Obama Ordered Hit-list of Targeted Individuals Worldwide to CYBER ATTACK, ISOLATE, FINANCIALLY RUIN the TARGETED INDIVIDUAL With Supporting Documents - Published by Debre Dupre in the Examiner on June 8, 2013

Obama ordered hit-list of Targeted Individuals worldwide to cyber-attack...
1 of 2
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-ordered-hit-list-of-targeted-indi...
10/23/2015 4:40 AM
2 of 2
Recommen
Jim Morrison's
faces life in pri
Valley man rec

national award
rescuing aband
dog
Learn more
10/23/2015 4:40 AM
Lancaster mayor, wife invited to watch Super

Bowl at White House
BERNARD HARRIS Staff Writer
Feb 1, 2011
Like many die-hard Eagles fans, with his team out of it, Rick Gray wasn't too excited about Sunday's
Super Bowl.
"It's hard when the Eagles get this close and don't get in," the Lancaster mayor said.
Gray said thought he might watch the game at home on television. Or he and his wife, Gail, might have
just skipped the game and gone to the movies instead.
Then, this week, they got a better offer.
The Grays are going to a Super Bowl party - and not just any Super Bowl party. They're headed down
to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to party with the president.
"It's going to be pretty fun. We're looking forward to it," Gray said of what will be his third visit to the
White House since President Barack Obama took office.
Gray said he responded to a White House e-mail that he would be delighted to attend.
And what do you wear to a White House Super Bowl party? he inquired. The response was "business
casual." He's planning to leave his tailgating duds at home. He'll wear his Philadelphia Eagles bow tie,
Gray said.
And, an appropriate contribution to the pot-luck? Gray said he considered bringing cream cheese
wrapped in sweet Lebanon bologna - "the canap of choice for Central Pennsylvania" - but he was
afraid he wouldn't get it past security.

Instead, he thinks Lancaster's own Hammond's pretzels will be better received. He's planning to bring a
couple of boxes - "so they know what really good pretzels are," the mayor said.
Although no official guest list has been released for this year's White House party, past Super Bowl
events have been attended by federal cabinet secretaries and key legislators from both sides of the aisle.
Gray said it will be a good opportunity to discuss city issues and make contacts.
Oh, and there's the Steelers-Packers game, too.
Gray practiced law in Pittsburgh before coming to Lancaster in the 1970s, but he's no Steelers fan. He's
an Eagles season ticket holder and has been cheering for the Philadelphia team since he was a boy.
Of the championship contest, he said simply, "I'm rooting for a good game."
bharris@lnpnews.com
Why You Should Care about Pentagon Funding of Obama's BRAIN Initi...
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/why-you-should-care-ab...
Critical views of science in the news
About
By John Horgan | May 22, 2013 |
In two recent posts (here and here), I complained that the big new BRAIN (Brain
Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies) Initiative, to which
Barack Obama has committed $110 million next year and possibly billions over the
next decade, may be premature.
I stupidly neglected to mention an
important reason to look askance at the
initiative: its biggest funder is the
Pentagon, more specifically the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency.
According to the White House, Darpa is
putting up $50 million, more than the
National Institutes of Health ($40
million) and National Science
Foundation ($20 million).
There's nothing new about the militarization of brain science. Ten years ago, when I
was writing an article on how information is encoded in the brain, Darpa was already
a major funder of research on neural coding and neural prosthetics. Darpa program
manager Alan Rudolph told me back then that the agency was interested in a wide
range of potential applications, including "performance enhancement" of soldiers via
either implanted or external electrodes linked to electronic devices.
One specific possibility, Rudolph told me, was a brain-machine interface that would
1 of 5
10/23/2015 3:41 AM
allow soldiers to control a jet or other weapon system through thought alone, as in the
1982 Clint Eastwood film Firefox. In the film, the thought-control device utilizes
external electrodes, but Rudolph said that electrodes could also be implanted in the
brain. "Implanting electrodes into healthy people is not something we're going to do
any time soon," Rudolph explained, "but 20 years ago no one would have thought wed
put a laser in the eye either. So this is an agency that leaves the door open on what's
possible." Yes, Rudolph was talking about that familiar fantasy of science fiction,
bionic soldiers.
So what's changed over the past decade? Several things come to mind: First, major
media have become less concerned about the militarization of brain science. A decade
ago, conservative New York Times pundit William Safire worried that science might
allow powerful institutions to "hack into the wetware between our ears." Today, few
prominent journalists question Darpa's role in the BRAIN Initative. The best critique
I've read is by physician/blogger Peter Freed, who asserts that Pentagon funding of
the BRAIN Initiative fulfills President Dwight Eisenhower's 1961 warning about the
growing power of the "military-industrial complex."
Second, as I have pointed out previously, neuroscientists are pursuing military
funding much more eagerly and openly, as evidenced both by the BRAIN Initiative
and by this 2009 publication of the National Research Council, Opportunities in
Neuroscience for Future Army Applications. Overseen by leading neuroscientists,
including Floyd Bloom and Michael Gazzaniga, the report advises researchers how to
tap into military funding. The report advocates "collaborating with pharmaceutical
companies to employ neuropharmaceuticals for general sustainment or enhancement
of soldier performance, and improving cognitive and behavioral performance using
interdisciplinary approaches and technological investments."
The third change over the last decade is that the Pentagon has become much cagier
about its motives in supporting brain research. Darpa now claims that its primary
interest in brain science is treatment of injured soldiers. As the White House put it,
Darpa hopes that brain science will "dramatically improve the way we diagnose and
treat warfighters suffering from post-traumatic stress, brain injury and memory loss."
For a more candid look at the Pentagon's long-standing interest in neuroscience, see
Mind Wars by respected bioethicist Jonathan Moreno of the University of
Pennsylvania. Originally published in 2006, the book was re-released last year with
updated information. As I pointed out last fall, Moreno documents the Pentagon's
interest in neurotechnologies that can enhance soldiers' capabilities as well as
disabling and monitoring the minds of enemies.
Barack Obama has asked his Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to explore
the "ethical, legal, and societal implications raised by [the BRAIN] initiative and other
recent advances in neuroscience." Let's not leave it up to government officials and
appointeesand neuroscientists--to weigh the pros and cons of neuroweapons. As
William Safire, writing not just about neurotechnologies but biotechnology in general,
warned more than a decade ago, we need "to get this far-reaching, soul-searching
debate out of the ivory tower, onto the floor, onto the tube and into print until it
penetrates every sentient being's consciousness."
Image: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
2 of 5
10/23/2015 3:41 AM
Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed:

Leaked Document
TOPICS:Activist Postmind controlsciencewhistleblowers
July 29, 2013
July 29, 2013

By Activist Post
Whistleblower Reveals Military Mind Control Project At Major University
What if the government could change peoples moral beliefs or stop political dissent through remote
control of peoples brains?
Sounds like science fiction, right? Well, a leaked document reveals that the US government, through
DARPA research, is very close to accomplishing this.
Activist Post was recently contacted by an anonymous whistleblower who worked on a secret ongoing
mind-control project for DARPA. The aim of the program is to remotely disrupt political dissent and
extremism by employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in tandem with sophisticated
propaganda based on this technology. TMS stimulates the temporal lobe of the brain with
electromagnetic fields.
The program, conducted by The Center for Strategic Communication, is based at Arizona State
University. The DARPA funding for this project can be confirmed on the ASU website here. The head
of the project, Steve Corman, has worked extensively in the area of strategic communication as it
applies to terrorism and extremism or what could be called the war of ideas.
Cormans latest project Narrating The Exit From Afghanistan and his many presentations make it quite
obvious that the mission is to shape the narrative and literally change peoples minds. Lest one believe
it will be contained to overseas extremists, we should keep in mind that the word extremist is
increasingly used domestically. The dissenters of yesterday could easily become the terrorist
sympathizers and supporters of political violence tomorrow.This DARPA research brings about many
ethical questions and dilemmas. Mainly, this research aims to literally induce or disrupt the operation of
narratives within the brain. In other words, this research aims to stop individuals from thinking certain
thoughts and make others believe things they normally would not believe. This research has
tremendous interrogation possibilities and could potentially be used to more successfully spread
propaganda or stop political upheaval to an unsuspecting public.
This research is being conducted by The Center for Strategic Communication at ASU and is entitled
Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its
Persuasive Effects A detailed overview of the project can be found in the document below. Highlights
include:
In phase 3 of the research, the research group will selectively alter aspects of narrative
structure and brain functions via Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (TMS) to induce or disrupt
selected features of narrative processing. (Page 16, emphasis added)
TMS is a very powerful tool used to impair the brain functioning of individuals. See the
videos below for a brief demonstration of the effects of TMSOnce the research group
determines which parts of the brain are associated with cognitive reasoning and narrative
comprehension, they will be attempt to impair those sections in order to create a
fundamental basis for understanding how to disrupt or enhance aspects of narrative
structure and/or brain functioning to minimize or maximize persuasive effects on subject
proclivity to engage in political violence. (Page 23)
Once it is determined that disruption of certain portions of the brain can enhance persuasive
messaging, individuals can be persuaded to do things they normally would not do and believe
things they normally would not believe. This could include something as simple as telling a
closely guarded secret, to believing in government propaganda, or even committing a violent
act. The group writes on page 26, once we have produced a narrative comprehension model
[i.e., how individuals comprehend stories and persuasive messages], end users [aka the
government] will understand how to activate known neural networks (e.g., working memory or
attention) and positive behavioral outcome (e.g., nonviolent actions) nodes with strategic
communication messages as a means to reduce incidences of political violence in contested
populations. The group will investigate possibilities for literally disrupting the activity of the
NCN [narrative comprehension network] through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. (page
30) [text added]
The group is so confident that they will be able to induce or disrupt the operations of narratives
in the brain, that they say on page 26 that the research offers the capability to induce or disrupt
the operation of narratives in the brain, and develops the capability to induce narrative validity
[i.e., the believability of a particular narrative/message], transportation [i.e., the ability to be
engaged by a narrative], and integration [i.e., associating a particular narrative with a larger,
more culturally specific narrative] with certainty. [text added]
The group gives the following example of this projects usefulness: If it is the case that
activation in one particular neural network enables people to connect personal narrative to
master narratives [i.e., cultural narratives], by disrupting activity in that brain area, we should be
able to selectively impair that specific aspect of narrative processing while holding other
meaning making processes constant, effectively creating a narrative disruptor. Not only would
this be an important finding in the science of neural networks and narrative persuasion, but
would also have considerably practical and strategic importance. (page 40) [text added]
Essentially, the research aims to literally disrupt how people think and comprehend ideas
and messages.
Further, and perhaps even more terrifying, on page 40, the group writes, Mechanical
disruptions of narrative processing may be, ultimately, replicated in through targeted strategic
communication campaigns that approximate the narrative disruptions induced via magnetic
stimulation. So, after figuring out which parts of the brain are activated by particular
persuasive messages and propaganda, the government can test out messages that only activate
particular portions of the brain and not others, in order to persuade individuals to believe or not
believe something. Essentially, they are attempting to modify brain functioning without TMS,
and only words. One can only imagine the strategies the government could use with this
technology. They could make the public believe almost anything that suits their needs. It could
literally lead to mass brainwashing.
But what does this mean, practically? It means that if this research succeeds, the government will be
able to modify how one personally thinks. They could strap you in a chair, put a machine to your head,
turn off parts of your brain, introduce a persuasive message, and make you believe it.
Further, through extensive research, they may be able to replicate the machines brain disrupting
functioning simply through carefully crafted and researched persuasive messages and propaganda.
They can use brain imaging to determine which portions of the brain are activated when a particular
message is presented to an individual, and if the right portions are activated, they know the message
will circumvent ones mental reasoning and lead to almost automatic acceptance. With enough data, the
government could spread propaganda through the media that people will almost automatically believe,
whether it is true or not.
In terms of interrogation possibilities, Transcranical Magnetic Stimulation can be forced upon
individuals to make them believe certain things, say certain things, and perhaps admit to acts they did
not actually commit (as the TMS can induce narrative validity), or commit acts they normally would
not commit.
The government is literally trying to brainwash the public. This is not science fiction. Technology has
made it possible to induce and disrupt cognitive functioning in individuals. In the future, your thoughts
may not be your own, but ones that have been implanted into your brain through exceedingly
successful and validated propaganda.
Meeting notes indicate concern about how the project will be perceived, particularly the focus on the
Christian/Muslim element.
We encourage you to embed these documents on your own website or blog and share them with
everyone you know. Page numbers listed above are based on Scribd conversion below; enter the page
number you wish to view in the Scribd search box. Note: As you can see, Scribd has taken down the
documents. While we attempt to get them restored, here are the mirror links:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/oy4uu85ctkd70bd/156562352-Toward-Narrative-Disruptors-andInductors-Mapping-the-Narrative-Comprehension-Network-and-its-Persuasive-Effects.pdf
http://www.mediafire.com/view/zy9i9677coinbv8/156566740-Center-For-Strategic-Studies-MeetingNotes-3-10-12.pdf
Persuasive E
Obama Funds Development Of Mind Control

Implants, For Real
http://mrconservative.com/2014/06/42472-obama-funds-development-of-mind-control-implants-forreal/
June 1, 2014
A disturbing report has surfaced detailing a program from the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA) that gave $70 million in contracts out to two hospitals so they could develop brain
implants to read, then control the emotions of people.
The contracts were awarded this week to Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of
California, San Francisco under Obamas BRAIN initiative, which is the brain-mapping program
launched by the White House last year. Theyre tasked with creating electrical brain implants to control
seven different psychiatric conditions to start, some of which include depression, addiction, and
borderline personality disorder, but researchers hope to expand their capabilities as time goes on.
According to TechnologyReview, The project builds on expanding knowledge about how the brain
works; the development of microlectronic systems that can fit in the body; and substantial evidence that
thoughts and actions can be altered with well-placed electrical impulses to the brain.
Mind-Altering Bodybuilding Drug Turned Virgin Killer Mad
The manager of the DARPA program, Justin Sanchez, says that with the epidemic of veterans with
mental illness, the military is turning to electrical devices to help control the effects from it since drugs
and traditional talk therapy have limited effect.
We want to understand the brain networks [in] neuropsychiatric illness, develop technology to
measure them, and then do precision signaling to the brain, says Sanchez. Its something completely
different and new. These devices dont yet exist.
However last year the FDA approved a device that can both record and stimulate the brain. The
NeuroPace is used to monitor brain activity for epileptic seizures, then send electrical pulses to prevent
their onset.
Researchers say theyre making great strides in implantable electronics, especially small, implantable
computers. Michel Maharbiz, a professor of electrical engineering at UC Berkeley, says that Obamas
brain initiative along with the DARPA money has created a feeding frenzy of researchers trying
todevelop new mind-controlling devices.
[Brain reader: An array of micro-electrodes printed on plastic can record from the brains surface. It is
6.5 millimeters on a side.]
Its a great time to do tech for the brain, he says.
The research theyre doing has been dubbed affective brain-computer interfaces, meaning that
electronic devices will be used to alter a persons feelings and in some cases the patient would be able
to directly control them.
Its to change what people feel and to change what they do. Those are intimately tied, says Darin
Dougherty, a psychiatrist who directs Mass Generals division of neurotherapeutics.
However such research has already gotten a bad rap in America, and in the 70s a Yale University
neuroscientist Jose Delgado created implants that caused people to feel emotions, like anxiety or
relaxation, using what he called stimoceivers. In spite of being funded by the military he was run out
of the country after Congressional hearings that accused him of developing totalitarian mind-control
devices.
For now, DARPA says that these devices will only be used to treat mental illness. However like with
anything else the military develops theres always more to the story than meets the eye.
With the government taking over our healthcare who knows what these could be used for in the future.
This is one area of medicine that would be better left alone, wouldnt you say?
The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...
1 of 5
http://pubrecord.org/torture/7730/obama-interrogation-official-linked/print/
- The Public Record - http://pubrecord.org -
Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind Control

Research
Posted By Jeffrey Kaye On May 25, 2010 @ 11:54 am In Torture | 8 Comments
A new article at Truthout I co-wrote with author and investigative journalist H.P.
Albarelli describes how the CIAs Artichoke Project* was the contemporaneous and
operational side of the MK-ULTRA mind control research program. It was not
superceded by MK-ULTRA in the 1950s, as often supposed.
Even more, Artichoke-derived methods of using drugs, hypnosis, sensory
Susan E.
Brandon, the
Obama
deprivation and overload, behavioral modification techniques and other methods

of mind control have resurfaced as a primary component of U.S. interrogation
practice.
administratio
The Truthout article includes some amazing revelations, including the largest
ns Chief for
description to date of the roles of then-Ford administration officials Dick Cheney
Research in
and Donald Rumsfeld in working hand-in-glove with the CIA to suppress
the DCHCs
information on Artichoke from surfacing.
Behavioral
Science
The article also references the November 2006 release of an Instruction from
Program.
the Secretary of the Navy (3900.39D) regarding its Human Research Protection
Program. While this memo specifically prohibits the use of research upon
prisoners, including so-called unlawful enemy combatants, waivers of informed consent for
research, or suspension of the protections enumerated in the memo can be made by the
Secretary of the Navy under conditions of operational contingency or during times of national
emergency. It is likely the latter rests upon the legislative language within the September 18,
2001 Authorization to Use Military Force, where terrorist acts are said to continue to pose an
unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.
The waivers allowed for normal human research testing gains further piquancy when one
considers the kinds of research referenced in the Secretary of the Navys memo. Section
7(a)(2)(a) describes the Undersecretary of the Navy as the approval authority for research done
upon prisoners, as well as Severe or unusual intrusions, either physical or psychological, on
human subjects (such as consciousness-altering drugs or mind-control techniques)
[emphasis added].
This referencing of mind-control techniques in a document specifically discussing human
subjects protections by then Secretary of the Navy, Donald C. Winter, is not an anomaly, but a
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
2 of 5
rare instance in which the actual activities of the government in this area are openly revealed.
Some of these activities can be documented via publicly available materials. This article describes
how some of the individuals involved in U.S. government mind control and torture activities can
be tracked and identified.
APA, CIA: How might we overload the system or overwhelm the senses?
Another instance in which the curtain was pulled back on mind control research by the U.S.
government involved the online description by the American Psychological Association (APA) of a
CIA and Rand Corporation workshop which it co-sponsored in July 2003 at Rands Arlington,
Virginia headquarters. The event was attended by approximately 40 research psychologists,
psychiatrists, neurologists, as well as representatives from the CIA, FBI and Department of
Defense with interests in intelligence operations.
One of these workshops, ostensibly on detection of deception, specifically described how
participants should consider sensory overloads on the maintenance of deceptive behaviors,
including the use of pharmacological agents. How might we, the workshop asked, overload the
system or overwhelm the senses and see how it affects deceptive behaviors?
The man in charge of recruiting the operational expertise for the workshop was Kirk Hubbard,
Chief of the Research & Analysis Branch, Operational Assessment Division of the CIA. It appears
likely that Hubbard was responsible for the presence at the workshop of SERE psychologists
James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, who were instrumental in the construction of the Bush
administrations enhanced interrogation torture program. Hubbard was also reported (by Scott
Shane of the New York Times) to have brought James Mitchell to an informal meeting of
professors and law enforcement and intelligence officers to brainstorm about Muslim extremism
at the home of former APA president Martin Seligman in November 2001.
Sometime in the past six months, the APA eliminated all references to the webpage described
above, even going so far as to eliminate linked references to it on other webpages on its site.
While the webpage that described the workshops has been scrubbed, mirrored images of the site
remain available at well-known web archive sites, as I described in a recent article on this
attempt to rewrite or hide APAs offensive history. In one sense, this attempt to hide its history is
not surprising, because the kind of activities discussed in these workshops are exactly like those
that involved CIA and military mind control torture programs going back fifty years or more, and
evidently still operational today.
The Role of Government Psychologist Susan Brandon
In a recent article, Scott Horton at Harpers picked up on the unique link between the APA/CIA
workshop and the recent revelations about torture at a hitherto unknown black site prison at
Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. That link was an individual, Susan Brandon.
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
3 of 5
Referenced by Horton as working for the Defense Intelligence Agencys (DIA), Defense
Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Center (DCHC), a recent publication identified
Brandon more fully as Chief for Research in the DCHCs Behavioral Science Program. As Horton
notes, a recent column by Marc Ambinder at The Atlantic described the DCHC as providing
intelligence operatives and interrogators.. [performing] interrogations for a sub-unit of Task
Force 714, an elite counter-terrorism brigade. Interrogations at the Afghan black site reportedly
have included use of sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, brutality, isolation, relying on the
guidelines of the Army Field Manual, including its Appendix M. Many human rights groups have
criticized Appendix M as including techniques tantamount to torture and/or cruel, inhumane and
degrading and illegal by domestic and international law.
Back in 2003, according to an APA news article, Brandon jointly conceived the APA/CIA
workshops with Rand Associate Policy Analyst, Scott Gerwehr. (Mr. Gerwehr reportedly died a few
years ago.) At the time, psychologist Susan Brandon was the Program Officer for Affect and
Biobehavioral Regulation at the National Institute of Mental Health, and worked on the APA/CIA
program while also serving as Senior Scientist at the APA.
In the early 2000s, Dr. Brandon served as Behavioral and Social Science Principal at the Mitre
Corporation, a company highly linked to U.S. Air Defense. Subsequent to her stint as APAs Senior
Scientist, she went on to work in for the Bush administration as Assistant Director of Social,
Behavioral, and Educational Sciences for the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy.
In addition, she became an instrumental member of the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
(SBES) Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Councils Committees on Science
and Homeland and National Security.
Subsequently, as described in an important article by Stephen Soldz that extends many of the
points in this essay, Brandon joined the Defense Departments Counterintelligence Field Activity
group (CIFA), which was later disbanded and reformed as part of the DCHC. Soldz also reminds
us that Brandon was one of the silent observers at the [APA] PENS [Psychological Ethics and
National Security] taskforce described by dissident taskforce member Jean Maria Arrigo as
exerting pressure on members to adopt a likely pre-approved policy in favor of participation in
Guantnamo, CIA, and other interrogations. According to a 2005 article by Geoff Mumford, APAs
Director of Science Policy, Dr. Brandon helped steer much of the associations scientific outreach
relevant to counter-terrorism after 9/11.
One example of such outreach would include the June 11, 2002 meeting between Brandon, and
other top APA officials with two senior staff members in the National Security Councils (NSCs)
Office of Combating Terrorism (OCT). Since Vice Admiral William McRaven was head of OCT at
that time, perhaps Brandons acquaintance with the world of Special Operations dates to that
time, as McRaven was to become Commander of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC).
JSOC is the other Defense Department component, besides DIA, that has been linked currently
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
4 of 5
with the management of the black site prisons run by the Obama administration, subsequent to
President Obamas apparent closure of the CIA black sites. One reputable source has informed me
that there are eight such black site prisons in Afghanistan alone. A recent report by the BBC
corroborated earlier reports by the New York Times and the Washington Post. The article by
Ambinder further elaborated upon this story.
Why is the Obama Administration Still Involved in Torture?
It is not known if Dr. Brandon has been involved in any of the reported abuses of prisoners
coming out of Bagrams Tor prison, or elsewhere. Yet one would think the Obama administration
and the Pentagon has a lot to explain in utilizing as their behavioral chief of research for an
agency involved in intelligence operations, including interrogation. But then, why is the Obama
administration involved in torture or operating secret prisons at all? President Obama has
manifestly broken his promise to the American people to end torture and close all secret prisons.
Nor has Congress done their due diligence in investigating these matters. Only when the
American people fully understand the extent to which these activities have occupied the
government and their various collaborators, like the APA, will society be able to take the
necessary steps to end these abuses, and hold those accountable for what amount to crimes
against humanity.
As for psychologists, Dr. Soldz rightly notes, Psychology as a profession is at a crossroads. The
same holds true for other professions involved with this abusive and criminal history, including
the activities of anthropologists in the militarys Human Terrain System teams in Afghanistan,
researchers in numerous academic departments across the country, and the many reports of
doctors and other medical personnel involved in the monitoring of torture activities for the CIA
and Defense Department. The use of torture has suborned U.S. civil society as a whole in
activities that are dark and evil, and the society as a whole must make a tremendous effort if it is
to extirpate such evil from its midst.
*For an early document referring to Artichokes history, see CIA, Memorandum for the Record,
Subject: Project ARTICHOKE, January 31, 1975. While this MOR downplays Artichokes history, it
represents the degree to which the CIA was willing to reveal such operations. The Truthout article
discusses Operation Dormouse, where then Ford administration officials Dick Cheney and Donald
Rumsfeld worked with the CIA to limit revelations about Artichoke and other CIA torture and
assassination operations.
Originally published on Firedoglake.
Jeffrey Kaye is a psychologist living in Northern California who writes regularly on torture and
other subjects for The Public Record, Truthout and Firedoglake. He also maintains a personal
blog, Invictus. His email address is sfpsych at gmail dot com
Tweet
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
Georgia GOP leaders suggest Obama is using mind-control - CBS46 News
1 of 3
http://www.cbs46.com/story/20119364/georgia-gop-leaders-suggest-oba...
Georgia GOP leaders suggest Obama is using mind-control technique

Posted: Nov 16, 2012 1:45 PM EDT
Updated: Dec 14, 2012 1:45 PM EDT
By Mandi Milligan, Senior Digital Producer
CONNECT
ATLANTA (CBS46) - The debate is firing up over a controversial seminar held at the State Capitol.
At that forum, Republican leaders warned that President Barack Obama is using mind control to manipulate all
of us.
Republican leaders sat in on a four-hour seminar at the State Capitol recently, and it was all caught on tape.
The topic was Agenda 21, a highly controversial plan developed during the 80s that would allow the
government to force people to move from the suburbs to the cities and use mind control to manipulate
everything we do.
"They had a 4-hour meeting how the United Nations is using a mind control technique developed during the
Cold War to secretly steal away Americans' freedoms," said Seth Clark of the political watchdog group Better
Georgia.
Clark videotaped part of the briefing. He captured slides from the presentation comparing President Obama's
record to that of Mao Zedong, a Chinese communist revolutionary, and Joseph Stalin, the one-time Communist
leader of the Soviet Union.
"Usually, when you got somebody talking about mind control and all these problems with the United Nations,
that person's wearing a tinfoil hat. I think the thing that concerns us is that the person wearing the tinfoil hat
seems to be our senate majority leader," said Georgia Democratic Party Chairman Mike Berlon.
Berlon said he has no idea why Republican Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers sponsored the Agenda 21
seminar.
Rogers told CBS Atlanta News he agreed to hold the forum after a group of constituents requested more
information on Agenda 21.
Better Georgia doesn't take political sides, but the activist group and Democrats said for the Republicans to
hold the forum is not just offensive, but also a waste of tax dollars.
"I honestly don't think it's going to sit well with the people of Georgia. I think the response so far has proven
that. They know this is a bunch of malarkey," said Clark.
"I'll be honest with you. The suggestion that the federal government is using mind control is just crazy," said
Berlon.
Copyright 2012 WGCL-TV (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.
In The News
Promoted Links by Taboola
Fulton County Medical

Judge who upheld execution
Examiner issues statement on for Kelly Gissendaner regrets
Bobbi Kristina
decision
Meet The Man Who Is

Disrupting a $13 Billion Razor
Industry
Dollar Shave Club
10/23/2015 3:07 AM
truthstreammedia.com
http://truthstreammedia.com/2013/09/28/judge-quashes-650m-government-mind-control-lawsuit/
Judge Quashes $650M Government Mind Control Lawsuit

Melissa
Dykes
September 28, 2013
Pittsburg resident Frederick Banks filed a case against an unknown number of federal judges and United States
covert government agents including Attorney General Eric Holder claiming he was a victim of voice-to-skull mind
control technology at the hands of the U.S. government.
The judge dismissed the case promptly, stating Banks was wholly incredible and delusional.
Patriot-News Penn Live, a Pennsylvania news outlet, reports:
Banks allegations do seem like something out of an episode of The X-Files.

He claimed that for some time, federal authorities have been using voice-to-skull, or V2K devices, to
place voices inside his head. The alleged harassment was prompted by his repeated filing of lawsuits
against the government, Banks contended.
In his two-page lawsuit, he cited what he said was information from the Federation of American
Scientists, which described V2K technology as non-lethal weaponry that uses microwaves to transmit
sound into a persons, or an animals, skull. The technology also is used as an electronic scarecrow to
chase birds away from airports, he wrote.
Past lawsuits filed by banks include everyone from President Barack Obama, to Hillary Clinton, to the entire U.S.
Congress and Senate.
While the Penn Live article lays out the fact that there are a multitude of other people who have similar stories of being
targeted individuals by the same technology, the author ends up dismissing Banks mind control conspiracy claims.
Was the man just nuts? Banks did not even get to present his case because the judge labeled him crazy and shut him
down right away. Project Lawsuit Abuse wrote, Prisoner lawsuits are a growing problem, and they waste millions in
taxpayer dollars each year. It seems if anyone mentions microwave weapons causing voices in their heads or
government mind control programs, they are instantly dismissed as mentally unhinged without question.
But what if something like that was actually happening to people?
While Penn Live actually lays out a lot of evidence to show theres a widescale pattern of people complaining of similar
targeting, the ultimate conclusion is, again, that its all just a conspiracy theory.
With just a bit more research, perhaps that author would have come across U.S. patent # 4,877,027 for A Hearing
System. According to the devices abstract, Sound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with
microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform.
There are many more patents out there like it.
The technology for neuroweapons absolutely exists, and all over the world, more and more people are claiming to be
victims of them people who say they have been mercilessly tracked and targeted, physically and psychologically
tortured day after day after day at the hands of unknown entities wielding electromagnetic frequency (EMF) weapons.
Victims are subjected to voices only they can hear and painful sensations and heating in various areas of their bodies
the exact types of symptoms that could be caused by the EMF weapons described in NASAs Future of War 2025
document and the declassified Army Intelligence report Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons.
The cover story Misled & Betrayed: How US Cover Stories Are Keeping a Cold War Weapon (Neuroweapons) and
Illegal Human Testing a Secret by Cheryl Welsh, featured in the most recent edition of Torture: Asian and Global
Perspectives, lays out the historical case for the U.S. governments research and development of classified mind
control and microwave weapons that began during World War II.
For decades, the US government prevented the science required for neuroweapons from developing
in the unclassified realm; thereby allowing the US government to claim neuroweapons are science
fiction, based on the best US science literature available. At the same time, secret neuroweapons
research flourished and the US government employed extensive secrecy methods to disguise the fact
that neuroweapons were scientifically possible not only in principle but were also proven with science
experiments.
Consequently, secret neuroweapons that are already developed are a serious threat but experts are
not warning the public and they should be.
When it comes to the two main areas of study in regard to the human brain, Welsh discusses how the government has
been backing and shaping all the publicly available research in the biochemical realm, while closing off and classifying
any significant research in the bioelectrical realm. Thus, secret research into the bioelectrical functions of the brain,
and the neuroweapons based on those properties, can continue off the record, unabated.
When any questions are raised as to the existence of neuroweapons technology, plausible deniability can easily be
claimed based on the latest unclassified science available.
Even though the 1977 Church Committee helped bring the top secret CIA project MKULTRA to the publics attention, it
would seem the project which at that point had spanned decades, with millions of dollars and thousands of victims
only got blacker and went deeper underground.
Stories like those in Banks lawsuit are sadly not even uncommon anymore. Did the U.S. really just suddenly have a
huge surge in schizophrenia in the last few decades? That disease has a typical onset in the under 30 crowd; why are
people in all age ranges suddenly waking up one day in their 40s, 50s and 60s and claiming to have a lot of the same
symptoms without any mental illness history or drug or alcohol problems?
Check out how this 1986 New York Times article Schizophrenia: Insights Fail to Halt Rising Toll begins:
Never before in American history have so many schizophrenics been seen on the streets of American
cities, screaming aloud to voices only they can hear, proclaiming themselves God, warning passers-by
that the Central Intelligence Agency has bugged their brains, or simply sitting, mute and
withdrawn, sunk in an apathy so deep that no emotion crosses their faces. [emphasis added]
There are even theories that many of the rather large number of people who believed themselves abducted by UFOs
in the 1980s and 1990s were actually victims of MKULTRA 2.0. (Guess that makes a lot more sense than aliens
traveling through the galaxy all that way to visit earth just to probe people)
We know that our brain cells communicate with electrical signals. How else would amputees be able to control the
latest high tech bionic legs using only their brainwaves?
The government has been called into question on EMF weapons lately, following suspected Navy Yard shooter Aaron
Alexis claims that he was targeted with just such weapons.
Ultra low frequency attack is what Ive been subject to for the last three months. And to be perfectly honest, that is
what has driven me to this, Mr. Alexis reportedly wrote in a note before he shot 12 people. Pictures of the shotgun
Alexis used to commit the crime have surfaced with My ELF [extremely low frequency] weapon, Better off this way,
and End the torment scratched into the barrel.
Aaron Alexis shotgun. Source: FBI
The mainstream media has, for the most part, dutifully painted Alexis as a mentally insane person who just randomly
lost it and decided to shoot a bunch of people one day. He isnt the first government employee to kill and claim it was
the government controlling his mind. Carl Campbell was found innocent by reason of insanity after shooting Navy
Commander Edward Higgins to death outside the Pentagon in 1991. Court papers revealed Campbell was believed to
be schizophrenic due to his assertions the U.S. government had inserted a mind control microchip into his brain.
U.S. Army Intelligence Veteran and Former Director of the Electronic Surveillance Project Julianne McKinney selfpublished Microwave Harassment & Mind-Control Experimentation in 1992 and Mind Control and the Secret State
in 2008. In her writings, McKinney outlined what could be the ultimate goals of these clandestine EMF torture
programs:
The long-term objectives of these harassment and experimentation campaigns appear to be quite
fundamental; viz.,
(1) induce a sense of perverted loyalty toward the very agencies engaged in the individuals
harassment, to confuse his or her priorities where the possibility of obtaining legal redress might be
concerned;
(2) redirect the targeted individuals feelings of hopelessness, anger and frustration toward racial and
Navy Yard Shooter Had Mind Control Group Contact | Examiner.com
1 of 2
http://www.examiner.com/article/navy-yard-shooter-had-mind-control-g...
10/23/2015 4:35 AM
2 of 2
Recommende
Jim Morrison's "s

faces life in priso
Valley man receiv

national award fo
rescuing abandon
dog
10/23/2015 4:35 AM
1 of 2
10/23/2015 4:40 AM

Leaked Document
July 29, 2013
July 29, 2013

By Activist Post
include:
30) [text added]
and messages.
not commit.
Persuasive E

Implants, For Real
June 1, 2014
their onset.
devices.
1 of 5

Research
Susan E.
Brandon, the
Obama

practice.
administratio
ns Chief for
Research in
the DCHCs
Behavioral
Science
Program.
[emphasis added].
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
2 of 5
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
3 of 5
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
4 of 5
against humanity.
Tweet
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
5 of 5
Article printed from The Public Record: http://pubrecord.org

URL to article: http://pubrecord.org/torture/7730/obama-interrogation-official-linked/
Copyright 2009 The Public Record. All rights reserved.
10/23/2015 4:27 AM
About
1 of 5
10/23/2015 3:41 AM
bionic soldiers.
2 of 5
10/23/2015 3:41 AM
The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.
Recommended For You
1.
Men Are Attracted to Nonconformist Women a week ago scientificamerican.com
ScientificAmerican.com Head Lines
2.
The Problem with Female Superheroes 3 months ago scientificamerican.com
ScientificAmerican.com Mind & Brain
3.
Your Facial Bone Structure Has a Big Influence on How People See You 4
months ago scientificamerican.com ScientificAmerican.com Everyday Science
4.
The Ups and Downs of Sex a week ago scientificamerican.com
Wow, I guess self defense is just plain immoral and against the scientific ethos.
|
It's alarming to hear Pentagon (highly political military arm of our government) and Brain
Initiative (pursuit of science) used in the same sentence much less financially linked. Why?
Because of misuse. We perceive science to have pure intentions whereas we perceive the military
to have malevolent intentions. Are the fears justified? Is our government different than others?
Just questions.
|
Obama wants to go further than the FBI and IRS have ever gone when it comes to "enemies".
|
@JPGumby, you mean like how self-defense led the US into Iraq? The US is looking to drones to
"sanitize" war for the american people. If they can turn war into a one sided video game then the
american people won't protest. Because the american people only care when americans die in their
wars. So the next time a US president uses the terms preemptive strike and WMDs the american
3 of 5
10/23/2015 3:41 AM
people won't complain, instead they will be rushing home to watch the carnage on TV. War will
become nothing more than reality TV.
|
I'm just saying that for this article Pentagon = evil misuse; it would appear that the research would
be tainted purely by this connection. Presumably the DoD funded school lunch program is
somehow tainted as well.
I don't agree with everything (or even much of what) the US govt has done, but I do believe in
self-defense, more or less in line with "just war" doctrine. As a corollary, if you do need to defend
yourself, you should do it as efficiently and effectively as possible. Just saying this is wrong
because it may be used militarily doesn't make sense. Unless you really are a true pacifist and
really wouldn't kill under any circumstances, no matter how great the evil that could be stopped, in
which case at least you have my respect for your principles.
In any case, mental control made a lot more sense when they were worrying about giving pilots an
edge, instead of putting drones in the air. The military future is now robots, not cyborgs.
|
I hadn't heard about this militarization of cognitive sciences in Obama's brain initiative. The piece
doesn't really scratch the surface on the many reasons why we should oppose this kind of
militarization. But militarization of science destroys science's potential to be liberating, using
science instead as a tool to maximize humanity's ability to inflict pain on each other.
|
The truth is they implant a wireless in-body antenna or nerve stimulator inside you. Dr. Lawrence
Chang of Pariser Dermatology in Newport News, VA (without my knowledge and consent)did this
to me. Even after it started protruding from my scar, he refused to remove it. I can barely walk
now due to this. I have bruises up my spine and across my back. I have pictures. The Virginia State
Police and local police use lasers to hack into your electronics (per State Trooper Jared Vance).
They beam voices into your head. See Popsci.com seeing thru walls with a wireless router. Check
out the audio spotlight by Holosonics. They taze people into what justnet.org calls "excited
delirium". This makes citizens act in ways you normally would not. (I am wondering if law
enforcement is responsible for the elementary school murders) See Daily Press 3/21 - 3/27 and
read the stories. In Virginia, the suicide rate has escalated. I believe this is why the military suicide
rate is so high. Read Brian Castner's The Long Walk. He says on page 67, "this is my new life. It's
intolerable" They are torturing our military into suicide. They have created what they call "crisis
stabilization wards" (truly gitmos) where they torture you and flat line repeatedly. They
electronically rape and sodomize you. They call it rape and sodomy. They know how it feels and
they do it anyway. I have been tortured by these criminals for almost five years. The Community
Service Boards and Emergency rooms are in on it. I consider this to be torture, and the mark of the
beast. I have an appointment next week with a general surgeon who I hope will honor my
constitutional right to privacy, freedom of religion, and control over my mind an body. They use
this to see what your brain sees through you eyes and hear what you hear. It is "ambient
intelligence and surveillance". They use ubiquitous computing to carry out their torture. I have two
cases in the fourth circuit court of appeals. You can read and see the fraud, corruption and abuse at
pacer.gov. Sadly, the Federal District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen, per her own clerk of courts,
knows how excruciatingly painful it is but fails to grant as motion for cessation of torture. Go to
forbes.com and search Brandon Raub. The colleges and cities are receiving millions of dollars to
torture and abuse our citizens. I have an article on Terrorism and Mental Health how these
weapons so cruel. In addition, I have a book: "Safeguards in the world of ambient intelligent" that
explains how they read you mind. I believe this to be the weapon of the anti-Christ. These people
assault and batter your mind, spirit and soul. They are committing the unpardonable sin of
blasphemy. You heart and mind are filled with the Holy Spirit and this assault on the Holy Spirit is
unforgivable. Virginia has a law that bans implanting microchips, but the state police are violating
their own laws!
|
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
4 of 5
10/23/2015 3:41 AM
PRIVATE
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF:
Magisterial District Number:
MDJ Name: Hon
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
VS.
DEFENDANT:
Address:
NAME and ADDRESS

Telephone:
President Barach Obama

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C.
Docket No.:
Date Filed:
OTN:
(Above to be completed by court personnel)
(Fill in defendants name and address)
Notice: Under Pa.R.Crim.P. 506, your complaint may require approval by the attorney for the Commonwealth before it can be
accepted by the magisterial district court. If the attorney for the Commonwealth disapproves your complaint, you may
petition the court of common pleas for review of the decision of the attorney for the Commonwealth.
Fill in as much information as you have.

Defendants Race/Ethnicity
Defendants Sex
White
Black
Asian
Native American
Hispanic
Unknown
Defendants A.K.A. (also known as)
I,
Defendants D.O.B.
Defendants SID (State Identification Number)
Female
Male
Defendants Vehicle Information
Plate Number
State
Registration Sticker (MM/YY)
Defendants Drivers License Number

State
Stan J. Caterbone
(Name of Complainant-Please Print or Type)
do hereby state: (check appropriate box)

1.
I accuse the above named defendant who lives at the address set forth above
I accuse the defendant whose name is unknown to me but who is described as
I accuse the defendant whose name and popular designation or nickname is unknown to me and whom I have
therefore designated as John Doe
with violating the penal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at
1250 Fremont Street and City of Lancaster, PA

(Place-Political Subdivision)
Collusion in Cointelpro Like Program against my person.

in
Lancaster
County on or about
January to Today
Participants were: (if there were participants, place their names here, repeating the name of the above defendant)
Law Enforcment of Lancaster County; Residents of City and County of Lancaster, Downtown Restuarant and Bar
Proprietors, Lancaster City Police and Fireman.
AOPC 411A-10
Page 1 of 2
PRIVATE
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Defendants Name:
Docket Number:
2.
The acts committed by the accused were:

(Set forth a summary of the facts sufficient to advise the defendant of the nature of the offense charged. A citation to the statute allegedly violated, without more,
is not sufficient. In a summary case, you must cite the specific section and subsection of the statute or ordinance allegedly violated. The age of the victim at the
time of the offense may be included, if known. In addition, social security numbers and financial information (e.g. PINS) should not be listed. If the identity
of an account number must be established, list only the last four digits. 204 Pa.Code 213.1 - 213.7. )
All of which were against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and contrary to the Act of
Assembly, or in violation of
and
(Section)
(Subsection)
of the
(PA Statute)
3.
I ask that process be issued and that the defendant be required to answer the charges I have made.
4.
I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and
belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.C.S. 4904)
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date
Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth

(Name of Attorney for Commonwealth-Please Print or Type)
AND NOW, on this date
Signature of Complainant
Approved
Disapproved because:
(Signature of Attorney for Commonwealth)
, I certify that the complaint has been properly completed and verified.
(Magisterial District)
AOPC 411B-10
(Date)
(Issuing Authority)
Page 2 of 2
SEAL

Bowl at White House
Feb 1, 2011
Super Bowl.
Gray said.

bharris@lnpnews.com
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Change.org Petition by Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced Media Group
March 17, 2016
When will the United States of America Settle with Targeted Individuals?
The United States would provide $100,000 per year for documented Targeted
Individuals, payable in the form of an annuity with survivor benefits.
The United States would provide a $10 Million Lump Sum for Suspicious or Accidental
Death.
The United States would provide Medical Benefits for life.
The United States would provide an extra layer of security by law enforcement for persons,
property, identity, and cybersecurity of targeted individuals.
The United States newly formed U.S. Task Force for Targeted Individuals would take a
random sampling of 200 Targeted Individuals Cases Including Affidavits and
Documentation. They would then develop a baseline for evidence and required
documentation.
Settlement is fair considering the following case law:
Erin Andrews Awarded $55 Million in Peephole Video Lawsuit
1. Andrews sought $75 million from the owner of the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt
University, where she was staying in 2008 when the incident occurred, and Michael
David Barrett, the stalker who booked hotel rooms next to her in Nashville and
Columbus, Ohio, and secretly recorded (via a peephole) and released videos of her
naked. Barrett, whom the jury found to be 51% at fault, has to pay more than $28
million. Nashville Marriott owner West End Hotel Partners and former operator Windsor
Capital Group, which were found to be 49% at fault, have to pay more than $26
million.
This is my story Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone are Targeted and Victims of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control Experimentation Programs. We have been engaged in
RECLAMATION; (assets; real estate; personal and business real property; intellectual property;
and business interests) LITIGATION; and RESEARCH since 2005 in federal and state courts. All
activities are for the purpose of restoring Advanced Media Group and all affiliated companies and
Stan J. Caterbone to WHOLE.
Stan J. Caterbone was recently accepted into the Graduate Studies and Research Program at
Millersville University in April of 2009 where a more formal research approach to mind control and
MKULTRA programs will be studied. Other studies will be considered in the areas of law; finance;
computer science; and philosophy.
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group are not able to continue it's litigation until it's
security needs are satisfied and it's computer/electronic property is returned and/or replaced.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-AffairsPage
Page
Page111of
of
of113
23
27
23
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and
fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling
arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which
would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart
further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue
our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our
rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media.
Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and
Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel?
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page222of
of
of113
23
27
23
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
January 22, 2016

Re: Good Old Boys Network and the Kathleen Kane Coup
I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates back to
1987, made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the "good old boys". In
1987 I blew the whistle on a local company, International Signal & Control, or ISC, that was
indicted for selling arms and weapons to Iraq via South Africa with the aid and support of the CIA
and the NSA. It was the 3rd largest white collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I
was the victim of a widespread wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that
included 29 false arrests, multiple false imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record that
to this day is still resonating.
Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for taking on
this culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law that they
so emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and conduct their affairs in a manner that
suggests they are above the law and we, the Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The
sad fact that it reaches into the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most
outrageous and deplorable truth to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the
APPELLANT in a case before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus
Corpus for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle Lambert. A murder case in the early 1990's
that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell found her actually
innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct in the English speaking
language" and released her from prison. The case drew nationwide attention when then
Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney
generals to curtail the reach of the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus Corpus
cases. To make matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable
Stewart Dalzell from the federal bench.
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison within 9
months while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The Honorable
Judge Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was again found guilty and sentenced to
life in prison. The case was covered by the LA Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer
Bill Curtis did a 48 Hours special, and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my efforts to free
Lisa Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively withdraw as her MOVANT
and Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my own demise was the result of the same
type of wholesale prosecutorial misconduct by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle
Lambert fell victim to. My efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed
attorney threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be
successful in helping her win the Habeus Corpus she filed in May of 2014. I allege the U.S. District
Judge was trying in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal court cases that seek to restore
me to whole from a life of ruin, misery, torture, and financial collapse.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page333of
of
of113
23
27
23
For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states and raised
some 90 million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and early 1990's I was one of
5 domestic companies that had the capabilities of manufacturing CDROM's that included a client
list that reached across the globe and included government agencies and fortune 500 companies.
And in 1987, myself and a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous
recording studio, Power Station Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first
"digital movie". The intellectual property rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal
claims in federal courts were too much for the "Good Old Boys" to handle.
_____________/S/___________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Advanced Media Group
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
ACTIVE COURT CASES
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page444of
of
of113
23
27
23
AFFIDAVIT

Affiant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Telephone: 717-826-5354
State of Pennsylvania
County of Lancaster
My current legal name is,Stan J Caterbone and my current address is, 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, PA
17603 . I am presently 57 years of age, and my current address of residence is
same as before. I, the Affiant submits and writes these statements of and on my own free will
and on behalf of myself, Stan J. Caterbone.
I, the Affiant states that I have been tortured by U.S. Sponsored Mind Control technologies; and
have experienced the following;
burns, directed high levels of energy being subjected to my
body, private parts, heart, head, spine, joints, etc. I the Affiant states that I have been attacked
by (individuals, police, military, and intelligence agents, etc.) I the Affiant states that I have made
formal police reports to: Lancaster City Police, Manheim Township Police, Southern
Regional Police, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Attorney Office, Pennsylvania
Attorney Office, Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster City Mayor and Office, I
have contacted the Pennsylvania Attorney General, Joe Pitts Office, Mike Sturla' Office,
Senator Arlen Specter, and Bob Casey and former senator Edward Kennedy; Brian
Cutler, and Ryan Aument, and countless other members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly,
and receive no support, just involuntary psychiatric commitments, and the endorsement and the
support for my perpetrators to continue the assaults.
I the Affiant have been arrested, forcibly placed in a mental hospital, physically harmed, assaulted
by countless officials, military, and civilians. I the Affiant states that my life has been ruined as I
am no longer employable, I am workplace mobbed, my work is being damaged, my family is
being threatened, etc.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page555of
of
of113
23
27
23
I am or have become a victim of (torture, attacks, assaults, harassment, sexual abuse, police
abuse, government funded technology abuse, etc., and am now aware that these technologies are
being funded by the United States government with most of these technologies being developed
for war are also now being tested and evaluated per Department of Defense Directive 5240.1-r
Procedure 13 Human Experimentation (on U.S. Persons and others) for Intelligence Purposes.
As a human being and with Human Rights I have not given approval for the use or abuse of my
body in any form to anyone or to any entity within or outside of the United States government to
include any corporation, researcher, scientist, military agency or anyone affiliated within or
outside of any agency, corporation or individual that has resulted in the harms that my body, life,
property, career and or finances have endured. To further state that military training documents
such
as
the
Department
of
Defense
Joint
https://www.aclu.org/files/dronefoia/dod/drone_dod_jp3_60.pdf;
Targeting
DOD
Joint
Publication
Targeting
of
Individual and Groups that involves the United States Joint Chiefs of Command and the United
States (HHS) Health and Human Services involvement, an agency that oversee the medical
records of every citizen along with citizens who are being used illegally for testing and evaluation
of war technologies;
I the Affiant of this Affidavit do object to such treatment and abuse of my body and life. In
addition to the above noted military training documents that is resulting in the harm to myself
and to millions of citizens of this country I do as well object to the Department of Defense
Directive 5240.1-r Procedure 13 that has resulted in the destruction of my health as will where
this document has existed for decades with no oversight yet it still exists as a published and
available document resulting in harm to myself and millions of citizens. The chapter 13 reads as
follows:
C13. CHAPTER 13 PROCEDURE 13. EXPERIMENTATION ON HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR
INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES
C13.1. APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to experimentation on human subjects if such
experimentation is conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component. This procedure
does not apply to experimentation on animal subjects.
C13.2. EXPLANATION OF UNDEFINED TERMS
C13.2.1. Experimentation in this context
means any research or testing activity involving human subjects that may expose such subjects
to the possibility of permanent or temporary injury (including physical or psychological damage
and damage to the reputation of such persons) beyond the risks of injury to which such subjects
are ordinarily exposed in their daily lives.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page666of
of
of113
23
27
23
C13.2.2. Experimentation is conducted on behalf of a DoD intelligence component if it is

conducted under contract to that component or to another DoD Component for the benefit of the
intelligence component or at the request of such a component regardless of the existence of a
contractual relationship.
C13.2.3. Human subjects in this context includes any person whether or not such person is a
United States person.
C13.3. PROCEDURES C13.3.1. Experimentation on human subjects
conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component may be undertaken only with the
informed consent of the subject, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Department of
Health and Human Services, setting out conditions that safeguard the welfare of such subjects.
DoD 5240.1-R, December 1982 58
I hereby state that the information above is true, to the best of my knowledge. I also confirm that
the information here is both accurate and complete, and relevant information has not been
omitted. (1) For an individual acting in his or her own right I set forth my signature:
Stan (ley) J. Caterbone Affiant Signed________________________________, Affiant

Stan J. Caterbone, State of Pennsylvania, County of Lancaster, City of Lancaster,
On
this, _________day of ______________, 20____, before me a notary public, the

undersigned (print name) _______________________________________, personally
appeared before me, known to me (by satisfactorily proven identification and affixed
signature) ______________________________ to be the person whose name is
subscribed to this document, and acknowledged that he or she executed the same for
the purposes therein contained. In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand and official
seal.____________________________________
Notary Public ___________________________ My Commission Expires on
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page777of
of
of113
23
27
23
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
1 of 4
December 9, 2015
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Letters to the Editor, News and Commentary
Breaking: Kanes staff has approved one of two contracts needed to hire a special prosecutor to
investigate the porno email scandal
by Bill Keisling
Have Republicans in the top levels of Pennsylvania government and courts engineered a takeover of the
Democratic-controlled state attorney generals office?
Has this high-level palace coup taken place under everyones noses?
Are the criminal charges brought by Republican officials against AG
Kane, her subsequent law license suspension, and efforts by the state
senate to remove her from office all simply a ruse meant to distract
voters from what is really going on: an attempt by Republicans to control
policy in the attorney generals office, and throughout state government,
without having won an election?
Recent developments in all three branches of Pennsylvania government
make these reasonable questions.
Several weeks ago, on November 18, four high-level staffers from the
AGs office testified before the state senate committee exploring AG
Kanes removal from office that theyve been running nearly all the
offices legal functions since Kane could no longer practice law.
Kathleen Kane
First Deputy Attorney General Bruce Beemer, and three executive
deputy attorneys general Robert Mulle, James Donahue, and Lawrence Cherba testified they have
effectively taken control of the elective attorney generals office following Kanes unprecedented law
license suspension.
First Deputy AG Beemer is a holdover from the days when Republican Attorney General Tom Corbett ran
the office, before Kanes election in 2012.
When she came into office Kane probably thought Beemer was a nice guy, and a competent and
experienced career prosecutors, who should be kept around.
But did Attorney General Kane make a mistake not having her own loyalists in these top positions?
Several weeks back, Beemer and the other three made a splash at the senate impeachment committee
when they spoke about the importance of the many criminal cases the office was responsible for handling.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page888of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
2 of 4
But criminal cases prosecuted by the AGs office

are, from a public policy perspective, small
potatoes.
The state AGs office is a johnny-come-lately in
criminal prosecutions. Before the office became
an elective one in 1980, the AGs office seldom if
ever prosecuted criminals. (Criminal
prosecutions, before 1980, were referred to local
DAs.)
For centuries, the most important job of the
Pennsylvania attorney general has been to issue
Four guys running the AG's office: who voted for them?
opinions on the legality or constitutionality of state actions or programs.

