No. 96-2168
TERRENCE BROOKER,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent, Appellee.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
States Attorney,
Margaret E. Cur
________________
on brief
appellee.
____________________
Per Curiam.
___________
Pro
se
appellant
Terrence Brooker
appeals
under 28 U.S.C.
In
his
constitutional
assistance
failed
2255.
We affirm.
motion,
rights to
of counsel
Brooker
due process
had been
sentencing
involved
his
the effective
his attorney
to distribute
and
to
for which he
However,
that
conspiring
"crack cocaine,"
"cocaine base"
sentenced.
for
and to
violated when
to challenge, at sentencing
enhanced
alleged
the
rather
than some
plea
hearing
he pled guilty
other form
of
more leniently
transcript
shows
having
agreed
to
conversations with a
distribute
crack
cocaine
government informant.
in
taped
"There can be no
sentencing
stage."
record
conclusively
unverified
justified
evidentiary
1396,
2255
in
refutes
motion,
denying
hearing.
the
the allegations
the district
motion
(1996).
Because the
in
court
without
Brooker's
was
holding
fully
an
v. LaBonte, 70 F.3d
_______
-2-
be dismissed without
are
contradicted "by
claims
must "rest
presented
under
established
on
oath,
facts of
a foundation
either
in a
record"; habeas
of factual
verified
allegations
petition
or
supporting affidavits").
Brooker to
to
file a "traverse" to
his motion, as
government
Brooker claims.
This is
so because the
delayed or
States,
______
successive petition.
2255 motion as
See Barrett
___ _______
v. United
______
2255
On
ineffective
appeal,
Brooker
assistance of
affidavit which
Ocasio-Rivera,
991 F.2d
made
new
counsel, proffering
was never
We decline to consider
has
presented to the
1,
3 (1st
claims
of
a supporting
district court.
Cir.
1993) ("It
is
_____________
bedrock
principle
in
squarely
raised
in the
the
criminal
this
circuit
that
district court
if
issues
must
they are
be
to be
sentencing
context.").
-3-
Brooker
has
not
different outcome.
Affirmed.
_________
would warrant a
-4-