ON
SUBMITTED BY:AANCHAL SETHI (02) ABHIJIT CHOWDHURY (03) ABHISHEK SHARMA (05) SHUCHI BHARGAVA (84)
Table of contents
Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2:Qualitative analysis using CRISIL
2.1 CRISIL criteria for rating FMCG companies 2.2 HUL new growth strategy 2.3 Distribution Network 2.4 Supply chain management 2.5 Brand equity 2.6 Price protection
Chapter 5: Bibliography
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION :
The FMCG market in India is set to treble from US$ 11.6 billion in 2003 to US$ 33.4 billion in 2015. Penetration level as well as per capita consumption in most product categories like jams, toothpaste, skin care, hair wash etc in India is low indicating the untapped market potential. Burgeoning Indian population, particularly the middle class and the rural segments, presents an opportunity to makers of branded products to convert consumers to branded products. HUL's brands, spread across 20 distinct consumer categories, touch the lives of two out of three Indians. They endow the company with a scale of combined volumes of about 4 million tonnes and sales of Rs. 13,718 crores. The mission that inspires HUL's over 15,000 employees is to "add vitality to life". With 35 Power Brands, HUL meets every day needs for nutrition, hygiene, and personal care with brands that help people feel good, look good and get more out of life. HUL is India's largest FMCG Company. It is a 52.11 per cent (as on March 31, 2008) subsidiary of Unilever, an Anglo-Dutch international marketer of leading brands in food products, home care, and personal care segments. HULs key brands include Wheel, Lux, Lifebuoy, Surf, Fair & Lovely, Ponds, Clinic, and Sunsilk. For 2007, HUL reported a consolidated net profit of Rs.19.25 billion on sales of Rs.137.18 billion, as against a net profit of Rs.18.55 billion and sales of Rs.121.03 billion, the previous year. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, HUL reported a standalone profit after tax of Rs.3.81 billion (Rs.3.93 billion in the corresponding period of 2007) and net sales of Rs.37.94 billion (Rs.31.84 billion).
CHAPTER-2
QULATITIVE ANALYSIS ON HUL
CRISILS CRITERIA FOR RATING FMCG COMPANIES :
1)
PRODUCT MIX :
HULs business activities are divided into four broad areas : Home and personal care Personal wash : Lux. Lifebuoy, Liril , Hamam, Breeze, Moti , Dove, Pears and Rexona Laundry : Surf Excel, sun light, Rin ,Wheel & Ala bleech Dishwasher : Vim Dis-infectants : Domex, cif Beauty Products : Fair & Lovely, Lakme, Ponds, Vaseline and Aviance Hair-Care : Sunsilk naturals, Clinic , Dove and Lifebouy Oral-Care : Pepsodent and Close-up Deo spray : Axe and Rexona 2) FOODS :
Kissan(Jam,Ketchup,Squashes), Annapurna(Aata and salt), Knorr Soups, Modern Bread Ice-cream:Kwality Wall's
Bewerages : Tea:- Brooke bond, Lipton, taj mahal Coffee:- Brooke bond bru.
3 )
New Ventures
Hindustan Lever Network, Ayush ayurvedic products and services, Sangam, Pureit water purifiers.
4)
Exports HPC, beverages, marine products, HUL s brands are household names across the country. They include: Lifebuoy, Lux, Surf Excel, Rin, Wheel, Fair & Lovely, Pond s, Sunsilk,Clinic, Pepsodent, Close-up, Lakme, Brooke Bond, Kissan, Knorr-Annapurna and Kwality Walls.
