Anda di halaman 1dari 234

M/S.

HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

Draft EIA & EMP Report for Greenfield


Multi-Purpose Plant for Manufacturing
of Various Technical Grade Pesticides
at Plot No. D-2/CH/357, Dahej ll,
Industrial Estate, Bharuch, Gujarat.
FEBRUARY, 2016

Kadam
Environmental Consultants
www.kadamenviro.com

Environment

for

Development

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET

HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

Greenfield Multi-Purpose Plant for Manufacturing of


Various Technical Grade Pesticides at Plot No. D2/CH/357, Dahej ll, Industrial Estate, Bharuch,
Gujarat.
Kadam Environmental Consultants (Kadam), February, 2016
This report is released for the use of the Hetban Spechem Limited, Regulators and relevant
stakeholders solely as part of the subject projects Environmental Clearance process. Information
provided (unless attributed to referenced third parties) is otherwise copyrighted and shall not be used
for any other purpose without the written consent of Kadam.

QUALITY CONTROL
Name of
Publication
Project Number

Draft EIA & EMP Report for Greenfield Multi-Purpose Plant for Manufacturing of Various
Technical Grade Pesticides at Plot No. D-2/CH/357, Dahej ll, Industrial Estate,
Bharuch, Gujarat.
1417581706

Report No.

Version

Released

February, 2016

DISCLAIMER
Kadam has taken all reasonable precautions in the preparation of this report as per its auditable quality plan.
Kadam also believes that the facts presented in the report are accurate as on the date it was written. However,
it is impossible to dismiss absolutely, the possibility of errors or omissions. Kadam therefore specifically
disclaims any liability resulting from the use or application of the information contained in this report. The
information is not intended to serve as legal advice related to the individual situation.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DARFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET

II

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DARFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET

III

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DARFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

QUALITY CONTROL
SHEET

IV

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS
1

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .............................................................. 1


1.1
1.2

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ........................................................................... 1


IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT ....................................... 1
1.2.1 Proposed Project ................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 Project Proponent ................................................................................ 1

1.3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY &
REGION ......................................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 Brief Description of the Project ................................................................ 2
1.3.2 Importance of Project to the Country and the Region ..................................... 2
1.4 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 2
1.4.1 General Clearance and Other Permissions ................................................... 3
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................ 3
2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. 10


2.1

TYPE OF PROJECT ...................................................................................


Condensed Description of Aspects ..........................................................
2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT ...........................................................................
2.2.1 Condensed Description of Aspects ..........................................................
2.3 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ......................................................................
2.3.1 General Location of the Site ..................................................................
2.3.2 Specific Location of Site & Project Boundary ..............................................
2.3.3 Approach to the Project Site .................................................................
2.3.4 Condensed Description of Aspects ..........................................................
2.4 SIZE AND MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION .........................................................
2.4.1 Size, Land Distribution at Site & Project Site Layout .....................................
2.4.2 Magnitude of the Project .....................................................................
2.4.3 Condensed Description of Aspects ..........................................................
2.5 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................
2.6 TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION ...................................................
2.6.1 Salient Features of Technology ..............................................................
2.7 PROCESS DESCRIPTION HERBICIDES .........................................................
2.7.1 Glyphosate ......................................................................................
2.7.2 2, 4 - Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ..........................................................
2.7.3 MCPA .............................................................................................
2.7.4 Atrazine ..........................................................................................
2.7.5 Metribuzin .......................................................................................
2.7.6 Propanil ..........................................................................................
2.7.7 Pretilachlor ......................................................................................
2.7.8 Pendimethalin ..................................................................................
2.7.9 Butachlor ........................................................................................
2.7.10 Clodinafop Propargyl ..........................................................................

2.1.1

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

10
10
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
14
14
16
16
17
19
19
20
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
V

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.11
2.7.12
2.7.13
2.7.14
2.7.15
2.7.16

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................
Quizalofop-P-Ethyl .............................................................................
Clodinofop-P-Ethyl .............................................................................
Paraquat Dichloride ............................................................................
Imazathapyr ....................................................................................
Oxyfluorfen .....................................................................................

2.8

PROCESS DESCRIPTION INSECTICIDES ......................................................


Thiamethoxam .................................................................................
Profenophos ....................................................................................
Acephate ........................................................................................
Chlorpyrifos .....................................................................................
Imidacloprid.....................................................................................
Acetamiprid .....................................................................................
Fipronil ...........................................................................................
Cartap Hydrochloride .......................................................................
Buprofezin .......................................................................................
Bifenthrin ........................................................................................
Diafenthiuron ...................................................................................
Deltamethrin ....................................................................................
Cypermethrin ...................................................................................
Permethrin ......................................................................................
Lambda-Cyhalothrin ...........................................................................
2.9 PROCESS DESCRIPTION FUNGICIDES .........................................................
2.9.1 Cymoxanil .......................................................................................
2.9.2 Cyproconazole ..................................................................................
2.9.3 Azoxystrobin ....................................................................................
2.9.4 Metalaxyl ........................................................................................
2.9.5 Trifloxystrobin ..................................................................................
2.9.6 Carbendazim ....................................................................................
2.9.7 Kresoxim-Methyl ...............................................................................
2.9.8 Thiophenate Methyl ...........................................................................
2.9.9 Tricyclazole......................................................................................
2.9.10 Isoprothiolane ..................................................................................
2.9.11 Propiconazole ...................................................................................
2.9.12 Hexaconazole ...................................................................................
2.9.13 Tebuconazole ...................................................................................
2.9.14 Difenconazole ...................................................................................
2.9.15 Epoxyconazole ..................................................................................
2.9.16 Chlorothalonil ...................................................................................
2.10
PROCESS DESCRIPTION PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ................................
2.10.1 Chlormequat Chloride .........................................................................
2.11
UTILITIES ..........................................................................................
2.11.1 Power ............................................................................................
2.11.2 Fuel ...............................................................................................

2.8.1
2.8.2
2.8.3
2.8.4
2.8.5
2.8.6
2.8.7
2.8.8
2.8.9
2.8.10
2.8.11
2.8.12
2.8.13
2.8.14
2.8.15

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
37
38
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
53
55
55
56
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
68
69
70
72
73
75
75
76
76
76
VI

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2.11.3 Water ............................................................................................ 76


2.11.4 Manpower ....................................................................................... 77
2.12
2.13

RAW MATERIAL, STORAGE & MODE OF TRANSPORT .......................................


SOLVENT AND SOLVENT RECOVERY SYSTEM ...............................................
2.13.1 Details of Solvents .............................................................................
2.13.2 Solvent Recovery Plan .........................................................................
2.14
CATALYST..........................................................................................
2.14.1 Details of Catalyst Consumption & its End Use ...........................................
2.15
PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................
2.15.1 Process Area ....................................................................................
2.15.2 Non-Processing Area ..........................................................................
2.15.3 Equipment List ..................................................................................
2.16
AIR EMISSIONS ...................................................................................
2.16.1 Point Source Emissions & Control ...........................................................
2.16.2 Area Source Emissions & Control ............................................................
2.16.3 Line Source Emissions & Control ............................................................
2.16.4 Fugitive Emissions & Control .................................................................
2.17
NOISE GENERATION .............................................................................
2.18
WATER CONSUMPTION, WASTE WATER GENERATION & DISPOSAL DETAILS .........
2.18.1 Water Consumption ...........................................................................
2.18.2 Waste Water Generation ......................................................................
2.18.3 Mode of Disposal ...............................................................................
2.18.4 Water Balance Table & Chart ................................................................
2.18.5 Details of ETP ...................................................................................

77
81
81
82
84
84
84
84
85
85
87
87
90
90
90
91
92
92
92
92
92
94

2.19
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION, QUANTIFICATION, STORAGE AND
DISPOSAL .................................................................................................... 99
2.19.1 Identification of Waste ........................................................................ 99
2.19.2 Categorization, Storage and Disposal of Waste .......................................... 100
2.19.3 Storage Area ................................................................................... 101
2.19.4 Treatment of Waste .......................................................................... 102
2.19.5 Transportation of Waste ..................................................................... 102
2.19.6 Safety System during Handling and Transportation of Waste ......................... 102
2.20
MITIGATION MEASURES AT DESIGN STAGE ................................................ 102
2.21
ASSESSMENT OF NEW AND UNTESTED TECHNOLOGY .................................... 102
3

DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................105


3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4

STUDY AREA ........................................................................................ 105


PERIOD .............................................................................................. 105
COMPONENTS ...................................................................................... 105
METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 105
3.4.1 Primary data Collection ...................................................................... 105
3.4.2 Secondary Data Collection ................................................................... 108
3.5 ESTABLISHMENT OF BASELINE FOR VALUED ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS ........ 108
3.5.1 Long Term Meteorology ..................................................................... 108
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

VII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

3.5.2
3.5.3
3.5.4
3.5.5
3.5.6
3.5.7
3.5.8
3.5.9
3.5.10
4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Land Use ....................................................................................... 114


Ambient Air .................................................................................... 119
Traffic Survey .................................................................................. 123
Noise & Vibration ............................................................................. 123
Hydrology, Surface Water & Ground Water .............................................. 126
Geology ......................................................................................... 135
Soil .............................................................................................. 137
Ecology & Biodiversity ........................................................................ 140
Socio-Economics .............................................................................. 152

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ........163


4.1
4.2

INVESTIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DUE TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ........ 163


AIR ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 167
4.2.1 Sources of Emissions, Emission rates and Predicted GLCs ............................. 170
4.2.2 Incremental Traffic ........................................................................... 175
4.3 NOISE ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................ 177
4.3.1 Assessment of Noise using SoundPlan .................................................... 177
4.4 WATER ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................... 183
4.4.1 Impact on Ground Water .................................................................... 183
4.4.2 Impact on Surface Water .................................................................... 183
4.4.3 Mitigation Measures .......................................................................... 183
4.5 LAND ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 186
4.5.1 Site Preparation ............................................................................... 186
4.5.2 Operation Phase............................................................................... 186
4.5.3 Mitigation Measure ............................................................................ 186
4.6 ECOLOGY & BIODIVERSITY ...................................................................... 189
4.7 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ............................................................. 192
4.8 RESOURCE DEPLETION ........................................................................... 194
5

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................196

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM .................................................197


6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6

AIR ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 197


NOISE ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................ 197
WATER ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................... 197
LAND ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 197
ECOLOGY & BIODIVERSITY ...................................................................... 197
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT COST ................................ 205

ADDITIONAL STUDIES ..............................................................................206


7.1
7.2

PUBLIC CONSULTATION .......................................................................... 206


RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................. 206
7.2.1 Scope & Methodology ........................................................................ 206
7.2.2 Consequence Analysis for Selected Failure Scenario .................................... 206
7.2.3 Consequence Analysis Results .............................................................. 209

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

VIII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.3

DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................. 213


7.3.1 About Industrial Activities ................................................................... 213
7.3.2 Assessment of Accident Consequences ................................................... 216
7.3.3 Description on Organization Set-Up for Safety ........................................... 216
7.3.4 First Aid and Antidotes ....................................................................... 218
7.3.5 Allocation and Delegation of Responsibilities for Plant Safety ......................... 218
7.3.6 Emergency Contact Details .................................................................. 218
7.3.7 Emergency Control Plan ..................................................................... 219
7.3.8 Internal Hazards .............................................................................. 223
7.3.9 External Hazards .............................................................................. 223
7.3.10 Offsite Emergency Response Plan .......................................................... 224
7.3.11 Traffic Risk Assessment ...................................................................... 228
7.4 R&R ACTION PLANS ............................................................................... 229
8

PROJECT BENEFITS ..................................................................................230


8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4

PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................... 230


SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................... 230
EMPLOYMENT POTENTIAL ........................................................................ 230
OTHER TANGIBLE BENEFITS ..................................................................... 230

ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS ................................................231

10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................232


10.1
10.2
10.3

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 232


PURPOSE OF EMP ................................................................................ 232
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................... 232
10.3.1 Air Environment ............................................................................... 232
10.3.2 Water Environment ........................................................................... 232
10.3.3 Land and Soil Environment (Solid Hazardous Waste Management) .................. 233
10.3.4 Ecology and Biodiversity Environment ..................................................... 233
10.3.5 Socio Economic Environment ............................................................... 237

11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ....................................................................239


11.1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 239


Proposed Project .............................................................................. 239
Process ......................................................................................... 240
Air Emissions & Control ...................................................................... 241
Waste Water Treatment & Disposal........................................................ 241
Noise ............................................................................................ 241
Hazardous & Other Solid Waste ............................................................ 241
11.2
DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ...................................................... 242
11.2.1 Study Period, Area & Monitoring/Sampling Locations ................................... 242
11.2.2 Land Use and Land Cover ................................................................... 242
11.2.3 Meteorology .................................................................................... 242
11.2.4 Ambient Air Quality ........................................................................... 242

11.1.1
11.1.2
11.1.3
11.1.4
11.1.5
11.1.6

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

IX

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

11.2.5
11.2.6
11.2.7
11.2.8
11.2.9
11.2.10

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Traffic ........................................................................................... 243


Noise Level ..................................................................................... 243
Water Quality .................................................................................. 243
Soil Quality ..................................................................................... 244
Biological Environment ....................................................................... 244
Socio-Economic Environment ............................................................. 244

11.3

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ............. 245


Air Environment ............................................................................... 245
Traffic ........................................................................................... 245
Noise Environment ............................................................................ 246
Water Environment ........................................................................... 246
Land Environment ............................................................................ 246
Biological Environment ....................................................................... 246
Socio-Economic Environment ............................................................... 247
11.4
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................ 247
11.5
ADDITIONAL STUDIES .......................................................................... 247
11.5.1 Socio Economic Development Activities ................................................... 247
11.5.2 Risk & Hazards ................................................................................ 247
11.6
PROJECT BENEFITS ............................................................................. 248
11.7
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................... 248
11.8
CONCLUSION..................................................................................... 249

11.3.1
11.3.2
11.3.3
11.3.4
11.3.5
11.3.6
11.3.7

12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS .................................................................250


12.1
12.2

BRIEF RESUME AND NATURE OF CONSULTANCY (KADAM)............................... 250


EIA TEAM MEMBERS ............................................................................ 251

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure 1: EC Application for ToR to EAC, MoEFCC ................................................................... 254
Annexure 2: Terms of Reference (ToR) from EAC, MoEFCC dated 29th April, 2015 ......................... 255
Annexure 3: Land Lease and Possession Documents .................................................................... 260
Annexure 4: Inprinciple Water Permission from GIDC .................................................................. 276
Annexure 5: Permission for Hazardous Waste Disposal ................................................................ 277
Annexure 6: Long Term Meteorological Data (1961 1976) IMD, Bharuch ................................. 278
Annexure 7: Classification of Land Use and Land Cover ................................................................ 280
Annexure 8: CPCBs National Ambient Air Quality Standards ......................................................... 286
Annexure 9: Detailed Results of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .................................................... 288
Annexure 10: Impact Assessment Methodology ........................................................................... 296
Annexure 11: Air Dispersion Modeling Results and Isopleths ........................................................ 306
Annexure 12: Detailed Traffic Survey Sheets ............................................................................... 330
Annexure 13: Methodology of Risk Assessment and Hazard Identification ..................................... 340
Annexure 14: Kadams NABET Certificate .................................................................................... 343

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XI

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Brief Description of the Project ....................................................................................... 2
Table 1-2: Statutory Clearances / Permissions required from Concerned Ministries or Bodies .............. 3
Table 1-3: Compliance with the Terms of Reference ........................................................................ 4
Table 2-1: Co-ordinates of Project Boundary ................................................................................. 12
Table 2-2: Area Breakup of the Site .............................................................................................. 14
Table 2-3: Product List ................................................................................................................ 16
Table 2-4: Project Implementation Schedule ................................................................................. 18
Table 2-5: Mass Balance Glyphosate .......................................................................................... 20
Table 2-6: Mass Balance 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid .......................................................... 21
Table 2-7: Mass Balance MCPA.................................................................................................. 22
Table 2-8: Mass Balance - Atrazine ............................................................................................... 23
Table 2-9: Mass Balance - Metribuzin ........................................................................................... 24
Table 2-10: Mass Balance Propanil ............................................................................................ 25
Table 2-11: Mass Balance Pretilachlor ........................................................................................ 26
Table 2-12: Mass Balance Pendimethalin .................................................................................... 28
Table 2-13: Mass Balance Butachlor .......................................................................................... 29
Table 2-14: Mass Balance Clodinafop Propargyl .......................................................................... 30
Table 2-15: Mass Balance Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................ 31
Table 2-16: Mass Balance Quizalofop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................. 32
Table 2-17: Mass Balance Clodinofop-P-Ethyl ............................................................................. 33
Table 2-18: Mass Balance Paraquat Dichloride ............................................................................ 34
Table 2-19: Mass Balance Imazathapyr ...................................................................................... 35
Table 2-20: Mass Balance Oxyfluorfen ....................................................................................... 36
Table 2-21: Mass Balance Thiamethoxam .................................................................................. 37
Table 2-22: Mass Balance Profenophos ...................................................................................... 38
Table 2-23: Mass Balance Acephate ........................................................................................... 40
Table 2-24: Mass Balance Chlorpyrifos ....................................................................................... 41
Table 2-25: Mass Balance Imidacloprid ...................................................................................... 42
Table 2-26: Mass Balance Acetamiprid ....................................................................................... 43
Table 2-27: Mass Balance Fipronil ............................................................................................. 44
Table 2-28: Mass Balance Cartap Hydrochloride ....................................................................... 45
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table 2-29: Mass Balance Buprofezin ......................................................................................... 46


Table 2-30: Mass Balance Bifenthrin .......................................................................................... 47
Table 2-31: Mass Balance Diafenthiuron .................................................................................... 48
Table 2-32: Mass Balance Deltamethrin ..................................................................................... 49
Table 2-33: Mass Balance Cypermethrin .................................................................................... 50
Table 2-34: Mass Balance Permethrin ........................................................................................ 52
Table 2-35: Mass Balance Lambda-Cyhalothrin ........................................................................... 53
Table 2-36: Mass Balance Cymoxanil ......................................................................................... 55
Table 2-37: Mass Balance Cyproconazole ................................................................................... 56
Table 2-38: Mass Balance Azoxystrobin ...................................................................................... 57
Table 2-39: Mass Balance Metalaxyl .......................................................................................... 59
Table 2-40: Mass Balance Trifloxystrobin ................................................................................... 60
Table 2-41: Mass Balance Carbendazim ..................................................................................... 61
Table 2-42: Mass Balance Kresoxim-Methyl ................................................................................ 62
Table 2-43: Mass Balance Thiophenate Methyl ........................................................................... 63
Table 2-44: Mass Balance Tricyclazole ....................................................................................... 64
Table 2-45: Mass Balance Isoprothiolane ................................................................................... 65
Table 2-46: Mass Balance Propiconazole .................................................................................... 67
Table 2-47: Mass Balance Hexaconazole .................................................................................... 68
Table 2-48: Mass Balance Tebuconazole .................................................................................... 70
Table 2-49: Mass Balance Difenconazole .................................................................................... 71
Table 2-50: Mass Balance Epoxyconazole ................................................................................... 72
Table 2-51: Mass Balance Chlorothalonil .................................................................................... 73
Table 2-52: Mass Balance Chlormequat Chloride ......................................................................... 75
Table 2-53: Fuel Details ............................................................................................................... 76
Table 2-54: Water & Waste Water Details for Various Products (for section of group) ...................... 76
Table 2-55: Assumption for Group of Products .............................................................................. 77
Table 2-56: Details of Raw Materials, Physical State & Means of Storage ......................................... 77
Table 2-57: List of Solvent used and its Recovery Plan .................................................................. 81
Table 2-58: Details of Catalyst Used ............................................................................................. 84
Table 2-59: List of Equipment with Cost ....................................................................................... 85
Table 2-60: Details of Stacks, Fuel Used and APCM ....................................................................... 87
Table 2-61: Technical Details of Proposed APCM ........................................................................... 90
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XIII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table 2-62: Water Consumption and Waste water Generation Details ............................................. 92
Table 2-63: Inlet and Outlet Characteristics of Wastewater ............................................................ 94
Table 2-64: List of Primary Treatment Unit for Removal of Cyanide from Wastewater ...................... 95
Table 2-65: List of MEE Pretreatment Units for treatment of High COD and High TDS Stream ........... 95
Table 2-66: List of MEE Units ....................................................................................................... 96
Table 2-67: List of Secondary Biological and Tertiary Treatment Units ............................................. 97
Table 2-68: Product-wise Distillation Residue Generation ............................................................... 99
Table 2-69: Product-wise Filtration Residue Generation .................................................................. 99
Table 2-70: Quantity of Non-process Waste ................................................................................ 100
Table 2-71: Identification of Other Waste ................................................................................... 100
Table 2-72: Categorization, Storage and Disposal of Waste .......................................................... 100
Table 2-73: Operational Controls at Design Stage ........................................................................ 103
Table 3-1: Predominant/Mean Wind Direction IMD Bharuch ......................................................... 109
Table 3-2: Average Meteorological Condition at Bharuch IMD Data ............................................ 110
Table 3-3: Monitoring Methodology of Meteorological Data .......................................................... 111
Table 3-4: Average Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village........................................................... 111
Table 3-5: Mean Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village Summer Season, 2015 .......................... 111
Table 3-6: GPS Reading Enumerating the Land Use Features in Study Area ................................... 115
Table 3-7: Area Statistic for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area .......................... 116
Table 3-8: Important Features within the Study Area ................................................................... 117
Table 3-9: Ponds within 5 Km from Project Site ........................................................................... 117
Table 3-10: Methodology of Analyzing Ambient Air Monitoring Parameters .................................... 119
Table 3-11: AAQM Locations with Justification ............................................................................. 120
Table 3-12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results ..................................................................... 122
Table 3-13: Noise Level Monitoring Methodology ......................................................................... 123
Table 3-14: Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones ................ 124
Table 3-15: Noise Level Monitoring Locations .............................................................................. 124
Table 3-16: Noise Level Monitoring Results ................................................................................. 125
Table 3-17: Analysis Methodology for Analyzing Surface & Ground Water Samples ........................ 126
Table 3-18: Surface Water Sampling Locations Ponds and River (Estuary) .................................. 129
Table 3-19: Surface Water (Ponds) Analysis Results .................................................................... 130
Table 3-20: Surface Water (Estuary) Analysis Results .................................................................. 131
Table 3-21: Ground Water Sampling Locations ............................................................................ 132
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XIV

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table 3-22: Ground Water (Borewells) Analysis Results ............................................................... 133


Table 3-23: Regional Geology .................................................................................................... 135
Table 3-24: Soil Sampling Locations ........................................................................................... 137
Table 3-25: Methodology for Analyzing Soil Samples .................................................................... 138
Table 3-26: Soil Analysis Results ................................................................................................ 139
Table 3-27: Floral species reported from the proposed project site / Core Zone ............................. 141
Table 3-28: Flora Reported from Buffer Zone of the Study Area .................................................... 141
Table 3-29: Herpetofauna Reported from Buffer Zone ................................................................. 146
Table 3-30: Avifauna Reported from Core Zone / Project Site ....................................................... 147
Table 3-31: Birds Reported from Buffer Zone .............................................................................. 147
Table 3-32: Mammals Reported from the Buffer Zone .................................................................. 149
Table 3-33: Butterflies Reported from the Buffer Zone ................................................................. 149
Table 3-34: Status of Phytoplankton in Various villages of the Study Area ..................................... 150
Table 3-35: Status of Zooplankton in Various villages of the Study Area ........................................ 151
Table 3-36: Demographic Status of the Study Area ...................................................................... 153
Table 3-37: Comparison of Sex Ratio of the Study Area from Previous Census Data ....................... 154
Table 3-38: Stratification (Age Wise) of Vadadla Village ............................................................... 155
Table 3-39: SC/ST Population in Study Area ................................................................................ 155
Table 3-40: Literacy Rate within the Study Area .......................................................................... 156
Table 3-41: Literacy Level of Vadadla Village ............................................................................... 157
Table 3-42: Housing Condition in the Surveyed Village - Village .................................................... 158
Table 3-43: Toilet Facility in the Surveyed Villages ....................................................................... 159
Table 3-44: Type of Livelihood Activity in the Core Impact area .................................................... 160
Table 4-1: Aspect Impact Identification from Proposed Project .................................................. 164
Table 4-2: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Air Environment ....................................... 168
Table 4-3: Assumptions for Calculating Emission Estimate for Point Source ................................... 170
Table 4-4: Emission Estimate Sheet for Point Source Emissions Flue Gas Stacks.......................... 171
Table 4-5: Emission Estimate Sheet for Point Source Emissions Process Stacks & Vents............... 171
Table 4-6: Summary of Air Dispersion Modeling for Proposed Stacks ............................................. 173
Table 4-7: Maximum Incremental GLC from Proposed Project ...................................................... 173
Table 4-8: Incremental Hourly Average Traffic on Bharuch to Dahej ............................................. 176
Table 4-9: Incremental Hourly Average Traffic on Dahej to Bharuch ............................................. 176
Table 4-10: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Noise Environment .................................. 178
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XV

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table 4-11: Sources of Noise with their Sound Pressure Levels ..................................................... 179
Table 4-12: Noise Level at Receptor Locations (Based on SoundPlan) ........................................... 179
Table 4-13: Predictive Cumulative Noise Levels ........................................................................... 180
Table 4-14: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Water Environment ................................. 184
Table 4-15: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Land Environment ................................... 187
Table 4-16: Activity-Aspect Based Determination of Impacting Ecological Components ................... 189
Table 4-17: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Ecology & Biodiversity ............................. 191
Table 4-18: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Socio Economic Environment ................... 193
Table 4-19: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Resource Depletion ................................. 195
Table 6-1: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Air Environment ........................................ 198
Table 6-2: Traffic Management Plan ........................................................................................... 200
Table 6-3: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Noise Environment .................................... 201
Table 6-4: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Water Environment ................................... 202
Table 6-5: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Land Environment ..................................... 203
Table 6-6: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Ecology and Biodiversity ............................ 204
Table 6-7: Environmental Monitoring and Management Cost ........................................................ 205
Table 7-1: Details of Flammable Raw Materials ........................................................................... 207
Table 7-2: Details of Flammable Solvents .................................................................................... 207
Table 7-3: Results of Consequence Analysis for Xylene & HSD ...................................................... 209
Table 7-4: Shift Timing .............................................................................................................. 213
Table 7-5: Organogram for Safety .............................................................................................. 216
Table 7-6: Details of Proposed NonRespiratory PPEs .................................................................. 217
Table 7-7: Details of Proposed Respiratory PPEs .......................................................................... 217
Table 7-8: Details of Proposed Fire Extinguishers at Site .............................................................. 218
Table 7-9: Emergency Contact Details ........................................................................................ 218
Table 7-10: Equipment available at OHC ..................................................................................... 222
Table 10-1: Plant Species Suggested for Greenbelt and Landscaping at Various Locations .............. 234
Table 10-2: Budget for Proposed Greenbelt Development within Project Site ................................. 235
Table 10-3: List of plant species for Plantation in LIZ Area ........................................................... 235
Table 10-4: Budget for Additional Greenbelt / Habitat Improvement Programme ........................... 236
Table 10-5: Issues Raised by Respondents of Core Zone .............................................................. 237
Table 11-1: Product List ............................................................................................................ 239
Table 11-2: Brief Description of the Project ................................................................................. 240
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XVI

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table 11-3: Environmental Monitoring Plan ................................................................................. 247


Table 12-1: EIA Team Member .................................................................................................. 251

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Process Flow Diagram Glyphosate ............................................................................ 20
Figure 2-2: Process Flow Diagram 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ............................................. 21
Figure 2-3: Process Flow Diagram MCPA .................................................................................... 22
Figure 2-4: Process Flow Diagram Atrazine................................................................................. 23
Figure 2-5: Process Flow Diagram Metribuzin ............................................................................. 24
Figure 2-6: Process Flow Diagram Propanil ................................................................................. 25
Figure 2-7: Process Flow Diagram Pretilachlor ............................................................................ 26
Figure 2-8: Process Flow Diagram Pendimethalin ........................................................................ 28
Figure 2-9: Process Flow Diagram Butachlor ............................................................................... 29
Figure 2-10: Process Flow Diagram Clodinafop Propargyl ............................................................ 30
Figure 2-11: Process Flow Diagram Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl .............................................................. 31
Figure 2-12: Process Flow Diagram Quizalofop-P-Ethyl ................................................................ 32
Figure 2-13: Process Flow Diagram Clodinofop-P-Ethyl ................................................................ 33
Figure 2-14: Process Flow Diagram Paraquat Dichloride .............................................................. 34
Figure 2-15: Process Flow Diagram Imazathapyr ........................................................................ 35
Figure 2-16: Process Flow Diagram Oxyfluorfen .......................................................................... 36
Figure 2-17: Process Flow Diagram Thiamethoxam ..................................................................... 37
Figure 2-18: Process Flow Diagram Profenophos ........................................................................ 38
Figure 2-19: Process Flow Diagram Acephate ............................................................................. 40
Figure 2-20: Process Flow Diagram Chlorpyrifos ......................................................................... 41
Figure 2-21: Process Flow Diagram Imidacloprid......................................................................... 42
Figure 2-22: Process Flow Diagram Acetamiprid ......................................................................... 43
Figure 2-23: Process Flow Diagram Fipronil ................................................................................ 44
Figure 2-24: Process Flow Diagram Cartap Hydrochloride ......................................................... 45
Figure 2-25: Process Flow Diagram Buprofezin ........................................................................... 46
Figure 2-26: Process Flow Diagram Bifenthrin ............................................................................ 47
Figure 2-27: Process Flow Diagram Diafenthiuron ....................................................................... 48
Figure 2-28: Process Flow Diagram Deltamethrin ........................................................................ 49
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XVII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Figure 2-29: Process Flow Diagram Cypermethrin ....................................................................... 50


Figure 2-30: Process Flow Diagram Permethrin........................................................................... 52
Figure 2-31: Process Flow Diagram Lambda-Cyhalothrin ............................................................. 53
Figure 2-32: Process Flow Diagram Cymoxanil ............................................................................ 55
Figure 2-33: Process Flow Diagram Cyproconazole ..................................................................... 56
Figure 2-34: Process Flow Diagram Azoxystrobin ........................................................................ 57
Figure 2-35: Process Flow Diagram Metalaxyl ............................................................................. 59
Figure 2-36: Process Flow Diagram Trifloxystrobin ...................................................................... 60
Figure 2-37: Process Flow Diagram Carbendazim ........................................................................ 61
Figure 2-38: Process Flow Diagram Kresoxim-Methyl .................................................................. 62
Figure 2-39: Process Flow Diagram Thiophenate Methyl .............................................................. 63
Figure 2-40: Process Flow Diagram Tricyclazole .......................................................................... 64
Figure 2-41: Process Flow Diagram Isoprothiolane ...................................................................... 65
Figure 2-42: Process Flow Diagram Propiconazole ...................................................................... 66
Figure 2-43: Process Flow Diagram Hexaconazole....................................................................... 68
Figure 2-44: Process Flow Diagram Tebuconazole....................................................................... 69
Figure 2-45: Process Flow Diagram Difenconazole ...................................................................... 70
Figure 2-46: Process Flow Diagram Epoxyconazole ..................................................................... 72
Figure 2-47: Process Flow Diagram Chlorothalonil....................................................................... 73
Figure 2-48: Process Flow Diagram Chlormequat Chloride ........................................................... 75
Figure 2-49: Schematic Diagram for Solvent Recovery Unit ............................................................ 83
Figure 2-50: PFD for HCl, SO2 / HBr Scrubbing System .................................................................. 89
Figure 2-51: Water Balance Diagram ............................................................................................ 93
Figure 2-52: Process Block diagram of Proposed ETP ..................................................................... 98
Figure 3-1: Windrose Diagram for Summer Season - 2015 ........................................................... 113
Figure 3-2: Earthquake zoning map of Gujarat ............................................................................ 137
Figure 4-1: Data Flow in AERMOD Modeling System .................................................................... 172
Figure 4-2: Isopleths Generated During Day Time ....................................................................... 181
Figure 4-3: Isopleths Generated During Night Time ..................................................................... 182
Figure 7-1: Late pool fire effect distance contours of Xylene due to 10mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.9/F ............................................................................................................. 210
Figure 7-2: Jet fire effect distance contours of Xylene due to 25mm leak in Storage tank at weather
condition 4.4/D ......................................................................................................................... 211

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XVIII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Figure 7-3: Late pool fire effect distance contours of Xylene due to 25mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.9/F ............................................................................................................. 211
Figure 7-4: Late pool fire effect distance contours of Xylene due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage
tank at weather condition 4.9/F ................................................................................................. 211
Figure 7-5: Late Explosion effect distance contours of Xylene due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage
tank at weather condition 4.4/D ................................................................................................. 212
Figure 7-6: Late pool fire effect distance contours of HSD due to 10mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.4/D ............................................................................................................ 212
Figure 7-7: Late pool fire effect distance contours of HSD due to 25mm leak in Storage tank at
weather condition 4.9/F ............................................................................................................. 212
Figure 7-8: Late pool fire effect distance contours of HSD due to Catastrophic Rupture of Storage tank
at weather condition 4.9/F ......................................................................................................... 213
Figure 7-9: Organization Chart of Factory ................................................................................... 215

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XIX

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 3-1: Photographs of Meteorological Station Setup ...................................................... 110
Photograph 3-2: Photographs Showing Different Type of Land Use in Study Area .......................... 115
Photograph 3-3: Photographs of AAQ Sampling Stations .............................................................. 120
Photograph 3-4: Photographs of Noise Level Monitoring Stations .................................................. 124
Photograph 3-5: Photographs of Surface Water Sampling ............................................................ 129
Photograph 3-6: Photographs of Ground Water Sampling............................................................. 132
Photograph 3-7: Photographs of Soil Sampling ............................................................................ 138
Photograph 3-8: Photographs Showing Project Site / Core Zone having Flora / plants .................... 141
Photograph 3-9: Herpetofauna Sighted from the Buffer Zone ....................................................... 146
Photograph 3-10: Avifauna Sighted from the Buffer Zone ............................................................. 148
Photograph 3-11: Mammal Sighted from the Buffer Zone ............................................................. 149
Photograph 3-12: Photographs showing Primary Survey at Schools............................................... 158
Photograph 3-13: Photographs of Kutcha Houses and Toilets ....................................................... 159
Photograph 3-14: Socio Expert with Local Vegetable Vendor & Stakeholder ................................... 160
Photograph 3-15: Animal Husbandry and Agricultural Fields in Study Area .................................... 161

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XX

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABBREVIATIONS
AAQM

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

AAS

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

AERMIC

American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model


Improvement Committee

AERMOD

AMS/EPA Regulatory Model

ALARP

As Low As Reasonably Practicable

ANP

Ammonium Nitro Phosphate

APCM

Air Pollution Control Measures

APHA

American Public Health Association

BLEVE

Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion

BOD

Biological Organic Demand

BSI

British Standards Institution

CAS

Chemical Abstracts Service

CCA

Consolidated Consent and Authorization

CCTV

Closed Circuit Television

CETP

Central Effluent Treatment Plant

cGMP

Current Good Manufacturing Practices

CIB

Central Insecticides Board

CO

Carbon Monoxide

COD

Chemical Oxygen Demand

CPCB

Central Pollution Control Board

CRO

Control Room Officer

CSLS

Crop Life Science Limited

CSR

Corporate Social Responsibility

CTO

Consent to Operate

dB

Decibels

DCP

Dry Chemical Powder

DCS

Distributed Control System

DG

Diesel Generator

DGVCL

Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited

DM

De-mineralization

DMP

Disaster Management Plan

EAC

Expert Appraisal Committee

EC

Environmental Clearance

ECG

Electrocardiogram

EIA

Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP

Environmental Management Plan

EMS

Environmental Management Systems

ENVIS

Environmental Information System

ERPG

Emergency Response Planning Guideline

ETP

Effluent Treatment Plant

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XXI

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

FAE

Functional Area Expert

FFA

Falling Film type Absorbers

GC

Gas Chromatography

GHGs

Green House Gases

GIDC

Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation

GoG

Government of Gujarat

GoI

Government of India

GPCB

Gujarat Pollution Control Board

GPS

Global Positioning System

GSI

Geological Survey of India

GSPL

Gujarat State Petronet Limited

HB

Hemoglobin

HBr

Hydrogen Bromide

HCs

Hydro-Carbons

HCl

Hydrochloric Acid

HDPE

High-Density PolyEthylene

HRT

Hydraulic Retention Time

HSD

High Speed Diesel

HSL

Hetban Spechem Limited

Hz

Hertz

IAA

Impact Assessment Authority

IC

Incident Controller

IDLH

Immediately Dangerous to Life & Health

IL&FS

Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited

IMD

India Meteorological Department

INR

Indian Rupees

IPP

Import Party Prices

IRC

Indian Roads Congress

IS

Indian Standards

ISLM

Integrating Sound Level Measurement

ISO

International Organization for Standardization

ITI

Industrial Training Institute

IUCN

The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

JCB

Joseph Cyril Bamford

Kadam /
KEC

Kadam Environmental Consultants

kPa

Kilo Pascal

kVA

Kilo Volt Amperes

LAN

Local Area Network

LCL

Lethal Concentration Low

LDO

Light Diesel Oil

LDPE

Low-Density PolyEthylene

LIZ

Likely Impact Zone

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

XXII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

LSIR

Location Specific Individual Risk

MCAS

Maximum Credible Accident Scenario

MCPA

2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid

MCC

Motor Control Center

MEE

Multiple Effect Evaporator

MLSS

Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids

MTA

Metric Tons Per Annum

MTPD

Metric Tons Per Day

MoEFCC

Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change

MSDS

Material Safety Data Sheet

MW

Mega Watt

MWC

Main Works Controller

NAAQES

National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Series

NABET

National Accreditation Board of Education & Training

NABL

National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

NG

Natural Gas

NH

National Highway

NH3

Ammonia

NIHL

Noise Induced Hearing Loss

NITT

National Institute of Technical Training

NOC

No Objection Certificate

NOx

Oxides of Nitrogen

NRSA

National Remote Sensing Agency

OCP

Operational Control Procedures

OHS

Occupational Health & Safety

OM

Office Memorandum

OSHAS

Occupation Health and Safety Assessment Series

P&ID

Piping and Instrumentation Diagram

PCM

Pollution Control Measures

PCPIR

Petroleum, Chemicals and Petrochemicals Investment Region

PCU

Passenger Car Unit

PEL

Permissible Exposure Level

PESO

Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organization

PFD

Process Flow Diagram

PFR

Pre-Feasibility Report

PFT

Pulmonary Function Test

pH

Power of Hydrogen

PHAST

Process Heating Assessment and Survey Tool

PM

Particulate Matter

PP

Polypropylene

PPE

Personal Protective Equipment

ppm

Parts per Million

PUCC

Pollution Under Control Certificates

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

XXIII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

PVC

Poly Vinyl Chloride

QC

Quality Council

QCI

Quality Council of India

QRA

Quantitative Risk Assessment

GLC

Ground Level Concentration

R&D

Research & Development

RA

Risk Assessment

RO

Regional Officer

RO

Reverse Osmosis

SEIAA

State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority

SEZ

Special Economic Zone

SGPT

Serum Glutamic Pyruvate Transaminase (Liver Test)

SH

State Highway

SMC

Site Main Controller

SPCB

State Pollution Control Board

SPL

Sound Pressure Level

SO2

Sulphur Dioxide

SOI

Survey of India

SOP

Standard of Procedure

SS

Suspended Solids

STEL

Short Time Exposure Limit

TCL

Toxic Concentration Low

TCM

Tri-Chloro Melamine

TDS

Total Dissolved Solids

TEFR

Techno-Economic Feasibility Report

TFD

Thin Film Dryer

TLV

Threshold Limit Value

TOC

Total Organic Carbon

ToR

Terms of Reference

TREM

Transport Emergency Card

TSDF

Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility

USEPA

United States Environmental Protection Agency

VOCs

Volatile Organic Compounds

ZLD

Zero Liquid Discharge

ZSI

Zoological Survey of India

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

XXIV

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF PERSONS AND INSTITUTIONS MET


S. No.

Name of Person Met

Designation / Village

Hetban Personnel
1

Mr. Rajesh Lunagariya

Executive Director

Mr. G D Joshi

General Manager

Mr. S S Shah

General Manager

Mr. Kaushal Shah

Mr. Balachandran

Karanbhai A Parmar

Jolva

Samar Sinh Rathore

Jolva

Karsanbhai Chatra Sinh

Jolva

Nanduben Nar Sinh Gohil

Jolva

Mahendrabhai P Rathore

Jolva

Adam Sahib Patel

Jolva

Rama Iswarbhai Rahtore

Jolva

Abhay Sinh Punjabhai Mahiji

Jolva

Technical Consultant

Others

Mitesh L Parmar

Jolva

10

Hajrina Ishak Patel

Jolva

11

Urmilaben Ajit Sinh Chauhan

Jolva

12

Bhupat Sinh M Parmar

Jolva

13

Ghanshyambhai Mangebhai Prajapati

Jolva

14

Jagdishbhai S Prajapati

Jolva

15

Manoharbhai S Prajapati

Jolva

16

Prakash Sinh Chandra Sinh Barot

Jolva

17

Babubhai Mohanbhai Solanki

Jolva

18

Jai Sinhbhai M Parmar

Jolva

19

Dhirajbhai G Parmar

Jolva

20

Ratanben D Parmar

Jolva

21

Manjulaben S Parmar

Jolva

22

Maganbhai R Parmar

Jolva

23

Ashokbhai R Parmar

Jolva

24

Jakir J Patel

Jolva

25

Natwarbhai L Prajapati

Jolva

26

Sudhaben Rajendra Singh Bharwad

Jolva

27

Bhanuben Kiranbhai Bharwad

Jolva

28

Harendra Amarsinh Bharwad

Jolva

29

Suresh Bhai Prajapati

Vadadala

30

Punsi Ben Prajapati

Vadadala

31

Somesh Awasthi

Vadadala

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XXV

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S. No.

Name of Person Met

Designation / Village

32

Ghanshyam Amar Sinh Yadav

Vadadala

33

Nandu Ben Purushottam Parmar

Vadadala

34

Arjun Bhai Amar Sinh Rathore

Vadadala

35

Dalpat Bhai Chagan Bhai Makwana

Vadadala

36

Ajit Sinh Rai Sinh Sinddha

Vadadala

37

Khuman Sinh Hari Sinh Singda

Vadadala

38

Mukeshji Solanki

Vadadala

39

Varun Balu Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

40

Dhanji Bhai G. Rathore

Vadadala

41

Chiman Bhai Sana Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

42

Chandresh Sinh Uday Sinh Chavda

Vadadala

43

Hamir Sinh Gambhir Sinh Chavda

Vadadala

44

Kapila Ben Jayanti Lal Shah

Vadadala

45

Suresh Bhai Bikha Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

46

Madhur Sinh Chandresh Sinh Parmar

Vadadala

47

Mahendra Sinh Amar Sinh Rai

Vadadala

48

Laxman Bhai Gulab Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

49

Raman Bhai Keasr Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

50

Jagdish Bhai Raman Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

51

Thakur Sona Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

52

Rukhi Ben Kesar Bhai Rathotre

Vadadala

53

Laxman Bhai U. Rathore

Vadadala

54

Suresh Bhai Ranjit Bhai Rahore

Vadadala

55

Ambu Bhai K. Rathore

Vadadala

56

Mana Bhai Lakha Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

57

Dilip Bhai Laxman Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

58

Shanta Ben Ranjit Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

59

Raju Bhai Jai Sinh Bhai Parmar

Vadadala

60

Gokul Bhai R. Rathore

Vadadala

61

Arvind Bhai C. Purushottam

Vadadala

62

Mahesh Bhai A. Rathore

Vadadala

63

Shantilal M. Rathore

Vadadala

64

Bhadresh Bhai Gaffur Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

65

Kalidas Soma Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

66

Keval Bhai Soma Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

67

Punja Bhai G. Narottam

Vadadala

68

Chagan Bhai Govind Rathore

Vadadala

69

Vishnu Bhai Himmat Bhai Rathore

Vadadala

70

Pravin Bhai L. Gohil

Kadodara

71

Shravan Bhai D. Parmar

Kadodara

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XXVI

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S. No.

