbon and
alloy grades. They are typically available as hot
rolled, hot rolled---cold drawn, hot rolled---cold finished and forged rounds. Cold drawing produces a
close tolerance bar with improved mechanical properties (higher hardness and yield strength). Low to
medium carbon steels are normally available as cold
drawn bar for gearing. Hot rolled---cold finished bars
are machined (turned, ground and/or polished) for
improved size control, but show no improvement in
mechanical properties over hot rolled or annealed
bar. Hot rolled bars are mechanically worked at
approximately 2100---2400_F (1150---1315_C) and
may be subsequently annealed, straightened and
stress relieved. Forged round bars are forged round
under a press or hammer at the same approximate
temperature as hot rolled bars (higher temperature
for lower carbon content carbon or alloy steel) and
Table 4---5
Mechanical Property Requirements --- Cold Drawn, Stress Relieved Steel Bars
(Special Cold Drawn, High Tensile)
Size
included
inch (mm)
Steel
Designation
1137 SR *
1045 SR
1141 SR
1144 SR
1144 SS[
4145 SS]
95
115
115
115
140
150
(655)
(795)
(795)
(795)
(965)
(1035)
90
100
100
100
125
130
(620)
(690)
(690)
(690)
(860)
(895)
11
10
11
10
10 w
10 w
24
24
24
24
30
32
3.001 (76.1)
to
3.500 (89)
4145 SS]
150
(1035)
130
(895)
10 w
32
3.001 (76.1)
to
4.000 (102)
1045 SR
1141 SR
1144 SR
105
105
105
(725)
(725)
(725)
90
90
90
(620)
(620)
(620)
9
9
9
24
24
24
0.375 (10)
to
3.000 (76)
* Stress Relieved.
[
Special steel. Additional requirements: Hardness, Rockwell C 30, min. 1144 SS not available above
2.5 in (64 mm).
] Special steel. Additional requirements: Hardness Rockwell C 32, min. 4145 SS not available above
3.5 in (89 mm).
w Typical value, not a requirement.
NOTE: Some cold finish steel companies furnish many of the above steels under various trade names.
ANSI/AGMA
11
2004---B89
4.8.1.3 Forgings. Forgings are made by hot mechanical deformation (working of a steel billet into a
specific form) which densifies the structure, and may
provide improved inclusion orientation. Typically,
deformation is done while the billet is at temperatures generally above 1900_F(1038_C).
Cast ingots, from which blooms and billets are
manufactured prior to forming forgings and barstock, are now also bottom poured as well as conventional top poured. Bottom poured ingots are poured
with a bottom ingate and runner which provides molten steel to the ingot mold, much like steel castings
are produced. Bottom poured ingots show improved
macro---cleanliness and ingot yield (more usable ingot metal after conventional cropping or removal of
the top pipe cavity and bottom discard of top poured
ingots).
12
2004---B89
melting processes, using both acid or basic lined furnace steel making practices. Secondary refining processes can be used for reducing the gas, phosphorus,
and sulfur levels of cast steel.
4.8.3.2 Material Grades of Cast Steel. The material grades used for cast gearing are generally modifications (silicon, etc) of standard AISI or SAE designations. Through hardened gearing applications
generally use 1045, 4135, 4140, 8630, 8640, and 4340
SOLID WEB
CORED WEB
SMALLER GEARS
SOLID RING
SOLID HUB
SPLIT RING
SPLIT HUB
ANSI/AGMA
13
2004---B89
Table 4---6
Typical Chemical Analyses for Through Hardened Cast Steel Gears
Alloy Percent for Cast Steel Types
Element
Carbon
Manganese
Phosphorus, max.
Sulfur, max.
Silicon, max.
Nickel
Chromium
Molybdenum
1045 Type
4140 Type
8630 Type
8642 Type
4340 Type
0.40---0.50
0.60---1.00
0.050
0.060
0.60
--- ----- ----- ---
0.37---0.43
0.70---1.00
0.030
0.040
0.60
--- --0.80---1.10
0.15---0.25
0.27---0.37
0.70---1.00
0.030
0.040
0.60
0.60---0.90
0.60---0.90
0.30---0.40
0.38---0.45
0.70---1.00
0.030
0.040
0.60
0.60---0.90
0.60---0.90
0.40---0.50
0.38---0.43
0.70---1.00
0.030
0.040
0.60
1.65---2.00
0.70---0.90
0.20---0.30
GENERAL NOTES:
1. Type designations indicate non---conformance to exact AISI analysis requirements.
2. When basic steel making practice, ladle refining or AOD (argon oxygen decarburization) processing
are used, lower phosphorus and sulfur contents to less than 0.020 percent are commonly achieved.
3. Vanadium content of 0.06---0.10 percent may be specified for grain refinement.
4. Aluminum content of 0.025 percent maximum may be specified for low alloy cast steel (per ASTM
A356) for ladle deoxidation to improve toughness, cleanliness and machinability.
5. Other AISI Type and proprietary chemical analyses are used for carbon and low alloy cast gears
according to ASTM A148 or customer specifications, depending upon specified hardness (mechanical
properties), type of heat treatment and controlling section size (hardenability) considerations.
6. Source: AGMA 6033---A88, Standard for Marine Propulsion Gear Units, Part 1 Materials.
Table 4---7
Tensile Properties of Through Hardened Cast Steel Gears!
Brinell
Hardness
Range
Minimum
Tensile
Strength
ksi (MPa)
Minimum
Yield
Strength
0.2 percent Offset
ksi (MPa)
Percent
Minimum
Elongation
in 2 in
(50 mm)
Percent
Minimum
Reduction
in Area
A
B
C
223---269
241---285
262---311
100 (690)
110 (760)
118 (810)
75 (480)
80 (550)
90 (620)
15.0
13.0
11.0
35.0
31.0
28.0
D
E
285---331
302---352
130 (900)
140 (970)
100 (690)
115 (790)
10.0
9.0
26.0
24.0
F
G
321---363
331---375
145 (1000)
150 (1030)
120 (830)
125 (860)
8.0
7.0
20.0
18.0
AGMA@
6033---A87
Class
NOTES:
1. Above tensile requirements for seven classes are modifications of three grades of ASTM A148
(Grades 105---85 through 150---135).
2. Source: AGMA 6033---A88, Standard for Marine Propulsion Gear Units, Part 1 Materials.
ANSI/AGMA
14
2004---B89
15
2004---B89
(3) Chemical Analysis. Unless otherwise specified, the chemical analysis is left to the discretion of
the casting supplier as necessary to produce castings
to the specification.
1
ASTM
Class
Number
20
30
35
40
50
60
4.8.4.2 Ductile Iron. Ductile iron, sometimes referred to as nodular iron, is characterized by the
spheroidal shape of the graphite in the metal matrix,
produced by innoculation with magnesium and rare
earth elements. A wide range of mechanical properties are produced through control of the alloying elements and subsequent heat treatments. (Refer to
Gray and Ductile Iron Handbook.)
(1) Material Considerations. Ductile iron castings are made by the electric arc furnace, cupola or
induction practice and should be free of shrink, porosity, gas holes and entrapped sand and hard areas
in the tooth portion.
Repair welds in areas to be machined should
have equivalent machinability as the casting. Repair
welding in the tooth portion should only be performed with the approval of the gear purchaser.
(2) Heat Treating. Ductile iron castings shall be
heat treated by annealing, normalizing and tempering or quenching and tempering or as---cast as required to meet the specified mechanical properties.
These heat treatments produce ferritic, pearlitic or
martensitic structures.
Tensile tests should only be required when specified. Tensile test requirements are shown in Table
4---8, and testing should be performed in accordance
with ASTM A48, Standard Specifications for Gray
Iron Casting.
Tensile test coupons are cast in separate molds in
accordance with the provisions of ASTM A48. The
size of the cast test coupon is dependent upon the
thickness of the tooth portion of the casting as follows:
0.25---0.50
(6.4---12.7)
0.51---1.00
(12.8---25.4)
1.01---2 incl.
(25.5---50.8)
As Cast Machined
Diameter, Diameter, ASTM A48
Test Bar,
in (mm)
in (mm)
0.88
(22.4)
1.20
(30.5)
2.00
(50.8)
0.50
(12.7)
0.750
(19.0)
1.25
(31.8)
(3) Chemical Analysis. Unless otherwise specified, the chemical analysis is left to the discretion of
the casting supplier as necessary to produce castings
to the specification.
