(https://biotest.t-nation.com/?

utm_source=tnation&utm_medium=marquee_top&utm_campaign=serious_athletes_prowler_10_
)

A Talk with Tudor Bompa (/training/talk-withtudor-bompa)

by Mike Mahler (/all-articles/authors/mike-mahler) | 03/22/02
Tudor Bompa is known to many as the man who single-handedly
revolutionized Western training methods. After more than forty years
of work in the arena of international sports, he's widely considered one
of the world's leading specialists when it comes to periodization,

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 1 de 25

planning, peaking, and strength and power training. Name your

favorite strength coach and very likely he's been strongly influenced
by the work of Tudor Bompa.
Like many top coaches, Bompa began as an athlete himself and
competed as a rower in the 1956 Olympic Games. As a coach (if one
can even use that limiting term to describe him), Bompa has worked
with athletes in eleven Olympic Games and World Championships, and
has helped create four gold medals and 22 national champions. He's
presented his training theories is over 30 countries.
In other words, this guy knows his stuff!
Currently, Bompa is a full-time professor at York University in Toronto
Ontario. Luckily, he took the time to sit down to an interview with T-

mag.
Testosterone: How did you first get interested in strength training?
Tudor Bompa: My athletic background is in track and field, and later on
I got into rowing and cross country skiing. I was amongst the first
athletes to incorporate a great deal of strength training into training
for skiing. That was back in the early 1960's! My improvements were so
visible that many other competitors were aghast. Because of my gains
in upper and lower-body strength, I was able to use the skating
technique for many parts of the race. Equally important was the use of
my superior force in the arms.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 2 de 25

T: How did you first begin coaching the things you learned as an
athlete?
TB: The most critical innovations in the approach to strength training
came in 1963 when I was asked to train a nationally ranked javelin
thrower. Her coach had moved to another city and I was the only
person who could train her. I have to mention that at that time, as is
the case today in many sports, athletes were training year-round only
for power, using some free weights but also a great deal of medicine
ball training. Before I started to train this athlete in early 1963, I'd
logically concluded that power is a function of maximum strength [he
highest force one can display in one attempt or 1RM], as well as speed
and quickness of action. While speed has more genetic limitations
than strength, I had decided to look for improved power by increasing
maximum strength to the highest possible levels.
As I continued to train this thrower, I also continuously monitored and
tested both speed and quickness and maximum strength. After a year
and a half of training her, I found out that gains in power come 95%
from gains in maximum strength, and only 5% from speed. That year
represented the year when I created periodization of strength. Using
this strength training strategy, my javelin thrower improved by 15
meters within a year and a half. She became the Olympic champion in
1964 and set a new world record as well.
T: You've written a great deal about periodization and its application in
strength training. In your terms, what exactly is periodization?

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 3 de 25

TB: In the case of training, periodization has two elements. First,

periodization of the annual plan, or how this type of plan is divided into
specific phases of training. Therefore we have the preparatory,
competitive, and transition phase. These phases are further
subdivided into macrocycles and microcycles.
Second, periodization of motor abilities strength, speed, and
endurance. In order to maximize the development of these abilities,
another kind of "periodization" exists, with specific training phases
and training objectives. In case of periodization of strength, the
sequence of these phases are: Anatomical Adaptation (AA phase),
Maximum Strength Phase, and conversion (transformation) of such
gains into power.
Periodization represents a clear structure to follow and is thus the
most effective way to improve athletic performance.
T: What are some of the most common mistakes that athletes make
with regard to training?
TB: This question is really big! I'll try to provide a brief answer. The first
problem is the influence of bodybuilding on strength training for
sports. Many people believe that strength is proportional to size.
T: Not true?

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 4 de 25

TB: Completely incorrect! Hypertrophy is necessary only in very few

sports, such as linebackers in football, shot putters in track and field,
the super heavy-weight category in wrestling, or if an individual is far
too slim. In such a case, the periodization of strength has to include
three to six, or even nine weeks of training for hypertrophy. For any
other athletes, bodybuilding methods are completely useless!
Sports do not require mass! Sports require power, quickness, and fast
application of force. Bodybuilding methods do not result in increasing
power. On the contrary, bodybuilding methods make the athletes
much slower. And this is a no-no in most of the sports that require
quickness and acceleration in force application.
T: Okay, what's another major mistake you see?
TB: The fallacy of Olympic weightlifting exercises! There are several
strength coaches with Olympic lifting backgrounds. Unfortunately for
them, they can't adjust their knowledge to the needs of strength
training for sports. Strength training programs for sports
must recognize that almost each sport involves different and specific
muscle groups. These muscles are called "prime movers" or the
muscles performing the actual technical moves. Therefore, strength
training exercises have to target the prime movers. The Olympic lifting
exercises are rigidly targeting only certain muscle groups, often not
very important for many sports.
T: Give us an example of what you mean.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 5 de 25

