HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
Kadam
Environmental Consultants
www.kadamenviro.com
Environment
for
Development
QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET
QUALITY CONTROL
Name of
Publication
Project Number
Draft EIA & EMP Report for Greenfield Multi-Purpose Plant for Manufacturing of Various
Technical Grade Pesticides at Plot No. D-2/CH/357, Dahej ll, Industrial Estate,
Bharuch, Gujarat.
1417581706
Report No.
Version
Released
February, 2016
DISCLAIMER
Kadam has taken all reasonable precautions in the preparation of this report as per its auditable quality plan.
Kadam also believes that the facts presented in the report are accurate as on the date it was written. However,
it is impossible to dismiss absolutely, the possibility of errors or omissions. Kadam therefore specifically
disclaims any liability resulting from the use or application of the information contained in this report. The
information is not intended to serve as legal advice related to the individual situation.
QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET
II
QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET
III
QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET
IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS
1
1.3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY &
REGION ......................................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 Brief Description of the Project ................................................................ 2
1.3.2 Importance of Project to the Country and the Region ..................................... 2
1.4 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 2
1.4.1 General Clearance and Other Permissions ................................................... 3
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................ 3
2
2.1.1
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
14
14
16
16
17
19
19
20
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
V
2.7.11
2.7.12
2.7.13
2.7.14
2.7.15
2.7.16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................
Quizalofop-P-Ethyl .............................................................................
Clodinofop-P-Ethyl .............................................................................
Paraquat Dichloride ............................................................................
Imazathapyr ....................................................................................
Oxyfluorfen .....................................................................................
2.8
2.8.1
2.8.2
2.8.3
2.8.4
2.8.5
2.8.6
2.8.7
2.8.8
2.8.9
2.8.10
2.8.11
2.8.12
2.8.13
2.8.14
2.8.15
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
37
38
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
53
55
55
56
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
68
69
70
72
73
75
75
76
76
76
VI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
77
81
81
82
84
84
84
84
85
85
87
87
90
90
90
91
92
92
92
92
92
94
2.19
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION, QUANTIFICATION, STORAGE AND
DISPOSAL .................................................................................................... 99
2.19.1 Identification of Waste ........................................................................ 99
2.19.2 Categorization, Storage and Disposal of Waste .......................................... 100
2.19.3 Storage Area ................................................................................... 101
2.19.4 Treatment of Waste .......................................................................... 102
2.19.5 Transportation of Waste ..................................................................... 102
2.19.6 Safety System during Handling and Transportation of Waste ......................... 102
2.20
MITIGATION MEASURES AT DESIGN STAGE ................................................ 102
2.21
ASSESSMENT OF NEW AND UNTESTED TECHNOLOGY .................................... 102
3
VII
3.5.2
3.5.3
3.5.4
3.5.5
3.5.6
3.5.7
3.5.8
3.5.9
3.5.10
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7.3
11.1.1
11.1.2
11.1.3
11.1.4
11.1.5
11.1.6
IX
11.2.5
11.2.6
11.2.7
11.2.8
11.2.9
11.2.10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
11.3
11.3.1
11.3.2
11.3.3
11.3.4
11.3.5
11.3.6
11.3.7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure 1: EC Application for ToR to EAC, MoEFCC ................................................................... 254
Annexure 2: Terms of Reference (ToR) from EAC, MoEFCC dated 29th April, 2015 ......................... 255
Annexure 3: Land Lease and Possession Documents .................................................................... 260
Annexure 4: Inprinciple Water Permission from GIDC .................................................................. 276
Annexure 5: Permission for Hazardous Waste Disposal ................................................................ 277
Annexure 6: Long Term Meteorological Data (1961 1976) IMD, Bharuch ................................. 278
Annexure 7: Classification of Land Use and Land Cover ................................................................ 280
Annexure 8: CPCBs National Ambient Air Quality Standards ......................................................... 286
Annexure 9: Detailed Results of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .................................................... 288
Annexure 10: Impact Assessment Methodology ........................................................................... 296
Annexure 11: Air Dispersion Modeling Results and Isopleths ........................................................ 306
Annexure 12: Detailed Traffic Survey Sheets ............................................................................... 330
Annexure 13: Methodology of Risk Assessment and Hazard Identification ..................................... 340
Annexure 14: Kadams NABET Certificate .................................................................................... 343
XI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Brief Description of the Project ....................................................................................... 2
Table 1-2: Statutory Clearances / Permissions required from Concerned Ministries or Bodies .............. 3
Table 1-3: Compliance with the Terms of Reference ........................................................................ 4
Table 2-1: Co-ordinates of Project Boundary ................................................................................. 12
Table 2-2: Area Breakup of the Site .............................................................................................. 14
Table 2-3: Product List ................................................................................................................ 16
Table 2-4: Project Implementation Schedule ................................................................................. 18
Table 2-5: Mass Balance Glyphosate .......................................................................................... 20
Table 2-6: Mass Balance 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid .......................................................... 21
Table 2-7: Mass Balance MCPA.................................................................................................. 22
Table 2-8: Mass Balance - Atrazine ............................................................................................... 23
Table 2-9: Mass Balance - Metribuzin ........................................................................................... 24
Table 2-10: Mass Balance Propanil ............................................................................................ 25
Table 2-11: Mass Balance Pretilachlor ........................................................................................ 26
Table 2-12: Mass Balance Pendimethalin .................................................................................... 28
Table 2-13: Mass Balance Butachlor .......................................................................................... 29
Table 2-14: Mass Balance Clodinafop Propargyl .......................................................................... 30
Table 2-15: Mass Balance Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................ 31
Table 2-16: Mass Balance Quizalofop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................. 32
Table 2-17: Mass Balance Clodinofop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................. 33
Table 2-18: Mass Balance Paraquat Dichloride ............................................................................ 34
Table 2-19: Mass Balance Imazathapyr ...................................................................................... 35
Table 2-20: Mass Balance Oxyfluorfen ....................................................................................... 36
Table 2-21: Mass Balance Thiamethoxam .................................................................................. 37
Table 2-22: Mass Balance Profenophos ...................................................................................... 38
Table 2-23: Mass Balance Acephate ........................................................................................... 40
Table 2-24: Mass Balance Chlorpyrifos ....................................................................................... 41
Table 2-25: Mass Balance Imidacloprid ...................................................................................... 42
Table 2-26: Mass Balance Acetamiprid ....................................................................................... 43
Table 2-27: Mass Balance Fipronil ............................................................................................. 44
Table 2-28: Mass Balance Cartap Hydrochloride ....................................................................... 45
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
XII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
XIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 2-62: Water Consumption and Waste water Generation Details ............................................. 92
Table 2-63: Inlet and Outlet Characteristics of Wastewater ............................................................ 94
Table 2-64: List of Primary Treatment Unit for Removal of Cyanide from Wastewater ...................... 95
Table 2-65: List of MEE Pretreatment Units for treatment of High COD and High TDS Stream ........... 95
Table 2-66: List of MEE Units ....................................................................................................... 96
Table 2-67: List of Secondary Biological and Tertiary Treatment Units ............................................. 97
Table 2-68: Product-wise Distillation Residue Generation ............................................................... 99
Table 2-69: Product-wise Filtration Residue Generation .................................................................. 99
Table 2-70: Quantity of Non-process Waste ................................................................................ 100
Table 2-71: Identification of Other Waste ................................................................................... 100
Table 2-72: Categorization, Storage and Disposal of Waste .......................................................... 100
Table 2-73: Operational Controls at Design Stage ........................................................................ 103
Table 3-1: Predominant/Mean Wind Direction IMD Bharuch ......................................................... 109
Table 3-2: Average Meteorological Condition at Bharuch IMD Data ............................................ 110
Table 3-3: Monitoring Methodology of Meteorological Data .......................................................... 111
Table 3-4: Average Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village........................................................... 111
Table 3-5: Mean Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village Summer Season, 2015 .......................... 111
Table 3-6: GPS Reading Enumerating the Land Use Features in Study Area ................................... 115
Table 3-7: Area Statistic for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area .......................... 116
Table 3-8: Important Features within the Study Area ................................................................... 117
Table 3-9: Ponds within 5 Km from Project Site ........................................................................... 117
Table 3-10: Methodology of Analyzing Ambient Air Monitoring Parameters .................................... 119
Table 3-11: AAQM Locations with Justification ............................................................................. 120
Table 3-12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results ..................................................................... 122
Table 3-13: Noise Level Monitoring Methodology ......................................................................... 123
Table 3-14: Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones ................ 124
Table 3-15: Noise Level Monitoring Locations .............................................................................. 124
Table 3-16: Noise Level Monitoring Results ................................................................................. 125
Table 3-17: Analysis Methodology for Analyzing Surface & Ground Water Samples ........................ 126
Table 3-18: Surface Water Sampling Locations Ponds and River (Estuary) .................................. 129
Table 3-19: Surface Water (Ponds) Analysis Results .................................................................... 130
Table 3-20: Surface Water (Estuary) Analysis Results .................................................................. 131
Table 3-21: Ground Water Sampling Locations ............................................................................ 132
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
XIV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
XV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 4-11: Sources of Noise with their Sound Pressure Levels ..................................................... 179
Table 4-12: Noise Level at Receptor Locations (Based on SoundPlan) ........................................... 179
Table 4-13: Predictive Cumulative Noise Levels ........................................................................... 180
Table 4-14: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Water Environment ................................. 184
Table 4-15: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Land Environment ................................... 187
Table 4-16: Activity-Aspect Based Determination of Impacting Ecological Components ................... 189
Table 4-17: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Ecology & Biodiversity ............................. 191
Table 4-18: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Socio Economic Environment ................... 193
Table 4-19: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Resource Depletion ................................. 195
Table 6-1: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Air Environment ........................................ 198
Table 6-2: Traffic Management Plan ........................................................................................... 200
Table 6-3: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Noise Environment .................................... 201
Table 6-4: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Water Environment ................................... 202
Table 6-5: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Land Environment ..................................... 203
Table 6-6: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Ecology and Biodiversity ............................ 204
Table 6-7: Environmental Monitoring and Management Cost ........................................................ 205
Table 7-1: Details of Flammable Raw Materials ........................................................................... 207
Table 7-2: Details of Flammable Solvents .................................................................................... 207
Table 7-3: Results of Consequence Analysis for Xylene & HSD ...................................................... 209
Table 7-4: Shift Timing .............................................................................................................. 213
Table 7-5: Organogram for Safety .............................................................................................. 216
Table 7-6: Details of Proposed NonRespiratory PPEs .................................................................. 217
Table 7-7: Details of Proposed Respiratory PPEs .......................................................................... 217
Table 7-8: Details of Proposed Fire Extinguishers at Site .............................................................. 218
Table 7-9: Emergency Contact Details ........................................................................................ 218
Table 7-10: Equipment available at OHC ..................................................................................... 222
Table 10-1: Plant Species Suggested for Greenbelt and Landscaping at Various Locations .............. 234
Table 10-2: Budget for Proposed Greenbelt Development within Project Site ................................. 235
Table 10-3: List of plant species for Plantation in LIZ Area ........................................................... 235
Table 10-4: Budget for Additional Greenbelt / Habitat Improvement Programme ........................... 236
Table 10-5: Issues Raised by Respondents of Core Zone .............................................................. 237
Table 11-1: Product List ............................................................................................................ 239
Table 11-2: Brief Description of the Project ................................................................................. 240
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
XVI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Process Flow Diagram Glyphosate ............................................................................ 20
Figure 2-2: Process Flow Diagram 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ............................................. 21
Figure 2-3: Process Flow Diagram MCPA .................................................................................... 22
Figure 2-4: Process Flow Diagram Atrazine................................................................................. 23
Figure 2-5: Process Flow Diagram Metribuzin ............................................................................. 24
Figure 2-6: Process Flow Diagram Propanil ................................................................................. 25
Figure 2-7: Process Flow Diagram Pretilachlor ............................................................................ 26
Figure 2-8: Process Flow Diagram Pendimethalin ........................................................................ 28
Figure 2-9: Process Flow Diagram Butachlor ............................................................................... 29
Figure 2-10: Process Flow Diagram Clodinafop Propargyl ............................................................ 30
Figure 2-11: Process Flow Diagram Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl .............................................................. 31
Figure 2-12: Process Flow Diagram Quizalofop-P-Ethyl ................................................................ 32
Figure 2-13: Process Flow Diagram Clodinofop-P-Ethyl ................................................................ 33
Figure 2-14: Process Flow Diagram Paraquat Dichloride .............................................................. 34
Figure 2-15: Process Flow Diagram Imazathapyr ........................................................................ 35
Figure 2-16: Process Flow Diagram Oxyfluorfen .......................................................................... 36
Figure 2-17: Process Flow Diagram Thiamethoxam ..................................................................... 37
Figure 2-18: Process Flow Diagram Profenophos ........................................................................ 38
Figure 2-19: Process Flow Diagram Acephate ............................................................................. 40
Figure 2-20: Process Flow Diagram Chlorpyrifos ......................................................................... 41
Figure 2-21: Process Flow Diagram Imidacloprid......................................................................... 42
Figure 2-22: Process Flow Diagram Acetamiprid ......................................................................... 43
Figure 2-23: Process Flow Diagram Fipronil ................................................................................ 44
Figure 2-24: Process Flow Diagram Cartap Hydrochloride ......................................................... 45
Figure 2-25: Process Flow Diagram Buprofezin ........................................................................... 46
Figure 2-26: Process Flow Diagram Bifenthrin ............................................................................ 47
Figure 2-27: Process Flow Diagram Diafenthiuron ....................................................................... 48
Figure 2-28: Process Flow Diagram Deltamethrin ........................................................................ 49
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
XVII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
XVIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Figure 7-3: Late pool fire effect distance contours of Xylene due to 25mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.9/F ............................................................................................................. 211
Figure 7-4: Late pool fire effect distance contours of Xylene due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage
tank at weather condition 4.9/F ................................................................................................. 211
Figure 7-5: Late Explosion effect distance contours of Xylene due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage
tank at weather condition 4.4/D ................................................................................................. 212
Figure 7-6: Late pool fire effect distance contours of HSD due to 10mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.4/D ............................................................................................................ 212
Figure 7-7: Late pool fire effect distance contours of HSD due to 25mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.9/F ............................................................................................................. 212
Figure 7-8: Late pool fire effect distance contours of HSD due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage tank
at weather condition 4.9/F ......................................................................................................... 213
Figure 7-9: Organization Chart of Factory ................................................................................... 215
XIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 3-1: Photographs of Meteorological Station Setup ...................................................... 110
Photograph 3-2: Photographs Showing Different Type of Land Use in Study Area .......................... 115
Photograph 3-3: Photographs of AAQ Sampling Stations .............................................................. 120
Photograph 3-4: Photographs of Noise Level Monitoring Stations .................................................. 124
Photograph 3-5: Photographs of Surface Water Sampling ............................................................ 129
Photograph 3-6: Photographs of Ground Water Sampling............................................................. 132
Photograph 3-7: Photographs of Soil Sampling ............................................................................ 138
Photograph 3-8: Photographs Showing Project Site / Core Zone having Flora / plants .................... 141
Photograph 3-9: Herpetofauna Sighted from the Buffer Zone ....................................................... 146
Photograph 3-10: Avifauna Sighted from the Buffer Zone ............................................................. 148
Photograph 3-11: Mammal Sighted from the Buffer Zone ............................................................. 149
Photograph 3-12: Photographs showing Primary Survey at Schools............................................... 158
Photograph 3-13: Photographs of Kutcha Houses and Toilets ....................................................... 159
Photograph 3-14: Socio Expert with Local Vegetable Vendor & Stakeholder ................................... 160
Photograph 3-15: Animal Husbandry and Agricultural Fields in Study Area .................................... 161
XX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS
AAQM
AAS
AERMIC
AERMOD
ALARP
ANP
APCM
APHA
BLEVE
BOD
BSI
CAS
CCA
CCTV
CETP
cGMP
CIB
CO
Carbon Monoxide
COD
CPCB
CRO
CSLS
CSR
CTO
Consent to Operate
dB
Decibels
DCP
DCS
DG
Diesel Generator
DGVCL
DM
De-mineralization
DMP
EAC
EC
Environmental Clearance
ECG
Electrocardiogram
EIA
EMP
EMS
ENVIS
ERPG
ETP
XXI
FAE
FFA
GC
Gas Chromatography
GHGs
GIDC
GoG
Government of Gujarat
GoI
Government of India
GPCB
GPS
GSI
GSPL
HB
Hemoglobin
HBr
Hydrogen Bromide
HCs
Hydro-Carbons
HCl
Hydrochloric Acid
HDPE
High-Density PolyEthylene
HRT
HSD
HSL
Hz
Hertz
IAA
IC
Incident Controller
IDLH
IL&FS
IMD
INR
Indian Rupees
IPP
IRC
IS
Indian Standards
ISLM
ISO
ITI
IUCN
JCB
Kadam /
KEC
kPa
Kilo Pascal
kVA
LAN
LCL
LDO
LDPE
Low-Density PolyEthylene
LIZ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
XXII
LSIR
MCAS
MCPA
2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid
MCC
MEE
MLSS
MTA
MTPD
MoEFCC
MSDS
MW
Mega Watt
MWC
NAAQES
NABET
NABL
NG
Natural Gas
NH
National Highway
NH3
Ammonia
NIHL
NITT
NOC
No Objection Certificate
NOx
Oxides of Nitrogen
NRSA
OCP
OHS
OM
Office Memorandum
OSHAS
P&ID
PCM
PCPIR
PCU
PEL
PESO
PFD
PFR
Pre-Feasibility Report
PFT
pH
Power of Hydrogen
PHAST
PM
Particulate Matter
PP
Polypropylene
PPE
ppm
PUCC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
XXIII
PVC
QC
Quality Council
QCI
QRA
GLC
R&D
RA
Risk Assessment
RO
Regional Officer
RO
Reverse Osmosis
SEIAA
SEZ
SGPT
SH
State Highway
SMC
SPCB
SPL
SO2
Sulphur Dioxide
SOI
Survey of India
SOP
Standard of Procedure
SS
Suspended Solids
STEL
TCL
TCM
Tri-Chloro Melamine
TDS
TEFR
TFD
TLV
TOC
ToR
Terms of Reference
TREM
TSDF
USEPA
VOCs
ZLD
ZSI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
XXIV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Designation / Village
Hetban Personnel
1
Executive Director
Mr. G D Joshi
General Manager
Mr. S S Shah
General Manager
Mr. Balachandran
Karanbhai A Parmar
Jolva
Jolva
Jolva
Jolva
Mahendrabhai P Rathore
Jolva
Jolva
Jolva
Jolva
Technical Consultant
Others
Mitesh L Parmar
Jolva
10
Jolva
11
Jolva
12
Jolva
13
Jolva
14
Jagdishbhai S Prajapati
Jolva
15
Manoharbhai S Prajapati
Jolva
16
Jolva
17
Jolva
18
Jolva
19
Dhirajbhai G Parmar
Jolva
20
Ratanben D Parmar
Jolva
21
Manjulaben S Parmar
Jolva
22
Maganbhai R Parmar
Jolva
23
Ashokbhai R Parmar
Jolva
24
Jakir J Patel
Jolva
25
Natwarbhai L Prajapati
Jolva
26
Jolva
27
Jolva
28
Jolva
29
Vadadala
30
Vadadala
31
Somesh Awasthi
Vadadala
XXV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No.
Designation / Village
32
Vadadala
33
Vadadala
34
Vadadala
35
Vadadala
36
Vadadala
37
Vadadala
38
Mukeshji Solanki
Vadadala
39
Vadadala
40
Vadadala
41
Vadadala
42
Vadadala
43
Vadadala
44
Vadadala
45
Vadadala
46
Vadadala
47
Vadadala
48
Vadadala
49
Vadadala
50
Vadadala
51
Vadadala
52
Vadadala
53
Vadadala
54
Vadadala
55
Vadadala
56
Vadadala
57
Vadadala
58
Vadadala
59
Vadadala
60
Vadadala
61
Vadadala
62
Vadadala
63
Shantilal M. Rathore
Vadadala
64
Vadadala
65
Vadadala
66
Vadadala
67
Vadadala
68
Vadadala
69
Vadadala
70
Kadodara
71
Kadodara
XXVI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No.
Designation / Village
72
Kadodara
73
Kadodara
74
Kadodara
75
Jaisang S. Gohil
Kadodara
76
Ramsang C. Gohil
Kadodara
77
Ganpat J. Makwana
Kadodara
78
Laxman S. Parmar
Kadodara
79
Kadodara
80
Kadodara
81
Deepsang M. Parmar
Kadodara
82
Kadodara
83
Amarsang K. Parmar
Kadodara
84
Kadodara
85
Kadodara
86
Kadodara
87
Kadodara
88
Kadodara
89
Kadodara
90
Kadodara
91
Kadodara
92
Kadodara
93
Kadodara
94
Kadodara
95
Kadodara
96
Kadodara
97
Kadodara
98
Kadodara
99
Kadodara
100
Kadodara
101
Kadodara
102
Jayesh M. Rathore
Kadodara
103
Kadodara
104
Kadodara
105
Kadodara
106
Kadodara
107
Kadodara
108
Kadodara
109
Kadodara
110
Suman Mansuri
Kadodara
111
Kadodara
XXVII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No.
Designation / Village
112
Vav
113
Vav
114
Kalidas R. Vasava
Vav
115
Vav
116
Vav
117
Vav
118
Vav
119
Vav
120
Vav
121
Vav
122
Vav
123
Vav
124
Vav
125
Vav
126
Vav
127
Vav
128
Vilashben Parmar
Dahej
129
Krushnadeep Patel
Dahej
130
Jayendrabhai Pratap
Dahej
131
Navneet Makwana
Dahej
132
Dahej
133
Dahej
134
Virendra Gadhavi
Dahej
135
Bhagwat Sinh
Dahej
136
Dhanjibhai Pehalvanbhai
Dahej
137
Kushalbhai Premabhai
Dahej
138
Vasantbhai Gohil
Dahej
139
Jethabhai Gohil
Dahej
140
Chandubhai Parmar
Dahej
141
Paharsingh Patel
Dahej
142
Jagdishbhai Gohil
Dahej
143
Ravibhai Solanki
Dahej
144
Ratilal Rathore
Dahej
145
Raojibhai Parshottambhai
Dahej
146
Ranchodbhai Rathod
Dahej
147
Prabhatbhai Parsurambhai
Dahej
148
Ramanbhai Bhupatbhai
Dahej
149
Thakorbhai Kashibhai
Dahej
150
Ganpatbhai Gohil
Dahej
151
Shantilal Prajapati
Dahej
XXVIII
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
Hetban Spechem Limited (HSL) proposes a Greenfield project for manufacturing of various technical
grade pesticides which will include herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and plant growth regulators at
Plot No. D- 2/CH/357, Dahej-ll Industrial Estate, situated in Vagra Taluka of Bharuch district, Gujarat
state.
1.1
Purpose of the report is to identify environmental aspects, impacts & mitigation measures arising out
from the proposed Greenfield multipurpose plant for manufacturing of various technical grade
pesticides and prepare EIA/EMP and RA/DMP report as per ToR issued by MoEFCC on 29th April, 2015
and seek environmental clearance.
This report is prepared based on General Structure of EIA given in Appendix III and IIIA of
mentioned EIA Notification.
1.2
1.2.1
Proposed Project
Project is for manufacturing of various technical grade pesticides. The project is classified as Category
A project. The proposed products falls under 5(b), Pesticides industry and pesticide specific
intermediates (excluding formulation) Project or Activities listed within the Category to the EIA
Notification dated September 14th, 2006 (amended till date).
1.2.2
Project Proponent
The company Hetban Spechem Limited (HSL) is promoted by existing company Crop Life Science
Limited (CLSL), engaged in formulations of agrochemical products. It will be managed by its Director
Mr. Rajesh Lunagariya who has a wide experience of pesticide and agro chemical formulations.
History
CLSL had started as a small scale unit for the manufacturing of crop protection chemical almost one
decade ago. By acquisition, backward and forward integration, CLSL now has become one of the
leading manufacturer of wide range of products- Insecticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Micro Fertilizers,
Plant Growth Regulators and Soil Plant Health Products.
CLSL believes in the strategy of continuous expansion and development of high value and branded
products with thrust on registration and marketing according to customer requirement.
CLSL has manufacturing unit located at Ankleshwar in Gujarat. It runs on robust & tested
technologies. Company has always focused on quality to serve its customers. Each stage of production
from raw material to finished product is closely monitored. Quality, environment and safety is
maintained. Companys unit is certified with International Standard ISO 9001:2008 for quality
assurance. NABL accreditation of QC laboratory is under process.
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
R & D is major strength for company and it continues to invest in innovative formulation that are
environmental and user friendly. The company is fully committed to maintain and expand its portfolio.
The aim of CLSL is to build strong relationship with customers to understand their needs and deliver
real performance in term of usage.
1.3
1.3.1
Details
Description
Nature
Size
Plot Area: 5,000 m2. Product and their capacities are shown in Table 2-3.
Location
~ 31.10 Crore.
1.3.2
The project brings the benefits to the country and the region that are both needed and beneficial as
all the products are worldwide used quality products. Being pesticides products, market demand is
high. Various products have export potential and will help in owns economy by generating foreign
exchange. Project will generate employment and state revenue. CSR activities will be made for
upliftment of the socio economic status of nearby villages.
Company has over 7 years of experience in pesticide formulation unit. Technical grade will reduce the
dependency on the requirement of raw material from third party. Company also has huge customer
base within India and around the globe. Based on the demand supply gap, proposed project will
carter requirement of pesticides in global and domestic market. The positives impact include enhanced
direct employment for technical/administrative works and indirect employment opportunities for
transporters of raw materials and finished goods.
1.4
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
As a part of Environmental Clearance process, HSL uploaded and submitted relevant documents,
namely Form 1 (as per the EIA Notification, 2006, as amended), along with a Pre-feasibility Report
and Proposed Terms of Reference (ToRs) for carrying out Environmental Studies, to the Expert
Appraisal Committee (EAC) MoEFCC on 5th February, 2015, vide letter HSL/EC/MoEF/2015/01 dated
31st January, 2015 as attached as Annexure 1.
Based on the information contained in the documents submitted, the project has been awarded file
no. J-11011/23/2015-IA II (I). Presentation has been made during the 34th Reconstituted Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry 2) meeting held on 17th February, 2015 to the EAC. ToRs has been
finalized to conduct the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) & Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) studies, vide its letter dated 29th April, 2015 as attached as Annexure 2.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
1.4.1
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
HSL shall obtain required statutory permission and clearances from concerned authorities. Details of
permits and clearance as applicable to this project are provided in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2: Statutory Clearances / Permissions required from Concerned Ministries or Bodies
S No.
Legal Instruments
Factory License
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Rules, 1975, as amended to date.
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 and Rules, 1978, as amended to date.
The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Rules, 1982, as amended to date.
The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical rules, 1989, as amended to date.
The Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as
amended to date.
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Rules, 1986, as amended to date
10
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 & The Central Motor Vehicle rules, 1989
11
12
13
14
15
The Biomedical waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998 as amended to date
16
17
The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 as amended to date
18
19
20
21
22
23
Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and Rules, 1991 as amended to date
24
25
26
CIB Registration
1.5
As per the ToR letter, scope of work for this EIA studies and preparation of detailed EIA/EMP report
includes collection of baseline data with respect to major environmental components, viz. Air, Noise,
Water, Land, Biological and Socio-economic components for one season.
This EIA report complies with Terms of Reference given by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry
2), Impact Assessment Authority (IAA). Summarized details of the same is tabulated in Table 1-3.
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
ToR
Regulatory framework.
10
11
12
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
S.
No.
ToR
13
14
15
16
Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for
green belt and other uses.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S.
No.
ToR
25
26
27
28
29
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
90.
Air quality modelling for proposed plant has
been done using AERMOD Software.
Atmospheric inversion level at the project
site and GLCs of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific
meteorological features are given in
30
32
Pg. 97.
Ground water monitoring was carried out
at 8 locations as mentioned in Chapter 3,
Section 3.5.6, Table 3-22, Pg. 133.
Geological features and Geo-hydrological
status of the study area is given in
Chapter 3, Section 3.5.7, Pg. 136.
Ecological status of the study area is given
in Chapter 3, Section 3.5.9, Pg. 140.
33
34
35
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
ToR
36
37
228.
No organic solid waste shall be generated
that can be given to cement
manufacturers.
In-principle membership is availed from
SEPL as provided in Annexure 5.
38
39
40
41
ToR
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
46
47
48
Not Applicable.
Environment management Plan (EMP) with
details of air pollution control system,
water & wastewater management is given
in Chapter 10, Pg. 232.
Monitoring frequency is provided in
Chapter 6, Pg. 197 & summarized in
Table 11-3.
EMP includes concept of wasteminimization, recycle / reuse / recover
techniques, ZLD and is given as per Point
No. 42.
Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum
for environmental pollution control
measures is given in Chapter 6, Section
49
50
51
215.
Reporting mechanism of reporting of noncompliance / violations of environmental
norms to the Board of Directors of the
company is given in Chapter 7, Section
1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
ToR
Shall be conducted.
Additional TOR
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This chapter provides a condensed description of those aspects of the project likely to cause
environmental effects. Details are described in following sections with regards to type, need, location,
size or magnitude of project operations, technology and other related activities.
2.1
TYPE OF PROJECT
HSL proposes a Greenfield project for manufacturing of various technical grade pesticides which will
include herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and plant growth regulators.
2.1.1
Air Emissions having pollutants like PM, SO2, NOx, HCl, Cl2, HBr, NH3 & HC.
Waste water generation having cyanide compounds.
Noise generation.
Hazardous waste generation.
Occupational health, hazards & safety risk.
2.2
Need for the proposed products are based on the demand and supply gap in the current market. With
increasing utilization of the current products, in future, to carter the requirement of all the products, it
is essential to have the proposed manufacturing unit.
The Indian pesticides industry is characterized by low capacity utilization. The present total installed
capacity is 146,000 tonnes and has a low capacity utilization of <60%. There is a marked difference in
the consumption pattern of pesticides in India vis--vis the rest of the world. Insecticides account for
76% of the total domestic market. On the other hand, herbicides and fungicides have a significantly
higher share in the global market. Crops like cotton, wheat and rice together account for 70% of total
agrochemical consumption. The consumption of pesticides in India is low in comparison to other
countries. The industry suffers from high inventory (owing to seasonal & irregular demand on account
of monsoons) and long credit periods to farmers, thus making operations 'working capital' intensive.
India due to its inherent strength of low-cost manufacturing and qualified low-cost manpower is a net
exporter of pesticides to countries such as USA and some European & African countries. Exports
formed ~37% of total industry turnover in FY13.
2.2.1
Based on the demand and supply gap, the need of the project is justified. Thus, expected aspects due
the production of these pesticides will lead to:
10
2.3
2.3.1
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The project site is located in the Dahej II Industrial Estate, situated in Jolwa Village, Vagra Taluka of
Bharuch district, Gujarat state. Dahej II Industrial Estate is an existing industrial area developed by
the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), categorized as chemical zone for setting up
chemical industries. The project location is provided in Map 2-1.
2.3.2
It is located at Plot No. D- 2/CH/357. Plot is taken on lease from M/s. Shaurya Enterprise, Agreement
documents of the same and Land possession documents from GIDC for plot are attached as
Annexure 3.
Site is immediately surrounded by vacant and undeveloped land under ownership of GIDC which are
yet to be allotted. The base elevation of site is at 8 m above mean sea level.
11
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The co-ordinates of the project site are given in Table 2-1. Location map showing specific location of
proposed project is given in Map 2-2.
Latitude
Longitude
2143'27.41"N
7239'43.28"E
2143'29.06"N
7239'43.06"E
2143'28.72"N
7239'39.67"E
2143'27.09"N
7239'39.82"E
2.3.3
Based on the location of the project, following are the expected aspects:
12
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
13
2.4
2.4.1
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Description
Area in m2
% of Total Area
Plant Building
504.0
10.1%
475
9.5%
Utilities
(Power, Water, Chilled Water, Hydrant System etc.)
Tank Farm
459
9.2%
280.0
5.6%
362
7.2%
Green Belt
878
17.6%
31.0
0.6%
2,011
40.2%
Total
5,000
100.0
14
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
15
2.4.2
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The design capacity of the Multi-purpose plant will be 3,500 MTA (~ 12 TPD) on the basis of running
the plant for 24 hrs., a day, seven days a week and 300 days / annum. The balance 65 days will be
utilized for product change-over preparation and annual maintenance shutdown.
It is proposed to manufacture four to five products simultaneously based on the market requirement
from list mentioned in Table 2-3.
Name of Product
Production
(MTPA)
S. No.
(Contd.)
25
Herbicides
Name of Product
Production
(MTPA)
Buprofezin
500
Glyphosate
2,000
26
Bifenthrin
200
1,000
27
Diafenthiuron
600
MCPA
500
28
Deltamethrin
100
Atrazine
500
29
Cypermethrin
600
Metribuzin
400
30
Permethrin
600
Propanil
500
31
Lambda-Cyhalothrin
300
Pretilachlor
300
Pendimethalin
600
32
Cymoxanil
300
Fungicides
Butachlor
300
33
Cyproconazole
200
10
Clodinafop Propargyl
300
34
Azoxystrobin
500
11
Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl
200
35
Metalaxyl
500
12
Quizalofop-p-Ethyl
200
36
Trifloxystrobin
450
13
Clodinofop-P-Ethyl
300
37
Carbendazime
800
14
Paraquat dichloride
500
38
Kresoxim-Methyl
200
15
Imazathapyr
300
39
Thiophenat-Methyl
400
16
Oxyfluorfen
100
40
Tricyclazole
1,000
41
Isoprothiolane
200
17
Thiamethoxam
400
42
Propiconazole
300
18
Profenofos
400
43
Hexaconazole
1,000
19
Acephate
800
44
Tebuconazole
600
20
Chlorpyrifos
350
45
Difenconazole
500
21
Imidacloprid
600
46
Epoxyconazole
200
22
Acetamiprid
500
47
Chlorothalonil
500
23
Fipronil
200
24
Cartap Hydrochloride
300
Insecticides
2.4.3
48
Chlormequatchloride
2,000
Based on the size and manganite of operation, following are the expected aspects:
Air Emissions having pollutants like PM, SO2, NOx, HCl, Cl2, HBr, NH3 & HC.
Waste water generation having cyanide compounds.
Hazardous waste generation.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
16
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Noise generation.
Increase in occupational health, hazards & safety risk due to handling of solvents, raw material,
finished products and hazardous waste.
2.5
The construction is likely to start after getting Environmental Clearance and NOC/CTE from the
authorized committee. The EIA studies is likely to get completed in 9-14 months.
Project implementation schedule describing various activities from finalization of site to project
commissioning is tabulated in Table 2-4.
17
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Aug-17
Jul-17
Jun-17
May-17
Apr-17
Mar-17
Feb-17
Jan-17
Dec-16
Nov-16
Oct-16
Sep-16
Aug-16
Jul-16
Jun-16
May-16
Apr-16
Mar-16
Feb-16
Activity
Application for PH
Tender floating
Receipt of Bids/offer
Evaluation of offers
EC Presentation
Application for NOC
Environmental Clearance from MoEF
Assurance from GIDC for Water
Supply
Receipt of NOC
Finalization of Contractors
Receipt of CTE
Procurement of equipment
Civil Completion
Mechanical Completion
Commissioning
18
2.6
2.6.1
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) shall be employed in the proposed plant to ensure
product quality, a safe working environment, and prevention of environmental impacts.
The proposed pesticide plant shall involve synthesis of molecules produced or modified to provide
compounds (active ingredients), namely herbicides, insecticides and fungicides. This active ingredients
is further formulated to form solid or liquid pesticides. It is then safely handled and packed in packing
systems comprising of automatic packing lines.
The pesticide is then sent to the farmer or other certified applicator, who dilutes it before applying it.
Pesticides manufacturing includes following steps:
Technical grade will be first manufactured in small scale in the laboratory followed by a pilot plant.
After successful trials and proven viability, production will begin in the factory. Herbicides will be
manufactured in a dedicated set of equipment of the plant while manufacture of Insecticides,
Fungicides and plant growth regulator will be undertaken in the rest of the equipment.
Odorous materials are Trimethyl amine, Isopropyl amine, DMPTC, Carbon disulphide, Acephate &
Profenofos. Solvents used in the process shall be recovered (upto ~ 99%) by distillation as discussed
in Section 2.13.2. Procurement of raw materials will be as per the production plan.
Trained chemists shall be employed who shall work in a sophisticated laboratory and factory. Cooling
and / or heating, and the application of vacuum or pressure conditions, are necessary.
All steps, and particularly the reactions, shall generate air emissions, effluents, and waste /
byproducts. The number of pesticide raw materials is extensive, including materials common to most
pesticide manufacturing processes (details given in Table 2-56).
Final product will be safely handled and packed using packing systems comprising of automatic
packing lines by transferring the final product into containers or boxes, either manually by gravity
feeding or automatically.
19
2.7
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Manufacturing Process steps of all Herbicides involved in proposed plant with Process Flow Diagram &
Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.7.1
Glyphosate
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Glyphosate are given below:
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Water
6.511
43.407
Carbon Catalyst
0.300
2.000
Oxygen
0.420
2.800
1.680
11.200
8.911
59.407
S. N.
Total
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of product
(MT)
Remarks
Glyphosate
1.000
6.66
Product
Excess
Oxygen
0.413
2.75
Emitted in Air
Catalyst
Slurry
0.38
2.53
For Recycling
CO2
0.348
2.32
To scrubber
Effluent
6.770
45.13
To ETP
6.770
0.413
1.348
0.380
Total
8.911
59.390
20
2.7.2
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Process flow diagram and mass balance of 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Water
0.500
1.667
0.527
1.758
NaOH 48%
0.545
1.815
0.909
3.030
Hydrochloric Acid 30 %
0.910
3.033
Diethyl ether
1.500
5.000
Petroleum ether
0.700
2.333
Total
5.591
18.636
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of product
(MT)
Remarks
2,4Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
1.000
3.333
Product
21
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of product
(MT)
Remarks
Recovery of
Diethyl ether
1.490
4.966
Recycle
Recovery of
Petroleum
ether
0.690
2.3
Recycle
Effluent
2.324
7.746
To ETP
Solid Waste
0.087
0.290
2.324
0.000
3.180
0.087
18.635
Total
2.7.3
5.591
MCPA
Process flow diagram and mass balance of MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid) are given
below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
O-Cresol
0.540
1.80
Chlorine
0.358
1.20
0.474
1.58
Water
1.000
3.34
2.372
7.920
Total
22
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of product
(MT)
Remarks
MCPA
1.000
3.34
Product
Effluent
1.006
3.36
To ETP
Acid to Scrubber
0.366
1.22
For sale
0.000
1.366
0.000
7.920
Total
2.7.4
1.006
2.372
Atrazine
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Atrazine are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Cyanuric Chloride
0.868
2.894
Isopropylamine
0.278
0.927
0.120
0.400
Ethylamine
0.212
0.707
Water wash
0.278
0.927
1.756
5.855
Total
23
S.
No.
Output/Day
of Product MT
Remarks
3.335
Product
2.520
To ETP
1.000
0.000
5.855
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Atrazine
1.000
Effluent
0.756
0.756
0.000
Total
2.7.5
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
1.756
Metribuzin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Metribuzin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Hexane
0.775
1.03
0.537
0.72
Pivaloyl Chloride
0.725
0.97
Hydrochloric Acid
0.725
0.97
CS2
0.235
0.31
Hydrazine Hydrate
0.460
0.61
Water
1.122
1.50
CH3Br
0.945
1.26
Caustic Solution
2.178
2.90
Total
7.702
10.269
24
S.
No.
Output/MT of Product
Output/Day of
Product (MT)
Remark
s
1.33
Product
7.09
To ETP
0.6225
0.83
For sale
0.7625
1.02
Recycle
5.317
0.000
2.385
0.000
10.269
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Metribuzin
1.000
Effluent
5.317
CuCl (Copper
Chloride)
Solvent
Total
2.7.6
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
7.702
Propanil
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Propanil are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
1,2 Dichlorobenzene
0.676
2.254
Nitric Acid
0.308
1.026
H2SO4
0.434
1.446
0.020
0.066
0.424
1.414
Water
1.600
5.334
3.462
11.540
Total
25
S.
No.
Output/MT of Product
Output/Day of
Product (MT)
Remarks
3.334
Product
0.386
Reuse
6.194
To ETP
1.553
Recycle
0.073
Recycle
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Propanil
1.000
1,2-Dichloro
benzene
0.116
Effluent
1.858
Spent acid
0.466
Used Catalyst
0.022
2.324
0.000
1.138
Total
2.7.7
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
0.000
3.462
11.540
Pretilachlor
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Pretilachlor are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
0.440
0.880
2,6-Diethyll Aniline
1.150
2.300
NaOH
0.350
0.700
0.400
0.800
Water
0.500
1.000
Toluene
1.800
3.600
4.640
9.280
Total
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
26
Output/MT of Product
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
Product
0.575
1.15
Recovery
Solid Residue
0.09
0.18
For
Disposal
HCl
0.133
0.266
For sale
Toluene
1.742
3.48
Recycle
Effluent
1.1
2.204
To ETP
1.100
0.000
3.450
0.090
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Pretilachlor
Total
4.640
9.280
27
2.7.8
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Pendimethalin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Pendimethalin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
3,4 Xylidine
0.443
0.89
Diethylketone
0.317
0.63
0.590
1.18
Water Wash
2.000
4.00
3.350
6.700
Total
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Pendimethalin
1.000
Spent Acid
2.350
2.350
0.000
Total
3.350
Output/Day of
Product (MT)
Remarks
2.000
Product
4.700
Recycle
1.000
0.000
6.700
28
2.7.9
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Butachlor
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Butachlor are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
0.386
1.158
Formaldehyde
0.096
0.288
Chloroacetyl Chloride
0.360
1.080
0.323
0.969
Butanol
0.236
0.708
Water
Total
S.
No.
0.670
2.010
2.071
6.213
Output/MT of Product
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
Product
0.877
2.632
To ETP
0.193
0.58
Recycle
0.877
0.000
1.193
0.000
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Butachlor
Effluent
Recovered
Alcohol
Total
2.070
6.212
29
2.7.10
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Clodinafop Propargyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Clodinafop Propargyl are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
5-Chloro-2,3-difluoro pyridine
0.417
0.417
Dimethylformammide
1.667
1.667
Potassium Carbonate
0.400
0.400
0.533
0.533
Propargyl Chloride
0.200
0.200
Methanol
1.167
1.167
Water
2.667
2.667
7.050
7.050
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
3.317
To ETP
1.100
1.100
Recycle
1.633
1.633
Recycle
3.317
0.000
3.733
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Clodinafopropargyl
Effluent
3.317
Recovered Alcohol
Recovered Solvent
Total
7.050
7.050
30
2.7.11
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) Propanoate
0.590
1.770
2,6-chlorobenzoxazole
0.470
1.410
Potassium carbonate
0.125
0.375
Water
2.700
8.100
Acetonitrile
1.500
4.500
5.385
16.155
Total
S.
No.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
3.000
Product
2.885
8.655
To ETP
1.500
4.500
Recycle
2.885
0.000
2.500
0.000
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Fenoxaprop-PEthyl
Effluent
Recovered
Acetonitrile
Total
5.385
16.155
31
2.7.12
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Quizalofop-P-Ethyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Quizalofop-P-Ethyl are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) Propanoate
0.550
1.10
2,6-chloroquinoxaline
0.560
1.12
Potassium carbonate
0.135
0.27
Water
2.900
5.80
Acetonitrile
1.500
3.00
5.645
11.29
Total
Output/MT of Product
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Quizalofop-PEthyl
1.000
2.00
Product
Effluent
3.145
6.29
To ETP
Recovered
Acetonitrile
1.500
3.00
Recycle
3.145
0.000
2.500
0.000
S.
No.
1
Total
5.645
Remarks
11.29
32
2.7.13
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Clodinofop-P-Ethyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Clodinofop-P-Ethyl are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) Propanoate
0.567
0.567
2,5-dichloro-3-fluoropyridine
0.487
0.487
Potassium carbonate
0.100
0.100
Water
2.500
2.500
Acetonitrile
1.500
1.500
5.153
5.153
Total
Output/MT of Product
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Clodinofop-PEthyl
1.000
1.00
Product
Effluent
2.686
2.69
To ETP
Recovered
Acetonitrile
1.467
1.47
Recycle
2.686
0.000
2.467
0.000
S.
No.
1
Total
5.153
Remarks
5.153
33
2.7.14
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Paraquat Dichloride
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Paraquat Dichloride are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Pyridine
0.620
1.033
Sodium amide
0.010
0.016
O2 (Oxydation)
0.020
0.033
Methyl chloride
0.394
0.660
Total
1.044
1.742
S.
No.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.667
Product
0.044
0.075
For Disposal
0.000
0.000
1.000
0.044
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Paraquat
Dichloride
Solid Waste
Total
1.044
1.742
34
2.7.15
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Imazathapyr
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Imazathapyr are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
3-ethyl pyridine
0.400
0.400
Xylene
1.167
1.167
Acetyl ketene
0.200
0.200
Ammonium sulfamate
0.267
0.267
Ethyl Acetoacetate
0.417
0.417
Water
1.667
1.667
4.117
4.117
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
1.133
1.133
Recycle
1.983
1.983
To ETP
1.983
0.000
2.133
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Imazathapyr
Xylene Recovery
Effluent
Total
4.117
4.117
35
2.7.16
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Oxyfluorfen
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Oxyfluorfen are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
3-Chlorophenol
0.430
0.860
Chloroethane
0.225
0.450
0.550
1.100
0.600
1.200
Water
0.800
1.600
2.605
5.210
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.00
Product
1.21
To ETP
1.70
Recycle
0.30
For scrubbing
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Oxyfluorfen
Effluent
0.605
Spent Acid
0.850
Air Emissions
Total
0.15
1.455
0.150
1.000
0.000
2.605
5.210
36
2.8
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Manufacturing Process steps of all insecticides involved in proposed plant with Process Flow Diagram
& Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.8.1
Thiamethoxam
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Thiamethoxam are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Hydrochloric Acid
0.250
0.500
S-Phenyl
0.750
1.500
Chlorine
0.750
1.500
SO2
0.500
1.000
Toluene
1.000
2.000
NaOH
0.500
1.000
Water
3.000
6.000
Dichloromethane
1.250
2.500
8.000
16.000
Total
37
S.
No.
Product
1
2
3
2.8.2
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.000
Product
9.800
To ETP
2.100
4.200
Recycle
4.900
0.000
3.100
0.000
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Thiamethoxam
Effluent
4.900
Solvent Recovery
Total
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
8.000
16.000
Profenophos
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Profenophos are given below:
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Orthochlorophenol
0.375
1.125
Monochlorobenzne
1.000
3.000
Bromine
0.470
1.410
Trimethylamine
0.295
0.885
0.563
1.688
Propylbromide
0.388
1.163
Water
1.500
4.500
4.590
13.770
S. N.
Total
38
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
3.000
Product
4.575
To ETP
0.18
0.540
Byproduct for
sale
Salt by Product
0.91
2.730
Byproduct for
sale
Solvent Recovery
0.975
2.925
Recycle
1.525
0.000
3.065
0.000
S.
No.
Product
1
2
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Profenophos
Effluent
1.525
Acid Recovery
4
5
Total
4.590
13.770
39
2.8.3
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Acephate
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Acephate are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
DMPTC
1.170
3.120
4.985
13.293
Ammonium Hydroxide
1.628
4.341
Dimethyl sulfate
0.150
0.400
Acetic Anhydride
0.826
2.203
Sulfuric Acid
0.021
0.056
Water
0.400
1.067
9.180
24.480
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.67
Product
9.02
ETP
12.79
Recycle
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Acephate
Effluent
3.383
MDC recovery
Total
4.797
3.383
0.000
5.790
0.000
9.180
24.480
40
2.8.4
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Chlorpyrifos
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Chlorpyrifos are given below:
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Diethylphosphorochloridothioate
0.457
1.60
0.629
2.21
Dichloromethane
3.429
12.03
0.000
0.00
4.514
15.840
S. N.
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
3.51
Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Chlorpyrifos
1.000
Effluent
0.257
0.90
To ETP
MDC
3.257
11.43
Recycle
0.257
0.000
4.257
0.000
Total
4.514
15.840
41
2.8.5
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Imidacloprid
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Imidacloprid are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
CCMP
1.268
2.54
EDA
0.460
0.92
0.583
1.17
Acetonitrile
10.897
21.79
Nitroguanidine
1.040
2.08
Water
3.333
6.67
17.582
35.163
Total
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
1
2
3
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Imidacloprid
1.000
2.000
Product
Effluent
5.748
11.497
To ETP
Solvent Recovery
10.833
21.67
Recycle
5.748
0.000
11.833
0.000
Total
17.582
35.163
42
2.8.6
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Acetamiprid
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Acetamiprid are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
N-Cyano-N-methylacetamidine
0.440
0.733
Potassium carbonate
0.620
1.033
Ammonium benzyltriethylchloride
0.020
0.033
1.000
1.666
2-chloro-5-chloromethyl pyridine
0.728
1.213
Water washing
2.000
3.332
Ethyl acetate
4.000
6.675
8.808
14.685
Total
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Acetamiprid
1.000
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.67
Product
43
S.
No.
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
3.92
6.54
Recycle
0.980
1.63
Recycle
2.908
4.845
To ETP
2.908
0.000
5.900
0.000
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Ethyl acetate
recovery
Filtrate
Distillation for
DMF recovery
Aqueous Layer
Total
2.8.7
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
8.808
14.685
Fipronil
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Fipronil are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
CF3COOH
2.500
3.300
Monochloro Benzene
1.500
1.980
1.040
1.373
H2O2 (50%)
2.500
3.300
Water
3.500
4.620
11.040
14.573
Total
44
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
Fipronil
1.000
1.32
Product
Effluent
5.000
6.6
To ETP
CF3COOH
Recovered
2.400
3.168
Recycle
Solvent Recovery
1.475
1.947
Recycle
Solid Waste
1.165
1.538
For Disposal
5.000
0.000
4.875
1.165
Total
2.8.8
11.040
14.573
Cartap Hydrochloride
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cartap Hydrochloride are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
1,3Dichloropropyldimethylamine
0.900
0.900
Sodium Thiocyanate
0.730
0.730
30% HCl
0.710
0.710
H2O
3.000
3.000
Methanol
1.330
1.333
6.670
6.670
Total
45
S.
No.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
Product
1.250
1.250
Recycled
4.420
4.420
To ETP
4.420
0.000
1.250
0.000
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Cartap-HCl
Methanol
Effluent
Total
2.8.9
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
6.670
6.670
Buprofezin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Buprofezin are given below:
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
MCB
2.400
4.000
0.500
0.833
0.640
1.067
H2O
2.000
3.333
Methanol
1.4
2.333
Ammonium Bicarbonate
2.400
4.000
9.340
15.567
S. N.
Total
46
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Buprofezin
Methanol
MCB
4
5
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
Recovery
Solid
Waste
1.67
Product
1.300
2.170
Recycle
2.380
3.960
Recycle
Solid Waste
0.16
0.267
For Disposal
Effluent
4.500
7.5
To ETP
4.500
0.000
4.680
0.160
Total
2.8.10
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
9.340
15.567
Bifenthrin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Bifenthrin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Dimethyl Formamide
2.000
0.5
0.5
0.65
0.650
Potassium carbonate
0.05
0.050
0.02
0.02
0.25
0.250
Hexane (Solvent)
4.5
4.500
5% EtOH in Hexane
0.25
0.25
Water
4.5
4.500
12.720
12.720
Total
47
S.
No.
Product
1
2
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
5.000
To ETP
6.220
6.220
Recycle
0.500
0.500
For Disposal
5.000
0.000
7.220
0.500
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Bifenthrin
Effluent
5.000
Solvent Recovery
Solid Waste
Total
2.8.11
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
12.720
12.720
Diafenthiuron
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Diafenthiuron are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Xylene
0.690
1.380
2,6-Diisopropyl-4-Phenoxybenzenamine
0.730
1.460
Hydrochloric Acid
0.093
0.186
Sodium Thiocyanate
0.210
0.420
Water
2.670
5.340
Tert-Butyl Amine
0.121
0.242
4.514
9.03
Total
48
S.
No.
Product
1
2
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.000
Product
5.610
To ETP
0.660
1.320
recycle
0.045
0.090
Scrubber
2.805
0.000
1.705
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Diafenthiuron
Effluent
2.805
Solvent Recovery
Ammonia
Total
2.8.12
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
0.000
4.514
9.030
Deltamethrin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Deltamethrin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Dichloromethane (Solvent)
4.000
4.000
0.400
0.400
Becisthemic Acid
0.900
0.900
Sodium Cyanide
0.150
0.150
49
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
3-Phenoxy benzaldehyde
0.600
0.600
Hexane (Solvent)
6.000
6.000
0.300
0.300
Water
2.000
2.000
Triethyl Amine
Total
S.
No.
0.200
14.550
Output/MT of Product
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.00
Product
2.900
2.90
To ETP
Solvent Recovery
9.550
9.55
Recycle
Solid Waste
1.100
1.10
For Disposal
2.900
0.000
10.550
1.100
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Deltamethrin
Effluent
3
4
Total
2.8.13
0.200
14.550
14.550
14.550
Cypermethrin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cypermethrin are given below:
50
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S. N.
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) cyclopropane
carboxylic acid ethyl ester (DV ester)
0.616
1.232
Sodium Hydroxide
0.108
0.216
Hydrochloric acid
0.300
0.600
Thionyl chloride
0.400
0.800
Toluene (Solvent)
2.000
4.000
0.566
1.132
0.017
0.034
Water
0.860
1.720
Sodium cyanide
0.133
0.266
10
NaOCl
0.266
0.532
5.266
10.532
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.000
Product
4.632
To ETP
3.900
Recycle
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Cypermethrin
Effluent
2.316
Solvent Recovery
Total
2.8.14
1.950
2.316
0.000
2.950
0.000
5.266
10.532
Permethrin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Permethrin are given below:
51
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) cyclopropane
carboxylic acid ethyl ester (DV ester)
0.617
1.234
48% NaOH
0.108
0.216
Hydrochloric acid
0.300
0.600
Thionyl chloride
0.367
0.734
Toluene (Solvent)
1.970
3.940
0.550
1.100
Water
0.866
1.732
4.778
9.556
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.000
Product
3.790
To ETP
1.833
3.666
Recycle
0.05
0.100
To scrubber
2.883
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Permethrin
Effluent
1.891
Solvent Recovery
HCl
1.891
0.000
52
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Total
2.8.15
Solid
Waste
Recovery
4.774
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
9.556
Lambda-Cyhalothrin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Lambda-Cyhalothrin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
0.500
0.500
0.067
0.067
2-chloro-(3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propynyl)-2,2-dimethyl
cyclo propane carboxylic acid
0.433
0.433
Xylene (Solvent)
20.000
20.000
Total
21.000
21.000
53
S.
No.
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
0.233
19.684
19.770
For Recycle
0.083
0.083
Recovery
0.000
0.233
20.767
0.000
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
LambdaCyhalothrin
Solvent Recovery
ML for solvent
recovery
Total
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
21.000
21.000
54
2.9
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Manufacturing Process steps of all Fungicides involved in proposed plant with Process Flow Diagram &
Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.9.1
Cymoxanil
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cymoxanil are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
NaNO2
0.350
0.35
1-Cyanoacetyl-3-Ethylurea
0.780
0.78
Carbonate Salt
0.100
0.10
p-TSA
0.033
0.03
0.313
0.31
Water
6.333
6.33
7.910
7.910
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
6.500
To ETP
0.16
0.160
To Scrubber
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Cymoxanil
Effluent
6.500
NOx
55
S.
No.
Product
CO2
Liquid
Effluent
Total
2.9.2
Air
Emission
Recovery
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
0.250
To Scrubber
0.250
6.500
0.410
1.000
0.000
7.910
7.910
Cyproconazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cyproconazole are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Butanol
2.000
1.33
1-(4-(Chlorophenyl)-2-Cyclopropanyl-1-propanone
0.550
0.37
DMS
0.100
0.07
KOH
0.150
0.10
Water
2.000
1.33
1,2,4 Triazole
0.350
0.23
Chloroform
0.750
0.50
5.900
3.93
Total
56
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
0.667
Product
1.380
To ETP
0.725
0.480
Recycle
Butanol Recovery
1.98
1.320
Recycle
Solid Waste
0.125
0.083
For Disposal
2.070
0.000
3.705
0.125
S.
No.
Product
1
2
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Cyproconazole
Effluent
2.070
Chloroform
4
5
Total
2.9.3
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
5.900
3.930
Azoxystrobin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Azoxystrobin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
0.810
1.35
DMF
1.140
1.90
Potassium Carbonate
0.522
0.87
57
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S. N.
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
2-cyano phenol
0.332
0.55
0.014
0.02
Toluene
1.360
2.27
Water
2.630
4.38
6.808
11.35
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.667
Product
5.666
To ETP
1.09
1.817
Recycle
1.32
2.200
Recycle
3.390
0.000
3.410
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Azoxystrobin
Effluent
3.390
DMF Recovery
Toluene
Total
6.800
11.350
58
2.9.4
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Metalaxyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Metalaxyl are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
0.320
0.53
0.440
0.73
Methoxyacetyl Chloride
0.290
0.48
Water
2.400
4.00
3.450
5.750
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.667
Product
4.083
To ETP
0.000
1.000
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Metalaxyl
Effluent
2.450
2.450
Total
3.450
5.750
59
2.9.5
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Trifloxystrobin
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Trifloxystrobin are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
1.076
1.61
10.889
16.33
Potassium carbonate
2.556
3.83
0.700
1.05
15.221
22.83
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.500
Product
10.777
16.166
Recovery
3.442
5.163
For
Bromine
Recovery
0.000
0.000
14.219
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Trifloxystrobin
Potassium bromide
Total
15.221
22.829
60
2.9.6
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Carbendazim
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Carbendazim are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Thiourea
0.400
1.07
Dimethoxysulfoxide
0.406
1.08
0.500
1.33
O-phenylene diamine
0.563
1.50
NaOH
0.125
0.33
Formic Acid
0.250
0.67
Water
1.500
4.00
3.744
9.983
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.667
Product
7.317
To ETP
0.000
1.000
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Carbendazime
Effluent
2.744
2.744
Total
3.744
9.983
61
2.9.7
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Kresoxim-Methyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Kresoxim-Methyl are given below:
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Phthalide
0.425
0.425
0.425
0.425
Cyanide
0.150
0.150
SOCl2
0.075
0.075
H2NOCH3
0.250
0.250
Water
6.500
6.500
7.825
7.825
S. N.
Total
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Kresoxim-Methyl
1.000
Effluent
Total
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
Product
6.825
To ETP
6.825
6.825
0.000
1.000
0.000
7.825
7.825
62
2.9.8
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Thiophenate Methyl
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Thiophenate Methyl are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
O-Phenylenediamine
0.325
0.650
Thiocyanate
0.538
1.075
HCl
0.663
1.325
MDC
3.500
7.000
0.625
1.250
Water
3.275
6.550
8.925
17.850
Total
Output/MT of Product
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Thiophenate
Methyl
1.000
2.000
Effluent
4.260
8.520
To ETP
MDC Recovery
3.450
6.900
Recycle
HCl to Scrubber
0.215
0.430
For
Scrubbing
4.260
0.215
4.450
0.000
S.
No.
1
Total
8.925
Remarks
Product
17.850
63
2.9.9
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Tricyclazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Tricyclazole are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
O-Toluidine
0.540
1.80
Ammonium Thiocyanate
0.441
1.47
HCl 30%
0.827
2.76
Toluene
1.084
3.61
Cl2
0.357
1.19
MDC
5.141
17.14
Hydrazine Hydrate
0.879
2.93
MEG
3.928
13.09
Xylene
2.319
7.73
10
Water
0.150
0.50
11
Formic Acid
Total
2.434
8.11
18.100
60.333
64
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
3.333
Product
3.200
To ETP
1.032
3.440
Recycle
HCl Recovery
0.227
0.757
For Sale
MDC recovery
5.092
16.973
Recycle
MEG+ Hydrazine
Hydrate + HCl for
Recycle
4.967
16.557
Recycle
Formic Acid
Recycle
2.297
7.657
Recycle
Xylene Recovery
2.311
7.703
Recycle
Solid Waste
0.214
0.713
For Disposal
0.960
0.000
16.926
0.214
S.
No.
Product
1
2
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Tricyclazole
Effluent
0.960
Toluene recovery
Total
2.9.10
18.100
60.333
Isoprothiolane
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Isoprothiolane are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
NaOH
0.725
1.450
CS2
0.300
0.600
65
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S. N.
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Diisopropylmalonate
0.700
1.400
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.775
1.550
n-Heptane
2.250
4.500
4.750
9.500
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.000
Product
1.71
To ETP
0.675
1.350
Recycle
2.220
4.440
Recycle
0.855
0.000
3.895
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Isoprothiolane
Effluent
0.855
1,2Dichloroethane
n-Heptane
Recovery
Total
2.9.11
4.750
9.500
Propiconazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Propiconazole are given below:
66
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
2,4 Dichloroacetophenone
0.433
0.433
Bromine
0.133
0.133
Acetic Acid
1.167
1.167
1,2-Pentane Diol
0.283
0.283
PTSA
0.033
0.033
Toluene
1.333
1.333
1,2,4 Triazole
0.150
0.150
KOH
0.050
0.050
Methanol
0.333
0.333
10
Water
0.500
0.500
4.417
4.417
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
0.643
To ETP
0.107
0.107
For sale
Acetic Acid
Recovery
1.067
1.067
Recycle
Toluene Recovery
1.283
1.283
Recycle
Methanol
Recovery
0.317
0.317
Recycle
0.643
0.107
3.667
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Propiconazole
Effluent
0.643
HBr to Scrubber
Total
4.417
4.417
67
2.9.12
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Hexaconazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Hexaconazole are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Valeric Acid
0.930
0.930
Thionyl Chloride
0.570
0.570
Dichlorobenzene
0.670
0.670
Dimethyl Sulfide
1.400
1.400
Dimethyl Sulfate
0.720
0.720
Potassium hydroxide
0.650
0.650
Water
5.750
5.750
DMF
1.720
1.720
Potassium carbonate
0.560
0.560
10
Methanol
2.000
2.000
11
1,2,4 Triazole
0.320
0.320
15.290
15.290
Total
68
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.000
Product
8.360
To ETP
0.35
0.350
For scrubber
DMF
1.548
1.548
Recycle
DMS
1.300
1.300
Recycle
Sulfur Dioxude
0.307
0.307
For sale as
sodium
bisulfite
Excess Valeryl
Chloride
0.465
0.465
Recycle
Methanol
1.960
Recycle
S.
No.
Product
1
2
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Hexaconazole
Effluent
8.360
HCl
Total
2.9.13
1.960
8.360
0.000
6.930
0.000
15.290
15.290
Tebuconazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Tebuconazole are given below:
69
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
4-Chlorophenyl Aldehyde
0.517
1.03
3,3-Dimethyl-2-Butanone
0.367
0.73
H2
0.100
0.20
1,2,4-Triazole
0.167
0.33
KOH
0.033
0.07
Water
1.333
2.67
2.517
5.033
S. N.
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
2.000
Product
3.033
To ETP
0.000
1.000
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Tebuconazole
Effluent
1.517
1.517
Total
2.9.14
2.517
5.033
Difenconazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Difenconazole are given below:
70
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
3,4-Dichlorodiphenyl Ether
0.600
1.000
0.340
0.567
AlCl3
0.200
0.333
1,2-Propylene Glycol
0.300
0.500
PTSA
0.032
0.053
Toluene
1.000
1.667
1,2,4 Triazole
0.150
0.250
KOH
0.030
0.050
Methanol
0.250
0.417
10
Water
1.400
2.333
4.302
7.170
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.667
Product
3.030
To ETP
0.264
0.440
For Sale
0.980
1.633
Recycle
`-
0.240
0.400
Recycle
1.818
0.000
2.484
0.000
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Difenoconazole
Effluent
1.818
Hydrochloric Acid
to Scrubber
Toluene Recovery
Methanol
Recovery
Total
4.302
7.170
71
2.9.15
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Epoxyconazole
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Epoxyconazole are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(4fluorophenyl)oxiranecarbaldehyde
1.875
1.25
Acetonitrile
6.250
4.17
Water
15.000
10.00
Sodium phosphate
0.050
0.03
18.750
12.50
(S)-1-methylbenzyl amine
0.645
0.43
Methanol
12.500
8.33
55.070
36.713
Total
S.
No.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
0.667
Product
11.500
ETP
0.625
0.417
For Sale
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Epoxyconazole
Effluent
17.250
Hydrogen
peroxide
72
S.
No.
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
18.000
12.000
Recycle
6.150
4.100
Recycle
12.045
8.030
Recycle
17.250
0.000
37.820
0.000
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Acetonitrile
Recovery
Methanol
Recovery
Total
2.9.16
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
55.070
36.713
Chlorothalonil
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Chlorothalonil are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Isophthalic acid
0.664
1.11
Alumina catalyst
0.090
0.15
Ammonia Gas
0.140
0.23
73
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S. N.
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Activated carbon
0.120
0.20
Chlorine gas
1.160
1.93
Solvent
1.800
3.00
3.974
6.623
Total
Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Remarks
1.000
1.667
Product
0.090
0.150
For Recycle
0.640
1.067
For scrubber
1.680
2.800
Recovery
Solid Waste
0.324
0.540
For Disposal
Waste Water
0.24
0.400
To ETP
S.
No.
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Chlorothalonil
Recovered
Alumina catalyst
HCl
Solvent Recovery
5
6
Total
0.240
0.000
3.410
3.974
0.324
6.623
74
2.10
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Manufacturing Process steps of Plant Growth Regulators involved in proposed plant with Process Flow
Diagram & Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.10.1
Chlormequat Chloride
Process flow diagram and mass balance of Chlormequat Chloride are given below:
Raw Materials
Input (MT) / MT of
Product
Trimethylamine (30%)
1.125
7.500
Ethylene dichloride
2.000
13.333
3.125
20.833
Total
Output/MT of Product
Input / Day of
Product (MT)
Product
Liquid
Effluent
Air
Emission
Recovery
Solid
Waste
Output/Day
of Product
(MT)
Chlormequatchlor
ide
1.000
6.667
Product
EDC Recovery
1.400
9.333
Recycle
0.725
4.833
Reuse
0.000
0.000
3.125
0.000
S.
No.
Total
3.125
Remarks
20.833
75
2.11
UTILITIES
2.11.1
Power
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Power requirement of 610 kVA will be sourced from DGVCL/Dahej Local Source. A transformer of
1,000 KVA capacity is proposed. Two DG Sets (400 kVA each) will be installed & used as standby
during emergency conditions and power outrages only.
2.11.2
Fuel
NG / FO / LDO and HSD will be used for the proposed Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters and DG Sets.
Details of the same is tabulated in Table 2-53. Boiler & Thremic fluid heater shall operate ~ 15 to 20
Hr/day.
Type of Fuel
Used in
Natural Gas or
FO
Boiler
Natural Gas or
LDO
HSD
2.11.3
Quantity
300 Sm /Hr or
4.2 KLD
Source
25 Sm3/Hr or
200 Ltr/Day
200 Ltr/Hr.
Water
Based on the mass balances shown in Section 2.7 to 2.10, water requirement is considered based
on the maximum water consumption from the set of group which will be manufactured in a day.
Various combination for the set of groups are tabulated in Table 2-54 & Table 2-55.
Table 2-54: Water & Waste Water Details for Various Products (for section of group)
Prod.
No.
Name of Product/
Byproduct
Production
(MT/Day)
Water Consumption
(KLD)
Waste Water
Generation (KLD)
Herbicides
1
Glyphosate
6.67
43.41
45.13
Propanil
3.34
5.33
7.75
11
Finoxprop-P-Ethyl
3.00
8.10
8.66
12
Quizalofop-p-Ethyl
2.00
5.80
6.29
Insecticides
17
Thiamethoxam
2.00
6.00
9.80
21
Imidacloprid
2.00
6.67
11.50
27
Diafenthiuron
2.00
5.33
5.61
Fungicides
40
Tricyclazole
3.33
0.50
3.20
42
Propiconazole
1.00
0.50
0.64
43
Hexaconazole
3.33
5.75
8.36
48
Chlormequatchloride
0.00
0.00
76
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Water Consumption
(KLD)
Waste Water
Generation (KLD)
Remarks
1 + 27 + 40 + 43 + 48
55
62
Product Mix 1
11 + 21 + 42 + 43 + 48
21
29
Product Mix 2
1 + 21 + 40 + 43 + 48
56
68
Product Mix 3
(Peak Load)
Considering production of Product Mix 3 group, 5 products, i.e. Glyphosate (Herbicide), Imidacloprid
(Insecticide), Tricyclazole (Fungicide), Hexaconazole (Fungicide) & Chlormequatchloride (Plant Growth
Regulator) at a time, maximum process water consumption (56 KLD) and process waste water
generation (68 KLD) was considered.
Considering this maximum peak load, during the operation phase of 12 TPD capacity multipurpose
plant, it is estimated, fresh water requirement would be 98 KLD after recycle and reuse concept &
achieving ZLD. Details of the same is provided in Section 2.18, Page 92.
However, water requirement will be ~ 200 KLD if treated waste water is drained to CETP, Dahej.
Inprinciple permission has been received from GIDC as shown in Annexure 4.
2.11.4
Manpower
During construction phase, around 60 100 laborers will be hired. During operation phase, around
125 135 employees will be hired based on their skills. They may be hired locally. First preference
shall be given to skilled, semi-skilled work force of local community.
2.12
Based on the need and availability, raw material shall be sourced from registered supplier within India
and Imported (if required) via road transportation by trucks & tempos. Details of raw material along
with the quantity, physical state and means of storage is given in Table 2-56.
Table 2-56: Details of Raw Materials, Physical State & Means of Storage
S.N.
Consumption
(MTPA)
Physical
State
Means of Storage
3,360
Solid
HDPE bags
Oxygen
940
Gas
Cylinder
NaOH (48%)
5,809
Liquid
909
Liquid
HDPE Drums
764
Solid
HDPE bags
Hydrochloric Acid*
3,121
Liquid
Dimethyl Sulfate
840
Liquid
HDPE Drums
Ortho cresol
270
Liquid
HDPE Drums
Chlorine
1,416
Gas
Cylinder
10
Cyanuric Chloride
434
Solid
HDPE bags
11
Isopropyl Amine
139
Liquid
MS Drum
77
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S.N.
Consumption
(MTPA)
Physical
State
Means of Storage
12
Ethyl Amine
106
Liquid
MS Drum
13
CuCN
215
Solid
HDPE bags
14
Pivolyl Chloride
290
Liquid
MS Drum
15
CS2
154
Liquid
16
Hydrazine Hydrate
1,063
Liquid
HDPE Drums
17
CH3Br
378
Gas
Cylinder
18
1,2-Dichloro benzene
338
Liquid
HDPE Drums
19
132
Liquid
HDPE Drums
20
Nitric Acid
324
Liquid
21
Sulfuric Acid
474
Liquid
22
102
Liquid
HDPE Drums
23
2,6-Diethyl aniline
189
Liquid
MS Drum
24
Hydrogen
60
Gas
Cylinder
25
1,2,4-Triazole
610
Solid
HDPE bags
26
730
Solid
HDPE bags
27
100
Solid
HDPE bags
28
3,4-Dichlorodiphenyl ether
300
Liquid
HDPE Drums
29
Bromoacetyl chloride
170
Liquid
HDPE Drums
30
1,2-propylene glycol
150
Liquid
HDPE Drums
31
3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2(4-fluorophenyl)
oxiranecarbaldehyde
375
Solid
HDPE bags
32
Sodium Phosphate
10
Solid
HDPE bags
33
129
Liquid
HDPE Drums
34
Alumina
45
Solid
HDPE bags
35
Becisthemic Acid
90
Solid
HDPE drums
36
2,368
Liquid
37
D.V.Ester
740
Liquid
HDPE Drums
38
Thionyl chloride
1,085
Liquid
HDPE Drums
39
670
Liquid
HDPE Drums
40
3-phenoxybenzaldehyde cyanohydrin
150
Liquid
HDPE Drums
41
20
Liquid
HDPE Drums
42
130
Solid
HDPE Drums
43
NaNO2
105
Solid
HDPE Drums
44
1-Cyanoacetyl-3-ethylurea
235
Solid
HDPE Drums
45
Dimethyl sulphide
1,514
Liquid
HDPE Drums
46
2,4-dichloroacetophenone
130
Solid
HDPE Drums
47
Bromine
224
Liquid
Glass Bottles
48
Pyridine
310
Liquid
HDPE Drums
49
Imidazole
68
Solid
HDPE Drums
78
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S.N.
Consumption
(MTPA)
Physical
State
Means of Storage
50
1-(4-(chlorophenyl)-2-Cyclopropanyl-1Propanone
110
Solid
HDPE bags
51
405
Solid
HDPE bags
52
10
Solid
HDPE bags
53
2-Cyanophenol
166
Liquid
HDPE Drums
54
2,6-dimethylaniline
160
Liquid
HDPE Drums
55
220
Liquid
HDPE Drums
56
145
Liquid
HDPE Drums
57
Diisopropyl Malonate
140
Liquid
HDPE Drums
58
Thiourea
320
Solid
HDPE bags
59
Dimethoxy sulfoxide
325
Liquid
HDPE Drums
60
Methyl chloroformate
650
Liquid
HDPE Drums
61
o-phenylene diamine
580
Solid
HDPE bags
62
Formic acid
2,634
Liquid
HDPE Drums
63
85
Liquid
HDPE Drums
64
Pthalide
85
Solid
HDPE bags
65
Sodium Cyanide
125
Solid
HDPE bags
66
NH2OCH3
50
Liquid
HDPE Drums
67
Ammonium Thiocyante
441
Solid
HDPE bags
68
Ortho toluidine
540
Liquid
HDPE Drums
69
3,928
Liquid
HDPE Drums
70
1,2-pentanediol
85
Liquid
HDPE Drums
71
Valeric acid
930
Liquid
HDPE Drums
72
m-Dichloro benzene
670
Liquid
HDPE Drums
73
R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) propionoate
398
Liquid
HDPE Drums
74
2,6-Dichlorobenzoxazole
94
Solid
HDPE bags
75
2,6-chloroquinoxaline
112
Liquid
HDPE Drums
76
2,5-dichloro-3-fluoropyridine
146
Liquid
HDPE Drums
77
Methyl chloride
197
Liquid
HDPE Drums
78
3-Ethyl pyridine
120
Liquid
HDPE Drums
79
Acetyl ketene
60
Liquid
HDPE Drums
80
Ammonium sulfamate
80
Solid
HDPE bags
81
Ethyl acetoacetate
125
Liquid
HDPE Drums
82
3-Chlorophenol
43
Liquid
HDPE Drums
83
Chloroethane
22.5
Liquid
Cylinders
84
4-Trifluoromethyl-2-chlorophenol potassium
salt
60
Solid
HDPE bags
85
S-phenyl
300
Liquid
HDPE Drums
86
Sulphur dioxide
200
Gas
Cylinder
79
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S.N.
Consumption
(MTPA)
Physical
State
Means of Storage
87
Orthochlorophenol
150
Liquid
HDPE Drums
88
Triethyl amine
20
Liquid
MS Drum
89
225
Solid
HDPE bags
90
Propyl bromide
155
Liquid
HDPE Drums
91
DMPTC
936
Liquid
HDPE Drums
92
Ammonia gas
167
Gas
Cylinder
93
Acetic acid
350
Liquid
HDPE Drums
94
Diethylphosphoro chloridothioate
160
Liquid
HDPE Drums
95
220
Solid
HDPE bags
96
2-chloro-5-chloromethyl pyridine
1,125
Solid
HDPE drums
97
276
Liquid
HDPE Drums
98
Nitroguanidine
624
Solid
HDPE bags
99
N-cyano-N-methyl acetamidine
220
Solid
HDPE bags
100
Ammonium Benzyltriethylchloride
10
Solid
HDPE bags
101
Thiopyrazole derivatives
208
Solid
HDPE bags
102
500
Liquid
HDPE Drums
103
Acetic anhydride
661
Liquid
104
3,4 Xylidine
266
Liquid
MS Drums
105
Diethyl ketone
190
Liquid
HDPE Drums
106
228
Liquid
HDPE Drums
107
R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) propionoate
398
Solid
HDPE bags
108
Potassium Carbonate
2,493
Solid
HDPE bags
109
160
Solid
HDPE bags
110
5-chloro-2,3-difluoro pyridine
125
Liquid
HDPE Drums
111
Formaldehyde
29
Liquid
HDPE Drums
112
Propargyl Chloride
60
Liquid
HDPE Drums
113
1,3 Dichloropropyldimethylamine
271
Liquid
HDPE Drums
114
Sodium Thiocyanate
559
Solid
HDPE bags
115
1-isopropyl-3-t-butyl thiourea
250
Solid
HDPE bags
116
Ammonium Bicarbonate
1200
Solid
HDPE bags
117
2,6-Diisopropyl-4-phenoxybenzenamine
442
Solid
HDPE bags
118
Tert-Butyl Amine
73
Liquid
HDPE Drums
119
Sodium hypochlorite
190
Liquid
HDPE Drums
120
484
Liquid
HDPE Drums
121
3-phenoxybenzaldehyde
60
Liquid
HDPE Drums
122
315
Solid
HDPE bags
123
Isophthalic acid
332
Solid
HDPE bags
124
Ammonium hydroxide
1,303
Liquid
MS Tank
125
BPC
100
Liquid
HDPE Drums
80
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S.N.
Consumption
(MTPA)
Physical
State
Means of Storage
126
MTH acid
130
Solid
HDPE bags
127
Sodium bicarbonate
80
Solid
HDPE bags
128
Chloral
1,011
Liquid
HDPE Drums
129
849
Liquid
HDPE Drums
* HCl requirement as a raw material will be met from the in-house production from other products.
Excess stock will be sold as byproduct.
2.13
2.13.1
Details of Solvents
Details of solvents used and its proposed recovery systems are tabulated in Table 2-57.
Name of solvent
Consumption
(MT/Annum)
%
Recovery
Means of storage
Recovery
Plan
Diethyl ether
10
99
MS drums
Distillation
Petroleum Ether
10
98.57
MS drums
Distillation
Hexane
128
93
Underground MS tank
Distillation
Dimethyl Formamide
227
94
HDPE drums
Distillation
Methanol
155
97.5
Underground MS tank
Distillation
Acetonitrile
68
98.4
MS drums
Distillation
Xylene
151
98
Distillation
Distillation
Toluene
624
90
Underground MS
storage tank
Dichloro Methane
284
97
Distillation
10
Monochlorobenzene
25
98.68
MS drums
Distillation
11
20
96
HDPE drums
Distillation
12
Butanol
17
96.3
MS drums
Distillation
13
Chloroform
96.6
MS drums
Distillation
14
Acetic Acid
30
91.4
HDPE drums
Distillation
15
150
96
MS drums
Distillation
16
Ethylene Dichloride
1,220
70.6
HDPE drums
Distillation
17
n-heptane
98.6
MS drums
Distillation
18
50
99
HDPE drums
Distillation
19
198
95
MS drums
Distillation
20
Trichloro Benzene
60
93
HDPE drums
Distillation
21
Ethyl acetate
40
98
MS drums
Distillation
81
2.13.2
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The solvents used in the process will be recovered using distillation unit, installed in the plant.
Following steps shall be involved in solvent recovery from the distillation units:
82
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
83
2.14
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
CATALYST
During the process various catalysts will be used. Their annual consumption, physical state, means of
storage details are tabulated in Table 2-58.
Name of Catalyst
Consumption
(MTPA)
Physical
State
Means of
Storage
Carbon catalyst
660
Solid
HDPE bags
Alumina catalyst
45
Solid
HDPE bags
Pd / C
10
Solid
HDPE bags
36
Solid
HDPE bags
Sodium amide
Solid
HDPE bags
Solid
HDPE drums
Solid
HDPE bags
35
Solid
HDPE bags
2.14.1
Major catalysts which shall be consumed in the products manufacturing, its consumption, recovery
and reuse technique is detailed below:
Carbon catalyst
Pd/C catalyst
Alumina catalyst:
2.15
PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
2.15.1
Process Area
Batching section;
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
84
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The Plant building will be multistoried with all necessary equipments and vessels having four
mezzanine floors in between for installing heat exchangers, dosing vessels, receivers etc. Utilities and
various scrubbers will to be located on the terrace roof. Factory will have tank farm, ETP, HW storage,
fire hydrant lines, admin building, security cabin, utility area, laboratory and health care center.
Herbicides will be manufactured in a dedicated set of equipment of the Plant while manufacture of
Insecticides, Fungicides and plant growth regulator will be undertaken in the rest of the equipment.
As a safety aspect, installation of process vessels shall be placed as far as possible from boiler section,
opposite to the predominant wind direction which is usually from SW in all seasons, except monsoon 1.
2.15.2
Non-Processing Area
Administration building;
Security cabin;
Utility area;
Laboratory;
Health Care Center.
2.15.3
Equipment List
For the proposed project equipment mentioned in Table 2-59 shall be placed:
Name of Equipment
Capacity
Quantity
(Nos.)
Cost/ Unit
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
INR (in Lacs)
Plant Section
1
1.6 KL
9.5
9.5
3 KL
12
24
6.3 KL
16
80
SS-316 Reactor
5 KL
13
104
SS-316 Reactor
10 KL
18
72
SS-316 Reactor
15 KL
21
63
1
1
As per IMDs long term meteorological data, mentioned in Chapter 3, Table 3-1.
85
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S. N.
Name of Equipment
Capacity
Quantity
(Nos.)
Cost/ Unit
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
INR (in Lacs)
500 mm dia *
10,000 mm
height
25
8 m2
21
4m
15
30
63
48
25
50
10
25 m
11
20 m2
12
5m
13
20 m
20
14
10 m2
2.5
12.5
15
SS-316 Centrifuge
48 in Dia.
27
135
16
10 KL
30
60
17
6 KL
26
104
18
500 Kg
18
19
5 m /hr.
10
0.7
21
CS centrifugal pump
5 m /hr.
10
0.6
22
SS-316 Receiver
2 KL
23
SS-316 Receiver
3 KL
10
2.8
28
24
PP Centrifugal pump
5 m3/hr.
0.6
24
SS-316 Receiver
5 KL
48
25
SS-316 Receiver
8 KL
28
26
MSGL Receiver
3 KL
21
27
1 torr
28
60 torr
1.5
4.5
29
20 KL
13
39
30
MS Storage tank
25 KL
3.5
21
31
25 KL
32
MS UG storage tank
20 KL
3.8
19
33
500 TR
5.5
5.5
34
100 TR
31
31
35
100 TR
42
42
36
Steam Boiler
3 TPH
27
54
37
Hightherm heater
1 Lac Kcal
18
22
22
20
38
Nitrogen Plant
1m
100 m /hr.
3
39
Compressed Air
50 m /hr.
40
BFW softener
5 TPH
3.5
3.5
41
HCl scrubber
100 kg/hr.
42
HBr scrubber
100 kg/hr.
43
500 CFM
3.5
3.5
86
S. N.
Name of Equipment
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Capacity
Quantity
(Nos.)
Cost/ Unit
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
INR (in Lacs)
25
50
Utility Section
1
400 kVA
1,000 kVA
5
6
7
100 m
12
25
25
Material Lifts
2 Tons
18
2 Tons
ETP
100 KL
80
80
R O Plant
100 KL
70
70
MEE
100 KL
158
158
10
Pilot Plant
30
30
10
Fork Lift
10
10
2.16
AIR EMISSIONS
2.16.1
Point source emission of pollutants into air from the proposed project will be through flue gas stacks
attached to boiler, thermic fluid heater & DG Sets and through process vents attached to various
scrubbers.
The principal air pollutants are volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM). These
emissions to air are generated during pesticide manufacturing, formulating and packaging processes.
It will be controlled by various scrubbers. Adequate stack height and proper pollution control
equipment will be provided for all flue gas stacks & process vents/stacks.
Action Plan to Control Ambient Air Quality
Appropriate control measures shall be taken to control ambient air quality. Details of the stacks, fuel
used, quantity of fuel used, air pollution control measures (APCM), expected pollutants and expected
efficiency of APCM are tabulated in Table 2-60.
