Challenge the
future
Outline
Background
Field survey in Colombia:
Objectives - Turbidity Formation
Methodology
Results
Laboratory experiments in Delft:
Adsorption Experiments
River bank filtration simulation
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
Mining
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
Challenge the
future
10
WTP
Pto. Mallarino
Ro Cauca
75%
WTP La
Reforma
4%
PTAP La
Riverita
1%
Challenge the
future
11
Challenge the
future
12
Lili
River
23 Ton/d BOD
Cauca
Department
Expansion
zone
Navarro
Leachate
Melendez
River
Caaveralejo
Monitoring 2006/ Monitoring 2005
WwTP
Inlet for
Location of future
Water Supply
WwTP
Monitoring 2006
CALI
Cauca River
Juanchito
station
Cauca River
Challenge the
future
13
14
Cauca River
Tributaries
Hormiguero
Before South
Channel
Before Pto
Mallarino Intake
<34,90
37,2
188
275
Aver
82,99
113,38
Min
2,31
1,43
Hg (g/l) Max
6,81
4,36
Aver
3,66
2,6
Min
<0,001
<0,001
Max
0,014
0,03
Aver
0,006
0,01
Min
<0,010
<0,001
0,343
0,023
Aver
0,101
0,006
Min
<0,030
<0,03
Cu (mg/L) Max
0,128
<0,03
Aver
0,057
<0,03
34,9
47,2
42,88
0,67
4,7
2,19
0
0,03
0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,03
<0,03
<0,03
Parameter
Min
Pb (g/l) Max
Cyanides
(mg/L)
South Channel
Decree
1594/1984
<34,90
156
<50
55,56
1,5
11,6
<2
5,48
<0,001
0,014
<0,2
0,006
0,01
0,24
<0,05
0,08
<0,03
8,34
<1,0
1,07
15
SIRENOMELIA
CYCLOPIA
16
Challenge the
future
17
Methodology
Challenge the
future
18
Methodology
(a)
P1, middle
1m
Palo River
(b)
Cauca River
Challenge the
future
19
Methodology
Challenge the
future
20
Results
Turbidity
EC
TSS
Fe
Turbidity (a), TSS (b), electrical conductivity (c), total iron (d) temporal distribution for Cauca River and Palo River
Challenge the
future
21
Results
P1 - Cauca River
Turbidity
TS
Fe
COD
TSS
TDS
Flow
TOC
Chl_a
Coliform
s
True
Color
0.90
0.48
0.59
0.95
-0.19
0.89
0.78
0.10
0.25
0.26
0.47
0.64
0.98
0.14
0.86
0.62
0.09
0.05
0.06
0.32
0.42
0.24
0.37
0.39
-0.25
-0.16
-0.13
0.69
-0.22
0.70
0.64
0.07
0.05
-0.22
-0.08
0.93
0.72
0.13
0.07
0.15
Turbidity
TS
Fe
COD
TSS
TDS
-0.30
-0.49
-0.18
-0.11
-0.39
Flow
0.82
0.03
0.06
0.25
TOC
-0.02
0.50
0.15
Chl_a
-0.07
-0.31
Coliform
s
True
Color
0.04
Challenge the
future
22
P1 - Cauca River
Results
Turbidity = 50.7 + 24.6 Fe + 0.738 TSS - 0.637 TDS - 0.435 Flow + 1.03 TO
Predictor
Constant
0.576
Fe
0.132
TSS
0.047
TDS
0.215
Flow
0.473
TOC
0.737
Constant
0.001
TSS
0.000
R-Sq = 90.2%
Challenge the
future
23
Results
P3 - Palo River
Turbidit
y
TS
Fe
COD
-0.21
-0.20
Turbidity
TS
0.98
1
0.85
0.75
Fe
TSS
Coliform True
s
Color
TDS
Flow
Chl_a
0.70
0.79
-0.08
-0.08
-0.16
0.03
0.16
0.12
0.46
-0.07
-0.54
0.33
-0.11
0.19
0.01
0.71
0.81
0.52
1
-0.07
-0.14
0.10
1
0.06
-0.15
0.37
0.03
0.08
0.41
0.03
0.23
COD
TSS
TDS
Flow
Chl_a
Coliform
s
True
Color
0.97 0.84
0.99 0.83
0.7325
-0.15
0.73
8
1
0.2401 0.04
7
1
0.78
-0.45
Challenge the
future
24
P3 - Palo River
Results
Turbidity = - 160 + 48.9 Fe + 0.905 TSS + 0.671 TDS - 3.18 Flow
Predictor
Constant
0.075
Fe
0.008
TSS
0.000
TDS
0.167
Flow
0.078
Constant
0.204
Fe
0.004
TSS
0.000
Flow
0.0757
R-Sq = 98.7%
Challenge the
future
25
Results
Cauca River
Challenge the
future
26
Cauca River
Palo River
Challenge the
future
27
Objectives Adsorption
Experiments
The general goal is to determine the adsorption capacity of
lead and mercury on the sediments transported by Cauca
River to evaluate potential heavy metals removal by using
RBF systems in Cauca River. The specific objectives are to:
Quantify Hg and Pb equilibrium adsorption in sediments
having different properties
Determine the effect of organic content on mercury and
lead adsorption capacity
Challenge the
future
28
Adsorbant
Type
Silt
Silt
+
Organic
Matter
MICROSIL M4 d50=50m
94% MICROSIL M4
+
6% Elliott Soil Humic Acid Standard
80% MICROSIL M4
+
5% Elliott Soil Humic Acid Standard
+
15% IMERYS MICA MU M2/1 (Positively charged) d 50=5m
Silt
+
Organic
Matter
+
Clay
80% MICROSIL M4
+
5% Elliott Soil Humic Acid Standard
+
15% IMERYS Speswhite (Neutral) d50=0,7m
80% MICROSIL M4
+
5% Elliott Soil Humic Acid Standard
+
15% IMERYS Polwhite B (Negatively charged) d50=2m
Adsorbate
Mass (g)
0,01
0,1
1
2
3
5
0,01
0,1
1
2
3
5
0,01
0,1
1
2
3
Demi water +
Buffers
Bottle 1
Bottle 3
Bottle 4
Bottle 5
Bottle 6
Bottle 7
Bottle 8
Bottle 11
Bottle 12
Bottle 13
Bottle 14
Bottle 15
Bottle 16
Bottle 19
Bottle 20
Bottle 21
Bottle 22
Bottle 23
Bottle 2
Bottle 9
Bottle 10
Bottle 17
Bottle 18
Bottle 24
0,01
0,1
1
2
3
Bottle 25
Bottle
Bottle
Bottle
Bottle
Bottle
Bottle 26
Bottle 32
0,01
0,1
1
2
3
5
Bottle 33
Bottle
Bottle
Bottle
Bottle
29
Bottle
Bottle
Challenge the
future
Bottle 34
27
28
29
30
31
35
36
37
38
39
40
Challenge the
future
30
Challenge the
future
31
Dank u wel
Vragen?
Challenge the
future
32