SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCIS
20
MINUTES.
Friday, August 15, 2008
RAMBUS INC.
PLAINTIFF(S)
vs.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al
DEFENDANT(S),
Present
Judge: RICHARD A. KRAMER
Reporter: JANET POND
Appearances:
Department: 304
Case Number: CGC-04-431105
Nature of Proceedings
(1) MOTION TO ENFORCE PRIOR
ORDER & COMPEL FURTHER
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF
JOEL KARP AND (2) MOTION TO
SEAL PORTIONS OF MICRON
OPPOSITION DOCUMENTS
Clerk: DONNA LOK
Baililt) NOT PRESENT
(No Appearance)
COTCHETT, PITRE, SIMON & MCCARTHY
San Franeisco Airport Office Center
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650) 697-6000
Attorney for Rambus, Ine.
Robert Becher
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER ct al
865 S. Figueroa Street, 10 Floor
Los Angels, CA 90017
(213) 443-3000
Attorness for Micron Technology / Semiconductor
Susan T. Boyd, Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke
MUNGER. TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, 35° Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(213) 683-9523
Attorneys for Rambus, Ine
Kenneth O°Rourke
O'MELVENY & MYERS, LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(213) 430-6000
Attorney for Hynix Semiconductor
Case Number: CGC-04-43 1105
Case Title: RAMBUS INC. VS. MICRON TECHNOLOGY,INC., et al.
ae
Date: August 15, 2008
Form: C0106SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
MINUTES
(No Appearance) (No Appearance)
THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
STEINER LLP 17° Floor, Four Embarcadero Center
225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111
San Jose, CA 95113 (415) 434-9100
Attorney for Hynix Semiconductor Attorney for Samsung defendants
(No Appearance) (No Appearance)
THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN STEINER LLP SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
101 Second Street, Suite 1800 1901 Ave of the Stars
San Francisco, CA 94105 Los Angeles, CA 90067
(415) 369-7552 (310) 228-3700
Attorney for Hynix Semiconductor Attorney for Samsung defendants
2:10 p.m.: The above-entitled action is called for hearing of Motion to Enforce Prior
Order & Compel Further Deposition Testimony of Joel Karp; and Motion To Seal Portions
of Micron Opposition Documents. The Court, personnel and counsel are present as listed
above. The Court and counsel confer on the Motion to Seal and Motion to Enforce Prior
Order as reflected in the reporter’s notes. Counsel present oral argument. The Court
GRANTS the Motion to seal. The existing redacted document will be replaced by a
further redacted version in compliance with the court’s procedures. The further redacted
version is deemed filed on the same date as the existing redacted document. The Court
also GRANTS the Motion to Enforce Prior Order & Compel Further Deposition
Testimony of Joel Karp with further discovery as to specific documents in question. This
motion is granted without prejudice to another motion being filed if necessary. Joel
Karp’s deposition is to be scheduled as promptly as possible with Judge Lynch present at
the deposition. The Court authorizes the deposition to take place even after the close of
discovery. Parties may contact the clerk in Department 304 to schedule a telephone
conference or an informal meeting if there is dispute over the proposed order. Case
management conference was previously set for December 12, 2008 at 10:30am. The
parties shall meet, confer and file a joint case management conference statement no later
than three (3) court days before the hearing.
Case Number: CGC-04-431105
Case Title: RAMBUS INC. VS. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al
-2- Date: August 15, 2008
Form: C01006