Anda di halaman 1dari 5

Exit Passes

Exit passes are used as a type of formative assessment which are easily differentiated to
cater to the diverse needs of students within a primary classroom. At the conclusion of a
lesson or prior to exiting the class, 5 students are chosen using paddle pop sticks to answer
differentiated questions in order for the teacher to assess student understanding. This form
of assessment is easily modified to suit any key learning area including numeracy and
literacy. Students are asked a question and if they give the correct response, they are able to
park their car in the exit pass parking. If the student gives an incorrect response, the
teacher modifies the question to allow them to have success. This is associated with
Vygotskys theory known as the Zone of Proximal Development (Readman & Allen, 2013).
The teacher keeps an anecdotal record of the students responses which allows them to
assess the students formally using a rubric. Students are able to receive immediate feedback
about whether they answered the question correctly and can also receive feedback about
how they could improve their response in order to progress higher on the rubric.

Anecdotal Evidence
e.g. Thomas






What is the
next number
after 29?



Whilst using the Exit pass assessment, teachers must anecdotally record the evidence that
they have assessed student learning and what outcome the student has achieved. This is
done by having an anecdotal evidence chart near where the students give their responses
which allows the teacher to record the student responses. The teacher is then able to use
this information to plan for future differentiated assessment and to drive lesson planning.
This evidence can also be used to assess students against the rubric.

Assessment Rubric
Term 1 Weeks 1-5 Early Stage 1
Demonstrates developing skills and strategies to read, view and
comprehend short, predictable texts on familiar topics in different
media and technologies
Students can read and understand some sight words

Literacy- Reading
Sight words

Focus Area:
Learning Intention (goal):



Student can read less than 10 sight words

Student can read at least 10 sight words including

a, and, I, the, to, see, can, look, up, big

Student can read more than 10 sight words

Numeracy- Number
(oral count)

Focus Area:
Learning Intention (goal):

counts to 30, and orders, reads and represents numbers in the
range 0 to 20


Student can count forwards to 20 and backwards from 10




Student can count forwards to a number less than

20 and may or may not be able to count backwards
from a number less than 10

Student is able to count forwards to 20 from any

given number and count backwards in the range of

Student is able to count forwards above 20 from

any given number and backwards in the range of

In order to document and compare student results, a rubric is used to report on student outcomes. These rubrics are specific to Numeracy and
Literacy and are a simple tool for teachers to document and analyse where their students are currently at and what they need to do to
progress forward. It is also a great tool for teachers to use Consistent Teacher Judgement (CTJ) to compare their student results to other
student results across the grade. These rubrics also allow the teacher to provide feedback to students and their parents. Teachers use the
evidence they have collected anecdotally to record results against the rubric.

AITSL Standard Alignment

Exit passes primarily aligns with AITSL standard 5.1 Assess student learning as it demonstrates
an understanding of the strategies needed to assess student learning formally and informally.
The verbal formative assessment is an informal approach to assessment and allows students
to feel comfortable and confident to take risks and feel success and incorporates Vygotskys
theory known as the Zone of Proximal Development where guidance is used to help the
student learn (Readman et al., 2013). The use of rubrics allow the teacher to formally assess
student learning and document student progress toward learning goals. This form of
assessment also addresses AITSL standard 5.2 (as a secondary alignment)-Provide feedback to
students on their learning. This assessment allows the teacher to provide immediate feedback
to students on their progress towards their learning goals. The student is able to attempt the
question again if they have not given the correct answer. The teacher will also give feedback
when they have recorded the evidence against a rubric which allows the student to see what
they need to achieve in order to progress in their learning. The rubric used in conjunction with
this assessment has a secondary alignment with AITSL standard 5.3 make consistent and
comparable judgements. The rubrics were created as part of a whole stage meeting which
allowed all teachers on Early Stage 1 to have a consistent understanding of what was expected
of students in their classes. The use of rubrics also allowed teachers to report accurately on
the progress of their students as the rubrics aligned with the Syllabus outcome expectations.
Both rubrics and anecdotal evidence records have a secondary alignment with AITSL standard
5.4 Interpret student data and 5.5 report on student achievement. Student data is recorded
daily and analysed weekly in order for the teacher to make judgements about the progress of
each student in the class. The teacher is then able to use this data to drive future planning by
modifying the lesson, differentiating or moving on to a new concept. Student achievement is
reported on using the anecdotal evidence combined with the rubrics. The data that is
collected from these two artefacts allow the teacher to use CTJ to accurately report on
student achievement.

Personal Reflection
Throughout my practicum, I have learnt many different assessment strategies to assist me as a
future educator. By using this assessment strategy within the classroom, I learnt that
assessment does not always have to be formal as the students may not respond well due to
pressure being put on the outcome. I believe that this type of formative assessment used
engages the students and allows them to be assessed through a fun activity. I believe that this
assessment type is also used as a self-assessment for the students as they are able to see
which questions they get right and which questions they do not. This experience has allowed
me to document student learning using a rubric where I was able to gain confidence in
assessing based on a verbal formative assessment strategy.
As a prospective educator, the experience of using this particular assessment has allowed me
to have confidence in using different assessment types that do not put as much pressure on
the students. I believe that this process was engaging and allowed the students to see where
they stand by viewing the rubric. Students have the ability to progress in their learning and
have a goal to work towards. I believe that I will use this assessment strategy in my future
classroom as I feel that it worked well with the students and allowed me to see where they
were at within the class. Using this strategy also allowed me to differentiate learning tasks
based on their ability which was obtained during the informal verbal formative assessment.