Stack Attached
to
Fuel Used
Quantity of
Fuel
APCM
Stack
Height
(m)
Expected
Pollutants
Efficiency
of APCE
Boilers
Thermic Fluid
Heater
NG / FO
(as per
availability)
300 Sm3/Hr NG
or 4.2 KLD FO
Adequate
Stack Ht.
45
NG / LDO
(as per
availability)
25 Sm3/Hr NG
or 200 Ltr/Day
LDO
Adequate
Stack Ht.
45
87
S.
No.
Stack Attached
to
Fuel Used
Quantity of
Fuel
APCM
Stack
Height
(m)
DG Sets
HSD
200 Ltr/Hr
Adequate
Stack Ht.
15
Expected
Pollutants
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Efficiency
of APCE
-
Vents attached
to Alkali
scrubber
Alkali
Scrubbers
35
HCl, SO2,
Cl2, NOx,
HBr
99.5%
Vents attached
to Acid scrubber
Acid
Scrubber
35
NH3 & HC
99.5%
Scrubbers for
odor control
system
Column
containing
Activated
Carbon
35
VOCs
99.95%
88
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
89
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S.
No.
Vent Attached to
APCM
Equipment
Specifications
Acid
Scrubber
Efficiency: 99.5%
Scrubbing Agent: (9 - 10%) Dilute
Sulphuric acid.
Process Reactor
Vents
Odor control
system, various
vents from reactors
2.16.2
Alkali
Scrubber
Scrubbers
HCl : 20
Cl2: 9
SO2: 40
NH3 : 30
NOx : 25
HC : 15
HBr : 5
Due to the proposed activities in the project, no area source emissions are identified.
2.16.3
During construction phase, vehicular emissions will be from use of construction machinery and
vehicles. Apart from it, application of heavy machinery and earth movers will generate emissions.
Suitable dust suppression techniques such as water sprinkling will be taken at these times as relevant.
During operation phase, vehicular emissions due to transportation of raw materials, finished goods
and local travel of employees are envisaged.
Approximately, 10 trucks, 10 Tempos per day carrying raw material and finished goods shall be using
the state highway connecting Bharuch and Dahej. Employees and contract workers (~20 cars, 30 two
wheelers & 25 cycles) shall use the same route during peak hours.
2.16.4
Fugitive emissions from storage & handling area for raw materials, solvents, finished products is
envisaged due to proposed project. Odor of raw materials & finished goods shall be limited to plant
area.
Raw materials such as Trimethyl amine, Isopropyl amine, DMPTC, Carbon disulphide etc., and
products such as Acephate & Profenofos have an unpleasant odour.
Odor shall be controlled by taking following steps:
All liquid raw materials and intermediates shall be charged into Reactors with pumps or under
gravity through closed pipes.
90
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
All vents of holding tanks and dosing vessels shall be connected to a Vent Scrubber system
comprising of a suction Blower, Acid Scrubber, Alkali Scrubber and an Activated Carbon Column
before venting through a tall stack.
Alkaline and Acidic gases present in the Vent gases shall be absorbed in the Acid & Alkali
scrubbers. VOC present in the vent gas stream shall be absorbed in the Activated Carbon tower.
Suction Hoods shall be placed near the Man-holes & Charging funnels of Reactors & Filters so that
chemical vapors and dust do not escape into the Plant & surroundings, when the man-hole covers
are opened for inspection or charging of RM.
All storage tanks of low boiling solvents / chemical shall be provided with Conservation Vents.
Storage tanks of Methylene chloride shall be provided with cold insulation and a vent condenser.
Vents of HCl storage tanks shall be provided with a Water filled trap to prevent Acid fumes from
escaping out.
HCl, SO2 & HBr generated during various Chemical reactions during the manufacture of the
Pesticides shall be absorbed in a multi-stage absorber consisting of two Falling Film type
absorbers, a Ventury Scrubber and a Tail gas Scrubber to make the exhaust gases practically free
of the contaminating gases.
Vent lines of Dosing vessels of Trimethyl Amine, Carbon disulphide etc. shall be connected back to
the vents of storage tanks to prevent contaminated air release during material transfer.
Carbon disulphide storage tank shall be placed in a concrete tank with a layer of water in it so
that in case of any spillage the spilled material will be trapped under water. The storage tank shall
have a layer of water floating.
All pumps handling hazardous chemicals shall be provided with mechanical seals to prevent
fugitive emission. Wherever possible magnetic coupled pumps will be used.
Any spillage from drums etc. will be absorbed with saw dust / soda ash and moped clean. The
contaminated absorbent will be safely disposed off along with hazardous waste.
Measuring Instruments with sound alarm and having strategically placed sensing elements will be
provided for alerting the personnel in case of any escape of gases like Chlorine, Ammonia or CS 2
vapors.
2.17
NOISE GENERATION
From the proposed project, noise shall be generated from the various activities. Source of noise
generation are:
The heavy machinery like crane, dumper, roller, bulldozers etc. will be used during daytime during
construction phase;
Operation of boiler, compressors, chillers, DG sets, etc. will have a permanent effect;
Vehicle movement for transportation of raw material and finished goods with frequency of more
than ten times in a day.
91
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
2.18
2.18.1
Water Consumption
As discussed in Section 2.11.3, Pg. 76, it is estimated the fresh water requirement would be 98 KLD
by maximizing recycle and reuse concept & achieving ZLD. Principle areas of water consumption are
DM Plant, Process, Boiler, Cooling Tower, Industrial Domestic Use and gardening.
It is to note that water requirement will be ~ 200 KLD if treated waste water is drained to CETP,
Dahej. Inprinciple permission has been received from GIDC as shown in Annexure 4.
2.18.2
The waste water will be generated from the process, utilities and domestic area. These will be treated
to achieve ZLD. Breakup of waste water generation is tabulated in Table 2-62.
2.18.3
Mode of Disposal
The process effluent will be treated by MEE (Capacity 100 KLD) and condensate from MEE will be
transferred to the ETP (Capacity 100 KLD) for further treatment. Also, utilities blowdowns and
domestic sewage will be treated in ETP followed by RO (Capacity 100 KLD).
Total flow in ETP will be 96.5 KLD. The permeate from the RO will be reused in plant areas and reject
will be treated into MEE. System is designed to achieve Zero Liquid Discharge.
However, once the CETP is established in future, company will discharge ~ 96 KLD treated effluent
(ETP consisting primary, secondary and tertiary treatment without RO & MEE) into CETP with
standards norms given by concern authority for further treatment & disposal.
2.18.4
By implementing various recycle/reuse schemes as shown in Figure 2-51, 77 KLD water will be
reused in cooling tower. Water consumption & Waste water generation details is given in Table 2-62.
Wastewater
Generation
(KLD)
S.
No.
Description
Domestic
To ETP
Process
56
68
To MEE
DM Plant
To ETP
To ETP
Boiler
24
Cooling Tower
100
To ETP
RO Reject
19
To MEE
MEE Condensate
83.5
To ETP
Gardening
175
Recycled Water
77
98
183.5
92
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
93
2.18.5
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Details of ETP
Stream segregation at source will be carried out for segregation of high pollution level and low
pollution level of streams.
Wastewater Treatment Methodology
Stream A: One of process stream containing cyanide waste will be segregate from the other
process streams and treated in MEE after primary treatment.
Stream B: Other High TDS & High COD streams from the process will be collected separately.
Primary treatment will be provided followed by multiple effect evaporation. The condensate from
MEE shall then pumped to ETP for secondary treatment.
Stream C: TDS streams i.e. utilities blow downs, domestic sewage along with condensate from
MEE as a combined stream shall be treated in ETP consisting of Secondary Biological Treatment
and Tertiary Treatment followed by RO. The RO reject will be transferred to MEE for salt removal
while RO permeate will be used in plant area.
Parameters
Unit
ETP Outlet
Characteristics
pH
5-7
6.5 8.5
COD
mg/l
7,000
100
BOD
mg/l
2,500
30
TDS
mg/l
1,000
1,500
SS
mg/l
250
100
O&G
mg/l
15
10
Stream A:
The toxic stream containing cyanide waste (about 7 KLD) will be treated with sodium hypochlorite till
all the cyanide pollutant is decomposed. Thereafter this stream is evaporated in an MEE after passing
from stripper along with other aqueous effluent stream having high TDS & COD and RO Reject water.
The list of treatment unit along with sizing for the primary treatment of this stream is given in Table
2-64.
94
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Table 2-64: List of Primary Treatment Unit for Removal of Cyanide from Wastewater
S.
No.
Treatment Unit
Volumetric Capacity
Remarks
8 KL
1 KL
To absorb unreacted
chlorine escaping from
Reactor.
Centrifugal pump
5 m3 / Hr.
Stream B:
The high TDS and high COD stream from the process plant (~61 KLD with 5.8% TDS) containing
inorganic salts like sodium chloride, sodium sulphate etc., (excluding untreated Cyanide effluent) is
segregated and sent to an Oil & Grease separator and then to an Equalization Tank.
The oil & grease, if any, is collected and disposed off for incineration.
The effluent from the equalization tank is then pumped into a lime treatment tank. The tank contents
are mixed by aeration through an under-water air grid. Lime slurry is added to get a pH of 10 11.
The mixture is then treated with alum solution, flocculating agent and send to a primary settler.
The settled sludge is dewatered on a sludge drying bed from where it is sent to an approved land fill
and leachate will be transferred to equalization tank.
The supernatant liquid (with a residual TDS of 4%) is then pumped continuously through a filter into a
live steam stripper column operated under vacuum.
The over-head vapors of the stripper is condensed, settled and separated into layers. The aqueous
layer is recycled back into stripper.
The organic layer is drummed out and sent out for incineration.
The aqueous layer from the bottom of the stripper is collected in a tank and mixed with the reject
stream from the Reverse Osmosis plant. The mixed stream (~84 KL) is sent to a Triple-EffectEvaporator.
The concentrate from the 3rd Effect of the MEE goes to a TFD. The salt discharged from the bottom of
the TFD (~3.5 MT) is sent to TSDF for disposal.
The combined distillate stream from 3rd Effect and TFD of MEE is condensed and collected in a tank.
This stream will have COD of about 5,000 7,000 ppm, but no TDS form as one part of stream C.
The list of treatment unit along with sizing for the primary treatment of this stream is given in Table
2-65. The list of MEE pretreatment unit and MEE Units is given in Table 2-66.
Table 2-65: List of MEE Pretreatment Units for treatment of High COD and High TDS Stream
S.
No.
Treatment Unit
Volumetric
Capacity
6 m3
Remarks
-
95
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S.
No.
Treatment Unit
50 m3 x 2
2 KL
1,000 m3 / Hr. x 2
Nash-Hyter type
Centrifugal pump
5 m3 / Hr. x 2
Flash mixer
2.5 m3
Flash mixer
4.5 m3
Capacity
Remarks
Primary Settler
7.5 m3
Bag filter
2 m2
S.
No.
Treatment Unit
10 KL
Centrifugal pump
5 m3 / Hr. x 2
1 KL
Capacity
Remarks
5 KL
500 Dia. x 5,000
Ht.
750 m / Hr. x 2
100 KL
Centrifugal pump
5 m3 / Hr. x 2
4 m3 / Hr.
10
Thin-Film Dryer
200 Kg / Hr.
Stream C:
This comprises of the distillate from MEE-TFD, blow-down streams from the boilers, DM Plant and
cooling tower and the domestic waste stream from the STP (totaling to 93 KL).
Stream C is continuously run into the Bio-degradation unit (Activated sludge process) under good
mixing by aeration.
The treated stream then goes into a secondary settler from where the settled sludge is partially
recycled back into the bio degradation tank to maintain its MLSS content and the rest is sent to the
sludge drying Bed.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
96
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The clear supernatant liquid is sent to a dual media filter. The filtrate (~88 KL) is then sent to the RO
plant. The permeate water from the RO plant (72 KL) is recycled to partially meet the fresh-water
requirement of the plant. The rejects stream from RO Plant (16 KL) is sent back into the MEE.
The list of secondary biological and tertiary treatment units is given in Table 2-67.
S.
No.
Treatment Unit
Secondary settler
10 m3
Centrifugal pump
5 m / Hr. x 2
1,000 m3 / Hr. x 2
Nash-Hyter type
16 m3
5 m3
Capacity
150 m3
100 m
100 KL / Day
Remarks
-
Block diagram of Proposed ETP (Effluent Treatment System) is shown in Figure 2-52.
Action Plan for Zero Liquid Discharge
The wastewater generated from the entire unit will be treated in ETP followed by RO & MEE as
described above and the treated water will be completely recycled and reused in plant premises
resulting Zero Liquid Discharge. Also the overall water demand of fresh water will be reduced by water
conservation plan like condensate recovery from the boiler.
97
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
98
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
2.19
2.19.1
Identification of Waste
The hazardous waste generated from the project will be of two types: process waste and non-process
waste.
Process Waste
Out of total 48 products, only 10 products will generate incinerable waste.
Maximum production capacity per annum on product selection/requirement basis is 3,500 MT out of a
maximum limit of 24,100 MT of all products putting together. Working days are assumed to be 300.
Hence, hazardous waste generation MTD can be calculated as below:
y = (x*3500) / (24,100*300)
Product wise quantity of waste generated is given in Table 2-68 & Table 2-69.
Name of product
Amt of waste
(y) in MTD
Pretilachlor (H)
0.09
27.5
0.013
Cyproconazole (F)
0.125
25
0.012
52.5
0.025
TOTAL
Type of waste
Distillation residue
* as per the mass balance shown in Section 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 & 2.10.
Name of product
Amt of waste
(y) in MTD
2,4 Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid (H)
0.087
87
0.044
0.044
22
0.011
Fipronil (I)
1.165
235
0.113
Buprofezin (I)
0.16
80
0.039
Bifenthrin (I)
0.5
100
0.048
Deltamethrin (I)
1.1
110
0.053
Tricyclazole (F)
0.214
214
0.104
Chlorothalonil (F)
0.324
162
0.078
1,010
0.490
TOTAL
Type of waste
Filtration residue
(Chemical sludge)
* as per the mass balance shown in Section 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 & 2.10.
Non-process Waste
Non-process waste generated from project and their quantity generated is given in Table 2-70.
99
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Processes
Type of Waste
Operation of DG Sets,
Boilers, Pumps etc.
Used/Spent Oil
1 KL/Annum
0.5 MT/Annum
Use of Solvents
Spent Solvents
1.5 KL/Annum
1.5 MT/Annum
10 MT/Annum
0.15 MT/Annum
Discarded containers/barrels/liners
0.1 MT/Annum
912 MT/Annum
1.5 MT/Annum
Spent Catalyst
27.3 MT/Annum
Spent Carbon
3 MT/Annum
0.05 KL/Annum
Production of Pesticides
Disposal of barrels
containers during handling
on HW.
Total Quantity
Type of Waste
Constituents
Inorganic Waste
Plastic Waste
E-waste
Biomedical Waste
Debris
2.19.2
Based on the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008,
as amended till date, categorization, storage and disposal of both process and non-process wastes are
provided in Table 2-72. In-principal approval for receiving landfilling / incineration waste by
Saurastra Enviro Projects Pvt. Ltd., Kutch Facility is received and attached as Annexure 5.
Hazardous Waste
Category
Total Quantity
Means of storage
Disposal Method
Used/spent oil
5.1
1 KL/Annum
Drums
Sold to authorized
Recyclers
100
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
S. No
Hazardous Waste
Category
Total Quantity
Means of storage
Disposal Method
Wastes/residues
containing oil
5.2
0.5 MT/Annum
Barrels
Incineration
Spent solvents
20.2
1.5 KL/Annum
Drums
Solvent Recovery
Units / To
authorized Reprocessor
Distillation residue
20.3
52.5 MT/Annum
Barrels
Incineration
Process waste/residues
29.1
1,010
MT/Annum
Barrels
Incineration
Chemical sludge
containing residue
pesticide
29.2
0.15 MT/Annum
Barrels
Incineration
29.3
10 MT/Annum
Incineration
Chemical containing
residue arising from
decontamination
33.1
1.5 MT/Annum
Drums
TSDF
Discarded
containers/barrels/liners
contaminated with
hazardous waste
33.3
7,500 Nos. of
Bags/ Drums /
Annum
As it is
To authorized
vendor
10
34.1
0.1 MT/Annum
HDPE Bags
TSDF
11
34.3
912 MT/Annum
HDPE Bags
TSDF
12
35.1
1.5 MT/Annum
HDPE Bags
TSDF
13
Spent Catalyst
35.2
27.3 MT/Annum
HDPE Bags
TSDF/ Recycler
14
Spent Carbon
35.3
3 MT/Annum
HDPE Bags
Incineration
15
36.3
0.05 KL/Annum
Barrels
Authorized Dealers
16
Distillation residues
from contaminated
organic solvents
36.4
2.5 MT/Annum
Drums
Incineration
17
Inorganic acids
D2
As it is
Barrels
Authorized vendors
2.19.3
Storage Area
101
2.19.4
2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Treatment of Waste
Transportation of Waste
The transport of the hazardous wastes will be in accordance with the provisions of The Hazardous
Waste (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as amended till date
and the rules made by the Central Government under the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988
Manifest system will be followed in accordance with Form 13 of Hazardous Waste (Management,
Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as amended till date.
TREM card will be provided to the transport drivers as per Form 11 of Hazardous Waste
(Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as amended till date.
2.19.6
PPEs like hand gloves, organic mask, gum boots/safety shoes, dust mask/ nose mask will be provided
to workers and drivers involved in handling and transportation of hazardous waste.
2.20
Description of operation control incorporated into the project to meet environmental standards,
environmental operating conditions at design stage are tabulated in Table 2-73.
2.21
No recommendation of Assessment of New and Untested Technology was given during appraisal
stage, hence it is not carried out.
World-wide tested technology for manufacturing of technical grade of pesticides shall be used.
102
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Name of Plant
Air
Water
Hazardous Waste
Parameters
Energy
Scrubber
--
--
Waste Water
--
--
Hazardous Waste
--
--
Herbicides
Insecticides
Safety
Interlocks, gas detection systems, alarm system, solvent recovery system, sprinkler system, control valves and fire
hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.
Energy
HBr
Scrubber
--
--
NH3
Scrubber
--
--
Waste Water
--
--
Hazardous Waste
--
--
Safety
Fungicides
Interlocks, gas detection systems, alarm system, solvent recovery system, sprinkler system, control valves and fire
hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.
NOx
Scrubber
--
--
HCl
Scrubber
--
--
HBr
Scrubber
--
--
Waste Water
--
--
Hazardous Waste
--
--
103
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Name of Plant
Safety
Plant Growth
Regulator
Operation of
Utilities i.e.
Boilers, Thermic
Fluid Heaters,
Chillers etc.
Air
Water
Hazardous Waste
Parameters
Interlocks, gas detection systems, alarm system, solvent recovery system, sprinkler system, control valves and fire
hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.
EDC Recovery
--
--
Recovery system
Waste Water
--
--
Safety
Control valves and fire hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.
PM
--
--
SO2
--
--
NOx
--
--
Waste Water
--
--
Hazardous Waste
--
--
104
3.1
STUDY AREA
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
The study area is considered within 10 km radius of the project site at Plot No. D-2/CH/357, Dahej II
Industrial Estate, situated in Vagra Taluka of Bharuch district, Gujarat State. Study area map of
proposed project is shown in Map 3-1.
3.2
PERIOD
Baseline monitoring study and surveys of the study area has been carried out in summer season from
1st March, 2015 to 31st May, 2015.
3.3
COMPONENTS
The baseline environmental data of valued environmental components with respect to air, noise,
water, land, flora, fauna, socio-economic and soil quality in the study area was collected by conducting
primary data collection which includes sampling/field studies, survey & secondary data collection as
mandated by the ToR issued by EAC.
3.4
METHODOLOGY
The guidelines given in the EIA Manual of the MoEFCC and methodologies mentioned in Technical EIA
Guidelines Manual for Pesticides Industries and Pesticide Specific Intermediates by IL&FS Ecosmart
Ltd., approved by MoEFCC is followed for conducting the baseline environmental survey.
Field monitoring for meteorological conditions, ambient air quality, water quality, noise quality, Soil
quality etc. has been carried out, which constitutes major portion of the baseline environmental
studies. In addition to these important parameters, certain aspects like land use, socio-economic
studies, Ecological and Biodiversity studies etc. are covered during the study period.
This information is based on secondary information sources and constitutes remaining part of the
baseline environmental studies. Sampling location map within the study area is shown in Map 3-2.
The entire data has been collected through actual physical surveys and observations, literature
surveys, interaction with locals, government agencies and departments.
3.4.1
Survey
105
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Map 3-1: Study Area Map showing Villages, Surface Water Bodies & Forests
106
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
107
3.4.2
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Socio-Economic profile;
Sensitive area as biosphere reserve, forests, sanctuaries, places of historical, archeological,
tourists importance, etc. if any.
3.5
3.5.1
The climate of the study area is based on information from the most recent published long-term
climatological tables (1961 1976) by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), for Broach (Station
ID: 42841).
The observatory was situated in the compound of the District Local Board Office. The place was in a
low lying area with tall trees all around. The Narmada flows nearby. Wind instruments were on the
topmost terrace of the office building. At present observatory situated at K.G. Polytechnic, Bharuch.
A copy of the long-term climatological data is enclosed as Annexure 6. These tables give useful
information about a regions weather, since they are collected over a 15-year period.
Temperature
The highest temperature (mean) & daily maximum temperature (mean) recorded are 47.8C (in the
month of May) & 39.9C (in the month of April) respectively. The highest temperature recorded was
47.8C on 20th May, 1955.
January is generally the coldest month, with daily minimum (mean) temperature of 11.3C. The lowest
temperature recorded was 4.0C on 22nd January, 1962.
During summer season, i.e. March May, day temperatures remain between 18.6 39.9C.
Humidity
Most humid conditions are found in the monsoons, followed by summer, post-monsoons, and winter in
that order. Mornings are more humid than evenings and relative humidity ranges from a high of 8190% in monsoon mornings to a low of 34-44% in winter evenings.
During summer season, in morning relative humidity remains between 65 74 % and in the evening it
remains between 29 39 %.
Rainfall
The distribution of rainfall in the region, which includes the study area, is regular. Annual total rainfall
in the region is 912.1 mm.
1
2
Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Long Term Climatological Tables, 1969 -1990, Broach (Bharuch) District.
108
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Distribution of rainfall by season is 860.7 mm in monsoons (June, July, August, September), 38.7 mm
in post-monsoons (October November), 2.8 mm in winter (December, January, February) and 9.9
mm in summer (March, April, May). About 94.4 percent of the annual rainfall in the region is received
during the monsoon months i.e. June to September. July is the rainiest month.
Maximum rainfall in any one month was recorded in the month of September in year 1954 which was
about 790.1 mm. July is having maximum number of rainy days i.e. 13.5.
Cloud Cover
The area remains cloudy between Junes - September, which is the active period of the monsoon
season. Generally cloud cover ranges from 1.5 to 6.7 OKTAS during this monsoon season.
In the summer season, cloud cover ranges from 0.2 to 1.9 OKTAS.
Wind
Long term wind direction data is presented in Table 3-1. Overall for the whole year, first predominant
wind directions are from SW Direction (45 %), second predominant wind direction is from NE (23 %)
and third predominant wind direction is from NW Direction (13 %).
During the summer period, first predominant wind direction is from SW direction (44.5 %), second
predominant wind direction is from NW Direction (20.0 %) and third predominant wind direction is
from SE Direction (15.5 %).
During post monsoon & winter season, first predominant wind direction is from SW & NE direction
respectively.
First
Second
Morning
Evening
Third
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
January
NE
NE
SW
SW
SE
NW
February
NE
NE
NW
SW
SW
NW
March
SW
SW
NE
NW
SE
NE
April
SW
SW
NW
NW
SE
NE
May
SW
SW
NW
NW
SW
SE
June
SW
SW
SW
NW
W/NW
SE
July
SW
SW
SE
S/NW
August
SW
SW
NW
S/NW
SW/W
September
SW
SW
NW
NW
October
SW
SW
NE
NE
SE
SE
November
NE
NE
SW
SW
SE
SE
December
NE
NE
SE
SE/SW
SW
NW
109
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Max
Min
Rainfall
(mm)
Monthly
Total
January
31.2
11.3
1.2
0.2
71
38
February
33.5
14
1.4
0.1
64
34
March
37.7
18.6
0.2
65
29
April
39.9
23.1
0.5
0.1
66
31
May
39.6
25.8
9.2
0.4
74
39
June
35.7
26.3
108.5
4.9
81
58
July
32.1
25.3
290.4
13.5
89
74
August
31.4
24.9
279.1
12.7
90
79
September
32.5
24.4
182.7
7.8
87
68
October
35.9
21.9
16.8
0.8
76
46
November
34.7
16.7
21.9
0.7
73
42
December
31.5
12.6
0.2
74
44
Total
--
--
912.1
41.2
--
--
Average
34.6
20.4
--
--
76
49
Month
Mean Daily
Temperature
No. of
Rainy
days
Relative
Humidity (%),
(Morning)
Relative
Humidity (%),
(Evening)
110
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Sampling
Parameters
Wind Speed
Sampling
equipment
Sensitivity/
Detection
Limit
Anemometer
cup counter
Total
Sampling
Period
Sampling
Frequency
Methodology
0.25 m/s
(0 to 65 m/s)
2
Wind Direction
Temperature
Humidity
Wind vane
(0 to 357)
Thermometer
(-40 to 60)
Relative
Humidity meter
As per
manufacturers
manual
1
0.1C
Summer 2015
Hourly
3%
(0-99%)
5
Rainfall
Rain gauge
0.5 mm
Cloud Cover
--
--
Visual Inspection
by the observer.
4 Hourly
Temp C
Relative
Humidity
%
Average /
Predominant
33.7
37.9
Wind
Speed
(m/sec)
Wind
Direction
Cloud
Cover,
Octas
Rainfall,
mm
4.6
SW
0.4
0.0
Table 3-5: Mean Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village Summer Season, 2015
Time
Temp C
Relative
Humidity
%
Wind
Speed
(m/sec)
Wind
Direction
Cloud
Cover,
Octas
Rainfall,
mm
0:00
31.5
45.4
5.3
SW
0.4
0.0
1:00
31.1
46.1
4.9
SW
0.4
0.0
2:00
30.4
47.1
4.4
SSW
0.4
0.0
3:00
29.7
48.2
4.0
SSW
0.5
0.0
4:00
29.3
49.9
3.7
SSW
0.5
0.0
5:00
28.7
51.4
3.4
SSW
0.5
0.0
6:00
28.3
53.0
3.3
SSW
0.6
0.0
7:00
30.1
48.8
3.4
SSW
0.6
0.0
8:00
31.1
45.7
3.6
SSW
0.6
0.0
9:00
31.8
43.5
3.7
SW
0.5
0.0
10:00
33.8
37.0
3.8
SW
0.4
0.0
111
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Time
Temp C
Relative
Humidity
%
Wind
Speed
(m/sec)
Wind
Direction
Cloud
Cover,
Octas
Rainfall,
mm
11:00
35.1
31.3
3.9
SW
0.4
0.0
12:00
36.3
26.8
4.0
0.4
0.0
13:00
37.6
24.5
4.3
0.3
0.0
14:00
38.4
22.7
4.5
0.3
0.0
15:00
38.9
20.3
4.6
0.3
0.0
16:00
38.5
21.7
5.1
0.3
0.0
17:00
37.9
23.4
5.5
0.3
0.0
18:00
37.6
24.5
5.9
WSW
0.3
0.0
19:00
36.6
31.1
6.0
WSW
0.3
0.0
20:00
35.6
37.1
6.2
WSW
0.3
0.0
21:00
34.6
42.1
6.2
SW
0.4
0.0
22:00
33.9
43.2
5.9
SW
0.4
0.0
23:00
32.7
44.2
5.6
SW
0.4
0.0
Average wind speed was 4.2 m/sec and mostly the morning hours are windier. Maximum wind
speed recorded was 12.2 m/sec on 24th May, 2015 at 1800 Hrs.
Wind blows predominantly from SW to NE direction (17.5 %). Calm wind contributes to about
1.90 % of all winds. Windrose diagram is shown as Figure 3-1.
