CASE STUDY
P R E S E N T E D B Y: A N A S E S A T T Y , D I
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Cholelithiasis
Gallstones can be formed from:
Excess water or bile acid absorption
Excess cholesterol in bile
Cholesterol can precipitate
Pancreatitis
Gallstones block pancreatic duct
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Pancreatic head mass
Acute or chronic pancreatitis
Activates pancreatic enzymes inside
the pancreas
MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS
Dx: Pancreatic head mass
Pancreatic head cancerous tumors
Malignant potential
DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
Endoscopic ultrasound
(EUS)
Thin, flexible tube with a
probe inserted through
mouth or anus
Detected the presence of
gallstones
Computerized tomography
(CT) scan
X-ray cross section images
Detected the presence of
pancreatic mass
Endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography
(ERCP)
Endoscope with camera
Placed common bile duct
stent
Biopsy
Cellular examination of
tissues
Pancreatic mass benign
with atypical cells
Abdominal pain
Fever
Jaundice
Nausea
Vomiting
Pancreatic Duct
Obstruction
Abdominal pain
Steatorrhea
Jaundice
Weight loss
Ascites
MEDICAL TREATMENT
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)
Known as Whipple procedure
Common treatment for pancreatic cancer tumors and
pancreatic cysts that are:
Cancerous or precancerous
Obstructing biliary duct system
Causing jaundice
Causing dilation of the main pancreatic duct
PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY
PROGNOSIS
Pancreatic cancer
Survival rates of <5 years even with tumor resection
Pancreatic fistulas
Surgical site infections
Hemorrhages
Intraabdominal abscess
NUTRITIONAL COMPLICATIONS
Delayed gastric
emptying
20%-25% of patients
Dumping syndrome
Weight loss
Hyperglycemia
(diabetes)
20%-50% of patients
Pancreatic
insufficiency
Maldigestion
Malabsorption
Lactose intolerance
Early satiety
Nutrient deficiencies
NUTRITION RECOMMENDATIONS
Pancreatic enzymes
Nutrient supplementation
Iron
Calcium
Folate
Zinc
Copper
Selenium
Fat soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K)
Vitamin B12
Fatty acids
NUTRITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Enteral nutrition
proven superior to
total parenteral
nutrition in
pancreatic cancer
patients post op
Whipple procedure
NUTRITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
What is the optimal feeding
route?
European nutrition guidelines
Routine enteral feedings post
op
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT
Height: 5 ft 5 in Weight: 154#/70kg
BMI: 25.6
NUTRITION DIAGNOSIS
Problem:
Etiology:
LABORATORY VALUES
Laboratory
Tests
Glucose
(mg/dL)
Referenc
eRanges
Post op
day 2
Post op
day 3
Post op
day 6
Post op
day 7
Post op
day 8
Laboratory Values
Interpretation
70 99
196
164
265
308
179
Surgery/trauma,
pancreatic insufficiency
Inflammatory response
from
surgery/pancreatitis
Albumin
(g/dL)
3.4 5.0
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.0
AST
(IU/mL)
5 40
85
51
ALT (IU/mL)
4 36
162
162
ALK PHOS,
TOTAL
(IU/L)
50 136
273
289
276
238
199
4.0 5.7
6.7
Indicative of diabetes
Hgb A1c
MEDICATIONS
Generic Name
Medical Uses
Nutritional Significance
Pepcid
Zofran
Miralax
Reglan
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 2
Current diet: Vivonex RTF @ 15 ml/hr
Goal:
Meet estimated nutrient needs this admit
Intervention:
Vivonex RTF goal of 75 ml/hr = 1800 kcals, 90 g pro (1.3 g/kg CBW),
and 1530 mLs of free H2O
Increase by 10 mL q 12 hrs to goal rate of 75 ml/hr
Monitoring:
TF tolerance
Diet advancement
Diet orders
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 3
Pt feeling well and tolerating tube feedings.