(4) Mechanical Properties. Typical mechanical
properties are shown in Table 4---9. Other properties
may be as agreed upon by the gear manufacturer and
casting producer.
A
B
C
Table 4---8
Minimum Hardness and Tensile Strength
Requirements
for Gray Cast Iron
ANSI/AGMA
155
180
205
220
250
285
Tensile
Strength
ksi (MPa)
20 (140)
30 (205)
35 (240)
40 (275)
50 (345)
60 (415)
Thickness
of Tooth
Section,
in (mm)
Brinell
Hardness
16
2004---B89
For solid cylindrical pieces, with length over diameter of one or more, the number of hardness tests
should be as follows:
Diameter of
Tooth Portion, in(mm)
To 3 (76) incl.
Over 3 (76) to 6 (152) incl.
Over 6 (152)
Hardness tests should be performed in accordance with ASTM Designation E10, Standard Method of Test for Brinell Hardness of Metallic Materials.
Hardness tests should be made on the mid rim thickness or mid face width of the tooth portion diameter.
Number of hardness tests per piece is based on the
diameter of the casting as follows:
Outside Diameter
of Casting, in(mm)
To 12 (305 )
Over 12 (305) to 36 (915)
Over 36 (915) to 60 (1525)
Over 60 (1525)
Number of
Hardness Tests
1
2
4
Number of
Hardness Tests
1
2
4
8
4.8.4.3 Austempered Ductile Iron. Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) is a ductile iron with higher
strength and hardness than conventional ductile
irons. The higher properties of ADI are achieved by
closely controlled chemistry and an austempering
heat treatment. This treatment results in a unique
microstructure of bainitic ferrite and larger amounts
of carbon stabilized austenite. With variation in austempering temperature and transformation time,
several ranges of engineering properties can be
achieved.
Table 4---9
Mechanical Properties of Ductile Iron
1
ASTM
Grade
Designation
60---40---18
65---45---12
80---55---06
100---70---03
120---90---02
Former
AGMA
Class
Recommended
Heat Treatment
Min. Tensile
Brinell
Strength
Hardness Range
ksi (MPa)
Min. Yield
Strength
ksi (MPa)
170 max.
156---217
60 (415)
65 (450)
40 (275)
45 (310)
187---255
241---302
Range
Specified
80 (550)
100 (690)
120 (830)
55 (380)
70 (485)
90 (620)
Elongation
in 2 inch
(50 mm)
percent min
18.0
12.0
6.0
3.0
2.0
17
2004---B89
The ductility of powder metal parts is substantially lower than for wrought steels. Hardness specifications can be developed for powder metal parts, but
must be specified as apparent hardness since the
hardness value obtained using a standard tester (either HRB or HRC) is a combination of the powder
particle hardness and porosity. The actual hardness
of the powder metal material will be higher than the
apparent hardness reading and can be more accuANSI/AGMA
Spur gears are the easiest to produce out of powder metal because of the vertical action of the press
and ease of ejection of the preform from the die cavity before sintering. Bevel, miter, helical, and other
special gear forms are, however, possible in powder
metal with sufficient development. True involute
gears are less difficult and may be less costly to pro-
18
2004---B89
NOTES: Mechanical properties in the transverse direction will vary with inclusion type
and material form.
Mechanical property data is normally
measured in the longitudinal direction.
Castings generally being isotropic (non---directionality of properties), when sound in the rim tooth
section, can provide comparable mechanical properties to those of forgings. Casting quality involves controlled steel making, molding, casting, heat treating
ANSI/AGMA
19
2004---B89
DIRECTION OF
METAL AND
INCLUSION
FLOW
ROLLED
RING FORGING
LONGITUDINAL TENSILE
TEST BAR OR PROPERTIES
TRANSVERSE
TENSILE TEST BAR
DIRECTION OF METAL
AND INCLUSION FLOW
PINION FORGING
TRANSVERSE TENSILE
TEST BAR
LONGITUDINAL
TENSILE TEST BAR
TANGENTIAL
TENSILE TEST BAR
20
2004---B89
4.10.4.2 General Information for Copper Castings. Additional information regarding manufacturing, chemical analysis, heat treating, tensile properties, hardness and hardness control, cast structure
and supplementary data for cast copper alloys is as
follows:
(1) Casting Manufacture. Cast copper base gear
materials may be melted by any commercially recognized melting method for the composition involved.
Castings should be free of shrink, porosity, gas holes
and entrapped sand in the tooth portion. Castings
should also be furnished free of sand and extraneous
appendages.
Heat treated castings should have the test coupons heat treated in the same furnace loads as the
casting they represent.
(3) Casting Chemical Analysis. Chemical analysis shall be in conformance with the type specified or
ANSI/AGMA
21
2004---B89
Table 4---10
Chemical Analyses of Wrought Bronze Alloys
Bronze
1
Alloy
UNS NO.
Former
AGMA
Type
Fe
Sn
Zn
Al
As
Mn
Si
Ni
(incl Co)
C62300
--- ---
Rem.
--- ---
2.0
to
4.0
0.60
--- ---
8.5
to
11.0
--- ---
0.50
0.25
C62400
--- ---
Rem.
--- ---
2.0
to
4.5
0.20
--- ---
10.0
to
11.5
--- ---
0.30
0.25
C63000
ALBR 6
Rem.
--- ---
2.0
to
4.0
0.20
0.30
9.0
to
11.0
--- ---
1.50
0.25
4.0
to
5.5
C64200
ALBR 5
Rem.
0.05
0.30
0.20
0.50
6.3
to
7.6
0.10
1.5
to
2.2
0.25
C67300
--- ---
58.0
to
63.0
0.40
to
3.0
0.50
0.30
Rem.
0.25
2.0
to
3.5
0.50
to
1.5
0.25
0.15
--- ---
1.0
--- ---
1 Unified Numbering System. For cross reference to SAE, former SAE & ASTM, see SAE Information
Report SAE J461. For added copper alloy information, also see SAE J463.
Table 4---11
Typical Mechanical Properties! of Wrought Bronze Alloy Rod and Bar
Bronze2 Alloy
UNS NO.
C62300
C62400
C63000
C64200
C67300
Former
AGMA
Type
Tensile Strength
ksi
(MPa)
Yield Strength
ksi
(MPa)
Elongation in
2 in (50 mm)
percent, min.
Hardness
HB and HRB
--- ---
90
(620)
45
(310)
25
180HB (1000kgf)
--- ---
95
(655)
50
(345)
12
200HB (3000kgf)
ALBR 6
90
(620)
45
(310)
17
100 HRB
ALBR 5
93
(640)
60
(415)
26
90 HRB
70
(485)
40
(275)
25
70 HRB
--- ---
1 Typical mechanical properties vary with form, temper, and section size considerations.
2 Unified Numbering System. For cross reference to SAE, former SAE & ASTM, see SAE Information
Report SAE J461. For added wrought copper alloy information, also see SAE J463.
ANSI/AGMA
22
2004---B89
Table 4---12
Chemical Analyses of Cast Bronze Alloys
Bronze
Former
Alloy * AGMA
UNS NO. Type
Sn
Pb
Zn
Fe
Ni
Sb (incl Co) S
Al
Si
Mn
C86200
MNBR 3
60.0
to
66.0
0.20
0.20
22.0
to
28.0
2.0
to
4.0
--- ---
1.0
--- ---
--- ---
3.0
to
4.9
--- ---
2.5
to
5.0
C86300
MNBR 4
60.0
to
66.0
0.20
0.20
22.0
to
28.0
2.0
to
4.0
--- ---
1.0
--- ---
--- ---
5.0
to
7.5
--- ---
2.5
to
5.0
C86500
MNBR 2
55.0
to
60.0
1.0
0.40
36.0
to
42.0
0.4
to
2.0
--- ---
1.0
--- ---
--- ---
0.5
to
1.5
--- ---
0.10
to
1.5
C90700
MNBR 2
88.0
to
90.0
10.0
to
12.0
0.50
0.50
0.15
0.20
0.5
0.05
0.30{
0.005
C92500
MNBR 5
85.0
to
88.0
10.0
to
12.0
1.0
to
1.5
0.50
0.30
0.25
0.8
to
1.5
0.05
0.30{
0.005
C92700
MNBR 3
86.0
to
89.0
9.0
to
11.0
1.0
to
2.5
0.70
0.20
0.25
1.0
0.05
0.25{
0.005
C92900
--- ---
82.0
to
86.0
9.0
to
11.0
2.0
to
3.2
0.25
0.20
0.25
2.8
to
4.0
0.05
0.25{
0.005
C95200
ALBR 1
86.0
min
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
2.5
to
4.0
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
0.50{
8.5
to
9.5
C95300
ALBR 2
86.0
min
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
0.8
to
1.5
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
9.0
to
11.0
--- ---
--- ---
C95400
ALBR 3
83.0
min
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
3.0
to
5.0
--- ---
2.5
--- ---
--- ---
10.0
to
11.5
--- ---
0.5
C95500
ALBR 4
78.0
min
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
3.0
to
5.0
--- ---
3.0
to
5.5
--- ---
--- ---
10.0
to
11.5
--- ---
3.5
* Unified Numbering System. For cross reference to SAE, former SAE & ASTM, see SAE Information
Report SAE J461. For added copper alloy information, also see SAE J462.