Name of Person Met

Designation / Village

72

Dharmendra Bhai D. Gohil

Kadodara

73

Ranjit Bhai K. Parmar

Kadodara

74

Ranjit D. Koli Patel

Kadodara

75

Jaisang S. Gohil

Kadodara

76

Ramsang C. Gohil

Kadodara

77

Ganpat J. Makwana

Kadodara

78

Laxman S. Parmar

Kadodara

79

Suresh Bhai R. Parmar

Kadodara

80

Kanti Bhai S. Parmar

Kadodara

81

Deepsang M. Parmar

Kadodara

82

Mahesh Bhai J. Makwana

Kadodara

83

Amarsang K. Parmar

Kadodara

84

Ajit Bhai J. Makwana

Kadodara

85

Jaisang Bhai Sukhji Bhai Makwana

Kadodara

86

Rupsang Bhai M. Gohil

Kadodara

87

Pratap Bhai Mohan Bhai Parmar

Kadodara

88

Dileep Bhai R. Parmar

Kadodara

89

Yogesh Bhai Ganpat Bhai Parmar

Kadodara

90

Jaya Ben Shankar Bhai Gohil

Kadodara

91

Sanjay Bhai Rathore

Kadodara

92

Dalpat Bhai Harji Bhai Vasava

Kadodara

93

Purushottam Sana Rathore

Kadodara

94

Khoda Bhai L. Rathore

Kadodara

95

Sanjay Bhai P. Rathore

Kadodara

96

Amba Bhai G. Rathore

Kadodara

97

Dhanji Bhai Rathore

Kadodara

98

Sonu Bhai S. Rathore

Kadodara

99

Naresh Bhai A. Sinh Rathore

Kadodara

100

Dariya Bhai B. Rathore

Kadodara

101

Chaggan Bhai P. Rathore

Kadodara

102

Jayesh M. Rathore

Kadodara

103

Swaraj Ben B. Rathore

Kadodara

104

Prabhat Bhai M. Rathore

Kadodara

105

Motilal Narsang Rathore

Kadodara

106

Kachra Bhai D. Rathore

Kadodara

107

Vishnu Amba Lal Vasava

Kadodara

108

Kapila Ben R. Vasava

Kadodara

109

Pratap Bhai Soma Bhai Vasava

Kadodara

110

Suman Mansuri

Kadodara

111

Hari Ben B. Vasava

Kadodara

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XXVII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S. No.

Name of Person Met

Designation / Village

112

Chandu Mehla Vasava

Vav

113

Jayshri Ben Vasava

Vav

114

Kalidas R. Vasava

Vav

115

Jeevan Bhai Manga Bhai Rathore

Vav

116

Daya Ganesh Vasava

Vav

117

Sana Bhai Bikha Bhai Rathore

Vav

118

Jeevan Bhai Chiman Rathore

Vav

119

Thakur Bhai Sana Bhai Gohil

Vav

120

Kirit Bhai Amar Sinh Parmar

Vav

121

Dilip Sinh Fateh Sinh Surma

Vav

122

Budda Bhai C. Vasava

Vav

123

Ravindra Sinh G. Surma

Vav

124

Prithviraj Dalpat Sinh Surma

Vav

125

Arvind Bhai Magan Bhai Prajapati

Vav

126

Prabhat Sang Amar Sang Gohil

Vav

127

Thaku Bhai Nar Sang Bhai Gohil

Vav

128

Vilashben Parmar

Dahej

129

Krushnadeep Patel

Dahej

130

Jayendrabhai Pratap

Dahej

131

Navneet Makwana

Dahej

132

Laubhai Narsinhbhai Gohil

Dahej

133

Kishorbhai Ambubhai Gohil

Dahej

134

Virendra Gadhavi

Dahej

135

Bhagwat Sinh

Dahej

136

Dhanjibhai Pehalvanbhai

Dahej

137

Kushalbhai Premabhai

Dahej

138

Vasantbhai Gohil

Dahej

139

Jethabhai Gohil

Dahej

140

Chandubhai Parmar

Dahej

141

Paharsingh Patel

Dahej

142

Jagdishbhai Gohil

Dahej

143

Ravibhai Solanki

Dahej

144

Ratilal Rathore

Dahej

145

Raojibhai Parshottambhai

Dahej

146

Ranchodbhai Rathod

Dahej

147

Prabhatbhai Parsurambhai

Dahej

148

Ramanbhai Bhupatbhai

Dahej

149

Thakorbhai Kashibhai

Dahej

150

Ganpatbhai Gohil

Dahej

151

Shantilal Prajapati

Dahej

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

XXVIII

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Hetban Spechem Limited (HSL) proposes a Greenfield project for manufacturing of various technical
grade pesticides which will include herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and plant growth regulators at
Plot No. D- 2/CH/357, Dahej-ll Industrial Estate, situated in Vagra Taluka of Bharuch district, Gujarat
state.

1.1

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Purpose of the report is to identify environmental aspects, impacts & mitigation measures arising out
from the proposed Greenfield multipurpose plant for manufacturing of various technical grade
pesticides and prepare EIA/EMP and RA/DMP report as per ToR issued by MoEFCC on 29th April, 2015
and seek environmental clearance.
This report is prepared based on General Structure of EIA given in Appendix III and IIIA of
mentioned EIA Notification.

1.2

IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT

1.2.1

Proposed Project

Project is for manufacturing of various technical grade pesticides. The project is classified as Category
A project. The proposed products falls under 5(b), Pesticides industry and pesticide specific
intermediates (excluding formulation) Project or Activities listed within the Category to the EIA
Notification dated September 14th, 2006 (amended till date).
1.2.2

Project Proponent

The company Hetban Spechem Limited (HSL) is promoted by existing company Crop Life Science
Limited (CLSL), engaged in formulations of agrochemical products. It will be managed by its Director
Mr. Rajesh Lunagariya who has a wide experience of pesticide and agro chemical formulations.
History
CLSL had started as a small scale unit for the manufacturing of crop protection chemical almost one
decade ago. By acquisition, backward and forward integration, CLSL now has become one of the
leading manufacturer of wide range of products- Insecticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Micro Fertilizers,
Plant Growth Regulators and Soil Plant Health Products.
CLSL believes in the strategy of continuous expansion and development of high value and branded
products with thrust on registration and marketing according to customer requirement.
CLSL has manufacturing unit located at Ankleshwar in Gujarat. It runs on robust & tested
technologies. Company has always focused on quality to serve its customers. Each stage of production
from raw material to finished product is closely monitored. Quality, environment and safety is
maintained. Companys unit is certified with International Standard ISO 9001:2008 for quality
assurance. NABL accreditation of QC laboratory is under process.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

R & D is major strength for company and it continues to invest in innovative formulation that are
environmental and user friendly. The company is fully committed to maintain and expand its portfolio.
The aim of CLSL is to build strong relationship with customers to understand their needs and deliver
real performance in term of usage.

1.3

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE


COUNTRY & REGION

1.3.1

Brief Description of the Project

The brief description of the project is given in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1: Brief Description of the Project


S No.

Details

Description

Nature

Manufacturing, storage, packing and packaging and dispatch of Technical Grade


Pesticides products.

Size

Plot Area: 5,000 m2. Product and their capacities are shown in Table 2-3.

Location

Plot No. D-2/CH/357, Dahej ll, Industrial Estate, Bharuch, Gujarat.

Cost of the project

~ 31.10 Crore.

1.3.2

Importance of Project to the Country and the Region

The project brings the benefits to the country and the region that are both needed and beneficial as
all the products are worldwide used quality products. Being pesticides products, market demand is
high. Various products have export potential and will help in owns economy by generating foreign
exchange. Project will generate employment and state revenue. CSR activities will be made for
upliftment of the socio economic status of nearby villages.
Company has over 7 years of experience in pesticide formulation unit. Technical grade will reduce the
dependency on the requirement of raw material from third party. Company also has huge customer
base within India and around the globe. Based on the demand supply gap, proposed project will
carter requirement of pesticides in global and domestic market. The positives impact include enhanced
direct employment for technical/administrative works and indirect employment opportunities for
transporters of raw materials and finished goods.

1.4

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

As a part of Environmental Clearance process, HSL uploaded and submitted relevant documents,
namely Form 1 (as per the EIA Notification, 2006, as amended), along with a Pre-feasibility Report
and Proposed Terms of Reference (ToRs) for carrying out Environmental Studies, to the Expert
Appraisal Committee (EAC) MoEFCC on 5th February, 2015, vide letter HSL/EC/MoEF/2015/01 dated
31st January, 2015 as attached as Annexure 1.
Based on the information contained in the documents submitted, the project has been awarded file
no. J-11011/23/2015-IA II (I). Presentation has been made during the 34th Reconstituted Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry 2) meeting held on 17th February, 2015 to the EAC. ToRs has been
finalized to conduct the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) & Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) studies, vide its letter dated 29th April, 2015 as attached as Annexure 2.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

1.4.1

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

General Clearance and Other Permissions

HSL shall obtain required statutory permission and clearances from concerned authorities. Details of
permits and clearance as applicable to this project are provided in Table 1-2.

Table 1-2: Statutory Clearances / Permissions required from Concerned Ministries or Bodies
S No.

Legal Instruments

Factory License

The Factories Act, 1948

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Rules, 1975, as amended to date.

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 and Rules, 1978, as amended to date.

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Rules, 1982, as amended to date.

The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical rules, 1989, as amended to date.

The Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as
amended to date.

The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Rules, 1986, as amended to date

Chemical accidents (Emergency Planning, preparedness and response) Rules, 1996

10

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 & The Central Motor Vehicle rules, 1989

11

The Petroleum Act, 1934 & Rules, 2002.

12

The Explosive Act, 1884 and rules, 1983 as amended to date

13

The Gas Cylinders Rules, 2004

14

The Static and Mobile Pressure Vessels (Unfired) Rules, 1981

15

The Biomedical waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998 as amended to date

16

The Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001, as amended to date

17

The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 as amended to date

18

E-waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011 as amended to date

19

Electricity Rule, 2005

20

Consents from GPCB

21

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 as amended to date

22

The Bureau of Indian Standards Act

23

Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and Rules, 1991 as amended to date

24

The Insecticide Act, 1968 & Rules, 1971

25

The Custom Act, 1962

26

CIB Registration

1.5

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

As per the ToR letter, scope of work for this EIA studies and preparation of detailed EIA/EMP report
includes collection of baseline data with respect to major environmental components, viz. Air, Noise,
Water, Land, Biological and Socio-economic components for one season.
This EIA report complies with Terms of Reference given by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry
2), Impact Assessment Authority (IAA). Summarized details of the same is tabulated in Table 1-3.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

Table 1-3: Compliance with the Terms of Reference


S.
No.

ToR

Compliance in the Report

Executive summary of the project

Executive Summary of the project is


provided as Chapter 11, Pg. 239.

Justification of the project.

Justification of the project is given in


Chapter 1, Section 1.3.2, Pg. 2.

Promoters and their back ground.

Regulatory framework.

Environment clearance for the existing unit issued by the


Ministry (reasons, if not obtained), Consent to Operate
and Authorization accorded by the SPCB.

Copy of NOC/Consent to Establish for the existing unit.

Compliance to the conditions stipulated in the NOC


granted by the SPCB.

Has the unit received any notice under the Section 5 of


Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections
of Air and Water Acts? If so, compliance to the notice(s).

Description of Promoters and their back


ground is given in Chapter 1, Section
1.2.2, Pg.1.
Regulatory framework of the project is
given in Chapter 1, Section 1.4, Pg. 2.

Not Applicable as the Proposed project is


greenfield.

For Proposed Plants:


Data for Stack emissions are given in
Chapter 2, Section 2.16.1, Pg. 87.

Data for the stack emissions, fugitive emissions; water


requirement and water balance chart; wastewater
generation, treated effluent quality, re-utilization and
disposal of solid/hazardous waste for the existing unit.

Data for fugitive emissions are given in


Chapter 2, Section 2.16.4, Pg. 90.
Water requirement is mentioned in

Chapter 2, Section 2.18, Pg. 92.


Water balance chart is given in Chapter 2,
Section 2.18.4, Pg. 93.
Waste water generation details is given in
Chapter 2, Section 2.18.4, Pg. 92.
Treated effluent quantity, reutilization
details is given in Chapter 2, Section
2.18.3, Pg. 92.
Disposal of solid/hazardous waste is given
in Chapter 2, Section 2.19, Pg. 99.

10

Plant layout alongwith details of facility.

Plant Layout is given in Chapter 2, Map


2-3, Pg. 15.

11

Infrastructure facilities including power sources.

Details of infrastructure facilities & Power


sources are given in Chapter 2, Section
2.15 & 2.11.1, Pg. 84 & 76 respectively.

12

Total cost of the project alongwith total capital cost and


recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures.

Total cost of the project alongwith total


capital cost and recurring cost/annum for
environmental pollution control measures is
given in Chapter 6, Section 6.6, Pg.205.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

S.
No.

ToR

Compliance in the Report

13

Project site location alongwith photographs and site map


of 10 km area and site details providing various
industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.

Project site location alongwith site map of


10 km area and site details is provided in
Chapter 3, Map 3-1, Pg.106.

14

Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study


area of 10 km radius.

Present Land Use map for the study area of


10 km radius is given in Chapter 3, Map
3-3, Pg. 118.

15

Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve


Forest within 10 km radius of the project.

16

Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for
green belt and other uses.

17

List of products along with the production capacities.

18

Detailed list of raw material required and source, mode of


storage and transportation.

Detailed list of raw material required, its


source, mode of storage and transportation
is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.12,
Table 2-56, Pg. 77.

19

Manufacturing process details alongwith the chemical


reactions and process flow chart.

Manufacturing process details alongwith


the chemical reactions and process flow
chart is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.6 2.10, Pg. 19 75.

20

Site-specific micro-meteorological data using


temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and
direction and rainfall is necessary.

Site-specific micro-meteorological data for


Summer 2015 is given in Chapter 3,
Section 3.5.1, Pg. 110.

21

Ambient air quality monitoring at 6 locations within the


study area of 5 Km., aerial coverage from project site as
per NAAQES notified on 16th September, 2009. Location
of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

22

One season site-specific micro-meteorological data using


temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and
direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except monsoon) for
PM10, SO2, NOx, CO including HC and VOCs should be
collected. The monitoring stations should take into
account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone
and sensitive receptors including reserved forests. Data
for water and noise monitoring should also be included.

Dahej reserved forest falls within study


area as shown in Chapter 3, Map 3-3,
Pg. 118.
Details of the total land and break-up of
the land use for green belt and other uses
is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.4, Table
2-2, Pg.14.
List of products alongwith the production
capacities is given in Chapter 2, Section
2.4, Table 2-3, Pg. 16.

Ambient air quality monitoring was carried


out at 6 locations within the study area of 5
Km. Details of the same is given in
Chapter 3, Section 3.5.3, Pg. 120.
One season site-specific micrometeorological data is provided in Chapter
3, Section 3.5.1, Pg. 110.
AAQ data (Summer 2015) & Justification
for selecting monitoring stations is given in
Chapter 3, Section 3.5.3, Pg. 120.
Data for surface water is given in Chapter
3, Section 3.5.6, Pg. 130 & 131.
Data for ground water is provided in

Chapter 3, Section 3.5.6, Pg. 133.


Data for noise monitoring is provided in
Chapter 3, Section 3.5.4, Pg. 125.

23

Air pollution control measures proposed for the effective


control of gaseous emissions within permissible limits.

24

Name of all the solvents to be used in the process and


details of solvent recovery system.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Proposed APCM is given in Chapter 2,


Section 2.16, Pg. 87.
Details of Solvent and Recovery is given in
Chapter 2, Section 2.13, Pg. 81.
5

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

S.
No.

ToR

25

Design details of ETP, incinerator, if any alongwith control


of Dioxin & Furan, boiler, scrubbers/bag filters etc.

26

Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan.

27

An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive


emissions from all the sources.

28

Action plan for odour assessment and control to be


submitted.

29

Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the


project site and assessment of ground level concentration
of pollutants from the stack emission based on site
specific meteorological features. Air quality modelling for
proposed plant.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

Compliance in the Report


Design setails are given in Chapter 2 for
ETP: Section 2.18.5, Pg. 94.
Scrubbers: Section 2.16.1, Pg. 88 - 90.
Details of water pollution and its mitigation
plan is given in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.1
- 4.4.3, Pg 183.
Details of air pollution and its mitigation
plan is given in Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1,
Pg. 170 - 175.
Plan to control secondary fugitive emissions
from all the sources is given in Chapter 2,
Section 2.16.4, Pg 90 and its monitoring
plan is provided in Chapter 6, Section
6.1, Pg. 198.
Plan for odour assessment and control is
given in Chapter 2, Section 2.16.4, Pg

90.
Air quality modelling for proposed plant has
been done using AERMOD Software.
Atmospheric inversion level at the project
site and GLCs of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific
meteorological features are given in

Chapter 4, Section 4.2, Pg. 173.

30

Source and quantity of fresh water requirement. Water


balance chart including quantity of effluent generated
recycled and reused and discharged.

After achieving ZLD scheme, fresh water


requirement of 98 KLD (~ 200 KLD if
treated waste water is drained to CETP)
will be sourced from GIDC water supply. In
principle approval has been received and
provided in Annexure 4. Water Balance
Chart is provided in Chapter 2, Section

2.18.4, Figure 2-51, Pg. 93.


31

32

Action plan for possible Zero discharge of effluent should


be included.

Ground water quality monitoring minimum at 6 locations


should be carried out. Geological features and Geohydrological status of the study area and ecological status
(Terrestrial and Aquatic).

Action plan for Zero discharge of effluent


is provided in Chapter 2, Section 2.18.5,

Pg. 97.
Ground water monitoring was carried out
at 8 locations as mentioned in Chapter 3,
Section 3.5.6, Table 3-22, Pg. 133.
Geological features and Geo-hydrological
status of the study area is given in
Chapter 3, Section 3.5.7, Pg. 136.
Ecological status of the study area is given
in Chapter 3, Section 3.5.9, Pg. 140.

33

Detailed plan for zero liquid discharge and reduction of


water consumption to be prepared.

34

The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation,


storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Refer ToR Point 31.


The details of solid and hazardous wastes
generation, storage, utilization and disposal
6

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S.
No.

35

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

ToR

Compliance in the Report

hazardous waste calorific value of hazardous waste and


detailed characteristic of the hazardous waste. Action
plan for the management of fly ash generated from boiler
should be included.

is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.19,


Table 2-72, Pg. 100.

Precautions to be taken during storage and


transportation of hazardous chemicals should be clearly
mentioned and incorporated.

36

A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding signed with


cement manufacturers indicating clearly that they will
utilized all the organic solid waste generated.

37

Authorization/Membership for the disposal of liquid


effluent in CETP and solid/hazardous waste in TSDF.

Coal is not used as fuel. Hence, action plan


for the management of fly ash is not
applicable.
Precautions to be taken during storage and
transportation of hazardous chemicals is
given in Chapter 7, Section 7.3.11, Pg.

228.
No organic solid waste shall be generated
that can be given to cement
manufacturers.
In-principle membership is availed from
SEPL as provided in Annexure 5.

38

Risk assessment for storage for chemicals/solvents. Risk


assessment for Cyanide.

Risk assessment for storage for


chemicals/solvents is given in Chapter 7,
Section 7.2.2, Pg. 206. Risk assessment
for Cyanide is provided in Chapter 7,
Section 7.3.10, Pg. 228.

39

Material safety data sheet to be submitted. CAS


No./RTECS No./DOT/UN etc to be
mentioned against each chemicals.

MSDS for chemicals to be stored at site is


provide in soft copy.

40

An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area.


Layout map indicating greenbelt to be submitted.

41

Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant


site should be included to harvest rainwater from the roof
tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground
water.

Green belt shall be developed within 17.5


% of project area as mentioned in

Chapter 10, Section 10.3.4, Pg. 234.

Groundwater recharge is not feasible in


this area due to formational salinity. And
due to space constrain rainwater
harvesting is not proposed.

Details of occupational health programme:


i) To which chemicals, workers are exposed directly or
indirectly.
ii) Whether these chemicals are within Threshold Limit
Values (TLV)/ Permissible Exposure Levels as per ACGIH
recommendation.
42

iii) What measures company have taken to keep these


chemicals within PEL/TLV.

Chapter 7, Section 7.2, Pg. 206-228.

iv) How the workers are evaluated concerning their


exposure to chemicals during pre-placement and
periodical medical monitoring.
v) What are onsite and offsite emergency plan during
chemical disaster.
vi) Liver function tests (LFT) during pre-placement and
periodical examination.
43

Details of occupational health surveillance programme.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Chapter 7, Section 7.2, Pg. 206-228.

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S.
No.
44

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

ToR

Socio-economic development activities shall be in place.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

Compliance in the Report


Socio-economic development activities shall
be in place as mentioned in Chapter 10,

Section 10.3.5, Pg. 237.


45

Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned


in the CREP guidelines.

46

Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with


specific reference to details of air pollution control
system, water & wastewater management, monitoring
frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation
plan for mitigation measure shall be provided.

47

EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization,


recycle / reuse / recover techniques, Energy
conservation, and natural resource conservation.

48

Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for


environmental pollution control measures.

Not Applicable.
Environment management Plan (EMP) with
details of air pollution control system,
water & wastewater management is given
in Chapter 10, Pg. 232.
Monitoring frequency is provided in
Chapter 6, Pg. 197 & summarized in
Table 11-3.
EMP includes concept of wasteminimization, recycle / reuse / recover
techniques, ZLD and is given as per Point
No. 42.
Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum
for environmental pollution control
measures is given in Chapter 6, Section

6.6, Pg. 205.


Corporate Environmental Responsibility:

49

(a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment


Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA report.

Environment Policy approved by its Board


of Directors shall be made.

(b) Does the Environmental Policy prescribe for standard


operating process/procedures to bring into focus any
infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental
or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in
the EIA report.

EMS shall have well defined aspect &


impacts for its normal, abnormal and
emergency activities of the process along
with mitigation measures and EMPs.

(c) What is the hierarchical system or Administrative


order of the company to deal with the environmental
issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC
conditions. Details of this system may be given.
(d) Does the company have a system of reporting of noncompliance / violations of environmental norms to the
Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders
or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism
should be detailed in the EIA report.

50

Any litigation pending against the project and/or any


direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the
project, if so, details thereof.

51

A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of


above TORs.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Hierarchical system of the company to deal


with the environmental issues and for
ensuring compliance with the EC conditions
is given in Chapter 7, Section 7.3, Pg.

215.
Reporting mechanism of reporting of noncompliance / violations of environmental
norms to the Board of Directors of the
company is given in Chapter 7, Section

7.3, Pg. 214.


Proposed project is greenfield. Hence, no
any litigation pending against the project
and/or any direction/order passed by any
Court of Law against the project.
A tabular chart with index for point wise
compliance of above TORs is given in

Chapter 1, Section 1.5, Table 1-3, Pg.


4.
8

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

1. INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND

ToR

Compliance in the Report

Public hearing to be conducted by SPCB and issues raised


and commitments made by the project proponent on the
same should be included in EIA/EMP Report in the form
of tabular chart with financial budget for complying with
the commitments made.

Shall be conducted.

Detailed Toxic/hazardous waste management plan to be


provided.

Additional TOR

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Toxic/hazardous waste management plan


is provided in Chapter 2, Section 2.19.2,

Table 2-72, Pg. 100.

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This chapter provides a condensed description of those aspects of the project likely to cause
environmental effects. Details are described in following sections with regards to type, need, location,
size or magnitude of project operations, technology and other related activities.

2.1

TYPE OF PROJECT

HSL proposes a Greenfield project for manufacturing of various technical grade pesticides which will
include herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and plant growth regulators.
2.1.1

Condensed Description of Aspects

Based on the type of project, following are the expected aspects:

Air Emissions having pollutants like PM, SO2, NOx, HCl, Cl2, HBr, NH3 & HC.
Waste water generation having cyanide compounds.
Noise generation.
Hazardous waste generation.
Occupational health, hazards & safety risk.

2.2

NEED FOR THE PROJECT

Need for the proposed products are based on the demand and supply gap in the current market. With
increasing utilization of the current products, in future, to carter the requirement of all the products, it
is essential to have the proposed manufacturing unit.
The Indian pesticides industry is characterized by low capacity utilization. The present total installed
capacity is 146,000 tonnes and has a low capacity utilization of <60%. There is a marked difference in
the consumption pattern of pesticides in India vis--vis the rest of the world. Insecticides account for
76% of the total domestic market. On the other hand, herbicides and fungicides have a significantly
higher share in the global market. Crops like cotton, wheat and rice together account for 70% of total
agrochemical consumption. The consumption of pesticides in India is low in comparison to other
countries. The industry suffers from high inventory (owing to seasonal & irregular demand on account
of monsoons) and long credit periods to farmers, thus making operations 'working capital' intensive.
India due to its inherent strength of low-cost manufacturing and qualified low-cost manpower is a net
exporter of pesticides to countries such as USA and some European & African countries. Exports
formed ~37% of total industry turnover in FY13.
2.2.1

Condensed Description of Aspects

Based on the demand and supply gap, the need of the project is justified. Thus, expected aspects due
the production of these pesticides will lead to:

Raised market price of product due to less supply.


Batch failure due to uncertain operational variations, to meet the production demand of product in
the market.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

10

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2.3

LOCATION OF THE PROJECT

2.3.1

General Location of the Site

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

The project site is located in the Dahej II Industrial Estate, situated in Jolwa Village, Vagra Taluka of
Bharuch district, Gujarat state. Dahej II Industrial Estate is an existing industrial area developed by
the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), categorized as chemical zone for setting up
chemical industries. The project location is provided in Map 2-1.

Map 2-1: General Location Map of Project Site

2.3.2

Specific Location of Site & Project Boundary

It is located at Plot No. D- 2/CH/357. Plot is taken on lease from M/s. Shaurya Enterprise, Agreement
documents of the same and Land possession documents from GIDC for plot are attached as
Annexure 3.
Site is immediately surrounded by vacant and undeveloped land under ownership of GIDC which are
yet to be allotted. The base elevation of site is at 8 m above mean sea level.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

11

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

The co-ordinates of the project site are given in Table 2-1. Location map showing specific location of
proposed project is given in Map 2-2.

Table 2-1: Co-ordinates of Project Boundary


Code

Latitude

Longitude

2143'27.41"N

7239'43.28"E

2143'29.06"N

7239'43.06"E

2143'28.72"N

7239'39.67"E

2143'27.09"N

7239'39.82"E

2.3.3

Approach to the Project Site

The project site is approachable:


By Road:
Site is well connected to Dahej and Bharuch via Bharuch Dahej State Highway (SH 6) at an aerial
distance of 1 Km in South Direction.
By Rail:
Major railway station for public transportation is Bharuch Railway Station at an aerial distance of ~35
Km in E Direction from the project site. Also, Dahej Railway Station an aerial distance of ~8.2 Km in
WSW Direction of project site is operational for goods transportation.
By Air:
Nearest airport from project site is Surat Airport at an aerial distance of ~ 68 Km in SSE Direction.
Vadodara Airport is at an aerial distance of ~ 90 Km in NE Direction.
By Water:
Nearest port is Adani port at Dahej located at an aerial distance of ~14 Km in WSW direction.
2.3.4

Condensed Description of Aspects

Based on the location of the project, following are the expected aspects:

Change in land use from barren to industrial.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

12

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Map 2-2: Specific Location Map of Project Site

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

13

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2.4

SIZE AND MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION

2.4.1

Size, Land Distribution at Site & Project Site Layout

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Plot area of the project consists of 5,000 m2 area.


Land distribution for the proposed project is tabulated in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2: Area Breakup of the Site


S. No.

Description

Area in m2

% of Total Area

Plant Building

504.0

10.1%

475

9.5%

Utilities
(Power, Water, Chilled Water, Hydrant System etc.)

Tank Farm

459

9.2%

Engineering Store Room, RM & Finished Good Storage

280.0

5.6%

ETP & Hazardous Waste Storage

362

7.2%

Green Belt

878

17.6%

Medical Center & Security Cabin

31.0

0.6%

Internal Roads, Parking & Open Land

2,011

40.2%

Total

5,000

100.0

Site layout map of the project is shown in Map 2-3.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

14

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Map 2-3: Site Layout Map

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

15

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.4.2

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Magnitude of the Project

The design capacity of the Multi-purpose plant will be 3,500 MTA (~ 12 TPD) on the basis of running
the plant for 24 hrs., a day, seven days a week and 300 days / annum. The balance 65 days will be
utilized for product change-over preparation and annual maintenance shutdown.
It is proposed to manufacture four to five products simultaneously based on the market requirement
from list mentioned in Table 2-3.

Table 2-3: Product List


S.
No.

Name of Product

Production
(MTPA)

S. No.
(Contd.)

25

Herbicides

Name of Product

Production
(MTPA)

Buprofezin

500

Glyphosate

2,000

26

Bifenthrin

200

2,4 Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid

1,000

27

Diafenthiuron

600

MCPA

500

28

Deltamethrin

100

Atrazine

500

29

Cypermethrin

600

Metribuzin

400

30

Permethrin

600

Propanil

500

31

Lambda-Cyhalothrin

300

Pretilachlor

300

Pendimethalin

600

32

Cymoxanil

300

Fungicides

Butachlor

300

33

Cyproconazole

200

10

Clodinafop Propargyl

300

34

Azoxystrobin

500

11

Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl

200

35

Metalaxyl

500

12

Quizalofop-p-Ethyl

200

36

Trifloxystrobin

450

13

Clodinofop-P-Ethyl

300

37

Carbendazime

800

14

Paraquat dichloride

500

38

Kresoxim-Methyl

200

15

Imazathapyr

300

39

Thiophenat-Methyl

400

16

Oxyfluorfen

100

40

Tricyclazole

1,000

41

Isoprothiolane

200

17

Thiamethoxam

400

42

Propiconazole

300

18

Profenofos

400

43

Hexaconazole

1,000

19

Acephate

800

44

Tebuconazole

600

20

Chlorpyrifos

350

45

Difenconazole

500

21

Imidacloprid

600

46

Epoxyconazole

200

22

Acetamiprid

500

47

Chlorothalonil

500

23

Fipronil

200

24

Cartap Hydrochloride

300

Insecticides

2.4.3

Plant Growth Regulator

48

Chlormequatchloride

2,000

Condensed Description of Aspects

Based on the size and manganite of operation, following are the expected aspects:

Air Emissions having pollutants like PM, SO2, NOx, HCl, Cl2, HBr, NH3 & HC.
Waste water generation having cyanide compounds.
Hazardous waste generation.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

16

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Noise generation.
Increase in occupational health, hazards & safety risk due to handling of solvents, raw material,
finished products and hazardous waste.

2.5

PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION

The construction is likely to start after getting Environmental Clearance and NOC/CTE from the
authorized committee. The EIA studies is likely to get completed in 9-14 months.
Project implementation schedule describing various activities from finalization of site to project
commissioning is tabulated in Table 2-4.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

17

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Aug-17

Jul-17

Jun-17

May-17

Apr-17

Mar-17

Feb-17

Jan-17

Dec-16

Nov-16

Oct-16

Sep-16

Aug-16

Jul-16

Jun-16

May-16

Apr-16

Mar-16

Feb-16

Activity

Table 2-4: Project Implementation Schedule

Application for PH
Tender floating
Receipt of Bids/offer
Evaluation of offers
EC Presentation
Application for NOC
Environmental Clearance from MoEF
Assurance from GIDC for Water
Supply
Receipt of NOC
Finalization of Contractors
Receipt of CTE
Procurement of equipment
Civil Completion
Mechanical Completion
Commissioning

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

18

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2.6

TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION

2.6.1

Salient Features of Technology

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) shall be employed in the proposed plant to ensure
product quality, a safe working environment, and prevention of environmental impacts.
The proposed pesticide plant shall involve synthesis of molecules produced or modified to provide
compounds (active ingredients), namely herbicides, insecticides and fungicides. This active ingredients
is further formulated to form solid or liquid pesticides. It is then safely handled and packed in packing
systems comprising of automatic packing lines.
The pesticide is then sent to the farmer or other certified applicator, who dilutes it before applying it.
Pesticides manufacturing includes following steps:

Preparation of process intermediates;


Introduction of functional groups;
Coupling and esterification;
Separation processes (e.g. filtration, washing and stripping);
Purification of the final product (e.g. dissolution and extraction, or filtration);
Evaporation and Distillation;
Drying, concentration and crystallization in purification operations.

Technical grade will be first manufactured in small scale in the laboratory followed by a pilot plant.
After successful trials and proven viability, production will begin in the factory. Herbicides will be
manufactured in a dedicated set of equipment of the plant while manufacture of Insecticides,
Fungicides and plant growth regulator will be undertaken in the rest of the equipment.
Odorous materials are Trimethyl amine, Isopropyl amine, DMPTC, Carbon disulphide, Acephate &
Profenofos. Solvents used in the process shall be recovered (upto ~ 99%) by distillation as discussed
in Section 2.13.2. Procurement of raw materials will be as per the production plan.
Trained chemists shall be employed who shall work in a sophisticated laboratory and factory. Cooling
and / or heating, and the application of vacuum or pressure conditions, are necessary.
All steps, and particularly the reactions, shall generate air emissions, effluents, and waste /
byproducts. The number of pesticide raw materials is extensive, including materials common to most
pesticide manufacturing processes (details given in Table 2-56).
Final product will be safely handled and packed using packing systems comprising of automatic
packing lines by transferring the final product into containers or boxes, either manually by gravity
feeding or automatically.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

19

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

PROCESS DESCRIPTION HERBICIDES

Manufacturing Process steps of all Herbicides involved in proposed plant with Process Flow Diagram &
Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.7.1

Glyphosate

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Glyphosate are given below:

Figure 2-1: Process Flow Diagram Glyphosate


Table 2-5: Mass Balance Glyphosate
Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Water

6.511

43.407

Carbon Catalyst

0.300

2.000

Oxygen

0.420

2.800

PMIDA (Phosphono methylimino di acetic acid)

1.680

11.200

8.911

59.407

S. N.

Total
Output/MT of Product
S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of product
(MT)

Remarks

Glyphosate

1.000

6.66

Product

Excess
Oxygen

0.413

2.75

Emitted in Air

Catalyst
Slurry

0.38

2.53

For Recycling

CO2

0.348

2.32

To scrubber

Effluent

6.770

45.13

To ETP

6.770

0.413

1.348

0.380

Total

8.911

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

59.390

20

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.2

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

2, 4 - Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid

Process flow diagram and mass balance of 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid are given below:

Figure 2-2: Process Flow Diagram 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid


Table 2-6: Mass Balance 2, 4 Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Water

0.500

1.667

Monochloro acetic acid

0.527

1.758

NaOH 48%

0.545

1.815

2,4- Di chloro phenol

0.909

3.030

Hydrochloric Acid 30 %

0.910

3.033

Diethyl ether

1.500

5.000

Petroleum ether

0.700

2.333

Total

5.591

18.636

Output/MT of Product
S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of product
(MT)

Remarks

2,4Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid

1.000

3.333

Product

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

21

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Output/MT of Product
S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of product
(MT)

Remarks

Recovery of
Diethyl ether

1.490

4.966

Recycle

Recovery of
Petroleum
ether

0.690

2.3

Recycle

Effluent

2.324

7.746

To ETP

Solid Waste

0.087

0.290

Stored, handled &


Disposed as per
HW Rules.

2.324

0.000

3.180

0.087

18.635

Total

2.7.3

5.591

MCPA

Process flow diagram and mass balance of MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid) are given
below:

Figure 2-3: Process Flow Diagram MCPA


Table 2-7: Mass Balance MCPA
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

O-Cresol

0.540

1.80

Chlorine

0.358

1.20

Mono Chloro Acetic Acid

0.474

1.58

Water

1.000

3.34

2.372

7.920

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

22

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Output/MT of Product
S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of product
(MT)

Remarks

MCPA

1.000

3.34

Product

Effluent

1.006

3.36

To ETP

Acid to Scrubber

0.366

1.22

For sale

0.000

1.366

0.000

7.920

Total

2.7.4

1.006

2.372

Atrazine

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Atrazine are given below:

Figure 2-4: Process Flow Diagram Atrazine


Table 2-8: Mass Balance - Atrazine
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Cyanuric Chloride

0.868

2.894

Isopropylamine

0.278

0.927

NaOH (Sodium Hydroxide)

0.120

0.400

Ethylamine

0.212

0.707

Water wash

0.278

0.927

1.756

5.855

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

23

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

Output/Day
of Product MT

Remarks

3.335

Product

2.520

To ETP

1.000

0.000

5.855

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Atrazine

1.000

Effluent

0.756

0.756

0.000

Total

2.7.5

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

1.756

Metribuzin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Metribuzin are given below:

Figure 2-5: Process Flow Diagram Metribuzin


Table 2-9: Mass Balance - Metribuzin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Hexane

0.775

1.03

CuCN (Copper Cyanide)

0.537

0.72

Pivaloyl Chloride

0.725

0.97

Hydrochloric Acid

0.725

0.97

CS2

0.235

0.31

Hydrazine Hydrate

0.460

0.61

Water

1.122

1.50

CH3Br

0.945

1.26

Caustic Solution

2.178

2.90

Total

7.702

10.269

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

24

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Output/MT of Product

Output/Day of
Product (MT)

Remark
s

1.33

Product

7.09

To ETP

0.6225

0.83

For sale

0.7625

1.02

Recycle

5.317

0.000

2.385

0.000

10.269

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Metribuzin

1.000

Effluent

5.317

CuCl (Copper
Chloride)

Solvent
Total

2.7.6

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

7.702

Propanil

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Propanil are given below:

Figure 2-6: Process Flow Diagram Propanil


Table 2-10: Mass Balance Propanil
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

1,2 Dichlorobenzene

0.676

2.254

Nitric Acid

0.308

1.026

H2SO4

0.434

1.446

Hydrogenation by H2 gas with catlyst palladium


carbon

0.020

0.066

EtCOCl (Propanoyl chloride)

0.424

1.414

Water

1.600

5.334

3.462

11.540

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

25

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Output/MT of Product

Output/Day of
Product (MT)

Remarks

3.334

Product

0.386

Reuse

6.194

To ETP

1.553

Recycle

0.073

Recycle

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Propanil

1.000

1,2-Dichloro
benzene

0.116

Effluent

1.858

Spent acid

0.466

Used Catalyst

0.022

2.324

0.000

1.138

Total

2.7.7

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

0.000

3.462

11.540

Pretilachlor

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Pretilachlor are given below:

Figure 2-7: Process Flow Diagram Pretilachlor


Table 2-11: Mass Balance Pretilachlor
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Propoxy Ethyl chloride

0.440

0.880

2,6-Diethyll Aniline

1.150

2.300

NaOH

0.350

0.700

Chloro acetyl chloride

0.400

0.800

Water

0.500

1.000

Toluene

1.800

3.600

4.640

9.280

Total
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

26

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Output/MT of Product

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

Product

0.575

1.15

Recovery

Solid Residue

0.09

0.18

For
Disposal

HCl

0.133

0.266

For sale

Toluene

1.742

3.48

Recycle

Effluent

1.1

2.204

To ETP

1.100

0.000

3.450

0.090

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Pretilachlor

Excess 2,6 DEA

Total

4.640

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

9.280

27

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.8

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Pendimethalin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Pendimethalin are given below:

Figure 2-8: Process Flow Diagram Pendimethalin


Table 2-12: Mass Balance Pendimethalin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

3,4 Xylidine

0.443

0.89

Diethylketone

0.317

0.63

Nitration (Nitric Acid & H2SO4)

0.590

1.18

Water Wash

2.000

4.00

3.350

6.700

Total

Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Pendimethalin

1.000

Spent Acid

2.350

2.350

0.000

Total

3.350

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Output/Day of
Product (MT)

Remarks

2.000

Product

4.700

Recycle

1.000

0.000

6.700

28

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.9

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Butachlor

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Butachlor are given below:

Figure 2-9: Process Flow Diagram Butachlor


Table 2-13: Mass Balance Butachlor
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

2,6 Dimethyl Aniline

0.386

1.158

Formaldehyde

0.096

0.288

Chloroacetyl Chloride

0.360

1.080

NH3 (Ammonia) or Et3N (Triethylamine)

0.323

0.969

Butanol

0.236

0.708

Water
Total

S.
No.

0.670

2.010

2.071

6.213

Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

Product

0.877

2.632

To ETP

0.193

0.58

Recycle

0.877

0.000

1.193

0.000

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Butachlor

Effluent

Recovered
Alcohol
Total

2.070

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

6.212

29

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.10

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Clodinafop Propargyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Clodinafop Propargyl are given below:

Figure 2-10: Process Flow Diagram Clodinafop Propargyl


Table 2-14: Mass Balance Clodinafop Propargyl
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

5-Chloro-2,3-difluoro pyridine

0.417

0.417

Dimethylformammide

1.667

1.667

Potassium Carbonate

0.400

0.400

R(+)-2-(4-hydroxy phenoxy) propionic acid

0.533

0.533

Propargyl Chloride

0.200

0.200

Methanol

1.167

1.167

Water

2.667

2.667

7.050

7.050

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

3.317

To ETP

1.100

1.100

Recycle

1.633

1.633

Recycle

3.317

0.000

3.733

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Clodinafopropargyl

Effluent

3.317

Recovered Alcohol

Recovered Solvent
Total

7.050

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

7.050

30

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.11

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl are given below:

Figure 2-11: Process Flow Diagram Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl


Table 2-15: Mass Balance Fenoxaprop-P-Ethyl
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) Propanoate

0.590

1.770

2,6-chlorobenzoxazole

0.470

1.410

Potassium carbonate

0.125

0.375

Water

2.700

8.100

Acetonitrile

1.500

4.500

5.385

16.155

Total

S.
No.

Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

3.000

Product

2.885

8.655

To ETP

1.500

4.500

Recycle

2.885

0.000

2.500

0.000

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Fenoxaprop-PEthyl

Effluent

Recovered
Acetonitrile
Total

5.385

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

16.155

31

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.12

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Quizalofop-P-Ethyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Quizalofop-P-Ethyl are given below:

Figure 2-12: Process Flow Diagram Quizalofop-P-Ethyl


Table 2-16: Mass Balance Quizalofop-P-Ethyl
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) Propanoate

0.550

1.10

2,6-chloroquinoxaline

0.560

1.12

Potassium carbonate

0.135

0.27

Water

2.900

5.80

Acetonitrile

1.500

3.00

5.645

11.29

Total

Output/MT of Product
Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Quizalofop-PEthyl

1.000

2.00

Product

Effluent

3.145

6.29

To ETP

Recovered
Acetonitrile

1.500

3.00

Recycle

3.145

0.000

2.500

0.000

S.
No.
1

Total

5.645

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Remarks

11.29

32

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.13

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Clodinofop-P-Ethyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Clodinofop-P-Ethyl are given below:

Figure 2-13: Process Flow Diagram Clodinofop-P-Ethyl


Table 2-17: Mass Balance Clodinofop-P-Ethyl
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) Propanoate

0.567

0.567

2,5-dichloro-3-fluoropyridine

0.487

0.487

Potassium carbonate

0.100

0.100

Water

2.500

2.500

Acetonitrile

1.500

1.500

5.153

5.153

Total

Output/MT of Product
Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Clodinofop-PEthyl

1.000

1.00

Product

Effluent

2.686

2.69

To ETP

Recovered
Acetonitrile

1.467

1.47

Recycle

2.686

0.000

2.467

0.000

S.
No.
1

Total

5.153

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Remarks

5.153

33

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.14

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Paraquat Dichloride

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Paraquat Dichloride are given below:

Figure 2-14: Process Flow Diagram Paraquat Dichloride


Table 2-18: Mass Balance Paraquat Dichloride
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Pyridine

0.620

1.033

Sodium amide

0.010

0.016

O2 (Oxydation)

0.020

0.033

Methyl chloride

0.394

0.660

Total

1.044

1.742

S.
No.

Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.667

Product

0.044

0.075

For Disposal

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.044

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Paraquat
Dichloride

Solid Waste
Total

1.044

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

1.742

34

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.15

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Imazathapyr

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Imazathapyr are given below:

Figure 2-15: Process Flow Diagram Imazathapyr


Table 2-19: Mass Balance Imazathapyr
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

3-ethyl pyridine

0.400

0.400

Xylene

1.167

1.167

Acetyl ketene

0.200

0.200

Ammonium sulfamate

0.267

0.267

Ethyl Acetoacetate

0.417

0.417

Water

1.667

1.667

4.117

4.117

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

1.133

1.133

Recycle

1.983

1.983

To ETP

1.983

0.000

2.133

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Imazathapyr

Xylene Recovery

Effluent
Total

4.117

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

4.117

35

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.7.16

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Oxyfluorfen

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Oxyfluorfen are given below:

Figure 2-16: Process Flow Diagram Oxyfluorfen


Table 2-20: Mass Balance Oxyfluorfen
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

3-Chlorophenol

0.430

0.860

Chloroethane

0.225

0.450

HNO3 (Nitric Acid) + H2SO4 (Sulphuric Acid)

0.550

1.100

4-Trifloromethyl-2-Chloro Phenol Potassium Salt

0.600

1.200

Water

0.800

1.600

2.605

5.210

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.00

Product

1.21

To ETP

1.70

Recycle

0.30

For scrubbing

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Oxyfluorfen

Effluent

0.605

Spent Acid

0.850

Air Emissions
Total

0.15

1.455

0.150

1.000

0.000

2.605

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

5.210

36

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.8

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

PROCESS DESCRIPTION INSECTICIDES

Manufacturing Process steps of all insecticides involved in proposed plant with Process Flow Diagram
& Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.8.1

Thiamethoxam

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Thiamethoxam are given below:

Figure 2-17: Process Flow Diagram Thiamethoxam


Table 2-21: Mass Balance Thiamethoxam
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Hydrochloric Acid

0.250

0.500

S-Phenyl

0.750

1.500

Chlorine

0.750

1.500

SO2

0.500

1.000

Toluene

1.000

2.000

NaOH

0.500

1.000

Water

3.000

6.000

Dichloromethane

1.250

2.500

8.000

16.000

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

37

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

1
2
3

2.8.2

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.000

Product

9.800

To ETP

2.100

4.200

Recycle

4.900

0.000

3.100

0.000

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Thiamethoxam

Effluent

4.900

Solvent Recovery
Total

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

8.000

16.000

Profenophos

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Profenophos are given below:

Figure 2-18: Process Flow Diagram Profenophos


Table 2-22: Mass Balance Profenophos
Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Orthochlorophenol

0.375

1.125

Monochlorobenzne

1.000

3.000

Bromine

0.470

1.410

Trimethylamine

0.295

0.885

Diethyl thiochloro phosphate

0.563

1.688

Propylbromide

0.388

1.163

Water

1.500

4.500

4.590

13.770

S. N.

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

38

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

3.000

Product

4.575

To ETP

0.18

0.540

Byproduct for
sale

Salt by Product

0.91

2.730

Byproduct for
sale

Solvent Recovery

0.975

2.925

Recycle

1.525

0.000

3.065

0.000

S.
No.

Product

1
2

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Profenophos

Effluent

1.525

Acid Recovery

4
5

Total

4.590

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

13.770

39

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.8.3

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Acephate

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Acephate are given below:

Figure 2-19: Process Flow Diagram Acephate


Table 2-23: Mass Balance Acephate
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

DMPTC

1.170

3.120

MDC (Methylene Di-Chloride)

4.985

13.293

Ammonium Hydroxide

1.628

4.341

Dimethyl sulfate

0.150

0.400

Acetic Anhydride

0.826

2.203

Sulfuric Acid

0.021

0.056

Water

0.400

1.067

9.180

24.480

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.67

Product

9.02

ETP

12.79

Recycle

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Acephate

Effluent

3.383

MDC recovery
Total

4.797

3.383

0.000

5.790

0.000

9.180

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

24.480

40

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.8.4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Chlorpyrifos

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Chlorpyrifos are given below:

Figure 2-20: Process Flow Diagram Chlorpyrifos


Table 2-24: Mass Balance Chlorpyrifos
Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Diethylphosphorochloridothioate

0.457

1.60

Sodium salt of 3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-ol

0.629

2.21

Dichloromethane

3.429

12.03

Phase Transfer Catalyst Tertiary amine acid boric


Tampon

0.000

0.00

4.514

15.840

S. N.

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

3.51

Product

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Chlorpyrifos

1.000

Effluent

0.257

0.90

To ETP

MDC

3.257

11.43

Recycle

0.257

0.000

4.257

0.000

Total

4.514

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

15.840

41

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.8.5

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Imidacloprid

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Imidacloprid are given below:

Figure 2-21: Process Flow Diagram Imidacloprid


Table 2-25: Mass Balance Imidacloprid
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

CCMP

1.268

2.54

EDA

0.460

0.92

25% Sodium Hydroxide

0.583

1.17

Acetonitrile

10.897

21.79

Nitroguanidine

1.040

2.08

Water

3.333

6.67

17.582

35.163

Total

Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

1
2
3

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Imidacloprid

1.000

2.000

Product

Effluent

5.748

11.497

To ETP

Solvent Recovery

10.833

21.67

Recycle

5.748

0.000

11.833

0.000

Total

17.582

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

35.163

42

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.8.6

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Acetamiprid

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Acetamiprid are given below:

Figure 2-22: Process Flow Diagram Acetamiprid


Table 2-26: Mass Balance Acetamiprid
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

N-Cyano-N-methylacetamidine

0.440

0.733

Potassium carbonate

0.620

1.033

Ammonium benzyltriethylchloride

0.020

0.033

DMF (Dimethyl formamide)

1.000

1.666

2-chloro-5-chloromethyl pyridine

0.728

1.213

Water washing

2.000

3.332

Ethyl acetate

4.000

6.675

8.808

14.685

Total

Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Acetamiprid

1.000

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.67

Product

43

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

3.92

6.54

Recycle

0.980

1.63

Recycle

2.908

4.845

To ETP

2.908

0.000

5.900

0.000

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Ethyl acetate
recovery

Filtrate
Distillation for
DMF recovery

Aqueous Layer
Total

2.8.7

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

8.808

14.685

Fipronil

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Fipronil are given below:

Figure 2-23: Process Flow Diagram Fipronil


Table 2-27: Mass Balance Fipronil
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

CF3COOH

2.500

3.300

Monochloro Benzene

1.500

1.980

5-Amino-1-(2,6-Dichloro-4-trifluoromethyl phenyl)3-cyano-4-trifluoromethyl thiopyrazole

1.040

1.373

H2O2 (50%)

2.500

3.300

Water

3.500

4.620

11.040

14.573

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

44

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

Fipronil

1.000

1.32

Product

Effluent

5.000

6.6

To ETP

CF3COOH
Recovered

2.400

3.168

Recycle

Solvent Recovery

1.475

1.947

Recycle

Solid Waste

1.165

1.538

For Disposal

5.000

0.000

4.875

1.165

Total

2.8.8

11.040

14.573

Cartap Hydrochloride

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cartap Hydrochloride are given below:

Figure 2-24: Process Flow Diagram Cartap Hydrochloride


Table 2-28: Mass Balance Cartap Hydrochloride
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

1,3Dichloropropyldimethylamine

0.900

0.900

Sodium Thiocyanate

0.730

0.730

30% HCl

0.710

0.710

H2O

3.000

3.000

Methanol

1.330

1.333

6.670

6.670

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

45

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

Product

1.250

1.250

Recycled

4.420

4.420

To ETP

4.420

0.000

1.250

0.000

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Cartap-HCl

Methanol

Effluent
Total

2.8.9

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

6.670

6.670

Buprofezin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Buprofezin are given below:

Figure 2-25: Process Flow Diagram Buprofezin


Table 2-29: Mass Balance Buprofezin
Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

MCB

2.400

4.000

1 - isopropyl-3 - t-butyl thiourea

0.500

0.833

N-chloromethyl-N-phenyl carbamoyl chloride

0.640

1.067

H2O

2.000

3.333

Methanol

1.4

2.333

Ammonium Bicarbonate

2.400

4.000

9.340

15.567

S. N.

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

46

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Buprofezin

Methanol

MCB

4
5

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

Recovery

Solid
Waste

1.67

Product

1.300

2.170

Recycle

2.380

3.960

Recycle

Solid Waste

0.16

0.267

For Disposal

Effluent

4.500

7.5

To ETP

4.500

0.000

4.680

0.160

Total

2.8.10

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

9.340

15.567

Bifenthrin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Bifenthrin are given below:

Figure 2-26: Process Flow Diagram Bifenthrin


Table 2-30: Mass Balance Bifenthrin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Dimethyl Formamide

2.000

2-Biphenyl carboxylic acid

0.5

0.5

lambda cyhalothric acid

0.65

0.650

Potassium carbonate

0.05

0.050

Tetrabutyl Ammoniumbromide (Catalyst)

0.02

0.02

Sodium Bi-carbonate solution

0.25

0.250

Hexane (Solvent)

4.5

4.500

5% EtOH in Hexane

0.25

0.25

Water

4.5

4.500

12.720

12.720

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

47

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

1
2

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

5.000

To ETP

6.220

6.220

Recycle

0.500

0.500

For Disposal

5.000

0.000

7.220

0.500

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Bifenthrin

Effluent

5.000

Solvent Recovery

Solid Waste
Total

2.8.11

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

12.720

12.720

Diafenthiuron

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Diafenthiuron are given below:

Figure 2-27: Process Flow Diagram Diafenthiuron


Table 2-31: Mass Balance Diafenthiuron
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Xylene

0.690

1.380

2,6-Diisopropyl-4-Phenoxybenzenamine

0.730

1.460

Hydrochloric Acid

0.093

0.186

Sodium Thiocyanate

0.210

0.420

Water

2.670

5.340

Tert-Butyl Amine

0.121

0.242

4.514

9.03

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

48

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

1
2

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.000

Product

5.610

To ETP

0.660

1.320

recycle

0.045

0.090

Scrubber

2.805

0.000

1.705

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Diafenthiuron

Effluent

2.805

Solvent Recovery

Ammonia
Total

2.8.12

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

0.000

4.514

9.030

Deltamethrin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Deltamethrin are given below:

Figure 2-28: Process Flow Diagram Deltamethrin


Table 2-32: Mass Balance Deltamethrin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Dichloromethane (Solvent)

4.000

4.000

Thionyl chloride (SOCl2)

0.400

0.400

Becisthemic Acid

0.900

0.900

Sodium Cyanide

0.150

0.150

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

49

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

3-Phenoxy benzaldehyde

0.600

0.600

Hexane (Solvent)

6.000

6.000

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)

0.300

0.300

Water

2.000

2.000

Triethyl Amine

Total

S.
No.

0.200
14.550

Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.00

Product

2.900

2.90

To ETP

Solvent Recovery

9.550

9.55

Recycle

Solid Waste

1.100

1.10

For Disposal

2.900

0.000

10.550

1.100

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Deltamethrin

Effluent

3
4

Total

2.8.13

0.200
14.550

14.550

14.550

Cypermethrin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cypermethrin are given below:

Figure 2-29: Process Flow Diagram Cypermethrin


Table 2-33: Mass Balance Cypermethrin

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

50

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) cyclopropane
carboxylic acid ethyl ester (DV ester)

0.616

1.232

Sodium Hydroxide

0.108

0.216

Hydrochloric acid

0.300

0.600

Thionyl chloride

0.400

0.800

Toluene (Solvent)

2.000

4.000

Metaphenoxy benzyl Alcohol

0.566

1.132

Tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB)

0.017

0.034

Water

0.860

1.720

Sodium cyanide

0.133

0.266

10

NaOCl

0.266

0.532

5.266

10.532

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.000

Product

4.632

To ETP

3.900

Recycle

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Cypermethrin

Effluent

2.316

Solvent Recovery
Total

2.8.14

1.950

2.316

0.000

2.950

0.000

5.266

10.532

Permethrin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Permethrin are given below:

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

51

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Figure 2-30: Process Flow Diagram Permethrin


Table 2-34: Mass Balance Permethrin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) cyclopropane
carboxylic acid ethyl ester (DV ester)

0.617

1.234

48% NaOH

0.108

0.216

Hydrochloric acid

0.300

0.600

Thionyl chloride

0.367

0.734

Toluene (Solvent)

1.970

3.940

Metaphenoxy benzyl alcohol

0.550

1.100

Water

0.866

1.732

4.778

9.556

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.000

Product

3.790

To ETP

1.833

3.666

Recycle

0.05

0.100

To scrubber

2.883

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Permethrin

Effluent

1.891

Solvent Recovery

HCl

1.891

0.000

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

52

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Total

2.8.15

Solid
Waste

Recovery

4.774

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

9.556

Lambda-Cyhalothrin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Lambda-Cyhalothrin are given below:

Figure 2-31: Process Flow Diagram Lambda-Cyhalothrin


Table 2-35: Mass Balance Lambda-Cyhalothrin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

3-phenoxy benzylaldehyde cyandohydrin

0.500

0.500

Diphenyl ammonium triflilate

0.067

0.067

2-chloro-(3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propynyl)-2,2-dimethyl
cyclo propane carboxylic acid

0.433

0.433

Xylene (Solvent)

20.000

20.000

Total

21.000

21.000

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

53

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

0.233

19.684

19.770

For Recycle

0.083

0.083

Recovery

0.000

0.233

20.767

0.000

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

LambdaCyhalothrin

Solvent Recovery

ML for solvent
recovery
Total

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

21.000

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

21.000

54

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

PROCESS DESCRIPTION FUNGICIDES

Manufacturing Process steps of all Fungicides involved in proposed plant with Process Flow Diagram &
Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.9.1

Cymoxanil

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cymoxanil are given below:

Figure 2-32: Process Flow Diagram Cymoxanil


Table 2-36: Mass Balance Cymoxanil
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

NaNO2

0.350

0.35

1-Cyanoacetyl-3-Ethylurea

0.780

0.78

Carbonate Salt

0.100

0.10

p-TSA

0.033

0.03

DMS (Di-Methyle Sulphate)

0.313

0.31

Water

6.333

6.33

7.910

7.910

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

6.500

To ETP

0.16

0.160

To Scrubber

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Cymoxanil

Effluent

6.500

NOx

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

55

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

CO2

Liquid
Effluent

Total

2.9.2

Air
Emission

Recovery

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

0.250

To Scrubber

0.250

6.500

0.410

1.000

0.000

7.910

7.910

Cyproconazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Cyproconazole are given below:

Figure 2-33: Process Flow Diagram Cyproconazole


Table 2-37: Mass Balance Cyproconazole
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Butanol

2.000

1.33

1-(4-(Chlorophenyl)-2-Cyclopropanyl-1-propanone

0.550

0.37

DMS

0.100

0.07

KOH

0.150

0.10

Water

2.000

1.33

1,2,4 Triazole

0.350

0.23

Chloroform

0.750

0.50

5.900

3.93

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

56

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

0.667

Product

1.380

To ETP

0.725

0.480

Recycle

Butanol Recovery

1.98

1.320

Recycle

Solid Waste

0.125

0.083

For Disposal

2.070

0.000

3.705

0.125

S.
No.

Product

1
2

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Cyproconazole

Effluent

2.070

Chloroform

4
5

Total

2.9.3

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

5.900

3.930

Azoxystrobin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Azoxystrobin are given below:

Figure 2-34: Process Flow Diagram Azoxystrobin


Table 2-38: Mass Balance Azoxystrobin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Methyl 2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy) pyrimidin 4yloxy]phenyl-3-methoxy acrylate

0.810

1.35

DMF

1.140

1.90

Potassium Carbonate

0.522

0.87

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

57

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

2-cyano phenol

0.332

0.55

1,4-diazobicyclo[2.2.2] octane (7.2 MT)

0.014

0.02

Toluene

1.360

2.27

Water

2.630

4.38

6.808

11.35

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.667

Product

5.666

To ETP

1.09

1.817

Recycle

1.32

2.200

Recycle

3.390

0.000

3.410

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Azoxystrobin

Effluent

3.390

DMF Recovery

Toluene
Total

6.800

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

11.350

58

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Metalaxyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Metalaxyl are given below:

Figure 2-35: Process Flow Diagram Metalaxyl


Table 2-39: Mass Balance Metalaxyl
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

2,6 Dimethyl Aniline

0.320

0.53

2 Bromo Propionic Acid Methyl Ester

0.440

0.73

Methoxyacetyl Chloride

0.290

0.48

Water

2.400

4.00

3.450

5.750

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.667

Product

4.083

To ETP

0.000

1.000

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Metalaxyl

Effluent

2.450
2.450

Total

3.450

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

5.750

59

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.5

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Trifloxystrobin

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Trifloxystrobin are given below:

Figure 2-36: Process Flow Diagram Trifloxystrobin


Table 2-40: Mass Balance Trifloxystrobin
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

(2-bromomethyl phenyl) methoxyimino acetic acid


methyl ester

1.076

1.61

Methyl Isobutyl ketone

10.889

16.33

Potassium carbonate

2.556

3.83

1-(3-Trifluoromethyl phenyl) ethanone oxime

0.700

1.05

15.221

22.83

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.500

Product

10.777

16.166

Recovery

3.442

5.163

For
Bromine
Recovery

0.000

0.000

14.219

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Trifloxystrobin

Methyl Isobutyl ketone

Potassium bromide

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

15.221

22.829

60

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.6

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Carbendazim

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Carbendazim are given below:

Figure 2-37: Process Flow Diagram Carbendazim


Table 2-41: Mass Balance Carbendazim
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Thiourea

0.400

1.07

Dimethoxysulfoxide

0.406

1.08

Methyl chloro formate

0.500

1.33

O-phenylene diamine

0.563

1.50

NaOH

0.125

0.33

Formic Acid

0.250

0.67

Water

1.500

4.00

3.744

9.983

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.667

Product

7.317

To ETP

0.000

1.000

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Carbendazime

Effluent

2.744
2.744

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

3.744

9.983

61

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.7

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Kresoxim-Methyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Kresoxim-Methyl are given below:

Figure 2-38: Process Flow Diagram Kresoxim-Methyl


Table 2-42: Mass Balance Kresoxim-Methyl
Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Phthalide

0.425

0.425

Sodium Salt of O-Cresol

0.425

0.425

Cyanide

0.150

0.150

SOCl2

0.075

0.075

H2NOCH3

0.250

0.250

Water

6.500

6.500

7.825

7.825

S. N.

Total

Output/MT of Product

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Kresoxim-Methyl

1.000

Effluent
Total

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

Product

6.825

To ETP

6.825

6.825

0.000

1.000

0.000

7.825

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

7.825

62

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.8

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Thiophenate Methyl

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Thiophenate Methyl are given below:

Figure 2-39: Process Flow Diagram Thiophenate Methyl


Table 2-43: Mass Balance Thiophenate Methyl
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

O-Phenylenediamine

0.325

0.650

Thiocyanate

0.538

1.075

HCl

0.663

1.325

MDC

3.500

7.000

Methyl chloro formate

0.625

1.250

Water

3.275

6.550

8.925

17.850

Total

Output/MT of Product
Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Thiophenate
Methyl

1.000

2.000

Effluent

4.260

8.520

To ETP

MDC Recovery

3.450

6.900

Recycle

HCl to Scrubber

0.215

0.430

For
Scrubbing

4.260

0.215

4.450

0.000

S.
No.
1

Total

8.925

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Remarks

Product

17.850

63

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.9

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Tricyclazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Tricyclazole are given below:

Figure 2-40: Process Flow Diagram Tricyclazole


Table 2-44: Mass Balance Tricyclazole
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

O-Toluidine

0.540

1.80

Ammonium Thiocyanate

0.441

1.47

HCl 30%

0.827

2.76

Toluene

1.084

3.61

Cl2

0.357

1.19

MDC

5.141

17.14

Hydrazine Hydrate

0.879

2.93

MEG

3.928

13.09

Xylene

2.319

7.73

10

Water

0.150

0.50

11

Formic Acid
Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

2.434

8.11

18.100

60.333

64

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

3.333

Product

3.200

To ETP

1.032

3.440

Recycle

HCl Recovery

0.227

0.757

For Sale

MDC recovery

5.092

16.973

Recycle

MEG+ Hydrazine
Hydrate + HCl for
Recycle

4.967

16.557

Recycle

Formic Acid
Recycle

2.297

7.657

Recycle

Xylene Recovery

2.311

7.703

Recycle

Solid Waste

0.214

0.713

For Disposal

0.960

0.000

16.926

0.214

S.
No.

Product

1
2

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Tricyclazole

Effluent

0.960

Toluene recovery

Total

2.9.10

18.100

60.333

Isoprothiolane

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Isoprothiolane are given below:

Figure 2-41: Process Flow Diagram Isoprothiolane


Table 2-45: Mass Balance Isoprothiolane
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

NaOH

0.725

1.450

CS2

0.300

0.600

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

65

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Diisopropylmalonate

0.700

1.400

1,2-Dichloroethane

0.775

1.550

n-Heptane

2.250

4.500

4.750

9.500

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.000

Product

1.71

To ETP

0.675

1.350

Recycle

2.220

4.440

Recycle

0.855

0.000

3.895

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Isoprothiolane

Effluent

0.855

1,2Dichloroethane

n-Heptane
Recovery
Total

2.9.11

4.750

9.500

Propiconazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Propiconazole are given below:

Figure 2-42: Process Flow Diagram Propiconazole

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

66

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-46: Mass Balance Propiconazole


S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

2,4 Dichloroacetophenone

0.433

0.433

Bromine

0.133

0.133

Acetic Acid

1.167

1.167

1,2-Pentane Diol

0.283

0.283

PTSA

0.033

0.033

Toluene

1.333

1.333

1,2,4 Triazole

0.150

0.150

KOH

0.050

0.050

Methanol

0.333

0.333

10

Water

0.500

0.500

4.417

4.417

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

0.643

To ETP

0.107

0.107

For sale

Acetic Acid
Recovery

1.067

1.067

Recycle

Toluene Recovery

1.283

1.283

Recycle

Methanol
Recovery

0.317

0.317

Recycle

0.643

0.107

3.667

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Propiconazole

Effluent

0.643

HBr to Scrubber

Total

4.417

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

4.417

67

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.12

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Hexaconazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Hexaconazole are given below:

Figure 2-43: Process Flow Diagram Hexaconazole


Table 2-47: Mass Balance Hexaconazole
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Valeric Acid

0.930

0.930

Thionyl Chloride

0.570

0.570

Dichlorobenzene

0.670

0.670

Dimethyl Sulfide

1.400

1.400

Dimethyl Sulfate

0.720

0.720

Potassium hydroxide

0.650

0.650

Water

5.750

5.750

DMF

1.720

1.720

Potassium carbonate

0.560

0.560

10

Methanol

2.000

2.000

11

1,2,4 Triazole

0.320

0.320

15.290

15.290

Total

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

68

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.000

Product

8.360

To ETP

0.35

0.350

For scrubber

DMF

1.548

1.548

Recycle

DMS

1.300

1.300

Recycle

Sulfur Dioxude

0.307

0.307

For sale as
sodium
bisulfite

Excess Valeryl
Chloride

0.465

0.465

Recycle

Methanol

1.960

Recycle

S.
No.

Product

1
2

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Hexaconazole

Effluent

8.360

HCl

Total

2.9.13

1.960

8.360

0.000

6.930

0.000

15.290

15.290

Tebuconazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Tebuconazole are given below:

Figure 2-44: Process Flow Diagram Tebuconazole

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

69

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-48: Mass Balance Tebuconazole


Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

4-Chlorophenyl Aldehyde

0.517

1.03

3,3-Dimethyl-2-Butanone

0.367

0.73

H2

0.100

0.20

1,2,4-Triazole

0.167

0.33

KOH

0.033

0.07

Water

1.333

2.67

2.517

5.033

S. N.

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

2.000

Product

3.033

To ETP

0.000

1.000

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Tebuconazole

Effluent

1.517
1.517

Total

2.9.14

2.517

5.033

Difenconazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Difenconazole are given below:

Figure 2-45: Process Flow Diagram Difenconazole


KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

70

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-49: Mass Balance Difenconazole


S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

3,4-Dichlorodiphenyl Ether

0.600

1.000

Bromo Acetyl Chloride

0.340

0.567

AlCl3

0.200

0.333

1,2-Propylene Glycol

0.300

0.500

PTSA

0.032

0.053

Toluene

1.000

1.667

1,2,4 Triazole

0.150

0.250

KOH

0.030

0.050

Methanol

0.250

0.417

10

Water

1.400

2.333

4.302

7.170

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.667

Product

3.030

To ETP

0.264

0.440

For Sale

0.980

1.633

Recycle

`-

0.240

0.400

Recycle

1.818

0.000

2.484

0.000

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Difenoconazole

Effluent

1.818

Hydrochloric Acid
to Scrubber

Toluene Recovery

Methanol
Recovery
Total

4.302

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

7.170

71

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.9.15

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Epoxyconazole

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Epoxyconazole are given below:

Figure 2-46: Process Flow Diagram Epoxyconazole


Table 2-50: Mass Balance Epoxyconazole
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(4fluorophenyl)oxiranecarbaldehyde

1.875

1.25

Acetonitrile

6.250

4.17

Water

15.000

10.00

Sodium phosphate

0.050

0.03

T-butyl methyl ether

18.750

12.50

(S)-1-methylbenzyl amine

0.645

0.43

Methanol

12.500

8.33

55.070

36.713

Total

S.
No.

Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

0.667

Product

11.500

ETP

0.625

0.417

For Sale

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Epoxyconazole

Effluent

17.250

Hydrogen
peroxide

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

72

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S.
No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Output/MT of Product
Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

18.000

12.000

Recycle

6.150

4.100

Recycle

12.045

8.030

Recycle

17.250

0.000

37.820

0.000

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery of tbutyl methyl


ether

Acetonitrile
Recovery

Methanol
Recovery
Total

2.9.16

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

55.070

36.713

Chlorothalonil

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Chlorothalonil are given below:

Figure 2-47: Process Flow Diagram Chlorothalonil


Table 2-51: Mass Balance Chlorothalonil
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Isophthalic acid

0.664

1.11

Alumina catalyst

0.090

0.15

Ammonia Gas

0.140

0.23

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

73

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Activated carbon

0.120

0.20

Chlorine gas

1.160

1.93

Solvent

1.800

3.00

3.974

6.623

Total

Output/MT of Product
Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Remarks

1.000

1.667

Product

0.090

0.150

For Recycle

0.640

1.067

For scrubber

1.680

2.800

Recovery

Solid Waste

0.324

0.540

For Disposal

Waste Water

0.24

0.400

To ETP

S.
No.

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Chlorothalonil

Recovered
Alumina catalyst

HCl

Solvent Recovery

5
6

Total

0.240

0.000

3.410
3.974

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

0.324

6.623

74

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.10

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

PROCESS DESCRIPTION PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS

Manufacturing Process steps of Plant Growth Regulators involved in proposed plant with Process Flow
Diagram & Mass Balance are described in this section.
2.10.1

Chlormequat Chloride

Process flow diagram and mass balance of Chlormequat Chloride are given below:

Figure 2-48: Process Flow Diagram Chlormequat Chloride


Table 2-52: Mass Balance Chlormequat Chloride
S. N.

Raw Materials

Input (MT) / MT of
Product

Trimethylamine (30%)

1.125

7.500

Ethylene dichloride

2.000

13.333

3.125

20.833

Total

Output/MT of Product

Input / Day of
Product (MT)

Product

Liquid
Effluent

Air
Emission

Recovery

Solid
Waste

Output/Day
of Product
(MT)

Chlormequatchlor
ide

1.000

6.667

Product

EDC Recovery

1.400

9.333

Recycle

Water for Reuse

0.725

4.833

Reuse

0.000

0.000

3.125

0.000

S.
No.

Total

3.125

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Remarks

20.833

75

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.11

UTILITIES

2.11.1

Power

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Power requirement of 610 kVA will be sourced from DGVCL/Dahej Local Source. A transformer of
1,000 KVA capacity is proposed. Two DG Sets (400 kVA each) will be installed & used as standby
during emergency conditions and power outrages only.
2.11.2

Fuel

NG / FO / LDO and HSD will be used for the proposed Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters and DG Sets.
Details of the same is tabulated in Table 2-53. Boiler & Thremic fluid heater shall operate ~ 15 to 20
Hr/day.

Table 2-53: Fuel Details


S. No.

Type of Fuel

Used in

Natural Gas or
FO

Boiler

Natural Gas or
LDO

HSD

2.11.3

Quantity

(2 Nos, 3 TPH Capacity each)


Thermic Fluid Heater
(2 Nos, 1 Lac Kcal/Hr Capacity)
DG Sets
(2 Nos. 400 kVA each)

300 Sm /Hr or
4.2 KLD

Source

25 Sm3/Hr or
200 Ltr/Day
200 Ltr/Hr.

NG from Local suppliers


like GSPL, FO & LDO from
Local Depot/ Suppliers
Local Depot/ Suppliers

Water

Based on the mass balances shown in Section 2.7 to 2.10, water requirement is considered based
on the maximum water consumption from the set of group which will be manufactured in a day.
Various combination for the set of groups are tabulated in Table 2-54 & Table 2-55.

Table 2-54: Water & Waste Water Details for Various Products (for section of group)
Prod.
No.

Name of Product/
Byproduct

Production
(MT/Day)

Water Consumption
(KLD)

Waste Water
Generation (KLD)

Herbicides
1

Glyphosate

6.67

43.41

45.13

Propanil

3.34

5.33

7.75

11

Finoxprop-P-Ethyl

3.00

8.10

8.66

12

Quizalofop-p-Ethyl

2.00

5.80

6.29

Insecticides
17

Thiamethoxam

2.00

6.00

9.80

21

Imidacloprid

2.00

6.67

11.50

27

Diafenthiuron

2.00

5.33

5.61

Fungicides
40

Tricyclazole

3.33

0.50

3.20

42

Propiconazole

1.00

0.50

0.64

43

Hexaconazole

3.33

5.75

8.36

48

Chlormequatchloride

0.00

0.00

Plant Growth Regulator


6.67

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

76

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-55: Assumption for Group of Products


S.
No.

Product Mix (Combination


of Prod. No.)

Water Consumption
(KLD)

Waste Water
Generation (KLD)

Remarks

1 + 27 + 40 + 43 + 48

55

62

Product Mix 1

11 + 21 + 42 + 43 + 48

21

29

Product Mix 2

1 + 21 + 40 + 43 + 48

56

68

Product Mix 3
(Peak Load)

Considering production of Product Mix 3 group, 5 products, i.e. Glyphosate (Herbicide), Imidacloprid
(Insecticide), Tricyclazole (Fungicide), Hexaconazole (Fungicide) & Chlormequatchloride (Plant Growth
Regulator) at a time, maximum process water consumption (56 KLD) and process waste water
generation (68 KLD) was considered.
Considering this maximum peak load, during the operation phase of 12 TPD capacity multipurpose
plant, it is estimated, fresh water requirement would be 98 KLD after recycle and reuse concept &
achieving ZLD. Details of the same is provided in Section 2.18, Page 92.

However, water requirement will be ~ 200 KLD if treated waste water is drained to CETP, Dahej.
Inprinciple permission has been received from GIDC as shown in Annexure 4.
2.11.4

Manpower

During construction phase, around 60 100 laborers will be hired. During operation phase, around
125 135 employees will be hired based on their skills. They may be hired locally. First preference
shall be given to skilled, semi-skilled work force of local community.

2.12

RAW MATERIAL, STORAGE & MODE OF TRANSPORT

Based on the need and availability, raw material shall be sourced from registered supplier within India
and Imported (if required) via road transportation by trucks & tempos. Details of raw material along
with the quantity, physical state and means of storage is given in Table 2-56.

Table 2-56: Details of Raw Materials, Physical State & Means of Storage
S.N.

Name of Raw Material

Consumption
(MTPA)

Physical
State

Means of Storage

Phosphono methylimino di acetic acid

3,360

Solid

HDPE bags

Oxygen

940

Gas

Cylinder

NaOH (48%)

5,809

Liquid

Above ground MS tank

2,4-Di chloro phenol

909

Liquid

HDPE Drums

Mono Chloro Acetic Acid

764

Solid

HDPE bags

Hydrochloric Acid*

3,121

Liquid

Above ground HDPE


tank

Dimethyl Sulfate

840

Liquid

HDPE Drums

Ortho cresol

270

Liquid

HDPE Drums

Chlorine

1,416

Gas

Cylinder

10

Cyanuric Chloride

434

Solid

HDPE bags

11

Isopropyl Amine

139

Liquid

MS Drum

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

77

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S.N.

Name of Raw Material

Consumption
(MTPA)

Physical
State

Means of Storage

12

Ethyl Amine

106

Liquid

MS Drum

13

CuCN

215

Solid

HDPE bags

14

Pivolyl Chloride

290

Liquid

MS Drum

15

CS2

154

Liquid

UG MS tank in RCC pit

16

Hydrazine Hydrate

1,063

Liquid

HDPE Drums

17

CH3Br

378

Gas

Cylinder

18

1,2-Dichloro benzene

338

Liquid

HDPE Drums

19

Propoxy Ethyl Chloride

132

Liquid

HDPE Drums

20

Nitric Acid

324

Liquid

Above ground SS tank

21

Sulfuric Acid

474

Liquid

Above ground MS tank

22

Propanoyl chloride (EtCOCl)

102

Liquid

HDPE Drums

23

2,6-Diethyl aniline

189

Liquid

MS Drum

24

Hydrogen

60

Gas

Cylinder

25

1,2,4-Triazole

610

Solid

HDPE bags

26

KOH (Potassium hydroxide)

730

Solid

HDPE bags

27

AlCl3 (Aluminium Chloride)

100

Solid

HDPE bags

28

3,4-Dichlorodiphenyl ether

300

Liquid

HDPE Drums

29

Bromoacetyl chloride

170

Liquid

HDPE Drums

30

1,2-propylene glycol

150

Liquid

HDPE Drums

31

3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2(4-fluorophenyl)
oxiranecarbaldehyde

375

Solid

HDPE bags

32

Sodium Phosphate

10

Solid

HDPE bags

33

S-1-methyl benzyl amine

129

Liquid

HDPE Drums

34

Alumina

45

Solid

HDPE bags

35

Becisthemic Acid

90

Solid

HDPE drums

36

Trimethyl amine solution

2,368

Liquid

Above ground MS tank

37

D.V.Ester

740

Liquid

HDPE Drums

38

Thionyl chloride

1,085

Liquid

HDPE Drums

39

Metaphenoxy benzyl alcohol

670

Liquid

HDPE Drums

40

3-phenoxybenzaldehyde cyanohydrin

150

Liquid

HDPE Drums

41

Diphenyl ammonium triflitate

20

Liquid

HDPE Drums

42

2-chloro-(3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propynyl)-2,2dimethyl cyclo propane carboxylic acid

130

Solid

HDPE Drums

43

NaNO2

105

Solid

HDPE Drums

44

1-Cyanoacetyl-3-ethylurea

235

Solid

HDPE Drums

45

Dimethyl sulphide

1,514

Liquid

HDPE Drums

46

2,4-dichloroacetophenone

130

Solid

HDPE Drums

47

Bromine

224

Liquid

Glass Bottles

48

Pyridine

310

Liquid

HDPE Drums

49

Imidazole

68

Solid

HDPE Drums

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

78

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S.N.

Name of Raw Material

Consumption
(MTPA)

Physical
State

Means of Storage

50

1-(4-(chlorophenyl)-2-Cyclopropanyl-1Propanone

110

Solid

HDPE bags

51

Methyl 2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4yloxyphenyl-3-methoxy acrylate

405

Solid

HDPE bags

52

Lithium bis (trimethylsilyl) amide

10

Solid

HDPE bags

53

2-Cyanophenol

166

Liquid

HDPE Drums

54

2,6-dimethylaniline

160

Liquid

HDPE Drums

55

2-bromo propionic acid methylester

220

Liquid

HDPE Drums

56

Methoxy acetyl chloride

145

Liquid

HDPE Drums

57

Diisopropyl Malonate

140

Liquid

HDPE Drums

58

Thiourea

320

Solid

HDPE bags

59

Dimethoxy sulfoxide

325

Liquid

HDPE Drums

60

Methyl chloroformate

650

Liquid

HDPE Drums

61

o-phenylene diamine

580

Solid

HDPE bags

62

Formic acid

2,634

Liquid

HDPE Drums

63

Sodium salt of ortho cresol

85

Liquid

HDPE Drums

64

Pthalide

85

Solid

HDPE bags

65

Sodium Cyanide

125

Solid

HDPE bags

66

NH2OCH3

50

Liquid

HDPE Drums

67

Ammonium Thiocyante

441

Solid

HDPE bags

68

Ortho toluidine

540

Liquid

HDPE Drums

69

MEG (Ethylene glycol)

3,928

Liquid

HDPE Drums

70

1,2-pentanediol

85

Liquid

HDPE Drums

71

Valeric acid

930

Liquid

HDPE Drums

72

m-Dichloro benzene

670

Liquid

HDPE Drums

73

R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) propionoate

398

Liquid

HDPE Drums

74

2,6-Dichlorobenzoxazole

94

Solid

HDPE bags

75

2,6-chloroquinoxaline

112

Liquid

HDPE Drums

76

2,5-dichloro-3-fluoropyridine

146

Liquid

HDPE Drums

77

Methyl chloride

197

Liquid

HDPE Drums

78

3-Ethyl pyridine

120

Liquid

HDPE Drums

79

Acetyl ketene

60

Liquid

HDPE Drums

80

Ammonium sulfamate

80

Solid

HDPE bags

81

Ethyl acetoacetate

125

Liquid

HDPE Drums

82

3-Chlorophenol

43

Liquid

HDPE Drums

83

Chloroethane

22.5

Liquid

Cylinders

84

4-Trifluoromethyl-2-chlorophenol potassium
salt

60

Solid

HDPE bags

85

S-phenyl

300

Liquid

HDPE Drums

86

Sulphur dioxide

200

Gas

Cylinder

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

79

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S.N.

Name of Raw Material

Consumption
(MTPA)

Physical
State

Means of Storage

87

Orthochlorophenol

150

Liquid

HDPE Drums

88

Triethyl amine

20

Liquid

MS Drum

89

p-ester(di-ethyl thiochloro phosphate

225

Solid

HDPE bags

90

Propyl bromide

155

Liquid

HDPE Drums

91

DMPTC

936

Liquid

HDPE Drums

92

Ammonia gas

167

Gas

Cylinder

93

Acetic acid

350

Liquid

HDPE Drums

94

Diethylphosphoro chloridothioate

160

Liquid

HDPE Drums

95

Sodium salt of 3,5,6-trichloropyridine-2-ol

220

Solid

HDPE bags

96

2-chloro-5-chloromethyl pyridine

1,125

Solid

HDPE drums

97

EDA (Ethylene Di-Amine)

276

Liquid

HDPE Drums

98

Nitroguanidine

624

Solid

HDPE bags

99

N-cyano-N-methyl acetamidine

220

Solid

HDPE bags

100

Ammonium Benzyltriethylchloride

10

Solid

HDPE bags

101

Thiopyrazole derivatives

208

Solid

HDPE bags

102

Hydrogen peroxide 50%

500

Liquid

HDPE Drums

103

Acetic anhydride

661

Liquid

Above ground SS tank

104

3,4 Xylidine

266

Liquid

MS Drums

105

Diethyl ketone

190

Liquid

HDPE Drums

106

Chloroacetyl chloride (CAC)

228

Liquid

HDPE Drums

107

R-2-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) propionoate

398

Solid

HDPE bags

108

Potassium Carbonate

2,493

Solid

HDPE bags

109

R(+)-2-(4-hydroxy phenoxy) propionic acid

160

Solid

HDPE bags

110

5-chloro-2,3-difluoro pyridine

125

Liquid

HDPE Drums

111

Formaldehyde

29

Liquid

HDPE Drums

112

Propargyl Chloride

60

Liquid

HDPE Drums

113

1,3 Dichloropropyldimethylamine

271

Liquid

HDPE Drums

114

Sodium Thiocyanate

559

Solid

HDPE bags

115

1-isopropyl-3-t-butyl thiourea

250

Solid

HDPE bags

116

Ammonium Bicarbonate

1200

Solid

HDPE bags

117

2,6-Diisopropyl-4-phenoxybenzenamine

442

Solid

HDPE bags

118

Tert-Butyl Amine

73

Liquid

HDPE Drums

119

Sodium hypochlorite

190

Liquid

HDPE Drums

120

2-bromomethyl phenyl methoxyimino acetic


acid methyl ester

484

Liquid

HDPE Drums

121

3-phenoxybenzaldehyde

60

Liquid

HDPE Drums

122

1-(3-trifluoromethyl phenyl) ethanone oxime

315

Solid

HDPE bags

123

Isophthalic acid

332

Solid

HDPE bags

124

Ammonium hydroxide

1,303

Liquid

MS Tank

125

BPC

100

Liquid

HDPE Drums

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

80

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S.N.

Name of Raw Material

Consumption
(MTPA)

Physical
State

Means of Storage

126

MTH acid

130

Solid

HDPE bags

127

Sodium bicarbonate

80

Solid

HDPE bags

128

Chloral

1,011

Liquid

HDPE Drums

129

TMP (Tri-Methyl Phosphite)

849

Liquid

HDPE Drums

* HCl requirement as a raw material will be met from the in-house production from other products.
Excess stock will be sold as byproduct.

2.13

SOLVENT AND SOLVENT RECOVERY SYSTEM

2.13.1

Details of Solvents

Details of solvents used and its proposed recovery systems are tabulated in Table 2-57.

Table 2-57: List of Solvent used and its Recovery Plan


S.
No.

Name of solvent

Consumption
(MT/Annum)

%
Recovery

Means of storage

Recovery
Plan

Diethyl ether

10

99

MS drums

Distillation

Petroleum Ether

10

98.57

MS drums

Distillation

Hexane

128

93

Underground MS tank

Distillation

Dimethyl Formamide

227

94

HDPE drums

Distillation

Methanol

155

97.5

Underground MS tank

Distillation

Acetonitrile

68

98.4

MS drums

Distillation

Xylene

151

98

Above ground MS tank

Distillation
Distillation

Toluene

624

90

Underground MS
storage tank

Dichloro Methane

284

97

Above ground MS tank

Distillation

10

Monochlorobenzene

25

98.68

MS drums

Distillation

11

Trifluoro acetic acid

20

96

HDPE drums

Distillation

12

Butanol

17

96.3

MS drums

Distillation

13

Chloroform

96.6

MS drums

Distillation

14

Acetic Acid

30

91.4

HDPE drums

Distillation

15

Tertiary butyl methyl ether

150

96

MS drums

Distillation

16

Ethylene Dichloride

1,220

70.6

HDPE drums

Distillation

17

n-heptane

98.6

MS drums

Distillation

18

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

50

99

HDPE drums

Distillation

19

Mono Ethylene Glycol

198

95

MS drums

Distillation

20

Trichloro Benzene

60

93

HDPE drums

Distillation

21

Ethyl acetate

40

98

MS drums

Distillation

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

81

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.13.2

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Solvent Recovery Plan

The solvents used in the process will be recovered using distillation unit, installed in the plant.
Following steps shall be involved in solvent recovery from the distillation units:

Crude solvent shall be pumped and the stirred.


The vacuum pump / ejector will provide vacuum in the distillation unit. (This steps is omitted for
solvents with low boiling point).
Steam shall be opened to get the required temperature.
When distillate starts collecting in the phase separator, reflux the organic layer back in column.
Water separated, if any, will be drained out.
After stabilizing the distillation column in about half an hour, part of the organic layer distillate
shall be collected in the distillate receivers, maintaining the required reflux to the column.
When distillation is completed, steam shall be stopped, vacuum valve, vacuum Pump/ejector shall
be stopped and reactor shall be cooled down.
Stirrer shall be stopped, vacuum shall be broken with N2 and residue shall be drained into a drum
and send for incineration.

