Student
Reading
Level
Jessica
Aubrey
Devon
Alexander
Adam
F
H
J
J
M
students demonstrated their understanding by actively participating in the lesson. However, several
students struggled to select appropriately leveled books. As a result, their comprehension was limited.
For example, my anecdotal notes indicated that two of my lowest readers (Aubrey and Jessica) chose
chapter books above their reading level during independent work time. These recurrent observations
affirmed their lack of self-awareness.
Throughout August and September, I also composed and refined a list of skills and strategies
essential to reading instruction. The schools English Language Learner (ELL) teacher helped my mentor
and I create differentiated lessons aimed at boosting students overall reading comprehension.
Additionally, I spent time getting to know my students as readers by using a general interest inventory to
gauge their interests and thoughts about reading (Appendix A). I determined my lower-leveled readers
found reading unenjoyable, whereas the higher-leveled students expressed their love for reading by
stating, I just love to read! I have hundreds of books to read at home. I like learning new things and being
challenged by books (Adam, August 28, 2015). Furthermore, I discovered several of my students were
2
unaware of helpful reading strategies. This became apparent through a question on the interest inventory
which asked what someone should know or do to be a good reader; many answers were left blank. I
began to wonder if the minimal strategy-based knowledge was affecting student reading levels.
Throughout the second month of school, I completed the Benchmark Assessment System (BAS)
Running Record on all of my students again. I re-assessed my students overall reading fluency and
comprehension level (Table 2). While the results showed only
Expected Reading
Level for Second
Grade Students
stood out as being low in comprehension as they only answered
Jessica
H
K
Aubrey
I
K
an average of fifty-two percent of comprehension-check
Devon
K
K
Alexander
L
K
questions correctly. The preliminary data I gathered early in the
Adam
M
K
Table 2
school year prompted me to continue observing these struggling students throughout the year.
three students with areas of concern, several other students
Reading
Level
3
they were reading below grade level (Anecdotal Notes). In the meantime, many of my struggling readers
written responses to guided reading books did not fully portray their thinking. For example, on November
26, 2015, I asked students to respond to a question and explain how they knew their answer was correct.
However, Alexander explained, In the rain forest you need a raft, canoe, and jackets because the book
says so (Reading Response Journal). In addition to Alexanders response, four other journal entries stood
out as lacking textual evidence to support their response. Since these students failed to provide textual
support, I suspected a lack of true understanding in their reading.