TB: Take judo for instance. Once I listened to a presentation regarding

strength training for judo. The speaker was your typical Olympic lifting
coach. He went over snatches and the clean and jerk! When the
organizers asked my opinion, I simply said that the whole idea is
wrong because judo involves primarily the flexor muscles of the hips,
abdominals, and trunk, not the extensors normally targeted by
Olympic lifting moves. The lifting coach became very upset when he
heard me say this and left the room!
The exact same thing happened with swimming. An Olympic lifting
coach once again suggested (what else?) the clean and jerk and the
snatch. I pointed out that he was really missing the actual prime
movers used in swimming, the arms flexors. The coach's exercises
were targeting exactly the opposite group of muscles, the extensors.
How difficult is to understand such a basic concept in sports training?
Personally I'd use power cleans only for few sports such as
linebackers in football and Greco-roman wrestling. I'd use clean and
jerks for basketball players, performed with a medicine ball or a power
ball.
This leads to another problem. The Olympic lifting coaches are using
their own periodization, specific to Olympic lifting. Well, how much
common sense does one need to have in order to understand that the
Olympic lifting coaches have to adapt their training methodology to
the periodization of that particular sport and not the other way
around?

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 6 de 25

T: Good point. Any other mistakes you see that drive you nuts?
TB: Many athletes and coaches use the same type of strength training,
irrespective of the physiological requirements their respective sports
require. Each sport has its specific physiological profile. The sports
where the alactic energy system is dominant are basically sports
where speed and power are necessary to achieve high results
[jumping and throwing events in track and field, linebackers, baseball,
sprinting, etc.]
For sports where the alactic-acid system has a high percentage of
ergogenesis, or breakdown in percentage of the three energy systems,
it's required that power-endurance and muscle-endurance [30-50 reps
per set] be trained. Finally, for endurance-dominant sports, one needs
to develop muscle-endurance [tens and even hundreds of reps]. If this
isn't achieved, a good adaptation to such training won't occur.
What we see here is a very important training principle strength
training has to play a physiological role; it has to tap the same energy
system to add to the specific adaptation to the physiological
requirements of a given sport. If one doesn't follow the above
principle, he or she is entirely missing the point in strength training. I
can strongly state that in athletics there is no strength for strength's
sake, but rather just strength training with a specific purpose:
maximum adaptation for performance improvement.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 7 de 25

T: Are there any strength-training exercises that all athletes should be

doing?

TB: Certainly, especially as they target the ankle, knee, and hip
muscles. Most sports performed on the ground [all team sports, track,
martial arts, etc.] use knee extensors and flexors, and gastrocnemius
and soleus for the ankle actions. Therefore squats, leg curls, and toe
raises are very popular with most sports.
Although many coaches do use squats and leg curls, toe raises aren't
utilized as much as the other two exercises. Somehow they miss the
fact that ankles play a very important role in any type of sprinting,
quick changes of direction, and any agility actions. In many cases, the
gastrocnemius and soleus are stronger than the quadriceps! This is
why improvements in quickness and agility will come faster after these
two muscles get stronger.
T: How about abs?
TB: Yes, this is equally true with regard to abdominal muscles.
Abdominal curls with all variations and rotations are very necessary for
all sports. A strong back is also crucial in many sports. Therefore, back
extensions should be considered.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 8 de 25

As for the arms and shoulders, there are more sports-specific

variations than for the lower body. Look at the technical moves to
figure out the prime movers in that sport. In sports training, it's more
important to think about training movements and not muscles since
exercises that mimic a technical move are better for targeting the
prime movers.
I also believe that training has to be simplified. Especially nowadays,
when there are so many gimmicks being introduced on the market and
some individuals come up with all kinds of "novelties"! If you were to
listen to each individual promoting a novelty [i.e. overspeed training,
balance-training, etc.], you'll never have the time to actually train the
athlete to reach the optimal adaptation level. Remember that high
levels of specific adaptation results in athletic improvements!
T: What are some of the techniques you've used to blast through
training plateaus?
TB: An athlete doesn't reach a plateau very quickly. It takes time
several years of training at a high level before something like that can
even be considered. In my career of many years I've rarely seen
athletes reaching a plateau in strength training. This situation is mostly
discussed in bodybuilding and at times in football. Nevertheless, let's
try to discuss some possibilities for breaking through training
plateaus. Here are five:

