+ =
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The curb of a well transfers all the superimposed loads to the soil through the
cutting edge while sinking. The material used for curbs may be timber or
RCC. The forces acting on well curb are shown in Fig(b). The total horizontal
force on the well curb on both sides is
well the of angle Internal
steining of line centre the along length unit per
curb and well of Weight W
well of diameter Internal D
where
2
D D
Wcot
i e
=
=
=
+
u
u
i
Curb
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The cutting edge is provided at the bottom of the well below the curb to cut
through the soil during sinking. It is generally made of steel and welded to an
angle iron to fit the outer dimensions of the well steining. The height of the
cutting edge is given by
concrete of stress e compressiv Safe f
edge cutting of Thickness t
rock of strength Crushing
where
tan f
h
c
c.
.
e
=
=
=
=
u
u
q
t q
u
Cutting Edge
The value of u is usually taken as 30
0
. The choice of this angle has been proved to
be suitable for easy access to the cutting edge.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Bottom Plug
After final grounding of the
well to the required
foundation level, a
concrete plug is provided.
The bottom plug transfer
the entire load to the
ground. The bottom plug
functions as an inverted
dome supported along the
periphery of the steining.
As it is not feasible to
provide reinforcement at
the bottom, it is generally
made thick and a rich
concrete mix (M20) is
used.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Sand Filling
The bottom plug concrete is cured and
after curing, the well is filled with
sand in saturated condition. Sand
filling provides
1. Stability to the bottom of the well.
2. Eliminate the tensile forces at the
base
3. Cancels hoop stresses induced in
steining
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Top Plug
The top plug is provided
after the filling is
completed. Top plug
helps in transferring the
load of the pier and
superstructure to the
steining. The thickness
of the top plug is
generally kept greater
than 50 % of the smaller
dimension of the dredge
hole. If sand filling is
used, the top plug is
simply constructed using
PCC of 1:2:4 otherwise
it is reinforced with steel
bars and lean concrete
of 1:3:6 is used.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Well Cap
As the shape of the well pier and cap
are different, the well cap forms an
interim layer to accommodate the
pier. The well cap is so designed that
the base of the pier is provided with
a minimum all round offset. The
centre of the well cap is made to
coincide with that of the pier and not
with that of the well. Such positioning
nullifies the effect of the minor shifts
which might have occurred during
well sinking.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Stability Analysis of Well Foundations
A well foundation supporting a bridge pier is subjected
to vertical and horizontal forces. The various forces
acting on the well are
1. Self weight of the well and its superstructure
2. Live loads
3. Water currents and buoyancy
4. Temperature, wind and earth quake
5. Breaking and tracking forces
6. Resistance of the well walls
7. Base and skin friction
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Terzaghi (1943) gave an
approximate solution
based on the analysis
of the free rigid bulk.
Resolve all forces in
vertical direction and
obtain the resultant
P
V
.
Resolve the forces in two
horizontal directions
i.e along and across
the pier and get the
values of P
B
and P
L
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The resultant vertical force P
V
and the resultant
horizontal force P
B
are
considered for analysis.
The forces and earth pressure
distribution acting on the
well are shown in the
figure.
Pressure at any depth z below
the scour level is
'
' ) ( p
DK DP z
zK K K z
D
a p
= =
= =
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The well is assumed to fail as
soon as the soil reaction at
the bottom is equal to P
D
.
For equilibrium at that
instant
) 3 ( 2 9 3 2D
D for Solving
(2)
3
' 2
2
1
3
'
2
1
) (
E about moment Taking
(1) ) 2 ( '
2
1
) (
' 2
2
1
'
2
1
BCF of area - AEF of area
length unit per pressure total of resultant ) (
1 1
2
1 1
1
1
1
2
1 max
1 max
1
2
max
D H D H H
D
D DK
D
K D H P
D D DK P
or
D DK K D
P
B
B
B
+ =
=
=
=
A A =
=
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
) (
D
1
tan
as given is well, the of
line centre the of deflection angular then the
nts, displaceme horizontal the are and If
) (P ve conservati
a yields forces frictional these of Omision
wall and base at the friction no is There 3.
ts coefficien pressure earth s Rankine' are K and K 2.
head bulk light a as treated is well The 1.
s assumption
following on based is theory This F. safety of factor
a by P reducing by obtained be can depth safe A
force. horizontal
maximum e sustain th to required length grip the
is D This D. for solving and (1) equation in D Putting
2 1
2 1
max. B
a P
D
1
o
o
=
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Stability Analysis of a Heavy Well
In the Terzaghi approximate
analysis, it is assumed that
the bulkhead tends to
rotate about some point O
above the lower edge and
tends to transfer the soil
from elastic to plastic
equilibrium. But in case of
heavy wells embedded in
cohesionless soil, the well is
assumed to rotate about its
base and the assumed
pressure distribution is
given in Fig(a). Taking the
moment about the base,
the value of (P
B
)
max
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
D H
D D D
K P
D H
D
K K P
B
a P B
+
+
=
+
=
) (
' '
6
1
) (
as given then is force resistance maximum equivlant
The Fig(b). in shown is on distributi pressure
The scour. of depth normal the half to equal be
to assumed be may and assess to difficult very is
D depth surcharge The surcharge. a as acts soil
uncovered the gs, surroundin well the Beyond
place. takes scouring well, the around Normally
) ( '
6
1
) (
2
2
max
2
3
max
=
=
y
or
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
IRC and IS Design Recommendations
The IRC and IS 3955 publications recommend
the following procedure for design of well
foundations in sand deposits (for clay the
expressions should be suitably modified)
1 Check the stability of well under working
loads, assuming elastic theory
2. Find the factor of safety of the well against
ultimate failure using ultimate load theory
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Causes of Tilts and Shifts
1. Nonuniform bearing capacity
2. Obstruction on one side of the well
3. Sand blowing in wells during sinking. It will cause
sudden sinking of well
4. Method of sinking: Material should be removed from
all sides equally otherwise the well may experience
tilt
5. Sudden sinking due to blasting may also cause tilting
of well
6. Irregular casting of steining will cause less friction on
one side leads to chances of tilting of well.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Rectification of Tilt
1. Eccentric grabbing
2. Eccentric loading
3. Water jetting
4. Arresting the cutting edge
5. Pulling the well
6. Strutting the well
7. Pushing the well by jacks