Anda di halaman 1dari 78

Introduction to Analog Layout

Design
Dr. S. L. Pinjare

Workshop on Advanced VLSI Laboratory


Cambridge Institute of Technology, Bangalore
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog VLSI Design


Implementation of analog circuits and systems using
integrated circuit technology.
Unique Features of Analog IC Design
Geometry
an important part of the design
Usually implemented as a mixed analog-digital circuit
Typically Analog is 20% and digital 80% of the chip area
Designed at the circuit level
Customized design
Analog requires 80% of the design time
Passes for success: 2-3 for analog, 1 for digital.
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog Design Flow

Electrical Design
Physical Design
Fabrication and Testing
Product

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog Design Flow


Electrical Design

Idea Concept
Define the Design

Comparison with the


Design Specification

Redesign

Implementation
Simulation

Physical
Design

Fabrication
Testing and Product
Development
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog Design Flow


Electrical Design

Idea Concept
Define the Design

Comparison with the


Design Specification

Redesign

Implementation
Simulation

Physical
Design

Physical Implementation-Layout
Physical Verification-DRC,ERC,LVS,Antenna
Parasitic Extraction and Back Annotation

Fabrication
Testing and Product
Development
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog Design Flow


Electrical Design

Idea Concept
Define the Design

Comparison with the


Design Specification

Redesign

Implementation
Simulation

Physical
Design

Physical Implementation-Layout
Physical Verification-DRC,ERC,LVS,Antenna
Parasitic Extraction and Back Annotation

Fabrication
Testing and Product
Development
30 April 2011

Fabrication

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog Design Flow


Electrical Design

Idea Concept
Define the Design

Comparison with the


Design Specification

Redesign

Implementation
Simulation

Physical
Design

Physical Implementation-Layout
Physical Verification-DRC,ERC,LVS,Antenna
Parasitic Extraction and Back Annotation

Fabrication
Testing and Product
Development
30 April 2011

Fabrication
Testing
Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

PRODUCT
7

Skills Required for Analog IC Design


In general, analog circuits are more complex than
digital.
Requires an ability to use multiple concepts simultaneously.
Be able to make appropriate simplifications and assumptions.
Need to have good knowledge of both modeling and
technology.
Be able to use simulation correctly.
(Usage of a simulator)x(Common sense)=Constant
Simulators are only as good as the models and the knowledge of those
models.
all models are wrong, some are useful

Be able to learn from failure.


30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog layout Issues


Issues that are important in digital circuits are still
important in analog layout.
Eg. Parasitic aware layout.
Minimize series resistance
slows down switching speed plus introduces unwanted noise.
Minimize parasitic capacitance
slows down switching speed
Increases power dissipation(Capacitance switching)
Extra load capacitance
Need to increase bias current to maintain bandwidth and/or slew
rate.
Can lead to instability in high gain feedback systems.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Analog layout Issues


Noise is important in all analog circuits because it limits
dynamic range.
In general there are two types of noise,
Random noise and
Environmental noise.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

10

Analog layout Issues


Random noise refers to noise generated by resistors and
active devices in an integrated circuit;
MULTI-GATE FINGER LAYOUT
reduces the gate resistance of the poly-silicon and the
neutral body region, which are both random noise
sources.
Generous use of SUBSTRATE PLUGS
will help to reduce the resistance of the neutral body
region, and thus will minimize the noise contributed by
this resistance.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

11

Analog layout Issues


Environmental noise
Crosstalk; Ground bounce etc.
Generally appears as a common-mode signal.
Use fully-differential circuit design,

Substrate noise occurs when a large amount digital circuits are


present on a chip. The switching of a large number of circuits
discharges large dynamic currents to the substrate, which
cause the substrate voltage to bounce.
The modulation of the substrate voltage can then couple
into analog circuits via the body effect or parasitic
capacitances.
SUBSTRATE PLUGGING
minimizes substrate noise because it provides a low
impedance path to ground for the noise current.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

12

Analog layout Issues


Matching components
In analog electronics it is often necessary to have
matched pairs of devices with identical electrical
properties, e.g. input transistors of a differential stage,
and current mirror
In theory two device with the same size have the same
electrical properties.
In reality there is always process variations

Matching:
Layout techniques to minimize the errors introduced by
process variations.
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

13

Analog Design components


Active devices
Transistors
N-mos and P-mos

Passives
Resistors
Capacitors
Inductors
Implemented using existing layers and masks
Possibly adding a few extra layers

