AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Number of People Living in
Counties with Air Quality
Concentrations Above the
Level
of the NAAQS in 1999
10
POLLUTANTS: SOURCES
11
AIR POLLUTION
POLLUTANTS: SOURCES
12
AIR POLLUTION
POLLUTANTS: SOURCES/TRANSPORT
13
AIR POLLUTION
OLLUTANTS: SOURCES
14
AIR POLLUTION
15
AIR POLLUTION
16
AIR POLLUTION
17
AIR POLLUTION
18
AIR POLLUTION
COMBUSTION POLLUTANTS
VOCs, NOx,
N-organics, Haloorganics
Metals, CO
Sources
Tobacco, Power plants
Incinerators,
Automobiles
Industry
19
AIR POLLUTION
IMPACT
Greenhouse effect
Ozone depletion
Acidification
Smog formation
Eutrophication
HUMAN HEALTH
Ecosystem health
20
HEALTH EFFECTS
21
Exposure to air pollution can cause both acute (shortterm) and chronic (long-term) health effects.
Acute effects are usually immediate and often
reversible when exposure to the pollutant ends. Some
acute health effects include eye irritation, headaches,
and nausea.
Chronic effects are usually not immediate and tend not
to be reversible when exposure to the pollutant ends.
Some chronic health effects include decreased lung
capacity and lung cancer resulting from long-term
exposure to toxic air pollutants
23
24
Description
Sources
Health Effects
Welfare Effects
Carbon
Monoxide
(CO)
Colorless, odorless
gas
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
Nitrogen
Dioxide (NO2)
Susceptibility to respiratory
infections, irritation of the lung
and respiratory symptoms
(e.g., cough, chest pain,
difficulty breathing).
Ozone (O3)
Gaseous pollutant
when it is formed in
the troposphere.
Lead (Pb)
Metallic element
Particulate
Matter (PM)
Visibility impairment,
atmospheric deposition,
aesthetic damage.
25
Sources
Effects on Vegetables
Aldehydes
Photochemical reactions
Ozone (O3)
Peroxy Acetyl
Nitrate (PAN)
Nitrogen dioxide
(NO2)
Chlorine (Cl2)
Hydrogen fluoride,
Silicon
tetrafluoride
Pesticides &
Herbicides
Agricultural operations
Particulates
Mercury (Hg)
26
AIR POLLUTION
27
AIR POLLUTION
28
AIR POLLUTION
29
UNIT CONVERSION
30
AIR POLLUTION
UNIT CONVERSION
There are two systems of unit in common:
Mass per unit volume: usually g m-3. The mass of
pollutant is expressed as a ratio to the volume of air.
Since the volume of a given parcel of air is dependent
upon the temperature and pressure at the time of
sampling, the pollutant concentration expressed in
these units should, strictly speaking, specify the
conditions at the time of sampling.
31
AIR POLLUTION
UNIT CONVERSION
32
AIR POLLUTION
UNIT CONVERSION
Volume mixing ratio: usually ppm - parts per million
(10-6); or ppb - parts per billion (10-9); or ppt - parts
per trillion (10-12). This is expressed as the ratio of
its (pollutant) volume if segregated pure, to the
volume of the air in which it is contained.
Ideal gas behavior is assumed and thus the
concentration is not dependent upon temperature
and pressure as these affect both the pollutant and
the air to the same extent. As a consequence of the
gas laws, a gas present at a volume mixing ratio of 1
ppm is not only 1 cm3 per 10-6 cm3 of polluted air, it is
also 1 molecule per 10-6 molecules and has a partial
33
pressure of one millionth of the atmospheric
AIR POLLUTION
UNIT CONVERSION
Since NOX consists partly of NO and NO2, the
volume fraction in air ppb equates to a different air
concentration in g m-3 depending on the ratio of
NO to NO2. For this reason air concentrations of
NOX are normally expressed as g NOX-NO2 m-3. i.e.
all references assume that NOX is in the form of
NO2.
Some pollutants (e.g. sulphate, nitrate) are present
as particles in the air and the concept of a volume
mixing ratio of gases is not obviously applicable.
Their concentrations are normally expressed only
in g m-3 units.
34
AIR POLLUTION
UNIT CONVERSION
Kg ha-1 year-1 to kilo equivalents ha-1 year-1
The unit eq (a keq is 1000 eq) refers to molar
equivalent of potential acidity resulting from e.g.
sulphur, oxidised and reduced nitrogen, as well as
base cations.
