Contents
I. Actix KPI Report generation procedure
II. KPI PASS CASE work procedure
III.KPI FAIL CASE work procedure
IV. Analysis work procedure for each Layer
V. Appendix
Owner
Coordinat
or
Job
Category
Check DT
information
2
Analyzer
Coordinat
or
Description
Report
Generation
Job Title
Generate Report
Analyzer
Preparatio
n
Tool
- Acti
x
Output
Next Step
Reference
Material
FMS
ActixOne
Coordinator
Analyzer
NEO Team
Description
Automatically synchronized
log files
Log
check
Should be check
whether the log
file counts are
same with FMS
and Actix
Generate KPI
Report
Owne
r
Analyze
r
2
Analyze
r
Job
Category
Preparatio
n for
Report
Job Title
Description
Tool
Output
PCI Observed
- AnyPlan
Sector Swap
- AnyPlan
Stationary Test
- X-Cap
- Excel
Macro
- Check Result
- Reject Report
- Actix
Report
- Reject Report
Analyze
r
Check
Points
Next Step
Reference
Material
Mandatory
- Compare
update
before submit SiteForge
with items
actual drive
8
Report
Submit
and planned
drive
route.
If (On-air) sites / Observed PCI)
C1: Total scope
(Planned
sites
/ Actual
- X-Cap
- Compare Result
less
than
80%
covered
If mismatch count with Actual and observed
PCI cell,- then
must
be include justification report
- Mapinfo
Reject
Report
planned
DT route,
Drive
C2: Planned
DTR (KML
Format)
C3: ActualReject.
DT route
If Actual DT covered is less than 80%, then must be include justification report)
C4: DT Sequence and DT cycle.
DT
Route calculation
method
- Excel
Macro
FMS
Whole Re-Drive
ActixOne
Additional Drive
Additional drive is below 2 cases only
Not observed PCI / If between 80% and 99% DT
Covered
Verification
test
after fix sector
swap issue
Coordinator
Analyzer
SiteForge
Description
KPI
Result
Check
Check several
points
- PCI Observed
- Sector swap
- Stationary
test
- Log file Reused
- Missing route
check
Pass Report
Request to Validate
: Total scope (Planned sites / Actual (On-air) sites / Observed PCI)
If mismatch count with Actual and observed PCI cell, then must be include justification report
: Planned DTR (KML Format)
: Actual DT route
Request to upload SiteForge
If less then 80% of Actual DT covered, then must be include justification report)
: DT Sequence and DT cycle.
Upload all KPI PASS report on SiteForge
Reject report
plan for Circle issue (Information mismatch with Actual and SiteForge)
Not properly implemented on the field base on optimizer recommended parameters.
[ NOPT ]
[ LSMR]
[ Circle Team]
[ SOLPAR ]
Region Coordi.
SiteForge
Physical parameter change by SOLPAR according to siteforge suggestion value Change PHY
Suggestion
Para. On site
field
RF Lead
Check points
Conclusion
10
11
Owner
Job
Category
Job Title
Analyze
r/
LSM
Enginee
r
Information
Acquisition
Request LSM
Information
Analyze
r
Check
antenna
parameter
Analyze
r
Analyze
r
Analyze
r
Compare
DT Route
Check
points
Analysis
Description
Tool
Output
Next Step
Reference
Material
Alarm History
Neighbor List
Ping Test Result
UL Interference
VSWR
RET Status
PKG Information
Golden
Parameter
- GTP Loss
-
- LSM Info
- Compare Result
- MapInfo
- X-Cap
- Compare Result
- Reject Report
DT
Route calculation M
ethods
Stationary
test check Methods
Stationary test
- X-Cap
- Excel Macro
- Check Result
- Reject Report
- Actix Report
- Reject Report
- In case of not
properly applied
Physical antenna
parameters on the
field, drive reject
AnyPlan
X-Cap
Mapinfo
Global
Mapper
- Excel Macro
Reserved.
- LSM Info
-
- Analysis Result
- Recommendatio
n
Confidential
and
L1 Analysis Methods
L2 Analysis Methods
L3 Analysis Methods
12
FMS
ActixOne
Coordinator
Analyzer
KPI
Result
Check
Request LSM
Information
Below 80% covered DT
rout
- Observed Stationary
test
Re-Drive
- Whole
Observed
Log file ReUsed
LSM
-
Description
Alarm History
Neighbor List
Ping Test Result
UL Interference
VSWR
RET Status
PKG Information
Golden Parameter
GTP Loss
Check several
points
- PCI Observed
- Sector swap
- Stationary
test
- Log file Reused
- Site Alarms
- Missing route
check
Additional Drive
Additional drive is below 2 cases only
Not observed PCI / If between 80% and 99% DT
Covered
Verification
test
after fix sector
swap issue
Request to Validate
13
Check points
Conclusion
14
15
SiteForg
e
Coordinat
or
Analyzer
LSM
Gathering the
information
LSM Information
- RET Information
- Alarm history
- UL RSSI
- VSWR
Preparation for
necessary report
Slide 18
If not possible to
reduce BSP, need
to create
exceptional case
report
Basic checks :
implemented in
system that
tx_atten as type3
Ant 3dB(20 -> 50),
type4 is 1dB(20 ->
30)
BSP Issue
Terrain Block
Block by high Rise
building or heavy dense
trees or ETC
Neighbor Issues
Anyplan Analysis
Site Alarms
UE Issue
SOLPAR Issues
Should be reflect
above issue in
analysis report
Recommendation
Create Report
Request to validate
NEO Team
Recommendation regulation
- Electrical tilt: should be less then 7 degree (if
necessary, may apply more then 7 degree but should
describe to reason why? In analysis report.
- Should be considering about Google Earth map and
EMF Report if available when suggest to physical
antenna parameters.
16
Analyzer
Adnan, Siksha
RJIL
Study
17
Coordinator
Analyzer
Check KPI
Result
If RSRPKPI is fail and < 90%
Description
Currently a large number of clots are failing due to only RSRP KPI failing.
On of the reasons for this KPI failing, is that antenna parameters on
field are not matching cellref
So the suggestion is that, every time for a clot, RSRP KPI is fail-antenna
parameter recommendations should be verified as left process
Check
areas of
very poor
RSRP
Request to verify
antenna parameters to
circle team
Only once antenna parameter values are match with CellRef then proceed normal analysis process
18
Analyzer
LSM
Refer to L1 analysis
process
NEO Team
Check KPI
Fail items
X-CAP Analysis
RF Issue
Other Issue
Overshooting
Poor Coverage
Shadow area
FTP Issue
Backhaul Issues
High UL Interference
(RSSI)
PCI Collusion
Handover Issues
UE Issues
Site Alarms
SOLPAR Issues
Request to Validate
19
Analyzer
Refer to L1 analysis
process
NEO
SI Team
Check KPI
Fail items
X-CAP Analysis
For all of third party issue cases are
must be inform to SI team to analysis
with SI Tracker
SI Issue
RF Issue
Other Issue
Overshooting
Poor Coverage
Shadow area
UE Configuration Error
High UL Interference
High GTP Loss
64QAM OCNS Loading
Site Alarm
SOLPAR Issues
Request to Validate
Share with circle
team
20
Appendix
21
Need to
check
other band
cluster
status
Physical antenna
parameter
Recommendation
In-Progress CLOT
Optimization
22
23