INTRODUCTION

KIM & LEE(2005)

IMPORTANT FACTOR IN DISCOURSES ON E-GOVERNANCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AND HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

BECKMAN (1997)
AN INCREASING EMPHASIS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS IN BOTH THE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS

KAMAL, MANJIT & GURVINDER (2007)

VITAL IN KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS UNIVERSITIES, THE EFFECTIVENESS ENSURES THAT ACADEMICS ARE ABLE TO REALIZE AND DEVELOP THEIR POTENTIAL TO THE FULLEST
CONT

 IN RELATION TO STUDENT OFFICER AT PUSARTI, REPORTED THAT MOST STUDENTS NOT PROPERLY PRACTICE KNOWLEDGE SHARING WHEREAS VALIDATION REPORT SAYS INFORMATION IS DIFFICULT TO ASSESS FROM PREVIOUS STUDENT OUR INITIAL SURVEY TO TROOP COMMANDER COURSE CONFIRMED THIS PROBLEM WHEREBY 30% OF CURRENT STUDENTS RECEIVED NOTES FROM THEIR SENIOR THEREFORE : WHAT LEVEL OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE SHARING AMONG STUDENT OFFICER AT PUSARTI? WHAT ARE FACTORS EFFECTING KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND THE CURRENT STATE OF THOSE FACTORS AMONG STUDENTS OFFICER AT PUSARTI?

AIM
THE AIM OF THIS PAPER IS TO STUDY ABOUT KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND FACTORS INVOLVE IN KNOWLEDGE SHARING ACTIVITIES AMONG STUDENTS OFFICER AT PUSARTI

SCOPE
OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE SHARING PROCESS MEASURING SHARING KNOWLEDGE PRACTICE RESULT ANALYSIS CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION

OBJECTIVE
TO EXPLAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING FOR STUDENT OFFICER AT PUSARTI TO EVALUATE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING AMONG STUDENT OFFICER AT PUSARTI TO IDENTIFY FACTORS EFFECTING TO KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND THE CURRENT STATE THE FACTOR AMONG STUDENT OFFICER AT PUSARTI

FRAMEWORK
INDIVIDUAL FACTORS

CLASSROOM FACTORS

KNOWLEDGE SHARING PROCESS

TECHNOLOGY FACTORS

KNOWLEDGE SHARING PROCESS

DEFINITION OF KNOWLEDGE
DAVENPORT AND PRUSAK, 1998

A FLUID MIX OF FRAMED EXPERIENCE, VALUES, CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION, AND EXPERT INSIGHT THAT PROVIDES A

FRAMEWORK

FOR

EVALUATING

AND

INCORPORATING

NEW

EXPERIENCES AND INFORMATION. IT ORIGINATES AND IS APPLIED IN THE MINDS OF KNOWER

KOGUT AND ZANDER, 1992; GRANT, 1996; RYLE, 1984

EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE TACIT KNOWLEDGE

KNOWLEDGE SHARING BENEFIT

FOUND FOUR IMPORTANCE VALUES OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING (GURTEEN,1999) IMPORTANT FOR CREATING A NEW KNOWLEDGE TO ACHIEVE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE WHEN SOMEONE LEAVES ORGANIZATION, THEIR KNOWLEDGE WALKS WITH THEM. THEREFORE, SHARING HAS THE POWER TO CARRY ON THE KNOWLEDGE EXPERTISE LEARNT AND APPLIED IN ONE PART OF THE ORGANIZATION IS NOT LEVERAGED IN ANOTHER, SO SHARING IS NECESSITY ACCELERATING CHANGE IN TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS AND SOCIAL 50 PERCENT OF WHAT WE KNEW 5 YEARS AGO IN PROBABLY OBSOLETE TODAY.

MEASURING SHARING KNOWLEDGE PRACTICE

QUESTIONNAIRE
QUESTIONNAIRE PRODUCE BASE ON PAPER FACTOR INFLUENCING KNOWLEDGE SHARING AMONG UNIVERSITY OFFICER(SIVAPORN WANGPIPATWONG,1999)

INDIVIDUAL FACTOR
CLASSROOM FACTOR TECHNOLOGY FACTOR SAMPLING BETWEEN STUDENT PUSARTI BATTERY CAPTAIN COURSE TROOP COMMANDER COURSE

INDIVIDUAL FACTOR
WILLINGNESS TO SHARE I AM WILLING TO SHARE COURSE MATERIALS WITH MY CLASSMATES I AM WILLING TO DISCUSS NEW IDEAS WITH MY CLASSMATES I AM WILLING TO SHARE KNOWLEDGE THAT I ACQUIRE WITH MY CLASSMATES ABILITY TO SHARE I FIND IT EASY TO PUT WHAT I KNOW INTO WORDS I AM CONFIDENT IN MY ABILITY TO PROVIDE KNOWLEDGE TO MY CLASSMATES I AM CONFIDENT THAT MY KNOWLEDGE SHARING WOULD INCREASE THE PERFORMANCE OF MY CLASSMATES

