in Collection Care
Agnes Brokerhof
Sector Moveable Heritage Research
Heritage
Management
Use
Operate value
Heritage
Cultural value
Meaning
Significance
Development
Preservation
Increase value
Heritage management
is making
well-argued decisions
about the
allocation of resources
to
most effectively
and
efficiently
achieve our goal:
optimum
accessible value.
Karlstad 21 November 2013
Values
Cultural history
Historic
Artistic
Information
Social
Societal
Experience
Use
Museum
Economic
7
Value assessment
Frame of reference: international
Attributes
State
Completeness or Ensemble
Provenance
Cultural history
Historic
Artistic
Information
Social
Societal
Experience
Use
Museum
Economic
Overall evaluation
8
+
o
+
+
o
+
o
+
o
+
o
+
+
o
o
-
+
+
+
o
+
+
+
Heritage
Management
Use
Operate value
RISK
RISK
Heritage
Cultural value
Meaning
Significance
Development
Preservation
Increase value
Physical forces
Pests
10
Light, UV, IR
Water
Fire
Dissociation
11
Physical forces
Thieves & Vandals
Fire
Water
Pests & Weeds
Handling
Preventive conservation
Registration
Documentation
Processes
Cumulative
Financial risks
Reputational risks
Preservation
risks
Business risks
Economical risks
13
Political risks
Karlstad 21 November 2013
14
Risk assessment
Risk Identification
Risk Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Risk Treatment
15
Establish context
16
Source
Cause
17
Path
Mechanism
Object
Effect
Scenario:
200 lx
3000 h/y
How soon?
How sensitive? ISO 3 1 jnf after 3,000,000 lx.h
What is light dosis? 200 x 3000 = 600,000 lx.h/y = 1 jnf in 5 years
How bad?
How much significance/value does the object lose?
How important is the object in the collection we assess?
18
Scenario:
How bad?
Where can material be lost?
How much significance/value will be lost?
How soon?
How can it lose material? How much?
How likely is that to happen?
19
Scenario:
How soon?
Level of security? Theft statistics?
What is likelihood of theft?
How bad?
Total loss of object?
How important is object in collection we asses?
20
Probability X Impact
How soon / often? X How bad?
rarefrequentconstant X mild-significant-catastrophic
21
Catastrophic
Significant
Mild
Impact
Rare
Frequent
Probability
22
Constant
23
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
24
25
Which method?
Choose
between
two
options
26
Confection
sizes
Tailor made
to fit
Which method?
As simple as possible
Outcome is worth the effort
Fit to suit the reason why you do it
Form that is understood by those you want to reach
Choose between
option A or B
27
Prioritize for
preservation strategy
Take away
the cause
Secure the
pathway
Reduce
the effect
28
Risk Treatment
Can you reach your goal with acceptable risk?
Do you need to reduce risks?
Which risks?
Why?
Biggest risk
Biggest uncertainty
And how?
29
Cost-effective
Sustainable
1
0
Within organisation
With stakeholders
With experts
With public
Karlstad 21 November 2013
In conclusion
If we want to be able to make well-argued decisions
about the allocation of resources to most effectively
and efficiently achieve our goal,
of passing on the heritage that is given in our care
to next generations with optimum accessible value,
then we need to assess and understand the value,
and assess and manage the risks to our heritage,
in a cost-effective manner.
31
Nice to read
Ashley-Smith, J. (1999) Risk assessment for object conservation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 358 pp.
Brokerhof, A.W. et al. (2005) Risk Assessment of Museum Amstelkring: Application to an historic building
and its collections and the consequences for preservation management; in Preprints of the 14th ICOM-CC
Triennial Meeting, The Hague, pp. 590-596.
Brokerhof, A.W. et al. (2013) Het Digitale Handboek Collectie-Risicomanagement; Rijksdienst voor het
Cultureel Erfgoed; http://www.cultureelerfgoed.nl/digitale-handboek-collectierisicomanagement.
Blow, A.E. (2010) Collection management using preservation risk assessment; Journal of the Institute of
Conservation, 33(1):65-78.
Blow, A.E. (2009) 'Risk Management as a Strategic Driver for a large Archive'; Collections - A Journal for
Museums and Archives Professionals, 5(9):61-72.
ISO 31000 (2009) Risk Management-Principles and Guidelines; International Organisation for Standarisation;
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43170
Michalski, S. (1994) A systematic approach to preservation: description and integration with other museum
activities; Preprints of the Contributions to the Ottawa Congress, 12 16 September 1994, Preventive
Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research, A. Roy and P. Smith (Eds.), IIC, London, pp. 8-11.
Versloot, A. (2010) Risk Assessment; Museum Our Lord in the Attic, Amsterdam, 48pp.
http://www.opsolder.nl/admin/pdf/Risico-analyseOLHoS-ENG.pdf
Waller, R.R. (1994) Conservation risk assessment: A strategy for managing resources for preventive
conservation. Preprints of the Contributions to the Ottawa Congress, 12 16 September 1994, Preventive
Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research, A. Roy and P. Smith (Eds.), IIC, London, pp. 12-16.
http://www.museum-sos.org/docs/WallerOttawa1994.pdf
Waller, R.R. (2003) Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model: Development and Application to Preventive
Conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Gteborg Studies in Conservation 13, ISSN 0284-6578;
ISBN 91-7346-475-9 Gteborg Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Gteborg; xvi + 189 pp.
32