Instructions

Sect.
1
PQR
PQR_Sens
PQR_S

4
PQ
PQ_Sens
PQ2

6
Prod
Res_Al
Res_Al_Sens
Mix
Mix_Sens
CarRent
CarRent_Sens
Agg
Agg_Sens
Power
Power_Sens

Sup.
Chem
Chem_Sens

Page 1

Instructions

Chapter 2 Examples
Operations Research Models and Methods
Paul A. Jensen and Jonathan F. Bard
http://www.me.utexas.edu/~jensen/ORMM/computation/unit/mp_add/index.html
http://www.me.utexas.edu/~jensen/ORMM/methods/unit/linear/subunits/teach/index.html

Instructions
To use this workbook, you must first load the Math Programming add-in. See the Excel help file
topic "About add-ins" before continuing.
For cases using the LP/IP Solver you must first load the Jensen LP/IP Solver.
This workbook comes without control buttons. To make the buttons choose Add Buttons from
the Math
This to
adds
buttons
to all the
worksheets.
When
youProgramming
are moving amenu.
workbook
another
computer,
use
the Remove Buttons command.
This simplifies opening the workbook on the other computer. Buttons are removed from all
worksheets.

Linear Programming Models

A Manufacturing Example
The Manufacturing Example
Sensitivity Analysis
Solved with Excel Solver

Solution Characteristics
The Manufacturing Example in Two Variables
Sensitivity Analysis
The Manufacturing Example in Two Variables with market constraints explicit

Problem Classes
Resource Allocation Problem with ranges identified
Resource Allocation Problem
Sensitivity Analysis
Blending or Mixing Problem
Sensitivity Analysis
Car Rental Problem
Sensitivity Analysis
Aggregate Planning Problem
Sensitivity Analysis
Network Flow Programming Problem
Sensitivity Analysis

Chemical Processing Example (Supplement)

Chemical Processing Example
Sensitivity Analysis

Page 2

Instructions

Add-ins Used
Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver
Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver
Math Programming - Linear/Excel Solver
Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver
Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver
Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math
Math

Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming
Programming

Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP
Linear-LP/IP

Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver
Solver

Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver

Math Programming - Linear-LP/IP Solver

Page 3

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:
Type:
Goal:
Objective:

PQR
LP1
Max
7664

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name Value
1
MachA 2400
2
MachB 2400
3
MachC 2285
4
MachD 1064

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
2400
2400
2400
2400

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:
1
2
P
Q
81.82 16.36
0
0
100
40
45

60

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

3
R
60
0
60
50

Linear Constraint Coefficients

20
10
10
12
28
16
15
6
16
10
15
0

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
0
Total Iter.
4
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet PQR

Variable Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
P
###
2
Q
###
3
R
60

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Basic
Basic
Upper

###

Objective
Coefficient
0
45
0
60
10.4545
50

Range
Lower
Limit
25.7143
22.5
39.5455

Range
Upper
Limit
83.3333
83
---

Shadow
Constraint
Price
Limit
1.2273
2,400
1.7045
2,400
0
2,400
0
2,400

Range
Lower
Limit
###
2,040
###
###

Range
Upper
Limit
###
2,920
-----

Reduced
Cost

Constraint Analysis

Num. Name Value

1 MachA 2,400
2 MachB 2,400
3 MachC ###
4 MachD ###

Statu
s
Upper
Upper
Upper
Upper

Microsoft Excel 9.0 Sensitivity Report

Worksheet: [ch02.xls]PQR_S
Report Created: 5/5/2002 8:08:50 PM

Adjustable Cells
Cell
Name
$H$8 Values: P
$I$8 Values: Q
$J$8 Values: R

Final
Reduced
Objective Allowable Allowable
Value
Cost
Coefficient Increase
Decrease
81.8181818
0
45 38.3333333 19.2857143
16.3636364
0
60
23
37.5
60 10.4545455
50 1.000E+030 10.4545455

Constraints
Cell
Name
$D$15 MachA Valu
$D$16 MachB Valu
$D$17 MachC Valu
$D$18 MachD Valu

