parameters. It assumes that all loads are supported by the fibers only and neglects any
contribution from the matrix material and the interaction between fibers. These
assumptions do not cause any significant error in the analysis, as long as the fibers are
primarily loaded in tension and the transverse and shear stresses in the composite plies
are low compared to the ultimate tensile strength of the fibers, . It is also assumed that the
load sharing contribution from the liner is minimal or non-existent.
Assume that the total thickness of the helical plies is and that of the hoop plies is .
The area of helical fibers intersecting unit length of the surface along the hoop and axial
. This needs to be in equilibrium with the force resultant in the composite shell
due to the internal pressure in the axial direction, pR/2.
Second, the force balance in the hoop direction needs to take into consideration a
combination of the hoop and helical fibers. The force resultant in the hoop direction of
the composite shell due to internal pressure is pR.
It is now assumed that the composite shell is designed such that the ultimate strength of
the fibers, is attained simultaneously along the hoop and helical directions at the
vessel’s burst pressure, . The thickness of the hoop and helical plies for the composite
pressure vessel can be estimated from the following equations:
Therefore, for a pressure vessel with a design burst pressure of , the netting analysis
estimates the total thickness of the composite shell in its cylindrical section to be