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

14

Analog Design Layout considerations


Design rules
Allowance Errors in patterning and etching
Minimum width
Minimum spacing
Minimum enclosure
Minimum extension

Process variability
Parameter variation across the chip

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

15

Design rules
Minimum width
The minimum width of polygon defines the limits of a fabrication process.
A violation of the minimum width rules potentially results in an open
circuit in the offending layer.
An open circuit may be created during fabrication.
A narrow path may be created during fabrication
large currents passing through a narrow path cause the path to act
like a fuse.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

16

Design rules
Minimum spacing:
To avoid an unwanted short circuit between two polygons
during fabrication,
S1 > Smin, where Smin is set by process.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

17

Design rules
Minimum enclosure:
Apply to polygons on different layers.
Misalignment between polygons may result in either
unwanted open or short circuit connections.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

18

Design rules
Minimum extension:
Some geometries must extend beyond the edge of others by a
minimum value.
Eg. Gate poly must have a minimum extension beyond the
active area to ensure proper transistor action at the edge.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

19

Design Rules
Example of the design rules applying to the POLY layer
C3.4 POLY:
Gate Structures and resistors are defined by the poly layer. Minimum design rules
are used for the polylayer. i.e. this is the minimum feature size for this process.
A 1.5 m,(minimum polywidth /Length).
B 1.5 m,(minimum poly to poly distance).
C 1.5 m,(minimum poly-over-oxide overlap).

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

20

Unit Matching
Two electrically equivalent components.
Draw them identically

Both item and surrounding


A and B have same shape in area and perimeter
Identical item?
Do they have the same surrounding?

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

21

Unit Matching
Two electrically equivalent components.
Draw them identically

Both item and surrounding


A and B have same shape in area and perimeter
Identical item?
Do they have the same surrounding?
No
Use Dummies to have identical surroundings

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

22

Common-centroid layout
Process variations can locally be approximated with a
linear gradient.
(a): A1 + A2 < B1 + B2
(b): A1 + A2 = B1 + B2 (common-centroid)

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

23

Resistors
All materials have a resistivity
Typical resistivities

Metal layer : 0.1 Ohm/square


n/p-plus contacts and polysilicon: 10-100 Ohm/square
n-well: 1000 Ohm/square
low doped poly silicon: 10 k Ohm/square
more well defined than n-well, i.e. higher accuracy

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

24

Poly-Resistors
Poly Resistors
Silicidated poly resistors: 1 10 Ohm/sq.
30%
Non-silicidated poly resistors: 50-1000 Ohms per unit area .
Small parasitic capacitances to substrate.
Superior linearity.
High cost due to the extra mask needed to block silicide
layer.
20%

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

25

Diffusion Resistors
1k Ohm/sq
N-well
Large parasitic capacitance between n-well and substrate.
Resistance is strongly terminal voltage-dependent and
highly nonlinear.
Depletion width varies with terminal voltages.The
cross-section area varies with terminal voltages
Large error : 40%
noisy as all disturbances/noise from substrate can be
coupled directly onto the resistors

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

26

Resistor Layout
Standard Resistors: Avoid 90 degree angle. 45 degree is
recommended

1. Resistance at the corners cannot


be estimated accurately

Recommended resistor
layout

2. Current flow at the corner is not


uniform
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

27

Resistor Layout
Dummy resistors are added to
minimizes the effect of
process variation

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

28

Shielded Resistors
Shielding resistors
Connected to a constant voltage
source
Prevent self-coupling of the
resistor R/inter-coupling
with others.

Layout of shielded resistors


(S = shielding resistors)

Widely used in analog/RF


design.
Caution
a mutual capacitance between
the resistor and its shield exist.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

29

Layout of Large Resistors


Use n-well resistors
have a large sheet resistance.

Enclosed by a substrate shielding ring, also known as guard ring,


to isolate the resistors from neighboring devices.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

30

Layout of Matched Resistors


Inter-Digitized Layout
minimizes the effect of process variation in x-direction.