Final
Shadow
Constraint Allowable Allowable
Value
Price
R.H. Side
Increase
Decrease
2400 1.22727273
2400 144.827586 866.666667
2400 1.70454545
2400
520
360
2285.45455
0
2400 1.000E+030 114.545455
1063.63636
0
2400 1.000E+030 1336.36364

Linear Model
7664
3
1
1
1
100

Change

Name: PQR_S
Type: LP1
Goal: Max
Objective: 7664

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name Value
1
MachA 2400
2
MachB 2400
3
MachC 2285
4
MachD 1064

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
2400
2400
2400
2400

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:
1
2
P
Q
81.82 16.36
0
0
100
40
45

60

Excel Solver
Linear
Yes
No

3
R
60
0
60
50

Linear Constraint Coefficients

20
10
10
12
28
16
15
6
16
10
15
0

Comp. Time

Comp. Time 00:06

Status Optimal

Microsoft Excel 9.0 Sensitivity Report

Worksheet: [ch02.xls2]PQR_S
Report Created: 7/28/2001 3:14:58 PM

Adjustable Cells
Cell
Name
$H$8 Values: P
$I$8 Values: Q
$J$8 Values: R

Final
Reduced
Objective Allowable Allowable
Value
Cost
Coefficient Increase
Decrease
81.8181818
0
45 38.3333333 19.2857143
16.3636364
0
60
23
37.5
60 10.4545455
50 1.000E+030 10.4545455

Constraints
Cell
Name
$D$15 MachA Valu
$D$16 MachB Valu
$D$17 MachC Valu
$D$18 MachD Valu

Final
Shadow
Constraint Allowable Allowable
Value
Price
R.H. Side
Increase
Decrease
2400 1.22727273
2400 144.827586 866.666667
2400 1.70454545
2400
520
360
2285.45455
0
2400 1.000E+030 114.545455
1063.63636
0
2400 1.000E+030 1336.36364

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
100

Change

Name:PQ_Web
Type: LP1
Goal: Max
Objective: 6300

Solve

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:

1
P
100
0
100

Linear Obj. Coef.:

45

Vary

Constraints
Num. Name
1
A
2
B
3
C
4
D

Value
1800
2400
1650
1150

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
2400
2400
2400
2400

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

2
Q
30
0
50
60

Linear Constraint Coefficients

15
10
15
30
15
5
10
5

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
0
Total Iter.
3
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet PQ_Web

Variable Analysis

Objective Value:

Statu
Num. Name Value
s
1
P
100 Upper
2
Q
30 Basic

Reduced
Objective
Cost
Coefficient
15
45
0
60

6,300
Range
Lower
Limit
30
0

Range
Upper
Limit
--90

Constraint Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
A
1,800
2
B
2,400
3
C
1,650
4
D 1,150

Statu
s
Basic
Upper
Basic
Basic

Shadow
Price
0
2
0
0

Constraint
Limit
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400

Range
Lower
Limit
1,800
1,500
1,650
1,150

Range
Upper
Limit
--3,000
-----

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:
Type:
Goal:
Objective:

PQ
LP1
Max
4664

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name Value
1
MachA 1800
2
MachB 1440
3
MachC 1325
4
MachD 1064

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
1800
1440
2040
2400

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

1
2
P
Q
81.82 16.36
0
0
100
40
45

60

Linear Constraint Coefficients

20
10
12
28
15
6
10
15

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
0
Total Iter.
3
Comp. Time 00:00
Status Optimal

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet PQ

Variable Analysis

Objective Value:

Statu
Num. Name Value
s
1
P
### Basic
2
Q
### Basic

###

Objective
Coefficient
0
45
0
60

Range
Lower
Limit
25.7143
22.5

Range
Upper
Limit
120
105

Shadow
Constraint
Price
Limit
1.2273
1,800
1.7045
1,440
0
2,040
0
2,400

Range
Lower
Limit
933.3333
1,080
###
###

Range
Upper
Limit
###
1,960
-----

Reduced
Cost

Constraint Analysis

Num. Name Value

1 MachA 1,800
2 MachB 1,440
3 MachC ###
4 MachD ###

Statu
s
Upper
Upper
Basic
Basic

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:
Type:
Goal:
Objective:

