Anda di halaman 1dari 7

Culturally Responsive Practices Glossary

Culturally responsive practices are an approach to teaching; they are a part of the skill, craft, and art of
teaching. They are the practice of taking the best of teaching methods and applying them to teaching
students whose culture differs from the dominant culture in our society and school system.
Gloria Ladson-Billings of the University of Wisconsin-Madison coined the term cultural relevancy in
1994. Cultural relevancy is a way of teaching that empowers students intellectually, socially,
emotionally, and politically by using culture to impart knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
Key components of culturally responsive practices are:

Teachers who are culturally competent about their students cultural beliefs and practices

Teachers who think of all of their students as capable learners, have high expectations for them,
and help the students set short- and long-term goals for themselves

Teachers who know each student and draw on the students own experiences to help them
learn

Teachers who have a wide variety of teaching strategies and skills to engage the students

Teachers who can help the students deal with the inequitable treatment of students of color
and other underserved populations by helping them become critically conscious and
knowledgeable about the students culture

Teachers who can create a bridge between the students home and school lives while meeting
district and state curricular requirements (Ladson-Billings, 1994)

The following terms are designed to provide foundational context related to cultural diversity as well as
represent some of the challenges that can arise in diverse school contexts (e.g., privilege, power
differences, inequitable distribution of resources, and classism). The following terms reflect the
practices that can be used to provide culturally responsive practices within an RtI framework.
Belonging describes students feeling personally accepted, respected, included, and supported by others
in the school environment (Goodenow, 1993).
Community building in education must extend beyond popular commentary and advocacy into action.
Community will engage many individuals ideas and actions, not just those of teachers, parents, and
legislators. It also will involve the reflective interactions of students as agents, not as objects or actors
(Davis, 2002).

The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Connectedness in school refers to an academic environment in which students believe that adults in
the school care about their learning and about them as individuals (Blum, 2005). Through the
development of a relationship where trust is evident, students have relationships with their peers,
educators, other families, the community, and their studies.
Cultural competence for educators includes: (a) believing that all students will learn; (b) knowing the
community where the school is located; (c) understanding all people have a unique world view; (d) using
curriculum that is respectful of and relevant to the cultures represented in its student body; (e) being
alert to the ways that culture affects who we are; (f) placing the locus of responsibility on the
professional and the institution; (g) examining systems, structures, policies, and practices for their
impact on all students and families; and (h) standing up to challenge and ameliorating prejudice and
discrimination (Liang, 2009).
Cultural proficiency is an approach that demonstrates the practitioner has the self-awareness to
recognize how he or shebecause of ethnicity, culture, and life experiencesmay affect others, as well
as what the practitioner offers to others. Being culturally proficient allows the practitioner to use
teachable moments to share and learn from others (Davis, 2007). Through culturally proficient
knowledge, the practitioner affects policies and practices of a school/district or the values and behaviors
that enable the practitioner or school to interact effectively in a culturally diverse environment. A
culturally proficient practitioner possesses and works to build on his or her contextualized knowledge of
culture, community, and identity of children and families as the core of his or her teaching practice.
Culturally proficient practitioners possess a multicultural competence that incorporates a deep and
sophisticated understanding of race, racism, and the contemporary contexts of schooling (Murrell,
N.D.).
Cultural relevance is evident through the integration of cultural knowledge, prior experiences, and
performance styles of diverse learners to make learning more appropriate and effective for them; it
teaches to and through the strengths of these learners. Culturally relevant instruction integrates a wide
variety of instructional strategies that are connected to different approaches to learning (CCSSOITASC,
2011).
Culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogy is the validation and affirmation of the homes
cultural and linguistic behaviors of the students through selected instructional practices for the purposes
of building and bridging the student to increased success in the cultural and linguistic demands of
academia (school) and mainstream society (Hollie, 2012).
Culturally relevant pedagogy requires teachers to empower students through teaching and using
cultural referents to maximize students learning and educational outcomes. As cited by Garcia, Gloria
Ladson-Billings outlines three criteria for culturally relevant pedagogy:

The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

An ability to develop students academically. This means effectively helping students read, write,
speak, compute, pose and solve higher order problems, and engage in peer review of problem
solutions.

