Objectives
This evaluation scheme is based on both ISO 17 025 Standard and on Regional Instrument Centre (RIC) Terms of R
The aim is to measure differences between real practices and requirements.
It has also been developed to help evaluation and identify improvement actions.
This evaluation scheme can be used as a frame for an internal or external audit, or for an autoevaluation.
Background
This tools is useful for every NMHS metrology laboratory and especially for Regional Instrument Centre.
Users must have basic knowledge of quality management and metrology.
Overview
In a general maner, buttons or dynamic user manual allow users to go directly into results.
Evaluation Scheme
This worksheet includes all evaluation items coming from ISO 17 025 and from the RIC Terms of Reference.
It contains three main parts for the evaluation.
Firstly, Chapter 4 and 5 (Management and Technical Requirements) from ISO 17025 and a third part adressing RICs
It is possible to fill only one part and go to results. When you fill Chapter 4 and/or Chapter 5, answers are automatica
If you are accredited, you may fill only the RIC's part.
For each question, the evaluation is done as follows:
- No: nothing
- Rather No: for example draft, under elaboration...
- Rather Yes: written but not validated, not implemented
-Yes: all is written and correct
- n/a: not applicable, the question is out of object
- I don't know: should be clarified later
Answers could be ticked manually or filled by runing the application (Ctrl+W).
Help is obtained by mouse over the red triangle.
Calculation
Radar graphs
This graph allows a simple and synthetic view.
It is also possible to identify improvement actions.
First two parts (chapter 4 and 5) are independant.
Overall results are shown as:
0 < N <40%
Not performing
Need improvments
Satisfactory
Good
Synthesis
This worksheet provides an overview of the results, grouping individual results by topics.
A color code is given from Orange (Not performing) to Green (Good)
A comment area is free for the evaluator to add his remarks.
Non Conforming
At the end, you can get some help to improve your Quality Assurance System.
But this possibility can be used only when the scheme is fully filled.
Bibliography
1 ISO/IEC 17025:2005
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm
3 Cofrac Website
http://www.cofrac.fr
4 Ralisation d'une grille d'valuation ISO 9001 version 2000, simple d'utilisation et associant des outils graphiques,
Jeannal BOURGET, Hassna HAMDOUCH, Rose MORET, Projet d'Intgration, MASTER Management de la Qualit
URL : http://www.utc.fr/mastermq ; Universit de Technologie de Compigne
5 Outil d'autodiagnostic sur la norme ISO 17025, Annunzio GIANNONI, Sofiane HAMITOUCHE, Nathalia MACIEL, Ker
Projet d'Intgration, MASTER Management de la Qualit (MQ), Mastre Spcialis Normalisation, Qualit, Certificati
http://www.utc.fr/master-qualite/public/publications/qualite_et_management/MQ_M2/2009-2010/projets/04_iso_17025/Grille_Autodiagnos
6 Royaume du Maroc
Ministre de l'Industrie, du Commerce et des Nouvelles Technologies
Questionnaire d'valuation pralable une demande d'accrditation
http://www.mcinet.gov.ma/mciweb/QualiteNormalisation/updoc/questionnaire.pdf
V2.1
MANUAL
Management Requirements
Technical Requirements
Regional Instrument Centre
ment actions.
apter 4 and/or Chapter 5, answers are automaticall inserted in relevant RIC's part.
n laboratories
Q_M2/2009-2010/projets/04_iso_17025/Grille_Autodiagnostic_ISO17025_gr04_QP10_v4.xls
Management Requirements
echnical Requirements
Domains
Domain 1
Domain 2
Domain 3
Domain 4
Domain 5
Total number of calibration done:
Total
Number:
Number:
Number:
Number:
Number:
Internal
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name and position of the person responsible for filling out this Questionnaire:
First name:
Family name:
Position:
E-mail:
Adress:
Attached to this questionnaire, please attach (in an electronic way) the following documents for each param
If you are accredited:
- a copy of your accreditation (certification) or a link to the accreditation body web showing your accreditatio
If you are not accredited (or certified):
- the last calibration certificate of your reference standard (for each parameter)
- an example of a calibration certificate issued your RIC.
Manager
Operator
Total
Domain
(example)
Pressure
Calibrated item
(example)
Digital Barometer
Mesurande
(example)
Error
Range / Domain
(example)
500 to 1060 hPa
Principle / Reference
(example)
Calibration by comparison
at 23 C 3C / PTE 100 (internal procedure)
Calibration instruments
(Reference Standard, Equipment)
(example)
Quartz barometer DHI RPM 3 A0015
Generator DH type PPC1
Traceability
Best Capability
(example)
8,8 + 5,4.10-5 P
Last standard
calibration date
(example)
01 January 2010
By
(example)
W.M.O. (Switzerland)
Chapter
4.1 Organization
4.5 Subcontracting of
calibrations
4.8. Complaints
Chapter
5.2. Personnel
5.5. Equipment
5.8. Handling of
calibration items
5.8. Handling of
calibration items
5.10.9. Amendments to
calibration certificates
Term Of Reference
Are the procedures for the review of requests and contracts established?
Are reviews and discussions with clients maintained?
Are you subcontracting some of your calibration works?
Are selecting criteria clearly defined?
Is the client advised of the subcontract?
Is a policy for purchasing supplies expressed?
Are the purchasing procedures written and validated?
Are the conformity criteria used for materials acceptance clearly defined, especially for materials used in
calibration works?
Is the evaluation of critical material suppliers performed?
Do you have a procedure or dispositions concerning relationship with your clients?
Are clients allowed to be present during your calibration work?
Is the confidentiality of clients ensured during all the process?
Do you have a policy for the resolution of clients' complaints?
Do you have procedure(s) for the resolution of clients' complaints?
Do you have a policy for the resolution of nonconforming work?
Do you have a procedure dealing with nonconforming calibration work?
In case of nonconforming work, is the responsibility for authorizing the resumption of work defined?
Are dispositions taken in case of nonconforming calibration report?
Have you established a policy for implementing corrective actions when nonconforming work has been
identified?
Have you established a procedure(s) for implementing corrective action when nonconforming work has
been identified?
Are corrective actions monitored to ensure effectiveness?
Have you established procedure(s) for preventive actions?
Have you established procedure(s) for the control of quality and technical records?
Has a member of staff been appointed as technical manager (or equivalent), which is in charge particularly
of method selection and validation?
Has the laboratory validated its calibration methods?
Are clients' needs in term of performance and accuracy clearly defined?
Or are your capabilities in term of range, steps and accuracy clearly defined?
Do you apply a procedure to estimate the uncertainty of all calibration measurement covered by quality
system?
Are calculations and data transfers systematically under control or checked?
Have you developed and validated special software for calibration work?
Have you established a procedure(s) for data protection?
Does the RIC have all equipment to perform calibration work for each claimed parameter?
Is the required accuracy specified for all equipment (reference standards in particular)?
Is every equipment (reference standard, particularly) uniquely identified?
Have you established records for all equipments?
Have you established instructions dealing with defective equipment or software?
Do you have special procedure(s) for equipment going out of your direct control?
Have you established a progamme for the calibration of reference standards and associated systems?
Have you established a procedure(s) for the calibration of reference standards and associated systems?
Can the RIC give real proofs of traceability to SI units for all reference standards and associated
equipments?
Do the calibration certificates of reference standards contain measurement results, including the
measurement uncertainty and/or a statement of compliance?
Have you performed regular checks to maintain confidence in the calibration status of reference?
Have you established a procedure(s) for handling, transport, storage and use of your reference standards?
Are you using equipments which are not able to ensure traceability to SI units?
(please add comments)
Have you established a procedure(s) for the transportation, receipt, storage of instruments to be calibrated?
