39(2005.

4) 373394

1)

.
.
1.

2.

.
,1) ,
.

, .

*
1) ,

. ,

.

374 39

, , , 1950.5.
, - 1
-, , 1952.7.
, , ,
1952.11.
, , , 1953.7.

.

.( ,

.)
.
, ,
1988 (
)
.

,

.
.
, - , ,
, 1989.
, , , ,
, 1993.
, -
, , , , 1999.

(, 2004)

 375

, 1945 1967
683 ,

.
,

. 1989
, 1987
() , 1955

.

,


.
,
. ,
.
1946 1947

,
.

( ,
) . ,

.

376 39

.
1.

,
. ,
,
. 1947
2) 1948
.3) 1 1952
.4)
2) , , , 1986, 221.
20 , 3 10
. , - ,
28, 2001., 312.
10 .
, ()
1947
. 1947
. , 1947
.
3) , , , 1952.11, 116
. ( - 1948)
. , , , 1995., 503
. , (
)
1948
. .
, 1948
.
4) 1952.7, 140 ,
,
. ,
()

 377

1955 .5) 1986

1987
.6) 1989
1952
. .
, 1952
.
5) , , , 2004, 121
, 668
. , 1952
. , 661
1952
.
,
. , , , 329 1955
, ,
( ) ,
4) 1952.7., 140
1952 .
, ()
1955
.
,
. ,
.

.
.
6) , - ,
, , , 1999, 314. 1987

1987
1989 .
, 1986
. 1986
. 1986
18 2

378 39

.7) 50 1995

56 2, 567 3
, 1995 4 .8)
2004
.9)
1947 1948
.
.
1952 1955
.
.
.( ,
.) 1987

. .
7) , , , 1989. ,
-
. , , ,
, , 1993.
.
8) , 1995.5., 14 50 ,


.
.
. ,
.
1995

. 1995 4
, , ()
.
9) ,
. , 2004 (
) .
.

 379

1948 1955
,

1948 4 3
1955
.
1948 1955
1950
.10)
1950
.11) ,
1950 1948
,
( ) . ,
1950 1955
.
1987
,
1986
.
, 1986 . 1989
1986 1987
. , 1986 1987

. ,

1955
.
10) , , , 328-330.
11) , , , 1950.5, 30.

380 39

,

.
1995 ,
. , 4 2
7 2
.

.
1995 ,
. 2004
1995 ,
.
, 1995 2004 1986 1987
( 1989)
, .
1986 1955 , 1995 2004
1986 1987

1955
.
, 1955 ( ,
) 1986( 1987
1989 ) 1995 ( 2004
) .
1955 1986 1995 1986
(
) 1955 1995
.12)
12) , ! !

 381

1955 1995
. , .

.
. 4 2
- / , , / !
. 4 5 ?
. 7 6
. (1955
) - - .
, .
, 6 7
.

.
, 1986
. , . 1955
1995
. 1995
1986 . 4 2
7 6 !/
/ /
, /
. , 1986 . , 1986 1995

.

! !

.

382 39

, 6 7
.
. , 1995
1986
. 1955
1995
1986
.
1955
1995
1986
.

.

1955

19861987
( 1989)

19952004

()

()

42

()

()

-/
42 , , /
()
()
!


42
()



45
?
?
?
67

 383

1955

19861987
( 1989)

!/
/
76
/


76

-/

19952004

()

!/
/
/

()

()

()

, 1955
.

,
1946 1947
. , 1995 1955
() (
) .
1995
, 1995
. , 1995
() ()

.
, 1995
() (
)

384 39

. ,
,

.
1955 1995 1986
, 1986
.
1995 1986
, 1995

.
()
,
.
,

1986
, (1986 1987
1989 )
. ,

.

,

, ,
,
, ,
,

 385

.

.13)

1950 ,

.

,


, , 1955

. ,

. 1986
,

, .
1986

. ,
1955

.

.
1986 (1987 )

13) , , , 1958.2, 104.

386 39

(1955)
1995 1955
() ()
()
. 1982

. 1980
.14)


. 1980
.
1990 ()
, 1994
.15) 1995
() ()
()
.


.

.

.
14) , , , 1988, 172 . 1980
23
1980
.
15) , , , 1997, 101-102 .

 387

2.
,
. ,


. ,
. ,
,
1946 1947
.


.
,

.
1946 11 . ()
1947 1 () . (
)


. ()
.

.16)

16) , , , 1986, 451-452.

, ,
, , 1994, 105-106 .

388 39

.

.
,
,
, .

.17)
,

.18) ,

.
,





.

.

17) ,
, 6 , , 1952, 52-57
. , , , 104 .
18) , , ,
, , 1947, 196. ,
, , 2000, 29 .

 389

,

. 6 H
. H
.
. ,
.


. ()

.

. ()

.19)

,


. , ,

.
. , ,
.
,
. ,
. ,

19) , , ,
1978.9, 40-41.

390 39

,
.
.


.
. ,
1946 1947

.
,
.
, 2-1 , 1955
. 1955
,
,
.

.
,
.

. ,
1955
.

 391

.

.
,
1946 1947


,
.
, 1955

.
.20)
,
1955
.
: , , , , , ,

20) 1955

.

392 39

, , (), 1955
, (), (), 1986
, (), (), 1987
, , (), 1989
, , (), 1995.5.-6.
, , (), 1995.5.-7.
, , (), 1995. 4
, , (), 2004

, , , 2004.
, - , , 2001..
, , ,
, 1994.
, , , ,
, 1993.
, , ,
, , 1947.

, (), , 1988.
, , ,
1978.9.
, - 1
-, , 1952.7.
, , , 1952.11.
, , , 1997

 393

, - ,
, , , 1999.
, , , 2000.
, , , 1950.5.
, , , 1958.2.
, , , 1988
, , , 1995.
, , , 1986.
, - , ,
, 1989.
, , , 1953.7.
, , , 1986.
, 6 , , 1952.

394 39

<Abstract>

Several Previous Problems of the Study on

Jo Gi-Chun's Baekdusan
Ko, Hyun-Chul
This essay aims to investigate several previous problems of the study on
Jo Gi-Chun's Baekdusan. The results of this essay are summarized as the
following:
First, this essay investigates differences between several Baekdusan
Texts, that is, 1955 Text, 1986 Text(1987 Text, 1989 Text) and 1995
Text(2004 Text). And, it examines we should practical use 1955 Text in
order to study Jo Gi-Chun's Baekdusan.
Second, it investigates the fact that Kim Il-Sung intervened in the process
of creating Jo Gi-Chun's Baekdusan, holding political intention in his bosom.
Third, it investigates that several perspectives external, internal, and
internal-critical of the study on North Korean Literature. And, it
investigates internal-critical perspective is most suitable for the study on Jo
Gi-Chun's Baekdusan among three perspectives.
In conclusion, it is claimed that we should read Baekdusan(before-1955
Text) by focusing on the political history of North Korea in terms of the
internal-critical perspective for the study on Jo Gi-Chun's Baekdusan.
Key Words : Jo Gi-Chun, Baekdusan, text, difference of meaning, process of
creation, methodology