{
ANSI/AGMA
23
2004---B89
Table 4---13
Mechanical Properties of Cast Bronze Alloys!
Copper
Alloy
UNS.2
NO.
Former
AGMA
Type
C86200 MNBR 3
Casting Method
& Condition #
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous
90
(620)
45 (310)
18
--- ---
180
110
110
(760)
(760)
60 (415)
62 (425)
12
14
225
225
C86500 MNBR 2
C86500 MNBR 2
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous
65
70
(450)
(485)
25 (170)
25 (170)
20
25
112
112
C90700 BRONZE 2
C90700 BRONZE 2
C90700 BRONZE 2
Sand
Continuous
Centrifugal
35
40
50
(240)
(275)
(345)
18 (125)
25 (170)
28 (195)
10
10
12
70
80
100
C92500 BRONZE 5
C92500 BRONZE 5
Sand
Continuous
35
40
(240)
(275)
18 (125)
24 (165)
10
10
70
80
C92700 BRONZE 3
C92700 BRONZE 3
Sand
Continuous
35
38
(240)
(260)
18 (125)
20 (140)
10
8
70
80
C92900
Sand, Continuous
45
(310)
25 (170)
90
--- ---
C95200 ALBR 1
C95200 ALBR 1
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous
65
68
(450)
(470)
25 (170)
26 (180)
20
20
125
125
C95300
C95300
C95300
C95300
ALBR 2
ALBR 2
ALBR 2
ALBR 2
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous (HT)
65
70
80
80
(450)
(485)
(550)
(550)
25
26
40
40
(170)
(180)
(275)
(275)
20
25
12
12
---------
---------
140
140
160
160
C95400
C95400
C95400
C95400
ALBR 3
ALBR 3
ALBR 3
ALBR 3
75
85
90
95
(515)
(585)
(620)
(655)
30
32
45
45
(205)
(220)
(310)
(310)
12
12
6
10
---------
---------
160
160
190
190
C95500
C95500
C95500
C95500
ALBR 4
ALBR 4
ALBR 4
ALBR 4
Sand, Centrifugal
Continuous
Sand, Centrifugal (HT)
Continuous (HT)
90
95
110
110
(620)
(655)
(760)
(760)
40
45
60
62
(275)
(290)
(415)
(425)
6
10
5
8
---------
---------
190
190
200
200
C86300 MNBR 4
--- ---
1 For rating of worm gears in accordance with AGMA 6034---A87, the Materials Factor, k s , will depend
upon the particular casting method employed.
2 Unified Numbering System. For cross reference to SAE, former SAE & ASTM, see SAE Information
Report SAE J461. For added copper alloy information, also see SAE J462.
3 Refer to ASTM B427 for sand and centrifugal cast C90700 alloy and sand cast C92900.
4 Minimum tensile strength and yield strength shall be reduced 10% for continuous cast bars having a
cross section of 4 inch (102 mm) or more (see ASTM B505, Table 3 footnote).
5 BHN at other load levels (1000 kgf or 1500 kgf) may be used if approved by purchaser.
ANSI/AGMA
24
2004---B89
(8) Supplemental Data. The following supplementary requirement should apply only when specified by contractual agreement. Details of this supplementary requirement should be agreed upon by
the casting producer and gear manufacturer.
(a) With proper foundry technique, the properties of static chilled and centrifugal cast separate test
bars should be the same.
5. Heat Treatment
Heat treatment is a heating and cooling process
used to achieve desired properties in gear materials.
Ferrous gearing may be through hardened or surface
hardened when gear rating or service requirements
warrant higher hardness and strength for improved
fatigue strength or wear resistance. Common heat
treatments for ferrous materials include:
(b) An integral or a separate test bar simply signifies the melt quality poured into the mold to make
the casting. It does not express the specific properties and characteristics of the casting which are greatly dependent on design, size, and foundry technique.
(c) The grain size of cast copper base alloys varies as a function of cooling rate and section thickness. Recommended maximum grain size for centrifugal castings is 0.035 mm in the rim, 0.070 mm in the
web and 0.120 mm in the hub. The grain size for copper base alloys is determined per ASTM E112 at 75X
magnification.
25
2004---B89
Specialized heat treatment for nonferrous materials should be recommended by the producer.
5.1 Through Hardening Processes. Through hardened gears are heated to a required temperature and
cooled in the furnace or quenched in air, gas or liquid. Through hardening may be used before or after
the gear teeth are formed.
There are generally three methods of heat treating through hardened gearing. In ascending order of
hardness for a particular type of steel they are;
annealing, normalizing (or normalizing and tempering), and quenching and tempering. Modifications
of quench hardening, such as austempering and martempering, occur infrequently for steel gearing and
are, therefore, not discussed. Austempering is used,
however, for through hardened (approximately 300
to 480 HB) ductile cast iron gears.
5.1.4 Quench and Temper. The quench and temper process on ferrous alloys involves heating to form
austenite at 1475---1600_F (802---871_C), followed
by rapid quenching. The rapid cooling causes the
gear to become harder and stronger by formation of
martensite. The gear is then tempered to a specific
temperature, generally below 1275_F(691_C), to
achieve the desired mechanical properties. Tempering reduces the material hardness and mechanical
strength but improves the material ductility and
toughness (impact resistance). Selection of the tempering temperature must be based upon the specified hardness range, material composition, and the
as quenched hardness. The tempered hardness varies inversely with tempering temperature. Parts are
normally air cooled from tempering temperatures.
Table 4---3 gives hardness guidelines for some steel
grades.
(2) When the hardness and mechanical properties required for a given gear application can be
achieved more economically by quench and temper
26
2004---B89
The steel carbon content determines the maximum surface hardness which can be achieved, while
the alloy composition determines the hardness gradient which can be achieved through the part. Refer
to 4.6 for more information on hardenability.
5.1.4.3 Tempering. Tempering lowers hardness
and strength, which improves ductility and toughness
or impact resistance. The tempering temperature
must be carefully selected based upon the specified
hardness range, the quenched hardness of the part,
and the material. The optimum tempering temperature is the highest temperature possible while maintaining the specified hardness range. Hardness after
tempering varies inversely with the tempering temperature used. Parts are normally air cooled from the
tempering temperature.
Tables in the appropriate reference are available
as guidelines for the effect of tempering temperature
on hardness.
CAUTION: Some steels can become brittle
and unsuitable for service if tempered in the
temperature
range
of
800---1200_F
(425---650_C). This phenomenon is called
temper brittleness and is generally considered to be caused by segregation of alloying
elements or precipitation of compounds at
ferrite and prior austenite grain boundaries.
If the part under consideration must be tempered in this range, investigate the specific
materials susceptibility to temper brittleness
and proceed accordingly. Molybdenum content of 0.25---0.50 percent has been shown to
eliminate temper brittleness in most steels.
Temper brittleness should not be confused
ANSI/AGMA
27
2004---B89
the gear element within the heat source (flame or induction coil) which envelopes the entire face width.
Gearing is removed from the heat source and immediately hardened by the quenchant. Shafting and
gearing can also be progressively spin hardened by
spinning the shaft or tooth section within the heat
source and following quench head. The heat source
and quench head traverse axially along the length to
be hardened.
NOTE: Stress relief below 1100_F(593_C) reduces the effectiveness. Stress relief below
900_F(482_C) is not recommended.
