Anda di halaman 1dari 106

ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEM

Types
Selection, requirements & identification
PROF. DR. ARIFFIN SAMSURI

MYP 2513

ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEM LEARNING OUTCOMES

Students must be able to:


Distinguish different type of artificial lift system
Identify & select the requirement for artificial lift
system

INTRODUCTION

Purpose:
To maintain a reduced producing bottom hole pressure so that formation
can give desired reservoir fluids required flowing bottom hole pressure
can be maintained for certain q

Design basis:
Maintaining required flowing bottom hole pressure for desired q

Requirement based on:


When well produced less than desired q
When well dead

Artificial Lift Fundamental

Reservoir pressure so low static fluid level below wellhead no natural flow
If PI sufficiently high & produced fluid contains enough gas flowing fluid pressure gradient
gives positive wellhead pressure well can flow but need kicked off by swabbing or other
techniques

Artificial Lift Fundamental

Pump installed create limited drawdown q

Maximises Potential Drawdown & q

Deeper pump create larger drawdown on formation & maximum potential production can
be achieved

ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEM TYPE

Available types:

Sucker rod pump


Progressive cavity pump PCP
Hydraulic pump
Electrical submersible pump (ESP)
Electrical submersible progressive cavity pump (ESPCP)
Rotating rod pump
Sonic pump
Plunger lift
Gas lift
etc

Most popular artificial lift type

Various Artificial Lift Technique/Method

Pump Classification

SELECTION CONCEPT

Philosophy :
for maximum potential, select most economical type/system

Methods or steps include:


Operator experience
Method available for installation @ certain area
Possibility of working in adjoining or similar field
Method will lift @ desired q from required depth
Evaluating advantages & disadvantages
Expert system to both eliminate & select system
Evaluation of initial cost, operating costs, production
capabilities, etc

SELECTION CONCEPT cont.

Generally should consider:


geographic location,
capital cost,
operating cost,
production flexibility,
reliability,
mean time between failures,
reservoir pressure,
well productivity,
reservoir fluids,
long-term reservoir performance &
facility constraints

In most cases, what has worked best or which lift method performs best in similar field serve
as selection criteria, together with consideration on equipment services available
type/system which provides highest present value for project life will be
selected

ARTIFICAL LIFT TECHNIQUE SELECTION CRITERIA


FACTOR TO BE CONSIDERED:
1.

Well & reservoir characteristics


1.

Well factor

2.

Reservoir factor

3.

Reservoir properties especially drive & type

Fluid factor

2.

Well geometry, performance, especially PI, q

Fluid properties particularly GOR, composition, SG, viscosity

Field location & environment

Well location & environment pollution

3.

Operational problems

4.

Economics

5.

Implementation of artificial lift selection techniques

6.

Long term reservoir performance & facility constraints

WELL & RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Production casing size


Maximum size of production tubing & required production rate
Annular & tubing safety systems
Producing formation depth & deviation
Nature of produced fluids
Well inflow characteristics

Influence of IPR on Production @ Drawdown Increased

Influence of IPR on production increase achieved when well


drawdown increased

FIELD LOCATION & ENVIRONMENT

Offshore platform design dictates maximum physical size and weight of


artificial lift equipment can be installed
Onshore environment strongly influence artificial lift selection:

Urban location requiring minimum visual & acoustic impact

Remote location with minimum availability of support infrastructure or regular access to well

Climatic extremes,

e.g. arctic operations will limit practical choices

Wellhead processing facilities distance will determine minimum wellhead


flowing pressure

E.g. ESP more attractive than gas lift since extra pressure drop @ flowline, due to injected
gas, makes gas lift unsuitable option

Power source available for prime mover will impact detailed equipment
design & reliability

E.g. voltage spikes reduce ESPs electrical motor lifetime.

OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS
Sand production
gas lift more tolerant to solids than centrifugal pump
Inhibitor can be carried in the power fluid for hydraulic pump suitable for massive organic & inorganic deposits such as
paraffin, asphaltene, scale & hydrate

ECONOMICS
Full life cycle of economic analysis : operating cost vs initial capital cost to
installed artificial lift
If capital cost to installed small as compared to total project costs and benefit to
increased revenue & reduced operating cost installed artificial lift
Need to consider:
Capital cost vs total operating cost & benefit
Reliability (maintenance & operator costs)
Energy efficiency

Maintenance cost depend on: location, service company infrastructure


Number of well (economic scale) operating costs
Need for automation & centralised facilities operating costs
Operational staff skill @ artificial lift technique

Energy Efficiency Comparison

Energy Efficiency of Various Artificial Lift Method

Only ESP & PCP have EE > 50%

IMPLEMENTATION
Need to consider, how to:
Determine the optimum type of artificial lift for a given well
Matching facility constraints, artificial lift capabilities & well
productivity efficient lift installation ?

Environmental factor
Geographical factor
Production problems: sand & paraffin production
Reservoir fluid characteristics
Example:
Populated area : sucker rod pump is not suitable
GLR: suitable for gas lift but problem for all pumps

Long Term Reservoir Performance

Problems in artificial lift selection & sizing 2 approaches


1. Equipment installed can handle well production & production condition @ lifetime
oversize equipment based on producing large water

equipment operate at poor efficiency due to underloading at early production


life
2. Design for current well producing conditions and not worry about future

many changes in type of lift equipment @ wells producing life


low cost operation @ short term but large sums money spent later to change
artificial lift equipment and/or completion

Facility Constraints

In new field development; fluid handling equipment may significantly increase size &
cost of facilities required

Rod pump & ESP : only produced fluid handled through facilities

Gas lift requires injection gas compression & distribution facilities & circulating lift gas increases size of
production facilities required

Hydraulic pump needs power fluid volume equal to produced fluid volume

Wellbore size need to be consider for desired flow rate

Casing designed to minimize drilling cost limitation on artificial lift equipment can be installed

Smaller casing size higher long term production cost due to well servicing problems, gas separation
problems etc.

