67%(3)67% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (3 suara)
2K tayangan4 halaman
The document outlines criteria for evaluating kaizen improvements at a facility in Sto. Tomas, Batangas, Philippines. It provides scoring guidelines across five key criteria: presentation, achievement of goals, cost savings, investment cost, and technical ideas. A target score of 100 is provided across the five criteria, with higher scores indicating better performance in areas like data quality, goal achievement, cost reduction, lower investment costs, and increased productivity.
The document outlines criteria for evaluating kaizen improvements at a facility in Sto. Tomas, Batangas, Philippines. It provides scoring guidelines across five key criteria: presentation, achievement of goals, cost savings, investment cost, and technical ideas. A target score of 100 is provided across the five criteria, with higher scores indicating better performance in areas like data quality, goal achievement, cost reduction, lower investment costs, and increased productivity.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai XLS, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
The document outlines criteria for evaluating kaizen improvements at a facility in Sto. Tomas, Batangas, Philippines. It provides scoring guidelines across five key criteria: presentation, achievement of goals, cost savings, investment cost, and technical ideas. A target score of 100 is provided across the five criteria, with higher scores indicating better performance in areas like data quality, goal achievement, cost reduction, lower investment costs, and increased productivity.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai XLS, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
a. Presentation Kaizen Improvement must be presented through report . Should consider the reason why to come up any change . Monitoring of result for three months should included on the report. Ensure that improvement activity must be standardize. 5 = 25 % imperfect data and no implementation 10 = 50% imperfect data but inconsistent implementation 15 = 75% perfect data but inconsistent implementation 20 = 100% perfect data and 100% implementation b . Achievement / Goal - Ensure that result of innovation meet the goal 5 = 25 % achievement 15 = 75 % achievement 10 = 50 % achievement 20 = 100 % achievement c. Cost Savings - tangible benefits of improvement must be clear on 3 months monitoring 5 = 100,000 below savings monthly 20= 101,000 to 150, 000 monthly savings 25 = perfect data 151,000 - 200,000 monthly savings 30 = 201,000 over monthly savings . d. Investment cost - cost for the kaizen activity will also consider in the evaluation . The lesser cost but result contribute big savings the better. 1 5 = 101, 000 over 20= 50,001 to 100, 000 cost investment 25 = 10,001 to 50 ,000 cost investment 30 = 10,000 below cost investment e . Technical ideas - adopting of unique ideas to increase productivity and improve quality and reduce scrap 5 = 9% and below increase 10 = 10% to 19 % productivity increase 15 = 20% to 29 % productivity increase 20 = 30% over productivity increase Performance Evaluation Table Target Score 15 20 25 20 20