5.1.6 Heavy Draft, Cold Drawn, Stress Relieved
Steel Bars. Heavy draft, cold drawn, stress relieved
bars may be used as an alternative to quench and
tempered steel. However, fatigue properties of this
steel may not be equivalent to quench and tempered
steel with the same tensile properties. Size limitations and mechanical properties are listed in Table
4---5. For further details see ASTM A---311.
5.2 Flame and Induction Hardening. Flame or induction hardening of gearing involves heating of gear
teeth to 1450---1600_F(788---871_C) followed by
quench and tempering. An oxyfuel burner is used for
flame hardening. An encircling coil or tooth by tooth
inductor is used for induction hardening. These processes develop a hard wear resistant case on the gear
teeth. When only the surface is heated to the required depth, only the surface is hardened during
quenching (see Figs 5---1 and 5---2). Material selection and heat treat condition prior to flame or induction hardening significantly affects the hardness and
uniformity of properties which can be obtained.
Gearing may also be tooth to tooth, progressively hardened by passing the inductor between the
roots of adjacent teeth, while the gear element is submerged in a synthetic quench (termed Delapena
Process). This process, like other tooth to tooth
hardening techniques, is time consuming and is not
economical for small, finer pitch gearing (finer than
10 DP). Spin hardening is more economical for
smaller gears.
5.2.1 Methods of Flame and Induction Hardening. Both of these methods of surface hardening can
be done by spin hardening, or by tooth to tooth hardening.
Spin hardening of gearing involves heating all of
the teeth across the face simultaneously by spinning
ANSI/AGMA
28
2004---B89
FLAME HEAD
FROM THIS
TO THIS
FLAME HEAD
FLAME HEAD
FROM THIS
TO THIS
FLAME HEAD
FROM THIS
TO THIS
FLAME HEAD
FLAME HEAD
FROM THIS
TO THIS
THE HARDENING PATTERNS SHOWN ARE NOT POSSIBLE FOR ALL SIZES AND DIAMETRAL
PITCHES OF GEARING, AND ARE DEPENDENT UPON THE CAPACITY OF THE EQUIPMENT.
29
2004---B89
SPIN HARDENING
INDUCTION COIL
OR FLAME HEAD
INDUCTION COIL
OR FLAME HEAD
FLANK HARDENING
INDUCTOR OR FLAME HEAD
30
2004---B89
If high root hardness is not required, flame hardening is more available and more economical than induction hardening for herringbone and spiral bevel
gearing.
NOTE: AGMA quality level will be reduced
approximately one level (from the green
condition) after flame or induction hardening
unless subsequent finishing is performed.
5.2.2 Application. Flame and induction hardening have been used successfully on most gear types;
e.g., spur, helical, bevel, herringbone, etc. These
processes are used when gear teeth require high surface hardness, but size or configuration does not lend
itself to carburizing and quenching the entire part.
These processes may also be used when the maximum contact and bending strength achieved by carburizing is not required. These processes are also
Induction heating depth and pattern are controlled by frequency, power density, shape of the inductor, workpiece geometry and workpiece area being heated.
Contour or profile hardened tooth patterns for
4---12 D.P. gearing can be obtained by dual frequency
spin coil induction heating using both low (audio)
frequency (AF) of 1---15 kHz and higher (radio) frequency (RF) of approximately 350---500 kHz. Initially low audio frequency is used to preheat the root
area, followed by high radio frequency to develop the
profile heated pattern, followed by quenching.
ANSI/AGMA
31
2004---B89
cracking. The annealed structure is the least receptive to flame or induction hardening.
5.2.6.1 Repeatability. Repeatable process control is essential for acceptable results. With induction, this is usually not a problem with properly maintained equipment since electrical power characteristics, inductor movement and integral quench intensity can be readily controlled.
Repeatabiltiy becomes more difficult with flame
hardening. Equipment varies from hand held
torches to tailor made machine tools with well controlled movement of burner heads. Equipment must
be such that heating rates across the burner face are
consistent from cycle to cycle. Gas pressure and mixing of heating gases must be uniform. Burner head
location must be precise from cycle to cycle.
5.2.6.2 Heating with Flame or Induction. Accurate heating to the proper surface temperature is a
critical step. Burner or inductor design, heat input
and cycle time must be closely controlled. Underheating results in less than specified hardness and
case depth. Overheating can result in cracking.
Flame hardening may also cause burning or melting
of tooth surfaces.
Flank or root and flank induction scan hardening (contour) can be applied to almost any tooth size
with appropriate supporting equipment and kW capacity. However, for pitches of approximately 16 DP
and finer, these methods are not recommended. Spin
hardening in an induction coil is recommended. Spin
hardening of finer pitches is also required when using
flame burners.
ANSI/AGMA
32
2004---B89
depth does not apply. When root is also to be hardened, depth of case at the root may be specified.
5.2.7 Rating Considerations. Designers should be
aware that AGMA decreases load ratings for gears
which do not have hardened roots. AGMA gear rating standards should be consulted for appropriate
stress numbers.
5.2.7.1 Heat Affected Zone. In flame hardening, the
heat affected zone (HAZ) is a region that is heated to
1300---1400_F, (704_C---760_C) but does not get
hardened and thus has lower strength. This zone
should be located either a minimum of 1/8 inch up the
flank from the critical root fillet or well below the
root diameter.
60
50
H= 10
EFFECTIVE CASE DEPTH HARDNESS
40
30
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
CARBON CONTENT --- PERCENT
0.80
0.70
Fig 5---3 Recommended Maximum Surface Hardness and Effective Case Depth
Hardness Versus Percent Carbon for Flame and Induction Hardening
ANSI/AGMA
33
2004---B89
5.2.7.2 Case Depth Evaluation (Hardness Pattern). Although it is not always practical, particularly
on larger gearing, the only positive way to check case
depth is by sectioning an actual part. For tooth by
tooth hardening, a segment of a gear can be hardened and sectioned. Case depth should be determined on a normal tooth section, using an appropriate superficial or micro---hardness tester. When a
gear cannot be sectioned, hardness pattern and
depth can be checked by polishing end faces of teeth
and nitric acid etching. Grit blasting is also occasionally used. Hardness can also be checked on end faces
at flank and root areas.
After carburizing for the appropriate time, gearing will usually be cooled to 1475---1550_F
(802---843_C), held at temperature to stabilize while
maintaining the carbon potential, and direct
quenched. Gearing may be atmosphere cooled after
carburizing to below approximately 600_F (315_C)
and then reheated in controlled atmosphere to
1475---1550_F (802---843_C) and quenched. After
quenching, gearing is usually tempered at
300---375_F (149---191_C). Gearing may be subsequently given a refrigeration treatment to transform
retained austenite and retempered.
5.2.8 Specifications. The drawing, order, or written specification should include the following information:
(1) Chemical analysis range of the material or
designation.
(2) Prior heat treatment.
(3) Hardening pattern required.
(4) Minimum surface hardness required.
(Maximums may be specified for induction hardened parts).
(5) Those areas where the surface hardness is to
be measured and the frequency of inspection.
(6) Depth of hardening required and the location(s) at which the depth is to be obtained.
(7) Whether destructive tests are to be used for
determining the depth of hardening and the frequency of such inspection.
(8) Tempering temperature, if required.
(9) Magnetic particle inspection, if required.
(2) Depth of hardening obtained at each location specified when destructive tests are required,
and the number of pieces inspected.
ANSI/AGMA
34
2004---B89
improved wear resistance. Specified finish operations after hardening depend upon accuracy and contact requirements for all applications.
Table 5---1
Test Bar Size for Core Hardness
Determination
BAR SIZE
4 1/2 DP
and finer
2 1/2 DP
to less than
4 1/2 DP
1 1/2 DP
to less than
2 1/2 DP
1 1/2 DP
and coarser
Test discs or plates may also be used whose minimum thickness is 70 percent of the appropriate test
bar diameter. The minimum inscribed diameter on a
test disc (or plate dimensions) should be a minimum
of three times its thickness.
The recommended test bar diameter for bevel
gearing is to be approximately equal to the inscribed
diameter of the normal tooth thickness at mid face
width.
DP
35
2004---B89
36
2004---B89
continuous atmosphere control is preferred, but other approved methods may be used.
(1) Material.
(2) Case depth range (refer to Table 5---2).
(3) Surface hardness range.