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 9 de 25

 Use a maximum strength phase to stimulate higher percentage

of fast twitch muscles into action. In many sports, strength
training is poorly designed lifting weights for strength's sake.
There's no plan, no periodization. Athletes and bodybuilders that
use periodization very rarely reach a plateau, in my experience.
Design a good periodization program with phases of maximum
strength and phases of power training, where the objective is to
increase the firing rate of fast-twitch muscles. In my strength
training book, Periodization of Training for Sports, I discuss that
in detail.
If one has a longer preparatory (pre-season) phase, several
phases of maximum strength and power could be alternated. This
alternation of maximum strength with power would certainly have
the probability of breaking the plateau.
Under normal conditions I wouldn't suggest a maximumstrength phase for longer than six weeks. It's quite stressful to
cope with. However, if an athlete has reached a plateau, I'd use a
nine-week long maximum strength phase. Under these
conditions, the muscles are stimulated at much higher levels than
before.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 10 de 25

 Use more eccentric (negative) contraction techniques. Eccentric

contractions require a much higher tension in the fast twitch
muscles. Eccentric training shouldn't be used before the athletes
have a better background. Unfortunately, many coaches can
hardly wait to use everything they know; in this way they
themselves are contributing to reaching a plateau.

T: So training and performance plateaus are often the coach's fault?

TB: Often a plateau is reached because of a coach's ignorance. Poor
selection of training methods and their logical sequence also
contribute. Similarly, the lack of patience in applying the right method
at the right time also contributes to a psychological plateau, meaning
that the coach thinks "I have used everything I know!" What's next
then? Don't rush to throw everything you know at your athlete!
Organize a longer-term sequence of training methods. Plan everything
you do well. Be more methodical in what you use in training. Allow the
necessary time for the athlete to grow, to get ready for the next
method, load increment, or alternation of types of strength. Remember
that you can help a great deal, but you may also do quite a bit of
damage. The coach has to wisely use maximum stimulation, high
recruitment of fast-twitch muscles, and alternate with power training,
where the firing rate of the same muscles are trained.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 11 de 25

T: What about altering tempo? For example, taking more time in the
concentric and eccentric ranges?
TB: Altering tempo is mostly a bodybuilding concept, though some
people promote it as a sort of strength-training novelty, good for
everything and everybody. The scope of altering the tempo of a lift is
to create the highest tension in a muscle for the longest period of
time, using both concentric and eccentric contraction.
Here's the main difference between bodybuilding and strength training
for sports. For bodybuilding, the scope of increased tension is
designed to induce hypertrophy. In strength training for sports, using
heavy loads [> 85-90% of 1 RM] the scope is not to increase the
duration of tension, but rather to apply the force against resistance as
quickly and dynamically as possible so that the highest number of
fast-twitch muscle fibers are recruited in the action.
Therefore, a major reason we use heavy loads in training athletes in
different sports is to stimulate the recruitment of fast-twitch muscle
fibers, and as a result, to use them during the performance of athletic
action. The more fast twitch muscle fibers are used during the
performance of a technical skill, the higher the application of force
and the benefit for an increased performance.
The use of eccentric contraction in strength training for sports isn't as
popular as concentric contraction. However, in some sports like
throwing events in track and field and linebackers in football, it's used

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 12 de 25

both to increase maximum strength and hypertrophy.