Dummy resistors are added to ensure both resistors have


the exactly same environment.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

31

Matched Resistors with Temperature Consideration


Keep away from power devices

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

32

Resistor layout guidelines-Matched resistors

Use same material


Identical geometry, same orientation
Close proximity, interdigitate arrayed resistors
Use dummy elements
Place resistors in Low stress area
Place resistors away from power devices
Use electrostatic shielding

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

33

Capacitors
There are naturally capacitors between each layer of
metal, poly silicon or silicon
Dielectrics between different metal layers have a
thickness of 0.5-1 micron, which gives a rather large
area for a given capacitance.
Key Parameters

Linearity
Parasitic capacitance to substrate
Series resistance - resistance of capacitor plates
Capacitance per unit area
Larger specific capacitance (capacitance per unit area)
gives smaller area

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

34

Types of IC Capacitors
Poly-diffusion capacitors
Nonlinear bottom-plate parasitic
capacitance.20% of inter-plate
capacitance.
.6-.8 fF/m2(5%). Matching
0.2%

MOS capacitors
Stable capacitance in strong
inversion
Non-negligible channel
resistance lowers the quality
factor (Q) of the capacitor
0.6 - 0.8 fF/m2; (5%).
Matching 0.5%

30 April 2011

Poly-poly capacitors
Not available in standard
CMOS processes
0.3 - 0.5 fF/m2; (10%).
Matching 0.5%

Metal-poly capacitors
Capacitance is small, area
consuming.
0.03-0.05 fF/m2. (25%).
Matching 0.5%

Metal-metal capacitors
Capacitance is small, area
consuming
0.02-0.04 fF/m2; (25%).
Matching 0.1%

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

35

NON-IDEAL EFFECTS- UNDER-CUT


Non-uniform undercut &/or edge
fringing field effects change the
value of designed capacitors.
The area and perimeter ratio is
preserved if we use layout using
unit capacitors.

Case 1

Ideal case: no undercut


Case 1 Case 2
Area

1:4

1:4

Perimeter

1:2

1:4

Typical case: 0.05 undercut


Case 1 Case 2
Area

1:4.46

1:4

P erimeter

1:2.1

1:4

Case 2
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

36

NON-IDEAL EFFECTS-Corner Rounding


Etching always causes corner
rounding to some extent.
This means that
90 corners will be eroded and
270 corners will be have
incomplete removal of material

In order to overcome this


effect use an equal number of
90 & 270 corners

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

37

Layout of MOS Capacitors


Single finger structure
Large source/substrate & drain/substrate capacitances
Large gate series resistance

Minimize Gate Series Resistance & Channel Resistance


30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

38

Layout of MOS Capacitors


Minimize Gate Series Resistance & Channel Resistance
Use Multi-Finger Structure

Multi-finger structure minimizes source/substrate &


drain/substrate parasitic capacitances.
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

39

Layout of Matched Capacitors


Minimize the Effect of
Oxide Thickness in both
x and y-directions.
Common Centroid
Structure.
Dummy capacitors are
needed to ensure the same
environment for C1 and
C2.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

40

Layout of Matched Capacitors


C1 and C2 are 2-poly capacitors.
n-well is employed as a charge
collector to shield the interaction
between the bottom plate and
substrate.
n-well is biased at multiple
points and connected to a
constant voltage source.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

41

Layout of MOS Transistors


Criteria for MOS Transistor Layout
Minimize gate series resistance.
Minimize source/drain resistances.
Minimize source/substrate & drain/substrate parasitic
capacitances.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

42

Layout of MOS Transistors


Large gate series resistance
Most of the current will be
7.82.5Ohm/sq for typical 0.18
shrunk to this side
CMOS processes.
Large distributed resistance of
source/drain
6.82.5Ohm/sq for n+ and
7.22.5Ohm/sq for p+ in typical
0.18 CMOS processes.
Large source/substrate and drain/substrate
parasitic capacitances.
Non-uniform gate/source/drain voltages.
Non-uniform current flow
M1 carries the most current and Mn
carries the least current).

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

43

Layout of MOS Transistors


Minimize Source/Drain Resistances
Multiple contacts at source/drain
Better contact at source/drain high reliability & smaller contact
resistance (R = Rc/N, where N=number of contacts).
Smaller source/drain resistances (series resistance is negligible but
lateral resistance still exists).
Large source/substrate and drain/substrate parasitic capacitances.
Large gate series resistance- Gate is too long.
Contacts are not allowed on the gate above the channel (high
temperature required to form contacts may destroy the thin gate oxide).

