Assignment 3:
Fluid Flow and Pressure Distribution in
Venturi Meter
Submission Date:
14/01/2012
1
Abstract
The pressure distribution along the wall of Venturi tube widely used in
many industry tests and applications. Here we did an experiment on the
wall of the venturi meter to check the internal distributed pressures.
Then, analyse the experimental data and plot graphs for it. Also, study
the theory of the venturi meter and calculate the data theoretically by
using Bernoullis equation. The concentration here is to analyse the
venturi meter internal pressures by Ansys CFX, which explores the use of
solid works to analyse the fluid flow in the tube. At the end of the report,
there is a compression between these analysis methods. The comparison
shows that the Ansys CFX model results not matching the other two
results due to some assumption made in this model.
Table of Contents:
List of Figures:
Figure 1 Venturi tube .................................................................................................................................... 5
Figure 2 Experiment Venturi meter .............................................................................................................. 6
Figure 3 Locations of pressure tapings ......................................................................................................... 7
Figure 4 Ansys model for venturi meter ....................................................................................................... 9
Figure 5 Comparison for the convergence in CFX ....................................................................................... 10
Figure 6 Mesh refinements for venturi meter ............................................................................................ 10
Figure 7 Mesh refinements before and after ............................................................................................. 11
Figure 8 Comparison of experimental pressure and velocity ..................................................................... 12
Figure 9 Comparison of theoretical pressure and velocity ......................................................................... 13
Figure 10 The velocity for Runs 1 and 2 ...................................................................................................... 14
Figure 11 The pressure for Runs 1 and 2 .................................................................................................... 14
Figure 12 Comparison graphs between Experimental, Theoretical and Ansys .......................................... 15
List of Tables:
Table 1 Experimental Result for Run 1........................................................................................................ 11
Table 2 Theoretical Results ......................................................................................................................... 12
Table 3 Comparison results between Experimental, Theoretical and Ansys.............................................. 15
1. Introduction:
The Venturi tube is used to determine flow rate through a pipe. Differential pressure is the
pressure difference between the pressure measured at D (venturi inlet) and at d (neck) as
shown in Figure 1 [1]. Normally, the venturi tube has less head loss than nozzles and orifices
due to its streamlined design [1]. The flow streamline in venturi meter is laminar when the
Reynolds number is in the range of 105 to 106.
The main characteristics of the venturi meter, there is no restriction to the flow down the pipe,
and it can be manufactured to fit any required pipe size. Also, the temperature and pressure
inside the tube does not affect the meter or its accuracy.
In this experiment, we will calculate the pressure distributed inside the tube using the data
from experiment. Also, calculate the pressure theoretically using Bernoullis equation.
Moreover, analyse the internal pressure by using Ansys which is effectively there are three
stresses (pressure) radial, hoop and longitudinal. But here the Ansys analysis will be on the
radial stresses (normal stresses) which we can compare them with experimental and theoretical
results.
2. Experiment:
The flow rate is supplied through the venturi tube and after the steady stat flow is achieved the
flow rate is measured by using a flow-meter, and the pressure readings measured by piezometer.
Also the location of each manometer pressure taps can be taking from the Figure 3, which
these measurements will help in modeling the venturi meter in Ansys.
2.2 Procedure:
The procedure of the experiment as follows [2]:
1. First of all, we made sure that, the air purge valve on the upper manifold is tightly
closed.
2. Then, we kept the apparatus flow control and bench supply valve to approximately 1/3
their fully open positions.
3. Then, Switching on bench supply valve and allow water to flow, at the same time, we
taped manometer tubes in order to remove air bubbles from apparatus.
4. Then, closing apparatus flow control valve.
5. Then, releasing air purge valve to allow water to raise approximately 2/3 the way up the
manometer tubes.
