It is now commonplace to argue that new media technologies have fundamentally changed the nature of
political campaigning. While most scholarly work focuses on how technologies enable efficient communication
and organization, this presentation will discuss the arguments expressed by such technologies. Brown argues
that the Obama campaign’s software (the MyBarackObama.com website) and its phone-banking scripts
deployed procedural arguments. Software involves the crafting of procedures and rules that dictate what content
should be delivered in a particular rhetorical situation. But the authoring of procedures is not confined to
software, and the Obama campaign’s
phone-banking scripts are evidence of this.
Further, volunteers grappled with these
procedural arguments. Obama volunteers engaged
with these procedural arguments and, in some
cases, authored their own procedures. A study of
these procedures reveals arguments that
sometimes contradict the narratives put forth by
the campaign. By tracking these arguments, we
can gain a more complete picture of the
campaign’s various complex, conflicting, and
contradictory messages, and we can help cultivate
a broad notion of software literacy. Software is a
unique discursive realm, one that opens up new
possibilities for persuasion and expression. Brown
will argue that these possibilities invite us to
examine the arguments and expressions embedded
in software as it becomes simultaneously
ubiquitous and invisible.
For More Information about the Humanities Center, contact at (313) 577-5471;
or visit our website at www.research.wayne.edu/hum;
Or add “WayneState HumanitiesCenter” on Facebook.