PQ2
LP1
Max
4664

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name Value
1
MachA 1800
2
MachB 1440
3
MachC 1325
4
MachD 1064
5
Mar_P 81.82
6
Mar_Q 16.36

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
1800
1440
2040
2400
100
40

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
No
No

1
2
P
Q
81.82 16.36
0
0
9999 9999
45

60

Linear Constraint Coefficients

20
10
12
28
15
6
10
15
1
0
0
1

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
0
Total Iter.
3
Comp. Time 00:00
Status Optimal

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:
Type:
Goal:
Objective:

Prod
LP1
Max
2989

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name
1
M1
2
M2
3
M3
4
M4

Value
160
200
120
280

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
160
200
120
280

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Objective Funct Side:

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
No
No

1
2
3
4
5
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
58.96 62.63
0 10.58 15.64
0
0
0
0
0
99999 99999 99999 99999 99999
18

12

15

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1.2
1.3
0.7
0
0.7
2.2
1.6
0.5
0.9
0.7
1.3
1
1.4
2.8
0.5
1.2

0.5
1
0.8
0.6

Constraint Values
Constraint Names
Constraint Limits
Constraint Relationships

25

10

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
0
Total Iter.
5
Comp. Time 00:00
Status Optimal

Variable Names
Simple Lower Bounds
Simple Upper Bounds
Objective Coefficients

Constraint Coefficients

Linear Model
0
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change
Solve
Vary

Name: Mix
Type: LP2
Goal: Min
Objective: 49.16

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Upper Bounds:

1
2
3
L
C
S
0.028 0.649 0.323
0
0
0
1
1
1

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name Value Lower Upper
1
Calcium 0.012 0.008 0.012
2
Protein
0.22
0.22
1
3
Fiber
0.039
0
0.05
4
Conserve
1
1
1

10

30.5

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

90

Linear Constraint Coefficients

0.38 0.001 0.002
0
0.09
0.5
0
0.02
0.08
1
1
1

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
1
Total Iter.
3
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet Mix

Variable Analysis

Objective Value:

49.1563

Objective
Coefficient
0
10
0
30.5
0
90

Range
Lower
Limit
--24.4
30.4459

Range
Upper
Limit
17.439
90.2116
123.8889

Statu Shadow
Constraint
Num. Name Value
s
Price
Limit
1 Calcium0.012 Upper -19.6167
0.012
2 Protein 0.22 Lower 145.1698
0.22
3
Fiber ### Basic
0
0.05
4 Conserve
1Equality 17.4543
1

Range
Lower
Limit
0.008
0.0874
0.0388
0.4693

Range
Upper
Limit
0.2137
0.2963
--1.2876

Num. Name Value

1
L
###
2
C
###
3
S
###

Statu
s
Basic
Basic
Basic

Reduced
Cost

Constraint Analysis

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name: Res_Al
Type: LP1
Goal: Max
Objective: 2989

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:

Vary

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:
1
2
P1
P2
58.96 62.63

3
P3

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

4
5
P4
P5
0 10.58 15.64

Change Relation

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name
1
M1
2
M2
3
M3
4
M4

Value
160
200
120
280

Rel.
<=
<=
<=
<=

RHS
160
200
120
280

18

25

10

12

15

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1.2
1.3
0.7
0
0.7
2.2
1.6
0.5
0.9
0.7
1.3
1
1.4
2.8
0.5
1.2

0.5
1
0.8
0.6

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Ph. 1 Iter.
0
Total Iter.
5
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet Res_Al

Variable Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
P1
###
2
P2
###
3
P3
0
4
P4
###
5
P5
###

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Basic
Basic
Lower
Basic
Basic

###

Objective
Coefficient
18
25
10
12
15

Range
Lower
Limit
13.2552
23.8437
--11.29
9.9091

Range
Upper
Limit
24.8066
41.8158
23.5303
17.9222
15.3631

Shadow
Constraint
Price
Limit
4.8195
160
5.2016
200
8.9635
120
0.3631
280

Range
Lower
Limit
99.3485
184.6901
101.1299
259.3189

Range
Upper
Limit
172.9961
230.3636
237.505
295.6412

Reduced
Cost
0
0
-13.5303
0
0

Constraint Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
M1
160
2
M2
200
3
M3
120
4
M4
280