HULs market share in the laundry segment grew to around 37.8%in the quarter ended June from 35.5% in the same period last year, according the market research firm ACNielsen. However, this time, the increase was not at the expense of price war with it multinational rival Procter & Gamble Co. P&G also gained 0.5percentage points, up to a 7.6% share. Nirma Ltd, the Ahmedabad-based manufacturer, however, saw its market share dip by 1.7%percentage points to 13.5%. Wheel, a value brand that, according to Vats contributes around50% of HULs laundry segment revenues, increased its market share by 2 percentage points in the same period, with a total share of about 18%. According to ACNielsen, the laundry industry in India was worth Rs7,908 crore in 2006 and rose 8.4% over 2005. HUL doesnt We have done key innovations across the product portfolio and it is working for us, says Vats. We successfully migrated from Rin Supreme to Surf Excel and Wheel Smart Srimati which was rolled out in 2006is also on the right track. HULs market share in the laundry segment grew to around 37.8%in the quarter ended June from 35.5% in the same period last year, according the market research firm ACNielsen. However, this time, the increase was not at the expense of price war with its multinational rival Procter & Gamble Co. P&G also gained 0.5percentage points, up to a 7.6% share. Nirma Ltd, the Ahmedabad-based manufacturer, however, saw its market share dip by 1.7%percentage points to 13.5%. Wheel, a value brand that, according to Vats contributes around50% of HULs laundry segment revenues, increased its market share by 2 percentage points in the same period, with a total share of about 18%. According to ACNielsen, the laundry industry in India was worth Rs7,908 crore in 2006 and rose 8.4% over 2005. HUL doesnt report its laundry revenues separately but puts them under the soaps and detergent category. In 2006, HULs soaps and detergents segment contributed around Rs5,596 crore to the companys total sales of Rs12,103 crore.
Laundry has been an attractive segment in the past and is likely to keep growing in the near future. The recent price war between companies led to erosion in their profitability but now, the industry is stabilizing, says Unmesh Sharma, an analyst at MacquarieSecurities here. According to Vats, the laundry business is witnessing a surge in demand from cities and HUL is focusing on Tier I and II cities to tap that demand
REDISTRIBUTION NETWORK
WHOLESELLER
CONSUMER
Hindustan Unilever's distribution network is recognised as one of its key strengths. Its focus is not only to enable easy access to our brands, but also to touch consumers with a three-way convergence - of product availability, brand communication, and higher levels of brand experience.
HUL's products, manufactured across the country, are distributed through a network of about 7,000 redistribution stockists covering about one million retail outlets. The distribution network directly covers the entire urban population. The general trade comprises grocery stores, chemists, wholesale, kiosks and general stores. Hindustan Unilever services each with a tailor-made mix of services. The emphasis is equally on using stores for direct contact with consumers, as much as is possible through in-store facilitators. Hindustan Unilever, which once pioneered distribution in India, is today reinventing distribution - creating new channels, and redefining the way current channels are serviced. In the process it is converging product availability, with brand communication and brand experience
In the villages: The company, to fully meet the emerging needs and increased purchasing power of the rural population has brought all markets with populations of below 50,000 under one rural sales organisation. The sales teams are formed, dedicated leaders are assigned to build the brand availability and enabling brand building in the deepest sections. HUL's distribution network in rural India already directly covers about 50,000 villages, reaching about 250 million consumers, through about 6000 sub-stockists
E) Brand Equity
It is the degree of consumer loyalty that a company product enjoys. HUL has various brands in the Indian market with the highest market share. The main challenge was to reverse the down trading the categories and reestablish the relevance of their brands in the minds of the customers. In 2000 they had 110 brands, many undifferentiated and lacking scale. Then they focus on 35 main brands covering all consumer appeal and pricing segments. They are already seeing the benefits . Six brands Brooke Bond, Lifebuoy, Lux, Fair & Lovely, Rin and Wheel have emerge as megabrands with salary of more than Rs.500 crores.
As a corporate, HLL wants to be a leader in every one of its businesses and the strategy is to fight on the strength of the competitive advantage arising from the possession of strong brands. It is this strategy that is getting reflected in the development of a multitude of strong brands. If we take the business of bathing soaps, as an example, HLL has the objective of being a national player (not a niche or a regional marketer) and the leader therein. HLL also wants about 30 per cent of the corporate income to come from this line.
F) Price Protection
The products of HUL enjoys the price protection in various segments of goods and services provided by the company. They have increased the prices of several main products and reduced on those products consumed by mass population
OBJECTIVES
1. To allow comparisons to be made which assist in predicting the future. 2. To investigate the reason for changes. 3. To construct a simple explanation of a coplicated financial statement by its expression in one figure. 4. To permit the charting of a firms history and the evaluation of its present position. 5. To provide indicators of a firms past performance in terms of its operational activity and profitability; and near-present financial condition.