When additional characteristics are required,
the following additional items may be specified in
whole or part:
(2) Atmosphere Control. Furnaces should be capable of maintaining a carburizing atmosphere with
controllable carbon potential. Instrumentation for
ANSI/AGMA
37
2004---B89
Table 5---2
Typical Effective Case Depth Specifications for Carburized Gearing
Normal
Diametral
1
Pitch
Normal
Tooth 2
Thickness
16
14
12
10
8
7
6
5
4
3.5
3.0
2.75
2.5
2.25
2.0
1.75
1.5
1.25
1.0
0.75
0.098
0.112
0.131
0.157
0.198
0.224
0.251
0.314
0.393
0.449
0.523
0.571
0.628
0.698
0.785
0.897
1.047
1.256
1.570
2.094
Range of
Normal
Diametral
Pitch
17.5 --- 13.7
17.5 --- 13.7
13.7 --- 10.5
10.5 --- 8.5
8.5 --- 7.5
7.5 --- 6.5
6.5 --- 5.2
5.2 --- 4.3
4.3 --- 3.7
3.7 --- 3.1
3.1 --- 2.8
2.8 --- 2.6
2.6 --- 2.3
2.3 --- 2.2
2.2 --- 1.9
1.9 --- 1.6
1.6 --- 1.3
1.3 --- 1.1
1.1 & less
1.1 & less
Range of
Normal
Circular
Pitch
0.180 --- 0.230
0.180 --- 2.300
0.230 --- 0.300
0.300 --- 0.370
0.370 --- 0.480
0.370 --- 0.480
0.480 --- 0.600
0.600 --- 0.728
0.728 --- 0.860
0.860 --- 1.028
1.026 --- 1.200
1.026 --- 1.200
1.200 --- 1.400
1.200 --- 1.400
1.428 --- 1.676
1.676 --- 1.976
1.976 --- 2.400
2.400 --- 2.828
2.828 & more
2.325 & more
-----------------------------------------
0.020
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.080
0.090
0.090
0.105
0.105
0.125
0.140
0.155
0.180
0.205
0.205
3, ,4 5
Worms with
Ground 7
Threads
0.020 --- 0.030
0.020 --- 0.030
0.025 --- 0.040
0.035 --- 0.050
0.040 --- 0.055
0.040 --- 0.055
0.045 --- 0.060
0.045 --- 0.060
0.045 --- 0.060
0.060 --- 0.075
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
0.075 --- 0.090
1 All case depths are based on normal diametral pitch. All other pitch measurements should be
converted before specifying a case depth.
2 Gears with thin top lands may be subject to excessive case depth at the tips. Land width should be
calculated before a case is specified.
3 Case at root is typically 50---70 percent of case at mid tooth.
4 The case depth for bevel and mitre gears is calculated from the thickness of the tooths small end.
5 For gearing requiring maximum performance, detailed studies must be made of the application,
loading and manufacturing procedures to determine the required effective case depth. For further
details refer to AGMA 2001---B88.
6 To convert above data to metric, multiply values given by 25.4 to determine mm equivalent.
7 Worm and ground---thread case depths allow for grinding. Un---ground worm gear cases may be
decreased accordingly. For very heavily loaded coarse pitch ground thread worms, heavier case depth
than shown in table may be required.
5.4 Carbonitriding. The purpose of this Section is to
establish methods for specifying carbonitrided gearing. Information in 5.3 on carburizing will generally
apply to carbonitriding, with noted exceptions.
Typically carbonitriding is carried out at lower
temperatures, 1550---1650_F (843---899_C), and for
shorter times than gas carburizing. Shallower case
depths are generally specified for carbonitriding
than is usual for production carburizing. Its effect on
steel is similar to liquid cyaniding and has replaced
cyaniding because of cyanide disposal problems.
ANSI/AGMA
38
2004---B89
advantages of carbonitriding is better case hardenability in lower alloy or plain carbon steels. The carbonitrided case has better wear and temper resistance than a straight carburized case. Carbonitriding
can be used to minimize distortion in finer pitch
gearing because lower austenitizing and quenching
temperatures can be used along with less severe
quench techniques and still achieve hardness. These
facts, along with lower alloy steels, result in the lower
core hardness mentioned previously, thus reducing
tooth growth and distortion. However, if higher core
hardness and deeper case depths are required for
bending resistance, carbonitriding may not be applicable.
Table 5---3
Approximate Minimum Core Hardness of
Carburized Gear Teeth
Grade
3316
9315
3310
9310
4820
8822
4320
8620
4620
1020
34
32
31
28
27
25
23
18
-----
5---6
7 & UP
36
34
33
31
33
30
27
24
18
14
37
36
35
33
35
32
30
26
22
16
38
37
36
34
36
34
33
28
25
18
39
2004---B89
In alloys such as series 4140 and 4340 steels, nitrided hardness is lessened appreciably by decreased
core hardness prior to nitriding. This must be considered when selecting tempering or stress relieving
temperatures.
5.5.5 Specific Characteristics of Nitrided Gearing. Nitriding does not lend itself to every gear application. The nitride process is restricted by and specified by case depth, surface hardness, core hardness
and material selection constraints.
ANSI/AGMA
40
2004---B89
Minimum Surface
Hardness, HRC
4140
4150
4340
Nitralloy 135
Case depth should be determined using a microhardness tester. At least three hardness tests should
be made beyond the depth at which core hardness is
obtained to assure that the case depth has been
reached.
28
30
32
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Material grade
Preheat treatment (see 5.5.5.2)
Minimum surface hardness
Minimum total case depth
Maximum thickness of white layer, if
required
(6) Areas to be protected from nitriding by
masking, if required
(7) Nitriding temperature
(8) Metallurgical test coupons
Table 5---4
Approximate Minimum Surface Hardness
--- Nitrided Steels
Steel Type
4140
4150
4340
Minimum Surface
Hardness
R15N
HRC!
85
48
85
48
84
46
90
60
89
58
1 Converted to HRC
2 British and German analyses, respectively
NOTE: Data infers a 269HB minimum core hardness.
5.5.5.4 Case Depth. The specified case depth for
nitrided gearing is determined by the surface and
sub---surface stress gradient of the design application. Surface hardness and core hardness will influence the designs minimum required case depth.
Since the diffusion of nitrogen is extremely slow,
ANSI/AGMA
41
2004---B89
teeth is restricted, however, to full gear tooth contours, and is better suited for flat than curved surfaces. This is true because the stream of electrons
must have line of sight access to the surface to be
hardened with a beam impingement angle of at least
25 degree (25---90 degrees
impingement angle
range). Dual laser beam optics have been developed,
however, for flank and root contour surface hardening of gear teeth.
ANSI/AGMA
42
2004---B89
Table 5---5
Commonly Used Quenchants for Ferrous Gear Materials
Material Grade
Quenchant
Remarks
1020
Water or Brine
4118
4620
8620
8822
4320
Oil
3310
Oil
1045
4130
8630
Water, Oil or
Polymer
1141
1541
Oil or Polymer
4140
4142
4145
Oil or Polymer
9310
Oil or Polymer
Gray or
Ductile
Iron
Oil, Polymer
or Air
ANSI/AGMA
43
2004---B89
5.8.3.1 Carburized Gearing. Distortion of carburized gearing makes it one of the least repeatable
of surface hardened processes. Lack of repeatability
is due to the greater number of variables which affect
distortion. Close control is, therefore, required. Distortion results from microstructural transformation,
and residual stress (from thermal shock, uneven
cooling, etc.) considerations. Transformation in the
case results in growth which sets up residual surface
compressive stress. This stress is balanced by corresponding residual tensile stress beneath the case.
Principal variables affecting the amount of
growth, distortion, and residual stress include:
(1) Geometry.
ANSI/AGMA
Stock removal by grinding after carburize hardening should be limited to approximately 0.007 inch
(0.18 mm) per tooth surface or 20 percent of the case
depth, whichever is less. Exception may be made for
coarser pitch gearing with cases 0.080 inches (2 mm)
or greater. Surfaces other than the tooth flanks and
roots may tolerate greater stock removal.
44
2004---B89
Distortion of carburized gearing also exhibits the following typical characteristics (refer to Fig 5---5):
(1) Reduction in tooth helix angle (helix unwind), which often requires an increased helix angle
to be machined into the element prior to carburizing
(more prevalent in pinions). Teeth on larger diameter, smaller face width gears may exhibit helix
wind---up after hardening.
(5) Bowing of the integral shaft pinions. Integral shaft pinions should, whenever possible, be hung
or fixtured in the vertical position (axes vertical) to
minimize bowing.