Statu
s
Upper
Upper
Upper
Upper

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name: CarRent
Type: LP1
Goal: Min
Objective: 2150

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name
1
Sat
2
Sun
3
Mon
4
Tues
5
Wed
6
Thurs
7
Fri

Value
5
5
10
5
16
7
11

Rel.
>=
>=
>=
>=
>=
>=
>=

RHS
2
5
10
3
16
7
11

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

1
Sat

2
Sun

3
M

4
Tu

5
W

6
Th

0
0
###

0
0
###

5
0
###

0
0
###

9
0
100

0
0
100

35

35

50

50

50

50

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
1
0

Ph. 1 Iter.
7
Total Iter. 10
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal
7
F

8
9
10
11
12
13
MTuW TuWTh WThF Weekend
Weekday Week
4
0
0
2
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100 ### ### ### ### ###
100
50

125

125

125

60

180

200

0
0
0
0
0
0
1

0
0
1
1
1
0
0

0
0
0
1
1
1
0

0
0
0
0
1
1
1

1
1
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet CarRent

Variable Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
Sat
0
2
Sun
0
3
M
5
4
Tu
0
5
W
9
6
Th
0
7
F
4
8
MTuW
0
9 TuWTh
0
10 WThF
2
11 Weekend
0
12 Weekday
0
13 Week
5

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Lower
Lower
Basic
Lower
Basic
Lower
Basic
Lower
Lower
Basic
Lower
Lower
Basic

Reduced
Objective
Cost
Coefficient
35
35
10
35
0
50
50
50
0
50
25
50
0
50
25
125
50
125
0
125
35
60
5
180
0
200

2,150
Range
Lower
Limit
0
25
40
0
25
25
25
100
75
115
25
175
175

Range
Upper
Limit
----55
--75
--75
----130
----210

Constraint Analysis

Num.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Name Value
Sat
5
Sun
5
Mon
10
Tues
5
Wed
16
Thurs
7
Fri
11

Statu
s
Basic
Lower
Lower
Basic
Lower
Lower
Lower

Shadow
Price
0
25
50
0
50
25
50

Constraint
Limit
2
5
10
3
16
7
11

Range
Lower
Limit
---

Range
Upper
Limit
3
5

--7
5
7

5
7
--5
107
11
107

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:
Type:
Goal:
Objective:

Agg
LP1
Min
###

Solve

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:

1
P1
1350
0
###

2
P2
1400
0
###

3
P3
1000
0
###

4
P4
550
0
###

5
P5
1700
0
###

6
P6
2000
0
###

Linear Obj. Coef.:

100

105

110

115

110

110

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
0
1

Vary

Constraints
Num. Name
1
M1
2
M2
3
M3
4
M4
5
M5
6
M6

Value
1300
1400
1000
800
1700
1900

Rel.
=
=
=
=
=
=

RHS
1300
1400
1000
800
1700
1900

Ph. 1 Iter.
6
Total Iter.
9
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal
7
I0
200
200
200

8
I1
250
0
250

9
I2
250
0
250

10
I3
250
0
250

1
0
0
0
0
0

-1
1
0
0
0
0

0
-1
1
0
0
0

11
I4

12
I5

0
0
250

0
0
250

13
I6
100
100
100

0
0
-1
1
0
0

0
0
0
-1
1
0

0
0
0
0
-1
1

0
0
0
0
0
-1

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet Agg

Variable Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
P1 1,350
2
P2 1,400
3
P3 1,000
4
P4
550
5
P5 1,700
6
P6 2,000
7
I0
200
8
I1
250
9
I2
250
10
I3
250
11
I4
0
12
I5
0
13
I6
100

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Upper
Upper
Upper
Upper
Lower
Lower
Upper

Reduced
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
-96
-1
-1
-1
9
4
110