METHOD/TYPE SELECTION
Examples

1.

Well factor

2.

Reservoir factor

3.

Water drive reservoir gas lift if adequate high pressure supply available

Fluid factor

4.

Big volume shallow well continuous flow gas lift, centrifugal pump, hydraulic pump
Small volume shallow well sucker rod pump
Small volume deviated deep well hydraulic pump

High GOR Gas lift


Crude with paraffin content Not suitable for hydraulic pump
High viscosity & low gravity crude Not suitable for hydraulic pump
High viscosity crude sucker rod pump

Environmental factor

To reduce pollution gas lift, hydraulic pump


Offshore, remote area or wash land area less maintenance/treatment type, such as
gas lift or hydraulic pump

Typical application areas of


artificial lift techniques

SUCKER ROD PUMP

Oldest and most widely used for oil wells

Working principal:
As energy transmitted from prime mover to polished rod, speed reducer @ gear box
reduces the speed
Rotary motion translated to reciprocating motion through crank, pitman & beam
Sucker rod string transmit horsepower from beam to pump
Downhole plunger moved up-down by a rod connected to engine @ surface
When pump actuated, work done on the well fluid as it is lifted to surface
Plunger movement displaces produced fluid into tubing via pump (with travelling &
standing valves within pump barrel)
Moved up-down fluid displaces surface @ q

principal parts:
Pump
Sucker rod string
Pumping unit
Prime mover

Sucker Rod Pump Surface Equipments

Surface Equipment @ Sucker Rod Pump

Sucker Rop Pump Operation

Sucker Rod Operation

SUCKER ROD PUMP


Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages:
New wells, lower volume cost effective over time & simple
system & easier to operate.
Lifting moderate volume from shallow depth (1000 BPD @
7000 ft)
Lifting small volume from intermediate depth (200 BPD @
14000 ft)

Disadvantages:
Most incompatible with deviated (doglegged) wells
Limited ability to produce sand-laden fluids
Paraffin & scale can interfere
Free gas interference can reduces pump efficiency
Leaking problems @ polished-rod stuffing box

ROD PUMP
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

1. Capital cost
2. Downhole equipment
3. Operating efficiency (hydraulic hp / input hp)
4. System Flexibility
5. Miscellaneous Problems
6. Operating costs
7. System Reliability
8. Salvage Value
9. System Total
10.Usage/Outlook

ROD PUMP
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Capital cost
Low to moderate
Increases as depth and unit size increases

Downhole equipment

Reasonably good rod design & operating practices needed


Data bank of failures beneficial
Good selection, operating, and repair practices needed for rods & pumps

Operating efficiency (hydraulic hp / input hp)


Excellent total system efficiency
With full pump fillage, efficiency typically 45 to 60%

System Flexibility

Excellent
Can alter strokes per minute, stroke length, plunger size & run time to control
production rate

Miscellaneous Problems
Stuffing box leakage may be messy & potential hazard

Rod Pump
Design Considerations
Operating costs
Low for shallow to medium depth (<7000 ft) onland with low production (<400 BFPD)

System Reliability
Excellent
Run time efficiency >95% if good rod practices followed

Salvage Value

Excellent
Easily moved & good market for used equipment

System Total
Straightfoward & basic procedures to design, install & operate following API specs and
RPs.
Each well is an individual system

Usage/Outlook
Excellent
Used on 85% of US artificial lift wells
Normal standard artificial lift method

ROD PUMP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

Casing Size Limits


Depth Limits
Intake Capabilities
Noise Level
Obstrusiveness
Prime Mover Flexibility
Surveillance
Relative Ease of Well Testing
Time Cycle & Pump Off

ROD PUMP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Casing Size Limits


Problem in high rate well (required large plunger pump)
Small casing sizes (4.5 5.5 in.) may limit free gas separation

Depth Limits

Good
Rod / structure may limit rate at depth
Effectively, 150 BPD at 15000 ft, 100 to 11000 ft typical, 16000 ft maximum

Intake Capabilities
Excellent, <25psi provided adequate displacement & gas venting
Typically, 50 100 psig

Noise Level

Fair
Moderate high for urban areas

Obstrusiveness

Size & operation drawbacks in populated & farming areas

ROD PUMP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Prime Mover Flexibility

Surveillance

Relative Ease of Well Testing

Time Cycle & Pump Off

Good
Both engine & motor can be used easily
Motor more reliable & fliexible
Excellent
Can be easily analyzed @ well test, fluid level, etc
Improved analysis by use of dynamometers & computer
Good
Well testing simple with few problems with use of standard available
equipment & procedures
Excellent if well can be pumped off

ROD PUMP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

1. Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability


2. Crooked/Deviated Holes
3. Duals Applications
4. Gas Handling Ability
5. Offshore Application
6. Paraffin Handling Capability
7. Slimhole Completions
8. Solids/Sand Handling Ability
9. Temperature Limitations
10. High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability
11. High Volume Lift Capability
12. Low Volume Lift Capability

ROD PUMP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability

Crooked/Deviated Holes

Good if can vent & use gas anchor with proper designed pump
Poor if must pump (50%) free gas

Offshore Application

Fair, parallel 2x2 in. low rate feasible inside 7 in. casing
Inside 5.5 in. not in fovor, potential gas problem from lower zone, increased mechanical problems

Gas Handling Ability

Fair, increased load & wear problems


High angle deviated holes (>70o) & horizontal wells are being produced
Some success in 15o/100ft dogleg severity with use of rod guides
Typical: 0 20, 0 90o, <15o/100 maximum

Duals Applications

Good to excellent
Batch treating inhibitor down annulus feasible

Poor, must design for unit size, weight, & pulling units space
Air balanced is lightest unit

Paraffin Handling Capability

Good / excellent
Hot water / oil treating and/or use of scrapers possible, but increase operating costs

ROD PUMP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Slimhole Completions
Feasible for low rates (<100BPD) & low GOR (<250)