A schematic diagram of the distillation unit is shown in Figure 2-49.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

82

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Figure 2-49: Schematic Diagram for Solvent Recovery Unit

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

83

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.14

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

CATALYST

During the process various catalysts will be used. Their annual consumption, physical state, means of
storage details are tabulated in Table 2-58.

Table 2-58: Details of Catalyst Used


S.
No.

Name of Catalyst

Consumption
(MTPA)

Physical
State

Means of
Storage

Carbon catalyst

660

Solid

HDPE bags

Alumina catalyst

45

Solid

HDPE bags

Pd / C

10

Solid

HDPE bags

PTSA (Para Toluene Sulfonic Acid)

36

Solid

HDPE bags

Sodium amide

Solid

HDPE bags

1,4-diazobicyclo [2.2.2] octane

Solid

HDPE drums

TBAB (Tetra-Butyl Ammonium Bromide)

Solid

HDPE bags

Tertiary Amine Acid Boric Tampon

35

Solid

HDPE bags

2.14.1

Details of Catalyst Consumption & its End Use

Major catalysts which shall be consumed in the products manufacturing, its consumption, recovery
and reuse technique is detailed below:
Carbon catalyst

Total input = 600 MTA


Total output in the form of slurry = 760 MTA
25% of this recovered amount will be disposed as hazardous waste = 190 MTA and balance will
be recycled.
Average disposal per day (as hazardous waste) = (190*3,500)/(24,100*300) = 0.091 MTD

Pd/C catalyst

Total input = 10 MTA


Total output in the form of slurry = 11 MTA
This recovered amount will be reused after getting it regenerated from external agency.

Alumina catalyst:

Total input = 45 MTA


Total output = 45 MTA
This recovered amount will be reused after getting it regenerated from external agency.

2.15

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE

2.15.1

Process Area

The industrial area shall comprise of following sections:

Batching section;
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

84

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Technical grade and formulation process area;


Wet/Slurry section;
Fine particle section.
Raw material storage;
Packing material storage;
Finished product storage;
Scrubbing area;
Solid & Hazardous waste storage area;
ETP area.

The Plant building will be multistoried with all necessary equipments and vessels having four
mezzanine floors in between for installing heat exchangers, dosing vessels, receivers etc. Utilities and
various scrubbers will to be located on the terrace roof. Factory will have tank farm, ETP, HW storage,
fire hydrant lines, admin building, security cabin, utility area, laboratory and health care center.
Herbicides will be manufactured in a dedicated set of equipment of the Plant while manufacture of
Insecticides, Fungicides and plant growth regulator will be undertaken in the rest of the equipment.
As a safety aspect, installation of process vessels shall be placed as far as possible from boiler section,
opposite to the predominant wind direction which is usually from SW in all seasons, except monsoon 1.
2.15.2

Non-Processing Area

Requirement of non-processing area will be developed as shown below:

Administration building;
Security cabin;
Utility area;
Laboratory;
Health Care Center.

2.15.3

Equipment List

For the proposed project equipment mentioned in Table 2-59 shall be placed:

Table 2-59: List of Equipment with Cost


S. N.

Name of Equipment

Capacity

Quantity
(Nos.)

Cost/ Unit
(in Lacs)

Total Cost
INR (in Lacs)

Plant Section
1

MS Glass Lined Reactor

1.6 KL

9.5

9.5

MS Glass Lined Reactor

3 KL

12

24

MS Glass Lined Reactor

6.3 KL

16

80

SS-316 Reactor

5 KL

13

104

SS-316 Reactor

10 KL

18

72

SS-316 Reactor

15 KL

21

63

1
1

As per IMDs long term meteorological data, mentioned in Chapter 3, Table 3-1.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

85

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S. N.

Name of Equipment

Capacity

Quantity
(Nos.)

Cost/ Unit
(in Lacs)

Total Cost
INR (in Lacs)

SS-316 Distillation Column

500 mm dia *
10,000 mm
height

25

SS-316 Falling film evaporator

8 m2

21

SS-316 Wiped film evaporator

4m

15

30

63

48

25

50

10

SS-316 Heat exchangers

25 m

11

SS-316 Heat exchangers

20 m2

12

SS-316 Heat exchangers

5m

13

Graphite Heat exchangers

20 m

20

14

Graphite Heat exchangers

10 m2

2.5

12.5

15

SS-316 Centrifuge

48 in Dia.

27

135

16

SS-316 Agitated Nutsch filter dryer

10 KL

30

60

17

SS-316 Rotary vacuum dryer

6 KL

26

104

18

SS-316 Fluidized bed dryer

500 Kg

18

19

SS-316 Centrifugal pump

5 m /hr.

10

0.7

21

CS centrifugal pump

5 m /hr.

10

0.6

22

SS-316 Receiver

2 KL

23

SS-316 Receiver

3 KL

10

2.8

28

24

PP Centrifugal pump

5 m3/hr.

0.6

24

SS-316 Receiver

5 KL

48

25

SS-316 Receiver

8 KL

28

26

MSGL Receiver

3 KL

21

27

Steam jet ejector

1 torr

28

Water Jet ejector

60 torr

1.5

4.5

29

SS-316 Storage Tank

20 KL

13

39

30

MS Storage tank

25 KL

3.5

21

31

HDPE Storage tank

25 KL

32

MS UG storage tank

20 KL

3.8

19

33

Cooling tower with pumps

500 TR

5.5

5.5

34

Chilled Water Plant with pumps

100 TR

31

31

35

Chilled brine plant with pumps

100 TR

42

42

36

Steam Boiler

3 TPH

27

54

37

Hightherm heater

1 Lac Kcal

18

22

22

20

38

SS-316 Sparkler filter

Nitrogen Plant

1m

100 m /hr.
3

39

Compressed Air

50 m /hr.

40

BFW softener

5 TPH

3.5

3.5

41

HCl scrubber

100 kg/hr.

42

HBr scrubber

100 kg/hr.

43

Vent gas scrubber

500 CFM

3.5

3.5

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

86

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S. N.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Name of Equipment

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Capacity

Quantity
(Nos.)

Cost/ Unit
(in Lacs)

Total Cost
INR (in Lacs)

25

50

Utility Section
1

Emergency Power Generator

400 kVA

Power transformer with switch gear

1,000 kVA

UG water storage tank

Fire Hydrant System

5
6
7

100 m

12

25

25

Material Lifts

2 Tons

18

Chlorine cyl. Hoist

2 Tons

ETP

100 KL

80

80

R O Plant

100 KL

70

70

MEE

100 KL

158

158

10

Pilot Plant

30

30

10

Fork Lift

10

10

2.16

AIR EMISSIONS

2.16.1

Point Source Emissions & Control

Point source emission of pollutants into air from the proposed project will be through flue gas stacks
attached to boiler, thermic fluid heater & DG Sets and through process vents attached to various
scrubbers.
The principal air pollutants are volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM). These
emissions to air are generated during pesticide manufacturing, formulating and packaging processes.
It will be controlled by various scrubbers. Adequate stack height and proper pollution control
equipment will be provided for all flue gas stacks & process vents/stacks.
Action Plan to Control Ambient Air Quality
Appropriate control measures shall be taken to control ambient air quality. Details of the stacks, fuel
used, quantity of fuel used, air pollution control measures (APCM), expected pollutants and expected
efficiency of APCM are tabulated in Table 2-60.

Table 2-60: Details of Stacks, Fuel Used and APCM


S.
No.

Stack Attached
to

Fuel Used

Quantity of
Fuel

APCM

Stack
Height
(m)

Expected
Pollutants

Efficiency
of APCE

Flue Gas Stacks


1

Boilers

Thermic Fluid
Heater

NG / FO
(as per
availability)

300 Sm3/Hr NG
or 4.2 KLD FO

Adequate
Stack Ht.

45

NG / LDO
(as per
availability)

25 Sm3/Hr NG
or 200 Ltr/Day
LDO

Adequate
Stack Ht.

45

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

PM, SO2 &


NOx
-

87

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

S.
No.

Stack Attached
to

Fuel Used

Quantity of
Fuel

APCM

Stack
Height
(m)

DG Sets

HSD

200 Ltr/Hr

Adequate
Stack Ht.

15

Expected
Pollutants

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Efficiency
of APCE
-

Process Vents / Stacks


1

Vents attached
to Alkali
scrubber

Alkali
Scrubbers

35

HCl, SO2,
Cl2, NOx,
HBr

99.5%

Vents attached
to Acid scrubber

Acid
Scrubber

35

NH3 & HC

99.5%

Scrubbers for
odor control
system

Column
containing
Activated
Carbon

35

VOCs

99.95%

Design details of Absorber system (to control HCl, SO2 / HBr)


During the manufacture of some of the products gaseous Hydrogen chloride, sulphur dioxide and
Hydrogen bromide are evolved as by-products. These gases are absorbed in water/ caustic soda
solution.
Hydrogen chloride gas is absorbed in water producing 31% Hydrochloric acid solution.
Sulphur dioxide gas is absorbed in Caustic soda solution producing sodium bisulphite solution. A
mixture of HCl gas and Sulphur dioxide gas, as obtained from the reaction involving Thionyl chloride,
is absorbed in a dual system using water in the first absorber to absorb HCl followed by caustic soda
solution in the second absorber to absorb SO2.
Hydrogen bromide gas is absorbed either in Water or in Caustic soda solution producing Hydrobromic
acid solution or Sodium bromide solution as per the salability of the by-product.
The absorber system is designed for absorbing a mixture of HCl and SO 2. The system is suitable for
absorbing HBr gas also. The system comprises of two FFA, one Ventury absorber and a packed
column as a tail gas absorber.
The first FFA is for concentrating HCl to 31% before it goes to the storage tank. In this dilute HCl
solution is circulated as the absorbent. Both HCl gas and absorbent liquid enters at the top (cocurrently) and flows down as a film through the tubular passage formed by the multi-block graphite
absorber. The heat generated is removed by the cooling water circulating through the utility passage.
The acid solution runs down into the circulating liquid holding tank and the unabsorbed gases go to a
ventury scrubber which absorbs part of the HCl and also creates a suction effect for the gas flow.
The exit gases from the ventury scrubber enters the second FFA where almost all the HCl is absorbed
in water. The exhaust gases comprising predominantly SO2 enters the packed tower made of PP and
packed with PP intallox saddles. The gas and the absorbent liquid (caustic soda solution) flows
counter-currently in the tower. The top outlet of the scrubber will be practically free of HCl and SO2.
Process flow diagram for this absorption system is shown in Figure 2-50.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

88

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Figure 2-50: PFD for HCl, SO2 / HBr Scrubbing System


Design details of Vent Scrubber System
All the vents of Reactors, Dosing / Holding vessels, Suction Hoods placed near Filters and Reactor
Charging points, are connected to a header from where it runs into the suction of a blower. The
discharge line of the blower is connected at the bottom of an Acid Scrubber fitted with a number of
perforated trays. 10% Sulphuric Acid solution is pumped in at the top of the tower. The Acid solution
trickles down the perforated trays counter current to the flow of vent gas stream. Alkaline components
of the gas stream (such as Ammonia, Amine vapors etc.) are thus removed by the circulating Acid
solution.
The residual gas stream leaves the top of the tower and enters the bottom of another similar column.
10% caustic soda solution is circulated in a similar manner as in the case of the first tower. Acidic
components of the gas stream (such as HCl, Cl2, SO2 and Acidic vapors of chemicals) are scrubbed by
the Alkali and the residual gas stream leaving the top of the tower is practically free of Acidic &
Alkaline components.
This stream exiting the second tower is then sent into a tower loosely packed with Activated Carbon
pellets to absorb any solvent vapors (VOC) present in it. The Air leaving the Carbon tower will be
practically free of Acidic, Alkaline and solvent vapors.
Technical specifications of scrubbers are given in Table 2-61.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

89

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-61: Technical Details of Proposed APCM

S.
No.

Vent Attached to

Exit Emission Rate


(mg/Nm3)

APCM
Equipment

Specifications

(As mentioned in CPCBs


emission norms for
Pesticide industries).

Type: Ventury Scrubber, Columns


with perforated trays.
Process Reactor
Vents

Capacity: 2,500 m3/Hr.

Acid
Scrubber

Efficiency: 99.5%
Scrubbing Agent: (9 - 10%) Dilute
Sulphuric acid.

Process Reactor
Vents

Odor control
system, various
vents from reactors

2.16.2

Alkali
Scrubber

Scrubbers

HCl : 20
Cl2: 9
SO2: 40

Type: Ventury Scrubber, Columns


with perforated trays.

NH3 : 30

Capacity: 2,500 m3/Hr.

NOx : 25

Efficiency: 99.5%, MOC: PP,

HC : 15

Scrubbing Agent: 10% Caustic


Soda Solution.

HBr : 5

Carbon Tower (to remove organic


traces)

Area Source Emissions & Control

Due to the proposed activities in the project, no area source emissions are identified.
2.16.3

Line Source Emissions & Control

During construction phase, vehicular emissions will be from use of construction machinery and
vehicles. Apart from it, application of heavy machinery and earth movers will generate emissions.
Suitable dust suppression techniques such as water sprinkling will be taken at these times as relevant.
During operation phase, vehicular emissions due to transportation of raw materials, finished goods
and local travel of employees are envisaged.
Approximately, 10 trucks, 10 Tempos per day carrying raw material and finished goods shall be using
the state highway connecting Bharuch and Dahej. Employees and contract workers (~20 cars, 30 two
wheelers & 25 cycles) shall use the same route during peak hours.
2.16.4

Fugitive Emissions & Control

Fugitive emissions from storage & handling area for raw materials, solvents, finished products is
envisaged due to proposed project. Odor of raw materials & finished goods shall be limited to plant
area.
Raw materials such as Trimethyl amine, Isopropyl amine, DMPTC, Carbon disulphide etc., and
products such as Acephate & Profenofos have an unpleasant odour.
Odor shall be controlled by taking following steps:

All liquid raw materials and intermediates shall be charged into Reactors with pumps or under
gravity through closed pipes.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

90

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

All vents of holding tanks and dosing vessels shall be connected to a Vent Scrubber system
comprising of a suction Blower, Acid Scrubber, Alkali Scrubber and an Activated Carbon Column
before venting through a tall stack.
Alkaline and Acidic gases present in the Vent gases shall be absorbed in the Acid & Alkali
scrubbers. VOC present in the vent gas stream shall be absorbed in the Activated Carbon tower.
Suction Hoods shall be placed near the Man-holes & Charging funnels of Reactors & Filters so that
chemical vapors and dust do not escape into the Plant & surroundings, when the man-hole covers
are opened for inspection or charging of RM.
All storage tanks of low boiling solvents / chemical shall be provided with Conservation Vents.
Storage tanks of Methylene chloride shall be provided with cold insulation and a vent condenser.
Vents of HCl storage tanks shall be provided with a Water filled trap to prevent Acid fumes from
escaping out.
HCl, SO2 & HBr generated during various Chemical reactions during the manufacture of the
Pesticides shall be absorbed in a multi-stage absorber consisting of two Falling Film type
absorbers, a Ventury Scrubber and a Tail gas Scrubber to make the exhaust gases practically free
of the contaminating gases.
Vent lines of Dosing vessels of Trimethyl Amine, Carbon disulphide etc. shall be connected back to
the vents of storage tanks to prevent contaminated air release during material transfer.
Carbon disulphide storage tank shall be placed in a concrete tank with a layer of water in it so
that in case of any spillage the spilled material will be trapped under water. The storage tank shall
have a layer of water floating.
All pumps handling hazardous chemicals shall be provided with mechanical seals to prevent
fugitive emission. Wherever possible magnetic coupled pumps will be used.
Any spillage from drums etc. will be absorbed with saw dust / soda ash and moped clean. The
contaminated absorbent will be safely disposed off along with hazardous waste.
Measuring Instruments with sound alarm and having strategically placed sensing elements will be
provided for alerting the personnel in case of any escape of gases like Chlorine, Ammonia or CS 2
vapors.

2.17

NOISE GENERATION

From the proposed project, noise shall be generated from the various activities. Source of noise
generation are:

The heavy machinery like crane, dumper, roller, bulldozers etc. will be used during daytime during
construction phase;
Operation of boiler, compressors, chillers, DG sets, etc. will have a permanent effect;
Vehicle movement for transportation of raw material and finished goods with frequency of more
than ten times in a day.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

91

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

2.18

WATER CONSUMPTION, WASTE WATER GENERATION & DISPOSAL DETAILS

2.18.1

Water Consumption

As discussed in Section 2.11.3, Pg. 76, it is estimated the fresh water requirement would be 98 KLD
by maximizing recycle and reuse concept & achieving ZLD. Principle areas of water consumption are
DM Plant, Process, Boiler, Cooling Tower, Industrial Domestic Use and gardening.

It is to note that water requirement will be ~ 200 KLD if treated waste water is drained to CETP,
Dahej. Inprinciple permission has been received from GIDC as shown in Annexure 4.
2.18.2

Waste Water Generation

The waste water will be generated from the process, utilities and domestic area. These will be treated
to achieve ZLD. Breakup of waste water generation is tabulated in Table 2-62.
2.18.3

Mode of Disposal

The process effluent will be treated by MEE (Capacity 100 KLD) and condensate from MEE will be
transferred to the ETP (Capacity 100 KLD) for further treatment. Also, utilities blowdowns and
domestic sewage will be treated in ETP followed by RO (Capacity 100 KLD).
Total flow in ETP will be 96.5 KLD. The permeate from the RO will be reused in plant areas and reject
will be treated into MEE. System is designed to achieve Zero Liquid Discharge.

However, once the CETP is established in future, company will discharge ~ 96 KLD treated effluent
(ETP consisting primary, secondary and tertiary treatment without RO & MEE) into CETP with
standards norms given by concern authority for further treatment & disposal.
2.18.4

Water Balance Table & Chart

By implementing various recycle/reuse schemes as shown in Figure 2-51, 77 KLD water will be
reused in cooling tower. Water consumption & Waste water generation details is given in Table 2-62.

Table 2-62: Water Consumption and Waste water Generation Details


Water
Consumption
(KLD)

Wastewater
Generation
(KLD)

S.
No.

Description

Domestic

To ETP

Process

56

68

To MEE

DM Plant

To ETP

To ETP

Boiler

24

Effluent Treatment and


Disposal Facility

Cooling Tower

100

To ETP

RO Reject

19

To MEE

MEE Condensate

83.5

To ETP

Gardening

Total Water Consumption


& Waste Water

175

Recycled Water

77

Fresh Water Consumption

98

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

183.5

Total 96.5 KLD to be treated in


ETP followed by RO and 87
KLD to be treated in MEE.

92

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Figure 2-51: Water Balance Diagram

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

93

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.18.5

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Details of ETP

The effluent generated from the various areas are:

Process Waste Water;


Domestic sewage;
Utility Blow downs Boiler, Cooling Tower, DM Plant etc.

Stream segregation at source will be carried out for segregation of high pollution level and low
pollution level of streams.
Wastewater Treatment Methodology

Stream A: One of process stream containing cyanide waste will be segregate from the other
process streams and treated in MEE after primary treatment.
Stream B: Other High TDS & High COD streams from the process will be collected separately.
Primary treatment will be provided followed by multiple effect evaporation. The condensate from
MEE shall then pumped to ETP for secondary treatment.
Stream C: TDS streams i.e. utilities blow downs, domestic sewage along with condensate from
MEE as a combined stream shall be treated in ETP consisting of Secondary Biological Treatment
and Tertiary Treatment followed by RO. The RO reject will be transferred to MEE for salt removal
while RO permeate will be used in plant area.

Inlet & Outlet Characteristics of Wastewater


The inlet and outlet characteristics of wastewater is tabulated in Table 2-63.

Table 2-63: Inlet and Outlet Characteristics of Wastewater


S. No.

Parameters

Unit

Combined ETP Inlet


Characteristics

ETP Outlet
Characteristics

pH

5-7

6.5 8.5

COD

mg/l

7,000

100

BOD

mg/l

2,500

30

TDS

mg/l

1,000

1,500

SS

mg/l

250

100

O&G

mg/l

15

10

Process Description of ETP


Waste water generated from the proposed pesticides manufacturing plant is segregated into separate
streams depending on their pollution levels as given in wastewater treatment methodology. The
detailed process description along with treatment units and their sizing is given in further details.

Stream A:
The toxic stream containing cyanide waste (about 7 KLD) will be treated with sodium hypochlorite till
all the cyanide pollutant is decomposed. Thereafter this stream is evaporated in an MEE after passing
from stripper along with other aqueous effluent stream having high TDS & COD and RO Reject water.
The list of treatment unit along with sizing for the primary treatment of this stream is given in Table
2-64.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

94

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-64: List of Primary Treatment Unit for Removal of Cyanide from Wastewater
S.
No.

Treatment Unit

Volumetric Capacity

Remarks

Stirred SS Reactor with Chlorine sparger


and attached packed scrubber. Scrubbing
fluid Caustic soda solution.

8 KL

To destroy the cyanide


content of the segregated
effluent.

Caustic soda solution dosing tank

1 KL

Scrubber column with PP intallox saddles


packing.

400 Dia. x 2,000 Ht.

To absorb unreacted
chlorine escaping from
Reactor.

Centrifugal pump

5 m3 / Hr.

Stream B:
The high TDS and high COD stream from the process plant (~61 KLD with 5.8% TDS) containing
inorganic salts like sodium chloride, sodium sulphate etc., (excluding untreated Cyanide effluent) is
segregated and sent to an Oil & Grease separator and then to an Equalization Tank.
The oil & grease, if any, is collected and disposed off for incineration.
The effluent from the equalization tank is then pumped into a lime treatment tank. The tank contents
are mixed by aeration through an under-water air grid. Lime slurry is added to get a pH of 10 11.
The mixture is then treated with alum solution, flocculating agent and send to a primary settler.
The settled sludge is dewatered on a sludge drying bed from where it is sent to an approved land fill
and leachate will be transferred to equalization tank.
The supernatant liquid (with a residual TDS of 4%) is then pumped continuously through a filter into a
live steam stripper column operated under vacuum.
The over-head vapors of the stripper is condensed, settled and separated into layers. The aqueous
layer is recycled back into stripper.
The organic layer is drummed out and sent out for incineration.
The aqueous layer from the bottom of the stripper is collected in a tank and mixed with the reject
stream from the Reverse Osmosis plant. The mixed stream (~84 KL) is sent to a Triple-EffectEvaporator.
The concentrate from the 3rd Effect of the MEE goes to a TFD. The salt discharged from the bottom of
the TFD (~3.5 MT) is sent to TSDF for disposal.
The combined distillate stream from 3rd Effect and TFD of MEE is condensed and collected in a tank.
This stream will have COD of about 5,000 7,000 ppm, but no TDS form as one part of stream C.
The list of treatment unit along with sizing for the primary treatment of this stream is given in Table
2-65. The list of MEE pretreatment unit and MEE Units is given in Table 2-66.

Table 2-65: List of MEE Pretreatment Units for treatment of High COD and High TDS Stream
S.
No.

Treatment Unit

Oil & Grease separator

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Volumetric
Capacity
6 m3

Remarks
-

95

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Volumetric

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S.
No.

Treatment Unit

Collection cum Equalization cum


Neutralization tank

50 m3 x 2

RCC tanks with sub merged


compressed air grid for mixing.

Agitated lime slurry dosing tank

2 KL

Common for both Neutralizers

Rotary air blower with perforated


HDPE air grid

1,000 m3 / Hr. x 2

Nash-Hyter type

Centrifugal pump

5 m3 / Hr. x 2

With semi-open impellor

Flash mixer

2.5 m3

Common for both Neutralizers with


Alum solution dosing system.

Flash mixer

4.5 m3

Common for both Neutralizers with


Flocculent solution dosing system.

Capacity

Remarks

Primary Settler

7.5 m3

Primary sludge will be drained on to


Sludge Dewatering Bed and
supernatant liquid will be sent to MEE
Stripper feed tank.

Bag filter

2 m2

For polishing filtration of Effluent

Table 2-66: List of MEE Units


Volumetric

S.
No.

Treatment Unit

Stripper feed tank

10 KL

Centrifugal pump

5 m3 / Hr. x 2

Stripper feed pump

Stripper re-boiler with live steam


sparger and packed column

Stripper O/H condenser

30 m2 area, Shell &


tube type

Receiver for organic distillate

1 KL

Water-ring vacuum pump

Capacity

Remarks

5 KL
500 Dia. x 5,000
Ht.

Suitable for vacuum service

750 m / Hr. x 2

MEE feed tank

100 KL

For mixing RO reject stream with


Stripper outlet water

Centrifugal pump

5 m3 / Hr. x 2

MEE feed pump

Triple-effect Evaporator with steam


heating

4 m3 / Hr.

One FFE followed by two Forced


Circulation type Evaporator.

10

Thin-Film Dryer

200 Kg / Hr.

For final Salt recovery

Stream C:
This comprises of the distillate from MEE-TFD, blow-down streams from the boilers, DM Plant and
cooling tower and the domestic waste stream from the STP (totaling to 93 KL).
Stream C is continuously run into the Bio-degradation unit (Activated sludge process) under good
mixing by aeration.
The treated stream then goes into a secondary settler from where the settled sludge is partially
recycled back into the bio degradation tank to maintain its MLSS content and the rest is sent to the
sludge drying Bed.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

96

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

The clear supernatant liquid is sent to a dual media filter. The filtrate (~88 KL) is then sent to the RO
plant. The permeate water from the RO plant (72 KL) is recycled to partially meet the fresh-water
requirement of the plant. The rejects stream from RO Plant (16 KL) is sent back into the MEE.
The list of secondary biological and tertiary treatment units is given in Table 2-67.

Table 2-67: List of Secondary Biological and Tertiary Treatment Units


Volumetric

S.
No.

Treatment Unit

Aeration Tank fitted with submerged


compressed air grid.

Secondary settler

10 m3

Centrifugal pump

5 m / Hr. x 2

With semi-open impellor

Rotary air blower with perforated HDPE air


grid.

1,000 m3 / Hr. x 2

Nash-Hyter type

Intermediate Collection Tank

16 m3

Dual media Filter

5 m3

Capacity
150 m3

Final Treated Effluent collection tank

100 m

Reverse Osmosis Plant

100 KL / Day

Remarks
-

Block diagram of Proposed ETP (Effluent Treatment System) is shown in Figure 2-52.
Action Plan for Zero Liquid Discharge
The wastewater generated from the entire unit will be treated in ETP followed by RO & MEE as
described above and the treated water will be completely recycled and reused in plant premises
resulting Zero Liquid Discharge. Also the overall water demand of fresh water will be reduced by water
conservation plan like condensate recovery from the boiler.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

97

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Figure 2-52: Process Block diagram of Proposed ETP

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

98

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

2.19

SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION, QUANTIFICATION,


STORAGE AND DISPOSAL

2.19.1

Identification of Waste

The hazardous waste generated from the project will be of two types: process waste and non-process
waste.
Process Waste
Out of total 48 products, only 10 products will generate incinerable waste.
Maximum production capacity per annum on product selection/requirement basis is 3,500 MT out of a
maximum limit of 24,100 MT of all products putting together. Working days are assumed to be 300.
Hence, hazardous waste generation MTD can be calculated as below:
y = (x*3500) / (24,100*300)
Product wise quantity of waste generated is given in Table 2-68 & Table 2-69.

Table 2-68: Product-wise Distillation Residue Generation


S.
No

Name of product

Waste per ton


of product*

Amt of waste for full


capacity (x) in MTA

Amt of waste
(y) in MTD

Pretilachlor (H)

0.09

27.5

0.013

Cyproconazole (F)

0.125

25

0.012

52.5

0.025

TOTAL

Type of waste

Distillation residue

* as per the mass balance shown in Section 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 & 2.10.

Table 2-69: Product-wise Filtration Residue Generation


S.
No

Name of product

Waste per ton


of product*

Amt of waste for full


capacity (x) in MTA

Amt of waste
(y) in MTD

2,4 Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid (H)

0.087

87

0.044

Paraquat dichloride (H)

0.044

22

0.011

Fipronil (I)

1.165

235

0.113

Buprofezin (I)

0.16

80

0.039

Bifenthrin (I)

0.5

100

0.048

Deltamethrin (I)

1.1

110

0.053

Tricyclazole (F)

0.214

214

0.104

Chlorothalonil (F)

0.324

162

0.078

1,010

0.490

TOTAL

Type of waste

Filtration residue
(Chemical sludge)

* as per the mass balance shown in Section 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 & 2.10.
Non-process Waste
Non-process waste generated from project and their quantity generated is given in Table 2-70.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

99

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Table 2-70: Quantity of Non-process Waste


S.
No.

Processes

Type of Waste

Operation of DG Sets,
Boilers, Pumps etc.

Used/Spent Oil

1 KL/Annum

Waste/Residues containing oil

0.5 MT/Annum

Use of Solvents

Spent Solvents

1.5 KL/Annum

Chemical residue from


decontamination

1.5 MT/Annum

Date-expired and off-specification


pesticides

10 MT/Annum

Chemical containing residue

0.15 MT/Annum

Discarded containers/barrels/liners

7,500 Nos. of Bags/ Drums /


Annum

Flue gas cleaning residue

0.1 MT/Annum

Chemical sludge from waste water


treatment

912 MT/Annum

Used Filter Materials

1.5 MT/Annum

Spent Catalyst

27.3 MT/Annum

Spent Carbon

3 MT/Annum

Spent acid from batteries

0.05 KL/Annum

Production of Pesticides

Disposal of barrels
containers during handling
on HW.

Treatment of exhaust, air,


water & waste water from
processes and ETP

Purification process for


Solvents
Hazardous waste
treatment processes

Total Quantity

Solid and Other Waste


Solid waste and other waste to be generated from the project are tabulated in Table 2-71.

Table 2-71: Identification of Other Waste


S. No.

Type of Waste

Constituents

Municipal Solid Waste

Kitchen waste, cardboard, paper and garden wastes

Inorganic Waste

Scraps, paper bags, cardboards and glasswares etc.

Plastic Waste

Plastic bags, plastic scraps etc.

E-waste

CDs, LAN Cables, Fuses, Data cables, circuit boards, etc.

Biomedical Waste

Syringe, Bandages, used cotton, medicine etc.

Construction & Demolition waste

Debris

2.19.2

Categorization, Storage and Disposal of Waste

Based on the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008,
as amended till date, categorization, storage and disposal of both process and non-process wastes are
provided in Table 2-72. In-principal approval for receiving landfilling / incineration waste by
Saurastra Enviro Projects Pvt. Ltd., Kutch Facility is received and attached as Annexure 5.

Table 2-72: Categorization, Storage and Disposal of Waste


S. No

Hazardous Waste

Category

Total Quantity

Means of storage

Disposal Method

Used/spent oil

5.1

1 KL/Annum

Drums

Sold to authorized
Recyclers

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

100

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

S. No

Hazardous Waste

Category

Total Quantity

Means of storage

Disposal Method

Wastes/residues
containing oil

5.2

0.5 MT/Annum

Barrels

Incineration

Spent solvents

20.2

1.5 KL/Annum

Drums

Solvent Recovery
Units / To
authorized Reprocessor

Distillation residue

20.3

52.5 MT/Annum

Barrels

Incineration

Process waste/residues

29.1

1,010
MT/Annum

Barrels

Incineration

Chemical sludge
containing residue
pesticide

29.2

0.15 MT/Annum

Barrels

Incineration

Date-expired and offspecification pesticides

29.3

10 MT/Annum

Poly Bag / Drums

Incineration

Chemical containing
residue arising from
decontamination

33.1

1.5 MT/Annum

Drums

TSDF

Discarded
containers/barrels/liners
contaminated with
hazardous waste

33.3

7,500 Nos. of
Bags/ Drums /
Annum

As it is

To authorized
vendor

10

Flue gas cleaning


residue

34.1

0.1 MT/Annum

HDPE Bags

TSDF

11

Chemical sludge from


waste water treatment

34.3

912 MT/Annum

HDPE Bags

TSDF

12

Used Filter Materials

35.1

1.5 MT/Annum

HDPE Bags

TSDF

13

Spent Catalyst

35.2

27.3 MT/Annum

HDPE Bags

TSDF/ Recycler

14

Spent Carbon

35.3

3 MT/Annum

HDPE Bags

Incineration

15

Spent acid from


batteries

36.3

0.05 KL/Annum

Barrels

Authorized Dealers

16

Distillation residues
from contaminated
organic solvents

36.4

2.5 MT/Annum

Drums

Incineration

17

Inorganic acids

D2

As it is

Barrels

Authorized vendors

2.19.3

Storage Area

Maximum process waste to be generated per day = 0.513 MT


Maximum non process waste to be generated per day = 3.185 MT
Discarded containers/barrels/liners per day = 25 Nos.
Storage area available 120 sqm
Considering two storey of storage, waste can be stored for maximum 40 days.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

101

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

2.19.4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

2. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Treatment of Waste

The waste will be neutralized before sending to Landfill if required.


2.19.5

Transportation of Waste

The transport of the hazardous wastes will be in accordance with the provisions of The Hazardous
Waste (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as amended till date
and the rules made by the Central Government under the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988
Manifest system will be followed in accordance with Form 13 of Hazardous Waste (Management,
Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as amended till date.
TREM card will be provided to the transport drivers as per Form 11 of Hazardous Waste
(Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 as amended till date.

2.19.6

Safety System during Handling and Transportation of Waste

PPEs like hand gloves, organic mask, gum boots/safety shoes, dust mask/ nose mask will be provided
to workers and drivers involved in handling and transportation of hazardous waste.

2.20

MITIGATION MEASURES AT DESIGN STAGE

Description of operation control incorporated into the project to meet environmental standards,
environmental operating conditions at design stage are tabulated in Table 2-73.

2.21

ASSESSMENT OF NEW AND UNTESTED TECHNOLOGY

No recommendation of Assessment of New and Untested Technology was given during appraisal
stage, hence it is not carried out.
World-wide tested technology for manufacturing of technical grade of pesticides shall be used.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

102

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Table 2-73: Operational Controls at Design Stage


Operational Controls at Design Stage
S.
No.

Name of Plant

Air

Water

Hazardous Waste

Air (Prevention & Control of


Pollution) Act 1981

Water (Prevention & Control


of Pollution) Act 1974

Hazardous Waste (Management Handling &


Trans Boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.

Parameters

Energy

HCl & HBr

Scrubber

--

--

Waste Water

--

Treated in MEE, followed by ETP


and RO.

--

Hazardous Waste

--

--

Impervious flooring with adequate storage space


and dyke wall will be provided.

Herbicides

Insecticides

Safety

Interlocks, gas detection systems, alarm system, solvent recovery system, sprinkler system, control valves and fire
hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.

Energy

Energy efficiency will be considered during technology selection.

HBr

Scrubber

--

--

NH3

Scrubber

--

--

Waste Water

--

Treated in MEE, followed by ETP


and RO.

--

Hazardous Waste

--

--

Impervious flooring with adequate storage space


and dyke wall will be provided.

Safety

Energy efficiency will be considered during technology selection.

Fungicides

Interlocks, gas detection systems, alarm system, solvent recovery system, sprinkler system, control valves and fire
hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.

NOx

Scrubber

--

--

HCl

Scrubber

--

--

HBr

Scrubber

--

--

Waste Water

--

Treated in MEE, followed by ETP


and RO.

--

Hazardous Waste

--

--

Impervious flooring with adequate storage space


and dyke wall will be provided.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

103

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Operational Controls at Design Stage


S.
No.

Name of Plant

Safety

Plant Growth
Regulator
Operation of
Utilities i.e.
Boilers, Thermic
Fluid Heaters,
Chillers etc.

Air

Water

Hazardous Waste

Air (Prevention & Control of


Pollution) Act 1981

Water (Prevention & Control


of Pollution) Act 1974

Hazardous Waste (Management Handling &


Trans Boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.

Parameters

Interlocks, gas detection systems, alarm system, solvent recovery system, sprinkler system, control valves and fire
hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.

EDC Recovery

--

--

Recovery system

Waste Water

--

Condensate will be recycled.

--

Safety

Control valves and fire hydrant system with water curtains will be designed and provided.

PM

Adequate Stack Ht.

--

--

SO2

Adequate Stack Ht.

--

--

NOx

Adequate Stack Ht.

--

--

Waste Water

--

Treated in ETP followed by RO.

--

Hazardous Waste

--

--

Sold to Authorized Agencies.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

104

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

3.1

STUDY AREA

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

The study area is considered within 10 km radius of the project site at Plot No. D-2/CH/357, Dahej II
Industrial Estate, situated in Vagra Taluka of Bharuch district, Gujarat State. Study area map of
proposed project is shown in Map 3-1.

3.2

PERIOD

Baseline monitoring study and surveys of the study area has been carried out in summer season from
1st March, 2015 to 31st May, 2015.

3.3

COMPONENTS

The baseline environmental data of valued environmental components with respect to air, noise,
water, land, flora, fauna, socio-economic and soil quality in the study area was collected by conducting
primary data collection which includes sampling/field studies, survey & secondary data collection as
mandated by the ToR issued by EAC.

3.4

METHODOLOGY

The guidelines given in the EIA Manual of the MoEFCC and methodologies mentioned in Technical EIA
Guidelines Manual for Pesticides Industries and Pesticide Specific Intermediates by IL&FS Ecosmart
Ltd., approved by MoEFCC is followed for conducting the baseline environmental survey.
Field monitoring for meteorological conditions, ambient air quality, water quality, noise quality, Soil
quality etc. has been carried out, which constitutes major portion of the baseline environmental
studies. In addition to these important parameters, certain aspects like land use, socio-economic
studies, Ecological and Biodiversity studies etc. are covered during the study period.
This information is based on secondary information sources and constitutes remaining part of the
baseline environmental studies. Sampling location map within the study area is shown in Map 3-2.
The entire data has been collected through actual physical surveys and observations, literature
surveys, interaction with locals, government agencies and departments.
3.4.1

Primary data Collection

Primary Data collected includes:


Sampling/Field Studies

Survey

Ambient air quality


Noise
Ground water/Surface water quality
Soil Quality

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Land Use Pattern


Flora and Fauna

105

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Map 3-1: Study Area Map showing Villages, Surface Water Bodies & Forests

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

106

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Map 3-2: Sampling Location Map

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

107

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

3.4.2

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Secondary Data Collection

This includes review of secondary/published information on:

Socio-Economic profile;
Sensitive area as biosphere reserve, forests, sanctuaries, places of historical, archeological,
tourists importance, etc. if any.

3.5

ESTABLISHMENT OF BASELINE FOR VALUED ENVIRONMENTAL


COMPONENTS

3.5.1

Long Term Meteorology2

The climate of the study area is based on information from the most recent published long-term
climatological tables (1961 1976) by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), for Broach (Station
ID: 42841).
The observatory was situated in the compound of the District Local Board Office. The place was in a
low lying area with tall trees all around. The Narmada flows nearby. Wind instruments were on the
topmost terrace of the office building. At present observatory situated at K.G. Polytechnic, Bharuch.
A copy of the long-term climatological data is enclosed as Annexure 6. These tables give useful
information about a regions weather, since they are collected over a 15-year period.
Temperature
The highest temperature (mean) & daily maximum temperature (mean) recorded are 47.8C (in the
month of May) & 39.9C (in the month of April) respectively. The highest temperature recorded was
47.8C on 20th May, 1955.
January is generally the coldest month, with daily minimum (mean) temperature of 11.3C. The lowest
temperature recorded was 4.0C on 22nd January, 1962.
During summer season, i.e. March May, day temperatures remain between 18.6 39.9C.
Humidity
Most humid conditions are found in the monsoons, followed by summer, post-monsoons, and winter in
that order. Mornings are more humid than evenings and relative humidity ranges from a high of 8190% in monsoon mornings to a low of 34-44% in winter evenings.
During summer season, in morning relative humidity remains between 65 74 % and in the evening it
remains between 29 39 %.
Rainfall
The distribution of rainfall in the region, which includes the study area, is regular. Annual total rainfall
in the region is 912.1 mm.

1
2

Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Long Term Climatological Tables, 1969 -1990, Broach (Bharuch) District.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

108

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Distribution of rainfall by season is 860.7 mm in monsoons (June, July, August, September), 38.7 mm
in post-monsoons (October November), 2.8 mm in winter (December, January, February) and 9.9
mm in summer (March, April, May). About 94.4 percent of the annual rainfall in the region is received
during the monsoon months i.e. June to September. July is the rainiest month.
Maximum rainfall in any one month was recorded in the month of September in year 1954 which was
about 790.1 mm. July is having maximum number of rainy days i.e. 13.5.
Cloud Cover
The area remains cloudy between Junes - September, which is the active period of the monsoon
season. Generally cloud cover ranges from 1.5 to 6.7 OKTAS during this monsoon season.
In the summer season, cloud cover ranges from 0.2 to 1.9 OKTAS.
Wind
Long term wind direction data is presented in Table 3-1. Overall for the whole year, first predominant
wind directions are from SW Direction (45 %), second predominant wind direction is from NE (23 %)
and third predominant wind direction is from NW Direction (13 %).
During the summer period, first predominant wind direction is from SW direction (44.5 %), second
predominant wind direction is from NW Direction (20.0 %) and third predominant wind direction is
from SE Direction (15.5 %).
During post monsoon & winter season, first predominant wind direction is from SW & NE direction
respectively.

Table 3-1: Predominant/Mean Wind Direction IMD Bharuch


Predominant Wind
Month

First

Second

Morning

Evening

Third

Morning

Evening

Morning

Evening

January

NE

NE

SW

SW

SE

NW

February

NE

NE

NW

SW

SW

NW

March

SW

SW

NE

NW

SE

NE

April

SW

SW

NW

NW

SE

NE

May

SW

SW

NW

NW

SW

SE

June

SW

SW

SW

NW

W/NW

SE

July

SW

SW

SE

S/NW

August

SW

SW

NW

S/NW

SW/W

September

SW

SW

NW

NW

October

SW

SW

NE

NE

SE

SE

November

NE

NE

SW

SW

SE

SE

December

NE

NE

SE

SE/SW

SW

NW

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

109

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Average Long Term Meteorological Condition


Average meteorological condition is given in Table 3-2.

Table 3-2: Average Meteorological Condition at Bharuch IMD Data

Max

Min

Rainfall
(mm)
Monthly
Total

January

31.2

11.3

1.2

0.2

71

38

February

33.5

14

1.4

0.1

64

34

March

37.7

18.6

0.2

65

29

April

39.9

23.1

0.5

0.1

66

31

May

39.6

25.8

9.2

0.4

74

39

June

35.7

26.3

108.5

4.9

81

58

July

32.1

25.3

290.4

13.5

89

74

August

31.4

24.9

279.1

12.7

90

79

September

32.5

24.4

182.7

7.8

87

68

October

35.9

21.9

16.8

0.8

76

46

November

34.7

16.7

21.9

0.7

73

42

December

31.5

12.6

0.2

74

44

Total

--

--

912.1

41.2

--

--

Average

34.6

20.4

--

--

76

49

Month

Mean Daily
Temperature

No. of
Rainy
days

Relative
Humidity (%),
(Morning)

Relative
Humidity (%),
(Evening)

Site Specific Meteorology


Baseline meteorological data has been collected hourly by installing automatic meteorological station
at roof top Kiran Padhiyars house, near Rahiyad Chokadi, which is ~ 5.20 Km in ESE direction from
the project site. Photographs showing Meteorological Station set up is given in Photograph 3-1.

Photograph 3-1: Photographs of Meteorological Station Setup

Meteorological Station at rooftop of Kiran Padhiyars house, near Rahiyad Chokadi

Methodology for Collection of Meteorological Parameters


Methodology for meteorological data collection is given in Table 3-3.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

110

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-3: Monitoring Methodology of Meteorological Data


Sample collection
S.
No.

Sampling
Parameters

Wind Speed

Sampling
equipment

Sensitivity/
Detection
Limit

Anemometer
cup counter

Total
Sampling
Period

Sampling
Frequency

Methodology

0.25 m/s

(0 to 65 m/s)
2

Wind Direction

Temperature

Humidity

Wind vane
(0 to 357)
Thermometer
(-40 to 60)
Relative
Humidity meter

As per
manufacturers
manual

1
0.1C

Summer 2015

Hourly

(IS 8829 -1978)


Instruments are
calibrated.

3%

(0-99%)
5

Rainfall

Rain gauge

0.5 mm

Cloud Cover

--

--

Visual Inspection
by the observer.

4 Hourly

Summer 2015s Site Specific Meteorological Data


The data obtained have then been compiled to obtain average data as shown in Table 3-4.

Table 3-4: Average Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village


Time

Temp C

Relative
Humidity
%

Average /
Predominant

33.7

37.9

Wind
Speed
(m/sec)

Wind
Direction

Cloud
Cover,
Octas

Rainfall,
mm

4.6

SW

0.4

0.0

Compiled mean meteorological data is represented in Table 3-5.

Table 3-5: Mean Meteorological Data of Rahiyad Village Summer Season, 2015
Time

Temp C

Relative
Humidity
%

Wind
Speed
(m/sec)

Wind
Direction

Cloud
Cover,
Octas

Rainfall,
mm

0:00

31.5

45.4

5.3

SW

0.4

0.0

1:00

31.1

46.1

4.9

SW

0.4

0.0

2:00

30.4

47.1

4.4

SSW

0.4

0.0

3:00

29.7

48.2

4.0

SSW

0.5

0.0

4:00

29.3

49.9

3.7

SSW

0.5

0.0

5:00

28.7

51.4

3.4

SSW

0.5

0.0

6:00

28.3

53.0

3.3

SSW

0.6

0.0

7:00

30.1

48.8

3.4

SSW

0.6

0.0

8:00

31.1

45.7

3.6

SSW

0.6

0.0

9:00

31.8

43.5

3.7

SW

0.5

0.0

10:00

33.8

37.0

3.8

SW

0.4

0.0

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

111

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Time

Temp C

Relative
Humidity
%

Wind
Speed
(m/sec)

Wind
Direction

Cloud
Cover,
Octas

Rainfall,
mm

11:00

35.1

31.3

3.9

SW

0.4

0.0

12:00

36.3

26.8

4.0

0.4

0.0

13:00

37.6

24.5

4.3

0.3

0.0

14:00

38.4

22.7

4.5

0.3

0.0

15:00

38.9

20.3

4.6

0.3

0.0

16:00

38.5

21.7

5.1

0.3

0.0

17:00

37.9

23.4

5.5

0.3

0.0

18:00

37.6

24.5

5.9

WSW

0.3

0.0

19:00

36.6

31.1

6.0

WSW

0.3

0.0

20:00

35.6

37.1

6.2

WSW

0.3

0.0

21:00

34.6

42.1

6.2

SW

0.4

0.0

22:00

33.9

43.2

5.9

SW

0.4

0.0

23:00

32.7

44.2

5.6

SW

0.4

0.0

Site-specific meteorological data shows that:

Average wind speed was 4.2 m/sec and mostly the morning hours are windier. Maximum wind
speed recorded was 12.2 m/sec on 24th May, 2015 at 1800 Hrs.
Wind blows predominantly from SW to NE direction (17.5 %). Calm wind contributes to about
1.90 % of all winds. Windrose diagram is shown as Figure 3-1.
Average temperature recorded was 33.7C with maximum temperature recorded as 44.2C at
1500 Hrs. (16th May, 2015) and minimum of 20.0C at 0600 Hrs. (1st March, 2015).
Average relative humidity was 37.9 % with maximum humidity recorded as 81.0 % at 0600 Hrs.
(27th March, 2015) and minimum of 8.9 % at 1600 Hrs. (20th March, 2015).

Collation of Site Specific Data with Secondary Data of IMD


Site specific meteorological data cannot be collated with IMDs secondary data as the project site is
nearer to Narmada Estuary and nearest IMD station is for Bharuch (~ 50 Km far from site). The
differences in these data is expected due to tidal impacts.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

112

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Figure 3-1: Windrose Diagram for Summer Season - 2015

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

113

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

3.5.2

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Land Use

Methodology Adopted for Land Use / Land Cover Study


Land Use and Land Cover is classified in Annexure 7. The project area was placed, based on coordinates taken on the site, on satellite imagery and determined the study area for the proposed
project. The resulting satellite data of study area was interpreted through onscreen visual
interpretation using basic elements of interpretation resulting in the combined land use/cover map for
the proposed project.
To accomplish the objective the following steps were undertaken:

Study and collection of relevant documents and maps


Interpretation of satellite data
Ground truth study/Field survey
Final map preparation

Study and Collection of Relevant Documents and Maps


This covers:

Downloading of remote sensing data using the licensed software, Google Earth Pro having high
resolution (<1.0 m) imagery.
Topographical maps as base map.
Reconnaissance survey of the study area to get a general feel of the entire ground area which can
aid in the preliminary interpretation of the data.

Interpretation of Satellite Data


The downloaded satellite imagery was imported to software and geo referencing of the imagery was
done by registering it to the SOI maps through identification of common points between the map and
the image.
Considering the basic elements of interpretation, such as tone, size, shape, texture, pattern, location,
association, shadow, aspect and resolution along with ground truth and ancillary information collected
during the preliminary reconnaissance survey, the interpretation was accomplished.

Ground Truth Studies/Field survey


A detailed ground truth was carried out to check the discrepancy of the interpreted data. It comprises
of data collection of ground features along with the respective geographical position in terms of
latitudes and longitudes. The aim of ground truth studies is to confirm whether the interpreted land
use / cover are correct thus improving the quality of the output. Interaction was done with local
people to gather background information.
The field survey consisted of traversing the study area, cross-checking of unidentified features. Field
notes were kept in the form of log sheets recording information pertaining to co-ordinates,
photographs and identified land use/cover. Additional features identified or remarks made against
existing interpretation were also recorded. A field visit was done on 15th March, 2014, 13th June 2014,
& 31st January, 2015 & 4th March 2015.

Table 3-6 & Photograph 3-2 enumerates the land features in the study area and its corresponding
GPS readings of all the ground truthing locations verified.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

114

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-6: GPS Reading Enumerating the Land Use Features in Study Area
S. No.

Latitude

Longitude

Location

Classes

214354.1N

723657.3E

Dahej

Scrub land

214356.9N

723830.2E

Dahej

Prosopis cover

214256.7N

723651.7E

Dahej

Industrial Area

214332.2N

723708.5E

Dahej

Scrub land

214255.9N

723919.7E

Jolwa

Village

214327.5N

723942.8E

Jolwa

Scrub land

2143'16"N

72427.89E

Atali

Prosopis cover

2141'47.67"N

7239'41.63"E

Suva

Prosopis and grass cover

213444.7N

724650.5E

Ambheta

Water Body

10

214048.6N

723539.3 E

Ambheta

Mudflat

11

214507.6E

723840.9E

Wav

Water body

12

2145 55.6 N

723843.5E

Kadodara

Village

13

2147 09.5 N

723617.7E

Padariya

Grassland

14

2142'14.90"N

7246'50.50"E

Kaladara

Prosopis cover

15

2145'32.80"N

7243'53.40"E

Nadida

Habitation

16

2144'21.90"N

7245'07.40"E

Khojbal

Agriculture land

Photograph 3-2: Photographs Showing Different Type of Land Use in Study Area

Khojbal Agricultural land

Prosopis covered area at Kaladara

Salt Pans at Dahej

Cotton cultivation at Vadadla village

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

115

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Open Sea at Suva

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Dahej Industrial Area

Class wise Area Statistics


The area statistics of these classes are presented in Table 3-7.

Table 3-7: Area Statistic for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area
Area, Secondary Class

S.
No.

Primary
Classification

Secondary
Classification

km

Ha.

~%

Built-up Land
or Habitation

Residential / Commercial

3.52

352

1.11

Industrial

11.24

1124

3.54

Crop Land/Fallow Land

113.15

11,315

35.66

Land without Scrub

20.06

2006

6.32

Mudflat

19.12

1,912

6.03

Reservoir / Lakes /
Ponds / Tanks

3.65

365

1.15

River

45.12

4,512

14.22

Scrub

56.86

5,686

17.92

Open Vegetation

20.12

2,012

6.34

Close Vegetation

2.31

231

0.73

Marshy Vegetation

5.51

551

1.74

Salt Pans

16.63

1,663

Grass Cover

0.01

Agricultural
Land

Wastelands

Water Bodies

Vegetation
Cover

Others

Area, Primacy Class


km2

Ha.

~%

14.76

1476

4.65

113.15

11,315

35.66

39.18

3,918

12.35

48.77

4,877

15.37

84.8

8,480

26.73

5.24

16.63

1,663

5.24

0.003

0.01

0.003

317.73

31,773

100

Total

Note: Road, Railways, Canals are not calculated separately in area statistics
Following were observed and noted during the study:

The most observed category in the region was Agriculture land followed by Vegetation cover,
Water bodies and Wastelands, as per area covered.
Crop cultivated in the study area are mostly cotton (Gossypium herbaceum), and in some area
Castor (Ricinus communis) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum).
The irrigation is essentially through rain water and in some area through bore wells and canals.
Open vegetation region includes Prosopis juliflora dominated vegetation cover. Vegetation in the
beyt area was mostly marshy species.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

116

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Narmada River flows on the southern side of the project.


The dried water body where grass were grown was termed as grass cover region.

Final Map Preparation


The proportional presence of different land uses and land cover in terms of statistical percentages was
derived for the study area. Appropriate legends were used to represent the various categories of land
use and land cover, and were then represented on land use and land cover map, Map 3-3.
Important Features of Project Site & Study Area
There is no Biosphere Reserve, National Park, Sanctuary & Reserved Forests within the study area.
However, details of the important features in the study area are provided in Table 3-8.

Table 3-8: Important Features within the Study Area


S. N.

Features

Details falling within study area

Critically Polluted Areas

None Identified

National Park / Wildlife Sanctuary

None Identified

Tiger Reserve / Elephant Reserve /


Turtle Nesting Ground

None Identified

Core Zone of Biosphere Reserve

None Identified

Reserved / Protected / Social Forests

Nearest Reserved forest is Dahej R.F ( ~ 12 Km towards


WSW)

Habitat for migratory birds

None Identified

None Identified in Study area.

Estuary: Narmada Estuary ( ~ 5 Km towards S)


Sea: Gulf of Khambhat ( ~ 13.5 Km towards W)
7

Estuary / Sea / Lakes / Reservoir / Dams


/ Streams / River

Mangroves

Mountains / Hills

None Identified

10

Archaeological Sites (as per ASI)

None Identified

11

Defense Installation

None Identified

River: Bhukhi River (~ 10.62 Km towards E)


Ponds: Approximately 28 Ponds within study area, having
7 ponds within 5 Km from project site as tabulated in
Table 3-9.
None Identified in Study area.
Afforested Mangroves ( ~ 12 Km towards WSW)

Table 3-9: Ponds within 5 Km from Project Site


S. N.

Pond / River / Other Water Bodies

Distance in Km / Direction w.r.t Site

Jolwa Pond

~ 1.29

Rahiyad Pond

~ 2.65

Vav Pond

~ 3.50

Suva Pond

~ 4.90

Atali Pond

~ 4.07

Koliyad Pond

~ 4.48

Akhod Pond

~ 5.05

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

117

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Map 3-3: Land Use Map

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

118

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

3.5.3

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Ambient Air

Ambient Quality Monitoring was conducted at Six (6) different locations within the study area.
The study area covers a 5 Km radius from the project site for carrying out Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring (AAQM).
Sampling Frequency
The frequency of monitoring was 24 hours twice a week at each station spread over the entire season.
Grab sampling for gaseous parameters like HCl, Cl2, HBr, VOC, HC (Methane and Nonmethane) & CO
taken atleast thrice a month.
Methodology Adopted for AAQM Parameters
The parameters monitored were PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), HCl, Cl2,
HB2, VOC, HC (Methane and Nonmethane) & CO. Other parameter as unless specified in ToR, i.e. NH3
was also analyzed as source for the same is envisaged from the project. Grab samples of CO were
taken and analyzed. The detailed monitoring methodology for ambient air is given in Table 3-10.

Table 3-10: Methodology of Analyzing Ambient Air Monitoring Parameters


Sampling
Parameters

Sampling equipment /
Solution used

Analytical
Equipment

Sensitivity/
Detection Limit

Methodology

PM10

Respirable Dust Sampler with


Cyclone & Flow measurement

Electronic
balance

10 g/m3

Gravimetric IS: 5182


(Part 23) 2006

PM2.5

Fine Particulate Sampler

Electronic
Balance

2 g/m3

Gravimetric

SO2

Gaseous Flow (Impinger with


TCM) with RDS

Spectro
photometer

3.7 g/m3

Colorimetric IS:
5182: (Part II) 2001

Spectro
photometer

6 g/m3

Colorimetric IS:
5182: (Part VI) 2006

NOX

Gaseous Flow (Impinger with


Sodium Hydroxide (0.1 N)
Media) with RDS

Cl2

Gaseous Flow (Impinger with


Methyl Orange) with RDS

Colorimetric

1.0 g/m3

IS 5182 (Part 19):


1982

HCl

Gaseous Flow (Impinger with


Distilled Water) with RDS

Titrimetric
Method

0.2 g/m3

Argentometric
Method

NH3

Gaseous Flow (0.1 N H2SO4)


attachment with RDS Sampler

Spectro
photometer

10 g/m3

Indophenol Blue
method

HBr

Gaseous Flow (Impinger with


KOH) with RDS

Spectro
photometer

1.0 g/m3

APHA: 4500 Br B_
22nd Edition,
Colorimetric Method

HC (Methane
& Non
Methane)

Bladder & Pump

GC

1 ppm

IS 5182 (Part 21)

GC

1 ppm

IS 5182 (Part 2)

CO analyzer/
GC

1,145 g/m3

Sensor/ GC method

VOC
CO

Bladder & Pump


(Charcoal adsorption/ analyzer)
Bladder & Pump

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

119

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

AAQM Monitoring Locations


The locations for AAQM were decided based on the prescribed guidelines3. For this EIA, the purpose is
to ascertain the baseline pollutant concentrations in ambient air. Accordingly, the criterion was
selected to ascertain quality of air at important human settlements (residential areas).
Details of AAQM monitoring locations and justification for selecting these stations are presented in
Table 3-11 & Photograph 3-3.

Table 3-11: AAQM Locations with Justification


AAQM
Station

Location &
Address

Distance from
Project Site in Km

Direction w. r. t
Project Site

AA01

At Project Site

AA02

Vadadla

Industrial

0.00

Base Station

Core station

Residential

~ 3.0

WNW

1st Crosswind

AA03

Jolwa

Residential

~ 1.2

SW

Source

Justification for
selection of station

Upwind
nd

AA04

Rahiyad X

Residential

~ 2.43

SSE

AA05

Atali

Residential

~ 4.0

ESE

2nd Downwind

Crosswind

AA06

Gelanda

Residential

~ 1.61

NNE

1st Downwind

Photograph 3-3: Photographs of AAQ Sampling Stations

Ambient Air Monitoring Station at Site

Ambient Air Monitoring at Vadadla

Ambient Air Monitoring at Jolva

Ambient Air Monitoring at Rahiyad Chokdi

1
3

As per Guidelines for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring by CPCB, MoEF Published as SERIES: NAAQMS/ /2003-04, April,
2013

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

120

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Ambient Air Monitoring at Atali

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Ambient Air Monitoring at Gelanda

AAQM Results
Detailed result of AAQM are given in Annexure 9. Complied average data are represented in Table
3-12.
The comparison of the results with the value range indicators provided by CPCB (Annexure 8) and
Factories Act indicates:

Average concentration of PM10 recorded ranged from minimum 38 g/m3 (At Atali Village) to
maximum 116 g/m3 (At Rahiyad Chokadi);
Average concentration of PM2.5 recorded raged from minimum 18 g/m3 (At Atali) to maximum 62
g/m3 (At Atali Village);
It is noted that the PM10 & PM2.5 results exceeds the permissible limits of 100 g/m3 & 60 g/m3
respectively for 24 Hrs. at Vadadla, Jolwa & Rahiyad Chokadi which could be due to:
Industrial & infrastructure development activities in study area (PCPIR & residential projects);
Villages near coastal regional, influence of windy atmosphere;
Vehicular movement on the kaccha roads of the villages;
Rural activities like burning of cow dung for household purposes like using it in chullas.
The concentration of SO2 (8.0 17.5 g/m3), NOx (10.0 35.7 g/m3), Cl2 ( < 1.0 12.8 g/m3),
HCl (< 20.0 5.6 g/m3), HC Methane (1,063 2,310 g/m3), NMHC Non-Methane (< 10 - 195
g/m3), CO (< 1,145 2,168 g/m3) are within permissible limits as prescribed by CPCB &
Factories act;
The concentration of NH3, HBr & VOC were below detectable limit.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

121

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results


Parameters & Results

Station code

AA1

AA2

AA3

AA4

AA5

AA6

All stations are in Industrial,


Residential, Rural & Other Areas
(CPCB)

Note: All units are in g/m3. Figures in brackets indicate CPCB limits. Minimum Reportable Readings are 8 g/m3 for SO2, 10 g/m3 for NOX, 1.0 g/m3 for Cl2, 1.0 g/m3 for HCl, 20.0
g/m3 for NH3, 1.0 g/m3 for HBr, 1.0 PPM for VOC, 800 g/m3 for HC, 10 g/m3 for NMHC & 1,145 g/m3 for CO.
PM10

PM2.5

SO2

NOX

100

60

80

80

Cl2

HCl

NS

NS

NH3

HBr

VOC

HC

NMHC's

NS

NS

NS

NS

400
[24 Hours]

CO
4,000

[24 Hours]

[24 Hours]

[24 Hours]

[24 Hours]

[1 Hour]

Maximum

89

38

17.5

27.0

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,556

157

1,146

Minimum

40

21

8.0

10.5

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,063

< 10

< 1145

Average

67

31

12.1

20.6

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,393

101

< 1145

98%tile

88

38

17.0

26.6

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,554

157

< 1145

Maximum

102

56

17.0

32.1

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

2,033

177

1,839

Minimum

51

19

8.0

11.5

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,263

< 10

< 1145

Average

80

37

9.5

20.7

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,561

89

1,547

98%tile

99

56

15.6

30.9

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,965

171

1,829

Maximum

105

53

10.4

35.7

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,831

144

1,607

Minimum

63

21

8.0

12.0

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,246

< 10

< 1145

Average

82

34

8.3

22.4

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,512

89

1,361

98%tile

102

51

10.0

34.5

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,791

142

1,597

Maximum

116

57

10.1

27.8

12.8

5.6

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,745

182

2,148

Minimum

56

21

8.0

10.0

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,297

< 10

< 1145

Average

84

37

8.1

18.8

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,479

89

1,777

98%tile

115

56

9.6

26.8

12.5

5.5

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,730

173

2,135

Maximum

99

62

10.1

32.9

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,781

170

1,771

Minimum

38

18

8.0

10.0

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,153

< 10

< 1145

Average

74

38

8.2

17.4

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,497

80

1,342

98%tile

98

61

9.9

31.4

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,758

163

1,753

Maximum

98

58

11.8

25.6

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

2,310

195

2,168

Minimum

51

23

8.0

11.8

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,161

< 10

< 1145

Average

77

38

8.6

20.4

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

1,493

97

1,766

98%tile

98

56

11.4

25.2

<1

<1

< 20

< 1.0

< 1 ppm

2,177

187

2,160

At Project Site

At Vadadla Village

At Jolwa Village

At Rahiyad Chokadi

At Atali Village

At Gelanda Village

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

122

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

3.5.4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Traffic Survey

Traffic Survey was carried out on SH 6 in S direction of the proposed site, road connecting site to
Dahej & Bharuch on 14th July. The road width of this road is 15 meters, which is a 3 Lane (One Way)
Arterial Road4.
Peak hours are considered from 08:00 12:00 Noon and 16:00 20:00 Hours. Average peak hourly
traffic on this route i.e. from Bharuch to Dahej and from Dahej to Bharuch is 531 and 570 PCU
respectively as tabulated in Table 4-8 & Table 4-9.
Traffic Survey sheets are given in Annexure 12.
3.5.5

Noise & Vibration

The objective of monitoring background noise level in study area is to establish baseline noise level to
identify impact due to proposed activity.
Methodology for Noise Level Analysis
Monitoring of noise is done by identifying suitable monitoring locations. Background noise quality is
monitored at the selected locations, in dB (A) Leq (d) and dB (A) Leq (n).
Monitoring methodology for noise monitoring is given in Table 3-13.

Table 3-13: Noise Level Monitoring Methodology


Envt.
Component

Ambient
Noise

Sample collection

Sampling
Location

Sampling
Frequency

Methodology

7
Locations

Once during the


study (Hourly
reading for 24
hours at each
location)

Sound Level
Measurement
(SLM)

Sampling
Equipment

Detection
Limit

Noise Level
Meter

0.1 dB (A)

Sampling
Parameter

Decibels
dB (A)

Following methodology is followed to conduct baseline monitoring, impact assessment and to propose
suitable mitigation measures:

Site visit (for existing plant) and identification of sources of noise and vibrations;
Determining possible impacts of Noise & Vibrations on the environment from proposed activities;
Identifying monitoring locations and conducting Noise monitoring;
Prediction of incremental noise levels by using SoundPlan software;
Checking whether the increase of SPL in the locations surrounding the project makes conflicts
with stipulated allowable norms;
Suggestions of mitigation measures of Noise/Vibrations and to reduce noise/vibrations of sources
exceeding the allowable limits of SPL.

The standard for monitoring ambient noise level as per CPCB guidelines is as given in Table 3-14.

1
As per The Indian Road Congress - Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:106-1990), Table-2,
Recommended Design Service Volumes, page 11.
4

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

123

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-14: Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones
Ambient Air Quality Standards
in Respect of NOISE

Area
Code

The Noise Pollution


(Regulation and Control) Rules,
2000
Note:

Category

Limits in dB(A) Leq*


Day Time

Night Time

Industrial

75.0

70.0

Commercial

65.0

55.0

Residential

55.0

45.0

Silence

50.0

45.0

Day Time: 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM; Night Time: 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM

dB (A) Leq*: denotes the time weighted average of the level of sound in decibels on scale A
which is relatable to human hearing.

Noise Level Monitoring Locations


Receivers were placed nearby project site, at a distance of 2 Km maximum from the source of noise
generation and at sensitive locations ambient noise monitoring i.e. habitation area.
Noise readings were taken at Seven (7) different locations within the study area as presented in Table
3-15. Photographs showing monitoring location is given in Photograph 3-4. Map showing
monitoring station locations is given in Map 3-2.

Table 3-15: Noise Level Monitoring Locations


Location
Code

Location

Date of
monitoring

Category of
Area / Zone

Distance from
Project Site in Km

Direction w.r.t.
Project Site

NL1

At Project Site

25.05.15

Industrial

NL2

100 m. from Project


boundary

26.05.15

Industrial

0.100

NL3

100 m. from Project


boundary

25.05.15

Industrial

0.100

NL4

250 m. from Project


boundary

27.05.15

Industrial

0.250

NL5

On Highway - GIDC
Road

26.05.15

Industrial

0.500

NL6

Jolwa Village

28.05.15

Residential

1.2

SW

NL7

Gelanda Village

29.05.15

Residential

1.5

NE

Photograph 3-4: Photographs of Noise Level Monitoring Stations

At Project Site

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

At 100 m. from Project boundary North Direction

124

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

At 100 m. from Project boundary West Direction

At 250 m. from Project boundary South Direction

On Highway - GIDC Road East From Project Boundary

At Jolwa Village

Noise Level Results


The average noise levels at monitoring stations are presented in Table 3-16.

Table 3-16: Noise Level Monitoring Results


CPCB Limits in
Location
Code

Location

Date

Category

NL1

At Project Site

25.05.15

NL2

100 m. From Project


boundary North Direction

NL3

dB (A)

Average Noise
levels in dB (A)

Day
Time

Night
Time

Day
Time

Night
Time

Industrial

75.0

70.0

57.7

52.7

26.05.15

Industrial

75.0

70.0

59.4

55.0

100 m. From Project


boundary West Direction

25.05.15

Industrial

75.0

70.0

64.2

57.0

NL4

250 m. From Project


boundary South Direction

27.05.15

Industrial

75.0

70.0

63.0

53.8

NL5

On Highway - GIDC Road


East From Project Boundary

26.05.15

Industrial

75.0

70.0

64.6

58.0

NL6

Jolwa Village

28.05.15

Residential

55.0

45.0

57.7

51.7

NL7

Gelanda Village

29.05.15

Residential

55.0

45.0

56.5

50.7

Observations:
Based on the noise monitoring results, it is observed that:
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

125

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Noise level during day time & night time, in Industrial area, were within the CPCB standards i.e.
Industrial area (75 dBA (d) & 70 dBA (n)).
Noise level during day & night time, in Residential area, were slightly higher than the CPCB
standards which is due to vehicular movements in nearby highways.

Vibration
Vibration is a mechanical phenomenon whereby oscillations occur about an equilibrium point. The
oscillations may be periodic such as the motion of a pendulum or random such as the movement of a
tire on a gravel road.
Major sources of vibration are blasting due to mining activities, vibration caused by motions
of engines, electric motors, or any mechanical device in operation theses are typically unwanted. Such
vibrations can be caused by imbalances in the rotating parts, uneven friction, the meshing
of gear teeth, etc. such vibrations can be reduced by proper designing.
In the study area there are no major sources of vibrations.
3.5.6

Hydrology, Surface Water & Ground Water

The objective of monitoring surface and ground water in study area is to establish baseline water
quality to identify impact due to proposed activity.
Source of Water
Drinking water is supplied by tankers or pipe lines in most of the villages at vicinity of GIDC and SEZ
area. Owing to geological conditions, groundwater is salty and only used for general purpose.
Methodology Adopted for Surface and Ground Water Sampling
Surface water was collected from Eight (8) locations, including Two (2) river water (estuary) samples
and Ground water from Six (6) locations. The samples were collected as grab samples, from each
location, once during the study period and the analysis methodology is given in Table 3-17.

Table 3-17: Analysis Methodology for Analyzing Surface & Ground Water Samples
Parameters Analyzed in
Surface
Water

River
(Estuary)
Water

Ground
Water

Minimum
Detection
Limit

APHA: 4500-H+ B*, pH meter

Color

APHA: 2120 *, Visual


Comparison

Temperature

APHA: 2550 B *, Standard


Thermometer

Turbidity

APHA: 2130 B *, Nephelometric

4 NTU

TDS

APHA: 2540C *, Gravimetric

20 mg/l

Electrical
conductivity

APHA: 2510 B *, Conductivity


meter

1mho/cm

COD

APHA: 5220 B *, Titrimetric


Open reflux method

<5 mg/l

BOD

IS: 3025 (part-44), Iodometric

<3 mg/l

S.
No.

Parameters

Analysis Methodology

pH

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

1 Pt-Co

1 Deg C

126

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Parameters Analyzed in
S.
No.

Parameters

Analysis Methodology

Surface
Water

River
(Estuary)
Water

Ground
Water

Minimum
Detection
Limit

Chlorides

APHA:4500Cl- B *, Titrimetric

1.5 mg/l

10

Phenol

APHA: 5530-D *, colorimetric

0.001 mg/l

11

Sulphates

APHA:4500-E as SO4 *, Turbid


metric

< 1 mg/l

12

Total Hardness

APHA: 2340-C *, Titrimetric


(EDTA method)

< 10 mg/l

13

Ca++ Hardness

APHA: 3500-B-Ca * Titrimetric,


(EDTA method)

< 4 mg/l

14

Mg++ Hardness

APHA: 3500-B-Mg *, By
difference

8 mg/l

15

Total Alkalinity

APHA: 2320 B *, Titrimetric

<10 mg/l

16

Nitrate

IS:3025 (part-34),3.3 ,
colorimetric

<0.1 mg/l

17

Fluoride

APHA:4500 F-D*,Colorimetric

<0.1 mg/l

18

Sodium

APHA:3500 Na-B *, Flame


emission Photometric

<1 mg/l

19

Potassium

APHA: 3500 K-B * Flame


emission Photometric

<1 mg/l

20

Calcium

APHA Edition 22 (3500 Ca- B)


Titrimetric (EDTA Method)

1 mg/l

21

Magnesium

APHA Edition 22 (3500 Mg- B),


by difference

3 mg/l

22

Salinity

APHA: 2520 B *, Electrical


Conductivity method

23

Total Nitrogen

APHA: 4500 N Org, Micro


Kjeldahl Distillation *,
Titrimetric

0.06 mg/l

24

Total
Phosphorous

APHA: 4500 P-C *, colorimetric

<1 mg/l

25

Dissolved
Oxygen

APHA: 4500O-C *, Iodometric

0.5 mg/l

26

Ammonical
Nitrogen

APHA: 4170-B */IS:3025 (part34), 1988, Distillation &


colorimetric

<0.01 mg/l

27

SAR

Flamephotmetric & EDTA


method

28

Heavy Metals

<0.002
mg/l

<0.003
mg/l

<0.003
mg/l

Arsenic (as As)

APHA: 3500-As-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS)*

Cadmium (as Cd)

APHA: 3500-Cd-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS) *

Chromium (as
Cr)

APHA: 3500-Cr-B *,
colorimetric

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

127

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Parameters Analyzed in
Ground
Water

Minimum
Detection
Limit

<0.05 mg/l

APHA: 4500 CN- D & E*,


colorimetric

0.003 mg/l

Iron (as Fe)

APHA: 3500-Fe-B *,
colorimetric

<0.1 mg/l

Lead (as Pb)

APHA: 3500-Ld-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS)*

<0.01 mg/l

Mercury (as Hg)

APHA: 3500-Hg-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS)*

<0.001
mg/l

Manganese (as
Mn)

APHA: 3500-Mn-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS) *

<0.04 mg/l

Nickel (as Ni)

APHA: 3500-Ni-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS)*

<0.02 mg/l

Zinc (as Zn)

APHA: 3500-Zn-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS)*

<0.08 mg/

Boron (as B)

APHA: 4500 B-C *, colorimetric

Total Coliform

APHA: 9221-B *, Multiple Tube


Fermentation

30

Fecal Coliform

APHA: 9221-E *, Multiple Tube


Fermentation

31

Free Ammonia

32

Floating Matters

APHA: 2530 - B *

33

Suspended Solids

APHA: 2540 - D *, Gravimetric


Method

2 mg/L

34

Oil and Grease


(including
Petroleum
Products)

APHA: 5520 - B *, (Partition Gravimetric Method

1.5 mg/L

35

Sludge Deposits,
Solid refuse
floating Solids,
Oil Grease and
Scum

APHA: 2710 - C *

S.
No.

Parameters

Analysis Methodology

Copper (as Cu)

APHA: 3500-Cu-A */ APHA:


3111-B(AAS)*
IS:3025(part42):1992

Cyanide (as CN)

29

Surface
Water

River
(Estuary)
Water

<0.02 mg/l

1.8
MPN/100m
l

1.8
MPN/100m
l
-

* denotes methods as per 22nd Edition

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

128

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Surface Water Results


Surface water samples were collected from Eight (8) different locations within the study area as
shown in Table 3-18, Map 3-2 & Photograph 3-5. Analysis results of collected samples are given
in Table 3-19 & Table 3-20.

Table 3-18: Surface Water Sampling Locations Ponds and River (Estuary)
Code

Location

Source

Date of
Sampling

Distance from
Site (in Km)

Direction
w.r.t Site

SW 1

Jolwa

Pond

06.05.2015

1.4

SW

SW 2

Vadadla

Pond

06.05. 2015

3.0

WNW

SW 3

Vav

Pond

06.05. 2015

3.5

NNW

SW 4

Gelanda

Pond

06.05. 2015

1.7

NNE

SW 5

Atali

Pond

06.05. 2015

4.3

SW 6

Rahiyad

Pond

06.05. 2015

2.6

SSE

SW 7

Narmada River
(U/s) Nr. Vegni

SW 8

Narmada River
(D/s) Nr.
Ambeta

Estuary

Estuary

06.05. 2015

06.05. 2015

7.3

8.2

Sampling Rational

To check water quality


of the stagnant water
body

SE

To check water quality


of the flowing water
body of upstream
direction

SW

To check water quality


of the flowing water
body downstream of
Project Site

Photograph 3-5: Photographs of Surface Water Sampling

Atali Pond

Vav Pond

Vadadla Pond

Jolwa Pond

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

129

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-19: Surface Water (Ponds) Analysis Results


Classification for Inland Surface Water5
S. No.

Parameters

Unit

Sampling Code & Locations

SW1

SW2

SW3

SW4

SW5

SW6

Jolva

Vadadla

Vav

Gelanda

Atali

Rahiyad

pH

pH Scale

6.5 to 8.5

6.5 to 8.5

6.0 to 9.0

6.5 to 8.5

6.5 to 8.5

7.16

7.35

6.69

7.33

7.37

7.25

Dissolved Oxygen

mg/l

NA

4.3

4.5

4.3

4.1

4.6

Total Dissolved Solids

mg/l

500

NA

1,500

NA

2,100

1,740

864

412

624

552

1,068

Electrical Conductivity

mohs/ cm

NA

NA

NA

1,000

2,250

2,658

1,335

658

1,276

874

1,735

BOD

mg/l

NA

NA

13

20

13

14

Colour

Pt.co

10

300

300

20

15

10

20

35

25

Total Hardness

mg/l

300

NA

NA

NA

NA

240

200

220

330

210

260

Ca++ Hardness

mg/l

200

NA

NA

NA

NA

88

78

128

60

76

74

Mg++ Hardness

mg/l

100

NA

NA

NA

NA

152

122

92

270

134

186

10

Copper

mg/l

1.5

NA

1.5

NA

NA

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

11

Iron

mg/l

0.3

NA

50

NA

NA

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

12

Manganese

mg/l

0.5

NA

NA

NA

NA

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

13

Chlorides(as Cl)

mg/l

250

NA

600

NA

600

699

303

93

211

178

396

14

Sulphate

mg/l

400

NA

400

NA

1000

50

81

34

36

13

115

15

Nitrate (as NO3)

mg/l

20

NA

50

NA

NA

12.4

8.9

13.35

18.2

20.4

5.36

16

Fluoride

mg/l

1.5

1.5

1.5

0.81

0.76

0.78

1.32

0.77

0.36

17

Phenolic Compound

mg/l

0.002

0.005

0.005

NA

NA

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

18

Free Ammonia

mg/l

NA

NA

NA

1.2

NA

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

19

Mercury

mg/l

0.001

NA

NA

NA

NA

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

20

Cadmium

mg/l

0.01

NA

0.01

NA

NA

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

21

Arsenic

mg/l

0.05

NA

0.2

NA

NA

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

22

Cyanide

mg/l

0.05

0.05

0.05

NA

NA

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

23

Lead

mg/l

0.1

NA

0.1

NA

NA

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

24

Zinc

mg/l

15

NA

15

NA

NA

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

25

Chromium

mg/l

0.05

0.05

NA

NA

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

26

Boron

mg/l

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.91

0.82

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

27

Sodium Absorption Ratio

mg/gm

NA

NA

NA

NA

26

8.97

5.8

1.75

3.21

2.24

5.31

28

Total Coliform

MPN/100ml

50

500

5,000

2,200

1,400

1,300

2,100

1,700

2,100

NA: Not Applicable


Classification of River Water as per their intended use is described in below table:
S. No.

Class

Intended Use

Drinking water source without conventional treatment but after disinfection

Outdoor bathing (organized)

Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by disinfection

Propagation of wild life, fisheries

Irrigation, industrial cooling etc.

1
5

IS 2296 1982 Inland Surface Water Standards

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

130

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-20: Surface Water (Estuary) Analysis Results


S. No.

Parameters

Sampling Code & Locations

Classification for Costal Water Marine (CPCB)

Unit

SW7

SW8

SW-I

SW-II

SW-III

SW-IV

SW-V

Narmada River (U/s)

Narmada River (D/s)

pH

6.5 to 8.5

6.5 to 8.5

6.5 to 8.5

6.0 to 9.0

6.0 to 9.0

7.45

7.69

Dissolved Oxygen

mg/l

4.3

4.1

No Colour

No Colour

No Colour

No Colour

No Colour

No Colour

No Colour

No Odour

No Odour

No Odour

No Odour

No Odour

No Odour

No Odour

Colour

Odour

Floating Matters

mg/l

None

None

None

10

None

None

Suspended Solids

mg/l

None from Sewage or


Industrial waste Origin

34

30

Turbidity

NTU

30

30

2.8

2.5

BOD

mg/l

Oil and Grease (including Petroleum Products)

mg/l

0.1

<0.4

<0.4

Mercury (as Hg)

mg/l

0.001

<0.001

<0.001

10

Lead (as Pb)

mg/l

0.001

<0.01

<0.01

11

Cadmium (as Cd)

mg/l

0.01

<0.001

<0.001

12

Dissolved Iron (as Fe)

mg/l

0.5

<0.1

<0.1

13

Dissolved Manganese ( as Mn)

mg/l

0.5

<0.04

<0.04

14

Faecal Coliform

ml (MPN)

100/100

500/100

500/100

500/100

330

310

15

Sludge Deposits, Solid refuse floating Solids, Oil


Grease and Scum

None except for treated


Sewage and Industrial
waste Effluent

None

None

Classification of Coastal/Marine Water for designated best uses is described in below table:
S. No.

Class

Designated Best Use

SW-I

Salt

SW-II

Bathing, Contact Water Sports and Commercial Fishing

SW-III

Industrial Cooling, Recreation (Non-contact) and Aesthetics

SW-IV

Harbor

SW-V

Navigation and Controlled Waste Disposal

Quality of Surface water (Pond)


It is observed that:

As per classification of inland surface water standards, analysis results for all surface water of all ponds could be considered under Class C except for BOD values which range from 5 mg/l to 20 mg/l. This is due to anthropogenic sources such
as washing, bathing etc.

Quality of Surface water (Estuary)


It is observed that:

As per classification for coastal water marine (CPCB), analysis results of Narmada estuary (upstream and downstream) could be considered under Class SW-III.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

131

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Ground Water Results


Ground water samples were collected from Six (6) different locations within the study area as shown
in Table 3-21, Map 3-2 & Photograph 3-6. The ground water table is around 7-8 m near site,
indicating that ground water recharge is not feasible. Analysis results of collected samples are given in
Table 3-22.

Table 3-21: Ground Water Sampling Locations


Code

Location

Source

Date of
Sampling

Distance from
Site (in Km)

Direction
w.r.t Site

GW 1

Jolwa

Borewell

06.05.2015

1.5

SW

GW 2

Vadadla

Borewell

06.05.2015

3.0

WNW

GW 3

Vav

Borewell

06.05.2015

3.4

NNW

GW 4

Gelanda

Borewell

06.05.2015

2.1

NNE

GW 5

Atali

Borewell

06.05.2015

4.1

GW 6

Rahiyad

Borewell

06.05.2015

3.0

SSE

Sampling Rational

To check ground water


quality within study
area

Photograph 3-6: Photographs of Ground Water Sampling

At Jolwa Village

At Vadadla Village

At Vav Village

At Gelanda Village

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

132

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT

Table 3-22: Ground Water (Borewells) Analysis Results


S.
No.

Parameters

Unit

Sampling Code & Location

IS 10500:2012 Standard Limits


for drinking water (2nd Revision)

GW1

GW2

GW3

GW4

GW 5

GW 6

Acceptable limit

Jolwa

Vadadla

Vav

Gelanda

Atali

Rahiyad

pH

pH scale

6.5 - 8.5

7.45

7.7

7.45

7.5

7.55

7.67

Temperature

29

29

29

29

29

29

Turbidity

NTU

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

TDS

mg/lit

500

264

656

812

384

1,168

1,028

Electrical conductivity

mho/cm

373

1214

1324

710

2200

1812

COD

mg/lit

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

BOD

mg/lit

<3

<3

<3

<3

<3

<3

Phenol

mg/lit

0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

Chlorides

mg/lit

250

39

169

256

67

333

362

10

Sulphates

mg/lit

200

20

183

115

182

123

11

Total Hardness

mg/lit

200

180

180

220

340

350

480

12

Ca++ Hardness

mg/lit

86

26

64

72

136

108

13

Mg++ Hardness

mg/lit

94

154

156

268

155

170

14

Total Alkalinity

mg/lit

200

130

180

130

140

150

180

15

Nitrate

mg/lit

45

19.8

3.5

23.8

23.8

73.9

58

16

Fluoride

mg/lit

1.72

0.93

1.33

0.41

0.7

0.79

17

Sodium

mg/lit

18

75

165

15.4

214

235

18

Potassium

mg/lit

23.5

10

15.6

23.6

16.5

10

19

Calcium

mg/lit

75

34.4

10.4

128.2

28.8

54.5

43.3

20

Magnesium

mg/lit

30

22.8

37.4

37.9

65.1

52

90.4

21

Salinity

mg/lit

70

304

460

122

599

651

22

Total Nitrogen

mg/lit

4.42

0.79

4.7

4.42

17.45

13.96

23

Total Phosphorous

mg/lit

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

133

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

S.
No.

Parameters

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Unit

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT

Sampling Code & Location

IS 10500:2012 Standard Limits


for drinking water (2nd Revision)

GW1

GW2

GW3

GW4

GW 5

GW 6

Acceptable limit

Jolwa

Vadadla

Vav

Gelanda

Atali

Rahiyad

24

Dissolved Oxygen

mg/lit

3.6

3.2

3.5

3.4

3.2

25

Ammonical Nitrogen

mg/lit

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

26

SAR

0.58

2.4

3.28

0.36

3.6

3.36

Arsenic (as As)

mg/l

0.01

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

Cadmium (as Cd)

mg/l

0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

Chromium (as Cr)

mg/l

0.05

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

Copper (as Cu)

mg/l

0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Cyanide (as CN)

mg/l

0.05

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

<0.003

Iron (as Fe)

mg/l

0.3

0.15

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

Lead (as Pb)

mg/l

0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

Mercury (as Hg)

mg/l

0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

Manganese (as Mn)

mg/l

0.1

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

<0.04

Nickel (as Ni)

mg/l

0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

Zinc (as Zn)

mg/l

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

28

Total Coliform

MPN/100ml

Shall not be detectable in any 100 ml


sample

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

29

Faecal Coliforms

MPN/100ml

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

27

Heavy Metals
a

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

134

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Quality of Ground water (Borewells)


It is observed that ground water quality as per IS 10500:2012 standard limits for drinking water,
deviates for following parameters at different villages:

TDS at Vadadla (956 mg/l), Vav (812 mg/l), Atali (1,168 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (1,028 mg/l);
Chlorides at Vav (256 mg/l), Atali (333 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (362 mg/l);
Total Hardness at Vav (220 mg/l), Gelanda (340 mg/l), Atali (350 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (480
mg/l);
Nitrate at Atali (73.9 mg/l) & Rahiyad villages (58 mg/l);
Fluoride at Jolwa (1.72 mg/l) & Vav villages (1.33 mg/l);
Calcium at Vav village (128.2 mg/l);
Magnesium at Vadadla (37.4 mg/l), Vav (37.9 mg/l), Gelanda (65.1 mg/l), Atali (52 mg/l) &
Rahiyad Villages (90.4 mg/l).

The observed higher concentration of TDS & Chloride is due to saline geological formations. Higher
concentration of Total Hardness, Nitrate, Fluoride, Calcium and Magnesium is due to near proximity of
sea (Gulf of Khambhat).
The main source of water is Narmada canal as bore wells are not feasible in the GIDC.
3.5.7

Geology

This section describes environmental setting covering baseline conditions with respect to geology.
Methodology
The methodology adopted for the study of baseline environment started with desk study followed by
secondary data collection.
Secondary data like recent Google imageries, District Resource Map, information published by GSI
studies were used to collect basic information on Geology, Hydrogeology, aquifers, identification of
Topography and Structural features of site and surrounding area.
A field visit was conducted to study site specific geological and hydrogeological conditions includes
lithology, drainage patterns, water bodies, ground water condition and any possible impact to the
environmental setting due to project.
Topography and Geomorphology
Topographically, the entire area is more or less flat with gentle dipping toward west to southwest i.e.
toward Gulf. Geomorphologically, coastal area is covered by tidal and mud flats. Drainages have
acquired a pattern of deltaic condition.
Regional Geology
A concise description of Geology is given by Geological Survey of India, as summarized in Table 3-23.