Opinions issued by the Attorney General can and do concern the nuts and bolts of how state agencies are
run from the legality of programs, to who is hired, to how paper clips are bought, to the treatment and
execution of prisoners.
Legal opinions of the attorney general carry the full force of law, until and unless a court overturns them.
Beemer and his three associates, testifying before the state senate, played down these important
constitutional responsibilities. These days, Beemer said, the AGs office rarely if ever issues important
opinions on government or inter-agency matters.
Two recent and important issues demanding high-level decisions in the AGs office clearly demonstrate
this is not true.
The first issue is a constitutional matter: the state senate is set to vote on whether to hold a hearing to
remove Kane from office, bypassing the constitutional impeachment process. Its the historic role of the
attorney generals office to intervene on questions of the legality of removing an official from office.
The second issue is a personnel, or contract, matter: The contract for Kanes choice of the special
prosecutor to investigate the court pornography email scandal must be reviewed and approved by her
office.
AG Kane selected Douglas Gansler, a former Maryland attorney general, and his Washington DC-based
law firm, to review the hundreds of thousands of emails Kane found on her office servers.
But contracts hiring Gansler and his firm must be approved and signed by the attorney generals office
staff.
The responsibility to review and approve Ganslers contract fell to one of the four AG office employees
who testified several weeks ago before the state senate panel to remove Kane: Robert Mulle, the
executive deputy attorney general of the civil law division.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page999of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
3 of 4
Two employment contracts, one involving Gansler and the other his firm, landed on Deputy AG Mulles
desk last week. Mulle evidentially at first objected to the form and content of the special prosecutor
agreements.
Kanes spokesman, Chuck Ardo, tells me, (Deputy AG) Mulle was able to work with Kane to massage the
first of the two contracts, about the firm.
That first contract has been signed, Ardo says. But Ganslers personal contract has yet to be approved, or
signed.
They are still working on Ganslers contract, Ardo says. But she certainly got the first part approved.
Needless to say, the last thing state Republicans want is an unfettered special prosecutor looking into
hundreds of thousands of correspondence found on the AGs email servers.
Likewise, the attorney generals office must soon respond to the senates demand for a hearing to remove
Kane from office.
Those running Kanes office apparently dont seem to be in any hurry, or think its their job, to weigh in on
the constitutionality of the senates proposed action.
But, it should go without saying, if a Democrat-controlled senate were to try removing a Republican
attorney general in this matter, the court papers already would be flying.
Likewise, if the porno email scandal involved mostly Democrats, instead of mostly Republican prosecutors
and judges, a special prosecutor would likely already be on the job.
So Kane finds herself having difficulties directing her own staff to work on these two important matters.
Three million Pennsylvania voters elected Kane. Voters didnt elect her staff members.
Making matters worse, should Attorney General Kane rightfully attempt to fire Republican loyalists for
failure to do their jobs, or insubordination, they will no doubt beat a trail to the Republican prosecutors and
judges in Montgomery County, claiming Kane is retaliating against them. GOP prosecutors would then
likely seek more criminal charges against her.
Not only average citizens, and voters, should take note of all this. Gov. Tom Wolf should take a long look
at whats going on in the AGs office.
Faced with large Republican majorities in the legislature, Gov. Wolf likely must soon turn to governing by
executive decree.
Those executive decrees will be subject to the approval of the attorney generals office.
Should Kane be removed from office, the GOP senate sooner or later must approve Gov. Wolfs
appointment of an attorney general to replace Kane.
Until then, Beemer and the three others will be running the office of attorney general.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page10
10
10of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
KEISLING: Senate unwittingly exposes darkest chapter in state legislati...
1 of 12
December 23, 2015
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/23/keisling-senate-unwittingly-exposes-dar...
Featured, Keisling on Pennsylvania Politics, News and Commentary
Senate invokes constitutional provision against AG Kathleen Kane tied to era of eugenics, forced
sterilizations, and the Holocaust
by Bill Keisling
The Pennsylvania Senate, carelessly hoping to remove state Attorney General Kathleen Kane from office,
has unwittingly invoked an obscure and long-forgotten clause in the state constitution thats rooted in
some of the darkest days in the commonwealths history.
The constitutional provisions, called Direct Address or Direct Removal, were added to the state
constitution in 1874 to remove judges and other office holders.
The removal provisions are firmly tied to that historical periods growing infatuation with identifying mental
defectives, eugenics, forced sterilizations, and what eventually would lead to the Holocaust of World War
II.
These forgotten provisions, remaining today like a shrunken appendix in Article VI Section 7 of the
Pennsylvania constitution, were used only twice before in the states history, with varying and
controversial results: in 1885 and 1891.
Century-old legislative records make clear that the provisions were meant to identify and remove judges
and state office holders with mental or physical infirmities, and occasions not rising to impeachable
offenses.
For example, in the 1885 case, which involved the removal from the bench of Pittsburgh Judge John
Kirkpatrick, who evidently suffered a stroke, the legislature was told:
There can be no doubt, but that the provisions of the Constitution for the removal of judges, on address
of two thirds of both House of the Legislature, was intended to apply to cases where a judge had become
incapable of discharging the duties of his office, from either bodily or mental infirmity. So, if the mind
and memory of a judge should become imbecile from old age or other cause (although not amounting to
lunacy) and that should be satisfactorily proved, it would be the imperative duty of the Legislature to ask
his removal.
Problem was, in the late 1800s and early 1900s, medical science had yet to understand the causes or
treatments of brain disorders, mental illness, or hereditary diseases.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page11
11
11of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
2 of 12
The start of the Neo- Darwinian era in Pennsylvania
To understand the purpose and intent of these 1874 constitutional

provisions, todays Pennsylvanians must bear in mind the times and
motivations in which they were added to the constitution.
In 1874, in the Victorian era, the public was grappling with the
implications of what was by far the greatest scientific insight of the
age: the publication, fifteen years earlier, of Charles Darwins book
On the Origin of Species, and his follow-up 1871 book, The Descent
of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex.
Darwins two books, its fair to say, upended not only science, but
also medicine, religion, society, and how people thought of
themselves, and their origins, and the order of things.
Charles Darwin as monkey in the 1870s
Darwins work was every bit as disruptive in the nineteenth century as

Einsteins work would be in the twentieth. Perhaps even more so.
By the 1870s, young, forward thinking members of society, and Pennsylvania lawmakers, would find
themselves grappling with the implications of Darwinian evolution.
Even so, no one, including Darwin himself, much understood the genetic or cellular mechanisms at work
behind evolution and natural selection.
It would be another quarter century before Friar Gregor Mendels lost and ignored work on the science of
genetics would be rediscovered, around 1900; and it wouldnt be until much later, in the 1950s, that
James Watson, Francis Frick and Rosalind Franklin would identify the structure of DNA in the double
helix.
Until then, in the 1860s onward, a growing movement, led by Darwins half-cousin, statistician Francis
Galton, would put forward the pseudo-scientific theory of eugenics to explain all sorts of societal and
personal ills, and supposed solutions.
Galton wrote that just as physical traits were inherited, so were mental abilities. He argued that heredity
must henceforth be guided by conscious decisions, so that the less fit not overrun the more fit.
In Galtons view, social institutions such as welfare and insane asylums were allowing inferior humans to
survive and reproduce at levels faster than the more superior humans in respectable society, and if
corrections were not soon taken, society would be awash with inferiors,' Wikipedia tells us.
Its hard to overstate the impact all this had on Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, the eugenics movement
grew like wildfire in the last decades of the 19th century.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page12
12
12of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
3 of 12
Eugenicists, imagining that human

problems could be viewed as problems
of selection and breeding, proposed all
sorts of outlandish and cruel solutions
for supposed societal ills.
To address these problems,
eugenicists in Pennsylvania, a hotbed
of the pseudo-science, would come to
advocate the forced sterilizations of
prostitutes, those with mental
conditions, prisoners and others.
The belief was that if society could
identify defects like feeble-
Charles Darwin in 1880 and his cousin eugenicist Francis Galton
mindedness, imbecility, idiocy, lunacy, or loose sexual morals, society could, and should, take action and
intervene.
Society could benefit by sterilizing or otherwise neutralizing the carriers of the problem, a concerned
public was told.
All this sounded reasonable, scientific, and even forward-thinking in 1872 and 73, when the attendees of
Pennsylvanias constitutional convention voted to include provisions for removing judges and office
holders for reasons of incompetency and other loosely defined mental and physical infirmities.
At the time, these ideas were in the air and the Zeitgesit and held increasing sway in Pennsylvania, and
elsewhere. This was simply the thinking of the day.
Eugenics code words, alienists, and the law
The Pennsylvania press at the time was literally awash in this dangerous eugenics nonsense, which often
played in to, and gave validation to, the worst sort of stereotypes and political pressures.
For example, an article appearing on the top of page one in the June 10, 1885 Philadelphia Inquirer, only
a few months after Judge Kirkpatricks removal from the bench, titled Pauperism and Crime, addresses
the evil of poor immigrants.
From the census of 1880 it was found that the proportion of the insane in the United States was one
native born to every 662 native born citizens, and one to every 254 citizens of foreign birth, the
Inquirer reports.
The implications were clear: foreigners bred insanity; and insanity, whatever that was, was two or three
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page13
13
13of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
4 of 12
times more prevalent in foreigners than in native-born Americans. Stop the presses!
The Inquirer article is steeped in what can only be called eugenicist sentiment and code words. These
sentiments and code words attempted to address and change laws.
On the surface, the problem, the Inquirer relates in its 1885 article on insanity and immigrants, involved
federal immigration legislation that must be changed.
The (1882 immigration) act was defective, the Inquirer relates, first, in that its execution depended
entirely upon local officials influenced by political and local considerations; second, that examinations (of
immigrants) were generally hurried and superficial, and so could not effectively weed out the insane from
entering our borders.
Beneath the surface, we understand today, there were deeper problems with this argument.
For one example, what was the clinical definition of insanity?
Literally, for most of the 1800s, there was none.
Emil Kraepelin, a founder of modern psychiatry, wouldnt publish the first edition of his book Compendium
of Psychiatry until 1883; hed argue in Compendium that psychiatry was a branch of medical science,
governed by observation and experimentation, like other sciences. Hed go on to classify disorders such
as manic depression, and what would come to be known as schizophrenia. What made mental disorders
recognizable, he argued, were not particular symptoms, which often could be shared by various disorders,
but by a pattern of symptoms and how they evolve over time. Kraepelin referred to his classification of
disorders as clinical, as opposed to what he called traditional symptomatic classifications. Before
Kraepelin, there was no clinical psychiatry, or clinical definitions of disorders as we know them today.
Likewise, Kraepelins contemporary, Sigmund Freud, founder of psychoanalysis, wouldnt begin his study
of nervous disorders until the mid-1880s.
The word psychiatrie, though coined in 1808 by German physician Johann Christian Reil from the ancient
Greek, meaning medical treatment of the soul, wasnt widely used in the nineteenth century.
Those who worked with the insane in this period werent called psychiatrists.
They were called alienists, because they dealt with those whose mental problems made them alien to
polite society, and outsiders.
These alienists, who had little or no scientific knowledge of mental conditions, would preside at the first
hearing under the states 1874 constitution to remove from office Judge john Kirkpatrick in Pittsburgh.
Most shocking of all, today in the twenty-first century, the Pennsylvania Senate proposes to apply these
nineteenth century alienist and eugenicists ideas to Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page14
14
14of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
5 of 12
Piggybacking on Progressivism
In his book, Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court and Buck v. Bell (Johns
Hopkins, 2008) historian and attorney Paul Lombardo explains how the leaders behind the Eugenics
Movement in the late 19th century cleverly latched on to other social movements of the day, like the
anti-prostitution Purity Movement, the Hygiene Movement, the Temperance Movement, and, perhaps
most importantly, the potent Progressive Movement, led by a new generation of American politicians, like
Wisconsins Robert La Follette, and Pennsylvanias own Democratic Gov. Robert Pattison.
The Purity Crusade of the nineteenth century fed into the

social hygiene movement of the twentieth, Lombardo
writes.
A eugenic program could address goals of both the Purity

Crusade and the social hygiene movement, Lombardo
explains. While not discarding the rhetoric of sexual
moralism they adopted from purity crusaders, many

eugenicists began to repeat arguments from social
hygienists that emphasized scientifically-based expertise as
a pragmatic foundation for legal reform. This shift was
entirely consistent with the even larger social movement
that was a key underpinning of eugenic activities:
Author, lawyer and historian Paul Lombardo
Progressivism.
Progressivism had many faces. Not so much a unified movement as a set of ideas pointing the way to
reform, it arose in the last years in the nineteenth century and for nearly thirty years had an impact on
U.S. political and social institutions. One trend that emerged under the banner of Progressivism was the
desire to apply principles of efficiency to the management of government and to delegate the control of
social welfare programs to a professionally trained class of experts.
Eugenicists, with their goal of identifying mental or physical defectives, offered Progressives a course of
action: removing undesirables and their traits from society and, eventually, forced castration and
sterilization.
These actions would not only cleanse society, eugenicists promised. They would ease the burden on
taxpayers who would no longer have to pay for the care and lodging of these defectives and their
progeny in mental asylums, jail cells or, in some cases, public offices.
Lunacy laws, and removing state officials with mental defects from office
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page15
15
15of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
6 of 12
In cases of mentally infirm judges and other office holders, society wouldnt be burdened, or their
government offices slowed, if they were removed. Or so Pennsylvania lawmakers hoped in the 1870s.
Hence, they wrote the constitutional provisions with which Attorney General Kathleen Kane today is
threatened.
With all this in mind, Pennsylvanias Direct Address removal provisions of 1874, and their legal
terminology, become understandable.
I spoke by telephone with author Paul Lombardo, a professor of law at Georgia State University.
There were three categories of laws in the nineteenth century related to all this, Prof. Lombardo tells me,
which can generally be defined as commitment laws.
The first were guardianship laws, dating to Colonial times, which primarily involved property rights.
Guardianship laws took away your personal responsibilities and you became a non-person, Lombardo
tells me. This, of course, he adds, simply didnt apply to large swatches of children, women or slaves in
the nineteenth century, who had no property rights.
The second involved criminal laws, such as insanity laws, which removed ones criminal responsibilities
from the commission of a crime.
The third, and this sounds like what youre talking about now in Pennsylvania, were the Lunacy Laws,
Lombardo says. They declare you unable to care for yourself and take away your rights. You lose your
legal personhood.
Take, for example, the paragraph mentioned above that was read to the legislature in 1885 in the removal
of Pittsburghs Judge Kirkpatrick from the bench. Kirkpatrick evidently suffered a stroke, and lost his ability
to speak and think clearly.
The sentence read to the legislature: If the mind and memory of a judge should become imbecile from
old age or other cause (although not amounting to lunacy) and that should be satisfactorily proved, it
would be the imperative duty of the Legislature to ask his removal.
The operative words here were imbecile and lunacy.
Whats the difference? we might ask today.
In the nineteenth century, lunacy was a general condition that imparted the legal definition of insanity,
Lombardo explains.
Imbecility, or idiocy, on the other hand, to the eugenicist, were specific mental deficiencies that could be
measured and ranked.
To the nineteenth century eugenicists way of thinking, one could be an idiot, or an imbecile, even a
moron, but that didnt necessarily make you a lunatic, or a victim of lunacy, or insanity.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page16
16
16of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
7 of 12
Profound idiot
A eugenicist, then, as we see in the 1885 case of the removal of Pittsburgh Judge Kirkpatrick, set out to
identify, categorize and rank the supposed differences between an idiot, an imbecile, a moron, and the
unfortunate feebleminded.
These days, of course, all this seems like splitting hairs, doesnt it?
The plight of the feebleminded ranked alongside epilepsy as a topic of special interest to professionals
working in Americas (nineteenth century) institutions, Lombardo writes in Three Generations.
According to Massachusetts physician Walter Fernald, those defined as feeble minded endured all
manner of congenital defect, ranging from the simply backward boy or girl but little below the normal
standard of intelligence to the profound idiot, a helpless, speechless, disgusting burden, with every
degree of deficiency between these extremes. Fernald noted the distinction between idiocy and imbecility
(imbeciles had slightly higher intellectual capacity) and concluded the term feebleminded was a less
harsh expression, and satisfactorily covers the whole ground. Worries about heredity feeblemindedness
fed into concerns about sexual misconduct.

The emergence of feeblemindedness as a topic of public concern signaled a changing role for
physicians, educators, and social workers who had ministered to the less fortunate class,' Lombardo
continues. Feeblemindedness also opened clear avenues of activity for a professional class of
reformers that could guide government policy in a Progressive direction.

To identify the feeble minded, what commonly happened, Lombardo tells me, is that a set of doctors or
other alienists from a local asylum would be appointed to examine a person to supposedly measure and
categorize his or her supposed mental deficiencies, defects, or illnesses.
Often these professional alienists, in the nineteenth century, had little more practical experience or
scientific knowledge than a horse doctor, and often much less.
PAs direct removal provisions, Judge Kirkpatrick, and feeblemindedness
All this becomes necessary to our understanding of the 1874 Direct Address provisions that todays
legislators want to apply to Attorney General Kathleen Kane.
Sure enough, in the 1885 Pennsylvania legislative record of the Investigation into the Condition of the
Hon. Judge John M. Kirkpatrick, with a view to his removal, as the report favoring the judges direct
removal was called, members of the state Senate and House committee and their lawyers investigating
Judge Kirkpatrick requested that three doctors from Pittsburghs Dixmont State Hospital for the Insane
examine the sick judge, who was incapacitated, after all, not by insanity, but a stroke.
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page17
17
17of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
8 of 12
We are not here for the purpose of prosecuting a case against Judge Kirkpatrick or anyone else,
attorney C.F. McKenna tells the committee, but for the purpose of securing, as far as possible, a fair
investigation of his physical and mental condition. And, with that purpose in view, (we) will call as
witnesses three medical gentlemen of character and repute in their profession. We will ask this court this
morning to designate these three gentlemen: Dr. Hutchinson, who has been connected with Dixmont for
seven or eight years, and has made a special study of the treatment of the insane; Dr. C. C. Wylie, who,
for a long period, was the acting superintendent of Dixmont Insane Hospital; and Dr. Samuel Ayres, a
physician of this city who has served some years in the hospitals for the insane and devoted much study
to their treatment, be designated by this committee as a committee of physicians to visit Judge Kirkpatrick
at his home and make report in connection with their and other expert testimony to be given here this
afternoon.
This was a classic move from the eugenicists playbook: appoint a team of professional experts to
examine one with a defect.
It would turn out that only one of these doctors from Dixmont, H. A. Hutchinson, a relatively young alienist,
would be allowed to examine Judge Kirkpatrick.
I think the judge is suffering from peretic dementia loss of mind, Dr. Hutchinson told the legislative
committee. He seems to be suffering from that; he seems to have lost his mind.
But Dr. Hutchinson, not surprisingly, was incorrect.
Today, peretic dementia, also known as general paralysis of the insane, or GPI, is associated with the
late-stage syphilis, and not a stroke. But Dr. Hutchinson couldnt have known that in 1885.
GPI was originally considered to be a type of madness due to a dissolute character, when it was first
identified in the eighteenth century, until the cause-effect connection with syphilis was discovered in the
late 1880s, Wikipedia tells us. That would be a few years after Judge Kirkpatricks legislative
examination. Subsequently, the discovery of penicillin and its use in the treatment of syphilis rendered
paresis both curable and even avoidable.

Dr. Hutchinson explained that he had arrived at his diagnosis by taking Judge Kirkpatricks pulse,
examining his skin, and speaking with the judge for fifteen minutes.
Couldnt mental trouble like this be cured by proper diet and sleep? the doctor was asked.
Dr. Hutchinson said he had his doubts.
Perhaps Judge Kirkpatrick merely had softening of the brain, whatever that was, another suggested.
I have cases under my care down at the hospital exactly like Judge Kirkpatricks, the doctor advises.
The doctor uses the eugenicists hot-button code word, feeble:
Judge Kirkpatrick, looked to me like a very broken-down man, Dr. Hutchinson tells the committee. He
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page18
18
18of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
9 of 12
seemed feeble, and he looks weak. I asked him to walk for me, and we walked with a tottering movement,
like a very old man a very decrepit man and he is not inclined to talk very much, and what he does
say is not altogether what he would say were he in health, I think. He cannot express himself intelligently
altogether.
In fact, the word feeble appears repeatedly throughout Judge Kirkpatricks 1885 legislative Direct
Address record.
He was feeble, Kirkpatricks supervisor, Pittsburgh President Judge Thomas Ewing, tells the legislature,
and so on.
They were politely asking whether Judge Kirkpatrick had grown feeble minded.
Shortly after this legislative investigation, Judge Kirkpatrick would be removed from the bench by the
legislature, with the approval of then-Gov. Robert Pattison.
Governors Pattison and Pennypacker
As I say, the Direct Address removal provisions in the Pennsylvania constitution would be attempted only
twice to remove office holders: in Judge Kirkpatricks 1885 case; and six years later, in 1891, when Gov.
Pattison failed to remove the state treasurer and auditor general from office.
It should be noted that both of these attempts at Direct Address constitutional removal were undertaken
with the blessing or involvement of Gov. Robert Pattison, of Philadelphia.
To understand both of these Direct
Address actions then, we have to
understand a thing or two about Gov.
Pattison.
Robert Pattison was the only Democrat to
hold the governors office in the 70 years
between the Civil War and the Great
Depression.
Pattison was first elected governor in
1882 at age 31, and remains the
youngest man to serve as governor in
Pennsylvania history, and one of the
youngest in U.S. history. (Only a boy of
Pennsylvania Governors Robert Pattison and Samuel Pennypacker
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page19
19
19of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
10 of 12
ten at the start of the Civil War, Pattison was able to escape the common charge hurled at Democrats that
they were Southern sympathizers during the war.)
Gov. Pattison in many ways was Pennsylvanias Teddy Roosevelt. Young, brash, hard charging, critical of
the Trusts and machine politicians, and forward looking, Gov. Pattison embraced the Direct Address
provisions in the state constitution of 1874 to identify, categorize, and remove mentally and physically
infirm officials from office.
Gov. Pattison successfully oversaw Judge Kirkpatricks Direct Address removal in 1885, and thereafter
named Kirkpatricks replacement to the Pittsburgh bench.
Robert Pattison went on to serve two non-consecutive terms as governor, winning reelection in 1890.
In 1891, at the start of his second term, Gov. Pattison attempted to again use the Direct Address
provisions to remove two political enemies, the Republican treasurer and the auditor general, for alleged
financial chicanery.
But this time the Republican-dominated legislature refused to go along.
The Senate acquitted the treasurer and the auditor general; Gov. Pattison was told he had no jurisdiction
to remove office holders using a constitutional provision meant for the removal of the mentally or
physically infirm.
Pattison would leave the governors office in 1895. Still relatively young, he would be encouraged to run
for higher offices. He ran for president in 1896, but lost the Democratic nomination to William Jennings
Bryan. (We should probably remember that Bryan went on to serve as counsel in the 1925 Scopes
monkey trial, the capstone of his career, in which he sought to prevent the teaching of evolution.)
In 1902, Pattison sought this third non-consecutive term as
governor of Pennsylvania.
This time Samuel Pennypacker, a Republican judge and
historian, soundly defeated him. Pennypacker was an affable
man with a rounded temperament and circumspect nature,
and a great sense of humor.
Pattison would die in 1904, from stress of his last campaign
for governor, The New York Times would report.
But thats not the end of the story.
Clarence Darrow, a famous Chicago lawyer, and

William Jennings Bryan, defender of
Fundamentalism, have a friendly chat in a
Eugenics reaches high mark in Pennsylvania and

elsewhere
courtroom during the Scopes evolution trial. Darrow

defended John T. Scopes, a biology teacher, who
decided to test the new Tennessee law banning the
teaching of evolution. Bryan took the stand for the
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page20
20
20of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
11 of 12
While Gov. Robert Pattisons career rose and fell, the

eugenics movement continued to grow in Pennsylvania, and
elsewhere.
prosecution as a bible expert. The trial in 1925

ended in conviction of Scopes. ca. 1925 Dayton,
Tennessee, USA
Pennsylvania hosted the first known sterilization (castration) in a public institution in 1889 or 1892,
reports the University of Vermont.
In all, at least 270 sterilizations would be performed in Pennsylvania between 1889 or 1892 and 1931, all
without the benefit of law, reports the university.
There was only one location where sterilizations were performed: the Pennsylvania Training School for
Feeble-Minded Children at Elwyn was the location of all 270 sterilizations, the University of Vermont
notes. It is the second oldest care facility for the mentally disabled in the United States, founded in 1852
as the Pennsylvania Training School for Idiotic and Feeble-Minded Children. It was actually opened in
Germantown, Pennsylvania, in 1854 and moved to Elwyn in 1857. The building complex is currently in
use as a service provider for the mentally retarded. The website for the institute, which is now known
simply as Elwyn, no longer makes any mention of sterilization or the eugenics movement.
Todays Elwyn institution then has this in common with todays Pennsylvania Senate: neither makes
mention of their long and dark association with eugenics, and forced sterilization.
In the 1890, a Kansas physician castrated 58 children in his Winfield, Kansas, Institution for Feeble
minded Children.
Shortly thereafter, a physician asexualized 26 patients at an epilepsy asylum in Massachusetts.
In Pennsylvania in 1892, Dr. Isaac Kerlin operated not only to curb an epileptic tendency in the patient
but also to remove her inordinate desires which (were) an offense to the community, Lombardo writes.
He challenged the states to take the lead in legalizing surgery for the relief and cure of radical depravity.
All this became a slippery and dangerous slope, embarked upon in the 1860s and 70s with the best of
intentions. By imaging we can do Gods work, we often do the devils work instead.
Within a decade, in the 1910s, eugenicists would suggest sterilization, and worse, as a solution to the
Negro problem.
Not long thereafter, Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich would incorporate these very eugenic policies, once
endorsed wholeheartedly by Pennsylvania lawmakers, into his Final Solution for Jews, gypsies,
homosexuals, and others who were deemed defective, undesirable, or degenerate. Tens of millions of
people would die.
Back in Pennsylvania, where all this tragedy had taken legal root in the 1874 constitution, and other laws,
eugenicists continued to hold great sway in to the early 1900s.
Teams of men were kept gainfully employed in the field by the eugenicists, traveling this and other states
to find and categorize entire towns and hamlets inhabited by generations of idiots, imbeciles, drunkards
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page21
21
21of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
12 of 12
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page22
22
22of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:11 AM
The Steinmans should pack their LNP bags and move on | Newslanc.com
1 of 1
http://newslanc.com/2015/11/15/the-steinmans-should-pack-their-lnp-ba...
Affidavit of Stan
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
JJ.Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page23
23
23of
of
of113
23
27
23

3/22/2016 2:13 AM
About Us | Newslanc.com
1 of 4
http://newslanc.com/about/
NewsLanc.com is an e-zine focused on the important issues facing Lancaster city and county. Our
mission is to provide an alternative source of coverage and comment from the Lancaster and statewide
media. We provide news without spin, editorials without vested interests and personal attacks, and solicit
vigorous discussions from the public.
If you have any questions, tips, or suggestions, please write to us at by clicking on this link.
Robert Edwin Field, Editor and Publisher

Graduate of University of California Berkeley, BA 59 with a major in economics.
Builder and longtime operator of apartment complexes and hotels (http://themanorgroup.com).
Partners with son Richard who develops planned communities in Eastern Europe.
Executive producer for award winning motion pictures Liquid Sky (1983), Diamond Men (2001), the
documentary Stalins Wife (2005), and Perestroika (2009).
Finance chair of Arlen Specters successful 1980 statewide senatorial campaign.
Co-founder with Melvin R. Allen of Project Forward Leap, for over twenty years providing five weeks of
educational overnight summer camp plus year-round academic support for about 300 inner city kids each
year.
Co-founder with Kevin B. Zeese of Common Sense for Drug Policy. See interview.
Founder of Lancaster and Harrisburg Harm Reduction Projects. (Syringe exchanges)
Co-sponsor (2002 2005) of a state and federally approved experimental Lancaster Prototype
Methadone Program that permitted local prescription fulfillment and medical care for stable patients
outside of a Methadone clinic.
Prime mover in the successful deregulation of the sale of syringes in Pennsylvania.
Originator and sponsor of a CARE program providing approximately three hundred small (approximately
300 books each) community libraries throughout Afghanistan and Guatemala.
Director of the American House Foundation which provides ongoing food aid to thousands of children in
Hungary.
Publisher of The Budapest Beacon.
Project Manager for the tragically aborted renovation and expansion of the Lancaster Public Library.
Founder of RealReporting.org / NewsLanc.com
AFFIDAVIT of Stan J. Caterbone re State-of-Affairs
Page
Page24
24of
of113
27

3/22/2016 2:19 AM
2 of 4
Recipient of the Crystal Stair award from the Sociology Department of the University of Pennsylvania.
Although living in Lancaster for over 40 years, Field only turned his political activism to local issues as he
became aware of the misrepresentations and crony capitalism taking place pertaining to the Convention
Center Project. (See mission statement.)
Field can be reached via email by clicking this link.
Kevin Zeese has been a political activist since graduating from George Washington Law School in 1980.
He works on peace, economic justice, criminal law reform and reviving American democracy.
As Executive Director of the Campaign for Fresh Air & Clean Politics he directs its key projects including
Voters for Peace (www.VotersForPeace.US), Prosperity Agenda (www.ProsperityAgenda.US), Come
Home America (www.ComeHomeAmerica.US) and True Vote (www.TrueVote.US). He also serves as
president of Common Sense for Drug Policy (www.csdp.org).
He has been active in independent and third party political campaigns including for state legislative offices
in Maryland, governor of California and U.S. president, where he served as press secretary and
spokesperson for Ralph Nader in 2004. He ran for the U.S. Senate in 2006 and was the only person ever
nominated by the Green Party, Libertarian Party and Populist Party.
Bill Keisling is author of more than a dozen books of fiction and nonfiction. His essays, investigative
writings, and short stories have appeared in diverse magazines and journals including The North
American Review, Rolling Stone, and The Progressive magazines. He was awarded a National
Endowment for the Arts fellowship for his novel The Meltdown. The introduction to his first nonfiction
book, Three Mile Island: Turning Point, was written by R. Buckminster Fuller.
Keisling grew up in close proximity to the Pennsylvania governors office, and the Pennsylvania Office of
Attorney General. He has published several books on corruption in Pennsylvania government and the
attorney generals office, including The Sins of Our Fathers, We All Fall Down, and The Midnight Ride of
Jonathan Luna.
He is also the writer and editor of Yardbird.com.
Slava Tsukerman was born in Moscow, Soviet Union.

Best known as the director/writer/producer of a cult classic Liquid Sky, Slava Tsukerman has directed
internationally 43 films of different genres. He has received 13 awards from many international film
festivals.
Page
Page25
25of
of113
27

3/22/2016 2:19 AM
3 of 4
Tsukerman made his debut at the age of 21, as the director/writer/producer of I Believe in Spring. This first
independently made fiction short in the Soviet Union history, won First Prize in the Moscow Amateur Film
Festival, was awarded in the Film Festival in Montreal and was successfully released nationally.
Tsukermans films Great Bells, The Heat in Cold Numbers, Professor Alexandrovs Discovery, Vaudeville
On Vaudeville won the highest awards in the Soviet film industry. His documentary Once Upon a Time
There Were Russians in Jerusalem, produced by Israeli Television, was a first prize winner at the Tenth
Hollywood Festival of World Television.
More recently Tsukerman wrote and director the critically acclaimed documentary Stalins Wife and the
motion picture Perestroika which received highly favorable reviews on the West Coast and elsewhere
but was later slammed by a young reviewer for the New York Times.
Columnist Richard H. Miller is a self-employed business person, life-long Western Pennsylvanian and has
been a self styled political junkie for 45 years.
He was elected chair of Mercer County Democratic Committee in 1970 at age 28 and has followed
Governors administrations closely ever since. Miller says he struggles to direct his columns to moderate
Republicans and ultra-liberal Democrats. Both groups need to get more in the mainstream of their
respective Parties or convince more of their fellow party members to think like they do.
A former Mayor of Greenville in Mercer County and president or chair of a dozen other governmental and
community organizations, he preaches that everyone owes public service in exchange for the benefits
they enjoy living where they do.
1949-1953 Cornell University, Ithaca NY BA Zoology

1953-1957 New York Medical College NY, NY MD
1957-58: Internship San Francisco Gen Hosp UC Service
1958-59: Military Svc US Army Dispensary Ft Bliss Texas
1959-63: General Surgery Residency Wm Beaumont Gen Hosp, El Paso TX
Sept 1964; Certified American Board of Surgery
1963-67:US Army Hosp Camp Zama Japan Ch/Surgery, Ch Professional Svcs
extensive experience with management of casualties from Vietnam 1965-67
1967-69: Residency Thoracic & CV surgery Letterman General Hosp San Francisco
1969 Certified Board of Thoracic Surgery
19671-1994 Private Practice Thoracic Surgery San Francisco/San Mateo CA
American College of Surgeons
Western Thoracic Surgical Society
From 1995-Became active in Drug Policy Reform; DPFoundation; edited Drug News Weekly
Page
Page26
26of
of113
27

3/22/2016 2:19 AM
4 of 4
Page
Page27
27of
of113
27

3/22/2016 2:19 AM
1987 NOTES OF MEETING WITH ISC EXECUTIVE LARRY RESCH ON JUNE 23, 1987
DATE:
JUNE 23, 1987 10:00 am
PLACE:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD 1755 OREGON PIKE LANCASTER, PA 17601
SUBJECT:
SCHEDULED MEETING OF STAN CATERBONE, LARRY RESCH, AND CARL JACOBSON OF

UNITED CHEM CON (COVERT ISC EXECUTIVE)
Upon the arrival of Mr. Larry Resch, Stan Caterbone net him in the lobby of FMG, Ltd., at
which time Larry Resell said "Carl Jacobson could not attend, we had to suddenly fly Mm
out of the country early this mourning.
The meeting was started with the subject of the financial difficulties of United Chem Con
and possible alternatives. Larry Resch specifically addressed the possibility of moving the
operations of United Chem Con to another facility, with specific regards to the Renevo
Plant, Larry Resch specifically addressed the financing capabilities of Stan Caterbone, along
with possible management opportunities.
Larry Resch also gave financial statements and documents to Stan Caterbone for the latest
fiscal year for United Chem Con.
Stan Caterbone went on to allege that United Chem Con had embezzled some $15,000,000
from the United States Government for contracts that contained improprieties.
Stan Caterbone also alleged improprieties of International Signal & Control and James
Guerin, with specific regards to its role in the United Chen Con, and its business activities
as related to government contracts.
Stan Caterbone noted that he, as a legal shareholder of International Signal & Control was
concerned about improper business activities.
Larry Resch was taken by surprise by all of the above.
Stan Caterbone became quite upset by the evasiveness and the lack of specifics with
regards to Larry Resch's conversation.
In efforts to thwart any further communication from James Guerin, United Chem Con, or
International Signal & Control, Stan Caterbone demanded a retainer fee of $10,000 before
anyone contacted him again.
It should be noted that it was quite evident that Larry Resch was merely acting as a
messenger for James Guerin and or others, and Stan Caterbone has continued a relationship
with Larry Resch that was not reflective of any improper activities or misconduct.
Page 28 of 113
RECORDED TRANSCRIPT WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA

SECURITIES COMMISSION
"JAMES GUERIN AND ISC OPERATIONS"
SEPTEMBER 29, 1987
Subject: Recorded excerpts from a recorded transcript between Stanley J.

Caterbone and Howard Eisler, Agent of the Pennsylvania State Securities
Commission.
This transcript was recorded with the approval of ail present parties.
Date of Conference: September 29th 1987
Place of Conference: 2323 New Danville Pike Conestoga, PA
Relationship to James Guerin: ISC Shareholder
Debtor to Parent Federal Savings and Loan
The following transcripts represent a few of the convections recorded during the
17512
meeting.
[DEFENSE ATTORNEY ROBERT BEYERS] Chem Con is the big local minority-held
corporation that was doing a lot of Defense contracts-it was associated with ISC. They
went under last spring, beginning of the summer, and there was a lot of criminal
allegations made, none of them substantiated.
[STAN CATERBONE] And I was connected with that. They sent a board member hi to
see me a week before this happened. Why. I don't know.
[STAN CATERBONE] "Jim Christian owned it - now I hear rumors that I was tied to
ISC and I am dose to several people in that organization. Why they sent someone in to
California to see me, I don't know. They wont answer me." "they wanted me to talk to
a guy from D.C, New York, a guy from the Caribbean. I don't know what the hell is
going on."
[DEFENSE ATTORNEY ROBERT BEYERS] "the supposition was - I don't know how
true it was a front for ISC."
[STAN CATERBONE] "It was, I'll tell you why. Because when Chem Con was
started, back to their inception, you look at ISC's books. They didn't have any
money. Well, the first thing Chem Con did was they went and got all that free money
from the government and you look where that money went. I bet I know where it
went, 'this guy named Guerin, James Guerin, And I know that they were setting
Page 29 of 113
contracts back. He runs ISC and he also has his fingers pretty deeply into Chem Con.
He's the one who started Chem Con, Guerin is the one who started it."
[BILL JOHNSON, CLIENT OF STAN CATERBONE] Wasn't there some allegations
about a tie to Wedtech?" (Defense Contractor of New York)
[STAN CATERBONE] "You bet they were tied, you'd better believe they were tied
with Wedtech. The same guys in Wedtech were involved with ISC and Chem Con.
ISC is sold over the London Exchange. (I bought my shares from Gib Armstrong) I
owned a thousand shares. I sold it when things started to hit the
. Now they just
did a multibillion dollar merger with a company in London.. They probably think this
is going to cover their tracks. "What they did was, they fronted all that money and
started the contracts, went bankrupt, and now the government is stuck for
$18,000,000. I know right now in this town's viewpoint, I stole money, I am insane,
and I am a lunatic. I tell you I will not condemn Jim Christian until he tells to my face
what happened. I was framed and set up. I don't know maybe Jim Christian doesn't
have the money. Maybe Guerin has ft or somebody else.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] The items in the
column (newspaper column) is the reporting of your somehow somebody associated
with - oh, someone associated
[STAN CATERBONE] in your District Office?
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] Yea. of course you
were also one of the principals in the - I still am the minor one - yes, the Financial
Management Group - there is about 50 names I am dealing with here and they are all
very similar so I have to be Financial Management Group Ltd. filed for 202B
exemption. Now all the security sold in PA had to be registered. Some securities are
exempt but you have to apply the detention type of thing. It is a registration, not a
registration that
so the 203D exemption was filed for.
Of course we have added
the security statement - explanation of where the money is going to be spent, how it is
going to be run, who runs the corporation and all that sort of thing.
Now under the
umbrella of this Financial Management Group there is a whole (now I am repeating

what is in the 203D which I spent some time Friday reading) - there is about 15, 14-1
guess under that there is about 5 other corporations, which are going to be insurance
agency, an investment advising agency, a group - now a lot of these things

have not come about.
AFFIDAVIT of Stan J. Caterbone re State-of-Affairs Page 30 of 113
[STAN CATERBONE] Well we simplified it.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] What do you mean

simplified it?
[STAN CATERBONE] They are operating but because of the accounting procedures
they would have been a nightmare with all those subs. So, they are operating the only
one that's separate distinction is the RIA (Registered Investment Advisor).
Everything else is operating under Financial Management Group Limited.

[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] So these other
corporations have not really come into being.

[STAN CATERBONE] Technically, legally, no.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] I seen also; I guess
there is an application for an investment advisor.

Securities or dealing with
Now, if you are selling
_. Now that came in under your name
[STAN CATERBONE] at that time I was President

[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] but now there is
another application in that is being acted on now by somebody else.

[STAN CATERBONE] There is? I don't know who. Is that for the advisor?
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] Yes, the Registered
investment advisor.
[STAN CATERBONE] Do your current records in Harrisburg indicate that he

is still an executive with FMG?
Yes, because this offering memorandum was
given back last March I think, - last August - when I initially did it.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] Oh, no, pardon me.
We are talking about two different things.
You are talking about your
application for the investment advisor.

[STAN CATERBONE] No, I am talking about FMG - the offering memorandum
AFFIDAVIT was
of Stan
J. Caterbone
re State-of-Affairs
Pagewhen
31 of 113
Tuesday,August
March 22, 2016
done
last August
because that's
I started raising the money.
of 1986 is when I did the initial filing for the offering memorandum - the 144
Reg D. Coming up this October is the 203D, 15 months
after conception. Alright, yea. There is a report that is due a
year after - Right,
that's what is coming up - to explain how much money was
raised and where it was
spent with the idea then of protecting investors. The idea of the
Page 32 of 113
your are
limited to like 35 investors.
You can't sell to 105 - you are limited. What the
state
does is comes in and says, how are you going to raise the money in your
offering
memorandum. Then a year after it is raised, or a year after
_ they
come in
and say, now what did you do with the money. You raised 4 hundred and
some odd thousand, now how did you spend it? Now that has not been
filed yet. It is due, in fact I think it is overdue. It is due October 20. I
got the letter right here. They just sent me the letter. You guys just
sent me the letter, I have it right here.
I have nothing to do with that end of it. I just came, well whenever I called
you
______ I didn't get a hold of you the next day; it was the following day
which was
Friday that we made contact.
Our Idea in coming here was to let you ask whatever questions you had in
terms of the investigation. Of my limited knowledge of the type of securities
these guys deal with and securities in general, the things that came to
interest me was the fact that there
arc stock certificates in here in force with names on them that ____ , that
there
are with the annual report, his name is forged by someone else. This
gentleman has some involvement with the original group and the President
suggested that he make false reports to the bonding company so that he can
get money back. They are the three things that stuck out to me as a
regular criminal attorney, that I thought you might be interest in because,
but like I say, we are here to have you ask questions of anything that you
might.
O.K., this offering then - when Financial Management Group limited applied
for their 203D, I get the idea they were going to raise four hundred and
some odd thousand dollars. At that time, they listed Bob Kauffman at
60,000 shares and you and Hartlett 40,000 a piece. So, Kauff man at this
point is the main factor? Or, when 1 was talking to you, it was really your
idea that put this whole thing together. I put it all together. I brought him
up from Atlanta to be president because I have a lot of business interests
and I didn't want to be tied down to the day-to-day operation. Plus, I
never had any management experience. Most of my work was consulting,
business
deals, this
and that, soPage
I actually
AtlantaMarch
to 22, 2016
AFFIDAVIT of
Stan J. Caterbone
re State-of-Affairs
33 of 113brought him up fromTuesday,
be president And, Hartlett - is he a complete local person. He's local. We

all started together in IDS back in 1982. That's your connection with
Kauffman, you know him through IDS? He's the one that got me started in
business. I am the one who took him to FSC, that was our broker/dealer
and
Page 34 of 113
Page 35 of 113
ABC News Nightline - September 12, 1991

[Ted Koppel] incidentally the function of the senior review panel is to advise one man, the
director of central intelligence. And at least part of the period in question there was an acting
director of the CIA Robert Gates. Well attempt to pull some of these threads together when we
come back.
Commercial Break
[Ted Koppel] When all is said and done, why should your or your representatives in Congress
care, eventually after all President Bush spoke and acted against Sadaam Hussein more forcefully
than anyone could have expected.
[Former President George H. Bush Speech] Were dealing with Hitler revisited, a
totalitarianism, a brutality, that is neglect and unprecedented in modern times.
[Vidoe-Gary Milhollin, Director, The Wisconsin Project] The more we gave Sadaam, the
more dangerous he got. And ultimately we had to go to war to destroy what we sold him.
[Ted Koppel] But its not a question of holding the Bush or Reagan Administrations to account
for having made mistakes with regards to their policies toward Iraq The issue is how those
policies were implemented.
As we reported over the past few months, The Atlanta Branch of an Italian Bank, BNL, was able to
funnel $Billions, some of it in U.S. Credits to Iraqs Military Procurement
Network.
The U.S.
Government knew, and turned a blind eye. Sophisticated Military Technology was illegally
transferred from a major U.S. company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania (International Signal & Control),
to South Africa,
and Chile, and from there onto Iraq.
The Iraqi borne designer of a chemicals
weapons plant in Lybia, set up shop in Florida, producing and shipping to Iraq chemical weapon
components.
The CIA, FBI, and other U.S. agencies were made aware of the operation and did
nothing to prevent it.

During the 1980s and into the 90s senior officials of both the Bush and Reagan Administration
encouraged the privatization of foreign policy, certainly towards Iran and Iraq. The policy may have
Page 36 of 113
had merit - but there werent willing or in some instances werent successful in fighting it out in
Capital Hill so they found other ways. They made a mockery of the Export Control System, and
they found ways of encouraging foreign governments to do what our laws prohibited. They even
knew or if not were guilty of the grossest incompetence that U. S. companies were collaborating
with foreign Arms merchants in the illegal transfer of American Technology that helped Sadaam
Hussein build is formidable arsenal.
This week, the CIA again told ABC News Nightline that our allegations over the past few months
regarding covert operations to supply Iraq with U.S. Arms and weapons technologies simply were
not true.
The CIAs Inspector General said a statement from the Agency [On Screen] - Has found to factual
support whatsoever for such an operation or for the involvement of Mr. Gates.
[Ted Koppel] At least one member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bill Bradley of New
Jersey, feels that there may be reason to doubt both those claims, and hell raise the issues next
week during the Gates Confirmation Hearings, next week.
The CIA also told us that its Inspector General has found no evidence of any off-thebooks illegal activity.
But the CIA concedes, off-the-books activities, are not
documented. Precisely so that deniability can be preserved.

One thing is undeniable, this gun sight video of a stealth fighter bomber from the 32nd
Tactical
Fighter Wing, last February attacking a bomb factory, on the outskirts of Bagdad U.S. Technology
in the air, destroying U.S. Technology on the Ground. The factory was built by Carlos Cardoen.
For all of us here at ABC News, Good night.
Page 37 of 113
ABC News Nightline - July 1991

[Ted Koppel] Carlos Cardoens role in shipping arms to Iraq has been known for years.
His
connection with Robert Gates has not. By the mid 1980s Cardoen was the largest private supplier
of weapons to Iraq. In all he has believed to ship a half billion dollars worth of arms and advanced
technologies to Bagdad.
At a factory 500 miles north of Santiago, Cardoen produced tens of
thousands of bombs and other equipment, absolutely essentially to Iraq during its eight year war
with Iran.
The material would be loaded aboard regular Iraqi airway flights flown from Santiago to Bagdad.
Cardoen did not simply ship weapons, he set up entire factories capable of producing bombs and
other explosives the components would be shipped from all over the world and then assembled in
Iraq. One of those factories turned out Cluster Bombs.
As we first reported on the 24th of May, much of the sophisticated military technology that Cardoen
was shipping to Iraq came from the United States.
This company in sleepy Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, is believed to be the source for some of the Cluster Bomb technology. But there was
more.
Nasser Bedouin is also an arms dealer. He acted as a middleman between Carlos Cardoen
and Iraq.
[Nasser Bedouin on Video] I am aware of Carlos Cardoen getting some type of technology
from the air fuel bomb from the United States. I believe Iraq has a viable fuel air explosive.
[Ted Koppel] These explosives are designed to explode just above ground level like miniature
atomic bombs, literally sucking all available oxygen out of the air. It is clear that Carlos Cardoens
special relationship with the United States was not known by all Departments. When the Commerce
Department inquired about that relationship in early 1987, it received a cable from the U.S.
Ambassador to Chile saying although Cardoen is involved with the sale of armaments, and he has
made his fortune from it, he is considered to be a responsible recipient of U.S. products. In fact by
1987, the covert relationship between the CIA and Cardoen was already well established.
In 1983 the Reagan Administration had become alarmed at how poorly the Iraqi military was doing
against Iran. A decision was made at the highest level of Government to begin helping Iraq.
Page 38 of 113
Indeed ABC News has learned only today, that around that time, in 1983 Ronald Reagan issued a
highly classified Presidential Finding stating that it was important to the National Interests that
arms and technical assistance be covertly funneled to Iraq and with the help of the CIA. More on
the significance of that Presidential Finding in a moment.
What it unleashed was a flood of US help to Iraq. A former CIA operative who was involved in the
program has told us of a series of covert operations, in which loads of 727s were flown into Iraq.
On one such mission in 1987 our source tells us he accompanied a planeload of Soviet built one
hundred twenty-two missiles.
The Soviet equipment was shipped because it would be compatible
with what the Iraqis already had. By 1987, there was at least one such flight a week into Bagdad.
Our former CIA source recalls bringing in $100 dollar bills in a bowling bag, they would also carry
whiskey, cartons of cigarettes and copies of Penthouse magazines to speed up the unloading
process, which usually took place at night.
Once the White House has authorized the Covert
Assistance Program to Iraq, the CIA took over. In effect the former CIA operative told us the covert
operation amounted to here is what we want you to do, and we really dont want to know too much
about how you do it.
Our source tells us that he has at least one meeting in 1986 in Florida between Robert Gates and
Carlos Cardoen, the Chilean Arms Dealer. Other sources have told us of other such meetings. Here
in the United States and in Europe.
Which brings us to an unsolicited statement that was
telephoned in to Nightline from the Central Intelligence Agency almost a month ago on June 17th.
Allegations, the statement read that Robert Gates facilitated illegal shipments to Iraq during the
1980s are totally without basis. Since we had never requested a statement of Mr. Gates, we didnt
know quite what to make of it at the time. But then today we learned of that Presidential Finding,
authorizing the Covert shipment of arms to Iraq.
It would be true then that Robert Gates did not facilitate illegal shipments to Iraq, under the
Presidential Finding, the shipments would have been quite legal.
But during this last set of
confirmation hearings, back in 1987, Robert Gates assured the Senate Confirmation Committee that
he would always keep the Committee current on ongoing covert operations.
Indeed the CIA is
supposed to provide the Intelligence Committee with quarterly reports. According to well-informed
sources on the Committee it has had no briefings on the Covert arms pipeline to Iraq.
Page 39 of 113
That, said
one Senator on the Committee would be a total breach of trust. What would it do to the Gates
Nomination? I asked. It would probably be enough said the Senator, to derail the Nomination.
Again, an excerpt from Mr. Gates Testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1987:
[Robert Gates 1987 on video] If you cannot have a system in which you can have some
confidence between A the branches of government, and confidence between the senior officials of
the Government, A that they abide by the rules, and B that they will deal with one another
honestly, then I think the system begins to collapse.
[Ted Koppel] Late this evening, the Whitehouse communicated its response to the charges
contained in this report, the Whole story is unfounded.
There were never any sales; covert or
overt to Iraq or Iran through a third country. And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen.
Well be back with more, in a moment.
[Ted Koppel] For the viewers, this is Alan Freidman, New York Correspondent for the Financial
Times of London, and a member of the team investigating Robert Gates. Alan Id like to begin by
repeating a statement, and let me put my specs on for a moment, the White House. This story is
unfounded and there were never any sales covert or overt to Iraq or Iran through a third country.
And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen.
Ah, ah a fairly carefully drafted statement one would think.
[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] Yes Ted, I
think that is right, I would agree with the statement that there were never any sales Iraq through a
third party.
Indeed what we found was that some of the cluster bomb technology and fuel air
technology was given smuggled down to Chile, for use that were used and made and shipped on
through to Iraq.
In terms of the um statement by the White House that there were never any
meetings between Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen, we have a number of sources, some of them
personally involved in these operations, one of them who was personally and physically an eye
witness present at a meeting, in Florida, with Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen in 1986. And who was
told my Mr. Gates, about other meetings that he had with Mr. Cardoen.
Page 40 of 113
[Ted Koppel] Now Congressman Gejdenson, I realized that we sort of unleashed an awful lot of
material on you today, but to what degree does this fit in with those thousands of documents that
you subpoenaed with the information that you have?
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Well we
just got the documents after a several month battle with the Administration to pry them loose and
it took the vote of a subpoena by the subcommittee to start the flow of those documents, but its
certainly consistent with the information that we got with Committee staffs with some of those
people that said they were at those meetings, ah as well.
I think that the important thing to
remember here is that the United States in 1982 under the Reagan Administration took Iraq off the
terrorist list at a time when some of the worst terrorist of the world were being harbored by
Saddam Hussein, and we suddenly changed our policy and continued to keep Iraq off the terrorist
list, enabling the export of dual use, ah items that can be used for dual use from the United States
to Iraq, as well as these sales that went indirectly to Iraq.
So, all through a time when they were harboring terrorists, and they killed 5,000 Kurds in 1988,
and as recent as six days before the invasion of Kuwait, when I and several members of Congress,
tried to stop the subsidy of grain sales to Iraq, the Bush Administration continued to impose any
sanctions against Iraq.
[Ted Koppel] Well of course theres a huge difference between grain sales and the shipment of
entire plants for the building of a cluster bomb factory.
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Except
for what I think you find is that a pattern by both the Bush and Reagan Administrations to trying to
assist Saddam Hussein.
What we found at one Hearing was a document from the State
Department, ah that said that the United States was ready to sell weapons to Iraq as long as they
were for the personal protection of Saddam Hussein. A policy that ignored all the outrages, a policy
that ignored I think the intent of the Congress and the American People. And that the allegations
that weve gotten from a number of sources seem to be consistent with that. The United States did
everything it could under the Reagan and Bush Administrations to assist Saddam Hussein.
[Ted Koppel] Alan, I know that one of the things that we discovered in our investigations was
and Id like you to elaborate on it a little bit was that frequently there was Federal Agencies, Law
Page 41 of 113
Enforcement Agencies that was trying to uncover what was going on we found that they were
stymied at every turn. Can you talk about a that a little bit?.
[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] Yes I think
that if we look back at other discoveries that we made, you can say that when we found ISC, the
company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, that was, that had cluster bomb technology, shipped down to
Chile that was part of this covert operation for Iraq, we found that the CIA had detailed knowledge
over a period of 4 years of all sorts of shipments from ISC to South Africa, some of which were
later trans shipped to Iraq, we found that Federal Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies were
unable to do anything about it because they just werent told. Likewise, we were just told of the
case that the man that built the Rapta Chemical Weapons plant in Libya, who ah, even though the
CIA were tracking him very carefully here in the United States, was allowed to build a chemical
weapons plant here in Florida, and shipped dangerous cyanide with the help of CIA Contract
Shippers to Iraq.
All of these things were going on and the investigators seem unable to do
anything about any of these things. We seem to have part of the Government trying to investigate,
and part of the Government trying to ship.
[Ted Koppel] Congressman Gejdenson Id like to get your reaction to that and see if your
experiences have been similar in some of the findings that ah or some of the conclusions that you
have reached, but well take a break first and be back in just a moment.
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Well we
saw it ah from across all of the agencies. We had Dennis Kloskey who was then in charge of export
licensing at Commerce testify before our committee in April that he suggested to Mr. Gates and
others that ah meetings at White House to stop the export of dangerous technologies to Iraq. The
following day ah Mr. Kloskey resigned from the Government. We were told by Mr. Kloskey that the
White House, the people in that room representing the President argued for a policy that assisted
Saddam Hussein in getting dual use technologies. We had Congressman Rose who I know has been
on your show testifying about the grain sales being tied up with funding weapons to Iraq as well.
So across the government, this thing went on. Its hard to believe that somebody like Mr. Gates in
his position didnt know about it.
[Ted Koppel] We are suggesting a lot more that he knew about it. Were suggesting that he was
actively involved in it let me just pass on a little information that we have gathered today, having to
Page 42 of 113
do with the Confirmation Hearings and was told earlier this afternoon. Alan Fryers, Senior Officer
with the CIA and Clair George are not likely to be testifying voluntarily, indeed Alan Fryers said he
will not be testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The White House, as we have all
heard throughout the day is putting on some pressure to get those Hearings underway before the
August recess, August 2nd, of course, the Senate goes into recess. Ah, and there are indications
now that a week from Monday, indeed the Hearings will begin, Mr. Gates will be asked to testify at
that time, but Ive been also told that there is no way that the Hearing will no way be completed
before the August recess. And that Mr. Gates will be told that he will be recalled again after other
witnesses have testified, after the August recess. So these Hearing now, are destined to go into
September.
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] I think that is
terribly important, because we have to what we have to remember here, unlike other appointees of
the President, what the head of the CIA does is not transparent. If youre the Secretary of Housing,
like Jack Kemp is, and I disagree with one of his programs, not only do I know about it, but the
average citizen knows about what Jack Kemps doing. Sometimes you agree with it and sometimes
you disagree with him.
In the case of the Director of the CIA, as is clear from repeated
experiences, often times even the people in Congress were suppose to know about these activities
are not informed. This has to do with National Security the standard ought not be somebody that
can get by the Hearing process with White House pressure. The White House ought to be with us
on this one, we ought to make sure that we have someone fully discloses what is going on to the
appropriate committees and to Congress. Not someone involved in Iran Contra and not someone
who hasnt told the entire truth. And not someone who is in question about these activities. This
has to be a definitive decision by the Congress, that this individual will come clean with the
Congress and fulfill not just the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law.
[Ted Koppel] Alright, let me just interrupt here for a moment, because were down to our last
minute and a half or so, Alan, it is inevitable in this kind of investigation that you run into a lot of
sleazy characters and I just want to get from you for our audience some sense of how much of the
information that we have compiled here comes from the sleazy characters and how much comes
from the few that we can really rely upon?
[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] I think, ah
Ted the important thing to remember here is that we have had all kinds of allegations for the last
Page 43 of 113
three months when our team has interviewed dozens of people, weve been acidulously cross
checking and weve waited to go ahead with this story until weve had very credible witnesses.
Those who were documented CIA operatives and those who were physically with Mr. Gates during
those meetings, and we asked some of them why would Mr. Gates take the risk and go out and
meet with Mr. Cardoen and get directly involved and get his hands dirty in these operations,
especially as he was deputy director of the CIA at the time himself. We were told that he went out
because he wanted to give his improtore in order to make sure the job got done. Weve talked to a
number of top people and cross checked.
[Ted Koppel] Alright, Alan Friedman thank you very much, Congressman Gejdenson, thank you
very much, Ill be back in a moment.
Page 44 of 113
Covert Harassment Conference

1-2 October 2015, Berlin, Germany
2
3
Mind Control:
4
5
DR. NICK BEGICH

A Brave New World together with HAARP The Update
DR. BEGICH:
Hello, and thank you for being
here and thank you to Peter and the rest of the team for
putting this together.
8
9
Everyone hears me okay, yes?

Okay.
In the back?
Good.
10
All right.
I want to give a little bit of
11
background in terms of my interest in these areas.
12
those that don't know my family story, it really goes
13
back quite a ways.
14
For
My father was in the United States Congress in
15
the early 1970s during the Nixon Administration.
16
lost in a plane with Hale Boggs.
17
remember this if you've got a little bit of gray hair.
18
Hale Boggs was our House majority leader at the time,
19
one of the most powerful people in the United States
20
Congress.
21
strong dislike for J. Edgar Hoover, because he basically
22
read everybody's mail, tapped everybody's phones,
23
including the United States Congress, and then,
24
essentially, blackmailed political leaders to follow
25
whatever script he laid out.
Some of you may
He was also a Warren Commissioner.
Page 45 of 113
He was
He had a
Boggs was a pretty outspoken individual.
At
the time -- it was just before the second election of
Richard Nixon -- Boggs came to Alaska to work on my
father's campaign, which would have been his second term
in the United States Congress.
Boggs, before they flew out on October 16th,
three weeks before the second election of Richard Nixon,
began to talk about this scandal brewing in Washington,
DC.
In fact, that very scandal, had it unfolded a
10
little bit differently -- for those that remember, the
11
planes disappeared.
12
Three weeks later, Nixon's elected for his
13
second term.
14
the Watergate scandal broke.
15
office.
16
moved up again.
17
Rockefeller then slid into the Vice President's slot.
18
And then one of the old Manson women from the Charles
19
Manson days tried to assassinate Ford, which would have
20
put Rockefeller in the White House.
21
It wasn't too much long after that that
Ford moved up.
Agnew was thrown out of
Then Nixon resigned.
Ford
For those that don't remember,
What would have otherwise happened, most
22
likely, the election would have taken place.
23
would have won.
24
out at the same time.
25
controlled the Congress.
Nixon
Agnew and Nixon would have been thrown
The Democrats would have

The Speaker of the House would
Page 46 of 113
have elevated to the Presidency.
have been in control.
happened and history tells us a lot about what really
happened there.
The Democrats would
But the opposite, of course,
Twenty years later there was a report, an
investigative report by a publication called "Roll Call"
in Washington, DC.
these various Congressional deaths.
crashes are kind of the hazard of political leadership,
10
11
That report was looking into all of

You know, plane
it seems like.
But in researching that, what they found in the
12
FBI files were a couple of telexes -- this goes before
13
FAX machines -- and telexes coming from California into
14
Washington, DC reported that two people had been found
15
at a crash site.
16
the FBI to determine whether they were credible.
17
follow-up telex came through saying, yes, they were.
18
That plane was never recovered.
19
officially; yet 20 years later, we find out, in fact,
20
there were.
21
Those sources were later looked at by

A
There were no survivors
So I know about conspiracies.
Conspiracies are
22
conversations that happen in a room like this when
23
there's a bunch of people standing on the outside who
24
might not agree with us.
25
the political life, even at the highest levels, things
But the reality is, even in
Page 47 of 113
happen.
Maybe a few decades go by before the truth is finally
revealed.
Things happen that aren't easily explained.
So I have a strong motivation foundationally in
terms of how I approach controversial issues.
do it with fear.
years.
is the absolute adversary for getting anything
accomplished on this planet.
10
I don't
I've been doing this work for over 20
Fear isn't part of the equation.
In fact, that
My interest in these areas started with HAARP.
11
And how many in this room do not know anything about
12
HAARP?
13
Okay.
Well, that's a lot better than it used
14
to be.
15
Twenty years of this work and the work of others have
16
kind of brought this into the public.
17
All right.
It used to be the other way around.
So the first image -- I'm going to use HAARP as
18
sort of the backdrop as I move into the mind control,
19
mind effects-related technology.
20
in my part of the world.
21
know if -- maybe I've come the farthest for this
22
presentation.
23
appreciate the opportunity to inform people about this
24
subject.
25
This is just an image
I come from Alaska.
I don't
But I appreciate being here and I
So HAARP is a large array, a field of antennas
Page 48 of 113
in Alaska, currently 180 antennas.
They're
approximately 20 meters tall.
which you can see, which is the very top of these
antennas.
concentrate radiofrequency energy into a relatively
small space.
They have a cross dipole,
And what these are designed to do is focus or
If you think about the energy of a flashlight,
for instance, or a torch, as they say here in Europe, I
shine that against the wall, the beam starts out small,
10
and then it broadens as you get further away from the
11
source.
12
The same is true with radiofrequency energy.
13
You can think about it as an inverted funnel starting
14
here at the transmitter and then spreading out and
15
getting thinner and thinner, less dense, which is why
16
the further you get away from radio broadcast antennas,
17
the weaker and weaker the signal.
18
With HAARP, the opposite occurs.
They have
19
figured out a way through what's called cyclotron
20
resonance, which would be focusing or concentrating the
21
energy.
22
like sort of a cork-screwing kind of motion that got
23
smaller and smaller as you move further and further away
24
from the transmitter.
25
So if you could visualize it, it would look
So it concentrates that energy or focuses that
Page 49 of 113
energy so you can manipulate it in various ways.
the HAARP array, which was originally designed by a
gentleman, Bernard Eastlund, who's now deceased, was
intended to do a number of things as a weapons
application.
half the current size of the transmitter in Alaska.
can see the field of antennas.
90 antennas in the array.
9
10
11
This is the earlier version when it was

You
In this case there were
And here's another image as they expanded the

array to 180.
And another image showing the array.
Now, they also upgraded the technology pretty
12
substantially over the years.
13
efficient.
14
much bigger effects.
15
And so
So it became much more
So with a much smaller system you create
So what does it do?
Essentially, it's sending
16
energy or focusing energy up into an area known as the
17
ionosphere, which in this image in miles -- I apologize
18
for that -- is approximately 37 miles to 620 miles out
19
into space.
20
Now, this is a highly energized area.
If you
21
think about radiofrequency signals or shortwave signals,
22
they would come from the earth, they'd bounce off of us,
23
and then bounce back down to the earth to transmit over
24
large distances.
25
The ionosphere also is an area that can be
Page 50 of 113
disturbed by solar radiation, radiation from the sun.
When it becomes destabilized, it interferes with
terrestrial communications of every kind.
So part of the idea in this technology was to
learn how to stabilize the ionosphere during these
periods or deliberately disrupt the ionosphere to
interfere with communications on a global basis.
8
9
Now, what caught my interest when I first

looked at this issue of HAARP was a very short article
10
in a publication, an Australian publication, that talked
11
about this big system in Alaska.
12
Now, I come from a family that's pretty
13
politically engaged.
14
Congress, my younger brother just finished a term in the
15
United States Senate.
16
politics a very long time.
17
Besides my dad being in the
My family's been involved in
Alaska is a very big region, but we're a really
18
small population; 700,000 people in our entire region.
19
And when you think about big projects, you know, you
20
think you know something about them.
21
Well, I'm reading about this project in my
22
state in a journal in Australia and I'm going, you know,
23
why doesn't anybody know about this?
24
25
And so I decided I would go in and look into

this issue independently.
And I did.
Page 51 of 113
I picked up maybe
30 articles and papers, design specifications, some
things, and with friends encouraging me to publish, I
published the first article that I had written on HAARP
back in 1994.
So it's been a very long time ago.
What also caught my interest was the idea that
they were primarily utilizing, in some applications,
extremely low frequency signals or ELFs.
signals that can be biologically active, can affect us
as human beings and in very specific ways.
10
These are
And in particular, certain applications of the
11
technology -- and this gives you sort of a graphic
12
illustration of the focus.
13
were given to me by the inventor, Bernard Eastlund,
14
prior to his passing.
15
publications and in some of our work.
16
kind of a graphic showing the radiofrequency from the
17
array, moving up into the ionosphere and focusing that
18
energy.
19
These view graphs, actually,
And we utilized them in our

So this gives you
His initial concept was to create a global
20
shield, to be able to utilize the natural magnetic field
21
lines that surround the earth, be able to punch energy
22
into this and then create this kind of global shielding
23
effect.
24
piercing that energy would be disrupted, like
25
satellites, intercontinental ballistic missiles,
And the idea was that any electronic device
Page 52 of 113
virtually any electronic device that ran into this field
of energy that was being amplified would be destroyed.
Now, one of the other interesting parts of
this -- and this kind of shows that, again, utilizing
one of Eastlund's graphics.
line and then you see this cork-screwing energy going
around it.
southern polar regions into the northern polar regions.
And, in this case, they actually couple -- actually
10
utilize the energy on the ground to couple with the
11
natural energy, and then coming from the north to the
12
south, create this cork-screwing effect, which
13
accelerates the electrons and then creates this global
14
shield.
15
So you can see like a field
That energy naturally is occurring from the
Now, that was his initial concept.
And as a
16
concept, it caught the attention of a number of people
17
and eventually got funding from the Congress, initially
18
at 30 million, and over the last few decades now over
19
almost 300 million, which in dollars is not a lot of
20
money, but when you consider, this is sort of the
21
pinnacle of billions of dollars spent in ionosphere
22
research over many decades.
23
What caught my attention in terms of the
24
technology of Eastlund -- I'm going to skip some of
25
these that are not so relevant -- was the idea that you
Page 53 of 113
10
could manipulate the ionosphere -- and I'll use this as
a better example.
you could punch or pulse energy into the ionosphere --
so think about this energy going up and, like, a hammer
ringing a bell.
ionosphere itself vibrates and then it begins to send a
signal in the ELF range.
signal going up, punching the ionosphere, the ionosphere
which is energized then acts as a broadcast antenna in
So one of the thoughts was that if
Every time it hits that ionosphere, the
So you have a high frequency
10
the sky bringing back an ELF signal to the earth, and in
11
this case covering an entire hemisphere.
12
Now, ELF signals, extremely low frequency
13
signals, are very long wavelengths.
14
earth and sea.
15
submarines, as an example, the depth, because short
16
wavelengths won't penetrate the earth and sea.
17
also used for what's called earth-penetrating
18
tomography, which in simple language or by analogy would
19
be like x-raying the earth or looking into the earth for
20
underground structures.
21
They penetrate the
They're utilized for communication with
They're
But one of the side effects of ELF is the
22
entrainment effect on the human mind.
23
signals will lock onto in what's called a frequency
24
following response.
25
techniques to create a frequency following response.
Because ELF
And you can use a lot of different
Page 54 of 113
11
You can use flickering light, you can use binaural beat,
which I'll explain in a few minutes.
electromagnetic fields such as this, or even the power
grid itself can be modulated in such a way to create a
signal that the human body will join with, will couple
with, and begin to follow.
of energy to accomplish this.
You can use
It doesn't take a great deal
This is the one that triggered my real interest
in HAARP, because this is the one that everybody kind of
10
ignored and said, oh.
11
well, if ELF has a biological effect, it's a side
12
effect.
13
phrase earlier today.
14
believe that it's an intended consequence.
15
intended to grade populations in very specific ways.
16
In fact, the HAARP planners said,
It's an unintended consequence.
We heard that
But I don't believe that.
It's
Now, this book was mentioned by my friend
17
earlier today, "Between Two Ages", by Zbigniew
18
Brzezinski.
19
written, actually, in 1973, when Brzezinski was at
20
Columbia University.
21
Security Adviser to President Carter.
22
the time that Kissinger and he and others were starting
23
to think about the Trilateral Commission organizing this
24
think tank, so to speak.
25
And why this is an important book, it was
This is before he became National
Now, find this book.
Page 55 of 113
This is around
I really encourage you to
12
find this book and read it, because it is not a
prediction of what will come with technology.
blueprint, in fact.
It's the
You can read this.
When I first read it -- he writes in a pretty
convoluted style.
English to understand.
read it because he predicted the economic changes that
took place, the political changes that took place in the
world over the last 40 years with a great deal of
10
accuracy.
11
prediction.
12
It's a little difficult even in

But I really encourage you to
And some will say it really wasn't the

It was the plan.
If you look within this text between Pages 54
13
and 56, you'll see a section that's dedicated to the
14
kind of technologies we're talking about today, a mind
15
control technology.
16
guy named J. F. Gordon MacDonald.
17
geophysicist at UCL.
18
chapter in a book and the chapter was called, "How to
19
Wreck Your Environment", which this is before Earth Day,
20
okay, so he could get away with that.
21
that book was actually published.
22
caught Zbigniew Brzezinski's attention was, he said, if
23
we could ever figure out how to electronically stroke
24
the ionosphere in just the right way, we could return a
25
signal to the earth that would influence the behavior of
And what Zbigniew referenced was a

And he was a
He wrote a book -- or, actually, a
Page 56 of 113
It was 1969 when
But what he said that
13
people over huge geographic areas.
Now, that's a pretty profound thing.
But we
didn't have a way to stroke the ionosphere in 1969.
we did by the 1990s.
fact, the HAARP system that can accomplish this.
But
And that was, in fact, and is, in
So the idea was -- and it was kind of, in a
gross sort of way, primitive, if you will, but what the
intention was, was that if you could pulse the
ionosphere, return this ELF signal to the earth, you
10
could agitate the population in very specific ways.
11
could make them passive, less aggressive, or the
12
opposite by just amplifying that signal.
13
explain a little bit of that as we go on.
You
And I'll
14
The other person that comes out in the last
15
presentations, Jose Delgado, and this book he wrote,
16
"Physical Control of the Mind:
17
Society".
18
images that you saw in just this short video clip of
19
Delgado's work, there is a good section in this text as
20
well showing that.
21
Toward a Psychocivilized
And this is, again, a 1960s book.
But in those days they used implants.
Those
They had
22
to physically put something in the brain.
23
Delgado originally did -- he was actually educated in
24
electrophysiology at the University of Madrid.
25
graduated in 1950.
And what Jose
He
Electrophysiology, as a degree
Page 57 of 113
14
field, thinking about it in 1950, now 65 years ago, most
people don't even realize that's an area of higher
education today, much less that far back.
One of my mentors, Raul Makayla (phonetic), he
actually graduated University of Madrid in 1958, and his
area of interest was, essentially, the same, biomagnetic
and electric fields, effects on human physiology, and he
spent his career studying that.
Delgado, at Yale University, he initially was
10
mapping the brain of primates and humans by stimulating
11
various portions of the brain to figure out what was
12
responsible for what kind of activity.
13
began to utilize the implants in those dramatic ways in
14
those film clips with the charging bull and he throws
15
the switch and the bull stops, to demonstrate that you
16
could take a creature from passive to highly aggressive
17
to passive to highly aggressive, just like flipping on
18
and off the lights in your living room.
19
And then he
What Delgado discovered by the mid-'80s is that
20
you didn't need any implants.
You just needed to
21
manipulate the energy itself.
And you didn't need a
22
great deal of energy.
23
Now, we've heard -- I forget the amount of
24
energy surrounding us now.
25
believe it was 18 zeros after the one that we heard
Was it a quintillion?
Page 58 of 113
15
earlier.
radiofrequency energy alone, it was 200 million times
more around us every day than nature created in 1994.
Back when I wrote the HAARP book in '94, just
Now, when you think about it, what did Delgado
discover?
of energy in the natural background noise of the earth
was sufficient to manipulate the behavior of human
beings if you could hit the right frequencies, if you
could hit those window frequencies that stimulated that
10
11
He discovered that one-fiftieth of the amount
kind of activity.
Now, if you think about this -- again, by
12
analogy, think about dialing through the radio stations
13
on a radio.
14
noise, the static, you get no clear signal.
15
you have resonance between the transmitter and the
16
receiver, then you get a nice, clear signal.
17
The same is true in our physiology.
18
you're looking at stimulating or affecting a specific
19
element in the body, molecules in the body, cell
20
structures or organ structures or even the human mind,
21
it's about manipulating the underlying energy.
22
In between the stations you get the white

But when
Whether
When you think about medical science in terms
23
of how the fork in the road is and how this kind of
24
applies to why don't we know more about this today,
25
well, there's lots of literature now.
Page 59 of 113
25,000 sources, I
16
think we heard quoted earlier today.
25,000 sources
talking about the energy interactions with the human
body.
That is a lot of information.
But what happened in medical science?
A lot of
people that went into life sciences, they were really
good in the chemistry, a little weak in the math, so
they went to life sciences.
better in the math, they went to physics.
upon a time, these two came together and we got
People who were a little

And then once
10
biophysics, which is really the root of real health
11
science.
12
you've got to get to the energetic interactions that
13
create chemical reactions that then manifest in the
14
body.
15
If you really want to get to the meat of it,
And that's what we kind of miss in so much of
16
our medicine.
17
opposed to an electromagnetic model.
18
to World War II, that fork in the road was being
19
explored pretty aggressively, the energetic models.
20
they were somehow lost in that shuffle and we ended up
21
with the pharmaceutical industry, and the results of
22
that, I think we can all not be quite so proud of.
23
We followed a pharmaceutical model as

In the '30s, prior
But
In terms of where the technology is going and
24
where a lot of the science is going, it will be
25
electromedicine that cures most of what we call
Page 60 of 113
17
incurable.
debilitates human consciousness itself.
It will also be that which enhances or
Now, Jose Delgado, when he figured out that you
didn't need implants, you just need to manipulate the
energy itself, this became kind of the essence of sort
of where everything went from there.
But I want to roll back a little bit, a little
bit back in time, and talk more about the evolution of
mind control as technology starting with the work at
10
Harvard University of a gentleman, Estabrook, who was
11
working in the Harvard hypnotherapy labs in the 1920s.
12
You can look Estabrook up.
13
of Congress and you'll see his list of publications, and
14
I recommend that you do that.
15
Look him up at the Library
What he decided was that you could create what
16
we would call today a Manchurian candidate.
17
take certain individuals, put them in a very, very deep
18
state of hypnosis and then over a period of time train
19
them so they would be like this super spy that you could
20
send into another country and they'd hang out for a year
21
or two, but if they got captured, they wouldn't really
22
remember any of their former self, and then when they
23
came back, in this case, into the United States, that we
24
would then give them the appropriate suggestions and
25
then extract the intelligence from them.
Page 61 of 113
You could
18
And this is what Estabrook was working on.
By
the 1930s, a lot of his work was being classified and he
continued to work in this field up through the 1960s.
His last book -- and I always like to read the last
thing someone writes, you know, because it tells you a
lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there are things
that you might discard bits and pieces as science
enlightens you and your experience enlightens you.
what he talked about in that last book were the
10
experiments he was involved in using LSD and other
11
hallucinogenics in mind control, which he actually
12
talked about in a favorable sense.
13
And
And for those of you that remember, the CIA was
14
heavily involved in this in the 1960s and, in fact, the
15
whole area pre-1960s going back even to the Korean War,
16
which is sort of my next mark on the timeline.
17
The Korean War, we had prisoners, patriotic
18
young Americans come back from war and they're handing
19
out Communist leaflets on street corners, and the term
20
or the phrase brainwashing came into being.
21
where it came from.
22
after the Korean War.
23
That's
It came from that series of events
The idea of being able to manipulate people's
24
behavior and change them so profoundly became of
25
interest to the predecessor of the Central Intelligence
Page 62 of 113
19
Agency and then later the Central Intelligence Agency.
And what they looked at were lots of different ways to
manipulate human behavior.
Now, when I was researching my first book with
Jeane Manning, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", I was
looking for a good source document that would speak to
this, because you always read about this in secondary,
tertiary sources.
surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy that I know,
And so I'm in a book room, a big
10
I really need this source.
11
conversation, I reach unconsciously behind me into a box
12
and I pull out this book.
13
And as I'm having this
This is a really interesting one.
This is
14
actually a presidential report.
15
was commissioned at the time, 1975, to look at the
16
abuses of the CIA.
17
Committee reports, which were Congressional hearings
18
that took place in the early '70s to investigate the
19
abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency, the kind of
20
abuses that we read about today, because nothing really
21
changed.
22
This is a report that
Now, this came out of the Church
Supposedly, this was to change things.

Now, what's in this report?
The LSD
23
experiments were in this report.
24
Intelligence Agency was domestically infiltrating civil
25
rights groups, antiwar groups, people that, essentially,
Page 63 of 113
The idea the Central
20
opposed the government within the United States, which
was not part of their mandate, in fact, was illegal.
The fact that they were reading people's mail, utilizing
unwitting victims and experiments for mind control.
of this came out in this report in 1975.
CIA continues to do it even to this day.
All
And yet, the
Think about the kinds of activities that have
been reported pretty widely over the last few years,
whether it's digging through garbage to blackmail other
10
diplomats, which is something our Intelligence community
11
does, whether it's to send pallet loads of money into
12
countries like we did in Afghanistan to bribe officials
13
as a way of doing business, or whether it's to
14
assassinate people with drones, kidnap people and
15
torture them.
16
Now, most of us don't know people like this,
17
but this is the government that I unfortunately have
18
guiding my country right now.
19
criminals.
20
couldn't happen here.
21
It's a government of
Now, people want to talk about, oh, this
It has happened here.
It's happened for
22
decades in the United States.
23
President's Commission touches the very tip of that
24
iceberg.
25
This report by the
This is another document.
Page 64 of 113
This is -- this guy,
21
Captain Tyler, he later became a colonel and retired.
He was involved in pretty much the sort of esoteric side
of some of the government research.
chapter out of this book is called, "Low-Intensity
Conflict and Modern Technology".
Maxwell Air Force Base in 1984.
about a large -- a variety of technologies.
8
9
This book -- this
It was prepared by
And it was talking
But in this particular one, if you look at,

certainly, the subject lines, you have stimulation of ,
10
bones* generation, healing of fractures, treatment of
11
disease, healing of wounds.
12
modification in animals.
13
that are listed here were kind of under the mysterious
14
category.
15
happening in 1984.
16
You look at behavior
You know, some of these things
They couldn't really explain what was
But the idea was to stimulate research in these
17
fields.
So a number of things happened.
18
started to flow into these areas.
19
that came out in the 1980s as a result of some of this
20
was the Radiofrequency Dosimetry Handbook.
21
big, thick handbook.
22
of Utah under contract to the United States Air Force to
23
determine the radiofrequency dosages that were required
24
to override every vital organ of the human body, whether
25
it be the heart, the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, just
A lot of money
One of the reports
It was a
It was produced by the University
Page 65 of 113
22
sort of preempt their natural function to be able to do
it remotely.
And the idea was to take that leap of
technology and begin to apply it into weapon systems.
Mind control.
you will remember this one.
Yeah, 2002.
about the ethics of mind control.
it exist or doesn't it exist?
"The Economist".
Cover story.
Some of
This is 2002, I believe.
And what this cover story was about was

Not saying, hey, does
It's just saying it's
10
here right now.
11
we should advance this technology, whether we should
12
limit this technology.
13
credible publication.
14
story.
15
We really need to be debating whether
"The Economist" is certainly a

Not too much happened from this
This is -- unfortunately, it's not showing up.
16
November -- you can get this one on my website.
I'll
17
give you my website, because this is a very important
18
document.
19
human experiments.
20
in history, that's like tomorrow and yesterday, right?
21
It's, like, now.
22
mind control experiments and who has the authority to
23
approve them.
24
approve them is under secretaries of the Navy in the
25
case of Navy Intelligence or Naval research.
The Navy set up a new set of regulations for

It was approved in 2006.
You know,
And in this they specifically call out
And the persons with the authority to
Page 66 of 113
23
Now, it's not just CIA.
Naval Intelligence
does this work.
non-lethal weapons that this falls under.
has the electromagnetic directorate, which is working in
an area called controlled effects, which deal, again,
with mind control and physiological effects on human
beings.
"Technology Horizons".
issue.
10
The Marines have a section on

The Air Force
In fact, they publish a publication called

I believe it's the June 2004
You can look it up.
The cover story is on
controlled effects.
11
Now, what are controlled effects?
The first
12
effect is attacking hardware; you know, like equipment,
13
like machines, to be able to interfere with the flow of
14
electrons through circuits to disrupt those machines to
15
operate.
16
history, but using energy itself to manipulate hardware.
17
Not using bombs and bullets and the things of
The second sort of level of controlled effects
18
talked about in that article is the idea of manipulating
19
the software, the systems that run those systems, so
20
that you can disrupt the software, then you disrupt the
21
hardware, and things collapse.
22
And the third leg of controlled effects is the
23
human operator.
And what they say in this particular
24
article produced by the electromagnetic director of the
25
Air Force is that we can target or create the illusion
Page 67 of 113
24
of all of the senses in the human body; sight, sound,
touch, taste, to give people complete memory sets,
complete experiential sets that you wouldn't be able to
distinguish the synthetic from the real.
Now, think about that for a moment.
What does
that do to court testimony in 20 years if this becomes
the norm?
post-traumatic stress syndrome folks, people coming back
from warfare.
They're now talking about using this for
This just sort of cleans up the garbage
10
of the mind and gets rid of that stress.
11
think that's a great idea.
12
the biggest mistake we could ever make.
13
whatever those servicemen and women were engaged in --
14
what used to happen in warfare -- what happened in World
15
War II when everybody came back, they said, I don't ever
16
want to see my children in these things, I don't want to
17
see my grandchildren in these things.
18
put down, not amplified.
19
Some people
Personally, I think that's

Because
Wars need to be
When you take the human factor out of warfare
20
and it becomes like a videogame, then our willingness to
21
withdraw from direct conflict no longer happens.
22
And think about where our military science has
23
gone.
In fact, I want to mention another very important
24
publication.
25
in the early 1980s.
It was produced by the US Army War College
It's called the "Revolution of
Page 68 of 113
25
Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War".
particular paper was talking about revolution of
military affairs.
And this
What is that exactly?
This is a leap as important as the introduction
of gunpowder in the middle ages in Europe, as important
as atomic weapons in the last century.
they characterize it.
where we move from ordinance, from bullets, bombs,
things that rip tissue and tear things up, to
And that's how
And what this is is the leap
10
electromagnetic weapon systems that keep sort of the
11
hardware intact, but debilitate the human operator to
12
the point of being combat ineffective.
13
enhance the possibilities within our own combatants
14
while degrading the abilities of others.
15
Or conversely,
There's simple ways that you can achieve this.
16
You can introduce to the battlefield certain elemental
17
compounds that in small background amounts would not be
18
considered dangerous.
19
example.
20
body to maintain thyroid function.
21
much iodine, you'll get poisoned.
22
get sick.
23
Let me give you iodine as an
We all need a certain amount of iodine in the
So what can you do?
But if you have too

You'll die.
You'll
You can send a signal in
24
that resonates the very same signal strength and
25
frequency as iodine, you can send that signal in and the
Page 69 of 113
26
body will begin to react as if its gotten this massive
load of iodine and show all the symptoms of iodine
poisoning.
You check the thyroid; check the blood, it's
not there.
Mystery illness.
Something as simple as that for manipulating
large populations, not necessarily with their consent
and not necessarily with clear knowledge, and nothing
shows up in the background that would say why this
poison actually exists that would account for this.
10
11
simple way.
One of the other ways that this technology can
12
be exploited is really quite simple.
13
article produced by "Parameters", which is a military
14
publication.
15
the -- I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you can look
16
up the article name called, "The Mind has no Firewall".
17
It's a very important article.
18
about all the various ways in which you could introduce
19
mind effects or mind control technologies using modern
20
technology today.
21
written in a military journal called "Orienteer"
22
published in what is now Russia.
23
"Parameters".
There was an
You can look it up.
It's
This article talked
And the original article was actually
What's interesting about this is it said you
24
could use any electromagnetic carrier, whether it be
25
radio, TV, the Internet, now cell phones; but,
Page 70 of 113
27
essentially, any of these carriers, you can modulate a
signal on them that will manipulate behavior of segments
of the population.
And the Russians demonstrated this in a couple
of different ways.
There was a program.
It was called
"Undercurrents".
Canadian Public Broadcasting System.
did two really interesting stories that I got to
participate in.
It aired in the CBC, which is the

"Undercurrents"
One was on HAARP and the other was on
10
mind control.
And on the mind control story that they
11
did -- this was a very popular program in Canada at the
12
time and this particular segment was their highest rated
13
that they had ever run.
14
who were involved in the "Star Wars" initiative during
15
the Reagan Administration that couldn't talk about what
16
they did in the White House, but they could talk about
17
what they observed in Russia.
And they had folks that came in
18
And one of the things that they talked about
19
was the idea that you could -- you could create, sort
20
of, this white noise and on this white noise carry a
21
signal.
22
cake.
23
these little cakes?
24
of Europe as well.
25
And so they put out this message, bring us

And Russians at tea time, you know, they eat
I guess you do that in other parts
And so at the appointed time they began to
Page 71 of 113
28
broadcast this.
and on the street were bringing cake into the meeting
room without really knowing why they were doing it.
They just felt like doing it.
what they were programmed to do.
And workers from within that building
Now, this goes back.
Well, that was, in fact,
We're talking about
15-year-old technology.
And when you think about sort
of where did it go from there, in 2006, there were a
couple contracts left by DARPA, which does research for
10
the defense industry in the United States.
And DARPA
11
used to be run by a guy named Tony Tether.
Tony Tether
12
was a good friend of Ben Eastlund's.
13
Now, what they were doing then was, they had
14
left two contracts to the University of California for
15
what's called electronic telepathy.
16
telepathy.
17
a distance by analyzing the emanations coming from this
18
area, being able to analyze that and determine and
19
interpret what it is.
20
contract was to create complex signals to see if you
21
could transfer that array, so to speak, of signals into
22
another person's consciousness and whether they would
23
perceive the same images.
24
25
Okay.
Electronic
The idea of reading another person's mind at
And then the other half of the
Now, there was work done by Elizabeth Rauscher

and her late husband, Bill Van Bise, in this very same
Page 72 of 113
29
area.
In fact, I have a copy of their unpublished paper
where they actually built an electronic circuit where
they could take a person in one room and a person in
another room, attach this person to that circuit and
this person to that circuit, and then, you know, the
psychic card where they show the triangles, the squares
and the circles and the little squiggly lines, a hundred
percent accurate with nine test subjects who had never
experienced consciously in any way any sense of
10
extrasensory perceptions or psychic perceptions.
11
did it with hardware, transferring thoughts from one to
12
the other.
13
They
Now -- which tells me it's probably a little
14
more simple than what DARPA's doing.
15
Eastlund was doing work on HAARP and he was doing other
16
work for DARPA at the time and we had talked about him
17
in our first publication, and then actually after
18
publication became friends, and Ben Eastlund's attitude
19
was, you know, some things just shouldn't be done.
20
one of the things that he had been working on was
21
whether modification technologies, which he was at that
22
time and when we first met, making that technology
23
available to the military.
24
us and others, he decided there's certain technologies
25
that are not safe in the hands of military.
But when Ben
And
And after some dialogue with
Page 73 of 113
30
At one point along the course I began doing
quite a bit of work on this whole mind effects issue.
And I caught the attention of a woman, Dorothy Lay.
Now, Dorothy is one of the heirs to the Lay, as in
Frito-Lay and PepsiCo Corporation.
family.
specifically as it applied to victims.
So a very wealthy
Dorothy was very interested in this technology
And so she approached me at one point and asked
if I would become a member of her board of directors for
10
a non-profit that she was setting up to deal with these
11
kinds of technologies.
12
whether I should tell you the rest of this story, and I
13
think I will, because why not?
14
And I've got to think about
So I have this thing, intuition.
All of us
15
have it.
16
do today.
17
listen, because when I really think about it, it's never
18
been wrong.
19
about it.
20
start acting on it.
21
I used to not pay as much attention to it as I

When my intuition tells me something, I
Neither has yours, if you really think

Or maybe you don't think about it and just
So my intuition said -- and this was a very
22
difficult time for me in 2002.
23
betrayed by a very good friend, economically was
24
bankrupt in the middle of this work, because I started
25
this work in '94.
In 2002, I had been
Economically was being crushed.
Page 74 of 113
And
31
at that point I was deciding whether I was going to stay
in this work at all.
And I'm going through a bunch of my files and I
see this file and it's marked Lay.
person had contacted us needing some information and we
provided it.
way we operated is, I sold books.
bought my books.
And I remember this
And we never charge for that.
I mean, the
And people like you
And they allowed me to do this work.
I didn't write for grants where somebody could
10
manipulate me and control me and tell me what to say.
11
didn't go out and find some publisher that would edit
12
out my work.
13
book.
14
that work by buying that book.
15
two and a half million dollars and I spent that two and
16
a half million dollars over 20 years doing what I'm
17
doing right now.
I risked my own money.
I published my
And then I asked people to help me by supporting
18
A VOICE:
19
(Applause.)
20
DR. BEGICH:
And I tell you, I made
Thank you.
And the whole idea was just to
21
educate.
I didn't deal with victims.
22
reason I didn't was because I felt that that was putting
23
the cart before the horse.
24
people that the technology is real, that this could
25
really happen to people and from that foundation, and
Okay.
And the
We first need to educate
Page 75 of 113
32
that became the foundation of my work in this.
So Dorothy calls me on the phone and she says,
will you be on my board?
an hour.
on your board.
And I talked to her for about
At the end of the hour, I said, no, I can't be
She said, well, why not?
I said, because my intuition is telling me I
8
9
10
really can't be on your board.

And she goes, well, I deserve more than that.
I said, okay.
I don't know your board members,
11
I don't know who your board is, but something in here is
12
saying there's a problem there and I don't want to be
13
associated with them.
14
(Applause.)
15
DR. BEGICH:
16
I got the call back.
17
you have millions.
18
what they say they're doing.
19
being done and find out for yourself.
20
diligence again.
21
So it was a couple of months later

Because I told her also, I said,
You have the ability.
And she did.
Go see if it's really

Do your due
A couple months later she came
22
back and she said, you were right.
23
me a number of ways.
24
just me now and my attorney.
25
Go research
They were defrauding
I've cleared out my board.
It's
Will you be on my board?
Now, bear in mind, I'm in a pretty desperate
Page 76 of 113
33
situation economically.
At the time I have five
children at home.
have an economy that I've got to manage.
Dorothy, no, I can't be on your board.
I've got people to take care of.

And I tell
She says, well, why not?
I said, well, I need to meet you first in
person, eyeball to eyeball.
for three days.
foundation.
I said, we're going to talk
We're not going to talk about your
I want to know everything I'm ever going to
10
read about you and your family in the newspaper.
11
you to have the same knowledge level of me.
12
to know what your world view is before I join with you
13
in achieving that world view, because you have the means
14
and I have the willingness if that world view is shared.
15
So we spent a few days.
I want
And I want
We decided that I
16
could do this.
17
And we put together, as her major effort was, a
18
conference on mind effects.
19
public.
20
bring some key people together to have a conversation
21
that would be open and free.
22
And for four years I worked with her.
But it wasn't open to the
It was closed to the public.
And it was to
And one of those people I invited was Ben
23
Eastlund, who by then I'd gotten to know, had watched
24
what he had done in terms of his career.
25
connected with DARPA at the time.
Page 77 of 113
He was well
34
And I called him and I said, you know, Ben,
would you consider participating in this conference?
And he said, you know, if you had asked me this
seven or eight years ago, on a scale of one to ten, ten
being the relevance and importance of this, and one
being irrelevant and unimportant, I would have given
this a one or a two.
time I talk to Tony Tether or others at DARPA, nobody's
laughing about mind control anymore and it's a nine or a
10
He goes, but -- he goes, every
ten and, yes, I'll participate in your conference.
11
The next person I asked was Garth Nicolson.
12
Does that name ring any bells for anybody?
13
Nicolson was a full professor, I believe it was Texas
14
A&M.
15
thousand medical students.
16
whistle on Gulf War Syndrome and testified in our
17
Congress six times before his wife was fired as a
18
molecular biologist from Texas A&M.
19
they couldn't fire him.
20
him, because he was one of the first courageously enough
21
to step up to the plate and complain about what had been
22
happening in the Gulf War; we depleted uranium and some
23
of the other technologies that were being applied there.
24
25
He taught medical students.
Okay.
Garth
He taught over a
He was the guy that blew the
And he was tenured;
But they definitely harassed
Well, the best thing that ever happened to him

was he got out of the university system.
Page 78 of 113
He formed a
35
nonprofit to deal with chronic disease.
somebody that I watched maintain his course under really
difficult circumstances.
conference.
And he was
So he was invited to that
I invited the daughter of my mentor, Raul
Makayla.
one of the boards in Russia that regulates medical
applications of lasers.
Quite brilliant.
10
She's an electrophysiologist.
She serves on
She's an electrophysiologist.
We invited her.
We invited Rosalie Bertell.

Okay.
Does anyone
11
remember Rosalie Bertell?
12
passed.
13
physicist, biologist.
14
doctoral students at Berkeley.
15
It's kind of an odd combination.
16
statistician to go in to Bhopal for the World Health
17
Organization after that huge chemical disaster.
18
was considered one of the top people in the world for
19
dealing with victims of radiological experiments,
20
including electromagnetic radiation.
21
some of our work and added to it and published a book on
22
the HAARP system and its effect on human beings on this
23
sort of broad scale.
24
been through some really difficult times as well, rose
25
out of her own ashes and maintained her ethical
Also deceased now.
A few.
Rosalie's
She was a mathematician,
She taught higher mathematics to

She was also a nun.
She was the lead
But she
She actually took
So we had invited Rosalie, who had
Page 79 of 113
36
1
2
platform.
The other person we invited was Alexander
Kaivarainen.
Does anybody recognize that name?
He was
the former head of the USSR Academy of Science
Biophysics Department for ten years.
area that really gets into the meat of what we're
talking about here today.
believe, is deceased now also.
guys, you know, they're a lot older than me and they
And this is the
Now, what got -- Alex, I

You know, all these
10
keep dying of old age.
11
science at a young age watching a demonstration of the
12
paranormal, ESP, telepathy, these kinds of things in
13
Russia when he was a teenager.
14
caught his interest.
15
But Alex got his stimulation in
And it just really
When I met Alex, he was in his 60s and he was
16
the brightest top five physicists on the planet,
17
recognized by institutions around the world.
18
he had determined is that there were rational reasons
19
for why these things manifested.
20
this conference and actually presented a paper giving
21
the mathematics and the physics that lends itself to
22
these extrasensory possibilities, these things that the
23
military now calls anomalous human capabilities.
24
used to call it extrasensory perception or ESP, but now
25
they give it a new name because there's a lot of
Page 80 of 113
And what
So he was invited to
We
37
connotations with that that kind of get you discredited
in certain segments of the scientific community.
So I want to talk -- roll back again a little
bit -- I want to talk about binaural beat, which I had
mentioned earlier in this presentation.
around a little bit.
not even use these things, but I think people feel more
comfortable using them.
And I jump
It's kind of my style.
The binaural beat.
I used to
We can't hear these really,
10
really low frequency signals, because the human ear
11
doesn't quite work that way.
12
the human ear won't hear.
Below a certain frequency,
13
Now, a gentleman by the name of Robert Monroe
14
developed a method using binaural beat where you could
15
send in a signal within the range of human hearing, say,
16
at 15,000 Hertz or pulses per second or cycles per
17
second, coming in one ear at, say, 15,000, another
18
signal coming in the other ear at, say, 15,007.
19
the cranium they will cancel each other out and leave a
20
beat frequency of seven, the difference between the two.
21
15,000, 15,007.
22
seven pulses per second, which happens to be in the
23
upper Theta range, and this is where the brain then
24
drives to.
25
Within
The beat frequency becomes seven Hertz,
At the same time that that occurs, you get a
Page 81 of 113
38
hemispheric balance, a distribution of energy across
both hemispheres of the brain, the analytical side and
the creative side and working together.
actually how human beings are supposed to function.
This is how young children predominantly function, with
more of a balance between the hemispheres, where the
energy is more balanced.
8
9
This is
And then we educate them.
And with young girls, who we say are more

intuitive and have this other operation of the brain,
10
and young boys are more analytical, and now we kind of
11
treat everybody the same so we kind of dumb them all
12
down to the same level.
13
children and you look at where their brain activity is
14
and between 3 and, say, 5 or 6 years old, they have
15
this predominant brain frequencies or a lot of Theta
16
brain frequencies coming in and then some ELF and then
17
higher frequency ranges.
18
But when you look at young
Now, what is Theta?
Theta states if we're in a
19
Theta state, we're kind of like in that dream-like state
20
between awake and asleep where you're consciously aware
21
of your dreams.
22
good deal of their time.
23
as we call it, are so active.
24
don't pay attention to that, don't pay attention to
25
that.
That's where 3 to 5 year olds spend a

That's why their imaginations,
And we keep saying, oh,
This was our first attempt to shut down the
Page 82 of 113
39
intuitive combinations of the way the brain is actually
supposed to work.
In fact, for those who have a Christian
background, you know Jesus Christ himself said, look at
the little children, watch what they do.
think I heard somebody say something about this earlier,
little children come to the table kind of innocent with
a view of the world that's quite different than the rest
of ours.
You know, I
But the brain activity of children is unique
10
and we begin to take that out of them in the structure
11
of the way we educate.
12
So what Robert Monroe -- he was actually a
13
radio engineer.
14
had this really weird experience.
15
body experience, that he had that kind of threw him.
16
You know, it didn't make any sense to him.
17
began -- he also noticed that in the background there
18
was this kind of noise that he perceived.
19
He owned a bunch of radio stations.
He
It's an OBE, an outer
So he
So he began to experiment and he created this
20
technique for binaural beat.
He developed a whole
21
series.
22
binaural beat.
23
those US patents from 1994, and this is showing the
24
brain before the activity, before turning on the
25
Hemi-Sync, and this is after, showing a more even
In fact, he actually got US patents on a

This is an image taken out of one of
Page 83 of 113
40
distribution in a more rhythmic pattern in the
brainwaves as you see in the upper right-hand corner.
Let me roll back again so you can kind of see
the comparison.
activities happening all through the brain, and then a
coherent signal creating a hemispheric balance and an
optimization of brain potential.
8
9
Normal brain, kind of disorganized
So what did he do with this?
He developed a
whole series of things; audio input technology,
10
essentially, to manipulate behavior, but where you're in
11
control of that manipulation.
12
smoking, you get his CD on quit smoking.
13
brain in such a way, becomes compelling, very affective.
14
So you want to quit

It affects the
Sleep disorders can be addressed in this way.
15
They have someone be able to relax, meditation,
16
concentration, accelerated learning.
17
things can be done.
18
over the course of many, many, many, many years, and now
19
his daughter doing the work of working with thousands of
20
people to determine which signals actually created which
21
effects and then developing technology that they could
22
place in the hands of individuals to make the choice on
23
how to use it.
24
25
A whole array of
And they did this by working with,
Now, that's kind of an interesting way of

looking at technology.
It was my area of interest, in
Page 84 of 113
41
the beginning of all of this work, was not looking for
the dark side of all of this, but in the mid-'80s I got
very interested in light and sound stimulation of the
brain that capitalized on sound signals and flickering
light for brain entrainment.
the brain will follow that external signal or what's
called FFR, frequency following response.
little energy.
Entrain the brain where
So very
Let me roll back to Delgado again.
10
One-fiftieth of the amount of energy the earth creates
11
is sufficient to move your brain into very specific
12
states.
13
just another technique for altering brain activity that
14
might be beneficial, but you're in control of it, not
15
somebody else.
16
Dialing that radio up, if you will.
This is
I'm going to skip some of these just because
17
they're not so relevant.
18
images and let me just go back into the whole dialogue
19
of this, mind effects.
20
And I'm going to close the
When I think about sort of where do we go with
21
this conference, when we put that conference together
22
with the Lay Institute, our purpose was to put together
23
these really good thinkers to try and see if we could
24
create a synergy between them.
25
And when I first got interested in doing
Page 85 of 113
42
something actively in science, it wasn't about HAARP and
it wasn't about mind control.
would play -- and I was working in a government office
at the time, and it was -- my friend said, you make your
living with your left foot.
living, but the rest of my creativity could be engaged
elsewhere and me working in bureaucracy was really a bad
match.
The role that I thought I
Because I could make my
But the point was, my youngest son, when I was
10
getting really frustrated with my work, said, change
11
channels.
12
You know, I'm thinking about this, because I
13
had just given him this discussion about creativity was
14
like changing the channels on the TV set, right, and so
15
he's feeding it back, time to change the channels, Dad.
16
So I thought about it.
And what I decided I
17
would do is -- I read independently in science over 20
18
years.
19
say, one guy in one branch of science.
20
if this person could ever meet that person, you could
21
really see something happen.
22
I had read some really compelling things from,

I thought, boy,
And the first paper I actually ever presented
23
in science, I was 19 and it was at another obscure
24
conference that I ended up in on biorhythm research.
25
And my paper was contrasting at that time the Soviet
Page 86 of 113
43
method of research versus the US method.
method was compartmentalization, separate.
distill things down to the smallest subspecialty and
then push these people into a corner and let them do
this bit of the research.
other people over here and ten other groups over there
and fifteen groups over there, and somewhere all of this
stuff comes together and it gets really sloppy.
It's sloppy because there's a lot of repetition; it's
10
Now, the US
You know,
And then you've got nine
Okay.
very expensive.
11
Now, the Russians, Soviets at the time, they
12
didn't have the money for that kind of research, to
13
spread it out that way, and they used a very different
14
method.
15
fields, even though they didn't seem like they should
16
connect.
17
together to develop science.
18
at the exposures that we had seen earlier, what are the
19
regulatory exposures of electromagnetic fields, the
20
Russians in the '90s and the '80s were a thousand times
21
more stringent than they were in the US.
22
They took experts from all of these different
They put them in the same room to work
Well, why was it?
That's why when you look
Because they had actually
23
made the observations that we hadn't made and actually
24
connected the dots in a way to say, hey, this is
25
dangerous.
That doesn't mean they followed their own
Page 87 of 113
44
regulations, because they probably didn't.
whatever was expeditious there.
recognized the physiological responses to
electromagnetic fields and the fact that you could
manipulate it.
They did
But at least they
What was discovered by a guy named Allan Frey,
he was looking at microwaves, and he discovered that
there's this flickering effect, but it only occurred
when you pulse-modulated the signal.
And if you look
10
at -- I heard earlier, it's always scalars.
11
scalars.
12
fields as we think about them.
13
It's not vectors.
It's always
It's not electromagnetic
But if you look at the ones that affect human
14
psychology and physiology, if you look at those signals,
15
they have a very quick rise time and a very fast drop.
16
They're like the punch, like punching that ionosphere to
17
create the ELF.
18
modulations on these other carriers are meant to trigger
19
that effect by you entraining to that pulse, that
20
firing, or some submodulation being carried on a general
21
carrier.
22
It's like those signals.
Those
Now, if you remember the first Gulf War, the
23
first Bush War, and you remember how the Iraqi Army just
24
sort of gave up.
25
just like school children on their first fire drill
The fourth largest Army in the world
Page 88 of 113
45
throwing their hands up and surrendering, you know,
thousands of guys to a few dozen.
Now, I speculated on this.
What was that about?

And then it was
Scottish media that later reported on this and said it
was Project Solo, which was a project operated by the
United States.
flying over the country at the time and it was taking
and piggybacking the signal on the radio broadcast going
into the region that were broadcasting the Muslim music
10
11
And what we did is we had this C-130
and prayers.
So all these guys are in their bunkers
12
listening to their favorite radio station.
Unbeknownst
13
to them, the subsignals being played on that broadcast
14
created anxiety, high levels of anxiety and fear.
15
then you watched this Army just collapse under this.
16
And that was kind of the -- in my view, the
And
17
first test of could you really do this, could you do it
18
in this adversarial environment.
19
And one of my friends joked, hey, it's the
20
perfect Republican weapon, right?
21
hardware in place, but totally wipe out the population.
22
Zbigniew Brzezinski said, in between two ways,
23
it doesn't matter if it's Republicans or Conservatives.
24
They just use different rationale for accomplishing
25
their political ends.
You can keep all the
On the conservative side, the
Page 89 of 113
46
Neocon side, it might be the fascination with gadgetry
and new technology, as Zbigniew Brzezinski said, and on
the liberal side it might be the idea that we're doing
this for your own good.
And we've all heard that before.
The government is here, right?
The fact of the matter is, when you start
thinking about mind control technologies as a concept,
the idea that someone believes that they can interfere
with your free will, this is something that most
10
religions in the world say God won't even do.
11
think this is their appropriate direction in technology,
12
to interfere with the way consciousness flows.
13
Yet, men
Now, think about for a moment what are the
14
things that -- what is the easiest way to manipulate
15
consciousness?
16
Create an environment of anxiety and fear.
17
happens at that point is you cannot reach your higher
18
states of consciousness.
19
The easiest way, the simplest way.

Because what
If you look at Monroe, rhythmic patterns in the
20
Hemi-Sync as an example, higher states of consciousness
21
are associated with those rhythmic patterns within the
22
brain; not that incoherent scattering of death and
23
information and energy.
24
25
So if you create a certain environment of fear

and anxiety and you look at an EEG monitor and the brain
Page 90 of 113
47
activity of an individual, you see it's kind of
scattered in patterns.
higher emotions; love, compassion.
rhythmic patterns.
One person is experiencing

You begin to see
Another simple way of seeing is something that
you can actually measure.
Take two people that are in
love and they -- you know the saying, and I looked into
her eyes, right?
another individual and hold that gaze, you'll begin to
If you actually gaze into the eyes of
10
mirror each other's brain activity in a pretty unique
11
way.
12
long enough.
Two people's breathing begins to
13
synchronize.
Their energy fields begin to synchronize.
Your breathing will even synchronize if you do it
14
And at the same time, their awareness, their
15
intuitions elevate and their rhythmic patterns in the
16
brain can be seen.
17
fear -- think about the advertising you see on
18
television.
19
breath is, you know?
20
uncomfortable.
21
If you can create an environment of
It's all about how you smell, how your

It's all these things to make you
Think about the 6:00 news.
Now, we heard
22
someone talk about the 6:00 news and how that kind of
23
works.
24
people sit down in front of the television set.
25
already fatigued.
You come home from a hard day at work.
Most
They're
They begin to watch the television.
Page 91 of 113
48
And then their spouse hollers, it's time for dinner;
it's time for dinner.
right?
they're in a light trance-like state.
How many of you've been there,
Nobody's listening.
No one's hearing.
Because
Now, if you look in a dark room -- the
television is here -- look behind you at the white wall
and look at the flicker rate.
coherent signal within a certain range through the optic
nerves, your brain will lock onto that signal.
If that flicker rate is a
If you
10
monitor the brain activity at that time, you'll drop
11
into this highly-suggestive state and now you listen to
12
the advertising.
13
Now, every school of psychology teaches
14
frequency following response today and that you can
15
create these kinds of effects.
16
advertising?
17
advertising works so well.
18
convincing and compelling.
19
Would they apply in
Of course they would.
That's why
It works because it's
When you look at the 6:00 news, would somebody
20
utilize that in broadcasting the news of the latest
21
propaganda from whatever source it's coming from?
22
would speculate -- today I would speculate and say yes.
23
When you think about how simple it is to create
24
that agitation.
There was a person at Valencia
25
University who published a paper in 1995 talking about
Page 92 of 113
49
this whole concept.
could create a complex signal, broadcast it out over a
large area that just created the sense that something's
not right.
And what he said back then was you
Unease.
And then you go watch the 6:00 news and they
indict some specific ethnic group, maybe it's Muslims,
and then a certain amount of that anger gets diverted
that way.
decided on the laser edge of populations, on majorities,
Well, in a day where a lot of things are
10
this is a very, very powerful tool and one quite simple
11
tool to apply in the modern world.
12
When you think about news feeds today, how much
13
is really investigative reporting and how much of it is
14
just spitting out somebody's press release, right?
15
little investigative reporting today because it's
16
expensive, because it's not immediate, and when you look
17
at the news media today, it's almost immediate and most
18
of it is just meant to entertain.
19
inform.
20
Very
It's not meant to
You know, freedom of the press, it used to have
21
something to do with keeping an informed public so we
22
could make good decisions and we could govern as a
23
public.
24
Say whatever you want, say it however you want, but
25
nobody takes responsibility and we have the neutered
Today we debate the media as freedom of speech.
Page 93 of 113
50
neutral news.
come on.
And if you really believe it's neutral,
Everybody who assigns a story to a reporter
knows that reporter's biased.
It comes out in the news and what gets published and
what doesn't.
the news?
up.
But no one has really taken it on as a topic and
10
11
The editors have bias.
How many stories about mind control hit
Occasionally.
The economists might pick it
Somebody might pick up a little bit, a piece of it.
consistently pursued it.

Yet, when you think about modern technology and
12
the resolution -- now, we've been talking about things
13
that have happened in the past, and somebody even
14
mentioned this, MK-ULTRA is a program -- you've heard it
15
alluded to.
16
subprojects under it.
17
That was the CIA's program.
It had 144
Most of the records surrounding that were
18
shredded by a guy named Gottlieb, who was responsible
19
for that at the Central Intelligence Agency during the
20
Church Committee hearings.
21
truth back then.
22
this, has become increasingly refined as our technology
23
has advanced.
24
25
We never really got the
But the resolution, the ability to do
When you think about technological advances,

one of the things I read says that technology from the
Page 94 of 113
51
invention of the wheel to where we are today, it doubles
about every nine to ten months.
Invention of the wheel to where we are today, ten months
from now we're going to double that, and then we're
going to keep doing that.
Wow.
Think about it.
It used to be every five years in the 1980s,
and it kept shrinking as our computing power increased
and our ability to manipulate large amounts of data
increased.
10
Now, a super computer, think about a super
11
computer.
12
was doing this work, about 280 teraflops a second, which
13
at that time would be like six billion people on the
14
planet with hand calculators doing a calculation every
15
60 seconds for 60 hours to do what that super computer
16
could do in a second.
17
A super computer will do somewhere, when I
Well, the next evolution -- some think it's
18
already here -- are the quantum computers.
19
the quantum computer do?
20
will do what a super computer does in a trillion years.
21
It's back to this analogy of how much EMF do we have out
22
there.
23
What will
A quantum computer in one hour
Well, think about the same kind of
24
amplification and computing power.
25
as a concept.
You look at privacy
It doesn't exist in the world today,
Page 95 of 113
52
right?
tracked, whether it's your GPS on your phone, whether
it's your phone conversations -- in the United States,
every piece of mail is photographed for who it went to
and who sent it.
Virtually everything about us is catalogued,
When you think about your telecommunications,
your Internet connections, Google, AT&T, Verizon, all of
them have violated the very essence of what personal
privacy is all about.
10
Because today, in the 21st Century, we need a
11
revolution, an evolution of what privacy is all about.
12
Because you, experiencing the victimization of this
13
technology, are the pinnacle of the abuse.
14
is subject to abuse of personal privacy.
15
But everyone
You used to think about it, it would start and
16
end in our physical doorway in our home.
17
in your home compared to what is in data banks stored on
18
every single human being in this room.
19
It has nothing
Now, people say, oh, don't worry about it.
20
don't have the ability to collect.
21
resolution to look into it.
22
that resolution.
23
computing first will be able to hack through every
24
security code for every system on the planet within
25
hours.
We
We don't have the
Quantum computers will give
Whichever government finds quantum
They'll be able to predict with so much accuracy
Page 96 of 113
53
by collecting all that data and analyzing that data, it
will almost seem a spiritual event.
But it will only be accurate up to a certain
point.
And over time that flaw will amplify to where it's big
flaws.
guide our world, to guide our ideas, our philosophy, and
how we pursue the world.
And then there will be a little bit of a flaw.
But we'll rely increasingly on these systems to
The Internet.
What people think about that is
10
the world wide mind of the 21st Century.
11
Public Broadcasting System, did a special called "The
12
World Wide Mind".
13
I say within 20 years or even now -- maybe it already
14
exists now -- but within 20 years that you'll be able to
15
connect the physical minds of all of the people on the
16
planet in a world wide mind.
17
PBS, our
And they say within 100 years -- and
Now, that might appeal to some.
It doesn't
18
really appeal to me from the standpoint of technology.
19
I think we already have that on a certain level.
20
think we already are connected on a certain level.
21
belief systems limit our ability to access that level,
22
but I believe it's here.
23
I
Our
And I've seen enough demonstrations of it.
You
24
know, all those scientists I had in that room for that
25
mind effects conference, the part that really blew me
Page 97 of 113
54
away that I didn't expect was what they really centered
on was the idea -- and this was Rosalie Bertell, the nun
and physicist, and she said that the next leap is going
to be the leap where we realize or we recognize or we
remember our extrasensory perceptions, our anonymous
capabilities as human beings and that becomes the next
evolution of the human kind.
8
9
And what suppresses that is fear and anxiety,

because you cannot reach those cases of consciousness as
10
long as you're in fear and anxiety.
And anyone who
11
purports or is a victim of these technologies, do you
12
have anxiety, do you have fear?
13
you have the ability to reach those higher states of
14
consciousness in that condition?
15
not possible.
Of course you do.
Do
It's physiologically
16
So when you think about entire populations,
17
whether it's religion injecting fear or whether it's
18
government injecting fear or as my friend used to say,
19
you know, the king keeps you poor and the church keeps
20
you dumb, kind of was the early idea when you think
21
about how things evolved in Europe several hundred years
22
ago.
23
When you think about modern technology on the
24
backdrop of that concept, what's changed?
25
changed.
It's just the same deal.
Page 98 of 113
Nothing's
You know, 6,000 wars
55
in 4,000 years, most of them over religion; let me give
you a clue, God doesn't need any help killing anybody.
God can probably do it himself or herself.
The fact of the matter is, the idea that people
would just be evil on -- and I think I heard earlier
today that the psychopaths are in the minority.
believe they are.
people, they're out there, but they're not this mass.
Most people do things because they believe they're
I think really evil-to-the-core
10
right, and then they want to impose their rightness on
11
other people.
12
And this is kind of a mistake and then we end
13
up in this conflict between ideas without being fair and
14
recognizing people's right to disagree.
15
said earlier, certain things you can't say in Germany.
16
Certain things you can't say in a movie theater, too.
17
You know, you can't yell fire.
18
sense.
19
And I heard it
Now, it makes good
You don't want to yell fire in a movie theater.