T: What role does nutrition play in recovery and do you provide
nutrition and supplementation advice for athletes?
TB: The efficiency of an athlete's performance depends on his or her
quality of training and nutrition. The energy used by the body strictly
depends on the nutrition, diet, and training supplements one uses. But
nutrition has to also be periodized according to the periodization of
strength and endurance training. One can't just talk about nutrition in
disregard of training.
For instance, diet has to be different for an individual working to
improve hypertrophy, doing maximum speed training, or working on
long-distance aerobic endurance. All these examples refer to
completely different types of training which require a very specific type
of nutrition. Unfortunately, most nutritionists haven't grasped this very
important concept yet. They've never heard about periodization of
training and the specific needs of nutrition as per a training program
planned for given days. They're still talking about nutrition in general.
Two years ago, I specified such a concept to a small group of
nutritionists. Most of them wanted more information about it. I
suggested they look into my book, Periodization: Theory and

Methodology of Training, where integrated periodization is discussed.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 13 de 25

T: Fair enough. I've read that in Bulgaria, Olympic athletes train five
times a day, seven times a week and that Russian powerlifters bench
press up to 21 times a week. What do you think of this training
frequency and would these types of programs be beneficial to a
natural trainer?
TB: I just wish that people wouldn't compare apples to oranges. In
order to discuss this we have to better qualify what Bulgarians and
Russian Olympic weightlifters were doing in the time of the communist
system. Yes, the Bulgarian Olympic lifters were training from 9:00 AM
to 5:00 or 6:00 PM, 45 minutes on and 30 minutes off, except for the
lunch break of some two hours. The Russians weren't powerlifters.
They were Olympic lifters and what they were doing is something
they've adapted to progressively over several years. Most of these
athletes had a background of eight to ten years before they were
doing that kind of training.
Also, remember that their training regimen was done in national
training camps, where training, sleeping, and food ingestion were the
only things they were doing. In addition, they weren't working on
anything else, just lifting the bloody barbells! I'm not as impressed
exaggerations and myths aside as many seem to be, simply because
I have a similar background, where my athletes were training two to
four times per day with a total of five to eight hours of training!

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 14 de 25

Now let's examine what pro-athletes are doing in the US. They train
technically, tactically, speed, agility and strength/power several times
per week, some up to three times per day. Is anybody suggesting that
these athletes have to bench press 21 times per week? Team sports,
however, aren't the best examples regarding training. Many amateur
athletes train much more than pro-players. Also, the quality of
coaching in many team sports, especially with regard to strength and
conditioning, is quite pathetic. Similarly, some of the professional
coaches in fact, the majority have a very poor understanding of
training theory.
What do I think about the programs you mentioned? Who cares?
Would I like to duplicate in this continent what my athletes have done
in training camps in Romania? Not at all! Different societies, different
times and mentality! Yet several of the athletes trained or consulted by
myself in this continent have won against the East Europeans several
times with just half of the amount of training time!
One of the key elements in training is to have high training knowledge
and excellent methodology in applying it. Being equipped with such
knowledge can do miracles. Forget about the "locker room gossip"
regarding Russians and Bulgarians.
T: What books do you recommend on strength training besides
yours, of course? Who are the best strength training coaches out
there?

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 15 de 25

TB: This is a very difficult question to answer, the reason being that I
don't feel comfortable discussing the books written by other authors.
However, I'll try to be as frank as I can. To be honest, I'm really
dissatisfied with the level of strength training books available on the
market. It seems to me that there's a great mess regarding this
important area.
One of the greatest frustrations I have is that to some authors, there's
no clear distinction between the objectives of strength training for
sports, bodybuilding, and Olympic weightlifting. Authors with a football
background expect everyone to do what a linebacker is doing. The
same thing is valid for those who have a bodybuilding background.
They discuss split routines, supersets, etc. This is totally inadequate
for strength training for sports.
To me, a strength training book must serve the needs of a given
audience. Use the best sports science information possible and most
importantly, be practical. Just going through the process of reviewing
the literature (as many do) isn't serving anybody's purpose.
T: Do you feel that some or most strength coaches have a tendency to
make their programs too general at times and too complicated at
other times?
TB: Yes, you're perfectly right. Let me try to explain what happens.
There are several situations that are necessary to examine. Hopefully,
from this analysis, some strength and conditioning coaches may start

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 16 de 25

reflecting on their own situation.

First, both the technical coach (head coach) and the strength and
conditioning coach are attempting to do their best to improve their
athlete's performance. Each of these two coaches is trying to prove to
themselves what they know and what they can do. Unfortunately,
these two individuals don't cooperate well together to create
programs specific to the needs of their athletes.
The head coach, not knowing much about strength and conditioning,
doesn't take a leadership role regarding how much training to do, in
which areas, what to stress in order to make the athletes better, etc.
The result of this lack of cooperation is a high level of fatigue. When
the athletes are reporting to the coach, each coach considers them

rested, which is hardly the case. Fatigue is a cumulative outcome of

training. If improperly monitored, fatigue will affect an athletes
potential, their focusing potential, their accuracy of passing and
shooting, and their performance.
Another problem is the "cocktail" strength and conditioning coach.
Often, training programs are very general, a sort of "cocktail," doing all
sorts of things for every athlete in the group. There isn't specificity
regarding the needs of the sport, position played, or to relate the
program to the dominant energy system in that particular sport.
Knowing the proportions of energy systems in that sport dictates the
type of training one must do.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 17 de 25

T: Give us an example of that please.