Is the client informed by the laboratory of the method used for calibration?
Have you established a procedure(s) dealing with uncertainty associated with calibration results?
Has a member of staff been appointed as technical manager (or equivalent), which is in charge particularly
of method selection and validation?
Do you have any Quality Assurance procedures (Quality Manual)?
Are objectives of RIC clearly documented (for instance in the quality policy statement)?
Do the quality procedures include the structure of the documentation and responsibilities of technical and
quality managers?
Have you organized or participated in an interlaboratory comparison?
Have results of intercomparison been published (for instance on WMO or RIC Web)?
Does the RIC have contact or meetings with other Members of the Region?
Have you received any demand concerning the calibration of national standards of Members of the Region
(NMHSs)?
Have you calibrated instruments (transfer standards or other sensors) for other Region Member(s) within
the last five years?
Have you collaborated within instrument domain with other Region Member(s) within the last five years?
Have you received demands dealing with instrument domain coming from other Region Members?
Have you received demands of Region Members dealing with instrumental documentation?
Have you contributed to the training of staff on instruments in the Region (workshop, trainee)?
Have you had contact(s) with other RICs within the last five years?
Do you inform regularly Members, president of the Region and WMO Secretariat, about your activities as
RIC?
ATION SCHEME
Answers
Comments
YES
NO
I don't know
YES
NO
I don't know
YES
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Not
valid
Draft
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
<1year
~1 year >>1year
No
MQ
I don't know
YES
Not
valid
NO
I don't know
YES
Draft
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Yes
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
<1year
~1 year >>1year
No
audit
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
<1year
~1 year
>>1year
No
audit
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
n/a
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
n/a
n/a
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
n/a
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
YES
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
YES
YES
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
YES
YES
YES
ISO
17025
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
Rather
YES
ISO 9001
Rather
YES
NO
I don't know
NO
I don't know
NO
I don't know
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
<2 y
YES
YES
~2 y
>>2 y
Never
I don't know
NO
I don't know
NO
I don't know
YES
NO
I don't know
YES
NO
I don't know
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
Rather
Not
Rather
Not
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
I don't know
NO
I don't know
NO
I don't know
NO
I don't know
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
YES
YES
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
<1year
~1 year
>>1year
Never
I don't know
YES
Rather
YES
Rather
Not
NO
I don't know
Requirements
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.8. Complaints
4.8. Complaints
5.2. Personnel
5.2. Personnel
5.2. Personnel
5.2. Personnel
5.5. Equipment
5.5. Equipment
5.5. Equipment
5.5. Equipment
5.5. Equipment
5.5. Equipment
5.8. Handling
5.8. Handling
Global
CALCULATION GRID
QUESTIONS
Are there policies and procedures relating to the protection of its clients confidential
information?
Are objectives of RIC clearly documented (for instance in the quality policy statement)?
Does the quality manual include the structure of the documentation and the
responsibilities of technical staff and quality managers?
Are there instructions or procedure dealing with the review and approval of documents?
Are the procedures for the review of requests and contracts established?
Are the conformity criteria used for materials acceptance clearly defined, especially for
materials used in calibration works?
Have you established a policy for implementing corrective actions when nonconforming
work has been identified?
Have you established procedure(s) for the control of quality and technical records?
Is every job described in the quality system from managerial to technical staff?
Does the RIC have all facilities to perform calibration work for the expressed
capabilities?
Do you have special dispositions dealing with neighboring areas (for instance
storage) ?
Do you have manuals for the use of all equipments used in calibration work?
Has the laboratory established instructions on the use and operation of all relevant
equipment?
Is the client informed by the laboratory of the method used for calibration?
Has a member of staff been appointed as technical manager (or equivalent), which is in
charge particularly of method selection and validation?
Have you developed and validated special software for calibration work?
Does the RIC have all equipment to perform calibration work for each claimed
parameter?
Is the required accuracy specified for all equipment (reference standards in particular)?