Average temperature recorded was 33.7C with maximum temperature recorded as 44.2C at
1500 Hrs. (16th May, 2015) and minimum of 20.0C at 0600 Hrs. (1st March, 2015).
Average relative humidity was 37.9 % with maximum humidity recorded as 81.0 % at 0600 Hrs.
(27th March, 2015) and minimum of 8.9 % at 1600 Hrs. (20th March, 2015).
112
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
113
3.5.2
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Land Use
Downloading of remote sensing data using the licensed software, Google Earth Pro having high
resolution (<1.0 m) imagery.
Topographical maps as base map.
Reconnaissance survey of the study area to get a general feel of the entire ground area which can
aid in the preliminary interpretation of the data.
Table 3-6 & Photograph 3-2 enumerates the land features in the study area and its corresponding
GPS readings of all the ground truthing locations verified.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
114
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Table 3-6: GPS Reading Enumerating the Land Use Features in Study Area
S. No.
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Classes
214354.1N
723657.3E
Dahej
Scrub land
214356.9N
723830.2E
Dahej
Prosopis cover
214256.7N
723651.7E
Dahej
Industrial Area
214332.2N
723708.5E
Dahej
Scrub land
214255.9N
723919.7E
Jolwa
Village
214327.5N
723942.8E
Jolwa
Scrub land
2143'16"N
72427.89E
Atali
Prosopis cover
2141'47.67"N
7239'41.63"E
Suva
213444.7N
724650.5E
Ambheta
Water Body
10
214048.6N
723539.3 E
Ambheta
Mudflat
11
214507.6E
723840.9E
Wav
Water body
12
2145 55.6 N
723843.5E
Kadodara
Village
13
2147 09.5 N
723617.7E
Padariya
Grassland
14
2142'14.90"N
7246'50.50"E
Kaladara
Prosopis cover
15
2145'32.80"N
7243'53.40"E
Nadida
Habitation
16
2144'21.90"N
7245'07.40"E
Khojbal
Agriculture land
Photograph 3-2: Photographs Showing Different Type of Land Use in Study Area
115
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Table 3-7: Area Statistic for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area
Area, Secondary Class
S.
No.
Primary
Classification
Secondary
Classification
km
Ha.
~%
Built-up Land
or Habitation
Residential / Commercial
3.52
352
1.11
Industrial
11.24
1124
3.54
113.15
11,315
35.66
20.06
2006
6.32
Mudflat
19.12
1,912
6.03
Reservoir / Lakes /
Ponds / Tanks
3.65
365
1.15
River
45.12
4,512
14.22
Scrub
56.86
5,686
17.92
Open Vegetation
20.12
2,012
6.34
Close Vegetation
2.31
231
0.73
Marshy Vegetation
5.51
551
1.74
Salt Pans
16.63
1,663
Grass Cover
0.01
Agricultural
Land
Wastelands
Water Bodies
Vegetation
Cover
Others
Ha.
~%
14.76
1476
4.65
113.15
11,315
35.66
39.18
3,918
12.35
48.77
4,877
15.37
84.8
8,480
26.73
5.24
16.63
1,663
5.24
0.003
0.01
0.003
317.73
31,773
100
Total
Note: Road, Railways, Canals are not calculated separately in area statistics
Following were observed and noted during the study:
The most observed category in the region was Agriculture land followed by Vegetation cover,
Water bodies and Wastelands, as per area covered.
Crop cultivated in the study area are mostly cotton (Gossypium herbaceum), and in some area
Castor (Ricinus communis) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum).
The irrigation is essentially through rain water and in some area through bore wells and canals.
Open vegetation region includes Prosopis juliflora dominated vegetation cover. Vegetation in the
beyt area was mostly marshy species.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
116
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Features
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
None Identified
Mangroves
Mountains / Hills
None Identified
10
None Identified
11
Defense Installation
None Identified
Jolwa Pond
~ 1.29
Rahiyad Pond
~ 2.65
Vav Pond
~ 3.50
Suva Pond
~ 4.90
Atali Pond
~ 4.07
Koliyad Pond
~ 4.48
Akhod Pond
~ 5.05
117
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
118
3.5.3
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Ambient Air
Ambient Quality Monitoring was conducted at Six (6) different locations within the study area.
The study area covers a 5 Km radius from the project site for carrying out Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring (AAQM).
Sampling Frequency
The frequency of monitoring was 24 hours twice a week at each station spread over the entire season.
Grab sampling for gaseous parameters like HCl, Cl2, HBr, VOC, HC (Methane and Nonmethane) & CO
taken atleast thrice a month.
Methodology Adopted for AAQM Parameters
The parameters monitored were PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), HCl, Cl2,
HB2, VOC, HC (Methane and Nonmethane) & CO. Other parameter as unless specified in ToR, i.e. NH3
was also analyzed as source for the same is envisaged from the project. Grab samples of CO were
taken and analyzed. The detailed monitoring methodology for ambient air is given in Table 3-10.
Sampling equipment /
Solution used
Analytical
Equipment
Sensitivity/
Detection Limit
Methodology
PM10
Electronic
balance
10 g/m3
PM2.5
Electronic
Balance
2 g/m3
Gravimetric
SO2
Spectro
photometer
3.7 g/m3
Colorimetric IS:
5182: (Part II) 2001
Spectro
photometer
6 g/m3
Colorimetric IS:
5182: (Part VI) 2006
NOX
Cl2
Colorimetric
1.0 g/m3
HCl
Titrimetric
Method
0.2 g/m3
Argentometric
Method
NH3
Spectro
photometer
10 g/m3
Indophenol Blue
method
HBr
Spectro
photometer
1.0 g/m3
APHA: 4500 Br B_
22nd Edition,
Colorimetric Method
HC (Methane
& Non
Methane)
GC
1 ppm
GC
1 ppm
IS 5182 (Part 2)
CO analyzer/
GC
1,145 g/m3
Sensor/ GC method
VOC
CO
119
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Location &
Address
Distance from
Project Site in Km
Direction w. r. t
Project Site
AA01
At Project Site
AA02
Vadadla
Industrial
0.00
Base Station
Core station
Residential
~ 3.0
WNW
1st Crosswind
AA03
Jolwa
Residential
~ 1.2
SW
Source
Justification for
selection of station
Upwind
nd
AA04
Rahiyad X
Residential
~ 2.43
SSE
AA05
Atali
Residential
~ 4.0
ESE
2nd Downwind
Crosswind
AA06
Gelanda
Residential
~ 1.61
NNE
1st Downwind
1
3
As per Guidelines for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring by CPCB, MoEF Published as SERIES: NAAQMS/ /2003-04, April,
2013
120
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
AAQM Results
Detailed result of AAQM are given in Annexure 9. Complied average data are represented in Table
3-12.
The comparison of the results with the value range indicators provided by CPCB (Annexure 8) and
Factories Act indicates:
Average concentration of PM10 recorded ranged from minimum 38 g/m3 (At Atali Village) to
maximum 116 g/m3 (At Rahiyad Chokadi);
Average concentration of PM2.5 recorded raged from minimum 18 g/m3 (At Atali) to maximum 62
g/m3 (At Atali Village);
It is noted that the PM10 & PM2.5 results exceeds the permissible limits of 100 g/m3 & 60 g/m3
respectively for 24 Hrs. at Vadadla, Jolwa & Rahiyad Chokadi which could be due to:
Industrial & infrastructure development activities in study area (PCPIR & residential projects);
Villages near coastal regional, influence of windy atmosphere;
Vehicular movement on the kaccha roads of the villages;
Rural activities like burning of cow dung for household purposes like using it in chullas.
The concentration of SO2 (8.0 17.5 g/m3), NOx (10.0 35.7 g/m3), Cl2 ( < 1.0 12.8 g/m3),
HCl (< 20.0 5.6 g/m3), HC Methane (1,063 2,310 g/m3), NMHC Non-Methane (< 10 - 195
g/m3), CO (< 1,145 2,168 g/m3) are within permissible limits as prescribed by CPCB &
Factories act;
The concentration of NH3, HBr & VOC were below detectable limit.
121
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Station code
AA1
AA2
AA3
AA4
AA5
AA6
Note: All units are in g/m3. Figures in brackets indicate CPCB limits. Minimum Reportable Readings are 8 g/m3 for SO2, 10 g/m3 for NOX, 1.0 g/m3 for Cl2, 1.0 g/m3 for HCl, 20.0
g/m3 for NH3, 1.0 g/m3 for HBr, 1.0 PPM for VOC, 800 g/m3 for HC, 10 g/m3 for NMHC & 1,145 g/m3 for CO.
PM10
PM2.5
SO2
NOX
100
60
80
80
Cl2
HCl
NS
NS
NH3
HBr
VOC
HC
NMHC's
NS
NS
NS
NS
400
[24 Hours]
CO
4,000
[24 Hours]
[24 Hours]
[24 Hours]
[24 Hours]
[1 Hour]
Maximum
89
38
17.5
27.0
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,556
157
1,146
Minimum
40
21
8.0
10.5
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,063
< 10
< 1145
Average
67
31
12.1
20.6
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,393
101
< 1145
98%tile
88
38
17.0
26.6
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,554
157
< 1145
Maximum
102
56
17.0
32.1
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
2,033
177
1,839
Minimum
51
19
8.0
11.5
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,263
< 10
< 1145
Average
80
37
9.5
20.7
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,561
89
1,547
98%tile
99
56
15.6
30.9
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,965
171
1,829
Maximum
105
53
10.4
35.7
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,831
144
1,607
Minimum
63
21
8.0
12.0
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,246
< 10
< 1145
Average
82
34
8.3
22.4
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,512
89
1,361
98%tile
102
51
10.0
34.5
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,791
142
1,597
Maximum
116
57
10.1
27.8
12.8
5.6
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,745
182
2,148
Minimum
56
21
8.0
10.0
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,297
< 10
< 1145
Average
84
37
8.1
18.8
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,479
89
1,777
98%tile
115
56
9.6
26.8
12.5
5.5
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,730
173
2,135
Maximum
99
62
10.1
32.9
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,781
170
1,771
Minimum
38
18
8.0
10.0
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,153
< 10
< 1145
Average
74
38
8.2
17.4
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,497
80
1,342
98%tile
98
61
9.9
31.4
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,758
163
1,753
Maximum
98
58
11.8
25.6
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
2,310
195
2,168
Minimum
51
23
8.0
11.8
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,161
< 10
< 1145
Average
77
38
8.6
20.4
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
1,493
97
1,766
98%tile
98
56
11.4
25.2
<1
<1
< 20
< 1.0
< 1 ppm
2,177
187
2,160
At Project Site
At Vadadla Village
At Jolwa Village
At Rahiyad Chokadi
At Atali Village
At Gelanda Village
122
3.5.4
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Traffic Survey
Traffic Survey was carried out on SH 6 in S direction of the proposed site, road connecting site to
Dahej & Bharuch on 14th July. The road width of this road is 15 meters, which is a 3 Lane (One Way)
Arterial Road4.
Peak hours are considered from 08:00 12:00 Noon and 16:00 20:00 Hours. Average peak hourly
traffic on this route i.e. from Bharuch to Dahej and from Dahej to Bharuch is 531 and 570 PCU
respectively as tabulated in Table 4-8 & Table 4-9.
Traffic Survey sheets are given in Annexure 12.
3.5.5
The objective of monitoring background noise level in study area is to establish baseline noise level to
identify impact due to proposed activity.
Methodology for Noise Level Analysis
Monitoring of noise is done by identifying suitable monitoring locations. Background noise quality is
monitored at the selected locations, in dB (A) Leq (d) and dB (A) Leq (n).
Monitoring methodology for noise monitoring is given in Table 3-13.
Ambient
Noise
Sample collection
Sampling
Location
Sampling
Frequency
Methodology
7
Locations
Sound Level
Measurement
(SLM)
Sampling
Equipment
Detection
Limit
Noise Level
Meter
0.1 dB (A)
Sampling
Parameter
Decibels
dB (A)
Following methodology is followed to conduct baseline monitoring, impact assessment and to propose
suitable mitigation measures:
Site visit (for existing plant) and identification of sources of noise and vibrations;
Determining possible impacts of Noise & Vibrations on the environment from proposed activities;
Identifying monitoring locations and conducting Noise monitoring;
Prediction of incremental noise levels by using SoundPlan software;
Checking whether the increase of SPL in the locations surrounding the project makes conflicts
with stipulated allowable norms;
Suggestions of mitigation measures of Noise/Vibrations and to reduce noise/vibrations of sources
exceeding the allowable limits of SPL.
The standard for monitoring ambient noise level as per CPCB guidelines is as given in Table 3-14.
1
As per The Indian Road Congress - Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:106-1990), Table-2,
Recommended Design Service Volumes, page 11.
4
123
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Table 3-14: Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones
Ambient Air Quality Standards
in Respect of NOISE
Area
Code
Category
Night Time
Industrial
75.0
70.0
Commercial
65.0
55.0
Residential
55.0
45.0
Silence
50.0
45.0
dB (A) Leq*: denotes the time weighted average of the level of sound in decibels on scale A
which is relatable to human hearing.
Location
Date of
monitoring
Category of
Area / Zone
Distance from
Project Site in Km
Direction w.r.t.
Project Site
NL1
At Project Site
25.05.15
Industrial
NL2
26.05.15
Industrial
0.100
NL3
25.05.15
Industrial
0.100
NL4
27.05.15
Industrial
0.250
NL5
On Highway - GIDC
Road
26.05.15
Industrial
0.500
NL6
Jolwa Village
28.05.15
Residential
1.2
SW
NL7
Gelanda Village
29.05.15
Residential
1.5
NE
At Project Site
124
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
At Jolwa Village
Location
Date
Category
NL1
At Project Site
25.05.15
NL2
NL3
dB (A)
Average Noise
levels in dB (A)
Day
Time
Night
Time
Day
Time
Night
Time
Industrial
75.0
70.0
57.7
52.7
26.05.15
Industrial
75.0
70.0
59.4
55.0
25.05.15
Industrial
75.0
70.0
64.2
57.0
NL4
27.05.15
Industrial
75.0
70.0
63.0
53.8
NL5
26.05.15
Industrial
75.0
70.0
64.6
58.0
NL6
Jolwa Village
28.05.15
Residential
55.0
45.0
57.7
51.7
NL7
Gelanda Village
29.05.15
Residential
55.0
45.0
56.5
50.7
Observations:
Based on the noise monitoring results, it is observed that:
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
125
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Noise level during day time & night time, in Industrial area, were within the CPCB standards i.e.
Industrial area (75 dBA (d) & 70 dBA (n)).
Noise level during day & night time, in Residential area, were slightly higher than the CPCB
standards which is due to vehicular movements in nearby highways.
Vibration
Vibration is a mechanical phenomenon whereby oscillations occur about an equilibrium point. The
oscillations may be periodic such as the motion of a pendulum or random such as the movement of a
tire on a gravel road.
Major sources of vibration are blasting due to mining activities, vibration caused by motions
of engines, electric motors, or any mechanical device in operation theses are typically unwanted. Such
vibrations can be caused by imbalances in the rotating parts, uneven friction, the meshing
of gear teeth, etc. such vibrations can be reduced by proper designing.
In the study area there are no major sources of vibrations.
3.5.6
The objective of monitoring surface and ground water in study area is to establish baseline water
quality to identify impact due to proposed activity.
Source of Water
Drinking water is supplied by tankers or pipe lines in most of the villages at vicinity of GIDC and SEZ
area. Owing to geological conditions, groundwater is salty and only used for general purpose.
Methodology Adopted for Surface and Ground Water Sampling
Surface water was collected from Eight (8) locations, including Two (2) river water (estuary) samples
and Ground water from Six (6) locations. The samples were collected as grab samples, from each
location, once during the study period and the analysis methodology is given in Table 3-17.
Table 3-17: Analysis Methodology for Analyzing Surface & Ground Water Samples
Parameters Analyzed in
Surface
Water
River
(Estuary)
Water
Ground
Water
Minimum
Detection
Limit
Color
Temperature
Turbidity
4 NTU
TDS
20 mg/l
Electrical
conductivity
1mho/cm
COD
<5 mg/l
BOD
<3 mg/l
S.
No.
Parameters
Analysis Methodology
pH
1 Pt-Co
1 Deg C
126
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Parameters Analyzed in
S.
No.
Parameters
Analysis Methodology
Surface
Water
River
(Estuary)
Water
Ground
Water
Minimum
Detection
Limit
Chlorides
APHA:4500Cl- B *, Titrimetric
1.5 mg/l
10
Phenol
0.001 mg/l
11
Sulphates
< 1 mg/l
12
Total Hardness
< 10 mg/l
13
Ca++ Hardness
< 4 mg/l
14
Mg++ Hardness
APHA: 3500-B-Mg *, By
difference
8 mg/l
15
Total Alkalinity
<10 mg/l
16
Nitrate
IS:3025 (part-34),3.3 ,
colorimetric
<0.1 mg/l
17
Fluoride
APHA:4500 F-D*,Colorimetric
<0.1 mg/l
18
Sodium
<1 mg/l
19
Potassium
<1 mg/l
20
Calcium
1 mg/l
21
Magnesium
3 mg/l
22
Salinity
23
Total Nitrogen
0.06 mg/l
24
Total
Phosphorous
<1 mg/l
25
Dissolved
Oxygen
0.5 mg/l
26
Ammonical
Nitrogen
<0.01 mg/l
27
SAR
28
Heavy Metals
<0.002
mg/l
<0.003
mg/l
<0.003
mg/l
Chromium (as
Cr)
APHA: 3500-Cr-B *,
colorimetric
127
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Parameters Analyzed in
Ground
Water
Minimum
Detection
Limit
<0.05 mg/l
0.003 mg/l
APHA: 3500-Fe-B *,
colorimetric
<0.1 mg/l
<0.01 mg/l
<0.001
mg/l
Manganese (as
Mn)
<0.04 mg/l
<0.02 mg/l
<0.08 mg/
Boron (as B)
Total Coliform
30
Fecal Coliform
31
Free Ammonia
32
Floating Matters
APHA: 2530 - B *
33
Suspended Solids
2 mg/L
34
1.5 mg/L
35
Sludge Deposits,
Solid refuse
floating Solids,
Oil Grease and
Scum
APHA: 2710 - C *
S.
No.
Parameters
Analysis Methodology
29
Surface
Water
River
(Estuary)
Water
<0.02 mg/l
1.8
MPN/100m
l
1.8
MPN/100m
l
-
128
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Table 3-18: Surface Water Sampling Locations Ponds and River (Estuary)
Code
Location
Source
Date of
Sampling
Distance from
Site (in Km)
Direction
w.r.t Site
SW 1
Jolwa
Pond
06.05.2015
1.4
SW
SW 2
Vadadla
Pond
06.05. 2015
3.0
WNW
SW 3
Vav
Pond
06.05. 2015
3.5
NNW
SW 4
Gelanda
Pond
06.05. 2015
1.7
NNE
SW 5
Atali
Pond
06.05. 2015
4.3
SW 6
Rahiyad
Pond
06.05. 2015
2.6
SSE
SW 7
Narmada River
(U/s) Nr. Vegni
SW 8
Narmada River
(D/s) Nr.
Ambeta
Estuary
Estuary
06.05. 2015
06.05. 2015
7.3
8.2
Sampling Rational
SE
SW
Atali Pond
Vav Pond
Vadadla Pond
Jolwa Pond
129
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Parameters
Unit
SW1
SW2
SW3
SW4
SW5
SW6
Jolva
Vadadla
Vav
Gelanda
Atali
Rahiyad
pH
pH Scale
6.5 to 8.5
6.5 to 8.5
6.0 to 9.0
6.5 to 8.5
6.5 to 8.5
7.16
7.35
6.69
7.33
7.37
7.25
Dissolved Oxygen
mg/l
NA
4.3
4.5
4.3
4.1
4.6
mg/l
500
NA
1,500
NA
2,100
1,740
864
412
624
552
1,068
Electrical Conductivity
mohs/ cm
NA
NA
NA
1,000
2,250
2,658
1,335
658
1,276
874
1,735
BOD
mg/l
NA
NA
13
20
13
14
Colour
Pt.co
10
300
300
20
15
10
20
35
25
Total Hardness
mg/l
300
NA
NA
NA
NA
240
200
220
330
210
260
Ca++ Hardness
mg/l
200
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
78
128
60
76
74
Mg++ Hardness
mg/l
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
152
122
92
270
134
186
10
Copper
mg/l
1.5
NA
1.5
NA
NA
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
11
Iron
mg/l
0.3
NA
50
NA
NA
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
12
Manganese
mg/l
0.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
13
Chlorides(as Cl)
mg/l
250
NA
600
NA
600
699
303
93
211
178
396
14
Sulphate
mg/l
400
NA
400
NA
1000
50
81
34
36
13
115
15
mg/l
20
NA
50
NA
NA
12.4
8.9
13.35
18.2
20.4
5.36
16
Fluoride
mg/l
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.81
0.76
0.78
1.32
0.77
0.36
17
Phenolic Compound
mg/l
0.002
0.005
0.005
NA
NA
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
18
Free Ammonia
mg/l
NA
NA
NA
1.2
NA
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
19
Mercury
mg/l
0.001
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
20
Cadmium
mg/l
0.01
NA
0.01
NA
NA
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
21
Arsenic
mg/l
0.05
NA
0.2
NA
NA
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
22
Cyanide
mg/l
0.05
0.05
0.05
NA
NA
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
23
Lead
mg/l
0.1
NA
0.1
NA
NA
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
24
Zinc
mg/l
15
NA
15
NA
NA
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
25
Chromium
mg/l
0.05
0.05
NA
NA
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
26
Boron
mg/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.91
0.82
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
27
mg/gm
NA
NA
NA
NA
26
8.97
5.8
1.75
3.21
2.24
5.31
28
Total Coliform
MPN/100ml
50
500
5,000
2,200
1,400
1,300
2,100
1,700
2,100
Class
Intended Use
1
5
130
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Parameters
Unit
SW7
SW8
SW-I
SW-II
SW-III
SW-IV
SW-V
pH
6.5 to 8.5
6.5 to 8.5
6.5 to 8.5
6.0 to 9.0
6.0 to 9.0
7.45
7.69
Dissolved Oxygen
mg/l
4.3
4.1
No Colour
No Colour
No Colour
No Colour
No Colour
No Colour
No Colour
No Odour
No Odour
No Odour
No Odour
No Odour
No Odour
No Odour
Colour
Odour
Floating Matters
mg/l
None
None
None
10
None
None
Suspended Solids
mg/l
34
30
Turbidity
NTU
30
30
2.8
2.5
BOD
mg/l
mg/l
0.1
<0.4
<0.4
mg/l
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
10
mg/l
0.001
<0.01
<0.01
11
mg/l
0.01
<0.001
<0.001
12
mg/l
0.5
<0.1
<0.1
13
mg/l
0.5
<0.04
<0.04
14
Faecal Coliform
ml (MPN)
100/100
500/100
500/100
500/100
330
310
15
None
None
Classification of Coastal/Marine Water for designated best uses is described in below table:
S. No.
Class
SW-I
Salt
SW-II
SW-III
SW-IV
Harbor
SW-V
As per classification of inland surface water standards, analysis results for all surface water of all ponds could be considered under Class C except for BOD values which range from 5 mg/l to 20 mg/l. This is due to anthropogenic sources such
as washing, bathing etc.
As per classification for coastal water marine (CPCB), analysis results of Narmada estuary (upstream and downstream) could be considered under Class SW-III.
131
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Location
Source
Date of
Sampling
Distance from
Site (in Km)
Direction
w.r.t Site
GW 1
Jolwa
Borewell
06.05.2015
1.5
SW
GW 2
Vadadla
Borewell
06.05.2015
3.0
WNW
GW 3
Vav
Borewell
06.05.2015
3.4
NNW
GW 4
Gelanda
Borewell
06.05.2015
2.1
NNE
GW 5
Atali
Borewell
06.05.2015
4.1
GW 6
Rahiyad
Borewell
06.05.2015
3.0
SSE
Sampling Rational
At Jolwa Village
At Vadadla Village
At Vav Village
At Gelanda Village
132
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT
Parameters
Unit
GW1
GW2
GW3
GW4
GW 5
GW 6
Acceptable limit
Jolwa
Vadadla
Vav
Gelanda
Atali
Rahiyad
pH
pH scale
6.5 - 8.5
7.45
7.7
7.45
7.5
7.55
7.67
Temperature
29
29
29
29
29
29
Turbidity
NTU
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
TDS
mg/lit
500
264
656
812
384
1,168
1,028
Electrical conductivity
mho/cm
373
1214
1324
710
2200
1812
COD
mg/lit
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
BOD
mg/lit
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
Phenol
mg/lit
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Chlorides
mg/lit
250
39
169
256
67
333
362
10
Sulphates
mg/lit
200
20
183
115
182
123
11
Total Hardness
mg/lit
200
180
180
220
340
350
480
12
Ca++ Hardness
mg/lit
86
26
64
72
136
108
13
Mg++ Hardness
mg/lit
94
154
156
268
155
170
14
Total Alkalinity
mg/lit
200
130
180
130
140
150
180
15
Nitrate
mg/lit
45
19.8
3.5
23.8
23.8
73.9
58
16
Fluoride
mg/lit
1.72
0.93
1.33
0.41
0.7
0.79
17
Sodium
mg/lit
18
75
165
15.4
214
235
18
Potassium
mg/lit
23.5
10
15.6
23.6
16.5
10
19
Calcium
mg/lit
75
34.4
10.4
128.2
28.8
54.5
43.3
20
Magnesium
mg/lit
30
22.8
37.4
37.9
65.1
52
90.4
21
Salinity
mg/lit
70
304
460
122
599
651
22
Total Nitrogen
mg/lit
4.42
0.79
4.7
4.42
17.45
13.96
23
Total Phosphorous
mg/lit
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
133
S.
No.
Parameters
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Unit
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT
GW1
GW2
GW3
GW4
GW 5
GW 6
Acceptable limit
Jolwa
Vadadla
Vav
Gelanda
Atali
Rahiyad
24
Dissolved Oxygen
mg/lit
3.6
3.2
3.5
3.4
3.2
25
Ammonical Nitrogen
mg/lit
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
26
SAR
0.58
2.4
3.28
0.36
3.6
3.36
mg/l
0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
mg/l
0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
mg/l
0.05
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
mg/l
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
mg/l
0.05
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
mg/l
0.3
0.15
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
mg/l
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
mg/l
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
mg/l
0.1
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
mg/l
0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
mg/l
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
28
Total Coliform
MPN/100ml
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
29
Faecal Coliforms
MPN/100ml
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
27
Heavy Metals
a
134
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
TDS at Vadadla (956 mg/l), Vav (812 mg/l), Atali (1,168 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (1,028 mg/l);
Chlorides at Vav (256 mg/l), Atali (333 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (362 mg/l);
Total Hardness at Vav (220 mg/l), Gelanda (340 mg/l), Atali (350 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (480
mg/l);
Nitrate at Atali (73.9 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (58 mg/l);
Fluoride at Jolwa (1.72 mg/l) & Vav villages (1.33 mg/l);
Calcium at Vav village (128.2 mg/l);
Magnesium at Vadadla (37.4 mg/l), Vav (37.9 mg/l), Gelanda (65.1 mg/l), Atali (52 mg/l) &
Rahiyad Villages (90.4 mg/l).
The observed higher concentration of TDS & Chloride is due to saline geological formations. Higher
concentration of Total Hardness, Nitrate, Fluoride, Calcium and Magnesium is due to near proximity of
sea (Gulf of Khambhat).
The main source of water is Narmada canal as bore wells are not feasible in the GIDC.
3.5.7
Geology
This section describes environmental setting covering baseline conditions with respect to geology.
Methodology
The methodology adopted for the study of baseline environment started with desk study followed by
secondary data collection.
Secondary data like recent Google imageries, District Resource Map, information published by GSI
studies were used to collect basic information on Geology, Hydrogeology, aquifers, identification of
Topography and Structural features of site and surrounding area.
A field visit was conducted to study site specific geological and hydrogeological conditions includes
lithology, drainage patterns, water bodies, ground water condition and any possible impact to the
environmental setting due to project.
Topography and Geomorphology
Topographically, the entire area is more or less flat with gentle dipping toward west to southwest i.e.
toward Gulf. Geomorphologically, coastal area is covered by tidal and mud flats. Drainages have
acquired a pattern of deltaic condition.