Some would say what we're doing here is yelling
20
fire in a movie theater because we're letting people
21
know what we know, what we've concluded from a good deal
22
of research.
23
You know, my books are written, every page at
24
the bottom of each page are the footnotes.
25
find that distracting.
Some of you
Personally, I want to know where
Page 99 of 113
56
the information came from as I'm reading it, not a week
later as I'm contemplating it.
source.
I want to know the
And so in the publications that I've written,
1600 source documents, reviews out of a matrix of a
hundred thousand that we had available to us, more or
less.
have made it into four books on technology dealing with
mind effects, dealing with HAARP, dealing with personal
20,000 have made it into my archives and 1600
10
privacy issues.
11
the last four years.
12
A lot of the things go unreleased in
You can look at my publications from 1999 and
13
2000, and you'll see the same things, because the old
14
literature showed enough to come to those conclusions.
15
When I testified in the European Parliament in
16
the '90s, at their invitation -- and this was another --
17
a good side story for technology.
18
name of Thomas Spencer, he was from the UK, he was a
19
Parliamentarian at the time, and he was the Chairman of
20
the Environmental Subcommittee of the European
21
Parliament.
22
given him the book on HAARP and he was very interested
23
in this.
24
I flew to Brussels and spent a few days with him talking
25
about the issue and brought with me a couple feet of
A gentleman by the
And he had contacted me.
So we had a conversation.
Page 100 of 113
Somebody had
And at my expense,
57
unclassified documents for his research team to take a
look at.
What happened then is he moved in the European
Parliament -- he was a Conservative, by the way, and he
moved into a Foreign Affairs Chairman, a very powerful
position, an ideal position for dealing with the things
that we were dealing with at the time.
8
9
So we -- at his invitation, I came over to

testify in front of the group on security and
10
disarmament in the European Parliament on HAARP and on
11
non-lethal weapons, the kinds of things we've been
12
talking about today, the manipulation of human beings.
13
Now, they do it a lot differently than we do it
14
in the US.
In the US, when you have public hearings,
15
the public actually gets to come.
16
Parliament, the public meeting is you have to have an
17
invitation to come.
18
know, I hadn't really thought much about that.
In the European
So that's kind of different.
You
19
And they also -- they can also do things behind
20
closed doors, which, you know, we theoretically can't do
21
in the United States.
22
the public invited or the media invited.
23
You can't have a meeting without
So what happened the night before the hearing
24
is the Committee met with myself, one of the other
25
people testifying, and a member of the press and we
Page 101 of 113
58
spent five and a half hours in a non-official meeting to
talk about these issues, so that when we actually gave
our testimony the following day, they would have
formulated a set of questions to give us the opportunity
to follow along.
because then they at least had a good base of knowledge.
So it was a great way to do it,
Now, in that private meeting we demonstrated a
technology using infrasound where you could transfer
sound through electrodes attached to the skin where you
10
would perceive that proverbial voice in the head.
11
demonstrated that to the Parliamentarians in that closed
12
session.
13
We
And then we went into the hearing the following
14
day.
15
her, testifying on our side.
16
the gentleman's name, but he was from a group called
17
GRIP in Brussels that does research on weapon systems
18
particularly and he had done his Master's thesis on
19
HAARP, and so he was there.
20
And it was Rosalie Bertell, which is where I met

It was -- I can't remember
We had someone from the International Red Cross
21
that had done work on non-lethal weapons and was a
22
specialist in this particular area.
23
there.
24
25
And then I was
We each got 15 minutes to present.
And then I
got an hour of questions from the committee in the open
Page 102 of 113
59
hearing where I had the opportunity to talk about some
of these things.
been this incident in Japan where children watching a
cartoon that had a certain flicker rate had caused over
700 children to go to the hospital with epileptic
seizures.
a problem, right?
to go into the hospital.
And right around that time there had
Now, remember, non-ionizing radiation is not

A flicker of the TV caused 700 kids
Now, some say that was by design.
Some say
10
that was by accident.
11
for talking about non-ionizing radiation in the European
12
Parliament because they had all read that story.
13
fresh.
14
But it was a perfect illustration
It was
The other thing demonstrating infrasound,
15
something that had never been demonstrated, to my
16
knowledge, in that type of a meeting, to show that you
17
could actually transfer sound without necessarily
18
involving the ears.
19
Now, there's another technology that was
20
advanced by a guy named Woody Norris -- he won the
21
Lemelson Prize at MIT for this particular technology,
22
and I believe the year was 2004.
23
Norris -- and his was using acoustic heterodyne where he
24
could send in two signals from two different sources,
25
point them at an individual in the crowd, and they would
Page 103 of 113
You can look up Woody
60
hear this voice in their head and nobody else would hear
it.
Well, he won a half a million dollars for that
prize, organized a company called ATCO.
them up.
technology to the military for perimeter protection.
You know, where they could have these sort of alarm
systems so when the protestors got too close they'd hear
these warning signs that nobody else was hearing.
10
They're a public company.
You can look
And he sold that
Now, you think about that for a moment.
11
Imagine -- this is why the European Parliament got
12
interested, because we used this illustration.
13
imagine a national leader standing up in front of a
14
group and all of a sudden they hear voices in their head
15
that nobody else hears.
16
right?
17
what that technology can do.
18
demonstration.
19
Now,
That's the end of that guy,
I mean, he's out of there.
And that's exactly
And that was one
Now, some have said that you can pulse modulate
20
on a single beam and create the same effect or utilize
21
something like HAARP, not so much for voice in the head,
22
but for certainly changing emotional state of large
23
segments of the population.
24
25
When we looked at all of this, we even looked

back -- you know, where else could this have been used?
Page 104 of 113
61
And there was a device in Vietnam called the Lida
machine, L-i-d-a.
named Ross Adey, who is, unfortunately, also deceased.
Ross Adey was brilliant and was utilized by the
government, by private sector as an expert in these
kinds of areas.
A guy who researched this was a guy
Well, he was asked to look at -- this
particular device had been captured during the Vietnam
War.
It was a Russian device.
And it created the
10
entrainment effect using flickering light and sound.
11
And they used it for interrogating prisoners by putting
12
them into that, like, trance-like state and then
13
extracting intelligence from them.
14
1960s.
15
Now, that's the
Again, this is low resolution, low technology.

As computing powers increased, as our knowledge
16
in human physiology has increased, as our knowledge of
17
the electromagnetic nature of human beings has
18
increased, the ability to manipulate large segments of
19
the population comes easily achieved, either as a side
20
effect or unfortunate disaster of our technology.
21
You mentioned Swiss Re, Swiss Re Insurance.
22
Swiss Re Insurance wrote a paper on Electrosmog.
23
believe it was 2002.
24
industry then, don't insure electromagnetic field
25
effects because it will result in a bigger lawsuit than
And they said to the insurance
Page 105 of 113
62
Firestone on their tires or the smoking industry,
because the knowledge is here and now and nobody insures
that risk.
Lloyd's of London insures anything, but they
won't insure that risk.
Nobody does.
Because insurance
companies don't like to lose money.
that.
before cell phones were invented, the University of
Washington had investigated those very same frequencies
It's as simple as
And yet the telecom industry on cell phones --
10
on chick embryo studies and determined they were
11
harmful.
12
Cell phones didn't exist then.

Then cell phones come out and everything's safe
13
all of a sudden.
14
says, now, wait a minute, we did all this research.
15
This is a dangerous thing.
16
a powerful adversary.
17
That same guy that did that research
So it went to the Congress.
18
There was a guy in Florida.
19
controversy.
20
said, we need a study.
21
pay for the study.
22
study.
23
But the telecom industry is
You remember this.
Brain cancer.
It ended up in the Congress.
Big
Congress
So the industry says, oh, we'll
They spend 25 million dollars on the
I can't remember the guy's name who did it, but
24
he eventually published a book because his findings
25
were, hey, this is dangerous.
Page 106 of 113
All right.
He issues his
63
report.
they got the 25 million into his queue.
it all on these projects.
himself.
5
6
They figured, hey, they got him.
You know,
He got to spend
He got to make some money
Hey, he's our man.

Well, he wasn't.
This guy actually had some
integrity, and I apologize for not recalling his name.
A VOICE:
DR. BEGICH:
A VOICE:
10
George Carlo.
Which one is it?
George Carlo.
DR. BEGICH:
George Carlo, that's correct.
And
11
he wrote a book called, "Cell Phones", a very important
12
book.
13
And when it comes to children, one of his
14
observations was -- he had the simple observation of
15
damage to skulls.
16
five-year-old, 400 percent more energy transfers to the
17
skull into the brain than an adult.
18
twelve-year-old, approximately 200 percent.
19
You know, you have a four-year-old, a
Ten-year-old,
This is one of the main reasons why you don't
20
want children using cell phones or, even worse, the
21
portable phone in the home because it's even less
22
efficient with the battery and the energy with even more
23
leakage.
24
phone today where you actually pick it up and talk into
25
it.
And what do we do?
Try and find a hard line
You can't even find them anymore.
Page 107 of 113
They're almost
64
impossible to find.
When you look at what we have learned about
human physiology and the effects of electromagnetic
fields on the human physiology, it is the revolution in
science that will collapse the pharmacuetical industry
one day.
recognize that the pea in the soup of electromagnetic
radiation has been the cause and the root to most of the
chronic disease we see on the planet today.
10
And one day we're going to wake up and
When you combine that with that concept that I
11
used, that example of iodine, everyone has a little bit,
12
now you have these complex interactions, 5,000 new
13
chemicals are introduced or compounds introduced to the
14
public every year without really any serious studies,
15
and then you add this on top of it, and now you have a
16
very toxic world.
17
manipulation from the propaganda of World War II to the
18
downloading of that.
19
achieve?
20
personnel with a download.
Blap.
21
years' worth of education.
Now, let's go on.
22
And then you take the technology of
What does the military hope to
They want to be able to train military
And now here's the thing.
23
kind of education.
24
programming.
25
thinking involved.
There's your 12
Think about that
No critical thinking involved.
It's like writing to a disk.
Who controls that?
Page 108 of 113
Just
No critical
Curriculum
65
controls the way in which our society goes.
risk.
This is the
What about evidence in courtrooms when you can
create a synthetic memory or wipe one out?
that do to a Democratic Republic or a Democracy where
people have the power?
us as we become increasingly transparent to governmental
agencies and they become increasingly opaque.
What does
That power has been taken from
It is the opposite of what should be occurring.
10
There shouldn't be a camera in every household.
11
should be a camera in every government office.
12
the technology's there.
13
and look at what our employees are doing, right?
14
Wouldn't you like to be able to dial up your
15
Congressional office and see that conversation they're
16
having in real time?
17
that?
18
There
Because
We should be able to dial in
And why shouldn't we be able to do
What do they have to hide?

You know, you think about government and you
19
start saying that and, you know, the only people
20
protected from that kind of intrusion in the US are
21
federal employees.
22
protection than the average citizen within the country
23
that I live in.
24
25
They have a higher level of
For what?
And when you think about government, everyone

points to the politician.
I can tell you, most
Page 109 of 113
66
politicians are ignorant.
parties in the United States the preference is to have
people that are -- they look like the news announcer,
but they couldn't think their way out of a phone booth,
right?
they couldn't think their way out of one.
want people that are smart enough to look good, but not
smart enough to think on their own.
politician for political parties, because they can be
10
In fact, most political
We don't even have a phone booth anymore, but

Because they
That's the ideal
told what to do.
11
Look at how much money is being spent in
12
political outcomes.
13
have pointed and looked at, like, Australia to mandatory
14
voting.
15
Huge amounts of money.
Some people
Everybody votes now.

Worst possible thing that you could ever do.
16
And here's why:
17
pulls the lever?
18
maybe 20 percent of the population votes, but at least
19
they're informed.
20
When the population doesn't vote, who

Those that are informed, right?
So
They've educated themselves.
If you force people to vote to keep their
21
driver's license, their medical benefits, or whatever
22
social programs you've got running and you say, you will
23
vote, now who decides what they vote on?
24
buy the 30-second or one-minute ad on TV that influences
25
them.
Whoever can
The moment they walk into the booth, they go, ah,
Page 110 of 113
67
and pull the lever.
A very dangerous situation.
Now we have a dangerous situation.
Democracy is something that each of us have to
claim internally.
The change that people are looking
for in this group happens by a change in consciousness,
by us recognizing what we are as human beings,
recognizing the potential that we have.
know what these government programs yielded?
points to the fear side of the equation.
Because you
Everybody
But what they
10
really discovered was that every single soul, every
11
human being has this anomalous capability.
12
Now, imagine if we could awaken those
13
capabilities, could you hide anything?
14
people could literally look into the mind of another
15
person, that makes a politician pretty vulnerable,
16
wouldn't it?
17
I mean, if
That is the next evolution that I believe is
18
happening and it's the only evolution, the only
19
revolution that can change the way things are.
20
starts with human consciousness.
21
believe to be right and true and beginning to act on it.
22
Not from a foundation of fear, but a foundation of
23
confidence.
24
25
It
It starts with what we
You know, somebody asked me once, what do you

think about faith?
I said, faith is what you know to be
Page 111 of 113
68
right and true and you step into it on the idea that you
can achieve it.
You believe it.
So many people I've seen in this work, they
keep jumping into things beyond their belief.
don't believe they can achieve it.
and they fail, and they keep failing.
are doing good work otherwise step back, do what you can
do with confidence, do what you can do with knowledge,
don't wait for a group to form.
They try it anyway

And people who
The group's already
10
here.
It's called the human race.
11
to be right and true.
12
up, learn from it, and move forward.
13
They
Act on what you know
If you make a mistake, clean it
When you look across this room and you look at
14
all these folks with a little bit of gray hair, and
15
you've got the gray hair not by all of those great
16
things that happened in your life, but by the real
17
disasters that happened in your life.
18
think about bad news is a stimulation for good news.
19
You know, you
People ask me, you know your father's
20
disappearance, disappeared off the face of the earth,
21
that must have been a horrible thing.
22
the time.
23
life because it altered my course.
24
25
Yeah, it was at
I consider it the most important event in my
The worst things in our lives alter our course,

change our direction, activate that higher potential
Page 112 of 113
69
that cause us to rise out of the ashes of our apathy and
our defeats and stand on our feet again and move
forward.
The pain that people experience today is the
catalyst for the solutions tomorrow, whether we like it
or not, whether it's falling down as a two-year-old or
standing up as an adult.
our ethics, on the basis of our values, and we
reinvigorate and let go of the fear and recognize what
If we stand up on the basis of
10
we are as creative beings, we have the potential to make
11
change.
12
And with that, I'll open it to questions.
13
(Applause.)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 113 of 113
USPS.com - USPS Tracking
1 of 2
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction!input.action?tLabels=94...
Customer Service
USPS Tracking
Have questions? We're here to help.
Get Easy Tracking Updates

Sign up for My USPS.
Tracking Number: 9407803699300023504149
Updated Delivery Day: Monday, March 14, 2016

Signed for By: M NALDO // WASHINGTON, DC 20500 // 3:47 am
Product & Tracking Information

Postal Product:
Features:
Priority Mail 2-Day
Insured
Available Actions
Signature Confirmation
DATE & TIME
STATUS OF ITEM
LOCATION
March 14, 2016 , 3:47 am
Delivered
WASHINGTON, DC 20500
Proof of Delivery
Text Updates
Email Updates
Your item was delivered at 3:47 am on March 14, 2016 in WASHINGTON, DC 20500 to 20500 WH PU.
The item was signed for by M NALDO.
March 13, 2016 , 10:22 am
Business Closed
March 13, 2016 , 9:39 am
Arrived at Hub
March 11, 2016 , 6:47 am
Departed USPS Facility
March 11, 2016 , 5:25 am
Arrived at USPS Destination

Facility
March 11, 2016 , 1:32 am
CAPITOL
HEIGHTS, MD 20790
March 10, 2016 , 6:37 am
Arrived at USPS Facility
CAPITOL
HEIGHTS, MD 20790
March 10, 2016 , 2:54 am
LANCASTER, PA 17604
March 9, 2016 , 6:48 pm
Arrived at USPS Origin

Facility
LANCASTER, PA 17604
March 9, 2016 , 5:33 pm
Accepted at USPS Origin

Facility
LANCASTER, PA 17603
March 9, 2016
Pre-Shipment Info Sent to

USPS
Track Another Package
Manage Incoming Packages
Tracking (or receipt) number
Track all your packages from a dashboard.

No tracking numbers necessary.
Sign up for My USPS
3/15/2016 4:50 AM
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 20 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 60
P
usps.com
062S0000000313
Click-N-Ship
Mailed from 17603
9407 8036 9930 0023 5041 49 0089 0000 0022 0500

$8.90
US POSTAGE
Flat Rate Env

Signature
Confirmation
03/09/2016
0006
Expected Delivery Date: 03/11/16
C000
PRIORITY MAIL 2-DAY
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
SIGNATURE REQUIRED
SHIP
WASHINGTON DC 20500-0003
TO: PRESIDENT BARRACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE
1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
USPS SIGNATURE TRACKING #
9407 8036 9930 0023 5041 49
Electronic Rate Approved #038555749
Cut on dotted line.
Click-N-Ship Label Record
Instructions
1. Each Click-N-Ship label is unique. Labels are to be
used as printed and used only once. DO NOT PHOTO
COPY OR ALTER LABEL.
2. Place your label so it does not wrap around the edge of
the package.
3. Adhere your label to the package. A self-adhesive label
is recommended. If tape or glue is used, DO NOT TAPE
OVER BARCODE. Be sure all edges are secure.
Signature Confirmation / Insurance Number:
9407 8036 9930 0023 5041 49

Trans. #:
Print Date:
Ship Date:
Expected
Delivery Date:
Insured Value:
From:
4. To mail your package with PC Postage, you

may schedule a Package Pickup online, hand to
your letter carrier, take to a Post Office, or
drop in a USPS collection box.
To:
5. Mail your package on the "Ship Date" you

selected when creating this label.
367860978
03/08/2016
03/09/2016
03/11/2016
$50.00
Priority Mail Postage:

Insurance Fee
Signature Confirmation
(Electronic Rate)
Total
$6.45
$0.00
$2.45
$8.90
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
PRESIDENT BARRACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE
1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
WASHINGTON DC 20500-0003
* Retail Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS Tracking service
on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping label. Refunds for
unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from the print date.
Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service!
Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking page at usps.com
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, MOVANT

Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-826-5354
717-669-2163 cell
March 8, 2016
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Re:
Formal Request to Commute the State Life Sentence of the following:

Lisa Michelle Lambert
Tabitha Buck
See the following U.S. District of Eastern Pennsylvania 04-02559
See the following U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals 15-3400; 16-1149
See the following Attachments
Executive Summary of Stan J. Caterbone
Office of the Executive of the U.S. Third Circuit Opinion
Working Theory for Tabitha Buck
________________________________________
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Dated: March 8, 2016
Notary:
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
POTUS - Lambert Coummutation Request
Page 1 of 59
March 9, 2016
WORKING THEORY ON AMICUS AND HABEUS FOR

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT AND TABITHA BUCK
by Stan J. Caterbone
1. Did Hazel and or John Show notify the police or any law enforcement regarding the harassment
the Laurie Show and the Show family endured before the murder took playce?
2. If so why did not the said law enforcement cite some kind of harassment or disorderly conduct
citation or arrest against Lambert, Buck, and or Yunkin before the murder took place?
3. If yes to the above, my working allegation is that the police were entrapping the three for a
more serious charge.
4. If 1 and 2 are true, maybe there is more to the rape allegations by Lambert; and maybe that is
another reason no harassment or disorderly conduct charges were filed. Remember, she was
awarded some $35,000 a few years ago because she was raped by a Correctional Officer.
5. Now, completely off the record, after my personal observation of Lambert at trial in the
Lancaster County Courthouse, the rape and sexual abuse, my experience and knowledge, Lisa
Michelle Lambert may be a Targeted Individual in the truest sense.
6. If the above is true, this would constitute a Wrongful Death Claim for the Show's.
Entrapment - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In criminal law, entrapment is a practice whereby a law enforcement agent induces a person to
commit a criminal offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely to commit.[1] It
is a conduct that is generally discouraged and thus, in many jurisdictions, it is a possible defense
against criminal liability.
Depending on the law in the jurisdiction, the prosecution may be required to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt that the defendant was not entrapped or the defendant may be required to
prove that they were entrapped as an affirmative defense.
Sting operations are fraught with ethical concerns over whether they constitute entrapment.[2]
Page 2 of 59
March 9, 2016
Will file Appeal for Reconsideration to 3 Third

Circuit Judge Panel by April 6, 2016; as instructed
in person by Margaret A. Wiegand Agent in
Philadelphia on March 7, 2016 at U.S. Federal
Courthouse!
Page 3 of 59
March 9, 2016
Will take U.S. Third Circuit Appeal

16-1149 to U.S. Supreme Court by
May 16, 2016 (90 Day Window by
U.S. Supreme Court Rules of
Procedure for Pro Se)
Page 4 of 59
March 9, 2016
Page 5 of 59
March 9, 2016
Page 6 of 59
March 9, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
The following is a letter to the editor which I wish to be published on your site.
January 22, 2016
Re: Good Old Boys Network and the Kathleen Kane Coup
I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates back to
1987, made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the "good old boys". In
1987 I blew the whistle on a local company, International Signal & Control, or ISC, that was
indicted for selling arms and weapons to Iraq via South Africa with the aid and support of the CIA
and the NSA. It was the 3rd largest white collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I
was the victim of a widespread wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that
included 29 false arrests, multiple false imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record that
to this day is still resonating.
Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for taking on
this culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law that they
so emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and conduct their affairs in a manner that
suggests they are above the law and we, the Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The
sad fact that it reaches into the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most
outrageous and deplorable truth to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the
APPELLANT in a case before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus
Corpus for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle Lambert. A murder case in the early 1990's
that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell found her actually
innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct in the English speaking
language" and released her from prison. The case drew nationwide attention when then
Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney
generals to curtail the reach of the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus Corpus
cases. To make matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable
Stewart Dalzell from the federal bench.
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison within 9
months while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The Honorable
Judge Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was again found guilty and sentenced to
life in prison. The case was covered by the LA Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer
Bill Curtis did a 48 Hours special, and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my efforts to free
Lisa Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively withdraw as her MOVANT
and Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my own demise was the result of the same
type of wholesale prosecutorial misconduct by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle
Lambert fell victim to. My efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed
attorney threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be
successful in helping her win the Habeus Corpus she filed in May of 2014. I allege the U.S. District
Page 7 of 59
March 9, 2016
Judge was trying in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal court cases that seek to restore
me to whole from a life of ruin, misery, torture, and financial collapse.
For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states and raised
some 90 million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and early 1990's I was one of
5 domestic companies that had the capabilities of manufacturing CDROM's that included a client
list that reached across the globe and included government agencies and fortune 500 companies.
And in 1987, myself and a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous
recording studio, Power Station Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first
"digital movie". The intellectual property rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal
claims in federal courts were too much for the "Good Old Boys" to handle.
_____________/S/___________
ACTIVE COURT CASES
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349
Page 8 of 59
March 9, 2016
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page119ofof
of51
51
59
Thursday, December
March17,
9, 2015
2016

scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
110
2
2ofof
1of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page3
211
3ofofof
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page4
312
4ofofof
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
413
5
5ofof
2of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016

For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
514
6
6ofof
3of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016

(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
615
7
7ofof
4of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016

mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
716
8
8ofof
5of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
817
9
9ofof
8of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
910
18
of
of
9of
of
50
51
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page11
10
19of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
111
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page12
11
20of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
212
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page13
12
21of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
313
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page14
13
22of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
414
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page15
14
23of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
515
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page16
15
24of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
616
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page17
16
25of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
717
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page18
17
26of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
818
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Change the history of events and the truth.
THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page19
18
27of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
59
Page
919
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND
WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page10
19
20
20
28of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page11
20
21
21
29of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page12
21
22
22
30of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page13
22
23
23
31of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page14
23
24
24
32of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page15
24
25
25
33of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW
** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page16
25
26
26
34of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page17
26
27
27
35of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page18
27
28
28
36of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page19
28
29
29
37of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page20
29
30
30
38of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page31
21
30
31
39ofof
of51
41
50
51
59
Thursday,
Saturday,
Friday, December
October
March10,
11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page32
31
32
40ofof
of51
50
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page33
32
33
41ofof
of51
50
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page34
33
34
42ofof
of51
50
51
59
Thursday,
Friday, December
March11,
17,
9, 2015
2016
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page35
35
43ofof
of51
51
59
Thursday, December
March17,
9, 2015
2016
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Nortwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
Dated: December 6, 2015
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page36
36
44ofof
of51
51
59
Thursday, December
March17,
9, 2015
2016
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page27
36
37
37
45of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page28
37
38
38
46of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page29
38
39
39
47of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page30
39
40
40
48of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page31
40
41
41
49of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page
Page
Page32
41
42
42
50of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
0 =
Page
Page
Page33
42
43
43
51of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

!
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page34
43
44
44
52of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

#
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page35
44
45
45
53of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

!
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page36
45
46
46
54of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page37
46
47
47
55of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Page 35 of 41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page38
47
48
48
56of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page39
48
49
49
57of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page40
49
50
50
58of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
POTUS
- Lambert
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
Coummutation
Press
PressRelease
Release
Request
Page
Page
Page41
50
51
51
59of
of
of51
50
51
59
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March
11,
17,
9, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
1 of 3

CONNECT
of us.
everything we do.
Georgia.
seminar.
Berlon.
In The News

Bobbi Kristina
decision
Meet The Man Who Is

Industry
Dollar Shave Club
10/23/2015 3:07 AM
2 of 3
1 Dirty Little Secret To

Eliminate 15 Years Of
Mortgage Payments
Banks Are Worried

Homeowners Will Do This
Comparisons.org
LowerMyBills
Are Banks Worried Home

Owners Will Learn About
This?
FetchaRate Quotes
From Around The Web
More Stories
Promoted Links
Ready to invest: Check out Wealthfront

today (Wealthfront)
Police: Teen rapes 3 year old, says she

'won't remember it'
How Consumerism Influences Our

Behavior (Prudential)
Police: Boy found dead in hot car was

Arkansas judge's son
Meet The Man Who Is Disrupting a $13

Billion Razor Industry (Dollar Shave Club)
Middle school teacher allegedly used

tree house to have sexual relations
wi
15 Amazing Movies Too Heartbreaking

To Watch Again (Refinery29)
Forget The iPhone 7. Next Apple
Sensation Leaked (The Motley Fool)
Jim Cramer's Brilliant Tip on Paying Off
Mortgage (Bills.com)
Atlanta police officer attempts to kiss

women, is Tased and arrested
Restaurant ordered to repay workers
millions after seizing tips
Domestic violence victim says she was
served with eviction notice for calling
by Taboola
Offers and Articles From Around the Web
ADVERTISEMENT
These new pills provide

unstoppable energy and
Will this mysterious 3-word

phrase in Genesis
Celebs you didn't know

passed away: #17 is
Chilling Last Photos of

Famous People Before
They
Surprising Ways to Reduce

Neuropathy Nerve Pain
Top 15 Celebrities You

Didn't Know are Black
Simple System to 'Reverse'

Diabetes
The Most Random Pics You

Will Ever See
End Of Social Security

Leaked Evidence Stumps Obama and Stuns Retirees.
10/23/2015 3:07 AM
3 of 3
Meet the Staff
ONLINE PUBLIC
FILE
Program Schedule
Closed Captioning
Job Openings
Childrens Programming
STATION
NEWS
WEATHER
VIDEO
PHOTOS
FCC EEO Public File Report

Public File Contact
10/23/2015 3:07 AM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------- X
:
CHRISTOPHER HEDGES, DANIEL ELLSBERG,
:
JENNIFER BOLEN, NOAM CHOMSKY, ALEXA
:
OBRIEN, US DAY OF RAGE, KAI WARG
:
ALLA, HON. BRIGITTA JONSDOTTIR M.P.,
:
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
-v:
:
BARACK OBAMA, individually and as
:
representative of the UNITED STATES OF :
:
AMERICA; LEON PANETTA, individually
and in his capacity as the executive and :
representative of the DEPARTMENT
:
OF DEFENSE, JOHN MCCAIN, JOHN BOEHNER, :
HARRY REID, NANCY PELOSI, MITCH
:
MCCONNELL, ERIC CANTOR as
:
representatives of the UNITED STATES
:
:
OF AMERICA,
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------- X
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: May 16, 2012
12 Civ. 331 (KBF)

OPINION AND ORDER
KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge:

On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed into law the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Pub. L.
112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 (Dec. 31, 2011) (the NDAA).
Plaintiffs,
a group of writers and activists, brought a lawsuit on January 13,

2012, seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief with
respect to one section (indeed, one page) of that voluminous
legislation:
1021.
Plaintiffs assert that Section 1021 is
constitutionally infirm, violating both their free speech and

associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as
due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United

States Constitution.
On February 27, 2012, plaintiffs filed a
motion for a temporary restraining order (which they subsequently

converted to a motion for preliminary injunction in a conference
with the Court), seeking to enjoin enforcement of 1021.
In
support of their motion, plaintiffs assert that 1021 already

has impacted their associational and expressive activities--and
would continue to impact them, and that 1021 is vague to such an
extent that it provokes fear that certain of their associational
and expressive activities could subject them to indefinite or
prolonged military detention.
On March 30, 2012, after expedited discovery, this Court held
an evidentiary hearing on plaintiffs motion.
At the hearing,
three plaintiffs testified live and, pursuant to stipulation,

another by sworn declaration.
The Government did not call any
witnesses, submit any documentary evidence, or file any

declarations in connection with its opposition to plaintiffs
motion. 1
The parties filed post-hearing memoranda; and the motion
was fully submitted on May 4, 2012.

As mentioned, plaintiffs challenge 1021 as vague and thus,
violative of their First and Fifth Amendment rights.
The
Government opposes plaintiffs request for preliminary injunctive

relief on three bases:
1
first, that plaintiffs lack standing;
The Government refers to all defendants in this action.
second, that even if they have standing, they have failed to

demonstrate an imminent threat requiring preliminary relief; and
finally, through a series of arguments that counter plaintiffs
substantive constitutional challenges, that Section 1021 of the
NDAA is simply an affirmation or reaffirmation of the
authority conferred by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military
Force, Pub. L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (Sept. 18, 2011) (the
AUMF), passed in the wake of September 11, 2001.
In essence, the Government argues that as an affirmation of
the AUMF, 1021 of the NDAA does nothing new; and therefore,
since the type of activities in which plaintiffs are engaged were
not subject to legal action under the AUMF, there is no reasonable
basis for plaintiffs to assert that 1021 could suddenly subject
them to governmental action now.
According to the Government, as
an affirmation of the AUMF, the NDAA must be read against the

backdrop of Executive practice and court decisions--a backdrop
which clarifies the scope of 1021.
(See Govts Supplemental
Mem. of Law in Oppn to Pls. Mot. for a Prelim. Inj. (Govt

Supp. Mem.) (Dkt. No. 33) at 1.)
For the reasons set forth below, this Court finds that 1021
is not merely an affirmation of the AUMF.
To so hold would be
contrary to basic principles of legislative interpretation that

require Congressional enactments to be given independent meaning.
To find that 1021 is merely an affirmation of the AUMF would
3
require this Court to find that 1021 is a mere redundancy--that

is, that it has no independent meaning and adds absolutely nothing
to the Governments enforcement powers.
In addition to rendering 1021 meaningless, the Governments
position ignores the differences between the two statutes.
Section 1021 lacks what are standard definitional aspects of
similar legislation that define scope with specificity.
It also
lacks the critical component of requiring that one found to be in

violation of its provisions must have acted with some amount of
scienter--i.e., that an alleged violators conduct must have been,
in some fashion, knowing.
Section 1021 tries to do too much
with too little--it lacks the minimal requirements of definition

and scienter that could easily have been added, or could be added,
to allow it to pass Constitutional muster.
This Court finds that plaintiffs (who, as discussed below,
have a reasonable fear of future government action sufficient to
confer standing) have carried their burden with respect to the
necessary elements for issuance of preliminary injunctive relief.
They have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits with
respect to their constitutional challenges; they have put forward
specific evidence of actual and threatened irreparable harm; the
balance of the equities and the public interest favors issuance of
preliminary relief (particularly, but not only, in light of the
fact that the Governments entire position is premised on the
4
assertion that 1021 does nothing new--that it simply reaffirms

the AUMF; in which case, preliminarily enjoining enforcement
should not remove any enforcement tools from those the Government
currently assumes are within its arsenal).
Accordingly, this
Court preliminarily enjoins enforcement of 1021 pending further

proceedings in this Court or remedial action by Congress mooting
the need for such further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
I.
THE STATUTES
The Governments central argument with respect to both
standing and the merits is that the NDAA is nothing more than an
affirmation of the AUMF.
Thus, the Court sets forth the relevant
portions of both statutes as well as the relevant enforcement

history relating to the AUMF.
The Court also discusses a similar
statute recently examined by the Supreme Court of the United

States, which has informed some of its thinking on the merits of
the instant motion.
A.
The AUMF
The AUMF was passed in direct response to the terrorist event

of September 11, 2001.
The AUMF provides:
[t]hat the President is authorized to use all necessary

and appropriate force against those nations,
organizations, or persons he determines planned,
authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks
that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such
organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future
acts of international terrorism against the United

States by such nations, organizations or persons.
Pub. L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (Sept. 18, 2001) 2(a).
President Bush utilized the authorization granted under the
AUMF to send U.S. armed forces into Afghanistan with a mission to
subdue al Qaeda and quell the Taliban regime that was known to
support it.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 510
(2004)(plurality); accord Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466, 470 (2004).

The hostilities that commenced in 2001 remain ongoing today.
The
Government has captured and detained a number of individuals

pursuant to the authority in the AUMF.
See generally, e.g.,
Hamdi, 542 U.S. 507.

In Hamdi, the Supreme Court recognized the authority granted
by the AUMF to detain the individuals captured:
detention of
individuals . . . for the duration of the particular conflict in

which they were captured, is so fundamental and accepted an
incident to war as to be an exercise of the necessary and
appropriate force Congress has authorized the President to use.
Id. at 518.
A number of subsequent cases, many of which arose in
the context of habeas proceedings relating to those captured

pursuant to the AUMF and detained at Guantanamo Bay, have
similarly upheld the detention authority granted under the AUMF.
See, e.g., Barhoumi v. Obama, 609 F.3d 416, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2010);
In re Petitioners Seeking Habeas Corpus Relief, 700 F. Supp. 2d
119, 135 (D.D.C. 2010); see also Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557,
603-04 (2006).
In March 2009, the Government submitted a memorandum in an
action relating to Guantanamo Bay detainees, In re Guantanamo Bay
Detainee Litigation, Misc. No. 08-442 (D.D.C.), in which it set
forth its views on the Presidents AUMF detention authority
(March 2009 Mem.). 2
That memorandum, upon which the Government
relies in the instant matter regarding certain interpretative

principles and the scope of 1021 of the NDAA, states:
The President has the authority to detain persons that
the President determines planned, authorized, committed,
or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on
September 11, 2001, and persons who harbored those
responsible for those attacks. The President also has
the authority to detain persons who were part of or
substantially supported, Taliban or al-Qaida forces or
associated forces that are engaged in hostilities
against the United States or its coalition partners,
including any person who has committed a belligerent
act, or has directly supported hostilities, in the aid
of such enemy forces.
March 2009 Mem. at 1-2.
At oral argument, the Government conceded that the March 2009
Memorandum simply states the Governments litigation position in
the Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation, and that it does not have
the effect of law.
Tr. 216-17. 3
In re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation, Misc. No. 08-442, Resps. Mem. Re:
the Govts Detention Authority Relative to Detainees Held at Guantanamo Bay
(D.D.C. Mar. 13, 2009). (Filed in this litigation at Dkt. No. 24-1.)
3
References to Tr. are to the transcript of the March 30, 2012 hearing on
plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction.
B.
The NDAA
Section 1021 of the NDAA--entitled Affirmation of Authority

of the Armed Forces of the United States to Detain Covered Persons
Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force--provides
(a) In General. Congress affirms that the authority
of the President to use all necessary and appropriate
force pursuant to the [AUMF] includes the authority of
the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered
persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending
disposition under the law of war.
(b) Covered Persons. A covered person under this
section is any person as follows
. . .
(2) A person who was part of or substantially supported
al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are
engaged in hostilities against the United States or its
coalition partners, including any person who has
committed a belligerent act or has directly supported
such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) Disposition Under the Law of War. The disposition
of a person under the law of war as described un
subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until
the end of hostilities authorized by the [AUMF].
. . .
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the persons
country of origin, any other foreign country or any
other foreign entity.
(d) Construction. Nothing in this section is intended
to limit or expand the authority of the President or
the scope of the [AUMF].
(e) Authorities. Nothing in this section shall be
construed to affect existing law or authorities
relating to the detention of United States citizens . .

. .
Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 1021.
When he signed the NDAA into law on December 31, 2011,
President Obama simultaneously issued a signing statement.
portion of that statement referred explicitly to 1021:

Section 1021 affirms the executive branchs authority to
detain persons covered by the [AUMF]. This section
breaks no new ground and is unnecessary. The authority
it describes was included in the 2001 AUMF, as
recognized by the Supreme Court and confirmed through
lower court decisions since then . . . . Moreover, I
want to clarify that my Administration will not
authorize the indefinite military detention without
trial of American citizens . . . . My Administration
will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures
that any detention it authorizes complies with the
law.
Statement on Signing the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012, 2011 DAILY COMP. PRES. DOC. 978 (Dec. 31, 2011) at
1-2 (hereinafter Signing Statement), available at
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201100978/pdf/DCPD201100978.pdf.
As stated above, the NDAA is a broad package of legislation
that includes both authorizations for military spending as well as
additional, non-spending legislation (such as 1021).
Pub. L.
112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 at Preamble (An Act); see also generally
Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 2.
In addition to 1021, the
NDAA includes 1022 which separately authorizes Military Custody

for Foreign Al-Qaeda Terrorists.
9
See Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat.
1298 1022.
That statute authorizes Custody Pending Disposition
Under Law of War.
Id.
Section 1022(a)(2) defines who
constitutes a Covered Person[] under that prong of the statute,

id. 1022(a)(2), and contains a specific provision that states
that, The requirement to detain a person in military custody
under this section does not extend to citizens of the United
States . . . , id. 1022(b)(1).
Section 1022 further provides, in pertinent part:
(c)(1) Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the President shall issue, and submit
to Congress, procedures for implementing this section.
(2) Elements. The procedures for implementing this
section shall include, but not be limited to, procedures as
follows:
(A) Procedures designating the persons authorized
to make determinations under (a)(2) and the process by which
such determinations are to be made . . . .
Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 1022(c)(1)-(2)(A).
On February 28, 2012, the White House issued a Presidential
Policy Directive (PPD-14) entitled, Requirements of the National
Defense Authorization Act regarding the procedures for
implementing 1022 of the NDAA (but not 1021).
Directive on
Procedures Implementing Section 1022 of the National Defense

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, 2012 DAILY COMP. PRES. DOC.
136 (Feb. 28, 2012), available at
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201200136/pdf/DCPD201200136.pdf.
That directive provides specific guidance as to
10
the Scope of Procedures and Standard for Covered Persons

Determinations.
Specifically, it states that covered persons
applies only to a person who is not a citizen of the United States

and who is a member or part of al-Qaeda or an associated force
that acts in coordination with or pursuant to the direction of
al-Qaeda; and who participated in the course of planning or
carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United
States or its coalition partners.
Id. at 1-2.
The directive
consists of 11 pages of specific implementation procedures

including defining scope and limitations.
As mentioned, no such directive was issued with respect to
section 1021 of the NDAA.
C.
18 U.S.C. 2339B and Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705

(2010), the Supreme Court considered whether a criminal statute
prohibiting the provision of material support to terrorists, or
providing resources to foreign terrorist organizations, was
constitutionally infirm under either the First or Fifth
Amendments.
Id. at 2712-13.
There, the relevant statutory
provision stated, in pertinent part:

Whoever provides material support or resources or
conceals or disguises the nature, location, source or
ownership of material support or resources, knowing or
intending that they are to be used in preparation for,
or in carrying out, a violation of [various criminal
statutes] . . . shall be . . . imprisoned for not more
than 15 years.
11
18 U.S.C. 2339A(a).
The term material support, as well as the types of
activities encompassed by material support--e.g., expert advice
or assistance--are defined within the statute itself.
See 18
U.S.C. 2339A(b)(1)-(3).
The following section of that statute, 2339B, sets forth
the penalties associated with violating 18 U.S.C. 2339A, and in
doing so, relies upon the definitions supplied in 2339A.
U.S.C. 2339B.
See 18
The penalties to be imposed are for, as 2339B
states, the prohibited activit[y] of [p]roviding material

support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or
attempts or conspires to do so . . . .
18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(1).
The penalties set forth in 2339B are imposed only upon a showing
that the person ha[d] knowledge that the organization is a
designated terrorist organization . . . , or that the organization
has engaged or engages in terrorism . . . .
Id.
In finding that 2339B did not violate either the First or

Fifth Amendments, the Supreme Court pointed specifically to the
definitional sections and the requirement for knowing conduct.
Holder, 130 S. Ct. at 2720.
The Supreme Court found,
Applying the statutory terms in this action

training, expert advice or assistance, service,
and personnel--does not require similarly
untethered, subjective judgments . . . Congress took
care to add narrowing definitions to the
material-support statute over time. These definitions
12
increased the clarity of the statutes terms . . . and

the knowledge requirement of the statute further
reduces any potential for vagueness, as we have held
with respect to other statutes containing a similar
requirement.
Id. (citations omitted).
II.
THE PARTIES
A.
Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs are a group of writers and political activists.

Of the seven named plaintiffs, only five submitted any evidence in
connection with this motion:
Jennifer Ann Bolen, Christopher
Hedges, Alexa OBrien, Kai Wargalla, and Hon. Brigitta Jonsdottir.

(Dkt. Nos. 10, 11, 14, 17, 18.)
Two of the plaintiffs, Daniel
Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky, are listed in the caption and referred
in the text of the verified amended complaint (see Dkt. No. 4-1),
but did not submit either affidavits in support of the motion or
appear live to provide testimony at the evidentiary hearing. 4
Bolen, who, as mentioned, submitted a declaration in support of
the motion, did not testify at the evidentiary hearing and was not
deposed.
Thus, her statements were not cross-examined and this
Court has not relied upon them for purposes of deciding the
This action was commenced by filing a verified complaint. While procedurally

the factual statements relating to a plaintiff in a verified complaint may be
taken as having the weight of a declaration or other statement under penalty of
perjury, see Colon v. Coughlin, 58 F.3d 865, 872 (2d Cir. 1995), this Court
required that any plaintiff asserting standing for preliminary relief put
forward a specific, separate declaration and make him or herself available for
deposition (see Dkt. No. 16). Accordingly, the Court has not based its
determination herein on the allegations in the verified amended complaint.
13
instant motion. 5
Plaintiffs Hedges, OBrien, Wargalla, and
Jonsdottir testified at the hearing (Jonsdottir by declaration as

agreed by the parties). 6
1.
Christopher Hedges
At the hearing in this matter, Hedges testified that he has

been a foreign correspondent for 20 years.
Tr. 156.
He won the
Pulitzer Prize for journalistic reporting.
Tr. 157.
Over the
course of his career, he has primarily worked in Latin America,

Africa, the Middle East, and the Balkans.
living writing, teaching, and lecturing.
Tr. 157.
He makes his
He has published a
number of articles in the New York Times, the Christian Science

Monitor, the Dallas Morning News, Harpers Magazine, and the New
York Review of Books.
Tr. 157.
After September 11, 2001, Hedges was based in Paris and

covered al-Qaeda in all European countries (with the exception of
Germany) as well as the Middle East.
Tr. 157. 7
As part of that
coverage, Hedges retraced the steps of Mohammed Atta, one of the

participants in the 9/11 events; he covered the abortive Paris
embassy bombing plot, the suicide bombing attack on the synagogue
5
Based upon the oral representations of plaintiffs counsel, plaintiff Bolen

was apparently ill and unable to appear for deposition. She did attend the
hearing, but due to the fact that she was not deposed prior to that date, she
did not testify at the hearing.
6
The Court found the testimony of each of the witnesses who testified live to
be earnest and credible.
7
Hedges does not speak German but does speak English, French, Spanish, and
Arabic. Tr. 157.
14
in Djerba in Tunisia, and he covered Richard Reed, the so-called

Shoe Bomber.
Tr. 158.
Hedges testified that some of the people he has interviewed

in connection with his work were al-Qaeda members who were later
detained and are currently in prison.
Tr. 158.
Accordingly to
Hedges himself, his reporting on al-Qaeda or other terrorist

organizations is read widely in the Middle East.
Tr. 159.
Certain of Hedges writings appear on Islamic or jihadist

websites.
Id.
Hedges stated that having covered war for 20 years, he is

familiar with the fact that a number of individuals who may be
detained as enemy combatants might not have ever carried a weapon.
Tr. 160.
In that regard, he referred to Osama Bin Ladens driver,
a Guantanamo detainee.
Tr. 160.
Hedges testified that he has read 1021 of the NDAA.

160.
Tr.
Hedges testified that he is also familiar with the
provisions of the AUMF and has a specific understanding as to what

they mean.
Tr. 165 (enemy combatants on foreign soil that are
engaged in direct hostilities with the United States and are

linked directly with those who carried out the attacks of 9/11).
He does not, however, understand that 1021 is entirely coextensive and goes no further than the AUMF.
Tr. 165.
Indeed, he
testified that he reads 1021 as radically different from the

AUMF.
Tr. 166.
In that regard, Hedges is unclear as to the

15
meaning of what constitutes associated forces in 1021, see Tr.

168, nor does he understand what the phrases engaged in
hostilities, covered person, or substantially supported means
as used in 1021, Tr. 162-63.
Hedges testified that he has reported on 17 groups contained
on a list prepared by the State Department of known terrorist
organizations.
(See Court Ex. 9 (Country Reports on Terrorism,
Report of the U.S. State Dept, Ch. 6 (Terrorist Groups) (Aug.

2010) at 1 (Certification of Christopher Lynn Hedges Ex. A (Dkt.
No. 11-1).) 8
Included among the groups on which Hedges has
reported (and which are on the State Department lists admitted as

Court Exhibit 9) are: the Abu Nidal Organization, the al-Aqsa
Martyrs Brigade, the Armed Islamic Group, Al-Jihad, the Gamaa alIslamiya, Hamas, Hizballah, Kahane Chai, the Konga-Gel, KGK (a/k/a
PKA), the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK), the Palestine
Liberation Front, the Palestine Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front
for the Liberation of Palestine (including also the Central
Command), al-Qaeda, Revolutionary Peoples Party/Front, and the
Salafist Group for Call and Combat.
(Id. at 1-2.)
See also Tr.
169.
Hedges testified that some of those organizations are
considered to be in hostilities with coalition partners of the
8
References to Court Ex. refer to documents marked for identification during
the March 30 preliminary injunction hearing.
16
United States.
For instance, the PKK is engaged in hostilities
with Turkey, which is one of the United States coalition

partners.
Tr. 169.
In connection with his coverage of the PKK,
he travelled with members of the PKK on occasion, and was with the
PKK when it was attacked by Turkish war planes.
Tr. 170-71.
Other groups Hedges has covered, such as the Popular Front

for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), have carried out acts of
terrorism against U.S. targets.
Tr. 170.
Hedges has also had a number of speaking engagements in

Belgium and France in which he has encountered and conversed with
members of al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
Tr. 174.
In connection with his reporting on Hamas, Hedges met with

members of Hamas leadership, stayed in their homes, and
socialized with them.
Tr. 172.
Hedges lived in Gaza and had
frequent contact with members of Hamas in connection with his

work.
Tr. 172.
Hedges testified that because he speaks a number of

languages, he has been approached by publications--e.g., Harpers
Magazine, the Nation and others--to return to the Middle East as a
correspondent.
Tr. 172-73.
He testified that he has a realistic
expectation that his work will bring him back to the Middle East.
Tr. 173.
Hedges testified that since the passage of 1021, he has
altered his associational and speech activities with respect to
17
some of the organizations upon which he previously reported due to

his concern that those activities might bring him within the ambit
of 1021, thereby subjecting him to indefinite military
detention.
See, e.g., Tr. 174, 177, 186 (When people begin to
speak about carrying out acts that are clearly illegal or

embracing acts that are violent or talking about terrorism, my
reaction so far is to get out as fast as I can because I think
under the NDAA [i.e., 1021], at least as I see it, there is a
possibility that those people looking at my activities from the
outside would not make a distinction between myself and the person
who embraced that kind of activity.).
At the time of the
hearing, Hedges had speeches scheduled in Paris and Brussels at

which he expected members of al-Qaeda or the Taliban to be present
and he intended to change his speech as a result of 1021.
Tr.
174.
Hedges also testified that he has previously associated with
a group called Bob Avakiam Revolutionary Party, a Maoist group,
which he stated he understands endorses the use of violence
towards revolutionary ends--a philosophy to which Hedges stated he
did not ascribe.
Tr. 177.
Despite that fact, Hedges understands
1021 as potentially encompassing his association with the

Avakiam Revolutionary Party and thus, the statute already has had
a chilling effect on his associational activities.
18
Tr. 177.
Hedges testified that prior to the passage of 1021 he had

never feared military detention for his activities.
2.
Tr. 206.
Alexa OBrien
Alexa OBrien has written a number of articles on a variety

of topics relating to, inter alia, interviews of prison guards or
detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
(Court Ex. 3 (series of articles
authored by OBrien, published on WL Central).)

occupation as a content strategist. Tr. 38.
and website designer for U.S. Day of Rage.
She refers to her

She is the founder
Tr. 40, 42.
She
testified that she founded U.S. Day of Rage in March 2011.

42.
Tr.
U.S. Day of Rage has never been involved in armed conflict
with the United States, and never been a co-belligerent with alQaeda or the Taliban, according to OBrien.
Tr. 52, 56.
OBrien is also a contributor and editor to a website called

WL Central.
Tr. 40.
WL Central is a collection of
international news journalists.
Tr. 40.
OBrien testified that
our definition of news is information that enables citizens to

govern themselves.
Tr. 40.
OBrien has made a number of
contributions to that website, including reporting on WikiLeaks

release of U.S. State Department cables, the JTF Memoranda for
Guantanamo Bay, and various revolutions in the Middle East (e.g.,
Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen, Iran).
Tr. 41.
Her reporting has included
both articles and live blogs.
Tr. 41.
Altogether, since January
2011, she has written approximately 50 pieces covering these types

19
of topics.
Tr. 41.
She testified that to her knowledge WL
Central has not been involved in armed conflict with the United
States nor has it been a co-belligerent with al-Qaeda or the
Taliban.
Tr. 56.
OBrien testified credibly that in February 2012, she learned

that an individual employed by a private security firm had
allegedly been asked to tie U.S. Day of Rage to Islamic
fundamentalist movements.
Tr. 43.
She received a copy of an
email which indicated that there had been communications in this

regard dating back to August 2011.
Tr. 43.
The email exchange
was located on the WikiLeaks website and was between individuals

named Thomas Kopecky and Fred Burton.
Tr. 45.
Based on first-
hand knowledge, OBrien testified that she is aware that Burton is

a former diplomatic security official, previously employed by the
U.S. State Department.
Tr. 45-46.
OBrien testified that she also received twitter messages

from a private security contractor called Provide Security.
47.
Tr.
One of the messages indicated that U.S. Day of Rage had been
found on an Islamic jihadist website.
Tr. 48.
The message
stated, Now you are really in over your head with this. Muslims
from an Afghanistan jihad site have jumped in. 9
The messages that OBrien received were marked as Court Exhibit 4, admitted
to show the reasonableness of OBriens fearful state of mind regarding being
subject to 1021, and not for the truth.
20
OBrien also testified that in September 2011 she was

contacted by someone she knew to be a Federal agent, but to whom
she guaranteed confidentiality of source.
Tr. 52.
She testified
that that individual had seen a memorandum from the Department of

Homeland Security (DHS) addressed to law enforcement across the
nation (a) regarding the fact that DHS planned to infiltrate U.S.
Day of Rage and (b) linking U.S. Day of rage to a loosely knit
organization called Anonymous that OBrien knew to be
associated with cyber-terrorism.
Tr. 51-54.
OBrien later met
with a journalist who told her that he had seen either the same
memo to which the federal agent had referred or one with similar
content.
Tr. 69.
OBrien testified that in August 2011 she
learned of an article suggesting that U.S. Day of Rage had been

posted on Shamuk and Al-Jihad, two al-Qaeda recruitment sites.
Tr. 59.
OBrien testified that since 1021 has gone into effect (or
when she perceived it to go into effect because there is a dispute
by the Government as to when 1021 became effective), it has had
a chilling effect on her speech.
Tr. 72 (Court: Are you saying
that there is a causal relationship between the passage of

[ 1021] and your withholding of these articles?
Absolutely.).
A:
She testified specifically to two articles that
she has withheld from publication.
Tr. 70.
One of the articles
details conversations with former military personnel at Guantanamo

21
describing physical restraints used there and other information.

Tr. 70.
The second article relates to discussions with a defense
attorney making accusations that a military defense attorney for a

military detainee threw a case.
When asked why she had withheld
those articles, OBrien testified she could not risk the danger to
herself under 1021.
Tr. 71.
She testified that prior to the passage of 1021, in July

2011, she had published an article relating to a former Guantanamo
detainee, Omar Deghayes, and that she was currently concerned
regarding whether her publication of that article could be
encompassed within the conduct of 1021.
Tr. 77.
Plaintiffs
marked as Court Exhibits 2 and 3 a number of articles published by

OBrien.
Exhibit 3 consisted of a compilation of articles that on
the topics she testified gave her concern with regard to whether
they would be encompassed by 1021.
Tr. 79-80.
OBrien also
testified that she has incurred expenses in connection with 1021

including the purchase of an additional hard drive on which she
double encrypts files in order to protect them from detection by
others, including for purposes of protecting them from the NDAA.
OBrien testified that she has read 1021.
Tr. 74.
She
testified that in particular the statutes references to

associative [sic] forces and substantial support led to her
withholding her articles.
Tr. 74.
22
She stated:
I think its best to use an example of someone like Sami AlHajj, who is a Sudanese Al Jazeera cameraman, who was later
released from Guantanamo Bay and now works for Al Jazeera.
Again, substantially supported, what does that mean? In a
war on terror where intelligence collection and the
information-sharing environment are competing with the press
for collection of information, its very similar activities
of collect, talking with people, getting information. Its
very hard when Secretary Clinton talks about the information
war that we are in to understand what substantially support
means in relationship to journalists.
Tr. 74. She testified that she understood that Sami Al-Hajj had
been detained for six or seven years.
Tr. 75.
OBrien testified that she was unaware of any action taken by

the United States Government to date regarding the activities of
U.S. Day of Rage or against her personally under the AUMF or
1021.
Tr.90-91.
She also testified that she is not aware of
any U.S. Government official who has threatened to take action

against U.S. Day of Rage as a result of expressive activities.
Tr. 93. However, she also testified that pursuant to a request
made under the Freedom of Information Act, an organization called
TruthOut.org had obtained a memorandum from the Department of
Homeland Security and which states National Cybersecurity and
Communications Integration Center Bulletin.
Details on
Anonymous, upcoming U.S. operations 17 September 2011 Occupy

Wall Street, U.S. Day of Rage.
10
Tr. 110. 10
The Court admitted the document obtained pursuant to that request under the
general hearsay exception contained in Fed. R. Evid. 807 as having sufficient
indicia of reliability to come in for the truth. The Court invited counsel for
the Government to notify the Court if, after the hearing, they determined that
the document was not authentic. The Court has not received such a
23
3.
Kai Wargalla
Kai Wargalla is an organizer and activist based in London.