Table 3-23: Regional Geology


Formation

Lithology

Geological Age

Younger alluvium

Soils and blown sand

Holocene

Older Alluvium

Highly weathered red colored Alluvium with


kankar and calc crusts

Pleistocene

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

135

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Formation

Lithology

Geological Age

Jhagadia Formation

Agate conglomerate

Pliocene to Middle Miocene

Kand Formation

Clay, marl, Limestone, Sandstone, siltstone and


conglomerate

Lower Miocene

Babaguru Formation

Ferruginous sandstones, Clay pebbly sandstone


and conglomerate

Tarakeshwar Formation

Bentonite clay, clay stone and sandstone

Lower Eocene to Oligocene

Nummulite Formation

Argillaceous Limestone and clay with Nummulite

Lower to Upper Eocene

Vadadkhol Formation

Clay Friable sandstone, pebbly sandstone and


Conglomerate

Lower Eocene

Deccan Volcanics

Basics Dykes, Plugs Rhyolite and Basalt etc.

Bagh Beds

Sandstone, limestone and clay

Upper Cretaceous To
Eocene
Middle to Upper Cretaceous

Geology and Hydrogeology at Site


Dahej GIDC is located on west of Bharuch at Gulf of Khambhat. Geologically, entire area is covered
with recent age deposits of fluvial and marine origin. Major part of the study area is covered with
gray to yellow colored silty loam.
As per discussion with local people and well owners, depth to water level, within study area is 8 10
m and total depth of wells ranging from 15 20 m. At some places, post monsoon water, shows slight
improvement in terms of quality. However with passage of time it turns saline.
Seismicity
Gujarat is categorized in the seismic zone III6, which is classified as having a fairly high probability of
earthquake shocks measuring 5 or 6 on the Richter scale, low probability of shocks of 6 or 7 on the
Richter scale.
Earthquake zoning map of Gujarat is shown as Figure 3-2.

1
6

Source: www.gujarat.earthquake.gov.in

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

136

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Figure 3-2: Earthquake zoning map of Gujarat


3.5.8

Soil

The project area falls under South Gujarat Agro-climatic Zone II and Agro-ecological region-21. The
soils are predominantly of trap origin deep black soils (63%), however coastal black (14%) and loam
soils (23%) are also present. Taxonomically these soils are classified as Vertisols. The soils at the
GIDC site are also clayey having very high water holding capacity and porosity, but permeability is
very low. The soil depth is > 100 cm and soil slope is 1-3 %. As the area is in the proximity of sea,
waters and soils are likely to be saline/alkaline. The crops of the surrounding areas are paddy, cotton
and sugarcane and in winter sorghum and wal are grown. The cropping intensity of the area is 117%.
Soil Sampling Locations
Soil samples were collected from Six (6) different locations within the study area as shown in Table
3-24, Map 3-2 & Photograph 3-7. Analysis results of collected samples are given in Table 3-26.

Table 3-24: Soil Sampling Locations


Code

Location

Date of
Sampling

Source

Distance from
Project Site in Km

Direction w.r.t
Project Site

ST1

Jolwa

06.05.2015

Residential

2.2

SSW

ST2

Vav

06.05.2015

Residential

2.3

SE

ST3

Vadadla

06.05.2015

Residential

1.6

ESE

ST4

Gelanda

06.05.2015

Residential

1.72

NE

ST5

Atali

06.05.2015

Residential

2.24

WSW

ST6

Rahiyad

06.05.2015

Industrial

--

--

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Justification

To check surface
soil quality within
study area.

137

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Photograph 3-7: Photographs of Soil Sampling

Soil sampling at Jolwa Village

Soil sampling at Vav Village

Soil sampling at Rahiyad Village

Soil sampling at Gelanda Village

Methodology Adopted for Soil Sampling


Various parameters were monitored in soil. The detailed monitoring methodology for soil sampling is
given in Table 3-25.

Table 3-25: Methodology for Analyzing Soil Samples


Sampling
Parameters

Sample
Collection

Analytical
Equipment

Methodology

Remarks

Porosity

Manual
sample
collection
using hammer

IS: 2720 Part 7

Keen Apparatus

HMSO, UK

IS: 2720 Part 17

Trial pit method for


topsoil sample
collection;
disturbed samples

Water holding
capacity
Permeability

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

138

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Sampling
Parameters

Sample
Collection

Analytical
Equipment

Methodology

Moisture content

and container
tube for
collecting
undisturbed
top soil.

Electronic Balance

IS: 2720 Part 2

IS: 2720 Part 4

Glass wares

IS: 2720 Part 4

Centrifuge

IS: 2720 Part 24


(1976)

SAR

F. Photometer (Na, K),


Titration ( Ca & Mg)

Calculation

pH

pH Meter

4500 H+B

Electrical
Conductivity

Conductivity Meter

As per IS 14767 2000

Calcium

Glass wares

3500 Ca B

Magnesium

Glass Wares

3500 Mg B

Sodium (Na)

F.Photometer

3500 Na B

Potassium

F.Photometer

3500 K B

Texture
Particle size
Distribution
Cation Exchange
Capacity

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Remarks

5% Leachate to be
made and analyzed
as per APHA,
Standard
Methods.
All method numbers
are as per APHA
Standard Methods
(21st edition, 2005)

Table 3-26: Soil Analysis Results


Sampling Location
S.
No

Parameter

Unit

ST1

ST2

ST3

ST4

ST5

ST6

Jolwa

Vav

Vadadla

Gelanda

Atali

Rahiyad

Porosity

56

56

59

60

61

60

Water Holding
Capacity

55.2

61.3

62.3

52.4

60.8

57.4

Permeability

mm/hr.

7.4

9.4

10.7

2.2

2.5

1.3

Particle Size Distribution


a

Sand

36

27

23

25

28

26

Silt

35

41

41

63

60

53

Clay

29

32

36

12

12

21

Texture

Clay
Loam

Clay
Loam

Clay
Loam

Silty Loam

Silty
Loam

Silty
Loam

Cation Exchange
Capacity

meq/100
gm

36

42

47

40

34

42

Electrical
Conductivity

mhos/
cm

285

140

294

808

265

281

SAR

1.32

1.06

1.73

3.08

0.31

0.32

Exchangeable
Sodium

0.69

0.31

1.28

3.17

< 0.1

< 0.1

10

pH

8.1

7.9

8.4

7.9

7.7

7.6

11

Calcium

gm/kg

0.46

0.85

0.32

0.52

0.43

0.72

12

Magnesium

gm/kg

0.25

0.21

0.29

0.41

0.42

0.39

13

Sodium

gm/kg

0.64

0.60

0.80

1.74

0.17

0.19

14

Potassium

gm/kg

0.10

0.12

0.10

0.16

0.36

0.16

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

139

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Soil Quality Results


It is observed that at different locations:

The porosity ranged from 56 to 61% and WHC varied from 52.40 to 62.30 %;
The soil permeability was low to medium ranged from 2.24 to 10.7 mm/hr, however soil texture in
all the soil samples was silty clay- clay loam, hence whatever variation observed was mainly due
to variation in organic matter content of soils;
The EC of soil ranged from 140 to 808 mhos/cm, while ESP varied from <0.01 to 3.17. As EC has
exceeded 808 mhos/cm soil of Gelanda village is saline, while ESP was <5.0 in all soil samples;
The pH of soil ranged from 7.6 to 8.4, which indicates that soils are neutral to slightly alkaline;
Among water soluble cations predominance of sodium was seen followed by Ca, Mg and K.

The overall soil quality indicates that soils are normal as the area is located in GIDC and not under
cultivation since long and whatever salts were there are washed off or leached down due to rain water
over the years.
3.5.9

Ecology & Biodiversity

This section represents existing biodiversity status of the project site and its surrounding environ of
the study area (buffer zone). Project site and surrounding 10 km. radius were considered as a core
zone & environ for study.
Methodology Adopted for Ecology & Biodiversity Study

Secondary Literature Review


Since the proposed project surrounding environ encompasses various industries, some studies have
been conducted by other agencies to carryout EIA projects. Secondary information on ecology and
biodiversity aspect has been used from following reports. However, efforts have been made to verify
same in the field and interaction with local people.
1. Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Special Economic Zone of Dahej SEZ Ltd.

located at Taluka: Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat Appended With Marine Environmental Impact
Assessment & Mitigation Measures For CRA Area (August 2010), Prepared By Ramans Consultancy
Services Pvt. Ltd.
2. Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Integrated Common Hazardous Waste Facility With
Common Incinerator Facility (10 Million Kcal/hour) prepared by Mahabal Enviro Engineer Pvt Ltd..
3. EIA, EMP & DMP for Industrial Plant at GIDC Dahej (M/s. SRF Limited), Bharuch District Gujarat
(2008), prepared by Kadam Environmental Consultants.
4. EIA / EMP and RA / DMP Report for Proposed Surfactants Manufacturing Facility (M/s. Galaxy
Surfactants Limited) at Dahej SEZ-II (June 2014), prepared by Kadam Environmental Consultants.

Field Data Collection / Inventory


Terrestrial Ecology
Since project site falls in the industrial area and no natural vegetation exists at site, efforts have been
made to enlist existing species. Similarly, the buffer zone is mainly dominated with crop / fallow land

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

140

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

while forest area is entirely invade by an invasive species Prosopis juliflora. So, secondary data from
various EIA reports have been extracted and verified through ground surveys.

Aquatic Ecology
Secondary data have been used to understand status of the marine environment of project study area.

Threat Assessment Criteria


Indian wild Life Protection Act, 1972, ENVIS Database, IUCN Database, Red Data Book etc.
Terrestrial Ecosystem

Flora
Core Zone / Project site
Project site was reported with six common species of flora / plants; taxonomic account is shown in the
Table 3-27 & Photograph 3-8.

Table 3-27: Floral species reported from the proposed project site / Core Zone
S. No.

Habit

Species Name

Local Name

Family

Shrub

Alhagi maurorum

Javaso, Javas

Fabaceae

Shrub

Prosopis juliflora

Gando Baval

Mimosaceae

Shrub

Calotropis procera

Akado,Aak

Asclepiadaceae

Herb

Cressa cretia

Bukan, Un Bakano

Convolvulaceae

Grass

Cynodon dactylon

Dhrab, Dhoob Grass

Poaceae

Photograph 3-8: Photographs Showing Project Site / Core Zone having Flora / plants

Buffer Zone
Buffer zone has been reported 155 floral species, which includes 53 species of trees (25 families), 30
species of Shrubs (21 families), 50 species of herbs (27 families), 8 species of grasses (one family)
and 14 species of climbers (6 families). Taxonomic account for all life forms is tabulated in Table

3-28.
Table 3-28: Flora Reported from Buffer Zone of the Study Area
S. No.

Family

Botanical Name

Common Name

Trees
1

i.

Fabaceae

Acacia auriculiformis

Austrianbaval

ii.

Fabaceae

Acacia leucophloea

Hermobaval

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

141

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S. No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Family

Botanical Name

Common Name

iii.

Fabaceae

Acacia nilotica

Baval

iv.

Fabaceae

Acacia Senegal

Goradiobaval

v.

Bombacucae

Adonsonia digitata

Rukhdo Choramli

vi.

Simaroubaceae

Ailanthus excelsa

Aurdso

vii.

Fabaceae

Albizia lebbeck

Siris

viii.

Fabaceae

Albizia procera

Kalo siris

ix.

Avicenniaceae

Avecinnia marina

Sundari

10

x.

Avicenniaceae

Avicennia alba

Patcheradi

11

xi.

Meliaceae

Azadirachta indica

Limbado

12

xii.

Balanitaceae

Balanites aegptica

Ingorio

13

xiii.

Caricaceae

Carica papaya

Papaya

14

xiv.

Caesalpiniaceae

Cassia fistula

Garmalo

15

xv.

Caesalpiniaceae

Cassia siamea

Kasid

16

xvi.

Casuarinaceae

Casuarina equisetifolia

Sharu

17

xvii.

Arecaceae

Cocos nucifera

Narial

18

xviii.

Caesalpiniaceae

Delonix elata

Sandsro

19

xix.

Caesalpiniaceae

Delonix regia

Gulmohar

20

xx.

Papilionaceae

Erythrina variegata

Pagario

21

xxi.

Myrtaceae

Eucalyptus

Nilgiri

22

xxii.

Moraceae

Ficus benghalensis

Vad

23

xxiii.

Moraceae

Ficus racemosa

Umaro

24

xxiv.

Moraceae

Ficus religiosa

Piplo

25

xxv.

Verbenaceae

Gmelina arborea

Sevan

26

xxvi.

Fabaceae

Leucaena leucocephala

Subaval

27

xxvii.

Anacardiaceae

Mangifera indica

Keri

28

xxviii.

Sapotaceae

Manilkara hexandra

Rayan

29

xxix.

Sapotaceae

Manilkara zapota

Chikoo

30

xxx.

Meliaceae

Melia azadirachta

Bakan Neem

31

xxxi.

Bignoniaceae

Millingtonia hortensis

Desi Buch

32

xxxii.

Moringaceae

Moringa oleifera

Sargavo

33

xxxiii.

Fabaceae

Parkinsonia aculeata

Rambaval

34

xxxiv.

Caesalpiniaceae

Peltophorum pterocarpum

Sonmukhi, Pila Gulmohar

35

xxxv.

Arecaceae

Phoenix sylvestris

Kajuri

36

xxxvi.

Fabaceae

Pithecellobium dulce

Gorasmli

37

xxxvii.

Apocynacea

Plumeria rubra

Chambo

38

xxxviii.

Annonaceae

Polylathia longifolia

Asopalav

39

xxxix.

Papilionaceae

Pongamia pinnata

Karanj

40

xl.

Fabaceae

Prosopis cineraria

Khijado

41

xli.

Fabaceae

Prosopis juliflora

Gando baval

42

xlii.

Euphorbiaceae

Ricinus communis

Castor, Arundo

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

142

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S. No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Family

Botanical Name

Common Name

43

xliii.

Salvadoraceae

Salvadora oleoides

Mithi Jar

44

xliv.

Salvadoraceae

Salvadora persica

Pilva, Piludi

45

xlv.

Caesalpiniaceae

Sesbania sesban

Shesri

46

xlvi.

Myrtaceae

Syzygium cumini

Jambu

47

xlvii.

Caesalpiniaceae

Tamarindus indica

Amli

48

xlviii.

Verbenaceae

Tectona grandis

Sag

49

xlix.

Combretaceae

Terminalia catappa

Badam

50

l.

Malvaceae

Thespesia populnea

Paras piplo

51

li.

Verbenaceae

Vitex negundo

Nagod

52

lii.

Rhamnaceae

Zizyphus glabrata

Bor

53

liii.

Rhamnaceae

Zizyphus mauritiana

Chani Bor

Shrubs
54

i.

Acanthaceae

Hygrophila auriculata

Akhro

55

ii.

Apocynaceae

Nerium indicum

Lalkaren

56

iii.

Apocynaceae

Thevetia peruviana

Pili karan

57

iv.

Asclepediaceae

Calotropis gigantea

Safed Ankdo

58

v.

Asclepediaceae

Calotropis procera

Ankdo

59

vi.

Balanitaceae

Balanites aegyptiaca

Ingorio

60

vii.

Bignoniaceae

Tecoma stans

Peilafol

61

viii.

Cactaceae

Opuntia elatior

Fafdo Thor

62

ix.

Caesalpiniaceae

Cassia auriculata

Tarwar, Awala

63

x.

Capparidaceae

Capparis decidua

Kerdo, Ker

64

xi.

Compositae

Xanthium strumarium

Gokhru

65

xii.

Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea fistulosa

Nasarmo, Besharam vel

66

xiii.

Euphorbiaceae

Euphorbia neriifolia

Thor

67

xiv.

Euphorbiaceae

Jatropha curcas

Ratanjot

68

xv.

Euphorbiaceae

Jatropha gossypifolia

Pardesi Devalo

69

xvi.

Euphorbiaceae

Ricinus communis

Devalo

70

xvii.

Alhagi maurorum

Javaso, Javas

Fabaceae

71.

xviii.

Lythraceae

Lawsonia inermis

Mendhi

72.

xix.

Malvaceae

Abelomoschus manihot

Jagali bhindi

73.

xx.

Malvaceae

Abutilon indicum

Khapat, Kanski

74.

xxi.

Malvaceae

Hibiscus rosa-sinensis

Jasund

75.

xxii.

Mimosaceae

Prosopis juliflora

Gando baval

76.

xxiii.

Musaceae

Musa paradisiaca

Kela

77.

xxiv.

Nyctaginaceae

Bougainvillea spectabilis

Bougainvel

78.

xxv.

Papilionaceae

Sesbania sesban

Shevari

79.

xxvi.

Rhamnaceae

Zizyphus nummularia

Chanibor, Bor

80.

xxvii.

Solanaceae

Datura metel

Daturo

81.

xxviii.

Solanaceae

Solanum incanum

Ubhi ringan

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

143

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S. No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Family

Botanical Name

Common Name

82.

xxix.

Verbenaceae

Clerodendrum inerme

Madhi

83.

xxx.

Verbenaceae

Lantana camara

Ganthai

Herbs
84.

i.

Amaranthaceae

Achyranthes aspera

Anthedi

85.

ii.

Amaranthaceae

Aerva javanica

Bur, Gorakh Ganjo

86.

iii.

Liliaceae

Aloe barbadensis

Kunvarpato

87.

iv.

Amaranthaceae

Alternanthera sessilis

Jar Bhaji, Jar Bhangaro

88.

v.

Amaranthaceae

Amaranthus viridis

Adbau Rajgaro, Rajgaro

89.

vi.

Lythraceae

Ammannia baccifera

Jal Agiyo

90.

vii.

Apiaceae

Anethum graveolens

Suva

91.

viii.

Papaveraceae

Argemone mexicana

Darudi

92.

ix.

Scrophulariaceae

Bacopa monnieri

Brahmi

93.

x.

Asteraceae

Blumea lacera

Kolhar, Pilo Kapurio

94.

xi.

Nyctaginaceae

Boerhavia diffusa

Satodi

95.

xii.

Caesalpiniaceae

Cassia tora

Kuvandio

96.

xiii.

Amaranthaceae

Celosia argentea

Lampdi

97.

xiv.

Capparidaceae

Cleome gynandra

Ghandhatu, Dholi Talwani

98.

xv.

Tilaceae

Corchorus aestuans

Kag Shing, Chunch, Chhadhari

99.

xvi.

Papilionaceae

Cortalaria medicaginea

Ran methi

100.

xvii.

Convolvulaceae

Cressa cretica

Khariyu

101.

xviii.

Cyperaceae

Cyperus bulbosus

Kal

102.

xix.

Cyperaceae

Cyperus difformis

--

103.

xx.

Cyperaceae

Cyperus rotundus

Bara-nagar-motha, Korehi-jhar

104.

xxi.

Cyperaceae

Cyperus stoloniferus

--

105.

xxii.

Solanaceae

Datura innoxia

Dhatura

106.

xxiii.

Asteraceae

Echinops echinatus

Shulio, Utkanto

107.

xxiv.

Asteraceae

Ecipta alba

Bhangro

108.

xxv.

Asteraceae

Eclipta prostrata

Bhangro

109.

xxvi.

Pontederiaceae

Eichhornia crassipes

Kanphutti

110.

xxvii.

Boraginaceae

Heliotropium indicum

Hathisundhi

111.

xxviii.

Acanthaceae

Hygrophila auriculata

Kanta shelio

112.

xxix.

Papilionaceae

Indigofera oblongifolia

Zil

113.

xxx.

Asteraceae

Launaea procumbens

--

114.

xxxi.

Molluginaceae

Mollugo pentaphylla

--

115.

xxxii.

Nymphaeaceae

Nymphaea pubescens

Kamal

116.

xxxiii.

Nymphaeaceae

Nymphaea stellata

Kamal

117.

xxxiv.

Lamiaceae ( Labiatae)

Ocimum basilicum

damaro

118.

xxxv.

Lamiaceae ( Labiatae)

Ocimum sanctum

Tuli

119.

xxxvi.

Asteraceae

Pentanema indicum

Sonasali

120.

xxxvii.

Poaceae (Gramineae)

Phragmites karaka

--

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

144

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED
S. No.

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Family

Botanical Name

Common Name

121.

xxxviii.

Asteraceae

Pulicaria wightiana

Sonela

122.

xxxix.

Malvaceae

Sida cordifolia

Bala

123.

xl.

Solanaceae

Solanum surattense

Bhoringini

124.

xli.

Asteraceae

Spheranthus indicus

Gorakh mundi

125.

xlii.

Chenopodiaceae

Suaeda nudiflora

Moras

126.

xliii.

Chenopodiaceae

Sueda fruticosa

--

127.

xliv.

Aziaceae

Trianthema monogyna

Satodo

128.

xlv.

Zygophyllaceae

Tribulus terrestris

Gokhru

129.

xlvi.

Boraginaceae

Trichodesma indicum

Undha fuli

130.

xlvii.

Asteraceae

Tricholepis amplexicaulis

--

131.

xlviii.

Asteraceae

Tridax procumbens

Pardesi bhangro

132.

xlix.

Typhaceae

Typha angustata

Gha-Bajariyu

133.

l.

Asteraceae

Vernonia cineraria

Sahdevi

Grasses
134.

i.

Poaceae (Gramineae)

Aleuropus lagopoides

khariyu gah

135.

ii.

Poaceae

Apluda mutica

Phophal

136.

iii.

Poaceae

Aristida sps.

Lapdu

137.

iv.

Poaceae

Cenchrus biflorus

Dhaman

138.

v.

Poaceae

Chloris barbata

Bidelpuchh

139.

vi.

Poaceae (Gramineae)

Cynodon dactylon

Dhrab, Dhoob Grass

140.

vii.

Poaceae

Dactylotenium indicum

Tarakiyu

141.

viii.

Poaceae

Heteropogon contortus

Kagadiu

Climbers
142.

i.

Asclepediaceae

Pergularia daemia

Chamar dudheli

143.

ii.

Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea pes-caprae

Dariani vel

144.

iii.

Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea pes-tigridis

wagpadi

145.

iv.

Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea aquatica

Nali ni Bhaji

146.

v.

Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea nil

Kaladana

147.

vi.

Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea obscura

Vad fudardi

148.

vii.

Convolvulaceae

Merremia emarginata

Undarkani

149.

viii.

Cucurbataceae

Trichosanthes cucumerina

Jungli parval

150.

ix.

Cucurbataceae

Citrulus colocynthis

Indravarna

151.

x.

Cucurbataceae

Coccinia grandis

Ghiloda

152.

xi.

Cucurbataceae

Luffa cylindrica

Galku

153.

xii.

Cuscutaceae

Cuscuta chinensis

Amarval

154.

xiii.

Menispermaceae

Cocculus hirsutus

Vevdi

155.

xiv.

Vitaceae

Vitis trifolia

Khachatumbo

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

145

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Fauna

Herpetofauna
Core Zone / Project Site
No herpetofauna reported from the project site.

Buffer Zone
Overall 8 herpetofaunal species have been reported from the buffer zone as shown in Table 3-29 &

Photograph 3-9.
Table 3-29: Herpetofauna Reported from Buffer Zone
S. No.

Family

Common Name

Scientific Name

IWPA-1972 & IUCN

Agamidae

Common garden lizard

Calotes versicolor

--

Colubridae

Common rat snake

Ptyas mucosus

Schedule-IV

Varanidae

Common Indian Monitor

Varanus bengalensis

Schedule-I, Lc

Gekkonidae

Yellow-Green House Gecko

Hemidactylus flaviviridis

--

Agamidae

Fan-Throated Lizard

Sitana ponticeriana

Lc

Elapidae

Spectacled cobra

Naja naja

Schedule-II

Viperidae

Russells Viper

Daboia russelii

Schedule-II, Lc

Elapidae

Common Indian Krait

Bungarus caeruleus

Schedule-IV, LRnt

Photograph 3-9: Herpetofauna Sighted from the Buffer Zone

Common Indian Monitor Sighted near Dahej to Vajapur Highway

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

146

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Avifauna
Core Zone
Only 4 common species of birds were reported from the project site (flying across site) as tabulated in
Table 3-30. Bird activity was very poor in adjacent area.

Table 3-30: Avifauna Reported from Core Zone / Project Site


S. No.

Family

New Common Name

Scientific Name

IWPA-1972 Schedule

Ardeidae

Cattle Egret

Bubulcus ibis

Schedule-IV, Lc

Sylviidae

Common Babbler

Turdoides caudatus

Schedule-IV, Lc

Corvidae

House Crow

Corvus splendens

Schedule-IV, Lc

Pycnonotidae

Red-vented Bulbul

Pycnonotus cafer

Schedule-IV, Lc

Buffer Zone
Overall 48 species of birds from 24 families have been reported from the buffer zone area as shown in
Table 3-31 & Photograph 3-10.

Table 3-31: Birds Reported from Buffer Zone


Scientific Name

IWPA-1972
Schedule

Asian Koel

Eudynamys scolopacea

Schedule-IV, Lc

Bank Myna

Acridotheres ginginianus

Schedule-IV, Lc

Black Drongo

Dicrurus macrocercus

Schedule-IV, Lc

Accipitridae

Black-winged Kite

Elanus caeruleus

Schedule-IV, Lc

Charadriidae

Black-winged Stilt

Himantopus himantopus

Schedule-IV, Lc

Meropidae

Blue-cheeked Bee-eater

Merops persicus

Schedule-IV, Lc

Ardeidae

Cattle Egret

Bubulcus ibis

Schedule-IV, Lc

Meropidae

Chestnut-headed Bee-eater

Meropsles chenaulti

Schedule-IV, Lc

S. No.

Family

Cuculidae

Sturnidae

Corvidae

New Common Name

Sylviidae

Common Babbler

Turdoides caudatus

Schedule-IV, Lc

10

Sturnidae

Common Myna

Acridotheres tristis

Schedule-IV, Lc

11

Corvidae

Common Raven

Corvus corax

Schedule-IV, Lc

12

Apodidae

Common Swift

Apus apus

Schedule-IV, Lc

13

Sylviidae

Common Tailorbird

Orthotomus sutorius

Schedule-IV, Lc

14

Nectariniidae

Crimson-backed Sunbird

Nectarinia minima

Schedule-IV, Lc

15

Cuculidae

Drongo Cuckoo

Surniculus lugubris

Schedule-IV, Lc

16

Columbidae

Eurasian Collared-Dove

Streptope liadecaocto

Schedule-IV, Lc

17

Corvidae

Eurasian Golden-Oriole

Oriolus oriolus

Schedule-IV, Lc

18

Paridae

Great Tit

Parus major

Schedule-IV, Lc

19

Centropodidae

Greater Coucal

Centropus sinensis

Schedule-IV, Lc

20

Phasianidae

Grey Francolin

Francolinus pondicerianus

Schedule-IV, Lc

21

Corvidae

House Crow

Corvus splendens

Schedule-IV, Lc

22

Passeridae

House Sparrow

Passer domesticus

Schedule-IV, Lc

23

Phasianidae

Indian Peafowl

Pavo cristatus

Schedule-I, Lc

24

Ardeidae

Indian Pond-Heron

Ardeo lagrayii

Schedule-IV, Lc

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

147

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

S. No.

Family

New Common Name

Scientific Name

IWPA-1972
Schedule

25

Muscicapidae

Indian Robin

Saxicoloides fulicata

Schedule-IV, Lc

26

Ardeidae

Intermediate Egret

Mesophoyx intermedia

Schedule-IV, Lc

27

Sylviidae

Jungle Babbler

Turdoides striatus

Schedule-IV, Lc

28

Corvidae

Large Cuckoo-shrike

Coracina macei

Schedule-IV, Lc

29

Ardeidae

Little Egret

Egretta garzetta

Schedule-IV, Lc

30

Apodidae

Little Swift

Apus affinis

Schedule-IV, Lc

31

Laniidae

Long-tailed Shrike

Lanius schach

Schedule-IV, Lc

32

Laniidae

Northern Shrike

Lanius excubitor

Schedule-IV, Lc

33

Columbidae

Oriental Turtle-Dove

Streptope liaorientalis

Schedule-IV, Lc

34

Ciconiidae

Painted Stork

Mycteria leucocephala

NT

35

Muscicapidae

Pied Bushchat

Saxicola caprata

Schedule-IV, Lc

36

Nectariniidae

Purple Sunbird

Nectarinia asiatica

Schedule-IV, Lc

37

Threskiornithidae

Red-naped Ibis

Pseudibis papillosa

Schedule-IV, Lc

38

Pycnonotidae

Red-vented Bulbul

Pycnonotus cafer

Schedule-IV, Lc

39

Charadriidae

Red-wattled Lapwing

Vanellus indicus

Schedule-IV, Lc

40

Pycnonotidae

Red-whiskered Bulbul

Pycnonotus jocosus

Schedule-IV, Lc

41

Columbidae

Rock Pigeon

Columba livia

Schedule-IV, Lc

42

Psittacidae

Rose-ringed Parakeet

Psittacula krameri

Schedule-IV, Lc

43

Corvidae

RufousTreepie

Dendrocitta vagabunda

Schedule-IV, Lc

44

Accipitridae

Shikra

Accipiter badius

Schedule-I, Lc

45

Columbidae

Spotted Dove

Streptope liachinensis

Schedule-IV, Lc

46

Strigidae

Spotted Owlet

Athene brama

Schedule-IV, Lc

47

Rallidae

White-breasted Water hen

Amaurornis phoenicurus

Schedule-IV, Lc

48

Dacelonidae

White-throated Kingfisher

Halcyon smyrnensis

Schedule-IV, Lc

Photograph 3-10: Avifauna Sighted from the Buffer Zone

Peacocks Sighted near Vadadala Village Waterbody


KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

148

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Mammals
Core Zone
No direct or indirect evidences of mammals were reported from the site.

Buffer Zone
Totally 9 species from six families have been enlisted from buffer zone of the project area as shown in
Table 3-32 & Photograph 3-11.

Table 3-32: Mammals Reported from the Buffer Zone


S. No.

Family

Common Name

Scientific name

IWPA-1972 & IUCN

Cercopithecidae

Common Langur

Semnopithecus entellus

Schedule-II, Lc

Canidae

Indian Fox

Vulpes bengalensis

Schedule-II, Lc

Felidae

Jungle cat

Felis chaus

Schedule-II, Lc

Herpestidae

Common Mongoose

Herpestes edwardsii

Schedule-IV, Lc

Leporids

Indian Hare

Lepus nigricollis

Schedule-IV, Lc

Muridae

Indian field mouse

Mus booduga

Schedule-V, Lc

Muridae

Black rat

Rattus Rattus

Schedule-V, Lc

Sciuridae

Five striped Palm squirrel

Funambulus pennantii

Schedule-IV, Lc

Sciuridae

Nilgai

Boselaphus tragocamelus

Schedule-III, Lc

Photograph 3-11: Mammal Sighted from the Buffer Zone

Dead Jungle Cat reported on the Dahej to Vajapur Highway

Butterflies
Totally 6 species of butterflies from three families have been enlisted from buffer zone as tabulated in
Table 3-33.

Table 3-33: Butterflies Reported from the Buffer Zone


S. No.

Family

Scientific name & family

Common name

IWPA-1972 & IUCN

Nymphalidae

Danaus genutia Cramer

Stripped Tiger

Schedule-IV

Nymphalidae

Hypolimanas misippus

Danaid egg fly

Schedule-IV

Nymphalidae

Mycalesis perseus

Common bush brown

Schedule-IV

Papilionidae

Papilio polytes

Common Mormon

Schedule-IV

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

149

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

S. No.

Family

Scientific name & family

Common name

IWPA-1972 & IUCN

Pieridae

Eurema hecabe

Common Grass yellow

Schedule-IV

Pieridae

Ixias marianne

White orange tip

Schedule-IV

Agriculture and Horticulture


The Tuver (Cajanus indica), Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) are
cultivated as major crops in this area. Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides) and Jowar (Sorghum bicolar) are
cultivated in few pockets immediately after monsoon period.

Major Crops: Major crops in the study area are Tuver (Cajanus indica), Wheat (Triticum
aestivum) and Cotton (Gossypium herbaceum).
Minor crops: The minor crops of this region are Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides), Jowar (Sorghum
bicolar) and Divel (Ricinus communis)
Vegetables: The vegetables grown in the study area are, Rigan (Solanum melongena), Tomato
(Lycopersicon lycopersicum) and Val, Valpapadi (Lablab purpureus).
Major horticultural crops: Horticulture activity is very less. Keri (Mangifera indica), Chikoo
(Manilkara zapota), Papaya (Carica papaya) and Banana (Musa Paradisiaca).

Aquatic Ecosystem
Status of fishery, phytoplankton & zooplanktons of the study area buffer zone is discussed further.

Fishery: Marine and Narmada Estuary


Bharuch District contributes less than 1% to the total state marine production. Bombay duck
(Harpadon nehereus) constitutes the dominant fishery (13%) of the region of the total marine catch.
The coastal water also serves as the migratory route for the clupeid Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) on their
way to the Narmada River for breeding and the outward route for the newly hatched juveniles and
some of the adults. This makes Hilsa fishery an important activity inside the Gulf and the estuarine
region of Narmada.
Water near confluence is heavily silted and turbid. No commercial fishery takes place in river or along
the coast due to strong water currents. Pagadiya type fishing is operational in intertidal zones. Very
few fishing boats present coastal villages which operate only during rainy season when large fishes are
available.

Phytoplankton and Zooplankton


Status of phytoplankton and zooplankton in various village water bodies has been tabulated in Table
3-34 & Table 3-35.

Table 3-34: Status of Phytoplankton in Various villages of the Study Area


S. No.

Genera

Village Names

Cladophora

Jolwa, Vadala, Ambheta

Coelastrum

Suwa, Jolwa

Desmium

Jolwa

Gonatozygon

Jolwa, Ambheta, Suwa, Vadala

Melosira

Suwa, Jolwa

Microspora

Kadodara, Vadala

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

150

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

S. No.

Genera

Village Names

Nitschia

Jolwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Suwa, Vadala

Pediastrum

Suwa

Penium

Suwa

10

Phormidium

Jolwa, Suwa, Vadala

11

Protococcus

Kadodara, Vadala

12

Richterella

Jolwa

13

Scenedesmus

Jolwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Suwa, Vadala

14

Spirulina

Jolwa, Vadala

15

Synedra

Suwa, Jolwa

16

Zygnema

Jolwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Vadala

Table 3-35: Status of Zooplankton in Various villages of the Study Area


S. No.

Genera

Village Names

Bosmina

Suwa

Branchionus

Suwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Jolwa, Vadala

Canthocampus

Suwa, Jolwa, Vadala

Ceriodaphnia

Suwa, Jolwa

Cyclops

Jolwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Suwa, Vadala

Daphnia

Jolwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Suwa, Vadala

Diaphanosoma

Suwa

Diaptomus

Jolwa, Suwa, Vadala

Eubranchionus

Jolwa, Vadala

10

Leptodora

Jolwa, Kadodara, Ambheta, Suwa, Vadala

11

Limnocalamus

Suwa, Jolwa, Ambheta, Vadala

12

Macrothrix

Suwa

13

Monas

Suwa

14

Nauplius

Suwa, Jolwa, Vadala

15

Polyphemus

Suwa

16

Sida

Vadala

Status of Threatened and Endemic Biodiversity


Among floral species, Citrulus colocynthis (Cucurbataceae) vernacularly / locally known as Indravarna
is a threatened species. For faunal species, threat status as per IWPA-1972 and IUCN has been given
in respective tables. Among herpetofauna, Common Indian monitor is a Schedule-I species as per
IWPA-1972. Reported birds also includes two Schedule-I species i.e. Peacock and Shikra. Among
recorded faunal species, none of the species can be designated as an endemic 7. Conservation plan for
Schedule I species is prepared.

1
7Venkataraman, K., Chattopadhyay, A. and Subramanian, K.A. (Editors). 2013. Endemic Animals of India (Vertebrates):1235+26 Plates. (Published by the Director, Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata)

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

151

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

3.5.10

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Socio-Economics

The main objectives of the socio economic need assessment study was:

To provide an accurate representation of the social, cultural and economic conditions of the
population surrounding the project site;
To identify the potential socio-economic positive and negative impacts during the construction,
operations and decommissioning phase of the proposed project;
To develop sustainable mitigation measures to enhance positive impacts and reduce or avoid
negative impacts;
To develop proper monitoring and evaluation system with accountability to be implemented;
To identify the CSR benefits for the target population.

Methodology Adopted for Social-Economic Survey


The approach of conducting baseline survey / Need Based Assessment is to bring views of the people
as to find out what are the issues faced; what is their understanding of development; which are the
areas that need to be worked upon based on needs of the communities so as to implement
sustainable CSR interventions.
Socio-economic fieldwork comprises of undertaking a structured household survey format focusing on
population, household composition, education levels, general health status, livelihood strategies,
employment, income level, and holding focus group discussions considering the origins and
movements of the local population and social concerns/issues in relation to the proposed project. The
respondents are selected from the various falias to get a representative result. The buffer zone
villages are selected by random sampling method. In the selected villages, focused group discussions,
consultation with people of various cross section of the society like teachers, fishermen etc. and
meeting with Village Panchayat representative are conducted.
The Primary Census Abstract of 2001 has been used for information regarding the village amenities
since at the time of report writing 2011 data was not available for public domain.
The data was captured offsite into a database, analyzed, and then was used to describe and interpret
the socio-economic and cultural environment for the project influenced areas.
Primary Field Survey
The field visit was done by the social experts from 10th to 26th February, 2015 in order to find out the
needs in the communities and thereby develop a sustainable CSR/Social Development approach which
can be replicated into meaningful interventions in the surrounding areas of the proposed site.
Based on DPE Guidelines, survey was conducted in 25 villages of Vagra Taluka of Bharuch district
which includes desktop review and documentation pertaining to the project influence; which is done
through government publications, qualitative and quantitative fieldwork data collections etc. The 20%
household level sample survey was carried out in study area namely Vadadla & Dahej village.
Social Profile

Population Distribution
The project study area consists of a section of the population whose land has been acquired for SEZ
through GIDC. Due to decrease of agricultural activity in recent past people work as daily wage and
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

152

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

contractual labors to carve out their livelihood. Fishermen community exists in the study area villages
who live on a daily earn basis.
Secondary data for demographic status in core zone (upto 3 Km from project site) and in buffer zone
(beyond 3 Km upto 10 Km from the project site) is tabulated in Table 3-36.

Table 3-36: Demographic Status of the Study Area


S.
No.

Village

Total Household
(2011)

Total Population
(2011)

Male

Female

Numbers

Numbers

Core Zone
1

Jolva

338

1,442

807

55.96

635

44.04

Galenda

120

611

314

51.39

297

48.61

Rahid

355

1,694

862

50.89

832

49.11

Vadadla

201

822

419

50.97

403

49.03

1,014

4,569

2,402

52.57

2,167

47.43

Sub- Total

Buffer Zone
1

Samantpor

79

367

182

49.59

185

50.41

Sambheti

82

416

226

54.33

190

45.67

Vav

155

727

378

51.99

349

48.01

Atali

239

1,150

612

53.22

538

46.78

Koliad

152

676

321

47.49

355

52.51

Suva

413

1,920

973

50.68

947

49.32

Akhod

174

831

435

52.35

396

47.65

Janiadra

150

729

361

49.52

368

50.48

Kadodara

420

1,995

1,018

51.03

977

48.97

10

Padariya

131

647

340

52.55

307

47.45

11

Vengani

202

908

462

50.88

446

49.12

12

Narnavi

151

692

349

50.43

343

49.57

13

Nadarkha

92

447

220

49.22

227

50.78

14

Paniadara

514

2,563

1,360

53.06

1,203

46.94

15

Dahej

3,426

13,495

8,345

61.84

5,150

38.16

16

Ambheta

347

1,552

807

52

745

48

17

Jageshwar

383

1,571

818

52.07

753

47.93

18

Nandida

160

719

383

53.27

336

46.73

19

Khojbal

287

1,513

782

51.69

731

48.31

20

Bhensali

228

1,123

582

51.83

541

48.17

21

Kaladara

393

1,663

934

56.16

729

43.84

Sub- Total

8,178

35,704

19,888

55.7

15,816

44.3

Grand Total

9,192

40,273

22,290

55.35

17,983

44.65

Source: Primary Census Abstract 2011


From the above table it can be inferred that in the study area male population is more than female. By
comparing the data with previous census data, it was noted that, the household number and
population have increased since the last decade. The household size has decreased to approximately 4
person per household. It shows the belief of people in nuclear family and day by day joint family is at
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

153

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

extinct level. The study area consists of Dahej and other nearby villages, which shows heavy increase
in the population from last decade. This is due to fast industrialization of the surrounding areas.
The main community prevailing in the core zone includes both majorly Muslims and Hindus (Koli Patel,
Brahmans, Valand, Solanki, Harijan, Rathore, Waghri, Jogi and Prajapati).

Table 3-37 reveals that male ratio have increased while female ratio has decreased in comparison to
2001, in the core zone. The same is with the buffer zone too. It is presumed that the villagers have
started to migrate to urban areas because of better availability of basic amenities in the Bharuch city.
The working class or business class use to settle at the village level.

Table 3-37: Comparison of Sex Ratio of the Study Area from Previous Census Data
S.
No.

Village

2001

2011

Males

Ratio

Female

Ratio

Males

Ratio

Female

Ratio

55.96

Jolva

436

53.56

378

46.44

807

635

44.04

Galenda

254

49.51

259

50.49

314

51.39

297

48.61

Rahid

692

52.62

623

47.38

862

50.89

832

49.11

Vadadla

305

50.33

301

49.67

419

50.97

403

49.03

1,687

51.94

1,561

48.1

2,402

52.6

2,167

47.43

Core
Zone

Sub- Total
1

Samantpor

172

51.81

160

48.19

182

49.59

185

50.41

Sambheti

205

52.43

186

47.57

226

54.33

190

45.67

Vav

355

52.51

321

47.49

378

51.99

349

48.01

Atali

612

53.45

533

46.55

612

53.22

538

46.78

Koliad

280

52.34

255

47.66

321

47.49

355

52.51

Suva

830

49.88

834

50.12

973

50.68

947

49.32

Akhod

356

53.21

313

46.79

435

52.35

396

47.65

Janiadra

314

50.56

307

49.44

361

49.52

368

50.48

Kadodara

933

51.52

878

48.48

1,018

51.03

977

48.97

Padariya

299

52.55

270

47.45

340

52.55

307

47.45

Vengani

352

52.15

323

47.85

462

50.88

446

49.12

10
11
12

Buffer
Zone

Narnavi

317

53.19

279

46.81

349

50.43

343

49.57

13

Nadarkha

215

51.56

202

48.44

220

49.22

227

50.78

14

Paniadara

1,244

53.39

1,086

46.61

1,360

53.06

1,203

46.94

15

Dahej

3,756

54.86

3,090

45.14

8,345

61.84

5,150

38.16

16

Ambheta

695

52.26

635

47.74

807

52.00

745

48.00

17

Jageshwar

861

58.77

604

41.23

818

52.07

753

47.93

18

Nandida

352

51.54

331

48.46

383

53.27

336

46.73

19

Khojbal

654

52.36

595

47.64

782

51.69

731

48.31

20

Bhensali

412

52.42

374

47.58

582

51.83

541

48.17

21

Kaladara

708

51.19

675

48.81

934

56.16

729

43.84

Sub- Total

13,922

53.19

12,251

46.8

19,888

55.7

15,816

44.3

Grand Total

15,609

53.05

13,812

46.9

22,290

55.3

17,983

44.7

Source: Primary Census Abstract, 2001 & 2011

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

154

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

During primary household survey, it was noted from Table 3-38 that the maximum population of
Vadadla village lies within the age group of 15-35 years which can be considered as the active work
force. This population may be focused for providing skill training programs in order to equip them to
get jobs.