Solids/Sand Handling Ability


Fair for low viscosity (<10cp) production
Improved performance for high viscosity (>200cp)
May be able to handle up to 0.1% sand

Temperature Limitations
Excellent, currently used in thermal operations (550oF)

High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability


Good for up to <200cp & low rates (400 BPD)
Diluent, downhole stuffing box or other methods for higher rates

High Volume Lift Capability


Fair, restricted to shallow depths with use of large plungers
Maximum rate 4000 BFPD from 1000 ft, and 1000 BFPD from 5000 ft

Low Volume Lift Capability

Excellent.
Most commonly used for wells producing <100 BFPD

Sucker Rod Pump Operational Diagnosis

Pump conditions can be evaluated by measuring


load at top of polished rod as function of its
position dynamometer card recording
Practical problems:

Excessive rod or pump friction


Restriction in flow-path
Vibrations
Sticking plunger, leaking travelling or standing valves
Gas presence in pump barrel and viscous emulsion
formation.

Dynamic load experienced by properly operating pump

HYDRAULIC PUMP
Use high pressure fluid to:
Drive downhole turbine or positive pump, or
Flow through venturi or jet, creating low pressure
area which produces increased drawdown and
inflow from reservoir
Two types:
Hydraulic jet pump
Reciprocating positive displacement pump

Hydraulic Pump Completion

Hydraulic Pump

Hydraulic Pump Positive Displacement Pump

Positive Displacement Hydraulic Pump Operation

Jet or Venturi Pump Operation

Jet or Venturi Pump Operation

Venturi/nozzle -- reduced pressure pressure energy converted into velocity


High velocity low pressure flow of power fluid commingles with production flow @
throat
Diffuser reduces velocity, increasing fluid pressure fluid flow to surface

Hydraulic pump installation types:


Open system
Power fluid supplied to downhole
equipment via separate injection
tubing
Commingle exhaust fluid with
production fluid
Closed system
Power fluid supplied to downhole
equipment via separate injection
tubing
Power fluid return to surface via
third separate tubing

HYDRAULIC PUMP CAPACITIES


RECIPROCATING
POSITIVE
DISPLACEMENT
PUMP

RECIPROCATING
POSITIVE
DISPLACEMENT
PUMP

JET-FREE
PUMP

Tubing size (in.)

Working Fluid Level (ft)

Max.Pump Disp. (BPD)

Production (BPD)

2 3/8

6000 - 17000

1311 - 381

3000

2 7/8

6000 - 17000

2500 - 744

6000

3 1/2

6000 - 15000

4015 - 1357

10000

HYDRAULIC PUMP ADVANTAGES

Able to circulate the pump in and out of the well


Positive-displacement pump capable of pumping depth to 17000 ft and
deeper for large volume
Working fluid level of jet pump limited to 9000 ft
By changing power-fluid rate to pump, production rate can be varied from
10 100% of pump capacity. Optimum speed 20 85% of rated speed.
Operating life significantly reduced if pump operated above the maximum
rated speed
Suitable for crooked & deviated wells
Jet pumps, with hardened nozzle throats, can handle sand/solid
Positive displacement pump with diluents added or power fluid can be
heated, the pumps can handle viscous oils very well
Corrosion inhibitors can be injected into power fluid for corrosion control.
Added fresh water can solve salt-buildup problems

HYDRAULIC PUMP DISADVANTAGES

Removing solid from power fluid is very important to positive-displacement


pump. Solid can also affect surface plunger pump. But, jet pump very
tolerant of poor power fluid quality
Positive displacement pump have shorter life time than jet, sucker rod and
ESP but operating at greater depth and at higher strokes per minute than
beam pump
Jet pump have very long pump life, lower efficiency and higher energy
costs
Positive displacement pump can pump from low BHP (<100psi). Jet pump
needs 1000 psi BHP if set at 10000 ft and 500 psi when set at 5000 ft
Positive displacement pump generally require more maintenance than jet
pump and others artificial lift (pump speed must be monitored daily & not
allowed to become excessive

Hydraulic Reciprocating Pump


Design Considerations
Capital Cost
Varies, but often competitive with rod pumps
Multiple well, central systems reduces cost per well but more complicated

Downhole equipment
Proper pump sizing & operating practices essential
Requires two conductors (power fluid & returns)

Operating efficiency (hydraulic hp/input hp)


Fair to good, usually not as good as rod pumping because of GLR, friction & pump wear)
Typical efficiency 30 40% with GLR>100, 40-50% if lower GLR

System flexibility
Good to excellent
Can vary power fluid rate; stroke / minute of downhole pump
Numerous pump sizes & pump-to-engine ratio adapt to production & depth requirements

Miscellaneous problems

Power fluid solid control essential


15 ppm of 15um particles maximum to avoid excessive engine wear
Must add surfactant to water power fluid for lubricity
High pressure power oil leakage may be hazardous
Triplex plunger leakage control required
Fluid system requires added tubing string

Hydraulic Reciprocating Pump


Design Considerations

Operating costs

System Reliability

Often higher than rod pump


Short run life increases total operating costs
Good with correctly designed & operated system
Wellsite power fluid system minimizes power oil or water problems
Problems or changing well conditions reduce downhole pump reliability
Frequent downtime results from power oil problems, injection pressure, pump maintenance problems, & downhole
pump failure

Salvage Value

System Total

Usage/Outlook

Fair, some trade in value especially for triplex pump


Good value for wellsite system easy moved well to well
Simple manual / computer design well application
Operating procedures easily learned
Free pump retrieved for servicing
Individual well unit flexible but extra cost (requires attention)
Central plant more complex; usually results in test & treatment problems
Often used as default artificial lift well system
Good for flexible operation; wide rate range to relatively deep, high volume, high temperature, deviated, oil wells
Used on <5% of US lifted wells

Hydraulic Jet Pump


Design Considerations
Capital Cost
Competitive with rod pump
Relatively low cost over 1500 BFPD
Increases with higher hp

