I kept a close watch on police blotters during the time I lived there, and noticed that all too often, the police would arrest a person, or several people, at this specific address (60 Wadsworth Street). The arrests
were almost always for trespassing. Basically, they would stop people who they deemed suspicious, then arrest them for trespassing if they were unable to find drugs or weapons on the individual. To me, this constitutes harassment. This is why I would like to know what made this car suspicious enough for the police to approach the vehicle. Did the police observe illegal activities, or did they simply see a car with three men in it, in an area that is designated a trouble spot due to this ridiculous War on Drugs and decide that they would try to find evidence of wrongdoing? The police say that the vehicle drove towards them. Once they were able to get out of the way, why resort to shooting the driver, rather than pursuing the vehicle? Can a bullet stop a car? Obviously, the shooting did not stop the vehicle, since the car then ended up inside an apartment. In fact, the shooting not only killed the driver, but it endangered the people living in that apartment building, because it caused the car to swerve into the apartment. So, what is the efficacy of using a gun to attempt to stop a motor vehicle? Even for those who believe that the shooting was justified, because the car was a deadly weapon that was aimed at the police officers, there is the question of whether the initial contact was justified. The state police will not reveal exactly what made the police suspicious. If the police did not observe any illegal activities, why approach the car in the first place? And, I am of the view that if the police did not reveal that there were drugs or weapons in the car, they probably found nothing. They were very quick to mention that the car was stolen, to back up their implication of the criminality of the men in the car, so I am sure they would have been very happy to reveal the presence of drugs and or weapons to provide evidence that their suspicion was justified. There are so many unanswered questions in the aftermath of this shooting. I can almost guarantee that the police officers involved will be cleared of any official wrongdoing. But the rules for police are different than for the rest of us, and what they might consider justifiable is not necessarily moral or righteous to the members of the public in Hartford, a city that is besieged by an often unwelcome and decidedly unfriendly police presence.