A willingness to nurture and support cultural competence in both home and school cultures. The
key for teachers is to value and build on skills that students bring from the home culture.

The development of a sociopolitical or critical consciousness. Teachers help students recognize,


critique, and change social inequities (Garcia, 2010).

Culture describes how we live on a daily basis in terms of our language, ancestry, religion, food, dress,
musical tastes, traditions, values, political and social affiliations, recreation, and so on (Singleton, 2006).
Equality is the state of alikeness in quantity, degree, and/or value. Applied to education, this means
providing the same educational resources to everyone (OECD, 2007).
Equity is the quality of being fair or impartial. Applied to education, this means accommodating and
meeting specific needs to ensure equal educational opportunity. Students of all cultures, languages,
classes, races, ethnic backgrounds, disabilities, religions, genders, sexual orientations, and other
diversity factors have equal educational opportunities (OECD, 2007).
Fairness is being free from injustice or bias. Applied to education, this can be considered a subcomponent of equity and means that personal and social circumstances (e.g., gender, SES, and ethnicity)
should not be an obstacle to achieving educational potential. Fairness refers to the educational
environment in which persons have the possibility of choice according to their own developmental
potential, abilities, and talent, and not on the basis of prejudice, educational stereotypes, expectations
of the environment, or discrimination, which opens up economic and social opportunities regardless of
developmental potential, gender, age, ethnic or racial belonging, or social status (OECD, 2007).
Fill building includes the participation in professional development used to:

Build background knowledge around history, culture, philosophy, and experience of


underserved student populations

Support understanding of historical contexts for accessing learning

Support understanding of what is not known (Hollie, 2012).

Identity in education is defined as a commitment that embodies beliefs and values concerning the aims
and the process of education against the background of basic convictions about what is right and good
for the individual and the society (www.policyarchive.org).

The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Identity development reflects the actions and arrangements that encourage productive self-exploration
and self-definition. Literature and topic selections related to social justice and the students
backgrounds are particularly important.

Race is a social construct based on visible physical features, as well as historical and political
characteristics. In the United States the general public tends to recognize five primary racial groups
Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, White, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian/Alaskan Native).
o

Racial identity attitudes are complex in that they can be reflected in an individuals
strong involvement in racially related activities and positive feelings of self-worth, or
seen in another individuals self-loathing behaviors and intense feelings of inferiority.
Individuals from the same racial group can exhibit a great deal of variance with respect
to their racial identity (Cross, 1971, 1991, 2001).

Ethnicity refers to a characterization of a group of people who see themselves and are seen by
others as having a common ancestry, shared history, shared traditions, and shared cultural traits such as
language, beliefs, values, music, dress, and food.
Intersectionality is a tool for analysis, advocacy, and policy development that addresses multiple
discriminations and helps us understand how different sets of identities impact access to rights and
opportunities (Symington, 2004).
Multicultural education is a lifelong learning process designed to empower all students to become
knowledgeable, caring, and active participants in their communities. Education that is multicultural is
inclusive and respectful of all ethnic, racial, and cultural backgrounds and engages staff, families,
students, and community.
Multicultural education is based on the following:

Everyone has culture.

Multicultural education is respectful and inclusive of each students cultural heritage and
learning styles.

A respectful learning environment is one that promotes success for all.

Everyone has a stake and a responsibility in their education.

Students from all ethnic, racial, and cultural backgrounds are active participants in their
learning.

Everyone has a right to an equitable education.

Infusion is throughout the curriculum and the culture of the school (Oregon DoE, N.D.)