6. After that, opening apparatus flow control valve to obtain full flow.
7. Finally, repeating the above and make 3 runs, and taking all readings for every turn.
is the density of the fluid at local temperature (kg/m3) [2]. Using the above
equation for P1 and the velocity at each respected points as the reference, Bernoullis equation
can be written as [2]:
(2)
And it can be written for venturi meter as [2]:
(3)
Where Cd is the Coefficient of Discharge, and also the velocity can be obtained from the
following equation [2]:
(4)
Where n indicates the point of interest where the velocity and area of point n can be obtained
using equation (4). Also, the mass flow rate can be obtained from the following equation:
(5)
Where, the water physical properties are taken at temperature 25 oC. Also, the pressure shown
on manometer can be obtained from equation:
(5)
Where the h is the height of flow rate and it should be in meter. From equations (2) and (3) the
pressure and coefficient of distribution can be calculated. Then all these data and result will be
tabled in result section.
The boundary conditions we applied here are the section A (V1 = 0.57 m/s) and the section L (P
= 2432.88 Pa). Also, the venturi meter walls are set as no slip, and then using CFX to solve.
During CFX analysis the result for the model is depending on the mesh refinement. The venturi
meter analysis here was done and performed for 100 and 1000 iterations as shown un Figure 5
below.
10
It is observed that from the graph above is that, the maximum stress is at about 15000
elements. So, at this number of elements, we applied CFX to solve the Ansys model.
5. Results:
5.1 Experimental Results:
According to the venturi meter, we did calculation for the pressure using equation (5) at each
section, and the results are shown in Table 1 and Figure 8 below.
Table 1 Experimental Result for Run 1
Run 1
Meter reading
(m^3)
start
94.06000
end
94.15000
Time (sec)
300.00000
0.00030
Measuring point
Area (m^2)
Pressure (N/m^2)
Velocity (m/s)
0.264
0.0005309
2589.84
0.57
0.262
0.0004227
2570.22
0.71
0.220
0.0002659
2158.20
1.13
0.154
0.0002011
1510.74
1.49
0.168
0.0002214
1648.08
1.36
0.200
0.0002679
1962.00
1.12
0.200
0.0003192
1962.00
0.94
0.232
0.0003746
2275.92
0.80
0.240
0.0004348
2354.40
0.69
0.246
0.0004992
2413.26
0.60
0.248
0.0005309
2432.88
0.57
11
The comparison between the velocity and pressure got it theoretically is shown in Figure 9.
12
13
6. Comparison of Results:
According to the above, the pressure head readings of the experiment and theoretical results
are close to each other, but the Ansys model CFX is far away and not matching these results. All
these results are as shown in Table 3 and Figure 12 below.
14
Theoretical
Ansys
2589.84
2589.84
2294.58
2570.22
2490.12
2286.35
2158.2
2074.13
2182.48
1510.74
1559.01
2014.74
1648.08
1769.58
2127.15
1962.00
2084.36
2198.01
1962.00
2284.83
2237.56
2275.92
2415.67
2376.54
2354.40
2505.07
2284.03
2413.26
2567.21
2432.88
2589.84
The big difference in results between Ansys model and the other two came because of
improper boundary conditions at walls in CFX analysis, which it was assumed there is no slip at
walls. Also, there is no calculation in the viscosity of the fluid inside the tube. In addition the
15
mesh refinement for the venturi meter is done in static structural since this will consider the
walls of the venturi meter as solid, which is not true and from here it gives different readings.
7. Conclusion:
In view of the above, the results from Ansys CFX is not matching the other two results of
experimental and theoretical due to the assumptions we made and due to the mesh refinement
of the venturi meter which is done in static structural instead of CFX itself. We think that, the
Ansys CFX needs more improvement and more consideration in mesh refinement to get proper
results by considering the materials of the venturi meter and the liquid viscosity.
16
8. References:
[1] Baker, R. C. (1996), An Introductory Guide to Industrial Flow, R. C. Baker Ed. Suffolk, London,
UK.
[2] Anderson, J. D., Degroote, J., Degrez, G., Erik, D., Grundmann, R., & Vierendeels, J. (2009),
Computational Fluid Dynamics, J. F. Wendt, Ed., Chaussee de Waterloo, Rhode-Saint-Genese,
Belgium.
17