Table 3-38: Stratification (Age Wise) of Vadadla Village


S. No.

Age Group

Frequency

Percentage

0-6 Years

17

8.0

7-14 Years

34

16.1

15-35 Years

97

46.0

36-60 Years

48

22.7

60+ Years

15

7.2

Total

211

100

Source: Primary Household Survey- 2015


Vulnerable Groups
SC/ST population in the study area has been shown in Table 3-39.

Table 3-39: SC/ST Population in Study Area


S. No.

Village

Scheduled Caste
Total

Male

Scheduled Tribe

Female

Total

Male

Female

Core Zone
1

Jolva

239

137

102

199

98

101

Galenda

91

47

44

Rahid

105

51

54

104

51

53

Vadadla

76

37

39

341

166

175

425

228

197

735

362

373

Sub- Total

Buffer Zone
1

Samantpor

49

21

28

Sambheti

12

37

16

21

Vav

28

15

13

163

90

73

Atali

117

63

54

381

205

176

Koliad

57

27

30

323

150

173

Suva

63

28

35

354

193

161

Akhod

69

36

33

305

152

153

Janiadra

25

10

15

248

121

127

Kadodara

48

23

25

511

258

253

10

Padariya

13

131

67

64

11

Vengani

40

18

22

279

136

143

12

Narnavi

64

33

31

140

63

77

13

Nadarkha

16

10

64

32

32

14

Paniadara

31

14

17

790

436

354

15

Dahej

542

279

263

2,090

1,097

993

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

155

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S. No.

Village

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Scheduled Caste

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Scheduled Tribe

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

16

Ambheta

67

37

30

261

137

124

17

Jageshwar

18

10

146

73

73

18

Nandida

64

33

31

267

151

116

19

Khojbal

40

20

20

425

225

200

20

Bhensali

45

18

27

415

218

197

21

Kaladara

108

54

54

570

294

276

Sub- Total

1,471

743

728

7,949

4,135

3,814

Grand Total

1,896

971

925

8,684

4,497

4,187

Source: Primary Census Abstract, 2011


According to Census 2011, the percentage of the ST population in the study area is almost 5 times
more than SC population in whole of the study area. In the core area, the ST population is almost
near to double of SC population. There has been decrease in the SC and slight increase in the ST
population since the last decade on the whole.

Educational Facility
The basic educational facilities in the core zone of the study area is upto to satisfactory level. There is
presence of Anganwadi, Primary School & Middle School in Jolva, Rahiyad, Vadadla and Galenda. For
attaining the higher education like High School, College and Vocational Training like ITI, Diploma or
Engineering, students avail the facilities from Atali, Dahej & Bharuch. An important parameter to
evaluate the situation of the society is literacy rate, which is shown in Table 3-40.

Table 3-40: Literacy Rate within the Study Area


S. No.

Village

Total
Population

Literate
Population
No.

Male

Female

No.

No.

Core Zone
1

Jolva

1,442

1075

74.55

661

61.49

414

38.51

Galenda

611

462

75.61

243

52.60

219

47.40

Rahid

1,694

1310

77.33

690

52.67

620

47.33

Vadadla

822

602

73.24

331

54.98

271

45.02

4,569

3,449

75.49

1925

55.81

1524

44.19

Sub- Total

Buffer Zone
1

Samantpor

367

264

71.93

154

58.33

110

41.67

Sambheti

416

316

75.96

188

59.49

128

40.51

Vav

727

575

79.09

324

56.35

251

43.65

Atali

1,150

857

74.52

494

57.64

363

42.36

Koliad

676

459

67.90

254

55.34

205

44.66

Suva

1,920

1427

74.32

783

54.87

644

45.13

Akhod

831

579

69.68

340

58.72

239

41.28

Janiadra

729

511

70.10

273

53.42

238

46.58

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

156

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

S. No.
9

Village

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
Literate
Population

Total
Population

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Male

Female

No.

No.

No.

Kadodara

1,995

1369

68.62

801

58.51

568

41.49

10

Padariya

647

498

76.97

293

58.84

205

41.16

11

Vengani

908

518

57.05

301

58.11

217

41.89

12

Narnavi

692

510

73.70

283

55.49

227

44.51

13

Nadarkha

447

325

72.71

183

56.31

142

43.69

14

Paniadara

2,563

1655

64.57

1003

60.60

652

39.40

15

Dahej

13,495

9970

73.88

6704

67.24

3266

32.76

16

Ambheta

1,552

1214

78.22

677

55.77

537

44.23

17

Jageshwar

1,571

1300

82.75

683

52.54

617

47.46

18

Nandida

719

506

70.38

293

57.91

213

42.09

19

Khojbal

1,513

1045

69.07

587

56.17

458

43.83

20

Bhensali

1,123

793

70.61

446

56.24

347

43.76

21

Kaladara

1,663

1062

63.86

704

66.29

358

33.71

Sub- Total

35,704

25,753

72.13

15,768

61.23

9,985

38.77

Grand Total

40,273

29,202

72.51

17,693

60.59

11,509

39.41

Source: Primary Census Abstract, 2011


The literacy rate in the core area is ~75 % while in the buffer area it is about 73 %. In the core the
male literacy level is much higher to female i.e. ~56% and ~44% respectively. In the total study area
there are ~61% literate male and ~39% literate female.
The undermentioned depicts the sample size survey being conducted at Vadadla Village.

Table 3-41: Literacy Level of Vadadla Village


S. No.

Literacy Status

Frequency

Percentage

Illiterate

62

29.5

Anganwadi/Balwadi

3.8

Standard 1-6

62

29.5

Standard 7-9

53

25.2

SSC

21

10.0

HSC

1.0

ITI/Diploma

1.0

Graduate

0.0

Post Graduate

0.0

210

100

Total

Source: Primary Household Survey-2015


According to the sample size study it depicts that there are 70.5% of the literates and 29.5% of the
illiterates in the core zone village. The above table reflects 3.8% of the students in the
Anganwadi/Balwadi, 29.5% in who have studied between 1-6th standard and 25.2% between 7-9th
standard. The SSC qualified accounts to be 10% whereas the SSC passed are 1%. For attaining higher
studies students travel to Bharuch and nearby cities.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

157

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Around 20.4% of the total population are students who are presently pursuing their studies in schools,
colleges and technical institutes as shown in Photograph 3-12.

Photograph 3-12: Photographs showing Primary Survey at Schools

Primary School at Jolva Village

Interaction at Dahej School

Health Facilities
The core study area avail the medical facilities from Primary Health Centre is available at Dahej. The
villagers are taking the facilities of 108 during emergency. Due to the absence of government medical
facilities, people go to Bharuch for their treatment. Dahej and Lakhigam villages are having private
medical facilities but due to high fees people prefer to go to the city itself.

Drinking Water Facilities


The tubewell and Panchayat overhead tanks are sufficiently present in the study area villages. But,
due to high salinity, this water is unsuitable for the drinking purpose. In the study area, main source
of drinking water is supply through pipe line and water tanker provided by GIDC.
Housing Condition and Sanitation Facility

Housing Condition
The housing condition of the sample size surveyed households of Vadadla Village is shown in Table
3-42. The houses that were pucca were mostly those who had primary and secondary sources of
income and had some land being acquired by the SEZ.

Table 3-42: Housing Condition in the Surveyed Village - Village


S. No.

Type of Housing

Frequency

Pucca

18

Semi Pucca

Kutcha

15

Shanty

Total

41

Source: Primary Household Survey-2015

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

158

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Sanitary Toilet Facility


The type of toilet facility present in the surveyed villages are tabulated in Table 3-43, which reveals
that open defecation is practiced in Vadadla village.

Table 3-43: Toilet Facility in the Surveyed Villages


S. No.

Type

Numbers

In house Toilet Facility

16

Open Defecation

25

Source: Primary Household Survey-2015

The people having pucca houses generally had the toilets built in their house. The people who were
living in Indira Awas or in kutcha houses were generally not having the toilet facility available at their
homes. The vulnerable groups had got their toilet build under the Government Scheme/private but
they were not in working condition so they were left with no other option but to defecate in open.
Photographs of kutcha houses at Vadadla village and toilet made under Govt. scheme are shown in
Photograph 3-13.

Photograph 3-13: Photographs of Kutcha Houses and Toilets

Kutcha Houses at Vadadla

Toilet made under Government Scheme

Economic Profile

Agriculture
In the core study area the agriculture is almost declining towards extinct due to rapid industrialization.
The agriculture is carried out mainly in two seasons namely Kharif and Rabi crops. The major crops
being cultivated in the study area are Wheat, Cotton, Paddy, Jowhar, Bajri, Banana etc. The farmers
have to depend on rainy season for irrigation. Few of them are irrigating the field through canal and
open wells. Agriculture provides employment in the form of daily wage labor during the harvesting
season.
People who have less or no land do labourwork in others field and paid on daily wage basis. The
average wage for the male is INR 200 per day and for the female is INR 150 per day.
Socio experts interacting with local vegetable vendor and Stakeholder is shown in Photograph 3-14.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

159

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

Photograph 3-14: Socio Expert with Local Vegetable Vendor & Stakeholder

Meeting with Local Vegetable Vendor

Dahej Industrial Associations Secretarys meeting

Industries/Factories
The Bharuch district has 11 notified industrial notified areas namely Ankleshwar, Bharuch, Panoli,
Palej, Jhagadia, Valia, Dahej-1, Dahej-2, Vagra (mini), Vagra (Vilayat) and Jambusar. PCPIR region
has been specifically delineated Investment Region planned for the establishment of production
facilities for petroleum, chemicals and petrochemicals. Proposed project falls in Vagra Taluka. Major
industries like Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer Company, Adani Power Dahej Ltd., First Carbon
Technologies Pvt. Ltd., GACL, SRF Limited, Narmada Bio Chem Pvt. Ltd., Indofil Chemicals Company,
BOC, Meghmani Organics Ltd. etc are established in GIDC Dahej Phase II.

Employment and Livelihood Status


The occupational status has been shown in the Table 3-44, based on the household sample survey
being conducted in Vadadla village.

Table 3-44: Type of Livelihood Activity in the Core Impact area


S. No.

Type of Livelihood

Frequency

Percentage

Agriculture

2.7

Daily Wage Labors

32

43.8

Pvt. Company Contractual Labour

14

19.2

Government Job

1.4

Electrician

2.7

Fishermen

8.2

Pension Holder

1.4

Mason

4.1

Drivers

6.8

10

Business

6.8

11

Livestock

2.7

73

100

Total
Source: Primary Household Survey-2015

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

160

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

From the above table it can be inferred that the bulk of the population falls in the daily wage earner
category working in as agricultural labour or in the private companies as the contractual labour. 6.8%
of the population were having stationary, grocery, tea stalls etc. About 2.7% of the population were
earning from the livestock. Even though livestock was owned by many in the village but it was for selfuse and no monetary gain was there from it. Photograph showing animal husbandry and agricultural
field in study area is shown in Photograph 3-15.

Photograph 3-15: Animal Husbandry and Agricultural Fields in Study Area

Animal Husbandry

Agricultural Field at the Study area

Means of Transportation
The study area is well connected with road & transportation facilities due to proper planning of PCPIR
authorities. Dahej and Bharuch are the nearest railway station present. Dahej railways station is
operational for goods transportation only.

Availability of Power Supply


The Government of Gujarat supplies power to all the households in the study area villages as well as
to the existing industries. There are few companies who has set up their own power plants as per
their own requirement.

Means of Communication
The villages have adequate communication facilities in form of post office, post and phone. The core
impact area has a post office. Many villagers have landline telephone connections. However, people
now also own mobile phones for quick and easy communication.
Lifestyle
Village life has always been the resemblance of simple society, informal relations, traditional livelihood
patterns and contented lives. The socio-economic changes are evident in progressive industrial
development that is transversing the whole of the developing nations. Gujarat state in India is the best
example we can get. The coming of the industries, creation of SEZ, SIR has made changes in the rural
life of Gujarat.
The scope for civic nuisance emerges with the coming of the migrant population. Local villagers giving
houses on rents have added on to their incomes. Blending of certain common attributes like fooding,

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

161

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM


LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT

common practices, lifestyle patterns, educational preferences etc. are remarkably noticed of the rural
community by coming in contact with in-migrated population in their area.
The local language spoken is Gujarati. However, use of Hindi language was also found in some rural
and most of the urban areas under our study.
Due to the development of upcoming industries, various facilities like hotel/restaurant, truck cleaners,
and other ancillary shops shall have more business opportunity and hence shall have overall positive
impact in socio economic environment.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

162

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND


MITIGATION MEASURES

In this chapter, we:

Identify project activities that could beneficially or adversely impact the environment;
Predict and assess the environmental impacts of such activities;
Examine each environmental aspect-impact relationship in detail and identify its degree of
significance;
Identify possible mitigation measures for these project activities and select the most appropriate
mitigation measure, based on the reduction in significance achieved and practicality in
implementation;
In case impact are low or moderate and can be suitably managed by SOPs / OCPs, to minimize /
control the consequences, no specific management plans are prescribed;
If consequences are high / indicating significant impact, implementation of mitigation measures
requires specific management plan, these are prescribed.

4.1

INVESTIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DUE TO THE PROPOSED


PROJECT

Details of investigated environmental impacts due to project location, possible accidents, project
design, project construction, regular operations and final decommissioning are discussed in this
section.
Key Definitions, identification of impacts, methodology of component wise risk assessment is described
in Annexure 10. This methodology is used in this chapter for preparing impacts and their listing
evaluation. Mitigation measures are formulated based on the significance of the impact.
A programme to implement all mitigation measures is then prepared and presented as an
Environmental Monitoring Program and Environmental Management Plan, presented in Chapter 6 &
Chapter 10 respectively.
Impact on environment have been identified, based on an assessment of various environmental
aspects associated with the project activities and has been summarized in Table 4-1.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

163

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Table 4-1: Aspect Impact Identification from Proposed Project

S
No.

Project Activity

C1

C2

Project Location

1.1

Site selection

Project Design

Identified Aspect

N / AN / E

Potential Impacts

C3

C4

Increase in traffic on state highways and


internal roads in study area

Air

Water

Ecology &
Biodiversity

Land

Resource
Depletion

Social

Remarks

AP /
AQ

NV

SW

GW

Effluent /
Sewage

LU /
LC

Soil

HW

ISW

MSW

TER.

AQUA.

RD

Infrastructure

Economic

OH /
(H&S)

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

C17

C18

C19

C20

C21

(+ve)

Permanent

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of the
following:
2.1

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

1) Air Pollution Control Equipment

2) Boilers / Compressors / Other utilities


3) ETP & Hazardous waste storage area

AN

4) Building structure (8 floors)

5) High Energy Consumption


3

Project Construction

Pre-Construction

3.A.1

Site Preparation

Construction

3.B.1

Excavation and paving of site,


Movement of JCBs, other
machinery, workers / labors etc.

3.B.2

Heavy fabrication work for erecting


major plant equipment including
operation of equipment like crane,
concrete mixtures, vibrators etc.

Removal of top soil & Land Clearance

Generation of Debris

Noise Generation

Dust Generation

Fall in pit, land sliding from sidewalls

AN

Generation of Scraps

Emission of Heat Radiation

Noise Generation

Breaking of pulley, chains of cranes during


lifting of equipment

AN

One time
One time

Sewage Generation

Vehicular movement for


transportation of materials and
equipment

Dust generation and emission of HC & CO

3.B.4

Noise Generation

Commissioning
Process Emissions of HCl, HBr, NH3, NOx &
HC

AN

Flue gas Emissions of PM, NOx, CO,


unburnt fuel, etc.

AN

Noise Generation

Leakage of chemicals, fuel and generation


of waste water

AN

Generation of discarded packing materials

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Influx of Construction Workers

3.C.1

3.B.3

Startup and shutdown activities like


operation of equipment for
Technical Grade Pesticides namely
Herbicides, Insecticides, Fungicides
& Plant Growth Regulator

Rare

Temporary

Temporary

Rare

One time

Momentary

Momentary

Rare

(+ve)

Temporary

Temporary

Momentary

Temporary

Temporary

Temporary

Rare
Temporary

164

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

S
No.

C1

Project Activity

C2

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

4.A.1

4.A.2

Identified Aspect

Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides

Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities

N / AN / E

Potential Impacts
Air

Effluent /
Sewage

LU /
LC

Soil

HW

ISW

MSW

TER.

AQUA.

RD

Infrastructure

Economic

OH /
(H&S)

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

C17

C18

C19

C20

C21

C3

C4

C5

Emission of HCl, excess oxygen & CO2


(from Herbicides)

Momentary

Emission of NH3 & HCl (from Insecticides).

Momentary

Emission of NOx, CO2, HCl & HBr (form


Fungicides)

Momentary

Noise Generation (due to operation of heat


exchangers / reactors / compressors /
pumps / blowers)

Continuous

Generation of process residue (chemical


residue, chemical sludge)

Generation of Effluent

Fire and Explosion due to runaway reaction

AN

Loss of Raw Material, Solvents, water


during failure of batch quality

AN

Fugitive Emissions of Solvents

Generation of Effluent

Generation of spent solvents, distillation


residues, expired date and off specification
products, spent catalyst, spent carbon,
used filter materials

Loss of unrecovered solvents

N
N

Operation of Reactor

Loss of unrecovered EDC

4.B.2

Concentrator and Drying

Generation of Effluent

SPM Generation and Emission of HC & CO

Fire and Explosion in Class A solvent


storage area

AN

Generation of discarded container, drums,


packing material etc.

Generation of Acidic and alkaline waste


water

Momentary
Continuous

Continuous

4.B.1

Rare
Rare

Plant Growth Regulator

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Operation of DM Plant

AN

5.3

Continuous

Low BCA counts in blood for affected


workforce

5.2

Continuous

Handling of Products

Storage of fuel, Class A Solvents,


Raw material, Finished products
and Hazardous waste

Remarks

GW

4.A.4

5.1

Social

SW

Dispatch of Various Products

General & Utilities

Resource
Depletion

NV

4.A.3

Vehicular movement for


transportation of raw materials,
finished goods, Industrial Waste

Ecology &
Biodiversity

Land

AP /
AQ

Generation of Pungent smell due to lose


packing

Water

Momentary

Rare

Momentary

Momentary

Rare

Continuous

Rare
Momentary
Continuous

165

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

S
No.

C1

5.4

5.5

Project Activity

C2

Operation of other utilities like


Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters, DG
Sets, Cooling Tower, Compressor,
Pumps, Blowers etc.

Plant operation during rainy days

5.7

Equipment maintenance

Analysis in laboratory

Air

LU /
LC

Soil

HW

ISW

MSW

TER.

AQUA.

RD

Infrastructure

Economic

OH /
(H&S)

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

C17

C18

C19

C20

Waste water generation from cooling tower


blow down, shaft leaks

Leakages in FO/LDO/HSD tank

AN

Noise Generation

Generation of Used/spent oil, waste/residue


containing oil, contaminated hand gloves,
discarded containers / barrels / bags

Zero Liquid Discharge

Untreated effluent generation due to


abnormal operation/ breakdown of RO &
MEE

AN

Overflow of plant drains merging with


storm water drain

Generation of waste/used oil and lubricants

Generation of scraps, used spares, cotton


waste, hand gloves etc.

Waste water generation

Generation of Broken Glassware

AN

Injury due to splash of acid/alkali on


chemist

AN

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Remarks

Effluent /
Sewage

Social

GW

Flue gas emission of PM, SO2, NOx from


boilers, thermic fluid heaters and DG sets

AN

Resource
Depletion

SW

C5

Sludge Generation

Ecology &
Biodiversity

Land

NV

C4

Spillage of HW/effluent

Water

AP /
AQ

C3

Operation of ETP, RO & MEE

5.6

5.8

Identified Aspect

N / AN / E

Potential Impacts

(+ve)

Continuous

C21

Occasional

Rare

Continuous

Continuous

(+ve)

Continuous

Continuous

Rare

Rare

Rare

Momentary

Occasional

Occasional

Occasional

Rare

166

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.2

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

AIR ENVIRONMENT

As discussed earlier, environmental aspects and impacts have been identified based on an assessment
of environmental aspects associated with the project, which include emissions:

During
During
During
During

Project Design Stage;


Project Construction;
Project Operation;
General Operation phase of Utilities.

For the purpose of impact predictions on air environment, emission sources can be classified into point
and area sources. Whilst no area sources have been identified as part of the project, point sources
have been identified and these include stacks attached to various units.
For the purpose of impact predictions on air environment, the impact assessment methodology is
given in Table 1 of Annexure 10. Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact
scores and operational controls / mitigation measures on air environment are tabulated in Table 4-2.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

167

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

Table 4-2: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Air Environment
Project Activity

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

Project Design

1.1

Design & selection of reactors/ equipment /


site layouts, etc.

Project Construction

Construction

2.A.1

Impact Scoring

N / AN / E

S
No.

Legal

Severity,
S

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

C9

C10

C11

Yes

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in Air
Pollution Control Equipment

AN

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Approved and standard designs of air pollution control equipment &


process equipment will be procured from Authorized vendors to meet
environmental standards.

Excavation and paving of site, Movement of


JCBs, other machinery, workers / labors etc.

Dust Generation

No

Low

Barricading will be done wherever required. Water sprinkling is carried out


as and when required.

No

2.A.2

Heavy fabrication work for erecting major plant


equipment including operation of equipment
like crane, concrete mixtures, vibrators etc.

Emission of Heat Radiation

No

Low

Properly certified, tested and calibrated equipment will be used.

No

2.A.3

Vehicular movement for transportation of


materials and equipment.

Dust generation and emission of HC


& CO

No

Moderate

PUC Certified vehicles will be used. Traffic management will be ensured.

No

Commissioning
Process Emissions of HCl, HBr, NH3,
NOx & HC

AN

No

Low

2.B.1

Startup and shutdown activities like operation


of equipment for Technical Grade Pesticides
namely Herbicides, Insecticides, Fungicides &
Plant Growth Regulator.

Flue gas Emissions of PM, NOx, CO,


unburnt fuel, etc.

AN

No

Low

Emission of HCl, excess oxygen &


CO2 (from Herbicides).

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Acid/alkali scrubber shall be attached for dedicated Process Reactor Vents


for herbicides at 35 m height to keep emission of HCl, excess oxygen &
CO2 (from Herbicides) within prescribed limit.

Yes

Emission of NH3 & HCl (from


Insecticides).

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Acid/alkali scrubber shall be attached for Process Reactor Vents at 35 m


height to keep emission of NH3 & HCl (from Insecticides) within prescribed
limit.

Yes

Emission of NOx, CO2, HCl & HBr


(form Fungicides).

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Acid/alkali/gas scrubber shall be attached for Process Reactor Vents at 35


m height to keep emission of NOx, CO2, HCl & HBr (form Fungicides)
within prescribed limit.

Yes

Fire and Explosion due to runaway


reaction.

AN

No

Low

OEP & OCP will be followed. Firefighting and emergency response team
will be at place.

No

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

3.A.1

Operation of Reactors of Herbicides,


Insecticides and Fungicides.

SOP's, OCP, OEP will be made and followed. APC will be provided.
Firefighting and emergency response team will be at place.

No
No

3.A.2

Condensation, Distillation, Extraction,


Separation, Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.

Fugitive Emissions of Solvents

No

16

High

Regular work place monitoring will be done. Leakages will be immediately


attended. OCP will be followed.

Yes

3.A.3

Dispatch of Various Products

Generation of Pungent smell due to


lose packing

AN

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Odor Control Plan shall be made and followed.

Yes

General & Utilities

4.1

Vehicular movement for transportation of raw


materials, finished goods, Industrial Waste.

SPM Generation and Emission of HC


& CO.

No

15

High

Traffic management will be made and ensured that the same is followed.
PUC Certified vehicles will be used.

Yes

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

168

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Legal

Severity,
S

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

C4

C5

C6

C7

Fire and Explosion in Class A solvent


storage area.

AN

No

Flue gas emission of PM, SO2, NOx


from boilers, thermic fluid heaters
and DG sets.

Yes

--

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

4.2

Storage of fuel, Class A Solvents, Raw material,


Finished products and Hazardous waste.

4.3

Operation of other utilities like Boilers, Thermic


Fluid Heaters, DG Sets, Cooling Tower,
Compressor, Pumps, Blowers etc.

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

Impact Scoring

N / AN / E

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

C8

C9

C10

C11

Low

Onsite and Offsite emergency plan will be followed. Firefighting &


emergency response team will be at place. Preventive maintenance
schedule in place.

No

--

--

Significant

SOP's, OCP and OEP will be followed. Stack height of 45 m, 45 m & 15 m


will be provided for boiler, thermic fluid heater and DG sets for proper
dispersion of PM, SO2 and NOx.

Yes

Note: Scoring is not done for those impacting activities, where the mitigation measure of the arising aspect requires to meet/comply with the Legal Requirement (i.e. NOC/CTO).

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

169

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.2.1

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

Sources of Emissions, Emission rates and Predicted GLCs

Point Source Emissions


As per the discussions with HSL officials, following relevant data were collected to calculate various
pollutants from point source for proposed plant stacks.

Quantity of fuel;
Fuel analysis;
Stack:
Internal diameter at top;
Height of stack;
Exit gas velocity & temperature;
Pollutants emission rate.

Details of proposed stacks & APCM are given in Table 2-60 & Table 2-61. Based on assumptions
mentioned in Table 4-3, emissions rates from proposed point sources (stacks) are calculated as
shown in Table 4-4 & Table 4-5.

Table 4-3: Assumptions for Calculating Emission Estimate for Point Source
S.
No.

Fuel
Source

S
Content,
%

Ash Content,
%

Density,
Kg/m3

GCV,
Kcal/Kg

Source

NG

0.001

0.0001

0.9

11,411

4 ppm @ Sabarmati Gas @


http://www.sabarmatigas.in/specific
ations-of-natural-gas.html

FO

0.1

900

10,000

https://www.iocl.com/products/Furn
aceoil.aspx

LDO

1.8

0.02

880

10,200

http://www.bharatpetroleum.in/busi
ness/indFuelsSolvents_light_diesel_oi
l.asp?from=bus
http://www.optionengg.net/ldo.htm

HSD

0.25

0.01

820 to
860

11,840

https://bharatpetroleum.com/pdf/MR
L_High%20Speed%20Diesel%20Oil.
pdf

Area Source Emissions


From the proposed project, no area source are identified having potential impact on air quality. Thus,
dispersion modeling is not carried out.
Line Source Emissions
Vehicular movement of approximately 95 vehicles per day is envisaged on road connecting Site to
Bharuch (in S Direction) which involves vehicular air emissions, majorly CO & HCs. This road is a six
lane, pakka road having 18 m width.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

170

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Table 4-4: Emission Estimate Sheet for Point Source Emissions Flue Gas Stacks
Stack
No.

Stack Attached to

Required
Stack Ht., m

Stack Ht., m

Stack Dia.
(Top), m

Stack Exit
Velocity,
m/s

Stack Exit
Temp, K

Stack Exhaust,
Nm3/s

Fuel Used

Fuel
Consumption

Fuel
Consumption
(kg/hour)

SO2 Emitted,
after APCM,
gm/sec

PM10 Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec

NOx Emitted,
ppm (GPCB
Norm)

NOx Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

Boilers

31.6

45

0.8

10

423

5.02

FO

4 KLD

378.0

8.40

0.105

50.00

0.3283

Thermic Fluid Heaters

10.6

45

0.3

10

423

0.71

LDO

200 Ltr/Day

22.0

0.22

0.001

50.00

0.0462

Table 4-5: Emission Estimate Sheet for Point Source Emissions Process Stacks & Vents
Stack
Exit
Temp,
K

Stack
Exhaust,
m3/s

Stack
Exhaust,
Nm3/s

Cl2 Emitted,
mg/Nm3

NH3
Emitted,
mg/Nm3

NH3
Emitted
after
APCM,
gm/sec

NOx
Emitted,
mg/Nm3

NOx
Emitted
after
APCM,
gm/sec

HC
Emitted,
mg/Nm3

HC Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec

HBr
Emitted,
mg/Nm3

HBr
Emitted
after
APCM,
gm/sec

Stack
No.

Stack Attached
to

Stack
Ht., m

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

C17

C18

C19

C20

Vents attached to
Alkali scrubber

35

0.30

1.20

318

0.08

0.08

20.00

0.002

9.00

0.001

0.00

0.000

25.00

0.002

0.00

0.000

5.00

< 0.001

Vents attached to
Acid scrubber

35

0.30

1.20

318

0.08

0.08

30.00

0.002

15.00

0.001

Scrubbers for odor


control system

35

0.30

1.20

318

0.08

0.08

15.00

0.001

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Stack Exit
Velocity,
m/s

Cl2 Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec

Stack
Dia.
(Top),
m

HCl Emitted,
mg/Nm3

HCl Emitted
after APCM,
gm/sec

171

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

Dispersion Modeling
Emissions from all the stacks were analyzed for their impacts on the GLC for various distances using
the dispersion modeling guidelines of AERMOD, developed by the AERMIC (American Meteorological
Society (AMS)/United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), as directed by CPCB.

About AERMOD
AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD) is a steady-state plume model. It is designed to apply to source
releases and meteorological conditions that can be assumed to be steady over individual modeling
periods (typically one hour or less). AERMOD has been designed to handle the computation of
pollutant impacts in both flat and complex terrain within the same modeling framework.
The American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement
Committee (AERMIC) was formed to introduce state-of-the-art modeling concepts into the EPA's air
quality models. Through AERMIC, a modeling system, AERMOD, was introduced that incorporated air
dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including
treatment of both surface and elevated sources, and both simple and complex terrain.
AERMET is an input data processor that is one of the regulatory components of the AERMOD modeling
system. It incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and
scaling concepts. Data flow in Aermod modeling system is shown in Figure 4-1.

Figure 4-1: Data Flow in AERMOD Modeling System

Meteorological Parameters
The hourly meteorological data considered were wind speed, wind direction, ambient atmospheric
temperature, cloud cover, humidity & rainfall.

Other Assumptions
The dispersion modeling assumptions considered are as follows:

The terrain of the study area was considered as FLAT;


Stability class and Atmospheric inversion level is based on softwares database.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

172

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Results
Air dispersion modeling results with predicted GLC (Isopleths) from proposed activity of all parameters
are provided in Annexure 11. Maximum 24 hourly average GLCs for PM10, SO2 & NOx, & hourly for
Cl2, HCl, NH3, HBr & HC are tabulated in Table 4-6.

Table 4-6: Summary of Air Dispersion Modeling for Proposed Stacks


S No.

Parameters

Number of
Sources

Maximum GLC
Concentration, g/m3

Distance, m

Direction

PM10

0.27

500

ENE

SO2

22.24

750

ENE

NOx

0.08

500

Cl2

0.22

250

NNW

HCl

0.51

250

NNW

NH3

0.05

250

SSE

HBr

0.13

250

NNW

HC

0.32

250

NNW

The worst combined environmental situation is predicted as the sum of maximum baseline monitored
value of a parameter and the incremental GLC at the monitoring location. It indicates maximum GLCs
as tabulated in Table 4-7.

Table 4-7: Maximum Incremental GLC from Proposed Project


S
No.

Name of Village
(Distance in
km/Direction)

At Project Site
(0.0 / - )

Pollutant

CPCB Limit
Concentration
(g/m3)

Baseline
Concentration
(Max.)
(g/m3)

GLC
(g/m3)

Total
Predictive
GLC (g/m3)

PM10

100

67

0.3

67.6

SO2

80

12.1

15.51

27.60

NOx

80

20.6

0.08

20.70

Cl2

<1

0.22

~ 1.22

HCl

<1

0.51

~ 1.51

NH3

400

< 20

0.05

~ 20.05

HBr

<1

0.13

~ 1.13

HC

4,000

1,392.81

0.32

1,393.13

PM10

100

80

0.01

79.90

SO2

80

9.5

1.03

10.55

NOx

80

20.7

20.67

Vadadla

Cl2

<1

~ 1.0

(3.0 / WNW)

HCl

<1

0.01

~ 1.01

NH3

400

< 20

~ 20.0

HBr

<1

~ 1.0

HC

4,000

2,033.00

0.01

2,033.01

Jolwa

PM10

100

82

0.06

82.21

(1.2 / SW)

SO2

80

8.3

4.72

12.99

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

173

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

S
No.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Name of Village
(Distance in
km/Direction)

Pollutant

CPCB Limit
Concentration
(g/m3)

Baseline
Concentration
(Max.)
(g/m3)

GLC
(g/m3)

Total
Predictive
GLC (g/m3)

NOx

80

22.4

0.01

22.45

Cl2

<1

0.01

~ 1.01

HCl

<1

0.02

~ 1.02

NH3

400

< 20

~ 20.0

HBr

<1

~ 1.0

HC

4,000

1,511.79

0.01

1,511.80

PM10

100

84

0.02

84.52

SO2

80

8.1

1.83

9.98

NOx

80

18.8

0.01

18.79

Rahiyad X

Cl2

<1

0.04

< 1.04

(2.43 / SSE)

HCl

<1

0.08

<1.08

NH3

400

< 20

~ 20.0

HBr

<1

0.02

~ 1.02

HC

4,000

1,479.00

0.05

1,479.05

PM10

100

74

0.03

74.47

SO2

80

8.2

2.8

11.03

NOx

80

17.4

0.01

17.44

Atali

Cl2

<1

0.01

~ 1.01

(4.0 / ESE)

HCl

<1

0.03

~ 1.03

NH3

400

< 20

~ 20.0

HBr

<1

0.01

~ 1.01

HC

4,000

1,341.68

0.02

1,341.70

PM10

100

77

0.10

77.27

SO2

80

8.6

4.81

13.38

NOx

80

20.4

0.01

20.37

Gelanda

Cl2

<1

0.02

~ 1.02

(1.61 / NNE)

HCl

<1

0.04

~ 1.04

NH3

400

< 20

0.01

~ 20.01

HBr

<1

0.01

~ 1.01

HC

4,000

1,493.20

0.02

1,493.22

Conclusion
Comparing the incremental ground level concentrations of pollutants with the CPCB limits, it can be
concluded the following:

Incremental GLCs for PM10 shall exceed the permissible limit at all locations due to high baseline
concentration.
Air impact are not expected to cause any effect on vegetation and human settlements in the
vicinity of the project site.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

174

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures for air quality impacts are:

Adequate height of at least 45 m will be provided as per the statutory requirements to flue gas
stacks attached to boiler and thermic fluid heaters;
APCM like scrubbers will be provided as per the applicability (acid, alkali and column containing
activated carbon) to control emissions of HCl, Cl2, HBr, SO2, NOx, NH3, HCs and traces of VOCs;
Species for odor Suppression in the project site shall be developed;
Use of odorants will be done as required;
Effective water spraying will be done on the access roads to control re-entrained dust during dry
season (if required);
Proper PPE like dust masks will be provided to workers and its use ensured;
Regular Work place monitoring will be done.

4.2.2

Incremental Traffic

From the proposed facility, approximately on daily basis, approximately, 10 trucks, 10 Tempos per day
carrying raw material and finished goods shall be using the state highway connecting Bharuch and
Dahej. Employees and contract workers (~20 cars, 30 two wheelers & 25 cycles) shall use the same
route during peak hours.
Based on the traffic survey conducted (Section 3.5.4), it is noted:

Average peak hourly traffic on this route is 531 and 570 PCU respectively;
From the proposed project, additional 31 PCUs will be required;
As per IRC, carrying capacity of this approach road is 3,600 PCU;
Thus, the maximum PCU on the road will be 562 (Bharuch to Dahej) & 601 (Dahej to Bharuch).

Thus, the road is capable of carrying the excess traffic from the proposed project.
Summary of traffic survey (peak hourly) are given in Table 4-8 & Table 4-9.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

175

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Table 4-8: Incremental Hourly Average Traffic on Bharuch to Dahej


Type of Vehicle

From Bharuch to Dahej

% of Total Stream

Equivalent PCU Factor8

Converted PCUs

Additional Vehicles per day

Additional PCUs per Hr.

Two wheeler

106

27%

0.75

79

30

11

Total PCUs
After Proposed Project
91

Three wheeler

26

7%

1.2

31

31

Car/Jeeps

101

26%

101

20

10

111

Truck/Buses/Tractors

143

37%

2.2

314

20

319

Non Motorable vehicles

12

3%

0.4

25

10

Total

388

100

531

95

31

562

Table 4-9: Incremental Hourly Average Traffic on Dahej to Bharuch


Type of Vehicle

From Dahej to Bharuch

% of Total Stream

Equivalent PCU Factor

Converted PCUs

Additional Vehicles per day

Additional PCUs per Hr.

Total PCUs
After Proposed Project

Two wheeler

112

29%

0.75

84

30

11

95

Three wheeler

29

8%

1.2

34

35

Car/Jeeps

100

26%

100

20

10

110

Truck/Buses/Tractors

158

41%

2.2

347

20

351

Non Motorable vehicles

10

3%

0.4

25

10

Total

409

100

570

95

31

601

1
8

As per The Indian Road Congress - Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:106-1990), Table-2, Recommended Design Service Volumes, page 10.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

176

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

Impacts due to Road Transportation

Increase in transportation will lead to increase in road traffic.


Generation of dust from trucks.
Emission of pollutants like HC, SO2, NOx and PM.
Noise generation from vehicular movement.
Spillage or leak of raw materials during transportation.

Mitigation Measures/Precautions as mentioned shall be taken whilst transporting hazardous waste:

Trucks with be covered with tarpaulins before traveling on public roads;


No overloading is done shall be ensured;
Vehicle manifest shall be maintained;
PUC Certified vehicles will be used;
Traffic management will be ensured as mentioned in Chapter 6, Table 6-2;
The engines and exhaust systems of all vehicles and equipment used will be maintained as such,
that exhaust emissions are low and do not breach statutory limits set for the concerned
vehicle/equipment type.

4.3

NOISE ENVIRONMENT

For the purpose of impact predictions on noise environment, the impact assessment methodology is
given in Table 1 of Annexure 10. Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact
scores and operational controls / mitigation measures on noise environment are tabulated in Table
4-10.
4.3.1

Assessment of Noise using SoundPlan

Noise Modelling study was done using the Software tool Sound Plan which predicts the Noise Map
generated due to the sources present at the project site and predicts the Noise Levels at various
receiver points due to the sources present at the project site.
To analyze the Noise Map of the project site, first, the geometrically coordinated Google Earth images
of the Project site were imported into the software. Various Sources of noise were added with their
approximate Sound Pressure Levels, and the Receiver points were added at various locations where
Noise Monitoring was conducted.
SoundPlan generates the Noise Map with colored pattern isopleths, which indicate whether or not
the SPL in that particular region exceeds the CPCB limits. If the SPL is above the user set allowable
limit, the area will be shown in Red contour depending upon the Difference between then Predicted
SPL and the Allowable SPL. Otherwise, it will be shown in Green contour.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

177

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

N / AN / E

Table 4-10: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Noise Environment
Legal

Severity, S

Probability, P

Final Score, S x
P

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

AN

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Process equipment meeting environmental noise standards


shall be procured.

Yes

Noise Generation

No

Low

Properly certified, tested and calibrated equipment will be


used.

No

2.A.2

Heavy fabrication work for erecting


major plant equipment including
operation of equipment like crane,
concrete mixtures, vibrators etc.

Noise Generation

No

Low

Properly certified, tested and calibrated equipment will be


used. Proper PPE like Ear Plugs & ear muffs will be provided
and its use shall be ensured.

No

2.A.3

Vehicular movement for transportation


of materials and equipment.

Noise Generation

No

10

Moderate

PUCC Certified vehicles will be used.

No

Commissioning

2.B.1

Start-up and shutdown activities like


operation of equipment for Technical
Grade Pesticides namely Herbicides,
Insecticides, Fungicides & Plant Growth
Regulator.

High

SOP's, OCP and OEP will be followed during start-up.


Acoustic enclosures will be built-in with equipment by
technology provider. PPE like Ear Plugs & ear muffs will be
provided and its use shall be ensured.

Yes

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

3.A.1

Operation of Reactors of Herbicides,


Insecticides and Fungicides.

Yes

General & Utilities

4.1

Vehicular movement for transportation


of raw materials, finished goods,
Industrial Waste.

4.2

Operation of other utilities like Boilers,


Thermic Fluid Heaters, DG Sets, Cooling
Tower, Compressor, Pumps, Blowers etc.

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

Project Design

1.1

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to faulty design of Boilers
/ Compressors / Other utilities.

Project Construction

Construction

2.A.1

Excavation and paving of site, Movement


of JCBs, other machinery, workers /
labours etc.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Noise Generation

Impact Scoring

No

15

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

Noise Generation (due to operation of


heat exchangers / reactors /
compressors / pumps / blowers)

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

PPE like Ear Plugs & ear muffs will be provided and its use
shall be ensured. No operators shall be allowed to do 2
continuous shifts.

Noise Generation

No

10

Moderate

PUCC Certified vehicles will be used.

No

High

SOP's, OCP and OEP will be followed during start-up.


Acoustic enclosures will be built-in with equipment by
technology provider. PPE like Ear Plugs & ear muffs will be
provided and its use shall be ensured.

Yes

Noise Generation

No

15

178

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

The sources considered at the project site for the analysis with their approximate SPL are considered
slightly on the higher side for more critical analysis. The sources of noise with their maximum SPLs are
tabulated in Table 4-11.

Table 4-11: Sources of Noise with their Sound Pressure Levels


S. No.

Sources

Levels dB(A)
Day

Night

DG Sets

100

100

Steam Boiler

100

100

Compressors

85

85

Pumps

95

95

Cooling Tower

85

85

Results
The predicted noise levels along with the conflict are tabulated in Table 4-12. Isopleths generated
during day time and night time are as given in Figure 4-2 & Figure 4-3.

Table 4-12: Noise Level at Receptor Locations (Based on SoundPlan)


S.
No.

Receiver Name

NL1

Prescribed Limit
dB(A)

Level dB(A)

Conflict dB(A)

Day

Night

Day

Night

Day

Night

At Project Site

75.0

70.0

66.9

66.9

NL2

100 m. North From At Project Site

75.0

70.0

47.6

47.2

NL3

100 m. West From At Project Site

75.0

70.0

46.2

45.5

NL4

250 m. South From At Project Site

75.0

70.0

44.9

45.5

NL5

On Highway-GIDC Road East


From At Project Site

75.0

70.0

47.4

43.1

NL6

Jolva Village

55.0

45.0

26.2

26.2

NL7

Galenda Village

55.0

45.0

31.1

27.1

Based on the modeling of proposed activities, it is noted that the proposed activities will not have any
conflict in Noise levels comparing to the prescribed CPCB limits.
Cumulative Impact
Results are collated with baseline data to predict the cumulative incremental in noise levels at the
monitored receptors. The details of the same for day time and night time is tabulated in Table 4-13.
Conclusion
The predicted cumulative incremental increase in Noise level shows that following:

Incremental increase in core area of 250 m from site shows incremental increase in the range of
0.1 dB(A) to 9.7 dB(A) during day time and 0.4 dB(A) to 14.4 dB(A) during night time.
Beyond 250 m from the project area, increase in noise level is almost null.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

179

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Table 4-13: Predictive Cumulative Noise Levels


Location
Code

Location

NL1

At Project Site

NL2

Category

CPCB Limits in dB (A)

Baseline Average Noise levels


in dB (A)

SPL predicted at Receiver by


Proposed Activities (dB)

Predicted Cumulative incremental


increase in Noise level dB (A)

Incremental increase in Noise


level dB (A)

Day Time

Night Time

Day Time

Night Time

Day Time

Night Time

Day Time

Night Time

Day Time

Night Time

Industrial

75

70

57.7

52.7

66.9

66.9

67.4

67.1

9.7

14.4

100 m. North From At Project Site

Industrial

75

70

59.4

55

47.6

47.2

59.7

55.7

0.3

0.7

NL3

100 m. West From At Project Site

Industrial

75

70

64.2

57

46.2

45.5

64.3

57.3

0.1

0.3

NL4

250 m. South From At Project Site

Industrial

75

70

63

53.8

44.9

43.1

63.1

54.2

0.1

0.4

NL5

On Highway - GIDC Road East From At Project Site

Industrial

75

70

64.6

58

47.4

43.2

64.7

58.1

0.1

0.1

NL6

Jolva Village

Residential

55

45

57.7

51.7

26.2

26.2

57.7

51.7

0.0

0.0

NL7

Galenda Village

Residential

55

45

56.5

50.7

31.1

31.1

56.5

50.7

0.0

0.0

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

180

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

Figure 4-2: Isopleths Generated During Day Time

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

181

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT
DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

Figure 4-3: Isopleths Generated During Night Time

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

182

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

WATER ENVIRONMENT

For the purpose of impact predictions on ground & surface water environment, the impact assessment
methodology is given in Table 1 of Annexure 10. Based on the identified aspects from project
activities, impact scores and operational controls / mitigation measures on water environment are
tabulated in Table 4-14.
4.4.1

Impact on Ground Water

No adverse impact on groundwater is envisaged as no withdrawal of groundwater is proposed in the


project. Also, groundwater recharge is not feasible in this area due to formational salinity.
4.4.2

Impact on Surface Water

Surface water quality and quantity will not be affected by the proposed project, since the project shall
achieve Zero Liquid Discharge, by taking various recycling and reuse steps as discussed in Chapter 2,
Section 2.17.
Only, during the heavy rainfall, there is a possibility of storm water to drain out from the factory
premise which will meet the storm water line of GIDC, having its final outlet in the Narmada Estuary
which is approximately 5 Km in south from the project site. Hence, impact on the surface water can be
considered negligible.
4.4.3

Mitigation Measures

Following mitigation measures will be implemented to minimize the impact on the water environment:

During construction phase, sewage will be disposed into soak pit and septic tank. Regular cleaning
will be carried out.
Properly designed effluent drains with side barriers will be provided & inflow will be diverted to
MEE followed by ETP & RO for necessary treatment.
Zero Liquid Discharge shall be achieved by recycled and reuse of the treated waste water.
Process, chemical fuel storage and handling area will have proper bunds and dyke walls so that
contaminated run-off cannot meet the storm-water line.