CANTILEVER PINION
Fig 5---4 General Design Guidelines for Blanks for Carburized Gearing
ANSI/AGMA
45
2004---B89
STRAIGHT
HELICAL
UNWIND
TAPER
HOURGLASSING
BOWING
END GROWTH
(REVERSE CROWN)
ECCENTRICITY
During both spin flame and spin induction hardening, the entire tooth cross section is often hardened to the specified depth below the roots of teeth.
For high bending strength applications, it is not
desirable to have the hardening pattern terminate in
the roots of the teeth because of residual tensile
stress considerations. Distortion increases as a
greater cross---section of a tooth is hardened. Spin
flame and spin induction hardening generally produce the following distortion characteristics:
(1) Helical unwinding of the gear teeth, as with
carburized pinions.
ANSI/AGMA
46
2004---B89
ground or lapped after hardening to meet dimensional tolerance requirements. Bearing diameters of
shaft extensions are often ground after nitriding with
only minimum stock provided. Surfaces can also be
masked for subsequent machining.
47
2004---B89
Coverage must be related to the part, not the Almen strip. The actual part must be examined for
complete coverage in all areas specified to be shot
peened. The peening time required to obtain 100
percent coverage should be recorded. The time re-
3.0 +
---0.015 in
(76+
--- 0.4mm)
+
0.031 +
---0.001 in (0.79 0.02mm)
--+
0.051 +
---0.001 in (1.30 0.02mm)
---
N STRIP
+
0.0938 +
---0.001 in (2.38 0.02mm)
---
A STRIP
PEENING NOZZLE
C STRIP
0.745 to
0.750 in
(18.9 to
19.0 mm)
ALMEN STRIPS
SHOT STREAM
4 to 6 in
(102 to 152 mm)
MEASURING DIAL
10--- 32
SCREWS
ALMEN TEST STRIP
HARDENED
BALL
SUPPORTS
0.75 in
(19.0 mm)
3.0 in
(76 mm)
1.5 in
(38.1mm)
3.0 in
(76 mm)
ARC HEIGHT
0.75 in
(19.0 mm)
HOLDING
FIXTURE
PEENING TEST
(a)
48
2004---B89
0
HRC 46 SHOT
--- 50
--- 500
---100
---1000
---150
HRC 61 SHOT
---200
---1500
---250
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
DEPTH IN INCHES
Fig 5---7 Residual Stress by Peening 1045 Steel at 62 HRC with 330 Shot
ANSI/AGMA
49
2004---B89
1.0
.040
HRC 31
.035
.75
.030
.025
.50
.020
HRC 52
.015
.25
.010
.005
.002
.005
.004
.010
.015
.006
.020
.008
.025 A
.010C
INTENSITY
Fig 5---8 Depth of Compressive Stress Versus Almen Intensity for Steel
Table 5---6 gives shot size and intensity for various diametral pitches.
Table 5---6
Typical Shot Size and Intensity for Shot
Peening
(2) All heat treating operations must be performed prior to shot peening as high temperatures
[over 450_F(232_C)] will thermally stress relieve the
peening effects.
Diametral
Pitch
8 --- 16
4 --- 7
2 1/2 --- 3 1/2
1 3/4 --- 2
3/4 --- 1
Shot Size
S110
S170
S230
S330
S550
Intensity
0.006
0.010
0.014
0.016
0.006
-----------
0.010A
0.014A
0.018A
0.020A
0.008C
5.9.3.7 General Comments. Additional comments for shot peening include the following:
(1) All magnetic particle or dye penetrant inspections should be performed before shot peening.
ANSI/AGMA
50
2004---B89
induced. Thermal, phase transformation and modification of surface chemistry stresses result from heat
treatment of steel.
5.10.2.1 Thermal and Phase Transformation
Stresses. Thermal stresses result from the heating
and cooling of materials. Quenching, one type of
thermal stress, can also be considered a phase transformation stress. Quenching, particularly fast
quenching to form martensite, generates both thermal and phase transformation stresses. For example,
two types of residual stress patterns can form on
quenching of a round bar. The most common type of
residual stress pattern in small diameter bars is a tensile stress at the surface and a compressive stress at
the center. This stress pattern results from the surface of a bar cooling faster than the center. The phase
transformation to martensite creates volume expansion producing tensile stress at the surface. This in
turn creates a compressive stress at the center.
51
2004---B89
Spectrographic Analysis
X---Ray Analysis
Atomic Absorption
Wet Chemistry
Iron casting grades are identified by their mechanical properties such as tensile strength, yield
strength, and elongation. Hardness may be specified
but cannot be used to identify grade.
Bronze material grades are normally qualified
using chemical analysis and hardness tests.
2
4
8
16
Number of Tests
Recommended
(Rim Face)
52
2004---B89
(4) When a total of eight hardness tests are specified, they shall be made 90 degrees apart on each
rim edge.
6.3 Incoming Material Mechanical Tests. Mechanical property test bars, for tensile testing and less frequently impact testing, are only required when specified. Refer to 6.8 for merits and limitations of mechanical test bars.
(1) A minimum of two hardness tests, 180 degrees apart with one on each side, shall be taken at
the mid radius on forgings of up to 18.0 inches (457
mm) in diameter, inclusive.
(2)A minimum of four hardness tests, two on
each side 180 degrees apart, shall be taken at the
mid radius on forgings over 18.0 inches (457 mm) in
diameter.
Test bar stock should remain attached to or accompany the rough stock until all thermal treatment
is completed.
Number of Tests
Recommended
2 (180_
apart)
4 (180_
apart)
6 (120_ apart)
8
(90_
apart)
(1) When a total of two hardness tests are specified, they shall be made 180 degrees apart, one on
the ring edge and the other on the opposite ring edge.
(2) When a total of four hardness tests are specified, they all shall be made 180 degrees apart on
ANSI/AGMA
53
2004---B89
commonly used methods for measuring and controlling carbon potential in a furnace atmosphere:
(1) Water Vapor Concentration. For a given
temperature, the carbon concentration on the surface of the part is related to the water vapor concentration (dew point) in a furnace atmosphere. The
water vapor concentration is measured using a dew
cell or dew pointer. The water vapor concentration is
expressed as the atmosphere dew point measured in
degrees fahrenheit.
(2) Carbon Dioxide Concentration. The concentrations of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide
in a furnace atmosphere at a given temperature are
related to the carbon concentration on the surface of
the part.
The carbon dioxide concentration is measured
with an external infrared gas analyzer and expressed
as a percentage.
When the furnace temperature instrument indicates that the furnace chamber has recovered its
heat, the part in the chamber may not be up to temperature. It is important that the part be held at temperature long enough for the entire part to be at temperature. Time at temperature for through hardening is generally 0.75 hour per inch (25.4 mm) of section.
54
2004---B89
Part characteristics such as hardness, micro--structure and test coupon results can provide valuable information.
55
2004---B89
6.5.3 Test Coupons. Test coupons of representative geometry are frequently used for destructive
testing in lieu of destroying gearing. Microstructure
and hardness testing of test coupons can be correlated to gearing characteristics.
Through hardened gearing is commonly inspected on the faces of gear rims, top lands of teeth
where size permits, gap of herringbone (double helical) gearing and on adjacent diameters of pinions
other than bearing journals. Through hardened
gearing is rarely inspected for hardness on the flanks
of teeth or in root radii because hardenability of the
steel selected should insure obtaining the specified
hardness at these locations. When hardness testers
are not available for accurate measurement at roots
of teeth, destructive sectioning and testing may be required.
6.6 Metallurgical, Mechanical and Non--- Destructive Tests and Inspections. Tests and inspections
which may be made on the final or near final product
are fatigue testing, hardness testing, surface temper
inspection, magnetic particle inspection, and ultrasonic inspection.
6.6.1 Fatigue Testing. Fatigue (life) testing of
the final product is the proof of the suitability of the
design for the intended purpose.
It is desirable to expedite this testing while maintaining validity of the test data. This can be done by
running the test at some overload ratio and evaluating the damage with time for the test conditions.
Damage can be compared with that for the product
design conditions. This comparison must be made
for both the beam strength and the surface durability
of the teeth. Miners Rule is a widely accepted method of making these comparisons.
56
2004---B89
be used in some instances. Caution should be exercised if the heavier load C scale is used.