Regional Geology
A concise description of Geology is given by Geological Survey of India, as summarized in Table 3-23.
Lithology
Geological Age
Younger alluvium
Holocene
Older Alluvium
Pleistocene
135
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Formation
Lithology
Geological Age
Jhagadia Formation
Agate conglomerate
Kand Formation
Lower Miocene
Babaguru Formation
Tarakeshwar Formation
Nummulite Formation
Vadadkhol Formation
Lower Eocene
Deccan Volcanics
Bagh Beds
Upper Cretaceous To
Eocene
Middle to Upper Cretaceous
1
6
Source: www.gujarat.earthquake.gov.in
136
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Soil
The project area falls under South Gujarat Agro-climatic Zone II and Agro-ecological region-21. The
soils are predominantly of trap origin deep black soils (63%), however coastal black (14%) and loam
soils (23%) are also present. Taxonomically these soils are classified as Vertisols. The soils at the
GIDC site are also clayey having very high water holding capacity and porosity, but permeability is
very low. The soil depth is > 100 cm and soil slope is 1-3 %. As the area is in the proximity of sea,
waters and soils are likely to be saline/alkaline. The crops of the surrounding areas are paddy, cotton
and sugarcane and in winter sorghum and wal are grown. The cropping intensity of the area is 117%.
Soil Sampling Locations
Soil samples were collected from Six (6) different locations within the study area as shown in Table
3-24, Map 3-2 & Photograph 3-7. Analysis results of collected samples are given in Table 3-26.
Location
Date of
Sampling
Source
Distance from
Project Site in Km
Direction w.r.t
Project Site
ST1
Jolwa
06.05.2015
Residential
2.2
SSW
ST2
Vav
06.05.2015
Residential
2.3
SE
ST3
Vadadla
06.05.2015
Residential
1.6
ESE
ST4
Gelanda
06.05.2015
Residential
1.72
NE
ST5
Atali
06.05.2015
Residential
2.24
WSW
ST6
Rahiyad
06.05.2015
Industrial
--
--
Justification
To check surface
soil quality within
study area.
137
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Sample
Collection
Analytical
Equipment
Methodology
Remarks
Porosity
Manual
sample
collection
using hammer
Keen Apparatus
HMSO, UK
Water holding
capacity
Permeability
138
Sampling
Parameters
Sample
Collection
Analytical
Equipment
Methodology
Moisture content
and container
tube for
collecting
undisturbed
top soil.
Electronic Balance
Glass wares
Centrifuge
SAR
Calculation
pH
pH Meter
4500 H+B
Electrical
Conductivity
Conductivity Meter
Calcium
Glass wares
3500 Ca B
Magnesium
Glass Wares
3500 Mg B
Sodium (Na)
F.Photometer
3500 Na B
Potassium
F.Photometer
3500 K B
Texture
Particle size
Distribution
Cation Exchange
Capacity
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Remarks
5% Leachate to be
made and analyzed
as per APHA,
Standard
Methods.
All method numbers
are as per APHA
Standard Methods
(21st edition, 2005)
Parameter
Unit
ST1
ST2
ST3
ST4
ST5
ST6
Jolwa
Vav
Vadadla
Gelanda
Atali
Rahiyad
Porosity
56
56
59
60
61
60
Water Holding
Capacity
55.2
61.3
62.3
52.4
60.8
57.4
Permeability
mm/hr.
7.4
9.4
10.7
2.2
2.5
1.3
Sand
36
27
23
25
28
26
Silt
35
41
41
63
60
53
Clay
29
32
36
12
12
21
Texture
Clay
Loam
Clay
Loam
Clay
Loam
Silty Loam
Silty
Loam
Silty
Loam
Cation Exchange
Capacity
meq/100
gm
36
42
47
40
34
42
Electrical
Conductivity
mhos/
cm
285
140
294
808
265
281
SAR
1.32
1.06
1.73
3.08
0.31
0.32
Exchangeable
Sodium
0.69
0.31
1.28
3.17
< 0.1
< 0.1
10
pH
8.1
7.9
8.4
7.9
7.7
7.6
11
Calcium
gm/kg
0.46
0.85
0.32
0.52
0.43
0.72
12
Magnesium
gm/kg
0.25
0.21
0.29
0.41
0.42
0.39
13
Sodium
gm/kg
0.64
0.60
0.80
1.74
0.17
0.19
14
Potassium
gm/kg
0.10
0.12
0.10
0.16
0.36
0.16
139
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
The porosity ranged from 56 to 61% and WHC varied from 52.40 to 62.30 %;
The soil permeability was low to medium ranged from 2.24 to 10.7 mm/hr, however soil texture in
all the soil samples was silty clay- clay loam, hence whatever variation observed was mainly due
to variation in organic matter content of soils;
The EC of soil ranged from 140 to 808 mhos/cm, while ESP varied from <0.01 to 3.17. As EC has
exceeded 808 mhos/cm soil of Gelanda village is saline, while ESP was <5.0 in all soil samples;
The pH of soil ranged from 7.6 to 8.4, which indicates that soils are neutral to slightly alkaline;
Among water soluble cations predominance of sodium was seen followed by Ca, Mg and K.
The overall soil quality indicates that soils are normal as the area is located in GIDC and not under
cultivation since long and whatever salts were there are washed off or leached down due to rain water
over the years.
3.5.9
This section represents existing biodiversity status of the project site and its surrounding environ of
the study area (buffer zone). Project site and surrounding 10 km. radius were considered as a core
zone & environ for study.
Methodology Adopted for Ecology & Biodiversity Study
located at Taluka: Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat Appended With Marine Environmental Impact
Assessment & Mitigation Measures For CRA Area (August 2010), Prepared By Ramans Consultancy
Services Pvt. Ltd.
2. Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Integrated Common Hazardous Waste Facility With
Common Incinerator Facility (10 Million Kcal/hour) prepared by Mahabal Enviro Engineer Pvt Ltd..
3. EIA, EMP & DMP for Industrial Plant at GIDC Dahej (M/s. SRF Limited), Bharuch District Gujarat
(2008), prepared by Kadam Environmental Consultants.
4. EIA / EMP and RA / DMP Report for Proposed Surfactants Manufacturing Facility (M/s. Galaxy
Surfactants Limited) at Dahej SEZ-II (June 2014), prepared by Kadam Environmental Consultants.
140
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
while forest area is entirely invade by an invasive species Prosopis juliflora. So, secondary data from
various EIA reports have been extracted and verified through ground surveys.
Aquatic Ecology
Secondary data have been used to understand status of the marine environment of project study area.
Flora
Core Zone / Project site
Project site was reported with six common species of flora / plants; taxonomic account is shown in the
Table 3-27 & Photograph 3-8.
Table 3-27: Floral species reported from the proposed project site / Core Zone
S. No.
Habit
Species Name
Local Name
Family
Shrub
Alhagi maurorum
Javaso, Javas
Fabaceae
Shrub
Prosopis juliflora
Gando Baval
Mimosaceae
Shrub
Calotropis procera
Akado,Aak
Asclepiadaceae
Herb
Cressa cretia
Bukan, Un Bakano
Convolvulaceae
Grass
Cynodon dactylon
Poaceae
Photograph 3-8: Photographs Showing Project Site / Core Zone having Flora / plants
Buffer Zone
Buffer zone has been reported 155 floral species, which includes 53 species of trees (25 families), 30
species of Shrubs (21 families), 50 species of herbs (27 families), 8 species of grasses (one family)
and 14 species of climbers (6 families). Taxonomic account for all life forms is tabulated in Table
3-28.
Table 3-28: Flora Reported from Buffer Zone of the Study Area
S. No.
Family
Botanical Name
Common Name
Trees
1
i.
Fabaceae
Acacia auriculiformis
Austrianbaval
ii.
Fabaceae
Acacia leucophloea
Hermobaval
141
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Family
Botanical Name
Common Name
iii.
Fabaceae
Acacia nilotica
Baval
iv.
Fabaceae
Acacia Senegal
Goradiobaval
v.
Bombacucae
Adonsonia digitata
Rukhdo Choramli
vi.
Simaroubaceae
Ailanthus excelsa
Aurdso
vii.
Fabaceae
Albizia lebbeck
Siris
viii.
Fabaceae
Albizia procera
Kalo siris
ix.
Avicenniaceae
Avecinnia marina
Sundari
10
x.
Avicenniaceae
Avicennia alba
Patcheradi
11
xi.
Meliaceae
Azadirachta indica
Limbado
12
xii.
Balanitaceae
Balanites aegptica
Ingorio
13
xiii.
Caricaceae
Carica papaya
Papaya
14
xiv.
Caesalpiniaceae
Cassia fistula
Garmalo
15
xv.
Caesalpiniaceae
Cassia siamea
Kasid
16
xvi.
Casuarinaceae
Casuarina equisetifolia
Sharu
17
xvii.
Arecaceae
Cocos nucifera
Narial
18
xviii.
Caesalpiniaceae
Delonix elata
Sandsro
19
xix.
Caesalpiniaceae
Delonix regia
Gulmohar
20
xx.
Papilionaceae
Erythrina variegata
Pagario
21
xxi.
Myrtaceae
Eucalyptus
Nilgiri
22
xxii.
Moraceae
Ficus benghalensis
Vad
23
xxiii.
Moraceae
Ficus racemosa
Umaro
24
xxiv.
Moraceae
Ficus religiosa
Piplo
25
xxv.
Verbenaceae
Gmelina arborea
Sevan
26
xxvi.
Fabaceae
Leucaena leucocephala
Subaval
27
xxvii.
Anacardiaceae
Mangifera indica
Keri
28
xxviii.
Sapotaceae
Manilkara hexandra
Rayan
29
xxix.
Sapotaceae
Manilkara zapota
Chikoo
30
xxx.
Meliaceae
Melia azadirachta
Bakan Neem
31
xxxi.
Bignoniaceae
Millingtonia hortensis
Desi Buch
32
xxxii.
Moringaceae
Moringa oleifera
Sargavo
33
xxxiii.
Fabaceae
Parkinsonia aculeata
Rambaval
34
xxxiv.
Caesalpiniaceae
Peltophorum pterocarpum
35
xxxv.
Arecaceae
Phoenix sylvestris
Kajuri
36
xxxvi.
Fabaceae
Pithecellobium dulce
Gorasmli
37
xxxvii.
Apocynacea
Plumeria rubra
Chambo
38
xxxviii.
Annonaceae
Polylathia longifolia
Asopalav
39
xxxix.
Papilionaceae
Pongamia pinnata
Karanj
40
xl.
Fabaceae
Prosopis cineraria
Khijado
41
xli.
Fabaceae
Prosopis juliflora
Gando baval
42
xlii.
Euphorbiaceae
Ricinus communis
Castor, Arundo
142
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Family
Botanical Name
Common Name
43
xliii.
Salvadoraceae
Salvadora oleoides
Mithi Jar
44
xliv.
Salvadoraceae
Salvadora persica
Pilva, Piludi
45
xlv.
Caesalpiniaceae
Sesbania sesban
Shesri
46
xlvi.
Myrtaceae
Syzygium cumini
Jambu
47
xlvii.
Caesalpiniaceae
Tamarindus indica
Amli
48
xlviii.
Verbenaceae
Tectona grandis
Sag
49
xlix.
Combretaceae
Terminalia catappa
Badam
50
l.
Malvaceae
Thespesia populnea
Paras piplo
51
li.
Verbenaceae
Vitex negundo
Nagod
52
lii.
Rhamnaceae
Zizyphus glabrata
Bor
53
liii.
Rhamnaceae
Zizyphus mauritiana
Chani Bor
Shrubs
54
i.
Acanthaceae
Hygrophila auriculata
Akhro
55
ii.
Apocynaceae
Nerium indicum
Lalkaren
56
iii.
Apocynaceae
Thevetia peruviana
Pili karan
57
iv.
Asclepediaceae
Calotropis gigantea
Safed Ankdo
58
v.
Asclepediaceae
Calotropis procera
Ankdo
59
vi.
Balanitaceae
Balanites aegyptiaca
Ingorio
60
vii.
Bignoniaceae
Tecoma stans
Peilafol
61
viii.
Cactaceae
Opuntia elatior
Fafdo Thor
62
ix.
Caesalpiniaceae
Cassia auriculata
Tarwar, Awala
63
x.
Capparidaceae
Capparis decidua
Kerdo, Ker
64
xi.
Compositae
Xanthium strumarium
Gokhru
65
xii.
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea fistulosa
66
xiii.
Euphorbiaceae
Euphorbia neriifolia
Thor
67
xiv.
Euphorbiaceae
Jatropha curcas
Ratanjot
68
xv.
Euphorbiaceae
Jatropha gossypifolia
Pardesi Devalo
69
xvi.
Euphorbiaceae
Ricinus communis
Devalo
70
xvii.
Alhagi maurorum
Javaso, Javas
Fabaceae
71.
xviii.
Lythraceae
Lawsonia inermis
Mendhi
72.
xix.
Malvaceae
Abelomoschus manihot
Jagali bhindi
73.
xx.
Malvaceae
Abutilon indicum
Khapat, Kanski
74.
xxi.
Malvaceae
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
Jasund
75.
xxii.
Mimosaceae
Prosopis juliflora
Gando baval
76.
xxiii.
Musaceae
Musa paradisiaca
Kela
77.
xxiv.
Nyctaginaceae
Bougainvillea spectabilis
Bougainvel
78.
xxv.
Papilionaceae
Sesbania sesban
Shevari
79.
xxvi.
Rhamnaceae
Zizyphus nummularia
Chanibor, Bor
80.
xxvii.
Solanaceae
Datura metel
Daturo
81.
xxviii.
Solanaceae
Solanum incanum
Ubhi ringan
143
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Family
Botanical Name
Common Name
82.
xxix.
Verbenaceae
Clerodendrum inerme
Madhi
83.
xxx.
Verbenaceae
Lantana camara
Ganthai
Herbs
84.
i.
Amaranthaceae
Achyranthes aspera
Anthedi
85.
ii.
Amaranthaceae
Aerva javanica
86.
iii.
Liliaceae
Aloe barbadensis
Kunvarpato
87.
iv.
Amaranthaceae
Alternanthera sessilis
88.
v.
Amaranthaceae
Amaranthus viridis
89.
vi.
Lythraceae
Ammannia baccifera
Jal Agiyo
90.
vii.
Apiaceae
Anethum graveolens
Suva
91.
viii.
Papaveraceae
Argemone mexicana
Darudi
92.
ix.
Scrophulariaceae
Bacopa monnieri
Brahmi
93.
x.
Asteraceae
Blumea lacera
94.
xi.
Nyctaginaceae
Boerhavia diffusa
Satodi
95.
xii.
Caesalpiniaceae
Cassia tora
Kuvandio
96.
xiii.
Amaranthaceae
Celosia argentea
Lampdi
97.
xiv.
Capparidaceae
Cleome gynandra
98.
xv.
Tilaceae
Corchorus aestuans
99.
xvi.
Papilionaceae
Cortalaria medicaginea
Ran methi
100.
xvii.
Convolvulaceae
Cressa cretica
Khariyu
101.
xviii.
Cyperaceae
Cyperus bulbosus
Kal
102.
xix.
Cyperaceae
Cyperus difformis
--
103.
xx.
Cyperaceae
Cyperus rotundus
Bara-nagar-motha, Korehi-jhar
104.
xxi.
Cyperaceae
Cyperus stoloniferus
--
105.
xxii.
Solanaceae
Datura innoxia
Dhatura
106.
xxiii.
Asteraceae
Echinops echinatus
Shulio, Utkanto
107.
xxiv.
Asteraceae
Ecipta alba
Bhangro
108.
xxv.
Asteraceae
Eclipta prostrata
Bhangro
109.
xxvi.
Pontederiaceae
Eichhornia crassipes
Kanphutti
110.
xxvii.
Boraginaceae
Heliotropium indicum
Hathisundhi
111.
xxviii.
Acanthaceae
Hygrophila auriculata
Kanta shelio
112.
xxix.
Papilionaceae
Indigofera oblongifolia
Zil
113.
xxx.
Asteraceae
Launaea procumbens
--
114.
xxxi.
Molluginaceae
Mollugo pentaphylla
--
115.
xxxii.
Nymphaeaceae
Nymphaea pubescens
Kamal
116.
xxxiii.
Nymphaeaceae
Nymphaea stellata
Kamal
117.
xxxiv.
Lamiaceae ( Labiatae)
Ocimum basilicum
damaro
118.
xxxv.
Lamiaceae ( Labiatae)
Ocimum sanctum
Tuli
119.
xxxvi.
Asteraceae
Pentanema indicum
Sonasali
120.
xxxvii.
Poaceae (Gramineae)
Phragmites karaka
--
144
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Family
Botanical Name
Common Name
121.
xxxviii.
Asteraceae
Pulicaria wightiana
Sonela
122.
xxxix.
Malvaceae
Sida cordifolia
Bala
123.
xl.
Solanaceae
Solanum surattense
Bhoringini
124.
xli.
Asteraceae
Spheranthus indicus
Gorakh mundi
125.
xlii.
Chenopodiaceae
Suaeda nudiflora
Moras
126.
xliii.
Chenopodiaceae
Sueda fruticosa
--
127.
xliv.
Aziaceae
Trianthema monogyna
Satodo
128.
xlv.
Zygophyllaceae
Tribulus terrestris
Gokhru
129.
xlvi.
Boraginaceae
Trichodesma indicum
Undha fuli
130.
xlvii.
Asteraceae
Tricholepis amplexicaulis
--
131.
xlviii.
Asteraceae
Tridax procumbens
Pardesi bhangro
132.
xlix.
Typhaceae
Typha angustata
Gha-Bajariyu
133.
l.
Asteraceae
Vernonia cineraria
Sahdevi
Grasses
134.
i.
Poaceae (Gramineae)
Aleuropus lagopoides
khariyu gah
135.
ii.
Poaceae
Apluda mutica
Phophal
136.
iii.
Poaceae
Aristida sps.
Lapdu
137.
iv.
Poaceae
Cenchrus biflorus
Dhaman
138.
v.
Poaceae
Chloris barbata
Bidelpuchh
139.
vi.
Poaceae (Gramineae)
Cynodon dactylon
140.
vii.
Poaceae
Dactylotenium indicum
Tarakiyu
141.
viii.
Poaceae
Heteropogon contortus
Kagadiu
Climbers
142.
i.
Asclepediaceae
Pergularia daemia
Chamar dudheli
143.
ii.
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea pes-caprae
Dariani vel
144.
iii.
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea pes-tigridis
wagpadi
145.
iv.
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea aquatica
Nali ni Bhaji
146.
v.
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea nil
Kaladana
147.
vi.
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea obscura
Vad fudardi
148.
vii.
Convolvulaceae
Merremia emarginata
Undarkani
149.
viii.
Cucurbataceae
Trichosanthes cucumerina
Jungli parval
150.
ix.
Cucurbataceae
Citrulus colocynthis
Indravarna
151.
x.
Cucurbataceae
Coccinia grandis
Ghiloda
152.
xi.
Cucurbataceae
Luffa cylindrica
Galku
153.
xii.
Cuscutaceae
Cuscuta chinensis
Amarval
154.
xiii.
Menispermaceae
Cocculus hirsutus
Vevdi
155.
xiv.
Vitaceae
Vitis trifolia
Khachatumbo
145
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Fauna
Herpetofauna
Core Zone / Project Site
No herpetofauna reported from the project site.
Buffer Zone
Overall 8 herpetofaunal species have been reported from the buffer zone as shown in Table 3-29 &
Photograph 3-9.
Table 3-29: Herpetofauna Reported from Buffer Zone
S. No.
Family
Common Name
Scientific Name
Agamidae
Calotes versicolor
--
Colubridae
Ptyas mucosus
Schedule-IV
Varanidae
Varanus bengalensis
Schedule-I, Lc
Gekkonidae
Hemidactylus flaviviridis
--
Agamidae
Fan-Throated Lizard
Sitana ponticeriana
Lc
Elapidae
Spectacled cobra
Naja naja
Schedule-II
Viperidae
Russells Viper
Daboia russelii
Schedule-II, Lc
Elapidae
Bungarus caeruleus
Schedule-IV, LRnt
146
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Avifauna
Core Zone
Only 4 common species of birds were reported from the project site (flying across site) as tabulated in
Table 3-30. Bird activity was very poor in adjacent area.
Family
Scientific Name
IWPA-1972 Schedule
Ardeidae
Cattle Egret
Bubulcus ibis
Schedule-IV, Lc
Sylviidae
Common Babbler
Turdoides caudatus
Schedule-IV, Lc
Corvidae
House Crow
Corvus splendens
Schedule-IV, Lc
Pycnonotidae
Red-vented Bulbul
Pycnonotus cafer
Schedule-IV, Lc
Buffer Zone
Overall 48 species of birds from 24 families have been reported from the buffer zone area as shown in
Table 3-31 & Photograph 3-10.
IWPA-1972
Schedule
Asian Koel
Eudynamys scolopacea
Schedule-IV, Lc
Bank Myna
Acridotheres ginginianus
Schedule-IV, Lc
Black Drongo
Dicrurus macrocercus
Schedule-IV, Lc
Accipitridae
Black-winged Kite
Elanus caeruleus
Schedule-IV, Lc
Charadriidae
Black-winged Stilt
Himantopus himantopus
Schedule-IV, Lc
Meropidae
Blue-cheeked Bee-eater
Merops persicus
Schedule-IV, Lc
Ardeidae
Cattle Egret
Bubulcus ibis
Schedule-IV, Lc
Meropidae
Chestnut-headed Bee-eater
Meropsles chenaulti
Schedule-IV, Lc
S. No.
Family
Cuculidae
Sturnidae
Corvidae
Sylviidae
Common Babbler
Turdoides caudatus
Schedule-IV, Lc
10
Sturnidae
Common Myna
Acridotheres tristis
Schedule-IV, Lc
11
Corvidae
Common Raven
Corvus corax
Schedule-IV, Lc
12
Apodidae
Common Swift
Apus apus
Schedule-IV, Lc
13
Sylviidae
Common Tailorbird
Orthotomus sutorius
Schedule-IV, Lc
14
Nectariniidae
Crimson-backed Sunbird
Nectarinia minima
Schedule-IV, Lc
15
Cuculidae
Drongo Cuckoo
Surniculus lugubris
Schedule-IV, Lc
16
Columbidae
Eurasian Collared-Dove
Streptope liadecaocto
Schedule-IV, Lc
17
Corvidae
Eurasian Golden-Oriole
Oriolus oriolus
Schedule-IV, Lc
18
Paridae
Great Tit
Parus major
Schedule-IV, Lc
19
Centropodidae
Greater Coucal
Centropus sinensis
Schedule-IV, Lc
20
Phasianidae
Grey Francolin
Francolinus pondicerianus
Schedule-IV, Lc
21
Corvidae
House Crow
Corvus splendens
Schedule-IV, Lc
22
Passeridae
House Sparrow
Passer domesticus
Schedule-IV, Lc
23
Phasianidae
Indian Peafowl
Pavo cristatus
Schedule-I, Lc
24
Ardeidae
Indian Pond-Heron
Ardeo lagrayii
Schedule-IV, Lc
147
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
S. No.
Family
Scientific Name
IWPA-1972
Schedule
25
Muscicapidae
Indian Robin
Saxicoloides fulicata
Schedule-IV, Lc
26
Ardeidae
Intermediate Egret
Mesophoyx intermedia
Schedule-IV, Lc
27
Sylviidae
Jungle Babbler
Turdoides striatus
Schedule-IV, Lc
28
Corvidae
Large Cuckoo-shrike
Coracina macei
Schedule-IV, Lc
29
Ardeidae
Little Egret
Egretta garzetta
Schedule-IV, Lc
30
Apodidae
Little Swift
Apus affinis
Schedule-IV, Lc
31
Laniidae
Long-tailed Shrike
Lanius schach
Schedule-IV, Lc
32
Laniidae
Northern Shrike
Lanius excubitor
Schedule-IV, Lc
33
Columbidae
Oriental Turtle-Dove
Streptope liaorientalis
Schedule-IV, Lc
34
Ciconiidae
Painted Stork
Mycteria leucocephala
NT
35
Muscicapidae
Pied Bushchat
Saxicola caprata
Schedule-IV, Lc
36
Nectariniidae
Purple Sunbird
Nectarinia asiatica
Schedule-IV, Lc
37
Threskiornithidae
Red-naped Ibis
Pseudibis papillosa
Schedule-IV, Lc
38
Pycnonotidae
Red-vented Bulbul
Pycnonotus cafer
Schedule-IV, Lc
39
Charadriidae
Red-wattled Lapwing
Vanellus indicus
Schedule-IV, Lc
40
Pycnonotidae
Red-whiskered Bulbul
Pycnonotus jocosus
Schedule-IV, Lc
41
Columbidae
Rock Pigeon
Columba livia
Schedule-IV, Lc
42
Psittacidae
Rose-ringed Parakeet
Psittacula krameri
Schedule-IV, Lc
43
Corvidae
RufousTreepie
Dendrocitta vagabunda
Schedule-IV, Lc
44
Accipitridae
Shikra
Accipiter badius
Schedule-I, Lc
45
Columbidae
Spotted Dove
Streptope liachinensis
Schedule-IV, Lc
46
Strigidae
Spotted Owlet
Athene brama
Schedule-IV, Lc
47
Rallidae
Amaurornis phoenicurus
Schedule-IV, Lc
48
Dacelonidae
White-throated Kingfisher
Halcyon smyrnensis
Schedule-IV, Lc
148
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Mammals
Core Zone
No direct or indirect evidences of mammals were reported from the site.
Buffer Zone
Totally 9 species from six families have been enlisted from buffer zone of the project area as shown in
Table 3-32 & Photograph 3-11.
Family
Common Name
Scientific name
Cercopithecidae
Common Langur
Semnopithecus entellus
Schedule-II, Lc
Canidae
Indian Fox
Vulpes bengalensis
Schedule-II, Lc
Felidae
Jungle cat
Felis chaus
Schedule-II, Lc
Herpestidae
Common Mongoose
Herpestes edwardsii
Schedule-IV, Lc
Leporids
Indian Hare
Lepus nigricollis
Schedule-IV, Lc
Muridae
Mus booduga
Schedule-V, Lc
Muridae
Black rat
Rattus Rattus
Schedule-V, Lc
Sciuridae
Funambulus pennantii
Schedule-IV, Lc
Sciuridae
Nilgai
Boselaphus tragocamelus
Schedule-III, Lc
Butterflies
Totally 6 species of butterflies from three families have been enlisted from buffer zone as tabulated in
Table 3-33.
Family
Common name
Nymphalidae
Stripped Tiger
Schedule-IV
Nymphalidae
Hypolimanas misippus
Schedule-IV
Nymphalidae
Mycalesis perseus
Schedule-IV
Papilionidae
Papilio polytes
Common Mormon
Schedule-IV
149
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
S. No.
Family
Common name
Pieridae
Eurema hecabe
Schedule-IV
Pieridae
Ixias marianne
Schedule-IV
Major Crops: Major crops in the study area are Tuver (Cajanus indica), Wheat (Triticum
aestivum) and Cotton (Gossypium herbaceum).
Minor crops: The minor crops of this region are Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides), Jowar (Sorghum
bicolar) and Divel (Ricinus communis)
Vegetables: The vegetables grown in the study area are, Rigan (Solanum melongena), Tomato
(Lycopersicon lycopersicum) and Val, Valpapadi (Lablab purpureus).
Major horticultural crops: Horticulture activity is very less. Keri (Mangifera indica), Chikoo
(Manilkara zapota), Papaya (Carica papaya) and Banana (Musa Paradisiaca).
Aquatic Ecosystem
Status of fishery, phytoplankton & zooplanktons of the study area buffer zone is discussed further.
