IM Sergey Soloviov
Kalojan Nachev
Translation by:
GM Evgeny Ermenkov
The publishers would like to thank Phil Adams for advice regarding
the English translation.
Igor Lysyj
Roman
Ovetchkin
Chess Stars
Bibliography
Opening for White Ace. to Anand (vol. I) by Khalifman, Chess Stars 2003
Beating the Open Games by Mihail Marin, Quality Chess 2008
Contents
Preface
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Index ofVariations
..
...
241
PREFACE
I managed to study the new positions quickly and easily and I felt
quite comfortable with them in practice. By the summer of 2011 I was
already playing nothing but l...eS and had no opening problems with
Black, either in the Finals of the Championship of Russia or in the
World Cup.
*English Editor's note: Ostap Bender is the hero of the famous Russian comic
novel The Twelve Chairs, by Ilf and Petrov
Igor Lysy
Ekaterinburg, February 2012
Part l
l.e4 e5
All
Chapter 1
l.e4 e5
Rarely-Played Moves
Centre Game
2.d4
For 2.c3 dS 3.exdS xdS 4.d4
exd4 (it is also good for Black to
simply develop a piece 4...lt:lc6!?=)
S.cxd4 lt:lc6 6.lt.'lf3 i.g4 - see
Chapter 9.
2.hS - Naturally, we shall
have a look at this move only be
cause it has been played several
times, against grandmasters at
that, by GM Nakamura. We can
not find any other pluses of this
move, though... Black equalizes
effortlessly, to say the least. 2...
lt:lc6 3.i.c4 g6 4.f3 lt:lf6 S.lt:le2
(after S.c3 i.g7 6.d3, Shaposhni-
Chapter 1
3.li:Jc3 lLlf6 4.f4 ( 4.lLlf3 d5 - see
Chapter 7; 4.g3 d5 5.exd5 lLlxd5
6.i.g2 lLlxc3 7.bxc3 i.c5 - see
Chapter 3) 4...exf4 5.hf4 d5 6.e5,
Kuehn - D.Trifunovic, Gladen
bach 1999. Now, Black's best re
ply seems to be 6...d4 7.exf6 dxc3
8.bxc3 xf6 9.i.d2 i.a3t - his
pieces are much more active than
their counterparts and White
might fail to develop altogether.
3.g3 d5 4.i.g2 (it is worse for
him to opt for 4.exd5 '\&xd5 5.lLlf3
i.g4 and now White loses after 6.
i.g2? e4-+, but even after the
more precise reply 6.lLlbd2 f5+
Black is better, because he has oc
cupied the centre and leads in de
velopment) 4...dxe4 5.he4 lLlf6
6.hc6+ bxc6+ White must fight
for equality, since his light
squared bishop is absent from the
board and the light squares on his
kingside are vulnerable, Meijers
- Krivonosov, Latvia 1994.
3.f4 d5 4.exd5 (after 4.lLlc3
dxe4 5.lLlxe4 lLlf6 6.lLlxf6+ '\&xf6
7.fxe5 lLlxe5+ Black is considera
bly ahead in development, Jan
turin - Feoktistov, Moscow 1996)
4...'\&xdS 5.lLlc3 i.b4 6.i.d2 (6.fxe5
\&xeS+ 7.'\&e2, Bardahchiyan Vasenina, Varna 2010, 7...lLlf6t he leads in development) 6...e6
7.lLlf3, Nikolin - Markovic, Vrnja
cka Banja 1996 (7.i.e2 exf4 8.lLlf3
lLlf6 - see 7.lLlf3), after 7...exf4+
8.i.e2 lLlf6 9.i.xf4 lLld5 10.i.d2
lLle3 ll.i.xe3 '\&xe3+ Black obtains
the advantage of the two bishops.
3.lLld2 lLlf6 4.g3 d5 5.i.g2 i.g4
6.lLlgf3 dxe4 7.dxe4 i.c5t - Black
10
2 . . . exd4 3.Ybd4
3.lLlf3 lLlc6 - see Chapters
9-12; 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 xd5 5.cxd4
lLlc6 6.lLlf3 i.g4 - see Chapter 9;
3.i.c4 lLlc6 4.lLlf3 (4.c3?! lLlf6 5.
lLlf3 lLlxe4 6.0-0 d5+) 4...i.c5 see Chapter 9.
lLlc6
4.e3
This is the main move for
White and it is considered to be
the most aggressive. His queen is
ready to go to g3 attacking Black's
kingside.
4.'\&d1 - This move is too slow.
4...lLlf6 5.i.d3 d5 6.exd5 '\&xd5 7.
lLlf3 i.g4t - Black is far ahead in
development, Lange - Paulsen,
Leipzig 1864.
4.d3 - White's queen is not
better placed here than on e3. 4...
lLlf6 5.lLlc3 (5.f3?! d5+) 5...d5 6.
i.g5 d4 7.lLld5, Badev - Marholev,
Borovetz 2008 (He can weaken
his opponent's pawn-structure
4 .c!t)f6
5.li:lc3
5.i.c4 .ib4+ 6.li:lc3 0-0 7..id2
i.xc3 - see 5.li:lc3.
5.e5 li:lg4 6.'%1/e2 d6!
11
Chapter 1
7.exd6+ .ie6 8.dxc7 Wxc'T+
White has won a pawn, but he
may fail to develop his forces.
7.f3 lt:\h6 8.exd6+ (8..ixh6
Wh4+ 9.g3 Wxh6 10.exd6+ .ie6 11.
d7+ xd'T+ Black has lost his cas
tling rights, but has obtained the
advantage of the two bishops,
having a considerable lead in de
velopment too.) 8....ie6 9.dxc7
Wxc'T+
7.h3 lt:\gxe5! White fails to win
a piece. 8.f4 lt:ld4 9.e4 Wh4+
10.d1, Taubenhaus - Gunsberg,
Hamburg 1885, 10... lt:\e6 ll.g3
Wf6 12.lt:lc3 c6+ Black ends up
with a solid extra pawn.
5..id2 - This modest looking
move is necessary anyway and
seems reasonable, since it pre
vents the development of the en
emy bishop to b4, where it would
be most active. 5....ie7 6.lt:\c3 (6.
.ic4 dS 7.exd5 lt:lxdS 8.Wg3?, Ca
brera - Suasnabar, Lima 2000,
opening of the central files is in
Black's favour, since he has supe
rior development. White's last
move has enabled Black to start
an immediate attack with the
move 8...lt:\d4!+) 6...d5 7.exd5 lt:\xd5
7.0-0- 0
7 . . . ges
s.eg3
White is trying to organize a
piece-attack against the enemy
king, but he is likely to fail due to
his lag in development.
8.tt:lge2 d5! 9.tt:lxd5 tt:lxd5 10.
Wfff3 hd2+ 11.l=!xd2 tt:lcb4! 12.exd5
tt:lxa2+ 13.Wb1 tt:lb4+ White's king
position has been weakened and
Black's pieces come into action
easily and effortlessly.
8.Wff4 i.xc3 9.hc3 l'!xe4 10.
'fffd2 (or 10.Wffg3 d5+) 10...d5 ll.f3
l'!e8 12.tt:le2 Wffe7 13.tt:lf4 d4! 14.
hd4 tt:lxd4 15.Wffxd4 i.f5t - Black
has mobilized his forces and seiz
es the initiative thanks to his cen
tralized pieces.
8.f3 d5 9.'ffff2 (In answer to
9.i.e1, Chigorin - Gunsberg, Ha13
Chapter 1
vana 1890, it is good for Black to
play 9...'?tfe7! 10.tt:lxd5 tt:lxdS 11.
ElxdS .ie6--+ and he completes the
activation of his forces and begins
an offensive; 9.'1!9g5 d4 10.tt:ld5
.ixd2+ ll.Elxd2 tt:lxd5 12.'1!9xd5 1!9e7+
Black is considerably ahead in de
velopment and this provides him
with excellent attacking chances.)
9...dxe4 lO ..igS (In the variation
10.tt:lxe4 .ixd2+ 1U!xd2 1!9e7 12.
tt:lxf6+ '?tfxf6t, unlike his oppo
nent, Black has no problems with
the development of his forces,
Meisling - Em.Lasker, Copenha
gen 1919.) 10....id7! 11.tt:ld5, O.Ka
linina - Z.Mamedjarova, Chisi
nau 2005. White's kingside stands
idle and Black begins an attack
with the help of the energetic line:
11...e3! 12.'?tfh4 .id2+ 13.@b1 .ifS
14.tt:lxf6+ gxf6 15..ixf6 1!9d6--+
8..ic4 d6
1 0 . . . 'f6 11.c!Llh3
After 11..b:c7? d6 12..b:d6
Wih6+ 13.c;t>b1 .b:d6-+ White's
back rank was so weak that he lost
his bishop in the game F.Mayer Geske, Offenbach 2005.
n . . . d6
t2 . .id3
12 . . .c!Lld4
13 . .ie3
13.c;t>b1? - This move loses by
force. 13...lt:le2 14.Wif3 i.a3!! 15.
bxa3 (15.c3 lt:lxc3-+; 15.i.c1 Wixf3
16.gxf3 e8-+ Rigby - Tuvshin
tugs, Las Vegas 2008) 15...lt:lc3+
16.c;t>c1 lt:lxa2+ 17.c;t>b1 lt:lc3+ 18.
c;t>cl .b:h3 19..b:e4 .b:g2! 20.Wixg2
'xf4+ 21.c;t>b2 lt:lxe4-+ Nepom
niachtchi - Vallejo Pons, Moscow
2007.
It is not good for White to play
13..ig5?! Wffe6 14.c3 Wixa2 15.cxd4,
Masliakov - Orlov, St. Petersburg
2007 and now Black wins with
15...xd4! 16..b:h7+ (16.lt:lf4 .if5!
15
Chapter 1
17.i.xf5 1!c4-+) 16 . . . 1!7xh7 17.1!xd4
a1+ 18.1!7c2 .tfS+ 19.1!7b3 .ie6+!
20.1!7c2 a4+ 21.1!7d3 1!e8!
White's king is completely bare
and he is helpless against his op
ponent's mating attack, despite
his extra rook: 22.h4+ l!?g8 23 .
.ie3 bS+ 24.1!7c2 c5-+
13 .tM5!?
16
14.Yff3 ges
16.c3 hc3!
15 .tg5
%YeS
Chapter 2
l.e4 e5 2.f4
King's Gambit
2 . . . d5
Black's main move in the dia
gram position is 2... exf4. It has
been analyzed in GM K. Sakaev's
book "The Petroff: an Expert
3.exd5
For the moves 3.lD f3 exf4 4.
exd5 (4.lDc3 lDf6 - see Chapter 3)
3 . . . exf4
This move is much more natu
ral than 3... e4, which was consid
ered as a refutation of White's en
tire attacking concept by the world
famous "knight" of the King's
Gambit - Rudolf Spielmann.
Black restores the material
balance, has the unpleasant threat
4... h4+ and his pieces come into
play effortlessly. His f4-pawn re
stricts the mobility of White's
17
Chapter 2
dark-squared bishop and enables
Black's pieces to fight for the e3square.
4.li:lf3
It is not good for White to play
4.d4?! h4+ 5.1!fd2, Tartakower
- Szabo, Ljubljana 1938, 5...
d8!+ Black removes his queen
from any possible enemy attack
with tempo, while White's king is
bound to remain stranded in the
centre for a long time; or if 4.
li:lc3?! 'W'h4+ 5.1!fe2 (in the gambit
variation 5.g3 fxg3 6.'W'e2+ ie7+
White has no compensation what
soever for the lost pawns) 5...
.ig4+ 6.li:lf3 id6+ and Black will
continue with li:le7 and li:ld7, as in
the 4. .ic4 variation. It would not
be in the spirit of the position for
White to choose 4.e2+?!, be
cause in this version of the King's
Gambit White's queen is mis
placed on the e-file and will come
under attack with tempo. 4... .ie7
5.li:lc3 li:lf6 6.d4 0-0t
It is rather dubious for White
to opt for 4. .ib5+?! c6 5.e2+
(5.dxc6 li:lxc6 6.li:lf3 li:lf6 - see
4.li:lf3) 5... .ie7 6.dxc6 li:lxc6 7.li:lc3
18
...
{6
19
Chapter 2
In the diagram position White
usually plays the moves A)
5.i.b5+ ?! and B) 5 .ic4.
For S.tt:lc3 ttJxdS - see Chapter
3, variation A.
S..ie2?! - The bishop is rather
passive on this square. After 5...
ttJxdS 6.c4 tt:lb4! 7.d4 .ifS 8.tt:la3
gS 9.0-0 .ie7+ Black has succeed
ed in keeping his extra pawn.
S.d4 ltJxdS
Chapter 2
c2+ 3l.li>h3 c8+ 32.1i>h4 b6=
Black has exchanged his oppo
nent's most active pieces and the
game will inevitably end in a
draw.
A) 5 . .ib5+ ? !
The bishop is better placed on
c4 than on b5.
5 . . . c6 6.dxc6
For 6.e2+?! i.e7 7.dxc6 lt:lxc6
- see 6.dxc6.
6 . . . tDxc6
7.d4
White loses a piece after 7.
0-0?? b6-+; it is also bad for
him to opt for 7.lt:le5? b6 8.e2
il.e7 9.lt:lc4 dB 10.c3 0-o:i= - he
has transferred his knight to a
very bad square and lags consid
erably in development.
7.e2+?! - This loses an im
portant tempo for White. 7... .ie7
22
7 . . . .id6
8.t'fe2+
8.tt:lc3?! 0-0 9.0-0 b6 - see
8.0-0.
White loses after 8.d5? tt:lxd5+ and Black's knight is untoucha
ble in view of .ib4+.
Black has no problems after
8.0-0 0-0.
8 . J.e6
.
(diagram)
9.g5
9.tt:le5? 0-0 10. .ixc6 bxc6+
Black has an obvious advantage
with his powerful bishop-pair,
23
Chapter 2
9 . . . 0 - 0 1 0 .4Jxe6
10..b:c6? i.g4 1l.d3 aS+
12.i.d2 xgS-+ White's king will
will be stuck in the centre, McTav
ish - Puri, Winnipeg 1985.
10
. .
b6!
g5t
ll.hc6
Jakubiec - Bulski, Cracow
2011.
11.4Jxf8? 4Jxd4 12.4Jxh7 (12.
'Lld7 'Llxd7 13..b:d7 4Jxe2 14.\t>xe2
l"\d8 1S.i.f5, Petrovic - Petran,
Novi Sad 1981, 15...c6-+ White
24
B) 5.J.c4
This calm move is White's
best.
5 . . . .!Llxd5
6. 0 - 0
For 6..!Llc3 .!Llxc3 - see Chapter
3.
6.\!9e2+ ?! i.e7 7.0-0 .!Llc6 (it is
less energetic for Black to contin
ue with 7...i.e6 - see 6.0-0) 8.d4
0-0 9.tt'lc3 tt'lb6+ White is faced
with an unpleasant choice - to re
main a pawn down, or to present
his opponent with the bishop
pair, D.Sokolov - Bykhovsky,
Pavlodar 1991.
6.d4 i.e6
(diagram)
7.0-0? tt'le3 - see 6.0-0; or 7.
i.b3 i.b4+! - see 6.i.b3.
7..ixd5 \!9xd5 8.0-0 (8.tt'lc3
Chapter 2
6 . . . J.e6
7.J.b3
Black is threatening 7...tt:le3,
7 c5 !
.
8.d3
8.tLle5?! fld6 9.!la4+ l!if8 10.
e2 f6 ll.tLlc4 flc7 12.d3 a6+ Black has lost his castling rights,
but is considerably ahead in de
velopment and preserves his ex
tra pawn, Villwock - Lyell, Buda
pest 2009.
8.ttlc3?! c4! 9.fla4+ (9.flxc4?
tLlxc3-+) 9... tt:lc6 10.d4 cxd3 11.
cxd3 fle7 12.tLlxd5 hd5 13.i.xf4
0-0+ White's pieces are discoor
dinated and his d3-pawn is weak,
Lanzani - Godena, Milan 2002.
8.c4 tLlf6 9.tLlc3 ttlc6 10.tLle2
.td6 ll.d4 tt:lxd4 12.tLlexd4 cxd4
27
Chapter 2
13.Wxd4 (13.lt:'lxd4 i.cS xf4
o-m= Black will quickly occupy
the central files with his rooks.)
13...Wc7 14.<i>h1 h6+ White has
failed to regain his pawn and his
bishops are passive.
8.<i>h1 i.e7 9.d4 0-0 10.c4 lt:'le3
11.i.xe3 fxe3 12.d5 i.g4+ Black's
bishop has gained access to the
important a1-h8 diagonal, while
White's bishop resembles a pawn,
Fier - Saralegui, Turin 2006.
8.d4 cxd4 9.lt:'lxd4 (Black
should not be afraid of the line:
9.<i>h1 lt:'le3 10.i.xe3 dxe3 11.
Wxd8+ <i>xd8 12.i.xe6 fxe6 13.
lt:'lgS i.d6, lngylfsson - Lukase
vicius, Email 2004 and here,
White's only move is 14.lt:'lf7+
<i>e7, but he ends up in a difficult
position after 15.lt'lxh8? lt:'lc6 16.
lt:'lc3 :B:xh8+ and Black's central
pawns should settle the issue.
White fails to equalize with 15.
lt:'lxd6 e2 16.:B:e1 <i>xd6 17.:B:xe2
lt:'lc6+ and Black remains with an
extra pawn and a more active
king.) 9....ic5 10.<i>h1 i.xd4 11.
'\Wxd4 0-0 12.i.xd5 (12.i.xf4 lt:'lc6
13.Wf2 lt:'lxf4 14.'\Wxf4, Hague Berzinsh, West Bromwich 2004,
28
c!Dc6
9.i.xd5
After 9.lt:'lc3 lt:'lxc3 10.bxc3 .id6
11.i.xe6 fxe6 12.We2 We7+ White
fails to regain his pawn.
Chapter3
l.e4 e5 2.ltlc3
Vienna Game
3 . . . d5 !
Chapter 3
often transposes to variation A2 .
4...exf4 5.e5 (5.exd5 tt:lxd5 or 5.
tt:lxd5 tt:lxd5 6.exd5 '\Wxd5 - see
variation A2) 5... tt:le4
Ala) 5.d3
Alb) 5."Bf3
Ale) 5.t0f3
Chapter 3
0-0-0! 13J'l:b3 ltlxe5 14.ltlxe5
Wxe5+ 15.i.e2 dxc3 16. Wf3 !!he8+
Black ends up with a so_lli:Lextra
pawn and good attacking chances
against White's king stranded in
the centre.
Ala) 5.d3
White forces the exchange of a
powerful enemy piece.
. .
c6!
Tournament
practice
has
shown that Black can easily ob
tain an edge if he ignores his op
ponent's c3-pawn. He leads in de
velopment and his pieces have
excellent squares.
8 . .ie2
After 8.i.b2 i.g4 9..ie2 dxc3
10.i.xc3 i.c5 11.d2 0-0 12.
0-0-0 d5 13.Wf4 i.e6+ White
succeeds in evacuating his king to
the queenside, but it is not well
32
8 . J.c5
..
. .
d4
9. 0 - 0
White solves the problems
with the safety of his king but sac
rifices a pawn, and regaining it
may be a difficult task.
9.cxd4 .b:d4 10.E!b1 0-0 11.
.ib2 E!e8 1V Lixd4 tt:Jxd4+ Black
forces his opponent either to sac
rifice a pawn, or to go in for an
unpleasant position with bishops
of opposite colours.
9..ig5 'd7 10.c4 h6 11..id2
0-0 12.0-0 'e7+ White will have
difficulties with the protection of
his pawns on d4 and eS.
9..ib2 0-0 10.cxd4 tt:Jxd4 11.
c3, Lewandowski - Paprocki, Tor
farm 2005, 11...tt:Jxe2 12.xe2 .ie6
13.d4 i.e? 14.c4 .ib4+ 15.g;,f2 c6+
White can hardly organize mean
ingful counterplay with his light
squared bishop absent from the
board and his pawn centre is
harmless for Black, since it can
easily be undermined with f7-f6,
or even with b7-b5.
12 .idl
Alb) 5.ti'fJ
The queen is better placed
here than on e2, because it does
not prevent the development of
White's bishop, but in many vari33
Chapter 3
ations it comes under attack with
tempo.
5 . . . c6 6.i.b5
6.lt)xe4?! ltld4 7.'<&c3 (7.'<&d1
dxe4 8.c3 ltlc6 9 . .ib5 '<&d5 10.'<&e2
i.d7 11.hc6 i.xc6-+ - The light
squares in his camp are cata
strophically weak, Spielmann Moewig, Coburg 1904) 7 . . . dxe4
8.ttle2 ltlc6 9.ltlg3 V9d5 10 . .ic4
'<&xeS 11.0-0, Tzermiadianos - A.
Mastrovasilis, Athens 2002, 11 . . .
f5!+ Black has an extra centre
pawn and can effortlessly develop
his pieces, so this provides him
with a clear advantage.
ltlxc3
7.dx:c3
This is White's best option.
His e5-pawn may be a bit weak,
but his pieces come into play
without any difficulties.
After 7.'<&xc3 Wh4+ White lags
in development and has problems
with the protection of his e5pawn.
7.bxc3 '<&h4+ 8.g3 '<&e4+ 9.
'<&xe4 dxe4 10 . .ixc6+ (10.d4 exd3
11.cxd3 .id7 12 . .if4? ltlxe5! 13.
hd7+ ltlxd7 14.'it>d2 0-0-0+
Black has a solid extra pawn, Ca
tozzi - Daniel, BesaDJon 1949)
10.. . bxc6 11.ltle2 (11.d4 exd3 12.
cxd3 .if5 13.'it>e2 l'!d8 14.d4,
Koeniger - Maier, Munich 1993,
after 14 . . . c5+, Black emphasizes
the vulnerability of his opponent's
central pawns) 11 . . . .ic5 12.d4 (12.
ltld4?! 0-0 13.ltlxc6 l'!e8 14 . .ib2
.id7 15.ltlb4 l'!xe5+ White has
failed to win a pawn, his knight on
b4 might be lost and his bishop is
very passive, Antal - Bick, Witley
2001.) 12 . . . exd3 13.cxd3, Vojta Spacek, Czech Republic 2011 and
by playing 13 . . . .ia6 14.d4 .ie7+
Black controls the light squares in
the centre and after completing
his development he can begin un
dermining White's pawn-chain.
7 Wh4+
.
1 0 . .ixc6+
White disrupts his opponent's
pawn-structure, but now Black's
light-squared bishop might be
come very active.
It is not good for White to opt
for 10..ie3 .id7 11..ixc6 .ixc6 12.
tt:le2 g6 13.0-0-0 .ig7 14.tt:\d4
.ixe5 15.tt:\xc6 bxc6 16..id4 .ixd4
17J'!xd4 f5 18J!hd1 o-m= and he
must play very energetically; oth
erwise, Black's central pawns will
promote, Adamko - Pheby, Email
2009.
After 10.tt:le2 .id7 11.hc6
.ixc6 12.tt:ld4, Baljon - Knox,
Teesside 1978, Black can preserve
his important bishop, avoiding
any defects of his pawn-structure,
with the move 12....id7t
10..if4 .id7 11.0-0-0 (White
cannot reach complete equality
with 11.tt:le2 0-0-0 12.i.c4 .ie6
13..ixe6+ fxe6t Black's e4-pawn
is safe, while White's e5-pawn will
need protection.) 11...0-0-0 12.
.ic4 !J.e7 13.h4, Paredes Corda -
Chapter 3
6.e2
White must fight against
Black's centralized knight, other
wise he may end up in a worse po
sition.
6.d4 cS 7..id3 (White would
not equalize with 7..ib5+ tt:lc6 8.
0-0 0-0 9..ixc6 bxc6 10.d3,
Menzel - Buchholz, Mecklenburg
2000, because Black can continue
with 10....if5 ll.tt:lh4 cxd4 12.tt:lxf5
dxc3 13.bxc3 .icS+ 14..ie3 .ib6+
and he gains an edge, thanks to
his powerful knight in the centre
and White's weakened pawn
structure.) 7...tt:lxc3 8.bxc3 c4 9.
.ie2 tt:lc6 10.0-0 0-0 ll..ie3 (Af
ter 11.e1 .ifS+ the vulnerability
of White's c2-pawn is empha
sized) ll...bS+ Black's position is
preferable, owing to his clear-cut
plan of queenside attack, Span
genberg - An.Karpov, Buenos
Aires 1994.
6..ie2 0-0 7.0-0 cS 8.'it>h1
(White can get rid of his oppo
nent's powerful knight with 8.
tt:lxdS xdS 9.d3 tt:ld6 10.exd6
.ixd6+, but Black would maintain
an edge in view of his control over
the centre.) 8...tt:lc6 9.d3 tt:lxc3 10.
36
l0xc3
7.dxc3
White's position would be
worse after 7.bxc3 0-0
Now:
8.W/e3 f6 9.c4 ltJc6 10..ib2 fxeS
ll.cxdS W/xdS+ - The position has
been opened up and Black has a
big lead in development, Meijer Euwe, Utrecht 1926.
8.d4 f6 9.We3 (9..if4 fxeS
lO ..txes .tg4 11.e3 ltJc6 12..te2
ttJxeS 13.dxe5 b6+ White's king is
stuck the centre, Becker - Cygon,
Espelkamp 1975) 9...fxe5 10.
ttJxeS, Pashkin - Akhromeev,
Simferopol 1989, and now the
best way for Black to exploit his
lead in development is to ex
change his opponent's only active
piece with the move 10...ltJc6+
8.g3 cS 9..ig2 ltJc6 10.0-0 .ie6
ll.d3 Wd7 12..ig5 !iae8 13.!iae1 h6
14.he7 !ixe7+ White has de
ployed his pieces relatively well,
but he is not likely to improve his
position in the near future, while
his queenside weaknesses remain
a cause of concern for him, Olsze
wski - Malaniuk, Kowalewo Po
morskie 2006.
c5
37
Chapter 3
8 . .if4
It is not so good for him to opt
for 8.e3 ltJc6 9.'\Wf2 '\WaS 10.'\Wg3
e6 11.e2 (ll.d3 0-0-0 12.
0-0 hS Black's chances of or
ganizing an attack against the en
emy king are not worse than those
of his opponent) 11...'\Wa4 12.d3,
Kujovic - Panchanathan, Dallas
2004, after 12... 0-0, Black is
threatening to win a pawn with
the move cS-c4, while after 13.b3
Vfig4+ White is faced with the rath
er unpleasant choice between an
inferior endgame and an attempt
to protect his weak pawns in the
coming middle game.
8.'\Wf2 Vfib6! - Black prevents
the development of the enemy
bishop on cl. 9.e2, Hector Docx, Gothenburg 200S (In reply
to 9.'\Wg3, Black is ready to trans
fer his queen to the other side
of the board: 9... '\Wg6 10.'\Wxg6
hxg6=. It would be worse for
White to continue with 9.c4 e6
10.cxdS hdS ll.c3 lLlc6+ - he has
got rid of his backward pawn, but
lags in development and his eS
pawn would be more of a target
than an asset, Vojta - Rachela,
38
8 .. )l)c6
9. 0 - 0 - 0
9.'\Wd2 h6 10.e2 (10.0-0-0
e6t Black controls the centre
and is ready to begin an offensive
on the queenside.) 10... gS 11.e3
g4 12.lLlg1 d4 13.f4 dxc3 14.
'\Wxc3, Aaberg - Barkhagen, Swe
den 1996, 14... '\WdS+ - He not only
attacks the g2-square, but his oth
er pieces are all perfectly prepared
to come into action immediately.
9.'\Wf2 e6 10.Vfig3 'WaS (It is
less energetic for Black to contin
ue with 10... '\Wb6 11.0-0-0 0-0-0
12.lLlgS hgS 13.hgS :i!d7 14.f4
9 . . . .te6
10
h6 11.g3
1 0 .h4
10.c4 - White is fighting for
the e4-square, but this only helps
Black organize active operations
on the queenside. 10...d4 11.llJd2,
Hector - Ivkov, Cannes 1989 (in
response to ll.h4, Hector Inkiov, Copenhagen 1990, it is
ll
Yfd7 12 .tg2
Chapter 3
l2Jxd4 \Wd5t - he will inevitably re
gain his pawn and his pieces will
be tremendously active.
12
0 - 0 - 0 13.h5
13
xd5 !
i.g4
14.'tf.>b1
14.\Wfl \We6 15.'tf.>b1 (after the
exchange of the light-squared
bishops with 15.i.h3 hh3 16.
\Wxh3 l'!d7 17.liJd2 a6 18.'i!?b1, Mo
rales Pecino - Kozlov, Email
2007, Black can play 18...\Wxh3
19.l'!xh3 i.d8t emphasizing that
White's e5-pawn might become a
weakness.) 15... l'!d7 16.a3 l'!hd8
17.l'!d3, Morales Pecino - Albano
Rivares, Email 2008, and after
17...i.f5 18.l'!d2 l2Ja5t Black ob
tains excellent attacking pros
pects.
A2) 4.exd5
White plays this move quite
often, even at grandmaster level.
He wishes to fight for the ad
vantage in a position with an ex
tra pawn after 4...e4, but...
5.fxe5.
Among his alternatives, we
must mention that in the varia
tion 5.\Wh5 l2Jxf4 6.Wxe5+ l2Je6+
White's queen will come under at
tack with tempo by Black's devel
oping pieces, Noble - Braunberg
er, Frankfurt 2010, while after 5.
\Wf3 l2Jxf4 6.i.c4 l2Jc6+ Black ends
up with a solid extra pawn, Blanch
- Janev, Balaguer 2011.
6.fxe5
For 6.tt:lf3 tt:lc6 7.fxe5 .ig4 see 6.fxe5.
6.tt:le2?! - White fails to evict
the enemy queen from the centre
with this: 6... .ie7 7.d4 (the seem
ingly more consequent 7.tt:lc3?
i.h4+ forces White to give up a
whole rook.) 7... .ih4+ 8.tt:lg3 exd4
9.c4, Halpin - Blumbergs, Email
2005, and now with 9.. .'c6+
Black impedes the development
of his opponent's light-squared
bishop and is quite ready to
launch a decisive attack in a few
moves.
After 6.\1;Ye2 tt:lc6 7.c3 .ie7 8.
fxe5 .ih4+ 9.<i>d1, Van de Berk
mortel - Gorla, Switzerland 1992,
the simplest for Black would be to
regain his pawn with 9... tt:Jxe5
10.tt:lf3 (Black does not lose his
knight, because in the variation
10.d4? .ig4 ll.tt:lf3 0-0-0-+
White is unable to capture it.)
10... i.g4 11.\1;Yb5+ \1;Yxb5 12.hb5+
c6 13. .ie2 tt:Jxf3 14.hf3 hf3+ 15.
gxf3 0-0-0+ - The material is
equal, but Black has a superior
pawn-structure and his pieces
come into play very quickly.
41
Chapter 3
This position is reached much
more often from the King's Gam
bit, but for the sake of a conveni
ent presentation of the theoreti
cal material, we shall analyze it
here.
6 .ic4
6 . . . lt'lxc3 7.bxc3
7.dxc3 \11ixd1+ 8.'tt> xd1 .id6 9.
!'le1+ 'tt> f8 10.lt'le5 .ixeS ll.!'lxeS f6
12.!'lc5 c6 13..ixf4 b6 14.!'ld5
(White's compensation for the ex
change is insufficient after 14.
.ixb8 bxcS 15..id6+ 'tt> e8 16..ixc5
.ifS+) 14...cxd5 15..ixd5 gS! (Black
frees the g7-square for his king in
case of an eventual check from
the d6-square!) 16..ie3 (16..ig3?!
.ig4+ 17.'tt> e1 lt'lc6 18..ixc6 !'lc8 19.
.ibS 'tt> t7+ Black has coordinated
his rooks and has no problems
with the realization of his advan
tage.) 16....ig4+ 17.'tt> d2 lt'lc6 18.
.ixc6 !'ld8+ 19..id4 !'ld6+ Although
White's bishop on d4 is a beauti
ful piece, it cannot compensate
for the lost exchange.
7 .id6 8.\11ie 2+
..
10.0-0
After lO.lLJgS i.e6 ll.ll'lxe6 fxe6
12.0-0 ll'Jc6+ Black has the better
prospects, thanks to his extra
pawn.
9 . . . V9h5
A2c) 5.fxe5
1 0 .d4? !
5 .. .ti)xc3 6.bxc3
After 6.dxc3? Wfh4+ 7.d2 icS
8.ll'Jf3 V9g4--+ White's extra pawn
Chapter 3
lt'lxd4! 13.cxd4 xf3+ 14..te2
:B:xd4+ 15..td2 :B:xd2+ 16.xd2
xh1-+ Donkers - Haast, Haar
lem 2011.) 12...xe5 13.d4 (The
position would remain approxi
mately equal after 13.xe5 lt'lxe5
White has the advantage of the
bishop pair, but his pawn-struc
ture is bad and he has problems
with the coordination of his
pieces.) 13...a5 14..td2, Naka
mura - Milliet, Cap d'Agde 2010
(it is no better for him to play
14.d3 .ta3+). It is essential here
for Black to take the fS-square
under control by playing 14 ...
g6.
11 . . . {6 !
12.exf6?
This is a principled move, but
it loses by force. Black must react
very energetically though ...
It would be more accurate
for White to continue with 12.
.tbS fxeS 13..txc6 bxc6.
Black plans to advance his
pawn to fS, restricting White's
light-squared bishop and moreo
ver he is threatening to play .th6.
After 15.a4 .th6 16.f4 (16..txh6?
xc3-+) 16...:B:he8 17.f3 lt'le7+,
or 15..tc4 .th6 16.f4 :B:he8 17.f3
fS+ he is able to force his oppo
nent to place a pawn on f4, where
it will become an easy target
for attack, while in the variation
15..td3 .b3 16.:B:b1 :B:he8 17.h4
dS 18.h3+ fS+ White will be
unable to coordinate his pieces.
1 0 . . . 0 - o - o u.q;,f2
44
12
.txf3 ! 13.Yfe6+
13
. .
15.Yfh3
White cannot save the game
with 15.h4 E:e8 and after the re
treat of his queen Black's attack is
crushing.
Chapter 3
ll:lxd4 19.cxd4 hd4+ 20.@f1 l'!e3
21.he3 'Wxf3+ 22.@e1 l'!e8 23.
@d2 he3+ 24.@c3 i.d4+ 2S.@b4
hS 26.'Wd3 l'!e3-+ ;
16.'Wxf6 i.d6 17.'Wh6 'WdS 18.
l'!b1 ll:lxd4 19.cxd4 l'!hg8-+;
It is no better for White to opt
for 15.id3 ib4! 16.l'!b1 (16.cxb4
'Wh4+ 17.@f1 l'!he8 18.'Wg4 'We1+
19.@g2 'Wc3 20.'Wf4 l'!g8+ 21.@f2
xa1 22.'Wxc7+ @aS!-+) 16...
h4+ 17.@fl l'!de8 18.'Wg4 'We1+
19.@g2 'We7-+
15 . . . 'Wa5 16.f4
White loses even faster after
16.i.b2 i.a3 17.ha3 'Wxc3!-+
16 . . . xd4! !
This is an important resource
for Black, to deprive White's mon
arch of any shelter.
19.@f3
19.@g2 l'!g8+ 20.@f3 l'!xd3+
21.cxd3 i.d4-+
19.@fl - This is evidently the
most tenacious defence for White.
46
B) 3.g3
This is a less risky move than
3.f4 - White obtains a solid pawn
structure on the kingside and
postpones active operations until
he has completed his develop
ment.
3 . . . d5
It is also good for Black to play
here 3...i.c5.
7.lLle2
7.lilf3 - There is no doubt that
this is the most dangerous move
for Black and after 7... lt:lc6, there
arises the Glek variation, see
Chapter 7.
For 7.d3 lilc6 8.lilf3 (8.lile2
0-0 - see 7.lile2) 8...0-0 9.0-0
i.g4 or 7.V9e2 0-0 8.d3 lt:lc6 9.lt:lf3
eB 10.0-0 i.fS - see Chapter 7.
7.b1 0-0 8.lile2 (White loses
after 8.i.xb7?? i.xb7 9.xb7 VNdS
10.V9f3 e4-+) 8... lilc6 9.0-0 V9d6!
- see 7.lile2.
7.f4N - This move has not
been tried in practice yet, but
Black must be well prepared
against it. 7... lilc6!? (The position
is less clear after 7... exf4 8.d4oo)
8.fxe5 (after 8.lLlf3 exf4 9.d4 i.d6
10.i.xf4 i.xf4 ll.gxf4 0-0 12.0-0
lt:le7!+, it becomes clear that not
only does White need to protect
his weak pawns on f4 and c3, he
also has weak squares on the e
file, which require defending.) 8...
i.xg1 9.hc6+ (9.xg1 lLlxeS 10.
i.a3 i.g4 ll.VNb1 lilf3+ 12.i.xf3
i.xf3 13.V9b5+ V9d7 14.V9e5+ @dB
1S.@f2 e8 16.vgf4 e6t - White's
light squares in the centre are vul47
Chapter 3
nerable and this provides Black
with good attacking prospects.)
9... bxc6 10.13xg1 0-0 White's
king has no safe shelter and the
presence of bishops of opposite
colours on the board will lead to a
powerful attack for Black.
7.W/h5?! - This queen-sortie,
in combination with the develop
ment of the bishop on c4, does not
seem logical and should not yield
any advantage for White. 7... 0-0
8.lt:'lf3 lt:'ld7 9.0-0, G.Szabo - Bon
te, Galatzi 2007. Black should oc
cupy the centre here with 9... e4
lO.lt:'lgS (10.lt:'ld4?! .ib6+ and his
pawn is untouchable, because
after ll.he4? lt:'lf6 12.W/h4 lt:'lxe4
13.xe4 l'%e8+ the light squares
around White's king are defence
less.) 10... lt:'lf6 ll.W/e2 l'%e8 12.
lt:'lxe4 lt:'lxe4 13.he4 .if5 14.d3 Wf6
15. .id2 .ixe4 16.dxe4 c6 17.l'%fe1
l'%e6 18.'>t>g2 fSt Black regains his
pawn and preserves the activity of
his pieces.
8... 0 - 0
lt:'lc6
9.d3
8. 0 - 0
For 8.l'%b1 0-0 9.0-0 W/d6 see 8.0-0; 8.d3 0-0 9.l'%b1 (9.0-0
48
9 . . . i.g4
(diagram)
1 0 .h3
For 10.l:'!:b1 l:'!:b8 ll.i.e3 i.xe3
12.fxe3 tt:Je7 - see 10.i.e3
After 10.i.e3 i.xe3 ll.fxe3 l:'!:b8
12.l:'!:b1 lt:Je7 13.c4 (White's greedy
attempt 13.l:'!:xb7? l:'!:xb7 14.hb7
49
Chapter 3
ll.c4 d7 12.<i!?h2 !i:ab8!t Black not only protects his b7pawn, but is also ready to counter
the deployment of his opponent's
knight on dS with the move b7-b5.
ll .id5
mxg2 YlYd7+
. . .
12.c4
hg2
13.
10
.ie6
u.mh2
After ll.!i:bl !i:b8 12.c4 d7
13.mh2 b6 14. .ie3 tt:\d4t Black's
piece-activity provides him with
excellent attacking prospects.
50
Chapter 4
l.e4 e5 2..ic 4
Bishop's Opening
..
/0c6
51
Chapter 4
5.d3?! d5! 6.i.b5 tt'ld6 7.i.xc6+
bxc6 8.fxe5 tt'lf5+ Black's doubled
pawns are not at all weak and his
light-squared bishop will become
very active on the long diagonal
or, if White plays d3-d4, on the f1a6 diagonal.
5.fxe5?! Steinitz - Steffelaar,
Haarlem 1896, This seems to be
the most natural move, but it is a
mistake. After 5... tt'lxe5! 6.tt'lxe5
vgh4+ 7.g3 tt'lxg3 8.i.xf7+ 'it>d8 9.
vgg4 xg4 10.tt'lxg4 ltlxh1 ll.i.d5
i.d6 12.i.xh1 h5 13.tt'le3 i.xh2+
Black ends up with a slight mate
rial advantage in the endgame.
5.i.d5 - White presents his op
ponent with the advantage of the
bishop-pair, but obtains a power
ful centre. 5... tt'lf6 6.i.xc6 dxc6
7.fxe5 tt'ld5 8.0-0 i.e7 9.d4 (9.
tt'lc3 tt'lxc3 10.bxc3 0-0 ll.d3 f6?)
9... i.f5 10.a3 tt'lb6 11.e2 0-0 12.
c4 d7 13.ltlc3 f6? Black ex
changes the e5-pawn, which
cramps his position and it is
White's turn to play very precise
ly.
6 . . . .te6 !N
Black emphasizes quick com
pletion of his development.
7.dxe5
A) 3.c3
This is an attempt to occupy
the centre.
tt'lf6
(diagram)
4.e2
4.d3 tt'la5 - see variation B.
After 4.b3 e7 s.vgc2 g6+
Black comfortably completes his
development.
52
. .
db4!
ttJd4
9.ti'd3
After 9.V9e4 i.xc4 10.tLlc3 hb4
1l.i.e3 c5 12.0-0-0 hc3 13.bxc3
!leSt White is very likely to come
under a dangerous attack.
Af5 1 0 .ti'g3
10
hb4+ ll.c3
B) 3.d3
The main idea of this move is
to enter variations of the King's
Gambit without sacrificing a
pawn.
3 . . . f6
(diagram)
4.f4
4.ttJf3 .ic5 - see Chapter 14;
4.ttJc3 ttJa5 - see variation C.
4. .ig5?! (4.tLle2 ttJ aS+!) 5... h6
5.i.h4, Spielmann - Schlechter,
Karlsbad 1907 (after 5.hf6
V9xf6+, White may be in trouble
53
Chapter 4
10.0-0?! tt:\a7 11.i.a4 b5 12.i.b3
i.xb3 13.cxb3 tt:\c6t Black's pawn
structure is better, so White must
play 10.c3 d5+!, although even
then Black has an excellent posi
tion. He has better development
and a slight space advantage.) 7...
axb6
4 . . . exf4
5.tl:\c3
After 5.lLle2? f3 6.gxf3 d5 7.
i.b5 i.d6+ White's kingside is in
ruins, while after 5.ltJf3 d5 6.exd5
ltJxd5t he will need to present his
opponent with the advantage of
the bishop-pair; otherwise he
cannot regain the f4-pawn.
5. .ixf4?! d5 ! 6.exd5 ltJxd5
5 . . J.b4
.
6.f3
In
mann
1906,
Black
Chapter 4
8...xd5 9.tt:\f3 .b:c3+ 10.bxc3
0-0t His pieces are perfectly
placed, while White's pawns are
vulnerable.
. .
d5 7.exd5 c!Dxd5 8. 0 - 0
C) 3 .!Dc3
3 ... c!Df6
8 . . . hc3 9.bxc3 0 - 0 1 0 .
hd5 ti'xd5
4.d3
ll.J.xf4
White must regain his pawn,
because after ll.c4?! d6 12J'!b1
i.g4 13.d2 (after 13.!!xb7 tt:\d4 14.
c3 tt:lxf3+ 15.gxf.3 i.h3 16J:!f2 l:'lfe8+
he must worry about the safety of
his king) 13...hf3 14.gxf3 tt:\d4+
Black has an extra pawn and bet
ter-placed pieces. In addition, he
maintains excellent attacking
prospects against his opponent's
badly protected king, Knezevic Blagojevic, Petrovac 2004.
. .
lt:la5
5.c!ige2
5.f4?! lt:l xc4 6.dxc4 .ib4 7.d3
(White loses quickly after 7.lt:l f3?
lt:l xe4 8.fxe5 lt:l xc3 9.d2 lt:l xa2
57
Chapter 4
10.c3 tt:Jxc1 ll.cxb4 tt:lb3 0-1 Gal
lagher - Miles, Chicago 1990.) 7...
.hc3+ 8.Wxc3 (after 8.bxc3 We7
9.tt:'lf3 d6 10.a3 c5+ White's bish
op is shut out of play) 8...0-0 9.
fxe5 tt:lxe4 10.Wd4 Wh4+ ll.g3
Wg4 12.f4 f5+ Black has fortified
his knight in the centre and wish
es, after suitable preparation, to
develop his bishop on b7, where it
will be perfectly placed. White, on
the other hand, will have a much
more complex task to activate his
bishop.
5.We2?! tt:Jxc4 6.dxc4 b4 7.
d2 0-0 8.a3 .hc3 9..hc3 We7
10.tt:'lf3 d6 ll.tt:'ld2 tt:ld7 12.tt:lfl tt:lc5
13.b3 f5+ Black is ahead in devel
opment and controls the centre,
Hromadka - Duras, Bad Pistyan
1912.
5.b5 - White's bishop cannot
avoid being exchanged. 5...c6 6.
a4 b5 7.b3 b4 8.tt:lce2 d5 9.exd5
tt:Jxb3 10.axb3 cxd5 ll.tt:'lf3 d6+ In addition to his bishop-pair,
Black maintains a space advan
tage, A.Sitnikov - Tarlev, Evpato
ria 2007.
5.g5 tt:Jxc4 6.dxc4 h6 7.h4
(after 7.e3 b4 8.Wd3, Riemer
sma - Willemsen, Groningen
1989, Black seizes the initiative by
playing 8...tt:lg4 9.d2 c5 10.tt:'ld1
d6t; 7..hf6?! Wxf6 8.tt:ld5 Wd8
9.'1Wh5 d6+ White's knight will not
remain for long on the d5-out
post, while Black's bishops are
much more powerful than White's
knights, which have no secure
squares, Deshmukh - Murali
Krishnan, Chennai 2000) 7...e7
58
Chapter 4
9...'\Wxd3 10.ltlxd3 .ifS ll.ltlbS!
.id6= - The position is complete
ly equal, Casper - Khalifman,
Moscow 1987.
7.exdS .ib4! - This is the most
precise way for Black to solve his
opening problems. He effortlessly
completes his development.
.ic5 !?
6. 0 - 0
White loses after 6.a3? tt:\g4-+
Vyhnalek - Blatny, Decin 1972, or
6..igS? tt:\xc4 7.dxc4 .ixf2+ 8.<;!;>xf2
tt:\g4+ 9.<;!;>e1 WfxgS-+
After 6.tt:\a4? .ie7+ Black gains
an important tempo,
since
White's knight will need to go
back to the c3-square in any
case.
6.tt:\g3 d6 7.0-0, Forgo - Lu
kacs, Zalakaros 1997 (7.h3 tt:\xc4
8.dxc4 .ie6 9.d3 0-0 10.0-0
tt:\d7 Black's plan is based on
Wfh4, followed by g6 and fS; in the
variation 7.tt:\a4 tt:\xc4 8.dxc4 .ib6
9.tt:\xb6 axb6= there arises a com
pletely safe position for Black.
Both sides will have difficulty in
finding an active plan, Pereira Lukacs, Almada 1988) 7. . . .ig4 8.
Wfe1 tt:\xc4 9.dxc4 .ie6 10.b3 0-0
11. .ie3 tt:\d7
6.h3 tt:\xc4 7.dxc4 d6
(diagram)
8.a3 .ie6 9.Wfd3 0-0 - see
8.Wfd3.
8.0-0 .ie6 9.Wfd3, Tischbierek
- V.Chekhov, Berlin 1984, 9...
0-0 10.tt:\g3 tt:\d7
8.Wfd3 .ie6 9.b3 (The aggres-
6 . . . toxc4 7.dxc4 d6
61
Chapter 4
8.d3
8.i.g5 i.e6 9.ltld5 (9.d3 h6 see 8.d3) 9... hd5 10.cxd5 h6
ll.i.xf6 xf6t
Black can solve his problems
with now-familiar manoeuvres
after 8.h3 (8.a3 i.e6 9.d3 a5 10.
b3 0-0 ll.ltlg3 ltld7+t) 8... i.e6 9.
d3 ltld7 10.b3 0-0 ll.ltlg3 h4+t
White cannot hurt his oppo
nent with 8.ltlg3 i.e6 9.b3 0-0
10.ltla4, Valenz - Sodoma, Plzen
2000, since after 10... i.d4 ll.c3
.ib6 12.ltlxb6 axb6=, despite the
absence of his dark-squared bish
op Black has an easy game: ltld7,
h4, g6, f5...
9. . 0 - 0
.
8 . . .ie6
.
1 0 .ig5
9.b3
In the variation 9.i.g5 h6
10. .ixf6 (after 10.i.h4?! g5 ll.i.g3
h5--+ Black launches a direct at
tack against the enemy king) xf6
ll.ltld5 hd5 12.cxd5 0-0 13.c3
a5t Black's powerful dark
squared bishop provides him with
a long-lasting initiative, Babujian
- Dolzhikova, Tromsoe 2010.
After 9.ltla4 ltld7 10.ltlg3 0-0
ll.b3, Forcen - Oms Pallisse, Tos62
l.e4 e5 2. c4 lt'l c6
vides Black with a stable advan
tage, thanks to his control of the
e5-square and the weakness of
White's e4-pawn.
10.lt'ld5 - His knight will not
remain on d5 for long and after
10...lt'ld7 ll.lt'lg3 c6 12.lt'lc3 Wff e7"?
White is practically incapable of
exploiting the vulnerability of the
d6-pawn.
10.b2 - The bishop is rather
passive on this square. 10...a6 11.
Eiad1, Miroshnichenko - Gustafs
son, Chalkidiki 2002. The stand
ard reaction ll...lt'ld7 12.lt'lg3 g61'
enables Black to advance f7-f5,
with good attacking chances.
After 10.h3 lt'ld7 ll.lt'lg3, Mit
kov - Finegold, Bolingbrook
2005, it is very good for Black to
play the standard move ll...Wff h4"?
Black deprives White's bishop of
the h6-square and prepares an of
fensive on the kingside. In the
game, there followed ll...d4
12.e3 lt'lc5 13.'\1;Vd2 he3 14.Wff xe3
f5 15.exf5 hf5 16.lt'lxf5 Eixf5= and
Black equalized completely.
10.lt'lg3 lt'ld7 11.e3 he3 12.
Wffxe3 a6!?= With this move Black
emphasizes that besides the plan
of f7-f5, White must be on the
alert about the possibility b7-b5,
Vogt - A.Petrosian, Riga 1981.
10
h6 ll . .ie3
ll . . . d7 12.lt'lg3 a5 13.a4
13.lt'lf5 xe3 14.Wff xe3 lt'lc5 15.
g4 a4?- White is faced with an un
pleasant choice. He must either
weaken the c4-pawn, or acquiesce
to the opening of the a-file, Ed
wards - Schloesser, Email 1997.
63
Part 2
l.e4 e5 2.f3 c6
All
f6 4 .ib5 .ib4 5. 0 - 0 0 - 0 6.
d3 d6 7 .ig5) Black plays 7 e7!
64
65
Chapter S
l.e4 e5 2.3 c6
Rarely-Played Moves
Ponziani Opening
66
3 . . . tt!f6
4.c3
White can hardly continue the
game without this move. White
intends to seize extra space on the
queenside and takes control over
the important d4-square, while
his queen gains access to the c2square.
4.tt!bd2 dS S.g3?! (his bishop
on g2 will be restricted by his own
pawn on e4, so it would be better
for White to choose S..ie2 .icS see 4..ie2, or S.c3 aS - see 4.c3)
S...dxe4 6.dxe4 .icS 7..ig2 0-0
8.0-0 V!ie7 9.c3 aS 10.a4 b6+
Black easily deploys his forces to
active positions and cannot be
prevented from occupying the d
file and penetrating to the d3square, compressing his oppo
nent's pieces to the maximum,
Bravo Barranco - Fernandez Gar
cia, Barcelona 2000.
4..ie2 dS S.exdS (After S.lt:lbd2
.icS 6.c3 aS, or 6.0-0 0-0 7.c3 aS,
4 . . . d5
5.tt!bd2
S..igS?! - White presents his
opponent with the advantage of
the bishop pair and he will be
forced to fight for equality. S...
dxe4 6..ixf6 xf6 7.dxe4, Loosh
nikov - Smikovski, Moscow 200S,
and now Black's most energetic
line to seize the initiative would
be: 7...gS!? 8..ic4 g4 9.t'iJfd2 i.d7
10.0-0 hS ll.lt:la3 0-0-0 with a
dangerous attack.
67
Chapter S
5.Wc2 a5 6.i.e2 (White cannot
create any problems for his oppo
nent with 6.a4 i.c5 7.i.g5 i.e6
8.lt:\bd2 !J..e7 9.1J..e2 lt:\d7 10.he7
Wxe7 11.0-0 0-0= and he has no
active prospects, but Black will
find it difficult to obtain anything
real out of his slight space advan
tage, Kurajica - Ivkov, Belgrade
1978. The position is equal after
6.lt:\bd2 !J..c5 7.exd5 Wxd5 8.lt:\e4,
Aubert - Beikert, France 1994,
because with the accurate reac
tion 8...1J..e7 9.i.e2 h6 10.0-0 !J.f5
ll.lt:\fd2 0-0= Black can hope to
obtain an edge later thanks to his
comfortably deployed pieces.) 6...
i.c5 7.0-0 (in the variation 7.i.g5
!J.. e6 8.lt:\bd2 h6 9.i.h40-0 10.0-0
d4= White cannot achieve much
from having pinned Black's f6knight.) 7 ... 0-0 8.i.g5 dxe4 9.
dxe4 h6 10.i.h4, Aleksic - Korne
ev, Assisi 2003, and here, Black
could consider trying the sharp
line: 10...g5!? ll.i.g3 lt:\h5+! when
he obtains a very active position
at the cost of a deterioration in his
pawn-structure.
68
a5
6 .ie2
.
.ic5
. .
7. 0 - 0
7.a4 - This is a purely defen
sive move, depriving White of his
only possible active plan, based
on the pawn advance b2-b4.
7...0-0 8.0-0 e8 9.Wc2 i.f8 10.
e1 h6 ll.lt:\f1 i.e6+ White's posi
tion is solid but very passive, lssa
- Jonkman, Cairo 2003.
7.Wa4 - This move helps White
prepare a quick b2-b4. 7... 0-0
8.b4 i.d6 9.b5 lt:\e7 10.0-0 lt:\g6=
White has seized space on the
queenside, but Black has de
ployed his pieces in ideal fashion.
7.Wc2 0-0 8.lt:\b3?! (it is better
for White to play here 8.0-0 We7
9.b3 dB - see 7...0-0; 8.h3?! this move weakens the dark
squares on White's kingside 8...
lt:\h5+) 8...i.a7 9.i.g5 h6 10.1J.xf6
Wxf6 ll.exd5 lt:\e7 12.c4 c6 (12...
lt:\ g6!?t) 13.dxc6 lt:\xc6 The vul
nerability of the dark squares in
White's camp cannot be compen-
0 - 0 8.b3
We7
9.a3
For 9.''c2!? l'!d8 10. .ib2 .ig4!
- see 9..ib2.
White can consider trying 9.
Chapter S
d4, or 14.dxc5 i.xe2 15.gxe2
ltld7!?+ and if White loses his cS
pawn he will have problems with
the protection of his d3-pawn, but
if 16.gcl ltlb4 17.'\Wc4 ltlxa2 l8.ga1
llJ b4+ the number of pawns on the
board remains equal, but White
has numerous weaknesses to wor
ry about.) 14...ltlxd4 15.ltlxd4
i.xd4+ The dark-squared bishops
have been exchanged and Black
maintains a slight but stable ad
vantage owing to his control over
the d4-square.
B) 3.c3
This is the Ponziani Opening.
3 . . . d5
9 ,gds 1 0 .Ylc2 d4
.
ll . .ib2
After ll.cxd4 i.xd4 12..ib2 (if
12.gbl?! ltlhS 13.g3 .ih3 14.gel
ltlf6t Black's activity is very dan
gerous) 12...i.xb2 13.V;Vxb2 i.g4+
Black will inevitably exchange his
bishop for White's knight to gain
control of the d4-square.
In the variation ll.c4 ltlhS+
White is deprived of any active
play for a long time, V. Pogosian
- Zhukova, Aix-les-Bains 2011.
B1) 4 .ib5?
4 . . . dxe4 5. c!bxe5
S.i.xc6+ bxc6 6.ltlxe5 YlYgS see S.ltlxeS.
5 . . . V;Vg5!
The double attack against g2
and eS presents White with prob
lems that he will be unable to
solve.
6.'lfa4
6..ixc6+ bxc6 7.W/a4 W/xg2 see 6.W/a4.
6.d4 W/xg2 7.:1U1 d6! 8.W/h5
(In the variation 8.li:lxc6 i.d7 9.
W/a4 a6 10.lt:la3 :Bc8+ Black re
gains his piece, ending up with a
great lead in development, while
after 9.lt:lxa7 c6 10.c4 :Bxa7 11.d5
c5 12.lt:la3 :Bxa3 13.bxa3 b5 14.e2
lt:lf6 15.e3 0-0+ his compensa
tion for the exchange is more than
sufficient. White's pieces are un
coordinated, his king is stranded
in the centre and his pawns are
weak, Hlavacek - Tsenkov, Email
2005.) 8...g6 9.W/h4 .ixe5 10.dxe5
d7 11.f4, Velimirovic - Boudiba,
Luzern 1989. Now Black should
complete his development by
playing ll...lt:lge7 12.lt:ld2 0-0-0
13.0-0-0 lt:lf5 14.W/g5 W/xg5 15.
.ixg5 lt:lxe5 16.e2 :Bde8+ and al
though White's bishops are
strong, this cannot compensate
for his lost pawn, because Black's
pieces are very well placed.
fixg2 7 .b:c6 +
9.gfl
White's position is hopeless
after 9.W/xa8 '?9xh1+ 10.@e2 d6
ll.lt:lxt7+ @d7 12.lt:lxd6 cxd6-+
and he will be mated or else he
loses his entire queenside.
In the variation 9.W/d5+ .id6
10.lLlxt7+ @e7 ll.W/g5+ 'lfxg5 12.
lt:lxg5 b7 13.0-0 @f6 14.d4 exd3
15.f3 @g6 16.lt:le4 he4 17.fxe4
71
Chapter S
lt:\f6+ White's position is very dif
ficult, because his queenside is
completely undeveloped, Pech Krupikov, Email 2005.
After 9.<;!,?d1 xh1+ 10.<;!,?c2 lt:\h6
1l.xa8 .id6 12.lt:\c6+ (White pre
serves more chances of saving the
game with 12.lt:\c4 xh2+) 12...
<;!,?d7 13.lt:\xa7 lt:\g4 14.lt:\a3 lt:\xf2-+
White is completely helpless
against the combined action of
Black's forces, Taylor - Hebden,
Aintree 1998.
9
<;!,?dt
11.lt:\c6+ <;!,?d6-+
13
e3+ 14.d3
13.b3
The alternatives for White lose
quickly:
13.lt:\a3 f6 14.lt:\c6+ <;!,?t7 15.lt:\d4
d3+! 16.<;!,?b3 .ig4 17.lt:\ac2 (after
17.c6 .id1+ 18.lt:\ac2, Black wins
with GM L.Gutman's recommen
dation - 18....id6 19.d5+ <;!,?g6
20.f5+ <;!,?h6 21.f3i.xc2+ 22.lt:\xc2
lt:\e7-+) 17...lt:\e7 18.xa7 .ie6+
19.lt:\xe6 d5+ 20.<;!,?a4 d7+ 21.
<;!,?b3 xe6+ 22.<;!,?a4 ll:\d5 23.b4
hb4 24.lt:\xb4 gas 0-1 Radoor 72
4 . . . f6
Black securely bolsters the e5pawn and hopes to complete his
development more easily than his
opponent.
5 . .ib5
After 5.exd5, the reduction of
the tension in the centre is in
Black's favour, since it facilitates
the task of developing his pieces.
5...'\WxdS 6.d4 (For 6..ib5 ll'lge7 see 5..ib5; if 6.b4 .id7 7.b5, Black
can provide an excellent square
for his knight by the intermediate
and now:
6.ll'lbd2 W/d7 (The inaccurate
move 6....id6?! enables White to
play 7.d4t and seize the initia
tive.) 7..ie2 ll'lge7 8.0-0 a6 9.d4
(It is still not too late for him to
simplify the position. It is inferior
for White to opt for 9.b4 ltlg6+
73
Chapter S
Ljubojevic - Palacios de la Prida,
Malaga 1971.) 9... exd4 lO.exdS
(10.cxd4 lLlg6+) lO... i.xdS 11.
ltJxd4 0-0-0 12.ltJ2b3 e8 13.
d1 ltJxd4 14.xd4 lLlc6 15.g4+
'i!?b8= Black has no problems, but
White's position has no problems
either;
In the variation 6.i.e3 i.d6 7.
ltJbd2 lLl ge7 8.d4 0-0= Black eas
ily completes his development,
Turkov - Nightingale, Email
2009;
6.i.e2 i.d6 7.exd5 (after 7.b4
ltJ ge7 8.ltJ bd2, B.Savchenko Delorme, Rijeka 2010, the sim
plest way for Black to stop the ad
vance of White's queenside pawns
is with the move 8... a6=) 7... i.xd5
8.ltJbd2 (In response to 8.d4,
Black equalizes with 8... exd4 9.
cxd4 ltJge7 10.0-0 0-0 ll.lLlc3
i.f7 12.i.c4 e8=; after 8.0-0
ltJ ge7 9. .ie3 it would be good for
Black to play the natural move
9... 0-0, not fearing 10.c4 in view
of 10... ltJd4! ll.i.xd4 i.c6 12.c2
exd4 and here it is bad for White
to continue with 13.lLlxd4? i.xh2+
14.'i!?xh2 xd4+, while in the vari
ation 13.lLlbd2 b6 14.lLlb3 i.cS=
Black maintains his space advan
tage.) 8... ltJge7 9.0-0 0-0 10.lLle4
fS (the position is equal after 10...
e8 ll.i.d1 lLld8 12.xe8 xe8=)
ll.lLlxd6 xd6? Black has grant
ed his opponent the advantage of
the bishop pair but has seized
space and has no problems with
his development.
5 .tL!ge7 6.exd5
6 . . . xd5
7.d4
White should try to gain space;
otherwise, after 7.0-0?! e4, he
will have difficulties equalizing.
7. . . e4
8.c4
After 8.i.c4 '!WaS 9.'\WxaS 'i:lxaS
10.'i:lfd2 'i:l xc4 ll.lLlxc4 i.e6 12.
'i:lbd2, Reznicek - Hladik, Havi
rov 2010, Black can play 12... fS
13.0-0 lLlg6t and he maintains
the initiative in the endgame,
thanks to his powerful light7S
Chapter S
squared bishop, which has no op
ponent.
8.l!jfd2 g5 9. \!;>f1 (White can
hold the balance with the sur
prising line: 9.fl! e3 10.fxe3
xe3+ 11.e2 g4 12.d1 xe2+
13.xe2 .ixe2 14.\!;>xe2 l2'ld5=) 9 . . .
a6 10.l2'la3? (after 10.e2 g6+
White's position is worse, but
there is plenty of fight left) 10 . . .
axb5 11.xa8, Ovetchkin - Ha
matgaleev, Perm 1998 and here
Black can immediately settle the
issue with ll . . . f5, because White
is helpless against the threat of
12 . . . l2Jd5.
2006.
d8 9.tlJfd2
1 0 .tlJxe4
It is too risky for White to play
76
Chapter 6
4.d4
In response to 4..ic4, Black
has an interesting counter-blow
4... lt:lxe4! - a move which has
been analyzed in the recently
published book of GM Konstantin
Sakaev "The Petroff: an Expert
Repertoire for Black" - but he
can also go into the Italian Game
Chapter 6
0-0 10J''l e1, Drazic - Blagojevic,
Zadar 2009, since after 10... b6+
Black prepares the development
of his light-squared bishop to a
wonderful square and, thanks to
his slight space advantage, he ob
tains the better prospects. After
6.b5 l!Jxc3 7.bxc3 d6=, White's
extra tempo a2-a3, in comparison
to the position with colours re
versed in the variation with 4.d4,
cannot provide him with an ad
vantage - see Chapter 10.) 5...
l!Jxe4 6.1!t/e2 (The position of the
pawn on a3 cannot guarantee an
edge for White in the variation 6.
l!Jxe5 1!t/g5 - see 4.e2; in the line:
6.0-0 1!t/d6 7.1!t/e2 l!Jxc3 8.dxc3
f6+ Black fortifies his centre and
can gradually compensate for his
lag in development, Starostits Colin, Calvi 2009) 6... l!Jxc3 7.
1!t/xe5+ 1!tle7 8.dxc3 d7 9.1!t/xe7+
(9.hc6 hc6 10.i.e3 1!t/xe5 11.
l!JxeS bS 12.a4 a6= Visser Van der Wiel, Hilversum 2006)
9... he7 10.i.f4 (or 10.e3 a6 11.
a4 bS 12.b3 e6=) 10... 0-0-0
11.0-0-0, Kindermann - Gyime
si, Austria 2004 and after playing
11... a6 12.a4 bS 13.i.b3 e6+
Black considerably restricts the
mobility of his opponent's light
squared bishop, which will not be
activated any time soon.
4.d3 dS S.exdS l!JxdS - Black
has occupied the centre and is
able to harmoniously complete
his development. Only one game
between grandmasters has been
played with this line and it contin
ued with 6.g3, Slobodjan - Babu78
..
exd4
5.t0d5
This is the Belgrade Gambit.
The move 5.tt:lxd4 leads to the
Scotch Game - see Chapter 10,
variation A.
5 .ie7 6 .ic4
6.tt:lxd4 tt:lxd5 7.exd5 (after 7.
tt:lf5? i.b4+ 8.i.d2, Ju.Hodgson Orr, London 1985, 8... tt:lf6-+
Black should win easily with his
extra piece) 7...tt:lxd4 8.'\!;lfxd4
0-0? - after the exchange of all
the knights, White's space advan
tage does not impede the harmo
nious development of the rest of
Black's pieces, Sax - An.Karpov,
Tilburg 1979.
. . .
79
Chapter 6
In the variation 6.i.d3 0-0
7.0-0 d6 8.h3 l"!e8+ Black pre
serves his extra pawn, Reinsdorf
Karmann,
Dittrichshuette
2004.
6.i.b5 0-0 7.0-0 d6 8.lL\xd4
(after 8.i.xc6 bxc6 9.lL\xf6+ .ixf6
10.lL\xd4 c5 ll.lLle2 i.a6+ Black's
powerful bishop pair gives a sta
ble edge, Fletzer - Zimmerman,
Venice 1949) 8... lL\xd4 9.xd4
lL\xd5 10.exd5 i.f6 11.'?9d3 a6
12.i.a4 b5 13.i.b3 g6 Black's
bishops are more active than
White's, but White has a slight
space advantage, Szilagyi
Kluger, Budapest 1963.
6.i.f4 d6 7.lL\xd4 (The alterna
tives are no better for him. After
7.i.b5 0-0 8.0-0 i.g4+, or 7.i.d3
i.g4 8.h3 .txf3 9.'?9xf3 0-0 10.
0-0 lL\e5 ll.he5 dxe5+ Phoo
balan - Ashwath, New Delhi
2007, or 7.'?9d3 0-0 8.0-0-0 i.g4
9.h3, Riemens - Erwich, Amster
dam 2002, 9... .th5+ White fails to
regain his pawn, while in the va
riation 7.i.c4 i.g4 8.h3 hf3 9.
xf3, Martensen - Hodl, Meck
lenburg 1998, 9... 0-0+ his bishop
pair provides him with some com
pensation, but not enough... )
7... 0-0
0 - 0 7. 0 - 0
xd5 1 0 .hd5
10
. .
.tf6 11.Vfid3 aS
d6 8.xd4 xd4
9.tbd4
After 9.ti:Jxe7+ Vfixe7 10.'1Wxd4
Vfixe4 ll.Vfic3 Vfffc6+ White did not
obtain any compensation for the
81
Chapter 7
xd5 6 . .ig2
6 . . . xc3 7.bxc3
According to our database, the
diagram position was reached for
the first time in the game Nim
zowitsch - E.Gruenfeld, Karlsbad
1923. It has been tried by some
other famous players too, but it
was GM Igor Glek who analyzed it
thoroughly and began to play the
move 4.g3 regularly and success
fully at grandmaster level.
7 .ic5
4 . . . d5
After this move Black obtains
a slight space advantage.
He has a reasonable alterna
tive here - 4...i.c5!?, which was
covered in detail in the recently
published book "The Petroff: an
Expert Repertoire for Black" by
Konstantin Sakaev.
5.exd5
82
8. 0 - 0
For 8.e2 0-0 9.0-0 e8 -
Chapter 7
tive, thanks to his greater control
of the centre. In addition, he tar
gets White's c3-pawn, which
might become very important in
many variations.
1 0 .h3
10. .ie3?! - This move leads to
a change in the pawn structure
which is not in White's favour,
Rodriguez - Miguel Lago, Mon
dariz 1995, 10... .b:e3 ll.fxe3 e4!
12.dxe4 We7+ Almost all White's
pawns are weak and his bishop is
passive.
10.'W'e1 f6 11.ltld2 (For ll.h3
.ih5 - see 10.h3; or ll.l'!b1 Wd7
12.We4 .ib6= Black has securely
covered his b7-pawn, fortified his
centre and developed his pieces in
ideal fashion, Aguilar Melian Mengual Bolo, Email 2008; after
ll.We4 .ie6 12.1!9h4 l'!b8, White
can hardly organize any active
Chapter 7
Black regains his pawn and it be
comes pointless to continue the
game.) 13.. .f5 14.li:'lc4 d7?
1 0 . . . i.h5
ll.g4
ll. .ie3?! - Just as on the pre
vious move, this leads to a change
in the pawn structure which is not
in White's favour. ll... .txe3 12.
fxe3 e4! 13.dxe4 .txf3 14.xf3
tt:le5 15.e2 e7+ Black's power
ful centralized knight is stronger
than White's bishop, restricted by
the pawn on e4, Belkhodja - Daas
Hossem, Tunis 2001.
In reply to 11.e2, Nyysti Van Hoolandt, Helsinki 2001, it
seems reasonable for Black to
support his e5-pawn by playing
ll... f6 (without the inclusion of
12.tt:lg5
12.'!We2 l"!e8 13.tt:lg5 (in answer
to 13.tt:ld2, Jensen - Efimov,
Email 2009, it is very good for
Black to continue with 13...'!Wd7
14.tt:le4 e7 15.l"!e1 f5 16.gxf5 hf"Sf!
followed by the transfer of his
87
Chapter ?
knight to e6) 13...h6 14.ll:Je4 b6
15.c;!lh1 (15.\Wf3, Burnett - M.Kan
torik, Tatranske Zruby 2008, 15...
ll:Je7 16J'!b1 b8 - he wants to
push c7-c6, while after 17.c4 Black
is ready to retreat 17...ll:Jc6 18.c3
e7?) 15...ll:Je7? Lupulescu Kir.Georgiev, Rijeka 2010.
12 . . . e7 13.ll:Je4 f5 !
15 . . . .i.g6
16.\Wg4 f5
17.trh5
17.\Wg3 c;!lh8?
17 . . . .i.g6= and the game Ste
vie Adams, Plovdiv 2010 ended
in a draw after a three-fold repeti
tion of moves.
-
Chapter S
4 . . . .ib4
We believe that this ancient
symmetrical response provides
Black with excellent chances of
equalizing. He has a good alterna
tive though. This is the sharper
move 4...ltld4!? - see Konstantin
Sakaev's book "The Petroff: an
Chapter S
plaiting this.) 8... exf3 9.'Wxf3 0-0
10.0-0 'Wh4 ll.i.e2?! (White
needs to make one more precise
move, and after ll.d3 i.d6=
Black's slight initiative is not dan
gerous, unless White weakens the
light squares around his king with
12.g3?! 'Wh3+ Falout - Vaindl,
Czech Republic 1999.) ll... l"l:e8 12.
d3 i.d6 13.g3 'Wa4t Black's pieces
are noticeably more active and he
has a dangerous initiative. The
game Y.Meister - Kurnosov, Sat
ka 2008, ended in a win for him
after 14.c3 i.h3 15.l"l:e1? i.g4 0-1.
5.d3 d6 6.i.g5 (6.0-0 0-0 see 5.0-0; 6.i.xc6+ bxc6 7.0-0
0-0 - see 5.0-0; it is too passive
for White to play 6.i.d2 0-0 7.
0-0 !iJe7 8.a3 i.a5 9.i.c4 c6 10.
i.a2 !iJg6= Black has covered the
d5-square and can try to seize the
initiative later with the move d6d5, or prepare the transfer of his
knight to the f4-square, Bara
midze - Kir.Georgiev, Kusadasi
2006; it is no better for White to
opt for 6.a3 i.xc3+ 7.bxc3 0-0 8.
0-0 h6 9.l"l:e1, because by playing
9... a6 10.i.a4 !iJa5= Black de
prives his opponent of his only
trump - his advantage of the
bishop pair.) 6... h6 7.i.h4 g5 8.
i.g3, Legaspi - Iuldachev, Kuala
Lumpur 2008. Here it is worth
considering 8... 0-0!? 9.a3 i.xc3+
10.bxc3 !iJa5 ll.i.a4 c6 12.!iJd2 b5
13.i.b3 !iJxb3 14.cxb3 i.g4! 15.f3
i.e6= With his bishop manoeu
vre, Black has deprived his oppo
nent of control of the important
h5-square and his knight cannot
90
Chapter S
6...d6 7.h3 (It is no improvement
to opt for 7.hc6 bxc6 8.tt:\d1, be
cause by playing 8.. J"!:e8= Black
prevents d2-d4 and prepares the
pawn-advance d6-d5, ending up
with a space advantage.) 7...h6 8.
tt:\d1 .ia5 9.c3 .ib6 10.d3 .ie6=
Black has deployed his pieces in
ideal fashion and has no problems
whatsoever, Santamaria - Mon
teros, Barranquilla 1995.
6J"!:e1 d6
A) 6 . .bc6
This exchange deserves atten
tion, but Black obtains the advan-
6 . . . dxc6
7 . . . i.g4
7.d3
After 7.!'1e1 e8 8.a3 (in re
sponse to 8.d3 it seems good for
Black to opt for 8... h6 9.h3 b6
10.i.e3 .b:c3 11.bxc3 c5= fortify
ing his position in the centre) 8...
i.d6 9.h3 l:iJd7? - this standard
transfer of Black's knight to the
e6-square provides him with an
excellent position.
7.l:iJxe5 e8 8.l:iJd3 (after 8.l:iJf3
l:iJxe4 9.l:iJxe4 xe4+ Black has the
bishop pair and superior develop
ment, Forgacs - Vidmar, Buda
pest 1913; in the variation 8.d4
.b:c3 9.bxc3 l:iJxe4= Black has the
better pawn-structure, but he
cannot really exploit this, Tauben
haus - Chigorin, New York 1889)
8 ... .b:c3 9.dxc3 l:iJxe4 10.e1 (af
ter 10.'?;Yf3 '?;Yf6 1l.'?;Yxf6 l:iJxf6= the
opponents can agree to a draw,
Spassky - Ljubojevic, Linares
1985; White has no chances of ob
taining an advantage after 10.i.f4
i.f5 11.e1 l:iJd6= Michiels Sasikiran, Antwerp 2009, or 11.
8.h3
In answer to 8.i.g5 it is good
for Black to play 8... 'Wd6 9.a3
.b:c3 10.bxc3 l:iJd7=, followed by a
later transfer of his knight to the
e6-square.
It is no improvement for White
to opt for 8.i.e3 l:iJd7? since Black
is ready to exchange on c3, fol
lowed by c6-c5, as well as accom
plish the standard manoeuvre of
the knight to e6.
After 8.'We2 l:iJd7 9.l:iJd1, it is
good for Black to continue with
9... '?;Yf6t, which would lead to a
weakening of White's pawn
structure.
8 . . . J.h5
(diagram)
9.ee2
It is not very easy for White to
get rid of the pin, for example it
would be bad for him to opt for
93
Chapter S
9 . . .c!Dd7 1 0 .dl
. .
B) 6.d3
This is White's main move in
this position. He wants to pin the
enemy knight on f6.
6 . . . d6
8.lDe2
In the diagram position, he
can try to fight for the advantage
with Bl) 7 .ixc6, B2) 7.lDe2 and
B3) 7 .ig5.
Chapter S
8
. .
10
.ic5 !?N
B2) 7.e2
ll .ie3
e7 8.c3
9 . . . c6 1 0 .ta4
l O . . . tiJg6
8 . . . .ta5
ll.d4
9.tiJg3
White has no chance of retain
ing an edge after the alternatives:
9.h3 tiJg6 10.tiJg3 c6 11.i.a4 d5
- see 9.tiJg3; 9.CiJh4 c6 10.i.a4 d5
1l.tiJg3 i.b6 12.h3, Gubanov - Pe-
Chapter S
for the pawn.) 13....ic7= and
Black's position in the centre is
slightly preferable, Llaneza Vega
- Sebastian, Germany 2009.
In answer to ll..ib3, it is good
for Black to play 1l...h6 12.h3 d5=
The position becomes dead
equal after ll.h3 dS 12..ib3, Varga
- G.Timoshenko, Herculane 1996,
12... dxe4 13.dxe4 h6=
ll . . J:e8
12 . . . .ib6 !
12 . .ic2
White supports his e4-pawn.
It would less logical to play
12..ib3 h6 (But not 12...exd4?!
13.cxd4, Alekhine - Euwe, Am
sterdam 1936, since the e4-pawn
is taboo, because if 13...tt'lxe4?
14.tt'lxe4 l"i:xe4 15..ixf7+ @xf7 16.
tt'l g5 White wins the exchange,
so it turns out that Black has sim
ply given up the centre to his op
ponent for nothing.) 13.h3 (It
would be more accurate for White
to continue with 13.dxe5 dxeS
14.c2 .ib6=; in the variation 13.
l"i:e1?! .ig4, he is unable to main
tain his centre and after 14.dxe5,
Janowski - Tarrasch, Ostend
1907, 14... tt'lxe5+ Black destroys
98
13.h3
But not 13.l"i:e1?! .ig4 14..ie3
d5t
13 d5 14. xe5, P.Popovic
Pruijssers, Germany 2010.
.
drawish.
B3) 7 .ig5
e7! ?
8. h4
After 8.e2 c6 9.a4 ttlg6 10.
c3 aS 11.b4, Schiffers - Steinitz,
Nuremberg 1896, it seems very
good for Black to aim his bishop
at the f2-square by playing 11...
b6t
It is not advisable for White to
play 8.c4 c6 9.hf6 (For 9.ttlh4
dS - see 8.h4; it is inferior to
opt for 9.'ti'e2 ttlg6 10.ttlh4,
Janowski - Showalter, New York
1898, since Black can counter this
with 10... ttlf4 11.hf4 exf4+ ob
taining the advantage of the bish
op pair and preparing the open
ing of the central files with the
move d6-d5; White also fails to
retain any advantage with the
line: 9.ttle2 ttlg6 10.c3 a5 11.ttlh4,
Matisons - Kostic, Bardejov 1926,
to which Black can respond with
11... d5 12.exd5 cxdS 13.b3 .ic7=
with a slight advantage in the
centre.) 9... gxf6 10.ttle2 dS 11.a3
.iaS 12.a2 .ib6 13.ttlg3 ttlg6
Black has put White's light
squared bishop out of play and
has excellent counter- chances,
based on eventual activity on the
kingside.
99
Chapter S
8.h3 c 6 9.i.c4 (9.i.a4 lt'lg6 10.
i.b3 h6 ll.i.d2 i.e6= ) 9 ... lt'lg6 10.
lt'lh4, Zavoronkov - Zjukin, Tal
linn 2 0 05 (10.lt'le2? ! h6 ll . .hf6
xf6+ The lack of White's dark
squared bishop is a telling factor
in this position.) 10 . . . lt'lf4 ll.i.b3
lt'le6 12 .he6 fxe6 ! = Black has se
curely covered the fS-square.
8.i.xf6 - This is a very princi
pled move. 8 . . . gxf6
10 .bxc3 cxbS ll.i.gS f6 12 .i.e3
aS+ and he obtains the better
prospects thanks to the weakness
of White's queenside pawns.
9.i.a4 lt'ld7
100
Now:
10.a3 hc3 11.bxc3 lt'lc5 12 .i.b3
lt'lxb3 13.cxb3 i.e6 = and Black has
no problems at all, Y.Gruenfeld Baron, Petach Tikva 2011;
10.i.b3 ll:lcS (10 ... h6? ll . .ixe7
xe7 12.lt'lg6 White ends up with
an extra exchange) ll.lt'lfS hfS
1 2 .exf5 h6 13.i.h4 d7 14.he7
(in the variation 14.f6 lt'lg6 15.fxg7
<;t>xg7 16.ig3 fSt Black has excel
lent attacking chances) 14 . . . xe7
15.lt'le2 dS+ with a very strong po
sition for Black in the centre, Ni
tin - A.Gupta, Dubai 2011;
10.lt'le2 lt'lcS ll.c3 (The game is
B3a) lO.hf6
White is trying to prove that
the weakening of his opponent's
king position is more important
than the advantage of the bishop
pair, which he presents to Black
with this move.
1 0 gxf6
ll.i.b3
ll.exdS cxdS 12 .i.b3 hc3 13.
bxc3 lt'Jg6
101
Chapter S
line : 16 . . . ttlxh4 17.xh4 fxeS 18.
g3 f6 = and the double-edged
variation 16 . . . ttlf4 17.h6 fxeS 18.
13ae1 f6 19.g3 13g8 2 0 .'i!th1 tt:lg6)
1S . . .'i!th8 16.ttlxg6+ (It is inferior
for White to continue with 16.d4
e4+ since Black's centre is very
solid and White's bishop on b3
might remain out of play for long
time to come. 16.g3 d7 17.ttlg2
rtlg7 18.ttle3 d4 ! - Black must dis
lodge the enemy knight from its
excellent post, since White was
already threatening to advance
his f2-pawn. 19.cxd4 exd4 20.ttlg2
i.g4 2 1.dS 13fd8 2 2 .xd7 i.xd7! =
White is unable to make use of the
vulnerability of Black's pawns,
mainly because his knight is badly
misplaced.) 16 . . . fxg6 17.h6 aS
18.a4 13f7 19.f4 b6+ 2 0 .'i!th1 c7
21.fxeS fxeS 22.13xf7 i.x7= White's
pawn on c3 and Black's eS-pawn
are equally weak;
14.ttlxg6?! - It is not logical for
White to strengthen his oppo
nent's king position, although this
move has been played very often.
14 . . .hxg6 1S.d2 (It is inferior for
him to continue with 1S.f4 e4 16.
c4? ! Arngrimsson - Semcesen,
Reykjavik 2 009. Black can coun
ter this with 16 . . . dxc4 17.i.xc4 bS !
18 .i.b3 d4+ 19.rtlh1 exd3 2 0 .
xd3 xd3 21.cxd3 i.fS 2 2 .d4 aS+
and he ends up with the better
endgame, thanks to the possibili
ty of creating an outside passed
pawn. It is also important that
White's centre pawn cannot ad
vance beyond the dS-square.
White fails to equalize with 1S.13b1
102
ll a5 !
This is an important improve
ment on Black's treatment of this
position in a game played nearly a
hundred years ago : ll . . . d6 12.
...
..
B3b) 10 .ib3
Chapter S
This is the most popular reply
for White. He is convinced that
the possibility of capturing on f6
is unlikely to run away.
1 0 a5
Black begins immediately ac
tive queenside play, although it
would be also very good to con
tinue with 10 . . . d6 ! ? , Caruana Aronian, Moscow 2010.
ll.a3
After 11.a4 d6 12 .f3 h6
13 . .ixf6 xf6 14.xf6 gxf6 15.f4
(White fails to obtain any advan
tage with the line : 15.exd5 .ixc3
16.bxc3 tt:lxd5 17 . .ixd5 cxd5 18.f4
l'!a6 ! =) 15 . . . i.e6= White is unlike
ly to be able to exploit the weak
ness of his opponent's kingside
pawns, while Black has already
occupied the centre. Black has
nothing to be afraid of after 16.
exd5 cxd5 17.tt:lb5 l'!ad8= Yu Rui
yuan - Harikrishna, Mashhad
2011. A much more dangerous try
is 16.f5, Kotsur - Pashikian,
Khanty-Mansiysk 2011, but here
Black can obtain excellent coun
terplay with the far-from-obvious
idea of 16 . . . i.c8 ! (the right square
for this bishop is a6 ! ) 17. tt:le2 b6
18.tt:lg3 i.c5+ 19.@h1 l'!d8 ! 20.tt:lh5
l'!d6 21.tt:lf3 (White's attempt to
mate his opponent fails after 21.
l'!f3 @f8 2 2 . l'!g3 i.f2 23.l'!g4 .ixh4
24.l'!xh4 dxe4 25.dxe4 i.a6+) 2 1 . . .
i.a6? and Black has succeeded in
protecting his f6-pawn with his
rook and now the weakness of his
kingside pawns is completely
104
Chapter 9
Chapter 9
on the h-file, while his own king
can be easily evacuated to a safe
zone.) 7 . . .f6 8 . .ib3 (It is more ac
curate for White to continue with
8.lL!f3 0-0 9.c3 dxc3 10.lL!xc3 d6+
and White has some compensa
tion for the pawn, although it is
insufficient. White can also try 8.
lL!f7 Wxf7 9.h5+ g6 10.xc5 d6
11..ib3+ , Ryden -Ahlberg, Goth
enburg 1919, obtaining the advan
tage of the two bishops, but Black
can deprive his opponent of this
trump by giving back his extra
pawn with ll . . . .ie6 12 . .ixe6+
Wxe6 13.c4+ dS 14.b3 Wf7 15.
exdS 'r9xd5 16.xb7 lL!eS 17.
xdS+ lL!xdS+ retaining a consid
erable lead in development.) 8 . . .
fxgS 9.'r9h5+ lL!g6 lO . .ixgS .ie7 11 .
.id2 , Balinov - Sarakauskas,
Schwarzach 2000. White has sac
rificed a piece and kept his oppo
nent's king stranded in the centre,
but after ll . . . b6! 12.f4 .icS ! - +
with the idea of h4 ! , Black easily
neutralizes all the threats.
White's alternatives do not
create any serious problems for
Black:
4 . .ig5 .ie7 S ..ixe7 (It is less
natural for White to play S.h4? !
h6 6 ..if4 lL!f6 7.lL!bd2 0-0 8 . .id3
dS 9.e5 lL!g4+ Black ends up with
an extra pawn and a superior po
sition in the centre. His knight is
ideally placed on the g4-square,
weakened by White's fifth move.)
s ... xe7 6.lL!bd2 lL!f6 7 . .id3 (or
7 . .ib5 b4+) 7 . . . d6 8.0-0 .ig4+
and White has no compensation
for the pawn.
106
A) 4.c3 ! ?
This i s a n interesting sacrifice
of the c-pawn, which is usually ir
relevant in the middlegame, with
the idea of gaining tempi for the
development of the pieces.
4 . . . d5 !
107
Chapter 9
6.cxd4
In answer to 6 . .id3 ? ! it is very
good for Black to play 6 . . . .ig4 7.
e2 Ejjge7 8 ..ie4 d7 9.0-0 0-0-0+
and Black has won a centre pawn
and leads in development.
It is worse for White to play
6.tjjxd4 (jj f6 !+, because his c3pawn merely impedes the devel
opment of his pieces, for example:
7.tjjx c6 (7 ..ie3 .ie7 8.c4 a5+ 9.
tjjc3 tjjxd4 10.hd4 0-0+ and
Black leads in development,
which guarantees him a growing
advantage in a position with open
files in the centre) 7 . . . xc6 8.ltld2
(Entering an endgame with 8.e2+
.ie7 9.b5 .id7 10.xc6 hc6+
merely highlights White's lag in de
velopment; after 8 . .ig5, Black can
mobilize his forces faster: 8 . . . .id7
9.e2+ .ie7 10.ltld2 0-0-0+) 8 . . .
i.g4 9 . f3 , Schrimpl - Tschanter,
Email 2 005 and here Black can
exploit his opponent's develop
ment problems by playing 9 . . .
0-0-0! 10.fxg4 !'!:e8+ ll.i.e2 xg2
12 .!'!:fl i.c5--+ and White will be un
able to activate his queenside.
After 6.i.e2 i.g4 7.0-0 (7.cxd4
i.b4 - see 6.cxd4) 7 . . . d3 ! 8.xd3
108
7 . .ie2
It would be too passive for
White to opt for 7.lt:lbd2? 0-0-0
8.i.e2, Munk - Miklos, Bratislava
Chapter 9
8 . .ixf3!
Black is not forced to present
his opponent with the advantage
of the two bishops, but this is his
most direct road to equality.
9.hf3c4
..
1 0 . .ixc6+
White's alternatives are not
very promising.
10.d5? ! d4 ll.i.d2 0-0-0+
- White's king is stranded in the
centre and the dS-pawn is weak,
Viszlai - Marek, Presov.
After 10 .i.d2 0-0-0 ll.i.xc6,
Goris - Schott, Davos 2006 (after
ll.a3 i.aS+ White will have prob
lems with his centralized king and
the protection of his d4-pawn.)
11.. .xc6+ White has given up his
only advantage - the two bishops
- and has gained nothing in return.
In the variation 10.i.e2 i.xc3+
ll.bxc3 xc3+ 12 .i.d2 xd4+ the
position is opened and White's
bishop-pair provides some com
pensation for his two missing
pawns, Mehlhorn - Van Bogaert,
corr. 1992.
10.i.e3 i.xc3 + ll.bxc3 xc3 +
12 .fl (12 . .id2 a3= ) 12 . . . c4+
110
1 0 . . . bxc6
11.1Ne2+
After 11.'Wb3 xb3 12.axb3
aS= the mutual weaknesses on
the queenside balance the pros
pects.
Chapter 9
0-0-0 lt:'le7+) 14 ... lt:'le7 1S.lt:'la2
l'!he8 16.lt:'lxb4 axb4 17.l'!fe1 ltJdS.
Black has no problems at all.
White's attempt to simplify the
position as much as possible with
the line 18 ..id2 l'!xe1+ 19.he1
l'!e8 2 0.l'!a8+ 'i!ld7 2 1.l'!xe8 'i!lxe8
2 2.f3 'i!ld7 23.g4 cS ! + fails, be
cause despite the fact that the
fight continues on both sides of
the board, only Black can play for
a win, since his pieces are notice
ably more active, while White's
queenside pawns are weak,
Spooner - MacKintosh, Email
20 03.
11 . . . -exe2+ 12.xe2 lt:'le7
Black's queenside is in ruins,
but White will find it difficult to
exploit this effectively, while
Black has a clear-cut plan of ac
tion against the enemy d4-pawn.
13 . .te3
It is no better for White to opt
for 13.l'!d1 0-0-0 14.'i!lfl cS 1S.
dxcS, Havlikova - Miturova,
Czech Republic 2 0 04, because the
game ends in a draw almost by
force, after 1S ...hc3 16.l'!xd8+
l'!xd8 17.bxc3 l'!d3 18 ..ib2 l'!d2
112
15.gacl
White has no advantage after
1S.l'!d3 ltJfS 16J'!ad1 cS 17.dxc5
l'!xd3 18.l'!xd3 hcS= Varitski Pedersen, Pardubice 2 0 0S.
B) 4 . .ic4
The Scotch Gambit. This is a
useful developing move. White
delays the pawn-advance c2-c3
for a while, although he can hard
ly manage without it. In fact,
Black's pawn on d4 deprives
White's knight on b1 of its best
development square - c3.
4 .ic5
It is natural for Black to pro
tect his d4-pawn, preventing its
capture.
5. 0 - 0
The variation 5.c3 tt:lf6 trans
poses to the Italian Game - see
Chapter 18.
5.i.f4? ! We will study this
move only for the sake of statis
tics, since White has won all the
games so far played with it. 5 . . . d6
6.tt:lg5, Valverde Lujan - Rubio
Chapter 9
for similar reasons, to opt for 7.
c3? - 7 ... ./tJeS 8 . .ie2 d3 9 ..id1 dS-+ ;
7.tt'lf3? - this move loses a second
pawn. 7 . . . xe4+ 8.d1 fS 9 .
j:'1e1+ .ie7- + ; 7 . ./tJ xfl tt'lxfl 8.
ht7+ xfl 9.xcS, Bassett Woollett, Dublin 1892, after 9 . . .
b 6 lO.bS aS !+ White has re
gained his pawn, but is consider
ably behind in development.) 7 . . .
d 6 8.h3 (Here i t i s bad t o continue
with 8.f4? .ig4 9.h4, Stein Lobo, Palo Alto 198 1, 9 . . . .ie2 ! 10.
.ixe2 d3+ 11.h1 dxe2 12,j:'1e1
.lt'ld4- + , or 8.c3? .ig4 9.h4 .lt'leS !
10.cxd4 hd4 11..ib3 f6 12 . .1t'lh3
.lt'lht7- +) 8 . . . ./tJeS 9 . .ib3 (9 . .ibS+?
c6 10 . .ia4 .lt'lg8 ! - + Black transfers
his passive knight to a better
square, with tempo) 9 . . . .id7 10.
f4 .lt'lc6 11.fS (11 ..id2 0-0-0+)
0-0-0+ White can capture the
enemy t7-pawn, but his queenside
is undeveloped and his e4-pawn
will need additional protection.
White can regain his pawn by
playing 6 . .1t'lxt7 .lt'lxt7 7.ht7+ (Af
ter 7.hS e7 8.ht7+ xt7 9.
xeS b6 10.bS aS+ White has
problems evacuating his king
away from the centre) 7 . . . xt7 8.
hS+ g6 9.xcS (9.dS+ g7 10.
xeS j:'1e8+)
114
6.c3
The alternatives rebound on
White :
6.tt:lg5 ? ! - This premature at
tack merely leads to a loss of tem
pi. 6 . . . ltle5 7 ..tb3 h6 8.f4 d3+ 9.
@h1 dxc2 10.'xc2 hxg5 11.fxe5
ltlh6 12.e6 (12.exd6 xd6 ! - + with
the idea of mating the opponent
after 13 ..ixg5 xh2+ 14.@xh2
tt:lf5+ 15.i.h6 l3xh6#) 12 . . . fxe6 13.
e5 ltlf5 14.l3xf5 exf5 15.e6 f6-+
Black has an extra exchange, su
perior development and an at
tack, Garcia Ilundain - Shirov,
Villarrobledo 1997.
6.h3 ? ! - White prevents his
knight from being pinned at the
cost of an important tempo. 6 . . .
tt:lf6 7.l3e1 (7.c3 dxc3 8.ltlxc3 h 6
9.i.f4 o-m: Helvensteijn - La
crosse, Netherlands 1996; or 7.
i.g5 h6 8.i.h4 0-0 9.ltlbd2 l3e8
10 .l3e1 ltle5 n . .td3 tt:lg6 12 .i.g3,
Harvey - Walker, Hinckley 2008,
12 . . . i.e6+, and in both cases
White's compensation for the sac-
Chapter 9
6J'!:e1 tt'lf6 7.e5 (7.c3 dxc3 8.
tt'lxc3, P.Balogh - Tropp, Liptovs
ky Mikulas 2005, 8 . . . tt'lg4 ! 9J!fl
tt'lge5 10.tt'lxe5 tt'lxe5 11.i.e2 a6! +
Black takes care of his bishop and
retains an extra pawn) 7 . . . dxe5
8.tt'lxe5 o-m=. White has opened
the e-file but Black has managed
to evacuate his king, Galli - Soli
nas, Bratto 1999.
6 . . J.g4!?
Black does not need the extra
pawn and he tries to use the time
that White will spend regaining it
to create meaningful counterplay.
.
7.ti'b3
7.h.f7? - This combination
loses. 7 . . . @xf7 8.tt'lg5+ xg5 9.
b3+ i.e6 10.1!t/xb7, Allen - Adle
man, Warren 1994, 10 . . . g6 ! 11.
xa8 .ih3 12 .g3 1!t/xe4- + and
Black mates quickly.
7.h3? ! - White obtains the ad
vantage of the two bishops, but
falls behind in development. 7 . . .
.ixf3 8 .xf3 f6 9.e2 ll::lg e7 1 0 .
b 4 .ib6 11.i.b2, Marra - Pinheiro,
Volta Redonda 2001, 11 . . . tt'lg6 12.
g3 h5 and Black begins a decisive
attack.
116
7 .lxf3!
9. gxf3
After 9.i.xg8? 1"i:xg8 10.gxf3
g5+ the d4-pawn hampers White's
harmonious development and his
king is vulnerable, so Black has
excellent attacking prospects.
(diagram)
White loses almost by force af
ter 11.\tlh1 Wf6 12.f4 gxf4 13.Wxb7,
Suhle - Anderssen, Cologne 1859,
13 . . . Wg5 ! 14.xa8+ lt:Jd8 15.e5
Chapter 9
ll
. . .
12.'llYd l
White is lost after 1 2 .'llYxb7?
l'l:b8 13.d5 h4 14.g2 g5-+
since Black's attack is decisive.
12 . . . {6 13.f4
After 13.l2Jd5 f7 14.g2 c6 15.
l2Je3 g6+ 16.h1 hS 17.g2
g6= the game ends in a draw by
repetition.
13 g5 !
Black brings his rook on g8
into action.
14.fxg5, Sosnik - Toczek,
Mikolajki 1991.
14.f5 g4 1S . .tf4 l2Jf3+ 15.h1,
Von Heydebrand - Mayet, Berlin
1839, 15 . . . c6+ and Black deprives
the enemy knight of the excellent
dS-square, after which White's
pieces will have difficulty in find
ing good squares. Both kings look
exposed, but White cannot hurt
118
Chapter 10
Chapter l O
Black's prospects are preferable,
thanks to his superior pawn
structure.
5.c4? ! - This attempt by
White to organize an attack
against the enemy king is prema
ture. 5 . . . ltJxe4 6.ltJxc6 (After 6.
0-0 d5 7.b5 d7+ Black has an
extra centre pawn. White can re
gain it with 6.hf7+ \t>xf7 7.''h5+
g6 8.''d5+ \t>g7 9.ltJxc6, but after
9 . . . ''e8 ! 10.''e5+ ''xeS 11.ltJxe5
b4+ 12 .c3, Petrik - Priehoda,
Nova Bana 1983, 12 . . . d6 ! 13.ltJf3
b6+ Black obtains the advantage
of the two bishops and his pieces
are very comfortably placed.) 6 . . .
bxc6 7.''e2 Vfie7 8.0-0. White
leads in development at the cost
of a pawn, but Black can neutral
ize his activity with the precise re
sponse 8 ... ltJd6 ! 9.e1 (9.e3?! ltJf5
10.e1 d5 11.d3 ltJxe3 12.''f3 e6
13.xe3 ''b4+ with an extra cen
tre pawn and the advantage of the
two bishops.) 9 . . . xe2 10.xe2 +
e7 11.d3 \t>d8+ Black should
not be afraid of coming under at
tack, now that the queens have
disappeared from the board. After
the completion of his develop
ment, his advantage will increase.
5 .e5? ! ltJxe5 6.e2 . White has
given up a pawn and he needs to
try to create some difficulties for
his opponent. 6 . . . ''e7 7.ltJf5. This
is his most attractive move, but
not the best. (He should prefer
7.f4 d6 8.ltJc3 ltJg6 9.e3 a6
10.0-0-0 c5 ll.ltJf3 e6 12 .ltJg5
f5+, or 7.ltJc3 ltJc6 8.ltJdb5 xe2+
9 .he2 @dB+ and in both cases
120
l.e4 e5 2. tiJj3 tiJc6 3.d4 exd4 4. tiJxd4 tiJf6 5. tiJxc6 be 6. tiJc3 i.b4
13Jxd8+ @xd8= Black has ex
changed a pair of rooks, his king
is safe and he can think about
seizing the initiative.
5 bxc6
..
A) 6.toc3
This position is very often
reached from the Four Knights
Game.
6 . . . .ib4
7 .id3
The alternatives for White re
duce him to fighting for equality.
7.i.d2 V!ffe 7 8 . .id3 hc3 9.hc3
tiJxe4 10.0-0 tiJxc3 ll.V!ffh S tiJe2 +
12 .he2 0 -0+ Black has a solid
extra pawn and he will easily
make up his slight lag in develop
ment.
7.i.g5 h6 8.i.h4 0-0 9.i.d3 dS
10.0-0 hc3 ll.bxc3 gS 12 . .ig3
121
Chapter 1 0
dxe4 1 3 . .ic4 '\We7+ Black has won a
pawn, while White will find it dif
ficult to exploit his opponent's
weakened king position.
7.e5 - White's pieces are not
ready to support his space advan
tage. 7 . . . '\We7 8.'\We2 tt:ld5 9 . .id2
tt:Jxc3 10.hc3 hc3+ 11.bxc3
O-m: Rapoport - V. Dmitriev,
Nikolaev 2007.
After 7.'\Wd4 '\We7, White has
difficulties in maintaining the
material balance.
8.exd5
After 8 . .ig5 h6 9 . .ih4 g5 10.
.ig3 dxe4+ Black has an extra cen
tre pawn.
It is rather dubious for White
to opt for 8.e5? ! tt:lg4. Now, we
shall analyze two logical continu
ations:
l.e4 e5 2.lb.j3 lb.c6 3.d4 exd4 4. 0.xd4 lb.f6 5.lb.xc6 be 6.lb.c3 i.b4
1) 9.0-0 0-0 10 .'\!;!fe1 (White
loses quickly after 10.'\!;!fe2 l"le8 11.
f4 i.c5+ 12.'it>h1 0.xh2 !-+ Gunnars
son - Hardarson, Arborg 1998, or
10.f4 ic5+ 11.'it>h1 '\!;!lh4 12 .h3,
Kastner - Schiess}, Passau 1999,
12 ... '\!;!lg3-+, or 10.l"le1 i.c5-+ fol
lowed by '\!;!lh4 ; after 10 .h3 0.xe5
11.i.xh7+ 'it>xh7 12 .'1'9h5+ 'it>g8 13.
'\!;!!xeS i.d6 14.'1'9d4 l"le8+ Black has
two bishops and dominates the
centre, so he has the better pros
pects, Cid Royo - Baron Rodri
guez, Spain 2004; 10.a3 i.c5 11 .h3
0.xe5 12 .i.xh7+ 'it>xh7 13 .'\!;!lhS+
'it>g8 14.xe5 l"le8 15.'\!;!fg3 i.d6 16.
i.f4 '\!;!ff6 17.i.xd6 cxd6+ White has
succeeded in exchanging one of
his opponent's active bishops but
this has strengthened Black's cen
tre, Koekoek - Konijn, Hengelo
1998) 10 . . .f6 11.exf6 Wd6 1 2 .f4
0.xf6+ White had to exchange his
e5-pawn, which was cramping
Black's position and now his king
is vulnerable.
2) 9.i.f4 f6 10.0-0 (10.exf6?!
'\!;!fxf6+ and Black has numerous
unpleasant threats; in the varia
tions 10.h3 0.xe5 11.i.xe5 '\!;!fe7 12.
0-0 fxe5 13.Wh5+ 'it>d8+, or 10 .e6
i.xe6 11.We2 , Alonso - Nuevo
Perez, Seville 2001, 11 . . . d7 1 2 .
i.f5 'it>fT+ White loses his centre
pawn and is unable to exploit the
uncastled enemy king) 10 . . . 0-0
11.exf6 Wxf6 12.i.g3 i.d6 13.Wd2
(13.i.e2 0.e5+ Black has a slight
edge with his perfectly centralized
forces, Afek - Gyimesi, Kecskem
et 1994) 13 . . . !'lb8 14.0.a4, M.
Nikolov - Arnaudov, Sunny
9. 0 - 0
9.i.g5 0-0 10.0-0 c6 - see
9.0-0; after 9.a3 i.e7 10.0-0
0-0, there arises a position from
variation C2 with a white pawn
on a3 rather than a2, but this does
not influence the correct evalua
tion of the position as equal.
9.i.b5+ i.d7 10.We2 + (10.
i.xd7+ ? ! Wxd7 11.0-0 0-0 12.
'\!;!fd3 !'lfe8+ Black has excellent de
velopment and dominates the
centre) 10 . . . i.e7 11.i.xd7+ Wxd7
12.0-0 0-0 13.i.g5 h6 14.hf6
hf6+ - Black's bishop is more
powerful than the enemy knight,
since the latter does not have any
secure outposts, Meister - A.
Onischuk, Togliatti 2003.
The inclusion of the moves
9.We2+ i.e7 cannot change the
character of the fight, because
White's queen on e2 is less active
ly placed than on the f3-square,
while Black's bishop will occupy
the d6-square anyway.
9. 0 - 0
..
123
Chapter 1 0
chances on the queenside and in
the centre, T.Kosintseva - Zaiatz,
Sochi 2 005.
1 0 . c6
..
1 0 . .ig5
This is White's most popular
and aggressive move.
After 10 .h3 c6 11.lLle2 (11.i.g5
h6 - see 10.i.g5) ll .. J'!e8 12.c3
i.d6 13.lLld4 i.c7t Black seizes the
initiative, Tinsley - Em. Lasker,
Leipzig 1894.
Or 10.i.e3 c6 ll.lLla4 l'!:e8 1 2 .
i.f4 i.g4 13.f3, Danilovic - Bakic,
Vrnjacka Banja 1999 and after
13 . . . i.d7+ the weakness of the e3square inside White's camp be
comes a telling factor.
10 .lLlb5 i.g4 ll.f3 i.c5+ 12 .@h1
i.d7 13.c3 i.b6 14.ltJd4 c5 15.ltJf5
l'!:e8+ Black has occupied the cen
tre and his pieces are ideally de
ployed, while White will have
great problems in accomplishing
the same, P. Dobrowolski - Nurk
iewicz, Barlinek 1996.
10.lLle2 l'!:e8 ll.c3, Navara Held, Olomouc 1999, ll . . . i.d6 1 2 .
i.f4 e S t Black takes space and
seizes the initiative.
The game is approximately
equal after 10.i.f4 i.d6 11.d2 c6
12 .lLle2 l'!:e8 13.lLlg3 .txf4 14.xf4
.ie6 = Black has gained a safe and
solid position and has counter124
l.e4 e5 2.lUj3 lUc6 3.d4 exd4 4.lUxd4 lUf 6 5.lUxc6 bc 6.lUc3 ib4
l l.lUe2 - White transfers his
knight to the f4-square, but it is
not very stable there. ll ...h6 12.
i.h4 i.d6
Al) ll.tLla4
125
Chapter l O
14.b3
14.c3 cS 15.i.c2 (15.b3 i.d7
16.tt'lb2 gS 17.i.g3 .ixg3 18.hxg3
\1;Va5t Black's pieces are very ac
tive, Hector - Fernandez Garcia,
Komotini 1992) 15 . . . i.d7 16J''lb 1,
Ki.Georgiev - P.Nikolic, Brussels
1992, 16 . . . :B:e8 17.:B:xe8+ i.xe8 18.
f3 .ic6+ Black maintains a slight
but stable edge thanks to his dom
inance in the centre and White's
passive knight on the edge of the
board.
14.c4 .ie6 15.cxd5 (after 15.:B:c1
d4 16.c5 i.f4 17.:B:a1 gS 18 .i.g3
hg3 19.hxg3, Al.Motylev - Der
vishi, Guarapuava 1995, Black
l.e4 e5 2. 1:iJ.f.3 1:iJ c6 3.d4 exd4 4. 1:iJxd4 1:iJf6 5. 1:iJxc6 be 6. 1:iJ c3 i.b4
could have played 19 . . .'aS 2 0 .b3
l"lfe8t, provoking the weakening
of the important c3-square) 1S . . .
cxdS 16.b3, Pugachov - Shalam
beridze, Mlada Boleslav 1993.
Now it is worth considering 16 . . .
l"lc8 17.l"lc1 '\WaS ! ? , without being
afraid of 18 . .ixf6 gxf6, because
Black's powerltil bishops will
compensate for the weakening of
his castled position. White cannot
organize an attack on the kingside
with the help of his f2-pawn, be
cause in answer to 19.l"lf1 ! ? Black
has the response 19 . . . '\Wb4 !
14 .Ae6 15.1Yf3 gb4 16 .Ag3
c5 17.h3
In the variation 17.i.fS i.xfS
18.'\WxfS gd4 19.l"le2 i.xg3 2 0 .
hxg3, Egin - Belozerov, Seversk
1997, Black can solve the prob
lems with the rather exposed po
sition of his rook and the protec
tion of his cS-pawn with the active
pawn-advance 2 0 . . . c4 ! =
t7 gbs
It is also good for Black to play
here 17 . . . c4 18.i.f1 i.xg3 19.'1Wxg3
'!WaS =
.
A2) ll.ti'f3
..
127
Chapter l O
dominance in the centre, Sutov
sky - Davies, Rishon Le Ziyyon
1995.
12 . . . ti'xf6 13.'xf6 gxf6
Black's two powerful bishops
fully compensate for the defects
of his pawn structure.
14.c!Oe2 .ld6
15.c!Od4
15.c4? ! dxc4 16.hc4 .ie5
17J!ab1 .if5 18.l='1bd1 .ixb2 19.l='1d6
l='1ac8+ and Black has managed to
win a pawn, E. Berg - Najer, In
ternet 2004.
In the variation 15.b3 .ie6 16.
l='1ad1 l='1fd8 17.c4 l='1ac8 18.cxd5
cxd5 19.l='1c1 l='1xc1 20.l='1xc1 l='1c8
21.l='1xc8+ .ixc8= Black's passed
d5-pawn, supported by his strong
bishops, provides him with equal
chances.
In reply to 15.l='1ad1, Votava V. Malakhov, Khanty-Mansiysk
2010, it would be fine for Black to
continue with 15 . . . .ie6 16.tt:\d4
(16.b3 c5=) 16 . . . c5 17.tt:\f5 h5
18 . .ixf5 d4 19.l='1fe1 l='1fe8= and this
endgame, with bishops of oppo
site colour, is equal.
It is more or less the same af128
ll.b3
White has many possibilities
to choose from, but he has no
chance of gaining an advantage
with any of them .
ll.lt':,f3 0-0 12 . .ig5 (after 12 .b3
lt':,e4= Black immediately neutral
izes the threats on the long diago
nal, Rosito - M. Sorokin, Villa Ge
sell 1997) 12 . . . h6 13 ..ih4 l"!fe8 14.
l"!e1 b5 15.b3, Tiviakov - Fressi
net, Pamplona 2 005, 15 . . . '\Wc5= Black is ready to attack the enemy
weakness on c3.
ll.l"!e1 0-0 12.l!fl (White does
not achieve much with 1Vt::l f3 ,
Tartakower - Thiellement, Paris
1955, 12 . . . l"!fe8 =) 12 . . . l"!ab8 13.b3
.ib4= Dolukhanova - Turova,
Salekhard 2008.
ll.c4 - White has matched his
opponent's slight superiority in
129
Chapter 1 0
the centre, but, as compensation
for his weakened pawn-structure
on the queenside, Black's central
ized knight is tremendously
strong. 11 . . . 0-0 12.cxd5 lLlxdS 13.
lt:Je4 l!ad8 14.'\1;Vf3 l!fe8 15.l!d1, E.
Sveshnikov - Morozevich, St. Pe
tersburg 1993, after 15 . . . '\1;Vb5
16 .h3 c6? Black's prospects are
by no means worse.
ll.lLlb3 0-0 12 . .ie3, Pedersen
- Juergens, Denmark 2 001, 12 . . .
l!fe8 13.l!e1 .id6= At a n oppor
tune moment Black can exploit
the insufficient protection of
White's kingside.
11 0- 0 12.i.b2 gfe8 13.
'11;Vf3
Or 13.lt:Jf3 c6=
C) 6.i.d3
This is a very reasonable and
flexible move. White can develop
his knight on b1 either to c3 or d2 .
However, it is rather difficult for
him to obtain any advantage in
this pawn-structure.
6 . . . d5
13 tt)g4
This is the simplest way for
Black to equalize. He plans to ex
change the dark-squared bishops.
14.h3 i.f6 15.hf6 tt)xf6 16.
gfe1 YHd6 17.'%Yc3 c5=
Black
dominates the centre, but White
has quite sufficient resources to
maintain the balance, Godena Onischuk, Reggio Emilia 2 010.
130
Chapter 1 0
ally placed pieces, Velimirovic Kurajica, Banja Luka 1985.) 11 . . .
b7 1 2 .b2 , Brandenburg - Tim
mermans, Dieren 2010; here
Black can play 12 . . . f4 ! ?t, pre
venting the enemy queen from
coming to the f3-square.
White fails to create any prob
lems for his opponent with the
line: 7.g5 e7 8.tLlc3 (8.exd5
'l!tifxd5! 9.1!tiff3?, Rocha - Cleeve, corr.
1987, 9 . . . 1!tifxg5 10.1!tifxc6+ d8 11.
'l!tifxa8 '!tiel+ 12.e2 'l!tixhl-+ and
Black ends up with an extra bish
op.) 8 . . . ttJxe4 9.xe7 '!tixe7 10.
he4 dxe4 ll.'l!tifd4 0-0 1 2 . 0-0
f5 13.Elfel Elfd8 14.1!tifc4 Elab8
White can probably regain his
pawn but Black's piece-activity
and the superiority of his bishop
over the enemy knight provide
him with sufficient counter
chances, Navarrete Delgado Nava Pereda, Bergara 2 010.
7.'!tie2 dxe4
.ic5
Cl) 7.e5? !
9 . .if4
9.CiJd2? \Wh4-+ ; 9 .\We1 \We7!
10.i.f4 gS+
It is rather careless for White
to play 9.h3? tlJxeS 10J'!e1 (10.\We2
\Wf6 1U'!e1 0-0 - see 10.l3e1; 11.
'it>h1 0-0 12 .i.e3 tlJxd3 13.\Wxd3
he3 14.fxe3 \Wxb2 1S.CiJd2 aS-+
and White lost several pawns in
the game Nash - Murphy, Email
2 007) 10 . . . \Wf6 11.e2 (In reply to
the more accurate move 11.i.e3 ,
Jouglet - Dessenne, Lille 20 04,
Black can enter a favourable end
game with 11 . . . d4! ? 12 . .ic1 0-0
13.hh7+ 'it>xh7 14.hS+ 'it>g8 1S.
xeS xeS 16.l3xeS i.d6 17.l3e1
cS+) 11 . . . 0-0 12.\WxeS xf2 + 13.
'it>h1 hh3 ! 14.gxh3 f3+ 1S.'it>h2
i.d6-+ Delmar - Lipschuetz,
New York 1888.
After 9.f3 0-0 10.i.f4 f6 11.
h3 g6+ White loses at least a
pawn, Klimpel - Held, Wuerz
burg 1996.
9.e2 e7 10.if4 gS 11.i.d2
(11.i.g3? hS 12 .i.a6 i.xa6 13.xa6
i.b6 14.a4 \We6 1S.h4 0-0-0 16.
CiJd2 gxh4 17.i.xh4 l3dg8-+
133
Chapter 1 0
White's king is weak and his piec
es are uncoordinated, Brochet Hebden, France 1998) 11.. .0-0
12 .b4 (after 12 .i.c3 d4, White
merely creates additional weak
nesses in his position with the
line 13.b4 i.b6 14.i.d2 xeS 1S.
xeS tt:JxeS 16.hgS tt:Jxd3 17.cxd3
i.fS 18.gd1 aS 19.bxaS gxaS+
Malureanu - Chifor, Baile Hercu
lane 2010, but his defence is
difficult even after the more
precise 13.i.aS xeS 14.xeS
tt:JxeS 1S.hc7 tt:Jxd3 16.cxd3 i.fS
17.gd1 gfe8+ - his d3-pawn is
weak and Black's light-squared
bishop is so powerful that White
faces a long and laborious de
fence.) 12 . . . i.b6 13.a4 xeS 14.
xeS tt:JxeS 1S.i.e2 aS 16.bxaS
i.xaS 17.hgS i.fS+ Fister - Babel,
Email 2009.
9 g5
ll .ie2
ll.h3? h4 12 .i.h2 tt:Jxh2 13.
xh2 e7 14.e2 (White cannot
ease his defensive task with the
prophylactic line: 14.h1 f8 1S.
e1 g4 16.hxg4 i.xg4 17.tl:Jd2 h3
18.g3 h2 19.4 Ah3 2 o .gf3 gb8 21.
tl:Jb3 i.gH) 14 . . . i.d4 1S.tl:Jc3 (1S.c3
xeS+ 16.f4 xe2 17..ixe2 Ae3 18.
fxgS hgS+ Haupold - Holl, corr.