Do you have special procedure(s) for equipment going out of your direct control?
Have you established a progamme for the calibration of reference standards and
associated systems?
Have you established a procedure(s) for the calibration of reference standards and
associated systems?
Can the RIC give real proofs of traceability to SI units for all reference standards and
associated equipments?
Have you performed regular checks to maintain confidence in the calibration status of
reference?
Have you established a procedure(s) for handling, transport, storage and use of your
reference standards?
Are you using equipments which are not able to ensure traceability to SI units?
(please add comments)
Have you established a procedure(s) for monitoring the validity of your calibrations?
Are all relevant information and data reported in the calibration certificate given to the
client after calibration work?
If needed, are calibration data, which are obtained before and after adjustment or
reparation, reported?
Does the RIC have all facilities to perform calibration work for the expressed
capabilities?
Does the RIC have all equipment to perform calibration work for each claimed
parameter?
Have you established a programme for the calibration of reference standards and
associated systems?
Can the RIC give real proofs of traceability to SI units for all reference standards and
associated equipments?
Is every job described in the quality system from managerial to technical staff?
Have the laboratory established instructions on the use and operation of all relevant
equipment?
Is the client informed by the laboratory of the method used for calibration?
Has a member of staff been appointed as technical manager (or equivalent), which is in
charge particularly of method selection and validation?
Are objectives of RIC clearly documented (for instance in the quality policy statement)?
Have results of intercomparison been published (for instance on WMO or RIC Web)?
Does the RIC have contact or meetings with other Members of the Region?
Is the laboratory certified or accredited against ISO 9001 or ISO 17025 standard?
Have you been audited or evaluated within the last five years by a recognized
authority?
Have you received any demand concerning the calibration of national standards of
Members of the Region (NMHSs)?
Have you calibrated instruments (transfer standards or other sensors) for other Region
Member(s) within the last five years?
Have you collaborated within instrument domain with other Region Member(s) within
the last five years?
Have you received demands dealing with instrument domain coming from other Region
Members?
Have you contributed to the training of staff on instruments in the Region (workshop,
trainee)?
Have you had contact(s) with other RICs within the last five years?
Do you inform regularly Members, president of the Region and WMO Secretariat, about
your activities as RIC?
weighted answer
weight
Mark (%)
per chapter
99.5
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
1.5
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
Note du ss
chapitre/100
87
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
103
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
1.5
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0%
0.00
1.5
0%
0%
Chapter Sheet
4.1 Organization
4.2 Quality
System
4.3. Documentation
Control
4.4 Review of
contracts
0%
0%
0%
0%
Management
Documentation
Customers
Suppliers
0%
0%
0%
0%
Synthesis
0%
Chapter Sheet
5.2. Personnel
5.3.
Accomodation
and
environmental
conditions
5.4. Calibration
methods and
method validations
5.5. Equipment
0%
0%
0%
0%
Man Power
Mother Nature
Method
Machine
(Equipment)
Synthesis
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Tableau par sous-chapitre
(a) A RIC must
have the
necessary
facilities and
laboratory
equipment
0%
0%
0%
0%
Method
Mind Power
Man Power
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4.5
Subcontracting
of calibrations
4.6 Purchasing
supplies
4.7 Service to
client
4.8. Complaints
4.9 Control of
nonconforming
calibration work
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Improvment
0%
5.6.
Measurement
traceability
5.8. Handling
5.10. Reporting
the results
0%
0%
0%
0%
Measurement
(Traceability)
Material
(Input/Output)
0%
0%
0%
0%
(i) A recognized
authority must
assess a RIC
0%
0%
0%
4.10 Corrective
action
4.11. Preventive
action
4.12. Technical
records
4.13. Internal
audits
4.14.