6.6.4 Magnetic Particle Inspection. Magnetic
particle inspection is a non---destructive testing
method for locating surface and near surface discontinuities in ferromagnetic material. When a magnetic field is introduced into the part, discontinuities
laying approximately transverse to the magnetic field
will cause a leakage field. Finely divided ferromagnetic particles, dry or in an oil base or water base suspension, are applied over the surface of the material
under test. These particles will gather and hold at the
leakage field making the discontinuities visible to the
naked eye.
Portable instruments vary in accuracy and reliability. Users, therefore, should take precautions to
insure accurate calibration and test results.
Hardness testing equipment manufacturers
should be contacted and literature searched for additional information on principles of hardness inspection, available test equipment and their capabilities.
Statistical process control is a useful tool to be used
with hardness testing.
6.6.3 Surface Temper Inspection. Surface temper inspection is used to detect and classify localized
overheating on ground surfaces by use of a chemical
etch method. Details of the process are covered in
AGMA 230.01, Surface Temper Inspection Process.
Inspection criteria includes a class designation
for critical and non---critical areas. To evaluate the
severity of surface temper, grinding burns are classified by intensity of color from light gray to brown to
black. Severe burning or re---hardening is indicated
by patches of white in the darkened areas. Cracking
may also be present. Re---hardening or cracking are
cause for rejection.
Tables I and II in AGMA 230.01 cover temper
classes ranging from Class A (Light temper) to Class
D (Heavy temper). Class C (Moderate temper) for a
limited area and hardness reduction may be permitted.
Rework for excessive temper is generally permitted by mutual agreement between customer and
supplier.
57
2004---B89
FIELD
(1) Fields should be at 90 degrees to the direction of defects. This may require magnetizing in two
directions.
HEAD
BATH
CURRENT
DISCONTINUITY
HEAD SHOT
CIRCULAR MAGNETIZATION LOCATES
DISCONTINUITIES OCCURRING 45 --- 90
DEGREES TO THE DIRECTION OF THE
FIELD.
(5) Circular magnetization specifications generally require from 100 to 1000 amps per inch of part
diameter. Amperage requirements should be incorporated into the magnetic particle procedure.
(6) For coil magnetization, a widely used formula for amperage calculations is:
NI = 45 000
L/ D
(Eq 6.1)
where
NI = ampere turns required,
L/D = length to diameter ratio.
NOTE: The 45 000 constant may vary with
specifications.
ANSI/AGMA
58
2004---B89
CURRENT
THROUGH
COIL
BATH
6.6.4.3 Documented Procedures. Written procedures for magnetic particle testing should as a minimum include:
(1) Which ASTM, ASNT or agency specifications the procedure meets.
(2) Qualifications--(a) Indicate that the operators are qualified
and tested to ASNT---TC---1A Level II, MIL--STD---271F, etc.
(b) Indicate type of equipment used for inspection, A.C. and D.C. full wave rectified, etc.
(c) Indicate type of particles used for inspection, fluorescent or black visible, wet or dry particle.
For the wet method, particle concentration should
also be indicated.
(3) General--(a) State when inspection is to be done; after
heat treat, finish machining, etc.
(b) State what the surface will be; for example, 250 RMS, black forge, etc.
DISCONTINUITY
COIL SHOT
LONGITUDINAL MAGNETIZATION LOCATES
TRAVERSE DISCONTINUITIES.
(c) State amps per inch of diameter for circular magnetization and the formula used for calculation of longitudinal magnetization.
(d) State what method will be used for determining field magitude; such as pie gage, etc.
(e) State demagnetization, if required, and
level of demagnetization required.
(4) Standard of Acceptance
(a) Indicate maximum size and density of
indications permitted.
(b)Indicate reporting procedures if
needed.
For further information on magnetic particle
testing, refer to:
Principles of Magnetic Particle Testing, C.E. Betz
Metals Handbook Volume II Eighth Edition
Nondestructive Inspection and Quality Control
Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Edited by
Robert C. McMasters for the Society for Nondestructive Testing
(2) Wet Method Materials. When the ferromagnetic particles are applied as a suspension in some
liquid medium, much finer particles can be used. The
upper limit of particle size in most commercial wet
ANSI/AGMA
59
2004---B89
6.6.5 Ultrasonic Inspection. Ultrasonic inspection is a nondestructive test method to determine the
internal soundness and cleanliness of gearing by
passing sound (ultrasound) through the material.
Very short sound waves of a frequency greater than
20,000 cycles per second (audible limit) are voltage
generated and transmitted into the part by a transducer. In the method most often used, returning
sound waves are transformed into voltage and monitored on an oscilloscope screen.
Before testing, the instrument must be calibrated according to the test specification. Scanning
sensitivity is often established as either the sensitivity
to just obtain a specified back reflection height, or at
the sensitivity to obtain an indication of specified
height from a flat bottom hole drilled into test blocks.
ANSI/AGMA
60
2004---B89
TRANSDUCER
SUITABLE COUPLANT ON SURFACE
X
Y
DEFECT
INITIAL PULSE
BACK REFLECTION
3 in (76 mm)
X
DEFECT
MARKERS
ANSI/AGMA
61
2004---B89
INDICATION
D ---A REFERENCE LINE FROM
FBH IN 12 in (306
2 1/2
mm) BLOCK
(63 mm)
3 in
(76 mm)
11 in
(279 mm)
Fig 6---4 Distance --- Amplitude Reference Line for Ultrasonic Inspection
austenite. Some research has shown that microcracks are produced by subzero treating.
Control of the microstructures in flame and induction hardened steel gears must also consider the
width and location of heat effected zones which will
always exist at the ends of the hardened pattern.
Microstructure evaluation must include the existence of structures other than tempered martensite
at the gear tooth surface and at core positions. In
carburized and hardened steel gears, retained austenite will exist in the case after the heat treating operations. Data and opinions vary as to the allowable
limits for retained austenite. Subzero treatment is
specified for some applications to reduce retained
ANSI/AGMA
62
2004---B89
6.8.2 Mechanical Properties Affected. Mechanical properties obtained from test coupons, especially
tensile ductility (percent elongation and reduction of
area measured after tensile testing), impact strength
and fatigue strength, are generally higher for test
coupons than for actual forged or cast gearing. Tensile and yield strengths of test coupons, however, better represent actual corresponding properties of
gearing, provided hardness of the test coupons is
within the specified range.
6.8.3 Interpretation. Mechanical properties obtained from test coupons should be considered as an
indication of the quality of gear materials, but should
not be interpreted as representing the precise mechanical properties of gearing for the reasons cited in
6.8.1 and 6.8.2. Specified mechanical properties for
test coupons should be minimum properties, not typical properties. Designers should incorporate appropriate factors of safety based on experience for
design of gearing to accommodate variance between
measured and actual properties of gearing. In addition to test coupons providing indications as to the
metallurgical quality of gear materials, test coupons
provide a comparison of steel quality between different orders and can often help identify problems in
steel making and heat treating.
ANSI/AGMA
63
2004---B89
Bibliography
ASTM A148---83,
ASTM A291---82,
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for Pinions and Gears for Reduction
Gears
ASTM A356---83,
Specification for Steel Castings, Carbon and Low Alloy, Heavy---Walled, for Steam
Turbines
ASTM E125---63 (1980), Reference Photographs for Magnetic Particle Indications on Ferrous Castings
ASTM E186---80,
Standard Reference Radiographs for Heavy Walled (2 to 4 1/2 inch)(51 to 114 mm)
Steel Castings
ASTM E280---81,
Standard Reference Radiographs for Heavy Walled (4 1/2 to 12 inch)(114 to 305 mm)
Steel Castings
ASTM E446---81,
Standard Reference Radiographs for Steel Castings Up to 2 inch (51 mm) in Thickness
ASTM E609---83,
ASTM E709---80,
Reference Addresses
American Society for Metals
Metals Park, OH 44073
(216) 338---5151
Metals Handbooks
Heat Treaters Guide
Metals Reference Book
ANSI/AGMA
Other:
Gray and Ductile Iron Castings Handbook
Cast Steel Handbook
Modern Plastics Encyclopedia
64
2004---B89
Appendix A
Plastic Gear Materials
[This Appendix is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as part of AGMA
Standard 2004---B89, Gear Materials and Heat Treatment Manual.]
A1. Purpose. The purpose of this Appendix is to provide information on plastic materials which have
been used for gearing. For physical properties, refer
to appropriate product standards.
