________________
Mark D. Wiseman, Cleveland, Waters and Bass, P.A.,
_________________ ___________________________________
Nighswander, and Sulloway and Hollis on brief for appellee.
___________
___________________
Warren
______
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
__________
by the
district court
It is worth
rests solely
Plaintiff's constitutional
Clause of
a matter of procedural
Cf. Montero
___ _______
(finding
no
the First
due
decision
on the Petition
in its
for
interest
1446-50 (10th
conferring
right
to
denied,
_____________
115 S.
where
moderator
selectmen or the
Nor are
(or
for
we faced with
that
matter
a situation
the
board
of
to withhold such
the
moderator in
would not
argument
from
be voted
plaintiff,
addressed,"
ultimate
instance
here, after
and thus
very
each
as
decision not
their perceived
called
and after
for
entertaining
vote
as
to
the
bodies
the
upon,
to state law
to
district
whom
court
to consider
invalidity.
the
petitions
noted--who
the articles
Plaintiff
thus
were
made
the
because of
succeeded
in
them.
Under
First
these
circumstances, it
is
apparent
that no
Community Colleges v.
__________________
person's
simply
right to
ignores
speak
that
is not
person
infringed when
while
listening
("A
government
to others.")
437 (3d Cir. 1994) ("the petition clause does not require the
government
to
communicator
respond
may
to
every
denominate a
communication
petition");
that
the
Cecelia Packing
_______________
district
the
judgment
others enumerated by
dismissing
plaintiff's
-3-