Management
review
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
(l) According to
relevant
(n) A RIC must
(j) A RIC must
recommendation
(k) A RIC must
(m) A RIC must
actively
assist Members
s on the WMO
participate in or
advise Members participate in, or
of the Region in
Quality
organize, WMO
on inquiries
assist in the
calibrating their
Management
and/or regional
regarding
organization of
national
Framework a
instrument
instrument
regional
meteorological
RIC must
intercomparisons
performance
workshops on
standards
contribute
meteorological
positively to
Members
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
RIC:
Date:
Comments :
Chapter
RIC
4
5
RIC
Machine (Equipment)
Man Power
Method
Mind Power
SYNTHESIS
Topic
Score (%)
RIC
0%
Management requirements
0%
Technical requirements
0%
Global Score
0%
0%
(a) A RIC must have the necessary facilities and laboratory
equipment
(b) A RIC must maintain a set of meteorological standard
instruments
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Global
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Caption:
0 < N <40%
Not performing
Need improvments
Satisfactory
Global Results
RIC
100%
75%
50%
0%25%
0%
0%0%
Technical requirements
Management requirements
Chapter 4 Results
Management
100%
75%
Improvment
50%
25%
0%
0% 0%
0%
0%0%
Suppliers
Documentation
Customers
Chapter 5 Results
Man Power
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Material (Input/Output)
Measurement (Traceability)
Mother Nature
Method
Machine (Equipment)
RIC Results
Machine (Equipment)
100%
75%
50%
Mind Power
25%
0%
0%0%0%
0%
Method
Man Power
Topic
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.1 Organization
4.2 Quality System
4.2 Quality System
4.2 Quality System
4.3. Documentation Control
Domains
4.8. Complaints
5.2. Personnel
5.2. Personnel
5.2. Personnel
5.2. Personnel
5.3. Accomodation and environmental conditions
(a) A RIC must have the necessary facilities and laboratory equipm
(a) A RIC must have the necessary facilities and laboratory equipm
(d) A RIC must develop its individual technical procedures for calib
(d) A RIC must develop its individual technical procedures for calib
(d) A RIC must develop its individual technical procedures for calib
(e) A RIC must develop its individual quality assurance procedures
(e) A RIC must develop its individual quality assurance procedures
(e) A RIC must develop its individual quality assurance procedures
(f) A RIC must participate in, or organize inter-laboratory comparis
(h) A RIC must apply international standards applicable for calibrat
Question
Chapter 4: Management Requirements
Are there policies and procedures relating to the protection of its clients confidential information?
Are there instructions or procedure dealing with the review and approval of documents?
Are the latest versions of documents promptly available?
Are the procedures for the review of requests and contracts established?
In case of nonconforming work, is the responsibility for authorizing the resumption of work defined?
Are dispositions taken in case of nonconforming calibration report?
Have you established a policy for implementing corrective actions when nonconforming work has been identified?
Have you established a procedure(s) for implementing corrective action when nonconforming work has been identified?
Are corrective actions monitored to ensure effectiveness?
Is every job described in the quality system from managerial to technical staff?
Have you described competency and responsibility of every technical staff?
Does the RIC have all facilities to perform calibration work for the expressed capabilities?
Do you have special dispositions dealing with neighbouring areas (for instance storage) ?
Has the laboratory established instructions on the use and operation of all relevant equipment?
Is the client informed by the laboratory of the method used for calibration?
Has a member of staff been appointed as technical manager (or equivalent), which is in charge particularly of method sele
Have you developed and validated special software for calibration work?
Have you established a procedure(s) for data protection?
Does the RIC have all equipment to perform calibration work for each claimed parameter?
Is the required accuracy specified for all equipment (reference standards in particular)?
Is every equipment (reference standard, particularly) uniquely identified?
Have you established records for each equipment?
Have you established instructions dealing with defective equipment or software?
Do you have special procedure(s) for equipment going out of your direct control?
Have you established a progamme for the calibration of reference standards and associated systems?
Have you established a procedure(s) for the calibration of reference standards and associated systems?