TB: In sports where the anaerobic alactic system is clearly dominant
baseball, linebackers in football, jumping and throwing events in track
and field training should be focused on maximum strength, power,
and maximum speed. In other words, they're focused on training
elements which are tapping this energy system.
What business does a linebacker have running three miles? During the
game he performs like a bulldozer, demolishing the opposition, but
only for a two to four-second duration. To have such an athlete run
three miles is a blasphemy! I wouldn't call this "general training," but a
high degree of ignorance!
T: A "cocktail" strength and conditioning coach, huh? Interesting term.
Any other categories of coaches you notice?
TB: Yes, the "busy-bee" type of strength and conditioning coach who
wants to do too much in a very short period of time. Let's face it, a
strength and conditioning coach has two to three hours per week to
work with team sports athletes. Depending on the phase of the annual
plan, a strength and conditioning coach has to do specific work
according to the periodization of a given motor ability. The closer to
the competitive phase, the more specific and simplified training
should be.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 18 de 25

And yet many coaches are doing everything under the sun: lifting
weights, power training, using medicine balls, working to improve
maximum speed, etc. The uninitiated "greenhorn" coach, the one with
a shallow level of knowledge in sports science, will easily bite into the
gimmicks of the day, such as overspeed, balance training, rotation
training, and functional training.
In addition to the fact that some of these training ideas don't work at
all, attempting to use them in training creates a crisis! A time crisis! If
one has two to three hours to work with the athletes, when do they
have the time to use all these novelties? Simplify your training! To be
effective, training must be simplified.
To create an efficient program, one has to be very selective in what he
does in training. Never forget that your training must result in a very
specific adaptation. When superior adaptation occurs, performance
will be superior. If one is using too many training elements, it's almost
impossible to have a good adaptation. Just think about that! If you do,
you'll see that you don't have time and room for totally unproven
gimmicks.
This is my case for position-specific training programs. In team sports,
almost each position requires different qualities and taps specific
proportions of the three energy systems. Take for instance a midfielder in soccer vs. a sweeper, or a linebacker versus a wide receiver
in football. These positions are so different from each other that a

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 19 de 25

"cocktail" training program impedes the improvement of these

athletes. Therefore a strength and conditioning training program has
to be specific, to train the necessary qualities for that position.
T: That makes total sense. By the way, do you have any new projects in
the works?
TB: The newest book that will be launched is the second edition of

Serious Strength Training. I'll have a new co-author, Dr. Mauro

DiPasquale. This new edition will be published by Human Kinetics in
August, 2002.
Another project I hope to start very soon will refer to endurance
sports. I do believe, together that we'll bring several training novelties
for endurance sports. Then, in the fall, I'd like to start to update my
strength training for sports book, Periodization of Training for Sports,
where the title has to be corrected to incorporate the term "strength."
My intent is to make this book the most popular training book [it
already is really, since it sold more copies than any other books.] The
book will have many additions regarding sports science and practical
application.
I'll also refer to several fallacies used in training, from balance training
to others. In my opinion, sports scientists have to take a strong and
critical stance regarding the newest gimmicks invading and polluting
the market.

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 20 de 25

T: Thanks for taking the time to chat with us, Tudor.

TB: My pleasure.
For more information on Tudor Bompa, go to TudorBompa.com
(http://www.tudorbompa.com/).

03/22/02

Get The Weekly

Dose Newsletter
It's Free!
Expert Insights To Get
Stronger, Gain Muscle Faster,
And Take Your Lifting To The
Next Level

Name
Email
Subscribe

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 21 de 25

(/store)

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 22 de 25

(//www.t-nation.com/workouts/american-sniper-

workout)

(https://biotest.t-nation.com/packages/velocity-diet)

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 23 de 25

(https://forums.t-nation.com/c/figure-athletes)

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 24 de 25

https://www.t-nation.com/training/talk-with-tudor-bompa

14/02/16 8:12 p.m.

Pgina 25 de 25