Tr. 116.
She is the Deputy Director of Revolution Truth, an
organization that conducts online, live panel discussions and

campaigns relating to, inter alia, WikiLeaks.
Tr. 117-18.
Wargalla also founded Occupy London in September 2011 and Justice

for Assange UK. 11
Tr. 117.
Wargalla testified that in October
2011 she received a copy of a bulletin 12 apparently issued by the

City of London Police, which listed Occupy London in a terrorism
and extremism update.
Tr. 120.
Wargalla testified that she has read 1021.
Tr. 121-22.
She expressed concern regarding the lack of definition around the

phrase covered persons and not understanding whether her
activities could be construed to bring her within that definition.
Tr. 122.
She also testified that she is concerned about the lack
of clarity surrounding the phrase substantially supported.

130.
Tr.
She testified that to her, this phrase could mean anything
communication and therefore assumes the document to be authentic.

111.
See Tr. 109-
11
Justice for Assange UK refers to an organization, the efforts of which are

directed at supporting Julien Assange, founder of WikiLeaks. See
www.justice4assange.com. Revolution Truth is an international group of
volunteers conducting campaigns on Bradley Manning and WikiLeaks . . . and
online live panel discussions. Tr. 117.
12
Similar to many other documents presented during this hearing, the bulletin
was admitted not for its truth, but for Wargallas state of mind regarding her
concerns relating to enforcement of 1021.
24
really, from having someone on a panel discussion, from conducting

campaigns, to organizing rallies and demonstrations.
Tr. 131.
Wargalla testified that 1021 has led to changes in the

expressive activities of Revolution Truth.
Revolution Truth holds
live panel discussions that are streamed over the Internet.

124.
Tr.
In light of 1021, Revolution Truth is considering not
inviting members of certain organizations to participate whom they

otherwise would have.
Tr. 124-25.
In particular, Wargalla
testified that they would likely not invite Hamas to participate

because they would not want to put themselves in danger of
prosecution under 1021.
Tr. 126.
She testified that other than
those panel discussions, she has not made any other changes in
response to the passage of 1021.
Tr. 140.
She testified that she is aware that several U.S. politicians

have referred to WikiLeaks as a terrorist organization and that
there is a grand jury investigation that involves WikiLeaks.
139.
Tr.
She also testified that she is, however, unaware of whether
WikiLeaks has been officially classified as a terrorist

organization.
Tr. 139.
Wargalla testified that to date, she has not learned that the
U.S. Government taking, or threatening to take, any action against
her in connection with her expressive activities.
Tr. 137.
However, she testified that she fears that the U.S. Government
25
could well take action against her for her associational and
expressive activities set forth at this litigation.
4.
Hon. Brigitta Jonsdottir 13
The Honorable Brigitta Jonsdottir is a member of parliament

in Iceland.
Tr. 147-48.
She stated that she has been an activist
and spokesperson for various groups such as WikiLeaks, Saving

Iceland, and Friends of Tibetan Iceland.
Tr. 148.
She has also
organized Art Against War in which a number of Icelandic artists

and poets protested the war in Iraq.
Tr. 148.
She has
participated in international events relating to writing and

activism against the war in Iraq including Poets Against the War,
Dialogue Among the Nations Through Poetry, and Poets for Human
Rights.
Tr. 148.
As part of her work in connection with
WikiLeaks, she assisted in producing a movie called Collateral

Murder.
Tr. 148.
That film was released in 2010, and alleges
the commission of war crimes by Americans and others during the

war in Iraq.
She stated that
the footage shown . . . showed an American Apache

helicopter in Baghdad, after the Iraqi war but during
the insurrection, open fire on a group of nine to
eleven men, most of them unarmed, and two of whom were
journalists working for Reuters. Eight men were
killed, including the two journalists. A second and
third strike killed more people and wounded two
children.
13
The parties stipulated that the declaration of Hon. Brigitta Jonsdottir could
be read at the hearing as if it were live testimony to which the Government
waived cross examination. Tr. 155. Naomi Wolf read the declaration into the
record.
26
Tr. 149.
Jonsdottir further averred that she understands that several
U.S. politicians have classified WikiLeaks as a terrorist
organization.
Tr. 149.
She stated that she is also aware that
Bradley Manning, who she stated leaked U.S. documents, has been
charged in 2011 with treason, based upon, in the Governments
view, his aiding of terrorists.
Tr. 150.
She stated that Manning
allegedly leaked the footage that formed the basis for the video
Collateral Murder.
Tr. 150.
She has received a subpoena for
her Twitter and other social media accounts for materials relating
to Julian Assange and Bradley Manning.
Tr. 152.
Jonsdottir stated that due to that subpoena, and now in

addition due to the passage of 1021, she is fearful of
travelling to the U.S.
Tr. 153.
She has been invited to be the
keynote speaker at a number of events in the U.S. but has declined

those invitations due to her concerns.
Tr. 154.
She stated that
she has a very real, legitimate fear that the federal government
will enforce the Homeland Battlefield Act [ 1021] against me in
that my work could be construed as giving substantial support to
terrorists and/or associated forces because of the way the
United States government views WikiLeaks.
6.
Tr. 154.
The Remaining Plaintiffs
Other individuals are named as plaintiffs in this action and

shall be plaintiffs as the matter proceeds in its subsequent
27
stages.
Ellsberg.
Those additional individuals include Bolen, Chomsky, and

Plaintiffs are not relying on those individuals to
support their motion for preliminary injunctive relief. 14

B.
Defendants
Defendants in this action are President Barack Obama, U.S.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, and the Department of Defense
(the DOD).
In their Amended Complaint, plaintiffs also named members of
Congress--John McCain, John Boehner, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi,
Mitch McConnell, and Eric Cantor.
(See Dkt. No. 4-1.)
As the
Government stated at oral argument, none of those additional

defendants have been served and thus, none are properly part of
this action at this time.
Accordingly, when the Court refers to the Government in
this Opinion, it is referring only to the defendants properly
before this Court--i.e., President Obama, Secretary Panetta, and
the DOD.
C.
Amici Curae Movants
On April 17, 2012, a group of entities and individuals-Virginia State Delegate Bob Marshall, Virginia State Senator Dick
Black, Downsize DC Foundation, DownsizeDC.org, Inc., U.S. Justice
14
As mentioned, Court required that any person upon whom plaintiffs wished to
rely for evidentiary support for their motion needed to both submit a
declaration by a certain point in time and make him/herself available for
deposition. (Dkt. No. 16.) Plaintiffs Hedges, OBrien, Wargalla did so and
the parties reached agreement with respect to plaintiff Jonsdottir.
28
Foundation, Institute on the Constitution, Gun Owners Foundation,

Gun Owners of America, Inc., The Lincoln Institute for Research
and Education, the Western Center for Journalism, Conservative
Legal Defense and Education Fund, U.S. Border Control, Restoring
Liberty Action Committee, Tenth Amendment Center, Center for Media
and Democracy, Bill of Rights Defense Committee, Pastor Chuck
Baldwin, Professor Jerome Aumente, and the Constitution Party
National Committee (collectively, the Amici Movants)--filed a
motion to file amicus brief.
(Dkt. No. 31.)
The Amici Movants filed their motion, in support of

plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction, because they share
Plaintiffs concerns that, as members of the press or
organizations which exercise First Amendment freedom of press
rights, they could be targeted due to the nature of the work that
they do and opinions they express.
(Decl. of Steven J. Harfenist
in Supp. of Mot. for Leave to File Amicus Curae Br. (Dkt. No. 32)
7.)
Although some of the arguments in the amicus brief overlap
substantially with the arguments advanced by plaintiffs, certain

arguments differ entirely--i.e., the amicus brief injects new
issues into this matter which the Court need not--and will not-consider.
See 16A Wright, Miller & Cooper, Fed. Prac. & Proc.
3975.1 (4th ed. 2012) (In ordinary circumstances, an amicus

will not be permitted to raise issues not argued by the
parties.).
To the extent that the Amici Movants reiterate

29
arguments already made by plaintiffs, the Court does not find the
amicus brief necessarily helpful.
See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay
Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 106 n.10 (2d Cir. 2010) (quoting Universal City
Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429, 445 (2d Cir. 2001)).
However, the Court accepts the amicus brief for filing in order to
have a full record on this motion.
III. THE GOVERNMENTS REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING 1021
The Government did not call any witnesses at the hearing on
this motion.
They did, however, submit briefing in advance of
(and subsequent to) the hearing, cross-examine plaintiffs at the

hearing, and made legal arguments at the hearing.
As stated
above, the Governments main contention is that 1021 is merely

an affirmation of the authority given the President in 2001
under the AUMF--it goes no further and does nothing more.
e.g., Tr. 214-15.
See,
(See also Govts Mem. of Law In Oppn to Pls.
Mot. for a Prelim. Inj. (Govt Mem.) (Dkt. No. 24) at 7-10.)
The Government relies upon Supreme Court precedent which has
upheld the authority granted under the AUMF, including Hamdi.
Tr.
214.
The Court asked whether there was any language in the AUMF
similar to 1021(b)(2) regarding in particular the phrases
substantially supported, associated forces, and directly
supported.
Tr. 215-16.
The Government stated that the phrase
directly supported has not been interpreted in any case law but
30
is referenced in the Governments March 2009 Memorandum.
Tr. 216.
However, the Government argued that the phrase associated forces

can be tied directly into the body of law relating to the Laws of
War as being co-extensive with co-belligerency.
Tr. 220-21.
According to the Government, therefore, the Laws of War place

important and clear limits on which organizations can be construed
as associated forces. Tr. 221.
As to the phrase substantially supported, the Government
conceded that the two cases in which that language has previously
been examined--Barhoumi v. Obama, 609 F.3d 416 (D.D.C. 2010), and
al-Bihani v. Obama, 590 F.3d 866, 873-74 (D.C. Cir.), rehg en
banc denied, 619 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct.
1814 (2011)--did not construe the contours or parameters of that
phrase.
Tr. 223.
The Court asked when we are talking about cases which have
used the phrase substantially supported and said that that is a
valid criterion under the AUMF or of the legislation, thats not
the same thing as saying that . . . any court has found, one way
or the other, that substantially supported has an understandable
meaning to an ordinary citizen?
The Government responded, Its
true that the courts have not expressly ruled that, thats right.
Tr. 223.
The Court then asked: Give me an example. Tell me
what it means to substantially support associated
forces.
31
Government: Im not in a position to give specific

examples.
Court: Give me one.
Government: Im not in a position to give one specific
example.
Tr. 226.
The Court then asked:
mean?
Government:
our brief.
Court:
What does directly supported
We have not said anything about that in
What do you think it means?
Government: . . . Your Honor, we had focused so much

on the phrase that was challenged by the plaintiffs,
substantial support that I have not thought through
exactly and we have not come to a position on what
direct support and what that means.
Tr. 229-230.
The Court then asked: Assume you were just an
American citizen and youre reading the statute and
you wanted to make sure you do not run afoul of it
because you are a diligent U.S. citizen wanting to
stay on the right side of 1021, and you read the
phrase directly supported. What does that mean to
you?
Government: Again it has to be taken in the context of
armed conflict informed by the laws of war.
Court: Thats fine. Tell me what that means?
The Government then returned to the Laws of War and
finally stated, I cannot offer a specific example. I
dont have a specific example.
Tr. 230.
The Court then asked the Government specific questions
regarding plaintiffs present and intended activities at issue
32
here and whether those activities would fall within the scope of
1021.
The Court required that each plaintiff testifying at the
evidentiary hearing both to submit a declaration prior to the

hearing on the topics about which he/she intended to testify and
to submit to deposition.
(See Dkt. No. 16.)
The Government
therefore knew well before the hearing the types of expressive and
associational conduct in which each plaintiff would testify he/she
engaged, and the conduct he/she asserted had already been or would
imminently be chilled.
In short, plaintiffs positions should
have come as no surprise to the Government.
Nevertheless, when
confronted with what the Court assumed was certainly among the
critical questions likely to be posed at the hearing--i.e.,
whether plaintiffs activities fell within 1021s scope, the
Government responded, I cant make specific representations as to
particular plaintiffs.
of anything.
I cant give particular people a promise
Tr. 235.
It must be said that it would have been a rather simple

matter for the Government to have stated that as to these
plaintiffs and the conduct as to which they would testify, that
1021 did not and would not apply, if indeed it did or would not.
That could have eliminated the standing of these plaintiffs and
their claims of irreparable harm.
Failure to be able to make such
a representation given the prior notice of the activities at issue

requires this Court to assume that, in fact, the Government takes
33
the position that a wide swath of expressive and associational

conduct is in fact encompassed by 1021.
With respect to the witnesses who had appeared in Court, the
Court had the following colloquy with the Government:
Court: These people have real things they are saying.
These are not speculative or hypotheticals. These are
people who have actually written articles that we have
here. [The Court then held up the articles written by
OBrien and marked as Court Ex. 3.] We are trying to
figure out, are these articles going to subject Ms.
OBrien to risk under 1021? . . . .
Government: Again, Im not authorized to make specific
representations regarding specific people. Im saying
that associated forces cannot extend to groups that
are not armed groups at all.
Court: So we dont know about the articles, it
depends?
Government: Maybe they are an armed group.
Tr. 236.
With respect to Jonsdottir the Court asked:
Im asking you as a representative of the United
States Government here today, can Ms. Jonsdottir
travel to the United States without any concern that
she will be captured by her current activities under
1021?
Government: Again, I cant make representations on
specifics. I dont know what she has been up to. I
dont know what is going on there.
Tr. 239.
With regard to Hedges the Court asked,
Is it possible, in your view, that Mr. Hedges, any of
his activities as he has described them, should they
occur in the future, [and also as to his past
34
activities], can you say that he would not be subject

to military detention without trial under 1021?
Government: Im not prepared to address that question
here today, but I would answer that by saying that his
concerns that he has raised are addressed by what I
have said and he has the burden of showing that his
fear as articulated is a reasonable fear.
Tr. 245.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiffs challenge to the constitutionality of 1021 and
request for preliminary injunctive relief requires this Court to
answer the following questions:
standing to bring this action?
do these plaintiffs have the

If plaintiffs do have standing--or
at least some of them do--are they able to meet the demanding

standards for preliminary injunctive relief?
As set forth below, the Court answers those questions in the
affirmative.
I.
ARTICLE III AND PLAINTIFFS STANDING

Article III, 2 of the United States Constitution empowers
this Court only to entertain actual cases and controversies.

Standing doctrine determines whether the plaintiff has made out
a case or controversy between himself and the defendant within
the meaning of Art. III and is therefore entitled to have the
courts decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues.
Amnesty Intl USA v. Clapper, 638 F.3d 118, 131 (2d Cir. 2011)
(quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975)).
35
A citizen
who dislikes a particular law may not require a court to address

its constitutionality simply by stating in a complaint his belief,
however deeply held, that the law is inconsistent with some
provision of the Constitution.
Id.
Concrete injury is required.
Id.
In Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984), the Supreme Court
made clear that standing is built on a single basic idea--the
idea of the separation of powers.
Id. at 752.
Article III
limits judicial review of legislative or executive acts only to

those instances in which it is truly necessary to protect a
complaining partys interests.
Clapper, 638 F.3d at 132.
The Supreme Court has set forth three elements a plaintiff

must establish to show standing: first, a plaintiff must have
suffered a concrete or particularized invasion of a legally
protected interest, which is must be actual or imminent, not
conjectural or hypothetical; second, there must be a causal
connection between the injury and the conduct complained of--that
is, the injury has to be fairly traceable to some action by the
defendant; and third, it must be likely, not merely speculative,
that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.
Lujan
v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992); see also

Clapper, 638 F.3d at 131-32; Pac. Capital Bank, N.A. v. Conn., 542
F.3d 341, 350 (2d Cir. 2008).
36
The Second Circuit recently took on the question of standing

again in Clapper.
There, the Second Circuit found that plaintiffs
challenging certain legislation (i.e., section 702 of the Foreign

Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978--a recent amendment to the
statute) had demonstrated that they suffered present injuries when
they demonstrated concrete economic and professional harms.
F.3d at 135.
638
The Court noted that in cases in which plaintiffs
allege an injury based on prospective government action, they need

only show a realistic danger of direct injury.
Babbitt, 442 U.S. at 298).
Id. (quoting
The court found further that where
plaintiffs allege a prospective injury to First Amendment rights,

they must only show an actual and well-founded fear.
Id.
The
Second Circuit also stated that the fact that the Government has
authorized the potentially harmful conduct [here, indefinite
detention under 1021] means that the plaintiffs can reasonably
assume that government officials will actually engage in that
conduct by carrying out the authorized [detention].
Id. at 138.
Here, each of the four plaintiffs who testified (either live

or via declaration as in the case of Jonsdottir) has shown an
actual fear that their expressive and associational activities are
covered by 1021; and each of them has put forward uncontroverted
evidence of concrete--non-hypothetical--ways in which the presence
of the legislation has already impacted those expressive and
associational activities.
37
For instance, Hedges has testified that he is currently

concerned about associating with certain individuals and in fact
has now removed himself from certain situations in the course of
his professional activities because of that concern.
In addition,
given his prior journalistic activities relating to certain

organizations such as al-Qaeda and the Taliban, as well as others
that are denominated terrorist organizations by the U.S. State
Department (e.g., associating with these individuals in these
groups as part of his investigative work, reporting on the groups
in the press), he has a realistic fear that those activities will
subject him to detention under 1021.
That fear cannot be said
to be ill-founded when, at the injunction hearing itself, the

Government was unwilling to commit that such conduct does not fall
within 1021s ambit. 15
Further, and as discussed below, since this Court is not
convinced that 1021 is simply a reaffirmation of the AUMF, and
since the Government has authorized detention for violations of
1021, plaintiffs here can reasonably assume that Government
officials will actually undertake the detention authorized by the
statute.
See Clapper, 638 F.3d at 138.
OBrien likewise has established a reasonable fear of future

government action that is likely to occur.
15
OBrien has written a
The inability to make specific representations as to the plaintiffs here

renders confusing the Governments repeated assertion that plaintiffs fears
are unreasonable.
38
series of articles already--some of which relate to al-Qaeda, the

Taliban, or associated forces no matter how defined.
The
Government was unwilling to state at the hearing that OBrien

would not be detained under 1021 for her expressive conduct in
regard to those articles.
Moreover, OBrien testified that she
has withheld at least two articles from publication because of her

concerns regarding the potential for her expressive conduct in
those articles to render her a covered person under 1021 and
thereby subject her to military detention.
Wargalla stated that, as Deputy Director of
RevolutionTruth.org, she is concerned that she not expose herself
or others to possible detention under 1021 by inviting Hamas to
participate in certain panel discussions.
That is a clear
chilling of her associational activities, 16 and supports a

reasonable fear that at least some of her associational activities
could result in enforcement under 1021.
Again, it is important
to this Courts determination that that at the hearing on this

motion the Government was unwilling to represent that Wargallas
activities would not subject her to detention under 1021.
Jonsdottirs concerns are based upon her specific fear that
her connections to WikiLeaks, the video Collateral Murder (which
16
It is less clear that her activities with respect to Occupy London would
provide her with a sufficient basis for standing--the only connection she draws
between that group and known terrorist groups is her understanding that the
City of London included Occupy London on an extremist and terrorist update
along with other organizations including al-Qaeda and FARC.
39
constitutes expressive conduct), and other associational anti-war

organizations could cause her to fall within the definition of
covered person under 1021.
She also testified by declaration
that she has not engaged in certain expressive conduct in the form
of speeches in the United States given her concerns.
Again, the
Government refused to state that those activities would not be

subject to prosecution under 1021.
Under such circumstances,
her fear is reasonable.

Each of the four plaintiffs who presented evidence in
connection with this motion therefore have specific, concrete past
actions which they fear may already have brought them within the
ambit of 1021, to which the Government has not represented--and
will not represent--otherwise.
Each have also already experienced
a chilling of specific associational and expressive conduct.
On
the record before the Court on this motion, those plaintiffs have
shown actual, as well as imminent and particularized, invasion of
legally-protected interests.
See Clapper, 638 F.3d at 131-32.
Plaintiffs have also shown a causal connection between

their imminent injury and potential detention under 1021.
Each
plaintiff testified that certain of his or her expressive or

associational conduct had in fact been chilled as a result of
his/her understanding (or lack thereof) of the scope of 1021.
That creates the necessary link between their asserted injury and
40
the action by the Government--namely, the passage of 1021 in its

current form.
See id. at 132.
Further, with respect to the costs undertaken to avoid

being prosecuted under the challenged statute as discussed in
Clapper, see 638 F.3d at 134, the Court finds that all four
plaintiffs have sufficiently sustained costs to confer standing.
The Court does not find that the costs incurred must be monetary.
Although the plaintiffs in Clapper had sustained monetary costs
based upon their reasonable fear of future government action that
was likely to occur--as have certain plaintiffs in this action
(e.g., OBriens purchase of a hard drive to protect certain of
her articles)--it cannot be that only monetary costs will suffice
to evidence the reasonable fear of future government harm that
is reasonably likely to occur.
Id. at 140.
The costs to
plaintiffs in changing their respective associational or

expressive activities imposes concrete, personal, human costs on
these plaintiffs. 17
Forgoing professional opportunities cannot be
said not to carry some costs, even of those costs cannot be

quantified in monetary terms.
The human costs associated with
altering their behavior--both in their personal, day-to-day lives
17
Plaintiffs focus on the monetary costs associated with their pursuing this
litigation in relation to their standing arguments.
(See, e.g., Certification
of Kai Wargalla (Dkt. No. 18) 18; Certification of Alexa OBrien (Dkt. No.
14) 30.) Those costs are not properly considered as costs associated with
plaintiffs reasonable fear of future government harm, and the Court does
consider them in its analysis of plaintiffs standing here.
41
as well as their professional lives--are certainly cognizable

costs undertaken based upon their reasonable fear.
Indeed, the fact that the instant action is a
pre-enforcement challenge to the NDAA goes precisely to that
point.
Courts have been willing to review pre-enforcement
challenges with respect to criminal statutes more readily than for

See, e.g., Holder, 130 S. Ct. at 2717; see also Babbitt v.
civil.
Farm Workers, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979).

In Holder, the Supreme Court reviewed a pre-enforcement
challenge to a criminal statute based upon the fact that
[p]laintiffs face a credible threat of prosecution and should
not be required to await and undergo a criminal prosecution as the
sole means of seeking relief.
Babbitt, 442 U.S. at 298).
130 S. Ct. at 2717 (quoting
There, plaintiffs claimed that they
had provided certain support to the PKK and LTTE before the
enactment of the statute at issue and would do so again if the
statutes allegedly unconstitutional bar were lifted.
Id.
The
Supreme Court noted that [t]he Government has not argued to this
Court that plaintiffs will not be prosecuted for what they wish to
do.
Id.
Thus, the Court concluded that the case before it
presented a justiciable case or controversy (with plaintiffs who

had standing).
Id.
Section 1021 of the NDAA is not classically a criminal

statute in that it does not provide for a maximum or minimum
42
period of imprisonment.
However, there can be no doubt that the
possibility of indefinite military detention, involving similar

deprivation of personal liberty as criminal incarceration, is
analogous to a criminal statute.
Indeed, as the court noted in
Hamlily v. Obama, 616 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), when reviewing

the breadth of the term substantially support with respect to
detention authority under the AUMF, a detention authority that
sweeps so broadly is simply beyond what the law of war will
support.
The Governments approach in this respect evidences an
importation of principles from the criminal law context.

75.
Id. at
An individual detained under 1021 could be subject to
military detention until the cessation of hostilities--and in the

context of the war on terrorism, that is an uncertain period of
time to be sure.
In addition, and this bleeds into the Courts analysis of
plaintiffs irreparable harm below, the uncontroverted testimony
at the evidentiary hearing indicated that certain plaintiffs have,
intend to or would engage in conduct that the Government will not
represent is outside of 1021.
Thus, similar to the Supreme
Courts finding in Holder as well as the Second Circuits in

Clapper, these plaintiffs have standing precisely because their
undisputed testimony clearly establishes that they are suffering
injuries in fact, and because [the Court] finds those injuries are
causally connected to [ 1021]--because they are taken in
43
anticipation of future government action that is reasonably likely

to occur.
Clapper, 638 F.3d at 140.
Finally, the injunctive relief requested by plaintiffs will,

at least preliminarily, redress the alleged injuries connected to
enactment of 1021.
Each of the four plaintiffs testified that
the recent chilling of his or her expressive and associational

conduct is directly related to 1021; therefore, issuance of the
relief they seek would redress this asserted injury.
Id. at 132,
143-45.
Accordingly, plaintiffs Hedges, OBrien, Wargalla, and
Jonsdottir have sufficiently established their standing to bring
this action.
II.
PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

In order for plaintiffs to demonstrate entitlement to
preliminary injunctive relief, they must demonstrate (a) a

likelihood of success on the merits of their claims of
constitutional infirmity; (b) that they will suffer irreparable
harm in the absence of the requested relief; (c) that the balance
of the equities tips in their favor; and (d) that the injunction
is in the public interest.
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense
Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); accord Salinger v. Colting, 607

F.3d 68, 79-80 (2d Cir. 2010).
[T]here is judicial power to enjoin enforcement of an act of
Congress pending final determination of constitutionality where
44
such an injunction is necessary in order to prevent irreparable

damage.
(1964).
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 85 S. Ct. 1, 2

However, [j]udicial power to stay an act of Congress,
like judicial power to declare an act unconstitutional, is an

awesome responsibility calling for the utmost circumspection in
its exercise.
Id.; Turner v. Broad. Sys. v. F.C.C., 507 U.S.
1301, 1302 (1993).
In the context of determining whether the
justiciable controversy here favors preliminary relief, this Court

has kept clearly before it those admonitions on judicial
restraint.
1.
Likelihood Of Success On The Merits 18
Plaintiffs have asserted both facial and as applied

challenges against 1021.
They assert that the statutes
purported overbreadth captures their expressive and associational

conduct in violation of their rights under the First Amendment,
and they separately assert that the statutes vagueness violates
their due process rights under the Fifth Amendment.
This Court starts with the proposition that there is strong
presumption of validity that attaches to an act of Congress.
This Courts first task is to try to avoid having to pass on
constitutional questions.
See F.C.C. v. Fox Television Stations,
18
Plaintiffs focus heavily on the constitutionality of the type of military

detention authorized by 1021. That question of such detention has been
examined at length by the Supreme Court--and the contours of what is, and is
not, permissible are well established at this point. The Court need not reach
the issue of detention here because the question of constitutionality rests
most significantly in plaintiffs First and Fifth Amendment claims.
45
Inc., 566 U.S. 502, 516 (2009) (The so-called canon of

constitutional avoidance is an interpretive tool, counseling that
ambiguous statutory language be construed to avoid serious
constitutional doubts.).
If such constitutional avoidance is
itself unavoidable, the Court must then seek to find an

interpretation of the statute that upholds the constitutionality
of the legislation.
United States v. Natl Dairy Prods. Corp.,
372 U.S. 29, 32 (1963).

The Courts attempt to avoid having to deal with the
Constitutional aspects of the challenge was by providing the
Government with prompt notice in the form of declarations and
depositions of the precise conduct in which plaintiffs are
involved and which they claim places them in fear of military
detention.
To put it bluntly, eliminating these plaintiffs
standing simply by representing that their conduct does not fall

within the scope of 1021 would have been simple.
The Government
chose not to do so--thereby ensuring standing and requiring this

Court to reach the merits of the instant motion.
a.
Facial versus As Applied Challenge: The First

Amendment
This Court approaches plaintiffs facial challenge to 1021

with great caution.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly cautioned
that facial challenges to the constitutionality of a law-which,

if successful, would invalidate the entirety of the law--are
46
disfavored.
Washington State Grange v. Washington State
Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442, 449 (2008).
Outside the context
of the First Amendment, it is accepted that a facial challenge

must generally fail when a statute has a plainly legitimate sweep.
Id.
Facial challenges run the risk of declaring the
constitutionality of statutes on an inadequate record; they run

the risk of addressing more than the bare minimum that must be
addressed in order to resolve the problem before a court; and they
most importantly threaten to short circuit the democratic process
by preventing laws embodying the will of the people from being
Id. at
implemented in a manner consistent with the Constitution.

451.
We must keep in mind that a ruling of unconstitutionality
frustrates the intent of the elected representatives of the

people.
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England,
546 U.S. 320, 329 (2006) (quoting Regan v. Time, Inc., 468 U.S.
641, 652 (1984) (plurality)). 19
The statute at issue here has a plainly legitimate sweep.
Indeed, as this Court noted at the evidentiary hearing, the
conduct in which the plaintiffs here engage is without a doubt
not the core conduct that is intended to be covered by the
statute.
See Tr. 20-21.
Section 1021 is a statute aimed at
19
Outside the First Amendment context, a facial challenge can generally only
prevail when a plaintiff establishes that no set of circumstances exist under
which the law would be valid. Washington State Grange, 552 U.S. at 449. In
other words, the Court is quite mindful of the nearly infinite bar that applies
to facial challenges when something other than the First Amendment is at issue.
47
individuals associating with, and providing some degree of

support (a degree known only to the drafters of 1021, if at
all), terrorists connected to al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
It
stands to reason that the type of person Congress intended to be

covered under 1021 is someone who has taken up arms, or might
be providing arms, to al-Qaeda, the Taliban or some of their offshoots.
No doubt the public should be protected from such people
and we should affirmatively defer to Congress and those in

appropriate law enforcement and military positions wherever
possible as to how best to accomplish this.
Nevertheless, with respect to 1021, and particularly in
light of the Governments representations that it could not
represent that plaintiffs expressive and associational conduct
does not bring them within the ambit of the statute, plaintiffs
have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute
inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the First
Amendment.
When a statute encroaches on rights guaranteed by the First
Amendment, facial challenges are allowed to prevent the
possibility that a statutes mere existence might inhibit free
expression.
See Members of the City Council of the City of Los
Angeles, et al. v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789 (1984).

In Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 (1965), the Supreme Court
stated, Because of the sensitive nature of constitutionally
48
protected expression, we have not required that all of those

subject to overbroad regulations risk prosecution to test their
rights.
For free expression--of transcendent value to all
society, and not merely those exercising their rights--might be

the loser.
Id. at 486.
When a statute captures both speech and non-speech conduct,

the overbreadth of a statute (e.g., the overbreadth equating with
capturing constitutionally protected conduct) must not only be
real, but substantial as well, judged in relation to the
statutes plainly legitimate sweep.
U.S. 601, 615 (1973).
Broaderick v. Oklahoma, 413
However, where the statute unquestionably
attaches sanctions to protected conduct [e.g., expressive and

associational conduct], the likelihood that the statute will
deter that conduct is ordinarily sufficiently great to justify an
overbreadth attack.
205, 217 (1975).
Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville, 422 U.S.
In short, there must be a realistic danger
that the statute itself will significantly compromise recognized

First Amendment protections of parties not before the Court for
it to be facially challenged on overbreadth grounds.
Id. at
216; Members of the City Council of the City of Los Angeles, 466
U.S. at 801.
In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 130 S. Ct.
876 (2010), Justice Kennedy wrote that [s]peech is an essential
mechanism of democracy, for it is the means that hold officials
49
accountable to the people . . . .
The right of citizens to
inquire, to hear, to speak, and to use information to reach

consensus is a pre-condition to enlightened self-government.
Id. at 899.
Laws that burden political speech are therefore
subject to strict scrutiny.
Id. at 898.
The First Amendment
protects speech and speaker, and the ideas that flow from each.
Id. at 899.
A facial challenge is appropriate here.
That does not,
however, mean that plaintiffs have necessarily shown a likelihood

of success on the merits as to that claim--the Court separately
analyzes that below.
As the Supreme Court noted in Broaderick,
it has been the judgment of this Court that the possible harm to
society in permitting some unprotected speech to go unpunished is
outweighed by the possibility that protected speech of others may
be muted and perceived grievances left to fester because of the
possible inhibitory effects of overly broad statutes.
at 612.
413 U.S.
There is a societal interest against requiring official
approval for protected speech or delegating standardless

discretionary power to local functionaries, resulting in
virtually unreviewable prior restraints on First Amendment
rights.
See id.; see also Cox v. State of Louisiana, 379 U.S.
536, 557 (1965) (It is clearly unconstitutional to enable a

public official to determine which expressions of view will be
permitted and which will not or to engage in invidious
50
discrimination among persons or groups either by use of a statute

providing a system of broad discretionary licensing power or, as
in this case, the equivalent of such a system by selective
enforcement of an extremely broad prohibitory statute.).
b.
Likelihood of Success on Plaintiffs First

Amendment Claim
Here, each of the four plaintiffs who testified at the

evidentiary hearing put forward evidence that their expressive and
associational conduct has been and will continue to be chilled by
1021.
The Government was unable or unwilling to represent that
such conduct was not encompassed within 1021.
Plaintiffs have
therefore put forward uncontroverted proof of infringement on

their First Amendment rights.
Applying strict scrutiny to the question of whether there is
a compelling government interest that outweighs infringement upon
First Amendment rights, the Court finds that plaintiffs have shown
a likelihood of success that there is not.
Again, that is
particularly so in light of the Governments position that 1021

does no more than the AUMF; therefore, the infringing potential
for 1021 may well be unintentional, but it is real nonetheless.
There is no doubt that the type of speech in which Hedges,
OBrien, Wargalla, and Jonsdottir engage is political in nature.
It is also likely that some of their views may be extreme and
51
unpopular as measured against views of an average individual.

That, however, is precisely what the First Amendment protects.
It is certainly true, as this Court stated at the hearing,
that not all speech is in fact protected by the First Amendment.
The exceptional circumstances in which the First Amendment does
not cover speech has been limited to speech that incites
violence, is obscene, or is incidental to criminal activity.
Nebraska Press Assn v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 590 (1976).
However, the type of speech in which the plaintiffs here have
engaged does not, as presented at the hearing, fall into any of
those categories.
This Court is left then, with the following conundrum:
plaintiffs have put forward evidence that 1021 has in fact
chilled their expressive and associational activities; the
Government will not represent that such activities are not covered
by 1021; plaintiffs activities are constitutionally protected.
Given that record and the protections afforded by the First
Amendment, this Court finds that plaintiffs have shown a
likelihood of succeeding on the merits of a facial challenge to
1021.
c.
The Due Process Challenge: Is the Statute Void

for Vagueness?
To satisfy the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment,

individuals are entitled to understand the scope and nature of
52
statutes which might subject them to criminal penalties.
Thus,
[a] penal statute must define the criminal offense (1) with
sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what
conduct is prohibited and (2) in a manner that does not encourage
arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.
States, 130 S. Ct. 2896, 2928 (2010).
Skilling v. United
That analysis is performed
against the backdrop of a strong presumption of validity given to

acts of Congress.
Id.
In the absence of an accompanying First Amendment challenge,

a vagueness challenge is generally evaluated on an as applied
basis.
United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 129 (2d Cir.
2003); accord United States v. Whittaker, 999F.2d 38, 42 (2d Cir.

1993).
However, there is an exception to the general rule that
vagueness challenges are generally evaluated on an as applied
basis:
courts have allowed facial attacks for vagueness when a
criminal statute lacks a mens rea requirement, even in the

absence of an accompanying First Amendment challenge.
of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999).
See City
In City of Chicago,
the Supreme Court found a criminal statute that lacked a scienter

requirement vague and subject to facial invalidation.
Id. at 55.
As stated above, 1021 (unlike 1022, or even 18 U.S.C.

2339A/B--i.e., the statute(s) under review in Holder) lacks a
knowledge requirement; an individual could fall within the
53
definition of covered person under 1021 without having either

intentionally or recklessly known that he or she was doing so.
A question, then, for this Court is whether 1021 should be
treated as analogous to a criminal statute.
test set forth in Skilling applies.
129.
If it is, then the
See Rybicki, 354 F.3d at
As stated above, this Court preliminarily finds that
1021, which could be used for the indeterminate military

detention, is sufficiently akin to a criminal statute to be
treated as such.
At the hearing on this motion, the Government
was unwilling or unable to state that these plaintiffs would not

be subject to indefinite detention under 1021.
Plaintiffs are
therefore at risk of detention, of losing their liberty,

potentially for many years.
In relevant part, then, that is the
analytical equivalent of a penal statute.
Cf. Hamlily, 616 F.
Supp. 2d at 75 ([A] detention authority that sweeps so broadly

is simply beyond what the law of war will support.
The
Governments approach in this respect evidences an importation of

principles from the criminal law context.).
Before anyone should be subjected to the possibility of
indefinite military detention, the Due Process Clause of the
Fifth Amendment requires that individuals be able to understand
what conduct might cause him or her to run afoul of 1021.
Unfortunately, there are a number of terms that are sufficiently
vague that no ordinary citizen can reliably define such conduct.
54
Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on their

vagueness challenge. The terms upon which they focused at the
hearing relate to who is a covered person.
In that regard,
plaintiffs took issue with the lack of definition and clarity

regarding who constitutes an associated forces, and what it
means to substantially or directly support such forces or,
al-Qaeda or the Taliban.
The Governments strongest position is with respect to the
definition of associated forces.
The Government argued that
there is an accepted definition of what constitutes associated

force under the Laws of War, which is defined in terms of
principles of co-belligerency and the Laws of War.
Specifically,
associated forces is understood, at least by the Government, to

be individuals who, in analogous circumstances in a traditional
international armed conflict between the armed forces of opposing
governments, would be detainable under principles of cobelligerency.
(Govt Mem. at 6 (quoting March 2009 Mem. at 7);
see also Govt Supp. Mem. at 9.) 20
The Court notes that even
accepting the Governments definition of associated forces, that

does not resolve plaintiffs concerns since they each testified to
20
As discussed above, Hedges testified that he knows a number of individuals

detained as enemy combatants pursuant to the Laws of War who were not armed
per se. Thus, the definition provided by the Government--albeit in a
litigation position taken in a wholly separate litigation--does not provide
clear parameters to plaintiffs here regarding the meaning of associated
forces.
55
activities with or involving individuals or organizations that are

associated forces as defined by the Government.
As to substantially or direct support, plaintiffs have
the stronger argument, stating that those terms lack sufficient
definition.
That is particularly persuasive in light of the fact
that a number of other statutes, including the prong of the NDAA

that directly follows this one (i.e., 1022 of the NDAA), have
lengthy definitional provisions.
1298 1022.
See Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat.
The Government was unable to define precisely what
direct or substantial support means.
Instead, the
Government pointed to cases in which the phrase substantially

supported had been referred to in connection with the
interpretation of the AUMF (Govt Mem. at 5 & n.5), but also
conceded, as it must, that the parameters of substantial support
were not at issue and not addressed in those cases.
In addition,
the Government conceded that the statute lacks a scienter or mens

rea requirement of any kind.
Tr. 230-31.
Thus, an individual
could run the risk of substantially supporting or directly

supporting an associated force without even being aware that he or
she was doing so.
Finally, and most importantly of course, the Government was
unable to state that plaintiffs conduct fell outside 1021.
the face of what could be indeterminate military detention, due
In
process requires more.
Indeed, 1022 of the NDAA contains a

56
long series of definitions, as does 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B

(examined in Holder).
In Holder, the Supreme Court specifically
found that the statute at issue was not unconstitutionally vague

because of the very definitions and the knowledge requirement
that are missing from this statute.
See Holder, 130 S. Ct. at
2719-22.
But, as the Supreme Court stated in Holder, its upholding of
2339A and 2339B does not mean that any other statute relating
to speech and terrorism would satisfy the First Amendment.
In
particular, we in no way suggest that a regulation on independent

speech would pass constitutional muster, even if the Government
were to show such speech benefits foreign terrorist
organizations.
Id. at 2730.
That is precisely the difficult
situation in which 1021 puts this Court:
the statute at issue
places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled

for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and
associated forces--i.e., foreign terrorist organizations.
The vagueness of 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or
even the Government itself, to understand with the type of
definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct
comes within its scope.
Because this Court has also found that that plaintiffs have
shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their facial
challenge under the First Amendment, this Court need not and does
57
not reach the question of whether a facial challenge (versus an as

applied challenge) would succeed on the Fifth Amendment claim at
this stage.
d.
Possible Limiting Constructions
The Supreme Court has instructed courts to refrain from

invalidating more of the statute than is absolutely necessary.
Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock, 480 U.S. 678, 684 (1987) (quoting
Regan, 468 U.S. at 652)).
This Court is mindful of its
responsibility not to enjoin a statute without considering whether

the statute--or the majority of the statute--is susceptible to a
limiting construction that renders the statute constitutional.
See, e.g., Washington State Grange, 552 U.S. at 456; Ayotte, 546
U.S. at 328-29; Reno v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844,
884 (1997).
The Court has considered that responsibility
carefully and does not believe that the brevity of this statute,
the myriad interpretations of substantial support, direct
support, and associated forces, and the absence of clear
guidance from the Government on appropriate definitions for those
terms, renders 1021 susceptible to a limiting construction that
would not result in the Court improperly taking on a legislative
role.
It is certainly true that in certain instances it is possible
to place a limiting construction on a statute that will save it
from facial invalidation.
See Reno, 521 U.S. at 884.

58
In
Skilling, the Supreme Court reiterated that it has long been our
practice, however, before striking a federal statute as
impermissibly vague, to consider whether the prescription is
amenable to a limiting construction.
130 S. Ct. at 2929.
Indeed, every reasonable construction must be resorted to.
Id.
Justice Scalia warned, however, that construction[s] should not

be judicial inventions.
Id. at 2931 n.43.
In considering a facial challenge, a court can impose a

limiting construction on a statute only if it is readily
susceptible to such a construction.
Reno, 521 U.S. at 884.
There is no such construction available here.
This Court could
state, and has considered, imposing a construction that simply

says that (1) knowledge is a required element; and (2) that speech
and association protected by the First Amendment are not covered.
However, that adds words and provides meaning in a way that dips
into the role of legislature.
Importing that construction into
1021 might, in fact, run contrary to what Congress intends;

Congress may want to capture certain otherwise protectable
associational conduct or they may want to capture conduct that is
not knowing--and they therefore may not want a court using a
blunt instrument of caselaw construction to alter their
legislative intent.
The Court has also considered importing certain principles
from the AUMF into 1021 to give the statute at issue a limiting
59
construction.
But that runs afoul of at least three things.
First, it runs afoul of Justice Scalias admonition in Skilling

that courts should not invent limiting constructions.
Ct. at 2931 n.43.
130 S.
Second, it runs afoul of the separation of
powers between the Executive and Legislative branches at it

imports a construction provided by the Executive, and not
Congress.
Doing so would strip Congress of its power to
legislate--and to give statutes the meaning it intends.
Even
though Congress entitled 1021 an affirmation of the AUMF, see

Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 1021, the stark differences
between 1021 and the AUMF (as discussed further below) leave the
Court without a framework provided by Congress itself through
which to impose a limiting construction and salvage 1021--or any
part thereof.
Third, it runs afoul of the rule of construction
that states that courts must presume that Congress acted

intentionally in crafting legislation--and in importing (or not)
concepts from one statute into a related or reaffirming statute.
Cf. Bates v. United States, 522 U.S. 23, 30-31 (1997).
One choice
Congress had to affirm the AUMF could have been to restate it

verbatim--or simply state, We affirm the AUMF and stop there.
They did not.
The Court finds that importing its interpretation
of principles from the AUMF into 1021 would ignore the

differences between those two statutes that this Court is required
to assume are intentional.
Cf. id.
60
Because this Court cannot fashion an appropriate limiting

construction, it finds that preliminarily enjoining enforcement of
1021 is the only appropriate remedy at this stage.
2.
Irreparable Injury
The second essential element of sustaining a claim for

preliminary injunctive relief is that a plaintiff suffers
irreparable harm in the absence of such relief.
F.3d at 80.
Salinger, 607
In the context of the First Amendment, the Supreme
Court has held that the loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even
minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable
injury.
Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976).
In Salinger,
the Second Circuit reiterated that point, but clarified that it

did not mean that First Amendment challenges necessarily carried a
presumption of irreparable injury; rather, that the loss of First
Amendment freedoms--even for a short duration--constituted
irreparable injury without more.
607 F.3d at 81-82.
Here, the uncontradicted testimony at the evidentiary hearing

was that the plaintiffs have in fact lost certain First Amendment
freedoms as a result of the enactment of 1021.
Hedges,
Wargalla, and Jonsdottir have changed certain associational

conduct, and OBrien and Jonsdittir have avoided certain
expressive conduct, because of their concerns about 1021.
Under
Elrod and Salinger, that is sufficient to meet the element of

irreparable harm.
Moreover, since plaintiffs continue to have

61
their associational and expressive conduct chilled, there is both

actual and continued threatened irreparable harm.
In addition, it is certainly the case that if plaintiffs were
detained as a result of their conduct, they could be detained
until the cessation of hostilities--i.e., an indeterminate period
of time.
Being subjected to the risk of such detention,
particularly in light of the Governments inability to represent

that plaintiffs conduct does not fall with 1021, must
constitute a threat of irreparable harm.
Is that harm immediate?
The question then is:
Since the Government will not say that
the conduct does not fall outside of 1021, one cannot predict
immediacy one way or the other.
The penalty we know would be
severe.
The Government argues that there cannot be a threat of
imminent harm because 1021 is simply an affirmation of the
AUMF--and since plaintiffs have not to date been subject to
detention under the AUMF, there is no reasonable basis for them to
fear detention under 1021.
(See Govt Mem. at 16-25.)
That
argument, however, ignores that, as mentioned above, there are

obvious differences between the AUMF and 1021.
certainly far from a verbatim reprise of the AUMF.
Section 1021 is
This Court
assumes, as it must, that Congress acted intentionally when

crafting the differences as between the two statutes.
62
First, by its terms, the AUMF is tied directly and only to

those involved in the events of 9/11.
Pub. L. 107-40, 115 Stat.
224 at 2(a) (authorization of the president to use force related

to attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001); see also id. at
Preamble (Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous
violence were committed against the United States and its citizens
. . .).
Section 1021, in contrast, has a non-specific definition
of covered person that reaches beyond those involved in the 9/11

attacks by its very terms.
See Pub. L. 112-81, 125 Stat. 1298
1021(b)(2) (a covered person is [a] person who was a part of

or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated
forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States .
. .).
To wit, 1021 speaks in terms of engaged in
hostilities, id.; that is the present progressive tense, not the

past tense relating to 9/11.
Relatedly, the individuals or groups at issue in the AUMF are
also more specific than those at issue in 1021.
At issue in the
AUMF are those who were directly involved in the 9/11 attacks
while those in 1021 are specific groups and associated forces.
Compare Pub. L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 at 2(a) with Pub. L. 11281, 125 Stat. 1298 1021(b)(2).
But the Government has not
provided a concrete, cognizable set of organizations or

individuals that constitute associated forces, lending further
indefiniteness to 1021.
63
Further, any question of support is specifically defined by

the verbs in the statute--i.e., planned, authorized,
committed, or aided in relation to the 9/11 attacks themselves
or harbored in relation to the organizations or persons who
engaged in the just-discussed acts.
at 2(a).
Pub. L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224
Such clarity is not provided in 1021 with respect to
what acts--and what mental state related to those acts--falls

within the broad, general phrase of substantial support.
Thus, the indefinite--indeed, vague--nature of 1021,
coupled with the Governments inability to provide assurances that
the specific conduct at issue here (of which the Government had
ample notice) would not subject plaintiffs to prosecution and
detention for their acts lays the foundation for plaintiffs
reasonable fear of irreparable harm. 21
3.
Balancing Of The Equities
In considering whether to issue a preliminary injunction, the

Court must consider, as noted above, the balance of the hardships
21
The assertion that President Obamas Signing Statement erases any reasonable
fear of imminent harm does not take into account precisely on what that Signing
Statement focuses. It does not state that 1021 of the NDAA will not be
applied to otherwise-protected First Amendment speech nor does it give concrete
definitions to the vague terms used in the statute. Rather, the Signing
Statement simply assures the public that the Obama Administration will not
authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens
and will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it
authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other
applicable law. Singing Statement, 2011 DAILY COMP. PRES. DOC. 978 at 1, 2.
Thus, the question only goes to the constitutionality of the detention
authorized by 1021--not the type of conduct that may fall within 1021.
Accordingly, the Signing Statement does not eliminate the reasonable fear of
future government harm that is likely to occur--i.e., the irreparable injury at
issue here.
64
between the plaintiff and defendant and issue the injunction only
if the balance of the hardships tips in the plaintiffs favor.
Salinger, 607 F.3d at 80.
The Governments primary argument in opposition to this
motion is that 1021 is simply an affirmation of the AUMF; that
it goes no further, it does nothing more.
As is clear from this
Opinion, this Court disagrees that that is the effect of 1021 as

currently drafted.
However, if the Governments argument is to be
credited in terms of its belief as to the impact of the

legislation--which is nil--then the issuance of an injunction
should have absolutely no impact on any Governmental activities at
all.
The AUMF does not have a sunset provision:
force and effect.
it is still in
Thus, to the extent the Government believes
that the two provisions are co-extensive, enjoining any action

under 1021 should not have any impact on the Government.
Even if, however, 1021 does convey some authority not
provided under the AUMF, the equities nonetheless tip strongly in
favor of enjoining its enforcement.
The Government was given a
number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state

unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational
activities engaged in by plaintiffs--or others--are not within
1021.
It did not.
This Court therefore must credit the chilling
impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable--and real.
65
Given
our societys strong commitment to protecting First Amendment

rights, the equities must tip in favor of protecting those rights.
Moreover, Congress can add definitional language to the
statute and resolve the issues the plaintiffs have raised and the
Court has flagged.
By adding definitions and imposing a scienter
requirement, it can resolve the issues with the statute and

proceed with enforcement activities it deems fit.
In the
meantime, there are a variety of other statutes which can be

utilized to detain those engaged in various levels of support of
terrorists--including the AUMF and 1022.
Thus, preliminarily
enjoining the enforcement of 1021 does not divest the Government

of its many other tools.
4.
Public Interest
There is a strong public interest in protecting rights

guaranteed by the First Amendment.
See Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v.
Pub. Utils. Commn of Cal., 475 U.S. 1, 8 (1986) (The

constitutional guarantee of free speech serves significant
societal interests . . . .
By protecting those who wish to enter
the marketplace of ideas from government attack, the First

Amendment protects the publics interest in receiving
information. (quotation marks and citations omitted)); Salinger,
607 F.3d at 82.
There is also a strong public interest in
ensuring that due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment

are protected by ensuring that ordinary citizens are able to
66
understand the scope of conduct that could subject them to

indefinite military detention.
Cf. Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S.
319, 335, 348-49 (1976).

Weighed against these public interests is the strong public
interest in upholding acts of Congress and thereby maintaining the
appropriate separation of powers; there is also a clear public
interest which counsels for cautious use of judicial power to
enjoin an act of Congress, and the public interest in ensuring
protection from terroristic acts--and that law enforcement has the
tools necessary to be as effective as possible in that regard.
The Government has assisted the Court in its deliberations
with respect to the risks associated with the various interests on
each side of the ledger.
In light of the Governments contention
that 1021 does nothing new, that it goes no further than the
AUMF, the Court can only assume that the Government believes that
preliminarily enjoining enforcement of 1021 will not expose the
public to any increased risk and that 1021 does not add anything
new to law enforcements tools. 22
This Court is acutely aware that preliminarily enjoining an
act of Congress must be done with great caution.
However, it is
the responsibility of our judicial system to protect the public

from acts of Congress which infringe upon constitutional rights.
22
The Court disagrees with this scope argument, as set forth above, but refers
to it as an indication of the expected impact on the Government.
67
As set forth above, this Court has found that plaintiffs have
shown a likelihood of success on the merits regarding their
constitutional claim and it therefore has a responsibility to
insure that the public's constitutional rights are protected.
Accordingly, this Court finds that the public interest is
best served by the issuance of the preliminary relief recited
herein.
CONCLUSION
For the aforementioned reasons, plaintiffs' motion for
preliminary injunction is GRANTED; enforcement of
1021 of the
NDAA is preliminarily enjoined pending further order of this Court

or amendments to the statute rendering this Opinion & Order moot.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion
for preliminary injunction and the motion to file amicus brief at
Docket Nos. 3 and 31.
SO ORDERED:
Dated: New York, New York
May 16, 2012
Katherine B. Forrest
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
68
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Stanley J. Caterbone
Appellant
v.
Residents of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania
:
:
:
1561 MDA 2015
PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
I hereby certify that this 23rd day of October, 2015, I have served the attached document(s) to the persons on the date(s)
and in the manner(s) stated below, which service satisfies the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 121:
Service
Residents of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania

Email
McCueA@co.lancaster.pa.us
10/23/2015
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Representing:
Appellee Residents of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania
/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone

(Signature of Person Serving)
Person Serving:
Attorney Registration No:
Law Firm:
Address:
Pro Se:
PACFile 1001
Caterbone, Stanley J.
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Appellant Caterbone, Stanley J.
Page 1 of 1
Print Date: 10/23/2015 11:51 am
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

CIVIL DIVISION
In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
PETITIONERS
v.
RESIDENTS of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania
DEFENDANTS
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015

Lower Court Case No. 15-06985
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT

Third Circuit Lambert Appeal SUBMISSION Statement and EXHIBIT by Appellant
October 23, 2015 with Executive Summary
I hereby on this
23rd
day of October, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the
attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. The Appellant
is going on the record as to linking President Obama's Administration (Not the President Per Se), the Military
Complex, Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray, and Lancaster City Police Chief Keith Sadler as being the Principals
executing the COINTELPRO-LIKE program against the APPELLANT, Stanley J. Caterbone and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP. In the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 08-13373, President Obama,
former Director of the CIA and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates were named DEFENDANTS in or about 2010.
There may also be undo influence between Lancaster City Police Chief Kieth Sadler, formerly of the Philadelphia
Police Department and the Honorable Judge Paul Diamond, as evidenced by his at the least biased ORDER
which is under the Appeal.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.

The prosecutorial misconduct the the Petitioner has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the Petitioner from
completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18
U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
The attached 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that
may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant
an inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law, a
plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to do an
unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice with
intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United States v.
Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by
the following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges
in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy
which attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups
committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A.
Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional
rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal
prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective
for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual
rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal
interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15,
2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court.
http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1

Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
brought before the courts.
These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of
limitations has run out.
Dated October 23rd , 2015
Advanced Media Group, President and Owner
Pro Se Litigant, U.S. District Court & Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court
Scaterbone@Live.com
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December
2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
BLANK PAGE
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALL
LEFT BLANK
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT
I hereby on this
23rd
attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. The Appellant is
going on the record as to linking President Obama's Administration (Not the President Per Se), the Military
MEDIA GROUP. In the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 08-13373, President Obama, former
Director of the CIA and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates were named DEFENDANTS in or about 2010. There
may also be undo influence between Lancaster City Police Chief Kieth Sadler, formerly of the Philadelphia Police
Department and the Honorable Judge Paul Diamond, as evidenced by his at the least biased ORDER which is
under the Appeal.
Date: October 23, 2015
15-3400 Lambert Appeal
/s/
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__
Page 1 of 44
Friday, October 23, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Page
Page
2 of1 44
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Page 3 of 44
Bill
A) Findings
Convention.
B) Purpose
or four years.
**
Page
Page
4 of2 44
telepathy devices.
one year..
in good faith.
Page
Page
5 of3 44
(c)
recipient.

Page
Page
6 of4 44
Page
Page
7 of5 44
Hon. P. Michael Sturla

8 North Queen Street
Suite 1100 The Griest Building
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-3157
Fax: (717) 295-7816
120 Main Capitol Building
PO Box 202096
Harrisburg, PA 17120-2096
(717) 787-3555
Fax: (717) 705-1923
Hon. Bryan Cutler
207 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
(717) 786-4551
Fax: (717) 786-3645
Hon. Bryan Cutler
147A East Wing
PO Box 202100
(717) 783-6424
Fax: (717) 772-9859
Hon. John M. Perzel
7518 Frankford Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19136
(215) 331-2600
Fax: (215) 708-3135
Hon. John M. Perzel
PO Box 202172
(717) 787-2016
Fax: (717) 783-7225
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
610 North 2nd Street
(215) 503-3245
Fax: (215) 503-7850
107 East Wing
PO Box 202175
(717) 783-8098
Fax: (717) 780-4787
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

852 Village Rd.,Municipal
Bldg
P.O. Box 268
Lampeter, PA 17537
(717) 464-5285
Fax: (717) 295-7817
Hon. Matthew E. Baker

115 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202068
(717) 772-5371
Fax: (717) 705-1850
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

432 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202043
(717) 783-6422
Fax: (717) 787-7731
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Judiciary, Chairman
645 Penn Street, 2nd Floor
Reading, PA 19601
(610) 376-1529
Fax: (610) 378-4406
Hon. Katie True

2938 Columbia Avenue
Manor West Commons, Suite
501
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-5050
Fax: (717) 295-5053
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

PO Box 202127
(717) 787-3525
Fax: (717) 772-5401
Hon. Katie True

7 East Wing
PO Box 202041
(717) 705-7161
Fax: (717) 705-1946
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver,
Health & Human Services,
Chairman
2839 West Girard Avenue
(215) 684-3738
Fax: (215) 235-4629
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver
34E East Wing
PO Box 202195
(717) 787-3480
Fax: (717) 783-0684
Chairman74 Main Street
Wellsboro, PA 16901
(570) 724-1390
Fax: (570) 724-2168
Page
Page
8 of6 44
Hon. Ron Marsico

Judiciary, Chairman
4401 Linglestown Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
(717) 652-3721
Fax: (717) 652-6276
Hon. Ron Marsico
PO Box 202105
(717) 783-2014
Fax: (717) 705-2010
Hon. Camille Bud George,
Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
275 Spring Street
Houtzdale, PA 16651
(814) 378-6279
Fax: (814) 765-0609
Hon. Camille Bud George
38B East Wing
PO Box 202074
(717) 787-7316
Fax: (717) 783-8236
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Energy, Chairman
302 Seneca Street
Oil City, PA 16301
(814) 677-6363
Fax: (814) 676-1653
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson
PO Box 202064
(717) 783-8188
Fax: (717) 705-1945
Lloyd K. Smucker (R)
Senate District 13
Lancaster (part) and York (part)
Counties.
Senate Box 203013
Harrisburg, PA 17120-3013 185
Main Capitol
(717) 787-6535
D.O. ADDRESS:
44 North Christian Street
Suite 100
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 397-1309
lsmucker@pasen.gov
http://senatorsmucker.com
Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Senate District 15
Dauphin (part) and York
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203015
173 Capitol Building
(717) 787-6801
D.O. ADDRESS:
916-B Park Plaza
North River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
(717) 896-7714
jpiccola@pasen.gov:
http://www.piccola.org
Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Senate District 36
Chester (part) and Lancaster
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203036
16 East Wing
(717) 787-4420
FAX: (717) 783-3156
D.O. ADDRESS:
301 East Main Street
Lititz, PA 17543
(717) 627-0036
mbrubaker@pasen.gov
http://senatorbrubaker.com
Page
Page
9 of7 44

weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Page
Page
10 of
8 44

Related posts:

weapons
Comments

Page
Page
11 of
9 44
Page 12 of 44

Bowl at White House
Feb 1, 2011
Super Bowl.
Gray said.
Page 13 of 44

bharris@lnpnews.com
Page 14 of 44
About

1 of 5
Page 15 of 44

10/23/2015 3:41 AM
bionic soldiers.

2 of 5
Page 16 of 44

10/23/2015 3:41 AM

Leaked Document
July 29, 2013
July 29, 2013

By Activist Post
Page 17 of 44
include:
30) [text added]
and messages.
Page 18 of 44
not commit.
Persuasive E
Page 19 of 44

Implants, For Real
June 1, 2014
their onset.
Page 20 of 44
devices.
Page 21 of 44
1 of 5

Research
Susan E.
Brandon, the
Obama

practice.
administratio
ns Chief for
Research in
the DCHCs
Behavioral
Science
Program.
[emphasis added].
Page 22 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
2 of 5
Page 23 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
3 of 5
Page 24 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
4 of 5
against humanity.
Tweet
Page 25 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
1 of 3

CONNECT
of us.
everything we do.
Georgia.
seminar.
Berlon.
In The News

Bobbi Kristina
decision
Meet The Man Who Is

Industry
Dollar Shave Club
Page 26 of 44

10/23/2015 3:07 AM

Melissa
Dykes
September 28, 2013

Page 27 of 44
experiments.
Page 28 of 44
The government has been called into question on EMF weapons lately, following suspected Navy Yard shooter Aaron
Alexis claims that he was targeted with just such weapons.
Ultra low frequency attack is what Ive been subject to for the last three months. And to be perfectly honest, that is
what has driven me to this, Mr. Alexis reportedly wrote in a note before he shot 12 people. Pictures of the shotgun
Alexis used to commit the crime have surfaced with My ELF [extremely low frequency] weapon, Better off this way,
and End the torment scratched into the barrel.
Aaron Alexis shotgun. Source: FBI
The mainstream media has, for the most part, dutifully painted Alexis as a mentally insane person who just randomly
lost it and decided to shoot a bunch of people one day. He isnt the first government employee to kill and claim it was
the government controlling his mind. Carl Campbell was found innocent by reason of insanity after shooting Navy
Commander Edward Higgins to death outside the Pentagon in 1991. Court papers revealed Campbell was believed to
be schizophrenic due to his assertions the U.S. government had inserted a mind control microchip into his brain.
U.S. Army Intelligence Veteran and Former Director of the Electronic Surveillance Project Julianne McKinney selfpublished Microwave Harassment & Mind-Control Experimentation in 1992 and Mind Control and the Secret State
in 2008. In her writings, McKinney outlined what could be the ultimate goals of these clandestine EMF torture
programs:
The long-term objectives of these harassment and experimentation campaigns appear to be quite
fundamental; viz.,
(1) induce a sense of perverted loyalty toward the very agencies engaged in the individuals
harassment, to confuse his or her priorities where the possibility of obtaining legal redress might be
concerned;
(2) redirect the targeted individuals feelings of hopelessness, anger and frustration toward racial and
Page 29 of 44
1 of 2
Page 30 of 44

10/23/2015 4:35 AM
2 of 2
Recommende
Jim Morrison's "s

faces life in priso
Valley man receiv

national award fo
rescuing abandon
dog
Page 31 of 44

10/23/2015 4:35 AM
1 of 2
Page 32 of 44

10/23/2015 4:40 AM
Outlook.com - scaterbone@live.com
1 of 1
https://col131.mail.live.com/?tid=cmNVnHWxQa5RGZNgAiZMJDlg2&...
New
amazon
Folders
Reply
Delete
Archive
Junk
Sweep
Move to
Categories
Stan J. Caterbone
Your Amazon.com order of "Abuse Hidden Behind The

Badge" has shipped!
Inbox
Amazon.com
Junk
To: Stan J. Caterbone
Add to contacts 6/23/15
Drafts 1
Shipping Confirmation
Sent
Deleted
AA Inbox 41
Deed and City Rehab
Hello Stan J. Caterbone,

"Abuse Hidden Behind The Badge" has shipped.
Ebay and Online Purcha

Facebook
Details
Fax Folder 146

FFCHS Communications
Order #110-6302565-1485032
Geek Squad 1
Go Fund Me 2
Expected delivery date:

Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Shipped to:
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 FREMONT ST...
Lambert Case 14
*See FICO Credit Score Terms
LinkedIn 5
May-June Surge 51
Total Before Tax:
$34.59
Mind Control Research
Tax Collected:
$2.08
Shipment Total: $36.67

Saved Sent
Search Results
New folder
Depending on the ship speed you chose, it may take 24 hours for tracking information to be available
in your account.
Return or replace your items in Your Orders.
We hope to see you again soon.

Amazon.com
Unless otherwise noted, items sold by Amazon.com LLC are subject to sales tax in select states in accordance with
the applicable laws of that state. If your order contains one or more items from a seller other than Amazon.com LLC,
it may be subject to state and local sales tax, depending upon the sellers business policies and the location of their
operations. Learn more about tax and seller information.
Your invoice can be accessed here.
This email was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming email. Please do not reply to this
message.
2015 Microsoft
Terms
Privacy & cookies
Developers
Page 33 of 44
English (United States)

9/17/2015 5:15 PM
* SADLER ABUSED EX-WIFE *** BREAKING NEWS *** @ LIP News
1 of 11
http://lipnews.com/2012/07/sadler-abused-ex-wife-breaking-news/
LIP News Lancaster Independent Press
Home
CONTACT
SITES
UNSOLVED MURDERS
CHERYL & STEVE MARKLE
UNSOLVED CRIMES
* SADLER ABUSED EX-WIFE *** BREAKING NEWS ***
Archives
Archives
Posted on July 29th, 2012 Becky 77 comments
* 7-30-12 Will Sadler resign or will Mayor Gray fire him?
Links
Cheryl Markle Stalker
Incest Tragedy
Lancaster Lynching
Steve Markle Stalker
*** BREAKING NEWS! ***

POLICE CHIEF SADLER
BEAT HIS WIFE!
Categories
Convention Center
Featured
Franklin & Marshall College
General News
Incest Tragedy
Lancaster Courts
Lancaster Lynching
Lancaster Newspapers
Lancaster Prison
Marvelous Marv
Police
Racism
Roseboro Murder
Uncategorized
Unsolved Murders
Meta
Rosaura Torres wrote a book about it published in 2010,

Abuse Hidden Behind the Badge. He caused a retinal
detachment that left her with permanent vision loss.
Please check back later for more on this unbelievable breaking
story!
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.org
Police
77 responses to * SADLER ABUSED EX-WIFE *** BREAKING NEWS ***

1. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 12:39
This comment came in under the story immediately below and I am also posting it here:
Page 34 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
2 of 11
We must bring an end to the cover up. Too many innocent people are being lost. My
prayers are with the victims and survivors.
Sincerely,
Author Rosaura Torres-Sader
Abuse Hidden Behind The Badge.
2. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 12:41
Her comment below also has this link:
http://www.torrespublishing.com/Pages/default.aspx
3. Barbequed chicken July 29th, 2012 at 12:46
Is this the reason, his abuse and dislike of women, that Sadler hasnt pressed his team to solve
the murder of Mrs. Kaylor?
4. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 13:00
Rosaura,
Thank you for speaking with me on the phone! This is so unbelievable. Im working as fast as I
can.
5. Rosaura Torres Sadler July 29th, 2012 at 13:12
I am here to help and support all victims and survivors of Domestic Violence. God bless you
Becky for the wonderful work you are doing.
Be blessed always.
Rosaura
6. FWIW July 29th, 2012 at 14:17
Why isnt the chief and the Trooper named on her website or anywhere else? If they beat her,
why not call them out all over the web? And what ever came of the abuse? Were they
prosecuted? Was internal affairs notified? When did it happen?
7. It's time to make the donuts July 29th, 2012 at 14:18
WOW!!..tommorw morning the donuts arent goin to go down the same..WOW.
8. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 14:54
Hello my friend, thank you for the wonderful Complement. I understanding about having the
scars of the past abuse you and I sustained. My abusers caused me to have retinal detachment in
both eyes. My ex husband who is Chief of Police In Lancaster, PA (Keith Sadler) caused my
first detachment, then the trooper who is retired now caused me second, this is why I decided to
write my story and continue my journey to help others. I refuse to keep the Code of SIlence. You
are amazing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vFoYl8KKvw
9. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 15:08
Sadler is the second photo down http://ciaracolonoidvsurvivorcom.blogspot.com/2012/03
/demons-in-their-own-right.html
Thanks to a friend who is doing research for me! There is so much to do
10. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 15:13
Her husband was called The Golden Child by city officials and the Commissioner because of
his spotless record, work ethics, and career path. Going to his family or the police for assistance
Page 35 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
3 of 11
was impossible. He went for my face when abusing her, punching, slapping, even causing a
retinal detachment creating permanent loss of peripheral vision. Finally, he left me for his
mistress. He is now a Chief of Police, and on a Domestic Violence Advisory Board.
http://www.examiner.com/article/abuse-hidden-behind-the-badge-when-dv-offenders-are-cops
11. Anonymous July 29th, 2012 at 16:35
Married when they were 23, Torres remembers her husband, a Philadelphia Police Officer,
showed signs of abuse in courtship. He was controlling by telling her how to dress and how to
behave. Having grown up in a loving, nurturing family, Torres did not understand the signs of an
abuser. For years, I played the blame, shame, guilt game, she explains; I protected him, his
career, and his image as a police officer. His African-American family was also abusive toward
Torres, who is of Puerto Rican descent, constantly telling her Latinas were the lowest of
people. His grandmother was a founder of Jack and Jill, and they were very racist always
(had) something racist to say to me. Her husband was called The Golden Child by city
officials and the Commissioner because of his spotless record, work ethics, and career path.
Going to his family or the police for assistance was impossible. He went for my face when
abusing her, punching, slapping, even causing a retinal detachment creating permanent loss of
peripheral vision. Finally, he left me for his mistress. He is now a Chief of Police, and on a
Domestic Violence Advisory Board.
TO FWIW, I DID REPORT IT.Your courts in Lancaster would not prosecute the trooper. If
you are wondering who he is, his name is Anthony Suber. I have no reason to lie. Imagine being
afraid; not knowing what could happened. I will share this with you, when he was Chief
Inspector, I was warned by a other officer that he was going to bring false charges against me
and have me arrested. She told me to run..I
The Mr. Suber was not charged because they protected him. I file a civil suit; not because of the
money but.The justice. There were emails him admitting to hurting me, the jury felt he was not
liable for my injuries. My case is in appeals.
I apologize for some of my mistakes. My reason for writing my book was to tell how so many
still live in fear. Many would rather believe an officer of the law because its difficult for them to
even phantom a Officer of the Law would do this unspeakable abuse. We look for them for
protection.
What happens when it is the Police Officer we fear?
To FIWI: I changed your chief name in the book, not to protect him but.to protect our
children. They are now all adults. Many do not even realize he had another family.
FIWI, Your chief is not a great importance to me. What is important to me; is how we can help
other victims and survivors of Domestic Violence.
15. Chunky Blue Line July 29th, 2012 at 18:20
Sadler beat a woman and got away with it without accountability. His martial arts must have
come in handy when he used his wife for a punching bag.
Sadler is a LOSER and the worst job in the world for a thug loser is in law enforcement where
they have no accountability.
Thank you for all your support Chunky Blue Line.
17. Busted down to patrolman July 29th, 2012 at 20:11
Rosaura, You are a brave woman. Your reaction to the abuse you endured at the hands of this
Page 36 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
4 of 11
monster is normal. There is nothing worse than being afraid of the police, being unable to get a
response to your legitimate allegations. Even the good cops are afraid to step up and deal with
their buddies in blue. Hopefully the rest of us have the courage to now stand up and rid the
police departments of the abusers.
I now think of the current Lancaster City Lt. who was involved in the beating of two Spanish
guys some years ago. Was that just before this chief showed up?
Who did Sadlers background check. I think that could be an interesting fact.
18. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 20:16
I am still in shock by this whole thing. Apparently theres a very good reason this big chief
inspector from Philly packed his bags and headed to this little town. Unbelievable!
19. Denny July 29th, 2012 at 20:31
I agree with Busted, who did the vetting for the chief? I have had background checks done for
employment and they were thorough, they even spoke with prior neighbors. Obviously this was
lacking with Sadler. Bravo Rosaura for speaking out!
20. FWIW July 29th, 2012 at 21:23
TORRES- I dont doubt your experiences, I was just curious as to what happened. I had/have so
many questions. And the chief is not my chief, I dont live in the city.
Thank you all for your support. What is so important is to now hold those who are abuser
accountable for there actions. We must not continue to push any abuse under the rug. FWIW, I
am a open book, you can ask me any questions.
This is why I decided to write my story. I am honored and humbled, because I am still here to
help others.
22. Jim July 30th, 2012 at 05:02
NOWwell have to see what LNP does with this
23. Jim July 30th, 2012 at 05:03
NOW.well have to see what LNP does with this shocking info..
24. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 06:54
Yup! Theyve ignored all the unsolved murders and crimes but can they ignore this?
25. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 07:35
And what is Mayor Gray going to do? OMG!
Rosaura thank you for the work you do to help victims of domestic violence. You are very
brave and honorable.
I was so angry when I read the information on your website and saw the YouTube video because
we rely on government officials to do the right thing when vetting candidates for important
positions. Our tax dollars pay these individuals a VERY good salary to do their job. I am still
shocked that Keith Sadler was hired for such a vital position in law enforcement. Im guessing
the Philadelphia police department exhaled a huge sigh of relief when their problem was taken
off their hands. Shove it under the rug or in this case, move him to Lancaster.
The mugshot of Rodriguez-Colon showed a face swollen and bruised without explanation. The
police chief uses his fists on a WOMAN looks like this is standard operating procedure in his
jurisdiction. Just like corporations, the guy at the top sets the tone for the entire culture. Any
honorable soul on the police force has to keep their mouth shut to keep their job.
Page 37 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
5 of 11
27. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 10:41

The Rodriguez-Colon assault should be investigated. From the LNP article, Suspects bruises
still a mystery there is this:
He received stitches and other treatment before being arraigned and taken to the prison.
Investigators still werent sure Friday how Rodriguez-Colon, 35, was injured.
There was no crime reported, city police Lt. Todd Umstead said.
Isnt that cute? The police spokesperson Umstead makes a little joke about it. So when are you
allowed to beat someone to a pulp in Lancaster? Only if they allegedly abuse children? Or if they
steal your wallet can you beat them up? Or if their dog poops on your yard can you beat them
up? Disgusting! This police department is completely out of control!
http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/670019_Suspect-s-bruises-still-a-mystery.html
Chunky Blue Line, thank you for all your compassion and support. I pray that one DAY I will
receive justice.
God bless all of you.
Rosaura
29. Two sides July 30th, 2012 at 13:13
Im shocked
Question was the husband the only abusve one and was it everyday beatings was he a angry
drunk that would come home just to beat the wife and was he the only abuser in the family and
out of both parents
No he was not an angry drunk controlling, dictator. I quote My home is a communist home
and I am the dictator and what I says goes.. Yes I did hit my boys. I admitted this in the book.
I have said time and time again, I was wrong and what happened to them was wrong. I hold
myself accountable for what happened to my boys.
32. G.R.S. July 30th, 2012 at 16:21
Time for all to move forward and just Live. I lost my primo last week I have more things to
worry about then the past the past made me strong and alert and that is why I am me so nope
wont hold onto past just time to move forward and live my life
33. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 16:36
Has Sadler received any type of therapy? Has he done anything to address and control his
abusive personality? This man repeatedly abused his wife for years. He has no respect for
women. There are not enough words to express how this man should not be a police chief, let
alone a police officer. This is outrageous!
Becky, no he did not. No he did not address this. I feel I must share this with your readers. My
abuse caused me retinal detachment and there is not a day I do not pray I can go back in time. I
have permanent damage. I know, I will never drive again or traveling but.I am now here to
help others. Until the day I go home with my parents; I will remember the abuse that caused me
my vision.
35. Goldilocks July 30th, 2012 at 18:33
Wow, this sure is unbelievable news about Chief Sadler. Becky, I fear for your safety in revealing
this news. You never know what abusive people and their supporters will do in order to protect
Page 38 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
6 of 11
their jobs, reputation, etc. Please be careful.

People .dont believe everything you read!!!!! This sound like a whole bunch of
nonsense. She waited soooo long to report the abuse Why??? It sounds to me like a case
of a breakup gone wrong And Mrs Torres You should hire an editor for your next book)
37. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 20:57
No, she didnt wait so long. She filed for a PFA in 1999. What about that dont you understand?
Becky thank you. Sounds to me this person is a bit jealous. I am going to pray for you. I feel no
anger or hate. Again, what matters here is what we can do to help victims who are afraid to
speak out. I tried to get help. I received no help absolutely Nothing. I will not turn my back on
another SURVIVOR OF Officer Involved Domestic Violence OIVD or any victim of Domestic
Violence.
Look how many treat the victims of Sandusky. They made comments how they only want
money. So many children, women and men, yes men lives with the memory of abuse.
40. anonymous July 30th, 2012 at 22:54
Question??? Are there any other women claiming abuse by this man!!! Why are you naming him
and not the trooper??? Why did you wait to open up about the abuse!!?? Are you hiding
anything???? Have you always been the victim or have you ever been the abuser????
I would love to hear what the CHILDREN who grew up in that household have to say!!!!! Ive
been in the same exact situation and Im beyond positive that this women is leaving somethings
out!!!!
So i guess its PRESIDENT OBAMAS fault for all the unsolved murders across the United
States???? No!!!!!! Its the cowards how commit the crime!!!! So I question this women even
more!!!! It seems that your only goal and mission is to destroy this man!!!!!! You seem like an
vindictive, manipulator!!!!! Youre all about yourself!!!! Your only chance and shot to fame was
this book!!! It has been two years since you published and it was a flop!!!! I read up on you and
him!!! He is married and has a new baby!!! So its obvious for very very bitter and jealous!!!!
Yall keep believing what you are reading, cause I guarantee lies are being told!!!!
If you watched the interview he gave before becoming Chief, he mentioned having FIVE
CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
44. It's time to make the donuts July 31st, 2012 at 09:54
Anon..could you be the one in denial?.Im thinking your related to the wife abusing
chief!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
45. Chunky Blue Line July 31st, 2012 at 12:18
Anonymous sounds like he doth protest too much. Check the IP address Becky, I would guess
its coming from CHUNKYs home address based on the time. Hes probably wise enough not to
use the Police Dept computer.
oh, and !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [just sayin]
46. Denny July 31st, 2012 at 12:36
Page 39 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
7 of 11
Anonymous, how can you guarantee lies are being told when you hide behind your identity?
LoL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!chunky blue line
July 30, 10:54 p.m.
Scene: Chunky at home, wife/kids asleep, working on his 3rd Jack&Coke reads LIP News
and angrily responds.
Another swig of Jack&Coke, posts again at 11:01 p.m.
Two more swigs of Jack&Coke, eyes bulging and red faced it takes several minutes to type
another handful of comments holding down the ! key for emphasis, 11:19 p.m.
Final comment 11:25 p.m. Chunky spills the 4th Jack&Coke on the keyboard and heads to bed.
He may be angry, but hes still large and in charge of his domicile and county department.
-scene49. Rosaura Torres Sadler July 31st, 2012 at 17:08
Most people would rather point the finger at the victim. AMON, are you Denise? Are you one of
his followers. Many would rather blame, shame and guilt the victim. Shame on you
AMONUntil you walk into any victims shoes you would never know the damage that has
been caused. Again, I will pray for you because this is all I can give you; is my prayers.
Becky, GOD BLESS YOU!!!!
50. Rosaura Torres Sadler July 31st, 2012 at 17:14
If you look at his BIO AMON, my and your chief children do not exist. When he was sworn in
as chief; did you see any of our adult children? NO. If you have any questions for me, just ask. I
am right here. Be blessed.
51. Clara Bell Leonard July 31st, 2012 at 19:18
I am no supporter of abusers, but i am also not a supporter of a lifelong sentence and drag about
of all or any one thing that someone is accused of. What is the purpose of this? Why cant Sadler
be on a board that serves to protect the women of abuse? In rehab facilities often the best
counselors are ones that have been in the shoes before, same for alcohilics etc. A person is
capable of seeing the wrong if any and making amends to that end. They may never pay enough
in your or my eyes, but luckily you and I dont have the final say. forgive and let live then you
can be free.
Clara you are so right, I agree he should be a part of all of these outstanding facilities but.How
can he advice on any such issues such as Domestic Violence, when the abuser will deny any
abuse. I have permitted damage to my vision. It does not matter what he did to me, what matter
is what we can do to help others. How can we help others. How can we stop the ABUSE!
53. Clara Bell Leonard August 1st, 2012 at 10:00
Sadly it is a loophole that you cannot go back an weave shut. it doesnt really matter what
method one uses to cleanse theirself or shed bad behaviors, as long as they do. Unless and until
his current wife decides to come out with something it does not really pose any threat in the
performance of his job as police chief. From what I am reading it is not you necessarily calling
for him to lose his job, but more dear Becky. I recognize you have a story you want to tell, but it
really looks like Becky is riding your coat tails and pushing your buttons to further her dislike or
disappointment of Sadlers performance. 2 separate things that should not be coupled together.
Your story your life and if it were me I would protect those which I hold to be my truth and be
uhhhm, choicier?? of who I give audience to. Life and time are precious and I am not trying to
further somebody elses gosh danged agenda. At the end of the day, you dont need
acknowledgement from any abuser, not if you have to ask for it, see that the longer you punish
Page 40 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
8 of 11
them the longer you are punishing yourself.

54. Becky August 1st, 2012 at 10:15
Clara, LOL! Riding her coat tails? Ive been publishing daily for almost 9 years! I dont do coat
tails. Did you watch the video by Lt. Todd Umstead that I linked to? The Lancaster Police deal
with 3,000 domestic calls a year it is their most common call. Tell me how you can have a
domestic abuser as the police chief under those conditions?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMR2UAAwTN0
September 25, 2012 will be the nine year anniversary of this site, Clara!
Becky I dont mean you need her, I just mean you WANT to use her. I have a site, its been up
since sites were allowed to be had. hoop dee freaking dooo!
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I listened to Rosa on the blogtalk interview and the one on YouTube where she talks with
another wife of a philly cop. anyway, Rosa could have her own blogtalk or other medium to
discuss her story the way she likes, she can give her goals, her mission, and her plan and tell us
all how we can help. so Becks, what are your goals, what is your mission, what is you plan to
have the rest of us help make Lancaster a better place or the best it can be?
Obviously as a new reader Clara, you wouldnt know but in the last six months or so I have
uncovered the following and plan to pursue and help get the situations corrected so that
Lancaster can move forward:
1. Blatant racial discrimination in hiring by the County of Lancster. This is an ongoing series.
2. Public officials not being held accountable in one case particularly the coroner. He failed
to perform his job duties by not performing autopsies on two women found hanging from trees
within a week of each other in the county. One looks very much like a murder, not a suicide as
he declared (without benefit of an autopsy. There will be more on that coming.
3. A terrible lack of diversity on the Lancaster Police force. Lancaster is over 50% minority.
Check out the Honor Guard on the police website. Check out their three new hires! This is
disgraceful and is also an ongoing part of a series.
4. The Lancaster Polices terrible record in solving murder and crimes. Check out the
UNSOLVED MURDERS and the UNSOLVED CRIMES tabs at the top of my site.
5. Blatant racism in sentencing by Lancaster County Judges.
6. Blantant racial discrimination in hiring by the Lancaster Newspapers which has allowed many
of the above inequalities to exist. They have one minority on their editorial staffs the editor of
La Voz (its in Spanish and hence they needed someone fluet in Spanish!) I have been writing
about this subject for years!
7. Trying to bring awareness about the sexual abuse of children including incest. This has been
ongoing on this site for years.
I could keep going but Ill stop now because I have work to do!
Okay, Clara, if youre going to get nasty and make personal attacks your comments are not going
Page 41 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
9 of 11
to be posted. Okay, Clara boo?

61. Rosaura Torres Sadler August 1st, 2012 at 11:22
It is time to come together to help the citizen of Lancaster and I believe in my heart that Becky
is trying to do just that.
Rosa, Im a going to leave this conversation for 2 reasons.
1. I dont stick around for any abusive conversation or ones that i feel degrade the person I am
tryin to be.
2. You appear to have never stopped being a victim and until you do, nothing can help you. I
believe you were wronged, but unless people are really going to band together and put some fire
under our system, little change will come. I wish you better outcomes and eventual peace. I have
it.
63. Jen Hopkins August 1st, 2012 at 12:58
Wow.. It is truly amazing how this woman decided to write a book only after Mr. Sadler became
a Chief in Lancaster. Also, she only claimed abuse after he left the marriage only to dismiss the
claim to get money. Really? This is truly a case of jealousy and need for revenge. I also find it
interesting that she is so focused in destroying Mr. Sadlers reputation but talks very little about
the State Trooper whom she claims abused her too. I have to admit that reading her book was
painful because of so many grammatical errors and inconsistency in her story. She claims that
she was terrified of him but also admits to being unfaithful, Im not sure how a terrified
woman that feared for her life can go ahead and be unfaithful to the man she fears. I personally
think that Ms. Torres has been on a campaign to destroy the Chief and her efforts have been
useless. I agree with Anonymous, I would love to hear from the children that lived in that
household. I would also love to hear from other people who witnessed the abuse, and how
about his current wife? Is she claiming abuse too? My predictions are that the Chief will
continue to be the Chief and Mrs. Torres will continue hating him for it.
I advise Ms. Torres to move on and do some soul searching in order to be happy and forget about
her ex-husband who left her over a decade ago. That is way too long to hold on to hate. Also,
Ms. Torres, you should take a basic grammar lesson before you call yourself an author.
Clara Bell, You as a survivor are aware that Domestic Violence is a lifetime of healing but.We
do live. So many victims and survivors live with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I am no longer a
victim but.Every day I am reminded just like so many of my sisters and brothers of the
damage they will live with them for the rest of their lives.
Should we tell those young men who were sexually abused to get over it? No, those young men
are our children. We must not stand and ignore what has happened to so many. I have never
shown any bitterness towards you. I am a good decent person. I will continue to treat you with
respect. Be blessed Clara Bell.
Do I hate Keith? No, I have spoken to many women and just as myself, they want
acknowledgement, accountability for what happened to them. If I live to be a 100, I will always
remember what Keith Sadler and Anthony Suber did to me.
I started writing my book back in 1999. I decided to come out after the death of my father. My
mother and father told me not to give up, to speak out and I did. There were many errors in my
book. My editor did a horrible job on the first fifty copies and it was corrected but.This does
not matter. The truth is the truth. No matter how many errors there were, it does not change the
fact that Keith is my past abuser. I did mention Anthony Suber, I wrote to Sotomayer about this,
I contacted the US Attorney Generals office, I put in a complaint. I did it all
I dont care if they dont like my book, I and many more knew what he did. My children are
Page 42 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
10 of 11
adults, if you wish to contact them, be my guest.

Jen, are you a member of Keiths current family? I received an email from a friend saying people
are confused and think the book is written by his current wife. The people in Lancaster know
nothing about his prior wife, Rosa, because we never heard one word about it in the press!
On the weekends, he plays taxi driver for his 13- and 17-year-old daughters, masters the
grill in almost any weather, hits the gym for a 90-minute Saturday-morning workout and is
able to wrest control of the TV remote for a blessed few hours.
Read more: http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/353634_Police-chief-hits-the-gymthe-grilland-the-tube.html#ixzz22JqiruNu
Rosa, this is about as much as anyone in Lancaster knew about his family. The reporter did not
tell us or maybe Sadler didnt tell him that the daughters are not his biological daughters!
OH MY GOD Becky, so many of your followers and readers would rather ignore the truth.Just
like the Penn State Scandal. Many wanted them to go away. Now I understand why their names
were never mentioned, look what is staking place on your Web Site..Why do they continue to
blame and abuse the survivor. They refuse to hold the abuser ACCOUNTABLE.
Becky, continue your work!!! I am honored to know you!!!!
Rosa, I think its one or two people who know Keith who have been posting comments all day
long. I think most of my reades are supportive of you. Nobody knew about his previous family.
Becky, Keith had a Favorite saying out of sight out of mind. My children are a reminder of the
past. When I was in court in April in Lancaster one of our sons stopped to see him. Sadly, his
staff was shocked. I wonder why, could it be some did not know about me? I could not answer
that but.I can answer this. I knew that it was time. So many of us continue to keep the CODE
OF SILENCE. I refuse to keep the CODE OF SILENCE.
Rosa, a friend sent me an email saying people are confused because they did not know he had a
first wife! Maybe you could outline a brief bit about your life with him when married, when
divorced, how many kids, etc. and I could also run it as the story this afternoon. People in
Lancaster are stunned! They knew nothing about this and a different family in his past!
God bless you Becky, I posted my comments..If they have any questions for me, I am right
here..I know in my heart that my parents are proud of me.Because they wanted me to
continue the fight and I did
Thank you Becky, I must apologize to your followers. I am reading some of these horrible
comments, whoever this person is family or friend would rather protect my past abusers Keith
Sadler and Anthony Suber.
I will write a short story for you. Thank you Becky.
Page 43 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
11 of 11
Perfect. As you said his own staff were shocked all the people in Lancaster are as well! WE
DIDNT KNOW! A brief story would be great! Thanks, Rosa.
77. Chunky Blue Line August 1st, 2012 at 16:55
Rosa, when the truth is revealed the abusers and his supporters will go after you the victim. It
happens all the time. Stay strong and know that there are people reading these stories who
understand your pain and support you in standing up and taking your power back. I applaud you!
Plus Ive sent relevant links far and wide to tell your story.
Powered by WordPress
Designed by My Mobiles
Page 44 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
and
Executive Summary
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
Page 1 of 41
Saturday, October 10, 2015

&
STAN J. CATERBONE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
do you believe in?
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 2 of 41

The
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the

And Again, the
Since August 1,

Lambert.

Page 3 of 41
no
$600.00.
Common Pleas.
Pennsylvania.
The
Page 4 of 41

Stan J. Caterbone.
Page 5 of 41
HISTORY
local laws.
This
ISC was a
INTERNATIONAL
States as of 1992.
Page 6 of 41
Agency (CIA).
Directors?

scandal.
Patent Office.
subsidiaries.
Carlos Cardoen.
believe him.


Lancaster, County.
Page 7 of 41



possible.

Page 8 of 41

Mind Control.
Page 9 of 41

WEAPONS.
topic.
without success.
This
more information.
Page 10 of 41
FAMILY HISTORY
the following:
business.

Samuel Caterbone,
subprograms.
Page 11 of 41
solvents.
His
In 1973 Samuel P.
account.
his record online.
He was in perfect
Julianne McKinney,
Page 12 of 41
By his own
suicide.
It left him in the
The
The Schizophrenia
Page 13 of 41
School.
Over the
were sold.
very short fashion.
Record:
Page 14 of 41
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

courts.
court filings.

Page 15 of 41


Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 16 of 41
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Derrick Robinson
P.O. Box 9022
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
Derrick,
see
attached.
ISC.
Dollar Fraud.
Page 17 of 41

Wikipedia.
Page 18 of 41
James Cross
Page 19 of 41
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 20 of 41
AFFIDAVIT
The
Page 21 of 41
And I affirm that the foregoing is true except to statements made upon information and belief,
and as to those I believe them to be true. Witness my hand under the penalties of perjury this
10th day of October, 2015.
Signature,
____________________________
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Signature
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On
before me,________________________personally appeared

, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged
to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature_____________________________
Affiant______Known______Produced ID
Type of ID_________________________
(Seal)
Page 22 of 41
!" #
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
/
/
#
9
"
"
!
3
,
9
"
!
3
,
#
9
"
!
3
,
/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
/
/
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
"
"
/ /
"
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ 3/
!
/ 3/
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
/ ,/
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
!/ #/
3
!/ #/
3
$ % &'
$&()*%& (* & +$+
$*(
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.( 0%/%*$1 2+ $'
,3! $*
3
! "$
$4
1
5
4
/.
/.
, 1 2 6 78 6 (
1
5
4
/.
/.
## 9
6
4 8 1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#
)
6 :1
5
4
/.
/.
#!
6(
:1
5
4
/.
/.
#,
$4 8 ): 2 678 $ ;
* .
< # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 #5
4
/.
/.
3=
# ==
.
6:
12
6 %
10 4
7 > 7
3 = #, " == 9 $4 8 *8
1 @
*8
0 4
7 > 7
3 = ! , == ! 1
(
+
4
0 4
7 >
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
3="
==
(
42
/
& .
> 7
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = !3" == *
A 4 0/* ( @B
(
%
6 :
3=
# == 9/ .
- C
/ 4: *88 %
6 :
3=
! == / *
- 47 : %
6 :
#/ 3 = ! , == # 1
*8
0/%
% 66
! =#
== / .
$ 88
6.
%
6 : % 66
3=
9(
/* 4
7& 8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
#
3 = , 3 ==
; ( / 66/& *88 0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
% 66
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = #! 9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
" % 66
! = #3
== E .2+F
+
/+
8.
8 6: % 66
$(
3# 1 3 .
2
:
:6
6
$(
3# 1 3 .2+ 4
:
.*$
6
8 6
:
Page 23 of 41
?
?
?
?
)6
G!
(&. G
++ /
,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%
6+ 8
&$-+
&
6& 4
8
&. *2$ * ! - ( &.

* + & - ( & .+
+
&. *( *A&($2(%&. *%
&
6(
6 : > ,3#?
*% +.&( $+*%
>& 4
? !1
!"
#
# (
%
= 3#
(
*(
+
!(
&'
9
@
'
8 62
9
#
= 3#
8
'
(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-
!( 3
*B
66 : >
,,9?
88B
> ,,"? /
1
( 2
*( 3
'
#
,
,
4
Page 24 of 41
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
September 27, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Page 25 of 41

Formal Notice
Officer.
Debra Hoeckler
Dated: September 27, 2015
Page 26 of 41
Page 27 of 41
Page 28 of 41
Page 29 of 41
AFFIDAVIT
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am
a citizen or a legal resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I
am the person whose signature follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to
advise Congress as well as state and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind
manipulation torture being committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or
Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of remotely-operated directed energy attacks
and mind control technologies on Americans in this country.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that
covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through
organized stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that
certain elements of Government either engage in these activities or protect those who perform
them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture
programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that high-tech torture, and the full
prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and
my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s) and include, but are not limited to the following victimization's:
1.
Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy.

Bombarding my body with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects.
Directed Energy Weapons Causing Severe Pain to Body and Brain. Began in at least 2005
and still continuing, with complaints to Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, FFCHS
in 2009, and in cited in various state and federal court cases over the past several years.
Attacks causing severe artificial pain most likely from Directed Energy Devices synchronized with
telepathic harassment and organized stalking and harassment have been logged and reported to
law enforcement and medical professionals since 2008.
Prior to 2008 the attacks were
experienced and reported to medical professionals but the sources were not known. Also reported
attacks of pain to a family physician, emergency room personnel and psychiatrists.
2.
Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies. Was sent an autonomous
email in 1998 introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being
used to create emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic complete
hacking of my mind.
3.
Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic telepathy
in 2005 with full-time 24/7 connection during the same time to present. When full-time telepathy
started a male conducted interrogations lasting several hours at a time concerning a wealth of
subjects including ISC/CIA Knowledge. Cannot disconnect from continuous conversations at all
times with one female person. The handlers know everything I know and experience in real time.
During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic with some 10 or more persons, both male and female
for short durations. Can recall most conversations and subject matter with identities of who they
said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still being used telepathically to harass and for
some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to DARPA, the FBI, and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
in 2007. Some conversations by the persons that are telepathic with me elude to some program
similar to the DARPA datalog program where they record your entire life. Everything that you try
to do on a daily basis is subject matter for conversation and harassment. Interference with
thought, harassment, and interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon attacks
to the brain or body.
Page 30 of 41
4.
Depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention. Mostly Experienced Sleep
Deprivation Techniques during periods of time in 2008 to 2010. Mostly with attacks of pain from
Directed Energy Weapons to back, neck, head (brain); and heart on a few occasions; and with
harassment from telepathy.
5.
Introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home. First experienced
toxic gases (Chloroform?) in heavy doses in 2006-2007. Made complaints to the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Southern Regional Police. Experienced attacks that would cause
dizziness at home, in automobile and in public. Was informed it was being released through a
distribution system the size of fishing line. To counter attacks used cotton in nostrils and gas
mask. In 2009 experienced attacks of what is said to be sleeping gas, when attacked could not
open eyes. Took Pictures during some attacks.
6.
Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or
car. Gang Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today. It includes
strangers using gestures such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public
mobbing. Complaints have been filed in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were
made to various public officials and local, state, and federal agencies as mental duress. The terms
organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual, etc., was not learned until a few years ago.
The organized stalking and harassment followed in several states, some while traveling from
Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have been used and most likely
are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
7.
Tapping (Bugging) my phones. Complaints of phone tapping/tampering were made to

New Jersey Bell in 1987 with a service call to Stone Harbor, New Jersey to check lines and phones.
The same was done by a Bell Atlantic repairman in Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1998. In 2004 a
complaint with a report number was filed with the Pennsylvania Attorney General Office in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Agent Amy Zelnick) regarding interference with phone calls and
impersonations by perps intercepting and rerouting calls. Computer Hacking complaints were filed
to local authorities in the County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation in 2005 to 2010.
8.
Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with
the Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations
Commission in 2008.
9.
Workplace mobbing. Experienced in 1987 at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

American Helix of High Industries in 1991 and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., in 1997/1998. Filed
complaints and logs as mental duress and harassment. Was forced out of all 3 organizations as a
result of the mobbing and harassment.
10. Public Mobbing. Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was
perpetrated heavily in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County
Courthouse, The Lancaster County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the Millersville
University Library and University Offices. I was given suspicious and illegal No Trespass Notices
in some 18 public places in Lancaster County in the years 2005 to 2009 without just cause. I was
complaining of stalking and harassing in most all of those public places. The Lancaster County
Public Library and the Millersville University took away my access to a computer after my personal
computers were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton Bank took away my safe deposit
box. Others included my church of worship, various bars and restaurants and one attorneys office.
Complaints have been filed regarding the same in courts and with various authorities.
Page 31 of 41
11.
Attempted Murder. Experienced with an attempt of vehicular homicide in 1991 after

National News Media reported ISC/CIA-NSA connection of Arms to Irag. The incident involved a
vehicle changing lanes and direction and heading directly toward me in the wrong direction
running me off the road, narrowly missing a tree. I Filed the incident in federal courts and used
as a motion to seal federal case no. 05-2288 in 2005 in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
12.
Pet Killing. Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane
Shelter and the Southern Regional Police Department.
13.
Illegal Entries of Home/Properties. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then
again in 1991; 1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance
claims, most with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania , State
Farm and Harleysville Insurance Companies.
14. Illegal Repossessions.

Airplane in 1987 containing legal and business files.
Home/Property and Contents in 2006 also containing legal and business files and documents.
15.
Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California
in 2005 and one in the City of Lancaster. Police reports were filed and obtained for both.
16. False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 20 in 2005 and 2006 in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The false arrests were
charges that were all dismissed prior to court hearings.
17. False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all
charges dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days of
imprisonment of 2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting,
which was confirmed to be false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully reinstated
as secured instead of unsecured. The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my release after
some 60 days of false imprisonment. There were no charges that resulted in any convictions.
18.
Psychiatric Abuses with False Suicide Allegations from Perpetrators/Stalkers. One

in 1987 resulting in a forced hospitalization for several hours by police in Stone Harbor, New
Jersey. And one again in February of 2005 resulting in police restraining me in my home and
abusing me. This one was a fraudulent and phony email sent to police by a perp. The Southern
Regional Police had to vacate after the email was proven to be a fraud.
19. Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991;
1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most
with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania and Harleysville
Insurance Company. 3 computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various
electronics equipment; dvd recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc., Most insurance
claims have been paid. In the past years a wave of purchased items, online and in stores, were
received broken or the wrong item and all had to be returned. Some included items to secure my
property, and others included computer related items, others were household and clothing items.
20. Gas Lighting. The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving
items and or hiding items. First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to
present. Clothing was also manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned in
2010, although it was reported to police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily draining
of my hot tub was also used as a psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility bills.
Numerous complaints were made to police in 2008 to 2010.
Page 32 of 41
21.
Thefts of Property. Not Yet Completed.
22. Vandalism to Car/Truck. Since 2005 have experienced years of gas siphoning, battery
outages, letting air out of tires, and wetting of inside of floor mats as psychological warfare tactics
by perps and stalkers. Made numerous complaints the Lancaster City Police Department.
23.
Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in
public places. Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms. Research states it is a tactic used
in organized stalking.
24.
Computer Hacking. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the
County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to
2010. Numerous complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was
also reported in 2010. Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line.
Electronic calenders, court documents, and financial records were often hacked causing many
problems of the years, including having to withdraw civil complaints.
25. Cyber Stalking. Most in 2005 to 2010.

Message Board, and the FBI Cyber Crime Unit.
Complaints to Microsoft legal counsel, Yahoo
26.
Interference/Delay/Theft of U.S. Mails. First reported to U.S. Postmaster of mail

tampering and illegal changing of address in 1987. In 2008 to 2009 have made several more
complaints to the U.S. Postmaster Inspector General who claim to have begun investigations.
Some caused missed court hearings and other missed appointments and or meetings.
27.
Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Severe Muscle Spasms/Cramps.

First
experienced in 2006 to present. One experience in 2006 was while I was in my hot tub and the
pain and cramp was so severe in my left calf muscle (you automatically bend over to rub it out,
which placed my head underwater) I had to crawl out of the hot tub before almost drowning.
28.
Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Sexual Stimulation. First experienced in 2005.
29. Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for
5 days; 2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency
surgery; and 2010 one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in
1991 and 2008.
30.
Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of all legal
and business documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987.
Microfiche/Microfilming began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been
ongoing to present. Numerous complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.
Page 33 of 41
Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. In 1987 I blew the
whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and Federal Authorities of Fraud during merger
negotiations with British Defense Contractor Ferranti International) on an international defense
contractor named International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling arms (Everything from
Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion
dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other federal agencies. See
ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and headquartered in my hometown
of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited by a top ISC Executives
(Convicted as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar Fraud) to help finance some of their operations
through an affiliate called United Chem Con. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor
and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland. Former Secretary of the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of Directors of ISC
and was also on the Board of Directors of Science Applications International Corporation, or SAIC.
SAIC was a huge defense contractor that was the recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or
DIA, program on Remote Viewing, which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that
Bobby Ray Inman declined the nomination for Secretary of Defense under the first Clinton
Administration because of the ISC and Trecor scandals. In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor
on a project for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST called TIMIT.
The project developed speech
corpora for the development of computer based speech recognition systems. I was also involved
in the bidding of other Department of Defense contracts dealing with information technologies. In
1998 I was stalked and approached by an employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in
York, Pennsylvania who said my problems were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys. In
2005 I was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military
base in Austin, Texas and was questioned and interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in
federal court for several hours. I was released and told to stay off of all military bases. My
brother, a Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify my travel plans and the fact that I was
staying with him prior to my release.
My father alleged he was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced
synthetic telepathy in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's as outlined in memos and documents he had
authored; and from my personal conversations with him prior to his death. Ms. Amy Fuchs of the
Disclosure Project confirmed that he was most likely given an ET experience via synthetic
telepathy. He died in 2001 in New York City of cancer. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force in the
late 1960's and I allege was a victim of the LSD experiments relating to MKULTRA in the late
1960's and a victim of murder (Suspicious Suicide with tainted medical reports) in Santa Barbara
California in 1984; Notarized Complaints were filed to the California Attorney General in 1991. He
made a declaration type statement prior to his death that he got bad LSD while in the U.S. Air
Force.
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I thought that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". During the times that legal Counsel and attorneys were solicited in 1987, 1991, and
1997 Organized Stalking and Harassment and other forms of attacks experienced by Targeted
Individuals were severely increased. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an allout assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of
directed energy devices and/or electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that
it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This targeting has ruined every aspect of my life.
Page 34 of 41
Some Perspectives
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilization of
mans mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of
meaning. For anyone who is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort
to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary
mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorized by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of
societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
"On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive
Technology"by Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
People have no comprehension of how lethal only one aspect (aside from the obvious of driving
the victim completely insane) of telepathy technology can be in disrupting and ruining an individual's life through the sabotaging of his/her daily activities. Everything an individual does begins
with a momentary thought. From the split second that thought is learned by the person on the
other end (telepathically) - the individual's right to privacy is not the real threat or loss. The real
lethal weapon is the advantage in disrupting or preventing the individual from accomplishing
whatever he/she is going to do before they actually do it. With a simple cell phone call or instant
message, the Advanced Team is in place to subvert; sabotage; manipulate; propagandize;
smear; disrupt; or even prevent the task or activity from being accomplished in any successful
manner. The perps are skilled at creating scenarios that are covertly arranged to simulate everyday occurrences to make the victim at fault for the loss or failure. Imagine the consequences
when these activities have legal and financial implications. With telepathy technology the need for
tracking and surveillance technology is greatly diminished and may even become obsolete. This is
not merely Mind Invasive Technology, as Carole Smith so eloquently wrote this is LIFE Invasive Technology. Say Goodbye to any true sense of capitalism and free enterprise in the not to
distant future unless of course someone stops these illegal and disastrous technology transfers
and leaks.
Stan J. Caterbone
Organized or Gang Stalking
A system of organized psychological terror tactics used against a person who has become an enemy of an individual or a government. Subtle but effective techniques of stalking by multiple individuals and psychological intimidation and manipulation are used to slowly but surely drive the
target to make complaints to authorities who will see the complaints as bogus because of the
methods used against the target. As a result, the target gets labeled as mentally ill.
There are as many stalking tactics as there are targets as the multistalkers will tailor the stalking
to the individuals habits and individual personality. Some common examples or organized stalking
are: following the target on foot, by car and public transportation, crowding the target's space in a
public place, murmuring insults under the breath so only the target can hear, sitting in the car
outside the target's residence, starting "fights" in public with the target, doing "skits" on the
street which involves information only the target should know but has been found out via surveillance of the target, stealing and vandalism of the target's possessions.
Organized Stalking Website
Organized Stalking is a form of terrorism used against an individual in a malicious attempt to
reduce the quality of a persons life so they will: have a nervous break-down, become incarcerated, institutionalized, experience constant mental, emotional, or physical pain, become homeless, and/or commit suicide. This is done using well-orchestrated accusations, lies, rumors, bogus
investigations, setups, framings, intimidation, overt or covert threats, vandalism, thefts, sabotage, torture, humiliation, emotional terror and general harassment. It is a ganging up by members of the community who follow an organizer and participate in a systematic terrorizing of an
individual. Mark M. Rich
Page 35 of 41
The acts described above violate many laws aimed at protecting Americans. Some of these laws
include but are not limited to the following:
10 USC 921, Article 121 -- Larceny and wrongful appropriation
10 USC 920A, Article 120a -- Stalking
18 2340 USC -- Torture
18 USC 241 -- Conspiracy against rights of sovereign, free, God created, spirit and soul
beings
18 USC 213 -- Illegal Surreptitious entry
18 USC 242 -- Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 USC 35 -- Imparting or conveying false information
18 USC 1117 -- Conspiracy to Murder
18 USC 1111 -- Murder
18 USC 1905 -- Disclosure of information generally
42 USC 1983 -- Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 USC 1985 -- Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
31 USC 5328 -- Whistleblower protections
18 USC 1512 -- Engaging in misleading conduct
18 USC 1503 -- Intimidating a witness/victim
18 USC 1512 -- Tampering with a witness/victim
18 USC 1513 -- Retaliation against a witness/victim
18 USC 1510 -- Obstructing a criminal investigation, conflict of interest roles in
government
18 USC 1509 -- Impeding due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct,
impede and Interfere with same
18 USC 1622 -- Subordination of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury
(Optional) I have attached a personal message _______ (check).
AFFIRMATION
I affirm that the statements in this Affidavit concerning my torture and the results of
that torture are true and correct. I further affirm that those statements are based on
my own direct knowledge, personal experience, research, and known and published
historical fact.
Stan J. Caterbone
Affiant (signature) ______________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone
Name (print): __________________________________________
June 19, 2015
Date: _________________________________________________
Pennsylvania
State of __________________________
County of
Lancaster
_____________________________
19
15
June
Sworn before me this _______
day of _______________________,
20__
________________________________,
Notary Public Exp.:
______________________
SJC
Stamp
& Seal:
Don't Know When
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance. All rights reserved. Copyright 2010 (This is an amended
form of the original Affidavit of September 2010 from Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance.)
Page 36 of 41
Page 37 of 41
Page 35 of 41

06/10/2007
Page 38 of 41
Page 36 of 41

06/10/2007
Page 39 of 41
Page 40 of 41
Page 41 of 41
Received 10/23/2015 Superior Court Middle District

Filed 10/23/2015 Superior Court Middle District
1561 MDA 2015
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

CIVIL DIVISION
In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
PETITIONERS
v.
RESIDENTS of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania
DEFENDANTS
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015

Lower Court Case No. 15-06985
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT

Third Circuit Lambert Appeal SUBMISSION Statement and EXHIBIT by Appellant
October 23, 2015 with Executive Summary
I hereby on this
23rd
attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. The Appellant
is going on the record as to linking President Obama's Administration (Not the President Per Se), the Military
MEDIA GROUP. In the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 08-13373, President Obama,
former Director of the CIA and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates were named DEFENDANTS in or about 2010.
There may also be undo influence between Lancaster City Police Chief Kieth Sadler, formerly of the Philadelphia
Police Department and the Honorable Judge Paul Diamond, as evidenced by his at the least biased ORDER
which is under the Appeal.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.