Can the RIC give real proofs of traceability to SI units for all reference standards and associated equipments?
Have you performed regular checks to maintain confidence in the calibration status of reference?
Have you established a procedure(s) for the transportation, receipt, storage of instruments to be calibrated?
Have you established instructions for identifying such items?
Have you established a procedure(s) for monitoring the validity of your calibrations?
Are all relevant information and data reported in the calibration certificate given to the client after calibration work?
If needed, are calibration data, which are obtained before and after adjustment or reparation, reported?
Does the RIC have all facilities to perform calibration work for the expressed capabilities?
Are environmental conditions controlled and recorded?
Does the RIC have all equipment to perform calibration work for each claimed parameter?
Required accuracy is specified for all equipment (reference standards in particular)?
Can the RIC give real proofs of traceability to SI units for all reference standards and associated equipments?
Have the laboratory established instructions on the use and operation of all relevant equipment?
Is the client informed by the laboratory of the method used for calibration?
Have you established a procedure(s) dealing with uncertainty associated with calibration results?
Has a member of staff been appointed as technical manager (or equivalent), which is in charge particularly of method sele
Do you have any Quality Assurance procedures (Quality Manual)?
Are objectives of RIC clearly documented (for instance in the quality policy statement)?
Have you organized or participated in an interlaboratory comparison?
Is a member of staff responsible of RIC quality assurance?
Have you received any demand concerning the calibration of national standards of Members of the Region (NMHSs)?
Have you calibrated instruments (transfer standards or other sensors) for other Region Member(s) within the last five yea
Have you collaborated within instrument domain with other Region Member(s) within the last five years?
Have you received demands dealing with instrument domain coming from other Region Members?
Have you participated in or organised workshop on metrology or instruments?
Have you had contact(s) with other RICs within the last five years?
Do you inform regularly Members, president of the Region and WMO Secretariat, about your activities as RIC?
Your answer
Yes
Help
4.1.5 The laboratory shall
e) define the organization and management structure of the
laboratory, its place in any parent organization and the
relationships...
4.1.5 The laboratory shall have policies and procedures to
ensure the protection of its clients confidental information...
Yes
4.1.5 The laboratory shall specify the responsability,
authority and interrelationships of all personnel...
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
4.1.5 The laboratory shall appoint a member of staff as quality manager who shall have authority for
4.2.2 The laboratory's quality system policies and objectives shall be defined in a quality manual...
4.2.1 The laboratoy shall establish, implement and maintain a quality system appropriate to the scope o
4.2.2 The averall objectives shall be documented in a quality policy statement...
4.3.1 The laboratory shall establish and maintain procedures to control all documents...
Yes
Yes
n/a
Yes
n/a
Yes
Rather Yes
Rather Yes
4.8 The laboratory shall have a policy and procedures for the resolution of complaints...
Rather Yes
4.8 The laboratory shall have a policy and procedures for the
resolution of complaints...
Internal or external. Delay, nonconforming work
Policy defines actions.
Procedure defines how to act.
Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Not
Rather Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
4.14.2 Findings from management reviews and the actions that arasie from them shall be recorded...
5.2 The laboratory management shall ensure the competence of all who operateand sign calibration
Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Not
Rather Yes
Yes
No
Rather Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Rather Not
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Rather Not
Yes
n/a
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
5.6.1 the laboratory shall have an established progamme and procedure for the calibration of its equ
5.6.2.1.1 For calibration laboratories, the programme for calibration of equipment shall be designed an
Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
Rather Yes
Yes
Rather Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Rather Not
No
No
Rather Yes
Rather Not
o shall have authority for ensuring that the quality system is followed at all times.
n a quality manual...
appropriate to the scope of its activities...
em shall be recorded...
ateand sign calibration certificates.
elevant equipment...
the laboratory shall ensure thatprocedures are established and implemented for protecting the data...
orrect performance of the calibrations...
ng the accuracy requiered...
n a quality manual...