Downhole equipment
Requires computer design program for sizing
Tolerant of moderate solid in power fluid
No moving parts in pump; long service life, simple repair procedures to run & retrieve pump
downhole

Operating efficiency (hydraulic hp/input hp)


Fair to poor, maximum eff. (ideal) 30%
Heavily influenced by power fluid & production gradient
Typical operating eff. 10-30%

System flexibility
Good to excellent
Power fluid rate & pressure adjust production rate & lift capacity ( from no flow to full design
capacity installed pump)
Selection of throat & nozzle sizes extends range of volume & capacity

Miscellaneous problems
More tolerant of power fluid solid; 200 ppm of 25um particle acceptable
Diluents may be added, if required
Power water, either fresh, produced, or sea water is acceptable

Hydraulic Jet Pump


Design Considerations
Operating costs
Higher power cost because of hp requirement
Low pump maintenance cost with properly sized throat & nozzle for long run life

System Reliability
Good with proper throat & nozzle sizing
Must avoid operating in cavitation range of jet pump throat
More problems if pressure >4000 psig

Salvage Value
Good, easily moved well to well
Fair, some trade in value (especially triplex pump)

System Total

Available computer design program for application design


Basic operating procedure for downhole pump & wellsite unit
Free pump easily retrieved for on-site repair/replacement
Downhole jet often requires trial & error to arrive at best/optimum jet

Usage/Outlook
Good for higher volume wells requiring flexible operation, wide depth range, high temperature,
high corrosion, high GOR, significant sand production
Used on <1% US lifted wells
Sometime used to test wells that will not flow offshore

HYDRAULIC RECIPROCATING
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Casing Size Limits


Large casing required for parallel free or closed systems
Small casing (4.5 5.5 in.) excessive friction losses & limits producing rate

Depth Limits

Intake Capabilities

Excellent but limited by power fluid pressure (5000 psi) or hp


Low volume/high lift pump operating at depths to 17000 ft.
Typical depth: 7500 10000 ft, maximum 17000 ft

Fair, not as good as rod pumping


Pp <100 psig frequent pump repairs
Free gas reduces displacement efficiency & service life

Noise Level
Good, well noise low and wellsite power fluid unit can be sound proofed

Obstrusiveness
Fair to good, wellhead equipment low profile
Requires surface treating & high pressure pumping equipment
Free pump can be retrieved into lubricator to avoid oil spillage

HYDRAULIC RECIPROCATING PUMP


NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Prime Mover Flexibility

Surveillance

Excellent
Can be electric motor, gas or diesel fired engines / motor
Good/fair
Downhole pump performance can be analyzed from surface power fluid
rate & pressure, stroke/minute & producing rate
Pressure recorder can be run & retrieved on free pump

Relative Ease of Well Testing


Fair and well testing with standard individual well units units present few
problems
Well testing with central system more complex; requires accurate power
fluid measurement

Time Cycle & Pump Off

Poor but possible with electric drive wellsite unit

HYDRAULIC JET PUMP


NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Casing Size Limits


Small casing limits producing rate at acceptable pressure drop
Larger casing required for dual strings

Depth Limits
Excellent & similar as reciprocating pump

Intake Capabilities
Poor to fair; >350 psig to 5000 ft with low GLR
Typical design target 25% submergence

Noise Level
Same as reciprocating pump

Obstrusiveness
Same as reciprocating pump

HYDRAULIC JET PUMP


NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Prime Mover Flexibility


Same as reciprocating pump

Surveillance
Same as reciprocating pump

Relative Ease of Well Testing


Same as reciprocating pump
Three stage production test can be conducted y adjusting
production step rates

Time Cycle & Pump Off


Poor

HYDRAULIC RECIPROCATING PUMP


SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability


Good/excellent; batch/continuous treating inhibitor circulated downhole with power fluid
for effective control

Crooked/Deviated Holes
Excellent; if tubing can be run in well & pump pass through tubing
Free pump retrieved without pulling tubing

Duals Applications

Gas Handling Ability

Fair, limited to low GLR & moderate rate


Good/fair

Offshore Application

Paraffin Handling Capability

Fair, requires deck space for power fluid pump & preferably wellsite type power fluid
system to avoid increased production treating capacity
Power water may be used in closed power fluid system but power oil potential fire/safety
problems
Good/excellent. Heated power water/oil circulates heat to downhole pump to minimize
buildup
Hot water/oil treatment, mechanical cutting, inhibition possible

HYDRAULIC RECIPROCATING PUMP


SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Slimhole Completions

Solids/Sand Handling Ability

Good. >8oAPI production with <500cp possible


Power fluid can be used to dilute low gravity production

High Volume Lift Capability

Excellent; standard materials to 325oF, typical 100-250oF


Operating to 400-500oF feasible with special materials

High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability

Poor; requires <10ppm power fluid for good run life


Produced fluid must have low solid (<200ppm of 15um) for reasonable life
Freshwater injection into power stream may solve salt buildup in pump

Temperature Limitations

Possible but may have high friction losses / gas problems


Have been used when moderate production rate & low GLR

Good but limited by tubulars & hp


Typical: 3000BFPD from 4000ft & 1000 BFPD from 10000ft with 3500 psi system
50-500BPD typical; 4000BPD maximum

Low Volume Lift Capability

Fair, not as good as rod pumping


Typical: 100-300 BFPD from 4000-10000ft; >75 BFPD from 12000 ft possible

HYDRAULIC JET PUMP


SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability


Good/excellent; inhibitor with power fluid mixes with produced fluid at entry of jet pump
throat
Batch treat down annulus

Crooked/Deviated Holes

Duals Applications

Excellent; short jet pump can pass through doglegs up to 24o/100ft in 2 3/8 in. tubing
0-20o typical; 0-90o <24o/100 build angle maximum
Same as reciprocating pump except can handle higher GLR with sufficient surface hp