The prosecutorial misconduct the the Petitioner has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the Petitioner from
completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18
U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
The attached 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that
may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant
an inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law, a
plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to do an
unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice with
intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United States v.
Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by
the following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges
in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy
which attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups
committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A.
Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional
rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal
prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective
for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual
rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal
interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15,
2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court.
http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1

Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
brought before the courts.
These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of
limitations has run out.
Dated October 23rd , 2015
Advanced Media Group, President and Owner
Pro Se Litigant, U.S. District Court & Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court
Scaterbone@Live.com
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December
2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
BLANK PAGE
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALL
LEFT BLANK
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT
I hereby on this
23rd
attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. The Appellant is
going on the record as to linking President Obama's Administration (Not the President Per Se), the Military
MEDIA GROUP. In the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 08-13373, President Obama, former
Director of the CIA and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates were named DEFENDANTS in or about 2010. There
may also be undo influence between Lancaster City Police Chief Kieth Sadler, formerly of the Philadelphia Police
Department and the Honorable Judge Paul Diamond, as evidenced by his at the least biased ORDER which is
under the Appeal.
Date: October 23, 2015
/s/
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__
Page 1 of 44
scaterboneIive.com
scaterbone@live.com
ranced
dia
up
Stan
J. Caterbone
Stan J.
Advanced Media
Advanced
Media Group
1250 Fremont
Fremont Street
1250
PA 17603
17603
Lancaster, PA
(717)669-2163
(717)669 -2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4,
Saturday,
4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
Pennsylvania, Advanced
Advanced Media
Media Group and
and Stan
Stan J.
Proposed ORGANIZED
Lancaster,
J. Caterbone Proposed
STALKING AND
AND DIRECTED
WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
BILL to Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania House
House of
Mike Sturla (Lancaster,
(Lancaster, Pennsylvania)
Pennsylvania) and
and City of Lancaster
Lancaster Mayor
Mayor Richard
Richard Gray.
Representative Mike
Gray.
The draft legislation
legislation is
is the
work of Missouri
Missouri House
House of Representative
Representative Jim
Guest, who has
has been
been
the work
Jim Guest,
working
on helping
helping victims
victims of these
horrendous crimes for years. The bill
bill will
will provide
provide protections
protections to
working on
these horrendous
individuals who
who are
are being
being harassed,
harassed, stalked,
stalked, harmed
harmed by
by surveillance,
surveillance, and assaulted;
assaulted; as
well as
individuals
as well
as
keep individuals
individuals from
from becoming
becoming human
human research
research subjects,
subjects, tortured,
and killed
killed by
protections to
to keep
tortured, and
electronic
directed energy devices,
devices, implants,
implants, and directed
directed energy weapons.
weapons.
electronic frequency devices, directed
Stan
victim of organized
stalking since
since 1987
and a
victim of electronic and
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
Caterbone has
has been
been a
a victim
organized stalking
1987 and
a victim
and
direct energy weapons
weapons since 2005.
2005. He has
has also
also been
been telepathic since 2005.
2005. Stan
Stan J.
will
J. Caterbone
Caterbone will
introduce measures that also
pertain to remote
remote viewing;
mental telepathy and
and synthetic
help introduce
also pertain
viewing; mental
telepathy in
in more
more detail.
detail. Personal
Personal accounts
accounts of his
his pain
pain and
and torture
in various
United
torture are
are also filed in
various United
and state courts.
courts.
States federal and
We
urging you
you to contact your local
local representatives
representatives and support our
pass this
We are
are urging
our efforts
efforts to
to pass
legislation. Below you
you will
will find
Pennsylvania State Representatives.
Representatives.
legislation.
find the listings of Pennsylvania
Information Please
Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com
scaterbone live.com and visit
visit our library of
For More Information
https: www .scribd.com /stan5i.5caterbone
//
_________________________________________________
The
legislation can
on the
page:
The draft of the legislation
can be found
found on
the following page:
15 -3400 Lambert Appeal

Appeal
15-3400
Pagageof
Page
Page
2 of1 44
44
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
Capitol
Office
Capitol Office
State
State Capitol
Capitol
Mo.
Jefferson City
Jefferson
City Mo.
573-751-0246
573-751 -0246
District Office
Office
Second
Second Street
Street
King
Mo.
King City
City Mo.
660-535-6664
660 -535 -6664
May
21, 2009
2009
May 21,
To Whom
It May
To
Whom It
May Concern,
Concern,
This
This letter
letter is
is to
to ask
ask for
for your
your help
help for
for the
the many
many constituents
constituents in
in our
who are
are being
our country
country who
being affected
affected unjustly
unjustly
rights violation
by electronic
weapons torture
torture and
and covert
privacy rights
violation and
physical
by
electronic weapons
covert harassment groups.
groups. Serious
Serious privacy
and physical
injuries
have been
non -lethal weapons
injuries have
been caused
caused by
these groups
groups and
their use
use of
weapons on
by the
the activities
activities of
of these
and their
of so-called
so- called non-lethal
on
men, women,
men,
women, and
even children.
and even
children.
you to
in helping
massive movement in
in the
II am
play aa role
role in
helping these
these victims
victims and
and also
the massive
the use
am asking
asking you
to play
also stopping
stopping the
use
Americans.
of
RFID technologies
technologies in
in tracking
tracking Americans.
of Veri-chip
Veri -chip and
and RFID
Long
Long before
before Veri-chip
was known
known we
we were
were testing
testing these
these devices
devices on
Americans, many
many without
their
Veri-chip was
on Americans,
without their
knowledge or
or consent.
consent.
There are
new revelations
There
revelations of the
the cancer
besides the
the privacy
human rights
problems with
the use
are new
cancer risk besides
privacy and
and human
rights problems
with the
use of
Veri-chip
RF signals.
Veri-chip and
and RF
signals.
II am
for your
your help
help in
in stopping
aiding those
those already
am asking
asking for
stopping these
these abuses
abuses and
and aiding
already affected.
affected.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
Rep.
Rep. Jim
Jim Guest
Guest

Appeal
15-3400
Page 3 of
Page
of 44
44
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
Bill
A) Findings
Convention.
B) Purpose
or four years.
**
Page
Page
4 of2 44
telepathy devices.
one year..
in good faith.
Page
Page
5 of3 44
(c)
recipient.

Page
Page
6 of4 44
Page
Page
7 of5 44

8 North Queen Street
Suite 1100 The Griest Building
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-3157
Fax: (717) 295-7816
PO Box 202096
(717) 787-3555
Fax: (717) 705-1923
Hon. Bryan Cutler
207 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
(717) 786-4551
Fax: (717) 786-3645
Hon. Bryan Cutler
147A East Wing
PO Box 202100
(717) 783-6424
Fax: (717) 772-9859
Hon. John M. Perzel
7518 Frankford Ave.
(215) 331-2600
Fax: (215) 708-3135
Hon. John M. Perzel
PO Box 202172
(717) 787-2016
Fax: (717) 783-7225
610 North 2nd Street
(215) 503-3245
Fax: (215) 503-7850
107 East Wing
PO Box 202175
(717) 783-8098
Fax: (717) 780-4787
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

852 Village Rd.,Municipal
Bldg
P.O. Box 268
Lampeter, PA 17537
(717) 464-5285
Fax: (717) 295-7817

PO Box 202068
(717) 772-5371
Fax: (717) 705-1850
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

PO Box 202043
(717) 783-6422
Fax: (717) 787-7731
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Judiciary, Chairman
645 Penn Street, 2nd Floor
Reading, PA 19601
(610) 376-1529
Fax: (610) 378-4406
Hon. Katie True

2938 Columbia Avenue
Manor West Commons, Suite
501
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-5050
Fax: (717) 295-5053
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

PO Box 202127
(717) 787-3525
Fax: (717) 772-5401
Hon. Katie True

7 East Wing
PO Box 202041
(717) 705-7161
Fax: (717) 705-1946
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver,
Chairman
2839 West Girard Avenue
(215) 684-3738
Fax: (215) 235-4629
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver
34E East Wing
PO Box 202195
(717) 787-3480
Fax: (717) 783-0684
Chairman74 Main Street
Wellsboro, PA 16901
(570) 724-1390
Fax: (570) 724-2168
Page
Page
8 of6 44
Hon. Ron Marsico

Judiciary, Chairman
4401 Linglestown Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
(717) 652-3721
Fax: (717) 652-6276
Hon. Ron Marsico
PO Box 202105
(717) 783-2014
Fax: (717) 705-2010
Hon. Camille Bud George,
Energy, Chairman
275 Spring Street
Houtzdale, PA 16651
(814) 378-6279
Fax: (814) 765-0609
Hon. Camille Bud George
38B East Wing
PO Box 202074
(717) 787-7316
Fax: (717) 783-8236
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Energy, Chairman
302 Seneca Street
Oil City, PA 16301
(814) 677-6363
Fax: (814) 676-1653
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson
PO Box 202064
(717) 783-8188
Fax: (717) 705-1945
Lloyd K. Smucker (R)
Senate District 13
Lancaster (part) and York (part)
Counties.
Senate Box 203013
Harrisburg, PA 17120-3013 185
Main Capitol
(717) 787-6535
D.O. ADDRESS:
44 North Christian Street
Suite 100
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 397-1309
lsmucker@pasen.gov
http://senatorsmucker.com
Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Senate District 15
Dauphin (part) and York
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203015
173 Capitol Building
(717) 787-6801
D.O. ADDRESS:
916-B Park Plaza
North River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
(717) 896-7714
jpiccola@pasen.gov:
http://www.piccola.org
Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Senate District 36
Chester (part) and Lancaster
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203036
16 East Wing
(717) 787-4420
FAX: (717) 783-3156
D.O. ADDRESS:
301 East Main Street
Lititz, PA 17543
(717) 627-0036
mbrubaker@pasen.gov
http://senatorbrubaker.com
Page
Page
9 of7 44

space -based
weapons
May 20,
20, 2015
2015
May
FacebookTwitterMore
FacebooTwitterMore
9
9 comments
comments
The Richmond
Richmond City
passed a
resolution Tuesday
The
Tuesday supporting
space-based
City Council
Council passed
a resolution
supporting a
a ban
ban on
on space
-based
weapons after a
weapons
a lengthy discussion
discussion over
over whether individuals are
are being
being psychologically
harmed by
high in
in the
and
and physically
physically harmed
by exotic government-patented
government - patented attacks
attacks from high
the sky.
sky.
Beckles, a
member of
Richmond Progressive
Progressive Alliance
Alliance (RPA),
Councilmember
the Richmond
Councilmember Jovanka
Jovanka Beckles,
a member
of the
(RPA),
introduced the
resolution, saying
it begins
Richmond resident
introduced
the resolution,
saying it
begins to
to address
address concerns
concerns of
of a
a Richmond
who claims
from space-based
weaponry.
who
targeted by
transmission from
claims shes
she's been
been targeted
by remote
"remote transmission"
space -based weaponry.
Others
to have
have suffered
from around
Others claiming
claiming to
suffered physical
physical and
and psychological
psychological attacks
attacks traveled
traveled from
around
Tuesday's council
meeting. One
have been
the
to speak
at Tuesdays
to have
the country to
speak at
council meeting.
One speaker
speaker claimed
claimed to
been
zapped multiple times
his testimony
zapped
council.
times right before
before his
testimony at
at council.
The resolution supports
Preservation Act
Act and
Preservation Treaty
Treaty
The
supports the
the Space
Space Preservation
and Space
Space Preservation
weapons," even
legislation first introduced
introduced
permanently
space-based
the legislation
permanently banning
banning "space
-based weapons,
even though
though the
by
Rep. Dennis
Dennis Kucinich
Kucinich in
in 2001
2001 has
has never
never gained
gained traction
in Congress.
by Rep.
traction in
Congress. It appears
appears that
Richmond is
is the
in the U.S.
issue in
in more
more than
Richmond
the first municipality in
U.S. to take
take up
up this
this lofty issue
than aa
In 2002,
2002, the
Berkeley passed
resolution supporting
decade.
decade. In
the City
City of
of Berkeley
passed a
a similar
similar resolution
supporting the
the ban.
ban.
Conspiracy
resolution is
is a
toward ensuring
weaponry
Conspiracy theorists
theorists believe
believe the
the resolution
a step
step toward
ensuring secret
secret weaponry
which are
in the
high -flying aircraft that supposedly
such
as chemtrails,
such as
chemtrails, which
are trails
trails left in
the sky
sky by
by high-flying
supposedly
no longer target unwitting
For RPA
RPA
emit
citizens. For
emit aa chemical
chemical or
or biological
biological agent,
agent, can
can no
unwitting citizens.
members on
resolution is
is also
initiative.
members
also an
an anti-war
on the
the council,
council, the
the resolution
anti -war initiative.
RPA members
members on
McLaughlin and
Eduardo Martinez,
Martinez, also
in favor of
RPA
voted in
on council,
council, Gayle
Gayle McLaughlin
and Eduardo
also voted
of
the
resolution. Vice
Vice Mayor
Mayor Jael
Myrick and
Nat Bates
Bates were
were the
final two
the resolution.
Jael Myrick
and Councilmember
Councilmember Nat
the final
two
Bates claimed
he was
was confused
yes
yes votes,
votes, although
although Bates
claimed he
confused by
by the
the discussion.
discussion.
"I'm going
going to
resolution for the
reason that we
we have
have voted
lot of
Im
to support
the simple
voted on
support the
the resolution
simple reason
on a
a lot
of
Appeal
15-3400
Pa0a
Page
Page
10 of
8 44
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015

Related posts:

weapons
Comments

Page
Page
11 of
9 44
Page
Lanca.ter( )nline.com: \ewx:15.000 greet Obama here
of 3
15.000 greet Obama here
/bVk s
6/1- 1473
5174,4
DAY
4,r
&)ct-bfatt)
tPil"kit
;J(.0
`1,;4ThS'
iti11"X's
IMO
?,
96
4,0
5451'1
5)[\''P
04
15-340&rlegirtabaptdlppeatle
15-3400
Lambert Appeal
Obama at Buchanan Park
ittl: articles Iancastcroniiie.coni
local
Pg4z
Page 12 of 44
` ._ t'0s``
Friday, October
23, 2015
s*Y-'i 3Mffi
Thursa
Lancaster mayor, wife

wife invited to
to watch Super
Bowl at White House
Bowl
BERNARD
BERNARD HARRIS
HARRIS Staff
Writer
Staff Writer
1, 2011
Feb
Feb 1,
2011
Like
Like many
many die-hard
Eagles fans,
fans, with
with his
his team
out of
it, Rick
Rick Gray
wasn't too
excited about
die-hard Eagles
team out
of it,
Gray wasn't
too excited
about Sunday's
Sunday's
Bowl.
Super
Super Bowl.
"It's hard
hard when
Eagles get
in," the
Lancaster mayor
"It's
when the
the Eagles
this close
get in,"
the Lancaster
mayor said.
get this
close and
and don't
don't get
said.
he might
he and
his wife,
might have
have
Gray
thought he
might watch
watch the
game at
home on
television. Or
wife, Gail,
Gray said
said thought
the game
at home
on television.
Or he
and his
Gail, might
the game
game and
and gone
the movies
movies instead.
instead.
just skipped
skipped the
gone to
to the
Then, this
Then,
this week,
they got
better offer.
week, they
got aa better
offer.
The
The Grays
are going
to aa Super
Bowl party
party -- and
not just any
Bowl party.
party. They're
They're headed
headed down
Grays are
going to
Super Bowl
and not
any Super
Super Bowl
down
1600 Pennsylvania
to
Pennsylvania Ave.
Ave. to
to party
to 1600
party with
with the
the president.
president.
"It's
"It's going
to be
be pretty
fun. We're
looking forward
forward to
to it,"
it," Gray
what will
be his
his third
visit to
to the
the
going to
pretty fun.
We're looking
Gray said
said of
of what
will be
third visit
White
House since
Barack Obama
Obama took
took office.
office.
White House
since President Barack
Gray
he responded
responded to
White House
House ee-mail
he would
would be
be delighted
Gray said
said he
to aa White
-mail that
that he
delighted to
to attend.
attend.
And what
House Super
party? he
inquired. The
The response
And
what do
to aa White
White House
Bowl party?
he inquired.
response was
was "business
do you
you wear
wear to
Super Bowl
"business
casual."
He's planning
planning to
to leave
leave his
his tailgating
tailgating duds
at home.
home. He'll
He'll wear
wear his
his Philadelphia
Philadelphia Eagles
Eagles bow
bow tie,
casual." He's
duds at
tie,
Gray
Gray said.
said.
And,
And, an
to the
the pot
pot-luck?
he considered
an appropriate
appropriate contribution
contribution to
-luck? Gray
Gray said
said he
considered bringing
bringing cream
cream cheese
cheese
Lebanon bologna
Pennsylvania" -- but
he was
wrapped
in sweet
for Central
was
wrapped in
sweet Lebanon
bologna -- "the
"the canap
canap of choice
choice for
Central Pennsylvania"
but he
Appeal
15-3400
Page 13
13 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015

bharris@lnpnews.com
Page 14 of 44
Initi...
Why You Should Care about Pentagon Funding of Obama's BRAIN
BRAIN Initi...
http
//blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross -check/why- you - should -care -ab...
:
ADVERTISEMENT
Renew your Office 365
Mirsat
subscription today
Renew raw
Subscription Center
Sign In
SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN'
Subscribe
Blogs
News & Features
Topics
Register
Subscribe to All Access

..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subscribe to Print
Search ScientijcAmerican,com
Give a Gift
View the Latest Issue
Videos & Podcasts
Blogs
Education
Citizen Science
SA Magazine
Books
SA en espaol
Search All Blogs
Cross -Check
Critical views of
in the
Critical
of science
science in
the news
Welcome to the Scientific American Blog Network, a

forum for a diverse and independent set of voices to
share news and opinions and discuss issues related
to science. For more information see our About
About
page and Guidelines....
ADVERTISEMENT
Why You Should Care about Pentagon

Funding of Obama's BRAIN Initiative
By
Horgan | May
22, 2013 |
By John Horgan
May 22,
SA Mind
In two recent posts (here and here), II complained that the big new BRAIN (Brain
Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies) Initiative,
Initiative, to which
Barack Obama has committed $110
$iio million next year and possibly billions over the
next decade,
decade, may be premature.
initiative: its biggest funder is
is the
Pentagon, more
more specifically the Defense
According to the White House,

House, Darpa is
$50 million,
million, more than the
putting up
up $50
($4o
Science

There's nothing new about the militarization of brain science. Ten years ago,
ago, when II
was writing an article on how information is
is encoded in the brain,
brain, Darpa was already
range of potential
potential applications,
applications, including "performance enhancement"
enhancement" of soldiers
soldiers via
devices.
One specific possibility,
brain-machine interface that would
possibility, Rudolph told me,
me, was a brain-machine
Our Blogs
SA BLOGS

Appeal
15-3400
11 of 55
Page 15
15 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
10/23/2015 3:41
10/23/2015
3:41 AM
Initi...
Why You Should Care about Pentagon Funding of Obama's BRAIN
BRAIN Initi...
2 of 55
http
//blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross -check/why- you - should -care -ab...
:
@ScientificAmerican (Inside SciAm)

Anecdotes from the Archive (History)
Dark Star Diaries (Blackholes)
Expeditions (Field research)
Guest Blog (Expert voices)
MIND Guest Blog (Expert voices)
Observations (News)
SA Visual (Art)
Talking back (Neuroscience)
Voices (Diversity in science)
allow soldiers
alone, as in the
soldiers to control
control a jet or other weapon system through thought alone,
1982 Clint Eastwood film Firefox. In the film,
film, the thought-control
utilizes
thought-control device utilizes
external electrodes,
electrodes, but Rudolph said that electrodes could
could also
also be implanted in the
brain. "Implanting electrodes into healthy people
people is not something we're
we're going
going to do
any time soon," Rudolph explained,
explained, "but 20 years ago
ago no
no one would have
have thought we'd
wed
put a laser in the eye either.
either. So
So this is an agency that leaves the door open on what's
possible."
fiction,
possible." Yes,
Yes, Rudolph was talking about that familiar fantasy of science fiction,
bionic soldiers.
NETWORK BLOGS
So what's changed over the past decade? Several things come to mind:
mind: First,
First, major
media have become less concerned about the militarization of brain science.
science. A decade
Anthropology in Practice (Anthropology)

Beautiful Minds (Intelligence & creativity)
ago, conservative New York Times

William Safire worried that science might
ago,
Times pundit William
Budding Scientist (Kids in STEM)

Cocktail Party Physics (Physics)
Compound Eye (Scientific photography)
Cross -Check (Science in the news)
Dog Spies (Companion animals)
Extinction Countdown (Endangered species)
Food Matters (Food & nutrition)
Frontiers for Young Minds (Science for kids)
Illusion Chasers (Illusions & perception)
Life, Unbounded (Astrobiology & cosmology)
Not bad science (Animal behavior & cognition)
Plugged In (Energy technology & policy)
PsySociety (Psychology & pop culture)
Roots of Unity (Math)
Rosetta Stones (Geology)
Running Ponies (Animals)
Symbiartic (Science art)
Tetrapod Zoology (Zoology)
The Artful Amoeba (Natural history)
The Urban Scientist (Culture & diversity)
Unofficial Prognosis (Medical School Experience)
allow powerful
powerful institutions to "hack into the wetware between our ears."
ears." Today, few
journalists question Darpa's role in the
the BRAIN Initative.
prominent journalists
Initative. The best critique
I've read
read is
is by physician/blogger Peter Freed, who asserts that Pentagon funding of
the BRAIN Initiative fulfills
1961 warning about the
fulfills President Dwight Eisenhower's 1961
growing power of the "military-industrial
"military -industrial complex."
Second,
previously, neuroscientists
Second, as II have pointed out previously,
neuroscientists are pursuing military
funding much more eagerly and openly,
openly, as evidenced both by the BRAIN Initiative
and by this 2009
2009 publication of the
Opportunities in
the National Research Council,
Council, Opportunities
Neuroscience for
neuroscientists,
for Future Army Applications.
Applications. Overseen by leading
leading neuroscientists,
funding. The report advocates "collaborating with pharmaceutical
tap into military funding.
of soldier performance,
performance using
performance, and improving cognitive
cognitive and behavioral performance
using
The third change over the

the last decade is that the Pentagon has become much cagier
about its motives in supporting brain research.
research. Darpa now claims that its primary
is treatment of injured soldiers.
soldiers. As the
the White House put it,
it,
interest in brain science is
treat warfighters suffering from post-traumatic
post- traumatic stress, brain injury and memory loss."
View Archived Blogs
MIND
(lassies
1tli:ltl
For a more candid look at the Pentagon's

-standing interest in neuroscience, see
Pentagon's long
long-standing
Pennsylvania. Originally published in 2006,
2006, the book was re-released
re- released last year with
updated information. As
Pentagon's
As II pointed out last fall,
fall, Moreno
Moreno documents the Pentagon's
interest in neurotechnologies that can enhance
enhance soldiers'
soldiers' capabilities
capabilities as
as well as
Barack Obama has asked his Commission for the
the Study of Bioethical Issues to explore
the "ethical,
"ethical, legal,
BRAIN] initiative
legal, and societal implications raised by [the BRAIN]
initiative and other
neuroscience." Let's not leave it up
up to government officials and
recent advances in neuroscience."
appointees
-and neuroscientists--to
neuroscientists - -to weigh the pros
appointeesand
pros and cons
cons of neuroweapons.
neuroweapons. As
As
William Safire,
Safire, writing not just
just about neurotechnologies but biotechnology in general,
warned more than a decade ago,
-reaching, soul-searching
soul -searching
ago, we need "to get this
this far
far-reaching,
debate out of the
the ivory tower,
tower, onto the floor,
floor, onto the tube
tube and into
into print until it
More from Scientific American
Follow Us:
DIGITAL
ty Li El
ADVERTISEMENT
View the Latest on SciLogs
ADVERTISEMENT
Image:
Image: Defense Advanced
Agency.

Appeal
15-3400
Page 16
16 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
10/23/2015 3:41
10/23/2015
3:41 AM
Revealed:
Secret
DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed:
Secret DARPA
Leaked Document
TOPICS:Activist
Postmind control
sciencewhistleblowers
TOPICS:Activist Postmind
controlsciencewhistleblowers
July
29, 2013
2013
July 29,
July
29, 2013
2013
July 29,
By
By Activist Post
University
Whistleblower
Military Mind Control
Control Project At Major University
Whistleblower Reveals Military
moral beliefs
or stop
stop political
dissent through
What
the government
beliefs or
political dissent
through remote
government could
could change
change peoples
people's moral
What if the
people's brains?
control
brains?
control of peoples
fiction, right?
right? Well,
the US
government, through
Sounds
like science
leaked document
US government,
through
science fiction,
Well, aa leaked
document reveals that the
Sounds like
research, is
is very
DARPA
DARPA research,
very close
close to
to accomplishing
accomplishing this.
this.
recently contacted
worked on
on aa secret
secret ongoing
ongoing
Activist
who worked
Activist Post was
was recently
contacted by
by an
an anonymous
anonymous whistleblower who
is to
DARPA. The
The aim
to remotely disrupt
disrupt political
dissent and
and
mind -control project for DARPA.
aim of the
the program
mind-control
program is
political dissent
in tandem
"Transcranial Magnetic
Magnetic Stimulation
sophisticated
extremism
(TMS) in
tandem with
with sophisticated
by employing
employing Transcranial
Stimulation" (TMS)
extremism by
TMS stimulates
the brain
brain with
propaganda
propaganda based
based on
on this
this technology.
technology. TMS
stimulates the
the temporal
temporal lobe of the
fields.
electromagnetic
is based
The Center
Communication, is
based at
State
The
The program,
program, conducted
conducted by
by The
Center for Strategic
Strategic Communication,
at Arizona State
ASU
here.
The head
The DARPA
confirmed on
on the
University.
DARPA funding
funding for
for this
be confirmed
the ASU website
website here. The
head
this project
project can
can be
University. The
in the
area of strategic
strategic communication
communication as
as it
of
the project,
project, Steve
Steve Corman,
Corman, has
has worked
worked extensively
extensively in
the area
of the
ideas."
be called
called the
"the war
applies
terrorism and
war of ideas.
to terrorism
and extremism
"extremism" - or
or what
what could
could be
applies to
his many presentations make it quite

The Exit From Afghanistan
and his
quite
Cormans
project Narrating The
Afghanistan and
Corman's latest project
mission is
is to
change people's
obvious
narrative and
peoples minds.
minds. Lest one
one believe
believe
that the
the mission
to shape
shape the
the narrative
and literally change
obvious that
keep in
in mind that the
is
the word
it
it will
will be
be contained
contained to
to overseas
overseas extremists,
extremists, we
we should
should keep
word extremist is
The dissenters of yesterday
yesterday could
could easily
easily become
become the
increasingly
the terrorist
increasingly used
used domestically.
domestically. The
ofpolitical
violence tomorrow.This
about many
sympathizers
sympathizers and
and supporters of
political violence
tomorrow.This DARPA research brings
brings about
questions and
research aims
aims to
to literally induce or
or disrupt
disrupt the
the operation
operation of
ethical
Mainly, this
and dilemmas.
dilemmas. Mainly,
this research
ethical questions
In other
aims to
to stop
stop individuals from thinking
thinking certain
certain
narratives
narratives within
within the
the brain.
brain. In
other words,
words, this
this research aims
not
This
research
has
make others
normally would
would
believe. This
thoughts
believe.
has
and make
others believe
believe things
things they
they normally
thoughts and
Lambert Appeal
Appeal
15-3400
15 -3400 Lambert
Page 17
17 of
of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
include:
30) [text added]
and messages.
Page 18 of 44
not commit.
Persuasive E
Page 19 of 44

Implants, For Real
June 1, 2014
their onset.
Page 20 of 44
devices.
Page 21 of 44
1 of 5

Research
Susan E.
Brandon, the
Obama

practice.
administratio
ns Chief for
Research in
the DCHCs
Behavioral
Science
Program.
[emphasis added].
Page 22 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
2 of 5
Page 23 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
3 of 5
Page 24 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
4 of 5
against humanity.
Tweet
Page 25 of 44

10/23/2015 4:27 AM
Georgia GOP leaders suggest Obama

Obama is using mind
mind-control
-control -- CBS46 News
11 of 33
http:
/ /www.cbs46.com/ story/20119364 /georgia -gop- leaders- suggest- oba...
a raga
SAVE HUNDREDS, EVEN THOUSANDS.

LEARN MOR
f:.1
+^'
Educator
Disco nt
Georgia
suggest Obama
Obama is using
using mind-control
Georgia GOP leaders suggest
mind -control technique
Posted: Nov 16,
16, 2012 1:45
1:45 PM
PM EDT
Dec 14,
14, 2012 1:45
1:45 PM
PM EDT
Updated: Dec
By
Senior Digital
By Mandi Milligan,
Milligan, Senior
Digital Producer
CONNECT
(CBS46) -- The debate is

is firing up
up over aa controversial
controversial seminar
held at
ATLANTA (CBS46)
seminar held
at the
the State Capitol.
Republican leaders
leaders warned
President Barack
Barack Obama
using mind
mind control
manipulate all
At that forum,
forum, Republican
warned that
that President
Obama is using
control to
to manipulate
of us.
us.
Republican leaders
leaders sat
in on a four
-hour seminar
recently, and
Republican
sat in
four-hour
seminar at
at the
the State
State Capitol
Capitol recently,
and itit was all caught on
on tape.
tape.
21, a highly
highly controversial
controversial plan
plan developed
developed during
during the
The topic was
was Agenda 21,
the 80s
80s that
that would
would allow
allow the
and use mind
mind control
control to
government to force people
people to move
move from the
the suburbs
suburbs to
to the
the cities
cities and
to manipulate
everything we
do.
everything
we do.
"They had
meeting how
how the
the United
is using
control technique
technique developed during the
the
had aa 44-hour
-hour meeting
United Nations
Nations is
using a mind
mind control
steal away Americans' freedoms,"
Seth Clark
Cold War to
to secretly steal
freedoms," said
said Seth
Clark of
of the
the political
political watchdog
watchdog group
group Better
Georgia.
Clark videotaped part
part of the briefing. He captured slides from
from the presentation
presentation comparing President Obama's
Obam s
record to that of Mao
Zedong, aa Chinese communist revolutionary,
revolutionary, and
-time Communist
record
Mao Zedong,
and Joseph
Joseph Stalin,
Stalin, the
the one
one-time
Communist
Union.
"Usually, when
you got
mind control and
and all these problems with
United Nations,
Nations,
"Usually,
when you
got somebody
somebody talking about
about mind
with the
the United
that
hat. I think the
is that
person wearing
hat
that person's
person's wearing
wearing aa tinfoil
tinfoil hat.
the thing
thing that concerns us
us is
that the person
wearing the
the tinfoil hat
be our senate
leader," said
said Georgia
Mike Berlon.
Berlon.
seems to be
senate majority leader,"
Georgia Democratic Party
Party Chairman
Chairman Mike
I
Berlon
said he
has no idea why
why Republican
Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers
sponsored the
the Agenda
Agenda 21
Berlon said
he has
Republican Senate
Rogers sponsored
21
seminar.
seminar.
Rogers told
CBS Atlanta
Atlanta News
hold the forum
constituents requested more
Rogers
told CBS
News he
he agreed
agreed to
to hold
forum after a group
group of constituents
more
information on
on Agenda 21.
information
21.
Georgia doesn't take

and Democrats said for the Republicans
Republicans to
Better Georgia
take political sides,
sides, but the activist group
group and
to
hold
is not just
just offensive,
offensive, but also
hold the forum is
also a waste of tax
tax dollars.
dollars.
"I honestly don't think
it's going to
people of
has proven
"I
think it's
to sit well with the people
of Georgia. I think the
the response so far
far has
proven
that.
is a
a bunch
said Clark.
Clark.
that. They
They know this
this is
bunch of malarkey,"
malarkey," said
I
"I'll be honest
with you.
the federal
federal government
government is
control is just crazy,"
honest with
you. The suggestion
suggestion that the
is using
using mind
mind control
crazy," said
said
Berlon.
Berlon.
WGCL -TV (Meredith Corporation).
Corporation). All rights reserved.
Copyright 2012 WGCL-TV
In The News
Promoted
Links by
by Taboola
Taboola
Promoted Links
86981 KRISTIHA BROWN PIE!

c -a
Fulton County
Medical
Judge
upheld execution
execution
Fulton
County Medical
Judge who upheld
on for Kelly Gissendaner regrets
Examiner issues statement
statement on
Bobbi Kristina
decision
Bobbi
decision
Meet The Man

Man Who Is
Is
Disrupting aa $13 Billion
Billion Razor
Razor
Disrupting
Industry
Industry
Dollar Shave Club

Appeal
15-3400
Page 26 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
10/23/2015 3:07 AM
10/23/2015

Melissa
Dykes
September 28, 2013

Page 27 of 44
experiments.
Page 28 of 44
The government
has been
been called
called into
into question
question on
EMF weapons
lately, following
Navy Yard
Yard shooter Aaron
The
on EMF
weapons lately,
following suspected
suspected Navy
government has
Alexis'
claims that
that he
he was
was targeted
targeted with
such weapons.
Alexis claims
with just such
weapons.
Ultra
attack is
is what
to for the
perfectly honest,
that is
what Ive
I've been
the last three
three months.
months. And to
to be
honest, that
is
"Ultra low frequency attack
been subject to
be perfectly
what has
has driven
driven me
me to
to this,
this," Mr.
Mr. Alexis
Alexis reportedly
reportedly wrote
in a
note before
before he
he shot
shot 12
12 people.
people. Pictures
Pictures of
of the
what
wrote in
a note
the shotgun
shotgun
Alexis
used to
to commit the
the crime
crime have
have surfaced
"My ELF
ELF [extremely low
low frequency] weapon,"
this way,"
Alexis used
surfaced with
with My
weapon, "Better
Better off this
way,
the torment"
scratched into
into the
the barrel.
barrel.
and
End the
torment scratched
and "End
Ur.
Aaron
Alexis' shotgun.
shotgun. Source:
Source: FBI
FBI
Aaron Alexis
The mainstream
mainstream media
media has,
has, for the
the most
most part,
part, dutifully
painted Alexis
mentally insane
insane person
randomly
The
Alexis as
who just randomly
dutifully painted
as a
a mentally
person who
lost it
it and
to shoot a
bunch of people
people one
He isnt
isn't the
the first
to kill
kill and
claim itit was
lost
and decided
one day.
first government employee
was
decided to
a bunch
day. He
employee to
and claim
the government
controlling his
his mind.
mind. Carl
innocent by
by reason
reason of insanity
insanity after
shooting Navy
Navy
the
government controlling
Carl Campbell
was found
found innocent
Campbell was
after shooting
Edward Higgins
Higgins to
the Pentagon in
in 1991.
1991. Court
papers revealed
revealed Campbell
believed to
Commander
to death
death outside the
to
Commander Edward
Court papers
Campbell was believed
be schizophrenic due
to his
his assertions
the U.S.
had inserted
inserted a
mind control
control microchip into
into his
his brain.
brain.
be
due to
assertions the
U.S. government had
a mind
Intelligence Veteran
Veteran and
Former Director of
the Electronic
Electronic Surveillance
Project Julianne
U.S.
and Former
of the
Julianne McKinney self
self-U.S. Army Intelligence
Surveillance Project
published Microwave
Harassment &
Mind -Control Experimentation
Experimentation" in
in 1992
1992 and
the Secret
published
& Mind-Control
"Microwave Harassment
and Mind
"Mind Control
Control and
and the
Secret State
State"
in 2008.
2008. In
In her
her writings,
could be
be the
the ultimate goals
EMF torture
in
writings, McKinney outlined what could
goals of these clandestine EMF
programs:
programs:
The long
-term objectives
to be
The
long-term
objectives of
of these harassment and experimentation
experimentation campaigns appear to
be quite
quite
fundamental; viz.,
fundamental;
viz.,
(1) induce a
a sense
sense of
"loyalty" toward the
very agencies engaged
in the
individual's
(1)
the very
the individuals
of perverted loyalty
engaged in
harassment,
to confuse his
his or her priorities where
where the
the possibility of obtaining
harassment, to
obtaining legal redress might be
be
concerned;
the targeted individual's

anger and frustration toward racial and
(2) redirect the
individuals feelings of
of hopelessness, anger
Appeal
Page 29
29 of 44
Friday, October 23,
15-3400
Page
Friday,
23, 2015
400 Lambert Appeal
15-31112)
Navy Yard
Yard Shooter Had Mind Control Group Contact | Examiner.com
11 of 2
NEWS
/ TOP
http
//www.examiner.com/article/ navy -yard- shooter-had -mind -control-g...
:
NEWS
See also: top news, targeted Individuals, mind control
Navy Yard Shooter Had Mind Control Group Contact

October 26, 2013
5:49 PM MST
Navy Yard tragedy's Aaron Alexis was reportedly in contact with an electronic surveillance and mind control "human rights support group" two weeks
before killing twelve people and being killed by police. Although Alexis wrote to the group's board members that the Navy was electronically assaulting
him and other targeted individuals, the FBI maintains the incident was "random," according to WBZT Saturday.
On October 21, Deborah Dupr published a news report on communications and personal contact between Alexis and the mind-control targeting support
group, Freedom From Covert Harassment and Stalking (FFCHS).
that October 21 report, Dupr provided the full text of one of the three emails to FFCHS, along with statements by the group's board members and
president.
In
[See: Exclusive: Aaron Alexis Pre -Navy Yard Tragedy Letter Released, by Deborah Dupr, Before It's News, October 21, 2013]
On October 23, the New York Post obtained Alexis's correspondence to FFCHS and reported the "exclusively" obtained emails:
"Two weeks before he slaughtered 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard, a desperate- sounding Aaron Alexis told an online 'mind control' outreach
group that the Navy was targeting his brain with extremely low frequency waves, according to a series of e-mails obtained exclusively by The Post"
Alexis blamed Navy for his torment

wlldpedle
each of the three emails, Alexis claimed that the Navy is conducting Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) research, including voices in his head and that of
other targeted individuals, according to the New York Post
In
"I
fear the constant bombardment from the ELF weapon is starting to take it's[sic] toll on my body," Alexis told FFCHS.
Alexis had also been attending FFCHS activities, according to self-identified targeted individuals (Tls).
Some of those Tls telephoned FFCHS board members the day of the Navy Yard tragedy when the shooter was identified. In emails to Dupr, they say that they told FFCHS president Derrick
Robinson, of Upland, CA, and other board members that they had met Alexis at the group's activities.
The FBI recently questioned FFCHS board member Max Williams. During an unannounced visit at his home, the agents asked if Williams had received emails from Alexis, he told Dupr.
When Williams responded to the agents, "No" the agents presented to him emails that he and other FFCHS board members had received from Alexis.
The first of those emails from Alexis was in August.
After the FBI visit, Robinson emailed
list of the organization's contacts, saying he had just realized that Alexis had communications with him and the group's board of directors.
"It appears that Aaron Alexis had contacted our organization just prior to the shooting spree that happened at the Washington Navy Yard," Robinson announced in his email last weekend.
Robinson admitted communications with Alexis saying, "Several email exchanges then ensued between Aaron Alexis and myself"
In
his email blast last weekend, Robinson asserted that the motive for the Navy Yard rampage was the ELF targeting of Alexis.
Robinson had asked Alexis in an email if he had access to "any of the technologies being used against us."
"I
don't have direct access to the equipment, how ever do have knowledge of where some of the attacks might be coming from," Alexis replied.
Within
month, thirteen victims lay dead from the Navy Yard tragedy: twelve people shot and killed by Alexis, and one man shot and killed by police - Aaron Alexis.
FFCHS spread the word that ELF technology is the weapon used to assault Tls
FFCHS board member Timothy White of The Bronx professes that Extremely Low Frequency is used to harass targeted individuals.
"ELF is the most advanced tech weapon, but people would not believe
that; White told Dupr last weekend.
Information Alexis had about ELF was from White's research, he said. According to White, the only individual with evidence about that and the only one providing that information and Alexis got his
information from him.
"The ELF weapons are part of the weapons systems of most of the modern vessels fielded by the Navy," Alexis wrote
starting to take it's[sic] toll on my body."
in
one of the emails.
fear the constant bombardment from the ELF weapon
"I
is
Robinson said Alexis "clearly showed" he:

"had come under physical attack from microwaves and was experiencing voice to skull technology, but was not able to process the situation until he arrived at our site," and 2) "had come across
some information at the Washington Navy Yard that convinced him that someplace inside there was a source of our ELF targeting establishing a motive for the attacks!"
1)
"Derrick,
have what believe to be the locations for where they've been developing these weapons for decades," Alexis told Robinson, in one of the emails.
I
Alexis's e-mails raised no alarms, according to Robinson.

The FBI maintains the shooting was "random" another lone -gun case, not revenge.
"The statements we've already put out regarding motive and not believing he had any specific targets
Washington field office.
- we're not changing anything there,"
said Lindsey Godwin, an FBI spokeswoman for its
The Post refers to the "twisted murderer's panicked mind" of Alexis. In thousands of untold cases, innocent people are targeted, rumors spread about them to discredit them in their respective
communities and workplace, and then, officials formerly pathologize them - give a mental health diagnosis without investigating possible covert weapon injuries.
While FFCHS refrained from providing its followers with the email address Alexis had used, so they could see if they, too, had ever received emails from him, board members told the Post that those
e-mails were sent from the address aalexis654@gmail.com.
Alexis was a Buddhist, an honorably discharged Navy reservist and
nor engaged in illicit drug use, according to family members.
Department of Defense computer consultant, never diagnosed with
mental health disorder, nor taken pharmaceutical drugs
He sought help for being subjected to technologically induced messages.

Appeal
15-3400
Page 30 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
10/23/2015 4:35 AM
10/23/2015
Navy Yard
Yard Shooter Had Mind Control Group Contact | Examiner.com
2 of 2
http
//www.examiner.com/article/ navy -yard- shooter-had -mind -control-g...
:
He had gone to FFCHS, the same organization many Tls go to seek help upon realizing they are being targeted electronically and by multi -stalkers.
"He wasn't that bad," White said. "We have many, many people who call and they are on the verge of suicide."
SUGGESTED LINKS
>
)
>
>
Surveillance is for remotely torturing innocent Americans

Snowden joined Booz for US spy evidence
How NSA spies ruin 1000s of America's greatest people
Obama ordered hit -list of Targeted Individuals worldwide to cyber- attack
FBI 'execution-style' in-home targeted killing
Re
Recommende
Sponsored Content on Examiner

Check Out This Innovative Feature You Need in Your Next Car [Watch]
By Ford Motor Company
Never fall victim to blindspots again with the Blindspot Information System (BLIS ) available in the new Ford Edge.
Jim Morrison's "s

Jin
faces life in priso

fac
Valley man receiv

Val
national award fo
nat
res
rescuing abandon
dol
dog
Deborah Dupre
Human Rights Examiner
2006 -2015 AXS Digital Group LLC d /b/a Examiner.com

Appeal
15-3400
Page 31
Page
31 of 44
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
10/23/2015 4:35 AM
10/23/2015
Obama ordered
ordered hit
hit-list
worldwide to cyber-attack...
-list of Targeted Individuals worldwide
cyber- attack...
11 of 2
http:
//www.examiner.com /article /obama- ordered -hit-list -of- targeted -indi...
NEWS /TOP NEWS

See also: top news, barack obama, human rights, cyber crime, targeted individuals
Obama ordered hit -list of Targeted Individuals worldwide to cyber- attack

6:07 PM MST
'Neutralizing targets' who expose and oppose high-level crime has been an FBI objective for decades. Obama has officialized this as the public becomes more aware of his regime's crimes.
Sosbee
Barack Obama ordered national security leaders to compile a new targeted individual hit -list, this one consisting of possible "adversaries" overseas and, in
emergencies in the U.S., for his regime to cyber- attack with "little or no warning," a top secret document reveals.
The 18 -page, classified document, entitled Presidential Policy Directive 20, outlines plans for
Offensive Cyber Effects Operations (OCEO), cyber- attacks that would target US adversaries globally.
"OCEO can offer unique and unconventional capabilities to advance US national objectives around the world with little or no warning to the adversary or
target and with potential effects ranging from subtle to severely damaging," the Washington Post cites the document as saying.
"The United States government shall identify potential targets of national importance where OCEO can offer favorable balance of effectiveness and risk as
compared with other instruments of national power," it continues.
The directive also includes the potential use of cyber- attacks on Americans and others in the US, though any such operations must be conducted with prior
authorization of the White House -- unless "it qualifies as an Emergency Cyber Action."
The directive, distributed to virtually every high- ranking member of the US Executive. Obama signed in in mid-October, but kept it a secret by never
publishing it.
Asked about efforts to ratchet up US offensive capabilities as outlined in the directive, a senior administration official told the Guardian: "Once humans
develop the capacity to build boats, we build navies. Once you build airplanes, we build air forces."
Control of all of humanity is the objective.
A target accustomed to internet communications and business could be be isolated, financially ruined, unable to seek help from family and friends without
internet capacity.
Each of hundreds of self -identified Targeted Individuals who have contacted this author since 2005 have complained about being cyber- attacked. Most of
their accounts related their targeting to corporate whistle -blowing or actively working to end high -level crime.
That raises the questions: Have they been guinea pigs? Did this program covertly start long ago?
SUGGESTED LINKS
>
Obama threatens: If you can't trust us, we're going to have problems
First city banning spy tech
Obama spying on all Americans a major human rights violation
Obama a 'monster' says Gitmo hunger strikers' rights defender, faster
>
Obama strips Americans' rights in NDAA bill, proclaims human rights week
>
>
>

Appeal
15-3400
Page 32 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
10/23/2015 4:40 AM
10/23/2015
Outlook.com - scaterbone@live.com
1 of 1
https://col131.mail.live.com/?tid=cmNVnHWxQa5RGZNgAiZMJDlg2&...
New
amazon
Folders
Reply
Delete
Archive
Junk
Sweep
Move to
Categories
Stan J. Caterbone
Your Amazon.com order of "Abuse Hidden Behind The

Badge" has shipped!
Inbox
Amazon.com
Junk
To: Stan J. Caterbone
Add to contacts 6/23/15
Drafts 1
Shipping Confirmation
Sent
Deleted
AA Inbox 41
Deed and City Rehab
Hello Stan J. Caterbone,

"Abuse Hidden Behind The Badge" has shipped.
Ebay and Online Purcha

Facebook
Details
Fax Folder 146

FFCHS Communications
Order #110-6302565-1485032
Geek Squad 1
Go Fund Me 2
Expected delivery date:

Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Shipped to:
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 FREMONT ST...
Lambert Case 14
*See FICO Credit Score Terms
LinkedIn 5
May-June Surge 51
Total Before Tax:
$34.59
Mind Control Research
Tax Collected:
$2.08
Shipment Total: $36.67

Saved Sent
Search Results
New folder
Depending on the ship speed you chose, it may take 24 hours for tracking information to be available
in your account.
Return or replace your items in Your Orders.
We hope to see you again soon.

Amazon.com
Unless otherwise noted, items sold by Amazon.com LLC are subject to sales tax in select states in accordance with
the applicable laws of that state. If your order contains one or more items from a seller other than Amazon.com LLC,
it may be subject to state and local sales tax, depending upon the sellers business policies and the location of their
operations. Learn more about tax and seller information.
Your invoice can be accessed here.
This email was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming email. Please do not reply to this
message.
2015 Microsoft
Terms
Privacy & cookies
Developers
Page 33 of 44
English (United States)

9/17/2015 5:15 PM
SADLER ABUSED EX-WIFE

EX -WIFE ***
* ** BREAKING NEWS ***
* ** @ LIP News
** SADLER
11
11 of 11
02
LIP News Lancaster Independent Press
Home
CONTACT
SITES
SITES
UNSOLVED MURDERS
CHERYL & STEVE MARKLE
UNSOLVED CRIMES
-WIFE ***
* ** BREAKING NEWS ***
* SADLER ABUSED EX
EX-WIFE
* **
Archives
Posted on July 29th, 2012 Becky 77 comments

comments
Archives Sulfa kiorrIi
** 7-30-12
Will Sadler resign or will Mayor
Mayor Gray fire
fire him?
him?
7 -30-12 -
Links
Cheryl Markle - Stalker
Stalker
Incest Tragedy
Tragedy
Lancaster Lynching
Steve Markle
Markle - Stalker
* ** BREAKING NEWS! ***

***
* **
POLICE CHIEF SADLER

BEAT HIS WIFE!
WIFE!
Categories
Convention Center
Featured
Franklin &
& Marshall Co
College
General News
Incest Tragedy
Tragedy
Lancaster Courts
Lancaster Lynching
Lancaster Newspapers
Lancaster Prison
Marvelous
Marvelous Mary
Marv
Police
Police
Racism
Racism
Roseboro
Roseboro Murder
Uncategorized
Unsolved
Unsolved Murders
Meta
Login
Log in
Rosaura Torres wrote a book about it published

published in 2010,
"Abuse Hidden Behind the Badge."
Abuse
Badge. He caused aa retinal
detachment that left her with permanent vision loss.
Please check back later for more on this unbelievable breaking
Entries RSS
RSS
Entries
Comments RSS
RSS
WordPress.org
story!
story!
Police
Police
-WIFE ***
* ** BREAKING NEWS
77 responses to "*
* SADLER ABUSED
ABUSED EX
EX-WIFE
NEWS ***
* * *"
1. Becky
29th, 2012
1.
Becky July 29th,
2012 at
at 12:39
12:39
story immediately
This comment came
came in
in under the
the story
immediately below and II am
am also
also posting it here:
here:
Appeal
15-3400
Page 34 of 44
Page
Friday, October 23,

Friday,
23, 2015
2015
6/15/2015 22:28
PM
:28 PM
2 of 11
We must bring an end to the cover up. Too many innocent people are being lost. My
prayers are with the victims and survivors.
Sincerely,
Author Rosaura Torres-Sader
Abuse Hidden Behind The Badge.
2. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 12:41
Her comment below also has this link:
http://www.torrespublishing.com/Pages/default.aspx
3. Barbequed chicken July 29th, 2012 at 12:46
Is this the reason, his abuse and dislike of women, that Sadler hasnt pressed his team to solve
the murder of Mrs. Kaylor?
4. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 13:00
Rosaura,
Thank you for speaking with me on the phone! This is so unbelievable. Im working as fast as I
can.
I am here to help and support all victims and survivors of Domestic Violence. God bless you
Becky for the wonderful work you are doing.
Be blessed always.
Rosaura
6. FWIW July 29th, 2012 at 14:17
Why isnt the chief and the Trooper named on her website or anywhere else? If they beat her,
why not call them out all over the web? And what ever came of the abuse? Were they
prosecuted? Was internal affairs notified? When did it happen?
7. It's time to make the donuts July 29th, 2012 at 14:18
WOW!!..tommorw morning the donuts arent goin to go down the same..WOW.
8. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 14:54
Hello my friend, thank you for the wonderful Complement. I understanding about having the
scars of the past abuse you and I sustained. My abusers caused me to have retinal detachment in
both eyes. My ex husband who is Chief of Police In Lancaster, PA (Keith Sadler) caused my
first detachment, then the trooper who is retired now caused me second, this is why I decided to
write my story and continue my journey to help others. I refuse to keep the Code of SIlence. You
are amazing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vFoYl8KKvw
9. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 15:08
Sadler is the second photo down http://ciaracolonoidvsurvivorcom.blogspot.com/2012/03
/demons-in-their-own-right.html
Thanks to a friend who is doing research for me! There is so much to do
10. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 15:13
Her husband was called The Golden Child by city officials and the Commissioner because of
his spotless record, work ethics, and career path. Going to his family or the police for assistance
Page 35 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
3 of 11
was impossible. He went for my face when abusing her, punching, slapping, even causing a
retinal detachment creating permanent loss of peripheral vision. Finally, he left me for his
mistress. He is now a Chief of Police, and on a Domestic Violence Advisory Board.
Married when they were 23, Torres remembers her husband, a Philadelphia Police Officer,
showed signs of abuse in courtship. He was controlling by telling her how to dress and how to
behave. Having grown up in a loving, nurturing family, Torres did not understand the signs of an
abuser. For years, I played the blame, shame, guilt game, she explains; I protected him, his
career, and his image as a police officer. His African-American family was also abusive toward
Torres, who is of Puerto Rican descent, constantly telling her Latinas were the lowest of
people. His grandmother was a founder of Jack and Jill, and they were very racist always
(had) something racist to say to me. Her husband was called The Golden Child by city
officials and the Commissioner because of his spotless record, work ethics, and career path.
Going to his family or the police for assistance was impossible. He went for my face when
abusing her, punching, slapping, even causing a retinal detachment creating permanent loss of
peripheral vision. Finally, he left me for his mistress. He is now a Chief of Police, and on a
Domestic Violence Advisory Board.
TO FWIW, I DID REPORT IT.Your courts in Lancaster would not prosecute the trooper. If
you are wondering who he is, his name is Anthony Suber. I have no reason to lie. Imagine being
afraid; not knowing what could happened. I will share this with you, when he was Chief
Inspector, I was warned by a other officer that he was going to bring false charges against me
and have me arrested. She told me to run..I
The Mr. Suber was not charged because they protected him. I file a civil suit; not because of the
money but.The justice. There were emails him admitting to hurting me, the jury felt he was not
liable for my injuries. My case is in appeals.
I apologize for some of my mistakes. My reason for writing my book was to tell how so many
still live in fear. Many would rather believe an officer of the law because its difficult for them to
even phantom a Officer of the Law would do this unspeakable abuse. We look for them for
protection.
What happens when it is the Police Officer we fear?
To FIWI: I changed your chief name in the book, not to protect him but.to protect our
children. They are now all adults. Many do not even realize he had another family.
FIWI, Your chief is not a great importance to me. What is important to me; is how we can help
other victims and survivors of Domestic Violence.
Sadler beat a woman and got away with it without accountability. His martial arts must have
come in handy when he used his wife for a punching bag.
Sadler is a LOSER and the worst job in the world for a thug loser is in law enforcement where
they have no accountability.
Thank you for all your support Chunky Blue Line.
17. Busted down to patrolman July 29th, 2012 at 20:11
Rosaura, You are a brave woman. Your reaction to the abuse you endured at the hands of this
Page 36 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
4 of 11
monster is normal. There is nothing worse than being afraid of the police, being unable to get a
response to your legitimate allegations. Even the good cops are afraid to step up and deal with
their buddies in blue. Hopefully the rest of us have the courage to now stand up and rid the
police departments of the abusers.
I now think of the current Lancaster City Lt. who was involved in the beating of two Spanish
guys some years ago. Was that just before this chief showed up?
Who did Sadlers background check. I think that could be an interesting fact.
18. Becky July 29th, 2012 at 20:16
I am still in shock by this whole thing. Apparently theres a very good reason this big chief
inspector from Philly packed his bags and headed to this little town. Unbelievable!
19. Denny July 29th, 2012 at 20:31
I agree with Busted, who did the vetting for the chief? I have had background checks done for
employment and they were thorough, they even spoke with prior neighbors. Obviously this was
lacking with Sadler. Bravo Rosaura for speaking out!
20. FWIW July 29th, 2012 at 21:23
TORRES- I dont doubt your experiences, I was just curious as to what happened. I had/have so
many questions. And the chief is not my chief, I dont live in the city.
Thank you all for your support. What is so important is to now hold those who are abuser
accountable for there actions. We must not continue to push any abuse under the rug. FWIW, I
am a open book, you can ask me any questions.
This is why I decided to write my story. I am honored and humbled, because I am still here to
help others.
22. Jim July 30th, 2012 at 05:02
NOWwell have to see what LNP does with this
23. Jim July 30th, 2012 at 05:03
NOW.well have to see what LNP does with this shocking info..
24. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 06:54
Yup! Theyve ignored all the unsolved murders and crimes but can they ignore this?
25. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 07:35
And what is Mayor Gray going to do? OMG!
Rosaura thank you for the work you do to help victims of domestic violence. You are very
brave and honorable.
I was so angry when I read the information on your website and saw the YouTube video because
we rely on government officials to do the right thing when vetting candidates for important
positions. Our tax dollars pay these individuals a VERY good salary to do their job. I am still
shocked that Keith Sadler was hired for such a vital position in law enforcement. Im guessing
the Philadelphia police department exhaled a huge sigh of relief when their problem was taken
off their hands. Shove it under the rug or in this case, move him to Lancaster.
The mugshot of Rodriguez-Colon showed a face swollen and bruised without explanation. The
police chief uses his fists on a WOMAN looks like this is standard operating procedure in his
jurisdiction. Just like corporations, the guy at the top sets the tone for the entire culture. Any
honorable soul on the police force has to keep their mouth shut to keep their job.
Page 37 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
5 of 11
27. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 10:41

The Rodriguez-Colon assault should be investigated. From the LNP article, Suspects bruises
still a mystery there is this:
He received stitches and other treatment before being arraigned and taken to the prison.
Investigators still werent sure Friday how Rodriguez-Colon, 35, was injured.
There was no crime reported, city police Lt. Todd Umstead said.
Isnt that cute? The police spokesperson Umstead makes a little joke about it. So when are you
allowed to beat someone to a pulp in Lancaster? Only if they allegedly abuse children? Or if they
steal your wallet can you beat them up? Or if their dog poops on your yard can you beat them
up? Disgusting! This police department is completely out of control!
http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/670019_Suspect-s-bruises-still-a-mystery.html
Chunky Blue Line, thank you for all your compassion and support. I pray that one DAY I will
receive justice.
God bless all of you.
Rosaura
Im shocked
Question was the husband the only abusve one and was it everyday beatings was he a angry
drunk that would come home just to beat the wife and was he the only abuser in the family and
out of both parents
No he was not an angry drunk controlling, dictator. I quote My home is a communist home
and I am the dictator and what I says goes.. Yes I did hit my boys. I admitted this in the book.
I have said time and time again, I was wrong and what happened to them was wrong. I hold
myself accountable for what happened to my boys.
32. G.R.S. July 30th, 2012 at 16:21
Time for all to move forward and just Live. I lost my primo last week I have more things to
worry about then the past the past made me strong and alert and that is why I am me so nope
wont hold onto past just time to move forward and live my life
33. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 16:36
Has Sadler received any type of therapy? Has he done anything to address and control his
abusive personality? This man repeatedly abused his wife for years. He has no respect for
women. There are not enough words to express how this man should not be a police chief, let
alone a police officer. This is outrageous!
Becky, no he did not. No he did not address this. I feel I must share this with your readers. My
abuse caused me retinal detachment and there is not a day I do not pray I can go back in time. I
have permanent damage. I know, I will never drive again or traveling but.I am now here to
help others. Until the day I go home with my parents; I will remember the abuse that caused me
my vision.
35. Goldilocks July 30th, 2012 at 18:33
Wow, this sure is unbelievable news about Chief Sadler. Becky, I fear for your safety in revealing
this news. You never know what abusive people and their supporters will do in order to protect
Page 38 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
6 of 11
their jobs, reputation, etc. Please be careful.

