0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
146 tayangan1 halaman
Letter from Fabio Lobo defense team requesting adjournment "to allow additional time for the parties to continue discussing case resolution short of trial"
Letter from Fabio Lobo defense team requesting adjournment "to allow additional time for the parties to continue discussing case resolution short of trial"
Letter from Fabio Lobo defense team requesting adjournment "to allow additional time for the parties to continue discussing case resolution short of trial"
Attorneys at Law 300 New Jersey Avenue, NW ~ Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001 www.returetawassem.com
Manuel J. Retureta, Esq. (DC)
Leigh Anne Wassem, Esq. (MD)
(202) 450-6119 Fax: (202) 347-0130
March 21, 2016
Via ECF The Honorable Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 03/22/2016
Re: United States v. Fabio Lobo Lobo, 15-cr-174 (LGS)
Dear Judge Schofield: The parties respectfully request a brief adjournment of the motion filing deadline established by the Court at the most recent status hearing on January 19, 2016. The basis for this request is to allow additional time for the parties to continue discussing case resolution short of trial, and allow defense counsel to consult with the defendant on such a resolution. Since the last court hearing undersigned counsel has been engaged in a lengthy trial in the District of Columbia. This commitment has limited the amount of time counsel has had to confer with Mr. Lobo. Accordingly, the parties agree that an additional two-weeks would be an appropriate period of time for the reasons set forth above, and a period of time that would not alter the Courts previous trial schedule. As noted in the Courts January order, March 21st filings would lead to responses by April 4th, replies on April 11th, and a status conference on May 16th. The following schedule is respectfully suggested: motions due by April 4, responses by April Application Granted. Defendant's motions, if any, shall be filed by 18, replies by April 25th. April 4, 2016. The Government's response shall be filed by April 18, Respectfully submitted, 2016. Defendant's reply shall be filed by April 25, 2016. The parties are warned that this application is untimely. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances, The parties are also reminded that discussions regarding the possible disposition of this matter will not stay the aforementioned schedule. The Clerk of the Manuel J. Retureta, Esq. Court is directed to terminate the letter motion at docket number 29. Dated: March 22, 2016 New York, New York RETURETA & WASSEM, P.L.L.C.
United States of America Ex Rel. Shaykh Muhammad Ali Hasan A/K/A Abyssinia Hayes v. Paul J. Gernert, Chairman Pennsylvania State Board of Probation and Parole, 395 F.2d 193, 3rd Cir. (1968)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Campaigner Publications, Inc., in Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Caucus Distributors, Inc., 795 F.2d 226, 1st Cir. (1986)
Robert W. McWhinney v. Robert P. Cain, Group Supervisor, Group 11, Internal Revenue Service, District of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and The United States of America, 289 F.2d 315, 3rd Cir. (1961)
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, and Hugh L. Rutledge v. United States, 272 F.2d 11, 4th Cir. (1959)
Robert L. Dowell, Etc. v. Board of Education of The Oklahoma City Public Schools, Rebecca Diane Baker, Etc., Intervening, 430 F.2d 871, 10th Cir. (1970)