1990) 1S . . . xeS+ 16. xeS+ heS+
17.g1 .ie6+ Black has two strong
bishops and an extra pawn, so his
position is nearly winning, Kopy
lova - Severina, Rybinsk 20 09.
.
1 0 .ig3
10.i.c1, Werner - Michalczak,
Boeblingen 1999, 10 . . . 0-0 11.tl:Jd2
tt:JxeS 12 .tl:Jb3 .ib6 13 .hS tt:Jxd3
14.cxd3 f6+ Black has won a pawn
and obtained the advantage of the
134
19 gaf8 !
This is much simpler than the
following line, which leads to a
completely unclear position: 19 . . .
l:Ml 5 20.Wixh5 !!h8 21.Wid1 h6 2 2 .
Wffd 4+ @g8 23.f4 Wffh 2+ 24.@f2oo
2 o .gf3 .tf5 21.g4 Wffe5 22.
gb3 .th7+ White's extra pawn is
of no importance, because his
king is vulnerable, his bishop out
of action and his major pieces are
passive.
14.exf6!
14.i.h5+? @f8 15.g4 Wie7 16.
gxf5 Wffxe5 17.!!e1 Wffxf5 18.f3
!!xh5 0-1 Pasternak - Em.Lasker,
Switzerland 1898.
White loses beautifully after
14.Wid3? fxg4 ! 15.Wffg 6+ @f8 16.
Wffxc6 .ib6 17.4:Jc3 (after 17.Wffx a8
@g7 18.c6 !!h6 19.Wic3 Wffh 8 2 0 .
e 6 + d4-+ White i s mated) 17 . . .
@g7 18.4:Jxd5 (18.Wffx a8 !!h6-+)
18 . . . !!h6 19.e6 he6 2 0 .4:Jxb6
cxb6 2 1.Wib7+ .if7- + Black is
threatening to mate after Wffh 8, so
he should easily convert his extra
bishop into a full point.
14 YlYxf6 15 .th5+ f8 16.
c3 g7 17.a4 i.d6 18.ge1
18.c4? ! i.a6 19 .g4 .bc4+
18 .td7 19.ge3
C2) 7.exd5
White gives up the centre and
cannot fight for an advantage, de
spite the fact that his pawn-struc
ture is better. Black can centralize
his pieces and equalize easily.
7 cxd5
135
Chapter 1 0
The pawn structure in the dia
gram position is identical to the
one that we analyzed in variation
A. Here, though, Black should not
develop his bishop to the b4square, since it will be better
placed on d6 or e7.
Grandmaster practice has con
firmed that Black's position is
very solid.
8. 0 - 0
It seems a bit strange for White
to make a second move in a row
with his bishop: 8 .i.b5 + i.d7 9.
i.xd7+ xd7 10.0-0 i.e7 11.c4
(After 11.ttld2, there arises a posi
tion from variation A, except that
Black has an extra tempo; 11.c3
0-0 12.ttld2 h6 13.ttlf3 i.d6 14.i.e3
c5+ Black's central superiority
gives him the slightly better pros
pects, Osadchy - M.lvanov, Mos
cow 1997; after 11.b3 0-0 12 .i.b2,
Plenkovic - Jovanic, Zadar 2010,
the simplest response for Black
would be to strengthen his posi
tion in the centre with 12 . . . c5
13.ttld2 E:fe8=) 11 . . . d4 12 .i.g5 0-0
13.d3 E:ab8 14.b3 ttld5 15.i.xe7
ttlxe7= Black has a powerful cen
tral passed pawn and can be opti
mistic about the future, Zelcic Varga, Montecatini Terme 1997.
After 8.tLld2 i.d6 9.0-0 0-0
10 .c4 (10.c3 c5+) 10 . . . d4 11.h3 c5
12 .tLlf3 E:e8+ Black dominates the
centre and has the better pros
pects, Chernyshov - Stebunov,
Anapa 2009.
The position seems completely
equal after 8 . .ig5 i.e7 9.ttlc3 0-0
10.0-0 c6= , or 8.tLlc3 c6=
136
.te7
9.c3
9.i.g5 0-0 10 .E:e1 (The posi
tion is again completely balanced
after 10.tLld2 .ig4 11.c1, Fercec
- Fejzullahu, Fuegen 2 0 06, 11 . . .
h6 12 .i.h4 tLlh5 1 3 . .b:e7 xe7=)
10 ... E:e8 11.tLlc3 c6 12.tLla4, Am
bartsumova - M. Krylov, Moscow
2010, 12 . . . i.e6 13.c3 c7=
In the variation 9.c4 0-0 10.
cxd5 tLlxd5 11.i.e4 i.e6 12.tLlc3
tLlxc3 13.bxc3 xd1 14.E:xd1 E:ad8=
Black's pieces are a bit more ac
tive, but the position is still equal,
Nimzowitsch - Tarrasch, San Se
bastian 1911.
9 0 - 0 10 .tg5
Black equalizes comfortably
after 10.E:e1 E:b8 11.b3, Hackfeld
- Zili, Email 2 005, 11.. .i.g4 ! 12.
d2 c5= , or 10.i.f4 c6 11.E:e1 i.d6
12 .d2, Serner - Piccoli, Email
2009, 12 . . . c7 13 . .b:d6 xd6 14.
h3 i.d7= , while after 10.ttle2,
Napoli - Del Rio Angelis, Cutro
2 0 04, 10 . . . c5 11.b3 b6+ Black's
chances are even preferable
thanks to his dominance in the
centre.
.
. .
12 .if4
After 12 . .ixf6? ! i.x6 13.0.a4
B:b8 14.B:ab1 d6 15.b3 c5+ Black's
.
137
Chapter ll
8.b3
After the rather indifferent
move 8.c3?, it is good for Black to
continue his development with 8 ...
g6 9.f4 i.g7 10 .g3 0-0 ll.i.g2 aS+
Chapter 11
)"1e8 15 . .b:g7 xg7 16.li:Jg3 h5+
Black is considerably ahead in de
velopment, while if 10.c4 f5= , ir
respective of White's reply, Black
will have no problems at all.) 9 .. .
1Wb4+ 10.1Wd2 (10 .c3? li:Jxc3+) 10 . . .
)"1b8 ll.c3 (ll.c4 1Wxd2+ 12 . .b:d2
li:Jb4 13.d1 c5= White must play
accurately to avoid to ending up
in a worse position, Schoellmann
- Mikhalchishin, Bled 1995) 11 . . .
1We4+ 12 .1We2 (12 .i.e2 ? ! i.a6i)
12 ... 1Wxe2+ 13.i.xe2 i.g7 14.0-0
0-0 15.c4 i.a6= Black has ob
tained a good game, Vujic Blagojevic, Belgrade 2 0 09.
8 . . a5! ?
This interesting move aims at
the quickest possible organization
of queenside counterplay.
9.c4
If White ignores his oppo
nent's threats he can end up pay
ing dearly, for example: 9.i.b2 a4
10.li:Jd2 axb3 11.axb3 )"1xa1+ 12 .
.b:a1 1Wa3 13.1Wd1 i.b4+ White has
great problems owing to his lag in
development and the weakness of
his dark squares, Mieses - Marco,
Hastings 1895.
.
140
9 .ti:lb6
1 0 . .ia3
For 10.li:Jd2 a4 11.i.b2 or 10.g3
a4 11.i.b2 - see 10.i.b2 .
10.a3 - This i s loses a tempo
and weakens the b3-pawn. Black
can play 10 . . . g6 1l.i.b2 i.g7 12.
li:Jd2 0-0 13.f4 and now after 13 ...
d6 ! + he obtains a huge lead in de
velopment and destroys the ene
my centre.
With the move 10.a4, White
prevents the opening of the a-file
at the cost of weakening the b4square and his b3-pawn. 10 . . .
1Wb4+ 11.li:Jd2 1Wc3 12.)"1b1 i.b4
13.1We4, Grosar - T.Matkovic,
Makarska 1994 (The alternatives
are even worse: 13.f4 1Wd4 14.g3
0-0 15.1Wd3 '&c5 16.i.b2 d5+
Weteschnik - S.Vajda, Balaton
bereny 1996, or 13.h4 0-0 14.)"1h3
'&d4 15.1We3 c5 16.'&xd4 cxd4 17.
)"1d3, Garma - Chan, Beijing
2008, 17 . . . c5+, or 13.d1 '&d4 14.
i.b2 '&f4 15.g3 '&h6 16.i.g2 0-0
17.i.d4 d5 ! + Uralde - Daus, Email
2002 and in all cases White has
obvious problems with his ex
posed king, which not only re-
Chapter 11
i.b4 14.0-0-0 axb3 1S.axb3 dS+)
12 . . . axb3 13.axb3 i.a3 14.e4,
Sarenac - Nestorovic, Subotica
2007, 14 . . . e7 1S. @c2 i.xb2 16.
@xb2 b4 17J''!b 1 0-0 18 ..id3 g6+
and Black retains an edge, since
his opponent's king is exposed.
11.e3 - This move is played
with the idea of developing the
light-squared bishop centrally
and castling kingside. ll . . . axb3
12.axb3 b4+ 13.@d1 (It is inferi
or for White to play 13.c3 l:'!xa1
14.ha1 4Ja4! 1S.xb4 hb4+ 16.
@d1 4JcS 17.@c2 d6 18.i.d3 4Jxd3
19.@xd3 i.fS+ 2 0.@e3, because
the more or less forced line has
ended and after 20 . . . @d7+ Black
has a great advantage, thanks to
his powerful bishop pair in an
open position and the unsafe po
sition of White's king; 13.4Jd2
l:'!xa1+ 14.i.xa1, Baumegger - Ols
en, Bled 2002, 14 . . . a3+ Black
has a noticeable lead in develop
ment.) 13 . . . l:'!xa1 14.ha1 i.cS 1S.
g3 0-0 16.@c2 e1 17.f4 xg3
18.hxg3 dS= White has succeeded
in completing his development
and exchanging the queens, but
Black has nothing to complain
about.
11.4Jd2 axb3 12.axb3 l:'!xa1 +
13.ha1 a3 14.d1 (14.i.d4?!
.ib4 1S.d1, Chandler - Loeffler,
Wuerzburg 1993, 1S . . . cS 16 . .ie3
b2 17.f4 d6 18.exd6 cxd6+ Black
has the better prospects, thanks
to his lead in development and
the open position of White's king.)
14 ... .tb4 1S.i.d3 (It is much more
passive to continue with 1S . .ie2
142
12.4Jc3!N
This is the only move to keep
the position balanced.
In response to 12.a4, it is good
for Black to play 12 . . . .ib7 13.e3
0-0-0 14.id3 d6+ with the better
3.d4 ed 4. !jj xd4 &jjf6 5. !jj xc6 be 6.e5 Vff e7 7. Vff e2 !jj d5 8.b3 a5
development and superior pawn
structure.
White has also tried 12.Cjj d 2
a4, after which he must already
fight for equality. 13J'l:d1 (He is
unable to keep the balance with
13 .b4 .ib7 14.Vfffe3 0-0-0+, or 13.
l'%c1 .ib7 14.Vfff e 4, Temkov - Mitk
ov, Skopje 2008, 14 . . . axb3 15.
axb3 0-0-0 16.c5 Cjj d 5+ and in
both cases, White is considerably
behind in development and might
lose his e5-pawn.) 13 . . . axb3 14.
axb3, Ambarcumova - Zaiatz,
Sochi 2 004, and here Black can
continue with 14 . . . .ib7 15.Vfffe 3 f6
16.Cjj f3 c5+ and he completely
solves the problem of how to acti
vate his pieces.
12 a4 13. 0 - 0 - 0
White is unable to prevent the
opening of the a-file, because af
ter 13.b4? .ia6+ he loses his c4pawn.
He obtains no advantage with
the greedy line 13.c5 Cjj d5 14.Cjj xa4
'it>d8 (Black can also play for a win
with 14 . . . .ia6 ! ? 15.Vfffe4 hf1 16.
'it>xf1 f5 17.Vfff d 4 f4gg with excellent
compensation for the pawn.) 15.
Vffe 4 l'%e8 16.0-0-0 &jj f6 17.f4
Vffx e5 18.Vfffxe5 l'%xe5 19 . .id3 .ia6
20 .ha6 l'%xa6= White has failed
to preserve his extra pawn and the
position is equal.
13 axb3 14.axb3
14 '1t>d8 !
After this precise move, Black
can even fight for more than
equality.
15.'9'e3
The alternatives for White
seem to be worse: after 15.Vfffe 4 f6
16.Vfffx h7 Vfffe 7!+ Black restores the
material balance, while if 15.h5
f6 16.Vfffxh7 e7 17.e6 (17.exf6 xf6
18.c2 l'%a1+ 19.Cjj b 1 d6 20.b2
Vfffh 6+ 2 l.l'%d2 l'%a8 2 2 .f3 i.f5 23.
.ie2 Cjj d7+ his compensation for
the sacrificed pawn is more than
sufficient) 17 . . . d5 18.cxd5 (18.
i.d3? ! he6 19.l'%he1 f5 2 0.l'%e2 Wf6
21.'1t>c2 'it>c8+) 18 . . . l'%a1+ 19.'1t>c2
l'%xd1 20.'1t>xd1 cxd5+ White has
succeeded in trading several piec
es, but his king is still exposed,
while Black dominates the centre.
15 f6 16 .td3 'ffxe5 17.
.ixh7 Wxe3+ 18.fxe3 .tb7 19.
.te4 (otherwise Black will contin
ue with 19 . . c5) 2 0 .h4 gas=
143
Chapter 12
Chapter 12
A) 9.d2
This is a natural developing
move. White generally deploys
his knight to f3 to fortify his e5pawn.
9 . g6
.
1 0 .f3
10.b3 i.g7 - see variation B.
It is too risky for White to
choose 10.g3?! i.g7 11.f4 0-0 12.
W/e4, L.Milov - Pinter, Bayern
1999, since after 12 . . . l!Jb6 ! 13.i.e2
(13 .c5 hf1 14.cxb6 i.h3 ! 15.bxc7
d5 16.'1Mfe2 f6-+) 13 .. .f6 14.exf6
\Mfxf6-+ Black's lead in develop
ment becomes decisive.
In answer to 10.l!Je4, Gress
hoff - Dimitriadis, Email 1996,
we recommend that Black con
tinue with 10 ... 0-0- 0 ! N
146
Tournament practice
has
shown that Black has no difficul
ties in this endgame:
after 13.i.e2 0-0 14.0-0 !:iae8
15.i.f3 g5 16.h3 h5 17.g3 d5+
White will be faced with an un
pleasant defence;
it is not no better for White to
opt for 13.b3 0-0 14.i.e2 i.b4 15.
0-0 !:iae8 16.i.f3 d5 17.!:1d1 g5 18.
h3 h5 19.g3 (19.g4 hxg4 2 0.hxg4
i.c5+ Shadrina - Pokorna, Sze
ged 2 006) 19 ... i.c5 2 0 .i.b2 g4-+
Black has seized control of the f-
3.d4 ed 4. l1Jxd4 l1Jf6 5. l1Jxc6 be 6.e5 Wie7 7. Wie2 l1J d5 B.c4 .ia6
file, Khamrakulov - Perez Cande
lario, Zafra 2004;
it looks most precise for White
to opt for 13 . .id3, but after 13 . . .
l1Jd5 ! ? 1 4 . .tc2 l1Jf4 15.g3 l1Je6=
Black is able to exploit the weak
ness of the d4-square.
1 0 . . . %tb4+
14 . . . c5 ! ?
With this move Black ensures
that his a6-bishop will be able
to relocated to the long diagonal
and also prevents his opponent
from gaining space on the queen
side with the move c4-c5.
15.c2 0 - 0 16 . .id3
With 16.a4 .ib7 17.a5 l1Jc8 =
White merely helps his opponent
to redeploy his pieces to more ac
tive positions.
After 16J'%d1 E:fe8 17.a4 (in the
variation 17 . .te3 he5 18.hc5
i.f6= White is unable to win the
d7-pawn, because after 19.hb6?
axb6 20.E:xd7 i.c8+ he loses his
a2-pawn) 17 . . . l1Jc8 18.i.e3 d6 19.
exd6 cxd6 2 0 . .tf4 .ib7= The activ
ity of Black's powerful bishops
fully compensates for the weak
ness of his d6-pawn.
16 . . . .ib7 17.gael
Black has no problems after
17.E:he1 d6 18 . .ic3 gae8 19.exd6
.txf3 20.gxf3 cxd6= The dark
squared bishops are exchanged
and Black obtains chances of
seizing the initiative by transfer
ring his knight to the centre.
147
Chapter 12
B) 9 .b3
White protects his b2-pawn
and in the process ensures that
his dark-squared bishop can be
developed to its most active posi
tion.
9 g6
.
Bl) 1 0 .ib2
This is an attractive move.
White develops his bishop to its
best possible position.
.
149
Chapter 12
1 0 . . i.g7
.
ll.g3
11.lLlc3? ! - After this move,
White loses any chance of exploit
ing the tactical motifs based on
capturing Black's knight. ll...lLlxc3
12 .hc3 0-0 13.g3 !lfe8 14.f4 d6+
White loses his e5-pawn and will
be unlikely to obtain full compen
sation for it owing to his lag in de
velopment, Ikonomopoulou Konstantinidis, Iraklion 2 0 07.
ll.lLld2 lLlb4
12 . .tg2
Or 12.f4? f6 13.exf6 'W!b4+ 14.
d1, Hampl - Goc, Email 2 00S,
14 ... xf6 ! - + with a crush.
1S1
Chapter 12
After 12.lt:\d2 d6 13 .e4 (13.
lt:)f3? dxe5 14.lt:)xe5 l:'lfe8-+ ; 14 .
.b:e5 .b:e5 15.lt:)xe5 l:'lfe8 16.f4
f6- + Kradolfer - Wang Yu A,
Oropesa del Mar 1998) 13 . . . .b:e5 !
(after 13 . . . lt:)b4? 14.a3 d5 15.cxd5
.b:f1 16.xf1 lt:)xd5 17.g2;!; White
has a stable edge thanks to his
better pawn structure and superi
ority in the centre, Jones Smeets, London 2 009) 14.cxd5
cxd5 15.e3 .b:b2 ! 16.xe7 l:'lfe8
17.e3 d4+ Black regains his
queen, obtaining two pawns for
the exchange, with a powerful
bishop pair and a strong central
passed pawn.
In answer to 12 .i.h3, Ashley
Held, Budapest 1997, it is good
for Black to continue in standard
fashion with 12 . . . d6 13 .0-0 .b:e5
14.i.g2 (14.he5 dxe5 15.l:'le1 l:'lfe8
16.d2 lt:)b6=) 14 . . . l:'lab8 15.lt:)c3
fi.g7= and White's compensation
for the pawn is sufficient for
equality, but nothing more.
12 . . . gae8 13. 0 - 0
After 13.f4? ! f6+, Black will not
only win the enemy e5-pawn, but
will also bring his rook on f8 into
action.
152
13 . . . .lxe5 14.ti'xe5
For 14 . .b:e5 xeS 15.xe5
l:'lxe5 - see 14.xe5 .
14 . . . ti'xe5 15 .ixe5 gxe5 16.
cxd5
Or 16.f4 l:'le3 17.cxd5 .b:fl 18 .
xfl cxd5 - see 16.cxd5.
16 .bf'1 17.xfl cxd5
18.f4
18.lt:)d2 l:'lfe8 19 . .if3 (19.lt:)f3?!
l:'le2 2 0 .l:'le1 l:'lxe1+ 2I.lt:)xe1, Lyell
- Truta, Bled 1997, 2 l . . .c6+ - The
exchange of rooks in this pawn
structure is in Black's favour.)
19 . . . a5 2 0 .l:'lc1 c6 2 I.lt:)b1 2 l . . .f8
2 2 . lt:)c3 e7 23.lt:)a4 d6 24.tt:lc5
l:'lb8 25.i.e2 l:'le7 26.l:'lc2 = . Black
has centralized his king and occu
pied the only open file. White will
find it difficult to improve his po
sition, because an exchange of
rooks or any opening of files on
the kingside will be in Black's fa
vour. However, Black cannot do
much without the help of his op
ponent either, so in the game S.
Movsesian - Bacrot, Chalkidiki
2 0 0 2 , the players agreed to a
draw.
It is scarcely any better for
3.d4 ed 4Ji:Jxd4 tlJf6 5. ttJxc6 be 6.e5 W!e7 7. W!e2 ttJ d.S B.c4 a 6
White to play 1B.0,a3 c6 19.tiJc2
!UeB 2 0 . tiJe3 (20.i.f3 'i!;>fB 21.tiJb4
'i!;>e7 2 2 .tiJd3 - see 1B.tiJc3) 20 . . .
'i!;>fB 2 1.d1 'i!;>e7 22.d4 'i!;>d6 ! =
and now that Black's king has oc
cupied the d6-square he has no
problems whatsoever.
1B.tiJc3 c6
Chapter 12
2B . .ie2 f6 29. lt:\c5 d6 30.lt:\a4+
@b7= The white pieces have de
veloped their maximum activity,
but White has failed to capture
the a6-pawn and there is no way
of improving his position in sight,
Rublevsky - Tseshkovsky, Sochi
2005.
18 ge3 19.h:d5
The tricky move 19 . .if3? ! is
rather dubious, because after 19 . . .
feB 2 0 .lt:\d2 @g7+ Black gains a
slight edge, thanks to the possibil
ity of activating both his rooks.
19.lt:\d2 c6 2 0 .lt:\f3, Turkin U.Eliseev, Moscow 200B (After
2 0 .e1? ! feB 21.lt:\f3 xe1+ 2 2 .
lt:\xe1 e3+, Black's active rook
and central pawns are stronger
than White's minor pieces, Lap
enna - Sbarra, Bratto 2 006.),
2 0 ... feB 21.lt:\e5 e7 2 2 .c1 f6
23.lt:\g4 3e6 24 . .if3 @g7=
White's rook cannot be activated,
owing to the weakness of his back
rank.
19 gd3
.
154
B2) 1 0 .f4
Garry Kasparov introduced
this move into practice some 20
years ago in his game against Kar
pov (Tilburg 1991) and it was con
sidered to be White's most princi
pled continuation.
1 0 d6 !?
2 0 .tf3 !
This is the only move to hold
the balance.
Chapter 12
12.Aa3
In the variation 12 .c5 hf1 13.
xfl dxc5 14.lt:lc3 c4+ White fails
to obtain compensation for the
pawn, because all Black's pieces
can be ideally deployed, Jara
binsky - Kalchev, Email 2009.
It is not much better for White
to play 12 . .ib2 .ig7 13 ..ie2 dxe5 14.
0-0 0-0 15.\!Na5 exf4 16 . .b:g7
Wxg7 17.f3 .ib7+ - He will prob
ably manage to regain one of his
missing pawns, but not both . . . ,
Szablowski - Kislik, Budapest
2011.
12 ... c5 13.c3
13 . .id3 - This move looks
more active, but in fact only White
will have problems now. 13 . . .
0 - 0 - 0 1 4 . .ib2 dxe5 15.0-0 1J.g7
16.e1 he8+ - Black's pieces
have been well centralized and his
prospects are superior.
13 . . . Ag7!?
Black shows that he is in a
fighting mood . . .
I t i s sufficient for equality for
Black to play 13 . . . dxe5, for exam
ple: 14.lt:ld5 lt:lxd5 15.xd5 dB
16.xe5 (in the endgame after
156
the pawn.
15 .ib7!
After 15 . . . l'!fd8?! 16 . .id3 dxeS
17 . .ie4 l'!ab8 18.hc5 W/f6 19 .f5 !
White has neutralized his oppo
nent's threats on the a1-g8 diago
nal, Kotronias - Gustafsson, Aix
les-Bains 2011.
16 .id3 a5+ - The a-file will
be opened and this will provide
Black with excellent counterplay.
157
Chapter 13
6.d4
White's alternatives here lead
at best to a transposition of moves
back to the main line.
6.Wb3 We7 7.d4 (White must
play energetically, since it would
be inferior to opt for the indiffer
ent line 7.0-0 tt:lf6 8.d4 0-o:t= and
Black succeeds in evacuating his
king away from the centre with
out any positional concessions,
while after 7.J.a3 d6 8.d4 tt:lf6 9.
d5, he has the tactical shot 9 . . .
tt:ld4 ! 10.tt:lxd4 exd4 11.Wa4+ .id7
12.Wxa5 Wxe4+ 13.d1 0-0--+
with a decisive attack.) 7 ... exd4 see 6.d4.
Chapter 13
out any problems, while retaining
a slight material advantage) 11 . . .
ti:J e 7 12 .a4 .b:c3 13.ti:Jxc3 ti:Jxc3
14.c4 ti:Jcxd5 (14 . . . ti:Jexd5 ! ?) 15.
g5 'it>g6 ! ? 16.xd5 ti:Jxd5 17.
hd8, Mavlyaveev - Mrykhin, Ar
mavir 2010 and after 17 . . . b6
Black has more than sufficient
compensation for the exchange,
thanks to his powerful passed
pawns, which will be advanced
soon.
6 . . . exd4
A) 7. 0 - 0
Strangely enough, this natural
and often-played move is serious
inaccuracy, after which White will
be forced to fight for equality.
However, this became clear only
during the process of the evolu
tion of this variation and mostly
owing to the analytical and practi
cal contributions of the English
grandmaster Michael Adams.
7 ge7
(diagram)
Al) 8.cxd4
A2) 8.g5
160
Chapter 13
16.xc3 .bc4 17.xc4 0-0 18.dS
'Lle7+ White has gained space and
has good chances of a draw, but
nothing more than that, Nowak
Potrata, Email 2006;
it is bad for White to be greedy
with 11.xb7 'Lldb4. In the varia
tion 12 .dS b8 13.xb8 xb8
14.dxe6 fxe6 1S.'Llc3 0-0 16.b1
e8+ he fails to obtain sufficient
compensation for the queen, Sui
skis - Svidler, Moscow 2001.
White cannot equalize with the
line: 12 .i.bS 0-0 13.hc6 b8 14.
xa7 'Llxc6 1S.cS .idS
coordinated, T.Warakomski
Batchuluun, Olomouc 2010.
1 0 . . . .ie6
ll ..ib5
11.b3 b8 ! - see 10.b3.
ll.'Llbd2 ? ! .ib4 12 .hb4 'Llcxb4
13.a4+. Now, after 13 . . . d7 14.
xd7+ c,ilxd7 1S.'Lle4gg White's ac
tive pieces compensate for the
sacrificed pawn, so Black should
instead play 13 . . . ll:\c6.
For example:
16.'Llbd2 e8 17.'Llb3 .ib4 18.
c2 hf3 19.gxf3 dS+ all his
pawns are weak and his king is ex
posed, E.Sveshnikov - Graf, Ke
merovo 199S;
16 ..igS f6 17 ..ie3 i.b6 18.c2,
Shlegin - Lysyj 2 010 and here
Black's most precise move is 18 . . .
fS ! --+ when his attack becomes de
cisive;
after 16 . .ia3 16 . . . e8 17.'Llbd2
.ib6 18.c3 .bf3 19.xf3 ll:\xd4+
White's queen must retreat to the
d1-square, after which Black has
an overwhelming advantage, be
cause his pieces are much better
162
l.e4 e5 2. tiJj3 tiJ c6 3. i.c4 i.c5 4.b4 hb4 5.c3 i.a5 6.d4 ed
practically only moves to do so:
14.h6! c8 15Jfcl ! 0-0 16.hb7!
xb7 17.xc6 xc6 18.fuc6 E:tb8=,
although at the end it is still only
Black who can play for a win.
ll ... .ib4! 12.hc6+ bxc6
13.hb4 tiJxb4 14.a4
14 . . . b8 !
Black provokes advantageous
simplifications.
15.a3 tiJd5 16.xc6+ ti'd7
17.c5 d6 18.xa7 0 - 0 19.
tiJbd2 gas 2 0 .c5 ti'xc5 21.
dxc5 a4= This almost forced
variation has led to an endgame
in which Black has returned the
pawn and can try to prove that his
bishop is stronger than the enemy
knight. In addition, White's cS
pawn can be attacked much more
easily than Black's c7-pawn.
A2) 8.c!Og5 d5
(diagram)
9.exd5
9.tiJxf7 - This piece-sacrifice is
interesting but not quite sound.
9 . . . @xf7 lO.exdS tiJeS ll.i.b3,
Hughey - South, Alberta 2000.
Now, it is reasonable for Black to
1 0 .ib3
After 10.l'i:e1?! tiJxc4 11.a4+
c6 12 .ti'xc4 0-0 13.d6 tiJfS+ Black
has the two bishops and an extra
pawn.
If 10.i.b5+ c6 ll.dxc6 bxc6
12.cxd4 cxbS 13.dxe5 xd1 14.
E:xd1 i.f5+ Black's bishops are tre
mendously active in this open po
sition, E.Sveshnikov - Wu Shao
bin, Beijing 2008.
163
Chapter 13
If 10.'&a4+, Mitlasovszki Shiomi, Budapest 1998, Black
equalizes easily with 10 ... .id7 11.
WxaS tLlxc4 12 .Wc5 tLld6 13.Wxd4
0-0= and White is unable to con
solidate his position in the centre
owing to his lag in development.
After 10.Wxd4 f6 ! White is un
able to exploit the weakness of
the e6-square. 11.1"1e1 (If 1l..ib3
.ib6 12 .We4 .ifS 13 .Wa4+ Wd7 14.
Wxd7+ , Segovic - I.Saric, Sibenik
2008, then after 14 . . . tLlxd7+ Black
maintains the better prospects,
because if 15.tLle6 he6 16.dxe6
tLlcS 17.1"1d1 tLle4+ White's pieces
are undeveloped and he is unable
to support his far-advanced pawn,
which he is likely lose before long.
Instead, several games have con
tinued ll ..ibS+ c6 12.dxc6 bxc6 13 .
.ie2 MS+, also with the better chanc
es for Black, in view of his lead in
development.) ll ... .ib6 12.Wh4 .ifS
ll.lL!xh7
White's alternatives are much
worse:
ll.Wxd4?! - this move pro
vides Black with important tempi
for the organization of a decisive
attack. ll . . . CLJ7g6 12 . .ic2 .ib6 13.
Wd2 h6 14.tLle4 Wh4-+ White is
unable bring his queenside pieces
into play, Baker - Collins, Sun
ningdale 2009;
ll.cxd4?! - after this move
White's centre pawns are doomed.
ll ... tLlg4 12.Wf3 (12 . .ia3 tLlxdS 13.
B) 7.'M>3
14 .id2
In the variation 14.cxd4 1"le8
15.f4 W/d6 16.xd6 cxd6 17 . .id2
.ib6t Black regains the pawn, re
taining some pressure thanks to
the greater activity of his pieces,
Canizares Cuadra - Grazinys,
Email 2 0 03 .
14. . . ge8 15.iff4 ifd6 16.
i!Yxd6 xd6 17.cxd4 .ib6 18.
c3 hd4=i= Black's pieces are
much more aggressively placed
165
Chapter 13
9.cxd4
The move 9.i.g5? is not good
and after 9 . . . f6 ! 10.i.f4 ltJa5 11.
1Wa4 ttJxc4 12 .1Wxc4 1Wf7 13 .1We2
d3 ! 14.1Wxd3 d6+ Black obtains
the advantage of the two bishops
and has prevented his opponent
from breaking through in the cen
tre, Daulyte - N. Kosintseva,
Dresden 2008.
9 .i.b5 - With this move White
presents his opponent with an
important tempo for develop
ment. 9 . . . tLlf6 10.i.a3 d6 11.e5, E.
Christiansen - Joensen, Torshavn
2 0 03, 11 . . . ltJg4 12 .hc6+ bxc6
13.cxd4 0-0+ Now, even if White
manages to regain the pawn, his
position will still be worse, be
cause he will have problems com
bating his opponent's active light
squared bishop.
A very interesting position
arises after 9.i.a3 ! ? d6 10.tLlbd2 ! ?
(for 10.cxd4 ttJxd4 11.tLlxd4 hd4
12 .tLlc3 lLlf6 - see 9.cxd4 ; if 10.
e5? ! tLl a5 11.1Wa4+ i.d7 12 .i.b5 a6
13.hd7+ 1Wxd7 14.1Wc2 ltJe7 15.
cxd4 0-0+ Black has succeeded in
preserving his extra pawn, while
ensuring the safety of his king)
10 . . . tLlh6! (Black needs to prepare
castling, but the e7-square is oc
cupied. Putting his knight on f6 is
no good either, because then
White's pawn-break e4-e5 be
comes much more effective.)
(diagram)
11.cxd4 (Black should not be
afraid here of the thematic move
11.e5, because after 11 . . . 0-0 1 2 .
ae1 tLl a5 13.1Wb2 i.e6 14.exd6
166
12 . .ia3
12-ltl bS ! ? - This is an interest
ing, if somewhat adventurous,
move, forcing Black to tread a
very narrow path and find a series
of only moves. If he manages to
do so, however, White will have to
fight for equality. 12 . . . i.xa1! (After
the less greedy line : 12 . . . i.e5? 13.
i.a3 d6 14Jacl c6 15.f4 ! a6 16.
lLlc7+ 11tlxc7 17.fxe5 dxeS 18.
11tlg3 ! + - Black is beyond salva
tion.) 13.lLlxc7+ (13.i.a3? - this is
Chapter 13
but he must pay for this with a re
duction in his attacking potential.
15 . . . V!!/c5 16.i.xd4 xd4 17.i.d5
(after 17Jd1 c5+ White has no
more attacking resources and
his knight remains in exile, Cotu
ra Vida - Kristjansson, Email
2010) 17 . . . ttlxd5 18.exd5 d6 19.
V!!/g3 (after 19 .f3 E:e8 20.xf7
i.d7+ White will be unable to save
his knight) 19 . . . xd5 20.xg7
V!!/e5 2 1 .V!!/xf7 i.d7 2 2.h3 E:e8+ The
material is equal, but it will be
much easier for Black to pro
mote his passed pawn than for
White to advance his kingside
pawns.
In reply to the most principled
move for White, 15.i.f4, Black
should not be greedy, because af
ter 15 . . . ttlxe4, Ibrahim - Mathews,
Khanty-Mansiysk 2010, 16.i.d5
White's activity might be trouble
some for Black, so it is better for
him to opt for 15 . . . d6!
13Jadl
White can regain one of his
pawns with 13.hf7+ Wxf7 14.
Wa4+ d7 15.Wxd4 0-0+, but this
will hardly be sufficient, because
Black has already completed his
development and has no weak
nesses whatsoever, Bohm Kraidman, Netanya 1977.
13 . . ..b:c3 14.Ybc3 ti'e5
It is premature for Black to
play 14 . . . 0-0 15.:B:fe1 tt'lg4 16.f4 ! gg
and White obtains excellent com
pensation for the pawn, Cosenti
no - Nowak, Email 2010.
169
Chapter 13
19.g4 Vfh4 2 0 .i.b3 i.e6+ and he
will exchange the light-squared
bishops, returning some of his ex
tra pawns.
16 We7
.
15.Vfcl!
This is the ideal square for the
queen; from here it not only helps
the development of White's bish
op to b2, but is ready to be trans
ferred to the kingside at any mo
ment.
15.Vfb3 ? ! 0-0 16 . .tb2 Wffe 7 17.
!l:fe1 .te6+ and Black succeeds in
exchanging one of his opponent's
powerful bishops, at the cost of
one of his extra pawns.
In the endgame, arising after
15.Vfxe5 dxeS 16.f4 .te6 17.he6
fxe6 18.fxe5, Kovalevskaya - Ste
fanova, Antalya 2002, White will
still need to fight hard for a draw
if Black plays 18 . . . lDg4 ! +
15 0 - 0
15 . . . lDg4? - This attempt to or
ganize a counter-attack leads to a
very difficult position for Black
after 16.f4 Wff aS 17 . .tb2 0-0 18.
:B:dS
16.i.b2
White cannot create any seri
ous problems for his opponent
with the consolidating move 16.
f3?! Wff aS 17.e5 WffxeS 18 . .tb2 ,
Mozzino - Defore!, Email 2002,
because Black can play 18 . . . Wffh 5
170
17.e5
17.f4 ! ? - This is an interesting
alternative for White. Black faces
great difficulties, which can be il
lustrated by the following varia
tions : 17 . . . .te6 18 . .td3 :B:fe8 19.f5
.td7 20.:B:f3--+ and White's rook is
transferred to the g-file, with de
cisive threats. After 17 . . . lDxe4 18.
:B:fe1, Black loses after 18 ... c6?
19.:B:xe4 Wffxe4 20.Wic3 Wffg 6 21 .
:B:xd6 .te6 2 2 .f5 ! +-, while some of
his other options lead to com
pletely unclear positions. Howev
er, he can solve all his problems
with 17 . . . b5 !
Chapter 13
2 1 . . . .ie6 ! 2 2 . .ixe6 '\Wxcl 23.E:xcl
l2Jd3 24 . .ib3 l2Jxb2 25.fxe5 (25.
E:xc7 e4 26.E:xb7 l2Jd3 27.E:e7 l2Jc5
28 .1d5 E:ad8=) 25 . . . c6 26.E:f3 b5
27.fuc6 l2Jc4= entering an equal
endgame with four rooks on the
board.
18 cxd6 19 .ia3
This is White's most aggres
sive line.
The seemingly attractive line
19.E:fel?! Wfh4 20.'\Wf4 i.e6+ pro
vides Black with superior pros
pects, because after any retreat of
White's bishop, Black continues
with 2 1 . . .g5 ! , exchanging the
queens.
Or 19.E:del i.e6 ! 2 0 . .ixe6 fxe6
2 1.'\Wc4 l2Je5 22 . .ixe5 dxe5 23.E:xe5
E:fe8 24.E:fel E:ac8 25.'\Wb3 E:c6
26.f4 Wfd7= and White will soon
regain his pawn, while Black will
activate his pieces.
It is less precise for White to
play 19.'\Wf4 l2Je5 2 0 .E:fel .ie6! 2 1 .
.ixe5 dxe5 22 .'\WxeS E:ad8 23.E:xd8
E:xd8 = , because he will need to
follow up with several very pre
cise moves to maintain the bal
ance, Corbat - Dayants, Email
2002.
19 gds 2 o .gfel
(diagram)
The diagram position was
172
Chapter 14
Giuoco Piano
5 . .tb3 ! ?
I n general, this prophylactic
move is useful for White.
For 5.lLlc3 - see Chapter 15;
for 5. 0-0 - see Chapter 17.
5.W/e2 d6 6.h3 (After 6.i.e3
!xe3 7.fxe3 .ie6= Black obtains a
slight lead in development, but he
can hardly exploit it effectively; it
is inferior for White to opt for 6.
0-0 0-0 7.i.g5, Spencer - Blake,
Liverpool 1923, because Black can
respond with 7 . . . h6 8.i.h4 g5
9.i.g3 g4 10.lLlh4 lLlh5t with ex
cellent attacking prospects; after
6.ig5 h6 7.ih4, Bohatirchuk Ludwig, Kirchheim 1947, it looks
173
Chapter 14
very good for Black to isolate
White's dark-squared bishop
from the action with 7 . . . gS 8 ..ig3
.ie6+) 6 . . . .ie6 7 . .ib3 , Nestler Milner Barry, Helsinki 19S 2 . Now
it is reasonable for Black to opt for
the prophylactic move 7 . . . h6=,
depriving the enemy knight and
bishop of the gS-square.
S . .igS - Black has not yet
played d7-d6 and so this pin is
not dangerous. S . . . h6 6 . .ih4 .ie7
(Much sharper positions arise af
ter 6 . . . gS ! ? 7 . .ig3 d6 8.c3oo) 7.tt:lc3
(7.c3 0-0, or 7.tt:lbd2 0-0 8.c3 d6
- see Chapter 19; 7.0-0 0-0 - see
Chapter 17) 7 . . . d6 8 . .ixf6 (This
move is almost forced, because if
8.0-0?! tt:Jxe4 9.he7 tt:Jxc3 10 .
.ixd8 tt:Jxd1 11.hc7 tt:lxb2 12 . .ixd6
lt:lxc4 13.dxc4 f6+, or 8.h3?! lt:lxe4
9 .he7 lt:lxc3 10.hd8 lt:lxd1 11.
hc7 lt:lxb2 12 . .ixd6 lt:lxc4 13.dxc4
f6+ Although White regains his
pawn his queenside pawn struc
ture is just terrible, so he must
fight for a draw.) 8 . . . .ixf6 9.lLldS
(it is preferable to opt for 9.0-0
lt:le7=) 9 . . . tt:laS 10.lt:ld2, Pelikan Rossetto, Villa Gesell 1971. Now
Black can continue with 10 . . . .igS't
and White's knight will inevitably
be ejected from its excellent
square and his light-squared
bishop will be exchanged for
Black's knight. In addition, Black
can activate his rook with fl-fS.
S.lt:lbd2 0-0 6 . 0-0 (6.h3 d6
7.c3 aS 8.0-0 .ie6= Black has
completed his development and
neutralized his opponent's most
active piece in the process. Black
174
6. 0 - 0
It would again be harmless for
Black for White to play 6 . .igS h6
7 ..ih4 .ie7 ! = or 6 ..ie3 .ixe3 7.fxe3
d6 8.0-0 .ie6.
6.t:tJbd2 aS ! ? 7.c3 d6 8.t:tJfl
(The position is equal after 8.0-0
.ie6 = , or 8.h3 .ie6= since Black
neutralizes the pressure of his op
ponent's light-squared bishop
and obtains an excellent posi
tion.) 8 . . . dS 9.exdS t:tJxdS 10.l:tJg3
f6 11.0-0 .ie6+! . Black has the
7.c3
7.t:tJbd2 d6 8.c3 (8.h3 .ie6 9 .
17S
Chapter 14
!!el i.xb3 10.axb3 dS= Black has
no weaknesses and comfortably
develops his pieces.) 8 . . . aS 9.1'!el
e6 10.ttlc4 (It is also possible for
White to try 10.a4 \Wb8 ! ? with
active play on the queenside; 10.
i.xe6 fxe6 ll.a4 e8= and Black
can organize active play on the
kingside ; 10.ttlfl i.xb3 ll.axb3
dS= , or ll.xb3 a4 12 .c2 dS=
with a slight space advantage for
Black) 10 . . . bS ll.ttle3 a4 12 .c2,
Hasan - Lodhi, Dhaka 2008 (it is
better for White to play 12 .i.xe6
fxe6?) and by playing 12 . . . b6
13.d4 exd4 14.cxd4 dS lS.eS ttle4t
with the idea of f7-f6, or even f7fS, Black firmly seizes the initia
tive.
It is no better for White to opt
for 7.e3 i.xe3 8 .fxe3 d6= fol
lowed by e6 and Black neutral
izes White's light-squared bishop.
After 7.1'!el d6 8.c3 e6 9 .d4
(9.h3 aS ! ? = ) i.xb3 10.axb3 b6=
the pressure against White's cen
tre pawns provides Black with
equal chances.
7 . . . d5 !?
8.exd5
176
9 . . . tLlf6 ! N
I t would b e worse for Black to
try the natural line : 9 . . . i.f5? ! (9 . . .
i.g4? 10.tlJe4 i.b6, Segura Perez
Uvasnani, Internet 2 0 04, 11.
i.xh6 ! and since Black loses after
1l.. .gxh6 12 .hd5 xd5 13.l2Jf6+
he will remain a pawn down . ) 10.
ttJe4 i.e7 ll.tLlg3 i.g6 12 J!elt
White will retain an enduring
initiative by exerting pressure
against the enemy e5-pawn and
along the a2-g8 diagonal.
1 0 .c!bc4
After 10.e2 l"1e8 ll.tlJe4 l2Jxe4
12.dxe4 f6 13.i.e3 i.b6 = the only
drawback of Black's position is
the relative weakness of the d5-
177
Chapter 15
and now:
6.0-0 0-0 7.d4?! (7.d3 h6 see 5.d3) 7 . . . ll:lxd4 8.i.g5 i.g4+
White's compensation for the sac
rificed pawn is obviously insuffi
cient;
6.d4 ll:lxd4 7.ll:lxd4 (7.b4 i.b6
8.i.g5 c6 9.i.xf6 gxf6 10.ll:lxb6
Wxb6+ Black has ended up with
an extra pawn in a solid position)
7 . . .i.xd4 8.i.g5? (This is the only
way for White to justify his pawn
sacrifice on the previous move.)
8 ... i.xf2 + 9.'i!ifl ll:lxd5 ! 10.Wxd5
(10 .i.xd8 ll:le3-+) 10 . . . Wxg5 11.
Wxf7+ 'i!id8 12.'i!ixf2 We7+ and
Black has a solid extra pawn;
after 6.c3 ll:lxd5 7.exd5 (7 . .b:d5
0-0 8.0-0 f6 9.d3 h6 - see 5.
d3) 7 ... ll:le7 8.0-0 0-0 9.d4 (9.d3
h6 - see 6.d3) 9 . . . exd4 10.ll:lxd4
ll:lf5 = Black easily completes his
Chapter 15
come very weak, L.Garcia - Alva
rez Fernandez, Spain 1997.
A) 6. 0 - 0 0 - 0
7.a3
For 7.tLld5 d6 - see 6.tLld5; 7.
h3 a6 (It is useful for Black to pre
vent the threat of tLla4.) 8.a3 d6
9 . .ie3 .ixe3 10.fxe3 .ie6 - see
7.a3.
White cannot achieve any
thing with the immediate 7.tLla4
!J.e7 8.tLlc3 .ic5=
The variations arising after 7.
!J.e3 d6 will be dealt with after the
move 7.a3 and the fact that here
the moves a2-a3 and a7-a6 have
not been included is not signifi
cant.
After 7.a4 d6 8 .tLld5 tLlxd5 9 .
!J.xd5 tLl e 7 10 . .ic4 a S 11.c3 c 6 1 2 .
E1 e 1 tLl g 6 = Black securely protects
the e5-square and will prepare the
deployment of his knight on f4,
Zautzig - Brobakken, Email
2008.
7 . .ib3 d6 8.tLla4 .ib4 9.h3,
Vallejo Pons - Ginzburg, St Lor
enzo 1995 (After 9 .a3 .ia5 10 . .ia2
180
9.h3
9.b4 .ixe3 10.fxe3 .ie6= Black
has neutralized White's active
bishop, Karpatchev - Galdunts,
Germany 2007.
White fails to obtain any ad
vantage with 9 . .ixc5 dxcS 10 . .id5
tLle7 11.tLlxe5 tLlexd5 12.exd5 tLlxd5
13 .Wf3 .ie6 14.tLle4 b6= Black has
no weaknesses in his position and
neither side has any active pros
pects.
9 .b:e3 1 0 .fxe3 .ie6 11.
.b:e6 fxe6 12.d4 exd4 13.exd4
e5 14.dxe5 li)xe5= White has
failed to obtain anything with this
variation and the position is com
B) 6.lt:ld5 d6
7.c3
Or 7.0-0 0-0 8.e3 (8.c3
li:lxd5 9.hd5 f6 - see 7.c3) 8 . . .
li:lxd5 9 .hd5 b6 10 .hb6 axb6=
and in view of the inevitable move
e6, the prospects are absolutely
balanced, Pepic - Laveryd, Stock
holm 1994.
The move 7.h3 is generally
useful, since it restricts the mobil
ity of Black's light-squared bish
op, but on the other hand it can be
harmful, because White's king
side is weakened. For example, he
can have problems protecting the
f4-square. 7 . . . li:lxd5 8.hd5 f6 9.
e3 li:le7 10 .b3 li:lg6 Robatsch
- Reshevsky, Maribor 1967.
7.e3 li:lxd5 8.hd5 he3 9.
fxe3 0-0 10.0-0 li:le7= Black
plans to transfer his knight to g6
and improve his position in the
centre with c7-c6 and d6-d5, And.
Sokolov - Tkachiev, France 2 0 07.
7 .. .lt:lxd5 8 . .ixd5
It is inferior for White to opt
9. 0 - 0
9.h3 e6 10.he6 fxe6 = Black
has exchanged his opponent's ac
tive bishop and has a slight lead
in development. Black has also
opened the f-file, but has ended
up with doubled pawns on the e
file, A. Kogan - Eljanov, Helsingor
2008.
9.d4 exd4 10.cxd4 (Here it
181
Chapter 15
would be inferior for White to
play 10.li:Jxd4 tt:lxd4 ll.cxd4 .tb4+
12 . .id2 .txd2+ 13.Wfxd2 Wlh4 ! t
and Black seizes the initiative,
thanks to the weakness of his op
ponent' s centre pawns.) 10 . . .
i.b6 ! ? 1 1 . 0-0 tt:lb4 12 . .tb3 .tg4 1 3 .
.te3 ttlc6 White has obtained a
beautiful pawn-centre, but Black
is exerting powerful pressure on
it.
9 . . . 1U6 1 0 . .ie3
After 10.b4 .tb6 ll.a4 aS 12 .b5
tt:le7 13 . .ia2 tt:lg6t Black is threat
ening a rather unpleasant pin and
his knight is headed for the excel
lent f4-outpost.
1 0 tt:le7 11 ..ib3
Or ll.ttld2 tt:lxd5 12 .exd5, Roy
Chowdhury - Grover, Le Touquet
2009, 12 . . . .tb6+ and Black has
very good prospects on the king. .
182
Chapter 16
7.f4
183
Chapter 16
White exploits the somewhat
unstable position of Black's
knight on d4 and opens the f-file,
hoping that this, together with his
advantage of the two bishops, will
provide him with attacking pros
pects.
After 7.c3?! tLle6 8.f4 d6 9.fS
tLlcS 10.tLld2 c6+ White will have
problems protecting his e4-pawn,
Chelushkina - Abramovic, Obre
novac 2 00S.
After 7.i.e3 tLle6 8.tLlc3 d6 9.f3
0-0+ White's two bishops do not
fully compensate for the lost
pawn, since Black has no weak
nesses in his camp.
White can try to transpose
moves with 7.i.gS d6 8.f4 (8.
tLlc3 ? ! c6 9.f4 i.e6 10.i.xe6 tLlxe6
1 1.fxeS dxeS 12 . .b:f6 gxf6+ Black's extra pawn looks weak,
but White's e4-pawn also needs
protection.) 8 . . . i.g4
8.fxe5
There is no doubt that White
must continue very aggressively
in order to create play. Slow con
tinuations such as 8.tLlc3 ? ! .ie6+
or 8.c3 tLlc6 9.fS h6+ would enable
Black to consolidate his position
simply and effortlessly.
184
8 . . dxe5 9 . .ig5
It is less energetic for White to
continue with 9.c3? ! .ig4 10.1Mfa4+
(10 .'<MI'e1? liJc2-+) 10 . . . i.d7 11.'<MI'd1
liJe6+ Black completes his devel
opment without any problems
and will later begin to attack the
weak enemy e4-pawn.
.
9 . . . We7 !
This is Black's most ambitious
move (9 . . . '<MI'd6 leads only to equal
ity) with which he is trying to gain
an edge. Now his queen protects
the t7-pawn and this will allow
him to evacuate his king to the
queenside, preventing White
from regaining his pawn.
l O .liJd2
This is not the most popular
move for White here, but it is a re
liable one. He has opened the f
file and now completes his devel
opment.
10.'it>h1 i.e6 11.i.xe6 (11.liJa3?!
0 - 0 - 0 12 .c3 , Heyne - Feher, Iasi
2011, 12 . . . liJb5+ Black disrupts his
opponent's queenside pawn
structure; 11 . .id3 0-0-0 12 .'<MI'e1
h6 13 . .ixf6 gxf6+ - Black is ahead
in development, having preserved
Chapter 16
was previously considered the
main line.
11.e1 i.e6+
ll . .ixf6 gxf6 12.@h1 i.d7+
ll.@h1 a6 12.c3 tt:le6 13 . .ixf6
gxf6 14.e1 .id7 15.d1 0-0-0+
Bodnaruk - Kosteniuk, Moscow
2010. Black retains the extra
pawn in all cases, completes
development and obtains excel
lent play on the open g- and d
files.
11.d3 - This is clearly the
best move for White. ll . . . i.d7 1 2.
g3 (12.e3 tt:l e 6 13 . .ixf6 gxf6 14.
ad1 b6 15.tt:lb5 0-0-0+ Black's
attack on the g-file is very danger
ous, Stefanov - Janosi, Email
2 0 08) 12 . . . c5 13.@h1 0-0-0 14.
.ixfl gf8 15.i.xf6 (15 ..id5 c6 16.
.ixf6 xf6 17.xf6 gxf6 18 .i.b3
tt:lxb3 19.axb3 d4 2 0 . tt:lc4 i.e6t
Black maintains an enduring ini
tiative thanks to his control of the
only open file and the superiority
of his bishop over the enemy
knight, Tucci - Lounek, Email
2009) 15 . . . gxf6 16.i.h5 @b8 17.
ad1 b6 18.c3 ltle6+ - Black's
knight will go either to c5, exert
ing pressure against the weak en
emy e4-pawn, or to the f4-square,
187
Chapter 17
A) 6.i.g5
A15 usual, this pin is not dan
gerous for Black if he can go back
to the e7-square with his bishop.
6 . . . h6 7.i.h4
It is inferior for White to opt
for 7.hf6 xf6+ - after the trans
fer of the knight to g6, Black will
have excellent attacking pros
pects and White will have prob
lems neutralizing the activity of
his opponent's dark-squared
bishop.
7 . . . i.e7
1 0 . .tb5
10 .i.b3, Sermek - Gostisa,
Bled 2002, 10 . . . a6 1l.e1 bS"fZ
when Black has neutralized the
opponent's light-squared bishop
and made his position secure.
1 0 . . . c6 n . .ta4 b5 12 . .tb3
xb3 13.axb3, Goergens - Kle
schtschow, Germany 2 0 0 2 .
Chapter 17
here, but we recommend 13
ftc7 Black gives eS-pawn fur
ther support and is able to com
fortably develop his pieces close
to the centre. After completing his
development, he can start active
play on both sides of the board, as
well as in the centre.
B) 6.h3 d6
7.c3
7.i.gS h6 8.i.h4 (8 . .txf6 Wxf6+)
8 . . . gS 9 . .ig3 (White's position be
comes very difficult after the dan
gerous move 9.ll:\xgS? hxgS 10.
i.xgS, Fedorov - Khruschiov, St.
Petersburg 2001. Black must re
act accurately, though . . . After
10 . . . @h7! White loses after 1l.ll:\c3
1!g8 12 .h4 i.g4 13 .ftc1 ftd7 14.i.xf6
i.f3- + and Black forces mate, but
even with the more precise line
11.h4 1!g8 12 .i.xt7 1!g7 13.i.c4
Wf8+ White is helpless against his
opponent's coming attack.) 9 . . .
ll:\hS 10.i.h2 ll:\f4 Black's king is
exposed, but White is unable to
exploit this because Black's pieces
are very active.
190
8 . .b:e6
For 8 .ll:\bd2 aS - see Chapter
19.
After S .igS? ! i.xc4 9.dxc4 h6+
White will have to play ixf6, after
which Black's dark-squared bish
op will remain without an oppo
nent, enabling him to dominate
the dark squares. White loses af
ter 10.ih4? gS ll.ll:\xgS hxgS 12 .
.ixgS aS ! 13. @h2 fte7 14.f4 exf4
1S.E:xf4 WeS-+ His attack has
reached a dead end, he is a piece
9.eb3
Black should not be afraid of
9.b4 .ib6 10.EDbd2 a6 ll.EDc4
.ia7= White has no active possi
bilities with which to create prob
lems for his opponent.
White should avoid 9.d4 i.b6
10.dxe5 EDxe5 11.EDxe5 dxe5 12.'1Wxd8
axd8 13.EDd2 d3+, when he has
isolated Black's doubled pawns
on the e-file, but has failed to
complete his development, so his
e4- and f2- pawns are vulnerable.
9 ti'c8 l O .EDg5 ges ll . .ie3
.ixe3 12.fxe3 h6 13.EDf3 b6=
Both sides have problems finding
any active ideas in this position,
Hemmer - Gach, corr. 1994.
..
C) 6.gel d6
(diagram)
7.c3
White does not achieve much
in the variations 7.h3 .ie6 8.i.xe6
191
Chapter 17
8 . .ib3
This accurate move is the most
popular for White at this point.
8.b4 - This pawn-advance is
pointless, since Black was pre
pared to retreat his bishop to a7 in
any case. Now, unlike in the vari
ation with 7 . . . .ie6, the bishop can
go to a7 in one move: 8 . . . .ia7 9 .
.igS h6 10 . .ih4 gS 11 . .ig3 (After
11.lt:lxg5? hxgS 12 . .ixg5 .ig4 13.
'Wd2 'it>h7+ - Black leads in devel
opment and is ready to use his ex
tra piece in the attack) 11 . . . lt>g7
8.lt:lbd2 - This is a harmless
move, which fails to create any
problems for Black: 8 . . . .ie6 9.a4
.ia7 10 . .ib3 h6 11.lt:lc4 bS 12.lt:le3,
Fries Nielsen - Brinck Claussen,
Tarnby 1983 and with 12 . . . 'Wd7=,
Black connects his rooks and is
ready to deploy them in the cen
tre.
8 . .ig5 h6 9 . .ih4 gS 10.lt:lxg5 ! ?
(In the only game with this line,
White played 10 . .ig3, Rodriguez
Vila - Sarin, Buenos Aires 2010,
but after 10 ... .ia7 11.lt:lbd2 g4
1 2 .lt:lh4 lt:lh5 Black had an excel
lent position.) 10 . . . hxg5 11 . .ixgsgg
9.bd2
9 . .ic2 - White retreats his
bishop from its active position
and this provides Black with the
opportunity to fight for the centre
with 9 . . . d5 10.'We2 l'l:e8 11.h3 h6
Ganguly - Fressinet, Dresden
2008.
9.h3 .ixb3 10.axb3 (in re
sponse to 10.'Wxb3, Kaidanov A.Ivanov, USA 1994, it looks at
tractive for Black to centralize his
pieces in standard fashion with
10 . . . 'Wd7 11.lt:lbd2 l'l:fe8 12.lt:lfl
193
Chapter 18
194
l . e4 e5 2. lt:Jj3
195
Chapter 18
Black's forces dominate the king
side.
S.b4 ! ? .ie7! ? Black wants to
advance d7-dS in one move. The
move S . . . .ib6, with the same pur
pose, is less appropriate because
Black needs to be able to control
the gS-square.
6.b4 i.b6
197
Chapter 18
7.d5 ttJf6 8J'!e1+ e7 9.ttJxd4
ttJxd4 10.\Wxd4 0-0+ - Black has
a solid extra pawn, Enrique - Ma
tras, Rio de Janeiro 2001.
In the variation 7.e2 dS 8.
cxd4 ttJxd4 9.ttJxd4 hd4 10.ttJc3
hc3 11.bxc3 e6+ Black already
has two extra pawns but he should
not forget to evacuate his king
from the centre, Keres - Raud,
Tallinn 1935.
After 7.b4 b6 8.b5 ttJe7
9.cxd4 dS 10.b3 g4+ Black has
the initiative as well as an extra
pawn, Anderssen - Riemann,
Breslau 1876.
7.cxd4 - This is the best move
for White, but it is still inade
quate. 7 . . . d5 8.dxc5 (After 8.b5
d6 9.ttJe5 0-0 10.ttJxc6 bxc6 11.
hc6 hh2 + 12.\!?xh2 \Wd6+ 13.g3
\Wxc6-+ Black has won a pawn
and weakened the light squares
on his opponent's kingside, Sun
day - Korneev, Velden 1993) 8 . . .
dxc4
A) 6.e5
White seizes space.
6 d5
..
7.b5
White is fighting aggressively
for the dark squares in the centre.
It is less active for him to play
7 . .ib3 lt:Je4 8.cxd4 .ib4+ 9 . .id2
(after 9.lt:Jbd2 .ig4+ White cannot
shake off the rather unpleasant
pins without making positional
concessions) 9 . . . lt:Jxd2 10.lt:lbxd2
.ig4 ! (Black must play aggres
sively, because after the indiffer
ent reply 10 . . . 0-0 ll.h3 White
maintains his space advantage for
free.) ll.a4 hf3 ! N 12.xf3
.ixd2 + 13 . ..t>xd2 h4 14 . .ixc6+
bxc6 15.e3 cS ! 16.dxc5 (The end
game is equal after 16.g3 cxd4
17.gxh4 dxe3+ 18.fxe3 0-0-0=)
16 . . J'!b8 17.b3 o-ogg White's king
is stuck in the centre and this pro
vides Black with excellent attack
ing chances.
199
Chapter 18
9.c3
White should avoid 9.a4 aS
10 .hc6+ bxc6 11.i.e3, V.Svesh
nikov - Samolins, Riga 2006 (in
response to 11.c2 , Pekin - H.
Yildiz, Izmir 2002, it is good for
Black to play 11 . . . c5+, getting rid
of his weak pawn and activating
his bishop), since after 11 . . . i.a6+
he can keep the enemy king
stranded in the centre.
After 9 .c2 Black can prevent
his pawns being doubled on the c
file by playing 9 . . . i.d7 10 .hc6
i.xc6 11. 0-0 (11.lLlc3 0-0 12 . .ie3
fS 13.0-0 f4 14.i.c1 d7? Black's
bishops are not very active yet,
but he has seized space on the
kingside and White will have
problems coping with the power
ful enemy knight on e4, Szewczyk
- Borawski, Lazy 2010) 11 . . . 0-0
12 ..ie3 i.d7 13.a4 c6? Bestian Liss, Haifa 1989.
9.i.xc6+ bxc6 10.0-0 (10.lLlc3
i.g4 - see 9.lLlc3 ; 10.i.e3 0-0 see 9 . .ie3 ; it is too passive for
White to opt for 10.lLlbd2? ! cS+; in
the variation 10.Ytfc2 cS 11.dxc5
i.xcS 12.0-0 0-0? Black gets rid
of his weak pawn on c6 and ob200
Chapter 18
on the kingside provide him with
the better prospects. It might ap
pear more precise for White to
play 14.i.b3 but then Black again
has a tactical resource at his dis
posal : 14 . . . lt:Jxf2 ! 15Jlxf2 lt:JxeS 16.
i.xdS i.xdS 17.xd5+ xdS 18.
lt:JxdS i.xf2 + 19.1!lxf2 l:!f7 2 0.1!le2
lt:Jxf3 21.gxf3 l:!af8 2 2 .f4 l:!e8+ 23.
l!lf3 !!d7 24.lt:Je3 l:!d3 = and this al
most forced variation leads to an
endgame in which Black's pieces
are much more active, but he will
still find it difficult to breach
White's defences.
After 11.0-0 0-0 12 .i.b3 i.e6
13.lt:Jc3, Januszewski - Zielinski,
Ostroda 2 009, it would be sensi
ble for Black to remove his king
from the dangerous diagonal and
after 13 . . . \!?h8 14.exf6 xf6
15.lt:Jxd5 i.xdS 16.i.xd5 lt:Jxf2 17.
l:!xf2 lt:Jxd4 18.\!?h1 lt:Jf5 his com
pensation for the piece should be
sufficient for a draw, for example:
19.i.g5 (White loses after 19.l:!fl?
lt:Jg3+ 20.I!lh2 d6-+ ; in the vari
ation 19.i.xb7 lt:Jg3+ 20.I!lh2 !!ad8
21 .l:!d2 f4= White cannot avoid
the perpetual check) 19 . . . d6
2 0 .i.xb7 !:labS 21.xd6 cxd6 2 2 .
l:! d 2 l:!xb7= White will find i t dif
ficult to prove that the isolated
d6-pawn is weak, because Black's
piece-activity provides compen
sation.
9. . . 0 - 0
(diagram)
1 0 .i.e3
After 10.i.xc6 bxc6 11.i.e3 (11.
c2? ! - this just loses time - 11 . . .
i.f5 12 .e2 cS+ Leks - K. Pelletier,
202
ll.Yc2
11.a4 I:De7 12 .i.d3 (After 12.
h3? ! hf3 13.gxf3 I:Dxc3 14.bxc3,
Sarakauskiene - Makropoulou,
Plovdiv 2008, Black can play 14 . . .
I:Df5+ emphasizing the weakness
of his opponent's kingside) 12 .. .f5
13.exf6 I:Dxf6 14.1:De5 i.f5 15.i.e2
I:Dg6 16.0-0 c6 17.1:Dxg6 hg6t Black has no weaknesses and his
pieces are easily activated, while
White's d4-pawn needs protec
tion, Macieja - Malaniuk, Wro
claw 2011.
11.hc6 bxc6 12.a4 (after 12.
c2 c5 13.dxc5 1:Dxc5+, the change
in the pawn structure is in Black's
favour; it is more accurate for
White to play 12 .h3 hf3 13.gxf3
I:Dxc3 14.bxc3 d7 15.f4 i.a5 16.
d3 f6t when Black has a power
ful initiative on the kingside, but
White's position is solid, and after
17J!b1 fxe5 18 .fxe5 :B:f3 19.d2
:B:af8 2 0 .a6 .ib6 21.:B:bg1 :B:xf2 +
2 2 .hf2 :B:xf2 + 23.e1 :B:f3 24.d2
203
Chapter 18
Elf2 + 25. 'i!?e1 Elf3= both sides have
nothing better than to acquiesce
to the draw, Vinchev - Friis,
Email 2009) 12 .. .f6 13.xc6
(White has failed to evacuate his
king, so opening the centre with
13.tt:\xe4 dxe4 14.tt:\d2 fxe5+ is in
Black's favour.) 13 . . . tt:\xc3 14.bxc3
hf3 15.gxf3 fxe5 16.dxe5 .ixe3
17.fxe3 Elxf3 18.'i!?e2 , Macieja - De
la Paz Perdomo, Merida 2 005, af
ter 18 . . . Elf8 19.Elafl Ele8+ Black re
tains an edge owing to the oppo
nent's exposed king and his many
weaknesses.
11.0-0 f6 12.exf6 (12 . .ie2? !
fxe5 13.dxe5 he3 14.fxe3 tt:\xc3
15.bxc3 'i!?h8t White's centre
pawns are weak, Cardelli - Mahl
ing, Email 2010) 12 . . . tt:\xf6 13 . .ie2
d6 14.h3 (14.Elc1 Elae8 15.a3 tt:\e7
16.tt:\e5 he2 17.tt:\xe2 tt:\f5+ Krug
- Schlesinger, Wiesbaden 199 0 ;
after 14.tt:\b5 d7 15.tt:\c3 Elae8
16.tt:\a4 .ih5 17.tt:\xb6 axb6 18.h3
d6 19.b3 tt:\e4t Black's pieces
are very active and in particular
White must consider the possible
exchange sacrifice on the f3square on every move, Niewold Wingo, Email 2008) 14 . . . .ih5= Black will prepare to plant his
knight on e4 by playing Elae8,
Carrettoni - Van Damme, Email
2010.
11.b3 hf3 1 2 .gxf3 tt:\g5 13.
0-0-0 (This move is more logical
than 13 .hc6 bxc6 14.d1, Vega
- Otero Acosta, Cuba 2000 and
after 14 . . . tt:\h3 ! 15.f4 h4 16.f3
Elae8 17.g3 h5 18.tt:\e2 f6+
Black is able to exert strong pres2 04
12.'Ml3
12 .a4 tiJe7 13.tiJh4 (13.0-0
a6 14 ..ie2 tiJc6 1S.Wfb3 tiJxc3 16.
bxc3 h6 17.tiJd2 Wfd7 18.h3 f6= )
13 . . .f6 ! 14.tiJxe4 he4 1S.exf6
xf6+ Vera Gonzalez Quevedo Lukacs, Havana 1986.
12 .hc6 bxc6 13.tiJxe4 (13.Wfa4
cS 14.dxcS hcS 1S.tiJxe4 he3
16.tiJg3 i.d7 17.aS i.b6 18.xdS
Wfe8+ Black's bishops are ex
tremely active, which more than
compensates the sacrificed pawn,
Strzemiecki - Rutkowski, War20S
Chapter 18
saw 2010) 13 ... dxe4 14J'!dl (14.
tt:lgl c5 15.dxc5 .ta5+ 16. \t>fl d5
17.\Wb3 \Wc6 18.tt:le2 a6 19.h3
.td7+ - Black's pieces are very ac
tive, J.Andersen - Ludwig, Email.
20 04) 14 . . . exf3 15.xf5 fxg2 16.
:!:!gl d5 17.g4 (17.g5?! .ta5+
18 . .td2 , Eggleston - Haslinger,
Hawick 2004, after 18 . . . g6+ Black
neutralizes all his opponent's
threats on the kingside) 17 .. .f5 ! t
- Black seized the initiative i n the
game Kashtanov - Lugovoi, St.
Petersburg 2002.
12 ... a5 13.b4
White loses after the greedy
13.xd5? e7! 14.tt:lxe4 i.e6 15.
tt:lf6+ gxf6 16.e4 b4+ 17.lt:Jd2
\Wxb5- + Bukojemski - A.Ga
vrilov, Cracow 2011.
After 13.a4 tt:Jxc3 14.bxc3 c6
15 ..te2 .ic7+ Black cannot be pre
vented from advancing with b7b5 and then deploying his knight
in the c4-outpost.
13 c6 14 .ie2
For 14 . .id3 tt:Jc4 15 . .ixc4 .ia5 see 14.i.e2.
14 ... c4 15 . .ixc4 .ia5 16.
b3 dxc4 17.xc4 b6 18 .icl
.
18 c5
After 18 . . . tt:Jxc3 19.bxc3 .ie6
2 0.d3 i.f5= Black can force a
threefold repetition of the posi
tion, because if White's queen
abandons the fl-a6 diagonal Black
will seize it with his queen, keep
ing the enemy king stranded in
the centre.
19. 0 - 0
It is inferior for White to opt
for the risky line 19.d5 tt:Jxc3 20.
bxc3 g6 2 1.tt:lh4 .id3 22 .tt:Jxg6
.ixc4 23.tt:Je7+ 'it>h8 24 . .id2 .idS+
when Black regains his pawn and
maintains a stable advantage,
thanks to his superior develop
ment and better pawn structure.
19 xc3 2 0 .bxc3 cxd4
21.xd4 i:!ac8 22.e2 .id7=
Black regains his pawn, retaining
an excellent position, Merrow Kamanel Zamora, Email 2010.
B) 6.cxd4
This is a natural move. White
occupies the centre with tempo.
This line was played as early as in
the 16th century in Greco's games.
6 .ib4+
206
207
Chapter 18
ll.a3N (11.lt:le4 ? ! d6 12 .W/a4
i.c5 13.lt:\xc5 dxc5 14.i.g5 Wd6 15.
l'!fe1 lt.Jg6+ - Black has preserved
his extra pawn and the change in
the pawn structure is in Black's
favour, since he can organize an
offensive on the queenside, Kriv
odedov - Moiseyenko, Yuzhny
20 09.) ll . . . i.a5 12 .b4 (A drawish
endgame arises almost by force
after 12 .d6 cxd6 13.lt:le4 d5 14.
hd5 lt:\xd5 15.W/xd5 d6 16.i.g5
i.e6 17.hd8 hd5 18.lt:lf6+ gxf6
19.ha5 i.c4= - Black will almost
certainly be unable to realise his
extra pawn, but it compensates
adequately for his kingside weak
nesses.) 12 . . . i.b6 13.d6 cxd6 14.
lt:\e4 d5 15.hd5 lt:\xd5 16.Wxd5 d6
17.i.f4 i.e6 18.Wxb7 d5 19.lt:lc5 i'k8
20 .l'!ac1 W/f6 2 1.g3 l'!fe8= White's
pieces are a bit more active, but
Black has a passed pawn in the
centre and still has his bishop pair.
8 . 0-0 lt:\xd2
Bl) 7 .ld2
.
1 0 .b3
This is the main line for White
and for a long time it was consid
ered that he could create some
problems for Black with it.
10 .c2 0-0 - see 10 .b3 /:jj a5
11.a4+ /:jj c 6 12 .c2.
After 10.e2+ i.e6 11.0-0
0-0= Black has no problems at
all. He has excellent development
and exerts pressure against the
enemy d4-pawn.
10./:jj e S /:jj xe5 11.dxe5 0-0 12.
0-0 /:jj f4f! Black can activate his
forces very quickly, Karpatchev
Korneev, Arco 2003.
In the variation 10 .i.b5 e7+
11.e2 xe2+ 12.xe2 !d7+ only
White can have problems. His d4pawn needs protection and after
Chapter 18
11.tt:'le5 tt:'lxd4 12.tt:'lb3 (12.tt:'le4?
tt:'lf4+) 12 . . . tt:'lxb3 13.i.xd5. The
threat of i.xf7 + followed by '?t/h5
looks very dangerous, but Black
can counter this with 13 . . . '?tff6 !
14.'?t/xb3 (14 ..bf7+ E:xf7 15.'?t/xb3
'?t/xe5 - see 14.'?t/b3) 14 . . . '?t/xe5 15.
i.xf7 + (It is inferior for White to
play 15.E:fe1 '?tff6 16.E:e3 c6 17.i.f3
E:b8+ Pribe - Robles Sanchez,
Hessen 2 003, or 15.E:ae1 '?t/f6 16.
E:e3 c6 17.i.f3 E:b8+ Antoszkiewicz
- Haupold, corr. 1979 and in both
lines Black ends up with a solid
extra pawn.) 15 . . . E:xf7 16.E:ae1 (It
is slightly inferior for White to opt
for 16.E:fe1 i.e6 17.E:xe5 i.xb3 18.
axb3 E:d8 = when he must play
very accurately to prevent his op
ponent from exploiting the weak
ness of his doubled pawns. How
ever, the position is still within
the bounds of equality, Deretic Mejak, corr. 1980 .) 16 . . . i.e6 17.
Wfxe6 '?t/xe6 18.E:xe6 E:d8 = - Black
has forced a transition into a
dead-drawn endgame.
1 0 . . . a5!
The move has dealt a serious
blow to the fans of this variation
for White.
ll.Wa4+
The other retreats of his queen
would enable Black to capture the
powerful bishop on c4, solving all
his problems.
ll . . c6
(diagram)
12.J.b5
The overwhelming majority of
games reaching this position have
.
210
13. 0 - 0
It is inferior to play 13.b3
e7+ 14.ci!;>fl i.e6+ - White has
lost his castling rights and his
rook on h1 will find it difficult to
come into play any time soon, Mi
ettinen - Buzas, Email 2009.
14.l!!ifel
After 14.b3 a6 15.ha6 gxa6
16.xd5 i.e6 17.c5 ga4 18.gfe1
CiJxd4= Black regains his pawn
and White is forced to play very
precisely, since his knight is po
tentially weaker than the enemy
bishop, Laine - Salonen, Email
2010.
14 a6
15 . .ifl
15.hc6?! hc6+ - Black's
bishop has found a working diag
onal and cooperates with his
knight, which is headed for the
wonderful f4-square, Goncalves Cerqueira Filho, corr. 1995.
15.i.d3 CiJcb4 16.b3 CiJxd3 17.
xd3 f6 ! t White's knights have
no stable squares in the centre, so
Black can begin to attack the weak
d4-pawn.
15 . . . .ie6= - Black has no
weak spots in his position, but the
board is still full of pieces and
Black will not find it easy to prove
that the enemy d4-pawn is weak,
Laine - Pesonen, Email 2 010.
B2) 7.CiJc3
211
Chapter 18
This sharp move was recom
mended and analyzed quite deep
ly more than 400 years ago by
Greco.
7 .tixe4 8. 0 - 0
In a few games White has tried
s :rge2? d5 9.0-0 hc3 10.bxc3
o-m=, but Black completes his de
velopment, remaining with a sol
id extra pawn.
White cannot even equalize
with the aggressive line 8.d5 lLlxc3
9.bxc3 hc3+ 10 .i.d2 hd2 + 11.
xd2 lLle7 12.0-0 (It would be
better to continue 12.d6! cxd6
13.0-0 d5 14.hd5 0-0+ and
Black would need to give back one
of his extra pawns to complete his
development.) 12 . . . d6 13.:1Ue 1
O-m= Villing - Horn, Baden
2002.
After s:rgb3 0-0 9 . 0 - 0 hc3
10 .bxc3 d5 ! ? 11..id3 (ll.hd5?
lLla5- +) ll . . . b6+ Black has a solid
extra pawn, Letay - Nyland, Bu
dapest 2008.
8 ... .ixc3
9.d5 !
9.bxc3 d5
212
1 0 .Yfe2
10 .bxc3 tt::l xc4 lUl:el (after 11.
Yld4 0-0, every possible capture
transposes to the main variation
- see 10.Yie2) ll...tt::l c d6 1 2 .tt::l d 2
0-0 13.tt::l x e4 tt::l xe4 14J'l:xe4 d6+
There are bishops of opposite
colours on the board and
White's pieces are very active, so
Black will find it very difficult
to realize his extra pawn, Geroni
mi - Van Wely, Ajaccio (blitz)
2007.
10.1J.b3 ? ! d6 ll.bxc3 .ig4 12.
:Bel fS ! 13 . .if4 (It is too risky for
White to play 13.h3 ix:f3 14.gxf3,
Barnes - Meisel, USA 1972 , since
Black can respond with 14 . . . 0 -0 !
1S.fxe4 Ylh4 16.1"ie3 fxe4 with a
strong attack, because the major
ity of White's pieces are out of
play on the queenside, for exam
ple : 17.1"ig3 :Bf3 18.:Bxf3 tt::l xf3+ 19.
2 13
Chapter 18
Budva 2009.) 24 . . . 'it>d8 25.a3 Ei:a2
2 6.tt:ld6 'it>e7 27.tt:lf5+ 'it>d8= Neither side can avoid the repeti
tion of the position.
13 . . . ti'f6
13.ti'd3
13 .ti'g4? b6 14.i.g5 f6 15.i.h6,
Chorba - Bezkorovainaya, Niko
laev 2 0 07, and with 15 . . .'e7+
Black parries his opponent's pre
mature attack.
White cannot create any prob
lems for his opponent with the
line 13.'\Wd4 tt:lf5 14.'\Wd3 d6 15.
i.g5 f6 16.i.d2 ti'e8+ and the
transfer of Black's queen to the
g6-square neutralizes his oppo
nent's activity, Berezjuk - Sosna,
Vsetin 1997.
The position is equal after 13.
Wf4 b6 14.i.a3 i.b7 15.c4 Ei:e8 16.
Ei:fe1 ti'f6 (16.i.xd6? ! cxd6 17.'\Wxd6
Ei:c8 18.Ei:fc1 h6 19.tt:ld4, Leite Parkes Navea, Email 2008, and
with 19 . . . i.a6t Black seizes the
initiative, emphasizing the weak
ness of White's pawns.) 17.'\Wxf6
gxf6 18.i.xd6 cxd6 19.tt:ld4 i.a6
20.Ei:xe8+ Ei:xe8 2 1.tt:lf5 Ei:e2 2 2 .
tt:lxd6 (22 .Ei:c1 'it>f8 23.tt:lxd6 'it>e7
- see 2 2 . tt:lxd6) 22 . . . 'it>f8 23.Ei:cl
'it>e7 24.tt:lf5+ (After the inaccu
rate 24.'it>f1? Ei:e5 25.f4 Ei:xd5 26.
tt:lc8+ 'it>d8 27.tt:lxa7 Ei:c5+ Black
wins a pawn with excellent win
ning chances, Anicic - Godena,
2 14
14.gel
White needs to play very accu
rately here.
14.i.a3?! b6 15.Ei:fe1 (In the
endgame after 15.'\Wd4 ti'xd4 16.
tt:lxd4 i.a6 17.i.xd6 cxd6 18.Ei:fe1
g6+ Black's bishop gains scope,
emphasizing the weakness of his
opponent's d5-pawn, Guizar Wilson, Email 2008; with the
variation 15.i.xd6 Wxd6 16.tt:lg5
ti'g6 17.'\Wxg6 hxg6+ White fails to
weaken Black's pawn structure,
Kravchenko - Otroshenko, Kiev
2000.) 15 . . . i.b7 16.Ei:e5 (if 16.tt:le5
Ei:fe8 17.tt:lxd7 ti'g6 18 .ti'xg6 hxg6+
White loses his d5-pawn and he
must look after his knight, since
Black threatens t7-f6.) 16 . . . Ei:fe8
17.i.xd6 Wxd6+ Verde - Kurkows
ki, Toronto 2008.
14.i.g5? ! '\Wf5 15.'\Wxf5 (15.'1Wd2
tt:le4 16.'1Wc2 d6+ - Black has re
tained his extra pawn and seized
the initiative, Molina Munoz -
16.Wxf5
White must enter an endgame;
2 15
Chapter 19
A) 6.b4 i.e7!
Black's bishop is better placed
here than on b6, since it supports
the preparation of the pawn-ad
vance d7-d5 in one move by cov
ering the important gS-square.
7.ti'b3
This is the most insidious
..
B) 6.bd2 a5! ?
With this move Black prevents
his opponent from seizing further
space on the queenside.
2 17
Chapter 19
After 6 . . . d5 7.exd5 tt:lxdS 8.
tt:le4 ! ? White's knight occupies
the e4-outpost with tempo and af
ter this the pin on his knight on f3
is less dangerous, in view of the
possible manoeuvre h3, i.hS, tt:lg3.
7. 0 - 0
In response to 7.tt:lf1, Black has
the powerful riposte 7 . . . d5+
7.h3 d6 8.ttlf1 (8.0-0 i.e6 see 7.0-0) 8 . . . i.e6 9.i.b3 dS 10.
exdS hdSt - Black is clearly
ahead in development and this
becomes quite clear after the ex
change of bishops, or even if
White avoids it, Koubek - Korsa,
Czech Republic 2006.
7.i.b3 d6 8.tt:lfl (8.0-0 - see
7.0-0; following 8.h3, Pelekh Serik, Evpatoria 2 005, the sim
plest way for Black to neutralize
his opponent's dangerous bishop
is with the move 8 . . . i.e6=) 8 . . . b5
9.a4 b4 10.tt:lg3 i.e6 11.0-0 l!b8
12 .he6 fxe6= - White has seized
space on the queenside and forced
the exchange on e6. This has ena
bled Black to activate his rook and
cover the fS-square, Baisaev - S.
Kuzin, Dagomys 2009.
218
7 . . . d6
Black's bishop will inevitably
come to e6 and this will solve all
his problems, because the pres
sure of White's light-squared
bishop against Black's kingside
will be thus removed.
8.h3
8.l!e1 i.e6 9.i.b3, Situru Bouchaud, New York 1994, (It is
no better for White to opt for 9.
he6 fxe6 10.b3 e8, since now
he loses his queen after 11.xb7??
i.b6-+, while if ll.a4 tt:lhSt Black
creates very dangerous threats on
the kingside.) 9 . . . hb3 10.axb3
dS= and despite the fact that
Black advanced d7-d5 in two
moves, he has no problems at all,
because he has succeeded in neu
tralizing the pressure of White's
light-squared bishop.
8.i.b3 i.e6 9.i.c2 (In response
to 9.a4, Black equalizes easily
with 9 . . . d5 10.c2 h6= - He ends
up with a slight space advantage
and his bishop has the excellent
e6-square.) 9 . . . h6 10 .h3 dS ll.i.a4
dxe4 12.dxe4, De Ia Paz Perdomo
- Rodriguez Sorribes, Barbera del
d5
7.Ci'Jbd2
For 7.exd5 Ci'Jxd5 8.0-0 f5 ! see Chapter 2 0 .
7.e2 aS
Chapter 19
Kobalia - Lysyj , Khanty-Mansi
ysk 2011.
8.i.a4 l'!b8 9.0-0 (It is inferior
for White to play the greedy 9.
hc6 bxc6 10 .tt:lxe5 since after
10 . . .'e8 11.d4 i.d6 12 .exd5 tt:lxd5+
he lags considerably in develop
ment and his light-squared bish
op, which could have covered the
f1-a6 diagonal, has disappeared
from the board. In the variation
9.i.g5 b5 ! 10.exd5 bxa4 11.dxc6
d5 12 .hf6 gxf6 13.0-0 xc6+
Black has the better prospects,
since he has two very active bish
ops and open files for his rooks, as
compensation for his seriously
weakened pawn-structure.) 9 . . . b5
10 .i.c2 (It is better for White to
try a line which not yet been test
ed in practice: 10.exd5 tt:Jxd5 11.
hb5 ! l'!xb5 12 .d4 l'!b8 13.dxc5
e7 14.l'!e1 xeS, and here not
15.tt:lxe5? l'!e8-+ when Black wins
a piece, but 15.b3 15 . . . l'!e8t with
good chances for equality for
White.) 10 . . . d4 11.h3 d6 12.cxd4
hd4+ The weakness of the d4square provides Black with better
chances, Herzog - Uifelean,
Email 2008.
8.a4 i.e6 (The game is much
more complex after 8 . . . d4 ! ? 9.
0-0 h6 10.tt:lbd2 e7oo Radjabov
- Shirov, Baku 2009.) 9.i.c2 dxe4
(9 . . . h6 ! ? 10.0-0 d4 11 .h3 l'!e8oo
Hou - Naiditsch, Khanty-Mansi
ysk 2 009) 10.dxe4 h6 11.h3 e7
12 .tt:lbd2 l'!ad8= and in this sym
metrical position, Black has the
better development, but he will
find it difficult to exploit this ef220
8.e2
8 .i.c2? ! - White avoids the ex
change of his bishop, but gives
Black a tempo for the develop
ment of his initiative. 8 . . . dxe4
9.dxe4 (It is better for White to
play here 9.tt:lxe4 tt:Jxe4 10.dxe4
i.c4t, but his king will be stuck in
the centre for some time to come,
so his h1-rook will be out of action
for a while.) 9 . . . tt:lg4 10.0-0 i.xf2 +
11.l'!xf2 tt:le3 12 .e2 tt:Jxc2 13.l'!b1
i.xa2+ Black's knight on c2 will
undoubtedly be lost, but, he will
obtain a rook and three pawns
in return for his two minor piec
es, Herman - Hess, Ledyards
2006.
8.0-0 dxe4 9.dxe4 hb3 10.
axb3 (10.xb3 a6= Black pre
vents - 11.xb7? tt:la5-+) 10 . . .
d3 11.b4 .ib6 12.tt:le1 b5 13.tt:lc2
(13.c2 a5 =) 13 ... d3= His queen
is very actively placed on d3 and if
White tries to oust it from there
with his knight he will have to ac-
D) 6.i.g5
Black can easily parry this pin
when his pawn has not been
moved to d6.
6 h6 7.i.h4
7 i.e7!
This is a typical idea !
8.bd2
In response to 8.b3, Black
can solve all his problems in
standard fashion with 8 . . . 11Jh5
9.he7 xe7= and his knight will
go to the f4-square.
8.0-0 d6 9.h3 (9.11Jbd2 l:iJhS
see 8.11Jbd2) 9 . . . 11Jh5 10.g3 11Jxg3
ll.fxg3 l:iJaS+ Black's bishops are
stronger than the enemy knights,
Zocchia - Bokros, Email 2009.
8.i.g3 d6 9 .h3 l:iJaS 10.11Jbd2
11Jxc4 11.11Jxc4, Verdu Vazquez Garijo Martinez, Valencia 2009,
ll ... e6 12.11Je3 aSt - Black seizes
space on the queenside, making
use of the fact that White's bishop
on g3 is cut off from the action.
8 d6 9.i.g3
In answer to 9.11Jf1 l:iJaS ! ? 10.
bS, Kisonova - Chorvat, Slova
kia 1998, Black's most energetic
response is lO . . . dS 11.e2 (It is
.
ll a5! ?N
Black's bishop should retain
the possibility of retreating to f8
in some lines, so he makes it dif
ficult for White to advance with
b3-b4.
The game Radjabov - Carlsen,
Nice 2 0 09, continued ll . . . a6 12.
b4 J.a7 13.11Jc4 e6 14.11J a5 l:iJxaS
15.l'!xa5t - White managed to iso
late the enemy dark-squared
bishop from the action on the
kingside.
12.ti'b5 i.b6 13.11Jc4 xe4
14.xb6 cxb6 15.i.e3 d6 16.
ti'xb6 f6+t White has captured
his opponent's dark-squared
bishop, but in return Black has
obtained a superiority in the cen
tre.
221
Chapter 19
inferior for White to release his
pressure on the eS-pawn : 11.
ltl3d2 ? ! i.e6+) ll . . . c6 12 .i.a4 dxe4
13.dxe4 bS 14.i.c2 ltlhS 15.i.g3
i.f6+. Black is threatening to play
ltlf4, either immediately or after
preparation, while if now 16 . .b:e5
i.xeS 17.4:lxe5 ltlf4 18.Wif3 WigS 19.
g3 ltlh3 20.4:ld3 i.g4 2 1.W/g2 ltlc4+
he keeps White's king stranded in
the centre and obtains excellent
attacking chances at the cost of
only a pawn.
9.0-0 ltlhS 10 .i.g3 (White los
es after the greedy 10.4:lxe5? ltlxeS
ll . .b:e7 W/xe7 12.W/xh5 i.g4-+ and
his queen is lost, Chen - Sprin
gelkamp, Bagneux 2001; 10.i.xe7
V9xe7=) 10 . . . 4:lxg3 ll.hxg3 i.f6=
Black's bishop frees the e7-square
for the knight manoeuvre ltlc6-e7g6, Thorhallsson - Godena, Saint
Vincent 2 005.
9.a4 ltlhS 10.i.g3, Tate Sanchez Jerez, Benidorm 2 009,
and here Black can play 10 ... 4Jxg3
ll.hxg3 i.f6= , followed by trans
ferring his knight to the g6square, solving all his problems.
9 .i.b3 ltlhS 10.i.g3 (White
does not achieve much with 10.
he7 W/xe7 ll.ltlc4 ltlf4 12.ltle3
W/f6= Kosintseva - Lahno, Chis
inau 2 005.) 10 . . . 4Ja5N (The care
less move 10 . . . 'it>h8 enables White
to win a pawn: ll.ltlxeS ! ltlxeS 12.
i.xeS dxeS 13.W/xh5 W/xd3 14.Wxe5;!;
Tiviakov - Narayanan, Bhubane
swar 2009.) ll.i.c2 c5 12.0-0 J.e6=
Black's position is at least equal.
His pieces are ideally placed and
he is ready for a fight in the centre.
222
9 4:la5
The attractive-looking 9 . . .
ltlhS? loses a pawn for Black after
lO.ltlxeS ltlxg3 ll.ltlxc6 bxc6 12.
hxg3;!;. He has the bishop pair but
this is not sufficient to compen
sate for the missing pawn.
1 0 .J.b5 h5 ll.d4 xg3
12.hxg3 exd4
It is logical for Black to open
the game, since he has two strong
bishops.
13.xd4
Here it is inferior for White to
opt for 13.cxd4 eSt since it is ad
vantageous for Black to open the
position for his bishop pair. If
White plays d4-d5 there arises a
Benoni pawn-structure in which
Black's powerful dark-squared
bishop has no opponent, giving
him the better prospects.
13 . . . a6 14.J.d3 c5 15.c2,
Tiviakov - Naiditsch, Sibenik
2010.
Chapter 2 0
6 . . . d5 ! ?
Black's main reply i n the dia
gram position is 6 . . . d6. That is
also a good move. However, we
recommend advancing the d
pawn one square further, because
with this Black immediately ob
tains a slight advantage in the
centre and a clear target for attack
- White's d3-pawn.
The drawback of the move 6 . . .
d S i s that for Black t o maintain
his advantage in the centre he
needs to coordinate his pieces,
which requires very precise
play.
7.exd5
This move is forced.
7 . . . ttlxd5
Chapter 2 0
White's d3-pawn and his undevel
oped queenside) 9 ...!J.e7= (Black
loses a pawn after 9 . . . !J.b6? 10.
hh6 ! and White's bishop is ta
boo, since capturing on dS fails to
a fork on f6.) 10.ltlbd2 , Iftime M.Szabo, Buzias 2002, and here
Black can play 10 . . . lt:Ja5+, either
gaining the advantage of the two
bishops or banishing the enemy
bishop to a4, after which he can
win the d3-pawn with lt:Jf4.
8.!J.b3 ifS 9.!J.g5, Cunha Koziel, Email 2008, (it is slightly
preferable for White to opt for
9 .ltlxe5 lt:JxeS 10.d4 lt:Jb4 ! 11.dxc5
lt:Jbd3= , but Black's piece-activity
is quite threatening) 9 . . . !J.e7 10.
he7 lt:Jdxe7+ - Black has com
pleted his development and will
go on to attack the d3-pawn.
8.e2 !J.g4 9.b4 (Black does
not need to fear 9.h3 !J.hS 10 .g4? !
!J.g6 11.ltlxe5 lt:JxeS 12.xe5 c6+
when White has won a pawn but
lags considerably behind in devel
opment and his king is in danger.)
9 . . . !J.b6 10.a4 a6 11.h3, Morozov
- Bascetta, Email 2009, Black
should maintain the pin with 11 . . .
!J.hS?, since h e need not fear the
loss of his pawn, because White's
king would then be exposed.
8.!J.g5 f6 9.d4N. This is a prin
cipled move for White. (After 9.
!J.h4?! <;!;>h8t, Black has moved his
king off the dangerous diagonal
and now seizes the initiative,
thanks to his superior develop
ment and dominance in the cen
tre, Borisov - Popvasilev, Sofia
2 011; if 9 . .ie3 he3 10.fxe3 .ie6
224
l.e4 e5 2. t:lJ.f3 t:lJ c6 3 . .ic4 .ic5 4.c3 t:lJf6 5.d3 0 - 0 6. 0 - 0 d5 7.ed t:lJxd5
10.CiJxc5 CiJd6= the weakness of
White's d3-pawn might become
an important factor.
After 9.b4 White wins a pawn:
9 . . . ie7 10.b5 CiJaS ll.CiJxe5 tt:laxc4
12.CiJdxc4 CiJxc4 13.CiJxc4, Bauer
Bacrot, Belfort 2010 (13.dxc4
xd1 14J:!xd1 .ie6t and White will
have serious problems with the
protection of his c4-pawn, while
the position is open and Black's
bishops are very powerful), but
after Black plays 13 . . . a6 14.bxa6
Elxa6 15.Ele1 .ie6 and he obtains
more than sufficient compensa
tion for the pawn owing to his ac
tive pieces and White's weak
queenside pawns.
8.h3 CiJb6
Chapter 2 0
A) 8.b4
The main benefit of this move
is that it wins a pawn, but its basic
drawback is that White lags in de
velopment and now weakens an
other pawn, on c3.
8 . . . i.e7
9.b5
This is his most consistent
continuation.
9 .ib3?! a6 10 .ic2 ifS ll.ie3
d7+ White has great problems
with the protection of his pawns
on d3 and c3 , Tairova - Samokhi
na, Urgup 2004.
l.e4 e5 2. liJj3 liJc6 3 . .ic4 .ic5 4.c3 liJf6 5.d3 0 - 0 6. 0 - 0 d5 7.ed liJxd5
9.b3? ! liJb6 10J'%e1 liJxc4 11.
dxc4 f6 12 .c5+ l!lh8+ - Black has
strengthened his position in the
centre and obtained the advan
tage of the two bishops, Rjanova
- Ponkratov, Moscow 2010.
9.h3 .if6 10.liJfd2 (in reply to
10 .1Mfb3, Black can gain the bishop
pair by playing 10 . . . liJb6+) 10 . . .
liJb6 ll . .ibS (ll.liJe4 liJxc4 12.dxc4
.ie7+) ll . . . .id7 12.liJe4 a6 13.hc6
hc6+ - without his light-squared
bishop White is unlikely to pre
serve his d3-pawn, Djurhuus S.Arkhipov, Gausdal 1991.
9J'%e1 .if6
1 0 .ixd5
It is no better for White to opt
for 10.liJxe5 liJxc4.
.
227
Chapter 2 0
Now, after ll.dxc4 tt:lb6 12 . .ia3
ha3 13.xd8 l!xd8 14.tt:lxa3 tt:la4
15J'l:ac1 f6 16.tt:lf3 .ig4 17.tt:ld4
tt:lxc3 18.l!xc3 l!xd4+, Ruan Lufei
- A.Kosteniuk, Antakya 2010,
Black gained a small but stable
advantage, since the bishop is
stronger than the enemy knight in
a position with an open centre.
In response to ll.tt:lxc4, Ficco
- Godena, Lugano 2007, it is very
good to continue with ll . . . a6! 12.
bxa6 l!xa6+ and Black's bishop
pair, combined with the weakness
of White's queenside pawns, more
than compensate for Black's sac
rificed pawn.
1 0 , . .'rgxd5 ll.c4 d7!
15 ..ic3
We shall take a look at White's
alternatives:
15.bxa6 l!xa6 16 . .ic3 l!d8 17.d4
(17.l!e1 c5 18.tt:ld2 l!d6 19.tt:le4
l!xd3+ Black regains his pawn and
retains his advantage of the two
bishops.) 17 . . . b5 18.tt:ld2 l!f6 19.
e3 l!e6 2 0.f3 .ia6 ! 21 .d5 l!g6
2 2 .cxb5 hb5 23.l!fe1 .if8+ White
loses his d5-pawn and the one on
a2 is more of a weakness than an
outside passed pawn;
15.b6 cxb6 16 . .ixb6 (after 16.
l.e4 e5 2. tiJ.fJ ti:J c6 3. i.c4 i.cS 4.c3 ti:Jf6 5.d3 0 - 0 6. 0 - 0 d5 7.ed ti:Jxd5
i.c3 c6 17.ti:Jd2 xf3 18.t?Jxf3 fS+
White's queenside pawns are much
weaker than Black's) 16 . . .i.f6 17.
d4 hd4 18.:E'!dl (It is obviously an
improvement for White to play
18 .hd4 xd4 19.ti:Ja3 cS+ but
Black's bishop is clearly superior
to White's knight on the edge of
the board, and his position is
more compact.) 18 . . . ha1 19J:!xd7
hd7 2 0 .xb7 (20.ti:Ja3 i.c6 21.
b3 E:fe8+) 20 . . . E:ae8 2 1.i.e3 E:b8
2 2 .e4 E:fe8 23.c2 i.a4 24.cl
i.b2 25.el E:bd8-+ Andriasian
- A.Mastrovasilis, Rijeka 2010;
White can maintain equality
with a line which has not been played
yet: 15.a4N axbS 16.axb5 E:d8
17. . . g5 !
Black releases the pressure
against the d3-pawn, but avoids
weakening his kingside and in
fact now plans an offensive
against the enemy monarch.
18.xc7 ga6
From this square the rook can
be redeployed in the centre or on
the kingside, and it also supports
a possible i.d6.
19 . .id2 f6 20 . .ic3 h4
21.g3
229
Chapter 2 0
2 1 . . . %Yxg3 !
This is stronger than 2 1 . . .Yfh6
2 2 .%Ye3 i.g5 23.f4 i.d8 24.tt:ld2oo
when White has completed his
development and kept his extra
pawn, Macieja - Fressinet, Wat
tenscheid 2011.
22.hxg3 b5+ Black has more
than enough compensation for
the pawn, despite the exchange of
queens. His bishops are very
strongl, while White will have
problems protecting his pawns on
d3 and a2. Furthermore, after the
exchange of queens White will
find it difficult to organize any ac
tive counterplay.
B) s.gel
This is the main line. White
has already opened the e-file, so it
is logical use it to exert some pres
sure on Black's e5-pawn.
8 . . . .ig4
(diagram)
9.h3
White should force Black's bish
op to the h5-square, from where it
cannot return to the centre.
After 9.tt:lbd2 and Black's best
reply 9 ... tt:lb6! it generally amounts
230
l.e4 eS 2. 0,j3 'Ll c6 3. 1ic4 ticS 4.c3 'Llf6 5.d3 0 - 0 6. 0 - 0 dS 7.ed ttJxdS
Souleidis - Ragger, Germany 2007;
it is too risky for White to opt for
14.1i.g5 b6 15.l'!e2 cxd5 16 . .ie3
a6 17.l'!d2 f5 Smola - Wiewio
ra, Kolobrzeg 2008) 14 . . . cxd5 15.
f3 1i.c7 and Black's kingside at
tack procedes effortlessly, Stjazh
kina - Arnaudov, Varna 2010.
ll.b5
11.hd5? - White cannot win a
piece like this, because after 11 . . .
xd5 12.c4 h f3 13.gxf3 d4-+
he cannot protect his rook.
It would be too aggressive for
him to weaken his kingside
with ll.g4? ! .ig6 12.a4 (12 .hd5?!
xd5 13.c4 xd3 14.c5 lt:lxb4 15.
cxb6 lt:lc2+ Black obtains a rook
and several pawns for two minor
pieces.) 12 . . . a6 13.a5 (13.lt:lxe5
f6+ Black regains his pawn and
White's kingside weaknesses will
be hurting him even more after
the opening of the e-file.) 13 . . . 1i.a7
14.lt:lxe5, Kubasky - Speisser,
Email 2006. Here Black can play
14 . . . lt:lxe5 15.l'!xe5 c6+, gaining
more than enough compensation
231
Chapter 2 0
for the exchange, owing to his lead
in development and the weakened
position of White's king.
After ll.a4 a6 1 2 J''!:a2 (12.l"!:a3
f6 13.lt:lbd2 .tf7 14.a5 .ta7 15.ll'le4
d7 16.b3 l"!:fd8= it is difficult
for both sides to improve their po
sitions.) 12 .. .f6 13.ll'lbd2 h8 14.
l"!:c2, Vasiukov - Opl, Dresden 2006,
Black should deploy his major
pieces in the centre and the best
way to begin this is to play 14 ... d7=
ll . . . ll'la5 12.gxe5
12 .g4?! - White has weakened
his queenside with his previous
move and now he is doing just the
same with his kingside. 12 . . . .tg6
13.ll'lxe5 (if 13Jxe5? ll'lf4 14.hf4
ll'lxc4+ Black regains his pawn
and quickly activates all his piec
es; or 13.hd5 xd5 14.ll'lxe5 l"!:fe8
15.d4 cS+ White might fail to de
velop altogether.) 13 . . . ll'lxc4 14.
dxc4 h4 ! -+ Black's forces are
tremendously active and White is
almost helpless against his oppo
nent's attack, for example : 15.f3
(15.cxd5? g3+ 16.h1 xh3+ 17.
g1 g3+ 18.hU.xf2-+) 15 ... l"!:ae8!
16 . .ta3 (16.cxd5 f6+) 16 .. .f6 17.
.ixf8 ll'lf4 18.xf4 fxe5-+ and Black's
threats on the f-file are decisive.
12 . . . ll'lf6N
(diagram)
13 . .tb3
13.ll'la3 hf3 14.xf3 .td4 ! 15.
cxd4 (after 15.l"!:e2 hc3 16.l"!:b1 l"!:e8
17.l"!:xe8+ xe8 18.ll'lc2 h6= Black
will easily eliminate White's ad
vantage of the two bishops) 15 . . .
xd4 16.l"!:e1 xa1 17 . .ld2 b2 18.
haS xa3 19.hc7 l"!:ae8 20.l"!:f1
232
B2) 1 0 .a4!?
12.bd2
This is the most natural devel
oping move for White.
He loses after the hasty 12.
\Wb3? 13.gxf3 \Wh4 ! 14.d4
exd4 15.hd5 Eiae8 16.'1Wd1 dxc3
17.e3 he3 18.Eixe3 Eixe3 19 .fxe3
cxb2 2 0 .Eia2 Eid8-+ Black regains
his piece and ends up with extra
pawns and an attack.
The position is double-edged
after 12 .d4 exd4 13.cxd4 b4 14.
d2 hd2 15.0,bxd2 /:i)f4? when
White has seized space on the
queenside but his d4-pawn needs
protection and his king might
come under attack.
A very complicated struggle
arises after 12 .b4 a7 13.b5 axbS
233
Chapter 2 0
14.hb5 f6 15.i.a3 l:'le8 16.a6
c8+ Black has the better posi
tion in the centre and eyes the
kingside, but White has made
some progress on the queenside.
12 .g4 - White wants to in
crease his pressure on the queen
side. 12 . . . i.g6 13.b3 e4 ! 14.dxe4
lt::l e5 ! 15.lt::l xe5 h4 ! . Black has
begun an attack after several very
strong moves and the difficulty
of White's defence can be best il
lustrated by the following varia
tions : 16.lt::l d3 (16.c2? l:'lae8 17.
hd5 g3+ 18.\!i>fl xh3+ 19.'i!i>e2
l:'lxe5- + White's queenside forces
cannot come into play.) 16 . . . g3+
17. \!i>fl xh3+ 18.'i!i>e2 (18.'i!i>g1?
xg4-+) 18 ...he4 19.'i!i>d2 (White
loses by force after 19.lt::l xc5 lt::l f4+
2 0 .hf4 xg4+ 21.'i!i>e3 f3+ 2 2 .
'i!i> d 2 xf4+ 23.l:'le3 xf2 + 24.l:'le2
f4+ 25.\!i>e1 g3+ 26.\!i>fl i.f5-+)
19 ... hd3 20 .hd3 lt::l f4 21.i.f5
lt::l g 2 2 2 .l:'le2 f3 23.c4 lt::l f4 24.
b4 l:'lad8+ 25.\!i>c2 lt::l x e2 2 6.xc5
lt::l x c1 27. \!i>xc1 c6+ and the materi
al is approximately equal, but
Black's prospects are better, since
all his pieces are active, while
White's king is unsafe and his
pawns on g4 and particularly on
f2 are quite vulnerable.
12 f5 13.lifl
After 13.d4 exd4 14.lt::l b 3 d6
15.d3 l:'lae8+ the opening of the
e-file is in Black's favour, because
he is the better-developed side.
13 e4! 14.dxe4 .ixf3! 15.
Yxd5
White loses quickly after 15.
xf3 fxe4-+ , or 15.gxf3 h4-+
234
21.ee3
The attempt to solve his prob
lems tactically by playing 21.
i.h6 leads after 2 1 . . .lt::l xf3+ 2 2 .'i!i>h1
e8 23 . .if4 e4 24.e3 c6 25.
e2 lt::l d 2+ 2 6.g2 lt::l xc4 27 . .ixd6
l.e4 e5 2JiJj3 11Jc6 3. i.c4 i.c5 4.c3 11Jf6 5.d3 0 - 0 6. 0 - 0 d5 7.ed l:iJxdS
xd6+ to material equality, but
White's position is worse, since
his king is completely exposed.
21 gdl 22.'ffx el el 23.
f2 (The attempt to play for a
win with 23.b3 11Jxc4 24.bxc4 gds
25.l'!b1 l'!dd1 26.l'!xb7 fuf1+ 27.
'i!lg2 l'!g1+ 28.'i!lf2 l'!gf1+ 29.'i!lg3
l'!g1+ 30.'i!lh4 h6+ does not pro
vide White with sufficient com
pensation for the exchange.) 23
c1 24.gxcl xc4 25.gdl g8
26.b4 d6 27.11Je3 xf5 28.
xf5 gxf5 29.gd7 M7 3 0 .gd8+
gf8= The position is drawish, ir
respective of whether White ex
changes the rooks or not.
B3) t o .tobd2 b6
B3a) 11.e4
B3b) 11 .tb5
B3c) 11.b4
14.xe5
This is White's most consist
ent move.
In reply to 14.a4, it is good
for Black to play 14 . . . l'!e8 ! - he
consolidates his position in the
centre, ignoring his opponent's
queenside threats. Now after
15.11Jxb7 11Jxb7 16.xc6 l'!e6 17.
xb7 l'!b6 18.xa8 xa8 19.11Jxe5
f6 20.11Jxg6 hxg6+ Black ends up
with a slight material advan
tage .
14 ..tg5 c8 15.11Jh4, Corte Redol:fi, Buenos Aires 1955 (it is
235
Chapter 2 0
preferable for White to opt for
15.d4 exd4 16.cxd4 b6 - see 14.
d4) and after 15 .. .f6 16.li:lxg6 hxg6
17 . .ie3 b6 18.ltle4 d7+ Black is
ready to attack the enemy d3pawn.
14.d4 exd4 15 . .ig5 (15.cxd4?!
b6 16.a4 ltlxd4 17.xd4 bxcS 18.
xeS f6 19Je3 ltle4 2 0 .xc7
:Bfd8+ White's king is vulnerable
and he has considerable problems
with the development of his
queenside.) 15 . . . c8 16.ltlxd4 (16.
cxd4 b6 17.ltle5 ltlxeS 18.dxe5
bxcS 19.exd6 cxd6= It will not be
easy for Black to exploit the weak
ness of White's king and after the
exchange of queens the position
will become a dead draw.) 16 . . .
lt'lxd4 17.xd4 b 6 18 .ltlb3 :Be8=
Tzermiadianos - Markidis, Kal
lithea 2009.
14 lt'lxe5 15.gxe5 b6
16 .ig5
It would be too risky for White
to play16.ltla6? ! , because the
transfer of the knight from that
square to the kingside would take
too long. 16 .. .f5 17.d4 h4 18.f1
:Bac8--+
236
. .
l.e4 eS 2. li:Jj3 li:J c6 3. i.c4 i.cS 4.c3 li:Jf6 5.d3 0 - 0 6. 0 - 0 d5 7.ed li:JxdS
a:e6- + , and Black's attack is deci
sive in both cases.) 25 fxg4
26.ti'c4+ lt>h8 27.ti'f7 ti'xf7 28.
gxf7 gxh3 29.gdl lt>g8 3 0 .gc7
h5 31.b4 h4-+ Despite the ex
change of the queens Black's at
tack is crushing, White's king is
incarcerated and he has no satis
factory defence against the threat
of 32 . . . .ig2 .
B3b) ll.J.b5
White tries to attack the ene
my eS-pawn.
ll J.d6
12.li:Je4
The transfer of the knight to g3
enables him to get rid of the un
pleasant pin without weakening
the position of his king.
For 12.li:Jfl a:es 13.li:Jg3 i.g6 see 12.li:Je4.
12.a4 a6 13.i.xc6 bxc6 14.tt:le4
fS 15.li:Jg3 .ix3 16.ti'xf3 d7?
White is unable to exploit the
weakness of his opponent's
queenside pawns, but Black's ad
vantage in the centre is over
whelming, Guido - Brunella,
Bratto 2 007.
13.tt:lg3
This is the natural completion
of White's knight-manoeuvre.
In reply to 13.ig5?! f6 14.i.e3,
Burtasova - Ir.Semenova, Sochi
2004, it is useful for Black to
eliminate his opponent's light
squared bishop with 14 . . . a6 15.
i.xc6 bxc6?
If 13.a4 a6 14.hc6 bxc6 15.a5
(after 15.i.d2 li:JdS 16.li:Jg3 i.g6?
Black obtains excellent counter
play, thanks to his strong light
squared which now has no oppo
nent, Kusturin - Kasperski, corr.
1998) 15 . . . li:Jd7 16.a:a4, Kalugin E.Alekseev, Olginka 2011 (in re
sponse to 16.i.e3 Black can im237
Chapter 2 0
prove his position i n the centre by
playing 16 . . . c5 17.g4 .ig6 18.lt:Jfd2
E:b8 19.lt:Jc4 i.f8?), and after 16 . . .
f6? Black bolsters his eS-pawn
and enables his bishop to retreat
to f7, where it is better placed
than on g6.
13 . . . .ig6 14.a4
There is no advantage for
White in simplifying the position
with 14 . .igS d7 1S.lt:Jh4 a6 16 .
.ixc6 xc6 17. lt:Jxg6 hxg6= Hase
- Amado, Buenos Aires 1983.
14 ... a6 15.hc6 bxc6 16.a5
lt:Jd7 17.e4 h6 18.a4
18.d4 exd4 19.lt:Jxd6 cxd6 20.
lt:Jxd4 Wff c 7= Wallinger - Colucci,
corr. 1990.
12 .g4
We shall examine White's al
ternatives:
after 12 .bS lt:JaS 13.E:xeS .ig6
14.E:e1 E:e8 1S.lt:JeS i.f6 16.lt:Jxg6
hc3 ! 17.E:xe8+ xeS 18.E:b1
hxg6, Black is not worse, since at
any moment he can exchange his
terribly misplaced knight on aS
for White's strong bishop. For ex
ample: 19 .c2 lt:Jaxc4 20.dxc4
.ixd2 2 1 . .ixd2 e2 2 2 .E:c1 lt:Jxc4
23.i.b4 xc2 24.E:xc2 lt:Jb6 2S.
E:xc7 lt:JdS 26.E:c4 lt:Jxb4 27.E:xb4
E:d8 28.E:c4 E:d7= with complete
equality;
12 .b3 .if6 13 . .ib2 (13.-ibS
aS ! ? 14 . .ixc6 bxc6 1S.lt:JxeS E:e8
16.d4 axb4 17.xb4 cS ! 18.xcS
lt:Jd7 19.c4 heS 20.dxeS lt:JxeS
2 1.d4 Wfff6 Black's piece activity
more than compensates for his
sacrificed pawn.) 13 . . . aS 14.a3
axb4 1S.axb4 lt:Jxc4 16.xc4 d7
17.g4 (17.bS?! lt:JaS+ White's
queenside pawns are an easy tar
get for Black's attack.) 17 . . . .ig6
18.lt:Je4 i.e7? White's pieces are
239
Chapter 2 0
15.xg6
After 15.i.a3 i.xe5 16J'!xe5 l'!e8
17.l'!xe8+ xeS 18.i.c5 bxc4 19.
dxc4 l'!d8 20.e1 f6 2 1.xe8+
i.xe8 2 2 .i.e3 b6= White's extra
pawn is irrelevant. Next move
Black plans to advance c7-c5, fix
ing the weakness and restricting
the enemy bishop.
15 . . . hxg6 16.e4
In the variation 16.c2 l'!e8
17.i.a3 d7 18.l'!ad1 c6 19.bxc6
xc6= Black regains his pawn.
16.i.b2 d7 17.e4 (after 17.
c2 axc4 18.tt:lxc4 xb5+ White's
bishop is bad and his d3-pawn is
weak.) 17 . . . tt:lbxc4 18.dxc4 xd1
19.l'!axd1 tt:lxc4 20.tt:lxf6+ gxf6 21.
.ic1 a6 2 2 .a4 axb5 23.axb5 l'!fe8=
The endgame is by no means
worse for Black.
16 . . . axc4 17.dxc4 xc4
18 . .if4
After 18.b3 tt:ld6 19.tt:lxd6
cxd6 2 0.i.d2 l'!c8= the pawns on
d6 and c3 are equally weak.
After 18.f3 a6= Black opens
the a-file and brings his rook into
play.
240
18 ... .ie5
The careless move 18 . . . a6? !
leads to a loss of a pawn for Black
after 19.bxa6 l'!xa6 20.xd8 l'!xd8
2 1.hc7 l'!d5 2 2 . a4:t
19.e2
19.f3 f5 20.l'!ad1 fxe4 21.xe4
E:xf4 2 2 . E:xd8+ E:xd8 23.xg6
E:d6 24.e8+ E:f8 25.e7 E:fl=
19 . . . .ixf4 2 0 .xc4 c6 21.
gadl (21.bxc6 l:k8= ) 21 . . . c7
22.bxc6 gac8=
Index of Variations
Part 1. l.e4 e5
Chapter 1 l.e4 e5
various
2 .d4 exd4 3.1!Nxd4 tt:lc6
.
9
10
29
31
. 40
. 46
. 51
52
. 53
. 56
64
77
79
241
Index of Variations
Chapter 7 1.e4 e5 2 . c!Of3 c!Oc6 3.c!Oc3 c!Of6 4.g3 d5
S.exdS lt:JxdS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Chapter 8 1.e4 e5 2.c!Of3 c!Oc6 3.lt:Jc3 lt:Jf6 4 .ib5 .ib4
various . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
5 . 0-0 0-0 various . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
A)
6 . .ixc6 dxc6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
B)
6.d3 d6 various . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
B1)
7 . .ixc6 bxc6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
B2)
7.lt:Je2 lt:Je7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
B3)
7 . .ig5 lt:Je7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
242
Index of Variations
A)
A1)
A2)
B)
243
Index of Variations
Chapter 2 0 l.e4 e5 2.f3 c6 3.i.c4 .ic5 4.c3 f6 5.d3 0 - 0
6. 0 - 0 d5 7.exd5 xd5
various
223
8.b4 i.e7
226
A)
B ) 8.!1el .ig4 9.h3 .ih5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 0
Bl)
10.b4 .ib6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 1
B2)
10.a4 a6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
B3)
10.tt:lbd2 tt:lb6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
.
244