Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why

Misquoting Jesus is a provocative book, written by a New Testament scholar, Bart D. Ehrman. The book introduces readers with layers of textual criticism of the bible. A number of textual variants, accidental and intentional, are discussed in this enthralling text. This book, which made it into the New York Times Best Sellers List, is available in hardcover and paperback. Bart D. Ehrman Bart Ehrman is one of North Americas leading textual critics today. As a teacher and writer, he is logical, witty, provocative. Bart D. Ehrman is the author of more than twenty books, including the New York Times bestselling Misquoting Jesus. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and is a leading authority on the early Church and the life of Jesus. He has been featured in Time and has appeared on NBC's Dateline, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, CNN, The History Channel, major NPR shows, and other top media outlets. Reviews and reception Alex Beam of the Boston Globe, wrote that the book is "a series of dramatic revelations for the ignorant, and continues to say, "Ehrman notes that there have been a lot of changes to the Bible in the past 2,000 years. I don't want to come between Mr. Ehrman and his payday, but this point has been made much more eloquently by...others." Jeffrey Weiss of the Dallas Morning News wrote: "Whichever side you sit on regarding Biblical inerrancy, this is a rewarding read." American Library Association writes, "To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants."

Charles Seymour of the Wayland Baptist University in Plainview, TX wrote: "Ehrman convincingly argues that even some generally received passages are late additions, which is particularly interesting in the case of those verses with import for doctrinal issues such as women's ordination or the Atonement." Neely Tucker of The Washington Post wrote that the book is "an exploration into how the 27 books of the New Testament came to be cobbled together, a history rich with ecclesiastical politics, incompetent scribes and the difculties of rendering oral traditions into a written text." Daniel B. Wallace, in review of Misquoting Jesus says the book "comes up short on genuine substance about his primary contention. Scholars bear a sacred duty not to alarm lay readers on issues that they have little understanding of. Unfortunately, the average layperson will leave this book with far greater doubts about the wording and teachings of the NT than any textual critic would ever entertain." Wallace also says Ehrman is selective in his use of evidence and ignores the views of scholars that disagree with him and he avoids giving his readers enough information so they can fully understand the issues and make up their own minds. Wallace concludes, however: "I grieve for what has happened to an acquaintance of mine, a man I have known and admiredand continue to admirefor over a quarter of a century. It gives me no joy to put forth this review. But from where I sit, it seems that Barts black and white mentality as a fundamentalist has hardly been affected as he slogged through the years and trials of life and learning, even when he came out on the other side of the theological spectrum. He still sees things without sufcient nuancing, he overstates his case, and he is entrenched in the security that his own views are right. Bart Ehrman is one of the most brilliant and creative textual critics Ive ever known, and yet his biases are so strong that, at times, he cannot even acknowledge them." Craig Blomberg, of Denver Seminary in Colorado, wrote that "Most of Misquoting Jesus is actually a very readable, accurate distillation of many of the most important facts about the nature and history of textual criticism, presented in a lively and interesting narrative that will keep scholarly and lay interest alike." Blomberg also wrote that Ehrman "has rejected his evangelicalism and whether he is writing on the history of the transmission of the biblical text, focusing on all the changes that scribes made over the centuries, or on the so-called 'lost gospels' and 'lost Christianities,' trying to rehabilitate our appreciation for Gnosticism, it is clear that he has an axe to grind."

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misquoting_Jesus

Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture, How Bible Got Tainted Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 2/10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 3/10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 4/10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 5/10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 6/10 /10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 7 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 8/10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 9/10 Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture 10/10