:
?
,
()
www.resourcegovernance.org
,
2016 3 31-
7
Source: Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper No. 5430. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130
9
Source: Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper No. 5430. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://www.govindicators.org), additional information at Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The
11
Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130).
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://www.govindicators.org), additional information at Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The
13
Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130).
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://www.govindicators.org), additional information at Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The
15
Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130).
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://www.govindicators.org), additional information at Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The
17
Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130).
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://www.govindicators.org), additional information at Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The
19
Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130).
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://www.govindicators.org), additional information at Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The
21
Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130).
Source: Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper No. 5430. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130
-10%
0%
-20%
-20%
-30%
-40%
2015
20%
2013
0%
2011
40%
2009
10%
2007
60%
2005
20%
2003
80%
1999
30%
1997
100%
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
40%
2001
Venezuela
Chile
90%
90%
80%
80%
70%
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
40%
40%
30%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
-10%
-10%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
100%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Mongolia
Source: The Atlas of Economic Complexity (http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/explore/tree_map/export/mng/all/show/2014/) , this is a measurement of complexity that33
is
calculated based on how many different products a country can produce and the number of countries able to make those products
Source: The Atlas of Economic Complexity (http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/explore/tree_map/export/mng/all/show/2014/) , this is a measurement of complexity that35
is
calculated based on how many different products a country can produce and the number of countries able to make those products
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
Mongolia
(score of -1.41)
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
Japan
South Korea
Czech Republic
United Kingdom
Slovakia
Ireland
China
Mexico
Estonia
Malaysia
Belarus
Lithuania
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Philippines
Ukraine
Greece
New Zealand
El Salvador
South Africa
Vietnam
Egypt
Argentina
Macedonia
Guatemala
Kuwait
Senegal
Cuba
Australia
Zambia
Cameroon
Qatar
Botswana
Uganda
Bangladesh
Turkmenistan
Mozambique
Gabon
Algeria
Malawi
Libya
Guinea
Angola
-2.5
*Note: Due to number of countries covered, only select countries are labeled in this chart. Mongolia is ranked 114 th out of 124 countries.
Source: The Atlas of Economic Complexity (http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/explore/tree_map/export/mng/all/show/2014/) , this is a measurement of complexity that37
is
calculated based on how many different products a country can produce and the number of countries able to make those products
2007
2015
Note: Mongolias rank in 2007 is 101 out of 131 and in 2015 is 104 out of 140.
Source: World Economic Forum, 2015-2016 Global Competitiveness Report, http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/
Mongolia
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Ukraine
Brazil
Russia
Kazakhstan
Azerbaijan
Chile
China
Worst 2
South
Korea
Singapore
Best
39
Worst 0
41
New Zealand
Norway
France
United Kingdom
Germany
Georgia
South Korea
Poland
Argentina
Spain
Bangladesh
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Dominican Republic
Mongolia
Kenya
Ukraine
Mali
Tanzania
Cameroon
Burkina Faso
Senegal
Tunisia
Sri Lanka
Liberia
Rwanda
Trinidad & Tobago
Angola
Nigeria
Bolivia
Fiji
Cambodia
Equatorial Guinea
Myanmar
Best 100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
1. Norway
2. United States (Gulf of Mexico)
3. United Kingdom
4. Australia (Western Australia)
5. Brazil
6. Mexico
7. Canada (Alberta)
8. Chile
9. Colombia
10. Trinidad and Tobago
11. Peru
12. India
13. Timor-Leste
14. Indonesia
15. Ghana
16. Liberia
17. Zambia
18. Ecuador
19. Kazakhstan
20. Venezuela
21. South Africa
22. Russia
23. Philippines
24. Bolivia
25. Morocco
26. Mongolia
27. Tanzania
28. Azerbaijan
29. Iraq
30. Botswana
31. Bahrain
32. Gabon
33. Guinea
34. Malaysia
35. Sierra Leone
36. China
37. Yemen
38. Egypt
39. Papua New Guinea
40. Nigeria
41. Angola
42. Kuwait
43. Vietnam
44. Congo (DRC)
45. Algeria
46. Mozambique
47. Cameroon
48. Saudi Arabia
49. Afghanistan
50. South Sudan
51. Zimbabwe
52. Cambodia
53. Iran
54. Qatar
55. Libya
56. Equatorial Guinea
57. Turkmenistan
58. Myanmar
100
80
60
98
92
88
85
80
77 76 75
74 74 73
Satisfactory (71-100)
Partial (51-70)
Weak (41-50)
Failing (0-40)
70
68
66
63 62
61
58 57
56 56 56
54 53 53
51 50
48 47 47 47
46 46 46 46
43 43 43 43 42 42
41 41
40
20
Source: Natural Resource Governance Institute: 2013 Resource Governance Index, http://www.resourcegovernance.org/rgi
39 38
37
34 34 33
31 31
29 28
26
19
13
5 4
43
45
Source: Natural Resource Governance Institute: 2013 Resource Governance Index, http://www.resourcegovernance.org/rgi
47
Resource-Rich Countries
45,000
30,820
12,712
10,272
6,851
3,941
10,000
5,000
0
Average Corruption
Control
Good Corruption
Control
Sources: GDP per capita (atop each column) from World Bank World Development Indicators, 2012.
Corruption Control data from Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI, 2012) Countries grouped into terciles based on WGI49
Control
of Corruption scores. Resource Rich country classification according to IMF (2010).
Domestic governance
Discovery &
deciding to
extract
Getting a
good
deal
Managing
revenues
Investing for
sustainable
development
International governance
51
53