Ruckmick
1936
Instinct
Darwin
1859-1872
Behavior Unlearned, Automated, and Mechanistic Biological Urges, Impulses, & Appetites Function of behavior was to serve bodily needs
Drive
Woodworth
1918
Freud
1915
All Behavior was motivated to serve the satisfaction of needs Drive had a purely physiological basis and bodily need was the ultimate basis of motivation, and could be predicted before it occured
Drive Internal Stimulation VIA Bodily Disturbances & External VIA Quality of Incentive
Clark Hull
1943, 1952
Page 1 of 4
PSY320r4
Equity
1960
Need
David McClelland
1961
Hierarchy Of needs
Abraham Maslow
1943
Clayton Alderfer
1969-1972
Two Theory
Factor
Frederick Herzberg
1966
It is not the actual reward that motivates; it is the perception of it. Based from the effort put into something and the efforts of others. It is a comparison of the rewards received to the rewards of others. Different needs motivate different people. ACHIEVEMENT: Seeks achievement, over realistic but challenging goals, and advancement in the job. There is a strong need for feedback. AFFILIATION: form close personal relationships and interaction with other people. POWER: motivated by authority, these type of people need to be influential, effective and to make an impact. personal status and prestige Categorized as selfactualization, esteem, belongingness, safety, physiological. Power needs take priority and must be fulfilled before others. Theories includes classification of each aspect of life such as sex, food, friends, freedom, approval, education, religion etc. Advancement of Maslows hierarchy. EXISTENCE: physiological and safety needs (lower order needs) RELATEDNESS: intrapersonal love and esteem of others GROWTH: self-actualization and self-esteem. If one of the higher order needs are not met, person will put extra effort into a lower category need to compensate. Content factor: contention associated with feeling good, taking care. Context factor: surroundings or peripheral aspects of environment
Page 2 of 4
PSY320r4
1975-2000
COMPETENCE: Seek to control the outcome and experience mastery RELATEDNESS: Is the universal want to interact, be connected to, and experience caring for others AUTONOMY: Is the universal urge to be causal agents of one's own life and act in harmony with one's integrated self There are INTRINSIC and EXTRINSIC motivators.
MOTIVATION THEORY Achievement motivation Arousal Attribution Cognitive dissonance Cognitive evaluation Differential emotions Drive Dynamics of action Effectance motivation Ego development Expectancy value
SUPPORTIVE REFERENCE CITATION Atkinson (1964) Berlyne (1967) Weiner (1986) Harmon-Jones and Mills (1999) Deci and Ryan (1985a Izard (1991) Bolles (1975) Atkinson and Birch (1978) Harter (1981) Loevinger (1976) Vroom (1964)
Facial feedback hypothesisLaird (1974) Flow Goal setting Learned helplessness Opponent process Positive affect Psychodynamics Reactance Self-actualization Self-determination Self-efficacy Csikszentmihalyi (1997) Locke and Latham (1990) Peterson, Maier, and Seligman (1993) Solomon (1980) Isen (1987) Westin (1997) Wortman and Brehm (1975) Rogers (1959) Rigby, Deci, Patrick, and Ryan (1992) Bandura (1997)
Page 3 of 4
PSY320r4
NINE THEMES RUN THROUGH MOTIVATION STUDY: 1. MOTIVATION BENEFITS ADAPTATION 2. MOTIVES AFFECT BEHAVIOR BY DIRECTING ATTENTION 3. MOTIVE STRENGTHS VARY OVER TIME AND INFLUENCE THE STREAM OF BEHAVIOR 4. MOTIVATION INCLUDES BOTH APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES 5. MOTIVATION STUDY REVEALS THE CONTENTS OF HUMAN NATURE 6. MOTIVATION VARIES NOT ONLY IN INTENSITY BUT ALSO IN ITS TYPE 7. WE ARE NOT ALWAYS CONSCIOUSLY AWARE OF THE MOTIVATIONAL BASIS OF OUR BEHAVIOR 8. MOTVATIONAL PRINCIPALS CAN BE APPLIED 9. THERE IS NOTHING SO PRACTICAL AS A GOOD THEORY
Page 4 of 4
PSY320r4