A5.6 Polyester (T/P). Polyesters are both unfilled and with glass fiber, and are finding their way
into more markets as a molded gearing material in
competition with nylon and acetal.
A5.7 Polyurethane (T/P). Polyurethane is generally noted for its flexibility and, therefore, has the
ability to absorb shock and deaden sound.
A5.8 SAN (Styreneacrylonitrile) (T/P). SAN is a
stable, low shrinkage material and is used in some
lightly loaded gear applications.
ANSI/AGMA
65
2004---B89
A8.3 Burrs. Feather edge burrs, if not eliminated by back up discs or subsequent removal by other means, will impair inspection of gearing and possibly contribute to noise during operation.
A5.9 Polyphenylene Sulfid (T/P). When compounded with 40 percent glass fiber with or without
internal lubricants, it has been found in certain gear
applications to have much greater strength, even at
elevated temperatures, than most materials previously available.
A5.10 Polymer Elastomer (T/P). Polymer elastomer is a newcomer to the gearing field, and has excellent sound deadening qualities and resistance to
flex fatigue, impact, and creep, among other advantageous characteristics.
A9.1
Industrial Laminated Thermosetting
Products. These products, whether in sheet or rod
form, contain laminations or plies of fibrous sheet
materials such as cellulose, paper, asbestos, cotton
fabric, glass fabric, or mat. These materials are impregnated or coated with a phenolic resin and consolidated under high pressures and temperatures
into various grades which have properties useful for
gearing.
Fabric base grades are chosen to withstand severe shock loads and repeated bending stresses, and
to resist wear. Fabric base grades are tougher and
less brittle than paper base grades. The linen grades
made with finer textured lightweight fabrics will machine with less trouble. Gears of linen base phenolic
are abrasive, and thus may require a hardened steel
mate and adequate lubrication.
A7. Gear Blanks. Many of these plastic materials, notably unfilled nylon and acetal, are available in standard extruded shapes, such as rounds, squares, and
rectangles of various sizes from which gears can be
machined. Gears can be molded at less cost if large
quantity warrants the cost of the mold.
A8. Machined Plastics Gears. The quality of machined gears may be generally better than their
molded counterparts, but the molded tooth surface is
superior to the machined surface in smoothness and
toughness. Final tooth strength is generally better in
a molded gear, than an equivalent machined gear,
because of the flow of the material into the tooth cavity of the mold. Gear cutting is done on standard machines and with standard tools. The following considerations will assist in obtaining higher quality machined parts.
ANSI/AGMA
66
2004---B89
Appendix B
Approximate Maximum Controlling Section Size Considerations
for Through Hardened Gearing
[This Appendix is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as part of AGMA
Standard 2004---B89, Gear Materials and Heat Treatment Manual.]
B1. Purpose. This Appendix presents approximate maximum controlling section size considerations for through hardened (quench and tempered)
gearing. Also presented are factors which affect
maximum controlling size, illustrations as to how
maximum controlling section size is determined for
gearing, and recommended maximum controlling
section sizes for several low alloy steels from AGMA
6033---A88, Marine Propulsion Gear Units, Part 1, Materials.
B2. Definition. The controlling section of a part
is defined as that section which has the greatest effect
in determining the rate of cooling during quenching
at the location (section) where the specified mechanical properties (hardness) are required. The maximum controlling section size for steel is based princi-
Table B---1
Approximate Maximum Recommended Controlling Section Size*
Specified
Brinell Hardness
223---262
248---293
262---311
285---311
302---352
321---363
341---388 w
363---415 w
**
AISI 4340
To 8.0(203) included
To 5.5(140) included
To 4.5(115) included
To 4.0(102) included
To 3.0 (76) included
Not recommended
Not recommended
Not recommended
No restriction ]
No restriction
No restriction
To 25.0 (640) included
To 15.0 (380) included
To 12.0 (305) included
To 8.0 (203) included
To 3.75 (95) included
4350 Type [
No restriction ]
No restriction
No restriction
No restriction
No restriction
No restriction
No restriction
To 23.0 (585) incl.
NOTES:
* Maximum controlling section sizes higher than those above can be recommended when substantiated
by test data (heat treat practice).
Maximum recommended controlling section sizes for nitrided gearing are less than those above for the
same hardness range because of higher tempering temperature required for nitriding gearing (refer to
5.5). Maximum recommended sizes for flame or induction hardening gearing would be same as
above, dependent upon specified core hardness.
[ 4350 Type Steel is generally considered equivalent to AISI 4340 for chemical analysis, except that
carbon is 0.48---0.55 percent.
] No restriction indicates maximum controlling section size is not anticipated to provide any
restrictions for conventional size gearing
w 900_F(482_C) minimum temper may be required to meet these hardness specifications.
** Higher specified hardnesses (e.g. 375---415 HB, 388---321 HB and 401---444 HB) are used for special
gearing, but costs should be evaluated due to reduced machinability.
ANSI/AGMA
67
2004---B89
B4. Recommendations. Table B---1 provides approximate recommended maximum controlling section
sizes for oil quenched and tempered gearing (H =
0.5) of several low alloy steels based on specified
hardness range, normal stock allowance before hardening, minimum tempering temperature of
900_F(482_C) and obtaining minimum hardness at
the roots of teeth.
B5. General Comments. Maximum controlling section sizes versus specified hardness for section sizes
to 8.0 inch (203 mm) diameter rounds can also be
approximated by use of the Chart Predicting
Approximate Cross Section Hardness of Quenched
Round Bars from Jominy Test Results published in
Practical Data for Metallurgists by Timkin Steel Co.,
TEETH
TEETH
2 inch
(50)
8
inch
(203)
10
inch
(254)
6 inch
(152)
TEETH
TEETH
36
inch
(914)
32
inch
(813) 36
inch
(914)
ANSI/AGMA
68
2004---B89
Appendix C
Case Hardenability of Carburizing Steels
[This Appendix is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as part of AGMA
Standard 2004---B89, Gear Materials and Heat Treatment Manual.]
can be used for carburized gearing considerations
without regard to the fact that gear teeth are machined prior to carburize hardening. The controlling
section size in both instances is the section related to
the location of gear teeth which governs the rate of
heat removed during quench hardening.
C3. Selection of Steel. To ensure that the steel under
consideration has sufficient case hardenability to be
capable of satisfactorily hardening the case in the
roots of teeth, Fig C---1 should be used. Figure C---1
is based on hardenability and controlling section size
considerations. Steels are presented in order of
hardenability on the ordinate of Fig C---1. Steels not
shown on Fig C---1, therefore, can be evaluated by
comparing hardenability to those steels presented to
determine the approximate maximum recommended controlling section size (as indicated by the
solid line in Fig C---1).
200
AISI 9310
AISI 4820
1200
1400
ADEQUATE
CASE HARDENABILITY
AISI 4320
CASE MAY OR
MAY NOT
HARDEN
AISI 8822
AISI 8620
NO CASE
HARDENABILITY
Source:
The Influence of Microstructure on the
of Case ---Carburized Components
by Geoffrey Parrish, ASM Text (1980)
AISI 4118
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Approximate Controlling Section Size, inch
50
55
60
Fig C---1 Effect of Controlling Section on the Case Hardenability of Carburizing Grades
of Steel
ANSI/AGMA
69
2004---B89
Appendix D
Service Life Considerations
[This Appendix is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as part of AGMA
Standard 2004---B89, Gear Materials and Heat Treatment Manual.]
D1. Purpose. Gears are generally removed from service due to wear, pitting, plastic flow, or breakage. If
the service life is less than expected, an in---depth investigation should be initiated. This Appendix deals
briefly with the causes of gear failures and the types
of failures encountered.
D2.7.2
Casting Defects. Casting defects
which can contribute to premature failure include
shrinkage, porosity, slag, chemical deviation, cracks,
sand, improper weld repair, core shift, cold shuts, etc.
D2.4 Assembly and Installation. Improper assembly and installation are major contributors to
premature failures and manifest themselves in excessive loading, wear, and misalignment.
ANSI/AGMA
70
2004---B89
ANSI/AGMA
D3.4 Breakage. The majority of breakage failures (90 percent) are due to low and high cycle fatigue. Brittle failures may occur in low temperature
service, in heat affected zones of welds or in notch
sensitive materials. Overload failures result from
misapplication, misalignment, and impact loading.
71
2004---B89