Gas Handling Ability


Same as reciprocating pump except can handle higher GLR
Free gas reduces efficiency but helps lift. Vent free gas possible. Use gas anchor

Offshore Application
Good; produced water or sea water may be used as power fluid with wellsite type system,
or power fluid separation before production treating system

Paraffin Handling Capability


Same as reciprocating pump

HYDRAULIC JET PUMP


SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Slimhole Completions
Same as reciprocating pump except can handle higher GLR

Solids/Sand Handling Ability


Fair/good; operating with 3% sand content
Power fluid can tolerate 200 ppm of 25um particle; freshwater treatment for salt buildup
possible

Temperature Limitations

High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability

Excellent
Typical: 100-250oF, possible to operate @ 500-600oF with special material
Good/excellent; >6oAPI with <800cp possible
Power oil of >24oAPI & <50cp or water power fluid reduces friction losses

High Volume Lift Capability


Excellent; up to 15000BFPD with adequate Pwf, tubular size & hp
300-1000BPD typical; >15000 BPD maximum

Low Volume Lift Capability

Fair; >200 BFPD from 4000 ft

ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP (ESP)

Employs downhole centrifugal pump driven by electric motor


supplied with electric power via cable run from surface
penetrates wellhead & strapped to outside of tubing
5 basic components:
- Electric motor
- Multistage centrifugal pump
- Electric cable (surface pump)
- Switchboard
- Power transformer
Large volume : 150 60000 BPD
Entire pumping system lowered, suspended on tubing string,
to desired depth

Electric Submersible Centrifugal Pump (ESP)

Electric Submersible Centrifugal Pump Well Completion

ESP Completion Design with Gas Anchors

Shroud :

to make use of casing ability to separate


produced gas from liquid
Increase maximum ESP diameter
Suitable for low rate well with large annular clearances
& large bubbles gas (free gas)
Protector or seal:
Unit connects electric motor drive shaft to
pump or gas separator shaft
Isolation barrier between clean motor oil & well
fluid
Expansion buffer for motor oil
Equaliser for internal motor pressure & well
annular pressure
Absorber for thrust generated by pump
Electric motor : 15 900 HP
Downhole sensor package: Measurement of:
Pump suction & discharge P & T
Fluid intake T
Electric motor T
Motor & pump vibration
Electrical current leakage to earth

ESP Incorporating Packer & @ Surface Controlled


Subsurface Safety Valves

Regulatory requirement
Venting gas to surface

Typical ESP Applications

a.

Direct water injection

Aquifer water lifted from


supply zone & pumped
directly to single injection
well
b. Powered dumpflood with ESP

Water supply well


combine with injection
well

ESP inverted with pump at


bottom & use to replace
conventional surface
mounted transfer pump
c. Pressure boosting surface pipeline
with shallow, subsurface mounted
ESP

ESP use to boost pressure


in surface flow line
d. Horizontally mounted ESP surface
pump

Y-tool

Device to allow wireline or CT


access below ESP, including:
Cased hole logging
Well stimulation
Perforating
Setting bridge plugs
(water shut off)
Pressure memory
gauges installation &
recovery
Plugs running &
retrieval
Downhole sampling
Bypass tubing > 2.375OD

Pump Duty Requirements

Pump required to deliver


required pressure (TDH)
Total dynamic head (TDH)
Difference between
pump discharge &
suction pressure
Sum of hydrostatic head
from ESP pump to
surface, tubing pressure
losses
Required surface
pressure @ q

NINE STEPS - ESP


1. Basic data
Collect & analysis all well data (for design)
2. Production capacity
Determine well productivity @ pump setting depth or determine pump setting depth
@ desired q
3. Gas calculation
Calculate fluid volume @ pump intake conditions
4. Total dynamic head
Determine pump discharge requirement
5. Pump type
Given capacity @ head select pump type @ highest efficiency for q
6. Optimum size of components
7. Electric cable
8. Accessory & optional equipment
9. Variable speed pumping system

ESP ADVANTAGES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

Adaptable to highly deviated wells; up to horizontal but must be set in straight section.
Crooked hole present no problem
Adaptable to required subsurface wellheads, 6 ft apart for maximum surface location density
Permit use of minimum space for subsurface controls & associated production facilities
Quiet, safe & sanitary for acceptance operation in offshore & environmentally conscious
area. Unobtrusive in urban locations
Generally considered a high volume pump. Can lift up to 20000BPD in shallow wells with
large casing. Available for different sizes, controllable production rate
Provides for increased volumes & water cut by pressure maintenance & secondary recovery
operations
Permits placing wells on production even while drilling & working over wells in immediate
vicinity
Simple to operate
Easy to install downhole pressure sensor for telemetering pressure to surface by cable
Corrosion & scale treatment easy to perform
Lifting cost for high volume generally very low
Efficient energy usage (>50% possible)
Access below ESP via Y tool
Comprehensive downhole measurements available
Quick start after shut down

ESP DISADVANTAGES
1.

Pump susceptible to damage by producing solids tolerate minimal % sand


production

2.

Costly pulling operations and lost production when correcting downhole failures

3.

Below 400 BPD, power efficiency drops sharply

4.

Not suitable for low volume well (<150 BPD)

5.

Need relatively large casing size (> 4.5 in OD) for moderate high production rate
equipment

6.

Long life ESP equipment required to keep production economical.

7.

Susceptible to damage during completion installation

8.

Tubing has to be pulled to replace pump

9.

High GOR presents gas handling problems

10.

Viscous crude reduces pump efficiency

11.

High T can degrade electrical motors

12.