Current is spread
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

44

Layout of MOS Transistors


Poly contact at both ends

Folding reduces gate


resistance

No of fingers:
Gate resistance < 0.1 to .5(1/gm)

Results in increase of parasitic capacitance


30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

45

Layout of MOS Transistors


Minimize Source/Substrate and Drain/Substrate Parasitic
Capacitances
Shared sources/drains.
Reduced silicon area.

Another layout
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

46

Antenna Effect
There will be charge accumulation on Metal1 during plasma
etching (of metal1) causing damage to thin gate oxide (Large
metal area)

Avoids antenna effect


30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

47

Layout of a Cascode circuit

a.

b.
30 April 2011

c.
Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

48

Layout of Wide transistors

Wide transistors need to be split


Parallel connection of n elements (n = 4 for this example)
Contact space is shared among transistors
Parasitic capacitances are reduced (important for high speed )

Note that parasitic capacitors are


lesser at the drain
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

49

Effect of wiring resistance

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

50

Layout of Matched Transistors


Matched transistors are used extensively in both analog
and digital CMOS circuits.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

51

Photo-lithographic invariance (PLI)


Lithography effects different in different direction
C and D are better

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

52

Photo-lithographic invariance (PLI)


Effect of shadowing
S/D implant often has an angle.
Drain/Source can be mirrored

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

53

Photo-lithographic invariance (PLI)


Effect of shadowing :
Gate aligned
Parallel gate:
Two drains have
different surroundings
Two sources have
different surroundings

30 April 2011

Orientation is important in analog


circuits for matching purposes

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

54

Layout of Matched Transistors


Add dummy
transistors to
improve
symmetry

Presence of Metal line over


M2 destroys symmetry

30 April 2011

Replicate Metal line over


M1 improves symmetry

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

55

Layout of Matched Transistors


Gradient along x-axis destroys symmetry

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

56

Matching - Summary
To achieve both common-centroid and PLI matched
transistors has to be split into 4 fingers.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

57

Matched Transistors
Matched transistors require elaborated layout techniques
Use inter-digitized layout style
Averages the process variations among transistors
Common terminal is like a serpentine

Uneven total drain area between M1 and M2.


This is undesirable for ac conditions: capacitors and other parameters may not be equal
A more robust approach is needed (Use dummies if needed)

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

58

Common Centroid Layouts

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

59

Common Centroid Layouts


Split into parallel connections of even parts
Half of them will have the drain at the right side and half at the left
Be careful how you route the common terminal

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

60

Differential Amplifier

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

61

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

62

Summary
Use large area to reduce random error
Common Centroid layout to reduce linear gradient
errors
Use unit element arrays
Interdigitize for matching
Use of symmetry (photolithographic invariance)
Dummy device for similar vicinity
Guard rings for isolation

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

63

References
A. Hastings, The Art of Analog Layout, PrenticeHall,2002.
B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits,
McGraw-Hill, 2001.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

64

Thank You

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

65

Simulation
To fully describe the function of a MOS transistor the
fundamental electro-magnetic equations are set up in 2D/3D.
Coupled non-linear partial deferential equations take long time to
solve.
Compact models are desired.
Simple mathematical relations that describes the relation between currents
and voltages.

There are 3 main types of models (for electrical devices and in


general).
Physical model parameters have physical meaning
Empirical parameters have no physical meaning (fitting parameters)
Table based measured data + interpolation functions

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

66

Simulation
Devices are characterized for a parameter window
where the model becomes valid.
Validity outside defined parameter window:
Physical: Good validity.
Empirical: Have difficulties outside the window and can in
some cases give preposterous results.
Table based Same or worse than empirical models.

Physical models with empirical fitting parameters are


common (semi-empirical).

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

67

SPICE
Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis
There are two sides of SPICE:
The simulator
The models

The simulator
A circuit is described with nodes and elements between nodes.
For linear circuits the matrix is solved using nodal admittance
analysis.
Non-linear circuits are solved using iterative methods.
The basic simulation types are OP, DC, AC and transient

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

68

SPICE simulations
OP Operating Point analysis.
Solves the currents and voltages in a circuit at one bias condition.

DC
Same as OP but does it for one or more swept parameters, e.g. IDS vs.
VDS

AC
Linearizes all elements at the bias point. Then a sinusodial signal is
applied on one or more inputs and the frequency is swept.
Note: since the circuit is linearized no saturation effects will occur
using AC.