For example:
1 keq N ha-1 yr-1 is equal to 14 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and
1 keq S ha-1 yr-1 is equal to 16 kg S ha-1 yr-1.
35
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
36
AIR POLLUTION
37
CYCLONES
Principle
38
39
CYCLONES
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
CYCLONES
41
Problem
Q1 = 150 m3/min
Q2 = 300 m3/min
Pt1 = 100% - 80% = 20%
Pt2/Pt1 = (Q1/Q2)0.5
Final Efficiency = 1- Pt2
= 86%
42
SETTLING CHAMBERS
43
FABRIC FILTERS
Principle
The filters retain particles larger
than the mesh size
Air and most of the smaller
particles flow through. Some of the
smaller particles are retained due
to interception and diffusion.
The retained particles cause a
reduction in the mesh size.
The primary collection is on the
layer of previously deposited
particles.
44
FABRIC FILTERS
Fabric Filter
45
FABRIC FILTERS
46
FABRIC FILTERS
47
Problem
10
15
20
25
30
Filter P (Pa)
330
490
550
600
640
700
Solution
Calculate the air velocity
800
875
W = LVt
20
24
12
16
FABRIC FILTERS
Pf
Pp
Ps
50
FABRIC FILTERS
ADVANTAGES
DARCYS EQUATION
Dp
V = Q/A
Qvolumetric gas flow rate m3/min
A cloth area m2
52
DUST LAYER
P = Pf + Pp
Problem
54
Solution
55
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR/ESP
ESP PRINCIPLE
57
ESP PRINCIPLE
MIGRATION VELOCITY
Where,
q = charge (Columbus)
Ep = collection field intensity (volts/m)
r = particle radius (m)
= dynamic viscosity of gas (Pa-S)
c = Cunningham correction factor
59
where,
T = absolute temperature (k)
dp = diameter of particle (m)
60
Problem
61
Solution
A =-[ (Q/w)*ln(1- )]
A = 70,000 m2
Number of plates = total area/plate area
= 1400
62
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR/ESP
ADVANTAGES
Very high efficiency, generally of the order of 99.5-99.9%.
Since the ESPs act on the particles and not on the air, they can
handle higher loads with lower pressure drops.
They can operate at higher temperatures.
Operating costs are generally low.
DISADVANTAGES
The initial capital costs are high.
Although they can be designed for a variety of operating
conditions, they are not very flexible to changes in the operating
conditions, once installed.
Particulate with high resistivity may go uncollected .
63
WET SCRUBBERS
64
WET SCRUBBERS
WET SCRUBBERS
Principle
Wet scrubbers are used for removal of particles which have a
diameter of the order of 0.2 mm or higher.
Wet scrubbers work by spraying a stream of fine liquid droplets
on the incoming stream.
The droplets capture the particles
The liquid is subsequently removed for treatment.
Construction/Operation
A wet scrubber consists of a rectangular or circular chamber in
which nozzles are mounted.
The nozzles spray a stream of droplets on the incoming gas
stream
The droplets contact the particulate matter, and the particles
get sorbed.
The droplet size has to be optimized.
66
WET SCRUBBERS
( CONTD..)
Smaller droplets provide better cleaning, but are more
difficult to remove from the cleaned stream.
The polluted spray is collected.
Particles are settled out or otherwise removed from the
liquid.
The liquid is recycled.
Wet scrubbers are also used for the removal of gases
from the air streams
67
WET SCRUBBERS
Efficiency
where,
k = Scrubber coefficient (m3 of gas/ m3 of liquid)
R = Liquid-to-gas flow rate (QL/QG)
= internal impaction parameter
Internal impaction parameter
where,
c = Cunningham correction factor
p = particle density (kg/m3)
Vg = speed of gas at throat (m/sec)
dp = diameter of particle (m)
dd = diameter of droplet (m)
= dynamic viscosity of gas, (Pa-S)
68
WET SCRUBBERS
ADVANTAGES
They can handle incoming streams at high temperature,
thus removing the need for temperature control
equipment.
Can handle high particle loading.
Loading fluctuations do not affect the removal efficiency.
Manage explosive gases with little risk.
Gas adsorption and dust collection are done in one unit.
Corrosive gases and dusts are neutralized.
DISADVANTAGES
High potential for corrosive problems
Effluent scrubbing liquid poses a water pollution problem.