CLASSROOM FACTOR
INSTRUCTOR SUPPORT INSTRUCTOR SUPPORTS US IN SHARING KNOWLEDGE WITH OTHER CLASSMATES INSTRUCTOR ENCOURAGES US TO DISCUSS WITH OTHER CLASSMATES MY INSTRUCTOR GIVES US A REWARD, SUCH AS VERBAL PRAISE AND SCORE, WHEN SHARING KNOWLEDGE WITH OTHER CLASSMATES CLASS ARRANGEMENT I FEEL THAT CLASS ARRANGEMENT IS SUITABLE FOR KNOWLEDGE SHARING PRACTISE

TECHNOLOGY FACTOR
TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY

OFFICIAL IT TOOLS AVAILABLE FOR SHARING KNOWLEDGE SUCH

AS EMAIL, WEB BOARD, AND WINDOWS LIVE MESSENGER HAVE ACCESS TO THE OFFICIAL INTERNET EITHER AT MY

TRAINING CENTRE

TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT EASIER FOR ME TO SHARE KNOWLEDGE WITH MY CLASSMATES EASIER FOR ME TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE THAT IS RELEVANT TO ME EASIER FOR ME TO GET IN CONTACT WITH MY CLASSMATES WHO HAVE KNOWLEDGE THAT IS IMPORTANT TO ME

KNOWLEDGE SHARING
INFORM MY CLASSMATES OF WHAT I AM WORKING ON

SHARE WITH MY CLASSMATES THE NEW KNOWLEDGE THAT I ACQUIRE

ALWAYS TELL MY CLASSMATES WHATEVER I KNOW WHEN THEY ASK ME

RESULT ANALYSIS

INDIVIDUAL FACTOR
INDIVIDUAL FACTOR % 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

80% OF BK COURSE ARE WILLINGLY TO SHARING KNOWLEDGE

COMPARE BETWEEN TC COURSE THE VALUE ONLY 60%. KNOWLEDGE SHARING HABIT AND AWARENESS HAD BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN BK COURSE FOR THEIR SERVICES ARE LONGER IN ARTILLERY ORGANIZATION

BK TC

NO

NOT SURE

YES

CLASSROOM FACTOR
CLASSROOM FACTOR
% 70 60 50 40 30 20 BK TC
PEOPLE DECIDE WHETHER TO SHARE KNOWLEDGE ACCORDING TO THE KNOWLEDGE VALUE AVERAGE CLASROOM FACTOR BETWEEN BK COURSE AND TC COURSE 55% AND 61% KS OCCURS WHEN INSTRUCTORS ENGAGES STUDENTS DISCUSSIONS

10
0 NO NOT SURE YES
CLASSROOM ARRANGEMENT ONLY SUITABLE FOR DISCUSSION WITH FRIEND BESIDE US. IF TABLE CAN BE ARRANGE LIKE MEETING ROOMS CAN INCREASE KS

TECHNOLOGY FACTOR
TECHNOLOGY FACTOR % 70 60 50 40 BK TC

69% YES FOR BK COURSE 57% FOR TC COURSE KNOWADAYS WE ARE EASY TO GET TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY SUCH AS INTERNET IN TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT IT A BIT WHEREAS PUSARTI NOT YET HAVE A MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

30
20 10 0 NO NOT SURE YES

CONCLUSION
AS LONG AS WE CONTINUOUSLY WITHIN OUR DOING THE SHARING KNOWLEDGE PRACTISE ARTILLERY STUDENT

OFFICER

HOPEFULLY

ALWAYS

REMEMBER

THAT

THE

SHARING

KNOWLEDGE PRACTISE WILL ACHIEVE GOALS IF ALL INDIVIDUAL TAKE PARTS IN AND WE MAKE IT AS A CULTURE OF ARTILLERY ORGANIZATION

RECOMMENDATION
FIRST IS THE INDIVIDUAL ITSELF WHERE WE MUST IMPLEMENT

OR MAKE THE SHARING KNOWLEDGE AS STUDENT CULTURE.

BUT MANY OF US DIDNT AWARE OF PRACTICING KS. SO THE KNOWLEDGE SHARING AWARENESS IS NECESSITY TO BE STUDY IN THE FUTURE

WE MUST MAKE MOVE ONE STEP AHEAD IN PROVIDING A GOOD DATABASE IN PUSARTI. THE IT TECHNOLOGY ARE CHEAPER

THAN TO PROVIDE ALL OFFICER WITH BOOKS. IN NOWDAYS

TECHNOLOGY DATABASE ARE MORE ACCESSIBLE ANYWHERE AND ANY PLACE

Q&A