In English, the gerund is identical in form to the present participle (ending in -ing) and can behave as
a verb within a clause (so that it may be modified by an adverb or have an object), but the clause as a
whole (sometimes consisting of only one word, the gerund itself) acts as a noun within the larger
sentence. For example: Eating this cake is easy.
In "Eating this cake is easy," "eating this cake," although traditionally known as a phrase, is referred to as
a non-finite clause in modern linguistics. "Eating" is the verb in the clause, while "this cake" is the object
of the verb. "Eating this cake" acts as a noun phrase within the sentence as a whole, though; it is the
subject of the sentence is "cake."
I like swimming. (direct object)
Swimming is fun. (subject)
Some use "gerund" to refer to all nouns ending in -ing, but in more careful use, not all nouns ending in -
ing are gerunds.[1] The formal distinction is that a gerund is a verbal noun – a noun derived from a verb
that retains verb characteristics, that functions simultaneously as a noun and a verb, while other nouns
ending in -ing are deverbal nouns, which function as common nouns, not as verbs at all. Compare:
For example:
advise, recommend and forbid:
These are followed by a to-infinitive when there is an object as well, but by a gerund otherwise.
The police advised us not to enter the building, for a murder had occurred. (Us is the object
of advised.)
The police advised against our entering the building. (Our is used for the gerund entering.)
consider, contemplate and recommend:
These verbs are followed by a to-infinitive only in the passive or with an object pronoun.
When talking about sports, there is usually a difference in meaning between the infinitive and gerund (see
the next section).
In some contexts, following these verbs with a to-infinitive when the subject of the first verb is the subject
of the second verb provides more clarity than a gerund.
dread, hate and cannot bear:
These verbs are followed by a to-infinitive when talking subjunctively (often when using to think), but by a
gerund when talking about general dislikes.
forget and remember:
When these have meanings that are used to talk about the future from the given time, the to-infinitive is
used, but when looking back in time, the gerund.
She forgot to tell me her plans. (She did not tell me, although she should have.)
She forgot telling me her plans. (She told me, but then forgot having done so.)
I remembered to go to work. (I remembered that I needed to go to work.)
I remembered going to work. (I remembered that I went to work.)
go on:
After winning the semi-finals, he went on to play in the finals. (He completed the semi-finals and
later played in the finals.)
He went on giggling, not having noticed the teacher enter. (He continued doing so.)
mean:
I did not mean to scare you off. (I did not intend to scare you off.)
Taking a new job in the city meant leaving behind her familiar surroundings. (If she took the job,
she would have to leave behind her familiar surroundings.)
regret:
We regret to inform you that you have failed your exam. (polite or formal form of apology)
I very much regret saying what I said. (I wish that I had not said that.)
try:
When a to-infinitive is used, the subject is shown to make an effort at something, attempt or endeavor to
do something. If a gerund is used, the subject is shown to attempt to do something in testing to see what
might happen.
Because of its noun properties, the genitive (possessive case) is preferred for a noun or pronoun
preceding a gerund.
We enjoyed their [genitive] singing.
This usage is preferred in formal writing or speaking. The objective case is often used in place of the
possessive, especially in casual situations:
Really, 'I do not see its making any difference' is the correct option.
This may sound awkward in general use, but is still the correct manner in which to converse or write. And
this form of gerund is applicable in all relative cases, for instance:
This is because the action, of doing or being, belongs, in effect, to the subject/object (direct or indirect)
practising it, thus, the possessive is required to clearly demonstrate that.
In some cases, either the possessive or the objective case may be logical:
Either of these sentences could mean that the student was startled because the teacher was shouting.
Using the objective case can be awkward if the gerund is singular but the other noun is plural. It can look
like a problem with subject-verb agreement:
Use as a noun John suggested the asking of Bill. *John kept the asking of Bill.
Replacement with a finite clause John suggested that Bill be asked. *John kept that Bill be asked.
Left dislocation Asking Bill John suggested. *Asking Bill John kept.
Owen Johnson's "Lawrenceville Stories" feature a Latin teacher who constantly demands that his
students determine whether a given word is a gerund or a gerundive.