Transient
One or more time varying signals (e.g. sinusodial, pulses, square waves)
are applied and the time is swept. This simulation does not linearize the
circuit so here saturation effects are present.
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

69

Latchup

Latchup may begin when Vout drops below GND due to a noise spike or an
improper circuit hookup (Vout is the base of the lateral NPN Q2). If sufficient
current flows through Rsub to turn on Q2 (I Rsub > 0.7 V ), this will draw
current through Rwell. If the voltage drop across Rwell is high enough, Q1
will also turn on, and a self-sustaining low resistance path between the power
rails is formed. If the gains are such that b1 x b2 > 1, latchup may occur. Once
latchup has begun, the only way to stop it is to reduce the current below a
critical level, usually by removing power from the circuit.
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

70

SPICE netlist
*** Top Level Netlist ***
M1 5 5 2 2 CMOSNB L=5u W=15u
M2 6 5 2 2 CMOSNB L=5u W=15u
R1 4 5 380k
VDD 3 0 DC 2.5v AC 0 0
Vout 1 0 DC 0
VSS 2 0 DC -2.5v AC 0 0
*** Control Statements ***
.DC VOUT -2.4 2.5 .1
.PRINT DC ALL
**** Spice models and macro models ****
.MODEL CMOSNB NMOS LEVEL=4 VFB=-9.73E-01
+LVFB=3.67E-01, WVFB=-4.72E-02, PHI=7.46E-01
+LPHI=-1.92E-24, WPHI=8.064E-24
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

71

SPICE models
The first MOS-models came in the begining of the 70's.

The first model was called Level 1 MOS model.


The model had 10 parameters (4 process and 6 electrical)
(TPG), TOX, NSUB and XJ from process
UO, VTO and LAMBDA , CGSO, CGDO, CGBO from
electrical
With a few minor differences the model is described by the
equations
.model Name_model NMOS Level=1
+TPG=1 TOX=10-7 NSUB=1E16 XJ=1E-6
+ UO=600 VTO=1.5 LAMBDA=0.01
+CGSO=1E-16 CGDO=1E-16 CGBO=1E-17
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

72

Level 1 MOS model

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

73

SPICE models history


Level 1, L ~> 5 micron, 1970
Level 2, L ~> 2 micron, 1980
Level 3, L ~> 1micron, 1981
Many empirical parameters, numerically better,
better short channel description.
Difficulties in finding parameter sets that cover a large
window of lengths.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

74

SPICE models history


2nd generation
BSIM1, L ~> 0.8 micron, 1987
Berkeley Short Channel IGFET Model 1
New knowledge about short channel effects. Many fitting
parameters for improved scaling
BSIM2, L ~> 0.35 micron, 1990
Improved model continuity, specifically output conductance
and sub-threshold current. Scaling still a problem. Binning
introduced.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

75

SPICE models history


3rd generation
BSIM3, L ~> 0.1 micron, 1994
Total re-write. The idea was to have a simple model with few physical
parameters.
Result: Many versions. Many empirical parameters.
Difficult to extract parameters.
Philips MOS Model 9 and 11
Industry approach, With few empirical parameters.
EKV (Enz-Krummenacher-Vittoz)
With few empirical parameters, more physical than MM9 and
MM11.

4th Generation Model


BSIM4
PSP (Penn State University and Philips)
The latest and most advanced model developed by merging the best
features of the two surface potential-based models: SP and MM11.
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

76

Sources of Power-Supply Noise


The fast rising voltage results in
current drawn from the power supply
leading to frequency-dependent IR
(voltage) drops in the VDD and VSS
traces of the printed circuit board
(PCB) or metal interconnect. This
phenomenon is called ground bounce
on the VSS side.
The ground bounce is related to the
parasitic inductance of the package
pins of the integrated circuit (IC),
device ground, and system ground.
The dynamic current can transform
into noise by contributing an amount
of voltage equal to V between the
system ground and device ground
30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

77

Sources of Power-Supply Noise


Since various components may share the VDD and VSS planes or
busses as a source of power, any large voltage fluctuations on the
PCB may violate the voltage noise rating of these components.
Such noise, if not reduced, can produce logical errors and other
undesirable effects.
The problem is more pronounced if the noise is coupled to the
analog portion of a mixed-signal integrated circuit as it can lead
to jitter, distortion, and reduced performance of the analog
components.
It is important to properly separate the digital and analog powers
supplies to minimize the noise levels as much as possible in a
mixed-signal environment.

30 April 2011

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

78

Anda mungkin juga menyukai