69
70
ORIFICE SCRUBBERS
71
IMPINGMENT SCRUBBERS
72
VENTURI SCRUBBERS
VENTURI SCRUBBERS
Ug
Qt
Qg
Problem
p = 4.8
75
HYDROCARBON
CONTROL
76
77
Problem
78
VOC INCINERATORS
79
VOC INCINERATORS
Principle
H2O
80
Timing
A certain time has to be provided for the reaction to proceed
Turbulence
Turbulence promotes mixing between the VOC's and oxygen
Proper mixing helps the reaction to proceed to completion in
the given time.
81
VOC INCINERATORS
82
VOC INCINERATORS
83
VOC INCINERATORS
84
Problem
In a workshop a mixture of chemicals were released,
Benzene 3000 ppm
Toluene 1000 ppm
Methane 2000 ppm
Calculate the lower exposure limit (LEL) of the mixture
LEL by volume for each chemical
Benzene 1.4 %
Toulene 1.27 %
Methane 5.00%
85
Solution
LEL of a mixture:
Xi - Volume of i component in the mixture
Xm - Volume of mixture
LELi - LEL of i component
86
GASES/VAPOURS
CONTROL
87
GASES CONTROL
Absorption,
Adsorption,
Condensation, and
Incineration (combustion)
88
ABSORPTION
The removal of one or more
selected components by
absorption is probably the
most important operation in
the control of gaseous
pollutant emissions.
Absorption is a process in
which a gaseous pollutant is
dissolved in a liquid.
Water is the most commonly
used absorbent liquid.
As the gas stream passes
through the liquid, the liquid
absorbs the gas, in much the
same way that sugar is
ABSORPTION
90
ADSORPTION
ADSORPTION
Regenerative Carbon
Adsorption System
Non-Regenerative
Carbon Adsorption
System
92
ADSORPTION TOWERS
CONSTRUCTION/OPERATION
Adsorption towers consist of cylinders packed with the adsorbent.
The adsorbent is supported on a heavy screen
Since adsorption is temperature dependent, the flue gas is
temperature conditioned.
Vapor monitors are provided to detect for large concentrations in
the effluent. Large concentrations of the pollutant in the effluent
indicate that the adsorbent needs to be regenerated.
ADVANTAGES
Very low concentrations of pollutants can be removed.
Energy consumption is low.
Do not need much maintenance.
Economically valuable material can be recovered during
regeneration.
93
CONDENSATION
94
CONDENSATION
Contact condenser, the gas
comes into contact with cold
liquid.
In a surface condenser, the
gas contacts a cooled surface
in which cooled liquid or gas
is circulated, such as the
outside of the tube.
Removal efficiencies range
from 50% to more than 95%,
depending on design and
applications.
Contact condenser
95
Surface condenser
INCINERATION
DIRECT COMBUSTOR
97
THERMAL INCINERATORS
CATALYTIC INCINERATORS
99
AIRQUALITY MODELLING
100
AIR POLLUTION
MODELLING
Air Quality Models are mathematical
formulations that include parameters that
affect pollutant concentrations.
They are used to
Evaluate compliance with NAAQS and other
regulatory requirements
Determine extent of emission reductions
required
Evaluate sources in permit applications
101
AIR POLLUTION
MODELLING TYPES
Meteorological
Model
Emission
Model
Chemical
Model
Source
Dispersion
Model
Receptor
Model
AIR POLLUTION
MODELLING TYPES
Emission Model
Estimates temporal and spatial emission rates based on
activity level, emission rate per unit of activity and
meteorology
Meteorological Model
Describes transport, dispersion, vertical mixing and
moisture in time and space
Chemical Model
Describes transformation of directly emitted particles
and gases to secondary particles and gases; also
estimates the equilibrium between gas and particles for
volatile species
103
AIR POLLUTION
MODELLING TYPES
Source Dispersion Model
Uses the outputs from the previous models to
estimate concentrations measured at receptors;
includes mathematical simulations of transport,
dispersion, vertical mixing, deposition and
chemical models to represent transformation.
Receptor Model
Infers contributions from different primary source
emissions or precursors from multivariate
measurements taken at one ore more receptor
sites.
104
AIR POLLUTION
MODELLING CLASSIFICATION
Developed for a number of pollutant types and
time periods
Short-term models for a few hours to a few days;
worst case episode conditions
Long-term models to predict seasonal or annual
average concentrations; health effects due to
exposure
Classified by
Non-reactive models pollutants such as SO2 and
CO
Reactive models pollutants such as O3, NO2, etc.