The overall impact on surface water quality will be negligible by following all precautionary measures
as mentioned in mitigation measures.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

183

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

N / AN / E

Table 4-14: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Water Environment
Legal

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

Project Design

1.1

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of
ETP, RO, MEE.

AN

Project Construction

Construction

2.A.1

Influx of construction workers

Sewage generation.

Commissioning

2.B.1

Startup and shutdown activities like


operation of equipment for Technical
Grade Pesticides namely Herbicides,
Insecticides, Fungicides & Plant
Growth Regulator.

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

3.A.1

Operation of Reactors of Herbicides,


Insecticides and Fungicides.

3.A.2

Condensation, Distillation, Extraction,


Separation, Crystallization, Filtration,
Drying & Washings activities.

Plant Growth Regulator

3.B.1

Operation of Reactor

General & Utilities

4.1

Operation of DM Plant

4.2

Operation of other utilities like Boilers,


Thermic Fluid Heaters, DG Sets,
Cooling Tower, Compressor, Pumps,
Blowers etc.

4.3

Impact on

Impact Scoring
Final Score,
SxP

EMP
Required

GW

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Design of ETP, RO, and MEE shall be done to meet


the environmental standards.

Yes

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Sewage will be diverted to ETP for further


treatment.

Yes

Leakage of chemicals, fuel and


generation of waste water

AN

No

Low

Properly designed effluent drains with side barriers


will be provided & inflow will be diverted to ETP
for further treatment.

No

Generation of Effluent

No

15

High

Properly designed effluent drains with side barriers


will be provided & inflow will be diverted to ETP
for further treatment.

Yes

Spillage and leakages of solvents/other


hazardous waste caused by Fire and
Explosion due to runaway reaction.

AN

No

Low

All Process, chemical fuel storage and handling


area will have proper bunds so that contaminated
run-off cannot meet the storm-water line.

No

Generation of Effluent

No

10

Moderate

Properly designed effluent drains with side barriers


will be provided & inflow will be diverted to ETP
for further treatment.

No

Generation of Effluent

No

10

Moderate

Properly designed effluent drains with side barriers


will be provided & inflow will be diverted to ETP
for further treatment.

No

Generation of Acidic and alkaline waste


water

No

10

Moderate

Effluent will be diverted to ETP via properly


designed channel.

No

Waste water generation from cooling


tower blow down, shaft leaks.

No

Low

Effluent will be diverted to ETP via properly


designed channel.

No

Leakages in FO/LDO/HSD tank.

AN

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Dyke wall will be provided and leaked fuel shall be


immediately transferred to the spare tank.

Yes

Zero Liquid Discharge

Yes

(+ve)

--

--

--

Significant

Treated waste water shall be reused and reutilized


in the process to achieve ZLD.

Yes

Spillage of HW/effluent.

AN

No

Low

Effluent will be diverted to ETP via properly


designed channel.

No

Probability,
P

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

SW

Severity,
S

Significance /
Consequence

Effluent /
Sewage

Operation of ETP, RO & MEE

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

184

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

N / AN / E

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

Legal

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

Untreated effluent generation due to


abnormal operation/ breakdown of RO &
MEE

AN

No

Impact on

4.4

Plant operation during rainy days.

Overflow of plant drains merging with


storm water drain.

No

4.5

Equipment maintenance

Generation of waste/used oil and


lubricants

No

4.6

Analysis in laboratory

Waste water generation

No

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Impact Scoring

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

C11

C12

C13

C14

Moderate

Plant will be shut down.

No

No

SW

GW

Effluent /
Sewage

Severity,
S

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

Low

All Process, chemical fuel storage and handling


area will have proper bunds so that contaminated
run-off cannot meet the storm-water drainage.
Separate drainage will be provided for storm water
and effluent water.

Low

Effluent will be diverted to ETP via properly


designed channel.

No

Negligible

--

No

185

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.5

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

LAND ENVIRONMENT

Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on land environment are tabulated in Table 4-15.
Potential impacts on land use, land cover and soil due to deposition of air pollutants, leakages of
waste water & solid hazardous waste are described in this section.
4.5.1

Site Preparation

Based on mutually agreed terms and conditions, M/s. Shaurya Enterprise has acquired the plot/land
from GIDC. On profit sharing basis, HSL has taken the plot on lease from M/s. Shaurya Enterprise for
five years (upto 31st May, 2019). Documents for the same is provided in Annexure 3.
Removal of Top Soil & Land Clearance

Change in the land use, currently from barren (scrub land), though within Dahej-II industrial
estate, to industrial area is envisaged;
Debris will be generated due to excavation and paving.

4.5.2

Operation Phase

Soil contamination is envisaged due to deposition of HCl, HBr, NH3, NOx & HC in adjoining plots;
Excess generation of hazardous and other solid wastes;
Generation of scraps, used spares, cotton waste, hand gloves etc.;
Soil Contamination due to Leakage of chemicals, fuel, raw material and waste water & sewage.

4.5.3

Mitigation Measure

Generated hazardous wastes during project operation will be transported to an authorized Treatment,
Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) site and sent for incineration. Storage areas for hazardous waste,
fuel & raw material will be impervious and will be designed to prevent Leachate penetration.
Consequently impacts on land / soil will be negligible.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

186

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

N / AN / E

Table 4-15: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Land Environment
Legal

LU /
LC

Soil

HW

ISW

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

Impact on

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

Project Design

1.1

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Project Construction

Pre-Construction

2.A.1

Site Preparation

Construction

2.B.1

Excavation and paving of site,


Movement of JCBs, other
machinery, workers / labors
etc.

Generation of Debris

No

2.B.2

Heavy fabrication work for


erecting major plant
equipment including operation
of equipment like crane,
concrete mixtures, vibrators
etc.

Generation of Scraps

No

2.B.3

Influx of Construction Workers

Generation of domestic/MSW
waste.

No

Commissioning

2.C.1

Startup and shutdown


activities like operation of
equipment for Technical Grade
Pesticides namely Herbicides,
Insecticides, Fungicides &
Plant Growth Regulator.

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

3.A.1

Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides.

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to allotment of
improper Hazardous waste storage
area.

AN

Yes

Removal of top soil & Land


Clearance

No

Impact Scoring
MSW

Severity,
S

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

C10

C11

C12

C13

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

C14

C15

C16

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Properly designed storage area for hazardous waste


with adequate capacity will be ensured. Prior
permissions for TSDF will be taken and prior
agreements with authorized vendors shall be made.

10

Moderate

Only scrubs will be removed. Top soil removed will be


used for green belt development.

No

10

Moderate

Debris will be reused in filling low lying area.

No

10

Moderate

Debris will be used for green belt development.

No

10

Moderate

Scraps will be handles as per rules and sold to


authorized vendors

No

10

Moderate

Proper disposal of sewage sludge will be carried out


as per rules.

No

No

Soil Contamination due to


deposition of HCl, HBr, NH3, NOx &
HC in adjoining plots.

AN

No

Low

SOPs will be followed during start up. Based on


APCM, HCl, HBr, NH3, NOx & HC shall remain well
within the CPCB standards. Compensation will be
given to affected person.

Soil Contamination due to Leakage


of chemicals, fuel and waste water.

AN

No

Moderate

Paved Flooring shall be made near storage tanks.

No

Generation of discarded packing


materials

No

10

Moderate

Packing material will be given to competent


authority/registered vendors

No

Soil Contamination due to


deposition of HCl, (from
Herbicides).

No

Low

SOPs will be followed during start up. Based on


APCM, HCl shall remain well within the CPCB
standards.

No

Soil Contamination due to


deposition of NH3 & HCl (from
Insecticides).

No

10

Moderate

SOPs will be followed during start up. Based on


APCM, NH3 & HCl shall remain well within the CPCB
standards.

No

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

187

Legal

LU /
LC

Soil

HW

ISW

MSW

Severity,
S

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Soil Contamination due to


deposition of HCl & HBr (form
Fungicides).

No

Generation of process residue


(chemical residue, chemical
sludge).

Yes

Soil Contamination due to Spillage


and leakages of solvents/other
hazardous waste caused by Fire
and Explosion due to runaway
reaction.

AN

No

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

3.A.2

Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration,
Drying & Washings activities.

General & Utilities

4.1

Storage of fuel, Class A


Solvents, Raw material,
Finished products and
Hazardous waste.

4.2

Operation of other utilities like


Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters,
DG Sets, Cooling Tower,
Compressor, Pumps, Blowers
etc.

4.3

4.4

4.5

Operation of ETP, RO & MEE

Equipment maintenance

Analysis in laboratory

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

N / AN / E

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

Impact on

Impact Scoring

Generation of spent solvents,


distillation residues, expired date
and off specification products,
spent catalyst, spent carbon, used
filter materials.

Yes

Generation of discarded container,


drums, packing material etc.

Yes

Soil Contamination due to leakages


in FO/LDO/HSD tank.

AN

No

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

C13

C14

C15

C16

10

Moderate

SOPs will be followed during start up. Based on


APCM, HCl & HBr shall remain well within the CPCB
standards.

No

--

--

--

Significant

Process residue will be disposed off to authorized


landfill facility/ vendors.

Yes

10

Moderate

Off-site emergency plan shall be made and followed.


Remediation shall be done at affected area/soil.
Compensations shall be given as applicable.

No

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Spent solvents will be sent to solvent recovery units.


Spent catalyst will be send to recyclers/ regeneration
/ reactivation. Spent carbon & used filter materials
will be sent to TSDF. Distillation residues & expired
date and off specification products will be sent for
incineration.

--

--

--

Significant

Discarded container, drums, packing material etc.


shall be decontaminated and sold to authorized
vendors.

Yes

Low

Dyke wall with proper flooring shall be made. SOPs


will be followed.

No

Yes

Generation of Used/spent oil,


waste/residue containing oil,
contaminated hand gloves,
discarded containers / barrels /
bags.

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Used/spent oil will be sold to GPCB authorized


Recyclers, Waste/residue containing oil disposed of to
CHWIF. Contaminated hand gloves, discarded
containers / barrels / bags shall be sold to authorized
vendors.

Sludge Generation

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Collected, stored and disposed to TSDF facility as per


HW rules amended till date.

Yes

Soil Contamination due to Spillage


of HW/effluent.

AN

No

Moderate

Dyke wall with proper flooring shall be made. SOPs


will be followed.

No

Generation of waste/used oil and


lubricants

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Used/spent oil will be sold to GPCB authorized


Recyclers.

Yes

Generation of scraps, used spares,


cotton waste, hand gloves etc.

Yes

--

--

--

Significant

Scraps, used spares, cotton waste, contaminated


hand gloves, discarded containers / barrels / bags
shall be sold to authorized vendors.

Yes

Generation of Broken Glassware.

AN

No

Low

Collected, stored and disposed as per HW rules


amended till date.

No

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

188

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.6

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

ECOLOGY & BIODIVERSITY

Identification of Impact Zone


Though the concentrations of the emitted pollutants will be kept within permissible levels through the
various engineering controls, it is essential to have eco-management in the Likely Impact Zone (LIZ)
for safeguard and enhanced of ecological environment of the project area. Assuming LIZ of 1.8
kilometer (maximum) around the project site. Accordingly, 2 localities i.e. Jolwa and Galenda village
water bodies / ponds and other habitats (scrub vegetation, open vegetation, crop / fallow land) and
associated biodiversity are falling in the LIZ area.
Determination of Ecological Components Likely Impacted
Ecological components, as tabulated in Table 4-16, are determined which may face likely impacts in
different phases due to various project activities.

Table 4-16: Activity-Aspect Based Determination of Impacting Ecological Components


S. No.

Activity

Aspect

Ecological Components
TFL

TFA

AFL

AFA

MFL

MFN

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1. Pre- Construction Phase


1.1

Site preparation

Removal of top soil


and vegetation

2. Construction Phase
2.1

Movement of Earth
movers and other vehicles

Generation of noise

--

3. Project operation Phase

3.1

Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides
and Fungicides.

Emission of HCl,
NOx, CO2, NH3 and
HBr due to operation
of reactors of
Herbicides,
Insecticides and
Fungicides.

--

--

--

--

--

3.2

Operation of heat
exchangers / reactors /
compressors / pumps /
blowers.

Noise Generation

--

--

--

4. General Utilities

4.1

Vehicular movement for


transportation of raw
material, finished goods
and industrial waste

Generation of SPM
and emission of HC
& CO.

--

--

--

--

--

4.2

Operation of Boilers,
Thermic Fluid Heater and
DG sets

Emission of PM, SO2,


NOx

--

--

--

--

--

4.3

Operation of ETP RO &


MEE.

Discharge of waste
water

--

--

--

--

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

189

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

S. No.

4.4

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Activity

Aspect

Plant operation during


rainy season

Overflow of plant
drains merging with
storm water drain.
Contamination of
water bodies due to
contamination of
storm water

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

Ecological Components
TFL

TFA

AFL

AFA

MFL

MFN

--

--

--

--

Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on ecology and biodiversity environment are tabulated in Table 4-17.
Biodiversity Appraisal Conclusion
Proposed project site is located in the GIDC Industrial Estate and does not support any species of
conservation significance and also not forms critical habitat.
All flora and fauna species reported are common component of the buffer zone. So, removal of these
common floral species from core zone will not result in the loss of floral diversity in true sense and will
not have significant / permanent impact on the species diversity and habitat structure of associated
faunal diversity. However, buffer zone area encompasses some Schedule-I species, so conservation
plan have been prepared for biodiversity improvement of the area.
Flora and fauna components will not get affected in normal function of the project and its associated
activities by implementation of proper safety measures and control devices.
Being an industrial area, considering cumulative impacts due to other adjacent industries, strict
implementation of EMP / mitigation measures are required to ensure that the biodiversity of the study
area should not impacted negatively.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

190

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Table 4-17: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Ecology & Biodiversity
Impact Scoring

S.
No.

Project Aspect Description

Likely Impacts on
Ecology and
Biodiversity (EB)

Impact Consequence - Probability


Description / Justification

Legal

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

Site specific loss of


common floral diversity

Site possesses common floral species; This will


be site specific impact.

Site specific loss of


associated faunal
diversity

No threat of loss of faunal diversity as species


reported are common which uses wide variety
of habitats of the local environment.

Site specific loss of


habitat / habitat
diversity

Project site forms common habitat structure


which is very common component of the buffer
zone habitats.

Site specific disturbance


to faunal species

Species reported from project site and buffer


zone are common / generalist species and not
very sensitive to the routine activities of the
urban and peri-urban area, so there will be no
threat of facing disturbance. However, its site
specific and temporary impact.

Impact on surrounding
vegetation and
associated biodiversity.

Though the emission levels of all pollutants will


be kept within permissible limits, considering
cumulative impact (due to industrial area),
minor short term impacts (due to acid rain) are
expected on surrounding flora and associated
fauna which may be resilient.

Yes

--

--

Impact on surrounding
vegetation and
associated biodiversity.

Though the emission levels of emitted pollutants


will remain in permissible limits due to use of
PUC certified vehicles complying vehicular
emissions norms, considering cumulative
impact, minor short term impacts are expected
on associated biodiversity.

No

Impact on surrounding
vegetation and
associated biodiversity.

Though the emission levels of emitted pollutants


will kept within permissible limits, considering
cumulative impact (due to industrial area),
minor short term impacts are expected on
surrounding habitats and associated biodiversity
which may be resilient.

No

Contamination of
surrounding water
bodies and associated
aquatic biodiversity.

A proposed plant is zero liquid discharge basis


so no waste water will be discharged. Also, all
the potential contaminant (solid and liquid) will
be stored in closed area, so that rain water /
storm water will not get contaminated.

No

Significance /
Consequence

Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

C9

C10

C11

Moderate

Operation subject to periodic monitoring /


surveillance. However, greenbelt / plantation will be
developed in project site and in periphery of the
project boundary, which will improve floral and
faunal diversity of the project area.

No

Low

Operation subject to periodic monitoring /


surveillance. However, all species reported from
project site are common and well adapted to the
routine urban activities, so they will not face
significant impact on their normal movements.

No

--

Significant

Operation subject to management by operational


controls. Emission levels of all pollutants will be kept
within permissible levels through various engineering
control measures. However, green belt development
with suitable species will help to mitigate likely
cumulative impacts.

Yes

Low

Green belt development with suitable species will


help to mitigate likely cumulative impacts.

No

10

Moderate

Operation subject to management by operational


controls. Emission levels of all pollutants will be kept
within permissible levels through various engineering
control measures. However, green belt development
with suitable species will help to mitigate likely
cumulative impacts.

No

Low

Operation subject to periodic monitoring /


surveillance.

No

Severity,
S

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

C6

C7

C8

1. Pre- Construction Phase

1.1

Removal of site vegetation like


herbs, shrubs and grasses (except
trees)

No

10

2. Construction Phase

2.1

Noise generation due to movement


of JCBs, other machinery, Heavy
fabrication work & Vehicular
Movement

No

3. Project operation Phase

3.1

3.2

Emission of HCl, NOx, CO2, NH3 and


HBr due to operation of reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides.
Noise Generation (due to operation
of heat exchangers / reactors /
compressors / pumps / blowers)

4. General Utilities

4.1

Generation of SPM and emission of


HC & CO due to vehicular movement

4.2

Flue gas emission of PM, SO2, NOx


from boilers, thermic fluid heaters
and DG sets.

4.3

Discharge of waste water from ETP,


RO & MEE.

4.4

During rainy season, overflow of


plant drains merging with storm
water drain.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

191

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.7

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on socio economic environment are tabulated in Table 4-18.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

192

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

Table 4-18: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Socio Economic Environment
N / AN / E

Infrastructure

Economic

C4

C5

C6

C7

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

No

10

Moderate

Traffic Management Plan shall be made


and followed.

No

Economic growth of Dahej Industrial Area.

No

--

--

--

NR

Positive Impact

No

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of 8
story Building structure.

AN

No

Low

Approved structural design (complying


seismic Zone 5) shall be implemented
which can resist earthquakes.

No

Employment to Locals and Others.

No

--

--

--

NR

Positive Impact

No

Damages due to Fire and Explosion


caused by runaway reaction.

AN

No

Low

Approved structural design and designs of


reactors and other equipment shall be
done and procured.

No

No

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

Project Location

1.1

Site selection

Heavy traffic on state highways and


internal roads in study area

Project Design

2.1

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Project Construction

Construction

3.A.1

Influx of Construction Workers

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

4.A.1

Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides.

4.A.2

Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.

Plant Growth Regulator

4.B.1

Operation of Reactor

General & Utilities

5.1

Storage of fuel, Class A Solvents,


Raw material, Finished products
and Hazardous waste.

5.2

Operation of other utilities like


Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters, DG
Sets, Cooling Tower, Compressor,
Pumps, Blowers etc.

Impact Scoring
Severity,
S

Project Activity

Impact on
Legal

S
No.

(+ve)

(+ve)

Probability,
P

Final Score,
SxP

Significance /
Consequence

Operation Controls / Mitigation


Measures

EMP
Required

Loss of Raw Material during failure of


batch quality.

AN

No

Moderate

Lab scale approved products by QC


experts shall be made. Timely/stage wise
quality check will be done during
production.

Loss of unrecovered solvents

No

Negligible

--

No

Loss of unrecovered EDC

No

Negligible

--

No

Damages due to Fire and Explosion in


Class A solvent storage area.

AN

No

Low

Approved structural design and designs of


reactors and other equipment shall be
done and procured.

No

Employment to Locals and Others.

No

(+ve)

--

--

--

NR

Positive Impact

No

Leakages in FO/LDO/HSD tank.

AN

No

Negligible

--

No

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

193

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

4.8

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES

RESOURCE DEPLETION

Based on the identified aspects from project activities, impact scores and operational controls /
mitigation measures on resource depletion are tabulated in Table 4-19.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

194

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION


MEASURES

Table 4-19: Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures for Resource Depletion
N / AN / E

Impact Scoring
Legal

Severity, S

Probability, P

Final Score, S x P

Significance /
Consequence

C4

C5

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

No

Moderate

Approved energy efficient equipment shall be designed


and procured.

No

No

S
No.

Project Activity

Identified Aspect

C1

C2

C3

Project Design

1.1

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Non-compliance of Environmental
standards due to failure in designs of
equipment causing High Energy
Consumption.

AN

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

2.A.1

Operation of Reactors of Herbicides,


Insecticides and Fungicides.

Plant Growth Regulator

2.B.1

Operation of Reactor

General & Utilities

3.1

Operation of other utilities like


Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters, DG
Sets, Cooling Tower, Compressor,
Pumps, Blowers etc.

Operation Controls / Mitigation Measures

EMP
Required

Loss of Raw Material, Solvents, water


during failure of batch quality.

AN

No

10

Moderate

Quality check in Batch process shall be closely


monitored for any abnormalities to reduce losses. Waste
Generated shall be collected, handled and disposed off
as per HW rules, 2008, amended till date.

Loss of unrecovered EDC

No

Low

Recovery and Reuse plan shall be made and


implemented.

No

Leakages in FO/LDO/HSD tank.

AN

No

Low

Dyke wall will be provided and leaked fuel shall be


immediately transferred to the spare tank.

No

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

195

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

5. ANALYSIS OF
ALTERNATIVES

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

Company has an operative facility in the name of Crop Life Science Limited in Ankleshwar making
formulation products of pesticides. The Company felt the necessity of setting up a new facility of
technical grade looking at future market demand. But, in Anklesh
The western part of India is an obvious choice for the new project considering its proximity to both,
raw material sources as well as captive markets. Within western India, Dahej is considered an
excellent location since it is an industrial area, has excellent infrastructure including infrastructure
required for management of Environment developed by GIDC.
Within Dahej few plots were considered and found the existing plot most suitable due to its location
within the estate.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

196

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING PROGRAM

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Based on the identified aspects from the proposed activities on air, noise, water, land, ecology and
biodiversity and socio-economic environment, scoring were done based on its severity and probability
as discussed in Chapter 4. Thus, monitoring program is required for each environment based on its
consequence. The preliminary budgetary monitoring plans are as discussed in this chapter. These
EMPs are based on the technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation measures (incl.
Measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis, reporting schedules, emergency
procedures, detailed budget & procurement schedules).
Main objective of environmental monitoring program is to:
Measure effectiveness of operational procedures;
Confirm statutory and mandatory compliance;
Identify unexpected changes.

6.1

AIR ENVIRONMENT

Budgetary environment monitoring plan for air environment is given in Table 6-1. Traffic
Management Plan is given in Table 6-2.

6.2

NOISE ENVIRONMENT

Budgetary environment monitoring plan for noise environment is given in Table 6-3.

6.3

WATER ENVIRONMENT

Budgetary environment monitoring plan for water environment is given in Table 6-4.

6.4

LAND ENVIRONMENT

Budgetary environment monitoring plan for land environment is given in Table 6-5.

6.5

ECOLOGY & BIODIVERSITY

Budgetary environment monitoring plan for ecology and biodiversity is given in Table 6-6.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

197

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Table 6-1: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Air Environment


Implementation and Management
Impacting
Activity

Mitigation Measures

C1

Data Analysis

Measurement
Methodology

Frequency

Location

Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility

Emergency
Procedure

Budget for
Mitigation Measure
(in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)

Procurement
Schedule

Remark

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Design & selection of


reactors/ equipment /
site layouts, etc.

Approved and
standard designs of
air pollution control
equipment &
process equipment
will be procured
from Authorized
vendors to meet
environmental
standards.

Design Drawings,
specification,
statutory permissions,
licenses, legal work.

In house
Technical
Experts.

During Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.

Head Office / At Site.

HSL officials /
vendors /
statutory
authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.

Re-designing

--

--

During designing
stage.

Halides (Chloride /
Bromide) Online
sensors

CEMS (Sensors)

Continuous

On stack attached
with scrubbers.

Plant Incharge, HSL

Installation of
Scrubbers during
Procurement and
Commissioning
stage, Analysis
and Maintenance
during Operation
Phase.

Capital Cost includes


cost of scrubbers,
online sensors.
Recurring Cost
includes maintenance
cost of the same, cost
of hiring third party
for carrying out
monitoring.

During Operation
Phase.

Capital Cost includes


cost of VOC meter.
Recurring cost
includes cost of hiring
third party for
carrying out WPM.

Project Design

Design & selection


of reactors/
equipment / site
layouts, etc.

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides


Acid/alkali scrubber shall
be attached for dedicated
Process Reactor Vents for
herbicides at 35 m height
to keep emission of HCl,
excess oxygen & CO2
(from Herbicides) within
prescribed limit.
Operation of
Reactors of
Herbicides,
Insecticides and
Fungicides.

Acid/alkali scrubber shall


be attached for Process
Reactor Vents at 35 m
height to keep emission
of NH3 & HCl (from
Insecticides) within
prescribed limit.
Acid/alkali/gas scrubber
shall be attached for
Process Reactor Vents at
35 m height to keep
emission of NOx, CO2, HCl
& HBr (form Fungicides)
within prescribed limit.

Condensation,
Distillation,
Extraction,
Separation,
Crystallization,
Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.

NH3 Sensors

HCl in Ambient Air

CEMS (Sensors)

Continuous

HCl - IS: 5182.

Plant Incharge, HSL

At Main Gate and


at Reactor Area.

Plant Incharge, HSL /


Third Party

Gelanda (Summer)
Once a Season
(Excluding
rainy season)

NH3 in Ambient Air

On stack attached
with scrubbers.

NH3 - Indophenol
Blue method.

Jolwa (Other
season)

Third Party

At Main Gate and


at Reactor Area.

Plant Incharge, HSL /


Third Party

Immediate
corrective action
will be taken to
solve the problem.
Problematic
activity shall be
controlled.

35

Gelanda (Summer)
Jolwa (Other
season)

Third Party

VOC - Online Meter


Regular work place
monitoring will be done.
Leakages will be
immediately attended.
OCP will be followed.

Work Place
Monitoring for VOC,
HCl & NH3.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

HCl - IS: 5182.


NH3 - Indophenol
Blue method.

As per
Factories Rules

At Main Gate and


at Reactor Area.

Plant Incharge, HSL /


Third Party

Leakages shall be
immediately
attended, OCP will
be followed.

3.5

0.5

198

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Implementation and Management


Impacting
Activity

Mitigation Measures

C1
Dispatch of Various
Products

Data Analysis

Measurement
Methodology

Frequency

Location

Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility

Emergency
Procedure

Budget for
Mitigation Measure
(in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)

Procurement
Schedule

Remark

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Odor Control Plan shall


be made and followed to
reduce Pungent smell
due to lose packing.

Odor Control Plans


is followed.

--

During operation
phase.

Recurring Cost
includes annual cost
of good housekeeping
& cleaning.

--

--

During
construction and
operation phase.

--

During Operation
Phase

Cost of Stacks for


various heights, APC
like Bag Filters to be
included as capital
cost. Cost of
maintaining the same
is to be included in
recurring cost.

--

Daily

Packing Area

Store Manager, HSL

Packing shall be
redone.

PUCC Certificate

To ensure Valid PUCC


certificate.

If considerable
emissions
observed
during
operations.

With Drivers at
main gate

Security Officer, HSL

Vehicles without
PUC certificates
will not be used

PM, SO2, NOx in


stack.

Stack monitoring by
Isokinetic sampling
IS: 11255.

Once in a
month

Flue gas stacks

Third Party

General & Utilities


Vehicular
movement for
transportation of
raw materials,
finished goods,
Industrial Waste.

Operation of other
utilities like Boilers,
Thermic Fluid
Heaters, DG Sets,
Cooling Tower,
Compressor,
Pumps, Blowers
etc.

Traffic management will


be made and ensured
that the same is followed.
PUC Certified vehicles will
be used.

SOP's, OCP and OEP will


be followed. Stack height
of 45 m, 45 m & 15 m
will be provided for
boiler, thermic fluid
heater and DG sets for
proper dispersion of PM,
SO2 and NOx.

PM10, PM2.5, SO2,


NOx in ambient air
within plant
premise & nearby
villages

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

PM10 - Gravimetric IS:


5182 (Part 23) 2006.
PM2.5 - Gravimetric IS:
5182.
SO2 - Colorimetric IS:
5182: (Part II) 2001.

Once a Season
(Excluding
rainy season)

NOx - Colorimetric IS:


5182: (Part VI) 2006.

At Main Gate and


at Gelanda
(Summer)

System Load shall


be reduced.

50

Third Party

Jolwa (Other
season).

Capital Cost (in Lacs)

88.5

During Commissioning Phase

Recurring Cost (in Lacs)

11.5

During Operation Phase

Total Cost for EMP (in Lacs)

100

--

199

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Table 6-2: Traffic Management Plan


Objective

To ensure that there is smooth traffic both within and outside the facility for the duration of the construction phase and operation phase

Benefit of EMP

Smooth and congestion free traffic operation


Implementation and Management

Impacting Activity

C1

Movement of vehicles
throughout the
construction phase and
operational phase

Mitigation Measures

Data Analysis

Measurement Methodology

Frequency

Location

Reporting Schedule/Responsibility

Emergency Procedure

Remark

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

Controlled vehicular
movement (preferably
with clearly demarcated
entry / exit) with
adequate supervision

Records of No. of
tankers entering
and exiting the site.

Manual

Throughout construction
and operation phase

Main Gate

Security In charge

Route for safe exit will be


in place.

--

Segregation of vehicular
and pedestrian area

--

--

Throughout construction
and operation phase

--

Security In charge

Route for safe exit will be


in place.

--

Vehicle entry and exit


scheduling so that traffic
congestion is not created
on the public road
leading to the site.

--

--

Throughout construction
and operation phase

--

Security In charge

Route for safe exit will be


in place.

--

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

200

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Table 6-3: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Noise Environment


Implementation and Management
Data Analysis

Measurement
Methodology

Frequency

Location

Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility

Emergency
Procedure

Budget for
Mitigation Measure
- (in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)

Procurement
Schedule

Remark

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Process equipment meeting


environmental noise
standards shall be
procured.

Design specification
related to Noise
standards, statutory
permissions,
licenses, legal work.

In house
Technical Experts.

During
Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.

Head Office / At
Site.

HSL officials / vendors


/ statutory authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.

--

During
designing
stage.

In house experts/
authorized Third Parties
shall be hired which will
be a part of the preproject activities.

During
commissioning
phase

Capital Cost includes


cost of Installation of
acoustic enclosures by
technology provider.
Recurring Cost includes
Monitoring cost of
regular Noise
measurements.

During
Operation
phase

Capital Cost includes


cost of Installation of
acoustic enclosures by
technology provider.
Recurring Cost includes
Monitoring cost of
regular Noise
measurements.

During
Operation
phase

Capital Cost includes


cost of Installation of
acoustic enclosures by
technology provider.
Recurring Cost includes
Monitoring cost of
regular Noise
measurements.

Impacting Activity

Mitigation Measures

C1
Project Design

Design & selection of


reactors/ equipment /
site layouts, etc.

Re-designing

--

Project Construction

Commissioning
Startup and shutdown
activities like operation
of equipment for
Technical Grade
Pesticides namely
Herbicides, Insecticides,
Fungicides & Plant
Growth Regulator.

SOP's, OCP and OEP will be


followed during startup.
Acoustic enclosures will be
built-in with equipment by
technology provider. PPE
like Ear Plugs & ear muffs
will be provided and its use
shall be ensured.

Noise Levels

Once during
startup

ISLM 100

All plants

Plant Incharge & Third


Party/Contractor

Regular
Maintenance
of equipment
to be done.

0.5

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides
and Fungicides.

PPE like Ear Plugs & ear


muffs will be provided and
its use shall be ensured. No
operators shall be allowed
to do 2 continuous shifts.

Noise Levels

ISLM 100

Once a Month

Plant Area

Contractor / Third
Party

Regular
Maintenance
of equipment
to be done.

1.5

General & Utilities


Operation of other
utilities like Boilers,
Thermic Fluid Heaters,
DG Sets, Cooling Tower,
Compressor, Pumps,
Blowers etc.

SOP's, OCP and OEP will be


followed during startup.
Acoustic enclosures will be
built-in with equipment by
technology provider. PPE
like Ear Plugs & ear muffs
will be provided and its use
shall be ensured.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Noise Levels

ISLM 100

Once a Month

Utilities Area (2
locations within
plant)

Contractor / Third
Party

Regular
Maintenance
of equipment
to be done.

2.5

0.5

Capital Cost (in Lacs)

12.5

During Commissioning phase.

Recurring Cost (in Lacs)

2.5

During Operation phase.

Total Cost for EMP (in Lacs)

15

--

201

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Table 6-4: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Water Environment


Implementation and Management
Project Activity

Operation Controls /
Mitigation Measures

C1

Data Analysis

Measurement
Methodology

Frequency

C2

C3

C4

C5

Approve and Standard Design of


ETP, RO and MEE shall be
procured from Authorized
vendors to meet environmental
standards.

Design specification of
ETP, RO & MEE &
receiving statutory
permissions for ZLD/
Final Discharge in
CETP drain.

In house
Technical
Experts.

During
Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.

Location

Reporting
Schedule /
Responsibility

Emergency
Procedure

Budget for
Mitigation
Measure (in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring
Cost (in
Lacs)

Procurement
Schedule

Remark

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Head Office /
At Site.

HSL officials /
vendors / statutory
authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.

--

During
designing
stage.

In house experts/
authorized Third Parties
shall be hired which will be
a part of the pre-project
activities.

Project Design

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Re-designing

--

Project Construction

Construction

Influx of construction workers

Generated Sewage will be


diverted to ETP for further
treatment.

--

--

--

--

--

--

10

During
Construction
Phase

Capital cost include cost of


sanitary Facility and line
for diverting it in ETP.
Recurring cost is for
regular cleaning of the
same to avoid over flow.

Manual

Once per
running Batch

After
Secondary and
Tertiary
treatment.

ETP In charge /
Third Party

Plant load will


be lowered.

300

25

During
Operation
Phase

Capital Cost for ETP, RO &


MEE. Recurring cost is for
maintaining the same.

1.5

During
Construction
Phase

Capital Cost includes cost


for Dyke walls and
pumping system.
Recurring cost is for
maintaining the dyke.

4.5

During
Operation
Phase

Capital Cost for Online pH


and Flow meter. Recurring
cost is for maintaining the
same.

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides


Operation of Reactors of
Herbicides, Insecticides and
Fungicides.

Properly designed effluent drains


with side barriers will be provided
& inflow will be diverted to ETP,
RO & MEE for further treatment.

COD, pH, TSS, TDS &


Ammonical Nitrogen.

General & Utilities


Operation of other utilities like
Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters,
DG Sets, Cooling Tower,
Compressor, Pumps, Blowers
etc.

Dyke wall will be provided and


leaked fuel shall be immediately
transferred to the spare tank.

Quantity of leakage

Operation of ETP, RO & MEE.

Treated waste water shall be


reused and reutilized in the
process to achieve ZLD.

COD, pH, TSS, TDS &


Ammonical Nitrogen.

Manual

Manual

Capital Cost (in Lacs)

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

During Leakage

Near Affected
Area

Plant Incharge, HSL

Leakages to be
pumped back
in spare tank.

Daily

At System
Outlet

ETP & Laboratory


Incharge

Collection and
divert for
reprocess.

15

325

During Commissioning phase.

Recurring Cost (in Lacs)

32

During Operation phase.

Total Cost for EMP (in Lacs)

357

--

202

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Table 6-5: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Land Environment


Implementation and Management
Project Activity

Operation Controls / Mitigation


Measures

C1

Data Analysis

Measurement
Methodology

Frequency

C2

C3

C4

C5

Properly designed storage area for hazardous


waste with adequate capacity will be ensured.
Prior permissions for TSDF will be taken and
prior agreements with authorized vendors
shall be made.

Design
specification of
storage area for
HW & receiving
statutory
permissions.

In house
Technical
Experts.

During
Designing,
erecting and
commissioning
stage.

Location

Reporting
Schedule /
Responsibility

Emergency
Procedure

Budget for
Mitigation
Measure (in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring
Cost (in
Lacs)

Procurement
Schedule

Remark

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Head Office
/ At Site.

HSL officials /
vendors / statutory
authorities
sanctioning, stage
wise, the project's
technical aspects.

--

During
designing
stage.

In house experts/
authorized Third Parties
shall be hired which will
be a part of the preproject activities.

During
Operation
phase

Capital Cost for storage


facility and Membership
fees for disposing of
HW to TSDF and
Incineration facility.
Recurring cost for
handling HW and
maintaining the storage
facility.

Project Design

Design & selection of reactors/


equipment / site layouts, etc.

Redesigning

--

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides


Operation of Reactors of Herbicides,
Insecticides and Fungicides.

Process residue will be sent to authorized


landfill facility/ vendors.

Condensation, Distillation,
Extraction, Separation,
Crystallization, Filtration, Drying &
Washings activities.

Spent solvents will be sent to solvent


recovery units. Spent catalyst will be send to
recyclers/ regeneration /reactivation. Spent
carbon & used filter materials will be sent to
TSDF. Distillation residues & expired date and
off specification products will be sent for
incineration.

Records of
trucks carrying
HW.

Number of
trucks:
Manually.
Weight of truck:
Weight stand.

During
dispatch

Main Gate

Utility and Security


Incharge.

Storage for
atleast 15
days will be
provided.

15

General & Utilities


Storage of fuel, Class A Solvents,
Raw material, Finished products and
Hazardous waste.

Discarded container, drums, packing material


etc. shall be decontaminated and sold to
authorized vendors.

Operation of other utilities like


Boilers, Thermic Fluid Heaters, DG
Sets, Cooling Tower, Compressor,
Pumps, Blowers etc.

Used/spent oil will be sold to GPCB authorized


Recyclers, Waste/residue containing oil
disposed off to CHWIF. Contaminated hand
gloves, discarded containers / barrels / bags
shall be sold to authorized vendors.

Operation of ETP, RO & MEE

Generated Sludge will be collected, stored


and disposed to TSDF facility as per HW rules
amended till date.

Records of
trucks carrying
HW.

Number of
trucks:
Manually.
Weight of truck:
Weight stand.

During
dispatch

Main Gate

Utility and Security


Incharge.

Storage for
atleast 15
days will be
provided.

10

Used/spent oil will be sold to GPCB authorized


Recyclers.
Equipment maintenance

Capital Cost for storage


facility and Membership
fees for disposing of
HW to TSDF and
Incineration facility.
Recurring cost for
handling HW and
maintaining the storage
facility.

Scraps, used spare2ws, cotton waste,


contaminated hand gloves, discarded
containers / barrels / bags shall be sold to
authorized vendors.

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Capital Cost (in Lacs)

25

During Commissioning phase.

Recurring Cost (in Lacs)

During operation phase.

Total Cost for EMP (in Lacs)

30

--

203

M/S. HETBAN SPECHEM LIMITED

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Table 6-6: Budgetary Environment Monitoring Plan for Ecology and Biodiversity
Implementation and Management

Project Activity

Operation
Controls /
Mitigation
Measures

Data
Analysis

Measurement
Methodology

Frequency

Location

Reporting Schedule
/ Responsibility

Emergency Procedure

Budget for
Mitigation Measure
- (in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring Cost
(in Lacs)

Procurement
Schedule

Remark

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

Tree
plantation
Counts

Manual

Once during
plantation

At site

Site Incharge

During Construction
phase

Capital Cost includes


Cost for saplings in and
around project site.

Project Operation

Technical Grade Pesticides

Operation of
Reactors of
Herbicides,
Insecticides and
Fungicides.

Thick Green belt


will be developed
around project site
to avoid depositions
of HCl, NH3, HBr on
nearby scrubs on
barren land.

Status
Survey of
Schedule-I
species
(Peacock)

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

Manual Field
Survey

Minimum of 17.5% Green belt


shall be maintained against
9.0% required by GIDC.

Once in a year

LIZ

0.847

0.153

Recurring cost includes


Maintenance cost of
green belt & Annual
Status survey.

During Operation
Phase

Environment Cell

Capital Cost (in Lacs)

0.847

During Commissioning phase.

Recurring Cost (in Lacs)

0.153

During Operation phase.

Total Cost for EMP (in Lacs)

1.0

--

204

M/S. HETBAN
SPECHEM LIMITED

6.6

DRAFT EIA & EMP REPORT - GREENFIELD PROJECT - MFG. OF VARIOUS


TECHNICAL GRADE PESTICIDES AT DAHEJ II INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING PROGRAM

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT COST

Total cost of the project is ~ INR 31.10 Crore. Expenditure to be incurred by HSL on environmental
monitoring and management including capital cost of ~ INR 451.85 Lacs and ~ INR 51.15 Lacs
recurring cost is tabulated in Table 6-7.

Table 6-7: Environmental Monitoring and Management Cost


S
No.

Head

Approximate
Capital cost
(INR in Lacs)

Approximate
Recurring cost per
Annum (INR in
Lacs)

Basis for Cost Estimates

Capital cost: Installation of Scrubbers,


Bag filters and Stacks of various
heights, Online sensors, VOC meter.

Recurring cost: Annual Cost for


1

Air Pollution
Control &
Monitoring

88.5

11.5

repairs / maintenance of all APC


equipment, monitoring of AAQM at the
project site for parameters as per CCA
& at Gelanda (Summer), Jolwa (Other
season except monsoon) by hiring third
party and payment of various statutory
fees to regulatory agencies.

Capital cost: Installation of acoustic


2

Noise Pollution
Control

12.5

2.5

enclosures by technology provider.

Recurring cost: Monitoring cost of


regular Noise measurements.

Capital cost: Installation of ETP, RO,

Water Pollution
Control &
monitoring

325

32

MEE including all instruments, tanks,


pumps, pipelines, layout of effluent &
storm water drains.

Recurring cost: Maintenance cost to


run ETP, RO, MEE, cleanup of drains.
Monitoring cost of effluent and waste
water.

Capital cost: Cost of Hazardous waste


4

Solid and
Hazardous waste
management

Storage Facility.
25

Recurring cost: Membership fees for


TSDF & Incinerator Facility. Disposal &
transportation cost.

Capital cost: Cost for saplings in and


5

Ecology and
Biodiversity

0.85

0.15

around project site.

Recurring cost: Maintenance of green


belt & & Annual Status survey.

Total Amount in Lacs

451.85

KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS | FEBRUARY, 2016

51.15

205

Anda mungkin juga menyukai