Power cable requires penetration of wellhead & packer integrity

ESP
Design Considerations
Capital Cost
Relatively low if electrical power available
Increases as hp increases

Downhole equipment
Requires proper cable in addition to motor, pump, seal, etc.
Good design & operating practices essential

Operating efficiency (hydraulic hp/input hp)


Good for high rate wells but decreases significantly for <1000BFPD
Typical total system eff. 50% for high rate wells but for <1000BPD eff. typically 40%
Eff. can be as high as 60% for large ID equipment

System flexibility

Poor for fixed speed. Requires careful design


Variable speed drive provides better flexibility

Miscellaneous problems
Requires highly reliable electric power system
System very sensitive to changes downhole or in fluid properties

ESP
Design Considerations
Operating costs
Varies. Higher hp high energy cost
High pulling cost result from short run life especially in offshore operation
Repair cost often high

System Reliability
Varies. Poor for problem area (very sensitive to operating temperature & electrical malfunction)

Salvage Value
Fair. Some trade in value. Poor open market value

System Total

Fairly simple to design but requires good rate data.


Requires excellent operating practices.
Follow API RPs in design, testing & operation.
Each well is individual producer with common electric system

Usage/Outlook

Excellent high rate artificial system


Best suited for <200oF and >1000BFPD rate
Most often used on high water cut wells
Used on 5% US lifted wells

ESP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Casing Size Limits


Will limit use of large motor & pump
Avoid 4.5 in. casing & smaller
Reduced performance inside 5.5 in. casing, depending on depth & rate

Depth Limits

Limited to motor hp or temperature


Practical depth 10000ft, typical 1000-10000ft TVD, 15000ft max.

Intake Capabilities
Fair if little free gas (Pp > 250psi)
5% gas at low pressure can cause problems

Noise Level

Excellent. Very low noise.


Often preferred in urban area if production rate high

Obstrusiveness

Good. Low profile but requires transformer bank

ESP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Prime Mover Flexibility


Fair.
Requires good power source without spikes or interruption
Higher voltage can reduce losses

Surveillance
Fair. Electrical checks but special equipment needed otherwise

Relative Ease of Well Testing


Good. Simple with few problems
High water cut & high rate well may requires free water knockout

Time Cycle & Pump Off


Poor.
Soft start & improved seal/protectors recommended

ESP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability


Fair. Batch treating inhibitor down annulus feasible

Crooked/Deviated Holes

Good. Few problems


Limited experience in horizontal well. Requires long radius wellbore bends to get
through
10o typical; 0-90o <10o/100 build angle maximum, but must set in section 0-2o
maximum deviation

Duals Applications
Larger casing required. Possible run & pull problems

Gas Handling Ability

Poor for free gas (>5% through pump)


Rotary gas separator helpful if solid not produced

Offshore Application
Good. Must provide electrical power & service pulling unit

Paraffin Handling Capability

Fair. Hot water/oil treatments, mechanical cutting, batch inhibition possible

ESP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Slimhole Completions

Solids/Sand Handling Ability

Fair. Limited to as high as 1000cp


Increases hp & reduces head solution to use core flow with 20% water

High Volume Lift Capability

Limited to <250oF for standard & <400oF for special motor & cable
100-275oF typical

High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability

Poor. Requires <100-200ppm solid for standard construction.


200-2000ppm as special bushing, stage materials, coating, & thrust bearing added
Maximum amount 5000ppm, but sharpness & angularity of grains important

Temperature Limitations

Not record installed

Excellent. Limited by needed hp & can be restricted by casing size


In 5.5in. casing can produce 4000BFPD from 4000ft with 240 hp.
Tandem motor increase hp & operating cost
200-20000 BPD typical, 30000 BPD maximum. 52000 BPD, shallow, 10.25 in. equipment has been done

Low Volume Lift Capability

Poor. Lower efficiency & high operating cost <400 BFPD

ESP Ammeter Chart Monitoring


24 hours normal operation

Technique:
Surface measurement of
current supplied to pump
along with well test
Supervisory Control &
Data Acquisition
system(SCADA)

ESP Ammeter Chart Monitoring


Pumped off well
At 8.15am: Pump started large
initial current surge motor up to
speed
Motor speed increase & steady
current for next 3 hours with
decreasing slightly as fluid head above
pump decreases
At 11.10am: current begins oscillate
rapidly & increases until 1.15pm when
pump shut down
Suspected gas form problem when
Pwf reduced below Pb gas locking &
pump ceasing to pump.
Leaving well fluid level build up 100
minutes & restart pump at 3.05pm
Same cycle repeated & problems
appear at 6.15pm
8.20pm: 3rd cycle started after 100
minutes shut-in current oscillation
starting again after 2 hours
production
11.00 pm : shut-in the well

ESP Ammeter Chart Monitoring


Pumped off well

Basic problem : Pumping fluid to surface faster


than fluid flowing into well from reservoir (outflow
> inflow )
Continue stopping & restarting ESP motor is not
recommended due to damage to motor winding by
initial high current surge as motor begins to rotate
early motor burnout
Option are:
Install lower capacity pump (smaller pump)
Operate pump at lower speed using variable
frequency drive (VFD)
Stimulate well to improve inflow performance

ESP Monitoring - SCADA

SCADA ESP Monitoring

Prior to energising pump, pump intake & discharge pressure same


Pump start at A
Pump discharge pressure increasing
Motor T warmer than fluid entering pump
Limited vibration @ surface choke adjustment
Follows by surface choke adjustment
At B steady operating conditions
Pump suction & discharge pressure slowly decline as well Pwf
reduced

New Technology ESP


Coiled tubing deployed ESP
Current: pump installed as part of conventional completion string & power cable
attached outside of tubing ESP as end of coiled tubing, power cable mounted
outside of coiled tubing & fluid flow inside of coiled tubing faster installation &
no need for wellhead penetration

Auto Y tool
Allow access below pump by flow generate power to open tool as compare to
wireline

Dual pump installation


Each zone having its own ESP & production tubing

Reducing water production


Hydrocyclone concept use for produced oil & water separation downhole
Single electric motor powering upper & lower pump unit. Lower pump to operate
hydrocyclone & upper pump to lift up produced fluid

PROGRESSING CAVITY PUMP (PCP)