Current diet: Vivonex RTF @ 20 ml/hr
Meeting 27% of estimated nutrient needs
Goal rate of 75 ml/hr increasing by 10 ml q 12 hrs
Goal:
Meet estimated nutrient needs this admit
Intervention:
Monitoring:
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 6
Pt with severe emesis did not tolerate clear liquids, NPO d/t
NGT placement for suction
Current diet: Vivonex RTF @ 55 ml/hr
Meeting 73% of estimated nutrient needs
Goal rate of 75 ml/hr increasing by 10 ml q 12 hrs
Goal:
Meet estimated nutrient needs this admit
Intervention:
Monitoring:
TF tolerance, diet advancement, and diet orders
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 7
Pt feeling better no N/V remains NPO, elevated glucose
levels
Current diet: Vivonex RTF @ 70 ml/hr
Meeting 93% of estimated nutrient needs
Goal rate of 75 ml/hr
296 g CHO
Goal:
Meet estimated nutrient needs this admit
Intervention:
Glucerna 1.2 cal goal of 65 ml/hr = 1872 kcal, 94 g pro (1.3 g/kg
CBW), 178 g CHO, 1256 ml free H2O
H2O flushes per MD
Monitoring:
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 8
Goal:
Meet estimated nutrient needs this admit
Intervention:
Osmolite 1.2 cal goal rate of 65 ml/hr = 1872 kcal, 87 g pro (1.2 g/kg
CBW)
Initiate at 30 ml/hr and increase by 10 ml q 6 hrs
180 mls H2O flushes QID
Monitoring:
TF tolerance, diet advancement, and diet orders
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 9
Pt tolerated few pieces of fruit and will d/c tomorrow.
Current diet: Osmolite 1.2 @ 40 ml/hr + post gastrectomy
Meeting ~60% of estimated nutrient needs
Goal rate of 65 ml/hr increasing by 10 ml q 6 hrs
Goal:
Meet estimated nutrient needs this admit
Intervention:
Increase by 10 ml q 6 hrs to goal of 65 ml/hr
180 mls H2O flushes QID
Will provide post Whipple sx diet education before d/c
Monitoring:
TF tolerance, diet advancement, and diet orders
NUTRITION INTERVENTION
POST OP DAY 10
Post Whipple sx diet education consult
Current diet: Osmolite 1.2 @ 65 ml/hr + post gastrectomy
Meeting 100% of estimated nutrient needs
Goals:
Pt will consume 5-6 meals/snacks each day
Pt will drink liquids 30 mins before/after solid foods
Intervention:
Eating tips
Nutrition strategies for complications and symptoms
Lists of foods recommended and foods to avoid
Keeping food journal to identify foods that cause distress
Discussed and printed materials from the ADA Nutrition Care Manual
Whipple surgery nutrition therapy
CONCLUSION
VA discharged September 11, 2015
Osmolite 1.2 cal @ 65 ml/hr with 180 mLs H2O flushes
QID
Meeting 100% of estimated nutrient and fluid needs
Good prognosis
REFERENCES
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Whipple Surgery Medical Nutrition Therapy. Nutrition Care
Manual website.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/vault/2440/web/files/Client-Ed/NCM/2014/WhippleSurgeryNutr
itionTherapy.pdf
. Accessed September 21, 2015.
Berry AJ. Pancreatic Surgery: Indications, Complications, and Implications for Nutrition
Intervention. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2013;28:330-357.
Chen S, Chen J, Zhan Q, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy:
a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2015.
Gallstones (Cholelithiasis). University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery website.
http://www.surgery.ucsf.edu/conditions--procedures/gallstones-(cholelithiasis).aspx. Accessed
September 20,2015.
Gerritsen A, Besselink MGH, Gouma DJ, Steenhagen E, Borel Rinkes, I. H. M, Molenaar IQ.
Systematic review of five feeding routes after pancreatoduodenectomy. British Journal of Surgery.
2013;100:589-598.
Lee P, Stevens T. Pancreatic Neoplasms. Cleveland Clinic website.
http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/gastroenterology/pancrea
tic-neoplasms/Default.htm
. Published February 2014. Accessed September 20, 2015.
REFERENCES
Liu C, Du Z, Lou C, et al. Enteral Nutrition Is Superior to Total Parenteral Nutrition for
Pancreatic Cancer Patients Who Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Asia Pacific
Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011;20:154-160.
Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, Raymond JL, Krause MV.Krause's Food & the Nutrition
Care Process. 13th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012.
Marcason W. What is the Whipple procedure and what is the appropriate nutrition
therapy for it? Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;115:168.
Munsell MA, Buscaglia JM. Acute pancreatitis. Journal of hospital medicine.
2010;5:241.
N. Decher, A. Berry. Post-Whipple: A practical approach to nutrition management
Practical Gastroenterol, 36 (8) (2012), pp. 3042.
http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinical/departments/medicine/divisions/digestive-h
ealth/nutrition-support-team/nutrition-articles/Decher_Berry_Aug_12.pdf
. Accessed September 21, 2014
Pancreatic Cysts and Pseudocysts. Cleveland Clinic website.
http://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases_conditions/hic_Pancreatitis/hic-pancrea