Genera
Village Names
Cladophora
Coelastrum
Suwa, Jolwa
Desmium
Jolwa
Gonatozygon
Melosira
Suwa, Jolwa
Microspora
Kadodara, Vadala
150
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
S. No.
Genera
Village Names
Nitschia
Pediastrum
Suwa
Penium
Suwa
10
Phormidium
11
Protococcus
Kadodara, Vadala
12
Richterella
Jolwa
13
Scenedesmus
14
Spirulina
Jolwa, Vadala
15
Synedra
Suwa, Jolwa
16
Zygnema
Genera
Village Names
Bosmina
Suwa
Branchionus
Canthocampus
Ceriodaphnia
Suwa, Jolwa
Cyclops
Daphnia
Diaphanosoma
Suwa
Diaptomus
Eubranchionus
Jolwa, Vadala
10
Leptodora
11
Limnocalamus
12
Macrothrix
Suwa
13
Monas
Suwa
14
Nauplius
15
Polyphemus
Suwa
16
Sida
Vadala
1
7Venkataraman, K., Chattopadhyay, A. and Subramanian, K.A. (Editors). 2013. Endemic Animals of India (Vertebrates):1235+26 Plates. (Published by the Director, Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata)
151
3.5.10
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Socio-Economics
The main objectives of the socio economic need assessment study was:
To provide an accurate representation of the social, cultural and economic conditions of the
population surrounding the project site;
To identify the potential socio-economic positive and negative impacts during the construction,
operations and decommissioning phase of the proposed project;
To develop sustainable mitigation measures to enhance positive impacts and reduce or avoid
negative impacts;
To develop proper monitoring and evaluation system with accountability to be implemented;
To identify the CSR benefits for the target population.
Population Distribution
The project study area consists of a section of the population whose land has been acquired for SEZ
through GIDC. Due to decrease of agricultural activity in recent past people work as daily wage and
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
152
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
contractual labors to carve out their livelihood. Fishermen community exists in the study area villages
who live on a daily earn basis.
Secondary data for demographic status in core zone (upto 3 Km from project site) and in buffer zone
(beyond 3 Km upto 10 Km from the project site) is tabulated in Table 3-36.
Village
Total Household
(2011)
Total Population
(2011)
Male
Female
Numbers
Numbers
Core Zone
1
Jolva
338
1,442
807
55.96
635
44.04
Galenda
120
611
314
51.39
297
48.61
Rahid
355
1,694
862
50.89
832
49.11
Vadadla
201
822
419
50.97
403
49.03
1,014
4,569
2,402
52.57
2,167
47.43
Sub- Total
Buffer Zone
1
Samantpor
79
367
182
49.59
185
50.41
Sambheti
82
416
226
54.33
190
45.67
Vav
155
727
378
51.99
349
48.01
Atali
239
1,150
612
53.22
538
46.78
Koliad
152
676
321
47.49
355
52.51
Suva
413
1,920
973
50.68
947
49.32
Akhod
174
831
435
52.35
396
47.65
Janiadra
150
729
361
49.52
368
50.48
Kadodara
420
1,995
1,018
51.03
977
48.97
10
Padariya
131
647
340
52.55
307
47.45
11
Vengani
202
908
462
50.88
446
49.12
12
Narnavi
151
692
349
50.43
343
49.57
13
Nadarkha
92
447
220
49.22
227
50.78
14
Paniadara
514
2,563
1,360
53.06
1,203
46.94
15
Dahej
3,426
13,495
8,345
61.84
5,150
38.16
16
Ambheta
347
1,552
807
52
745
48
17
Jageshwar
383
1,571
818
52.07
753
47.93
18
Nandida
160
719
383
53.27
336
46.73
19
Khojbal
287
1,513
782
51.69
731
48.31
20
Bhensali
228
1,123
582
51.83
541
48.17
21
Kaladara
393
1,663
934
56.16
729
43.84
Sub- Total
8,178
35,704
19,888
55.7
15,816
44.3
Grand Total
9,192
40,273
22,290
55.35
17,983
44.65
153
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
extinct level. The study area consists of Dahej and other nearby villages, which shows heavy increase
in the population from last decade. This is due to fast industrialization of the surrounding areas.
The main community prevailing in the core zone includes both majorly Muslims and Hindus (Koli Patel,
Brahmans, Valand, Solanki, Harijan, Rathore, Waghri, Jogi and Prajapati).
Table 3-37 reveals that male ratio have increased while female ratio has decreased in comparison to
2001, in the core zone. The same is with the buffer zone too. It is presumed that the villagers have
started to migrate to urban areas because of better availability of basic amenities in the Bharuch city.
The working class or business class use to settle at the village level.
Table 3-37: Comparison of Sex Ratio of the Study Area from Previous Census Data
S.
No.
Village
2001
2011
Males
Ratio
Female
Ratio
Males
Ratio
Female
Ratio
55.96
Jolva
436
53.56
378
46.44
807
635
44.04
Galenda
254
49.51
259
50.49
314
51.39
297
48.61
Rahid
692
52.62
623
47.38
862
50.89
832
49.11
Vadadla
305
50.33
301
49.67
419
50.97
403
49.03
1,687
51.94
1,561
48.1
2,402
52.6
2,167
47.43
Core
Zone
Sub- Total
1
Samantpor
172
51.81
160
48.19
182
49.59
185
50.41
Sambheti
205
52.43
186
47.57
226
54.33
190
45.67
Vav
355
52.51
321
47.49
378
51.99
349
48.01
Atali
612
53.45
533
46.55
612
53.22
538
46.78
Koliad
280
52.34
255
47.66
321
47.49
355
52.51
Suva
830
49.88
834
50.12
973
50.68
947
49.32
Akhod
356
53.21
313
46.79
435
52.35
396
47.65
Janiadra
314
50.56
307
49.44
361
49.52
368
50.48
Kadodara
933
51.52
878
48.48
1,018
51.03
977
48.97
Padariya
299
52.55
270
47.45
340
52.55
307
47.45
Vengani
352
52.15
323
47.85
462
50.88
446
49.12
10
11
12
Buffer
Zone
Narnavi
317
53.19
279
46.81
349
50.43
343
49.57
13
Nadarkha
215
51.56
202
48.44
220
49.22
227
50.78
14
Paniadara
1,244
53.39
1,086
46.61
1,360
53.06
1,203
46.94
15
Dahej
3,756
54.86
3,090
45.14
8,345
61.84
5,150
38.16
16
Ambheta
695
52.26
635
47.74
807
52.00
745
48.00
17
Jageshwar
861
58.77
604
41.23
818
52.07
753
47.93
18
Nandida
352
51.54
331
48.46
383
53.27
336
46.73
19
Khojbal
654
52.36
595
47.64
782
51.69
731
48.31
20
Bhensali
412
52.42
374
47.58
582
51.83
541
48.17
21
Kaladara
708
51.19
675
48.81
934
56.16
729
43.84
Sub- Total
13,922
53.19
12,251
46.8
19,888
55.7
15,816
44.3
Grand Total
15,609
53.05
13,812
46.9
22,290
55.3
17,983
44.7
154
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
During primary household survey, it was noted from Table 3-38 that the maximum population of
Vadadla village lies within the age group of 15-35 years which can be considered as the active work
force. This population may be focused for providing skill training programs in order to equip them to
get jobs.
Age Group
Frequency
Percentage
0-6 Years
17
8.0
7-14 Years
34
16.1
15-35 Years
97
46.0
36-60 Years
48
22.7
60+ Years
15
7.2
Total
211
100
Village
Scheduled Caste
Total
Male
Scheduled Tribe
Female
Total
Male
Female
Core Zone
1
Jolva
239
137
102
199
98
101
Galenda
91
47
44
Rahid
105
51
54
104
51
53
Vadadla
76
37
39
341
166
175
425
228
197
735
362
373
Sub- Total
Buffer Zone
1
Samantpor
49
21
28
Sambheti
12
37
16
21
Vav
28
15
13
163
90
73
Atali
117
63
54
381
205
176
Koliad
57
27
30
323
150
173
Suva
63
28
35
354
193
161
Akhod
69
36
33
305
152
153
Janiadra
25
10
15
248
121
127
Kadodara
48
23
25
511
258
253
10
Padariya
13
131
67
64
11
Vengani
40
18
22
279
136
143
12
Narnavi
64
33
31
140
63
77
13
Nadarkha
16
10
64
32
32
14
Paniadara
31
14
17
790
436
354
15
Dahej
542
279
263
2,090
1,097
993
155
S. No.
Village
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Scheduled Tribe
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
16
Ambheta
67
37
30
261
137
124
17
Jageshwar
18
10
146
73
73
18
Nandida
64
33
31
267
151
116
19
Khojbal
40
20
20
425
225
200
20
Bhensali
45
18
27
415
218
197
21
Kaladara
108
54
54
570
294
276
Sub- Total
1,471
743
728
7,949
4,135
3,814
Grand Total
1,896
971
925
8,684
4,497
4,187
Educational Facility
The basic educational facilities in the core zone of the study area is upto to satisfactory level. There is
presence of Anganwadi, Primary School & Middle School in Jolva, Rahiyad, Vadadla and Galenda. For
attaining the higher education like High School, College and Vocational Training like ITI, Diploma or
Engineering, students avail the facilities from Atali, Dahej & Bharuch. An important parameter to
evaluate the situation of the society is literacy rate, which is shown in Table 3-40.
Village
Total
Population
Literate
Population
No.
Male
Female
No.
No.
Core Zone
1
Jolva
1,442
1075
74.55
661
61.49
414
38.51
Galenda
611
462
75.61
243
52.60
219
47.40
Rahid
1,694
1310
77.33
690
52.67
620
47.33
Vadadla
822
602
73.24
331
54.98
271
45.02
4,569
3,449
75.49
1925
55.81
1524
44.19
Sub- Total
Buffer Zone
1
Samantpor
367
264
71.93
154
58.33
110
41.67
Sambheti
416
316
75.96
188
59.49
128
40.51
Vav
727
575
79.09
324
56.35
251
43.65
Atali
1,150
857
74.52
494
57.64
363
42.36
Koliad
676
459
67.90
254
55.34
205
44.66
Suva
1,920
1427
74.32
783
54.87
644
45.13
Akhod
831
579
69.68
340
58.72
239
41.28
Janiadra
729
511
70.10
273
53.42
238
46.58
156
S. No.
9
Village
Total
Population
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Male
Female
No.
No.
No.
Kadodara
1,995
1369
68.62
801
58.51
568
41.49
10
Padariya
647
498
76.97
293
58.84
205
41.16
11
Vengani
908
518
57.05
301
58.11
217
41.89
12
Narnavi
692
510
73.70
283
55.49
227
44.51
13
Nadarkha
447
325
72.71
183
56.31
142
43.69
14
Paniadara
2,563
1655
64.57
1003
60.60
652
39.40
15
Dahej
13,495
9970
73.88
6704
67.24
3266
32.76
16
Ambheta
1,552
1214
78.22
677
55.77
537
44.23
17
Jageshwar
1,571
1300
82.75
683
52.54
617
47.46
18
Nandida
719
506
70.38
293
57.91
213
42.09
19
Khojbal
1,513
1045
69.07
587
56.17
458
43.83
20
Bhensali
1,123
793
70.61
446
56.24
347
43.76
21
Kaladara
1,663
1062
63.86
704
66.29
358
33.71
Sub- Total
35,704
25,753
72.13
15,768
61.23
9,985
38.77
Grand Total
40,273
29,202
72.51
17,693
60.59
11,509
39.41
Literacy Status
Frequency
Percentage
Illiterate
62
29.5
Anganwadi/Balwadi
3.8
Standard 1-6
62
29.5
Standard 7-9
53
25.2
SSC
21
10.0
HSC
1.0
ITI/Diploma
1.0
Graduate
0.0
Post Graduate
0.0
210
100
Total
157
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Around 20.4% of the total population are students who are presently pursuing their studies in schools,
colleges and technical institutes as shown in Photograph 3-12.
Health Facilities
The core study area avail the medical facilities from Primary Health Centre is available at Dahej. The
villagers are taking the facilities of 108 during emergency. Due to the absence of government medical
facilities, people go to Bharuch for their treatment. Dahej and Lakhigam villages are having private
medical facilities but due to high fees people prefer to go to the city itself.
Housing Condition
The housing condition of the sample size surveyed households of Vadadla Village is shown in Table
3-42. The houses that were pucca were mostly those who had primary and secondary sources of
income and had some land being acquired by the SEZ.
Type of Housing
Frequency
Pucca
18
Semi Pucca
Kutcha
15
Shanty
Total
41
158
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Type
Numbers
16
Open Defecation
25
The people having pucca houses generally had the toilets built in their house. The people who were
living in Indira Awas or in kutcha houses were generally not having the toilet facility available at their
homes. The vulnerable groups had got their toilet build under the Government Scheme/private but
they were not in working condition so they were left with no other option but to defecate in open.
Photographs of kutcha houses at Vadadla village and toilet made under Govt. scheme are shown in
Photograph 3-13.
Economic Profile
Agriculture
In the core study area the agriculture is almost declining towards extinct due to rapid industrialization.
The agriculture is carried out mainly in two seasons namely Kharif and Rabi crops. The major crops
being cultivated in the study area are Wheat, Cotton, Paddy, Jowhar, Bajri, Banana etc. The farmers
have to depend on rainy season for irrigation. Few of them are irrigating the field through canal and
open wells. Agriculture provides employment in the form of daily wage labor during the harvesting
season.
People who have less or no land do labourwork in others field and paid on daily wage basis. The
average wage for the male is INR 200 per day and for the female is INR 150 per day.
Socio experts interacting with local vegetable vendor and Stakeholder is shown in Photograph 3-14.
159
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
Photograph 3-14: Socio Expert with Local Vegetable Vendor & Stakeholder
Industries/Factories
The Bharuch district has 11 notified industrial notified areas namely Ankleshwar, Bharuch, Panoli,
Palej, Jhagadia, Valia, Dahej-1, Dahej-2, Vagra (mini), Vagra (Vilayat) and Jambusar. PCPIR region
has been specifically delineated Investment Region planned for the establishment of production
facilities for petroleum, chemicals and petrochemicals. Proposed project falls in Vagra Taluka. Major
industries like Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer Company, Adani Power Dahej Ltd., First Carbon
Technologies Pvt. Ltd., GACL, SRF Limited, Narmada Bio Chem Pvt. Ltd., Indofil Chemicals Company,
BOC, Meghmani Organics Ltd. etc are established in GIDC Dahej Phase II.
Type of Livelihood
Frequency
Percentage
Agriculture
2.7
32
43.8
14
19.2
Government Job
1.4
Electrician
2.7
Fishermen
8.2
Pension Holder
1.4
Mason
4.1
Drivers
6.8
10
Business
6.8
11
Livestock
2.7
73
100
Total
Source: Primary Household Survey-2015
160
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
From the above table it can be inferred that the bulk of the population falls in the daily wage earner
category working in as agricultural labour or in the private companies as the contractual labour. 6.8%
of the population were having stationary, grocery, tea stalls etc. About 2.7% of the population were
earning from the livestock. Even though livestock was owned by many in the village but it was for selfuse and no monetary gain was there from it. Photograph showing animal husbandry and agricultural
field in study area is shown in Photograph 3-15.
Animal Husbandry
Means of Transportation
The study area is well connected with road & transportation facilities due to proper planning of PCPIR
authorities. Dahej and Bharuch are the nearest railway station present. Dahej railways station is
operational for goods transportation only.
Means of Communication
The villages have adequate communication facilities in form of post office, post and phone. The core
impact area has a post office. Many villagers have landline telephone connections. However, people
now also own mobile phones for quick and easy communication.
Lifestyle
Village life has always been the resemblance of simple society, informal relations, traditional livelihood
patterns and contented lives. The socio-economic changes are evident in progressive industrial
development that is transversing the whole of the developing nations. Gujarat state in India is the best
example we can get. The coming of the industries, creation of SEZ, SIR has made changes in the rural
life of Gujarat.
The scope for civic nuisance emerges with the coming of the migrant population. Local villagers giving
houses on rents have added on to their incomes. Blending of certain common attributes like fooding,
161
3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT
common practices, lifestyle patterns, educational preferences etc. are remarkably noticed of the rural
community by coming in contact with in-migrated population in their area.
The local language spoken is Gujarati. However, use of Hindi language was also found in some rural
and most of the urban areas under our study.
Due to the development of upcoming industries, various facilities like hotel/restaurant, truck cleaners,
and other ancillary shops shall have more business opportunity and hence shall have overall positive
impact in socio economic environment.
162
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Identify project activities that could beneficially or adversely impact the environment;
Predict and assess the environmental impacts of such activities;
Examine each environmental aspect-impact relationship in detail and identify its degree of
significance;
Identify possible mitigation measures for these project activities and select the most appropriate
mitigation measure, based on the reduction in significance achieved and practicality in
implementation;
In case impact are low or moderate and can be suitably managed by SOPs / OCPs, to minimize /
control the consequences, no specific management plans are prescribed;
If consequences are high / indicating significant impact, implementation of mitigation measures
requires specific management plan, these are prescribed.
4.1
Details of investigated environmental impacts due to project location, possible accidents, project
design, project construction, regular operations and final decommissioning are discussed in this
section.
Key Definitions, identification of impacts, methodology of component wise risk assessment is described
in Annexure 10. This methodology is used in this chapter for preparing impacts and their listing
evaluation. Mitigation measures are formulated based on the significance of the impact.
A programme to implement all mitigation measures is then prepared and presented as an
Environmental Monitoring Program and Environmental Management Plan, presented in Chapter 6 &
Chapter 10 respectively.
Impact on environment have been identified, based on an assessment of various environmental
aspects associated with the project activities and has been summarized in Table 4-1.
163
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
S
No.
Project Activity
C1
C2
Project Location
1.1
Site selection
Project Design
Identified Aspect
N / AN / E
Potential Impacts
C3
C4
Air
Water
Ecology &
Biodiversity
Land
Resource
Depletion
Social
Remarks
AP /
AQ
NV
SW
GW
Effluent /
Sewage
LU /
LC
Soil
HW
ISW
MSW
TER.
AQUA.
RD
Infrastructure
Economic
OH /
(H&S)
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
C21
(+ve)
Permanent
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of the
following:
2.1
AN
Project Construction
Pre-Construction
3.A.1
Site Preparation
Construction
3.B.1
3.B.2
Generation of Debris
Noise Generation
Dust Generation
AN
Generation of Scraps
Noise Generation
AN
One time
One time
Sewage Generation
3.B.4
Noise Generation
Commissioning
Process Emissions of HCl, HBr, NH3, NOx &
HC
AN
AN
Noise Generation
AN
3.C.1
3.B.3
Rare
Temporary
Temporary
Rare
One time
Momentary
Momentary
Rare
(+ve)
Temporary
Temporary
Momentary
Temporary
Temporary
Temporary
Rare
Temporary
164
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
S
No.
C1
Project Activity
C2
Project Operation
4.A.1
4.A.2
Identified Aspect
Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides
Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities
N / AN / E
Potential Impacts
Air
Effluent /
Sewage
LU /
LC
Soil
HW
ISW
MSW
TER.
AQUA.
RD
Infrastructure
Economic
OH /
(H&S)
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
C21
C3
C4
C5
Momentary
Momentary
Momentary
Continuous
Generation of Effluent
AN
AN
Generation of Effluent
N
N
Operation of Reactor
4.B.2
Generation of Effluent
AN
Momentary
Continuous
Continuous
4.B.1
Rare
Rare
Operation of DM Plant
AN
5.3
Continuous
5.2
Continuous
Handling of Products
Remarks
GW
4.A.4
5.1
Social
SW
Resource
Depletion
NV
4.A.3
Ecology &
Biodiversity
Land
AP /
AQ
Water
Momentary
Rare
Momentary
Momentary
Rare
Continuous
Rare
Momentary
Continuous
165
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
S
No.
C1
5.4
5.5
Project Activity
C2
5.7
Equipment maintenance
Analysis in laboratory
Air
LU /
LC
Soil
HW
ISW
MSW
TER.
AQUA.
RD
Infrastructure
Economic
OH /
(H&S)
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
AN
Noise Generation
AN
AN
AN
Remarks
Effluent /
Sewage
Social
GW
AN
Resource
Depletion
SW
C5
Sludge Generation
Ecology &
Biodiversity
Land
NV
C4
Spillage of HW/effluent
Water
AP /
AQ
C3
5.6
5.8
Identified Aspect
N / AN / E
Potential Impacts
(+ve)
Continuous
C21
Occasional
Rare
Continuous
Continuous
(+ve)
Continuous
Continuous
Rare
Rare
Rare
Momentary
Occasional
Occasional
Occasional
Rare
166
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.2
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
AIR ENVIRONMENT
As discussed earlier, environmental aspects and impacts have been identified based on an assessment
of environmental aspects associated with the project, which include emissions:
During
During
During
During
For the purpose of impact predictions on air environment, emission sources can be classified into point
and area sources. Whilst no area sources have been identified as part of the project, point sources
have been identified and these include stacks attached to various units.
For the purpose of impact predictions on air environment, the impact assessment methodology is
given in Table 1 of Annexure 10. Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact
scores and operational controls / mitigation measures on air environment are tabulated in Table 4-2.
167
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Table 4-2: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Air Environment
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
Project Design
1.1
Project Construction
Construction
2.A.1
Impact Scoring
N / AN / E
S
No.
Legal
Severity,
S
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
C9
C10
C11
Yes
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in Air
Pollution Control Equipment
AN
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Dust Generation
No
Low
No
2.A.2
No
Low
No
2.A.3
No
Moderate
No
Commissioning
Process Emissions of HCl, HBr, NH3,
NOx & HC
AN
No
Low
2.B.1
AN
No
Low
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
AN
No
Low
OEP & OCP will be followed. Firefighting and emergency response team
will be at place.
No
Project Operation
3.A.1
SOP's, OCP, OEP will be made and followed. APC will be provided.
Firefighting and emergency response team will be at place.
No
No
3.A.2
No
16
High
Yes
3.A.3
AN
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
4.1
No
15
High
Traffic management will be made and ensured that the same is followed.
PUC Certified vehicles will be used.
Yes
168
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Legal
Severity,
S
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
C4
C5
C6
C7
AN
No
Yes
--
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
4.2
4.3
Impact Scoring
N / AN / E
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
C8
C9
C10
C11
Low
No
--
--
Significant
Yes
Note: Scoring is not done for those impacting activities, where the mitigation measure of the arising aspect requires to meet/comply with the Legal Requirement (i.e. NOC/CTO).
169
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.2.1
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Quantity of fuel;
Fuel analysis;
Stack:
Internal diameter at top;
Height of stack;
Exit gas velocity & temperature;
Pollutants emission rate.
Details of proposed stacks & APCM are given in Table 2-60 & Table 2-61. Based on assumptions
mentioned in Table 4-3, emissions rates from proposed point sources (stacks) are calculated as
shown in Table 4-4 & Table 4-5.
Table 4-3: Assumptions for Calculating Emission Estimate for Point Source
S.
No.
Fuel
Source
S
Content,
%
Ash Content,
%
Density,
Kg/m3
GCV,
Kcal/Kg
Source
NG
0.001
0.0001
0.9
11,411
FO
0.1
900
10,000
https://www.iocl.com/products/Furn
aceoil.aspx
LDO
1.8
0.02
880
10,200
http://www.bharatpetroleum.in/busi
ness/indFuelsSolvents_light_diesel_oi
l.asp?from=bus
http://www.optionengg.net/ldo.htm
HSD
0.25
0.01
820 to
860
11,840
https://bharatpetroleum.com/pdf/MR
L_High%20Speed%20Diesel%20Oil.
pdf
170
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Table 4-4: Emission Estimate Sheet for Point Source Emissions Flue Gas Stacks
Stack
No.
Stack Attached to
Required
Stack Ht., m
Stack Ht., m
Stack Dia.
(Top), m
Stack Exit
Velocity,
m/s
Stack Exit
Temp, K
Stack Exhaust,
Nm3/s
Fuel Used
Fuel
Consumption
Fuel
Consumption
(kg/hour)
SO2 Emitted,
after APCM,
gm/sec
PM10 Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec
NOx Emitted,
ppm (GPCB
Norm)
NOx Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
Boilers
31.6
45
0.8
10
423
5.02
FO
4 KLD
378.0
8.40
0.105
50.00
0.3283
10.6
45
0.3
10
423
0.71
LDO
200 Ltr/Day
22.0
0.22
0.001
50.00
0.0462
Table 4-5: Emission Estimate Sheet for Point Source Emissions Process Stacks & Vents
Stack
Exit
Temp,
K
Stack
Exhaust,
m3/s
Stack
Exhaust,
Nm3/s
Cl2 Emitted,
mg/Nm3
NH3
Emitted,
mg/Nm3
NH3
Emitted
after
APCM,
gm/sec
NOx
Emitted,
mg/Nm3
NOx
Emitted
after
APCM,
gm/sec
HC
Emitted,
mg/Nm3
HC Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec
HBr
Emitted,
mg/Nm3
HBr
Emitted
after
APCM,
gm/sec
Stack
No.
Stack Attached
to
Stack
Ht., m
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
Vents attached to
Alkali scrubber
35
0.30
1.20
318
0.08
0.08
20.00
0.002
9.00
0.001
0.00
0.000
25.00
0.002
0.00
0.000
5.00
< 0.001
Vents attached to
Acid scrubber
35
0.30
1.20
318
0.08
0.08
30.00
0.002
15.00
0.001
35
0.30
1.20
318
0.08
0.08
15.00
0.001
Stack Exit
Velocity,
m/s
Cl2 Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec
Stack
Dia.
(Top),
m
HCl Emitted,
mg/Nm3
HCl Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec
171
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Dispersion Modeling
Emissions from all the stacks were analyzed for their impacts on the GLC for various distances using
the dispersion modeling guidelines of AERMOD, developed by the AERMIC (American Meteorological
Society (AMS)/United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), as directed by CPCB.
About AERMOD
AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD) is a steady-state plume model. It is designed to apply to source
releases and meteorological conditions that can be assumed to be steady over individual modeling
periods (typically one hour or less). AERMOD has been designed to handle the computation of
pollutant impacts in both flat and complex terrain within the same modeling framework.
The American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement
Committee (AERMIC) was formed to introduce state-of-the-art modeling concepts into the EPA's air
quality models. Through AERMIC, a modeling system, AERMOD, was introduced that incorporated air
dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including
treatment of both surface and elevated sources, and both simple and complex terrain.
AERMET is an input data processor that is one of the regulatory components of the AERMOD modeling
system. It incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and
scaling concepts. Data flow in Aermod modeling system is shown in Figure 4-1.
Meteorological Parameters
The hourly meteorological data considered were wind speed, wind direction, ambient atmospheric
temperature, cloud cover, humidity & rainfall.
Other Assumptions
The dispersion modeling assumptions considered are as follows:
172
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Results
Air dispersion modeling results with predicted GLC (Isopleths) from proposed activity of all parameters
are provided in Annexure 11. Maximum 24 hourly average GLCs for PM10, SO2 & NOx, & hourly for
Cl2, HCl, NH3, HBr & HC are tabulated in Table 4-6.
Parameters
Number of
Sources
Maximum GLC
Concentration, g/m3
Distance, m
Direction
PM10
0.27
500
ENE
SO2
22.24
750
ENE
NOx
0.08
500
Cl2
0.22
250
NNW
HCl
0.51
250
NNW
NH3
0.05
250
SSE
HBr
0.13
250
NNW
HC
0.32
250
NNW
The worst combined environmental situation is predicted as the sum of maximum baseline monitored
value of a parameter and the incremental GLC at the monitoring location. It indicates maximum GLCs
as tabulated in Table 4-7.
Name of Village
(Distance in
km/Direction)
At Project Site
(0.0 / - )
Pollutant
CPCB Limit
Concentration
(g/m3)
Baseline
Concentration
(Max.)
(g/m3)
GLC
(g/m3)
Total
Predictive
GLC (g/m3)
PM10
100
67
0.3
67.6
SO2
80
12.1
15.51
27.60
NOx
80
20.6
0.08
20.70
Cl2
<1
0.22
~ 1.22
HCl
<1
0.51
~ 1.51
NH3
400
< 20
0.05
~ 20.05
HBr
<1
0.13
~ 1.13
HC
4,000
1,392.81
0.32
1,393.13
PM10
100
80
0.01
79.90
SO2
80
9.5
1.03
10.55
NOx
80
20.7
20.67
Vadadla
Cl2
<1
~ 1.0
(3.0 / WNW)
HCl
<1
0.01
~ 1.01
NH3
400
< 20
~ 20.0
HBr
<1
~ 1.0
HC
4,000
2,033.00
0.01
2,033.01
Jolwa
PM10
100
82
0.06
82.21
(1.2 / SW)
SO2
80
8.3
4.72
12.99
173
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
S
No.