Employs helical, metal rotor rotating inside an elastometric,


double helical stator

Rotating action supplied by downhole electric motor or by


rotating rods & prime mover

Popular for viscous crude oil production

Progressing Cavity Pump Completion

Progressing Cavity Pump (PCP) Well Completion

PCP Principle

PCP & Components (Cross Section View)

a. Steel shaft rotor formed into helix


b. Rotor rotated inside elastometric pump body or stator
c. Offset center line of rotor & stator creating series if fluid filled cavities along the
length of pump
Rotor within stator operates as pump fluid trapped in sealed cavities progress
along pump length from suction to discharge

PCP ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES


Advantages

Disadvantages

Simple design
High volume efficiency
Efficient design for gas anchors available
High energy efficiency
Emulsion not formed due to low shear
pumping action
Capable of pumping viscous crude oil
Can be run into horizontal & deviated
wells
Q can be varied with variable speed
controller & cheap downhole pressure
sensor
Moderate cost
High electrical efficiency

High starting torque


Fluid compatibility problems with
elastomers in direct contact with aromatic
crude oil
Gas dissolves in elastomers, at high
bottom hole pressure
Upper T limit for stator material H2S
chemical deterioration
Frequent stops & starts several
operating problems (wear & leaking)
Best efficiency occurs @ gas is separated
bottomhole separator needed
If unit pump off the well or gas flows
continuously, stator will be permanently
damaged (overheating by gas compression)
Gearbox in ESPCP is source of failure if
wellbore fluid or solid leak inside it or if
excessive wear occurs

PCP
Design Considerations
Capital Cost
Low but increases as depth & pump rate increases
Downhole equipment
Problems on selection of stator elastomer
Operating efficiency
Excellent. May exceed rod pumps
Typical: 40 70%
System flexibility
Fair, can alter strokes/minute
Hydraulic unit provides additional flexibility with added cost
Miscellaneous problems
Limited service in some areas with limited field knowledge & experiences

PCP
Design Considerations
Operating costs
Low but short run life on stator or rotor
System Reliability
Good. Normally over pumping & lack of experience decrease run time
Salvage Value
Fair/poor.
Easily moved & some market for used equipment
System Total
Simple to install & operate
Each well as an individual system
Usage/Outlook
Limited to relative shallow wells with low rate
Used <0.5% US lifted wells, primarily gas well dewatering

PCP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Casing Size Limits


Normally no problem for 4.5 in. casing & larger, but gas separation
limited
Depth Limits
Poor. Limited to shallow depth
Possible 5000ft, 2000-4000 ft typical, 6000ft TVD maximum
Intake Capabilities
Good. <100 psi provided adequate displacement & gas venting
Noise Level

Good. Only surface prime mover noisy

Obstrusiveness

Good. Low profile surface equipment

PCP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Prime Mover Flexibility


Good. Both engines & motor can be used
Surveillance
Fair. Analysis based on production & fluid levels only
Relative Ease of Well Testing
Good. Well testing simple with few problems
Time Cycle & Pump Off
Poor. Avoid shutdown in high viscosity/sand production

PCP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability


Good. Batch treating inhibitor down annulus feasible
Crooked/Deviated Holes
Poor-fair. Increased load & water problems
Very few known installation
Duals Applications
No known installations
Gas Handling Ability

Offshore Application

Poor if pump must handle free gas


Poor. Need pulling unit

Paraffin Handling Capability

Fair. Tubing may need treatment


Rod scrapers not possible to use

PCP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Slimhole Completions
Feasible if low rates, low GOR & shallow depth, but no known installation
Solids/Sand Handling Ability
Excellent. Up to 50% sand with high viscosity (>200cp) crude
Decrease to 10% sand for water
Temperature Limitations
Fair. Limited to stator elastometer.
Max. 250oF, typical 75-150oF
High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability

High Volume Lift Capability

Excellent for high viscosity fluids provided no stator/rotator problems


Poor. Restricted to relatively small rate.
Possible 2000 BFPD from 2000ft & 200 BFPD from 5000ft. Maximum 4500 BPD at shallow depth

Low Volume Lift Capability

Excellent for <100 BFPD shallow wells

Progressing Cavity Electric Submersible Pump PCESP

Require gearbox to reduce rotation speed since


centrifugal pup in ESP is high speed device & PCP is
low speed device
Well suitable for handling solids & viscous fluid
Simple design & rugged construction very reliable
Low operating speed (300-600 rev/min) long
period downhole operation
Problem of rotating rods & tubular in PCP PCESP
was introduced (PCP + ESP)

ESP & PCESP Comparison

Comparison Between ESP & PCESP

ROTATING ROD PUMP

Operates as electrical submergible centrifugal


pump, but utilizes rotating rod as its means of
power (not electrical cable)
Internal combustion engine as its prime mover
on the surface
Generally utilized for shallow wells

SONIC PUMP
Mechanical device actuated by conventional source of
power
Designed to vibrate tubing string so that series of
valves, installed in tubing collar will lift fluid to surface
Operates based on elastic characteristics of metal
rod, free both ends that will vibrate according to
simple harmonic motion principle
When tubing string vibrated at one end at a rate
corresponding to its fundamental frequency,
vibrations transmitted over entire length of tubing
string and form standing wave on tubing (tubing is in
resonance)

PLUNGER LIFT
Plunger (free piston) fits inside tubing string and
allowed to travel freely in the tubing string
Provide sealing interface between liquid slug
produced by gas volume and gas volume itself
Communication between tubing & casing will
accumulated a gas in casing-tubing annular space
between cycles (gas is a source power producing
liquid slug)
Plunger mechanically closed upon hitting bottom
(provides positive seal for upward travel) and opened
when at the top (provides bypass allowing plunger to
fall back to bottom)

Plunger Pump
Design Considerations

Capital Cost

Very low if no compressor required

Downhole equipment

Operating practices have to be tailored to each well for optimization


Some problems with sticking plungers

Operating efficiency (hydraulic hp/input hp)