Objective
Coefficient
100
105
110
115
110
110
4
4
4
4
4
4
0

866,050
Range
Lower
Limit
4
104
109
114
106
0
---------5
0
---

Range
Upper
Limit
101
106
111
--119
114
100
5
5
5
-----110

Constraint Analysis
Statu Shadow
Constraint
Num. Name Value
s
Price
Limit
1
M1 1,300Equality
100
1,300
2
M2 1,400Equality
105
1,400
3
M3 1,000Equality
110
1,000
4
M4
800Equality
115
800
5
M5 1,700Equality
110
1,700
6
M6 1,900Equality
110
1,900

Range
Lower
Limit
-50
0
0
250
0
-100

Range
Upper
Limit
-------------

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name: Power
Type: LP1
Goal: Min
Objective: 48313

Solve

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Vary

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name
1
A
2
B
3
C
4
X
5
Y
6
Z

Value
###
0
###
-25
-50
-30

Rel.
=
=
=
=
=
=

RHS
0
0
0
-25
-50
-30

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:
1
PA
0
0
100

2
PB
17.5
0
75

3
PC
100
0
100

500

475

400

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

4
xAB

5
xAC

6
xBA

0
0
###

0
0
###

0
0
###

Linear Constraint Coefficients

-1
0
0
1
0
-1
0 -0.95
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
0
-0.95
0
0
0

-0.95
1
0
0
0
0

Ph. 1 Iter.
6
Total Iter. 10
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal
7
xBC

8
xCA
0 16.67
0
0
### ###

9
xCB

10
yAX

0
0
###

11
yAZ
0 15.83
0
0
### ###

12
yBY
0
0
###

13
14
15
yBZ
yCX
yCY
17.5 27.78 55.56
0
0
0
### ### ###

0
1
-0.95
0
0
0

-0.95
0
1
0
0
0

0
-0.95
1
0
0
0

1
0
0
-0.9
0
0

1
0
0
0
0
-0.9

0
1
0
0
-0.9
0

0
1
0
0
0
-0.9

0
0
1
-0.9
0
0

0
0
1
0
-0.9
0

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet Power

Variable Analysis

Num.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Name
PA
PB
PC
xAB
xAC
xBA
xBC
xCA
xCB
yAX
yAZ
yBY
yBZ
yCX
yCY

Value
0
17.5
100
0
0
0
0
###
0
0
###
0
17.5
###
###

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Lower
Basic
Upper
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Basic
Lower
Lower
Basic
Lower
Basic
Basic
Basic

48,312.5

Reduced
Objective
Cost
Coefficient
25
500
0
475
-51.25
400
23.75
0
46.3125
0
23.75
0
46.3125
0
0
0
0
0
23.75
0
0
0
23.75
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Range
Lower
Limit
475
421.0526
---23.75
-46.3125
-23.75
-46.3125
-23.75
0
-23.75
-25
-23.75
0
-----

Range
Upper
Limit
--500
451.25
--------0
----0
--25
23.75
23.75

Shadow
Constraint
Price
Limit
-475
0
-475
0
-451.25
0
-501.3889
-25
-501.3889
-50
-527.7778
-30

Range
Lower
Limit
-15.8333
-57.5
-16.6667
-40
-65
-81.75

Range
Upper
Limit
17.5
17.5
18.4211
-8.4211
-33.4211
-14.25

Constraint Analysis
Statu
Num. Name Value
s
1
A
0Equality
2
B
0Equality
3
C
0Equality
4
X
0Equality
5
Y
0Equality
6
Z
0Equality

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change
Solve
Vary

Name: Chem
Type: LP2
Goal: Max
Objective: ###

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Variables
Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Upper Bounds:

0
0
###

Linear Obj. Coef.:

-4

Constraints
Num. Name Value Lower Upper
1
A_CON
0
0
0
2
B_CON ###
0
0
3
C_CON
0
0
0
4 M1_CONI ###
0
0
5 M1_CONO
3E-012
0
0
6 M2_CONI
0
0
0
7 M2_CONO
9E-012
0
0
8
X_CON
0
0
0
9
Y_CON 5E-012
0
0
10 Z_CON
0
0
0
11 YB_CON
0
0
0
12
AM1% 833.3
0 ###
13
BM1%
###
0 ###
14
BM2%
0
0
0
15
XM1%
###
0
0
16
YM%
###
0
0
17
YM2%
0
0
0
18
ZM2%
###
0
0
19
ZLIM
9286 1000 ###
20 Con 20 5000 ### 10000