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Name of Village
(Distance in
km/Direction)
Pollutant
CPCB Limit
Concentration
(g/m3)
Baseline
Concentration
(Max.)
(g/m3)
GLC
(g/m3)
Total
Predictive
GLC (g/m3)
NOx
80
22.4
0.01
22.45
Cl2
<1
0.01
~ 1.01
HCl
<1
0.02
~ 1.02
NH3
400
< 20
~ 20.0
HBr
<1
~ 1.0
HC
4,000
1,511.79
0.01
1,511.80
PM10
100
84
0.02
84.52
SO2
80
8.1
1.83
9.98
NOx
80
18.8
0.01
18.79
Rahiyad X
Cl2
<1
0.04
< 1.04
(2.43 / SSE)
HCl
<1
0.08
<1.08
NH3
400
< 20
~ 20.0
HBr
<1
0.02
~ 1.02
HC
4,000
1,479.00
0.05
1,479.05
PM10
100
74
0.03
74.47
SO2
80
8.2
2.8
11.03
NOx
80
17.4
0.01
17.44
Atali
Cl2
<1
0.01
~ 1.01
(4.0 / ESE)
HCl
<1
0.03
~ 1.03
NH3
400
< 20
~ 20.0
HBr
<1
0.01
~ 1.01
HC
4,000
1,341.68
0.02
1,341.70
PM10
100
77
0.10
77.27
SO2
80
8.6
4.81
13.38
NOx
80
20.4
0.01
20.37
Gelanda
Cl2
<1
0.02
~ 1.02
(1.61 / NNE)
HCl
<1
0.04
~ 1.04
NH3
400
< 20
0.01
~ 20.01
HBr
<1
0.01
~ 1.01
HC
4,000
1,493.20
0.02
1,493.22
Conclusion
Comparing the incremental ground level concentrations of pollutants with the CPCB limits, it can be
concluded the following:
Incremental GLCs for PM10 shall exceed the permissible limit at all locations due to high baseline
concentration.
Air impact are not expected to cause any effect on vegetation and human settlements in the
vicinity of the project site.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016
174
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures for air quality impacts are:
Adequate height of at least 45 m will be provided as per the statutory requirements to flue gas
stacks attached to boiler and thermic fluid heaters;
APCM like scrubbers will be provided as per the applicability (acid, alkali and column containing
activated carbon) to control emissions of HCl, Cl2, HBr, SO2, NOx, NH3, HCs and traces of VOCs;
Species for odor Suppression in the project site shall be developed;
Use of odorants will be done as required;
Effective water spraying will be done on the access roads to control re-entrained dust during dry
season (if required);
Proper PPE like dust masks will be provided to workers and its use ensured;
Regular Work place monitoring will be done.
4.2.2
Incremental Traffic
From the proposed facility, approximately on daily basis, approximately, 10 trucks, 10 Tempos per day
carrying raw material and finished goods shall be using the state highway connecting Bharuch and
Dahej. Employees and contract workers (~20 cars, 30 two wheelers & 25 cycles) shall use the same
route during peak hours.
Based on the traffic survey conducted (Section 3.5.4), it is noted:
Average peak hourly traffic on this route is 531 and 570 PCU respectively;
From the proposed project, additional 31 PCUs will be required;
As per IRC, carrying capacity of this approach road is 3,600 PCU;
Thus, the maximum PCU on the road will be 562 (Bharuch to Dahej) & 601 (Dahej to Bharuch).
Thus, the road is capable of carrying the excess traffic from the proposed project.
Summary of traffic survey (peak hourly) are given in Table 4-8 & Table 4-9.
175
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
% of Total Stream
Converted PCUs
Two wheeler
106
27%
0.75
79
30
11
Total PCUs
After Proposed Project
91
Three wheeler
26
7%
1.2
31
31
Car/Jeeps
101
26%
101
20
10
111
Truck/Buses/Tractors
143
37%
2.2
314
20
319
12
3%
0.4
25
10
Total
388
100
531
95
31
562
% of Total Stream
Converted PCUs
Total PCUs
After Proposed Project
Two wheeler
112
29%
0.75
84
30
11
95
Three wheeler
29
8%
1.2
34
35
Car/Jeeps
100
26%
100
20
10
110
Truck/Buses/Tractors
158
41%
2.2
347
20
351
10
3%
0.4
25
10
Total
409
100
570
95
31
601
1
8
As per The Indian Road Congress - Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:106-1990), Table-2, Recommended Design Service Volumes, page 10.
176
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
4.3
NOISE ENVIRONMENT
For the purpose of impact predictions on noise environment, the impact assessment methodology is
given in Table 1 of Annexure 10. Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact
scores and operational controls / mitigation measures on noise environment are tabulated in Table
4-10.
4.3.1
Noise Modelling study was done using the Software tool Sound Plan which predicts the Noise Map
generated due to the sources present at the project site and predicts the Noise Levels at various
receiver points due to the sources present at the project site.
To analyze the Noise Map of the project site, first, the geometrically coordinated Google Earth images
of the Project site were imported into the software. Various Sources of noise were added with their
approximate Sound Pressure Levels, and the Receiver points were added at various locations where
Noise Monitoring was conducted.
SoundPlan generates the Noise Map with colored pattern isopleths, which indicate whether or not
the SPL in that particular region exceeds the CPCB limits. If the SPL is above the user set allowable
limit, the area will be shown in Red contour depending upon the Difference between then Predicted
SPL and the Allowable SPL. Otherwise, it will be shown in Green contour.
177
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
N / AN / E
Table 4-10: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Noise Environment
Legal
Severity, S
Probability, P
Final Score, S x
P
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
AN
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Noise Generation
No
Low
No
2.A.2
Noise Generation
No
Low
No
2.A.3
Noise Generation
No
10
Moderate
No
Commissioning
2.B.1
High
Yes
Project Operation
3.A.1
Yes
4.1
4.2
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
Project Design
1.1
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to faulty design of Boilers
/ Compressors / Other utilities.
Project Construction
Construction
2.A.1
Noise Generation
Impact Scoring
No
15
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
PPE like Ear Plugs & ear muffs will be provided and its use
shall be ensured. No operators shall be allowed to do 2
continuous shifts.
Noise Generation
No
10
Moderate
No
High
Yes
Noise Generation
No
15
178
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
The sources considered at the project site for the analysis with their approximate SPL are considered
slightly on the higher side for more critical analysis. The sources of noise with their maximum SPLs are
tabulated in Table 4-11.
Sources
Levels dB(A)
Day
Night
DG Sets
100
100
Steam Boiler
100
100
Compressors
85
85
Pumps
95
95
Cooling Tower
85
85
Results
The predicted noise levels along with the conflict are tabulated in Table 4-12. Isopleths generated
during day time and night time are as given in Figure 4-2 & Figure 4-3.
Receiver Name
NL1
Prescribed Limit
dB(A)
Level dB(A)
Conflict dB(A)
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
At Project Site
75.0
70.0
66.9
66.9
NL2
75.0
70.0
47.6
47.2
NL3
75.0
70.0
46.2
45.5
NL4
75.0
70.0
44.9
45.5
NL5
75.0
70.0
47.4
43.1
NL6
Jolva Village
55.0
45.0
26.2
26.2
NL7
Galenda Village
55.0
45.0
31.1
27.1
Based on the modeling of proposed activities, it is noted that the proposed activities will not have any
conflict in Noise levels comparing to the prescribed CPCB limits.
Cumulative Impact
Results are collated with baseline data to predict the cumulative incremental in noise levels at the
monitored receptors. The details of the same for day time and night time is tabulated in Table 4-13.
Conclusion
The predicted cumulative incremental increase in Noise level shows that following:
Incremental increase in core area of 250 m from site shows incremental increase in the range of
0.1 dB(A) to 9.7 dB(A) during day time and 0.4 dB(A) to 14.4 dB(A) during night time.
Beyond 250 m from the project area, increase in noise level is almost null.
179
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Location
NL1
At Project Site
NL2
Category
Day Time
Night Time
Day Time
Night Time
Day Time
Night Time
Day Time
Night Time
Day Time
Night Time
Industrial
75
70
57.7
52.7
66.9
66.9
67.4
67.1
9.7
14.4
Industrial
75
70
59.4
55
47.6
47.2
59.7
55.7
0.3
0.7
NL3
Industrial
75
70
64.2
57
46.2
45.5
64.3
57.3
0.1
0.3
NL4
Industrial
75
70
63
53.8
44.9
43.1
63.1
54.2
0.1
0.4
NL5
Industrial
75
70
64.6
58
47.4
43.2
64.7
58.1
0.1
0.1
NL6
Jolva Village
Residential
55
45
57.7
51.7
26.2
26.2
57.7
51.7
0.0
0.0
NL7
Galenda Village
Residential
55
45
56.5
50.7
31.1
31.1
56.5
50.7
0.0
0.0
180
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
181
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
182
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.4
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
WATER ENVIRONMENT
For the purpose of impact predictions on ground & surface water environment, the impact assessment
methodology is given in Table 1 of Annexure 10. Based on the identified aspects from project
activities, impact scores and operational controls / mitigation measures on water environment are
tabulated in Table 4-14.
4.4.1
Surface water quality and quantity will not be affected by the proposed project, since the project shall
achieve Zero Liquid Discharge, by taking various recycling and reuse steps as discussed in Chapter 2,
Section 2.17.
Only, during the heavy rainfall, there is a possibility of storm water to drain out from the factory
premise which will meet the storm water line of GIDC, having its final outlet in the Narmada Estuary
which is approximately 5 Km in south from the project site. Hence, impact on the surface water can be
considered negligible.
4.4.3
Mitigation Measures
Following mitigation measures will be implemented to minimize the impact on the water environment:
During construction phase, sewage will be disposed into soak pit and septic tank. Regular cleaning
will be carried out.
Properly designed effluent drains with side barriers will be provided & inflow will be diverted to
MEE followed by ETP & RO for necessary treatment.
Zero Liquid Discharge shall be achieved by recycled and reuse of the treated waste water.
Process, chemical fuel storage and handling area will have proper bunds and dyke walls so that
contaminated run-off cannot meet the storm-water line.
The overall impact on surface water quality will be negligible by following all precautionary measures
as mentioned in mitigation measures.
183
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
N / AN / E
Table 4-14: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Water Environment
Legal
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
Project Design
1.1
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of
ETP, RO, MEE.
AN
Project Construction
Construction
2.A.1
Sewage generation.
Commissioning
2.B.1
Project Operation
3.A.1
3.A.2
3.B.1
Operation of Reactor
4.1
Operation of DM Plant
4.2
4.3
Impact on
Impact Scoring
Final Score,
SxP
EMP
Required
GW
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
AN
No
Low
No
Generation of Effluent
No
15
High
Yes
AN
No
Low
No
Generation of Effluent
No
10
Moderate
No
Generation of Effluent
No
10
Moderate
No
No
10
Moderate
No
No
Low
No
AN
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Yes
(+ve)
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Spillage of HW/effluent.
AN
No
Low
No
Probability,
P
SW
Severity,
S
Significance /
Consequence
Effluent /
Sewage
184
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
N / AN / E
Legal
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
AN
No
Impact on
4.4
No
4.5
Equipment maintenance
No
4.6
Analysis in laboratory
No
Impact Scoring
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
C11
C12
C13
C14
Moderate
No
No
SW
GW
Effluent /
Sewage
Severity,
S
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
Low
Low
No
Negligible
--
No
185
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.5
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
LAND ENVIRONMENT
Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on land environment are tabulated in Table 4-15.
Potential impacts on land use, land cover and soil due to deposition of air pollutants, leakages of
waste water & solid hazardous waste are described in this section.
4.5.1
Site Preparation
Based on mutually agreed terms and conditions, M/s. Shaurya Enterprise has acquired the plot/land
from GIDC. On profit sharing basis, HSL has taken the plot on lease from M/s. Shaurya Enterprise for
five years (upto 31st May, 2019). Documents for the same is provided in Annexure 3.
Removal of Top Soil & Land Clearance
Change in the land use, currently from barren (scrub land), though within Dahej-II industrial
estate, to industrial area is envisaged;
Debris will be generated due to excavation and paving.
4.5.2
Operation Phase
Soil contamination is envisaged due to deposition of HCl, HBr, NH3, NOx & HC in adjoining plots;
Excess generation of hazardous and other solid wastes;
Generation of scraps, used spares, cotton waste, hand gloves etc.;
Soil Contamination due to Leakage of chemicals, fuel, raw material and waste water & sewage.
4.5.3
Mitigation Measure
Generated hazardous wastes during project operation will be transported to an authorized Treatment,
Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) site and sent for incineration. Storage areas for hazardous waste,
fuel & raw material will be impervious and will be designed to prevent Leachate penetration.
Consequently impacts on land / soil will be negligible.
186
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
N / AN / E
Table 4-15: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Land Environment
Legal
LU /
LC
Soil
HW
ISW
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
Impact on
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
Project Design
1.1
Project Construction
Pre-Construction
2.A.1
Site Preparation
Construction
2.B.1
Generation of Debris
No
2.B.2
Generation of Scraps
No
2.B.3
Generation of domestic/MSW
waste.
No
Commissioning
2.C.1
Project Operation
3.A.1
Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides.
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to allotment of
improper Hazardous waste storage
area.
AN
Yes
No
Impact Scoring
MSW
Severity,
S
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
C10
C11
C12
C13
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
C14
C15
C16
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
10
Moderate
No
10
Moderate
No
10
Moderate
No
10
Moderate
No
10
Moderate
No
No
AN
No
Low
AN
No
Moderate
No
No
10
Moderate
No
No
Low
No
No
10
Moderate
No
187
Legal
LU /
LC
Soil
HW
ISW
MSW
Severity,
S
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
No
Yes
AN
No
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
3.A.2
Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration,
Drying & Washings activities.
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Equipment maintenance
Analysis in laboratory
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
N / AN / E
Impact on
Impact Scoring
Yes
Yes
AN
No
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
C13
C14
C15
C16
10
Moderate
No
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
10
Moderate
No
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Low
No
Yes
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Sludge Generation
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
AN
No
Moderate
No
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
Yes
--
--
--
Significant
Yes
AN
No
Low
No
188
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.6
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Activity
Aspect
Ecological Components
TFL
TFA
AFL
AFA
MFL
MFN
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Site preparation
2. Construction Phase
2.1
Movement of Earth
movers and other vehicles
Generation of noise
--
3.1
Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides
and Fungicides.
Emission of HCl,
NOx, CO2, NH3 and
HBr due to operation
of reactors of
Herbicides,
Insecticides and
Fungicides.
--
--
--
--
--
3.2
Operation of heat
exchangers / reactors /
compressors / pumps /
blowers.
Noise Generation
--
--
--
4. General Utilities
4.1
Generation of SPM
and emission of HC
& CO.
--
--
--
--
--
4.2
Operation of Boilers,
Thermic Fluid Heater and
DG sets
--
--
--
--
--
4.3
Discharge of waste
water
--
--
--
--
189
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
S. No.
4.4
Activity
Aspect
Overflow of plant
drains merging with
storm water drain.
Contamination of
water bodies due to
contamination of
storm water
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
Ecological Components
TFL
TFA
AFL
AFA
MFL
MFN
--
--
--
--
Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on ecology and biodiversity environment are tabulated in Table 4-17.
Biodiversity Appraisal Conclusion
Proposed project site is located in the GIDC Industrial Estate and does not support any species of
conservation significance and also not forms critical habitat.
All flora and fauna species reported are common component of the buffer zone. So, removal of these
common floral species from core zone will not result in the loss of floral diversity in true sense and will
not have significant / permanent impact on the species diversity and habitat structure of associated
faunal diversity. However, buffer zone area encompasses some Schedule-I species, so conservation
plan have been prepared for biodiversity improvement of the area.
Flora and fauna components will not get affected in normal function of the project and its associated
activities by implementation of proper safety measures and control devices.
Being an industrial area, considering cumulative impacts due to other adjacent industries, strict
implementation of EMP / mitigation measures are required to ensure that the biodiversity of the study
area should not impacted negatively.
190
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Table 4-17: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Ecology & Biodiversity
Impact Scoring
S.
No.
Likely Impacts on
Ecology and
Biodiversity (EB)
Legal
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
Impact on surrounding
vegetation and
associated biodiversity.
Yes
--
--
Impact on surrounding
vegetation and
associated biodiversity.
No
Impact on surrounding
vegetation and
associated biodiversity.
No
Contamination of
surrounding water
bodies and associated
aquatic biodiversity.
No
Significance /
Consequence
Mitigation Measures
EMP
Required
C9
C10
C11
Moderate
No
Low
No
--
Significant
Yes
Low
No
10
Moderate
No
Low
No
Severity,
S
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
C6
C7
C8
1.1
No
10
2. Construction Phase
2.1
No
3.1
3.2
4. General Utilities
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
191
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.7
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on socio economic environment are tabulated in Table 4-18.
192
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Table 4-18: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Socio Economic Environment
N / AN / E
Infrastructure
Economic
C4
C5
C6
C7
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
No
10
Moderate
No
No
--
--
--
NR
Positive Impact
No
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of 8
story Building structure.
AN
No
Low
No
No
--
--
--
NR
Positive Impact
No
AN
No
Low
No
No
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
Project Location
1.1
Site selection
Project Design
2.1
Project Construction
Construction
3.A.1
Project Operation
4.A.1
Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides.
4.A.2
Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.
4.B.1
Operation of Reactor
5.1
5.2
Impact Scoring
Severity,
S
Project Activity
Impact on
Legal
S
No.
(+ve)
(+ve)
Probability,
P
Final Score,
SxP
Significance /
Consequence
EMP
Required
AN
No
Moderate
No
Negligible
--
No
No
Negligible
--
No
AN
No
Low
No
No
(+ve)
--
--
--
NR
Positive Impact
No
AN
No
Negligible
--
No
193
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
4.8
4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
RESOURCE DEPLETION
Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on resource depletion are tabulated in Table 4-19.
194
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Table 4-19: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Resource Depletion
N / AN / E
Impact Scoring
Legal
Severity, S
Probability, P
Final Score, S x P
Significance /
Consequence
C4
C5
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
No
Moderate
No
No
S
No.
Project Activity
Identified Aspect
C1
C2
C3
Project Design
1.1
Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of
equipment causing High Energy
Consumption.
AN
Project Operation
2.A.1
2.B.1
Operation of Reactor
3.1
EMP
Required
AN
No
10
Moderate
No
Low
No
AN
No
Low
No
195
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
5. ANALYSIS OF
ALTERNATIVES
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
Company has an operative facility in the name of Crop Life Science Limited in Ankleshwar making
formulation products of pesticides. The Company felt the necessity of setting up a new facility of
technical grade looking at future market demand. But, in Anklesh
The western part of India is an obvious choice for the new project considering its proximity to both,
raw material sources as well as captive markets. Within western India, Dahej is considered an
excellent location since it is an industrial area, has excellent infrastructure including infrastructure
required for management of Environment developed by GIDC.
Within Dahej few plots were considered and found the existing plot most suitable due to its location
within the estate.
196
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
6. ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING PROGRAM
Based on the identified aspects from the proposed activities on air, noise, water, land, ecology and
biodiversity and socio-economic environment, scoring were done based on its severity and probability
as discussed in Chapter 4. Thus, monitoring program is required for each environment based on its
consequence. The preliminary budgetary monitoring plans are as discussed in this chapter. These
EMPs are based on the technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation measures (incl.
Measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis, reporting schedules, emergency
procedures, detailed budget & procurement schedules).
Main objective of environmental monitoring program is to:
Measure effectiveness of operational procedures;
Confirm statutory and mandatory compliance;
Identify unexpected changes.
6.1
AIR ENVIRONMENT
Budgetary environment monitoring plan for air environment is given in Table 6-1. Traffic
Management Plan is given in Table 6-2.
6.2
NOISE ENVIRONMENT
Budgetary environment monitoring plan for noise environment is given in Table 6-3.
6.3
WATER ENVIRONMENT
Budgetary environment monitoring plan for water environment is given in Table 6-4.
6.4
LAND ENVIRONMENT
Budgetary environment monitoring plan for land environment is given in Table 6-5.
6.5
Budgetary environment monitoring plan for ecology and biodiversity is given in Table 6-6.
197
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Mitigation Measures
C1
Data Analysis
Measurement
Methodology
Frequency
Location
Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility
Emergency
Procedure
Budget for
Mitigation Measure
(in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)
Procurement
Schedule
Remark
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
Approved and
standard designs of
air pollution control
equipment &
process equipment
will be procured
from Authorized
vendors to meet
environmental
standards.
Design Drawings,
specification,
statutory permissions,
licenses, legal work.
In house
Technical
Experts.
During Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.
HSL officials /
vendors /
statutory
authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.
Re-designing
--
--
During designing
stage.
Halides (Chloride /
Bromide) Online
sensors
CEMS (Sensors)
Continuous
On stack attached
with scrubbers.
Installation of
Scrubbers during
Procurement and
Commissioning
stage, Analysis
and Maintenance
during Operation
Phase.
During Operation
Phase.
Project Design
Project Operation
Condensation,
Distillation,
Extraction,
Separation,
Crystallization,
Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.
NH3 Sensors
CEMS (Sensors)
Continuous
Gelanda (Summer)
Once a Season
(Excluding
rainy season)
On stack attached
with scrubbers.
NH3 - Indophenol
Blue method.
Jolwa (Other
season)
Third Party
Immediate
corrective action
will be taken to
solve the problem.
Problematic
activity shall be
controlled.
35
Gelanda (Summer)
Jolwa (Other
season)
Third Party
Work Place
Monitoring for VOC,
HCl & NH3.
As per
Factories Rules
Leakages shall be
immediately
attended, OCP will
be followed.
3.5
0.5
198
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Mitigation Measures
C1
Dispatch of Various
Products
Data Analysis
Measurement
Methodology
Frequency
Location
Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility
Emergency
Procedure
Budget for
Mitigation Measure
(in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)
Procurement
Schedule
Remark
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
--
During operation
phase.
Recurring Cost
includes annual cost
of good housekeeping
& cleaning.
--
--
During
construction and
operation phase.
--
During Operation
Phase
--
Daily
Packing Area
Packing shall be
redone.
PUCC Certificate
If considerable
emissions
observed
during
operations.
With Drivers at
main gate
Vehicles without
PUC certificates
will not be used
Stack monitoring by
Isokinetic sampling
IS: 11255.
Once in a
month
Third Party
Operation of other
utilities like Boilers,
Thermic Fluid
Heaters, DG Sets,
Cooling Tower,
Compressor,
Pumps, Blowers
etc.
Once a Season
(Excluding
rainy season)
50
Third Party
Jolwa (Other
season).
88.5
11.5
100
--
199
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
To ensure that there is smooth traffic both within and outside the facility for the duration of the construction phase and operation phase
Benefit of EMP
Impacting Activity
C1
Movement of vehicles
throughout the
construction phase and
operational phase
Mitigation Measures
Data Analysis
Measurement Methodology
Frequency
Location
Reporting Schedule/Responsibility
Emergency Procedure
Remark
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
Controlled vehicular
movement (preferably
with clearly demarcated
entry / exit) with
adequate supervision
Records of No. of
tankers entering
and exiting the site.
Manual
Throughout construction
and operation phase
Main Gate
Security In charge
--
Segregation of vehicular
and pedestrian area
--
--
Throughout construction
and operation phase
--
Security In charge
--
--
--
Throughout construction
and operation phase
--
Security In charge
--
200
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Measurement
Methodology
Frequency
Location
Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility
Emergency
Procedure
Budget for
Mitigation Measure
- (in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)
Procurement
Schedule
Remark
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
Design specification
related to Noise
standards, statutory
permissions,
licenses, legal work.
In house
Technical Experts.
During
Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.
Head Office / At
Site.
--
During
designing
stage.
In house experts/
authorized Third Parties
shall be hired which will
be a part of the preproject activities.
During
commissioning
phase
During
Operation
phase
During
Operation
phase
Impacting Activity
Mitigation Measures
C1
Project Design
Re-designing
--
Project Construction
Commissioning
Startup and shutdown
activities like operation
of equipment for
Technical Grade
Pesticides namely
Herbicides, Insecticides,
Fungicides & Plant
Growth Regulator.
Noise Levels
Once during
startup
ISLM 100
All plants
Regular
Maintenance
of equipment
to be done.
0.5
Project Operation
Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides
and Fungicides.
Noise Levels
ISLM 100
Once a Month
Plant Area
Contractor / Third
Party
Regular
Maintenance
of equipment
to be done.
1.5
Noise Levels
ISLM 100
Once a Month
Utilities Area (2
locations within
plant)
Contractor / Third
Party
Regular
Maintenance
of equipment
to be done.
2.5
0.5
12.5
2.5
15
--
201
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Operation Controls /
Mitigation Measures
C1
Data Analysis
Measurement
Methodology
Frequency
C2
C3
C4
C5
Design specification of
ETP, RO & MEE &
receiving statutory
permissions for ZLD/
Final Discharge in
CETP drain.
In house
Technical
Experts.
During
Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.
Location
Reporting
Schedule /
Responsibility
Emergency
Procedure
Budget for
Mitigation
Measure (in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring
Cost (in
Lacs)
Procurement
Schedule
Remark
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
Head Office /
At Site.
HSL officials /
vendors / statutory
authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.
--
During
designing
stage.
In house experts/
authorized Third Parties
shall be hired which will be
a part of the pre-project
activities.
Project Design
Re-designing
--
Project Construction
Construction
--
--
--
--
--
--
10
During
Construction
Phase
Manual
Once per
running Batch
After
Secondary and
Tertiary
treatment.
ETP In charge /
Third Party
300
25
During
Operation
Phase
1.5
During
Construction
Phase
4.5
During
Operation
Phase
Project Operation
Quantity of leakage
Manual
Manual
During Leakage
Near Affected
Area
Leakages to be
pumped back
in spare tank.
Daily
At System
Outlet
Collection and
divert for
reprocess.
15
325
32
357
--
202
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
C1
Data Analysis
Measurement
Methodology
Frequency
C2
C3
C4
C5
Design
specification of
storage area for
HW & receiving
statutory
permissions.
In house
Technical
Experts.
During
Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.
Location
Reporting
Schedule /
Responsibility
Emergency
Procedure
Budget for
Mitigation
Measure (in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring
Cost (in
Lacs)
Procurement
Schedule
Remark
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
Head Office
/ At Site.
HSL officials /
vendors / statutory
authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.
--
During
designing
stage.
In house experts/
authorized Third Parties
shall be hired which will
be a part of the preproject activities.
During
Operation
phase
Project Design
Redesigning
--
Project Operation
Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.
Records of
trucks carrying
HW.
Number of
trucks:
Manually.
Weight of truck:
Weight stand.
During
dispatch
Main Gate
Storage for
atleast 15
days will be
provided.
15
Records of
trucks carrying
HW.
Number of
trucks:
Manually.
Weight of truck:
Weight stand.
During
dispatch
Main Gate
Storage for
atleast 15
days will be
provided.
10
25
30
--
203
DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Table 6-6: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Ecology and Biodiversity
Implementation and Management
Project Activity
Operation
Controls /
Mitigation
Measures
Data
Analysis
Measurement
Methodology
Frequency
Location
Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility
Emergency Procedure
Budget for
Mitigation Measure
- (in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)
Procurement
Schedule
Remark
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
Tree
plantation
Counts
Manual
Once during
plantation
At site
Site Incharge
During Construction
phase
Project Operation
Operation of
Reactors of
Herbicides,
Insecticides and
Fungicides.
Status
Survey of
Schedule-I
species
(Peacock)
Manual Field
Survey
Once in a year
LIZ
0.847
0.153
During Operation
Phase
Environment Cell
0.847
0.153
1.0
--
204
M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED
6.6
6. ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING PROGRAM
Total cost of the project is ~ INR 31.10 Crore. Expenditure to be incurred by HSL on environmental
monitoring and management including capital cost of ~ INR 451.85 Lacs and ~ INR 51.15 Lacs
recurring cost is tabulated in Table 6-7.
Head
Approximate
Capital cost
(INR in Lacs)
Approximate
Recurring cost per
Annum (INR in
Lacs)
Air Pollution
Control &
Monitoring
88.5
11.5
Noise Pollution
Control
12.5
2.5
Water Pollution
Control &
monitoring
325
32
Solid and
Hazardous waste
management
Storage Facility.
25
Ecology and
Biodiversity
0.85
0.15
451.85
51.15
205