Excellent for flowing well. No input energy required because it uses


well energy

System flexibility

Good to low volume well


Can adjust injection time & frequency

Miscellaneous problems

Plunger hang up & sticking is major problem

Plunger Pump
Design Considerations
Operating costs
Usually very low unless plunger problem
System Reliability
Good if well production stable
Salvage Value
Fair. Some trade in value
Poor open market value
System Total
Individual well or system.
Simple to design, install & operate
Usage/Outlook
Essentially low liquid rate, high GLR lift method
Can be used for extending flow life or improving efficiency
Ample gas volume and/or pressure needed for successful
operation
Used on <1% US wells

PLUNGER PUMP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Casing Size Limits


Small casing suitable for low volume type lift
Depth Limits
8000ft TVD typical; 19000 ft TVD maximum
Intake Capabilities
Good. Bottomhole pressure <150 psi @ 10000 ft for low
rate, high GLR wells
Noise Level
Low at well
Obstrusiveness
Good

PLUNGER PUMP
NORMAL OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS

Prime Mover Flexibility


None required

Surveillance
Good depending on good well tests & well pressure chart

Relative Ease of Well Testing


Well testing simple with few problems

Time Cycle & Pump Off


Not applicable

PLUNGER PUMP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Corrosion/Scale Handling Ability

Crooked/Deviated Holes

Excellent

Duals Applications

Fair. Normal production cycle interrupted to batch treat the well

No known installations

Gas Handling Ability

Excellent

Offshore Application

Excellent for correct application

Paraffin Handling Capability

Excellent. Cuts paraffin & removes small scale deposits

PLUNGER PUMP
SPECIAL PROBLEMS & CONSIDERATIONS

Slimhole Completions (2 7/8 production casing string)

Solids/Sand Handling Ability

Sand can stick plunger. Plunger wipes tubing clean. Brush plunger
usually used for small amount of sand

Temperature Limitations

Good. Similar to casing lift but must have adequate formation gas

Excellent

High Viscosity Fluid Handling Capability

Not applicable

High Volume Lift Capability

Poor. Limited by cycle number.


Possible 200 BFPD from 10000ft. Typical 1 5 BPD; maximum 200-300
BPD

Low Volume Lift Capability

Excellent for 1-2 BFPD with high GLR

SELECTION METHODS
1.

Depth/Rate system capabilities consideration

Use of depth vs rate chart @ types can function

2.

Beam pump produces more from shallower depth & less from deeper depth
ESP can produce large production rate
Plunger for low liquid rate

Initial selection possibilities or quick elimination of possibilities

Advantages & disadvantages

3.

Preliminary look of type operation details & capabilities

Expert program available

4.

Computerized artificial lift selection programs, include rules & logic to select best system as function
of user input well & operating conditions
Module 1: includes knowledge base structured from human expertise, theoretical, rule of thumb
ranks selected types & issues warning
Module 2: incorporates simulation design & facility-component specification programs for all selected
types
Module 3: economic evaluation; cost database, cost-analysis program for lift profitability

Net-present-value comparison

More thorough selection technique depending on life time economics of available types; system
components failure rate, fuel cost, maintenance cost, inflation rate, well anticipated revenue return
Users required to have good idea on costs, advantages & disadvantages, additional equipment &
costs,

ADVANTAGES

Rod Pump

Simple, basic design


Unit easily changed
Simple to operate
Can achieve low
BHFP
Can lift high
temperature viscous
oils
Pump off control
pump motor off @
fluid level reached
minimum safety level
above the pump

ESP

Extremely high
volume lift using up to
1000 kw motor

Venturi Hydraulic
Pump

Gas Lift

High volume

Solids tolerant

Can use water as


power fluid

Large volume in high


PI wells

Unobstrusive surface
location

Remote power source

Simple maintenance

Downhole telemetry
available

Tolerant high well


deviation / doglegs

Unobstrusive surface
location / remote
power source

Tolerant high well


elevation / doglegs
Corrosion / scale
treatments possible

Tolerant high well


deviation / doglegs
Tolerant high GOR
reservoir fluids

Wireline maintenance

PCP

Solids and viscous


crude tolerant
Energy efficient
Unobstrusive surface
location with
downhole motor

DISADVANTAGES

Rod Pump
Friction in crooked
holes
Pump wear with
solids production
Free gas reduces
pump efficiency
Obstrusive in urban
areas
Downhole corrosion
inhibition difficult
Heavy equipment for
offshore use

ESP
Not suitable for
shallow, low volume
wells
Full workover
required to change
pump
Cable susceptible to
damage during
installation with
tubing
Cable deteriorates at
high temperature
Gas and solids
intolerant
Increased praduction
casing size often

Venturi
Hydraulic Pump

Gas Lift

PCP

High surface
pressures

Lift gas may not


available

Elastomers swell in
some crude oils

Sensitive to change in
surface flowing
pressure

Not suitable for


viscous crude oil or
emulsions

Pump off control


difficult

Free gas reduces


pump efficiency

Susceptible to gas
FBHP

Power oil systems


hazardous

Abandonment
pressure may not be
reached

High minimum FBHP


Abandonment
pressure may not be
reached

Casing must
withstand lift gas
pressure

Problems with
rotating rods (windup
& after spin) increase
with depth

HYBRID SYSTEMS
Combination of two artificial lift type

Mostly combination of gas lift with other types (gas above )


Some benefits of combining gas lift with positive displacement artificial lift
method (ESP, PCP, sucker rod, etc.)

Increased volumetric efficiency higher liquid volumes


Decreased injection gas requirements compared to gas lift alone
Increased reservoir drawdown & production
Increase pump installation depth- allows greater reservoir drawdown
Reduction in pump & motor power requirements
Lower electrical energy consumption compared to pump alone
Gas lift provides backup in case of pump failure

THANK YOU

Anda mungkin juga menyukai