1
A

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No

2
3
4
B
C
M1
5000 16071 7143
0
0
0
5000 ### 10000
-3

-1

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

5
6
AM1
BM1
1548 357.1
0
0
### ###

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.1
0
0
0 -0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.7
0
0
0
-0.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0

-1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
-1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Ph. 1 Iter. 22
Total Iter. 24
Comp. Time 00:02
Status Optimal
7
CM1
5238
0
###

8
XM1
5000
0
###

9
10
11
YM1
WM1
M2
1429 714.3 15476
0
0
0
### ### ###

12
13
BM2
CM2
4643 10833
0
0
### ###

14
YM2
4643
0
###

15
16
ZM2 AOM2
9286 1548
0
0
### ###

0
0
-1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
-1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.3
0
0
-0.3
-0.6
0
0

0
-1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
-1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0

17
X
5000
0
5000

18
Y
6071
0
###

1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

19
Z
9286
0
###

20
Y1
500
0
500

21
Y2
5571
0
###

10

11

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet Chem

Variable Analysis

Num.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Name
A
B
C
M1
AM1
BM1
CM1
XM1
YM1
WM1
M2
BM2
CM2
YM2
ZM2
AOM2
X
Y
Z
Y1
Y2

Value
0
5,000
###
###
###
###
###
5,000
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
5,000
###
###
500
###

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Lower
Upper
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Upper
Basic
Basic
Upper
Basic

Reduced
Objective
Cost
Coefficient
-3
-4
23
-3
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0714
5
0
0
0
10
3
11
0
8

###
Range
Lower
Limit
---26
-4
-2.85
-69
-57
-2.9483
-4.0714
-14.25
-28.5
-6.9
-23
-9.8571
-23
-11.5
-69
0.9286
-19
-1.5
8
-11

Range
Upper
Limit
-1
------3
25
69
------17.1
57
24.4286
57
28.5
171
----38.5
--11

Constraint Analysis
Range
Statu Shadow
Constraint
Lower
Num. Name Value
s
Price
Limit
Limit
1 A_CON
0Equality
-1
0
###
2 B_CON
0Equality
-26
0
###
3 C_CON
0Equality
-1
0
###
4 M1_CONI
0Equality
-1
0
###
5 M1_CONO
0Equality
0
0
--6 M2_CONI
0Equality
-1
0
###
7 M2_CONO
0Equality
-1
0
###
8 X_CON
0Equality
-0.9286
0
###
9 Y_CON
0Equality
-8
0
--10 Z_CON
0Equality
-10
0
--11 YB_CON
0Equality
-8
0
--12 AM1% ### Basic
0
0
--13 BM1%
0 Lower
-25
0 -357.1429
14 BM2%
0Equality
-25
0
###
15 XM1%
0Equality
0.9286
0
-2,000
16 YM%
0Equality
8
0
###
17 YM2%
0Equality
7
0
###

Range
Upper
Limit
833.3333
2,500
----714.2857
--833.3333
2,000
###
###
###
833.3333
2,500
2,500
625
714.2857
833.3333

18 ZM2%
0Equality
19 ZLIM ### Basic
20 Con 205,000 Basic

9
0
0

0
1,000
10,000

###
--5,000

833.3333
###
---

Sensitivity Analysis for Worksheet Bus

Variable Analysis

Num. Name Value

1
x0
4
2
x4
10
3
x8
0
4
x12
8
5
x16
4
6
x20
0

Objective Value:
Statu
s
Basic
Basic
Lower
Basic
Basic
Lower

Reduced
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0

Objective
Coefficient
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
0
1
0
1
0

Constraint
Limit
4
8
10
7
12
4

26
Range
Lower
Limit

Range
Upper
Limit
0
0
1
1
1
1

1
1
--1
1
---

Constraint Analysis

Num.
1
2
3
4
5
6

Name Value
D0
4
D4
14
D8
10
D12
8
D16
12
D20
4

Statu
s
Lower
Basic
Lower
Basic
Lower
Lower

Shadow
Price

Range
Lower
Limit
0

Range
Upper
Limit
---

---

---

14

---

8
11
0

--5

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:
Type:
Goal:
Objective:

Solve

Bus
LP1
Min
26

Variables
Name:
Values:

Vary

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:
1
x0
4

2
x4
10

3
x8

Jensen LP/IP
Linear
Yes
No
4
x12

Ph. 1 Iter.
Total Iter.
Comp. Time

5
x16

6
x20

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
1

1
0
0
0
0
1

Change Relation

Linear Obj. Coef.:

Constraints
Num. Name
1
D0
2
D4
3
D8
4
D12
5
D16
6
D20

Value
4
14
10
8
12
4

Rel.
>=
>=
>=
>=
>=
>=

RHS
4
8
10
7
12
4

Ph. 1 Iter.
7
Total Iter.
7
Comp. Time 00:00
Status Optimal

Linear Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60

Change

Name:Dist1_LP
Type: LP1
Goal: Min
Objective: 5300

Solve

Variables

Vary

Name:
Values:
Lower Bounds:
Change Relation
Upper Bounds:
Linear Obj. Coef.:
Constraints
Num. Name
1
Phoe
2
Chi
3
LA
4
Dal
5
Atl
6
NY
7
Aus
8
Gain

Value
700
-200
-200
-300
-150
-250
200
200

Rel.
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

RHS
700
-200
-200
-300
-150
-250
200
200

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Jensen LP/IP Ph. 1 Iter.

Linear
Total Iter.
No
Comp. Time
No
Status

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Phoe- Phoe- Phoe- Phoe- Dal- Dal- DalChi
LA
Dal
Atl
LA
Chi
NY
200 200 200 100
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
6

Linear Constraint Coefficients

1
1
1
1
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
-1
1
0
0
0
0

0
-1
0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
1
0
-1
0
0

12
17
###
Optimal
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Dal- AtlAtlAtl- Aus- Aus- Aus- Gain- Gain- GainAtl
NY
Dal
Chi
LA
Dal
Atl
Dal
Atl
NY
50
0
0
0
0 200
0
0
0 200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
2

0
0
0
1
-1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
-1
0
0

0
0
0
-1
1
0
0
0

0
-1
0
0
1
0
0
0

0
0
-1
0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
-1
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
-1
0
1
0

0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
1

Network Model
1
0
1
0
0
100
100
0
60
0
0
0

Change

Name: Dist1
Type: Net
Goal: Min
Objective: 5300

Solver:
Type:
Sens.:
Side:

Jensen Network
Linear
No
No

Solve
Vary
Arc Data and Flows
Num. Name Flow Origin Term. Lower Upper
1 Phoe-Chi 200
1
2
0
200
2
Phoe-LA
200
1
3
0
200
3 Phoe-Dal 200
1
4
0
200
4 Phoe-Atl
100
1
5
0
200
5
Dal-LA
0
4
3
0
200
6
Dal-Chi
0
4
2
0
200
7
Dal-NY
50
4
6
0
200
8
Dal-Atl
50
4
5
0
200
9
Atl-NY
0
5
6
0
200
10
Atl-Dal
0
5
4
0
200
11
Atl-Chi
0
5
2
0
200
12 Aus-LA
0
7
3
0
200
13 Aus-Dal
200
7
4
0
200
14 Aus-Atl
0
7
5
0
200
15 Gain-Dal
0
8
4
0
200
16 Gain-Atl
0
8
5
0
200
17 Gain-NY
200
8
6
0
200

Cost
6
3
3
7
5
4
6
2
5
2
4
7
2
5
6
4
7

Gain Flow_O
1
200
1
200
1
200
1
100
1
0
1
0
1
50
1
50
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
200
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
200

en Network

Flow_O

Ph. 1 Iter.
2
Total Iter.
11
Comp. Time 00:01
Status Optimal

Node Data and Balance Constraints

Num. Name Fixed Balance
1
Phoe
700
0
2
Chi
-200
0
3
LA
-200
0
4
Dal
-300
0
5
Atl
-150
0
6
NY
-250
0
7
Aus
200
0
8
Gain
200
0