A graph within the same article shows a positive correlation between the percent of people who
say the government should not reduce income gap and annual incomeas income increases, so
does the amount of people that are against redistribution of wealth. This idea both undermines
and explains youth support of Bernie Sandersyoung people who struggle to make a living feel
as if the current system has failed them, lending itself to the glorification of the redistribution of
wealth, but conversely, as more money is made, redistribution becomes less and less desirable.
Another interesting, yet haunting fact Thompson includes: 42% of millennials think socialism is
Although Thompson vouches for Bernie supporters through these three reasons, many political
bigwigs are concerned with the millennial mindset, such as David Brooks, who exasperatedly
wrote: Its amazing that a large part of the millennial generation has rejected the American
consensus that free markets are the way toward individualism, achievement and flexibility.
This exclamation ties neatly into the 42% of millennials that find socialism preferable to
capitalism, yet cannot define it. A misunderstanding or lack of information on the government
may lead to the countrys economic demise if socialism were to replace capitalism, something
that many millennials are gunning for. However, Thompson attempts to explain this by
With the addition of a statistic that wages have grown 60% more slowly for millennials than
those of the general population, Thompson effectively relays why millennials may, for example,
side with Bernie Sanders on the issue of the redistribution of wealth, as why they also may not
trust the government, as it has failed them and tanked their finances (Thompson 2016). However,
young Sanders supporters are the most fervent, but also the least involved in government. An
appealing platform may lead to high verbal support, but millennials have become notorious for
their lack of government involvement, as discussed further in the following section. Furthermore,
modern Supreme Court rulings, such as the legalization of gay marriage, and societal issues,
such as abortion, legalization of marijuana, and LGBTQ+ rights, have led to an extremely
polarized government, one that forces many millennials to the left. In a recent Pew study, it was
found that:
Young voters continue to identify with the Democratic Party at relatively high
levels and express more liberal attitudes on a range of issues from gay marriage
The stagnant results from these polls may be a result of a lack of substantial change during
President Obamas first termthe introduction of ObamaCare, Dodd Frank, and the Lily
Ledbetter Act in 2008 may have rallied Democrats behind the president without driving any
away. The main political conflict during Obamas two terms was the recession of 2008,
something that had been building for years prior to his taking office. Rather than greatly
impacting the Democratic Party, Republicans took the hit, which may attest to the reason why
Democrats were just as appealing four years later.
Another similar bout of statistics in a Gallup poll analysis by Jeffery M. Jones shows the
repercussions of such political conflicts: the main reason Americans want political change is
because of the appearance of an inefficient government due to government shutdowns, gridlock,
and constant argument. Because of the rise of political independents, the Democratic Party is
gaining steamwhen it comes to voting, last year, in addition to the 29% of Americans who
identified as Democrats, another 16% of independents leaned toward the Democratic Party, for a
combined total of 45% alignment with the Democratic Party. Although third parties allow for the
spread of new ideas in politics, they do a poor job of jiving with the traditional two-party system
already in play. The recent increased in independents is not all bad, especially because as a party
they lean to the left, meaning they will likely support at least one major presidential candidate in
elections, but this creates a positive feedback loopone that does little but increase the problem.
Millennials traditionally lean left (for aforementioned reasons such as age, diversity, and
economics) and a large percentage identify as independents, disillusioned by both parties.
Thompson continues to argue that because youth participation is so low, a political revolutionist
such as Bernie Sanders can never be successful; in order to change his fate of imminent failure,
young voters need to learn to vote like old people (Thompson 2016). What this means is that
millennials need to become more civically engaged and take their issues to the polls; without the
voice of the youth being heard, their diversity will not be reflected in the government. If
millennials are all throat and no vote, politicians are less likely to cater towards young people;
many may be less likely to tailor their agenda to young voters, who show little support in the
general election, and talk up platform issues that draw in older voters, who do show support in
the polls. Because of this, the government will continue to neglect the increasing diversity of
Generation Y, which is quickly becoming the infamous Generation Wh(y) Dont They Vote?
Political candidates would not be wrong in catering towards older voters, because a 2014
US Census Bureau report signified that Americans 65 and older have historically had higher
A look at the decline in youth support for Obama between the 2008 and 2012 elections, just four
years, epitomizes the decline in youth participation in the government, a problem that will grow
increasingly more serious as millennials continue to grow in size (Young Voters 2012). Another
important trend noted in the above statistics is the breakdown of voters of differently
nationalities. Because 43% of diversity lies within Americans aged 18-29, it can be inferred that
many of the minority groups that lacked high participation are part of the diverse, young
generation. Diversity is a strength, not a weakness, of the millennial generation, but only when
portrayed in the polls.
Conclusion
Given the above research, as generations experience growth in diversity, views on the
government change. The vicious cycle that occurs here follows these steps: young Americans
feel as if the government has failed them, so they decide to boycott civic duties, such as voting,
to make a statement, which in turn leads to no change, and goes back to the perception of a
corrupt government. The most diverse generation in American history could make a huge change
in the current system of government, but only if they vote. The diversity in both race and arising
social issues, such as abortion, legalization of marijuana, and high unemployment rates among
References