The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Risk ratio compares one racial/ethnic groups risk of receiving special education and related services to
that of all other students. The risk ratio can be used to calculate disproportionality at both the state and
district levels (Bollmer, 2007).
School climate/school culture refers to the quality and character of school life that is based on the
patterns of students, parents, and school personnels experiences of school life and reflects norms,
goals, values, interpersonal relationships, teaching aligned learning practices, and organizational
structures (NSCC, N.D.).
Skill building is bridging newfound knowledge to pedagogical approaches including a focus on four areas
of instruction including culturally and linguistically responsive classroom management, academic
vocabulary/language, academic literacy, and learning environment (Hollie, 2012).
Underserved population(s) is represented by any student who is not successful academically, socially,
and/or behaviorally in school (Hollie, 2012).
Will building is the power of making a reasoned choice. It is characterized by determination, a certain
attitude, or a particular desire or choice. Will building includes:

Aligning philosophy

Managing frustration

Creating a culture of collaboration

Institutionalizing a healthy culture

Analyzing data

Building leadership teams

Building capacity at the district/school level for the work (Muhammad, 2012)

The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Reference List
Blum, R. W. (2005). The case for school connectedness. The Adolescent Learner, 62 (7).
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/apr05/vol62/num07/A-Case-for-SchoolConnectedness.aspx.
Bollmer, J. Bethel, J., Garrison-Mogren, R. and Brauen, M. (2007). Using the risk ratio to assess
racial/ethnic disproportionality in special education at the school-district level. Journal of Special
Education, 41 (3).
Cross, Jr., W. E. (1971). The negro-to-black conversion experience. Black World, 20 (9), 1327.
Cross, Jr., W. E. (1991). Shades of Black: Diversity in African-American Identity (Philadelphia: Temple
University Press).
Cross, Jr., W. E. and Vandiver, B. J. (2001). Nigrescence theory and measurement: Introducing the crossracial identity scale (CRIS). Handbook of Multicultural Counseling, 2nd Ed.(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Davis, B.M. (2005). How to Teach Students Who Dont Look Like You: Culturally Relevant Teaching
Strategies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin)
Davis, O.L. (2002). Editorial/on community. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18 (1).
Fairness of the education system, accessed January 16, 2014, http://www.seeeducoop.net/education_in/pdf/chal-educ-reform-ser-08-ser-enl-t02.pdf.
Garcia, M. (2010). An introduction to culturally relevant pedagogy, Teaching Tolerance, accessed August
26, 2014, http://www.tolerance.org/blog/introduction-culturally-relevant-pedagogy.
Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale
development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30 (1).
Hollie, S. (2012). Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Teaching and Learning: Classroom Practices for
Student Success (Huntington Beach: Shell Education).
Council of Chief State School Officers Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (2011).
InTASC model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue.
http://www.ccsso.org/documents/2011/intasc_model_core_teaching_standards_2011.pdf.
Ladson-Billings, Gloria (1994). The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African American Children. (San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing).
Liang, X. and Zhang, G., (2009). Indicators to evaluate pre-service teachers cultural competence.
Evaluation and Research in Education 22 (1) and the state of Washingtons Office of Public Instruction.
The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Lindsey, R. B., Nuri Robins, K. and Terrell, R. D. (2003). Cultural Proficiency: A Manual for School Leaders
(Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press); Davis 2007.
Muhammad, A. and Hollie, S. , (2012). The Will to Lead, the Skill to Teach: Transforming Schools at Every
Level (Bloomington: Solution Tree Press).
Murrell, Jr., P.C. (N.D.). Concept paper for discussion: Defining the community teacher, accessed August
26, 2014, http://acts-alliance.org/resources/Murrell/CommunityTeacherConceptPaper.pdf
Oregon Department of Education, s.v. Multicultural Education, accessed January 6, 2014,
http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=2575
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, (2007). Education at a Glance 2007. (Paris:
OECD Publications).
School Climate, National School Climate Center, accessed January 6, 2014,
http://www.schoolclimate.org/climate/.
Singleton, G. E. and Linton, C. Courageous Conversations About Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity
in Schools (Thousand Oaks: Corwin, 2006).
Symington, A., (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice, Womens Rights and
Economic Change 9, accessed September 15, 2014:
https://lgbtq.unc.edu/sites/lgbtq.unc.edu/files/documents/intersectionality_en.pdf

The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this
federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the
Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai