1.
Superintendents Recommendation:
Background/Analysis:
BOARD OF EDUCATION
middle level, three were from high schools, four had roles which were secondary in
general (middle and high combined), and six had K-12 roles. Of the 13 members who
were school-based (including Instructional Coaches), five had roles in city schools and
eight were in suburban schools.
The Assessment Planning Committee met on seven occasions from February through
April, 2016, reviewing formative assessment options, defining optimal test package
characteristics, exploring different assessment products on the market, and inviting a
number of vendors to present information on their products to the group. At the end of
the exploratory process, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was developed and posted. A
voluntary subset of the Assessment Planning Committee, with both elementary and
secondary members represented, convened on May 19, 2016 to review formal
proposals. The proposal review committee received four proposals, all of which were
qualified. The committee of eleven members evaluated each proposal on six general
evaluation criteria and selected the top ranking company receiving the highest
evaluation score (see attachment). I-Ready was selected in this proposal review
process.
4. Fiscal Impact: District wide $200,000. Local Funds. Cost $181,200.00. Increased
amount provides the District the option to expand assessment package to a greater
number of students.
5.
Attachment
BOARD OF EDUCATION
15
Training Specifications:
15
35
Reporting Specifications:
WEIGHT
BOARD OF EDUCATION
15
Technical Specifications:
10
Price
10
Pricing must include at least one viable option below $200,000.
TOTAL
100
Evaluation CHR-2016-12
Vendors
Assigned
Points
Total
Score
Average
Score
Rank
Curriculum Associates
1 (I-Ready)
100
962
87.45
2 NWEA
100
761
69.18
Renaissance Learning
100
745.5
67.77
McGraw Hill
100
624
56.72
BOARD OF EDUCATION