105
AIR POLLUTION
MODELLING TYPES
Classified by coordinate system
used
Grid-based
Region divided into an array of cells
Used to determine compliance with
NAAQS
Trajectory
Follow plume as it moves downwind
Classified by level of
sophistication
Screening: simple estimation use
preset, worst-case meteorological
conditions to provide conservative
106
AIR POLLUTION
FIXED-BOX MODELS
The city of interest is assumed to be
rectangular.
The goal is to compute the air pollutant
concentration in this city using the general
material balance equation.
107
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
109
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
c b
uH
The
equation
indicates
that the
concentration
Where
c is the
concentration
in upwind
the
is
added
to the concentrations produced by the city.
entire
city
To find the worst case, you will need to know the wind
speed, wind direction, mixing height, and upwind
(background) concentration that corresponds to this
worst case.
111
Problem
A city has the following description: W = 5 km, L = 15 km,
u = 3 m/s, H = 1000 m. The upwind, or background,
concentration of CO is b = 5 g/m3. The emission rate per
unit area is q = 4 x 10-6 g/s.m2. what is the concentration
c of CO over the city?
qL
c b
uH
g
6
15000 m
4 10
2
5 g
s.m
c 3
3 m/s 1000 m
m
= 25 g/m3
112
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
Annual
Average
Concentration
concentration
for that
meteorology
frequency of
occurrence of that
meteorology
115
Problem
For the city in example 6.1, the meteorological
conditions described (u = 3 m/s, H = 1000 m)
occur 40 percent of the time. For the remaining
60 percent, the wind blows at right angles to
the direction shown in Fig. 6.1 at velocity 6 m/s
and the same mixing height. What is the annual
average concentration of carbon monoxide in
this city?
First we need to compute the concentration
resulting from each meteorological condition
and then compute the weighted average.
For u = 3 m/s and H = 1000 m c = 25 g/m3
116
Solution
g
5000 m
4 10
2
5 g
s.m
c
Annual
concentration
for that
meteorolog
y
frequency of
Average
occurrence of that
Concentration
meteorolog
y
Annual
g
g
g
Average 25 3 0.4 8.33 3 0.6 15 3
m
m
m
Concentration
117
AIR POLLUTION
118
AIR POLLUTION
Q
u
119
AIR POLLUTION
120
AIR POLLUTION
1 y
Q
zH
C x, y , z
exp
2
2
2 y z u
2
y
z
Where;
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
123
AIR POLLUTION
124
AIR POLLUTION
1 y2 z2
Q
C x, y , z
exp 2 2
y z u
2
z
y
Plume Rise
H is the sum of the physical stack height
and plume rise.
125
AIR POLLUTION
Vs D
Ts Ta
3
1.5 2.68 10 PD
h
u
Ts
= the
plum rise in m
This equation is only correcth
for
Vs = stack exit velocity
dimensions shown.
in m/s
D = stack diameter in
m
u = wind speed in m/s
P
=
pressure
in
millibarsclasses other
needed for stability
Ts
=
stack
gas
temperature in K
B classes: multiply
result by
Ta
= theatmospheric
temperate126
in K
Correction is
than C:
For A and
1.1 or1.2
For D, E, and F classes: multiply the result by
Problem
Q = 20 g/s of SO2 at Height H
u = 3 m/s,
At a distance of 1 km, y = 30 m, z = 20 m (given)
Required: (at x = 1 km)
a) SO2 concentration at the center line of the plume
b) SO2 concentration at a point 60 m to the side of
and 20 m below the centerline
127
127
Solution
y2
Q
( z H )2
c
exp
2
2
2 u y z
2 z
2 y
a) At the centerline
y 0,
z - H 0 e0 1
Q
20 (g/s)
c
z - H - 20 m
20 (g/s)
60 2
( 20) 2
c
exp
2
2
2 (3 m/s)(30 m)(20 m)
2
(
30
)
2
(
20
)
AIR POLLUTION
AIR POLLUTION
Cij = (aikSkj)
AIR POLLUTION
Problem
Total Pb concentration (ng/m3) measured at the
site: a linear sum of contributions from
independent source types such as motor vehicles,
incinerators, smelters, etc
PbT = Pbauto + Pb incin. + Pbsmelter +
Next consider further the concentration of
airborne lead contributed by a specific source. For
example, from automobiles in ng/m3, Pbauto, is the
product of two cofactors: the mass fraction
(ng/mg) of lead in automotive particulate
emissions,
aPb,
and
the
total
mass
auto,
concentration (mg/m3) of automotive emission to
the atmosphere, Sauto
131
132
133
Dimensions of a Standard
Cyclone
134
135
Problem
Design of Cyclone
Body diameter = 0.75 m
Flow rate = 2.75 m3/s
p = 1600 kg/m3
g = 1.1 kg/m3
= 2.5*10-5 kg/m-s
High throughput
H = 0.8 * body diameter
W = 0.35 * body diameter
Lb = 1.7 * body diameter
Lc = 2.0 * body diameter
136
Solution
Inlet Velocity = Q/A
= 17.46 m/s
Number of effective turns
Ne = (Lb + Lc/2)/H
Ne = 3.375
Diameter of particle
137
138
DERIVATION
Distribution of pollutant concentration c in the flow field (velocity vector u ux, uy, uz)
in PBL can be generally described by Reynolds equation in the form:
c
c
c
c
(u )c x
z
y
t
x
x y
y z
z
x , y , z
(u )c u x
c
c
c
uy
uz
x
y
z
DERIVATION
Gaussian model is simplified - does not include a transport in complex flow fields.