IMPORTANCE/ADVANTAGES
Aid to the management Aid in business forecasting Aid in cost control To know efficiency To know liquidity and solvency position Useful for decision making Investment decision Aid in comparision and Trend Analysis
LIMITATIONS/DISADVANTAGES
Lack of proper standard Different methods Lack of qualitative analysis also various Accounting limitation
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIOS
Ratios are classifibd according to the need of different interested groups(e.g., shareholders, lenders, investors, management, etc.). these ratios are as follows:(A) PROFITABILITY RATIOS 1. GROSS PROFIT RATIO. 2. NET PROFIT RATIO. 3. OPERATING PROFIT RATIO. 4. OPERATING RATIO.
(B) LEAVERAGE RATIOS:1. DEBT-EQUITY RATIO. 2. CAPITAL EMPLOYEED TO NET WORTH RATIO.
(C) LIQUIDITY RATIOS:1. CURRENT RATIO. 2. QUICK RATIO ( Acid test ratio).
(D) TURN OVER RATIOS:1. INVENTORY TURN OVER RATIO. 2. FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO. 3. WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO.
(E) VALUATION RATIOS:1. DIVIDEND YEILD RATIO. 2. DIVIDEND PAY OUT RATIO. 3. PRICE-EARNING RATIO.
4.
Debt-Equity Ratio
0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0
3. CURRENT RATIO
The Current Ratio of HUL is 0.89 while that of the industry is 0.93 and that of Colgate Palm is 1.05. As a convention the minimum of two to one ratio is referred to as a bankers rule of thumb. Current Ratio of HUL is 0.89 is matter of concern. As there is more investment in the FMCG but current assets also to be increased accordingly to improve the current ratio.
Current Ratio
1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 Current Ratio
Current Ratio
6. PBITM :
Since PBITM represents the amount of cash that the companies can earn to pay off creditors. Profit before interest and tax of HUL: 15.53, which is satisfactory while that of INDUSTRY is 24.02 which is very good as compared to standard value while that of COMPETITOR (Colgate-Palm.) is 14.89 which is also satisfactory and close to that of HUL.
PBITM (%)
25 20 15 10 5 0 PBITM (%)
PBITM (%)
CHAPTER-4
COST OF CAPITAL
COMPONENTS OF CAPITAL:
a) DEBENTURES b) PREFERENCE SHARES c) EQUITY SHARES d) RETAINED EARNINGS
Cost of capital is the cost at which the company acquires its funds for different operations. It is taken from the investors point of view. It is the expected return of the investors on their different type of investments in different portfolios. The cost of capital helps the company to evaluate the financial feasibility of a venture or project. It can be done by seeing that the minimum rate of profit should be at least equal to the expected rate of return.
1. COST OF DEBT FORMULA: COST OF DEBT = INTEREST (1-TAX RATE) SALES VOLUME Flotation cost = Nil Corporate Tax Rate = 30% The secured loans that are taken by the company are the irredeemable debts that are taken by the company. In the annual report of the company the debt taken by the company is mentioned to be nil thus cost of debt is zero.
2. COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL The cost of equity capital can be calculated by two methods A) DIVIDEND APPROACH CALCULATION OF COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL (Dividend Approach Method) FORMULA: = EXPECTED DIVIDEND PER SHARE + GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT YEAR CURRENT MARKET PRICE Expected dividend cannot be predicted and hence we cannot calculate cost of equity using this method, so we will calculate it using the other method i.e.
B) CAPITAL ASSET PRICING METHOD (CAPM) FORMULA: Ke = Rf + (Km-Rf) Ke cost of capital Rf risk free return on equity which is 6.9% beta of the stock Km market return (Calculated from average returns indicated by SENSEX index of last 10 years)
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
CLOSE 5,005.82 3,972.12 3,262.33 3,377.28 5,838.96 6,602.69 9,397.93 13,786.91 20,286.99 9,647.31 17,464.81 20,509.09
Market return
-20.64% -17.86% 3.52% 72.88% 13.07% 42.33% 46.7% 51.06% -52.44% 81.03% 17.42%
Since cost of capital for retained earnings is also the opportunity cost hence it is equivalent to fully subscribed issue or additional shares, which is measured from cost of equity shares. No retained earnings are mentioned in the balance sheet of the company. So cost of retained earnings is zero.
CHAPTER-5
Bibliography
www.capitaline.com Financial Accounting by I.M pandey Corporate Finance by Prasansa Chandra
www.hul.co.in www.bse.com