People .dont believe everything you read!!!!! This sound like a whole bunch of
nonsense. She waited soooo long to report the abuse Why??? It sounds to me like a case
of a breakup gone wrong And Mrs Torres You should hire an editor for your next book)
37. Becky July 30th, 2012 at 20:57
No, she didnt wait so long. She filed for a PFA in 1999. What about that dont you understand?
Becky thank you. Sounds to me this person is a bit jealous. I am going to pray for you. I feel no
anger or hate. Again, what matters here is what we can do to help victims who are afraid to
speak out. I tried to get help. I received no help absolutely Nothing. I will not turn my back on
another SURVIVOR OF Officer Involved Domestic Violence OIVD or any victim of Domestic
Violence.
Look how many treat the victims of Sandusky. They made comments how they only want
money. So many children, women and men, yes men lives with the memory of abuse.
Question??? Are there any other women claiming abuse by this man!!! Why are you naming him
and not the trooper??? Why did you wait to open up about the abuse!!?? Are you hiding
anything???? Have you always been the victim or have you ever been the abuser????
I would love to hear what the CHILDREN who grew up in that household have to say!!!!! Ive
been in the same exact situation and Im beyond positive that this women is leaving somethings
out!!!!
So i guess its PRESIDENT OBAMAS fault for all the unsolved murders across the United
States???? No!!!!!! Its the cowards how commit the crime!!!! So I question this women even
more!!!! It seems that your only goal and mission is to destroy this man!!!!!! You seem like an
vindictive, manipulator!!!!! Youre all about yourself!!!! Your only chance and shot to fame was
this book!!! It has been two years since you published and it was a flop!!!! I read up on you and
him!!! He is married and has a new baby!!! So its obvious for very very bitter and jealous!!!!
Yall keep believing what you are reading, cause I guarantee lies are being told!!!!
If you watched the interview he gave before becoming Chief, he mentioned having FIVE
CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anon..could you be the one in denial?.Im thinking your related to the wife abusing
chief!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Anonymous sounds like he doth protest too much. Check the IP address Becky, I would guess
its coming from CHUNKYs home address based on the time. Hes probably wise enough not to
use the Police Dept computer.
oh, and !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [just sayin]
46. Denny July 31st, 2012 at 12:36
Page 39 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
7 of 11
Anonymous, how can you guarantee lies are being told when you hide behind your identity?
LoL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!chunky blue line
July 30, 10:54 p.m.
Scene: Chunky at home, wife/kids asleep, working on his 3rd Jack&Coke reads LIP News
and angrily responds.
Another swig of Jack&Coke, posts again at 11:01 p.m.
Two more swigs of Jack&Coke, eyes bulging and red faced it takes several minutes to type
another handful of comments holding down the ! key for emphasis, 11:19 p.m.
Final comment 11:25 p.m. Chunky spills the 4th Jack&Coke on the keyboard and heads to bed.
He may be angry, but hes still large and in charge of his domicile and county department.
-scene49. Rosaura Torres Sadler July 31st, 2012 at 17:08
Most people would rather point the finger at the victim. AMON, are you Denise? Are you one of
his followers. Many would rather blame, shame and guilt the victim. Shame on you
AMONUntil you walk into any victims shoes you would never know the damage that has
been caused. Again, I will pray for you because this is all I can give you; is my prayers.
Becky, GOD BLESS YOU!!!!
If you look at his BIO AMON, my and your chief children do not exist. When he was sworn in
as chief; did you see any of our adult children? NO. If you have any questions for me, just ask. I
am right here. Be blessed.
51. Clara Bell Leonard July 31st, 2012 at 19:18
I am no supporter of abusers, but i am also not a supporter of a lifelong sentence and drag about
of all or any one thing that someone is accused of. What is the purpose of this? Why cant Sadler
be on a board that serves to protect the women of abuse? In rehab facilities often the best
counselors are ones that have been in the shoes before, same for alcohilics etc. A person is
capable of seeing the wrong if any and making amends to that end. They may never pay enough
in your or my eyes, but luckily you and I dont have the final say. forgive and let live then you
can be free.
Clara you are so right, I agree he should be a part of all of these outstanding facilities but.How
can he advice on any such issues such as Domestic Violence, when the abuser will deny any
abuse. I have permitted damage to my vision. It does not matter what he did to me, what matter
is what we can do to help others. How can we help others. How can we stop the ABUSE!
Sadly it is a loophole that you cannot go back an weave shut. it doesnt really matter what
method one uses to cleanse theirself or shed bad behaviors, as long as they do. Unless and until
his current wife decides to come out with something it does not really pose any threat in the
performance of his job as police chief. From what I am reading it is not you necessarily calling
for him to lose his job, but more dear Becky. I recognize you have a story you want to tell, but it
really looks like Becky is riding your coat tails and pushing your buttons to further her dislike or
disappointment of Sadlers performance. 2 separate things that should not be coupled together.
Your story your life and if it were me I would protect those which I hold to be my truth and be
uhhhm, choicier?? of who I give audience to. Life and time are precious and I am not trying to
further somebody elses gosh danged agenda. At the end of the day, you dont need
acknowledgement from any abuser, not if you have to ask for it, see that the longer you punish
Page 40 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
8 of 11
them the longer you are punishing yourself.

Clara, LOL! Riding her coat tails? Ive been publishing daily for almost 9 years! I dont do coat
tails. Did you watch the video by Lt. Todd Umstead that I linked to? The Lancaster Police deal
with 3,000 domestic calls a year it is their most common call. Tell me how you can have a
domestic abuser as the police chief under those conditions?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMR2UAAwTN0
September 25, 2012 will be the nine year anniversary of this site, Clara!
Becky I dont mean you need her, I just mean you WANT to use her. I have a site, its been up
since sites were allowed to be had. hoop dee freaking dooo!
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I listened to Rosa on the blogtalk interview and the one on YouTube where she talks with
another wife of a philly cop. anyway, Rosa could have her own blogtalk or other medium to
discuss her story the way she likes, she can give her goals, her mission, and her plan and tell us
all how we can help. so Becks, what are your goals, what is your mission, what is you plan to
have the rest of us help make Lancaster a better place or the best it can be?
Obviously as a new reader Clara, you wouldnt know but in the last six months or so I have
uncovered the following and plan to pursue and help get the situations corrected so that
Lancaster can move forward:
1. Blatant racial discrimination in hiring by the County of Lancster. This is an ongoing series.
2. Public officials not being held accountable in one case particularly the coroner. He failed
to perform his job duties by not performing autopsies on two women found hanging from trees
within a week of each other in the county. One looks very much like a murder, not a suicide as
he declared (without benefit of an autopsy. There will be more on that coming.
3. A terrible lack of diversity on the Lancaster Police force. Lancaster is over 50% minority.
Check out the Honor Guard on the police website. Check out their three new hires! This is
disgraceful and is also an ongoing part of a series.
4. The Lancaster Polices terrible record in solving murder and crimes. Check out the
UNSOLVED MURDERS and the UNSOLVED CRIMES tabs at the top of my site.
5. Blatant racism in sentencing by Lancaster County Judges.
6. Blantant racial discrimination in hiring by the Lancaster Newspapers which has allowed many
of the above inequalities to exist. They have one minority on their editorial staffs the editor of
La Voz (its in Spanish and hence they needed someone fluet in Spanish!) I have been writing
about this subject for years!
7. Trying to bring awareness about the sexual abuse of children including incest. This has been
ongoing on this site for years.
I could keep going but Ill stop now because I have work to do!
Okay, Clara, if youre going to get nasty and make personal attacks your comments are not going
Page 41 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
9 of 11
to be posted. Okay, Clara boo?

It is time to come together to help the citizen of Lancaster and I believe in my heart that Becky
is trying to do just that.
Rosa, Im a going to leave this conversation for 2 reasons.
1. I dont stick around for any abusive conversation or ones that i feel degrade the person I am
tryin to be.
2. You appear to have never stopped being a victim and until you do, nothing can help you. I
believe you were wronged, but unless people are really going to band together and put some fire
under our system, little change will come. I wish you better outcomes and eventual peace. I have
it.
63. Jen Hopkins August 1st, 2012 at 12:58
Wow.. It is truly amazing how this woman decided to write a book only after Mr. Sadler became
a Chief in Lancaster. Also, she only claimed abuse after he left the marriage only to dismiss the
claim to get money. Really? This is truly a case of jealousy and need for revenge. I also find it
interesting that she is so focused in destroying Mr. Sadlers reputation but talks very little about
the State Trooper whom she claims abused her too. I have to admit that reading her book was
painful because of so many grammatical errors and inconsistency in her story. She claims that
she was terrified of him but also admits to being unfaithful, Im not sure how a terrified
woman that feared for her life can go ahead and be unfaithful to the man she fears. I personally
think that Ms. Torres has been on a campaign to destroy the Chief and her efforts have been
useless. I agree with Anonymous, I would love to hear from the children that lived in that
household. I would also love to hear from other people who witnessed the abuse, and how
about his current wife? Is she claiming abuse too? My predictions are that the Chief will
continue to be the Chief and Mrs. Torres will continue hating him for it.
I advise Ms. Torres to move on and do some soul searching in order to be happy and forget about
her ex-husband who left her over a decade ago. That is way too long to hold on to hate. Also,
Ms. Torres, you should take a basic grammar lesson before you call yourself an author.
Clara Bell, You as a survivor are aware that Domestic Violence is a lifetime of healing but.We
do live. So many victims and survivors live with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I am no longer a
victim but.Every day I am reminded just like so many of my sisters and brothers of the
damage they will live with them for the rest of their lives.
Should we tell those young men who were sexually abused to get over it? No, those young men
are our children. We must not stand and ignore what has happened to so many. I have never
shown any bitterness towards you. I am a good decent person. I will continue to treat you with
respect. Be blessed Clara Bell.
Do I hate Keith? No, I have spoken to many women and just as myself, they want
acknowledgement, accountability for what happened to them. If I live to be a 100, I will always
remember what Keith Sadler and Anthony Suber did to me.
I started writing my book back in 1999. I decided to come out after the death of my father. My
mother and father told me not to give up, to speak out and I did. There were many errors in my
book. My editor did a horrible job on the first fifty copies and it was corrected but.This does
not matter. The truth is the truth. No matter how many errors there were, it does not change the
fact that Keith is my past abuser. I did mention Anthony Suber, I wrote to Sotomayer about this,
I contacted the US Attorney Generals office, I put in a complaint. I did it all
I dont care if they dont like my book, I and many more knew what he did. My children are
Page 42 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
10 of 11
adults, if you wish to contact them, be my guest.

Jen, are you a member of Keiths current family? I received an email from a friend saying people
are confused and think the book is written by his current wife. The people in Lancaster know
nothing about his prior wife, Rosa, because we never heard one word about it in the press!
On the weekends, he plays taxi driver for his 13- and 17-year-old daughters, masters the
grill in almost any weather, hits the gym for a 90-minute Saturday-morning workout and is
able to wrest control of the TV remote for a blessed few hours.
Read more: http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/353634_Police-chief-hits-the-gymthe-grilland-the-tube.html#ixzz22JqiruNu
Rosa, this is about as much as anyone in Lancaster knew about his family. The reporter did not
tell us or maybe Sadler didnt tell him that the daughters are not his biological daughters!
OH MY GOD Becky, so many of your followers and readers would rather ignore the truth.Just
like the Penn State Scandal. Many wanted them to go away. Now I understand why their names
were never mentioned, look what is staking place on your Web Site..Why do they continue to
blame and abuse the survivor. They refuse to hold the abuser ACCOUNTABLE.
Becky, continue your work!!! I am honored to know you!!!!
Rosa, I think its one or two people who know Keith who have been posting comments all day
long. I think most of my reades are supportive of you. Nobody knew about his previous family.
Becky, Keith had a Favorite saying out of sight out of mind. My children are a reminder of the
past. When I was in court in April in Lancaster one of our sons stopped to see him. Sadly, his
staff was shocked. I wonder why, could it be some did not know about me? I could not answer
that but.I can answer this. I knew that it was time. So many of us continue to keep the CODE
OF SILENCE. I refuse to keep the CODE OF SILENCE.
Rosa, a friend sent me an email saying people are confused because they did not know he had a
first wife! Maybe you could outline a brief bit about your life with him when married, when
divorced, how many kids, etc. and I could also run it as the story this afternoon. People in
Lancaster are stunned! They knew nothing about this and a different family in his past!
God bless you Becky, I posted my comments..If they have any questions for me, I am right
here..I know in my heart that my parents are proud of me.Because they wanted me to
continue the fight and I did
Thank you Becky, I must apologize to your followers. I am reading some of these horrible
comments, whoever this person is family or friend would rather protect my past abusers Keith
Sadler and Anthony Suber.
I will write a short story for you. Thank you Becky.
Page 43 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
11 of 11
Perfect. As you said his own staff were shocked all the people in Lancaster are as well! WE
DIDNT KNOW! A brief story would be great! Thanks, Rosa.
77. Chunky Blue Line August 1st, 2012 at 16:55
Rosa, when the truth is revealed the abusers and his supporters will go after you the victim. It
happens all the time. Stay strong and know that there are people reading these stories who
understand your pain and support you in standing up and taking your power back. I applaud you!
Plus Ive sent relevant links far and wide to tell your story.
Powered by WordPress
Designed by My Mobiles
Page 44 of 44
6/15/2015 2:28 PM
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
and
Executive Summary
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
Page 1 of 41

&
STAN J. CATERBONE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
do you believe in?
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 2 of 41

The
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the

And Again, the
Since August 1,

Lambert.

Page 3 of 41
no
$600.00.
Common Pleas.
Pennsylvania.
The
Page 4 of 41

Stan J. Caterbone.
Page 5 of 41
HISTORY
local laws.
This
ISC was a
INTERNATIONAL
States as of 1992.
Page 6 of 41
Agency (CIA).
Directors?

scandal.
Patent Office.
subsidiaries.
Carlos Cardoen.
believe him.


Lancaster, County.
Page 7 of 41



possible.

Page 8 of 41

Mind Control.
Page 9 of 41

WEAPONS.
topic.
without success.
This
more information.
Page 10 of 41
FAMILY HISTORY
the following:
business.

Samuel Caterbone,
subprograms.
Page 11 of 41
solvents.
His
In 1973 Samuel P.
account.
his record online.
He was in perfect
Julianne McKinney,
Page 12 of 41
By his own
suicide.
It left him in the
The
The Schizophrenia
Page 13 of 41
School.
Over the
were sold.
very short fashion.
Record:
Page 14 of 41
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

courts.
court filings.

Page 15 of 41


Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 16 of 41
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Derrick Robinson
P.O. Box 9022
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
Derrick,
see
attached.
ISC.
Dollar Fraud.
Page 17 of 41

Wikipedia.
Page 18 of 41
James Cross
Page 19 of 41
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Page 20 of 41
AFFIDAVIT
The
Page 21 of 41
And I affirm that the foregoing is true except to statements made upon information and belief,
and as to those I believe them to be true. Witness my hand under the penalties of perjury this
10th day of October, 2015.
Signature,
____________________________
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Signature
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On
before me,________________________personally appeared

, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged
to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature_____________________________
Affiant______Known______Produced ID
Type of ID_________________________
(Seal)
Page 22 of 41
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
mailto: amgroup0l@msn.com
ij

1250 Fremont Street
!" #
Lancaster, PA 17603
:AMG Legal Systems Prototype
The "ISC Cover -Up"

The Enclosed CD -ROM Contains
authentic information that substantiates
my claims of widespread corruption and
misconduct toward my person and my
business interests, immediately
following my allegations of fraud within
International Signal & Control, Plc,
(1SC), which I disclosed in a meeting
with an ISC executive on June 23, of
1987, including PA Officials.
The CD contains 42 minutes of tape

recorded conversations and over 600
images of authentic documents which
can be proven to be authentic
This information is intended to restore

my reputation and restore me to whole.
Sta4gi
. .
stered 05l16191
$ % &' J. CATERBONE,
$&()*%& PRO
(* SE
& LITIGATOR
+$+
$*(
STANLEY
29
DISMISS
/NOT- GUILTY
, CRIMINAL
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.(
0%/%*$1
2+ $'
CHARGES
/WITHDRAWN
1987
TO 2008
,3! $*
3
Terroristic Threats
Quashed
,/ / ,3! Cc2706
! "$
$4
1- M1 5
4
/
09/01/1987
/ .Dismis // .Demur Sus
Restraint 1- M1 5
Quashed
,/ #/ ,3! Cc2902
, 1-1 2
6 78 6 (
4
/
09/03/1987
Unlawful
Nolle
Withdrawn
,/ #/ ,3! Cc3304a2
## 9
4 8 1- F3
#%
66 Prossed /
4
7
09/03/1987
Criminal6 Mischief
/0
Burglary
,/ #/ ,3! Cc3502
#
)
6 : 1- F1 Quashed
5
4
/
09/03/1987
Robbery: 1- F1 5
Quashed
,/ #/ ,3! Cc3701a1
#!
6(
4
/.
5. 09/03/1987
/Dismis /.
/Demur Sus
Theft
By 2
Dispo <
Nolle
"
,/ #/ ,3! Cc3921a
#,
$4 8 ):
678 Taking
$ ;
*
66 Pros /
0 4
7
6. 09/03/1987
Unlwf
Or .
-F3# %
/ Withdrawn
Nolle
"
,/ #/ ,3! Cc3933a1
#,##
2
6 78 6 2
66 Pros /0
4
7
6. 09/03/1987
Unlawful
Use *8
Of Computer -1 F3# %
/Withdrawn
7. 09/03/1987
!
,/ #/ ,3! Cc3933a2
#,##
2
6 78 6 2
4
/
Unlawful
Use *8
Of Computer -1 F3# 5
Quashed
/ .Disnis // .Demur Sus
Disorderly
Noise 1- Withdrawn
(Lower
3
/ /
" 1 18
3=
# ==
6: Conduct 12
6 %
0 4
7 >
7 Court)?
8. 12/05/2006
5503
A2 .
-Unreasonable
Theft
,
/ /
" 1 18
3=
" ==
9 $4
8 *8
@
*8
0 4
7 >(Lower
7 Court)?
9. 12/05/2006
#,
3926
A4
Of Services1-Acquisition
Of Services Withdrawn
10. 12/05/2006
Harassment 1- Comm. (
Repeat +In Another
Manner 0
Withdrawn
/ /
" 1 18
3=
! , ==
4
4
7 >(LC)?
2709
A7! 11. 01/23/2007
No Parking
Withdrawn
/ #/
! 1 285
3 1-21d %
;
* Stopping Permitted 0
4
7 >(Lower
7
Or
Court)?
12. 01/23/2007
Withdrawn
/ #/
! 1 285
3 1#
A 6
0
4
7 >(Lower
7
-30a Meter Violation
Court)?
14.
Al Scatter (
Rubbish4 2
Dismissed >(Lower
9 01/23/2007
/ #/
! 1 18
3=
7
"
6501 ==
Upon Land /
/Stream &Etc .
Court)?
15. 01/23/2007
No Parking
Withdrawn
/ #/
! 1 285
3 1-21d %
;
* Stopping Permitted 0
4
7 >(Lower
7
Or
Court)?
16.
Withdrawn
" 01/23/2007
/ #/
! 1 285
3 1#
A 6
0
4
7 >(Lower
7
-30a Meter Violation
Court)?
17.
75 =
Driv While
Revoked
Not Guilty
! 01/18/2007
/ 3/
! 1 !
9# ==
04 6 *
;
%
6 :
1543
A .
Oper Priv Susp *
Or (
18.
75 =
Veh
W/O (
Req'd
Resp %
Not Guilty
3 01/18/2007
/ 3/
! 1 !
!3" ==
4 0/*
@B Financ (
6 :
1786
F *
Oper A
19.
Disorder Conduct Hazardous
Not Guilty
, 04/30/2007
9/# /
! 1 18
3=
# ==
9/ .
C
/
4: Off
*88 %
6 :
5503
A4/
/Physi
20. 04/30/2007
A /
/ *Obstruction -Highways
Not Guilty
9/# /
! 2 18
3=
! ==
47 : %
6 :
5507
21. 04/30/2007
Harassment 1- Course *8
W /No Legiti Purpose %
Nolle
9/# /
! #/
! , ==
#66 Pros
3/ 183 = 2709
A3
Of Conduct 0/%
22. 04/30/2007
75 =
A /
/ .Disregard $Traffic
Device %
Not Guilty
Nolle
9/# /
! 1 !
88 Control6 .
6 :%
66 Pros
#
3111 ==
23.
Resist Arrest /*
Law
Enforce
K4775120
# 05/10/2007
/ /
! M2 18
3=
9(
4
7&
8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
5104
/Other
08/04/2006
24.
Rep /
/Etc *88
K4775120 %
Nolle
9 05/10/2007
/ /
!#
3=
, 3 ==
; (
0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
66 Pros
3 M1 18
908
A Make
/Sell66/&
Off Weap
08/04/2006
25. 05/29/2007
75 =
Driv While
Revoked
Not Guilty
/ ,/
! 1 !
9# ==
04 6 *
;
%
6 :
1543
A .
Oper Priv Susp *
Or (
26.
75 =
A Careless
Driving 08/04/2006
Nolle
#!
3714
" 11/01/2007
/ /
!S!
9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
"%
66 Pros
27.
75 =
A1*
DUI:
Imp
/Inc
Driving
Nolle
! 11/01/2007
/ /
!!
#3
==
E
.2+F
+
/+
8
.
8
6: %
66 Pros
3802
Gen
of
Safely
28.
Driving 2
3 07/03/2008
!/ #/
3 TR0001835
$(
3# 1-08
3.
: Pennsylvania
:6
6
Under Suspension by
State Police
29.
DUI charge
, 07/03/2008
!/ #/
3 TR0001835
$(
3# 1-08
3 .2+
4
: PennDOT
.*$ in Clearfield
6
8 6 County
:
by
1.
2.
#
3.
4.
9
Page 23 of 41
Page
41
10, 2015
Saturday,
Saturday, October 10,
)6
G!
(&. G
++ /
,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%
6+ 8
&$-+
&
6& 4
8
&. *2$ * ! - ( &.

* + & - ( & .+
+
&. *( *A&($2(%&. *%
&
6(
6 : > ,3#?
*% +.&( $+*%
>& 4
? !1
!"
#
# (
%
= 3#
(
*(
+
!(
&'
9
@
'
8 62
9
#
= 3#
8
'
(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-
!( 3
*B
66 : >
,,9?
88B
> ,,"? /
1
( 2
*( 3
'
#
,
,
4
Page 24 of 41
s
caterbone@live.com
scaterbone@live.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup0l
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
Stan
Advanced Media
Media Group
1250 Fremont
Fremont Street
1250
Lancaster, PA
PA 17603
17603
Lancaster,

STAN
J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
STAN J.
GROUP
Violations of Public
Public Accommodations Law re
re Discrimination
Discrimination
-Trust Violations with False
False Statements to
to Authorities
and Anti
Anti-Trust
September
27, 2015
2015
September 27,
Work-In-Progress
Work-In- Progress
Stalking and
and Organized Libel/Slander
Libel /Slander Campaign
Campaign Strategy
- Issue
Issue a
a few every
Community Stalking
imprisonment; fabricated
mental illness
illness history.
history. In
In addition
addition to
year to support false arrests;
arrests; false imprisonment;
fabricated mental
to
isolate
isolate by prohibiting
prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good
good live
live music.
music. Prohibit from
from
defending against the lies and
and slander in
in public to a
a minimum.
minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
strong
defending
Christian values and
and church
church attendance on
on a weekly basis
basis by
by keeping
keeping away from
from church.
church. The
Christian
The
Millersville
Graduate Studies
Millersville University
University Graduate
Studies No
No Trespass Notice
Notice was accommodated
accommodated by the denial
denial of
entitled benefits
benefits of LETA Job
Education Course
Course of the
Paralegal program
program at HACC during
entitled
Job Training
Training Education
the Paralegal
during
period.
1. David
David Pflumm
Pflumm Properties by David
David Pflumm
Pflumm - Served by
by State Constable in
in June
1.
June of
2005, original not
not signed
signed by David
David Pflumm
Pflumm
2005,
2. Eden
Eden Resort
Resort Inn,
Inn, by Drew
Drew Anthon,
- Sent
Sent via 11stst Class
Class Mail
Mail in
in 2005.
2005.
2.
Anthon, Owner
3.
3. Barley
Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster
Lancaster Office, by
by Shawn
Shawn Long,
Long, Esq.,
Esq., Attorney representing
representing
Fulton Bank in
in 2006
2006
- Sent via
Fulton
via 11stst Class Mail
4. Lancaster
Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by
by Steve
Steve Weaver,
in 2006,
2006, No
No Notice,
Notice,
4.
Weaver, Manager in
Corraborated by
by Jack Buckwalter,
Buckwalter, Chairman
Chairman and CEO
with Barley
Corraborated
CEO and George
George Warner, Atty with
Snyder, LLC,
LLC, No Formal
Formal Notice,
Notice, allowed
allowed to
in 2015.
2015.
Snyder,
to reenter in
5. Ruby
Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping
Shopping Center,
Center, Lancaster, by Manager
Manager and
and Lancaster
Lancaster City
5.
Police in
in 2006,
2006, No
No Formal
Formal Notice,
Notice, allowed
allowed to reenter in
in 2015.
2015.
Police
6. Alley Kat Restaurant
Restaurant and
Bar, Lancaster by Bartender
Bartender Ms.
Ms. Santinello, Brett
Brett Stabley,
6.
and Bar,
and
and Lancaster
Lancaster City Police,
Police, No
No formal Notice
Notice in
in 2006
2006
7. Village Nightclub,
Nightclub, Lancaster
Lancaster by
by George in
in 2008,
2008, No
No Formal
Formal Notice
Notice
7.
8. Marion
Marion Court Restaurant,
Restaurant, Lancaster,
Lancaster, by Security
Security Personnel,
Personnel, corroborated
corroborated by Michael
Michael
8.
Geesey, in
in 2008,
2008, No
No Formal
Formal Notice,
Notice, allowed to
to enter in
in 2015.
2015.
Geesey,
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster,
Lancaster, by Jeanine,
Bartender,in 2008, corroborated
corroborated by
by John
John
9.
Jeanine, Bartender,in
No Formal
Formal Notice
Notice
Valentino, Owner, No
10. Brunswick
Brunswick Hotel,
Hotel, Lancaster,
Lancaster, by
by Staff Employees,
Employees, in
in 2008,
2008, No Formal
Formal Notice
Notice
10.
11. Lancaster
Lancaster County Library
Library and
and Duke
Duke Street Business
Business Center, by
by Executive
Executive Director
Director in
in
11.
March
March of 2009,
2009, by 11stst Class Mail
Mail
12. Anne Bailey's
Bailey's Restaurant
Restaurant and Bar,
Bar, Lancaster,
Lancaster, by
by Manager in
in 2009,
2009, No
No Formal
Formal Notice
Notice
12.
13. Millersville
Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University,
University, Millersville,
Millersville, by
by
13.
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via
via Certified
Certified Mail
Mail in
in June of 2009.
2009.
Lori
Page 25 of 41
Page
41
10, 2015
Saturday,

Formal Notice
Officer.
Debra Hoeckler
Dated: September 27, 2015
Page 26 of 41
AFFIDAVIT
I,
Address:
'A"
(ZS
E7 Q. 0frreef3414/6
residing at:
>,5,104.4f
City, State, Zip Code:
Tom-
lgt
? id-0 S
do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am a citizen or a legal resident of the
United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I am the person whose signature
follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to advise Congress as well as state
and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind manipulation torture being
committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or Congressional investigation and
hearing on the use of remotely- operated directed energy attacks and mind control technologies
on Americans in this country.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that covertly harass,
torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through organized stalking and remote
electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that certain elements of Government either
engage in these activities or protect those who perform them. I seek the complete dismantling
of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture programs, the passage of legislation
specifically outlawing that high -tech torture, and the full prosecution of any person, regardless
of his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and my most basic human rights.
The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for,
include, but are not limited to the following (checked below):
month(s) and
year(s) or
/blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy.

invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies.
4 ,TA
CsAtalDU?CJ Tir
making me mentally shore others' wises through the microwave hearing effect.
/depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention.

introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home. 044. a
`!having
me stalked me en masse on foot and In vehicles, OR d i
cc.
si-escP '
42
id,
fr7?_,
C earJ ic.tcs.1/
vandalizing my home and /or car.
tapping my phones and hacking my computer;
S oc. trga-AucC
41
Page 27
27 of
Page
of 41
i'
At
M4 &;
o vG G 4 cuove
2015
10, 2015
Saturday,
blacklisting me in the labor market_
"workplace mobbing",
bombarding my body with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects.
'/i
it
41
c7
'i r-t
.F
4-1r4-as
G-k)
eP*i
I/
S 6`&iels 741-;
are:
10 USC 921, Article 121
_ Larceny and'wrongful appropriation
10 USC 920A, Article 120a
- Torture
18 2340 USC
18 USC
241-
18 USC 213
- Stalking
Conspiracy against rights of sovereign, free; Gtiti created, spirit and soul beings
- Illegal Surreptitious entry
18 USC 242 -- Deprivation of rights under color

18 USC 35
- Imparting or conveying false information
18 USC 1117
18 USC
of law
- Conspiracy to Murder
1111- Murder
- Disclosure of information generally

42 USC 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
18 USC 1905
42 USC 1985
- Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
31 USC 5328 -Whistleblower protections

18 USC 1512
18 USC 1503
- Engaging in misleading conduct

Intimidating
witness /victim
18 USC 1512
- Tampering with a witness /victim
18 USC 1513
- Retaliation against
witness/victim
Page 28 of 41
Page
41
10, 2015
Saturday,
- Obstructing criminal investigation, conflict of interest roles in government

18 USC 1509 - Impeding due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct, Impede and
18 USC 1510
Interfere with same

18 USC 1622
- Subordination of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury
AFFIRMATION
affirm that the statements In this Affidavit concerning my torture and tilt results of that
torture are true and correct. further affirm that those statements are based on my own direct
I
knowledge, personal experience, research, and known and published historical fact.
Affiant (signature)
Name (print):
t a.010
vo
2010
,
Stamp
Notary Public
& Seal:
NOTARUII SEAL
GLORIA COLON
Notary Pubilc
LANCASTER CITY, LANCASTER COUNTY
My Commission Expires Dec 12. 2011
Page 29
Page
29 of
of 41
41
Saturday, October
October 10,
10, 2015
2015
Saturday,
AFFIDAVIT
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am
a citizen or a legal resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I
am the person whose signature follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to
advise Congress as well as state and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind
manipulation torture being committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or
Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of remotely-operated directed energy attacks
and mind control technologies on Americans in this country.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that
covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through
organized stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that
certain elements of Government either engage in these activities or protect those who perform
them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture
programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that high-tech torture, and the full
prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and
my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s) and include, but are not limited to the following victimization's:
1.
Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy.

Bombarding my body with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects.
Directed Energy Weapons Causing Severe Pain to Body and Brain. Began in at least 2005
and still continuing, with complaints to Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, FFCHS
in 2009, and in cited in various state and federal court cases over the past several years.
Attacks causing severe artificial pain most likely from Directed Energy Devices synchronized with
telepathic harassment and organized stalking and harassment have been logged and reported to
law enforcement and medical professionals since 2008.
Prior to 2008 the attacks were
experienced and reported to medical professionals but the sources were not known. Also reported
attacks of pain to a family physician, emergency room personnel and psychiatrists.
2.
Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies. Was sent an autonomous
email in 1998 introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being
used to create emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic complete
hacking of my mind.
3.
Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic telepathy
in 2005 with full-time 24/7 connection during the same time to present. When full-time telepathy
started a male conducted interrogations lasting several hours at a time concerning a wealth of
subjects including ISC/CIA Knowledge. Cannot disconnect from continuous conversations at all
times with one female person. The handlers know everything I know and experience in real time.
During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic with some 10 or more persons, both male and female
for short durations. Can recall most conversations and subject matter with identities of who they
said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still being used telepathically to harass and for
some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to DARPA, the FBI, and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
in 2007. Some conversations by the persons that are telepathic with me elude to some program
similar to the DARPA datalog program where they record your entire life. Everything that you try
to do on a daily basis is subject matter for conversation and harassment. Interference with
thought, harassment, and interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon attacks
to the brain or body.
Page 30 of 41
4.
Depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention. Mostly Experienced Sleep
Deprivation Techniques during periods of time in 2008 to 2010. Mostly with attacks of pain from
Directed Energy Weapons to back, neck, head (brain); and heart on a few occasions; and with
harassment from telepathy.
5.
Introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home. First experienced
toxic gases (Chloroform?) in heavy doses in 2006-2007. Made complaints to the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Southern Regional Police. Experienced attacks that would cause
dizziness at home, in automobile and in public. Was informed it was being released through a
distribution system the size of fishing line. To counter attacks used cotton in nostrils and gas
mask. In 2009 experienced attacks of what is said to be sleeping gas, when attacked could not
open eyes. Took Pictures during some attacks.
6.
Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or
car. Gang Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today. It includes
strangers using gestures such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public
mobbing. Complaints have been filed in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were
made to various public officials and local, state, and federal agencies as mental duress. The terms
organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual, etc., was not learned until a few years ago.
The organized stalking and harassment followed in several states, some while traveling from
Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have been used and most likely
are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
7.
Tapping (Bugging) my phones. Complaints of phone tapping/tampering were made to

New Jersey Bell in 1987 with a service call to Stone Harbor, New Jersey to check lines and phones.
The same was done by a Bell Atlantic repairman in Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1998. In 2004 a
complaint with a report number was filed with the Pennsylvania Attorney General Office in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Agent Amy Zelnick) regarding interference with phone calls and
impersonations by perps intercepting and rerouting calls. Computer Hacking complaints were filed
to local authorities in the County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation in 2005 to 2010.
8.
Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with
the Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations
Commission in 2008.
9.
Workplace mobbing. Experienced in 1987 at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

American Helix of High Industries in 1991 and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., in 1997/1998. Filed
complaints and logs as mental duress and harassment. Was forced out of all 3 organizations as a
result of the mobbing and harassment.
10. Public Mobbing. Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was
perpetrated heavily in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County
Courthouse, The Lancaster County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the Millersville
University Library and University Offices. I was given suspicious and illegal No Trespass Notices
in some 18 public places in Lancaster County in the years 2005 to 2009 without just cause. I was
complaining of stalking and harassing in most all of those public places. The Lancaster County
Public Library and the Millersville University took away my access to a computer after my personal
computers were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton Bank took away my safe deposit
box. Others included my church of worship, various bars and restaurants and one attorneys office.
Complaints have been filed regarding the same in courts and with various authorities.
Page 31 of 41
11.
Attempted Murder. Experienced with an attempt of vehicular homicide in 1991 after

National News Media reported ISC/CIA-NSA connection of Arms to Irag. The incident involved a
vehicle changing lanes and direction and heading directly toward me in the wrong direction
running me off the road, narrowly missing a tree. I Filed the incident in federal courts and used
as a motion to seal federal case no. 05-2288 in 2005 in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
12.
Pet Killing. Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane
Shelter and the Southern Regional Police Department.
13.
Illegal Entries of Home/Properties. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then
again in 1991; 1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance
claims, most with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania , State
Farm and Harleysville Insurance Companies.
14. Illegal Repossessions.

Airplane in 1987 containing legal and business files.
Home/Property and Contents in 2006 also containing legal and business files and documents.
15.
Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California
in 2005 and one in the City of Lancaster. Police reports were filed and obtained for both.
16. False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 20 in 2005 and 2006 in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The false arrests were
charges that were all dismissed prior to court hearings.
17. False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all
charges dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days of
imprisonment of 2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting,
which was confirmed to be false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully reinstated
as secured instead of unsecured. The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my release after
some 60 days of false imprisonment. There were no charges that resulted in any convictions.
18.
Psychiatric Abuses with False Suicide Allegations from Perpetrators/Stalkers. One

in 1987 resulting in a forced hospitalization for several hours by police in Stone Harbor, New
Jersey. And one again in February of 2005 resulting in police restraining me in my home and
abusing me. This one was a fraudulent and phony email sent to police by a perp. The Southern
Regional Police had to vacate after the email was proven to be a fraud.
19. Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991;
1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most
with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania and Harleysville
Insurance Company. 3 computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various
electronics equipment; dvd recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc., Most insurance
claims have been paid. In the past years a wave of purchased items, online and in stores, were
received broken or the wrong item and all had to be returned. Some included items to secure my
property, and others included computer related items, others were household and clothing items.
20. Gas Lighting. The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving
items and or hiding items. First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to
present. Clothing was also manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned in
2010, although it was reported to police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily draining
of my hot tub was also used as a psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility bills.
Numerous complaints were made to police in 2008 to 2010.
Page 32 of 41
21.
Thefts of Property. Not Yet Completed.
22. Vandalism to Car/Truck. Since 2005 have experienced years of gas siphoning, battery
outages, letting air out of tires, and wetting of inside of floor mats as psychological warfare tactics
by perps and stalkers. Made numerous complaints the Lancaster City Police Department.
23.
Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in
public places. Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms. Research states it is a tactic used
in organized stalking.
24.
Computer Hacking. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the
County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to
2010. Numerous complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was
also reported in 2010. Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line.
Electronic calenders, court documents, and financial records were often hacked causing many
problems of the years, including having to withdraw civil complaints.
25. Cyber Stalking. Most in 2005 to 2010.

Message Board, and the FBI Cyber Crime Unit.
Complaints to Microsoft legal counsel, Yahoo
26.
Interference/Delay/Theft of U.S. Mails. First reported to U.S. Postmaster of mail

tampering and illegal changing of address in 1987. In 2008 to 2009 have made several more
complaints to the U.S. Postmaster Inspector General who claim to have begun investigations.
Some caused missed court hearings and other missed appointments and or meetings.
27.
Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Severe Muscle Spasms/Cramps.

First
experienced in 2006 to present. One experience in 2006 was while I was in my hot tub and the
pain and cramp was so severe in my left calf muscle (you automatically bend over to rub it out,
which placed my head underwater) I had to crawl out of the hot tub before almost drowning.
28.
Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Sexual Stimulation. First experienced in 2005.
29. Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for
5 days; 2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency
surgery; and 2010 one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in
1991 and 2008.
30.
Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of all legal
and business documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987.
Microfiche/Microfilming began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been
ongoing to present. Numerous complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.
Page 33 of 41
Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. In 1987 I blew the
whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and Federal Authorities of Fraud during merger
negotiations with British Defense Contractor Ferranti International) on an international defense
contractor named International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling arms (Everything from
Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion
dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other federal agencies. See
ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and headquartered in my hometown
of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited by a top ISC Executives
(Convicted as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar Fraud) to help finance some of their operations
through an affiliate called United Chem Con. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor
and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland. Former Secretary of the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of Directors of ISC
and was also on the Board of Directors of Science Applications International Corporation, or SAIC.
SAIC was a huge defense contractor that was the recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or
DIA, program on Remote Viewing, which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that
Bobby Ray Inman declined the nomination for Secretary of Defense under the first Clinton
Administration because of the ISC and Trecor scandals. In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor
on a project for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST called TIMIT.
The project developed speech
corpora for the development of computer based speech recognition systems. I was also involved
in the bidding of other Department of Defense contracts dealing with information technologies. In
1998 I was stalked and approached by an employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in
York, Pennsylvania who said my problems were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys. In
2005 I was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military
base in Austin, Texas and was questioned and interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in
federal court for several hours. I was released and told to stay off of all military bases. My
brother, a Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify my travel plans and the fact that I was
staying with him prior to my release.
My father alleged he was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced
synthetic telepathy in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's as outlined in memos and documents he had
authored; and from my personal conversations with him prior to his death. Ms. Amy Fuchs of the
Disclosure Project confirmed that he was most likely given an ET experience via synthetic
telepathy. He died in 2001 in New York City of cancer. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force in the
late 1960's and I allege was a victim of the LSD experiments relating to MKULTRA in the late
1960's and a victim of murder (Suspicious Suicide with tainted medical reports) in Santa Barbara
California in 1984; Notarized Complaints were filed to the California Attorney General in 1991. He
made a declaration type statement prior to his death that he got bad LSD while in the U.S. Air
Force.
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I thought that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". During the times that legal Counsel and attorneys were solicited in 1987, 1991, and
1997 Organized Stalking and Harassment and other forms of attacks experienced by Targeted
Individuals were severely increased. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an allout assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of
directed energy devices and/or electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that
it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This targeting has ruined every aspect of my life.
Page 34 of 41
Some Perspectives
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilization of
mans mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of
meaning. For anyone who is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort
to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary
mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorized by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of
societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
"On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive
Technology"by Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
People have no comprehension of how lethal only one aspect (aside from the obvious of driving
the victim completely insane) of telepathy technology can be in disrupting and ruining an individual's life through the sabotaging of his/her daily activities. Everything an individual does begins
with a momentary thought. From the split second that thought is learned by the person on the
other end (telepathically) - the individual's right to privacy is not the real threat or loss. The real
lethal weapon is the advantage in disrupting or preventing the individual from accomplishing
whatever he/she is going to do before they actually do it. With a simple cell phone call or instant
message, the Advanced Team is in place to subvert; sabotage; manipulate; propagandize;
smear; disrupt; or even prevent the task or activity from being accomplished in any successful
manner. The perps are skilled at creating scenarios that are covertly arranged to simulate everyday occurrences to make the victim at fault for the loss or failure. Imagine the consequences
when these activities have legal and financial implications. With telepathy technology the need for
tracking and surveillance technology is greatly diminished and may even become obsolete. This is
not merely Mind Invasive Technology, as Carole Smith so eloquently wrote this is LIFE Invasive Technology. Say Goodbye to any true sense of capitalism and free enterprise in the not to
distant future unless of course someone stops these illegal and disastrous technology transfers
and leaks.
Stan J. Caterbone
Organized or Gang Stalking
A system of organized psychological terror tactics used against a person who has become an enemy of an individual or a government. Subtle but effective techniques of stalking by multiple individuals and psychological intimidation and manipulation are used to slowly but surely drive the
target to make complaints to authorities who will see the complaints as bogus because of the
methods used against the target. As a result, the target gets labeled as mentally ill.
There are as many stalking tactics as there are targets as the multistalkers will tailor the stalking
to the individuals habits and individual personality. Some common examples or organized stalking
are: following the target on foot, by car and public transportation, crowding the target's space in a
public place, murmuring insults under the breath so only the target can hear, sitting in the car
outside the target's residence, starting "fights" in public with the target, doing "skits" on the
street which involves information only the target should know but has been found out via surveillance of the target, stealing and vandalism of the target's possessions.
Organized Stalking Website
Organized Stalking is a form of terrorism used against an individual in a malicious attempt to
reduce the quality of a persons life so they will: have a nervous break-down, become incarcerated, institutionalized, experience constant mental, emotional, or physical pain, become homeless, and/or commit suicide. This is done using well-orchestrated accusations, lies, rumors, bogus
investigations, setups, framings, intimidation, overt or covert threats, vandalism, thefts, sabotage, torture, humiliation, emotional terror and general harassment. It is a ganging up by members of the community who follow an organizer and participate in a systematic terrorizing of an
individual. Mark M. Rich
Page 35 of 41
include but are not limited to the following:
10 USC 921, Article 121 -- Larceny and wrongful appropriation
10 USC 920A, Article 120a -- Stalking
18 2340 USC -- Torture
18 USC 241 -- Conspiracy against rights of sovereign, free, God created, spirit and soul
beings
18 USC 213 -- Illegal Surreptitious entry
18 USC 242 -- Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 USC 35 -- Imparting or conveying false information
18 USC 1117 -- Conspiracy to Murder
18 USC 1111 -- Murder
18 USC 1905 -- Disclosure of information generally
42 USC 1983 -- Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 USC 1985 -- Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
31 USC 5328 -- Whistleblower protections
18 USC 1512 -- Engaging in misleading conduct
18 USC 1503 -- Intimidating a witness/victim
18 USC 1512 -- Tampering with a witness/victim
18 USC 1513 -- Retaliation against a witness/victim
18 USC 1510 -- Obstructing a criminal investigation, conflict of interest roles in
government
18 USC 1509 -- Impeding due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct,
impede and Interfere with same
18 USC 1622 -- Subordination of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury
(Optional) I have attached a personal message _______ (check).
AFFIRMATION
I affirm that the statements in this Affidavit concerning my torture and the results of
that torture are true and correct. I further affirm that those statements are based on
my own direct knowledge, personal experience, research, and known and published
historical fact.
Stan J. Caterbone
Affiant (signature) ______________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone
Name (print): __________________________________________
June 19, 2015
Date: _________________________________________________
Pennsylvania
State of __________________________
County of
Lancaster
_____________________________
19
15
June
Sworn before me this _______
day of _______________________,
20__
________________________________,
Notary Public Exp.:
______________________
SJC
Stamp
& Seal:
Don't Know When
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance. All rights reserved. Copyright 2010 (This is an amended
form of the original Affidavit of September 2010 from Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance.)
Page 36 of 41
FIELD OF DREAMS
11
THIS STORY FIRST STARTED IN 1957

Video came in 1973 and Audio in 1984 and before that it was
sort of psychic with felt impressions and today a Human Radio.
The same following information was given to the Doctor for
searching the Internet and continues to be worth $1000.00.
Sam Caterbone
VIDEO
How can the eye project the same image on any surface and it
be a independent intellegent entity.
This eye projection exists every conscious moment with or
without my awareness.
I cannot accept the brain or mind to be responsible.
EYE PROJECTION IMAGE
Its own mobility of movement within the space of sight
independent of my eye control.
Two female facial images larger then a silver dollar on any wall
who simulate a computer orgin model with each having their
own personality.
A eye projection in vivid color that is lively and simulates
being of a computer control orgin.
For communication the eye projection uses a coded system of
colors and numbers.
EYE PROJECTION COMMUNICATION

The total eye projection is constanly flashing with dots in
color at a speed only a computer mind can interpert.
When directed to myself the dots appear so I can interpert.
The facial parts are used thru dots and facial expressions.
The clock posistions sometimes with hands are used for numbers
and time.
The two facial images are side by side and one is smaller and
can direct themselves to look up, down, to the side and
facing each other.
AUDIO
Male and female people talking in a audio pipeline at 3 locations
Each location has its own voice ID.
They use my eyes, my ears and talk about everything I know and
whereever I go and do it all better then I.
Audio sees Video and Video hears Audio.
Apartment 309, the mailing list and the envirement other then
309 is their conversation with TV and the local paper.
Page 37 of 41
Page
41
THE
MEDIA GROUP
THE ADVANCED MEDIA
Page
of 41
41
Page 35
35 of
10, 2015
Saturday,
06/10/2007
06/10/2007
INTEGRITY
This writing with the dateline September 1996
intends to focus on integrity, my integrity and aliso your
integrity.
Your lack of interest is obvious and I would say
this is the nineties and this type of story does not jell
regardless of value. Then again the investigative value
associated to the Extraterrestrial phenominon is a fact the
Media does concur with.
Looking back at when this hi- profile
mailing list started in July 1994 and expanded to a final count
of fifty does suggest something.
Whatever those conclusions
I can only imagine.
However for the value contained in this
story this mailing list is most proper.
Aliso adding that I
think I am the most advanced in the phenomena of Extraterrestrial
information.
Saying this because I am a legitimate and
scientific valid Human Radio.
A Human Radio that operates in
the micro -range of biological radio frequency communication
that is both audio and video.
A technology situation that is
not known to this World.
My confidence of this value allows
this mailing situation to be taken one step further.
Therefore
to encourage incentive to challenge this break -thru story a
special account of one thousand dollars has been opened with
the Core States Meridian Bank (717)569 -8731.
Showing I am
dead serious in being equal to the contemporary rational of
Aatronomers using radio telescopes to investigate the
Exraterrestrial.
Finally a name and number will allow a phone
call at my expense to continue this writing on Integrity.
Remember the challenge $1000.00 to debunk my direct communication

with the Extraterrestrial that is both audio and video.
These
Extraterrestrials are people who are at a specific place
with technology.
Sam Caterbone
Dr.Taylor:
If you and your colleagues can find a comparable Case History
of my Audio and Video situation anywhere on the Internet that
is recorded and not hear -say and would prove the above hi -lite
wrong I promise to pay one - thousand dollars.
(VC
S I4sCrtipe.d.
`44t';s
18'u^
b2ior'L
day
aer 0e-1,14A,, J9 96
NOTARIAL SEAL
THE
MEDIA GROUP
THE ADVANCED
ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP
Joanne B. May, Notarrypubiic

Page 38tqf
of 461
41
Lancaster. LencilawC
My Commission ExpirrsJt,weAl1997
Page 36 of 41
Saturday, October
October 10,
10, 2015
2015
Saturday,
06/10/2007
06/10/2007
Advanced Media Group, Ltd.

An Information Technologies Company
October 23, 1991

California State Attorney General's Office
Sacramento, California
Re:
Caterbone, Samuel A.
11733089 (Military ID), Deceased
Dear Sirs:
As per the enclosed death certificate of December 25, 1984, which
states in item #35A "Under Investigation ", I am hereby formally
and officially requesting information as to the findings of that
investigation.
Please understand, that in the spring of 1985, I had personally

visited the County of Santa Barbara's Public Guardian Office for
the above information, however they would did not provide any
additional information.
For the record, on December 27th, 1984, I had received a phone call
upon receiving and
from Charles Snyder Jr., the mortician,
examining the body of the deceased, which arrived from Santa
Barbara, California.
Snyder raised some concerns into an apparent discrepancy with

the cause of death, as stated by the Coroner, John Carpenter. Mr.
Carpenter certified that the cause of death was "Asphyxiation;
Under
Suicide -hung self with belt;
ligature strangulation;
Investigation ".
Mr.
Snyder stated to, in similar words, "Stan, I have a problem,

the report says that your brother hung himself, yet there are no
markings on your brothers neck, there should be some kind of marks
from the bruises, there is always some kind of markings in hanging,
I can't find any marks ".
Mr.
had intimate discussions with attorney Joseph Roda, of Lancaster,

pertaining to these matters.
I
Most importantly, while visiting with my brother in Santa Barbara,

California, he had informed me that he was given "Bad LSD" while
in the service, and that was the reason for his mental condition.
I
have always known that he had often times experienced
"flashbacks ", and in that conversation my brother confirmed, and
And
admitted that he often times experienced "flashbacks ".
of
LSD
"flashbacks" are medically proven to be a characteristic
users.
1857 Colonial Village Lane

Lancaster, PA 17601
41
Page 39
Page
39 of
of 41
Saturday, October
Octod&r 10,
1#220614
Saturday,
2015
FAX 717 392 7897
California State Attorney General,
October 23, 1991,
Page
In light of the recent information concerning alleged "experimental

drug programs administered by certain branches of the United States
Military ", and the use of LSD in the respective programs, and my
intimate conversations concerning LSD with my brother, I have
serious questions regarding my brother's death.
Especially in regards to the alleged suicide, which as I have been

told by medical professionals, is impossible without any marking
on the victim's neck, if indeed asphyxiation by strangulation is
the cause of death.
So that I may bring a conclusion to these issues,
I would expect
information regarding the "Investigation ", apparently conducted by
Coroner Kenneth Carpenter, be submitted to me in a timely fashion.
I would think that I, as administering all matters regarding my

brother's death, be privilege to this information.
Incidently, I have had numerous fabricated allegations of suicide,

which have always been supported by the fact that my brother
allegedly committed suicide, and I would like this issue either
denied or confirmed.
It has caused me a great deal of emotional
duress, especially when the allegations of my suicide were proven
to be fabricated.
I
may be reached at:
I appreciate
matters.
your
Stan J. Caterbone
615 Wyncroft Lane #2
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 392 -3682 Phone
(717) 392 -5032 Fax
immediate
cooperation
into
these
sensitive
Sincerely,
Stan J. Caterbone
Enclosures
cc:
County of Santa Barbara, Public Guardian Office
Senator Bill Bradley, New Jersey
Charles Snyder, Jr., Snyder Funeral Home
Congressman Robert Walker, Pennsylvania
Notary :
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE

ME THIS
DAY
OCT``
1991
NOTARIAL SEAL
N1CHOLE M. MAURER, Notary
411.ancaster, Lanca ter County,
Page 40
Page
40 of
of 41
Mlle
Saturday,
October 10,
10, 2015
2015
ay, October
Faatur
My Commission Expires Aug. 2, 1993
3E-evtz,
slat
i..i
of tile t.tat>p of (California

of t'ttntA Barbara
Filed
Conservator-
n the Matter of the
19
HOWARD C. MENZEL, County Clerk
ship of the Person and Estate Of
By
Deputy Clerk
SAMUEL ANTHONY CATERBONE,

No
Conservatee.
137839
CITATION
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

SAMUEL ANTHONY CATERBONE
To
.Greeting:
YOU ARE HEREBY CITED to be and appear in the Superior Court of the State of California in and
for the County of Santa Barbara, at the Courtroom thereof, at the Court House in the City of
Santa Barbara
day of
November
82, at_
cause, if any you have, why.
and
County of Santa Barbara, State of California, on
the
8: 45...o'clock. ... !al.-...M.,
zg.?P_P.9in:tment Qf a
estate is not
II d
Tues day, the 2nd
of that day then and there to show
conservator of y_ur.person
...M]......i?....1=!!.kces,
t..P.....GJa
r3aara._o.un_ty........
4.-19132
HOWARD C. MENZEL, County Clerk
(SEAL)
MtE
By
ER
Deputy Clerk.
CLi 57 Rev. 3l76
Page 41
41 of 41
Page
41
10, 2015
Saturday,

Obama Ordered Hit-list of Targeted Individuals Worldwide to CYBER ATTACK, ISOLATE, FINANCIALLY RUIN the TARGETED INDIVIDUAL With Supporting Documents - Published by Debre Dupre in the Examiner on June 8, 2013

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Obama Ordered Hit-list of Targeted Individuals Worldwide to CYBER ATTACK, ISOLATE, FINANCIALLY RUIN the TARGETED INDIVIDUAL With Supporting Documents - Published by Debre Dupre in the Examiner on June 8, 2013

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Obama ordered hit-list of Targeted Individuals worldwide to cyber-attack...

Obama ordered hit-list of Targeted Individuals worldwide to cyber-attack...

Valley man rec

Lancaster mayor, wife invited to watch Super

afraid he wouldn't get it past security.

Critical views of science in the news

By John Horgan | May 22, 2013 |

Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed:

July 29, 2013

Obama Funds Development Of Mind Control

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

- The Public Record - http://pubrecord.org -

Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind Control

deprivation and overload, behavioral modification techniques and other methods

description to date of the roles of then-Ford administration officials Dick Cheney

and Donald Rumsfeld in working hand-in-glove with the CIA to suppress

information on Artichoke from surfacing.

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

Georgia GOP leaders suggest Obama is using mind-control - CBS46 News

Georgia GOP leaders suggest Obama is using mind-control technique

By Mandi Milligan, Senior Digital Producer

Promoted Links by Taboola

Fulton County Medical

Meet The Man Who Is

Judge Quashes $650M Government Mind Control Lawsuit

September 28, 2013

Banks allegations do seem like something out of an episode of The X-Files.

Aaron Alexis shotgun. Source: FBI

Navy Yard Shooter Had Mind Control Group Contact | Examiner.com

Navy Yard Shooter Had Mind Control Group Contact | Examiner.com

Jim Morrison's "s

Valley man receiv

Obama ordered hit-list of Targeted Individuals worldwide to cyber-attack...

Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed:

July 29, 2013

Obama Funds Development Of Mind Control

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

- The Public Record - http://pubrecord.org -

Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind Control

deprivation and overload, behavioral modification techniques and other methods

description to date of the roles of then-Ford administration officials Dick Cheney

and Donald Rumsfeld in working hand-in-glove with the CIA to suppress

information on Artichoke from surfacing.

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

The Public Record Obama Interrogation Official Linked to U.S. Mind...

Article printed from The Public Record: http://pubrecord.org

Critical views of science in the news

By John Horgan | May 22, 2013 |

Recommended For You

The Ups and Downs of Sex a week ago scientificamerican.com

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

MDJ Name: Hon

NAME and ADDRESS

President Barach Obama

(Fill in defendants name and address)

Fill in as much information as you have.

Defendants SID (State Identification Number)

Registration Sticker (MM/YY)

Defendants Drivers License Number

do hereby state: (check appropriate box)

this, _day of __, 20, before me a notary public, the