The model describes only smoke plume drift by constant velocity along a linear path.
Derivation of this model, therefore, does not take into account the nonlinear
advection term and based on equation involving only the turbulent dispersion.
c
c
c
c
z
(u )c x
y
t
x
x y
y z
z
c
c
c
c
x
z
y
t x
x y
y z
z
x y z is the equation
For constant and isotropic turbulent dispersion
simply in the form:
c
2c 2c 2c
c
c 2 2 2
x
y
z
t
This simplified spherically symmetric diffusion equation has an analytical solution in the
form of a concentration function of two variables (t, r)
Q
r2
c (r , t )
exp
32
4
t
8 t
140
DERIVATION
Analytical solutions - the spherically symmetric function of time and distance from the
source is expressed by the graph:
It is obvious that the concentration is high but
rapidly decreasing with increasing distance
from the center in a short time t1 after the
pulse emission of pollutant from the source.
Concentration after a longer time t2 is lower
with slow decline.
To derive the model of plume is necessary to establish transport - a shift from the source
in the direction of the x-axis. We can simple define:
y 2 velocity
r x uisx t constant
z2
of u
drifting
flow
x
2
12
141
DERIVATION
We have the function of pollutant concentration including the shift in the x-axis:
x u xt 2 y 2 z 2
Q
c (r , t )
exp
32
4 t
8 t
u x t3
t1
t2
t1
t3
t2
t3
x u xt y 2 z 2
ux y 2 z 2
Q
Q
dt
c ( x, y , z )
exp
exp
32
t
4
x
4
x
8
142
DERIVATION
Resulting formula after integration (and neglect of small terms) expresses the timeindependent 3D field of spatial distribution of pollutant concentration corresponding
to smoke plume.
ux y 2 z 2
Q
c ( x, y , z )
exp
4x
4 x
The anisotropy of turbulent dispersion can be re-introduced for the y and z-axes:
yz
ux y 2
ux z 2
Q
exp
c ( x, y , z )
exp
4 x
x
4 y z x
y
z
2 y x
ux
, z
2 z x
ux
143
DERIVATION
The resulting formula of Gaussian smoke plume model is:
2
2
Q
y
z
c ( x, y , z )
exp 2 exp 2
2
2 u x y z
y
2 z
Q
mg s
mg m 3
2 u x y z m s m m
APPLICATION
In practical applications, z does not mean the distance from the axis of plume but
represents the height difference between the ground level at the source and at the
reference point (point where the pollutant concentration is calculated).
2
Q
y
c ( x, y , z )
exp 2
2
2 y z u
y
z h 2
z h 2
exp
. exp
2
2
2 z
2 z
The reflection of pollutant from the ground at the level of source is also included in
the formula.
h - is effective height of
the source (stack).
145
APPLICATION
The second possibility is the inclusion of pollutant reflection from the ground level at
the reference point.
This approach is appropriate to calculate the concentration of the pollutant in
reference points on the plateau.
2
z h 2
Q
y
c ( x, y , z )
exp 2 . exp
2
y z u
2
y
z
146
APPLICATION
Both approaches for calculating of pollutant reflection from the ground can be
included continuously by a factor theta.
2
z h 2
z h 2
Q
y
1 exp
1 exp
c
exp
2
2
2
2. y z u
2 z
2 z
y
A1
A2
A2 (rectangle)
A1
Reference
point
APPLICATION
y , z
y ay x
by
z az xb
148