Anda di halaman 1dari 1

in drawing the conclusion that <blah... blah.. .blah...

>, <xyz> uses the anecdotal


evidence <blah blah blah> and several unfounded assumptions. these unsubstantiated
assumptions, along with the flaws in the reasoning, leave the argument less
persuasive and weak.

the first questionable assumption stems from <blah blah...>. for example, <blah
blah...>...

the second assumption that <blah blah...> leaves the possibility for <blah blah>
open.

additionally, the logic that <... blah blah ...> is weak because <blah blah>.

the argument could be strengthened by <blah blah...>. however, if the information


is <blah blah> the arguement falls apart.

as a result of the caveats in the premises and assumptions, the argument that
<blah blah> is weak. before making a decision to <blah blah>, <xyz> must consider
<blah blah>.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai