NOMENCLATURE
0 , vacuum permeability.
r , relative permeability.
Bm , PM flux density.
air-gap.
H m , PM magnetization.
Br , PM remanent flux density. e g , air-gap depth.
S g , two poles air-gap
B g , air-gap flux density.
surface.
L pm , PM length in the
axial direction.
e pm , PM thickness.
d sl , slot depth.
Lst , stator yoke thickness.
M pm , PM weight.
I. INTRODUCTION
Considering automotive applications, the electric machines
have severe constraints in terms of size and weight. Due to its
high torque density [1-2], a double stator axial-flux PM
synchronous motor (AFPMSM) is chosen. To satisfy the
complex specifications (in particular in terms of specific
torque and specific power), a design by optimization using an
analytical model and a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is
performed [3]. The GAs enable to solve multi-objective
13
D Dint
S g = ext
2
Bm = Br + 0 . r .H m
(7)
Tnom
.(Dext + Dint )
e pm
4p
where
D + Dint
= .B g .K s . ext
.(Dext Dint )
2
(8)
(1)
H m .e pm + 2.H g .e g =
2 .Rm .K s
N sl
(2)
Bm .
L pm Dext Dint
Sg
= Bg .
.
2
2
2
(3)
Fig. 2. Circulation of the flux produced by one PM pole.
Hm =
Bm Br
0 . r
(4)
2 .Rm .K s
N sl
0 r
Bm =
D Dint
L pm . ext
1
2
.e pm + 2.e g .
0 r
Sg
Br
Br
0 r
Bg =
1
0 r
.e pm
.e pm _
2 .Rm .K s
D Dint
L pm . ext
N sl
2
.
Dext Dint
Sg
L pm .
2
+ 2.e g .
Sg
(5)
.e pm
(6)
Fig. 3. Representation of one pair of poles according to the plan (xoy).
14
TABLE 1
DOMAIN OF VARIATION OF THE OPTIMIZATION PARAMETERS
Design
Parameters
Symbols
Units
Type
Variation
Range
External Diameter
Dext
[mm]
Continuous
[180, 230]
Internal Diameter
Dint
[mm]
Continuous
[120, 160]
Stator Yoke
Thickness
Lst
[mm]
Continuous
[10, 30]
PM Thickness
epm
[mm]
Continuous
[1, 50]
PM Axial Lenght
Lpm
[mm]
Continuous
[1, 50]
Number of Slots
per Phase
Discrete
Slot Depth
dsl
[mm]
Continuous
2,38
[5,50]
TABLE 2
THE OPTIMIZATION CONSTRAINTS
Optimization
Constraints
Symbols
Units
Min Value
Max Value
Bg
[T]
0.6
0.9
Bst
[T]
0.7
1.7
Bt
[T]
PM weight
Mpm
[kg]
Lmot
[mm]
Nominal torque
Tnom
[N.m]
55
PM magnetization
Hm
[A/m]
Hcj
1.8
0.8
1.3
TABLE 3
OPTIMIZATION TOOL PARAMETERS
Number of individuals
Number of generations
Number of chromosomes
Number of constraints
Number of criteria
102
100
100
7
7
2
15
Torque [p.u]
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
Instantanous Torque (FEM)
0.4
0.2
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Time [ms]
Fig. 5. Evolution of the optimization criteria.
16
[4]
REFERENCES
[6]
[1]
[2]
[3]
M. Aydin, S. Huang and T.A. Lipo, Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Disc
Machines: A Review, in Conf. Record of SPEEDAM, pp. 61-71, May
2004.
R. Qu, M. Aydin, T.A. Lipo, Performance Comparison of Dual-Rotor
Radial-Flux and Axial-Flux Permanent Magnet BLDC Machines, in
International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, 2003
K. Deb, A.Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, A Fast and Elitist
Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on
Evolutionary Computation, vol.6, no.2, April 2002.
[5]
[7]
[8]
17