1. Metro Manila Development Authority v. Garin, 456 SCRA 176 (2005) CONST., Art. III, 2; Searches and Seizures Electronic Searches 2. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) 3. Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001) 4. United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 10 (2012) 5. Disini v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, 11 February 2014 (main decision by Abad, J.). Read also the concurring and dissenting opinion by Sereno, C.J., the concurring and dissenting opinion by Carpio, J., and the dissenting and concurring opinion by Leonen, J. 6. Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie, Nos. 13-132 and 13-212, 25 June 2014 7. Grady v. North Carolina, No. 14-593, 30 March 2015 Searches in General 8. Roan v. Gonzales, 145 SCRA 687 (1986) 9. Knowles v. State of Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998) John Doe Warrant 10. People v. Veloso, 48 phil 169 (1925) Probable Cause 11. Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. 19550, 19 June 1967, 20 SCRA 383 12. Columbia Pictures v. Court of Appeals, 26 SCRA 144 (1996) Description 13. People v. Court of Appeals, 291 SCRA 400 (1998) 14. People v. Tee, 395 SCRA 419 (2003) Bank Secrecy 15. Marquez v. Desierto, 359 SCRA 772 (2001) Search of Moving Vehicles 16. Caballes v. Court of Appeal, 373 SCRA 221 (2002) 17. Obra v. Court of Appeals, 367 SCRA 594 (1999) Plain View Doctrine 18. People v. Compacion, 361 SCRA 540 (2001) 19. People v. Valdez, 341 SCRA 25 (2000) Checkpoints 20.People v. Escao, G.R. Nos. 129756-58, January 28, 2000 21. People v. Suzuki, 414 SCRA 43 (2003) Exigent Circumstances 22. People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716 (1994) Arrests 23. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) 24. United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973) 25. People v. Balasa, 321 SCRA 459 (1999) 26. People v. Escordial, 373 SCRA 585 (2002) Entrapment 27. People v. Doria, 301 SCRA 668 (1999) Stop & Frisk 28. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 29. Manalili v. Court of Appeals, 280 SCRA 400 (1997) 30. Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159 (1997) 31. People v. Chua, 396 SCRA 657 (2003) CONST., Art. III, 3 (1); PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 32. Gaanan v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 145 SCRA 112 (1989) 33. People v. Matti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991) CONST., Art. III, 3 (2); THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE Fruit of the Poisonous Tree 34. Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939) CONST., Art. III, 4; FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OF EXPRESSION AND OF THE PRESS 35. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
36. Diocese of Bacolod v. Comelec, G.R. No. 205728, 21 January 2015